Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The evaluation based on the comparison of the actual and standard dimensions are based
Table 1. Criteria for the Evaluation Based on the Dimension of Road Elements
Evaluation Criteria
SATISFACTORY When road element located on both sides
of the road on a station conform to the
standard dimensions assigned for each
element. Standard width of shoulders,
sidewalks and canals are 3 m, 1.2 m, and
0.3 m to 1.8 m respectively. Standard
culvert diameter ranges from 0.3 to 2.0 m.
STANDARD When a road element located on either side
of the road on a station conform to the
standard dimensions assigned for each
element. Standard width of shoulders,
sidewalks and canals are 3 m, 1.2 m, and
0.3 m to 1.8 m respectively. Standard
culvert diameter ranges from 0.3 to 2.0m.
When a road element located on both or
NONSTANDARD either side of the road on a station does not
conform to the standard dimensions
assigned for each element. Standard width
of shoulders, sidewalks and canals are 3 m,
1.2 m, and 0.3 m to 1.8 m respectively.
Standard culvert diameter ranges from 0.3
to 2.0 m.
Table 2. Criteria for the Overall Evaluation of Road Elements Along the
Circumferential Road on the Municipality of Gasan
a rating scale used to assess opinions, attitudes, or behaviors. This researchers used the
rating for quality from the Likerts Scale. The researchers highlight the importance of the
standard design and dimension of the roadway because of its evident contribution on safety
while on the road. Similarly, a study entitled “Roadside Infrastructure for Safer Roads” of
the European Best Practice For Roadside Design states that, “The road width, types of lane
markings, roadside geometry etc. should provide clues to the driver that signal appropriate
driving speeds and lane positioning for the type of road and indicate what type of other
road users to expect.” The same study states that, “By maintaining consistent and uniform
road and roadside design procedures, the road meets drivers’ expectancy and drivers can
consideration whether the roadway and the road elements the standard dimension for such.
This leads to the development of the criteria stated in Table 2 where there are three ratings
which is based on the rating of the road element on the three categories namely: Evaluation
evaluation by serviceability. The first rating “Very Good” is given as a rating if the road
element has three satisfactory rating or it received satisfactory rating on all given categories
of evaluation. The second rating, on the other hand, is “good” which means that the road
if the road element serve its purpose of ensuring safety and comfort while travelling.
standard dimensions. Notice that Good and Acceptable are almost the same, however, the
researchers give prime importance that the road element conform to the standard
dimensions allotted due to its positive effects on safety. Similarly, an article of Transport
and Communications Bulletin for Asia and the Pacific stated, “One study found that the
probability for road with a 60 cm wide shoulder on each side, has thirty percent (30%)
more crash risk than a road having a 1.8 meter wide shoulder on each side.” The article of
the Transport and Communications Bulletin for Asia and the Pacific highlights the
to the standards there is high probability that it can serve its purpose. The reasons stated in
the previous sentences signifies the reason why the researchers arrived with the rating listed
in Table 2.
Table 3: Road Elements along the Circumferential Road of the Municipality of Gasan
LENGTH
ROAD ELEMENTS LRP + DISP 1 LRP + DISP 2 LOCATIONS TYPES
(M)
A. SHOULDER
0095+093 0095+106.75 13.75 Both sides Concrete
LENGTH
ROAD ELEMENTS LRP + DISP 1 LRP + DISP 2 LOCATIONS TYPES
(M)
C. SIDEWALK
0109+624.46 0109+838.56 214.1 Left side Concrete
LENGTH
ROAD ELEMENTS LRP + DISP 1 LRP + DISP 2 LOCATIONS TYPES
(M)
D. CANAL
0095+106.75 0095+433.89 327.14 Both sides Close
0095+891.29 0095+991.17 99.88 Right side Close
0096+056.97 0096+170.67 113.7 Right side Close
0097+074.96 0098+280.19 1205.23 Right side Open
0098+349.02 0098+824.32 475.3 Right side Open
0099+565.86 0099+725.56 159.7 Right side Close
0099+857.31 0099+918.56 61.25 Right side Close
0100+100.76 0100+790.27 689.51 Both sides Close
0101+009.77 0102+740.8 1731.03 Right side Open
0102+817.75 0103+814.04 996.29 Right side Open
0104+324.1 0104+366.1 42 Right side Open
0104+789.46 0104+850.46 61 Left side Close
0104+850.46 0106+343.6 1493.14 Right side Close
0106+632.76 0106+682.86 50.1 Both sides Open
0106+682.86 0106+891.56 208.7 Right side Open
0106+902.71 0106+956.13 53.42 Right side Open
0106+956.13 0107+184.19 228.06 Both sides Open
0107+184.19 0107+254.88 70.69 Right sides Open
0107+261.43 0107+323.83 62.4 Left side Open
0108+837.91 0108+928.81 90.9 Right side Open
0109+081.36 0109+621.66 540.3 Right side Open
0110+051.58 0110+090.58 39 Left side Open
0110+095.58 0110+429.74 334.16 Left side Open
LRP + LRP +
ROAD ELEMENTS LENGTH (M) LOCATIONS TYPES
DISP 1 DISP 2
E. SIGNAGE
Regulatory,
39 pieces - - Left side informative,
guide
Regulatory,
36 pieces - - Right side informative,
guide
F. GUARDRAILS
G. CULVERTS
Table 4.1.
Table 4.1 presents the percentage of existing road elements along the
circumferential road of Municipality of Gasan. Using the formula P1 = Te/Tr (100), the
results were obtained. The most common existing road elements along the circumferential
road of Municipality of Gasan were the canal with 65.76%; the second was shoulder with
39.05%, third was guardrail with 28.80%, fourth was side slope with 12.35%, and lastly,
Table 4.2
a. Signage 82
b. Culvert 12
In table 4.2, signage and culvert have no percentages because their data were
Table 5.1 shows the shoulder types that existed along the circumferential road of
Table 5.2 reflects the percentage and the types of side slopes that existed along the
Table 5.4 reflects the percentages and the types of canals that existed along the
Note: P2 = Tt/Te(100) was used to obtain the percentages of the types of road elements.
Table 5.5 shows the types of signage that existed along the circumferential road of
Note: P2 = Tt/Te(100) was used to obtain the percentages of the types of road elements.
Table 5.6 reflects percentages and the types of guardrails that existed along the
12 9 3 - 75 25 -
Note: P2 = Tt/Te(100) was used to obtain the percentages of the types of road elements.
Table 4.7 reflects the percentages and the types of culverts that existed along the
Evaluation of the Road Elements Along the Circumferential Road of the Municipality
serviceability
Road elements present along the circumferential road of the Municipality of Gasan are
shoulders, side slopes, sidewalks, guardrails, canals, culverts and signages. In order to
provide an accurate evaluation for the fore mentioned road elements the researchers
consider three factors that will determine the overall evaluation of the road elements.
Cross-section of the road elements considers the length, width, depth, thickness, location,
diameter and color. On the other hand, roadside condition evaluates the road element
whether there are obstructions on shoulders, sidewalks and others or whether the road
elements are in present condition. To evaluate the roadside condition, the researchers use
a checklist to have a detailed evaluation of the roadside condition. Serviceability is
evaluated by asking the drivers from different tricycle operators and drivers association,
the researchers believe that they will give more experience-based evaluation of the road
elements given the fact that they traverse the circumferential road on a daily basis
regardless of the present weather condition. In relation to that the researchers provide a
questionnaire to ask the opinion of the drivers regarding the serviceability of the road
elements.
Road elements are assigned with standard dimensions or minimum dimensions that
should be followed on the design and construction of a certain roadway. The standard
dimensions vary based on the location of the roadway. There is a difference between the
standards for urban and rural roadways which consider the population and the presence of
different establishments that creates traffic and congestion. This study evaluates the actual
dimension of existing road elements such as the shoulder, the sidewalk and the canals or
ditches that are common road elements seen on rural areas especially those areas near
institutional and commercial buildings. However, the researchers failed to evaluate the
dimensions of other road elements such as the side slope, the culverts, the guard rails and
the signage. Side slope are difficult to evaluate considering that standards are given as the
vertical and horizontal measurements. Culverts, on the other hand are not visible on the
road way, thus, the researchers could not determine its actual dimensions and present
condition. Moreover, there are a few data regarding guard rails and their present condition
and serviceability are all satisfactory thus the researcher does not evaluate their actual
dimensions. Signage are divided into three categories, and based on the standards provided
the signage are all satisfactory and well-designed because it conform to the standard color,
ROAD
ELEMENTS
and CROSS -
SECTION Standard
Start LRP + End LRP + DIMENSION
Length Width of Evaluation
Distance DISP1 Distance DISP2 S
Shoulder
Shoulders
L R
218 0095+093 231.75 0095+106.75 13.75 3m 3m 3m satisfactory
231.75 0095+106.75 248 0095+123 16.25 3m 3m 3m satisfactory
3.5
14158.26 0109+026.71 14184.91 0109+053.36 26.65 2.2m 3m satisfactory
m
3.5
14212.91 0109+081.36 14218.51 0109+086.96 5.6 3m standard
m
3.5
14218.51 0109+089.96 14337.31 0109+205.76 118.8 2.2m 3m satisfactory
m
3.5
14337.31 0109+205.76 14442.91 0109+311.36 105.6 2.2m 3m satisfactory
m
Table 6.1 shows the width of the shoulder on the left and right side of the road. 59
stations has shoulder located on both sides of the road, based on the comparison of the
standard width for shoulder both shoulders located on the left and right side of the road
conform with the standard. Similarly, 7 stations have shoulders on either of the road and
all the shoulder conform to the standard width indicated. Out of 184 stations, 66 roadway
stations are constructed with a shoulder or about thirty six percent (35.89%) of the stations
Table 6.2 shows the comparison of the actual width of the existing sidewalks along
the circumferential road and the standard width of a sidewalks for roadways on rural area
based on the comparison made on the table above, out of all the existing sidewalks none
conform on the standard width of the sidewalk. The actual dimensions of the sidewalks are
less than 0.2 meters than the standard dimensions. It is considerably a small difference but
it is enough to provide more space for opposing pedestrians especially on areas that has
greater volume of vehicles like markets, schools and churches which need a standard
sidewalk to ensure safe passage of walking pedestrians amidst the number of passing
vehicles.
Table 6.4 shows the comparison of the actual diameters and the standard the
diameter of a culvert. The actual diameter of the culvert used in several areas along the
circumferential road is 1m, however, the standard diameter of culverts ranges from 0.3
meters to 2.0 meters, thus, the culverts used along the circumferential road in the
Municipality of Gasan are of standard dimensions. The evaluation for the culvert is
satisfactory, since the culvert are placed from the right side of the road to the left side of
the road, the researchers consider that there are culverts located on both sides of the road
and since the culverts are of standard dimension the evaluation is satisfactory.
Table 7. Checklist for the Evaluation of the Roadside Condition along the
Circumferential Road in the Municipality of Gasan
1. Shoulder
5. Signage
6. Guardrails
Table 7 shows how the road elements are evaluated based on the roadside condition and
the present condition of the road elements itself. There are three criteria that are considered
in the evaluation of the elements and it is evident that one common criterion is considered
in evaluating the road elements, it is whether there is obstruction on the road elements
especially on sidewalks, shoulders and signages. Even though, road elements are designed
and constructed with the standard dimensions and locations, it would be useless if there are
obstructions that consume the width and view of the road elements. Based on the
observation and inspection conducted by the researchers, the road elements condition are
all satisfactory, there are several obstructions like privately owned vehicles and several
electric post located on several parts of the circumferential road but the number is quite
small thus there are plenty of space to be used for emergency purposes and others purposes
that the road element must serve. However, the researchers think that there are many room
for improvements on the current condition of the road elements to give more exemplary
form of service to the pedestrians and motorists. Moreover, several parts of the entire length
of the canal contain organic matter such as fallen dried leaves, small branches of trees and
other solid waste, given the fact that there are organic matter present on the canal it does
not obstruct the flow of water and cause overflow. Thus, based on the evaluation conducted
by the researchers, the researchers comes up with the evaluation that all of the road
elements are all on good condition, despite several obstructions the road elements still are
able to serve its purpose of providing ease and comfort, thus, the evaluation based on
A. Shoulder e. Signage
C. Sidewalk g. Culvert
D. Canal
Table 8.1
100 95% 0 5%
Note: P3 = TD/TT(100) was used to obtain the percentages of tricycle drivers of different Tricycle Operators
and Drivers’ Association (TODA).
Table 8.2
Table 8.3
100 98% 0 2%
Note: P3 = TD/TT(100) was used to obtain the percentages of tricycle drivers of different Tricycle Operators
and Drivers’ Association (TODA).
Table 8.4
100 95% 0 5%
Note: P3 = TD/TT(100) was used to obtain the percentages of tricycle drivers of different Tricycle Operators
and Drivers’ Association (TODA)
Upon careful deliberation and analysis of the answers of the drivers, the
serviceability rating of the road elements along the circumferential road in the Municipality
of Gasan is ninety five percent (95%), which means that the road elements along the road
serve its purpose of providing convenience and comfort while travelling and ensuring
safety of the motorist and the pedestrians that are simultaneously using the roadway.
evaluation wherein if the road element has an evaluation of satisfactory on all the categories
the road element has an overall evaluation of very good which means that the road element
is well-designed, of good present condition and has satisfactorily serve its purpose.
good present condition but does not satisfactorily serve its purpose of providing safe travel,
the overall evaluation for the road element is good. Similarly, if the road element is of good
present condition and has satisfactorily serve its purpose of a safe travel, the overall
condition, it is still essential that the road element is constructed using standard dimensions.
Table 9: Overall Evaluation of the Road Elements along the Circumferential Road in
Categories of Evaluation
Cross- Overall
Road Elements Roadside
Section of Serviceability Evaluation
Condition
Elements
Shoulder Satisfactory Satisfactory Satisfactory Very Good
Side slope Satisfactory Satisfactory Satisfactory Very Good
Sidewalks Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Satisfactory Acceptable
Canals or
Satisfactory Satisfactory Satisfactory Very Good
Ditches
Signage Satisfactory Satisfactory Satisfactory Very Good
Guardrails Satisfactory Satisfactory Satisfactory Very Good
Culverts Satisfactory Satisfactory Satisfactory Very Good
Table 8 shows the overall evaluation of the road elements based on the three
categories of evaluation. Depicted on the table that all of the road elements evaluated are
well-designed because they are constructed in conformance with the standard dimensions
for each road element except the sidewalks. The standard with of sidewalks is 1.2 m,
however, the actual dimension of the existing sidewalks is 1.0 m. Thus, it does not conform
to the standard dimension for sidewalk. Moreover, since all of the six road elements is rated
satisfactory on the three categories of evaluation, the overall evaluation for the six road
elements namely: shoulder, side slope, canal or ditches, signage, guardrails and culverts is
very good. The rating very good means that the road element is well-designed, it has a good
present condition and it is satisfactorily serving its purpose. On the other hand, the overall
evaluation for sidewalk is fair, because it does not conform to the standard dimension for
considered in the construction of any road element or the road surface itself for it is the
foundation for providing ease, safety and comfort to the road users.
Definition of Terms
Canal. These are waterways channels or artificial waterways for water conveyance or to
Culvert. It is a structure that allows water to flow under a road, railroad, trail, or similar
Geometric Design. It is the branch of highway engineering concerned with positioning the
serious injury.
be made.
Road Traffic Safety. It refers to the methods and measures used to prevent road users from
Sidewalk. It is also known as a footpath or footway that is along the side of a road.
Side Slope. It is the slope of the cut or fills expressed as the ratio of horizontal distance to
Signage. There are signs erected at the side of or above roads to give instructions or provide