Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ID No: GSR/4388/14
2022
Geophysical investigations employing observations of the earth's magnetic field have much
in common with those employing observations of the earth's gravitational field. Thus, you
will find that your previous exposure to, and the intuitive understanding you developed from
using, gravity will greatly assist you in understanding the use of magnetics. In particular,
some of the most striking similarities between the two methods include:
Geophysical exploration techniques that employ both gravity and magnetics are
passive. By this, we simply mean that when using these two methods we measure a naturally
occurring field of the earth: either the earths gravitational or magnetic fields. Collectively,
the gravity and magnetics methods are often referred to as potential methods, and the
gravitational and magnetic fields that we measure are referred to as potential fields*.
magnetic and gravitational forces. For example, the fundamental element used to define
the gravitational force is the point mass. An equivalent representation is used to define the
force derived from the fundamental magnetic element. Instead of being called a point mass,
representations for the point mass and the magnetic monopole are identical.
The acquisition, reduction, and interpretation of gravity and magnetic observations are
1
2. The magnetic field can be broken into three separate components. List and
explain them.
Magnetic field components can be obtained by calculating the projection of the magnetic field
H(r,θ,z)along the three defined axes ur, uθ and uz. We obtain the magnetic components Hr(r, θ,
z), Hθ(r, θ, z) and Hz(r, θ, z). It is noted that the azimuthal component Hθ(r, θ, z) is fully
analytical whereas the radial and axial components use elliptic integrals.
Fig: Representation of the geometry considered. The tile inner radius is r1; the tile outer radius is
2
Where:
With:
And the special functions E∗, F∗ and Π∗ are the elliptic functions
With:
3
3. Explain the advantages of Aeromagnetic survey.
carried out with a hand-held magnetometer, but allows much larger areas of the earth’s
An aeromagnetic surveys, in conjunction with other geophysical methods, are used to help in
The surveying is developed in 1930’s after the development of flux gate magnetometers.
It requirements:
3. Magnetic effects of the air craft (generated in the engine & other moving part must be
avoided.
4. Flight altitude
4
5. Flight pattern
Their spacing depends on the coast and scale of the survey (detail or regional surveys).
1. Large area coverage in a relatively short time; rapid coverage of a large area, if the area is
large and ground access difficult, less affected by ferrous objects, anomalies are smaller and less
sharp.
By the use of the aeromagnetic survey the data can be interpreting and analyzing in the short
period of time for the given huge area, which is important to minimize the cost of the
professional works.
The method is allows much larger areas of the earth’s surface to be covered quickly for
regional reconnaissance.
The air craft typically flies in a grid like pattern with height and line spacing determining the
resolution of the data (and cost of the survey per unit area).
2. For extensive areas, the field cost compared to ground magnetic surveys is less (cheap):
The aeromagnetic survey is less costly than the other geophysical methods such as gravity
5
This method has its own role for the decrement of the level of costs relative to the ground
magnetic surveys, so that costs are lower than those of any geophysical land survey for a
large area.
3. Survey over inaccessible areas like dense forests, swamps, etc can be carried out
These survey make it possible to effectively cover large areas that may be inaccessible or
even dangerous without requiring any line cutting, there by dramatically reducing overhead
so that costs are lower than those of any geophysical land survey for a large area.
How ever, the resolution they provide is lower than that of terrestrial geophysical survey.
4. Near surface artificial features like buildings, pipes don’t produce anomalies (noises) in
the records
In this case, there is no the gravity difference between the geological formation materials
around the features and the magnetic susceptibility between the materials are also not
observed.
There is no the formation of the positive and the negative charged poles between the
The density difference between the artificial features are form the gravity anomalies.
6
within the magnetic material and oriented parallel to the direction of the inducing
field.
The strength of the magnetic field induced from the magnetic material by the
inducing field is called the Intensity of Magnetization (I).
The intensity of magnetization is related to the strength of the inducing magnetic field
through a constant of proportionality known as the Magnetic Susceptibility.
The intensity of magnetization (I) is related to the strength of the inducing magnetic
field (H) through a constant of proportionality (k) known as the Magnetic Susceptibility.
I = KH
Where (H) can be changed by Varying the coil current (i ) Values of I corresponding to Small changes in
H are plotted along a straight line.
7
The magnetic susceptibility (K) of the substance indicates the materials capacity to
acquire magnetism.
The nature of magnetization material is in general complex, governed by atomic properties, and
well beyond the scope of this series of notes. Suffice it to say, there are three types of magnetic
materials: paramagnetic, diamagnetic, and ferromagnetic.
8
their outer electron shells, this is the only form of magnetism observed. The susceptibilities
of diamagnetic materials are relatively small and negative. Quartz and salt are two common
diamagnetic earth materials.
Paramagnetism - This is a form of magnetism associated with elements that have an odd
number of electrons in their outer electron shells. Paramagnetism is associated with the
alignment of electron spin directions in the presence of an external magnetic field. It can
only be observed at relatively low temperatures. The temperature above which
paramagnetism is no longer observed is called the Curie Temperature. The susceptibilities
of paramagnetic substances are small and positive.
Pure Ferromagnetism - The directions of electron spin alignment within each domain are
almost all parallel to the direction of the external inducing field. Pure ferromagnetic
substances have large positive susceptibilities. Ferromagnetic minerals do not exist, but iron,
cobalt, and nickel are examples of common ferromagnetic elements.
9
susceptibilities of antiferromagnetic materials are almost zero. Hematite is an
antiferromagnetic material.
10
5. List the five basic magnetic interpretation approaches.
Data interpretation
1. Magnetisation
Large anomalies tend not to reflect major lateral changes in structure, as they do in gravity,
rather lateral changes in rock susceptibility.
The basement ridge is important for assessing the oil potential of the sedimentary basement,
but the change in susceptibility is of no consequence.
2. Ambiguity
The ambiguity problem is the same for magnetic surveying as it is for gravity.
There is ambiguity between size and distance. In the case of magnetic the problem is much
worse, as there are many other ambiguities, e.g., between the direction of the body
magnetization and the dip of the Earth’s field.
Approaches to interpretation
There are five basic approaches:
1. Qualitative
2. Parametric
11
3. Forward modelling
4. Inverse methods
5. Data enhancement
1. Qualitative interpretation
physical topography.
Magnetic topography reflects the lithology, not the dimensions of bodies, Because there are
positive and negative poles, and also because the magnetic field is a vector field, there are
positive and negative parts of magnetic anomalies.
2. Parametric interpretation
The method is based on defining the anomaly value at the origin and the characteristic points
and their corresponding distances on the anomaly profile.
In both cases, the method parameters obtained by the present method particularly the shape
and depth of the buried structures.
3. Forward modelling
Is the methods that used to predict what would observe and use a comparison of those
predictions to the magnetic data to infer the model parameters.
4. Inverse methods
Is the method where it use the features of the magnetic data to estimate a set of underlying
the parameters of the physical model of what is going on.
5. Data enhancement
12
13