Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Behaviorism in Language Learning
Behaviorism in Language Learning
LANGUAGE
LEARNING/ACQUISITION
(Behaviorism)
What’s the
difference
between
Acquisition &
Learning?
SECOND LANGUAGE
LEARNING
12
Ivan Pavlov
❑ He conducted a series of
experiments by training a
dog to salivate when
hearing a bell.
❑ It is known as Classical
Conditioning
13
Classical Conditioning
14
“
15
Classical Conditioning
❑ Consider a hungry dog who sees a
bowl of food.
Food ---> Salivation
❑ The dog is hungry, the dog sees
the food, the dog salivates.
❑ This is a natural sequence of
events, an unconscious,
uncontrolled, and unlearned
relationship. See the food, then
salivate. 16
Classical Conditioning
❑ When we present the food to the
hungry dog (and before the dog
salivates), we ring a bell. Thus,
· Bell with
· Food ---> Salivation
21
Operant Conditioning
❑ Skinner was not satisfied that all
behavior was based on reflexes.
❑ He argued that we behave the way we
do because of the consequences
generated by our past behavior.
26
In 1950s and 1960s, the learning
theory of Behaviorism underpinned
the used of Audiolingual Method
(ALM) on language teaching, with
three crucial learning elements:
1. Stimulus
2. Response
3. Reinforcement
27
❑ The classroom
environment is
arranged with
mimicry,
memorization, and
pattern drills.
28
❑ Behavioristic view of language
acquisition simply claims that
language development is the
result of a set of habits.
◦ Cueing responses to
behavior allows the learner
to react in a predictable way
under certain conditions
30
Strengths of Behaviorism
THANKS!
Any questions?
33