The document summarizes the key events surrounding the passage of the Rizal Law in 1956, which mandated the study of Jose Rizal's life and works in schools. It notes that Senator Claro Recto originally proposed the bill during a time of political corruption and communist insurgency. However, the Catholic Church strongly opposed the bill, claiming Rizal's works were anti-Catholic. After intense debate and lobbying, the Rizal Law was passed in 1956 but allowed exemptions for religious reasons.
The document summarizes the key events surrounding the passage of the Rizal Law in 1956, which mandated the study of Jose Rizal's life and works in schools. It notes that Senator Claro Recto originally proposed the bill during a time of political corruption and communist insurgency. However, the Catholic Church strongly opposed the bill, claiming Rizal's works were anti-Catholic. After intense debate and lobbying, the Rizal Law was passed in 1956 but allowed exemptions for religious reasons.
The document summarizes the key events surrounding the passage of the Rizal Law in 1956, which mandated the study of Jose Rizal's life and works in schools. It notes that Senator Claro Recto originally proposed the bill during a time of political corruption and communist insurgency. However, the Catholic Church strongly opposed the bill, claiming Rizal's works were anti-Catholic. After intense debate and lobbying, the Rizal Law was passed in 1956 but allowed exemptions for religious reasons.
Recto promulgated the original Rizal Bill. the country was being destroyed by the HUKBALAHAP Philippines became part of the global network to contain the spread of communism with the conclusion of a mutual defense agreement with the U.S in 1951 joining the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO). the country was troubled by corrupt party politcs and news of political corruption was rampant. was the time when Recto submitted his bill, calling for a return to patriotic values pronounced by Filipino heroes like Jose Rizal. Under the bill, it shall be obligatory for college and university students to study the life and works of Jose Rizal. the issuance of the bill was not welcomed by various quarters. the Catholic Church assailed the Rizal Bill as anti Church. Forcing the students to read Rizal's works which have religious overtones would be a violation of the constitutional freedom of religion and of conscience. The church made use of lobbyists and priests in opposing the Rizal bill. Among them were Catholic Organizations such as the Accion Catolico. Priests attended and Participated in the hearings of the Senate. Why did the Catholic Church assailed the Rizal Bill? Commentors of the Rizal Bill “Rizal's novels belonged to the past and it would be harmful to read them because they presented a false picture of the conditions of the country at that time.” - Fr. Jesus Cavanna Narciso Pimentel offered the speculation that Recto introduced his Rizal Bill to get back at the Catholic voters together with President Magsaysay. Representative Miguel Cuenco & Senator Francisco “Soc” Rodrigo
voiced the opposition of the
Church in Congress. Bishops threatened to close down Catholic schools if the bill were approved. Recto dared the Catholic Church to shut down their schools, knowing that this was only the idle threat since the Catholic learning institutions were its major source of income. he also rejected Senator Rodrigo's suggestion that the annotated or edited versions of the Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo should be used. June 12, 1956, Republic Act. No 1425 better known as the Rizal Law, came into effect. The law accommodated the second paragraph of Section 1. Allowing students to seek exemption from reading Rizal's Works for religious reasons. Republic Act No. 1425 House Bill No. 5561 Senate Bill No. 438 Section 1. Courses on life, works, and writings of Jose Rizal, particularly his novels Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo, shall be included in the curricula of all schools, colleges and universities, public or private: Provided, that in the colligiate courses, the original or unexpurgated editions of Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo or their English translation shall be used as basic texts. Out of the 333 pages of the Noli Metangere, there were only 25 patriotic statement compared to 120 anti-Catholic statement.