Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323884700
CITATIONS READS
0 41
1 author:
Touhami Lanez
El-Oued University
165 PUBLICATIONS 258 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Touhami Lanez on 20 March 2018.
Abstract
Pesticides are among the most potentially hazardous compounds to human, animals, and the
environment, they can damage the environment and accumulate in ecosystems and cause
serious disturbances. Although they have highly specific actions, some pesticides are capable
of interacting with cellular structures directly or after processing by metabolic enzymes, and
form a covalent bond with DNA nucleosides to produce DNA adducts, The objective of this
study is to evaluate the in vitro mutagenic and/or carcinogenic potential of somed pesticide,
the most used in farmers in the region of El Oued (South Algeria), the evaluation is carried
out using electrochemical techniques based on cyclic voltammetry and chromatography
techniques based on high performance liquid chromatography. Both techniques indicate that
the pesticide somed has a very high in vitro mutagenic and carcinogenic potential.
1. Introduction
Pesticides are chemicals which are synthesized for the purpose of killing living beings; it is a
generic term which includes a variety of categories such as insecticides, acaricides,
fungicides, algaecides, herbicides, weedicides and bactericides [1-2]. These chemicals that are
toxic by nature can contaminate the water we drink, the air we breathe, the food we eat and
the soil on which we walk [3-6].
As shown by numerous epidemiological studies, some types of cancer are increasing
particularly rapidly if the environment (water, air, food, soil ...) is contaminated with
pesticides [7-11]. The development of cancer in this case is due to the penetration of the active
ingredient of a pesticide in the body. This active material can be fixed by covalent bonding to
nucleophilic sites present in the DNA and then form adducts which can be mutagenic in a first
time, then carcinogenic [12,13]. Detection of adducts can therefore be a very useful tool for
evaluating the mutagenic and/or carcinogenic potential of pesticides [14]. In a previous work
we have reported the use of electrochemical techniques as a tool for the evaluation of the in
vitro mutagenic potential of abamectin pesticide [15]. In this paper we present the study of the
reaction of somed pesticide with thymidine using voltammetric and chromatographic
methods.
(A) (B)
Fig.1. Molecular Structure of active ingredient of somed pesticide (A) metalaxyl (B)
mancozeb
2.4. Description
Metalaxyl is a systemic, residual fungicide with curative and preventive properties against
oomycosis and, more specifically, against peronospora (downy mildew). Mancozeb is a
broad-spectrum, preventative fungicide with special activity on leaf diseases caused by
endoparasitic fungi. It has a side effect on mites. The combination of Metalaxyl and
Mancozeb results in a formula with a broader spectrum of activity and important benefits: It
interferes in the synthesis of fungal proteins by preventing the development of promycelium,
mycelium growth and production spores. It prevents the activity of sulfhydrilic enzymes in
general and cysteine in particular forming complexes with enzymes that contain metals such
as those involved in the production of ATP. By acting on multiple processes, controlled by
various genes, it prevents the appearance of resistance. It combines a good shock effect with a
persistence of up to three weeks. Containing Manganese and Zinc, it corrects the deficiencies
of these elements.
2.5. Action spectrum
Somed is authorized as a preventive and curative fungicide in the following crops: - broccoli,
cocombre, cauliflower, poultry, melon, onion, pasteque: Mildew. - Potato: Alternaria,
Anthracnose and Mildew. - tobacco: Blue mold - vineyard: Downy mildew.
3. Methods
3.1. Reaction of pesticides with nucleosides
The reaction of somed pesticide with thymidine nucleoside was carried out using phosphate
buffer 0.05 M solution at pH equal to 7.2 as a solvent. The general procedure was as follows:
An amount of newly supplied somed pesticide (0.5 mM) was added to 25 ml of phosphate
dT
1000 dT+ somed
800
Current density [µA/cm²]
600
400
200
The decrease in anodic pick curent density of thymidine nucleoside followed the addition of
somed pesticide can be used to calculate the yield of the formation of the adduct thymidine-
somed obtained from the reaction of thymidine nucleoside and somed besticide at 37 °C for
72 hours. This yield is calculated from electrochemical data using the following equation 1.
i (t 0)
Yield % 1 a 100 (1)
i a ( t 72h )
Where i a ( t 0 ) represents the anodic pic current desity of pure thymidine nucleoside and
i a ( t 72h ) represents the anodic pic current desity of thymidine nucleoside in the precence of
somed pesticide after 72 hours of incubition at 37°C. Replacing i a ( t 0 ) and i a ( t 72h ) by
their values from the voltammogram in figure 1,
The high value of the yield indicates a quantitative reaction between thymidine nucleoside
and somed pesticide.
3.1.2. Chromatography
This has been done through high performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) techniques to
detect the formation of thymidine nucleosides adduct using chromatograms. Analyses were
performed utilizing a high performance liquid chromatography (LC 20 AL equipped with
universal injector (Hamilton 25 µl) UV-VIS detector SPD 20A (Shimadzu). After incubation
of the reaction mixture of thymidine nucleoside and somed pesticide for 72 hours at 37 °C, it
was then analyzed under the following conditions: stationary phase, Shim-pack VP-ODS C18
(250 mm L. x 4.6 mm I.D., 5 μm). Flow rate: 1 mL/min. Oven temperature: 25 °C. UV
detector: detection wavelength 260 nm. Injection volume: 20 µL. Run time: 50 min. A linear
gradient was used for mobile phase as follows: linear gradient from 0% B to 12% B, 0-30
min; linear gradient from 12% B to 50% B, 30-50 min.
The obtained chromatogram of thymidine nucleoside shows two picks, the first is at retention
time equal to 2.5 min. and the second is at 30 min. Figure 3.
uV
500000
400000
300000
200000
100000
0
0 10 20 30 40 min
After incubation of the mixutre of thymidine nucleoside and somed pesticide for 72 hours at
(37 ± 1 °C), the pick at 30 minutes disappeared and a new pick appeared with the same
intensity at 26.5 minutes, Figure 4.
uV
400000
350000
300000
250000
200000
150000
100000
50000
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 min
Fig.4. HPLC chromatogram of the reaction mixture of somed pesticide and thymidine
nucleoside after 72 hours of incubation under agitation at 37 °C
5. Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Algerian ministry of higher education and was
administrated by VTRS laboratory under faculty of sciences and technology. The authors are
grateful to Dr. Ahmed Chenna for many valuable discussions and insights provided during the
course of this work. We are also indebted to Abdelkirm Rebiai and Ali Tliba for their help.
6. References
[1] Krauthacker B., Tanja AK., Kralj M., Thalcevic B., Reiner E. Organochlorine pesticides
in blood serum of the general population of Yoguslavia and in occupationally exposed
workers. Int Arch Occ Env Hea, (1980):45, 217-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00380785
[2] P Anna; P Nandoor; F IIdiko. Pesticide use related to cancer incidence as studied in a rural
district of hungary. Sci Total Environ, (1988):73, 229-244.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(88)90431-7
[3] Cantor KP., A Blair., Everett G., R Gilsor., Brumeister LF., Brown LM. Pesticides and
other agricultural risk factors for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma among men in Jowa and
Minnesota. Cancer Res, (1992):52, 2447-2455.
[4] Matuo YK., Lopes JNC., Carsanova IC., Matuo T., Lopes JLC. Organochlorine pesticide
residues in human milk in the Ribeuao Preto region. State of Sao Pauto, Brazil Arch Environ
Contam Toxicol, (1992):22, 167-175.
[5] Addy JJ., Robert LF., Alphouse P. Measurement of DDT and DDE from Serum, fat and
stool specimens. J Environ Sci heal A, (1992):27, 967-981.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529209375773
[6] Swaen GMH., Varvliet C., Slangen JJM., Sturmans F. Cancer mortality among licensed
pesticide applicators. Scand J Work Env Hea, (1992):18, 201-204.
[7] Yadav SK. Pesticide Applications Threat to Ecosystems. J Hum Ecology, (2010):32(1),
37-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2010.11906319
[8] Belpomme D., Irigaray P., Hardell L., Clapp R., Montagnier L., Epstein S., Sasco AJ. The
multitude and diversity of environmental carcinogens. Environ Res, (2007):105, 414-429.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2007.07.002
[9] Schenker MB., McCurdy SA. Occupational health among migrant and seasonal
farmworkers: the specific case of dermatitis. Am J Ind Med, (1990):18, 345-351.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.4700180317
[10] Waddell BL., Zahm SH., Baris D., Weisenburger DD., Holmes F., Burmeister LF.,
Cantor KP., Blair A. Agricultural use of organophosphate pesticides and the risk of non-
Hodgkin’s lymphoma among male farmers (United States). Cancer Cause Control, (2001):12,
509-517.https://doi.org /10.1023/A:1011293208949
[11] Zheng T., Zahm SH., Cantor KP., Weisenburger DD., Zhang Y., Blair A. Agricultural
exposure to carbamate pesticides and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. J Occup Environ Med,
(2001):43, 641-649.https://doi.org /10.1097/00043764-200107000-00012
[12] Garbellini GS., Uliana CV., Yamanaka H. Interaction of Organophosphorus Pesticides
with DNA Nucleotides on a Boron‑Doped Diamond Electrode. J Braz Chem Soc, (2013),
24(12):1942-1949.
[13] Oliveira PA., Colaço A., Chaves R., Guedes-Pinto H., De-La-Cruz PLF., Lopes C.
Chemical carcinogenesis. An Acad Bras Ciênc, (2007):79(4), 593-616.