Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2021Edition II
EHS Program
1 A Sparrow Initiative
www.sparrowrms.in
About 1EHS
1EHS Program
EHS Program
1
1EHS program is India’s first EHS community
research program (1st edition was extremely
insightful & useful for EHS community). It
provides deep insight on standards, trends,
future need, employment, growth potential,
perception and most importantly the pattern
of growth. It is India’s one of a kind annual
research done by Sparrow Risk Management
to find out all the latest trends in EHS
segment in India, what the people associated
with EHS think about the upcoming
technologies, new laws, and what is necessary
to do in order to make all the premises safer
and risk free.
18 sectors covered
*sample size may vary with questions as
only complete entries were considered
This year’s 1EHS Insight Report (Edition II) is deeper and more data
driven, it mesmerizes your thoughts on endless possibilities of
growth in EHS. It focuses on future trends, perception &
possibilities in EHS perspective Personal Career & Growth,
Sustainability, Role of technology, Process Safety, Road Safety to
name a few. We have also updated the data nodes for career
Mr. Pawan
orientation & related educational institution demand along with
Director & CEO, global certification indexes.
to Success!!!
Sincere thanks to our team of interns from IIM Indore & NITIE
Let us Fail more." Mumbai, our respected mentors and colleagues back at home i.e.,
Sparrow.
Science has moved with a lot of pace than our learning capability –
सपने और सु कू न ,
we are catching up with more R&D in focus.
स लयत से कभी साथ नह होते !
Enjoy reading and utilizing the great insights ahead.
My heartiest congratulation
to Sparrow and their (Durga Shakti)
Team for generating industry insight called as
“1EHS Program”. The way you are creating this culture will
certainly lead to new dimension on the EHS industry and
professional. This goes true with the cardinal principal “You will
achieve the level of safety that you demonstrate you want to
achieve”. This culture change is evolutionary and revolutionary that
mean a paradigm shift i.e. shifting the focus from operators error
to focusing on culture and management system that influence
safety behavior of not any individual but industry. EHS workspace is
waiting for young diverse professionals with fresh revolutionary ideas
Saurabh Srivastava,
to make workplace safe. I wish this report to reach all industry leaders Head H&S Compliance
so that they understand the great work done by your team in -South Asia, ASEAN &
collecting and analyzing mammoth data for the benefit of employee
NoA,
Health & Safety.
Thanks for giving me opportunity to be part of this fantastic Reckitt
journey.
(C) Sparrow Risk Management Pvt. Ltd., www.sparrowrms.in
3
Message from the Mentors
Mentors
“Trust has to be earned, and should come only after the passage
Gyanesh Pathak,
of time ‘’ – Arthur Ashe.
I would like to say ‘Team Sparrow’ have earned this Trust in
Head EHS,
the EHS fraternity. I have closely watched them over the past few years Bennett Coleman
and have grown fond of their approach, passion and perseverance to and Co. Ltd.
work on every minute details to be as authentic as possible.
I congratulate them for achieving another forte by releasing
(Times Group)
their second edition of 1EHS & would like to appreciate
the insights provided in the edition. My wishes to them for
their future endeavors.
"Absolutely
great insights covering
all aspects from industry
requirements to employability, from the
current status of EHS to what the future holds.
Congratulations to Team Sparrow for coming out with the
second edition of 1EHS Survey so beautifully to help thought
leaders in this space work on a strategy to meet the ever growing
industry demands on different facets of EHS and Sustainability. Step
Pankaj Singh,
up from the maiden edition in spite of the country going through such a
Head of Road Safety, difficult time of COVID pandemic which clearly shows the grit, resilience
India and passion to support the larger EHS community with deep insights and
Holcim Group (ACC help the ecosystem be 'future ready'. While we see the area of industrial
safety and environmental compliance maturing due to the legislative
and Ambuja framework and focus of the industry, the future is clearly about 'beyond
Cements) compliance'. This can only be achieved if the academia and corporate
work hand in hand to bring out industry ready EHS professionals who
are ready to talk the language of digitization and sustainability, who
cares road safety as much as process safety, who bring value
rather than just meet legal requirements. Health will get much
deserved focus across the globe due to the ongoing
pandemic and shall continue to be one major area of
expenditure going forward, I will put my bet
on Digital, Road Safety and
Sustainability as three key
“Many compliments to Sparrow team ably led by Mr. Pawan for verticals that will see
initiating this unique initiative. Frankly, I never came across such exponential
Head, Safety culture, budget, gender etc. The insights given on digitization front is
noteworthy and thought provoking whether existing safety digital platforms
Birla Corporation are helping business continuity or not in terms of predictive analysis and
Limited effective tool for management’s decision making!
Best Wishes for Grand Success of 2nd Edition ! Cheers !!!
#1EHS #SparrowRocks #EHSFraternity
Table of Contents
Job opportunities .....................................................09
Education ..................................................................13
Certification .............................................................16
EHS Budget...............................................................26
Safety ........................................................................35
OSHA
3%
Women representation
in EHS
60%
Organizations have Process
Safety Management program
Remained Same
Increased
Decreased
0 20 40 60
Remained Same
Increased
Decreased
0 10 20 30 40 50
Overall, 47.9% Middle management professionals said that they saw a increase in job opportunities in their
companies, while 36% middle management professionals disagreed that there was no significant change in
opportunities, while 16% felt that the opportunities had actually decreased in their organization. Middle management
positions were significantly higher in demand during the previous year in the corporate compared to entry level posts
with 46.8% professionals believed that opportunities increased in corporate for middle management while only 14.8%
felt that opportunities increased for entry level posts in corporates.
With the above data and talking to multiple professionals in EHS fraternity, we get an
impression that due to COVID - 19, the companies felt the requirement of more experienced
professionals from middle management level and more than 5 years of experience in the field
rather than hire and train entry level employees.
"We can infer from the data that demands for entry
Less than 5
level EHS jobs decreased, especially at the corporate
69.7%
level while middle level job opportunity increased,
70% respondents voted there
showing high rotation among the EHS professionals
might be no openings at all or
from one organization to another rather than absolute less than 5 openings when it
came to EHS department.
increase in total EHS jobs"
Looking at the team size, we analyzed the data from approximately 100 organization & averaged out the number of
team members by taking the middle values i.e. for a range of 10 - 20, we take 15 as the average value for further
calculations.
We found there were roughly 8000 EHS professionals in the organization sample taken, with approximately 60% being
permanent employees & rest contract basis.
Analyzing the data about the planned increase, the total number goes to 9000 employees after planned intake.
1950
Less than 30
2178
Organizations having team
1495
30-100
1664
size of
1050
100-200
1185
3600
more than 200
4040
Comparing the perceptions of middle level professionals, entry level professionals and Senior
management, we get a clarity that though the organizations are planning a 12% intake, the
actual number of fresh EHS job opening for entry level might be less as the organizations are
focusing on hiring professionals with experience above 5 years.
50%
Highest qualifications - Entry Level
40%
Perception of entry level employees
if core engineering knowledge help
30% to better perform EHS duties
20%
10% 97%
0%
B.tech Mtech Others PGDM
97% of the respondents from entry level believed that core engineering knowledge helps in
fulfilling EHS duties. This is evident with the highest qualifications of the entry level with over
70% having BTech/MTech degrees while the rest specializing in other services or management
with or without engineering as base.
0
BTech MTech Others PGDM
Low Not possible Very High Very Low
Speaking about the colleges from which the senior management EHS leaders would like to
hire, NITIE Mumbai takes the lead in preference with IIM Lucknow, IIT Kharagpur ranked 2nd
and Anna university behind them. Although this preference was limited to the above 4
colleges, Industry leaders have specifically mentioned colleges such as NIT Trichy, Regional
Labor institute & open preference to other major engineering colleges such as all major IITs,
private colleges offering specializations.
Anna University
Cochin University
IPS Indore
NIT Trichy
NITIE, Mumbai
UPES, Dehradun
While the respondents from the middle management preferred to study in NIT Trichy (23.5%), UPES (21%), NITIE
(29.4%), etc. when it came to hiring, they had positive preference towards Anna University, Cochin university with
2.7% and 2.6% more preference to hire than to study in these colleges respectively. These few minor differences in
the hiring pattern and studies indicate the budget restrictions where companies prefer to hire from a step below the
top tier colleges. This may also mean specializations are more preferred which are not available in those colleges.
Respondents had the highest preference to hire from NITIE, NIT Trichy & UPES Dehradun ,
with the same results for college preference to study for higher studies as well. But not all
who wanted to study from these top tier colleges wanted to hire from them, showing positive
difference in hiring vs studying for colleges like Anna University, Cochin university & IPS
Indore.
Skills
When asked about which skills or education was more important while thinking about the near future of EHS,
Employees from the middle and entry level gave their preference according to this:
38.69% EHS employees feel the need for core engineering knowledge which can integrate with the EHS field while
24.62% felt much more appreciation towards data analytics in accordance to the IOT and AI based software coming
into the EHS market and making data a bigger parameter while performing EHS duties, and 36.68% respondents
weighted towards the more conventional methods of certifications & specialization.
Data Analytics
24.62%
Core Engineering
38.69%
Specialization
36.68%
We see an upcoming trend for Data analytics after the advent of multiple software in the EHS
field with data increasing in size due to IOT and AI based tools. While the Current perception
about core engineering knowledge is at 97%, the future sees a higher value for more
specialized skills & data analytics.
In recent years, the growing need and demand for EHS-based skills and certifications has resulted in an outstanding
marketable skillset. Every EHS Personnel has few certifications listed on LinkedIn while others are actively pursuing
more certifications. To understand the importance of these certifications from a practical point of view, we compared
how these additional skill sets fare in real life expectations. We asked the entry level respondents about what
certification or skill set do they think is valuable and compared them with the expectations of EHS professionals
having more than 5 years of experience in the field to see if the expectations of entry level personnel was in line
with seniors or not.
Senior Management Expectations
IEMA/EMS
5%
M.tech
18%
RLI
45%
NEBOSH
21%
OSHA
Entry Level Perception 7% Middle management Perception
IEMA/EMS IEMA/EMS
8% 2%
RLI
23%
M.tech
25%
RLI
41%
OSHA
6% M.tech
34%
NEBOSH
NEBOSH 20%
26% OSHA
10%
There comes a stark difference between the perception of entry level EHS respondents and
more experienced set of professionals in the industry. While the Middle management and
senior management views are very similar to each other, giving higher priority to RLI
(Regional Labor Institute) with more than 40% upper management professionals responded
they would prefer to hire professionals with RLI certification much more than MTech,
NEBOSH or OSHA.
Violation reporting
14.3%
Collection of data
29.9%
Vendor management
9.1%
Training
26% Supporting seniors
20.8%
>70%
0-20%
20-40%
40-70%
0 10 20 30 40
Corporate Factories
Analysis show that the Entry level EHS personnel spend up to 70% time in repetitive
tasks.
Out of the total Entry level professionals, 31% professionals belonging to factories said
they have 20 - 40% repetitive work where else 36% professionals of factories said that
their tasks involve 40-70% repetitive work. We believe that it needs disruption.
India depends highly on man power rather than technology. As evident by the percentage time spent by ground level
employees on repetitive work, we see a stark difference in the corporate vs factory setting. Companies have
implemented technology at corporate level but factories still remain dependent on man power. It is also true that at
corporate level, the requirements are less as compared to factory level, but it only strengthens the need for
technological advances to reduce repetitive work. Repetitive work may lead to less active approach by EHS personnel
due to routine work & may lead to human error.
40-70%
24%
20-40%
43%
Repetitive Tasks - Conclusion
Repetitive tasks for entry level team in EHS is much higher compared to middle
management with maximum respondents pointing out that they have repetitive tasks in
range of 40 -70 percent or at least more than 20 to 40%. The middle management on
other hand felt they had 20 - 40% task repetitive with 43% people agreeing with that,
while 24% said their repetitive tasks went up to 70%.
Due to this repetitive nature of work, 60% EHS professionals from middle management
say that they feel there is nothing much left to learn after spending 5 years in the EHS
field while 23% felt that number to be near to 10 years.
75%
50%
25%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Job satisfaction ratings tend to become better as we move towards the right with increase in appraisal
The missing bars are negligible ratings
>15%
24.2%
5-10%
41.7%
0-5%
18.3%
10-15%
15.8%
12-18%
10.7%
1-5%
29.3%
8-12%
30.7%
5 -8%
25.3%
Average appraisals for EHS Professional is below par compared to all the other industries
such as software, finance, marketing, etc. EHS fraternity as a whole needs to resolve this as
early as possible . EHS has never been a sought after career nor has been the primary
choice of students. Most of the EHS professionals are underpaid compared to other
professions, making EHS unattractive for fresh candidates.
90% professionals from entry level feel that EHS is now becoming more important than ever
with good growth opportunities and better working conditions and would love to see their
future generation into EHS field, but how the next generation will cope up with the lesser
growth?
Over 60% middle management professionals gave a rating of above 8 out of 10 to show their
willingness towards their future generations joining EHS field, while 32% showed medium
willingness by giving 5 - 7 ratings for the same.
Lesser accidents
Shared Responsibility
60%
EHS professionals were more confident in terms of their
aspirations and career growth when working in organizations
that was always receptive towards their ideas
56%
EHS professionals measured Safety Culture with
respect to the support show by management in
matters of Safety & Health
EHS Budget
6.09%
Accidents &
Trainings
23.48%
Board representation
14.78%
Support for initiative from management for day to day safety related activities, initiatives for
new programs and campaigns, support in terms of approvals, man power, participation, etc.
had a much deeper impact than giving a position in boardroom or giving higher budget for
EHS.
Man hours spent for safety related activities by Non EHS employees
None of these
10.3% More than 100hrs/yr
17.1%
<50hrs/yr
28.4%
100-50hrs/yr
35.5%
50-100 hrs/yr
33.6%
Non EHS workers manhours for Safety - Non EHS workers manhours for Safety -
Senior Management Perception Entry level Perception
The perception of senior management on the amount of hours all non EHS personnel spend
on safety is higher than what the entry level thinks are the number of hours spent by non
EHS personnel a year on safety activities. This may be the difference between the planned
trainings and the trainings actually not happening due to multiple reasons such as
cancellation, people not attending , production targets & culture.
75
50
25
0
Always Often Rarely Sometimes
Organizations who support ideas from their employees, implement them give boosts to the
employees and incentivize them to think beyond the box, making them more confident about
their job and accelerate their career growth.
Updating SOPs:
Almost a quarter of the respondents participating in 1EHS % of SOP updated in a year
More than 50% of the time, request for EHS budget was approved which shows the
dedication of most of the leading organizations.
Spending:
EHS spending is growing as organizations start understanding the importance of safety, incorporating EHS not just for
compliance purposes, but also incorporating it in board rooms, decision making process and making it a part of annual
planning. Just from a sample size of 92 respondents from the senior management, a combined amount of roughly 2637
cr has been spent in a year by taking approximate revenues and averaging out the percentage terms into absolute
terms.
This value comes by using the publicly available data on the revenues of the organizations, and the respondents
answers on the percentage of revenue allotted to EHS budget. All values obtained are approximate.
Considering a sample data of less than 100 companies result in spending worth 2600+ Crores
INR, India has literally thousands of companies, all of them getting slowly aware about the
importance of EHS and are allocating more and more budget every year for it making it grow
on a very rapid rate.
EHS Budget for safety - Middle management perception EHS budget for safety - Senior management perception
We see 2 distinct groups of organizations when it comes The senior management of many organizations had a
to safety spending. The majority participants (41%) were perception that their organization spent more on safety
from organizations that spent more than 40% of the EHS when it came to the overall EHS budget. With 21.9%
budget on safety while another approx. 40% spent less responding they spent up to 40% and 39% professionals
than 30% of their budget on safety aspects of the EHS responding they spent beyond 40%, we can assume that
budget. the EHS budget of many organizations stay tilted
towards the safety aspect of EHS.
% of EHS budget spent on Safety - Middle % of EHS budget spent on Safety - Senior
Management perception management perception
25-30%
26.4%
25-30% >40%
more than 40%"
39.8% 39.6%
41.5%
31-35%
12.1%
While the perception of middle and upper level employees matched at the higher end of the spending spectrum, there
were difference of opinion when it came to the lower end of the spectrum with almost 40% of middle management
responded that their organization spent less than 30% of EHS budget on safety while only 26% senior management of
various organizations accepted their spending below 30% for safety. Most of the upper management quoted towards
the higher end of the range when it came to safety budget as a part of EHS budget.
Organizations tend to spend more on safety aspect when it comes to EHS due to its
immediate nature of results and impact for improving conditions compared to health and
environment which are generally long term projects.
>40%
12.5%
36-40%
15.2%
25-30%
58.9%
31-35%
13.4%
Spending on Health has increase very much due to the ongoing pandemic. Previous years
data shows a spending of mere 10 -20% on health, while this figure has increased to 25-30%
with many organizations nearing 40% of their annual EHS budget spending on health.
Machine Guarding
24.2%
Chemical Exposure
42.4%
Falling object
14.6%
Ergonomics
18.7%
Assessment
Road safety is another growing concern for organizations, especially when they have a lot of road travel included due
to distance involved between factories & residential places. A lot of these organizations providing transportation have
their own road safety officers (42.8%) who ensure that the correct guidelines are being followed. With digital systems
in place, (19%) organizations are able to monitor and track their vehicle movements inside & outside their premises. A
good chunk of organizations also rely on penalty structure & road safety rules (38.1%). Relying on penalty structure
ensures the compliance of the workers but works only as long as there is strict enforcement of penalties.
19.05%
Warning and Penalty structure in place
according to type of rules broken,
38.10%
42.86%
Road safety for Non Factory Workers Road safety for Non Factory Workers
While the organizations are taking an interest for
50% Not yet
Yes, and measuring road safety, it is still in the initial stages and not
KPIs are all factory workers are covered. There are a lot of non
40% Yes,
defined
factory staff working on the field who are barely covered.
however
30% there is On asking about the same, respondents from different
We are
no KPI organization responded that only 33.33% organizations
developing
20% defined
one had their non factory workers covered in road safety while
47.6% did not have any such ability, 4.7% were developing
10%
their strategy for the same & 14.29% measured it but had
0%
no KPI's defined for the same.
Safety Strategy focused on road safety % of safety strategy focused on road safety
43% respondents from senior management said their
More than
safety strategy consisted of more than 15% when it came 50%
15%
to road safety with 19% responding it was between 10-
40%
15% and another 19% responding it was around 5-10% of
their overall safety strategy. Remaining had less than 5%
30%
focus on road safety or none at all. In the coming years,
10-15% 5-10% Less
this numbers will change significantly as more and more 20% than
organizations are focusing on their employee's safety on 5%
None
the roads. 10%
0%
Organizations are focusing more on road safety with more than 5-15% of their safety
strategy revolving around road safety. With 40% organizations having dedicated road safety
officers who take care of all the incident investigations, SOP update, rules & implementation
of penalty based systems, etc. Being relatively new in adaption by organizations, there are no
strict KPIs for majority of the organizations when it comes to road safety but more and more
organizations are planning to implement it.
Industry 2.0
Started with the advent of the concept of mass production. Brought
around changes using continuous production lines & electricity.
Industry 3.0
Advent of Computers and preprogrammed machines performing pre
selected functions. Base of the modern day industries & groundwork
for implementation of Industry 4.0
Industry 4.0
Smart decisions using AI & machine learning. Interconnectivity
through IOT based tools, digital networks through cloud computing.
70%
organizations lack specialized software for daily operations and are
stuck with generally used tools like emails, excels, etc which are very
basic in nature.
75%
Maturity rating of their own Digital strategy Rating of current Digital Processes
by Upper management
Poor (0 - 4)
19.5% Poor (1-4)
Good (8-11)
26.1%
28.7%
Good (8 - 11)
36.8%
Medium (5 - 7)
Medium (5-7)
43.7%
45.2%
There appears to be a lack of confidence among the EHS professionals over their own digital
strategies and processes. Out of the total respondents, only 30-35% have enough confidence
on their digital plans and implementations to give a rating above 8 out of 11. 20-25% have
out rightly accepted that their digital transformation journey lacks the correct direction or
pace.
Very basic
37.8%
Some what
32.4%
None of these
Penalized, incentivized
Industry 4.0
Others
The companies are very much in line with their expectations of using Artificial intelligence
and Industry 4.0 tools, but their current conditions makes it highly unlikely that many
companies will reach that stage in the next 5 years considering the trend of growth in
digitalization. Digital transformation cannot be achieved in a day, it's a long process, with
significant CAPEX. It can be achieved slowly over a period of time while balancing the
financial and integration aspects.
It is a talk of town
CAPA on paper and actual results are aligned. No repetition of issues observed.
CAPA on paper and actual results may be aligned. Repetition of issues observed.
CAPA on paper and actual results may not be aligned. No repetition of issues observed.
CAPA on paper and actual results may not be aligned. Repetition of issues observed.
While organizations focus a lot on systems like LOTO, which can have serious consequences
if not followed, the same cannot be said for processes that help in improving the efficiency
and mitigating risks. It shows the mentality of the organizations about reactive safety &
preventive safety, meaning they focus only on high risk, immediate factors rather than have a
long term plan.
On asking the senior management EHS leaders about having a process safety management program active in the
organization, only 60% professionals responded yes. The rest of the organizations did not have any such program or
were still in the planning stage.
PSM Program
PSI management
On commonly used digital medium like PDF, excel etc. on a common server
While majority of the respondents, 41% were using commonly used digital mediums such as excel, mails, pdfs, etc. a
lot of professionals (29%) said they did not keep information on a common server and kept it within defined teams
only. It was interesting to know that a lot of companies have now started using more sophisticated methods of
collecting and storing data with 12% using custom software and 18% using digital twin interface software.
Process safety has in general been given higher importance due to the catastrophic
consequences of PSM failure. Process safety can be improved on a large scale via usage of
data analytics and data collection in real time. Use of digital mediums are rapidly increasing
with more custom built software & real time data with digital twin interface. While there are
still organizations not utilizing the full potential of data, those numbers are bound to
decrease
When asked if they could rate their PSI management system for updating and storing data without multiple versions,
only 45% of the respondents gave a Good rating of above 8 out of 10. Rest 45% gave ratings between 5 - 7 and 10%
rated poor when it came to data management. It was interesting that most of the professionals using digital twins &
custom software gave higher ratings.
Low
Medium
Good
0 10 20 30 40 50
The ratings though on a better side of expectation prove that organizations using custom
software and digital twin interface were more likely to rate their PSI management on the
higher side compared to organizations who did not use centralized data management tools &
digital mediums for storage.
Management of change:
When asked about how their organizations did MOC, the senior management respondents were divided into three
groups with the first using automated software (36%), second group using conventional means on emails (46.38%). the
third group (17.39%) opted for none of the automated or emails, using their own methods for MOC.
None of these
17.4%
Automated by a software
36.2%
MOC awareness:
The entry level respondents were asked about how they would rate themselves with respect to knowledge of
Management of change on the scale of 10. Maximum respondents (67.53%) rated between 8 - 10, giving a good rating
to themselves. 26% said they felt adequately knowledgeable but not enough to rate above 8 and gave themselves
ratings between 5 - 7. Only 6% respondents thought they had poor knowledge about MOC and had a lot to learn
before giving themselves decent ratings.
Poor
Medium
Good
0 25 50 75
It is nice to see organizations training their entry level EHS professionals about management
of changes. Though the process may be followed by all levels in the organization, chances of
mistakes, error in judgement tend to happen on ground where most of work is done by entry
level employees. Though 32% entry level professionals rated their knowledge about MOC as
less, its a surprise that 67.5% rated their knowledge on a very high end of the ratings.
Better valuation
Most Serious
Neutral
Not serious
Partially serious
Serious
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
In today's times, sustainability is not only required for the purpose of legal requirements.
Sustainability has become a core part of Corporate social governance as well as for public
relations. Organizations not following sustainable means for productions are looked down
upon and slowly get affected on their business revenues as people in general are more aware
than before, and believe that they can do their bit in saving the environment by supporting
organizations who themselves are using sustainable means of production.
Though organizations have started following reporting standards, their general mindset
towards sustainability remains below par compared to organizations from the western
countries. Using sustainable means for productions is not cheap, but have long term benefits.
Sadly, less than 52% EHS professionals believe that their organizations is not taking
sustainability very seriously.
Reporting Mechanisms
Reporting Standards followed
While 91% respondents said that they have a reporting mechanism in place, 83% out of the given 91% organization
had an internal reporting mechanism for sustainability. Among those 83%, GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) appeared
to be the most prominent with over 31.42% organizations using it. Surprisingly, 34% of the organizations reporting
internally did not follow any of the major reporting standards such as GRI, CDP, IIRC or SASB, giving a different
approach towards reporting or just logging it for compliance purposes.
We also asked professionals which standard they found more relevant and practical when it came to Indian scenario. A
whopping 44% selected GRI as the best practical reporting mechanism IIRC(Incident Investigation & Reporting
Committee being the second most popular with 18% votes.
None of these
34.5% GRI (Global Reporting Initiative)
31.4%
GRI (Global reporting index) appeared to be the most popular for organizations with over
31.4% organizations using it, while 44% EHS professionals believe that GRI is more suitable in
Indian scenario.
Good (8 to 11)
48%
Medium (5 to 7)
44%
Water Management
With all majority of the companies situated out side of water scarce zone, there is a perception that companies don’t
care about their surrounding air and water resources. When asked to the respondents about the same, it came as a
surprise to see the data with 68% participating EHS personnel giving a good rating between 8 to 11 out of 11 to their
organizations for their water management processes, while 29% gave a rating of 4-7 and only 3% felt the efforts their
organization was putting in was wholly inadequate. This shows the seriousness of the organizations towards water
management and compliance to state and national laws being followed strictly.
Poor (1 - 4)
3%
Medium (5 to 7)
29%
Good (8 to 11)
68%
Organizations have started working on plastic wastage & water management but according to
the entry level staff who are on the ground most of the day, the efforts towards water
management are rated much higher as compared to the efforts by the organizations on plastic
waste management.
GHG Emissions
For GHG measurements, out of the total middle management respondents, 59% did not have sensors in place and the
whole recording took place manually. While the 41% respondents had sensors, only 26% had the technology to go
with the sensors in place, rest 15% are still depended on manual logging.
GHG measurement
We plan to do it in future
GHG Focus
SOx (Sulphur Oxide)
17.5%
ODX
12.3%
There are too many types of emissions the companies need to focus depending on their
production and material handling, but there is significant seriousness only for carbon dioxide
emissions which are in focus these days due to Global warming and media outrage. This is
again a part of reactive approach and not proactive approach to mitigate risks before they
happen. Only 50% organizations recorded GHG emissions out of the total respondents.
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
<10%, >30% 10%-20%, 21%-30%, others
Energy consumption reduction GHG reduction
Organizations are focusing on both, energy consumption reduction and GHG reduction with
both targets going hand in hand for almost all the organizations except few who are more
focused on reducing energy consumption compared to GHG emissions. This may be due to
multiple organizations going with green building designs, power efficient lighting &
application of renewable energy to reduce their net energy consumption from conventional
fuels.
(C) Sparrow Risk Management Pvt. Ltd., www.sparrowrms.in
45
We are Sparrow!
www.sparrowrms.in