Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Quality
Why is Cost of Quality important for managers. Highlight any 2 quality related costs that apply to
your college/Institute.
Evolution of TQM
1. INSPECTION
a. Error detection
b. Rectification
2. QUALITY CONTROL
a. Quality standards
b. Statistical quality techniques
c. Process performance
d. Treating quality problems
3. QUALITY ASSURANCE
a. Quality systems (ISO 9000)
b. Quality planning
c. Quality policy
d. Quality costing
e. Problem solving
4. TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
a. Involvement of all employees, customers and suppliers
b. Empowered employees
c. Teamwork
d. Quality strategy based upon a common mission and vision
e. Process oriented
Total Quality Management
Monitor and measure the processes and product against plan and objectives
Verify whether the improvement has been successful
Act
Variations
o Chance Variations
Due to random events
Cannot be controlled
Also called as common causes of variations
o Assignable causes
Due to some perceptible changes
Possible to identify and take CA
System Drifts from desired level of performance
Possibilities of Assignable causes
This represents the voice of the This represents the voice of the process
customer
Desired Average is called Nominal Value
Control Chart
Step 1
Characteristics to measure
1. Measurable and observable characteristics
2. Should impact monetary, criticality
3. Example: viscosity of the Resin in the PVC plant
In a hotel, impatience of the guest at check in counter
Step 2
Measurement Methods
Step 3
Sampling Procedure
Examples
Random Sampling
Snowball Sampling
Systematic Sampling
Convenience Sampling
Etc
Step 4
Choose the type of Control Chart
X and R chart
o Mean Monitors the central tendency of a process
o Range monitors the dispersion of a process
o Based on Normal Distribution
P - chart
c – chart
Variable measures
Mean - X
Notations and computations used in control charts
Range – R
Attribute measures
Notation
Proportion of defects – p
Step 5 n
No. of defects – c
Calculate Control Limits measures m
Variable
Mean
1. Determine - X
the sub-group size n, i.e., each sub-group contains n observations
Range – R
2. Compute the sub-group measures Variable measures
Attribute measures
Mean - X
a. X and R for variable
Proportion data
of defects –p X
b. p,No.
c forofattribute
defects –data
c m
m the number of sub-groups, say sample lots,
3. Determine mR
Range – R
4. Calculate the process average (centre line) of the respective m control chart
a. For variable Attribute measures
Variable measures
Criterion
Sub-group size n Proportion of defects –
Notations and computations used in control charts
Notation
Each
Explanation
sub-group consists of n
Mean - X
observations
p
Sub-group measures Variable measures Based on the n observations, each of
X
Mean - X these measures can be computed for
Range – R each sub-group
Attribute measures
Pr opor tion of defects – p
No. of defects – c
Number of sub- m m measurements are used for
p
groups establishing the sampling
distribution and control chart
Mean of the Variable measures These means are nothing but the
m m
sampling distribution
of the sub-groups Mean - X X process average (center line) of the
respective control charts formed
m
using each of these measures.
Range – R
R
m
Range – R
Attribute measures
No. of defects - c
Pr opor tion of defects –
p
R
p
c
m
No. of defects - c
c
m
Standard deviation of Attribute measures Three standard deviations on either
the sampling Pr opor tion of defects – side of the center line are the control
distribution of the p (1 p ) limits for the respective charts.
sub-groups p
n
m m
No. of defects - c c
b. For Attribute
Attribute measures Attribute measures
Proportion of defects – Proportion of defects –
p
p p
p(1 p)
m n
No. of defects - c
c No. of defects - c c
m
Attribute
5. Setting Control measures
Limits
a. Proportion of defects
For Variable Data–
p(1 p)
p
chart n R
X and
No. of defects - c c
For X For R
UCL = X́ + A2 R UCL = D4 R
LCL = X́ - A2 R LCL = D3 R
Step 6
Plot the Graph
X-bar Chart
Sample Means Centre Line UCL LCL
12.50
12.49
12.48
12.47
12.46
Mean Diameter (cms)
12.45
12.44
12.43
12.42
12.41
12.40
12.39
12.38
12.37
12.36
12.35
12.34
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Sample Number
R Chart
Sample Range Centre Line UCL LCL
0.28
0.26
0.24
0.22
0.20
Mean Range (cms)
0.18
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.10
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Sample Number
Even though the process may be in control, if there are patterns or trends occurring quality
manager should stop the process and study the peculiar behaviour / pattern
When must a process be stopped for investigations?
Reliability
While quality is defined as “conformance to the requirement at the start of use” by the
customer, the question remains “how many of these units still meet the specifications after
a week of operation, or after a month, or at the end of one year warranty period”?
It is the probability of a device performing its purpose satisfactorily for the period of
time intended under operating conditions encountered.
It is the ability of the plant and equipment to continue to be fit for the intended purpose
and not to breakdown in operation
Amount of plant maintenance work will depend upon the reliability of the system.
Reliability = (Number of units survived till the specified time limit)
(Numbers of units inspected)
It is invariably associated with the performance of the product.
o Numerical Value – indicates the element of probability that makes measurement
of reliability possible.
o Life- indicates the age of the product through which it must be performing to
satisfaction.
o Intended function- the product must perform a certain function or do a certain
job for which it is designed, when required.
o Environmental conditions- Even the storage and transport conditions, have a
significant effect on product reliability.
Need for reliability
Profitability
Warranty Period
Inventory of spare parts
Avoid Contractual penalties
To gain Competitive advantage
System Reliability
R1 R2 R3
A B
o The effective reliability of the system between points A and B is RAB =R1 x R2 x R3
where R1, R2 and R3 are the reliabilities of the three components or more.
o RTotal = R1.R2.R3…..RN
o The disadvantage of this series is that as more processes or machineries are added,
the reliability of the entire system decreases.
Parallel Systems/Standby Systems
R1
A B
R2
R3
If either component fails, the system continues to operate but at a reduced performance
The whole system will fail only if all the components so connected fails
the system reliability is greater than the reliability of the individual components.
The effective reliability of the system between two points A and B is R AB= 1-(1-R1) (1-R2)
(1-R3)
Or more generally Rtotal = 1- (1-R1) (1-R2) (1-R3)……(1-RN)
Mixed Systems
R1 R1
A B
R1 R1
Process Capability
Sampling Distribution and Process Distribution
Process is capable, as
99.73% of the goods will be
within the specifications
Lower Upper
specification specification
o Process variability well within specifications
Lower Upper
specification specification
Lower Upper
specification specification
Possible Solutions
Redesign the process
Use alternative process
Retain the current process and eliminate unacceptable output by inspection
Examine whether specifications could be relaxed
Cp = 1, Barely capable
Cp < 1, Not capable
Cp > 1, Capable… Ideally it should be at least 1.33
If the process is not centred, we use a slightly different measure to compute the capability of the
process. This is represented by the symbol Cpk
Quality function Deployment
It is a method designed
o to identify potential failure modes for a product or process,
o to assess the risk associated with those failure modes
o to rank the issues in terms of importance; and
o to identify corrective actions to address the most serious concerns.
Failure Mode – the manner in which a system, subsystem, or component fails to meet
the intended purpose or function
Failure Effect – impact a failure has caused when not prevented or corrected SEVERITY
Failure Cause – the how or why that leads to a failure mode, factors contributing to the
failure mode. OCCURENCE
Failure Control – the methods used to detect or control the failure cause. DETECTABILITY
Criticality
o Relative measure of the combined influence of the failure mode and its
frequency. (S x O)
RPN
o It is the mathematical product of the numerical Severity, Occurrence, and
Detectability ratings
o S x O x D = RPN
o It is used to rank order potential system failures
o It defines the priority of the failure
Benefits of FMEA
o Make output error free
o Better Safety of the product
o Better Quality
o Better Reliability
o Improves Customer Satisfaction
o Reduces Risk & warranty concerns
Acceptance Sampling
It is a SQC process
Process of randomly inspecting a certain number of items from a lot or a batch in
order to decide whether to accept or reject the entire batch based on
predetermined standards
It is either done before or after the process, hence different from SPC
Used where inspection is expensive, volume is high, or inspection is destructive
Can be used on either variable or attribute measures, but more commonly used for
attributes
Sampling Plan
Acceptable Quality Level (AQL): the percent defect that the buyer is willing to
tolerate in the lot delivered by the supplier
Lot Tolerance Percent Defective (LTPD): the worst quality beyond which the
manufacturer is not willing to accept the incoming lot
Producer’s risk: the risk supplier faces in getting his/her lot rejected when indeed it
was conforming to the agreed terms
Consumer’s risk: the risk that a manufacturer faces of accepting a lot with poor
quality beyond his/her tolerance level
Operating Characteristics (OC) Curve
Common thinking around specification limit is that the customer is satisfied as long as
the variation stays within the specification limits
Specification limits do not cleanly separate satisfaction levels for the customer
Taguchi states that any variation away from the nominal (target) performance will
begin to incur customer dissatisfaction.
The quality does not suddenly plummet once the limits are exceeded, rather it is a
gradual degradation as the measurements get closer to the limits.
As the variation increases, the customer will gradually (exponentially) become
dissatisfied
The goal of a company should be to achieve the target performance with minimal
variation. That will minimize the customer dissatisfaction.
Taguchi loss function is the graphical depiction of loss to describe a phenomenon
affecting the value of products produced by the company.
It emphasizes the need for incorporating quality and reliability at the design stage,
prior to production
According to Taguchi, the loss is directly proportional to the square of the deviation from
the target.
Taguchi measured quality as the variation from the target value of a design specification,
and then translated that variation into an economic “loss function” that expresses the cost
of variation in monetary terms.
NUMERICAL
Six Sigma 6σ
Definition
improving quality
reduce costs
reduce defects
reduce product/process variability
reduce delivery time
increase productivity
improve customer satisfaction
Why 6 sigma? – 99.99974%
If things were only at 3 Sigma Quality (99.73% or 2.7 defects per 1,000 operations):
Analyse data, establish and confirm the “possible causes for bad quality.
Identify areas of improvement
Statistical graphical tools used
Improve: Improve current process using different tools
Improvement strategy
Develop ideas to remove root causes
Design and carry out experiments,
Optimize the process.
Final solutions
Control: Control future process so that any deviations are corrected before defects are
formed
Accessibility/approachability
Communicating to keep customers informed in their language
Competence to perform service
Courtesy & politeness towards people
Credibility & honesty of purpose-financial ratings, Image
Reliability-honouring promise
Responsiveness to provide services beyond specified-speed
Security- Ability to dispel risk
Tangibles-physical delivery
Listening to their customers & understanding their needs
Gap analysis / ServQual Model
effective diagnostic tool for uncovering broad areas of a company’s service quality
shortfalls and strengths. Used to analyse the gaps influencing customer perception
Company’s perception of service outcome should match customer's expectation. If it
fails, there is a service gap.
The gap between expected and perceived service is a measure of service quality
Expectation < Service perceived = Exceptional Quality,
Expectations > Service perceived = Unacceptable Quality
Expectations = Service perceived = Satisfactory Quality
Offers the potential to determine the relative importance of the 5 major service
quality dimensions-- Reliability, Responsiveness, Assurance, Tangibles, and Empathy
-- and to track service quality performance over time
We can use data on customer priorities to feed into the House of Quality (QFD)
Gap 1: Not knowing what customers expect
Gap 5: The discrepancy between customer expectations and their perceptions of the service
delivered
Most Important
Reasons
o Differences in understanding of customer expectations between managers
and service providers
Cost of Conformance
o Prevention Costs – approx. 5% of the total
o Appraisals costs – approx. 25% of the total
Cost of non-conformance approx. 70% of the total
o Internal failure costs
o External failure costs
Prevention costs: Costs aimed at preventing defects and building acceptable quality into
products & services
Scrapping
Rework
Reinspecting / Retesting
Loss of productive time
Opportunity loss
Billing errors
External Failure: Costs associated with defects in products and processes that are detected
after delivery to customers
Scrapping
Rework, Reinspecting / Retesting
Damage in transit – theft
Break-down during warranty period
Non-conforming is when intended purpose is met but some specifications are not
met. E.g., Seconds garments
Defective is when intended purpose is not met and product is unfit to be used for
intended purposes and scrap is the ultimate of defective goods
Steps for dealing with non-conformity
Discovery
Identification
Segregation
Analysis
Approval
Action
Tracking