Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Council on Foreign Relations is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Foreign
Affairs.
http://www.jstor.org
A Response to Lee Kuan Yew
Is Culture Destiny?
The Myth ofAsia's Anti-Democratic Values
In his interview with Foreign Affairs Some people conclude that the Soviet
journal, this kind of argument is likely to and prospects for democracy in Asia.
have considerable impact and therefore Such doubts have been raisedmainly by
deserves a careful Asia's authoritarian leaders, Lee being
reply.
With the collapse of the Soviet Union the most articulate among them. They
in 1991, socialism has been in retreat. have long maintained that cultural
Kim Dae Jung was a dissident, human rights activist, and presidential can
didate during a political career of more than four decades in the Republic of
Korea. He is currently Chairman of the Kim Dae Jung Peace Foundation for
the Asia-Pacific Region.
societies, unlike Western ones, "believe cuss local affairs. Japans powerful gov
that the individual exists in the context ol ernment intrudes into the
constantly
his family" and that the family is "the business world to protect
perceived
brick of society." However, as an national interests, to the
point of causing
building
inevitable consequence of industrializa disputes with theUnited States and
tion, the family-centered East Asian other trading partners. In Lee's Singa
societies are also toward pore, the government stringently regu
rapidly moving
self-centered individualism. Nothing in lates individuals' actions?such as
human history is permanent. chewing bubble-gum, spitting, smoking,
Lee asserts that, in the East, "the ruler and so on?to an Orwellian
littering,
or the government does not try to pro extreme of social engineering. Such facts
vide for a person what the family best fly in the face of his assertion that East
cites this ostensibly self Asia's are minimalist. Lee
provides." He governments
reliant, family-oriented culture as the makes these false claims to justify his
suc
main cause of East Asia's economic rejection ofWestern-style democracy.
cesses and ridicules Western govern He even dislikes the one man, one vote
ments for allegedly trying to solve all of principle,
so fundamental to modern
even as he worries democracy, saying that he is not "intel
society's problems,
about the moral breakdown ofWestern convinced" it is best.
lectually
societies due to too much democracy and Opinions like Lee's hold considerable
some
too many individual
rights.
Conse sway not only inAsia but among
to Lee, theWestern Westerners because of the moral break
quently, according
its intrusive gov down of many advanced democratic soci
political system, with
ernment, is not suited to eties. Many Americans thought, for
family-oriented
East Asia. He Westernization that the U.S. citizen Michael
rejects example,
its the caning he received from
while embracing modernization and Fay deserved
attendant in lifestyle?again authorities for his act of
changes Singaporean
tries, one is also compelled to ask as one does heaven. These ideas inspired
whether has been given a and motivated half a million
peas
democracy nearly
chance in places like Singapore. ants in 1894 to revolt against exploitation
A thorough analysis makes it clear that by feudalistic government internally and
has a rich heritage of democracy-ori forces are
Asia imperialistic externally. There
ented philosophies and traditions. Asia no ideas more fundamental to
democracy
has already made great strides toward than the teachings of Confucianism,
democratization and possesses the neces Buddhism, and Tonghak. Clearly, Asia
sary conditions to has democratic as
develop democracy philosophies profound
even beyond the level of theWest. as those of theWest.
Democratic Ideals. It iswidely Democratic Institutions. Asia also has
accepted
that English political philosopher John many democratic traditions. When
Locke laid the foundation for modern Western societies were still being ruled
nearly 1,000 years in China and Korea, racy. Incidentally, in countries where eco
even the sons of
high-ranking officials nomic development preceded political
were not to official
appointed important advancement?Germany, Italy, Japan,
unless civil service was amatter of time before
positions they passed Spain?it only
examinations. These tests were followed.
stringent democracy
administered to members of the aristo The State inAsia. The
ofDemocracy
cratic class, who constituted over ten per best proof that democracy in can work
cent of the thus guaranteeing Asia is the fact that, despite the stubborn
population,
equal opportunity and socialmobility, resistance of authoritarian rulers like Lee,
which are so central to Asia has made great strides toward
popular democracy.
This practice sharply contrasted with that democracy. In fact, Asia has achieved the
of European fiefdoms
ofthat time, where most remarkable record of democratiza
more or less determined one's tion of any region since 1974. By 1990 a
pedigree
official position. In China and Korea pow majority of Asian countries were democ
erful boards of censors acted as a check racies, compared to a 45 percent democ
ratization rate worldwide.1 This
against imperial misrule and abuses by
Europe andAsia. Although Asians devel phase into an information- and technol