Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1/2, 1995
INTRODUCTION
Although the phenomenon of internal oxidation had been known for many
years, it was not until 1959 that it was thoroughly analyzed and formalized
by C. Wagner) (Internal oxidation is used in the generic sense in which a
diffusing species from the surface reacts with a less-noble solute in the alloy
to form discrete particles. The species usually causing the phenomenon are
oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen, sulfur and carbon. Halogens can also cause
internal "oxidation," but the number of cases is very limited.) Wagner m a d e
several assumptions, which at the time, seemed quite reasonable. These
included the following: stoichiometric oxide precipitated at the reaction
front, the formation of low-solubility-product oxides caused virtually all
of the reactive solute to precipitate leaving a matrix of "pure" solvent,
precipitation was complete at the reaction front and no further precipitation
occurred within the internal-oxidation zone subsequently, uniform planar
fronts existed, a constant mole fraction of solute oxide existed across the
reaction zone, and thickening of the front was controlled primarily by oxy-
gen diffusion in the substrate. Wagner's work led to several mathematical
relations that have since been reviewed by numerous authors including
Kofstad,2 Rapp, 3 Swisher, 4 Birks and Meier, 5 among others. The most exten-
sive review was published in 1974 by Meijering. 6
A Critique of Internal Oxidation in Alloys 83
Wagner's considerations fell within the low end of the criterion, whereas
Laftamme and Morral's work involves the high end of the criterion. The
latter involves relatively few systems and cases compared to the former,
because the oxygen, nitrogen, etc., solubilities in most metals are very low.
Exceptions involve Group IV and V metals that form very stable oxides,
and thus the available solutes that would preferentially oxidize are very
few. For purposes of expediency, the Wagnerian behavior (low solubility
products) will be deemed Type I, and the behavior involving oxides having
high-solubility products is referred to as Type II. Most of this paper involve
Type-I systems.
~I' I I I
]~ .1100~ ~or lOhr
[~ o Ni - AI
]~ r-1 Ni -Cr
I| 9 Ni -Mn
2OO~-~--'
" X Ni-Mo -
I I I
II ,, Ni-V
lain ] I 9 Ni-W
I I
~ o
01 ] J w
0 0-025 0.05 0.075
Atomic fraction solute
The relation states that the zone thickness varies inversely with the square
root of the solute concentration. Thus, for a given solvent, e.g., nickel, if
the surface oxygen solubility and oxygen diffusivity are independent of solute
concentration (generally likely for dilute solutions), it should make no
difference what the solute is. In other words, a given amount of solute
should produce the same thickness of the internal-oxidation zone. Stott et
al. 9 studied a number of dilute nickel alloys and generally found that Wag-
ner's prediction was indeed valid. However, one notable exception was
abundantly evident. Ni-A1 alloys "marched to their own drummer," as can
be seen in Fig. 1, which is a plot of zone thickness versus atomic fraction
of solute. All alloys produced the same thickness for a particular solute
concentration except for A1 which clearly enabled much thicker zones to
form than predicted by Eq. (2). Stott et al. attributed this behavior to the
A Critique of Internal Oxidation in AHoys 85
900~
l..1612
"T,.,,, 3 ]612 0
~E
o/
~o
Q
Z
8 2.)512
j612i o
/
J
o/
/
I
0 ~02 0.J0Z. O.J06 J
0-08
NAt
Fig. 2. Plot of permeability versus aluminum content in
Ni-A1 alloys internally oxidizedat 900~ in a Ni-NiO pack
showing the validity of Eq. (10) for the enhanced diffusivity
of oxygen in the interfaces between A1203 rods and the
matrix.
PRECIPITATE MORPHOLOGY
8000X
Fig. 3. Dendritic morphology of SiO2 formed during inter-
nal oxidation of Cu-Si near the reaction front. The den-
drites subsequently broke down into "spheres. ''1~
(a)
200X
~;i 84
iiiii~
(e)
(d)
500X
Fig. 4. Continued.
is essentially equal to the velocity of the advancing reaction front, and thus
the solute has time to diffuse to the tips of the needles and plates. The reduced
rate of reaction-front movement enables growth processes to dominate over
nucleation.
The factors governing the shapes of precipitates have been addressed
by many authors and nicely summarized by Fine. a7 In essence, high interfa-
cial energy between a precipitant and matrix favors a spherical geometry to
minimize interfacial area and thus the total energy, but high strain energy
is minimized if disks, needles, or plates form. The initial precipitation is
most likely determined by minimization of diffusion distances, e.g., pearlite
90 Dou~a~
(a)
(b)
Birks and Meier 5 summarized the many factors governing the size of
the particles. They note that large particles are favored by high particle-
matrix interfacial energies. Megusar and Meier 16 found particles two orders
of magnitude larger in Co-Ti alloys compared to particles in Cu-Ti alloys
in work by Wood e t al. 18 Wood e t al. were able to measure the dihedral
angle of a grain-boundary particle in a T E M micrograph from which they
obtained a value of 400 700 ergs/cm 2 for the TiO2-Cu interfacial energy.
They attributed the small particles to the low energy. The larger particles
of TiO2 in C o - T i alloys 16 and the breakup of needles formed at the reaction
front are consistent with a much higher interfacial energy between TiO2 and
Co than between TiO2 and Cu.
Another interesting morphology noted by Chen and Douglass ~9 is a
"fishbone," (see Fig. 6), of T I N formed during internal nitriding of Co-3Ti.
This structure seems to be intermediate to needles and dendrites and can be
best described as needles with small sidearms. Breakup of the fishbones
occurred also, particularly at higher temperatures, 1100~
I N T E R G R A N U L A R INTERNAL OXIDATION
Grain boundaries are sites for heterogeneous nucleation and act as
short-circuit or rapid diffusion paths. Thus, it is not surprising that
92 Douglass
c)
Fig. 7. Various types of internal-oxidationstructures, after Schenk.2~(a) oxygendiffusiononly
in grain boundaries, (b) oxygendiffusionthrough the alloy lattice, (c) oxygendiffusionmainly
by grain boundaries, (d) diffusion in both lattice and grain boundaries with lattice diffusion
predominating.
(a)
lO00X
(b)
500X
Fig. 8. Intragranular precipitates, grain-boundary precipitates,
and denuded zones adjacent to the boundaries.~5 (a) Nb 1Zr
oxidized 5 min at 1555~ 5 x 1 0 - 4 torr 02, (b) Nb-2.5Zr oxid-
ized 20rain at 1555~ 5 x 10-4 tort 02.
10{] um
Fig. 9. Combined grain-boundary and intragranular inter-
nal sulfidation (Schenck et al. types I and III). Fe-51.9 a/o
Cr sulfidized 72 ks, 1073 K, Ps2 = 10 Pa.
zone and matrix. Planar interfaces formed initially (10 min) at 600~ but
after 1 h internal bands formed, and the reaction front was very irregular
(Fig. 1la, b). Thickening of the bands followed the parabolic rate law with
an activation energy of 17 kcal/mol. This value is higher than that for oxygen
diffusion in pure silver (11.0 kcal/mol.), thus it appears that oxygen diffusion
in the alloy is slower than in pure silver. A significant observation was that
numerous nodules of pure silver formed on the surface (a phenomenon to
be discussed in a separate section) which is indicative of high stresses caused
by precipitation.
The existence of internal-oxide bands has been known for many years
and has been extensively noted in the literature, but there is no adequate
explanation that answers all questions regarding this behavior. Various pos-
sibilities have been discussed by Douglass, 7 who noted the limitations of
each proposed mechanism. The most viable mechanism relates to stress
generation as proposed by Meijering. 6'24'25 The mechanism is analogous to
the formation of healing layers in binary alloys at the base of the solvent-
metal oxide after steady-state conditions are achieved. Enhanced diffusion
to the surface occurs via dislocations generated by the internal-oxidation
A Critique of Internal Oxidation in Alloys 95
Ty_p~. a Ty.pe b
surface
9 o I 9 o e~ f e *a
~1~
l t
grain boundary grain boundary
Type c Ty.pe d
surface
1,
I
i
't l
ub- g rain
I
boundary
grain boundary
gram boundary
Fig. 10. Schematicstructures of four types of intergranular oxidationin dilute
Ni-AI alloys oxidizedin a Ni-NiO Rhines pack. (Shida et al) 2)
SURFACE N O D U L E S OF P U R E - S O L V E N T M E T A L
As noted in the previous section, nodules of pure solvent form on the
surface of certain alloys undergoing internal oxidation. Guruswamy et al. 26
investigated the nodule formation both with and without imposed strain,
e.g., simultaneous creep. Their interpretation is perhaps the most viable for
the nodule formation and will be considered subsequently.
96 Douglass
(a) 2 hr 500 ~
(d) 60 m• 800~
Fig. 11, Continued.
Guruswamy e t al. observed that the total nodule volume was equal to
the volume change caused by internal oxidation. Nodules formed over grain
boundaries in the grip region of creep samples for some alloys under certain
conditions, whereas grain boundaries in the gage section were devoid of
nodules. On the other hand, unstressed Ag-3.5In oxidized at 800~ showed
grain boundaries devoid of nodules and partially cracked. The same alloy
at 700~ and unstressed showed preferential nodule growth over grain boun-
daries. These examples are shown in Fig. 12.
Douglass e t al. 23 always found preferential nodule formation over grain
boundaries of Ag-3Mg and an increase of nodules with time, Fig. 13. Rubly
and Douglass 14 also found nodules of pure nickel on various Ni-Cr-A1
alloys that had been internally nitrided, although there did not appear to
be any difference in nodule formation over grain boundaries compared to
the grains. Nickel nodules in plan view and in cross section are shown in
Fig. 14.
Guruswamy and co-workers considered various models to explain nod-
ule formation. The Nabarro-Herring creep mechanism was assumed, but
calculated upper and lower bounds for rate constants for internal oxidation
based on diffusional flow were much lower than observed values. It was
further found that the large volume change caused by internal oxidation
could not be accounted for by vacancy flow. Thus, the region around each
particle forming at the reaction front must deform by slip rather than by
creep, and slip increases the dislocation density. Countercurrent silver/
vacancy flow must therefore occur by dislocation-pipe diffusion, this being
the only mechanism accounting for the large amount of silver transported
to the surface. The slight increase in the internal oxidation rate when samples
were subjected to creep is caused by enhanced generation of dislocations.
98 Douglass
(a)
(b)
NONSTOICHIOMETRIC PRECIPITATES
Certain very reactive solutes in much-more-noble solvents, i.e., A1 in
Ag and Mg in Ag, have been shown to form non-stoichiometric particles
which can be hypo- or hyper-stoichiometric. Darken 27 reported on studies
of Ag-A1 by T E M and low-angle X-ray scattering in which very small clus-
ters of A1 and oxygen formed. The clusters had O:A1 ratios greater than
1.5, the value corresponding to A1203. The variation of the O/A1 ratio with
A Critique of Internal Oxidation in Alloys 99
40000
Cq
E 30000
E
0
20000
Z
<
10000
0 100 200
t (rains.)
Fig. 13. Effect of oxidation time on the number density of silver nodules
formed on the surface during oxidation of Ag-3Mg at 580~ (Douglass
et al. 23 )
(a)
(b)
i;i
T R A P P I N G OF O X I D A N T
The transition from internal to external "oxidation" in Ni C~c alloys
requires a much higher chromium content when nitrogen is the oxidant
compared to oxygen. The approximate values, depending upon temperature
and pressure, are 30 to 40 at.% for CrN-film formation and about 15 at.%
A Critique of Internal Oxidation in Alloys lOl
TEMPERATURE, " F
600 800 I000 1200 1400 1600
5.0 - 1 - , , , ,
2.5
o
5
~: z.o t5
d
20
_AI~O 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
i.5
I I
500 ,| ,;o 8oo 9OO
OXIDATION TEMPERATURE, *C
Fig, 15. The O/AI ratio in A1-O clusters formed during internal oxida-
tion of Ag-AI alloys as a function of temperature (left scale) and the
cluster size (right scale). (Darken. 27)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
A~--A~ AI-A~ A~
o o o o o olololo
AI '" AI AI AI AI AI
0 0 0 0 0 Ol O l 0 I 0
AI AI AI
0 010 0
Fig. 16. Schematic arrangements of aluminum-oxygen clusters on a silver lattice. (Darken. 27)
0
kq
o_
rain
0.5
, Jl it
so'oo ~o'ooo ~5'boo 20000
t(s),
Temperature(~C)
900 800 700
10-1o , , ,
=.,,.-.,---~ Ni-20Cr.-5AI(int. Nitrd.)
~ Ni-20Cr (Int. Nitrd.)
~" Ni-10Cr
Eo ~ "~ "~ (Int. Nitrd,)
:z~ 10-~2
d Ni-5,,.,,I .. Ni-10C.r-SAI
z= (Int, ~ ' i t r d . ) ~ ~ , . . "~,lnnt' Nmtrd)
10<3 Ni-SAI/ ~,, ~".
9
(int. Oxide) / . ~~\ - , .-., . \ Nl-10Or
NoDo/ ~ " , . (Int. Nitrd,)
10-14
(Park & Alstetter)
I I I I I
8.0 9.0 10,0 11.0
1/-r x lO4 (l/K)
Fig. 18. Arrhenius plot of permeabilities, NNDN and
NoDo, determined from internal nitridation, internal
oxidation, and electrochemical measurements] 4
A Critique of Internal Oxidation in Alloys 103
are always greater for internal nitriding than for internal oxidation with the
exception of Ni-5A1 which, as noted, 9 forms A1203 rods perpendicular to
the surface, and thus rapid diffusion occurred along the alumina/matrix
interfaces. Nitrogen diffusivities in nickel are not known, but results calcula-
ted from measured permeabilities and available nitrogen solubilities 7 clearly
showed that nitrogen diffusivities were about 100 times faster than those of
oxygen. The calculated values were opposite to the expected values based
on size considerations and diffusivities of oxygen and nitrogen in other
metals. 2 The only logical explanation for the observed permeabilities and
calculated diffusivities is that oxygen is trapped at the dislocations or some
other sites and that a high binding energy exists between the oxygen atoms
and the trapping sites. Trapping of hydrogen in iron 32 and of oxygen in
dilute refractory-metal alloys have been reported. 33'34
It is apparent that both internal-oxidation rates and the critical~ values
for transition are markedly affected by subtleties in diffusion behavior,
neither one of which were considered by Wagner.
HIGH-SOLUBILITY-PRODUCT PRECIPITATES
The high end of the Laflamme-Morral criterion, Eq. (1) (Type-II
behavior), represents a very interesting and somewhat unique aspect of inter-
nal oxidation. Type-II behavior occurs in systems in which appreciable solu-
bility of oxygen exists as seen schematically in Fig. 19.* The variation of
solute concentration, oxidant concentration and mole fraction of precipitates
across the reaction zone as well as in the substrate was calculated by Christ et
al., 35 who used a finite-element analysis to analyze TiC precipitation during
internal carburization in Ni-Ti. Their results, replotted, are shown in Fig.
20. Several features are readily apparent that should be compared to Type-
I behavior, for which plots are given by Rapp, 3 Birks and Meier, 5 etc. First,
the solute mole fraction does not go to zero in the internal-reaction zone
but decreases from the reaction front to the surface. Second, the oxidant
activity does not go to zero at the reaction front but decreases monotonically
into the alloy beyond the reaction front. Third, the mole fraction of precipi-
tates varies across the zone, and further precipitation can occur even after
the front has passed by.
The distribution of precipitates was considered and analysed by Ohriner
and Morral. 36 Their calculated results are shown in Fig. 21 as a normalized
set of distribution curves for several values of a solubility parameter, a
(described on the figure). The value of unity for alpha is for Type-I behavior,
whereas alpha approaching zero is the other extreme for an initially saturated
alloy for which the precipitation fraction equals erfc(y). Values of alpha
between zero and one represent various degrees of Type-II behavior.
104 Douglass
~ X ,,-
BC 9 Moles of BC i
nmo x
Cs ~~~nc. ofsoluble
IC
I
I
I
. . . . J ~
0
X ~
(ol
Umif
/ o X~/~.OCrOSS subscole
*/.B ,,-
(b)
Fig. 19. Alloy system exhibiting Type-II behavior of internal oxida-
tion, based on the Laflamme Morral criterion. 8
0.08
0.06 ../(NB)'~
o~.
z
0.04
(o)~,~
~" 0.02 ~ 0 ) ~
0.0
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0
DistancefromSurface(mm)
Fig. 20. Calculated profiles for high-solubility-product
oxide formed during internal oxidation. (Christ
et aL 35 )
A Critique of Internal Oxidation in Alloys 105
1.0
.8
~
0 .6
.4
a,,)
.2
y = X
2~/D+N(~) ~,~'r(BO')n'IT~(BO~)B
0
o~ = m a x . v a l u e o f solute in precipitate
= 1 - Ksp/N~)- N(~)
Fig. 21. Normalized distribution curves of precipitates for various values of a
solubility parameter. (After Ohriner and Morral. 36)
70,
KINETIC THEORY , 1768"C 1555"C
./ /
lIE
10
TIME, SECONDS
~[ ~9 C6 0/ ~ ~ ~ A
A 200
E: I
"1-
I-
Lu
I1.
150-
13
I-.,
z
n~
0
u.
zo_ 100-
I-
0
IZ
ILl
50
DUAL OXIDANTS
There are many cases in which dual oxidants exist, such as air which
has been used over the years for oxidation studies. Generally, most metals
do not react with nitrogen, although there are some notable exceptions such
as Cr, Ti, Zr, Hf, and some Group-V metals. Reaction of a metal with CO
108 Douglass
NB
Internal-oxide ] Internal-sulfide (or carbide, etc.) I ~ - - NBo
"#r zone ~!~1 zone ~ /
= Nxs
unreacted
LL
G)
alloy
No s
t n
mixed gas/alloy
interface x--*
Fig. 24. Concentrationprofilesin an alloy for dual oxidants. (Meijering.6)
Nx is the mole fraction of second oxidant in the solvent. There are three
unknowns: A1, A2 and 89 ( ( D A ) -1/2 (hereafter called p). The quantity
89 -1/2 (hereafter called rn) is obtained from Eq. (11). Equations (12)
and (13) must give equal U~ at x - - q ; the difference in the concentration
gradient dU~/dx at both sides of x = q is determined by the amount of the
second oxidant liberated by reaction of oxygen with the second-oxidant
compound. The magnitude of dUx/dx at x = q determines the velocity of
the boundary between the alloy and the second-oxidant reaction zone. Thus,
pe pz erfp = me m2erf m + N~/NB n l zr1/2 (14)
A graph of xe x2 versus eft(x) can be used to solve for p. If No <<NB, N~ <<NB
and NoDo<<N~Dx, both m and p are small, and Eq. (14) becomes
(2 = (2t/NB)(NoDo/n2 + N~D~ In1 ) (15)
This relation states that the square of X penetration driven by oxygen is
increased by the square of the oxygen penetration.
CONCLUSIONS
A critical analysis of the field of internal oxidation during the period
after Wagner first formulated his theory on this subject has been made with
the main goal of analyzing the various observations and theories that are
seemingly contradictory to the idealized assumptions made by Wagner.
Specifically, the following items have been discussed: (a) the role of solute
concentration and its effect on reaction kinetics, (b) precipitate morphology,
110 Douglass
REFERENCES
1. C. Wagner, Z. Elektrochem. 63, 772 (1959).
2. Per Kofstad, High-Temperature Oxidation of Metals (Wiley, New York, 1966).
3. R. A. Rapp, Corrosion 21, 382 (1965).
4. J. H. Swisher, in Oxidation of Metals and Alloys, D. L. Douglass (ed.) (ASM, Metals Park,
Ohio, 1971), Chapter 12.
5. N. Birks and (3. H. Meier, Introduction to High-Temperature Oxidation o f Metals (Edward
Arnold, London, 1983).
6. J. L. Meijering, Advances in Materials Science, Herbert Herman (ed.) (Wiley, New York,
1971), p. 1.
7. D. L. Douglass, J. Met. Nov., 74 (1991).
8. G. R. Laflamme and J. E. Morral, Acta Met. 26, 1791 (1978).
9. F. H. Stott, G. C. Wood, D. P. Whittle, B. D. Bastow, Y. Shida, and A. Martinez-Villafane,
Solid State Ionics 12, 365 (1984).
10. G. B6hm and M. Kahlweit, Acta Met. 12, 641 (1964).
11. P. Bolasitis and M. Kahlweit, Acta Met. 15, 765 (1967).
12. J. (3. Keller, Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA, 1994.
13. D. L. Corn, D. L. Douglass, and C. A. Smith, Oxid. Met. 35, 139 (1991).
14. R. P. Rubly and D. L. Douglass, High-Temperature Corrosion of Advanced Materials and
Protective Coatings, Y. Saito, B. Onay and T. Maruyama (eds.) (Elsevier, Amsterdam,
1992), p. 133.
15. D. L. Douglass, D. L. Corn, and F. Rizzo, J. Phys. IV, Coll. C9 suppl. J. Phys. III 3, 75
(1993).
16. J. Megusar and G. H. Meier, Met. Trans. A 7A, 1133 (1976).
17. Morris E. Fine, Phase Transformations in Condensed Systems (Macmillan, New York,
1964).
18. S. Wood, D. Adamonis, A. Guha, W. A. Sofia, and G. H. Meier, Met. Trans. A 6A, 1793
(1975).
19. L Chen and D. L. Douglass, Oxid. Met. 38, 189 (1992).
20. H. Schenck, E. Schmidtman, and H. Mfiller, Arch. Eisenhuttenw. 31, 121 (1960).
21. T. Narita, W. W. Smeltzer, and K. Nishida, Oxid. Met. 17, 299 (1982).
22. Y. Shida, F. H. Stott, B. D. Bastow, D. P. Whittle, and G. C. Wood, Oxid. Met. 18, 93
(1982).
23. D. L. Douglass, Baizhao Zhu, and F. Gesmundo, Oxid. Met. 38, 365 (1992).
24. J. L. Meijering, Strength of Solids, Bristol Conference Report (Physical Society, London,
1947), p. 140.
25. J. L. Meijering, Pittsburgh International Conference Surface Reaction (Corrosion, Pitts-
burgh, 1948), p. 101.
26. S. Guruswamy, S. M. Park, J. P. Hirth, and R. A. Rapp, Oxid. Met. 26, 77 (1986).
27. L. S. Darken, Trans. A S M 54, 600 (1961).
28, L. Charrin, A. Combe, and G. Moya, J. Therm. Anal. 14, 89 (1978).
29. A. Combe and J. Cabane, Oxid. Met. 21, 21 (1984).
30. L. Charrin, A. Combe, and J. Cabane, Oxid. Met. 37, 65 (1992).
31. Jong-Wan Park and Carl J. Alstetter, Met. Trans. A 18A, 43 (1987).
32. H. H. Johnson, Met. Trans. A. 19A, 2371 (1988).
A Critique of Internal Oxidation in Alloys 111