Professional Documents
Culture Documents
S.C.No. 171/2021
Name of the accused : A1: Morgi @ Methri Sukumar S/o Methri Ramulu
@ Ramaiah, age: 35 yrs, Caste: SC madiga, Occ:
Agri., R/o H.No. 4-24/54 Devanpalle, Kamareddy
Nizamabad District, Cell No.9849 384048.
Page 1 of 9
S.C.No.171/2021.
A10: Abenda Sanjivulu @ Sanjevlu @ Sanjivaiah
S/o Nagaiah, age: 45 yrs, Caste:SC Madiga, Occ:
Agriculture, R/o H.No. 3-35 Ranapur village of
Manoor Mandal, Sangareddy, Cell No. 9550
299060.
offence of charge : U/secs. 147, 148, 452, 307 r/w 149 of IPC.
This case is coming on this day before me for final hearing in the presence
of learned Addl.P.P., and of Sri. S.Chandra Shaker Patil learned advocate, for all
the accused, and upon hearing both sides, and upon considering all the material
papers and documents on record, this court delivered the following.
JUDGMENT
The sub-Inspector of Police, PS. Manoor, has filed charge sheet against all
the accused for the offence under sections.147, 148, 452, 307 r/w 149 IPC.
Page 2 of 9
S.C.No.171/2021.
1. The brief averments of the prosecution are that on 27-12-2019 at about
02:00 hours the HC.20 Sri. SD Sikander of PS.Manoor came to Manoor PS and
age:25yrs, Caste: SC madiga, OcC: Auto Driver, R/o Ranapur village of Manoor
mandal, sangareddy District Cell No.83093 00303, recorded by the HC.20 Sri.SD
Narayankhed in which the victim stated that his name is Morgi Yevan son of
On 26-12-2019 at night at around 21:00 hours while he was had dinner in his
home along with his mother M. Satyamma, his brother Prashanth, mean time his
Poul S/o Peeraiah, 3. Abbenda Jabili S/o Peeraiah, 4. Abbenda Jon S/o Peeriah,
W/o Ramaiah. 10. Abbenda Sanjivulu s/o Nagaiah, 11. Nagamma W/o Sanjivulu,
all are residence of village Ranapur and another 12. Ravi is belongs to Chalki
village, and some of others criminally trespassed into his house by keeping
previous enmity in their mind abused in filthy language, attacked by iron rods
and sticks to him and his mother Satyamma, and his brother Parshanth and they
tried to attempt to commit murder them due to which he got blood injury on his
head, and his mother Satyamma got blood injuries on her both hands, and his
brother parshan got injuries on both legs. At that time of incident his grand
father Peeraiah, grand mother Ratnamma came on the spot, them also beaten by
the respondents by sticks and rods in which his grandfather got blood injuries on
his legs, and head, grandmother got blood injuries on her left hand, his father in-
law yesaiah, mother in-law Bujjamma and brother in-law Sreekanth also came on
Page 3 of 9
S.C.No.171/2021.
crime scene they also beaten by the respondents due to which his mother in-law
got injury on left thigh and right hand, his brother in law got blood injury on his
left leg, and father in law got blood injuries on his both hands, due to blood
Crime No. 56/2019, U/secs. 147, 148, 452, 307 r/w 149 of IPC and took up the
investigation.
collected the bonafide of the accused A2 and the JCL No.4 from the head master
i.e.LW16 of MPPS Ranapur village. As per the bonafide certificate the age of A2
is 19 years running, the ages of JCL3, JCL4 were under the 18 years. During the
and visited the SC boys hostel checked the attendance register of students of
hostel in the presence of LW17 on the date of 26-12-2019 at 21:00 hours, where
in the register found the JCL No.4 was present in the hostel, and also examined
the hostel warden and recorded his detailed statement in part-II CD, obtained the
warden the JCL No.4 is not involved in this offence. On 20-02-2020 during part of
investigation visited the Ranapur village and where examined the eye witness i.e.
LW13 to 15, and recorded their detailed statements in part-II CDs, wherein they
stated that except the JCL No.3 and 4, the alleged accused A1, A2, A5 to A12
were intentionally criminally trespassed into the house of the complainant and
attacked over the complainants family members and attempt to commit murder by
iron and sticks by keeping previous land disputes in their mind. On 25-05-2020
collected the Medical certificates of injured persons i.e.LW1 and the LW4 to 10
Page 4 of 9
S.C.No.171/2021.
from the Medical officer LW18 in which the medical officer opined that the
Lw-20 along with men visited the house of accused of Ranapur village and
apprehended the accused persons A1, A5, A7 to A11 at 09:30 hrs interrogated
admitted their guilty of offence. Hence brought them to PS at 10:00 hrs and
effected their arrest at 10:30 hrs by issuing arrest memos duly informing the
grounds of arrest as per notice U/s 50 A & 50 Cr. P.C and produce them before
the court under the escort PC 2100, 1179. of Manoor PS, and WHG.57 of
Narayankhed P.S. During course of investigation into this case on 11.02.2020 the
collected the bonafieds of the accused A2 and the JCL No.3 & JCL No.4 from the
head master le the Lw-16 of MPPS Ranapur village. As per the bonafied certificate
the age of A2 is 19 years running, the ages of JCL3, JCL4 were under the 18
years. During the course of investigation into this case on 12.02.2020 proceeded to
village of kather and visited SC boys hostel checked the attendance register of
2100hrs, wherein in the register found the JCL No. 4 was present in the hostel,
and also examined the hostel warden and recorded his detailed statement in part
certificate, statement of warden the JCL No.4 is not involved in this offence. On
25.05.2020 collected the Medical certificates of injured persons ce Lw-01, and the
Lw-04 to 10 from the Medical officer the Lw-18 in which the medical officer
opined that the injuries of the Lw-01, and the Lw-04 to 10 are "Simple in nature.
While investigation in progress on 17.06.2020 the A6 & A12 both were got
Page 5 of 9
S.C.No.171/2021.
conditions the accused submitted the bail bond for Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties
Lw 20 along with men visited the house of accused at Ranapur village and
the same scene cum seizere panchnama the Lw-11 & 12, and seized the crime
later brought the A2 to P.S effected his arrest at 10:00 hrs by issuing arrest memo
duly informing the grounds of arrest as per notice u/s 50-A & 50 Cr.P.C and
produced before magistrate under the escort PC.1179, 2100.Lw-20 deposited the
seized property i.e. 7 sticks, 3 iron rods before the Hon'ble court vide CPR
charge sheet.
6. The case was taken on file U/secs.147, 148, 452, 307 r/w 149 of IPC
to him U/s.207 Cr.P.C. Subsequently on perusal of the record, the committal court
committed the case to the Court of sessions, and in turn, this case is made over to
8. On appearance of all the accused before this court, all the accused are
examined U/s.228 Cr.P.C., for which they denied the offence, and upon
consideration charge 147, 148, 452, 307 r/w 149 of IPC has been framed, read
over and explained to all the accused in his own language, for which, they denied
the charge, pleaded not guilty, and claimed to be tried as per law.
Page 6 of 9
S.C.No.171/2021.
9. During the course of trial, the prosecution examined PW1 to PW15 of
Eye witness, PW3.Smt.Morgi Satyamma is the Eye witness and injured and mother
of LW1, PW4.Sri.Morgi Prashant is the eye witness injured and brother of LW1,
PW5.Sri.Abbenda Peeriaih is the Eye witness injured and brother of LW1, PW6.
Smt. Abbenda Ratnamma is the Eye witness injred and grandmother of LW1, PW7.
Sri.Abbenda Yesaiah is the Eye witness injured and maternal uncle of LW1,
LW1, PW9.Sri.Abbenda Srikanth is the Eye witness injured and mother in law of
LW1, PW10 Sri. Ahmed Hussain and PW11 Sri.Pantulu Gorak Rao are the panch
for scene cum seizure panchanama and rough sketch and confession cum seiuzre
PW14. Sri.Begari Ramaiah are Eye witness, PW15.G. Narender is the examined the
statement of LW1.
10. The prosecution also relied on Ex.P1 to P10 of which Ex.P1 is the
complainant, Ex.P2 is the scene of offence cum seizure panchanama, Ex.P3 is the
rough sketch, Ex.P4 is confession cum seizure panchanama, Ex.P5 is FIR, Ex.P6 to
11. After closure of the prosecution evidence, all the accused are examined
U/s.313 Cr.P.C. The incriminating evidence and the circumstances that appeared
against them in the prosecution evidence is read over and explained to all the
accused and they denied the same and submitted that they have no defence witness
12. Heard the learned Addl. P.P. and the counsel for all the accused.
Perused the record.
Page 7 of 9
S.C.No.171/2021.
13. Now the points that arises for determination are that:-
1. Now the point for determination is whether the prosecution is able to
prove the guilty of all the accused beyond all the reasonable doubt for offences
U/secs.147, 148, 452, 307 r/w 149 of IPC
2. Whether the prosecution proved the guilty of the accused herein beyond
all reasonable doubt?
seizure panchanama along with rough sketch about one years back at ranapur and
seized sticks, rods in their presence and that they attested the same. They signed
on Ex.P2 is the scene of offence cum seizure panchanama, Ex.P3 is the rough
sketch and MO1 sticks (7) MO2 rods(3) . They further stated that Police also
conducted confession cum seizure panchanama and seized the stick in their
presence and that the accused admitted guilty in their presence. Ex.P4 is confession
15. Pw15 who is the investigating officer stated that he examined Pw1 at
police station, and examined other witness at hospital, SangaReddy, went to the
scene of offence and conducted CDF in the presence of mediators and seized
knife ,sent the injured to the hospital, A6 and A12 obtained anticipatory bail, sent
the remaining accused to the court for remand and then after completion of
investigation,I filed the charge sheet after receiving all relevant documents and
16. The prosecution to prove its case has examined PW1 to PW15 and the
learned APP has given up LW3 P. Nagaiah who is the Eye witness LW16 L.Pandith
who is the head master, LW17 P. Kishan who is the hostel warden,
Page 8 of 9
S.C.No.171/2021.
LW18.S.Ramakrishna Raju who treated all the injured, LW19.SD.Sikander who
17. PW1 is the defacto complainant who has moved the law into motion by
way of giving report vide Ex.P1 which is registered as Ex.P5 FIR. Surprisingly,
PW1 along with other material witness PW2 to 9, PW12 to 14 has stated that they
do not want to proceed with the case as the matter is compromised among them.
As such there is no averment against all the accused for the offence charged
examined PW1 and the police station and examined other witness at the hospital,
Sangareddy and then went to the scene of offence and conducted CDF in the
presence of mediators, seized the knife and send the injured to the hospital. A6
and A12 obtained anticipatory bail and he send the remaining accused to the
remand and then up to complete investigation after he filed the charge sheet. The
learned APP has got marked Ex.P6 to P8 are Bonafide certificates, Ex.P9 to P15
19. PW10 and 11 are the panch witness for the scene of offence cum
seizure panchanama. In order to prove and establish that PW15 has been to the
scene of offence and conducted panchanama, PW10 and 11 lends assurance to the
evidence of Pw15 who stated that police conducted the scene of offence cum
seizure panchanama along with the rough sketch vide Ex.P2 is the scene of offence
cum seizure panchanama Ex.P3 is the rough sketch about one year back at Ranapur
and seized the sticks, rods in their presence and that they have attested the same.
PW10 and 11 further stated that police conducted confession cum seizure
panchanama and seized the stick their presence and that accused admitted guilty in
their presence. So the vital document to prove the offence against the accused is
Page 9 of 9
S.C.No.171/2021.
Ex.P4 but surprisingly there is no averment or whisper in Ex.P4 that the accused
has given confession voluntarily. Though nothing contra is elicited from the
testimony of PW10 and 11 except mere suggestion that Ex.P2 to P4 are not
conducted in their presence, yet there is no averment mentioned in Ex.P4 that the
accused has given confession voluntarily and even the material witness including
PW1 who has moved the law into motion and Pw2 to 9 and Pw12 to 14 has not
20. From the above discussion, the prosecution utterly failed to prove and
establish the accusation against A1, A2, A5 to A12 and thus they are entitled for
acquittal.
21. In the result A1, A2 and A5 to A12 are found not guilty for the offence
charge under section 147, 148, 452, 307 r/w 149 of IPC and thus all the accused
are acquitted for the same under section 235(1) CrPC. The bail bonds of all the
accused shall stand cancelled. The case property sticks vide MO1, Rods (3) vide
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE:
WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR
2. PW2.Sri.Sonnaila
3. PW3.Smt.Morgi Satyamma
4. PW4.Sri.Morgi Prashant
Page 10 of 9
S.C.No.171/2021.
5. PW5.Sri.Abbenda Peeriaih
8. PW8.Smt.Abbenda Bujjamma
9. PW9.Sri.Abbenda Srikanth
EXHIBITS MARKED:
MATERIAL OBJECTS
1. MO1 Sticks (7)
Page 11 of 9