You are on page 1of 5

Telemetry system to study functional occlusal forces

W. D. McCall, Jr., Ph.D,* J. A. De Boever, L.D.S., D.M.D., Ph.D,** and


M. M. Ash, Jr., D.D.S., M.S.‘**
Univemity of ?v4ichigan, School of Dentistry. Ann Plrhor. %lich,

S tatic bite (closing) force has been investigated


centuries by many investigators using different
for 100 to 200, whereas foil or wire gauges have gauge
factors of 2. Prior to gauge installation, stone casts of
methods, equipment, and conditions.‘-“’ Occlusal the patient were mounted on an articulator and the
forces exerted by the masticatory muscles have also occlusal surface of the pontic was waxed up accord-
been investigated during chewing and swallowing, ing to a wax-added technique. The occlusal surface
using strain gauges,“.” pressure transducers,‘“-‘” and was then cast in gold. A negative of this surface and
piezoelectric devices.“‘-Z! the abutment teeth was made in plaster and also
Methods of simultaneously recording functional cast. The gold occlusal surface was reduced 1.5 mm.
occlusal forces and mandibular movements have also providing an occlusal table for mounting the sensors.
been reported.‘!‘-” In very few reports, however, has The occlusal table was soldered to a rigid frame and
the electrical activity of the masticatory muscles to the two partial denture attachments for the
been related to the occlusal forces.“-” abutment teeth. The eight strain gauges* were
These investigations have contributed significant- attached to the occlusal table; four sensors were in
ly to our understanding of the neuromuscular basis the mesial, central, and distal fossae; two sensors
of the masticatory system. However, factors such as under the supporting cusps; and two under the
the disturbing influence of transoral linkages have nonsupporting cusps (Fig. 1). The sensors were
caused a continued search for more precise and covered with a uniform layer of cold-cure acrylic
independent methods that do not disturb the system. resint using the negative mold previously obtained
Therefore, telemetric devices have been developed to from the occlusal surface.
continously monitor occlusal forces during func- Description of the transmitter. Since the electron-
tion 1I-L’i. ic characteristics of the present telemetric system for
The purpose of the present research was to develop measuring occlusal forces have been described else-
an intraoral force telemetry system that would regis- where.:’ only the essential features will be summa-
ter occlusal forces during function without the rized here.
disturbing influence of transoral linkages. The transmittert is composed of three main
elements: the ring counter, analog switches, and
METHODS radio frequency (RF) module. The transmitter
Occlusal surface and transducer placement. components are shown in Fig. 2. The ring counter is
Strain gauges vary their resistance in response to used as a commutator to operate a series of field
deformation and. in conjunction with beams, effect transitor (FET) switches. There is one switch
measure forces. The development of semiconductor for each sensor and one additional switch for a
strain gauges has made available gauge factors of synchronization (SYNC) pulse. These FET switches
are operated sequentially by the ring counter to form
‘Awxiate Professor, Department of Oral .Medicinc, School of a nine-pulse commutated signal. The solid-state
Dentist?. State University of New York at Buffalo. Buffalo.
strain sensors have an output of 20 mV maximum.
N. Y.
l *Associate Profcuor, Department of Prosthodontics, Ghent State This is amplified by a factor of five in a DC
University, C;hent. Belgium.
***Professor and ChaIrman, Department of Occlusion. School of ‘Mcdel DOI-04..5OCO. Celesko Electronics, (:anoga Park. Calit
IIcntistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, STich. tKcsin Perm. Dental Manufacturing Company. Akron. Ohm
Supported by USPHS Grant DE 02i31. $Film Microclcctronics, Burlington. Mass.

98 JULY 1978 VOLUME 40 NUMBER I


TELEMETRIC STUDY OF OCCLUSAL FORCES

BUCCAL

LINGUAL
Fig. 1. Placement of strain gauges. The placement of the
semiconductor strain gauges under the occlusal surface is
shown schematically. The view is from the occlusal
surface. The force information from each strain gauge was
multiplexed for transmission and demultiplexed for Fig. 2. Electronic components of the eight-channel occlu-
analog presentation. sal force transmitter. Clockwisr fronl :efi [L) 7ighi: Ring
counter, FET-switches, DC amplifier, RF-module, coil,
resistor of the sync pulse, capacitor, fr>zlr I .S V
amplifier, and the resulting signal is applied to the batteries.
RF module. The RF module frequency modulates
the nominally 120 MHz carrier proportionally to the
pulse amplitude (PAM) commutated from the
sensors. Full pulse amplitude causes 0.25 MHz of
deviation from the carrier. The eight data pulses are
0.30 to 0.45 of the sync pulse (Fig. 3). The sampling
rate is approximately 300 Hz for each channel.
A small antenna in the buccal fold provides
radiation of the signals for several feet. The power for
the transmitter is provided by four small 1.5 V DC
batteries* in a waterproof battery case with a screw Fig. 3. The signal emitted by the transmitter and demo-
cap. The battery drain is 3.5 mA. By meticulous dulated by the receiver consists of a sync pulse and eight
pulses varying linearly in amplitude with the resistance of
selection of batteries, a continuous experimental
the strain gauges under the occlusal surface. Calibrations:
session of up to 2 hours could be obtained. 1 V and 0.5 msec.
Construction of the transmitter. All electronic
components of the transmitter were mounted on a used to drive a sample and hold circuit for each
board and tested on the bench. After all the compo- channel. Thus the output of the decoder is eight
nents were soldered underneath the pontic, the analog signals corresponding to the volta,qes from the
transmitter was embedded with epoxy resin.t Test- eight sensors.
ing and assembly time for each transmitter was Tests and calibration. The transmitter underwent
approximately 250 hours. The configuration of the a series of tests prior to use in the patient. The
assembled transmitter is shown in Figs. 4 and 5. embedded transmitter was checked for both elecrri-
Receiver and decoder. A loop antenna around the cal and water leakage by operating it in water.
patient’s neck picks up the RF signal and sends it to Afterward, the stability of the signal was verified by
a conventional FM superheterodyne receiverx for connecting the transmitter to a power supply and
amplification and demodulation into a video signal. recording for 24 hours. Each channel of each trans-
The sync pulse is extracted from the video signal and mitter was calibrated by applying knowrl forces on
used both to reset a counter and to delete the sync the occlusal surface and recording the response from
pulse from the nine pulses, leaving the data pulses. the decoder. A semidynamic calibration instrumen-
Clock pulses are generated from the data pulses and tation system was developed to move the precision
XY (horizontal) table on which the transmitter was
mounted in the XY plane automatically in either a
*Mallory MS 212.
tResin 5005. Amrez Co., Sterling Heights, Mich. continuous or intermittent mode.” In this way the
fModel GPR-20, Defense Electronics Inc., Ann Arbor, Mich force could be applied anywhere on the occlusal

THE JOURNAL OF PROSTHETK DENTISTRY 99


MCCALL, DeBClEVER, AND ASH

Fig, 4. Configuration of the assembled transmitter. I,


Strain gauges. 2, Gold occlusal table. 3, Ring counter. 4,
FET-switches. 5, DC amplifier. 6, RF-module. 7, Coil. 8,
Antenna. 9, Battery case. A, Acrylic resin occlusal surface.
B, Waterproof epoxy resin.

surface. The table could be repositioned to the


starting point to within +0.04 mm.
Force was applied to the occlusal surface in the Z
(vertical) direction by means of a small ball
connected to an air piston, spring loaded in a
retracted position. Precise force values were obtained
with this system. All calibration curves were re- Fig. 5. A, Occlusal view of the radiotransmltter partial
corded on polygraph paper and measured twice with denture under construction before putting the resin on the
surface. Arrows, Micro semiconductor strain gauges; Bu.
Boley gauges to 0.1 mm. The average of the two
Partial denture attachment. B. View of the finished trans-
measurements was recorded. mitter bridge before insertion into the mouth. 6rc. Partial
The velocity of the movement of the calibration denture attachment.
table had a minimal influence on the output, since
increasing the velocity of the table by 300 times decoded as described above, were available along
changed the output by less than 5%. Calibrations at with electromyographic (EMG) data, described in a
22” C and 37” C did not show any variation in companion paper.“’ These data were recorded on the
amplitude. same polygraph by using the pen driver amplifier
The effect of the acrylic resin covering the strain only. A block diagram of the data recording and
gauges on the transient response or the frequency analysis equipment is shown in Fig. 6. Three force
response was not investigated. The immediate repro- channels and the EMG from the masseter muscle on
ducibility was checked by three calibrations during the partial denture side were also recorded on FM
and after each recording session involving the tape for later replay in time expansion.
patient. The reproducibility of the telemetry system Data analysis. The experimental protocol was
was verified and found to be within 2% of the means. planned around functional events, chewing various
Variations due to temperature, water leakage, the foods under various occlusal conditions, and a few
speed of the calibration procedure, and movement voluntary but nonchewing movements such as
were found to be minimal. tapping the teeth together. Each event consisted ot
The eight channels of force data, transmitted from 15 strokes, occasionally fewer if swallowing occurred.
the patient’s partial denture and received and The raw data, then. consisted of a polygraph record-

100 IULY 1971) VOLUME 40 NUMBER 1


TELEMETRIC STUDY OF OCCLUSAL FORCES

_- _.- .- -~ - ..-- ~.. E


~~ _ ~. .~-

Fig. 6. Block diagram of the recording and analyzing system. All equipment, except the path
from digitizer to cards to computer, were operational during the experiment. The patient /ZI
with the bridge (I) is sitting in a radiofrequency-shielded room (3). The received signal (4) is
decoded (61 and recorded on a polygraph (10) together with the electrical muscle activity (7j.
The signals are stored on a tape recorder (13). The recordings are digitized at a later date (I J)
and analyzed by computer (Ji).

ing of the eight channels of force data and four with the magnitude of the applied force. The cali-
channels of EMG data for each of the 15 strokes. The brations were performed with a standardized contact
force data on the polygraph paper were measured by surface between calibrator and transmitter. Occlusal
an electronic digitizer accurate to 0.001 inch which contact telemetry studies showed that in almost 75%
punched the data and an identifying code number of the chewing strokes occlusal contact occ~rs.‘~ In
on cards for later computer analysis. The data these cases the zone and the extent of contact are
recorded on FM tape were replayed with the time known.
scale expanded by four and recorded on the poly- In other instances, with food between the teeth,
graph with a paper speed of 100 mm/set. From each the contact surface varied and depended on the kind
event, 15 chewing strokes were replayed, and for of food. Therefore, comparison of data obtained by
each stroke up to 25 parameters were measured and chewing different kinds of food even in the same
punched onto cards by the digitizer. session must be made very carefully. On the other
A number of special computer programs were hand, the comparison of the values obtained in
written to convert the measurements from inches to chewing the same food in different sessions can be
pounds by incorporating the calibration data. The made with more confidence. Other authors have
results were plotted with a Calcomp plotter” and discussed methods and devices to measure oral
analyzed statistically. muscle forces.“’ They have stressed that artifacts can
arise from several sources and that consideration
DISCUSSION must be given to each. From the description and
The forces exerted on the occlusal surface by calibration of the present transmitter, no artifacts
patients vary in time, duration, and position. Since exist from muscle displacement by the intraoral
the calibration system is only semidynamic, it is not device, temperature fluctuations in the mouth, inad-
ideal. In some reports however, the recording devices equate waterproofing of the electrical components,
were calibrated by applying a static force to a part or extraneous force due to movement of wires, nonlin-
the whole occlusal surface by means of a ballzo, 23 or ear response of the device, internal factors affecting
a loading platform.‘4 In other reports the pressure reproducibility, or movement of the transducer rela-
transducers were calibrated before incorporation tive to the tooth surface.
into prostheses,6. lb or the calibration remained The system bandwidth is a possible limitation to
unknown.” accuracy. The overall bandwidth of each channel
The output of the sensors is a function of three was limited to 10 Hz by the final DC amplifier in the
variables: the magnitude of the force, the area of decoder. This bandwidth would preclude analysis of
contact between the force and the occlusal surface, pulse shape and transient phenomena if this infor-
and the distance from the force to the sensor. The mation had been desired. Comparisons of tape-
calibration showed the linearity of the strain gauges recorded data indicated that the peak was increased
only about 10% by increasing the bandwidth from
10 Hz to 100 Hz. Thus this bandwidth limitation

THE JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY


MCCALL, DcBOEVER, AND ASH

does not unduly affect the peak data. In the analysis 15. Anderson, D. J., and P.icton, I). C.: Masticatory ctress in
normal and modified occlusion. J Dent Res 37:3 12, 1958.
of the direct tracings, the bandwidth was not taken
16. Eichner, K.: Aufschliisse iiber den Kauvorgang durch elek-
into consideration. In the replayed tracings, this tronisxhe Kaukraftmessungen. Deutsch Zahnaerzr Z 19:415.
factor is a possible limitation. 1964.
In measuring lateral muscle forces, e.g., from the 17. Windecker, D.: Messung des durchschnittlichen Kaukraf-
tongue, the zone of contact between transducer and taufnahmevermogens van Prothesen mittels einer cigensta-
hiler Kaukraftmessdose. Deutsch Zahnaerztl % 19~808,
muscle varies considerably. In our experiments the
1964.
contact occurs between two small stable surfaces, 18. Beam, E. M.: Some masticatory force pattern produced by
and the muscles do not contact the surface direct- full denture wearers. Dent Pratt Dent Ret 22:342. 1972
‘Y. 19. Briner, M.: Kaubewegung und Kaudruck in ihren wcchsel-
seitigen Buiehungen. Med Dis Ziirich 1952.
CONCLUSION 20. Nyquist, G.. and Owall, B.: Masticatory load registration
during function. Odontol Rev 19:45, 1968.
Considering the complexity of the problem in 21. Graf, H., Grassl, H., and Aeberhard, H. J.: A method for
measuring functional occlusal forces of the mastica- measurement of occlusal forces in three directions. Hclvet
tory muscles,an accurate and manageable telemetric Odontol Acta 18:7, 1974.
system has been developed. Many tests in vitro and 22. Atkinson, H. F., and Shephard, R. W.: Masticatory move-
ments and the resulting force. Arch Oral Biol 12:195,
hundreds of recordings in several patients prove its
1967.
value in the study of the physiologic mechanism of 23. Ahlgren, J., and &all, B.: Muscular activity and chewing
the stomatognathic system. forces. A polygraphic study of human mandibular move-
ment. Arch Oral Biol 15:271, 1970.
24. Pameijer, C. H., and Stallard, R. E.: Intraoral forces during
REFERENCES function in relation lo tooth contact and muscle physiology.
I Bore& G. A.: De motu animalium (1680). Tram Royal Sot Proc 49th Meeting Intern Assoc Dent Res, 1971 (Abstr No.
Med 26:71, 1933. 402)
2. Brekhus, P. J., Armstrong, W. D., and Simon, W. J.: 25. Scott, I.. and Ash M. M., Jr.,: A six channel intraoral
Stimulation of the muscles of mastication. J. Dent Res 20:87. transmitter for measuring occlusal forces. J PROSWET DEW

1941. l&56, 1966.


3. Worrier, H. K., and Andenon, M. N.: Biting force measure- 26. Kydd, W. L., and Mullins, G.: A telemetry system for
ment on children. Aust Dent J 4&l, 1944. intraoral pressures. Arch Oral Biol 8:235, 1963.
4. O’Rourke, J. ‘I‘.: Oral Physiology. St. Louis, 1951, The C. V. 27. Scott, I., and Ash M. M., Jr.,: Micro-miniature intraoral
Mosby Company, pp 66-103. telemetry system. Proc 6th Intern Telemetq Conference, LOS
5. Cehlig, H.: Ueber die Kaukraft. Deutsch Zahnaerztl 2 8:30, Angeles, 1970, pp 122-127.
1953. 28. Ash. M. M., Jr., and Scott, I. S.: Calibrarlon of six channel
6. Kraft, E.: Ueber die Bedtutung der Kaukraft fiir das intraoral occlusal forces transmitters. Report 07975. Office of
Kaugeschehen. Zahnaentl Praxis 13:129, 1969. Research Administration, University of Michigan. Ann
7. Martinko, V.: Messungen von Kriifte bei KauvorgCngen. Arbor, Michigan, 1967.
Deutsch Zahnaentl Z ‘2Oz910, 1965. 29. De Bcevcr, J., McCall, W. D., Holden, S., and Ash, M. M
8. Jenkins, G. N.: The Physiology of the Mouth, ed 3. Phila- Functional occlusal forces: An investigation by telemetry. J
delphia, 1966, F. A. Davis Company, pp 422-428. PROSTHET DEN.r (Submitted for publication).
9. Linderholm, H, and WennstrGm, A.: Isometric bite force 30. Pameijer, J. H., Glickman, I., and Roeber, F. W.: Intraoral
and its relation to general muscle force and body build. Acta occlusal telemetry. III. Tooth contact in chewing, swallow-
Odgntol Stand 8:679, 1970. ing, and bruxism. J Periodontol 40:253, 1969.
10. Marklund,‘G., and Wennstrtim, A.: A pilot study concerning 31. Lear, C. S. C., Cats, J., Grossman, R. C., Glanagan. J. B..
the relation between manifest anxiety and bite force. Svensk and Morrees, C. F. A.: Measurement of lateral muscle forces
‘I‘andlaek T 65:107, 1971. on dental arches. Arch Oral Biol 10:669. 1965.
11. Brudevold, F.: A basic study of the chewing forces of the Rcprtnt rcque~~slo.
denture wearer. J Am Dent Assoc 43:45, 1951. DR. J. DF. B~EVER
12. Yurkstas, A., and Curby, W. A.: Force analysis of prosthetic JhPAR’IMENT OF PROsTHoUoN.rIcS
appliances during function. J PROSMET DENT 3:82, 1953. STOMATOLOClE
13. Anderson, D. J.: A method of recording masticatory loads. J AKADEMISCH ZIEKENHUIS
Dent Res 32:785, 1953. DE PINTELAAK. 135
14. Anderson, D. J.: Measurement of stress in mastication. J GENT B 9000
Dent Res 35:644, 1956. BELGIUM

102 JULY 1978 VOLUME 40 NUMBER 1

You might also like