Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gender discrimination is prevalent even before a child is born into this world. Sex
selective abortion is still practiced in many parts of India where the gender of the foetus is
determined through Pre Natal Sex determination techniques. If the child is found to be a girl,
pregnancy is terminated through abortion. Pre Natal Sex Determinations has been banned by
the Government of India through the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques
(PCPNDT) Act, 1994. In spite of the strict regulations in force, sex determination continues
to be a widely practiced form of gender based discrimination even prior to birth and is the
major cause of declining sex ratio. Another form of gender discrimination prior to birth is
preference towards a male child. Son preference exists in all communities. The birth of a son
is warmly welcomed; among various social reasons one being the son is seen as a future
financial prospect, and the girl being seen as a future financial liability. It has been widely
noticed in many cases that if the parents have their first child as a son, they are reluctant to
have future kids, cause of the fear of a girl child. And in some cases, if the first child is a girl,
the fear for a second girl child still boggles them and they are reluctant to have future kids.
This antipathy for a girl child has been the prime reason that pre-natal sex determination
continues to be practiced on a large scale. Sex selective abortion has had very serious
implications for the child sex ratio in the Indian society. Female infanticide and abandonment
of female children are other common practices of prior birth gender discrimination that were
widely prevalent in our society until some recent past.
India is still largely a rural society where parents are reluctant to provide quality
education to girls. It is a widespread belief that girls should learn and skill themselves with
domestic activities which would enable them to serve and live a secure life with their future
husband and his family. This precedence over formal education has been the major reason
for low levels of awareness among women and a major cause for complete disempowerment
of one specific gender. In addition, schools are not sufficiently equipped with facilities
specifically required for the girl students. The parents generally do not want to send their
daughters to distant places for education. The prevalence of such mindset in the society
leading to selective bias towards a girl child has resulted in very low literacy levels especially
among the females; contributing to low literacy ranking of India and specifically low female
literacy levels. The government does conduct programmes to increase awareness and promote
education of a girl child, but lacks greatly in execution. Low literacy among women translates
into some direct disadvantage for their young children as well. Lack of education also
influences their utilization of health care facilities for themselves as well as their children.
And high level of poverty adds to the problem further limiting access to health care and
education and social benefits. All these factors collectively result in high infant and child
mortality rate, and high levels of malnutrition in India. The lack of awareness for proper
hygiene and benefits of child immunizations, as a result of low literacy levels is widely
prevalent in the rural India.
As mentioned, gender inequality has adverse effects in almost every part of the
society and the economy. In this study, we are focusing on the demographic manifestation of
gender inequality. Demographic data and studies are driven by indicators and parameters.
These Demographic indicators like the different sex ratios help us understand the affect of
gender inequality on the overall population.
The sex ratio is the ratio of males to females in a population. Sex ratio varies with the
age of population taken in to consideration. The adult sex ratio determines the ratio of males
to females in an adult population. Adult sex ratio is highly affected by the rate of migration
which is very high among adults. The adult male population migrates mostly to cities in
search of job opportunities and to pursue higher education, which is less for the adult female
population. The adult female population migrates after marriage from rural to rural or rural to
town or town to rural. According to Census of India reports, the migration among adult
female population highly affects the Adult sex ratio. Hence, the Adult sex ratio due to the
migration among adult population is not an accurate indicator of gender inequality.
Child Sex Ratio is the ratio of number of females to males in the age group of 0-6.
Chid Sex Ratio may be more accurate indicator than overall sex ratio because it is not
affected by migration. Child sex ratio is bound to a particular age limit of 0-6 age group of
male and female child. In this age group migration of the population is on a small scale.
Hence, Child sex ratio can be considered as an accurate indicator to study gender inequality
prevalent in demography under consideration.
Sex Ratio at birth is determined by the number of girls born to every thousand boys.
Sex ratio at birth is an important and much accurate indicator to analyze the demographic
manifestation of gender inequality as it is recorded at the time of birth and is not affected by
factors like migration.
In this study, we are focusing on Sex Ratio at Birth to understand gender inequality in
India and in the state of Haryana.
The status of women is the assessment of her position and rights in the societal
structure. It represents her position as an individual in the society by virtue of her being a
woman. In gender comparative studies, the status of a woman is analyzed as compared to the
respective amount of rights, benefits and freedom entrusted to a man. The status of women in
Indian society has undergone several changes throughout the course of history. There have
been periods where women were liberated and there have been times where women were
oppressed. Every period in the Indian history has its own history on the status of women,
beginning from when they were considered as deities in the house during the Vedic Period
and times when they were subjected to evil practices like “Sati” in the medieval period. The
status of women underwent a drastic deterioration in the post-Vedic period, and the same
continued till the medieval period. Social reformers in the pre-independence India came
forward to improve the status of women but it did not make any substantial change in the
already deteriorated status of women. The post-independence period has witnessed
significant improvement in the status of women with growing awareness about their human
and constitutional rights.
The Vedic period is often termed as the “Golden age” for women, where they were
celebrated, respected and worshipped. In the Vedic Period (2000-500 BCE) women enjoyed
equal rights and privileges along with men. They both had equal status and rights in all
aspects of life. The works of ancient Indian scholars like Patanjali and Katyayana reveal that
women had right to education in the early Vedic period. The oldest epic Rigveda suggested
that women were free to choose their partners through a social practice called Swayamvar or
live in relationship called Gandharva marriage. Women enjoyed a fair amount of freedom
and equality in the Vedic period. The Vedic society might best be termed as the period of
feminine glory and prestigious life. The Aryans evidently preferred male child to female
child. However, females were as free as their male counterparts. According to this quotation
from Vedic literature, “With great effort and care, a child should also be brought up and
taught.” it celebrates the birth of a daughter and the importance of educating a girl child as
part of her growth as an individual.
It was in the post-Vedic period that the status of women suffered a setback for the
first time while the men were granted more privileges. Under the influence of Manusmiriti,
the status of women declined considerably and the status and privileges of men were raised.
The birth of a daughter began to be considered as a curse for the father. The birth of a son
was an occasion for rejoice for all while the birth of a daughter became inauspicious. In Post-
Vedic period, women had no right to education and property which was earlier regarded as an
essential norm in the Vedic period.
The Medieval period (6th century to 18th century) witnessed further deterioration in the
status of women. This was a period when India faced foreign conquests especially by the
Muslim invaders from central Asia and the consequent establishment of Muslim rule in India.
They brought about significant changes in the Indian society. Social practices like “Purdah
System” which is seclusion of women from the public by covering their faces inspired from
the Muslims and “Jauhar”, a practice of self immolation of women to save their dignity from
foreign invaders were introduced in the 10th century. The social evils like “sati”, self
immolation of a widow on her husband’s funeral pyre and child marriage were widely
practiced. The practice of polygamy was prevalent among Hindu “Kshatriyas” (a class in
Hindu society who are warriors), but it was not uniformly practiced among other Hindus
during this period. Polyandry was also practiced in some societies during this period.
The status of women during the early days of British Rule in India was at its lowest
levels with hardly a woman in hundred being able to read or write. Evil practices,
superstitions and sinister customs had deteriorated the status of women to its lowest levels.
After centuries of oppression and degradation until the nineteenth century, many social
reformers raised awareness against the social evils that had relegated the status of women.
Social reformers such as Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar, Jyotirao Phule and Raja Ram Mohan
Roy led social movements to empower women. The passage of 1856 Hindu Widow
Remarriage Act, as a result of Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar's initiatives, was a positive step
towards improvement of status of women in India. In 1829, the efforts of Raja Rammohan
Roy and Governor-General William Cavendish-Bentinck led to the abolition of Sati. Jyotirao
Phule, an eminent social reformer from Maharashtra, worked towards promoting women,
particularly of lower castes, to the ambit of modern education. He and his wife were among
the pioneers of female education and established the first school for girls in Pune in 1848. P C
Sarkar, founded the first school for girls that provided free education in 1847 at Calcutta.
(Later the school was renamed to Kalikrishna Girls' High School). In south India a
missionary Martha Mault née Mead and her daughter Eliza Caldwell née Mault lead
movements to promote education among the girls. Sarojini Naidu and Pandita Ramabai were
also among the leading female social reformers campaigning against the social evils that
degraded the status of women. With every social reform programs challenging the existing
social norms there were resistance by the locals, but these movements carved the way for
liberating women from existing social evils and religious taboos.
Post independence of India from the British rule, status of women has changed
significantly. However, women still do not have complete freedom to make choices for their
lives. It is particularly worse in rural areas. In urban areas the situation has undergone a
continuous change and women are more advanced and enjoy greater freedom than their
counterparts in rural areas. The Constitution of India guarantees women equal rights with
men, but the society especially in the rural parts continues to be largely dominated by males.
The demographic manifestations of persisting gender inequality continue to be a matter of
great concern. Demographic indicators like overall sex ratio or child sex ratio is equally
imbalanced and continues to decline in both urban and rural areas. The situation is further
more alarming in some of the developed states like Haryana and Punjab. In recent times there
has been a drastic improvement in the level of education among females. Sex ratio has
declined continuously despite several policy measures and awareness programs launched by
central and state governments. Beti Bachao-Beti Padao (Save the Girl and Educate the Girl)
is one such programme initiated by the central government but it is still far from achieving
the goals of equal rights and empowering women. The women continue to have limited
access to basic rights of speech, expression and education. Though the status of women
continues to be appalling, there have been remarkable achievements by women in modern
India. Today women participate actively in politics and contest election for various positions
in the central and state government. The presence of women can be noticed in every field and
profession from army to administrative jobs to private corporate jobs to being doctors and
lawyers. Modern India has had women holding prime positions like the President and Prime
Minister of India.
Gender inequality prevalent in modern India has deep historical roots. The social
norms and cultural practices limiting the status of women have existed for centuries now. As
stated earlier, gender inequality is a result of various rules set by the society to identify and
determine the role of a gender and in case of a male dominated Indian society it has clearly
resulted in the subordinate condition of women.
3.2 Trends of Sex Ratio in India:
Sex ratio is defined as the ratio of number of males to number of females. Globally,
sex ratio is calculated as the total number of males per 100 females. In India, the Census of
India defines sex ratio as the number of females per 1000 males. India is one of the few
countries in the world where males outnumber females. An imbalance in the sex ratio
denotes gender inequality. Gender inequality refers to a disparity between the male and
female population. Gender inequality has serious implications to the society, economy and
the population of a country, and hence it is matter of concern. Demographers take gender
inequality seriously, as it is one of the major indicators denoting the well being of a
population. Sex ratio is a significant parameter to measure the gender inequality of any
society at a given point of time. Gender inequality (Declining sex ratio) on large scale reflects
social and cultural variations of a society. Determinants of changes in sex ratio vary from sex
differentials in mortality, sex selective migration, sex ratio at birth, and at times, sex
differentials in population enumeration.
The first census of India was conducted in 1872 in an asynchronous manner and the
first synchronous census was conducted in 1881. Since the first census in 1881 to the latest
census conducted in 2011, sex ratio has been declining continuously. There have been two
times when sex ratio increased few points, firstly in 1951 census (1 point increase) and
secondly in 1981 (4 point increase). These were the only two times when sex ratio increased;
else through all Census beginning from 1881 until the latest 2011, the trends reveal the ratio
in favour of men than women. Although statistic experts do not consider the one point
increase of 1981 census as an increase in sex ratio, they refer to it as a ‘statistical
phenomenon’. Raju and Premi (1992:911) described it as a misplacement of statistical data.
The census of India is being conducted since 1881 after every 10 years in different
stages simultaneously throughout the country. There were only 9 points increase in the sex
ratio from 1881 (954) to 1901 (963) census. But since 1901 the sex ratio has seen gradual
decline except for the 1951 and 1981 census. The sex ratio according to the 1901 census was
954 and according to 2011 census was 933; a decline of 21 points in a century. Child sex
ratio in the age group of 0-6 years noted a serious drop of 50 points in some states in the past
one decade only. The data published reveals that child sex ratio in states like Haryana,
Punjab, Delhi and Rajasthan had alarming levels of gender based inequality when compared
to the overall child sex ratio. The special pattern analysis of north western states of India,
Haryana, Punjab and the Union Territory of Delhi and Chandigarh show huge gender gap
between male to female population. The 1991 census of India recorded little improvement in
the overall sex ratio at the national level, but the north western states had a vital decline in
sex ratio. The child sex ratio (0-6 age groups) during 1991 to 2001 has substantially declined
in these north-western states by a point of more than 50. The highest number decline was
recorded in Punjab (82 points) while Haryana recorded a decline of 60 points. The decline in
numbers showing huge gap in gender population is matter of serious concern and requires
intensive attention. (Premi, 2001: 1876).
900
880
860
840
820
800
780
760
740
720
1901 1911 1921 1931 1941 1951 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 2011
Census
The table 3.1 indicates continue decline in overall sex ratio of India in the last century. In
1901, the sex ratio of India was 972 females per thousand males, but in 2011, it was 940
females per thousand males, a total decline of 32 points within a century. The recent census
(1991-2011) recorded some gradual increase in sex ratio as a result of government initiatives
showing some positive signs. The condition in rural areas continues to be appalling with a
huge decline of 32 points recorded between 1901 to 2011 census. But in the urban locations
from 1961 to 2011 census, there is continue increase. The sex ratio is higher than the national
average in the rural areas in contrast to urban areas where the sex ratio is lower than the
national average. The declining sex ratio has adverse impact in the respective areas resulting
in social crimes like increase in domestic violence, trafficking of girls from different states
and sexual crimes.
3.3 Trends of Sex Ratio in Haryana:
Haryana is one of the developed states of India with considerable economic and
agricultural development. But the state has lowest sex ratio in India according to 2011 census.
The sex ratio of Haryana was 879 in 2011 and it was 861 in 2001. The existing social norms
and practices like son preference, dowry system, female foeticide and infanticide have
resulted in low sex ratio of the state. It is to be noted that there is high level of misuse of
modern technologies like amniocentesis for prenatal sex determination in the state. The
Union and the Haryana state government have undertaken policy changes and launched
initiatives to protect and empower the female child in order to balance the sex ratio. The
Prime Minister of India launched “Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao” movement first in Panipa, a
city of Haryana in January of 2015. There are numerous other schemes for the female child in
Haryana like ‘Devi Rupak Yojna’ that focus in improving the plight of girl child in the state.
In spite of the policy support and initiatives the condition of women has not shown much
improvement in the state. In Haryana, there has been an increase of 18 points in the sex ratio
during 2001 to 2011 censuses, but the continuous decline of Child Sex Ratio is a subject of
grave concern.
Haryana
Trends of Sex Ratio
Urban and Rural
920
900
Number of Females per 1000 Males
880
860
840
820
800
780
760
740
720
1901 1911 1921 1931 1941 1951 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 2011
Census
Table 3.2 represents a comparison between the sex ratio of rural and urban areas of Haryana.
The total sex ratio moved by 12 points (867 in 1901 and 879 in 2011) as per the census data
recorded between the years 1901 and 2011. The sex ratio in Haryana attained several high
and lows as seen in the graph during this period of 110 years. There is also an increase of 21
points in urban areas of state from 1901 to 2011. But there is a huge decline of 35 points in
rural locations in the state during same time period. During the same period the sex ratio
declined at an alarming rate on national as well as state levels. India reported 872 females per
one thousand males in 1901 whereas it was 867 in Haryana. However, post independence of
India from the British rule there were only two incidents where sex ratio increased (1981 by 3
points and 2011 by 18 points) otherwise in this 60 years period, the sex ratio recorded
systematic decline. The minor increase in the sex ratio noted during the last decade was a
result of awareness programmes by the central and respective state governments and also due
to strict regulations of prenatal sex determination and pregnancy termination.
Table: 3.3 Trends in the Deficit of Females in Haryana’s Population (Absolute Number)
1901-2001
Census Year Population Deficit of Average Annual
Male Female Females Rate of Growth
1901 276390 2146674 329716 -
1911 2274909 1899768 375141 1.4
1921 2307985 1947907 360078 -0.4
1931 2473228 2086689 386539 0.7
1941 2821783 2451046 370737 -0.4
1951 3031612 2641985 389627 0.5
1961 4062787 3527737 535050 3.7
1971 5377044 4659387 717657 3.4
1981 6909679 6012440 897239 2.5
1991 8827474 7636174 1191300 3.3
2001 11363953 9780611 1583342 3.3
Source: Census of India, 1901-2001
Table 3.3 represents the data of deficit females in absolute numbers in Haryana from 1901 to
2001. The data indicates deficit of females was only 1.4 (1911) at average annual growth rate
which increased at 3.3 in 2001. It shows the value of girl child and her rearing procedure in
the state.
Map No 3.1
Table: 3.4 Trends in Sex Ratio in Haryana by Age Groups, 1961-2001
Census Age Groups
Year 0-4 5-9 10-14 0-14 15+ 30+ 55+ All Ages
Total
1961 939 874 864 895 839 796 672 864
1971 921 855 850 875 859 836 689 867
1981 922 874 865 886 859 865 780 870
1991 887 880 845 871 861 874 930 865
2001 817 835 868 841 872 912 984 861
Rural
1961 939 869 862 893 856 804 658 872
1971 924 850 835 870 869 841 674 870
1981 921 868 861 882 872 879 762 876
1991 885 879 841 869 861 884 915 864
2001 821 842 876 847 878 923 975 866
Urban
1961 937 900 875 906 772 760 746 825
1971 905 881 926 904 817 815 769 853
1981 925 897 884 901 820 819 856 849
1991 892 884 859 878 863 848 987 868
2001 805 815 846 844 844 881 889 847
Source: Census of India, 1961-2001
Note: Data for the year 1961 have been obtained by clubbing the 7 districts of erstwhile
undivided Punjab.
Table 3.4 states the sex ratio data for various age-groups in Haryana. The age-groups are
divided according to the data published by the census of India between 1961 and 2001 stating
the urban and rural sex ratio with respect to different age groups. The sex ratio for 0-4 year
age group has declined continuously from 1961 to 2001 in both urban and rural areas of the
state. The sex ratio for all the other age groups has declined with minor increase in an
intermittent time period; overall there is a decrease of 6 points in rural areas, where as the
urban areas show an increase of 22 points in the same time period.
3.4 Trends of Child Sex Ratio in India and Haryana:
Child sex ratio is a crucial social indicator of a developed society. Child sex ratio not
only represents the number of females as compared to males which denotes the gender status,
but it also enables to predict the future profile of a society like marriage rates, age
composition and migration. A low child sex ratio in any society can be an indicator of sinister
social practices like female foeticide or female infanticide that is causing gender inequality.
In an ideal situation, CSR should be 105 to 106 males per 100 females as exhibited in the
CSR of developed countries. Any imbalance in the child sex ratio can have adverse impact on
the society. India is one of those few nations were the child sex ratio is very alarming. The
trend in deficit of female child has been recorded since the enumeration of first census of
India in 1881 until the latest census in 2011. But it has been observed that in the last two
decades the difference between the overall sex ratio and the child sex ratio has been more
than 150 points in some states which is very alarming. The situation is gravely critical in the
states of Haryana, Punjab, Rajasthan and Union Territory of Delhi; as a matter of fact these
states are developed compared to most states in terms of per capita income, infrastructure and
literacy rate.
As per the Census of India data from 2001 to 2011, the overall sex ratio had
increased by 7 points, but the child sex ratio has decreased by 13 points from 927 in 2001 to
914 in 2011. The Government of India along with the state governments framed policies and
launched programmes and schemes to close the gender gap and promote equality among
genders, and also laid down strict regulations for pregnancy termination and prenatal sex
determination but the child sex ratio continues to ring the alarm. As said by the census
commissioner, “One thing is clear-the imbalance that has set at early age group is difficult to
be removed and would remain to haunt the population for a long time come”. Gender
inequality in India and the existing social gender bias towards males has been a matter of
concern for many decades among scholars and researchers at the national and sub national
level and as noted in the works of Miler (1981), Sen (1990), Desgupata and Bhat (1995),
Agnihorari (2000); since the numerical imbalance were pointed out by Visaria (1971) and
Natrajan (1972). Bardhan (1982) mentioned that sociological, ecological, cultural and
historical causes are some factors behind the low child sex ratio.
The Child sex ratio is not influenced by sex selective migration because migration
in this age group normally occurs with the family. Sex ratio among children is therefore
considered a better indicator of gender relations and the status of girl child in a population.
When child sex ratio is lower than the overall sex ratio, it indicates gender inequality and in
most cases the society being male biased, it indicates low birth of a girl child and it can be
due to the sinister practices like female foeticide and female infanticide. The main factors that
determine the child sex ratio are sex ratio at the birth and sex differential of mortality rate
among children. The prime reasons for the declining child sex ratio in India and particularly
in states like Haryana, Punjab and Delhi are sex selective abortion, differential in mortality
rate of children and a high son preference. The child sex ratio of these states was close to the
national average but it has particularly degraded in the last two decades. As mentioned
earlier, migration doesn’t play any role here, so can this decline be related to change in sex
ratio at birth? “Sex ratio in the age group 0-6 years depends primarily on sex ratio at birth and
sex differentials in mortality of infants and children. Differential under count may also
sometimes result in spurious imbalance in sex ratio. However, the same has undergone
decrease over time, and can’t explain the recent decline in child sex ratio by such a margin
(Premi, 2001: 1876)”.
Table no 3.5 shows the pattern of child sex ratio of different states in India. The CSR of India
declined by 31 points from 1991 (945) to 2011 (914). The rate at which CSR declines is
much more in the north Indian states of Haryana and Punjab and the Union Territory of
Delhi. The major causes of this trend are son preference and misuse of amniocentesis
technology prevalent in these areas. In Haryana, there was 60 point decline from 1991 to
2001. There was a declining pattern of CSR in most of the states of India, except in two states
of Kerala and Mizoram where CSR increased by 2 and 3 points respectively, as published by
the Census of India from 1991 to 2011.
Table 3.6: India: Range of Child Sex Ratio (1991-2011)
Below-900 3 6 11
900-950 9 11 14
Above 950 22 18 10
34 35 35
Table 3.6 lists the number of states and union territories according to their sex ratios. In 1991,
there were only 3 states/UTs having their sex ratios below 900, and in 2001 and 2011 the
number of states/UTS falling in this category increased to 6 and 11 respectively. During the
same time period 22 states/UTs had their sex ratios above 950, but in 2001 and 2011 the
number of states/UTs in this category dropped to 18 and 10 respectively. This was a time
period when the Government of India and the respective state governments had launched
schemes and programmes to boost women empowerment and reduce gender inequality, but
gender actually widened and still persists.
Table 3.7: India and Haryana, Trends in Child Sex Ratio (1991-2011)
India Haryana
Table 3.7 compares the child sex ratios of India and Haryana from 1991 to 2011 and the
decadal change in sex ratio. In India, sex ratio continued to decline, 18 point decrease
between 1991 and 2001 (945 to 927) and 13 point decrease between 2001 and 2011 (927 to
914). During the same time period, Haryana witnessed a huge decline of 60 points from 1991
to 2001 (879 to 819) but there was an increase of 11 points from 2001 to 2011 (819 to 830),
overall the sex ratio of Haryana declined between 1991 and 2011 as can be seen in the table.
Table No. 3.8. Haryana: Districts wise variation in Sex Ratio, Child Sex Ratio (2001-11)
State/ District Sex Ratio Percent (0-6 Population) Sex Ratio (0-6 Popu)
Table 3.8 shows the comparison of overall sex ratio and child sex ratio from two censuses
(2001 and 2011). In 2011 census, the child sex ratio and overall sex ratio have increased by
11 and 16 points in Haryana. But when each district is analyzed specifically, it is noticed that
districts like Mewat, Palwal, Ambala and Panchkula have made improvements in the overall
sex ratio and child sex ratio by some point, whereas districts like Jhajjar, Sonepat, Gurugram
and Bhiwani have negative trends.
Table 3.8 represents the data of differential in child sex ratio in urban and rural Haryana from
1961 to 2011. As per the 1961 census CSR of Haryana was 910 which decreased by 80 points
in 2011 census. From 1961 to 2011 there was continuous decline except for two times in
1981 and 2011 where it increased by 4 and 11 points respectively. CSR declined sharply in
both rural and urban areas. In 2001 the rural-urban differential of CSR was 15 points at 823
for rural and 808 for urban areas. The state of Haryana has the lowest child sex ratio in India,
which raises questions about the socio-cultural values, which are highly responsible for the
gender inequality.
Table: 3.10 Spatial Pattern of CSR in Haryana, 2011
Sr. High (Above 850) Moderate (800-850) Low (Below 800)
No. District CSR District CSR District CSR
1 Mewat 906 Hisar 849 Sonipat 790
2 Palwal 862 Fatehabad 845 Rewari 784
3 Sirsa 852 Gurugram 842 Mahendergar 778
h
4 Panchkula 850 Faridabad 842 Jhajjar 774
5 Jind 835
6 Paniapt 833
7 Bhiwani 831
8 Yamunanagar 825
9 Kaithal 821
10 Karnal 820
11 Kurukshetra 817
12 Ambala 807
Source: Calculated by author
Table 3.10 represents the spatial pattern of child sex ratio in Haryana. There are only 4
districts that have child sex ratio more than 850, namely; Mewat (906), Palwal (862), Sirsa
(852), Panchkula (850). There are total 12 districts which have moderate child sex ratio
between 800-850; these are in descending order, Hisar (849), Fatehabad (845), Gurugram
(842), Faridabad (842), Jind (835), Panipat (833), Bhiwani (831), Yamunanagar (825),
Kaithal (821), Karnal (820), Kurukshetra (817) and Ambala (807). There are only 4 districts
having low child sex ratio below 800, Sonipat (790), Rewari (784), Mahendergrah (778) and
Jhajjar (774). By analysing the above table and categorization of child sex ratio in Haryana
we can aptly said that only Mewat has child sex ratio above 900. Jhajjar has the lowest CSR
(774) in the state of Haryana.
3.5 Sex Ratio at Birth in Haryana:
Sex ratio at birth (SRB) is conventionally defined as the number of male babies per
100 females during birth, and it varies from 103 to 107. The average figure is, thus, taken as
105 male births to 100 female births. In most of the populations of the world, there is already
a preponderance of male babies over female babies at birth. Evidences indicate a further rise
in masculinity at birth in the country during the recent past. This trend of rising number of
males is more conspicuous in north-western parts of the country especially Haryana. For
instance the sample registration system based estimates of sex ratio in India during the period
1987-90 to 1996-98 indicates a rise from 109.5 to 111.0 i.e. at the rate of 1.37 percent. The
corresponding figures for Haryana are 115.0 and 123.3 respectively implying a growth rate of
well over 7 percent. Such a fast growth in male preponderance at birth is undoubtedly an
indication of female foeticide practices in the state. It is also true that with improvement in
health care facilities, the loss of male foetuses have undergone decline contributing to the rise
in masculinity at birth. However, for a state like Haryana the contribution of this factor is
very much limited.
Although, Haryana ranks very high in terms of the levels of economic development in
the country, the status of women continues to be appalling in the state. The male dominated
social ethos and patriarchal system discriminate against women in a number of ways. There is
a strong preference for a son child because of economic, social and religious reasons
including financial support, old age security, property inheritance, dowry, family lineage,
prestige and power, birth and death rituals and beliefs about religious duties and salvation
(Unisa et al. 2007: 60). A female child is considered as a burden and a liability on the
family’s resources. ‘One manifestation of this discrimination in the past used to be female
infanticide, which has now given way to female foeticide with the advent of prenatal sex
determination techniques (Hassan, 2000). As these facilities are largely concentrated in urban
areas, it is the middle class urban- dwellers who first make use of the technology. Thereafter,
the practice gradually spreads to the rest of the segments of urban population and eventually
penetrates among the affluent groups in the countryside. The urban population, therefore, in
general reflects a lower child sex ratio than its counterpart in the rural areas. Interestingly,
however, the rural-urban differentials in Haryana do not match with this observed pattern
completely. The rural areas were marked with lower child sex ratio up to 1991. It was only at
the time of 2001 census that the ratio in urban areas dipped to a level lower than that in rural
areas. Nevertheless, what is remarkable to note is the fact that the urban areas in the state
have witnessed a distinctly faster decline in child sex ratio over the last two decades. For
instance, between 1981 and 2001, child sex ratio declined by 104 points in urban areas as
against 76 points in rural areas.
There is ample evidence now of the prevalence of the practice of sex selective
abortions in Haryana. Facilities for sex determinant techniques are known to have existed in
this part of the country for over a quarter of century now. Interestingly, the rural areas in the
state report an equally widespread practice of female foeticide. There are evidence of mobile
facilities for sex determinations and termination of pregnancy if the foetus is female,
available in the villages of Haryana (George and Dahiya, 1998). According to a study of six
select villages in Rohtak district of the state by George and Dahiya, the practice is more
prevalent among the upper caste Hindus, and women of this group openly admit the practice
of the same. In another study, Krishnamoorthy (2003) has derived estimates on sex selective
abortions using NFHS-2 data. According to the study, Haryana ranks very high in India in
order of the magnitude of sex selective abortions. In a more recent study, Unisa et al. (2007)
have provided some useful information on, and insights into, the clandestine practice of sex
selective abortions in rural Haryana based on the data on pregnancy history of a sample of
our 2,500 ever married women obtained in the survey of Jind district.
Table No 3.11: Sex Ratio at Birth* and its Differential, India and Haryana, 2001
Sr.No. Census Data Years Sex Ratio at Birth
Haryana India
Table 3.10 represents the estimates on sex ratio at birth from Census Data of various years. It
also provides data on 0-2 age group child sex ratio and sex ratio by mother’s educational
standard. The Census data show even a wider gap between SRB in Haryana and complete
India. The gap is found to have recorded almost three-fold increase between 1981 and 2001.
Wife Beating:
Haryana is mainly a rural agrarian society where male dominated culture still has
deep roots. Hence, males are given a higher status and the females are subjugated. This is the
norm in Haryana. Wife beating is a routine matter within a family. It is as if sanctioned by the
society as something not serious. The status of woman vis-a-vis that of a man in rural
Haryana is vividly reflected in some of most famous proverbs in different parts of state. Some
examples are:
(Garri ka Paanchra, Aurat ka Tatnra)
It means that the iron ring of an ox cart wheel and the head of a woman should be beaten to
make it work efficiently.
Punia (1993) has observed that “abusing and wife beating on even minor matters is very
common in the region, according to him the prevalence of wife beating indicates the
subjugated status of women in the society”. The results of NFHS-2 indicate a widespread
acceptance among married women that the beating of a wife by her husband is justified under
some circumstances (NFHS-2, 1998: 50). “Wife beating is routine matter for some, where no
justification is needed, in fact wife beating was considered such a normal activity that no
valid reason or cause was really needed to justify it, it had almost achieved the status of
routine” (Choudhary, 2004: 280).
Status of Woman as Daughter:
There is a strong son preference in rural Haryana. A female child is unwanted and
considered as a curse. The growing daughter is always a cause of stress to her father. Her
chastity, safety-security requires a constant vigil. In addition, the problem to arrange dowry
for the wedding of their female child is a matter of stress for most families. There is a saying
in the local language:
(Baap ke Ghar Beti, Gudar Lapeti)
(Saraswati, 1996: 73)
While in father’s house, the daughter should line with extreme simplicity and should not use
cosmetics and jewellery.
(Beti Aisa Dhan Hai, Jo Aate Bhi Rulawe, Jate Bhi Rulawe Hai)
Daughter’s is such a wealth, which makes one weep at birth and while departing from their
parent’s house.
“Early marriage is preferred in rural areas and parents want it soon, from dance-drama known
as swang show numerous rituals and proverbs can be quoted for early marriage and lower
status for girls. For instance, a few lines from ‘Kissa Nal Damayanti’
Wife purchase is another practice prevalent in the regions of Punjab and Haryana. “Wife
purchase in prosperous areas of Haryana and Punjab has been in limelight in the wake of
widening gap in the numerical strength of males and females in the marriageable age groups,
due to prosperity, development and shortage of maiden those who cannot afford remain
unmarried and those who can afford go for wife purchase” (Choudhary, 2004).
Wife purchase from poor backward states (Bihar, UP and West Bengal) is a
common practice these days in Haryana. It is more in rural than urban areas of Haryana. An
article in the daily newspaper mentioned “girls from West Bengal, Orissa, MP, Bihar, UP and
Jharkhand are brought to the state, these girls belong to poor families” (Dainik Bhaskar, April
4, 2004: 10).
“They had been sold to men who could not find wives locally, either because
they were too poor....., these men belonged to a society where females are reportedly missing
and where the sex ratio recorded in successive censuses is remarkably skewed” (Blanchet,
2005: 306).
In Rigveda, “the father was anxious for ten sons, may the husband be the 11 th
male members of the family, the rest ten being his sons” (Upadhyaya, 1974: 53).
In Manusamiriti, “there are special references in chapter 9, Sholaka 59, 62, 69,
which guide a person for ‘Niyoga’ to get a son, polygamy was allowed for the birth of a son.
Sholaka 137 and 138 states that with the blessing of a son the father is assured a place in the
heaven, the grandfather achieves eternal bliss” (Kumar, 1985: 756, 780-781).
(Bebe, Bahu Tere Bete ho, Tu Sdha Suhagan Rho, Tere Bhai Batije Jio)
In these blessings, wishes are expected for the young bribe to be blessed with a son soon and
her husband and his brothers have a long life.
Even in devotional songs, desire for sons finds great importance. Here a woman
confesses in a devotional song that her heart is not under control though she rebukes it a lot.
Sometimes she has a desire for five seven sons and sometimes she feels satisfied with silver
and gold. She says:
(Re Man dat ta konya; datu su roj batera,
Ak Man Khe mere paanch saat chore ho,
Ak man Khe sona chandi be batere ho)
During the month of ‘Sawan’ (Monsoon) the daughter in law seeks permission from her
father in law to go to her father’s home. At this time of departure, the mother in law addresses
her son and daughter law:
(Ya Dhan beta Janmegi Puut, Bel Dadhegi, Thare Baap Ke,
Ya Dhan ma, Janmegi Dhee, Kul Lajavegi, Mhare Bapp Ke)
She remarks that if the daughter in law gives birth to a son, your father’s family will grow,
and if she gives birth to a daughter our family will be disrespected.
(Raho Raho re Banjhri Dur Rahio, Tere a Lawan se Mhare Phal Jhare,
Tere a Hiware Bhande Da Bale)
O, barren woman, keep away from us, our fruits will drop if you approach us, and we will
also be barren, as your heart burns with the fire of jealousy.
In another folk song, one of the barren women expresses her anguish and anger, on her being
childless. She considers barrenness as the greatest curse of her life.
Also in various folk dance and dramas known as ‘swang’ references to son
preference are very common. In various ballads and dance drama by famous writer, singer,
musician Lakhmi Chand and Mange Ram, their references has been selected:
Birth of a Son:
The birth of a son in a family is celebrated like some festival. In north-
western states of India, (particularly Haryana) the birth of a son is auspicious while birth of a
daughter is considered to be inauspicious. Whenever a daughter is born, the father decides to
migrate from the house.
(Peela to odd mhari Jcha Kuan chali, Sara Sahar sarhaya Patipayara Ji)
(Yadav, 1960: 142)
The mother worships the well covering her head with a yellow ‘Odhni’ cloth. All the people
appreciate the father and mother of new born son and provide costly gifts to parents.
On this auspicious occasion, various types of gifts known as ‘Neg’ are given to Brahman,
barber and Dai, sweeper etc. these ‘Neg’ might be in form of cash, clothes, cereals and items
of gold and silver. Sister in law presented special ‘Neg’ on this occasion. The birth of 12
sons, is good, but if a daughter is born there are no celebrations.
(Mhare to kapde re lado us din ujle, jis din tumri sajan ghar jaogi)
(Bhardwaj, 1983: 117)
The father says that their clothes will be bright only when daughter will be relieved for her
husband’s house.
There is a famous saying in Haryanvi language, regarding the girl’s education. It is said that
there is no need of formal education or looking after girls. They just grow by themselves. But
when a son is born, he is called ‘one eyed daughter’. This can be noticed in the following
proverb:
(Chori Chari to Noa Padh Likh Jaya Kre)
(Kani Ldki Hi He,( Taki Najar Na Lge).
(Deswal, 2001: 19)
From the table above it is clear that 36 percent of married women do not use any
contraceptive method for family planning in Haryana. Female sterilization is the most
popular form of contraceptive being practiced. Around 38 percent of married women adopt
this method; on the other hand male sterilization is only about 0.6 percent. 86 percent of
sterilized women had their sterilization procedure done in a public sector health facility,
mainly in a government or municipal hospital. Those who use contraceptive pill and condom
commonly procure it from private medical facilities or local medical shops. Nonetheless as
per the data, 43 percent of pill users and 27 percent of condom (Nirodh) users get their supply
from the public health sector (NFHS-4, Report).
India has achieved high rates of economic growth in recent years, but
Gender inequality still persists and it continues to be an immense issue of concern. According
to World Economic Forum’s Gender Gap Index (GGI), 2014, India ranks low with scores
below average. UNDP’s Human Development Index (HDI) 2015 states that only Afghanistan
ranks lower than India among South Asian countries, with respect to gender inequality. India
lags behind in gender equality even when compared to its neighbouring countries Pakistan
and Bangladesh. The Government of India along with the respective state governments has
framed policies and launched various schemes and programmes since 1989 to narrow the
gender gap and empower women. In spite of all the efforts, gender gap still exists, and as a
matter of fact the gender inequality continues to rise. The existing patriarchal set up and age
old beliefs and traditions continue to promote a male biased society where females are
degraded to a secondary status in the society as well as the household.
One of the major reasons of gender inequality is poverty. Out of the total
30 percent poor people, 70 percent are females. The high percentage of poverty among
female is because of lack of economic opportunities for women. The employment rate of
women dropped from 18 percent in 2009 to 16 percent in 2012. Only 13.4 percent of working
women have a regular salaried job. World Economic Forum, 2014 stated that women earn 56
percent when compared to their male counterparts. According to the World Bank, 90 percent
of Indian working women work in the informal sector doing physical intensive jobs, with
long working hours and very low pays. The disparity in employment opportunities alleviates
poverty and continues to disempower women.
As discussed above it can be noted that gender inequality itself causes the
gender gap to widen. The factors leading to gender inequality along with the social norms and
beliefs, and the existing gender gap, all collectively contribute to increasing gender
inequality. Evil practices like female foeticide and female infanticide reduce the number of
females affecting the sex ratio and child sex ratio. Low literacy levels contribute to lack of
basic awareness about health and hygiene leading to high infant death rates, low birth rates.
Female deficit gives rise to various crimes against women. The government schemes and
programmes fail to achieve their goals because women are not well equipped enough to
access and take advantage of the benefits. As a result, sex ratio continues to decline. The sex
ratio in 1978-88 was 32.2 percent and it decreased to 24 percent in 2014. Inspite of all the
economic development and government legislation and schemes, gender inequality exists.
Declining gender ratio, low economic participation of women, rising gaps in life expectancy
and mortality rates between men and women are parameters of great concern.