You are on page 1of 2

706.

13-40D

a) Fouling of the air side: manifests itself In cases where it is suspected that the
as an increased pressure drop across air cooler water side is obstructed, the
the air side. resistance across the cooler can be
checked by means of a differential pres-
Note however, that the heat transmis- sure gauge.
sion can also be influenced by an ‘ ‘ oily
film’’ on tubes and fins, and this will only NB: A mercury manometer pressure
give a minor increase in the pressure gauge should not be used, because of
drop. environmental considerations.

Before cleaning the air side, it is recom- Before dismantling the air cooler, for
mended that the U-tube manometer is piercing of the tubes, it is recommended
checked for tightness, and that the coo- that the remaining salt-water system is
ler is visually inspected for deposits. examined, and the cooling ability of the
other heat exchangers checked.
Make sure that the drainage system
NB: Be careful when piercing, because
from the water mist catcher functions
the pipes are thin-walled.
properly, as a high level of condensed
water (condensate) ! up to the lower me-
asuring pipe ! might greatly influence the
)p measuring. See also ‘ Cleaning of 5. Specific Fuel Oil Consumption
Turbochargers and Air Coolers’, Item 3, Plate 70611
‘ Drain System’ further on in this Chap-
ter. Calculation of the specific fuel oil consump-
tion (g/kWh, g/bhph) requires that engine
b) Fouling of the water side: Normally in- power, and the consumed fuel oil amount
volves a reduction of the cooling water (kg), are known for a certain period of time.
temperature difference, because the
heat transmission (cooling ability) is re- The method of determining the engine power
duced. is illustrated in Appendix 2. For engines wit-
hout indicator drive, see Appendix 5 in this
Note however that, if the deposits redu- Chapter.
ce the cross sectional area of the tubes,
so that the water quantity is reduced, the The oil amount is measured as described
cooling water temperature difference below.
may not be affected, whereby diagnosis
is difficult (i.e. lower heat transmission, To achieve a reasonable measuring accu-
but also lower flow volume). racy, it is recommended to measure over a
suitably long period ! dependent upon the
Furthermore, a similar situation will arise method employed i.e.:
if such tube deposits are present simul-
taneously with a fault in the salt water ! If a day tank is used, the time for the
system, (corroded water pump, errone- consumption of the whole tank contents
ous operation of valves, etc.). Here will be suitable.
again the reduced water quantity will
result in the temperature difference re- ! If a flow-meter is used, a minimum of 1
maining approximately unaltered. hour is recommended.

The measurements should always be made


under calm weather conditions.
706.14-40D

Since both of the above-mentioned quantity LCV1 LCV1 = the specific lower calorific
measurements will be in volume units, it will 42,707 value, in kJ/kg, of the bunker oil
be necessary to know the oil density, in or- concerned)
der to convert to weight units. The density is or
to correspond to the temperature at the mea-
suring point (i.e. in the day tank or flow-- LCV2 LCV 2 = the specific lower calorific
meter). 10,200 value, in kcal/kg, of the bunker oil
concerned)
The specific gravity, (and thus density) can
be determined by means of a hydrometer Example: (6L60MC)
immersed in a sample taken at the measur- Effective Engine
ing point, but the density can also be calcu- Power, Pe : 15,600 bhp
lated on the basis of bunker specifications.
Consumption, Co : 7.125 m3 over 3 hours
Normally, in bunker specifications, the spe- Measuring point
cific gravity is indicated at 15EC/60EF. temperature : 119EC
The actual density (g/cm 3) at the measuring Fuel data : Specific gravity:
point is determined by using the curve on 0.9364 g/cm3 at
Plate 70611, where the change in density is 15EC, 3% sulphur
shown as a function of temperature.
Density at 119EC (see Plate 70611),
The consumed oil quantity in kg is obtained D119: 0.9364 ! 0.068 = 0.8684 g/cm3.
by multiplying the measured volume (in lit-
res) by the density (in kg/litre). Specific consumption:
Co × D119 × 106
In order to be able to compare consumption (g / bhph)
measurements carried out for various types h × Pe
of fuel oil, allowance must be made for the
differences in the lower calorific value (LCV) where:
of the fuel concerned. Co = Fuel oil consumption over
Normally, on the testbed, gas oil will have the period, m3
been used, having a lower calorific value of D119 = Corrected gravity, g/cm 3
approx. 42,707 kJ/kg (corresponding to h = Measuring period, hours
10,200 kcal/kg). If no other instructions have Pe = Brake horse power, bhp
been given by the shipowner, it is
recommended to convert to this value. 7.125 × 0.8684 × 106
= 132.2 g/bhph
3 × 15,600
Usually, the lower calorific value of a bunker
oil is not specified by the oil companies.
Correction to ISO reference conditions
However, by means of the graph, Plate
regarding the specific lower calorific value:
70611, the LCV can be determined with
sufficient accuracy, on the basis of the LCV 1 = 40,700 kJ/kg, derived for Plate
sulphur content, and the specific gravity at 70611.
15EC.
Consumption corrected for calorific value:
The corrected consumption can then be
determined by multiplying the ‘ ‘ measured
132.2 × 40,700
consumption’’, by either: = 126.0 g/bhph
42,707
or

You might also like