Professional Documents
Culture Documents
fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI
10.1109/LAWP.2015.2423318, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters
1
1536-1225 (c) 2015 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See
http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI
10.1109/LAWP.2015.2423318, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters
2
slot, a line slot and two stepped slots. A microstrip line and a without open-ended slot
0 with open-ended slot(Ls=6.3mm)
stepped slot compose a UWB antenna element and the two with open-ended slot(Ls=8.3mm)
antenna elements are symmetrically arrayed. To improve the
-10
impedance matching characteristic and reduce the mutual
S11(dB)
coupling, a T- shaped slot and a line slot are used on the ground.
-20
More details will be discussed in the following.
-30
-40
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Frequency(GHz)
(a) (b)
Fig. 2. (a) Configurations and (b) S11 of UWB antennas with and without the
open-ended slot.
B. T-Shaped Slot
Fig. 3(a) shows the MIMO antenna A, which is implemented
by combining two UWB antennas simply. The two antenna
elements are using a common ground plane with compact size
of 22×26 mm2. For such a small antenna, the ground plane is a
Fig. 1. Structure of the proposed UWB-MIMO antenna. part of the antenna radiator. Its size has a close relationship with
The optimized dimensions are derived using the the impedance matching and radiation of the antenna. The
commercial software Ansoft HFSS. The design parameters ground surface currents and near-field lead to a strong mutual
optimized for the antenna were eventually determined with coupling between two elements. To achieve better isolation, a
W=2 mm, L=15 mm, A1=3.2 mm, A2=7.5 mm, B1=5 mm, rectangular slot cut from the ground plane is adopted in MIMO
L1=12 mm, wl=0.2 mm, T1=7.5 mm, T2=7.4 mm, T3=2 mm, antenna B as show in Fig. 3(b). The simulated results of two
D=8.5 mm, S=3.2 mm. antennas are shown in Fig. 3(c). Compared to antenna A, which
has poor reflection coefficient and isolation, S21 of antenna B in
III. ANTENNA DESIGN the frequency bands of 4 to 8 GHz has a significant reduction,
The proposed antenna was designed step by step. Two representing an isolation increased. Besides, the impedance
configurations of UWB antenna element and four different matching characteristic in the corresponding frequency bands is
UWB-MIMO antennas will be investigated in this section. The improved. That is because the cutting can change the
desirable performance in terms of broadband impedance distribution of ground surface currents and extend the distance
bandwidth and high isolation are achieved by adopting the between the two feed ports.
T-Shaped slot and the line slot.
A. UWB antenna element
As shown in Fig. 2(a), the stepped slot antenna which is
similar to that in [11] is adopted as an element of the proposed
MIMO antenna. By tuning the parameters of the stepped slot
and the position of the feed line, broadband impedance
bandwidth can be easily achieved, which is due to the gradual (a) (b)
change structure. However, like the antenna in [11], the -10 dB
0
impedance bandwidth is only from 3.8 to 10.6 GHz, which does
not cover the entire UWB band (3.1 to 10.6 GHz). In order to -10
S-Parameters (dB)
1536-1225 (c) 2015 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See
http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI
10.1109/LAWP.2015.2423318, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters
3
back of the feed, and the mutual coupling can be weakened by (Agilent 8719A) was utilized to measure and verify the antenna
cutting a rectangular slot between two antenna elements. Thus, performance. When the return loss was measured, one of the
combining the two structures, a T- shaped slot is adopted in ports is excited, while the other is terminated with a 50Ω load.
MIMO antenna C as show in Fig. 4(a). The S-parameters for The measured and simulated S-parameters are in good
antenna A(with a conventional ground plane) and antenna agreement as shown in Fig.7. The -10 dB bandwidth was
C(with T- shaped slot) are given in Fig. 4(b). It can be observed measured as 3.1 to 10.6GHz, covering the entire UWB
that the antenna C has wider operating frequency band and frequency band. In addition, the measured isolation between
higher isolation. The first resonant frequency was reduced by the two ports is better than 18 dB in the frequency range. The
the top part of the T- shaped slot, and high isolation at middle performance in terms of impedance bandwidth and isolation
frequency band was achieved by the bottom part. As a result, satisfied the design requirement. Comparing the size and
both impedance matching characteristic and isolation between performance of the proposed antenna to some other
the two ports are improved. UWB-MIMO antennas, as reported previously in Table I, it is
seen that this antenna guarantees an entire UWB bandwidth
C. Line slot
with high isolation and has the smallest dimensions.
Observing Fig. 4(b), we can find that the isolation is larger
than 20 dB for the frequencies ≥4 GHz, and that is because the
T- shaped slot extended the distance between the two feed ports.
To reduce the mutual coupling for the band of 3–4 GHz, a line
slot etched on the ground plane with width 0.2 mm is applied in
the antenna D as shown in Fig. 5(a). Antenna D is the proposed
compact UWB-MIMO antenna with high isolation.
The line slot improves the isolation at the band of 3-4 GHz
and has little effect to the return loss. It can be proved by the
comparison of results shown in Fig. 5(b). Current distributions Fig. 6. Current distributions on MIMO antenna C and D at 3.5GHz.
at 3.5 GHz for the MIMO antenna C and the proposed MIMO
0
antenna D are displayed in Fig.6. For antenna D, the coupled
currents distributing on the non-excited antenna element is -10
S-parameters(dB)
smaller comparing to antenna C. That is because the line slot -20
produces an additional coupling current path for the coupling
currents, and the current path can cancel out a part of original -30 Simulated S11
Simulated S12
coupling currents from the excited port to the non-excited port. -40 Measured S11
Measured S12
0 -50
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
-10 Frequency(GHz)
-20
(a) (b)
S-parameters
-40 S12 of antenna A COMPARISONS OF THIS AND SOME OTHER UWB-MIMO ANTENNAS.
(
S12 of antenna C
-50
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Bandwidth
Size(mm) Isolation(dB)
Frequecy(GHz) (GHz)
(a) (b) Reference [5] 3.1-10.6 26×40 >15
Fig. 4. (a) Configuration of antenna C, (b) S-parameters of antenna A and Reference [6] 2.8-11 58×58 >14
antenna C. Reference [7] 3.1-10.6 32×32 >15
Reference [8] 3.1-10.6 60×40 >20
0
Reference [9] 3.1-10.6 55×13.5 >17.2
Reference [10] 3.1-10.6 30×40 >15
-10 >18
S-parameters(dB)
-30 S
1 of antenna C
1 In order to verify the capability of proposed antenna for
S
2 of antenna C
1
-40 S
1 of antenna D
1
MIMO application, it is necessary to achieve a low envelope
S
2 of antenna D
1 correlation coefficient (ECC). The envelope correlation
-50 coefficient is a measure that describes how much the
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Frequency(GHz) communication channels are isolated or correlated with each
(a) (b) other. It can be calculated using the follow formula [6]:
Fig. 5. (a)Configuration of antenna D, (b) S-parameters of antenna C and 2
antenna D.
*
S11 S12 + S 21
*
S 22 (1)
ECC =
IV. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS (1 − ( S 11
2
+ S 21
2
)) (1 − ( S 22
2
+ S12
2
))
The proposed antenna has been successfully simulated, An envelope correlation coefficient value of 0.5 has been set
fabricated, and measured. A microwave network analyzer as an acceptable value for diversity conditions [12]. The
1536-1225 (c) 2015 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See
http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI
10.1109/LAWP.2015.2423318, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters
4
REFERENCES
(a) [1] I. Oppermann, M. Hamalainen, and J. Iinatti, UWB Theory and
Applications. New York: Wiley, 2004, ch. 1, pp. 3-4.
[2] Federal Communication Commission, “First report and order-Revision of
part 15 of the Commission’s rules regarding ultra-wideband transmission
system,” 2002, FCC 02 48.
[3] G. J. Foschini, “On limits of wireless communications in a fading
environment when using multiple antennas,” Wireless Pers. Commum.,
vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 311–335, 1988.
[4] T. Kaiser, Z. Feng, and E. Dimitrov, “An overview of ultra-wideband
systems with MIMO,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 285–312, Feb.
2009.
[5] Li Liu, S. W. Cheung, and T. I. Yuk, “Compact MIMO antenna for
portable devices in UWB applications,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.,
vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 4257–4264, Aug. 2013.
[6] Bybi P. Chacko, Gijo Augustin, and Tayeb A. Denidni, “Uniplanar slot
antenna for ultrawideband polarization-diversity applications,” IEEE
Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 12, pp. 88–91, 2013.
[7] Jian Ren, Wei Hu, Yingzeng Yin, and Rong Fan, “Compact printed
(b) MIMO antenna for UWB applications,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag.
Fig. 8. Measured patterns of the proposed antenna. (a) E-plane (XZ-plane). Lett., vol. 13, pp. 1517–1520, 2014.
(b) H-plane (YZ-plane). [8] Chun-Xu Mao, Qing-Xin Chu, Yu-Ting Wu, and Ya-Hui Qian, “Design
and investigation of closely-packed diversity UWB slot-antenna with
20 1.0 high isolation,” Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, vol. 41, pp.
0.9 13–25, 2013.
15 0.8 [9] Jae-Min Lee, Ki-Baek Kim, Hong-Kyun Ryu, and Jong-Myung Woo, “A
Radiation Efficiency
Peak gain(dBi)
1536-1225 (c) 2015 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See
http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.