1 of 35

Abstract Cosmology

Ian Beardsley, 2022

Copyright © 2022 by Ian Beardsley

 2 of 35

Abstract Cosmology is not concrete because the truth, if

such a thing can even be shown to exist, escapes us at
every juncture. Abstract cosmology looks for form in the
relationship between point, plane, line, angle, etc…and
and suggests it exists in Nature. With this process we will
determine the radius of the proton, that makes the atom,
predict the relationships between elements, in particular
in the hydrocarbons that are the skeletons of life
chemistry. We will move up in scale to the radius of the
solar system, and in the end predict the relative
abundances of the most abundant elements — the
primordial elements hydrogen and helium — that make
up 98% of the Universe. Along the way we will find the
proportions of the primary constituents of the air that
makes up the Earth atmosphere, and show they are
integral to water geometrically. We will offer
interpretations for space, time, and matter (inertia). It
won’t be as important as to what the interpretations are
as much as it will be that we can have them. It is done like
this because it is suggested that reality is a construct of
the mind, so models are only useful as tools to manipulate
components in the mind.
 3 of 35

The transformation T : ℝ2 → ℝ2 that rotates counter-

clockwise where T ( x ⃗ ) = A x ⃗ is given by the standard
matrix

( sin(θ ) cosθ )
cos(θ ) −sin(θ )
Equation 1. A =

We suggest there is an aspect of Nature founded on six-

fold symmetry, the example of which we are interested in
here is The Periodic Table of the Elements, because it has
18 groups which we can define by carbon, C. This because
we have the following scenario:
Equations 2.
3+3+3=9
2+2+2=6

3 ⋅ 6 = 18
2 ⋅ 9 = 18

2⋅3=6

And, we pull out the 2 and the 3 and write (Fig. 1) Fig. 1 Dividing line in golden
mean.
π π 5+1 π
2cos = 2 , 2cos = , 2cos = 3
4 5 2 6

5+1 a a b
Where =Φ= , = such that a = b + c
2 b b c
b 1 a2 a
ϕ= = which is given by − −1=0
a Φ b2 b
 4 of 35

In general Fig. 2

π
Equations 3. f (n) = 2cos , n = 4,5,6 The point (1,0) can be rotated
n through an angle θ.
π π
= 45∘, π /5 = 36∘, = 30∘
4 6
And these can be mapped by the matrix A onto a linear vector
space (Fig. 2)

( 2sin(θ ) 2cosθ )
2cos(θ ) −2sin(θ )
A= =

( 2sin(30∘) 2cos(30∘) )
2cos(30∘) −2sin(30∘)
A=

3 (0)
3 −1 1
A e 1⃗ = = ( 3,1)
1

3 (1)
3 −1 0
A e 2⃗ = = (−1, 3)
1

( 2sin(36∘) 2cos(36∘) )
2cos(36∘) −2sin(36∘)
A= =

1
Φ − 2
(5 − 5)
1
2
(5 − 5) Φ
 5 of 35

1
A e 1⃗ = Φ, (5 − 5)
2

1
A e 2⃗ = (5 + 5), Phi
2

( 2sin(45∘) 2cos(45∘) )
2cos(45∘) −2sin(45∘)
A= =

2 − 2
2 2

2 2
A e 1⃗ = ,
2 2

2 2
A e 2⃗ = − ,
2 2
 6 of 35

π
Our 2cos is based on the square (Fig. 3)
4
π
= 45∘ is the line x2 = x1. The reflection through x2 = x1 Fig. 3
4
is given by:

(1 0)
0 1
Equation 4. A=

π
And our 2cos is the equilateral triangle:
6

Fig. 4

To transform the square into the equilateral triangle we

expand the square of base e 1⃗ with the matrix

( 0 1) ( 0 ) 2
3/2 0 1 3
Equation 5. A = = ,1

And we see e 1⃗ becomes 3/2 and we have added half the

square to itself. (Fig. 4)
 7 of 35

Or, better we can use the contraction Fig. 5

( 0 1) ( 0 ) 2
1/2 0 1 1
A= =

We draw in the diagonal of the the half-square and

reassemble the two half-triangles into an equilateral
triangle. To get Φ we take the half square and draw in the
circle of radius 1/2. (Fig. 5) We have

1 1 4 5
+ 12 = + = Fig. 6
2 2 4 4 2

5 1 5+1
+ = =Φ
2 2 2
Thus we see the periodic table is 18 groups (Fig. 6).
Carbon is in group 14. We have 18-14=4 valence electrons. Fig. 7
Hydrogen is neither a metal or a non-metal but ionizes
like a metal by losing one electron becoming H + and
carbon being C 4− means it needs 4 positive ions to be
neutral meaning it combines with 4 hydrogens to each C,
or with two hydrogens to a C and a C in long chains
(hydrocarbons) which form the Skeltons of organic
compounds in life chemistry (Fig. 7) .

We now show carbon, the core element of life is six-fold

symmetric with hydrogen in terms of the natural
constants that characterize space, time, and matter:
 8 of 35

mP : 1.67262 × 10−27kg (Proton Mass)

h : 6.62607 × 10−34 J ⋅ s (Planck Constant)

rp : 0.833 × 10−15m (Proton Radius)

−11 m2
G : 6.67408 × 10 N 2 (Gravitational Constant)
kg

c : 299,792,459m /s (light speed)

α : 1/137 (Fine Structure Constant)

We find one second gives six protons which is carbon:

Equation 6. Ue
α2 =

mec 2
1 h 4π rp2
= 6proton ⋅ secon ds = carbon(C ) The fine structure constant squared is the ratio of
α 2 mp Gc the potential energy of an electron in the first
circular orbit to the energy given by the mass of
an electron in the Bohr model times the speed of
We find six seconds gives 1 proton is hydrogen: light squared.

Equation 7.

1 h 4π rp2
= 1proton ⋅ 6secon d = hydrogen(H )
α 2 mp Gc

For time t greater than 6 seconds we have fractional

protons. For t<6 we the have other elements.
 9 of 35

For equation 9 to be perfect Earth day needs to be shorter. A long time ago it
In that we get one second for carbon and 6 seconds for was; the Earth loses energy to the moon. The days become longer by 0.0067
hydrogen very nearly even, that is1 hours per million years. Equation 9 is actually 1.2 seconds:

24h ou rs
= 20h ou rs

1 1 h 4π rp2 1.2
Eq. 8 ⋅ 2 = 1.004996352secon ds
6 α mp Gc 24-20=0.0067t

It is suggested that the second is a natural unit. If it is, t=597 million years

since it comes from designing a calendar that reconciles This was when the earth went through a dramatic change and there was a
the phases of the moon with the Earth year (12 moons per big explosion of life (The Cambrian). The dinosaurs went extinct 65 million
year, approximately) it is suggested the unit of a second years ago giving small mammals a chance to evolve paving the way for
should be in the Earth-Moon-Sun orbital mechanics. The humans.

translational kinetic energy of the moon and earth are:2

24-x=0.0067t

K . E . Moon = 3.67E 28J x=23.5645 hours

K . E . Ear th = 2.649R33j We say 20 hours + 3 hours is 0 hours + 3 hours since 20 hours is the zero of
our cosmic calendar:

It turns out: 2
3c os (0∘ ) + c os (30∘ ) = d i n osa u r − e x t i n c t i o n =

3
Eq . 9
3
(K Eof Moon)(Lun arOrbitalPer iod ) 3h ou rs +
3
h ou rs What is the next term?

1secon d ≈ LunarMonth
EarthDay
(K Eof Ear th) 3 2
20h rs + 3h rs + h rs + =

3 3
Where the Lunar Month can be as much as 31 days and is
based on the lunar orbital period (27.32 days). We have 20+3+0.57735+0.4714=24hours

1 See Appendix 2 that produces our values.

2 See Appendix 1 For Data on Kinetic Energy
 10 of 35

31d ays
Eq. 10 = 31 ≈ π 3 = 31.006
(1Ear th Day)

Essentially we have formed a Planck constant, h, for the

moon by multiplying its kinetic energy over the time for
the period of its orbit:

h = (3.67E 28J )(2.36E6s) = 8.6612E 34J ⋅ s

8.6612E 34J ⋅ s
= 32.696secon ds
K Eof Ear th

If we let the lunar month cancel with moon’s orbital

period, we have:

Eq. 11

1 h 4π rp2 K Eof Moon

≈ 6protons ⋅ ⋅ Ear th Day
α 2 mp Gc K Eof Ear th

Since

1 1 h 4π rp2
⋅ 2
1sec α mp Gc

is units of mass divided by mp we can let it cancel with mp,

the mass of a proton, and write:
 11 of 35

Eq. 12

1 h 4π rp2 K Eof Moon

≈6⋅ ⋅ Ear th Day = (6)1.2secon ds
α mp
2 Gc K Eof Ear th

That is:
1 1 h 4π rp2
⋅ 2 = 1.00secon d
6protons α mp Gc

is phenomenal because It allows multiplication between

degrees and seconds to output our fundamental ratios
( 2, 3, . . . ). We see in the following wave:

A = A0cos(θt), A0 = 1, θ = 30∘,60∘,45∘

Where t=1 second is carbon yielding:

A(60∘) = cos(60∘ ⋅ 1s) = 0.5

A(30∘) = cos(30∘ ⋅ 1s) = 3 /2
A(45∘) = cos(45∘ ⋅ 1s) = 2 /2

And, t=6 seconds is hydrogen yielding:

A(60∘) = cos(60∘ ⋅ 6s) = 1

A(30∘) = cos(30∘ ⋅ 6s) = − 1
A(45∘) = cos(45∘ ⋅ 6s) = 0
 12 of 35

In so far as

1 h 4π rp2 K Eof Moon

≈6⋅ ⋅ Ear th Day ≈ (6)1secon d
α mp
2 Gc K Eof Ear th

relates carbon=1second to the Earth-Moon-Sun orbital

mechanics and to the radius of a proton through six-fold
symmetry:

1 h 4π rp2
=6
α 2 mp Gc

can we bring in our relationships

π
f (n) = 2cos , n = 2,3,4,5.6.,...
n

f (2) = 2, f (6) = 3

to expand the Earth-Moon-Sun orbital mechanics to the

size of the Solar System? We consider:
 13 of 35

Equations 13.

( 2 3)
1 1 1
∫
6 dt = 6 − = 0.78
2 t2

2
1 π −4
∫ 6( )
cos −1(x /2)d x = 3π − 6 = = 0.21
3 2 2 = 0.21

We move down from carbon in the periodic table to

silicon (Si) and down from there to germanium (Ge).
Their densities are Si=2.33 g/cm3 and Ge=5.323 g/cm3.
We have 0.21Si+0.78Ge=4.64124 g/cm3. Consider this
the starting point for the density of a thin disc decreasing
linearly from the Sun to Pluto (49.5 AU=7.4E14cm).

Equation 14.

∫0 0 ( R)
2π R
r πρ0 R 2
∫0
M= ρ 1− rdrdθ =
3

π (4.64124)(7.4E14)2
= = 2.661E 30g
3
The sum of the masses of the planets is 2.668E30 grams.
The accuracy is:

2.66
100 = 99.736
2.668
 14 of 35

We have the radius of the solar system is given by:

Equation 15.

3Mp
Rs =
π (0.78Ge + 0.21Si )

Interestingly, the relative abundances of Nitrogen and

oxygen are 0.78 and 0.21 in the Earth air. In fact, the
molar mass of air as a mixture is:

air = 0.78N2 + 0.21O2 = 29.0g/m ol

Interestingly as well, by molar mass

air
≈Φ
H2O

Carbon equals one second is the radius of a proton:

Equation 16.

18 2 Gc
rp = α mp = 8.288587 × 10−16 m = 8.29f m
3 4πh

The experimental radius of a proton is:

rp = 0.833 ± 0.014f m
 15 of 35

In our integral:

2
1
6(
3π − 6) = 0.21
∫
cos −1(x /2)d x =
3

where did cos −1(x /2) come from? We had Equations 3

π
f (n) = 2cos , n = 4,5,6
n
We write x = 2cosθ and get θ = cos −1(x /2) and
π
cos −1( 2 /2) = 45∘ =
4
π
cos −1( 3 /2) = 30∘ =
6
If we can explain the Earth-Moon-Sun orbital mechanics,
the radius of the solar system, and the radius of the
proton, can we predict the relative abundances of the
primordial elements created at the beginning of the
Universe - hydrogen and helium - from which all of the
elements were made by stars in nucleosynthesis?

We consider a gaussian wave packet at t=0:

x2−
ψ (x,0) = Ae
2d 2
 16 of 35

We say that d which in quantum mechanics would be the

delocalization length when squared is

( C )
2
Si − C 16
=

9
We write the wave packet as a Fourier transform:

x2 dp
2d 2 ∫ 2π ℏ
i px
−
ψ (x,0) = Ae = ϕp e h

We use the identity that gives the integral of a quadratic:

∞
π β2
∫−∞
2 x+βx
e −α dx = e 4α

α
p2 d2 p2

∫
− hi ( px− 2m t)
ψ (x, t) = dp ⋅ e 2ℏ2 ⋅e

Calculate the Gaussian integral of dp:

d2 it ix
α= 2+ and. β =

2ℏ 2mℏ ℏ
Equation 17.

[ d 1 + t 2 /τ 2 ]
2 x2 1
ψ = exp − 2 ⋅

m d2
τ=

ℏ
 17 of 35

2 C2 x2 1
ψ = exp − ⋅

[ m(Si − C)2 ]
(Si − C )2 ℏC 2
2
1+ t2

2 9 2 1
ψ = exp − x ⋅
16 ℏ281
1 + 2 t2
m 256

For Hydrogen (t=6 seconds):

2 9 1
ψ = (1)exp − (1proton)2 ⋅
16 1+
(0.075)81
(6secon ds)2
(1)256
=74%

For Helium (t=3 seconds):

2 9 1
ψ = (2)exp − (2proton)2 ⋅
16 1+
(0.075)81
(3secon ds)2
(4)256
=26%

This is in close agreement with what we observe. The

Universe is 74% hydrogen and 24% helium, The
remaining 2% is comprised by the rest of the elements.
 18 of 35

We need an interpretation of equation 6, which was

1 h 4π rp2
= 6proton ⋅ secon ds = carbon(C )
α 2 mp Gc

Matter is that which has inertia. This means it resists

change in position with a force applied to it. The more of
it, the more it resists a force. We understand this from Fig. 8
experience, but what is matter that it has inertia?

In this analogy we are suggesting a proton is a three

dimensional bubble embedded in a two dimensional
plane. As such there has to be a normal vector holding the
higher dimensional sphere in a lower dimensional space.
Thus if we apply a force to to the cross-section of the
sphere in the plane there should be a force countering it
proportional to the normal holding it in a lower
dimensional universe. This counter force would be
experienced as inertia. (Fig. 8)

Since plank’s constant h is a measure of energy over time

where space and time are concerned it must play a role. Of
course the radius of a proton plays a role since squared and
multiplied by 4π it is the surface area of our proton embedded
in space. The gravitational constant is force produced per
kilogram over a distance, thus it is a measure of how the
surrounding space has an effect on the proton giving it inertia.
The speed of light c has to play a role because it is the
velocity at which events are separated through time. The mass
of a proton has to play a role because it is a measurement of
inertia itself. And alas the fine structure constant describes the
degree to which these factors have an effect. We see the
inertia then in equation 6 is six protons over 1 second, by
dimensional analysis.

 19 of 35

The fine structure constant squared is the ratio of the

potential energy of an electron in the first circular orbit to
the energy given by the mass of an electron in the Bohr
model times the speed of light squared:
Ue
α2 =
mec 2
We need offer an interpretation of time, as well. (Fig. 9)
Fig. 9
In The Time Machine, a science fiction story by HG Wells,
the time traveller describes time as physical distance, the
direction through which the universe is falling at the
speed of light, c. Thus, not only when we move through
space do we travel through a distance at a velocity v, but
we travel through a distance t at a velocity c. If we draw
the picture and account for that distance and velocity as
well, we arrive at time dilation as given by relativity
theory. He writes:

I think that at the time none of us quite believed in the

Time Machine. The fact is, the Time Traveller was one of
those men who are too clever to be believed: you never
felt that you saw all around him; you always suspected
some subtle reserve, some ingenuity in ambush, behind
his lucid frankness.
 20 of 35

x2 + t2 = d 2

x = vt02

v 2t02 c 2t02
+ =1
c 2t 2 c 2t 2

(c )
v2
t02 2
+ 1 = t2

t
t0 =
v2
1+
c2

Since we don’t experience our motion through time as we

fall through it with the universe, we change the sign in
v 2 /c 2. And have the relativistic equation for time dilation:
t
t0 =
v2
1−
c2
 21 of 35

We can actually formulate this differently than we have. We

had

1 1 h 4π rp2
= 6proton s

t1 α 2 mp Gc

1 1 h 4π rp2
= 1proton

t6 α 2 mp Gc

But if t1 is not necessarily 1 second, and t6 is not necessarily

six seconds, but rather t1 and t2 are lower and upper limits in
an integral, then we have:

1 h 4π rp2 1 t2

Gc ∫t1 t 2
Equation 18. dt = ℕ

α 2 mp

This Equation is the generalized equation we can use for

solving problems.

Essentially we can rigorously formulate the notion of proton-

seconds by considering

∫t ∬S
Equation 19. qdt = t 2 ρ(x, y, z)d x d y

Is protons-seconds squared where current density is

J ⃗ = ρ v ⃗ and ρ = Q /m 3 (ρ can also be Q /m 2). We say

∫V
Equation 20. Q= ρdV

 22 of 35

Keeping in mind q is not charge (coulombs) but a number of

charges times seconds, here a number of protons. It is

1 h 4π rp2
Equation 21. ℕ= 2

α mp Gc

Dividing Equation 19 through by by t:

Equation 22.

1 h 4π rp2dt
Gc ∫t t ∬S
=t ρ(x, y, z)d x d y

α 2 mp

Which is proton-seconds. Dividing through by t again:

1 h 4π rp2dt
Gc ∫t t 2
Equation 23. = proton s

α 2 mp

We see that if J ⃗ = ρ v ⃗ where ρ = Q /m 3 and v = m /s then

J is I/m2 (current per square meter) is analogous to amperes
per per square meter which are coulombs per second through
a surface. Thus we are looking at a number of protons per
second through a surface. Thus we write:

1 h 4π rp2 tC
dt 1.0

Gc ∫tMg ∫
=6 t −2 dt = − 6(1 − 2) = 6

α 2 mp t 2
0.5

Is carbon where 0.5 seconds is magnesium (Mg) from the

values of time corresponding to protons in the output from our 

 23 of 35

program3 and 1.0 seconds is carbon (C). We see we have the

following theorem (Fig. 10):
Fig. 10

h 4π rp2
J ⃗ ⋅ d S
⃗
1 dt
Gc ∫t t 3 ∬S
Equation 24. =
α 2 mp

So as an example,…

( 0.25 )
h 4π rp2 1.0
J ⃗⋅ d S ⃗ = − 3 1 −
1 dt 1 proton s
Gc ∫0.5 ∬S
= =9

α mp
2 t 3 secon d

Is fluorine (F). Divide by xy with x=y=1 and we have current

density. And multiply by 1 second which is carbon and we
have protons per square meter.

⃗ y, z) = (0,0,J ) = − J k
⃗
J (x,

d S ⃗ = d x d y k
⃗

J ⃗ ⋅ d S ⃗ = (0,0,J ) ⋅ (0,0,d x d y) = − Jd x d y

3 See Appendix 2 for the program that produces our values.

 24 of 35

We now formulate what I call Giordano’s Relationship: Warren

Giordano writes in his paper The Fine Structure Constant And
The Gravitational Constant: Keys To The Substance Of The
Fabric Of Space, March 21, 2019:

In 1980, the author had compiled a series of notes analyzing

Einstein’s geometric to kinematic equations, along with an
observation that multiplying Planck’s constant ‘h’ by ‘1 + α’,
where ‘α’ is the Fine Structure Constant, and multiplying by
10 23 yielded Newton’s gravitational constant numerically, but
neglecting any units.

Let’s do that

(6.62607E-34Js)(1+1/137)(1E23)=6.6744E-11 Js

And it works, G is:

G=6.67408E-11 N(m2/kg2)

Let us reformulate this as:

(1 + α) kg 2 ⋅ s
Equation 1.1 h NA H = 6.0003

G m
Where NA = Avoga dro′s − num ber = 6.02E 23 atoms/
gram and H=1 gram/atom

Because for hydrogen 1 proton is molar mass 1 gram, for

carbon 6 protons is 6 grams and so on for 6E23 atoms per
gram. Thus,…

atom s 1gra m
NA H = 6.02E 23 ⋅ = 6.02E 23

gra m atom
 25 of 35

Since grams and atom cancel we can work in grams even

though our equations are in kilograms. Let us not write H,
since formally it is grams per mole of hydrogen but write

gra m
ℍ=1

atom
We have:

(1 + α) s
h ⋅ NAℍ = 6.0003kg 2 ⋅

G m
Or,…

Equation 1.2 h(1 + α)NAℍ = 6Gx

Where

s
Equation 1.3 x = 1.00kg 2

m
Let us say we were to consider Any Element 𝔼 say carbon ℂ.
Then in general

(1 + α) s
Equation 1.4 h ⋅ NA𝔼 = 6.0003kg 2 ⋅

G m
We have

6gra m s 6(6E 23proton s)

ℂ= and NA =

6proton s 6gra m s
Because there are six grams of protons in carbon which has 6
protons and 6 neutrons and a molar mass of 12. We have 

 26 of 35

12-6=6 grams of protons in the 12 grams of protons and

neutrons. Thus

NAℂ = 6E 23

And it follows that

(1 + α) s
h ⋅ NAℂ = 6.0003kg 2 ⋅

G m
We see in general since the atomic number Z is the number of
protons in an atom that in general this holds for all elements 𝔼
because

Z ⋅ 6E 23proton s
NA =

Z ⋅ gra m s
And,

Z ⋅ gra m s
𝔼=

Z ⋅ proton s
Therefore we always have:

Equation 1.5 NA ⋅ 𝔼 = 6E 23

This works nicely because we formulated molar mass nicely;

we said element one (hydrogen) which is one proton and one
electron has one gram for a mole of atoms. Historically this
was done because we chose carbon (element six) to have 12
grams per mole, and determined what the mole was such that
it would hold. The reason this works is that hydrogen is one
proton and has no neutrons, but carbon has twelve neutrons
but since hydrogen doesn’t have any neutrons, and the
neutron has the same mass as the proton, and our theory 

 27 of 35

makes use only of protons (in this instance of its formulation)

equation 1.3

s
x = 1.00kg 2

m
Comes out to have x equal to 1.00 (nearly) even. It is at this
moment that we point out, because it is important, that in
equation 1.5

NA ⋅ 𝔼 = 6E 23

𝔼 is not molar mass, and that NA is a variable determined by

𝔼; it is the number of a mole of atoms multiplied by the
number of protons in 𝔼. The reason we point this out, though
it may already be clear, is we wish to find the physical theory
behind it. That is we need to find the physical explanation for
equation 1.4

(1 + α) s
h ⋅ NA𝔼 = 6.0003kg 2 ⋅

G m
It is the integer 6 to 3 ten thousandths. Which classifies it as
interesting because since it is in kilograms, seconds, and
meters, it may mean these units of measurement have some
kind of a meaning. We can in fact write it:

(1 + α) s
h ⋅ NA𝔼 = 6.000kg 2 ⋅

G m
We know that

Ue
α2 =

mec 2
 28 of 35

The fine structure constant squared is the ratio of the potential

energy of an electron in the first circular orbit to the energy
given by the mass of an electron in the Bohr model times the
speed of light squared. To begin our search for the meaning of
s
equation 1.4 we convert x, the factor of 1.00 kg 2 ⋅ to
m
astronomical units, years, and solar masses, as these are
connected to the orbit of earth as it relates to the sun. We
have:

kg 2 s (1.98847E 30)2 M⊙2 1.4959787E11m year

⋅ ⋅ ⋅

1 m kg 2 AU 3.154E 7s

M⊙2 ⋅ year
=1.8754341E64

AU
We can now write

(1 + α) AU
Eq 1.6. h ⋅ NA𝔼 = 8.2172E 32M⊙

G year

This unit of AU/year is very interesting. It is not 2π AU/year,

which would be the Earth’s orbital velocity, but is a velocity
given by the earth orbital radius to its orbital period, which is
quantum mechanical in nature. It relates to earth as as a state,
as we have with atoms, a number. We multiply both sides by
4π 2 and we have earth velocity on the left and the units stay
the same on the right. But what we will do is return to the form
in kg-m-s and leave it as an equation but put in the Earth
mean orbital velocity which is 29.79m/s (Zombeck, Martin V.
1982). We get:

 29 of 35

(1 + α)
Eq. 1.7 h ⋅ NA𝔼 ⋅ ve = 422.787kg

G
This brings up an interesting question: while we have masses
characteristic of the microcosmos like protons, and masses
characteristic of the macrocosmos, like the minimum mass for
a star to become a neutron star as opposed to a white dwarf
after she novas (The Chandrasekhar limit) which is 1.44 solar
masses, we do not have a characteristic mass of the
intermediary world where we exist, a truck weighs several tons
and tennis ball maybe around a hundred grams. To find that
mass let us take the geometric mean between the mass of a
proton and the mass of 1.44 solar masses. We could take the
average, or the harmonic mean, but the geometric mean is the
squaring of the proportions, it is the side of a square with the
area equal to the area of the rectangle with these proportions
as its sides. We have:

M⊙ = 1.98847E 30kg

We multiply this by 1.44 to get 2.8634E30kg. The mass of a

proton is mp = 1.67262E − 27kg. We have the intermediary
mass is:

Eq. 1.8
mi = (2.8634E 30)(1.67262E − 27) = 69.205kg

All we really need to do now is divide 1.7 by 1.8 and we get an

even number that is the six of our six-fold symmetry.

1 (1 + α)
Eq. 1.9 h ⋅ NA𝔼 ⋅ ve = 6.1092 ≈ 6

mi G
The six of our six-fold symmetry.

 30 of 35

We have something very interesting here. We have

1 s
6kg 2 =6 The second comes from the Ancient Greeks
69.205kg m dividing a minute into 60 seconds and an hour
into 60 minutes because they used sexagesimal
This is: counting (base 60). Probably because 60 is
evenly divisible by:

Equation 2.0. k ve = 6
1,2,3,4,5,6,…12,15,20.30,60,…

Where k is a constant, given Mercury= 60

Mars= 30

1 s Saturn= 12
Equation 2.1. k=
800 m
We can take the velocity of earth as being 30,000 m/s by
rounding it. We have

30,000 1
= 37
800 2

37.5 = 6.123734357

1 1 h 4π rp2
⋅ 2 = 1.004996352secon ds
6 α mp Gc

Using k ve = 6, we write

1 h 4π rp2
= 1proton ⋅ secon d 1 (1 + α)
α 2 mp Gck ve Eq. 2.2 k = h ⋅ NA𝔼
mi2 G
 31 of 35

(The orbital period is a function of distance from body orbited)

and we have found one second in the kinetic energies of these
(K . E . Moon)(Ear th Da y) bodies, then since kinetic energy is a function of mass, then the
≈ 1secon d masses of the moon and and earth should have some
(K . E . Ear th) significant connection to their radii in connection with this
possible signature. And indeed we should compare these ratios
1 h 4π rp2 (K . E . Ear th) to their respective orbital velocities. We do that here:
= 1proton
6α 2 mp Gck ve (K . E . Moon)(Ear th Day) For the moon:
M𝑚/R𝑚=(7.34767E22kg)/(1,738,100m)=4.2274E16 kg/m
(M𝑚/R𝑚)(orbital velocity)=(4.2274E16 kg)(1.3259E10m/
1 h 4π rp2 (K . E . Ear th) s)=5E6E26 kg/s
= 6protons
α 2 mp Gck ve (K . E . Moon)(Ear th Day) For the earth:
Me/Re=(5.97E24kg)/(6,371,000m)=9.37E17 kg/m
Eq. 2.3. 9.37E17 kg/m(3.852E11m/s)=3.6E29 kg/s

My Abstract Cosmology was founded upon proton-seconds.

1 h 4π rp2 (K . E . Ear th) This is a related concept (kilograms per second) This is the
=ℂ action of mass per time of the the respective motions of the
α 2 mp Gck ve (K . E . Moon)(Ear th Day) earth and the moon, I think this is exactly what we want to be
looking at.
ℂ = carbon When we say a possible signature, what do we mean? We
cannot say, but we can suggest it is of a more advanced
The core element of life. sentience spiritually or intellectually.

It suggests as well that the moon might somehow be integral to This result makes sense; divide that of the earth by that of
life, which is an extraordinary thing to suggest because we have the sun…
always thought it is nothing more than a rock that happened to
form in orbit, having really no role in making life possible. Me ve Rm
Thus for it to be otherwise, perhaps since it affects the tides Equation 3.1 ⋅ ⋅ = 642.857
and life began in the ocean, it played a role in life coming out of Re vm Mm
the sea to walk upon land.
This says that of the earth 642,857 times greater than that
Clearly what we need to do here is…If we have considered the of the moon. Divide that by the six or our six-fold
orbital periods and sizes of the earth and moon and these
determine the fact that the moon perfectly eclipses the sun symmetry…
 32 of 35

1 h 4π rp2 K . E . Ear th 1
643.857/6=107.142857 3. ⋅ ⋅ =ℂ
α 2 mp Gck ve K . E . Moon Ear th − Day
Now look at how many solar diameters are in the Earth-
Sun separation: 1 (1 + α)
4. k = h ⋅ NA𝔼
mi2 G
1 1.496E11m
⋅ = 107.4187897
2 696.34E6m
The two are very, very near the same:

107.142857
100 = 99.743
107.4187897
It is now obvious that we can write:

Equation 3.2

1 Me ve Rm Ear th − Or ibtal − Ra dius

⋅ ⋅ ⋅ =
6 Re vm Mm Diamter − of − Sun

Four Basic Equations Of Creation From everything

we have said we can write four basic equation of creation:

1 Me ve Rm Ear th − Or ibtal − Ra dius

1. ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ =
6 Re vm Mm Diamter − of − Sun
K . E . Moon
2. ⋅ (Ear th − Day) = 1 − Secon d
K . E . Ear th
 33 of 35

Appendix 1

To find the translational kinetic energy of the

moon:
Distance from earth: 3.85E8m
2π(3.85E8m) = 2.419E9m
Orbital period:
T=27.32 days=2.36E6seconds
v=1.025E3m/s~1000m/s
Mass: 7.34767E22kg

1 2
Use E = mv
2
E=3.67E28 Joules

To find the translational kinetic energy of the

earth:

Distance from Sun: 1AU=1.496E11m

2π(1.496E11m) = 9.399E11m
Orbital period: 1 year=3.1558E7 seconds
v=2.9785E4m/s
E=2.649E33 Joules

Earth day=(24)(60)(60)=86,400 seconds.

 34 of 35

produces one proton (hydrogen). Beyond six seconds you

have fractional protons, and the rest of the elements heavier
Appendix 2 than carbon are formed by fractional seconds. These are the
hydrocarbons the backbones of biological chemistry. Here is
the code for the program:

1 h 4π rp2

#include <stdio.h>

α 2 mp Gc
#include <math.h>

int main(int argc, const char * argv[]) {

Is proton-seconds. Divide by time we have a number of

protons because it is a mass divided by the mass of a proton.

But these masses can be considered to cancel and leave pure int n;

number. We make a program that looks for close to whole float value=0, increment,t=0, p=1.67262E-27,
number solutions so we can create a table of values for h=6.62607E-34,G=6.67408E-11,
problem solving.
c=299792459,protons[100],r=0.833E-15;

By what value would you like to increment?: 0.25

do

How many values would you like to calculate for t in equation {

1 (no more than 100?): 100

printf("By what value would you like to increment?: ");

24.1199 protons 0.250000 seconds 0.119904 decpart

scanf("%f", &increment);

12.0600 protons 0.500000 seconds 0.059952 decpart

printf("How many values would you like to calculate for t in
8.0400 protons 0.750000 seconds 0.039968 decpart
equation 1 (no more than 100?): ");

6.0300 protons 1.000000 seconds 0.029976 decpart

scanf("%i", &n);

4.0200 protons 1.500000 seconds 0.019984 decpart

}

3.0150 protons 2.000000 seconds 0.014988 decpart

while (n>=101);

2.1927 protons 2.750000 seconds 0.192718 decpart

{

2.0100 protons 3.000000 seconds 0.009992 decpart

1.2060 protons 5.000000 seconds 0.205995 decpart

for (int i=0; i<n;i++)

1.1486 protons 5.250000 seconds 0.148567 decpart

{

1.0964 protons 5.500000 seconds 0.096359 decpart

protons[i]=((137*137)/(t*p))*sqrt(h*4*(3.14159)*(r*r)/
1.0487 protons 5.750000 seconds 0.048691 decpart
(G*c));

1.0050 protons 6.000000 seconds 0.004996 decpart

0.2487 protons 24.250000 seconds 0.248659 decpart

int intpart=(int)protons[i];

0.2461 protons 24.500000 seconds 0.246121 decpart

float decpart=protons[i]-intpart;

0.2436 protons 24.750000 seconds 0.243635 decpart

t=t+increment;

if (decpart<0.25)

A very interesting thing here is looking at the values generated { printf("%.4f protons %f seconds %f decpart \n",
by the program, the smallest integer value 1 second produces protons[i], t-increment, decpart);

6 protons (carbon) and the largest integer value 6 seconds }}}}


 35 of 35

The Author