Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PUBLICSCHOOLCONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
200W.BALTIMORE STREET
BALTIMORE, MARYLAND21201
410-767-4378
ROBERTA.GORRELL
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
T H E O R IG IN A L R E S P O N S E T O T H IS L E T T E R S H O U L D B E S E N T T O
F R E D M A S O N, P R O G R A M M A N A G E R - P U B L IC S C H O O L S C O N S T R U C T IO N P R O G R A M,
D E P A R T M EN T O F G E N E R A L S ER V IC E S, 3 0 1 W. P R ES T O N S T., ROOM 1405, B A L T IM O R E, M D 2 1 2 01,
E-Mail:Mahmood.Yahyai@maryland.govandcopyAngela.Allen@maryland.gov )
C O P IE S T O O T H E R P S C P S T A F F A R E N O T R E Q U IR E D.
Ms. Lisa Seaman-Crawford Crofton Area High School
November 28, 2017 New School
Page 2
Sincerely,
DGSTECHNICALREVIEWCOMMENTS (SchoolConstruction)
Crofton Area High School –
PROJECT TITLE PSC PROJECT # 02.135.18LP
New School
LEA NAME Anne Arundel LEA CONTACT Ms. Lisa Seaman-Crawford
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER GWWO Inc. /Architects TECHNICAL DISCIPLINE General andIneligible Items
SUBMITTAL PHASE CDs REVIEW DATE 11/28/17
Stated as: ‘Prevailing Wage Rates shall beapplicable tothisproject,’ while the
Prevailing Wage Rates Section forArnold ESReplacement School were included inthe
Gi4
Wage Rates: Specifications instead. Please ensure thatthecorrect Wage Rates Section forthis
project areincluded inthedocuments prior tobidding.
Response:
Buy American
Gi5 Included intheSpecifications. Noresponse required.
Steel Act:
Response:
November 28, 2017 Page 4
DGSTECHNICALREVIEWCOMMENTS (SchoolConstruction)
Crofton Area High School –
PROJECT TITLE PSC PROJECT # 02.135.18LP
New School
LEA NAME Anne Arundel LEA CONTACT Ms. Lisa Seaman-Crawford
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER GWWO Inc. /Architects TECHNICAL DISCIPLINE General andIneligible Items
SUBMITTAL PHASE CDs REVIEW DATE 11/28/17
Civil Drawings
Any work performed outside the property line including paving, pavement
removal, treeplanting, etc. (butnotincluding extension ofpublic water and
sewage lines orother utilities, oranyother off-sitedevelopment costs relating
topublic utilities required bylocal, State and/orFederal agencies asper Rules
6.r.and7.l.oftheRules, Regulations andProcedures forthe Administration of
theSchool Construction Program). Identify allineligible items inresponse.
Specifications
012300 Alternates – (Those identified as100% Locally funded, only)
Ineligible Items: Gi6
015000 Temporary Facilities andControls
2.1.1 Field Offices
2.1.2 Sheds
102123 Cubicles
2.3 Curtains
105100 Lockers
2.3 Metal Lockers
113100 Appliances
2.1B Refrigerator
2.1C Range, Electric
2.1D Wall Oven
2.1E Dish Washer
2.1F IceMaker
2.2A Clothes Washer
2.2B Clothes Dryer
Culinary Kitchen
Item #1 Dunnage Rack
Item #2 Shelving
Item #6 Reach-inRefrigerator, Mobile
Item #7 Reach-inFreezer, Mobile
Item #9 Work Table
Item #10 Range/Oven, Mobile
Item #12 IceMachine/Bin
Item #13 Convection Oven, Mobile
Item #14 Utility Stand, Mobile
Item #15 Griddle, Mobile
Item #17 PanRack Cart, Mobile
Item #19 Utility Cart, Mobile
Item #20 Mixer, 5-Quart
Item #22 Demonstration Table, Mobile
Item #29 Pot & PanShelving, Mobile
Item #32 Washer/Dryer Stacked
Item #33 Shelving
Item #34 Security Shelving, Mobile
Drawings
Allmovable furniture including student desks andchairs, worktables, counter
tables, computer stations, conference tables; aswellasthose located inthe
Library, Cafeteria, Kitchen, andCulinary Kitchen wherever indicated.
Response:
Library Reading Room (B371) islisted at137 occupants. 146seats shown inthis
CS.7 A3 room onthefurniture plan. Thetotal occupants load forthisspace should notbe
based onatabular area, butrather onanactual occupancy.
November 28, 2017 Page 9
DGSTECHNICALREVIEWCOMMENTS (SchoolConstruction)
Crofton Area High School –
PROJECT TITLE PSC PROJECT # 02.135.18LP
New School
LEA NAME Anne Arundel LEA CONTACT Ms. Lisa Seaman-Crawford
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER GWWO Inc. /Architects TECHNICAL DISCIPLINE Architectural
SUBMITTAL PHASE CD REVIEW DATE 8/18/17
The Main Lobby appears toprovide seating foralarge number ofpeople. Please
CS.7 A4
provide anoccupant load forthis area.
Response:
Corridor 039A only allows for emergency egress inone direction. This results ina
CS.7 A5
long dead endcorridor. Please verify andmodify asneeded.
Response:
Detail 9shows athrough wall scupper. Some form ofsolid blocking needs tobe
AC.4 A6 provided between the ext. gypsum sheathing andtheback side oftheinsulated metal
panels where penetration occurs.
Response:
Site Sign no.2” (Detail 6/AS.2)should include information about thefont, size and
AS.2 A8
depth oftheletters.
Response:
One urinal ineach men’srooms must bemounted at17” max tomeet ADA. (typical
SB.1.4 A10 throughout theproject)
Response:
Detail 8/A5.7 shows 2'wide surface mounted at2'10" AFF. Notsure what theextent
A5.1 A11
ofthis isinplan.
Response:
A5.1 A12 Stair section (10/A5.1)needs toshow andcallfor aguardrail orother barrier tomeet
November 28, 2017 Page 10
DGSTECHNICALREVIEWCOMMENTS (SchoolConstruction)
Crofton Area High School –
PROJECT TITLE PSC PROJECT # 02.135.18LP
New School
LEA NAME Anne Arundel LEA CONTACT Ms. Lisa Seaman-Crawford
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER GWWO Inc. /Architects TECHNICAL DISCIPLINE Architectural
SUBMITTAL PHASE CD REVIEW DATE 8/18/17
6’-9” dimension infront ofDoor EX10 (Stair 3)appears tight. Consider moving the
A5.2 A13 CMU wall asfarasispossible while allowing for 80” headroom under thestair to
meet ADA.
Response:
5’-10” dimension infront ofDoor EX13 (Stair 4)appears tight. Consider moving the
A5.3 A14 CMU wall asfarasispossible while allowing for80” headroom under thestair to
meet ADA.
Response:
The 6’-0” wide flight ofstairs from the3rdfloortotheroof level appears tobemuch
A5.4 A16
wider then isneeded. Could bereduced to3’-0”.
Response:
6’-3” dimension infront ofDoor EX16 (Stair 6)appears tight. Consider moving the
A5.5 A17 CMU wall asfarasispossible while allowing for 80” headroom under thestair to
meet ADA.
Response:
Detail 7/6.15 –There isnoanchoring system shown toattach thelower section ofthe
curtain wall totheconcrete wall itisinfront of?Noinsulation isshown. How isthe
A6.15 A23 continuous insulation barrier maintained inthis area?The bottom ofthecurtain wall
isnoted tobe6” minabove finished grade. Consider the useofinsulated metal panels
instead ofglass inareas thisclose totheground.
Response:
Detail 16/A6.15 –Having apiece ofexposed structural steel partially inside and
A6.15 A25 outside ofthe insulated building envelope isbadpractice. Thebottom flange will
provide roosting andanesting area forbirds
Response:
Detail 2/A6.18 –Need toprovide: through wall flashing below windows inmasonry
walls; some means tocontain sprayed insulation atedge ofwindow; closer between
A6.18 A26
window frame and CMU sill; and positive drainage atexterior brick sill. Why notuse
shaped brick silllikeinDetail 4/A6.18?
Response:
A6.18 A27 Detail 7/A6.18 –Detail atdoor threshold onto the roof ismissing.
November 28, 2017 Page 12
DGSTECHNICALREVIEWCOMMENTS (SchoolConstruction)
Crofton Area High School –
PROJECT TITLE PSC PROJECT # 02.135.18LP
New School
LEA NAME Anne Arundel LEA CONTACT Ms. Lisa Seaman-Crawford
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER GWWO Inc. /Architects TECHNICAL DISCIPLINE Architectural
SUBMITTAL PHASE CD REVIEW DATE 8/18/17
Detail 4/7.13 –The mirror above thefirst sink inthese restrooms may allow
A7.13 A32
undesirable viewing into these areas.
Response:
Detail 25/A7.16 –Verify that allsingle (non-paired) water fountains meet ADA
A7.16 A35
Section 211.
Response:
A7.19 A37 Verify that allsingle (non-paired) water fountains meet ADA Section 211.
Response:
Int. Elevations (19/A7.51 & 21/7.5.1)donotinclude wall mounted bars often found
A7.51 A39 inDance Studios. Verify thatnone arerequired.
Response:
Details 8/A7.63, 9/A7.63 & 15/A7.63 –Itseems there isnot enough information
A7.63 A40
provided tobeable toconstruct from thisdrawing.
Response:
Details H21, H22 & H41 –The thermal barrier around thewindow openings isnot
A8.8 A41
continuous. Typical ofallwindows atwalls with metal panels.
Response:
Detail S11 – Nothrough wall flashing isshown below thesill. Airspace inwall
A8.8 A42
cavity appears tobelessthan isminimally recommended.
Response:
Details S21 & S41 – Itappears that asingle bead ofsealant isbeing relied ontokeep
A8.8 A43
water outofthewall cavity. Noflashing orsillpanisshown.
Response:
A8.8 A44 Detail S41 – Nothrough wall flashing isshown below thesill.
Response:
November 28, 2017 Page 14
DGSTECHNICALREVIEWCOMMENTS (SchoolConstruction)
Crofton Area High School –
PROJECT TITLE PSC PROJECT # 02.135.18LP
New School
LEA NAME Anne Arundel LEA CONTACT Ms. Lisa Seaman-Crawford
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER GWWO Inc. /Architects TECHNICAL DISCIPLINE LEED
SUBMITTAL PHASE CD REVIEW DATE 8/18/17
CS.4 L2 Only minimum code compliant Rvalues arenoted forroof andwall construction.
Response:
DGSTECHNICALREVIEWCOMMENTS (SchoolConstruction)
Crofton Area High School –
PROJECT TITLE PSC PROJECT # 02.135.18LP
New School
LEA NAME Anne Arundel LEA CONTACT Ms. Lisa Seaman-Crawford
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER GWWO Inc. /Architects TECHNICAL DISCIPLINE Structural
SUBMITTAL PHASE CD REVIEW DATE 8/18/2017
S1.13 S3 Recommend adjusting beam label locations where lines intersect forclarity
Response:
November 28, 2017 Page 15
DGSTECHNICALREVIEWCOMMENTS (SchoolConstruction)
Crofton Area High School –
PROJECT TITLE PSC PROJECT # 02.135.18LP
New School
LEA NAME Anne Arundel LEA CONTACT Ms. Lisa Seaman-Crawford
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER GWWO Inc. /Architects TECHNICAL DISCIPLINE Structural
SUBMITTAL PHASE CD REVIEW DATE 8/18/2017
DGSTECHNICALREVIEWCOMMENTS (SchoolConstruction)
Crofton Area High School –
PROJECT TITLE PSC PROJECT # 02.135.18LP
New School
LEA NAME Anne Arundel LEA CONTACT Ms. Lisa Seaman-Crawford
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER GWWO Inc. /Architects TECHNICAL DISCIPLINE Mechanical
SUBMITTAL PHASE CD REVIEW DATE 8/18/17
FCU-A12 displayed having 3x500cfm supply grilles, while theschedule lists FCU
M1.1b M2 A12 asa1100 cfmunit. Verify thatflow ratesarecoordinated between drawings and
schedules.
Response:
FCU-A15 shows grilles supplying 1600 cfmtothespace, butFCU Schedule shows the
M1.1b M3
unit supplying 1100 cfm.
Response:
Risers between floors notalways displayed with firedampers. Verify that firedampers
M1.1b M4
areincluded between allnecessary fire-partitioned areas.
Response:
FCU-B14 shown supplying 1180 cfmtoKeyboard Lab, butonly returning 900 cfm.
M1.5b M8 The schedule shows FCU-B14 supplying 1100 cfm. Recommend coordinating
flowrates forFCUs.
Response:
Consider adding wait times for bringing onboilers toprevent short cycling of
M7.4 M10
equipment.
Response:
Notes onpage are doubled, which makes them difficult toread. Recommend cleaning
MP1.11 M12
upnotes.
Response:
Specification
M14 Recommend adding acceptance criteria tomechanical commissioning specification.
230800
Response:
DGSTECHNICALREVIEWCOMMENTS (SchoolConstruction)
Crofton Area High School –
PROJECT TITLE PSC PROJECT # 02.135.18LP
New School
LEA NAME Anne Arundel LEA CONTACT Ms. Lisa Seaman-Crawford
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER GWWO Inc. /Architects TECHNICAL DISCIPLINE Plumbing
SUBMITTAL PHASE CD REVIEW DATE 8/18/17
P3.1 P4 Clarify whether Detail 5P3.1 isalsoused for overflow roofdrains (ORD).
Response:
DGSTECHNICALREVIEWCOMMENTS (SchoolConstruction)
Crofton Area High School
PROJECT TITLE PSC PROJECT # 02.135.18LP
New School
LEA NAME Anne Arundel LEA CONTACT Ms. Lisa Seaman-Crawford
Electrical; FireAlarm; Technology
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER GWWO Inc. /Architects TECHNICAL DISCIPLINE
Engineering
SUBMITTAL PHASE CD REVIEW DATE 8/18/2017
E1.5 E4 Please verify ifKey Plan iscorrect. Itdoes notresemble thefloor plan.
November 28, 2017 Page 19
DGSTECHNICALREVIEWCOMMENTS (SchoolConstruction)
Crofton Area High School
PROJECT TITLE PSC PROJECT # 02.135.18LP
New School
LEA NAME Anne Arundel LEA CONTACT Ms. Lisa Seaman-Crawford
Electrical; FireAlarm; Technology
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER GWWO Inc. /Architects TECHNICAL DISCIPLINE
Engineering
SUBMITTAL PHASE CD REVIEW DATE 8/18/2017
E1.14 E7 Please start General Note with Note A.Delete letters A &Bfrom theKey Plan area.
Response:
E1.15 E8 Lighting Control Panel LRC-3E: Consider specifying # ofwires ineach conduit.
Response:
The floor plan does notmatch hatch area oftheKey Plan. The Key Plan shows a
E2.2 E10
corridor tothemain building andishatched. Please clarify andcorrect.
Response:
Specify how wires areruntothetwist lock receptacle locations inGym Room B302.
E2.11 E13
Overhead inconduit?
Response:
November 28, 2017 Page 20
DGSTECHNICALREVIEWCOMMENTS (SchoolConstruction)
Crofton Area High School
PROJECT TITLE PSC PROJECT # 02.135.18LP
New School
LEA NAME Anne Arundel LEA CONTACT Ms. Lisa Seaman-Crawford
Electrical; FireAlarm; Technology
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER GWWO Inc. /Architects TECHNICAL DISCIPLINE
Engineering
SUBMITTAL PHASE CD REVIEW DATE 8/18/2017
Detail 1 –Provide details toshow how electrical duct bank run uptothegenerator
andthetransformers from theground including twist andturns toensure conforming
E2.14 E15 totheCODEs -Ifthegenerator andBGE transformers areplaced onthethird floor -
Area F-Chiller Enclosure. Otherwise, correct thetitleonDetail 1.TheChiller
Enclosure appears tobeatground level.
Response:
E2.14 –E2.19 E16 Provide aKey Plan showing location ofwork areas
Response;
Make note toclarify that conduit run DPFH-2istobebelow slaband turn upinside
E2.19 E18
thebuildings inconduit stub-ups.
Response:
E7.8 E21 Panel S2K2 needs tobe400A panel; not225A. Please correct.
Response:
E7.8 E22 Switchboards SB2B andSB2C aremarginal insize. Recommend increasing SB2B to
November 28, 2017 Page 21
DGSTECHNICALREVIEWCOMMENTS (SchoolConstruction)
Crofton Area High School
PROJECT TITLE PSC PROJECT # 02.135.18LP
New School
LEA NAME Anne Arundel LEA CONTACT Ms. Lisa Seaman-Crawford
Electrical; FireAlarm; Technology
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER GWWO Inc. /Architects TECHNICAL DISCIPLINE
Engineering
SUBMITTAL PHASE CD REVIEW DATE 8/18/2017
The floor plan does not match hatch area ofKey Plan. The Key Plan shows a
T1.2 E24
corridor tothemain building and ishatched. Please clarify.
Response:
The floor plan does notmatch hatch area oftheKey Plan. The Key Plan shows a
TY1.1,TY1.2 E26
corridor tothemain building andishatched. Please clarify.
Response:
AV2.21-AV2.23,
E27 AVequipment, circuits andnotes should beshown indarker linetype.
AV3.01
Response:
The floor plan does not match thehatch area inKey Plan. The Key Plan shows a
FA1.1,FA1.2 E28
corridor tothemain building andishatched. Please clarify.
Response:
Specification
E30 The page number isnotreadable. Please correct.
260500
Response:
Load Flow
E31 Excessive voltage dropoccurred atPanel PR1. Please verify.
Calculation
November 28, 2017 Page 22
DGSTECHNICALREVIEWCOMMENTS (SchoolConstruction)
Crofton Area High School
PROJECT TITLE PSC PROJECT # 02.135.18LP
New School
LEA NAME Anne Arundel LEA CONTACTMs. Lisa Seaman-Crawford
Electrical; FireAlarm; Technology
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER GWWO Inc. /Architects TECHNICAL DISCIPLINE
Engineering
SUBMITTAL PHASE CD REVIEW DATE 8/18/2017
DGSTECHNICALREVIEWCOMMENTS (SchoolConstruction)
Crofton Area High School –
PROJECT TITLE PSC PROJECT # 02.135.18LP
New School
LEA NAME Anne Arundel LEA CONTACT Ms. Lisa Seaman-Crawford
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER GWWO Inc. /Architects TECHNICAL DISCIPLINE FireProtection
SUBMITTAL PHASE CD REVIEW DATE 8/18/2017
DGSTECHNICALREVIEWCOMMENTS (SchoolConstruction)
Crofton Area High School –
PROJECT TITLE PSC PROJECT # 02.135.18LP
New School
LEA NAME Anne Arundel LEA CONTACT Ms. Lisa Seaman-Crawford
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER GWWO Inc. /Architects TECHNICAL DISCIPLINE Food Services
SUBMITTAL PHASE CD REVIEW DATE 08/18/2017
Clarify thethree blank rectangular shapes, even ifthey arealready labeled onanother
CK102 CK2 page.
Response:
Suggest labeling theLED light atthe bottom ofthe document tomatch the others that
CK502 CK6
arelabeled.
Response:
CK502,
CK7 Although dimensions arespecified, recommend adding alabel aswell.
CK505
Response:
DGSTECHNICALREVIEWCOMMENTS (SchoolConstruction)
Crofton Area High School –
PROJECT TITLE PSC PROJECT # 02.135.18LP
New School
LEA NAME Anne Arundel LEA CONTACT Ms. Lisa Seaman-Crawford
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER GWWO Inc. /Architects TECHNICAL DISCIPLINE Food Services
SUBMITTAL PHASE CD REVIEW DATE 8/18/17
The Riprap Outlet Sediment Table isprovided onthissheet forTrap 2;however, itis
C9.2 –Erosion
notprovided forTraps 3 &4.Please consider adding anote thatindicates these tables
andControl C5
canbefound onDrawing C9.29. This noteshould beadded toallErosion and
Plan Phase A-1
Control Plans where Traps areshown.
Response:
C3.4 –Site Please verify polyurethane track products asproduced byPlexipave California
Details C6 Products isincluded intheSpecifications.
Response:
C3.4 –Site
C7 Please verify details forfootball goal foundations areprovided.
Details
November 28, 2017 Page 25
DGSTECHNICALREVIEWCOMMENTS (SchoolConstruction)
Crofton Area High School –
PROJECT TITLE PSC PROJECT # 02.135.18LP
New School
LEA NAME Anne Arundel LEA CONTACT Ms. Lisa Seaman-Crawford
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER GWWO Inc. /Architects TECHNICAL DISCIPLINE Food Services
SUBMITTAL PHASE CD REVIEW DATE 8/18/17
C3.4 –Site Note 7ofTrack Detail 1|3.4 notes work byothers. Recommend clarifying thescope
C8
Details ofother owner contractor toavoid inappropriate bidexclusions.
Response:
The Specimen Tree Table intheStatus column indicates several trees as “Protect,”
L2.12 –FCP
L3 however theplans donotshow anyprotection around them orwhat type ofprotection
Tree List
isrequired. Please consider revising toindicate thetype ofprotection required.
Response:
L2.13 –FCP
Please consider referencing these details ontheplans andinthelegends where
Construction L4 appropriate. Forinstance, which trees getpruning andwhich need trunk protection.
Details
Response:
L3.1 – The Key intheupper lefthand corner indicates where Detail Aislocated. Please
Materials Plan- L5 consider putting asquare around thearea inquestion similar tothekeys onDrawings
Playground L3.2 &L3.3.
Response:
L1128171.cdc