The document discusses how museum culture has changed over time. Specifically, it contrasts how art was appreciated in the past versus how it is experienced today. In the past, people like philosopher Richard Wollheim would spend hours sitting before a single painting at the Louvre to fully take it in. However, now most tourists only spend a minute in front of famous works like the Mona Lisa before being asked to move on so others can see it too. This rushed experience makes it impossible to truly appreciate the art. The document argues museums should encourage spending more time with exhibits instead of prioritizing throughput of large numbers of visitors.
The document discusses how museum culture has changed over time. Specifically, it contrasts how art was appreciated in the past versus how it is experienced today. In the past, people like philosopher Richard Wollheim would spend hours sitting before a single painting at the Louvre to fully take it in. However, now most tourists only spend a minute in front of famous works like the Mona Lisa before being asked to move on so others can see it too. This rushed experience makes it impossible to truly appreciate the art. The document argues museums should encourage spending more time with exhibits instead of prioritizing throughput of large numbers of visitors.
The document discusses how museum culture has changed over time. Specifically, it contrasts how art was appreciated in the past versus how it is experienced today. In the past, people like philosopher Richard Wollheim would spend hours sitting before a single painting at the Louvre to fully take it in. However, now most tourists only spend a minute in front of famous works like the Mona Lisa before being asked to move on so others can see it too. This rushed experience makes it impossible to truly appreciate the art. The document argues museums should encourage spending more time with exhibits instead of prioritizing throughput of large numbers of visitors.
The article under consideration entitled «The Guardian view on museum culture:
take your time» was published in the Guardian by Editorial.
The main idea of the article is summed up in the depreciation of the cultural world in modern realities. The author draws a century-old parallel of the perception of art. And as an example, he talks about different situations of visiting one of the world famous museums - the Louvre. It’s a well-known fact that first of all, all tourists want to visit all the outstanding monuments of the city they came to, museums are no exception. But now they can spend only a minute in front of a masterpiece of art - the Mona Lisa before being asked to move on. Much of that time, for some of them, is spent taking photographs not even of the painting but of themselves with the painting in the background. And it happens because of that we have democratized tourism and gallery-going so much that we have made it effectively impossible to appreciate what we’ve travelled to see. Leisure, thus conceived, is hard labour, and returning to work becomes a well-earned break from the ordeal. But people who lived in the last century treated art in a completely different way. For example, philosopher Richard Wollheim. He said that When he visited the Louvre he could spent as much as four hours sitting before a painting. The first hour, he claimed, was necessary for misperceptions to be eliminated. It was only then that the picture would begin to disclose itself. Another lover of the Louvre was Marcel Proust. He said that only through art we can escape from ourselves and know how another person sees a universe which is not the same as our own. Even any exhibition or installation on an important social or world problem might seem nothing more than an entertainment, overrun as it is with toddlers romping in fog rooms and spray mist installations as their parents tut-tut over anyone who dares interpose themselves between their offspring and their snapping phones. Personally, I love art in all its manifestations. And if possible, I want to visit exhibitions more and learn something new for myself. I think that most people who come to the museum are also not indifferent to it. But maybe they are limited by some rules. Like, it's about time. And all that remains for them is to take a photo of this or that object or a selfie with it and move on so as not to delay others. But as for parents with small children under 10, I think they should still find a nanny or ask someone to sit with their child and go to the exhibition without them. It’s not that it’s forbidden, it’s just that they should think about others as well. But it turns out that a person may be trying to immerse himself in the atmosphere of the exhibit, understand the idea or see something of his own, and a child rushes in front of him and his attention is scattered and he already has completely different feelings.