You are on page 1of 42

RESULTS-BASED

PERFORMANCE
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
(RPMS)

2021-2022
portfolio

MA. REINA GAIL T. LIZASO


Teacher III

ROWENA T. ZUNIEGA
OIC-Head Teacher

LORENZO E. GANDO
School Principal I
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE AND
COMMITMENT FORM
Key Result Area 1

Content Area and


Pedagogy
Key Result Area 2

Learning
Environment
Key Result Area 3

DIVERSITY OF
LEARNERS,
CURRICULUM and
PLANNING, &
ASSESSMENT
AND REPORTING
Key Result Area 4

COMMUNITY
LINKAGES AND
PROFESSIONAL
ENGAGEMENT&
PERSONAL GROWTH
AND PROFESSIONAL
DEVELOPMENT
Key Result Area 5

Plus factor
OBJECTIVE 1
APPLIED KNOWLEDGE OF
CONTENT WITHIN AND
ACROSS CURRICULUM
TEACHING AREAS
OBJECTIVE 2
USED RESEARCH-BASED
KNOWLEDGE AND PRINCIPLES
OF TEACHING AND LEARNING
TO ENHANCE PROFESSIONAL
PRACTICE
OBJECTIVE 3
DISPLAYED PROFICIENT
USE OF MOTHER TONGUE,
FILIPINO AND ENGLISH TO
FACILITATE TEACHING AND
LEARNING
OBJECTIVE 4
USED EFFECTIVE VERBAL AND
NON-VERBAL CLASSROOM
COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES
TO SUP- PORT LEARNER
UNDERSTANDING,
PARTICIPATION, ENGAGEMENT
AND ACHIEVEMENT
OBJECTIVE 5
ESTABLISHED SAFE AND SECURE
LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS TO
ENHANCE LEARNING THROUGH
THE CONSISTENT
IMPLEMENTATION OF POLICIES,
GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES
OBJECTIVE 6
MAINTAINED LEARNING
ENVIRONMENTS THAT PROMOTE
FAIRNESS, RESPECT AND CARE TO
ENCOURAGE LEARNING
OBJECTIVE 7
MAINTAINED LEARNING
ENVIRONMENTS THAT NURTURE
AND INSPIRE LEARNERS TO
PARTICIPATE, COOPERATE AND
COLLABORATE IN CONTINUED
LEARNING
OBJECTIVE 8
APPLIED A RANGE OF SUCCESSFUL
STRATEGIES THAT MAINTAIN
LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS THAT
MOTIVATE LEARNERS TO WORK
PRODUCTIVELY BY ASSUMING
RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR OWN
OBJECTIVE 9
DESIGNED, ADAPTED AND
IMPLEMENTED TEACHING
STRATEGIES THAT ARE
RESPONSIVE TO LEARNERS
WITH DISABILITIES,
GIFTEDNESS AND TALENTS
OBJECTIVE 10
ADAPTED AND USED
CULTURALLY APPROPRIATE
TEACHING STRATEGIES TO
ADDRESS THE NEEDS OF
LEARNERS FROM INDIGENOUS
GROUPS
OBJECTIVE 11
ADAPTED AND IMPLEMENTED
LEARNING PROGRAMS THAT
ENSURE RELEVANCE AND
RESPONSIVENESS TO THE
NEEDS OF ALL LEARNERS
OBJECTIVE 12
UTILIZED ASSESSMENT DATA
TO INFORM THE MODIFICATION
OF TEACHING AND LEARNING
PRACTICES AND PROGRAMS
OBJECTIVE 13
MAINTAINED LEARNING
ENVIRONMENTS THAT ARE
RESPONSIVE TO COMMUNITY
CONTEXTS
OBJECTIVE 13

REVIEWED REGULARLY PERSONAL


TEACHING PRACTICE USING
EXISTING LAWS AND REGULATIONS
THAT APPLY TO THE TEACHING
PROFESSION AND THE
RESPONSIBILITIES SPECIFIED
IN THE CODE OF ETHICS FOR
PROFESSIONAL TEACHERS
OBJECTIVE 15

COMPLIED WITH AND IMPLEMENTED


SCHOOL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
CONSISTENTLY TO FOSTER
HARMONIOUS RELATIONSHIPS WITH
LEARNERS, PARENTS, AND OTHER
STAKEHOLDERS
OBJECTIVE 16

ADOPTED PRACTICES THAT UP-


HOLD THE DIGNITY OF TEACHING
AS A PROFESSION BY EXHIBITING
QUALITIES SUCH AS CARING
ATTITUDE, RESPECT AND INTEGRITY
OBJECTIVE 17

SET PROFESSIONAL
DEVELOPMENT GOALS
BASED ON THE PHILIPPINE
PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS
FOR TEACHERS
OBJECTIVE 18

SET PROFESSIONAL
DEVELOPMENT GOALS
BASED ON THE PHILIPPINE
PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS
FOR TEACHERS
OBJECTIVE 19

PERFORMED VARIOUS
RELATED WORKS/ACTIVITIES
THAT CONTRIBUTE TO
TEACHING—LEARNING
PROCESS
MODE OF VERIFICATION

COT RATING SHEET 1


COT RATING SHEET 2
Any Annotated Document used during CO 1 and 2
One Lesson Plan with Annotations identifying the
research-based knowledge and/or principles of
teaching and learning used as basis for
planning/designing lesson
MODE OF VERIFICATION

COT RATING SHEET 1


COT RATING SHEET 2
Any Annotated Document used during CO 1 and 2
Or Any Supplementary Material (In print/digital format) made by ratee and used in the
lesson delivery that highlights maintaining learning environments that nurture and
inspire learners to participate, cooperate and collaborate in continued Learning with
client/learner feedback on how the material encouraged the learners to participate,
cooperate, and collaborate a range of strategies that maintain learning environments
that moti vate learners to work productively by assuming responsibility for their own
learning.
MODE OF VERIFICATION

COT RATING SHEET 1 and 2 or, Teacher Reflection


Form (TRF)
Adapted contextualized learning program using any
of the following:
- Proof of evaluation of implementation
- Progress report on the implementation
Accomplishment/Completion/Technical Report/
Action Plan/ Activity
- Proposal/ Activity Matrix
List of Identified least/most mastered skills based on
the frequency of errors/correct responses with any
of the following;
- Accomplishment Report for Remedial/Enhancement
- Intervention Material used Remedial/Enhancement
- Lesson Plan/Activity Log utilizing of assessment
data modify and
- learning practices or programs
MODE OF VERIFICATION

Implementation/ Completion of PPA that maintain a


learning environment responsive to community
context:
- Collaborated with Community Stakeholder
- Planned with the community stakeholders
- Conducted a consultative meeting with Community
(Minutes of Meeting)
- Communicated with community (Letter)
Annotated instructional material of one’s teaching that
shows im- pact of regular reviewing one’s teaching
- Video/Audio Recording
- Printed Instructional Materials (LP, LAS, Assessment
materials) - Personal reflection notes as outputs in
4 quarters
- Proof of Attendance with Date in LAC or coaching
and mentoring sessions
MODE OF VERIFICATION

Implemented School Policies and procedures that


foster harmonious relationships with learners,
parents, and other stakeholders
- Proof of participation/involvement in school
community partnerships for the implementation of
A school policy/ procedure
- Minutes of parent-teacher conference
- Communication letter about an implemented school
policy
One (1) lesson plan with annotations explaining the
application of learner-centered teaching philosophy
Exhibit dignity of teaching
- Documented feedback from superiors, colleagues,
learners, parents/guardians, or other
stakeholders directly reflecting the ratee’s good
practices
- Annotated evidence of practice indirectly linking
to the upholding of the dignity of teaching
- Screenshot of text message/chat/email/ any
communication with parent/guardian
- Remarks from mentor/master teacher/school head
about one’s qualities (PMCF)
- Recognition from the school/ school community
about one’s quality
- Others (please Specify)
Professional Development Goals
- Updated IPCRF-DP from Phase II - Mid-year Review
Form (MRF)
- IPCRF—DP - Certification from ICT
Coordinator/School Head
MODE OF VERIFICATION

CERTIFICATE OF PARTICIPATION IN
RETOOLING/TRAINING/SEMINAR/ WORKSHOP WITH
PROOF OF IMPLEMENTATION
CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION/SPEAKERSHIP
ANY PROOF OF PARTICIPATION IN SCHOOL LAC
CERTIFIED BY LAC COORDINATOR
OTHERS
MODE OF VERIFICATION

Committee Involvement
Coordinatorship/Chairpersonship
Advisorship of co-curricular activities
Coaching and Mentoring learners in competitions
Book or Journal Authorship/ Contributorship
Serving as reliever of classes in the absence of
teachers
Mentoring Pre-service teachers Participation in the
Demonstration Teaching
Participation in the Technical Working Group Member
SUMMARY OF CO RATINGS FOR
INDICATOR #1 OBJECTIVE 1

RPMS 5-Point RPMS Rating for Quality


MOVs COT Rating
Scale Rating
Average

COT RATING
7 5
SHEET 1
5.000 OUTSTANDING
5.000 OUTSTANDING

COT RATING
7 5

SHEET 2
SUMMARY OF CO RATINGS FOR
INDICATOR #2 OBJECTIVE 3

RPMS 5-Point RPMS Rating for Quality


MOVs COT Rating
Scale Rating
Average

COT RATING
7 5
SHEET 1
5.000 OUTSTANDING
5.000 OUTSTANDING

COT RATING
7 5

SHEET 2
SUMMARY OF CO RATINGS FOR
INDICATOR #3 OBJECTIVE 4

RPMS 5-Point RPMS Rating for Quality


MOVs COT Rating
Scale Rating
Average

COT RATING
7 5
SHEET 1
5.000 OUTSTANDING
5.000 OUTSTANDING

COT RATING
7 5

SHEET 2
SUMMARY OF CO RATINGS FOR
INDICATOR #4 OBJECTIVE 5

RPMS 5-Point RPMS Rating for Quality


MOVs COT Rating
Scale Rating
Average

COT RATING
7 5
SHEET 1
5.000 OUTSTANDING
5.000 OUTSTANDING

COT RATING
7 5

SHEET 2
SUMMARY OF CO RATINGS FOR
INDICATOR #5 OBJECTIVE 6

RPMS 5-Point RPMS Rating for Quality


MOVs COT Rating
Scale Rating
Average

COT RATING
7 5
SHEET 1
5.000 OUTSTANDING
5.000 OUTSTANDING

COT RATING
7 5

SHEET 2
SUMMARY OF CO RATINGS FOR
INDICATOR #6 OBJECTIVE 7

RPMS 5-Point RPMS Rating for Quality


MOVs COT Rating
Scale Rating
Average

COT RATING
7 5
SHEET 1
5.000 OUTSTANDING
5.000 OUTSTANDING

COT RATING
7 5

SHEET 2
SUMMARY OF CO RATINGS FOR
INDICATOR #7 OBJECTIVE 8

RPMS 5-Point RPMS Rating for Quality


MOVs COT Rating
Scale Rating
Average

COT RATING
7 5
SHEET 1
5.000 OUTSTANDING
5.000 OUTSTANDING

COT RATING
7 5

SHEET 2
SUMMARY OF CO RATINGS FOR
INDICATOR #8 OBJECTIVE 9

RPMS 5-Point RPMS Rating for Quality


MOVs COT Rating
Scale Rating
Average

COT RATING
7 5
SHEET 1
5.000 OUTSTANDING
5.000 OUTSTANDING

COT RATING
7 5

SHEET 2
SUMMARY OF CO RATINGS FOR
INDICATOR #9 OBJECTIVE 10

RPMS 5-Point RPMS Rating for Quality


MOVs COT Rating
Scale Rating
Average

COT RATING
7 5
SHEET 1
5.000 OUTSTANDING
5.000 OUTSTANDING

COT RATING
7 5

SHEET 2

You might also like