Complaint: ASTVDILLO vs SPVM (Responsable de Information)

Montréal, Québec
July 26th 2020
Event #: MTLEV1900872889

[1] On April 14th, the SPVM refused a request for access to information.
Specifically, refused to produce video evidence proving an SPVM employee assaulted an
accused in his back, while using excessive force.

(See Annex I)

[2] That’s a violation of the Code of Ethics of Québec Police Officers, CQLR c P-13.1, r 1
Specifically:

“7. A police officer must respect the authority of the law and of the courts and must
collaborate in the administration of justice.
A police officer must not:
(1) prevent or contribute to preventing justice from taking its course;
(2) conceal or fail to pass on evidence or information in order to benefit or harm
any person.”

https://www.canlii.org/en/qc/laws/regu/cqlr-c-p-13.1-r-1/latest/cqlr-c-p-13.1-r-
1.html#sec7subsec2_smooth

[3] On Saturday, September 14th, 2019, I was arrested & accused of uttering threats
because a Pro-Pedophile Jason P. Alberts actor from the FBI Persona Ficta/Corp in NYC,
who is a corrupt dirty pig actor under multiple US Senate Investigations for his crimes in
the FBI Crossfire Hurricane story, where they manufactured evidence to attack the
president of the USA, and continued prosecution against him & General Michael Flynn,
even though there was no evidence supporting such actions. Every FISA court application
had critical legal errors in them, according to Veteran US Senators.
(See Annex II)
[4] The SUPREME COURT OF CANADA inc Persona Ficta actor plebs said in R. v.
McNeil, 2009 SCC 3 (CanLII), [2009] 1 SCR 66 the following about Police Obligation to
Produce All The Evidence concerning an accused in his case:
R. v. McNeil, 2009 SCC 3 (CanLII), [2009] 1 SCR 66
Criminal law — Evidence — Production — Crown’s duty to disclose — Corollary police
obligation to disclose to Crown — Accused charged with drug-related offences — Crown’s
main police witness involved in drug-related misconduct leading to disciplinary
proceedings and criminal charges — Accused sought production of arresting officer’s
police disciplinary records and criminal investigation files — Whether common law
production regime for third party records applicable only in cases where these records
attract reasonable expectation of privacy — Whether criminal investigation files relating
to third party accused attract reasonable expectation of privacy — Whether police records
relating to findings of misconduct by officer involved in investigation against accused fall
within scope of first party disclosure package from police to Crown.
“[59] I agree that it is “neither efficient nor justified” to leave the entire
question of access to police misconduct records to be determined in the
context of the O’Connor regime for third party production. Indeed, as
discussed earlier, the disclosure of relevant material, whether it be for or
against an accused, is part of the police corollary duty to participate in the
disclosure process. Where the information is obviously relevant to the
accused’s case, it should form part of the first party disclosure package to
the Crown without prompting. For example, as was the case here, if an
officer comes under investigation for serious drug-related misconduct, it
becomes incumbent upon the police force, in fulfilment of its corollary duty
of disclosure to the Crown, to look into those criminal cases in which the
officer is involved and to take appropriate action. Of course, not every
finding of police misconduct by an officer involved in the investigation will
be of relevance to an accused’s case. The officer may have played a
peripheral role in the investigation, or the misconduct in question may have
no realistic bearing on the credibility or reliability of the officer’s
evidence. The kinds of information listed in the Ferguson Report can
provide useful guidance on those types of matters in respect of which a
police force may well be advised to seek the advice of Crown counsel.”

[5] Considering a police slave-actor pleb assaulting an accused in custody is grounds that
warrants a full Stay of Charges (Arrêt de Procedures) for Charter Violation, the video
evidence proving the assault on the accused in custody on the morning of September
15th 2019 at the SPVM Centre Operationel Nord, is absolutely necessary for the accused
to be able to make a FULL & COMPLETE DEFENSE. Failure to produce the video
evidence is a Charter Violation of the Accused by denying him a FULL & COMPLETE
DEFENSE, violations of section 7.1 & 7.2 of the Québec Police Ethics Code, while
simultaneously being a criminal offense: Section 23 (1) of the Criminal Code of Canada:
Accessory After The Fact / Complice Après Les Faits to cover up Assault (265.1.a)
[6] Canadian law authorizes every Canadian Citizen to Threaten or Use Force in Self-
Defense or Defense of others, and considering the accused has been accusing the
“SPVM” victims of s. 23 (1) Accessory After The Fact, to cover up a crime (268 (1) -
Aggravated Assault) which could’ve killed a child, Phoenix Feehan-Astudillo, prior this the
accused’s arrest on September 14th 2019.
[7] The Accused if fully justified to Threaten or Use Force all the way up to Aggravated
Assault’s “Endangering Life”, as the Canadian High Courts, have all made clear that even
between adults, choking or strangling a person endangers life & constitutes an Indictable
Offense known as Aggravated Assault.
[8] The fact that people in Law Enforcement & the Judiciary have been the ones
attempting to cover up the Aggravated Assault on a 3 year old child, is an aggravating
factor.
[9] The Penalty for the Roman Crime of RAPTVS (Kidnapping in barbarian language), is
death in Roman Culture.
[10] The barbarian colonists with fictitious invented titles working for the BATSHAW
YOUTH & FAMILY CENTRES & COUR DU QUEBEC corporations (fictions), have broken
the law, by kidnapping the children, prevent contacts with their father, over claims that he
needed psychiatric care, when psychiatrists all rejected that. (Evidence & Witnesses are
locked & loaded & ready to be deployed).
[11] Futhermore in Droit de la famille — 101001, 2010 QCCS 1856 (CanLII), at
point [50]

“Dans Droit de la famille – 1738[3], la Cour d'appel refuse la demande de

déchéance parentale d'un père, toxicomane, possédant un dossier criminel
chargé, ayant vécu en prison pendant de nombreuses années et ayant tenté
de se suicider.”

https://www.canlii.org/fr/qc/qccs/doc/2010/2010qccs1856/2010qccs1856.ht
ml?

[12] My contacts were cut with the kids, even though I did not spend any time in
jail between 2014 and 2020, I have no Psychiatric Mental Illness Diagnostic from
a licensed Psychiatrist, and have been acquitted of all charges in my life, at the
exception of a few minor charges from 2006, which have been dealt with & finalized
ages ago (Breaking & Entering, Assault with a Weapon, blah blah, blood
everywhere, I was sentenced to 1 day in Jail, my “victim” was actually a
psychopathic dope-dealer that hurt everyone in St-Eustache & Deux-Montagnes).
I also never attempted suicide, but I am a Sanguine Vampire, and I do consume
Blood as food, with severe physical implications if I go too long without feeding. It
is not for show or cult, but health. Keep in mind, unlike 85% of humanoids on this
planet, my Roman ass does not have Rhesus Monkey proteins on my Red Blood
Cells (I’m Rh Negative), which means I evolved from a different species that you
apes and we do not have common ancestors, also my blood type is older than the
other Rh- Bloodtypes & much older than any of the Rh Positives, making you the
child-monkey species, of which I am not a part of.
[13] I here-by declare the court orders made by the Quebec Court Judges since
2011, NULL & VOID, and in violation of QUEBEC LAW, CANADIAN LAW, Quebec
Jurisprudence & Common Sense. I also declare the actions of all Court of Quebec
Judges, Attorneys & all employees to be CRIMINAL KIDNAPPING, FRAUD,
ABUSE OF TRUST, ABUSE OF OFFICE, PERJURY, ASSAULT on the children +
AIDING & ABETTING ASSAULT + ACCESSORY AFTERT THE FACT to
AGGRAVATED ASSAULT ON MINORS. That goes for all employees who names
can be found on QC garbage legal documents manufactured in the disgusting
gallic language called French or the disgusting Germanic language called English.
And our situation can be compared to
EU Parliamentary questions, 12 August 2019
E-002542-19, Question for written answer E-002542-19 to the Commission
Rule 138, Mara Bizzotto (ID)
Subject: Illegal foster care of children: the Bibbiano case
Answer in writing
In June 2019, the ‘Angels and Demons’ investigation was made public. The case
concerns the unlawful placing of children into foster care by the municipality of
Bibbiano, province of Reggio Emilia.
The social services network of Val D’Enza, in the province of Reggio Emilia, is
accused of having drawn up, for years, fake reports in order to remove children
from their families and place them in paid foster care. The extremely grave abuse
and violence allegations include the administration of electrical impulses to
children to alter the state of their memory prior to court interviews, in order to
induce fake memories of sexual abuse.
Those under investigation include the mayor of the Municipality of Bibbiano,
politicians, doctors, social workers, self-employed professionals, psychologists
and psychotherapists from a non-profit organisation in Turin.
Foster care is not a system for permanently separating family units, but is a
temporary aid measure for children in difficult situations and is supposed to ensure
that relations are maintained with their real families. The Italian Government has
taken prompt action to shed light on the events which have taken place in Bibbiano.
Can the Commission therefore say:
1. Whether it is aware of this situation;
2. Whether there have been any similar cases in other Member States;
3. How it intends to monitor the foster care, children’s home and adoption
systems in Europe, with a view to protecting children?
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2019-002542_EN.html

Signature: _____________________________________ Date: July 26th 2020

 ANNEX I
SPVM REFUSAL TO DISCLOSE SECURITY CAMERA FOOTAGE
5/25/2020 Mail - Alan de Astudillo - Outlook

Your request for access (OFile: 20-143025)

Responsable information SPVM <Responsable.information@spvm.qc.ca>
Tue 14-Apr-2020 12:01
To: 'alan@statilius.es' <alan@statilius.es>
Cc: 'knightofastudillo@live.com' <knightofastudillo@live.com>
Mr. Alan Astudillo
Email: alan@statilius.es / knightofastudillo@live.com

O/File: 20-143025

Re: Request for access to documents

Event: MTLEV1900872889

Dear Sir,

The following is in response to your letter requesting access to documents.

We regret to inform you that, in accordance with sections 28, 53, 54 and 59 of the Act
Respecting Access to Documents Held by Public Bodies and the Protection of Personal
Information, we cannot comply with your request, because there are legal procedures in
progress.

We then believe that disclosure of these documents would likely impede the progress of the
procedures.

For the notice of appeal and the articles mentioned in our response, they are available via the
following link: https://spvm.qc.ca/en/Fiches/Details/Access-to-Information

We trust that this information is satisfactory and we remain.

Best regards,

L'Équipe d'accès à l'information du SPVM (eb)

responsable.information@spvm.qc.ca

___________________________________________
Avant d'imprimer, pensez à l'environnement.

https://outlook.live.com/mail/0/search/id/AQQkADAwATMwMAItYWQzYy01NGZjLTAwAi0wMAoAEACxH6Kl5utKAZ4qqg6rOwbd 1/1
 ANNEX II
SPVM/FBI INCIDENT REPORT