Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BUCCAL
LINGUAL
Fig. 1. Placement of strain gauges. The placement of the
semiconductor strain gauges under the occlusal surface is
shown schematically. The view is from the occlusal
surface. The force information from each strain gauge was
multiplexed for transmission and demultiplexed for Fig. 2. Electronic components of the eight-channel occlu-
analog presentation. sal force transmitter. Clockwisr fronl :efi [L) 7ighi: Ring
counter, FET-switches, DC amplifier, RF-module, coil,
resistor of the sync pulse, capacitor, fr>zlr I .S V
amplifier, and the resulting signal is applied to the batteries.
RF module. The RF module frequency modulates
the nominally 120 MHz carrier proportionally to the
pulse amplitude (PAM) commutated from the
sensors. Full pulse amplitude causes 0.25 MHz of
deviation from the carrier. The eight data pulses are
0.30 to 0.45 of the sync pulse (Fig. 3). The sampling
rate is approximately 300 Hz for each channel.
A small antenna in the buccal fold provides
radiation of the signals for several feet. The power for
the transmitter is provided by four small 1.5 V DC
batteries* in a waterproof battery case with a screw Fig. 3. The signal emitted by the transmitter and demo-
cap. The battery drain is 3.5 mA. By meticulous dulated by the receiver consists of a sync pulse and eight
pulses varying linearly in amplitude with the resistance of
selection of batteries, a continuous experimental
the strain gauges under the occlusal surface. Calibrations:
session of up to 2 hours could be obtained. 1 V and 0.5 msec.
Construction of the transmitter. All electronic
components of the transmitter were mounted on a used to drive a sample and hold circuit for each
board and tested on the bench. After all the compo- channel. Thus the output of the decoder is eight
nents were soldered underneath the pontic, the analog signals corresponding to the volta,qes from the
transmitter was embedded with epoxy resin.t Test- eight sensors.
ing and assembly time for each transmitter was Tests and calibration. The transmitter underwent
approximately 250 hours. The configuration of the a series of tests prior to use in the patient. The
assembled transmitter is shown in Figs. 4 and 5. embedded transmitter was checked for both elecrri-
Receiver and decoder. A loop antenna around the cal and water leakage by operating it in water.
patient’s neck picks up the RF signal and sends it to Afterward, the stability of the signal was verified by
a conventional FM superheterodyne receiverx for connecting the transmitter to a power supply and
amplification and demodulation into a video signal. recording for 24 hours. Each channel of each trans-
The sync pulse is extracted from the video signal and mitter was calibrated by applying knowrl forces on
used both to reset a counter and to delete the sync the occlusal surface and recording the response from
pulse from the nine pulses, leaving the data pulses. the decoder. A semidynamic calibration instrumen-
Clock pulses are generated from the data pulses and tation system was developed to move the precision
XY (horizontal) table on which the transmitter was
mounted in the XY plane automatically in either a
*Mallory MS 212.
tResin 5005. Amrez Co., Sterling Heights, Mich. continuous or intermittent mode.” In this way the
fModel GPR-20, Defense Electronics Inc., Ann Arbor, Mich force could be applied anywhere on the occlusal
Fig. 6. Block diagram of the recording and analyzing system. All equipment, except the path
from digitizer to cards to computer, were operational during the experiment. The patient /ZI
with the bridge (I) is sitting in a radiofrequency-shielded room (3). The received signal (4) is
decoded (61 and recorded on a polygraph (10) together with the electrical muscle activity (7j.
The signals are stored on a tape recorder (13). The recordings are digitized at a later date (I J)
and analyzed by computer (Ji).
ing of the eight channels of force data and four with the magnitude of the applied force. The cali-
channels of EMG data for each of the 15 strokes. The brations were performed with a standardized contact
force data on the polygraph paper were measured by surface between calibrator and transmitter. Occlusal
an electronic digitizer accurate to 0.001 inch which contact telemetry studies showed that in almost 75%
punched the data and an identifying code number of the chewing strokes occlusal contact occ~rs.‘~ In
on cards for later computer analysis. The data these cases the zone and the extent of contact are
recorded on FM tape were replayed with the time known.
scale expanded by four and recorded on the poly- In other instances, with food between the teeth,
graph with a paper speed of 100 mm/set. From each the contact surface varied and depended on the kind
event, 15 chewing strokes were replayed, and for of food. Therefore, comparison of data obtained by
each stroke up to 25 parameters were measured and chewing different kinds of food even in the same
punched onto cards by the digitizer. session must be made very carefully. On the other
A number of special computer programs were hand, the comparison of the values obtained in
written to convert the measurements from inches to chewing the same food in different sessions can be
pounds by incorporating the calibration data. The made with more confidence. Other authors have
results were plotted with a Calcomp plotter” and discussed methods and devices to measure oral
analyzed statistically. muscle forces.“’ They have stressed that artifacts can
arise from several sources and that consideration
DISCUSSION must be given to each. From the description and
The forces exerted on the occlusal surface by calibration of the present transmitter, no artifacts
patients vary in time, duration, and position. Since exist from muscle displacement by the intraoral
the calibration system is only semidynamic, it is not device, temperature fluctuations in the mouth, inad-
ideal. In some reports however, the recording devices equate waterproofing of the electrical components,
were calibrated by applying a static force to a part or extraneous force due to movement of wires, nonlin-
the whole occlusal surface by means of a ballzo, 23 or ear response of the device, internal factors affecting
a loading platform.‘4 In other reports the pressure reproducibility, or movement of the transducer rela-
transducers were calibrated before incorporation tive to the tooth surface.
into prostheses,6. lb or the calibration remained The system bandwidth is a possible limitation to
unknown.” accuracy. The overall bandwidth of each channel
The output of the sensors is a function of three was limited to 10 Hz by the final DC amplifier in the
variables: the magnitude of the force, the area of decoder. This bandwidth would preclude analysis of
contact between the force and the occlusal surface, pulse shape and transient phenomena if this infor-
and the distance from the force to the sensor. The mation had been desired. Comparisons of tape-
calibration showed the linearity of the strain gauges recorded data indicated that the peak was increased
only about 10% by increasing the bandwidth from
10 Hz to 100 Hz. Thus this bandwidth limitation
does not unduly affect the peak data. In the analysis 15. Anderson, D. J., and P.icton, I). C.: Masticatory ctress in
normal and modified occlusion. J Dent Res 37:3 12, 1958.
of the direct tracings, the bandwidth was not taken
16. Eichner, K.: Aufschliisse iiber den Kauvorgang durch elek-
into consideration. In the replayed tracings, this tronisxhe Kaukraftmessungen. Deutsch Zahnaerzr Z 19:415.
factor is a possible limitation. 1964.
In measuring lateral muscle forces, e.g., from the 17. Windecker, D.: Messung des durchschnittlichen Kaukraf-
tongue, the zone of contact between transducer and taufnahmevermogens van Prothesen mittels einer cigensta-
hiler Kaukraftmessdose. Deutsch Zahnaerztl % 19~808,
muscle varies considerably. In our experiments the
1964.
contact occurs between two small stable surfaces, 18. Beam, E. M.: Some masticatory force pattern produced by
and the muscles do not contact the surface direct- full denture wearers. Dent Pratt Dent Ret 22:342. 1972
‘Y. 19. Briner, M.: Kaubewegung und Kaudruck in ihren wcchsel-
seitigen Buiehungen. Med Dis Ziirich 1952.
CONCLUSION 20. Nyquist, G.. and Owall, B.: Masticatory load registration
during function. Odontol Rev 19:45, 1968.
Considering the complexity of the problem in 21. Graf, H., Grassl, H., and Aeberhard, H. J.: A method for
measuring functional occlusal forces of the mastica- measurement of occlusal forces in three directions. Hclvet
tory muscles,an accurate and manageable telemetric Odontol Acta 18:7, 1974.
system has been developed. Many tests in vitro and 22. Atkinson, H. F., and Shephard, R. W.: Masticatory move-
ments and the resulting force. Arch Oral Biol 12:195,
hundreds of recordings in several patients prove its
1967.
value in the study of the physiologic mechanism of 23. Ahlgren, J., and &all, B.: Muscular activity and chewing
the stomatognathic system. forces. A polygraphic study of human mandibular move-
ment. Arch Oral Biol 15:271, 1970.
24. Pameijer, C. H., and Stallard, R. E.: Intraoral forces during
REFERENCES function in relation lo tooth contact and muscle physiology.
I Bore& G. A.: De motu animalium (1680). Tram Royal Sot Proc 49th Meeting Intern Assoc Dent Res, 1971 (Abstr No.
Med 26:71, 1933. 402)
2. Brekhus, P. J., Armstrong, W. D., and Simon, W. J.: 25. Scott, I.. and Ash M. M., Jr.,: A six channel intraoral
Stimulation of the muscles of mastication. J. Dent Res 20:87. transmitter for measuring occlusal forces. J PROSWET DEW