Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Analysis. SIP Annex 4

    Uploaded by

    Jen Resurreccion
    5 views1 page
    This table analyzes priority areas for improving a school's performance. It shows that increasing performance in numeracy (Math) and literacy (English), and increasing parental involvement, were the highest priorities with an average of 4.75. Strengthening identification of learning disabilities and at-risk students, and achieving zero dropout rates, were also high priorities with averages of 4.25 and 3.75 respectively. Providing psychosocial training for faculty and students had a moderate priority average of 3.25 and was the lowest ranked improvement area.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This table analyzes priority areas for improving a school's performance. It shows that increasing performance in numeracy (Math) and literacy (English), and increasing parental involvement, were the highest priorities with an average of 4.75. Strengthening identification of learning disabilities and at-risk students, and achieving zero dropout rates, were also high priorities with averages of 4.25 and 3.75 respectively. Providing psychosocial training for faculty and students had a moderate priority average of 3.25 and was the lowest ranked improvement area.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views1 page

    Analysis. SIP Annex 4

    Uploaded by

    Jen Resurreccion
    This table analyzes priority areas for improving a school's performance. It shows that increasing performance in numeracy (Math) and literacy (English), and increasing parental involvement, were the highest priorities with an average of 4.75. Strengthening identification of learning disabilities and at-risk students, and achieving zero dropout rates, were also high priorities with averages of 4.25 and 3.75 respectively. Providing psychosocial training for faculty and students had a moderate priority average of 3.25 and was the lowest ranked improvement area.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Analysis/Interpretation

    This table shows the results of the identified priority improvement areas which need utmost
    attention on the total performance of the school. It can be gleaned from the data that the areas of
    increasing the performance in numeracy (Math) and literacy (English) and low parents’ involvement in
    school’s programs and activities got the highest average of 4.75 which consider very high priority.
    Intensifying child mapping and strengthen monitoring to identified learning with disabilities/learners at
    risk got an average of 4.25 which considers as high priority while zero dropped – out rates got an
    average of 3.75 and considered also as high priority. Lastly, trainings for psychosocial for school faculty
    and learners got an average of 3.25 and interpreted as moderate priority and ranked last among all the
    improvement areas.

    You might also like