Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WP 1 Explication Essay
WP 1 Explication Essay
Tony Liang
Professor Tumen
WRIT 2
11 Aug 2022
quantitatively analyzed the antibacterial properties of several food preservative mixtures was
translated into an infographic. The translation shifted the target audience from highly specialized
individuals with expertise in both chemistry and biology, to a non-specialized, general audience.
The infographic accurately highlighted the major objectives of the original research paper, while
also maintained a strong readability consistent with the extent of knowledge of a general
audience. The translation achieved this via the exemplary characteristics of an effective
infographic, which were descriptive title and subheads, organized and specially formatted facts,
between genres. The format of the original article is similar to that of a lab report, comprised of
entirety of the article was written in third person perspective, and in past tense, consistent with
extracted from cinnamon plant essential oils was explored as a potential substitute for the
popular nitrite food preservative. An experiment was conducted to measure the effectiveness of
cinnamaldehyde and nitrite in the suppression of growth against harmful foodborne bacteria such
Liang 2
as E. coli, S. aureus, and C. perfringens. Challenges of the experiment were then elaborated to
explain for the methods employed, such as cinnamaldehyde’s “possibility of drastic changes in
the sensory attributes of the product, [its] volatility and instability, low water solubility, and its
oxidation ability” (Hojati et al.), all of which could potentially eliminate the antibacterial
eliminate these negative effects. Therefore, the researchers sought to investigate the effectiveness
preservatives, giving rise to the title of the infographic, The Antibacterial Property of
Food Preservatives.
In order to translate a pedantic and highly specialized research paper into an infographic
important recurring concepts in the original research paper, and were essential to the objective of
the experiment, therefore their definition had to be provided in the infographic. The terms
“cinnamaldehyde” and “nitrite” were also in bold and large font in the infographic to emphasize
their importance in the study. In contrast to these scientific jargons, the data and results sections
of the original article contained large amounts of precise numeric values and esoteric units of
measurement. Data such as “105.8 CFU/g” were unnecessary to the holistic understanding of the
experiment, and were therefore removed or simplified for easier interpretation by the audience.
As a result of this editing process, the top half of the infographic largely contained information
present in the introduction section of the original research paper, which were more factual than
statistical. Unlike the top half the infographic, the bottom half was largely occupied by
Liang 3
interpretation of the results and conclusion sections of the original paper. In the original research
paper, much of the conclusion was backed up by excessive experimental data that would be
under different preservative treatment was constructed using the numerical data in the original
paper to provide a more direct visual representation of the experimental result. Additionally, the
original paper was referenced in the bottom of the infographic to provide credibility of the claims
made.
infographic was the lack of stance offered by the research paper. As with most scientific
experiments, the conclusions are bimodal: statistical significance is either present or absent,
which made the objective of the infographic translation confusing and unappealing to a general
audience. To assert a stronger position, the infographic took inspiration from the motive that lead
to the scientific research, “The use of nitrites and nitrates in the sausage formulation… has
increased the public concerns about their consumption” (Hojati et al.). To magnify the argument
that cinnamaldehyde is not only more effective in bacterial suppression, but also carries
significant health benefit over the nitrite, a separate study was briefly referenced. A study from
the Journal of Functional Foods compounded with the motive from the original article,
(Khadije et al.). Combined with the result of the original paper which indicated statistical
significance of Cinnamaldehyde having a stronger antibacterial property, a strong case was made
for cinnamaldehyde as the healthier and more effective food preservative. To further emphasize
the strength of cinnamaldehyde over nitrite, phrases such as “naturally occurring” and “healthier
alternative” were boldened and colored green when describing cinnamaldehyde, while phrases
Liang 4
such as “synthetic” and “potential carcinogenic properties” were boldened but colored red when
describing nitrite.
Finally, thematic and eye-catching graphic icons were placed throughout each section of
the infographic translation. This provided intuitive sense to the reader of what each section
entailed without reading extensively into each paragraph. It also gave the audience an attention
grabber for each section, encouraging them to move down each section of the infographic. At the
same time, the graphic icons all center around and enhance the main stance of the infographic,
Despite having markedly different audience, the biochemical research paper, “Effect of
an infographic effectively. By utilizing graphic and textual elements essential to infographics, the
final product delivered reliable information to a non-specialized audience while being visually
intuitive.
Liang 5
Works Cited
Hojati, Narges, Sedigheh Amiri, and Mohsen Radi. "Effect of Cinnamaldehyde Nanoemulsion
Induced by High Tail Fat in Rats.” Journal of Functional Foods, Elsevier, 24 July 2014,
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1756464614002424.