Lupong Tagapamayapa Incentives Awards Enhanced Criteria

LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
INCENTIVES AWARDS
ENHANCED CRITERIA AND
GUIDELINES
DILG MC No. 2023-22
SB SESSION HALL
March 10, 2023
1.
OBJECTIVES
LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA INCENTIVES AWARDS
ENHANCED CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES
DILG MC No. 2023-22
2
OBJECTIVES
• Demonstrate above average understanding of the enhanced
criteria and guidelines in the conduct of Lupong
Tagapamaya Incentives Awards (LTIA) Assessment
• Categorize the major difference between the current versus
the previous assessment based on the applicable MOVs and
Technical Notes
• Learn the Provincial Indicative Timeline in the
implementation of LTIA Assessment
• Devise the next step of action to assess ALL the Barangays
in their AOR within the implementation schedule
3
2.
LEGAL BASES
DILG MC No. 2023-22
4
LEGAL BASES
• Section 399 of RA No. 7160 provides for the creation in each
Barangay a Lupong Tagapamayapa, hereinafter referred to
as the Lupon, composed of the Punong Barangay as
Chairperson and 10 to 20 members. The Lupon shall be
constituted every three (3) years in the manner provided
herein.
• Section 406 (b) of RA No. 7160 or the Local Government
Code states that the DILG shall provide for a system of
granting economic or other incentives to the Lupon or
pangkat members who adequately demonstrate the ability
to judiciously and expeditiously resolve cases referred to
them.
5
LEGAL BASES
• The Lupong Tagapamayapa Incentives Awards (LTIA) was
conceptualized and implemented in 1982 and has been
elevated to a Presidential Award pursuant to Executive
Order No. 394 s. 1997 entitled "Establishing the Lupong
Tagapamayapa Incentives Awards."
6
3.
WHAT is LTIA?
DILG MC No. 2023-22
7
WHAT is LTIA?
• The LTIA is an annual search which recognizes the
outstanding lupong tagapamayapa that adequately
demonstrates the ability to judiciously and expeditiously
resolve cases referred to them and demonstrate exemplary
performance and commendable contribution in the
promotion and implementation of Katarungang
Pambarangay (KP)
8
4.
CRITERIA AND SCORING
DILG MC No. 2023-22 VS. DILG MC 2016-058
9
CRITERIA ASSIGNED POINT SCORE
(DILG MC. 2023-022)
I. EFFICIENCY IN OPERATIONS 42
II. EFFECTIVENESS IN SECURING THE SETTLEMENT 20

OF INTERPERSONAL DISPUTE OBJECTIVE OF THE
KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY
III. CREATIVITY AND RESOURCEFULNESS OF THE 30

LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
IV. AREA OR FACILITY FOR KP ACTIVITIES 5

V. FINANCIAL OR NON-FINANCIAL SUPPORT 3
10
CRITERIA ASSIGNED ASSIGNED POINT
POINT SCORE SCORE
(DILG MC. (DILG MC. 2016-
Difference
2023-022) 058)
I. EFFICIENCY IN OPERATIONS 42 35 +7
II. EFFECTIVENESS IN SECURING THE 20 30 -10

SETTLEMENT OF INTERPERSONAL DISPUTE
OBJECTIVE OF THE KATARUNGANG
PAMBARANGAY
III. CREATIVITY AND RESOURCEFULNESS OF 30 25 +5

THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
IV. AREA OR FACILITY FOR KP ACTIVITIES 5 5 -

V. FINANCIAL OR NON-FINANCIAL SUPPORT 3 5 -2
11
INDICATOR 1.
EFFICIENCY IN OPERATIONS
DILG MC No. 2023-22
12
ASSIGNED POINT
I. EFFICIENCY IN OPERATIONS SCORE
A. Observance of Settlement Procedure and 20
Settlement Deadlines
B. Systematic Maintenance of Records 5
C. Timely Submissions to the Court and the DILG 7
D. Conduct of monthly meetings for administration 10

of the Katarungang Pambarangay (KP)
TOTAL: 42
13
INDICATOR 2.
EFFECTIVENESS IN SECURING THE SETTLEMENT OF
INTERPERSONAL DISPUTE OBJECTIVE OF THE
DILG MC No. 2023-22
14
II. EFFECTIVENESS IN SECURING THE
SETTLEMENT OF INTERPERSONAL DISPUTE ASSIGNED POINT
OBJECTIVE OF THE KATARUNGANG SCORE
PAMBARANGAY
A. Quantity of settled cases against filed 10
B. Quality of Settlement of Cases 2
C. At least 80% compliance with the terms of 8

settlement or award after the cases have been
settled
TOTAL: 20
15
INDICATOR 3.
CREATIVITY AND RESOURCEFULNESS OF
DILG MC No. 2023-22
16
III. CREATIVITY AND RESOURCEFULNESS OF ASSIGNED POINT
THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA SCORE
A. Settlement Technique utilized by the Lupon 10
B. Coordination with Concerned Agencies relating 5

to disputes filed (PNP, DSWD, DILG, DAR, DENR,
Office of the Prosecutor, Court, DOJ, CHR, etc.)
C. Sustained information drive to promote 5

Katarungang Pambarangay
D. KP Training or seminar within the assessment 10
period
TOTAL: 30
17
INDICATOR 4.
AREA OR FACILITY FOR KP
ACTIVITIES
DILG MC No. 2023-22
18
IV. AREA OR FACILITY FOR KP ACTIVITIES ASSIGNED POINT
SCORE
A. Building structure or space 5

TOTAL: 5
19
INDICATOR 5.
FINANCIAL OR NON-FINANCIAL
SUPPORT
DILG MC No. 2023-22
20
V. FINANCIAL OR NON-FINANCIAL ASSIGNED
SUPPORT POINT SCORE
A. FINANCIAL OR NON-FINANCIAL 3
SUPPORT
TOTAL: 3
21
INDICATOR I.
DILG MC No. 2023-22
22
INDICATOR I.
A. OBSERVANCE OF SETTLEMENT PROCEDURE AND SETTLEMENT
DEADLINES
DILG MC No. 2023-22
23
I. EFFICIENCY IN DEADLINES
OPERATIONS POINT
Means of Verification
SCORE
1.a) Proper 5 • Two (2) photos with caption of

Recording of the Record Book and
every
dispute/complaint • Sample Entries in Record Book
24
OPERATIONS POINT
SCORE How to Rate?
1.a) Proper 5 5 points - submitted/presented the record book or

logbook reflecting all the required details
Recording of
every 2.5 points - submitted/presented the record book or
logbook reflecting some of the necessary details
dispute/complaint
0 point - no presented record book or logbook

• docket number;
• names of the parties;
• date and time filed;
• nature of the case and disposition
25
OPERATIONS POINT
SCORE
1.b) Sending of 5 At least 10 samples of Notices to

Notices and
Summons with the Complainant/s and Summons
complete and to the respondent/s with Officer's
accurate information Return and Minutes of the
to the parties within
the prescribed period Proceedings
• within the next working day upon

receipt of complaint
26
OPERATIONS POINT
SCORE How to Rate?
1.b) Sending of 5 Submitted/presented ____ of summons with complete

and accurate information issued within the prescribed
Notices and Summons
with complete and period
accurate information 5 points - 80-100%
to the parties within 3 points - 50-79%
the prescribed period 2 points - 1-49%
0 point – have not submitted/presented any
summons/notices

Note: Scores will be given only when file copy of the
notices and summons issued within the next working day
is with date and time stamped of the receipt.
27
OPERATIONS POINT
SCORE
2.) Settlement and 10 • At least 10 samples of the

Award Period
Minutes of Settlement
(with at least 10 settled cases
within the assessment period)
Proceedings the
• Mediation (within 15 days from initial
confrontation with the Lupon
Chairman) • Four (4) photos with caption of
on-going procedure
• Conciliation (15 days from initial
confrontation with the Pangkat)
• Conciliation (with extended period
•
not to exceed another 15 days)
Arbitration (within 10 days from the
(mediation, conciliation or
•
date of the agreement to arbitrate)
Conciliation beyond 46 days but not arbitration)
more than 60 days on a clearly
meritorious cases
28
OPERATIONS POINT
SCORE How to Rate?
2.) Settlement and 10 ______ cases were resolved using any mode
Award Period of ADR (supported by minutes of
(with at least 10 settled cases proceedings) within the prescribed
within the assessment period)
• Mediation (within 15 days from initial

confrontation with the Lupon
10 points - 80-100%
Chairman)
• Conciliation (15 days from initial
8 points - 60-79%
confrontation with the Pangkat)
• Conciliation (with extended period
6 points - 40-59%
not to exceed another 15 days)
• Arbitration (within 10 days from the
4 points - 20-39%
date of the agreement to arbitrate)
• Conciliation beyond 46 days but not
2 points - 1-29%
more than 60 days on a clearly
meritorious cases
0 point – 0 cases resolved
29
INDICATOR I.
B. SYSTEMATIC MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS
DILG MC No. 2023-22
30
I. EFFICIENCY IN
OPERATIONS POINT
SCORE
1.) Record of Cases For Cities

For Cities - computer 2 • Two (2) Photos with caption of the
database with computer database with searchable case
searchable case information and
information

For Municipalities: For Municipalities
Manual Records 1
Digital Record Filing 1 • One (1) photo each, with caption of the
manual and digital file
31
I. EFFICIENCY IN
OPERATIONS POINT
How to Rate?
SCORE
1.) Record of Cases For Cities:

2 points if presented photos of the computer database
For Cities - computer with searchable engine. During onsite, to check the
2 actual database and try the search engine
database with
searchable case For Municipalities:
information 1 point if presented copy/photo of the manual record
1 point if presented digital record filing
For Municipalities:
Manual Records 1 To check the actual document during onsite validation
Digital Record Filing
1 To check the quality of the file management - Record of
dockets cases should be arranged in chronological
order, folders properly labelled.
32
I. EFFICIENCY IN
OPERATIONS POINT
SCORE
2.) Copies of 1 Two (2) photos with the caption of

Minutes of Lupon the compilation of the following:
meetings with
attendance • Notices of the Meeting
sheets and • Minutes of the Lupon Meetings
notices • Attendance Sheets
33
I. EFFICIENCY IN
OPERATIONS POINT
How to Rate?
SCORE
2.) Copies of 1 1 point – complete and accurate compilation

Minutes of Lupon
Note: During the table assessment, the
meetings with MOVs presented should suffice. However,
attendance the assessment team should inspect the
sheets and complete physical records during onsite
notices validation.
34
I. EFFICIENCY IN
OPERATIONS POINT
SCORE
3.) Copies of 1 Two (2) photos with the caption of

reports submitted the Compilation of the Copies of
to the Court and Reports submitted to the:
to the DILG on • Court
file • DILG
35
I. EFFICIENCY IN
OPERATIONS POINT
How to Rate?
SCORE
3.) Copies of 1 1 point – complete and accurate compilation

reports submitted
to the Court and MOVs presented should suffice. However,
to the DILG on the assessment team should inspect the
file complete physical records during onsite
validation.
36
I. EFFICIENCY IN
OPERATIONS POINT
SCORE
4.) All records 1 Two (2) photos with captions

are kept on file of the filing cabinet
in a secured
filing cabinet(s)
37
I. EFFICIENCY IN
OPERATIONS POINT
How to Rate?
SCORE
4.) All records 1 1 point if judicial standard is observed,

where filing cabinets is secured with lock
are kept on file and have key
in a secured
filing cabinet(s) MOVs presented should suffice. However,
the assessment team should inspect the
filing cabinet during onsite validation
38
INDICATOR I.
C. TIMELY SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT AND THE DILG
DILG MC No. 2023-22
39
I. EFFICIENCY IN
OPERATIONS POINT
SCORE
1.) To the COURT: 5 Transmittal Memo or Letters and copies

Submitted/ presented of settlement or the arbitration award to
copies of settlement the court within five (5) days from the
agreement to the Court
from the lapse of the ten-
date of the award or from the lapse of the
day period repudiating the ten-day period repudiating the settlement
mediation/ conciliation
settlement agreement, or
within five (5) calendar KP Form No. 16 Amicable Settlement or
days from the date of the KP Form No. 14 Agreement for Arbitration
arbitration award
40
I. EFFICIENCY IN
OPERATIONS POINT
How to Rate?
SCORE
1.) To the COURT: 5 5.0 points = 80%-100% submitted on time

Submitted/ presented 4.0 points = 60%-79% submitted on time
copies of settlement 3.0 points = 40%-59% submitted on time
agreement to the Court
from the lapse of the ten-
2.0 points = 20%-39% submitted on time
day period repudiating the 1.0 point = 1%-19% submitted on time
mediation/ conciliation 0 point = 0% of reports submitted on time
settlement agreement, or
within five (5) calendar
days from the date of the
Note: Copies of transmittal letters must be
arbitration award stamped as received by the Court. No score
will be given in the absence of the said court
stamped document.
41
I. EFFICIENCY IN
OPERATIONS POINT
SCORE
2.) To the DILG: 2 • Submitted KP reports to the DILG with

• (Quarterly) date and time stamped of receipt
42
I. EFFICIENCY IN
OPERATIONS POINT
How to Rate?
SCORE
2.) To the DILG: 2 2 points - Submitted/presented of the required

report to the DILG within the prescribed period
• (Quarterly)
1 point – submitted/presented partial report of the
DILG within the prescribed period.
0 point - the required report to the DILG was not

submitted or submitted beyond the prescribed period

Note: Copies of transmittal letters must be stamped
as received by the DILG. No score will be given in
the absence of the said DILG stamped document
43
INDICATOR I.
D. CONDUCT OF MONTHLY MEETINGS FOR ADMINISTRATION OF
THE KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY (KP)
DILG MC No. 2023-22
44
I. EFFICIENCY IN THE KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY (KP)
OPERATIONS POINT
SCORE
1.) Notice of 2 Copies of Notices of

Meeting Meetings with (1.)Name and
(2.) Date and Time stamped
receipt of each Lupon
Members
45
OPERATIONS POINT
How to Rate?
SCORE
1.) Notice of 2 2.0 points – minimum of 12 meetings with KP-related matters,

complete details, each Lupon member must sign (indicating
their name, date and time of receipt) when receiving notices
Meeting of meeting.

1.0 point – anything beyond the compliance document, with
incomplete details

0 point = no data presented
Notes: This indicator should only be given scores if the agenda of the meeting is
confirmed to directly pertain to administration of the Katarungang Pambarangay

Copies of Notices of Meetings must be signed/stamped as acknowledged by the Lupon
members. No score will be given in the absence of the said acknowledged document.

In case a meeting for a particular month was not conducted due to instances like the
COVID-19 pandemic, a certification from the DILG on the reason thereof must have been
submitted.
46
OPERATIONS POINT
SCORE
2.) Minutes
of 8 • Copies of the Minutes of
the Meeting the Meetings with
Attendance Sheets
• Three (3) photos of on-

going meetings with
caption
47
OPERATIONS POINT
SCORE How to Rate?
2.) Minutes
of 8 Number of months with KP-related meetings with
minutes and attendance sheets conducted:
the Meeting
8.0 points = 12 months
6.0 points = 9-11 months
1.0 point = 1-2 months
0 point = no meeting

Note: KP Matters must directly pertain to complaints filed before the Lupon, case
management, dispute resolution procedures and techniques, trainings/capacity
building and information campaign on KP, and resources, support and
partnerships for KP.
48
INDICATOR II.
EFFECTIVENESS IN SECURING THE
SETTLEMENT OF INTERPERSONAL
DISPUTE OBJECTIVE OF THE
DILG MC No. 2023-22
49
INDICATOR II.
EFFECTIVENESS IN SECURING THE SETTLEMENT
A. QUANTITY OF SETTLED CASES AGAINST FILED
DILG MC No. 2023-22
50
II. EFFECTIVENESS IN A. QUANTITY OF SETTLED CASES AGAINST FILED
SECURING THE SETTLEMENT
OF INTERPERSONAL DISPUTE
OBJECTIVE OF THE
POINT
SCORE Means of Verification
Quantity of 10 *Refer to LTIA Form 6-A

settled cases
against filed
51
II. EFFECTIVENESS IN A. QUANTITY OF SETTLED CASES AGAINST FILED
OBJECTIVE OF THE
POINT
SCORE How to Rate?
Quantity of 10 With a minimum of 10 cases settled, the

percentage of cases received by the Lupon
settled cases resulting to settlement:
10.0 points = 100%
against filed 8.0 points = 80%-99%
6.0 points = 60%-79%
4.0 points = 40%-59%
2.0 points = 1%-39%
0 point = 0%
Formula:
Total Number of Cases - X 100%
No. of Cases received by Lupon + Referred by other agencies

52
INDICATOR II.
B. QUALITY OF SETTLEMENT CASES
DILG MC No. 2023-22
53
II. EFFECTIVENESS IN B. QUALITY OF SETTLEMENT CASES
OBJECTIVE OF THE
POINT
Quality of Settlement *Refer to LTIA Form 7

Cases
1. Zero cased 1
repudiated
2. Non-recurrence 1
of cases settled
54
II. EFFECTIVENESS IN B. QUALITY OF SETTLEMENT CASES
OBJECTIVE OF THE
POINT
SCORE How to Rate?
Quality of Settlement 1 point - for non-recurrence and zero

Cases cases repudiated (out of the total
1. Zero cased 1 number of settled cases)
repudiated
2. Non-recurrence 1 0 point - at least one (1) (out of the
of cases settled total number of settled cases)
55
INDICATOR II.
C. AT LEAST 80% COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS OF
SETTLEMENT OR AWARD AFTER THE CASES HAVE BEEN SETTLED
DILG MC No. 2023-22
56
II. EFFECTIVENESS IN C. AT LEAST 80% COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS OF SETTLEMENT
SECURING THE SETTLEMENT OR AWARD AFTER THE CASES HAVE BEEN SETTLED
OBJECTIVE OF THE
POINT
At least 80% 8 At least 10 samples of Proof of

compliance with Compliance:
the terms of • Acknowledgement Receipt
settlement or • Ledgers
award after the • Certifications
cases have been • Others
settled
*Show Sample
57
II. EFFECTIVENESS IN C. AT LEAST 80% COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS OF SETTLEMENT
SECURING THE SETTLEMENT OR AWARD AFTER THE CASES HAVE BEEN SETTLED
OBJECTIVE OF THE
POINT
SCORE How to Rate?
At least 80% 8 _____compliance with the terms of

compliance with settlement or award
the terms of 8 points = 80% -100%
settlement or 6 points = 70% -79%
award after the 4 points = 60% -69%
cases have been 2 points = 50% -51%
settled 1 point = 49% and below
58
INDICATOR III.
CREATIVITY AND
RESOURCEFULNESS OF THE
LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
DILG MC No. 2023-22
59
INDICATOR III.
A. SETTLEMENT TECHNIQUE UTILIZED BY THE LUPON
DILG MC No. 2023-22
60
III. CREATIVITY AND A. SETTLEMENT TECHNIQUE UTILIZED BY THE LUPON
RESOURCEFULNESS OF
THE LUPONG POINT
SCORE
TAGAPAMAYAPA
Settlement 10 Two (2) photos with caption

Technique of EACH Settlement
utilized by the Techniques utilized by the
Lupon Lupon within the assessment
Period
61
III. CREATIVITY AND A. SETTLEMENT TECHNIQUE UTILIZED BY THE LUPON
RESOURCEFULNESS OF
THE LUPONG POINT
How to Rate?
SCORE
TAGAPAMAYAPA
Settlement 10 10 points – 5 or more settlement technique

utilized
Technique 8 points – at least 4 settlement technique
utilized
utilized by the 6 points - at least 3 settlement technique utilized
Lupon 4 points - at least 2 settlement technique utilized
2 points - at least 1 settlement technique utilized
0 point – no report

Note: Settlement techniques to be considered are those that are within the
KP process and procedures.
*Show Sample
62
INDICATOR III.
B. COORDINATION WITH CONCERNED AGENCIES RELATING TO
DISPUTES FILED (PNP, DSWD, DILG, DAR, DENR, OFFICE OF THE
PROSECUTOR, COURT, DOJ, CHR, ETC.)
DILG MC No. 2023-22
63
III. CREATIVITY AND B. COORDINATION WITH CONCERNED AGENCIES RELATING TO
RESOURCEFULNESS OF DISPUTES FILED (PNP, DSWD, DILG, DAR, DENR, OFFICE OF THE
THE LUPONG PROSECUTOR, COURT, DOJ, CHR, ETC.)
TAGAPAMAYAPA POINT
SCORE
Coordination with 5 Certified True Copy of any Proof of

Concerned Agencies Coordination
relating to disputes • Certificate of Appearance
filed (PNP, DSWD, • Letters
DILG, DAR, DENR,
Office of the
• Other written documents
Prosecutor, Court,
DOJ, CHR, etc.) Two (2) photos each, with caption for
each coordination activity with
concerned agencies relation to disputes
file
64
III. CREATIVITY AND B. COORDINATION WITH CONCERNED AGENCIES RELATING TO
RESOURCEFULNESS OF DISPUTES FILED (PNP, DSWD, DILG, DAR, DENR, OFFICE OF THE
THE LUPONG PROSECUTOR, COURT, DOJ, CHR, ETC.)
TAGAPAMAYAPA POINT
How to Rate?
SCORE
Coordination with 5 5 points - with proof of coordination

Concerned Agencies
relating to disputes filed relative to the filed disputes
(PNP, DSWD, DILG,
DAR, DENR, Office of 0 point - without proof of
the Prosecutor, Court,
DOJ, CHR, etc.) coordination relative to the filed
disputes
65
INDICATOR III.
C. SUSTAINED INFORMATION DRIVE TO PROMOTE KATARUNGANG
PAMBARANGAY
DILG MC No. 2023-22
66
III. CREATIVITY AND C. SUSTAINED INFORMATION DRIVE TO PROMOTE KATARUNGANG
RESOURCEFULNESS OF PAMBARANGAY
THE LUPONG POINT
SCORE
TAGAPAMAYAPA
For Cities 1. Copies of pamphlets, leaflets,

• IEC materials developed 2
• IEC activities conducted 1 tarpaulins, and other IEC materials
• Innovative Campaign 2 produced by Lupon
Strategy

For Municipalities 2. Two (2) photos with caption of the
• IEC materials developed 2 information drive conducted by the LT in
• IEC activities conducted 2
• Innovative Campaign 1 the promotion of KP in their community
Strategy
3. Two (2) photos of Innovative Campaign
Strategy utilized by the Lupon
67
III. CREATIVITY AND C. SUSTAINED INFORMATION DRIVE TO PROMOTE KATARUNGANG
RESOURCEFULNESS OF PAMBARANGAY
THE LUPONG POINT
How to Rate?
SCORE
TAGAPAMAYAPA
For Cities For Cities:

• IEC activities conducted 1 2 points - IEC materials produced
• Innovative Campaign 2 1 point – IEC activities conducted
Strategy
2 points - Innovative Campaign Strategy

For Municipalities
• IEC activities conducted 2
• Innovative Campaign 1 For Municipalities:
Strategy 2 points - IEC materials produced
2 points – IEC activities conducted
1 point - Innovative Campaign Strategy
68
INDICATOR III.
D. KP TRAINING OR SEMINAR WITHIN THE ASSESSMENT PERIOD
DILG MC No. 2023-22
69
III. CREATIVITY AND D. KP TRAINING OR SEMINAR WITHIN THE ASSESSMENT PERIOD
RESOURCEFULNESS OF
THE LUPONG POINT
SCORE
TAGAPAMAYAPA
Organized skills Two (2) photos with caption

10 • Training on general/basic orientation or review
training of KP system
participated by • Skills training on the conduct of KP
the Lupong Proceedings
• Advance knowledge on laws, policies, and
Tagapamayapa standards in relation to KP System
Certified True Copies of any proof of trainings

such as:
• Certificate of Completion and/or Participation
• Attendance Sheets
70
• Others
III. CREATIVITY AND D. KP TRAINING OR SEMINAR WITHIN THE ASSESSMENT PERIOD
RESOURCEFULNESS OF
THE LUPONG POINT
How to Rate?
SCORE
TAGAPAMAYAPA
Organized skills 10 points = at least 6 qualified training/seminar

10 8 points = at least 5 qualified training/seminar
training 6 points = at least 4 qualified training/seminar
participated by 4 points = at least 3 qualified training/seminar
the Lupong 2 points = at least 2 qualified training/seminar
0 point = No qualified information
Tagapamayapa training/seminar
Note: The OADR conducts free webinar series

and regional road show in relation to KP
71
INDICATOR IV.
ACTIVITIES
DILG MC No. 2023-22
72
INDICATOR IV.
ACTIVITIES
BUILDING STRUCTURE OR SPACE
DILG MC No. 2023-22
73
IV. AREA OR FACILITY BUILDING STRUCTURE OR SPACE
FOR KP ACTIVITIES
POINT
Building structure or
space
5 Three (3) photos with caption of
the building or space used
For cities – the office or
space should be exclusive
exclusively for KP and LT
for KP matters concerns, furniture, fixtures and
equipment used in the operation
For municipalities – KP
office or space may be of the KP Office
shared or used for other
Barangay matters.
74
IV. AREA OR FACILITY BUILDING STRUCTURE OR SPACE
FOR KP ACTIVITIES
POINT
SCORE How to Rate?
Building structure or 5 For Cities:

space

5 points – office or room for exclusive use
For Cities – the office or during KP proceedings with tables, chairs
space should be and other furniture and necessary
exclusive for KP matters equipment

For Municipalities – KP

office or space may be 2 points – office or room for shared use
shared or used for other during KP proceedings with tables, chairs
Barangay matters. and other furniture and necessary
equipment
75
INDICATOR V.
FINANCIAL OR NON-
FINANCIAL SUPPORT
DILG MC No. 2023-22
76
V. FINANCIAL OR NON- From City, Municipal, Provincial or NGAs
FINANCIAL SUPPORT
POINT
1. From City, 2 Certified True Copies of any proof

Municipal, of support such as:
• Deed of Donation,
Provincial or
• Resolution,
NGAs • MOA,
• Appropriations Ordinance,
• Vouchers,
• Acknowledgement Receipts
77
V. FINANCIAL OR NON- From City, Municipal, Provincial or NGAs
FINANCIAL SUPPORT
POINT
SCORE How to Rate?
1. From City, 2 2 points - received support from the both

National & Local Government
Municipal,
Provincial or 1.5 points - received support from the either
National & Local Government
NGAs
0 point - no support

Note:
1. Excluding the regular appropriations for the barangay and incentives from the
DILG programs
2. Acknowledgement receipt should be signed by both the donor and recipient.
3. Additional honoraria or support from the Lupon on top of the mandatory
allocations
78
V. FINANCIAL OR NON- From People's Organizations, NGOs or Private Sector
FINANCIAL SUPPORT
POINT
2. From 1 Certified True Copies of any proof

People's of support such as:
• Deed of Donation,
Organizations,
• Resolution,
NGOs or • MOA,
Private Sector • Appropriations Ordinance,
• Vouchers,
• Acknowledgement Receipts
79
V. FINANCIAL OR NON- From People's Organizations, NGOs or Private Sector
FINANCIAL SUPPORT
POINT
SCORE How to Rate?
2. From 1 1 point – received support from

People's either the organization or individual

Organizations,
0 point – no support received from
NGOs or either the organization or individual
Private Sector
80
4.
LTIA FORMS
DILG MC No. 2023-22
81
THOSE WITH POTENTIAL
AWARDEES
• LTIA Form 01 – Performance Evaluation Form
• LTIA Form 02 - Consolidated Performance Evaluation Form
• LTIA Form 03 - [C/M] Comparative Performance Evaluation Form
• LTIA Form 05 - Official Entry Form
• LTIA Form 06 - Summary of Cases
• LTIA Form 07 - Performance Highlights
• LTIA Form 07-A - List of Cases
• LTIA Form 07-B - Lupong Tagapamayapa Profile
82
THOSE WITH NO POTENTIAL AWARDEES
• LTIA Form 03 - [C/M] Comparative Performance

Evaluation Form
• LTIA Form 05-A - Non-Submission of Official Entry
83
5.
INDICATIVE TIMELINE
DILG MC No. 2023-22
84
ACTIVITY OPR SCHEDULE
Reorganization/Reactivation of Awards C/M/P February
Committees
Provincial Orientation on the Enhanced LTIA Provincial Office and
C/MLGOOs
March 6, 2023
Assessment Criteria and Guidelines
Conduct of Self-Assessment with the C/M/B March 7-15, 2023
Barangays
Watch Party on the Nationwide Orientation Provincial Office and
C/MLGOOs
March 9, 2023
relative to the Enhanced LTIA Assessment
Criteria and Guidelines via Zoom Platform
Calibration of Self-Assessment Results City/Municipal
Awards Committee
March 16 -17, 2023
Ocular Site Validation of C/MACS City/Municipal
Awards Committee
March 20 – 22, 2023
Uploading of Scores and MOVs to the LTIA-IS C/MLGOOs March 23 – 24, 2023
Orientation on the Packaging of MOVs with the Provincial Office,
C/MLGOOs/PFP
March 27, 2023
Provincial Awards Committee and shortlisted
LT
Onsite Validation of PACS Provincial
Committee
Awards April 3 – 5, 2023
Online submission of Provincial Awardees to PFP April 11, 2023
the RAC via LTIA-IS
85
6.
WAYS FORWARD
DILG MC No. 2023-22
86
LOOK OUT:
• All 597 barangays must be assessed
• All scores of the 597 barangays must be encoded in
the LTIA-Information System by MARCH 24, 2023
• The LTIA- IS is currently being updated and will be
open on MARCH 13, 2023
• Only those LT’s with the score of 90 will be assessed
by PAC
• The PO will not be strict in the submission of MOVs
for those LGUs with NO potential awardees
87
LOOK OUT:
• Please be reminded of the Watch Party
on MARCH 9, 2023 for the LTIA National
Orientation at the Domsowir Hotel,
Borongan City, Eastern Samar
88
89
POST EVALUATION FORM:
bit.ly/LTIAPostEval
You may also scan this

Post Evaluation QR Code:
90

Lupong Tagapamayapa Incentives Awards Enhanced Criteria

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Lupong Tagapamayapa Incentives Awards Enhanced Criteria

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA

II. EFFECTIVENESS IN SECURING THE SETTLEMENT 20

III. CREATIVITY AND RESOURCEFULNESS OF THE 30

IV. AREA OR FACILITY FOR KP ACTIVITIES 5

II. EFFECTIVENESS IN SECURING THE 20 30 -10

III. CREATIVITY AND RESOURCEFULNESS OF 30 25 +5

IV. AREA OR FACILITY FOR KP ACTIVITIES 5 5 -

B. Systematic Maintenance of Records 5

C. Timely Submissions to the Court and the DILG 7

D. Conduct of monthly meetings for administration 10

B. Quality of Settlement of Cases 2

C. At least 80% compliance with the terms of 8

A. Settlement Technique utilized by the Lupon 10

B. Coordination with Concerned Agencies relating 5

C. Sustained information drive to promote 5

A. Building structure or space 5

DILG MC No. 2023-22

1.a) Proper 5 • Two (2) photos with caption of

1.a) Proper 5 5 points - submitted/presented the record book or

1.b) Sending of 5 At least 10 samples of Notices to

• within the next working day upon

1.b) Sending of 5 Submitted/presented ____ of summons with complete

2.) Settlement and 10 • At least 10 samples of the

• Mediation (within 15 days from initial

DILG MC No. 2023-22

1.) Record of Cases For Cities

1.) Record of Cases For Cities:

2.) Copies of 1 Two (2) photos with the caption of

2.) Copies of 1 1 point – complete and accurate compilation

3.) Copies of 1 Two (2) photos with the caption of

3.) Copies of 1 1 point – complete and accurate compilation

4.) All records 1 Two (2) photos with captions

4.) All records 1 1 point if judicial standard is observed,

DILG MC No. 2023-22

1.) To the COURT: 5 Transmittal Memo or Letters and copies

1.) To the COURT: 5 5.0 points = 80%-100% submitted on time

2.) To the DILG: 2 • Submitted KP reports to the DILG with

2.) To the DILG: 2 2 points - Submitted/presented of the required

0 point - the required report to the DILG was not

DILG MC No. 2023-22

1.) Notice of 2 Copies of Notices of

1.) Notice of 2 2.0 points – minimum of 12 meetings with KP-related matters,

• Three (3) photos of on-

DILG MC No. 2023-22

DILG MC No. 2023-22

Quantity of 10 *Refer to LTIA Form 6-A

Quantity of 10 With a minimum of 10 cases settled, the

No. of Cases received by Lupon + Referred by other agencies

DILG MC No. 2023-22

Quality of Settlement *Refer to LTIA Form 7

Quality of Settlement 1 point - for non-recurrence and zero

DILG MC No. 2023-22

At least 80% 8 At least 10 samples of Proof of

At least 80% 8 _____compliance with the terms of

DILG MC No. 2023-22

DILG MC No. 2023-22

Settlement 10 Two (2) photos with caption

Settlement 10 10 points – 5 or more settlement technique

DILG MC No. 2023-22

Coordination with 5 Certified True Copy of any Proof of

Coordination with 5 5 points - with proof of coordination

DILG MC No. 2023-22