Professional Documents
Culture Documents
‘Final common
for death from infection
• Hotchkiss 2013
Infection
Patofisiologi SEPSIS
Inflammatory Endothelial
Vasodilation
Mediators Dysfunction
Ischemia
The SOFA score predicts mortality risk for patients in the intensive care unit
based on lab results and clinical data on the degree of dysfunction of 6 organ
systems.
• The score is calculated at admission and every 24 hours until discharge
• The SOFA score is not designed to influence medical management
• An initial SOFA score of < 9 predicted a mortality of < 33%, SOFA > 11 predicted
mortality of 95%
• Adam Malik Hospital (2018) SOFA score >7, kematian >>(Andrew, Ginting F KONAS PETRI
2019)
5
4
S
1
S 6
C
2
0
1 3
6 2
SOFA SCORE
Variable
0 1 2 3 4
Respiratory :PaO2/FiO2, > 400 ≤400 ≤300 ≤ 200 ≤ 100
mmHG
Coagulation : Platelet x 103μl >150 ≤150 ≤ 100 ≤50 ≤20
Liver : Bilirubin, mg/dl <1,2 1,2 – 1,9 2,0 – 5,9 6.0 – 11,9 >12
Cardiovascular : Hypotension No MAP : <70 DOP ≤ 5 or Do ( DOP >5, Epi ≤ 0,1, Dop >15,
hypotension mmHg any dose) or Nor - epi ≤ 0,1 Epi >0,1 or
Nor – Epi
>0,1
Central Nervous System : 15 13 – 14 10 - 12 6-9 <6
GCS Scale
Renal :Creatinine/Urine <1,2 1,2 – 1,9 2.0 – 3,4 3,5 – 4,9 or UOP : >5 .0 or
Why to Use
The SOFA score can be used to determine the level of organ dysfunction and
mortality risk in ICU patients.
When to Use
• The SOFA can be used on all patients who are admitted to an ICU.
• It is not clear whether the SOFA is reliable for patients who were transferred from
another ICU.
Instructions
Calculate the SOFA score using the worst value for each variable in the preceding
24-hour period.
“the major gap is the difficulty to apply current sepsis case definitions, especially in LMIC settings when
the main tests are not available”
“90% of cases with poor outcome in the Australian sepsis database, inadequate recognition was found
to be the most common feature”
The SOFA scoring system is useful in predicting the clinical outcomes of critically ill patients.
According to an observational study at an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) in Belgium the mortality
• least 50% when the score is increased regardless of initial score in the first 96 hours
• 27% to 35% if the score remains unchanged
• less than 27% if the score is reduced.
III.2.q SOFA
SSC 2016
QSOFA
The qSOFA
• a rapid, bedside clinical score to identify patients with suspected infection
who are at greater risk for poor outcomes.
• The primary outcome was in hospital mortality, and the secondary outcome
was an ICU length of stay of ≥ 3 days.
• The qSOFA was meant to replace the systemic inflammatory response
syndrome (SIRS) criteria.
• qSOFA has also been found to be poorly sensitive for the risk of death with
SIRS possibly better for screening
• Sepsis HAM Hospital 2018: 16,7% under diagnose (Maruli,Ginting F, KONAS PETRI 2019)
-Angus, Derek C.; Seymour, Christopher W.; Coopersmith, Craig M.; Deutschman, Clifford S.; Klompas,
Michael; Levy, Mitchell M
.; Martin, Gregory S.; Osborn, Tiffany M.; Rhee, Chanu. Williams JM, Greenslade JH, McKenzie JV, et al. -
SIRS, qSOFA and organ dysfunction: insights from a prospective database of emergency department patients
with infection. Chest 2017;151:586-596.
• The qSOFA score predicts mortality but does not diagnose sepsis
• no prospective studies have demonstrated that clinical decisions based
on the qSOFA lead to better patient outcomes.
A positive qSOFA score clinicians to further investigate for the presence of organ
dysfunction or increase the frequency of patient monitoring.
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA
Correspondence to: Paul Marik, MD. Eastern Virginia Medical School, 825 Fairfax Av, Suite 410, Norfolk VA 23507, USA. Email:
marikpe@evms.edu. Provenance: This is an invited Editorial commissioned by the Section Editor Zhongheng Zhang (Department of
Emergency Medicine, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China).
Comment on: Williams JM, Greenslade JH, McKenzie JV, et al. SIRS, qSOFA and organ dysfunction: insights from a prospective database of
emergency department patients with infection. Chest 2017;151:586-596.
Submitted Feb 05, 2017. Accepted for publication Mar 06, 2017. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.03.125
View this article at: http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.03.125
Evaluated the presence of SIRS criteria in 109,663
patients with infection and organ failure. In this study,
12% of patients were classified as having SIRS-negative
sepsis (i.e. <2 SIRS criteria)
Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Pilcher D, et al. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria in de ning severe sepsis. N Engl J
Med 2015;372:1629-38.
Over diagnose
A new large retrospective cohort analysis among 184,875 patients in
182 Australian and New Zealand intensive care units (ICUs) found
SOFA score had superiority in prediction of in-hospital mortality but it
showed SIRS criteria has greater prognostic accuracy for in-hospital
mortality than qSOFA score
Raith EP, Udy AA, Bailey M, et al. Prognostic accuracy of the sofa score, sirs criteria, and qsofa score for in-hospital mortality among adults with
suspected infection admitted to the intensive care unit. JAMA 2017;317:290-300.
The discrimination of in-hospital mortality for SOFA (75.3% AUROC; 99% confidence interval (CI): 0.750–0.757) was significantly
higher than that of qSOFA (60.7% AUROC; 99% CI: 0.603– 0.611) or SIRS (58.9% AUROC; 99% CI: 0.585–0.593).
Of the study population, 90.1% (165,103 patients) had an increase in SOFA score from baseline to at least
two points; 86.7% (158,710 patients) met two or more SIRS criteria, and 54.4% (99,611 patients) had a qSOFA score
of at least two points .
In adults admitted to the ICU with suspected infection, an increase in SOFA score of at least two points had superior prognostic
accuracy for in-hospital mortality followed by qSOFA and finally SIRS criteria.
With SOFA score demonstrating significantly greater discrimination for in-hospital mortality, the authors highlight that this may
suggest that SIRS criteria and qSOFA may have limited utility in predicting mortality in an ICU setting .
• The definition of SIRS, although sensitive to detect sepsis, was rather unspecific.
• In addition, the SIRS criteria performed badly in identifying patients significant morbidity
and mortality.
• These issues led to a recent new consensus definition for sepsis and septic shock
• This international task force
o defined sepsis as ‘life-threatening organ dysfunction
o Using large datasets (>1 million patient records),
o increase in 2 points or more for a patient suspected to have infection using the
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) best predicted in-hospital mortality.
• The SOFA is well known within the intensive care community, but is not so well known
generally.
• The task force developed a simpler clinical screening tool that performed very well in
identifying adult patients with suspected infection who were likely to have poor
outcomes, which they termed ‘quick SOFA’ (qSOFA).
PPK SEPSIS PERMENKES 2017 - > SSC 2012
MENGHITUNG RASIO PAO2/ FIO2
Perhitungan rasio PaO2 / FiO2 dilakukan untuk mengetahui status oksigenasi pasien.
• Rasio paO2 / FiO2 yang normal adalah > atau =300.
• Apabila rasio paO2 / FiO2 < 300 maka pasien mengalami acute lung injury ( ALI)
• Apabila rasio PaO2 / FiO2 < 200 maka pasien mengalami acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)
Cara menghitung rasio paO2 / FiO2 pasien diatas adalah:
1. cari nilai FiO2: misal, pasien menggunakan O2: 3 l/mnt FiO2 adalah : 33% atau 0,32
2. hasil AGDA didapat paO2 pasien diatas adalah 82 mmHg
3. masukan ke rumus berikut:
AO2 100% (l/mnt) FiO2
PaO2 / FiO2
82 / 0,3 = 273,3 Kanul nasal Sungkup O2
1 0,24 5-6 0,40
2 0,28 6-7 0,50
3 0,32 7-8 0,60
4 0,36 Sungkup reservoar
5 0,40 6 0,60
6 0,44 7 0,70
8>= 0,80
qSOFA Score
qSOFASOFA SSC 2016
STEP 1
Inflammation or Bacterial or viral?
infection?
Quick Sofa : 3
Laboratorium
Hb : 9,6 AGDA :
PLT : 22.000 pH 7,46 IgG anti toxoplasma 157
WBC : 12.300 pCO2 : 21 IgM anti toxoplasma 2,72
Ureum : 75 pO2 : 167
Creatinin : 1,63 HCO3 : 14,9
Total Co2 : 15,5
Bilirubin total : 2,3
Base Excess : -6,9
SO2 : 100
Natrium : 130
Kalium 3,2
Chlorida 102
Sofa score:
1. Kesadaran :
1
1 3
2. Tekanan darah
TD : 90/60 mmHg
MAP > 70
(score = 0)
Pernafasan
AO2 100% (l/mnt) FiO2
Kanul nasal Sungkup O2
1 0,24 5-6 0,40
2 0,28 6-7 0,50
3 0,32 7-8 0,60
4 0,36 Sungkup reservoar
5 0,40 6 0,60
6 0,44 7 0,70
8>= 0,80
167/0,36= 463
PO2 : 167 FiO2:0,36
0 1 2 3 4
>400 <400 >300 <200 <100
Trombosit : 22.000 ( score 3)
Bilirubin : 2,3 ( score 2)
pO2/FiO2 : AGDA pO2 167/FiO2 0,36= 463 ( score : 0)
Trombosit :22.000 ( score 3)
Bilirubin : 2,3 ( score 2)
MAP : 73 ( score 0)
GCS :5 ( score 4)
Creatinin : 1,63 ( score 1)
Total Score : 10
DX
Sepsis ec pneumonia
Pneumonia HAP dd CAP
HIV stadium IV
Toxoplasma Encephalopathy
Kas us 2
Tn L, pria 54
tahun
Anamnesa
Sesak nafas dialami sejak 1 hari sebelum rumah sakit. Sesak
nafas memberat dengan aktivitas disertai dengan batuk.
Pasien di diagnosa dengan acute lung oedema oleh dept
cardiologi. Demam dialami sejak 4 hari dirawat di CVCU.
Demam terjadi sepanjang hari .Pasien menggunakan
ventilator sejak berada di cvcu.
Vital Sign
Hasil
Bil. Total 20,70
Bil Direk 11,00
Apakah ini sepsis?
TOTAL SCORE : 2
SOFA score:
• AGDA PaO2/FiO2 159/0,5= 318 (<300) 1
• Platelet 6000 4
• Bilirubin 20 4
• Cardiovaskular MAP >70 0
• CNS GCS >15 0
• Renal Cr>5,00 4
• TOTAL SCORE 13
3. Berapa SOFA Score?
TOTAL SCORE 14
Diagnosis
• Sepsis ec dd/ pneumonia dd/urosepsis dd/ cholangitis
• Reynoud Disease
Treatment
• Cor NaCl 0,9% 30 cc/kgBB 1500 cc
• Kultur darah, sputum, urin
• Cek Procalcitonin 31,89
• Antibiotik Drip meropenem 1 gram/8 jam dalam 100 cc
NaCl 0,9% habis dalam 3 jam
Hasil Kultur
• Darah : tidak ada pertumbuhan bakteri
• Urin : tidak ada pertumbuhan bakteri
• Sputum:
– Dijumpai batang gram (-)
– Bakteri aerob: Acinetobacter baumanii
• Sensitive: Amikasin, Tigecyline
• Resisten: Ampicillin Sulbactam, ceftazidime, ceftriaxon, cefepime,
ciprofloxacin, gentamycin, meropenem, trimetropim/sulfametoxazole
SGOT 105
MENINGKAT
SGPT 131 Hasil Foto Thorax pasien menunjukkan
adanya TB paru dan diberikan OAT,
sehingga OAT mungkin penyebab
peningkatan SGOT dan SGPT