BARNACHEA, ALEXANDRA C.

BSED SCI 2A

MISTAKES OF PEOPLE IN 19TH CENTURY

-Church leaders charged Senator Claro M. Recto, who backed the relevant legislation, of anti-Catholicism
and communism. The bill's clause allowing Catholic students to use conscientious objections to forego
reading Rizal's works was incorporated in the final form.

-The debate's main issues were centered on religion and the Catholic Church. Rizal's writings allegedly
criticized the Catholic Church, according to critics.

-Noli Me Tángere and El Filibusterismo have anti-clerical undertones, and the Roman Catholic Church in
the Philippines has firmly opposed the movement.
VALUE NEEDED TO AVOID SUCH MISTAKE IN 21ST CENTURY

- By being giving of oneself and sincere.

- By opposing formality.

ACHIEVEMENT OF PEOPLE IN 19TH CENTURY THAT REMAINED UNTIL 21ST CENTURY

- Millions of Filipinos were converted to the Roman Catholic Church and other kinds of Christianity.

-The Trial of Dr. Jose Rizal illustrates the importance of education by educating Filipinos about the life
and legacy of our National Hero, who gave his entire being to the nation. The book demonstrates to
Filipinos the appeal of looking at Jose Rizal's life and works from the standpoint of many social science
disciplines.

VALUE NEEDED TO SUSTAIN SUCH ACHIVEMENT IN 21ST CENTURY

- It's important since it both assesses and encourages the application of students' critical thinking and
introspective abilities. Because of its emphasis on self-improvement and civic engagement, the Rizal Law
is particularly efficient at fostering Filipino patriotism.

- Being nationalistic
 DISCOVERY

The Rizal Law, also known as Republic Act No. 1425, mandates that all Philippine schools
provide lessons about José Rizal. On June 12, 1956, Jose Rizal was recognized for his contribution to the
liberation of the Philippines by the signing into law of Republic Act 1425. Senator Claro M. Recto
supported the Rizal Act, sometimes known as the Rizal Act. Jose Rizal's life, works, and writings,
particularly Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo, must be incorporated into the curricula of public and
private schools, colleges, and universities in order to teach students about nationalism. In the
Philippines, José Rizal must be covered in history classes. Noli Me Tángere and El Filibusterismo have
anti-clerical overtones, and the Roman Catholic Church in the Philippines was vehemently against the
law. Due to a lack of religious education, the church had little opportunities for progress. The officials of
the church and the Spanish government were concerned that if they supported Filipino education, the
Philippines may become independent and the church would lose its hold on society. In the latter half of
the 1800s, Dr. Jose Rizal used his writings like "Noli me Tangere" and "El Filibusterismo" to educate the
Filipino people about the hypocrisy and corruption of the Spanish colonials. His movement led to his
1896 execution, and the Philippines now honor him as a national hero.
The Catholic churches opposed Senate Bill 438, which had been submitted by the Committee on
Education on April 3, 1956, in an effort to disparage their religion. They claim that both books include
components that conflict with their essential beliefs. After the measure's trials were over, Republic Act
no. 1425 was signed into law on June 12, 1956.