You are on page 1of 387

 

 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

 ‌
POL‌‌LAB‌‌TAX‌ ‌|‌ ‌CRM‌  ‌
CIV‌‌COM‌ ‌|‌ ‌REM‌‌ETH‌  ‌
 
#BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌‌based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Shortened‌S
‌ yllabus‌  ‌
 
   ‌ ‌

 ‌

Compiled‌‌by‌‌RGL‌‌|‌‌USC‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

TABLE‌‌OF‌‌CONTENTS‌  ‌ Bill‌‌of‌‌Rights‌  ‌ Powers‌‌relative‌‌to‌‌appropriation‌‌measures‌  ‌


 ‌
Due‌‌Process‌  ‌ Veto‌‌powers‌  ‌
DAY1‌‌|‌‌AM‌‌Constitutional‌‌Law‌ ‌2 ‌ ‌
Equal‌‌Protection‌  ‌ Judiciary‌  ‌
DAY1‌‌|‌‌AM‌‌International‌‌Law‌ ‌34‌  ‌ Freedom‌‌of‌‌Expression‌  ‌ Separation‌‌of‌‌Powers‌  ‌
Rights‌‌During‌‌Expropriation‌  ‌ System‌‌of‌‌Checks‌‌and‌‌Balances‌  ‌
DAY1‌‌|‌‌AM‌‌Labor‌‌Law‌ ‌37‌  ‌
Searches‌‌and‌‌Seizure‌  ‌ Process‌‌of‌‌Legislation‌  ‌
DAY1‌‌|‌‌AM‌‌Taxation‌‌Law‌ ‌54‌  ‌
Composition‌‌and‌‌Powers‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Government‌ ‌Organs‌  ‌ Subject‌‌and‌‌Title‌  ‌
DAY1‌‌|‌‌PM‌‌Criminal‌‌Law‌ ‌106‌  ‌ Judicial‌‌Review‌  ‌ As‌‌to‌‌specific‌‌laws‌  ‌
Supervision‌‌of‌‌Courts‌  ‌ Procedure‌‌for‌‌passage‌‌of‌‌bills‌  ‌
DAY2‌‌|‌‌AM‌‌Civil‌‌Law‌ ‌145‌  ‌
Powers‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Supreme‌‌Court‌  ‌ Nationalization‌‌Principle‌  ‌
DAY2‌‌|‌‌AM‌‌Commercial‌‌Law‌ ‌222‌  ‌ Qualification,‌‌Disqualifications‌‌and‌‌Selection‌  ‌ Natural‌‌Resources‌  ‌
Immunity‌‌and‌‌Privileges‌  ‌ Economic‌‌Activities‌  ‌
DAY2‌‌|‌‌PM‌‌Remedial‌‌Law‌ ‌247‌  ‌
Presidential‌‌Immunity‌  ‌ Advertising‌‌and‌‌Media‌  ‌
DAY2‌‌|‌‌PM‌‌Ethics‌ ‌358‌  ‌ Privileges‌‌of‌‌Legislators‌  ‌ Amendment‌‌and‌‌Revision‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Constitution‌  ‌
Structure‌‌of‌‌Government‌  ‌
DAY2‌‌|‌‌PM‌‌Practical‌‌Exercises‌ ‌384‌  ‌ 1. Basic‌‌Principles‌‌of‌‌Political‌‌Law‌   ‌
Composition‌  ‌
a. Sovereignty‌  ‌
 ‌

DAY1‌‌|‌‌AM‌‌Constitutional‌‌Law‌  ‌ Functions‌  ‌
Concurring‌‌Opinion‌‌of‌‌Justice‌‌Mendoza‌‌in‌E
‌ strada‌‌v.‌‌Arroyo‌,‌‌supra‌‌   ‌
Powers‌‌and‌‌Privileges‌  ‌
Basic‌‌Principles‌‌of‌‌Political‌‌Law‌  ‌ While‌  ‌Art.‌  ‌II,‌  ‌§1‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Constitution‌‌   says‌‌
  that‌‌
  "‌sovereignty‌‌  resides‌‌ 
Legislative‌  ‌ in‌  ‌the‌  ‌people‌  ‌and‌  ‌all‌  ‌government‌  ‌authority‌  ‌emanates‌  ‌from‌‌ 
Sovereignty‌  ‌ them‌,"‌  ‌it‌  ‌also‌  ‌says‌  ‌that‌  ‌"‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌democratic‌  ‌and‌‌ 
Executive‌  ‌ republican‌‌state.‌"  ‌‌ ‌
State‌‌Immunity‌  ‌
Power‌‌of‌‌appointment‌  ‌ This‌  ‌means‌  ‌that‌  ‌ours‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌representative‌  ‌democracy‌  ‌— ‌ ‌as‌‌ 
Delegation‌‌of‌‌Powers‌ 
distinguished‌  ‌from‌  ‌a ‌ ‌direct‌  ‌democracy‌  ‌— ‌ ‌in‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌sovereign‌‌ 
Power‌‌of‌‌control‌‌and‌‌supervision‌  ‌
Fundamental‌‌Powers‌‌of‌‌the‌‌State‌  ‌ will‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌people‌  ‌is‌  ‌expressed‌  ‌through‌  ‌the‌  ‌ballot,‌  ‌whether‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌‌ 
Emergency‌‌powers‌  ‌ election,‌  ‌referendum,‌‌   initiative,‌‌
  recall‌‌
  or‌‌
  plebiscite.‌‌  ‌Any‌‌
  exercise‌‌   of‌‌ 
Police‌‌Power‌  ‌ the‌‌powers‌‌of‌‌sovereignty‌‌in‌‌any‌‌other‌‌way‌‌is‌‌unconstitutional.‌  ‌
Commander-in-chief‌‌powers‌  ‌
Eminent‌‌Domain‌  ‌ Indeed,‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌revolt‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌recognized‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌constitutional‌‌ 
Executive‌‌clemency‌  ‌ principle.‌  ‌A ‌ ‌constitution‌  ‌to‌  ‌provide‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌people‌  ‌to‌‌ 
Taxation‌  ‌ revolt‌‌
  will‌‌
  carry‌‌   with‌‌   it‌‌
  the‌‌
  seeds‌‌
  of‌‌
  its‌‌
  own‌‌ destruction.‌‌ Rather,‌‌ ‌the‌‌ 
Diplomatic‌‌power‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 2‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌  ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

right‌‌
  to‌‌ revolt‌‌ is‌‌ affirmed‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌natural‌‌ right.‌‌ Even‌‌ then,‌‌ it‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ 
b. State‌‌Immunity‌  ‌
a) sovereign‌‌and‌‌governmental‌‌acts‌‌(j‌ ure‌‌imperii‌)‌‌from‌‌   ‌
exercised‌‌only‌‌for‌‌weighty‌‌and‌‌serious‌‌reasons.‌  ‌
1) Where‌‌  a ‌‌suit‌‌ is‌‌ filed‌‌ NOT‌‌ against‌‌ the‌‌ government‌‌ itself‌‌ or‌‌ its‌‌  b) private,‌‌commercial‌‌and‌‌proprietary‌‌acts‌‌(j‌ ure‌‌gestionis‌).‌‌   ‌
What‌  ‌took‌  ‌place‌  ‌at‌  ‌EDSA‌  ‌from‌  ‌January‌  ‌16‌  ‌to‌  ‌20,‌  ‌2001‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌‌ officials‌‌
  but‌‌ against‌‌ one‌‌ of‌‌ its‌‌ entities,‌‌ it‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ ascertained‌‌  Under‌  ‌the‌  ‌restrictive‌  ‌rule‌  ‌of‌  ‌state‌  ‌immunity,‌  ‌state‌  ‌immunity‌‌ 
revolution‌‌ but‌‌ the‌‌ peaceful‌‌ expression‌‌ of‌‌ popular‌‌ will.‌‌ The‌‌ operative‌‌ 
whether‌‌or‌‌not‌‌the‌‌State‌‌has‌‌given‌‌its‌‌consent‌‌to‌‌be‌‌sued.‌  ‌ extends‌  ‌only‌  ‌to‌  ‌acts‌  ‌jure‌  ‌imperii‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌restrictive‌  ‌application‌  ‌of‌‌ 
fact‌‌
  which‌‌   enabled‌‌   VP‌‌
  Arroyo‌‌   to‌‌  assume‌‌   the‌‌
  presidency‌‌   was‌‌ the‌‌ fact‌‌ 
2) This‌‌  ascertainment‌‌ will‌‌ depend‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ first‌‌ instance‌‌ on‌‌ WON‌‌  State‌  ‌immunity‌  ‌is‌  ‌proper‌  ‌only‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌proceedings‌  ‌arise‌  ‌out‌  ‌of‌‌ 
that‌  ‌there‌  ‌was‌  ‌a ‌ ‌crisis,‌  ‌nay‌  ‌a ‌ ‌vacuum,‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌executive‌  ‌leadership‌ 
commercial‌  ‌transactions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌sovereign,‌  ‌its‌  ‌commercial‌‌ 
which‌‌   made‌‌ the‌‌ government‌‌ rife‌‌ for‌‌ seizure‌‌ by‌‌ lawless‌‌ elements.‌‌ The‌‌  the‌‌agency‌‌impleaded‌‌is‌‌incorporated‌‌‌or‌‌unincorporated.‌  ‌ activities‌‌or‌‌economic‌‌affairs.‌  ‌
presidency‌  ‌was‌  ‌up‌  ‌for‌  ‌grabs,‌  ‌and‌‌   it‌‌
  was‌‌
  imperative‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌rule‌‌
  of‌‌ 
3) An‌  ‌incorporated‌  ‌agency‌  ‌has‌  ‌a ‌ ‌charter‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌own‌  ‌that‌‌  The‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌immunity‌  ‌from‌  ‌suit‌  ‌will‌  ‌not‌‌
  apply‌‌  and‌‌   may‌‌
  not‌‌   be‌‌ 
succession‌‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Constitution‌‌be‌‌enforced.‌  ‌
invests‌  ‌it‌  ‌with‌  ‌a ‌ ‌separate‌  ‌juridical‌  ‌personality.‌  ‌The‌  ‌test‌  ‌of‌‌  invoked‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌public‌  ‌official‌  ‌is‌  ‌being‌  ‌sued‌  ‌in‌  ‌his‌  ‌private‌  ‌and‌‌ 
suability‌‌   lies‌‌
  in‌‌
  its‌‌  charter‌‌
  — ‌‌It‌‌
  is‌‌
  suable‌‌
  if‌‌
  its‌‌
  charter‌‌
  says‌‌  personal‌‌capacity‌‌as‌‌an‌‌ordinary‌‌citizen.‌  ‌
Dissenting‌‌Opinion‌‌of‌‌Justice‌‌Puno‌‌in‌T
‌ olentino,‌‌et‌‌al.‌‌v‌‌Comelec‌  ‌
so;‌‌regardless‌o ‌ f‌‌the‌‌nature‌‌of‌‌the‌‌functions‌‌it‌‌is‌‌performing.‌  ‌ In‌‌
  this‌‌ case,‌‌ the‌‌ US‌‌ respondents‌‌ were‌‌ sued‌‌ in‌‌ their‌‌ official‌‌ capacity‌‌ as‌‌ 
The‌‌
  people‌‌ can‌‌ directly‌‌ exercise‌‌ their‌‌ sovereign‌‌ authority‌‌ through‌‌ the‌‌  commanding‌‌   officers‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  US‌‌
  Navy.‌‌
  ‌The‌‌
  suit‌‌
  is‌‌
  deemed‌‌   to‌‌ be‌‌ one‌‌ 
4) Unincorporated‌  ‌agencies‌  ‌have‌  ‌no‌  ‌separate‌  ‌juridical‌‌ 
following‌‌modes,‌‌namely:‌‌   ‌ against‌‌the‌‌US‌‌itself.‌‌‌The‌‌principle‌‌of‌‌State‌‌immunity‌‌thus‌‌applies.‌  ‌
personality‌  ‌as‌  ‌they‌  ‌are‌‌
  merged‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  general‌‌
  machinery‌‌
  of‌‌ 
1) Elections‌. ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌the‌  p
‌ eople‌  ‌choose‌  ‌the‌  ‌representatives‌  t‌ o‌‌ 
the‌‌government.‌  ‌ Philippine‌‌Textile‌‌Research‌‌Institute‌‌v.‌‌CA‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌
whom‌  ‌they‌  ‌will‌  ‌entrust‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌powers‌  ‌of‌‌ 
government.‌  ‌ a. A‌‌suit‌‌against‌‌it‌‌is‌‌necessarily‌‌against‌‌the‌‌State.‌  ‌ PTRI,‌  ‌et‌  ‌al.‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌immune‌  ‌from‌  ‌suit.‌  ‌Being‌  ‌an‌  ‌unincorporated‌‌ 
2) Plebiscite‌. ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌the‌  ‌people‌  ‌ratify‌  ‌any‌  ‌amendment‌  ‌to‌  ‌or‌‌  b. Suability‌‌   then‌‌
  depends‌‌  on‌‌ the‌‌ nature‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ function‌‌  government‌  ‌agency‌  ‌that‌  ‌exercises‌  ‌a ‌ ‌governmental‌  ‌function,‌‌ 
revision‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Constitution‌‌ and‌‌ may‌‌ introduce‌‌ amendments‌‌  it‌‌is‌‌performing‌‌either‌‌governmental‌‌or‌‌proprietary.‌  ‌ ordinarily,‌‌the‌‌PTRI‌‌enjoys‌‌immunity‌‌from‌‌suit.‌‌   ‌
to‌‌the‌‌constitution.‌  ‌
5) Suability‌  ‌vs.‌  ‌Liability.‌‌
  — ‌‌Waiver‌‌
  of‌‌
  immunity‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  State‌‌  The‌‌
  State‌‌   may‌‌   be‌‌  sued‌‌   with‌‌
  its‌‌
  consent‌. ‌‌The‌‌ State's‌‌ consent‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ 
3) Initiative‌. ‌‌— ‌‌legal‌‌
  process‌‌
  whereby‌‌   the‌‌ registered‌‌ voters‌‌ of‌‌  sued‌‌
  may‌‌   be‌‌
  given‌‌   either‌‌   ‌expressly‌‌   ‌or‌‌ ‌impliedly‌. ‌‌‌Express‌‌ consent‌‌ 
does‌‌not‌‌mean‌‌concession‌‌of‌‌its‌‌liability.‌  ‌
an‌‌
  LGU‌‌ may‌‌ directly‌‌ propose,‌‌ enact,‌‌ or‌‌ amend‌‌ any‌‌ ordinance‌‌  may‌‌
  be‌‌  made‌‌   through‌‌   a ‌‌general‌‌   law‌‌  or‌‌  a ‌‌special‌‌ law.‌‌ The‌‌ general‌‌ law‌‌ 
through‌‌an‌‌election‌‌called‌‌for‌‌the‌‌purpose.‌  ‌ a. Suability‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌result‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌express‌  ‌or‌  ‌implied‌‌  waiving‌‌ the‌‌ immunity‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ state‌‌ from‌‌ suit‌‌ is‌‌ found‌‌ in‌‌ ‌Act‌‌ No.‌‌ 3083‌, ‌‌
4) Recall‌. ‌‌— ‌‌a ‌‌method‌‌
  of‌‌
  removing‌‌   a ‌‌local‌‌
  official‌‌
  from‌‌ office‌‌  consent‌‌of‌‌the‌‌State‌‌to‌‌be‌‌sued.‌  ‌ where‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippine‌  ‌government‌  ‌'consents‌  ‌and‌‌   submits‌‌   to‌‌
  be‌‌
  sued‌‌ 
before‌  ‌the‌  ‌expiration‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌term‌  ‌because‌  ‌of‌  ‌loss‌  ‌of‌‌  upon‌‌   any‌‌  money‌‌   claim‌‌   involving‌‌   liability‌‌ arising‌‌ from‌‌ contract,‌‌ 
b. Liability‌‌  ‌is‌‌
  determined‌‌ after‌‌ hearing‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ basis‌‌ of‌‌ 
confidence.‌‌   ‌ express‌  ‌or‌  ‌implied,‌  ‌which‌  ‌could‌  ‌serve‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌basis‌  ‌of‌  ‌civil‌  ‌action‌‌ 
relevant‌‌laws‌‌and‌‌established‌‌facts.‌  ‌ between‌‌private‌‌parties.‌  ‌
5) Referendum‌. ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌the‌  ‌people‌  ‌can‌  ‌approve‌‌
  or‌‌
  reject‌‌
  a ‌‌law‌‌
  or‌‌ 
an‌‌issue‌‌of‌‌national‌‌importance.‌  ‌ Arigo‌‌v.‌‌Swift‌‌2
‌ 014‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ PTRI‌  ‌entered‌  ‌into‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Contract‌  ‌of‌  ‌Works‌  ‌with‌  ‌B.A.‌  ‌Ramirez.‌  ‌PTRI‌  ‌is‌‌ 
being‌  ‌sued‌  ‌upon‌  ‌a ‌ ‌claim‌  ‌involving‌  ‌liability‌‌
  arising‌‌   from‌‌
  a ‌‌contract.‌‌ 
The‌  ‌1987‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌not‌  ‌only‌‌   enlarged‌‌   the‌‌
  democratic‌‌  space‌‌
  with‌‌  While‌  ‌the‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌appears‌  ‌to‌  ‌prohibit‌  ‌only‌  ‌suits‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌  ‌state‌‌  Hence,‌  ‌the‌  ‌general‌  ‌law‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌waiver‌  ‌of‌  ‌immunity‌  ‌from‌  ‌suit‌‌ 
provisions‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌
  electorate’s‌‌   direct‌‌
  exercise‌‌   of‌‌
  sovereignty,‌‌ but‌‌ also‌‌  without‌  ‌its‌  ‌consent,‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌‌  also‌‌
  applicable‌‌   to‌‌
  complaints‌‌  filed‌‌
  against‌‌  finds‌‌application‌. ‌ ‌
highlighted‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  people‌‌   to‌‌
  information‌‌   on‌‌
  matters‌‌   of‌‌  officials‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌state‌  ‌for‌  ‌acts‌  ‌allegedly‌  ‌performed‌  ‌by‌  ‌them‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
public‌  ‌interest‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌predicate‌  ‌to‌  ‌good‌  ‌governance‌  ‌and‌  ‌a ‌‌ discharge‌‌of‌‌their‌‌duties.‌‌   ‌ Furthermore,‌‌   there‌‌   is‌implied‌‌
    consent‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌
  part‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  State‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ 
working‌‌democracy‌.  ‌‌ ‌ subjected‌  ‌to‌  ‌suit‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌enters‌  ‌into‌  ‌a ‌ ‌contract.‌  ‌However,‌‌ 
The‌‌   ‌rule‌‌ ‌is‌‌ that‌‌ if‌‌ the‌‌ judgment‌‌ against‌‌ such‌‌ officials‌‌ will‌‌ require‌‌ the‌‌  distinction‌‌  must‌‌   still‌‌
  be‌‌
  made‌‌  between‌‌   one‌‌   which‌‌   is‌‌
  executed‌‌   in‌‌ the‌‌ 
In‌‌ our‌‌ jurisdiction,‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌ also‌‌ the‌‌ rule‌‌ that‌‌ ‌the‌‌ exercise‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ right‌‌ of‌‌  state‌  ‌itself‌‌   to‌‌
  perform‌‌   an‌‌
  affirmative‌‌  act‌‌
  to‌‌
  satisfy‌‌  the‌‌
  same,‌‌  such‌‌  exercise‌‌
  of‌‌ its‌‌ sovereign‌‌ functions‌‌ and‌‌ another‌‌ which‌‌ is‌‌ done‌‌ in‌‌ its‌‌ 
suffrage‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌an‌‌   enlightened‌‌   one‌, ‌‌hence,‌‌
  based‌‌   on‌‌
  relevant‌‌  as‌  ‌the‌  ‌appropriation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌amount‌  ‌needed‌  ‌to‌  ‌pay‌  ‌the‌  ‌damages‌  proprietary‌‌capacity‌. ‌ ‌
facts,‌‌data‌‌and‌‌information.‌‌   ‌ awarded‌  ‌against‌‌   them,‌‌   the‌‌
  suit‌‌
  must‌‌
  be‌‌
  regarded‌‌   as‌‌
  against‌‌   the‌‌
  state‌‌ 
itself‌‌although‌‌it‌‌has‌‌not‌‌been‌‌formally‌‌impleaded.‌  ‌ c. Delegation‌‌of‌‌Powers‌  ‌
This‌  ‌traditional‌  ‌rule‌  ‌has‌  ‌evolved‌  ‌into‌  ‌a ‌ ‌restrictive‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌which‌‌ 
distinguishes‌‌   ‌ The‌  ‌rule‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌  ‌what‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌delegated,‌‌
  cannot‌‌
  be‌‌
  delegated‌‌
  or‌‌
  as‌‌ 
expressed‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Latin‌  ‌maxim—‌potestas‌  ‌delegata‌  ‌non‌  ‌delegari‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 3‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

potest‌.‌‌The‌‌recognized‌e
‌ xceptions‌t‌ o‌‌the‌‌rule‌‌are‌‌delegation:‌  ‌ 4. May‌‌   not‌‌
  be‌‌   bargained‌‌ away‌‌ through‌‌ the‌‌ medium‌‌ of‌‌ ‌contract‌‌ 
The‌  ‌Social‌  ‌Security‌  ‌Act‌  ‌has‌  ‌validly‌  ‌delegated‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌fix‌  ‌the‌‌ 
1) Of‌‌tariff‌‌powers‌‌‌to‌‌the‌‌President‌‌under‌‌Sec‌‌28(2)‌‌Art‌‌VI;‌  ‌ contribution‌  ‌rate‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌minimum‌  ‌and‌  ‌maximum‌  ‌amounts‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌  or‌  ‌even‌  ‌a ‌ ‌treaty‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌impairment‌‌
  clause‌‌  must‌‌
  yield‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌ 
monthly‌  ‌salary‌  ‌credits.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌scope‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Social‌‌
  Security‌‌  police‌  ‌power‌  ‌whenever‌  ‌the‌  ‌contract‌  ‌deals‌  ‌with‌  ‌a ‌ ‌subject‌‌ 
2) Of‌‌
  ‌emergency‌‌
  powers‌‌
  ‌to‌‌
  the‌‌
  President‌‌ under‌‌ Sec‌‌ 23(2)‌‌ Art‌‌ 
Commission's‌‌power‌‌to‌‌fix‌‌them,‌‌as‌‌clearly‌‌laid‌‌out‌‌in‌‌the‌‌law.‌  ‌ affecting‌‌the‌‌public‌‌welfare.‌  ‌
VI;‌  ‌
3) To‌‌the‌‌people‌‌at‌‌large;‌  ‌ d. Fundamental‌‌Powers‌‌of‌‌the‌‌State‌  ‌ 5. May‌  ‌sometimes‌  ‌use‌  ‌the‌  ‌taxing‌  ‌power‌‌
  as‌‌
  an‌‌
  implement‌‌ 
for‌‌the‌‌attainment‌‌of‌‌a‌‌legitimate‌‌police‌‌objective.‌  ‌
4) To‌‌local‌‌governments;‌‌and‌  ‌  ‌ Police‌‌Power‌  ‌ Eminent‌‌Domain‌  ‌ Taxation‌  ‌
a. In‌  ‌Lutz‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Araneta‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌SC‌  ‌sustained‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌legitimate‌ 
5) To‌‌administrative‌‌bodies.‌  ‌
exercise‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  police‌‌
  power‌‌   the‌‌
  imposition‌‌   of‌‌ a ‌‌special‌‌ 
Regulates‌  ‌ Both‌‌liberty‌‌  Only‌‌property‌‌rights‌  ‌
In‌‌
  every‌‌
  case‌‌
  of‌‌ permissible‌‌ delegation,‌‌ there‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ a ‌‌showing‌‌ that‌‌  tax‌  ‌on‌  ‌sugar‌  ‌producers‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌creating‌  ‌a ‌‌
and‌‌property‌  ‌
the‌‌delegation‌‌itself‌‌is‌‌valid.‌‌It‌‌is‌‌valid‌‌only‌‌if‌‌the‌‌law‌‌   ‌ special‌‌ fund‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ used‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ rehabilitation‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ sugar‌‌ 
  ‌complete‌‌
a) is‌‌   in‌‌ itself,‌ ‌setting‌‌ forth‌‌ therein‌‌ the‌‌ policy‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌  Exercised‌‌by‌  ‌ Government‌  ‌ Government‌‌and‌‌  Government‌  ‌ industry.‌  ‌
executed,‌‌carried‌‌out,‌‌or‌‌implemented‌‌by‌‌the‌‌delegate;‌‌and‌  ‌ private‌‌entities‌  ‌
b. In‌‌
  ‌Gerochi‌‌   v.‌‌
  DOE‌, ‌‌the‌‌   Universal‌‌   Charge‌‌   was‌‌
  considered‌‌ 
b) fixes‌  ‌a ‌ ‌standard‌  ‌— ‌ ‌the‌  ‌limits‌  ‌of‌  ‌which‌  ‌are‌  ‌sufficiently‌‌  Property‌‌taken‌  ‌ Destroyed‌‌  Intended‌‌for‌‌public‌‌use‌‌or‌‌  as‌‌
  an‌‌
  exaction‌‌   in‌‌ the‌‌ exercise‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ State’s‌‌ police‌‌ power,‌‌ 
determinate‌‌   and‌‌
  determinable‌‌   — ‌‌to‌‌ which‌‌ the‌‌ delegate‌‌ must‌‌  because‌‌it‌‌is‌‌  purpose‌‌and‌‌is‌‌therefore‌‌  imposed‌‌   to‌‌
  ensure‌‌   the‌‌  viability‌‌
  of‌‌ the‌‌ country’s‌‌ electric‌‌ 
conform‌‌in‌‌the‌‌performance‌‌of‌‌his‌‌functions.‌‌   ‌ noxious‌  ‌ wholesome‌  ‌ power‌‌industry.‌  ‌
A‌‌sufficient‌‌standard‌‌‌is‌‌one‌‌which‌‌defines‌‌legislative‌‌policy,‌‌  6. Power‌  ‌of‌  ‌eminent‌  ‌domain‌  ‌could‌  ‌also‌  ‌be‌  ‌used‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌‌ 
marks‌‌its‌‌limits,‌‌maps‌‌out‌‌its‌‌boundaries‌‌and‌‌specifies‌‌the‌‌public‌‌  Compensation‌  ‌ Intangible‌‌  A‌‌full‌‌and‌‌fair‌‌equivalent‌‌of‌‌the‌‌ 
altruistic‌‌  property‌‌expropriated‌‌or‌‌  implement.‌  ‌
agency‌‌to‌‌apply‌‌it.‌‌It‌‌indicates‌‌the‌‌circumstances‌‌under‌‌which‌‌the‌‌ 
legislative‌‌command‌‌is‌‌to‌‌be‌‌effected.‌  ‌ feeling‌‌that‌‌he‌‌  protection‌‌and‌‌public‌‌  7. When‌  ‌the‌  ‌conditions‌  ‌so‌  ‌demand‌  ‌as‌  ‌determined‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
has‌‌  improvements‌‌for‌‌the‌‌taxes‌‌paid‌  ‌ legislature,‌  ‌property‌  ‌rights‌‌  must‌‌  bow‌‌  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  primacy‌‌  of‌‌ 
⭐‌Provincial‌‌
  Bus‌‌
  Operators‌‌ Association‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Philippines‌‌ v.‌‌ DOLE‌‌  contributed‌‌to‌‌ 
police‌  ‌power‌  ‌because‌  ‌property‌‌  rights,‌‌
  though‌‌   sheltered‌‌
  by‌‌ 
2018‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌ the‌‌general‌‌ 
welfare‌  ‌ due‌  ‌process,‌  ‌must‌  ‌yield‌  ‌to‌  ‌general‌  ‌welfare.‌  ‌(‌Carlos‌‌ 
Our‌  ‌governmental‌  ‌structure‌  ‌rests‌  ‌on‌‌   the‌‌
  principle‌‌
  of‌‌
  separation‌‌  of‌‌  Superdrug‌‌v.‌‌DSWD‌) ‌ ‌
powers‌. ‌‌In‌‌ reality,‌‌ however,‌‌ the‌‌ powers‌‌ are‌‌ not‌‌ as‌‌ strictly‌‌ confined‌‌ or‌‌  i. Police‌‌Power‌  ‌ 8. Both‌‌
  ends‌‌
  and‌‌ means‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ legitimate‌. ‌‌Otherwise,‌‌ the‌‌ 
delineated‌  ‌to‌  ‌each‌  ‌branch.‌  ‌The‌  ‌growing‌  ‌complexity‌  ‌of‌  ‌modern‌  ‌life,‌‌  police‌  ‌measure‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌struck‌  ‌down‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌  ‌arbitrary‌‌ 
the‌‌
  multiplication‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ subjects‌‌ of‌‌ governmental‌‌ regulation,‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌  1. Power‌  ‌of‌  ‌promoting‌  ‌the‌  ‌public‌  ‌welfare‌  ‌by‌  ‌restraining‌  ‌and‌‌  intrusion‌‌into‌‌private‌‌rights.‌‌   ‌
increased‌  ‌difficulty‌  ‌of‌  ‌administering‌  ‌the‌  ‌laws‌  ‌require‌  ‌the‌‌  regulating‌‌the‌‌use‌‌of‌‌liberty‌‌and‌‌property.‌  ‌
delegation‌  ‌of‌  ‌powers‌  ‌traditionally‌  ‌belonging‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌to‌‌  9. There‌‌
  should‌‌
  be‌‌
  ‌reasonable‌‌ relation‌‌ between‌‌ the‌‌ means‌‌ 
administrative‌‌agencies.‌  ‌ 2. In‌‌
  a ‌‌‌positive‌‌
  sense,‌‌  it‌‌
  is‌‌
  the‌‌
  power‌‌  to‌‌
  prescribe‌‌
  regulations‌‌  and‌‌the‌‌end‌. ‌ ‌
to‌‌
  promote‌‌   the‌‌
  health,‌‌  morals,‌‌   peace,‌‌
  education,‌‌
  good‌‌
  order‌‌  a. In‌  ‌Ynot‌  ‌v.‌  ‌IAC‌, ‌ ‌an‌  ‌EO‌  ‌prohibiting‌  ‌the‌  ‌transport‌  ‌of‌‌ 
⭐‌Kilusang‌‌Mayo‌‌Uno‌‌v.‌‌Aquino‌‌III‌2
‌ 019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌ or‌‌safety,‌‌and‌‌general‌‌welfare‌‌of‌‌the‌‌people.‌  ‌ carabaos‌  ‌and‌  ‌carabeef‌  ‌across‌  ‌provincial‌  ‌boundaries‌‌ 
without‌  ‌government‌  ‌clearance,‌  ‌was‌  ‌invalidated‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌‌ 
All‌‌
  that‌‌
  is‌‌
  required‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ valid‌‌ exercise‌‌ of‌‌ this‌‌ power‌‌ of‌‌ subordinate‌‌  In‌‌
  ‌negative‌‌   terms,‌‌
  it‌‌
  is‌‌
  that‌‌   inherent‌‌
  and‌‌   plenary‌‌
  power‌‌   in‌‌ 
purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌indiscriminate‌  ‌slaughter‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌ 
legislation‌‌is‌‌that‌‌   ‌ the‌‌  State‌‌
  which‌‌
  enables‌‌   it‌‌ to‌‌ prohibit‌‌ all‌‌ things‌‌ hurtful‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌  satisfactorily‌‌met‌‌by‌‌the‌‌means‌‌employed.‌  ‌
1) the‌‌  regulation‌‌
  must‌‌
  be‌‌
  germane‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  objects‌‌
  and‌‌ purposes‌‌  comfort,‌‌safety‌‌and‌‌welfare‌‌of‌‌society.‌‌(A ‌ gustin‌‌v.‌‌Edu‌) ‌ ‌
b. A‌  ‌law‌  ‌limiting‌  ‌the‌  ‌capacity‌  ‌of‌  ‌common‌  ‌carriers,‌  ‌or‌  ‌of‌‌ 
of‌‌the‌‌law;‌‌and‌‌   ‌ 3. The‌  ‌most‌  ‌essential,‌  ‌insistent‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌least‌  ‌limitable‌  ‌of‌‌  theaters‌‌   as‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  case‌‌
  of‌‌
  ‌People‌‌   v.‌‌
  Chan‌, ‌‌is‌‌ valid‌‌ as‌‌ this‌‌ 
2) that‌  ‌the‌  ‌regulation‌  ‌be‌  ‌not‌  ‌in‌  ‌contradiction‌  ‌to,‌  ‌but‌  ‌in‌‌  powers,‌‌extending‌‌as‌‌it‌‌does‌‌“to‌‌all‌‌the‌‌great‌‌public‌‌needs.”‌  ‌ would‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌ ‌reasonable‌  ‌method‌  ‌for‌  ‌promoting‌  ‌the‌‌ 
conformity‌‌with,‌‌the‌‌standards‌‌prescribed‌‌by‌‌the‌‌law.‌‌   ‌ comfort,‌‌convenience‌‌and‌‌safety‌‌of‌‌the‌‌customers.‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 4‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

c. In‌  ‌City‌  ‌Government‌  ‌of‌  ‌QC‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Ericta,‌  ‌in‌  ‌invalidating‌  ‌an‌‌  specific‌  ‌grant‌  ‌takes‌  ‌precedence‌  ‌over‌  ‌requirements‌  ‌set‌  ‌forth‌  ‌in‌‌  a. Complaint‌  ‌for‌  ‌expropriation‌  ‌sufficient‌  ‌in‌‌
  form‌‌
  and‌‌ 
ordinance,‌  ‌the‌  ‌SC‌  ‌said‌  ‌“there‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌reasonable‌‌   relation‌‌  another‌‌   law‌‌
  of‌‌
  general‌‌
  application,‌‌
  in‌‌
  this‌‌
  case‌‌ the‌‌ National‌‌ Building‌‌  substance‌‌is‌‌filed‌‌in‌‌the‌‌proper‌‌court;‌‌and‌  ‌
between‌‌   the‌‌
  setting‌‌
  aside‌‌  of‌‌
  at‌‌
  least‌‌ 6%‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ total‌‌ area‌‌  Code.‌  ‌
b. Deposit‌  ‌with‌  ‌said‌  ‌court‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌15%‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
of‌  ‌private‌  ‌cemeteries‌  ‌for‌  ‌charity‌  ‌burial‌  ‌grounds‌  ‌of‌‌  Even‌  ‌if‌‌
  the‌‌
  National‌‌   Building‌‌
  Code‌‌
  imposes‌‌   minimum‌‌   requirements‌‌  property’s‌  ‌fair‌  ‌market‌‌
  value‌‌   ‌based‌‌
  on‌‌
  its‌‌
  current‌‌ 
deceased‌  ‌paupers‌  ‌and‌‌   the‌‌
  promotion‌‌   of‌‌
  health,‌‌  morals,‌‌  as‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌construction‌  ‌and‌  ‌regulation‌  ‌of‌  ‌billboards,‌  ‌the‌  ‌city‌‌ 
good‌  ‌order,‌  ‌safety,‌  ‌or‌‌
  the‌‌
  general‌‌   welfare‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  people.‌‌  tax‌‌declaration.‌  ‌
government‌‌   may‌‌  impose‌‌   stricter‌‌  limitations‌‌
  because‌‌   its‌‌
  police‌‌ 
The‌  ‌ordinance‌  ‌is‌  ‌actually‌  ‌a ‌ ‌taking‌  ‌without‌  ‌just‌‌  power‌  ‌to‌  ‌do‌  ‌so‌  ‌originates‌  ‌from‌  ‌its‌  ‌charter‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌  4. Stages‌  ‌
compensation.”‌  ‌ National‌‌Building‌‌Code‌. ‌ ‌ a. Determination‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌   ‌validity‌‌
  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  expropriation.‌‌ 
d. In‌  ‌OSG‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Ayala‌  ‌Land,‌  ‌Inc.‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌SC‌  ‌rejected‌  ‌petitioner’s‌‌  Necessity‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌expropriation‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌justiciable‌‌ 
contention‌‌   that‌‌
  malls,‌‌
  inasmuch‌‌   as‌‌ they‌‌ are‌‌ required‌‌ by‌‌  City‌‌of‌‌Cagayan‌‌De‌‌Oro‌‌v.‌‌Cagayan‌‌Electric‌‌Power‌‌&‌‌Light‌‌2
‌ 018‌  ‌ question.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌National‌  ‌Building‌  ‌Code‌  ‌to‌  ‌provide‌  ‌parking‌  ‌spaces‌ 
The‌‌   purpose‌‌   of‌‌ an‌‌ imposition‌‌ will‌‌ determine‌‌ its‌‌ nature‌‌ as‌‌ either‌‌ a ‌‌tax‌‌  b. Determination‌‌of‌j‌ ust‌‌compensation.‌  ‌
for‌‌their‌‌customers,‌‌should‌‌provide‌‌such‌‌for‌‌free.‌  ‌
or‌‌
  a ‌‌fee.‌‌
  If‌‌
  the‌‌   purpose‌‌   is‌‌  primarily‌‌   ‌revenue‌, ‌‌or‌‌ if‌‌ revenue‌‌ is‌‌ at‌‌ least‌‌  5. Private‌  ‌Property.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Anything‌  ‌that‌  ‌can‌  ‌come‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌‌ 
10. The‌  ‌SC‌  ‌has‌  ‌invariably‌‌
  applied‌‌
  certain‌‌
  standards‌‌
  for‌‌
  judicial‌‌ 
one‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ real‌‌ and‌‌ substantial‌‌ purposes,‌‌ then‌‌ the‌‌ exaction‌‌ is‌‌ properly‌‌  dominion‌  ‌of‌  ‌man,‌  ‌including:‌  ‌(1)‌  ‌real‌  ‌and‌  ‌personal,‌  ‌(2)‌‌ 
review:‌  ‌
classified‌‌   as‌‌  an‌‌   exercise‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ power‌‌ to‌‌ ‌tax‌. ‌‌On‌‌ the‌‌ other‌‌ hand,‌‌ if‌‌ the‌‌ 
tangible‌  ‌and‌  ‌intangible‌  ‌properties.‌  ‌Except‌  ‌money‌  ‌and‌‌ 
Laws‌‌dealing‌‌with‌‌the‌‌freedom‌‌of‌‌the‌‌  purpose‌  ‌is‌  ‌primarily‌  ‌to‌  ‌regulate‌, ‌ ‌then‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌deemed‌  ‌an‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Strict‌‌scrutiny‌  ‌ choses‌‌in‌‌action.‌  ‌
police‌  ‌power‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌form‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌fee‌, ‌ ‌even‌  ‌though‌  ‌revenue‌  ‌is‌‌ 
mind‌‌or‌‌restricting‌‌the‌‌political‌‌process.‌  ‌
incidentally‌  ‌generated.‌  ‌In‌‌   other‌‌   words,‌‌
  ‌if‌‌
  generation‌‌   of‌‌
  revenue‌‌   is‌‌  a. Property‌  ‌already‌  ‌devoted‌  ‌to‌  ‌public‌  ‌use‌  ‌is‌  ‌still‌‌ 
the‌‌ primary‌‌ purpose,‌‌ the‌‌ imposition‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌tax‌‌ but,‌‌ if‌‌ regulation‌‌ is‌‌  subject‌  ‌to‌‌
  expropriation,‌‌
  provided‌‌   this‌‌
  is‌‌
  done‌  ‌(1)‌‌ 
Rational‌‌basis‌‌  the‌‌   primary‌‌   purpose,‌‌   the‌‌   imposition‌‌ is‌‌ properly‌‌ categorized‌‌ as‌‌ 
Review‌‌of‌‌economic‌‌legislation‌  ‌ directly‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌legislature‌, ‌ ‌or‌  ‌(2)‌  ‌under‌  ‌a ‌‌
standard‌  ‌ a‌‌regulatory‌‌fee.‌  ‌
specific‌‌grant‌‌of‌‌authority‌‌‌to‌‌the‌‌delegate.‌ 
Heightened‌‌or‌‌  Evaluating‌‌classifications‌‌based‌‌on‌‌gender‌‌  ii. Eminent‌‌Domain‌  ‌ b. Services‌‌  ‌are‌‌ considered‌‌ embraced‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ concept‌‌ of‌‌ 
immediate‌‌scrutiny‌  ‌ and‌‌legitimacy‌  ‌ property.‌  ‌
1. Definition,‌‌   Nature‌‌   and‌‌   Function.‌‌   — ‌‌‌Also‌‌ called‌‌ the‌‌ power‌‌ 
6. Taking.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌May‌‌   include‌‌   trespass‌‌   without‌‌   actual‌‌   eviction‌‌
  of‌‌ 
Overbreadth‌‌  A‌‌statute‌‌needlessly‌‌restrains‌‌even‌‌  of‌  ‌expropriation,‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌described‌  ‌as‌  ‌“the‌  ‌highest‌  ‌and‌  ‌most‌‌ 
the‌‌  owner,‌‌  material‌‌   impairment‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  value‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌ property‌‌ 
doctrine‌  ‌ constitutionally‌‌guaranteed‌‌rights‌  ‌ exact‌  ‌idea‌  ‌of‌  ‌property‌  ‌remaining‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌government”‌  ‌that‌‌ 
or‌  ‌prevention‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌ordinary‌  ‌uses‌  ‌for‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌‌ 
may‌‌   be‌‌
  acquired‌‌   for‌‌
  some‌‌   public‌‌ purpose‌‌ through‌‌ a ‌‌method‌‌ 
was‌‌intended.‌  ‌
Void-for-vagueness‌‌  A‌‌penal‌‌statute‌‌encroaches‌‌upon‌‌the‌‌  “in‌‌the‌‌nature‌‌of‌‌a‌‌compulsory‌‌sale‌‌to‌‌the‌‌State.”‌  ‌
a. In‌‌   ‌Ayala‌‌
  de‌‌
  Roxas‌‌   v.‌‌
  City‌‌ of‌‌ Manila‌, ‌‌the‌‌ imposition‌‌ of‌‌ an‌‌ 
doctrine‌  ‌ freedom‌‌of‌‌speech.‌  ‌ 2. Essential‌‌requisites‌‌for‌‌the‌‌exercise‌‌by‌‌an‌‌LGU‌  ‌ easement‌  ‌over‌  ‌a ‌ ‌3-meter‌  ‌strip‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌plaintiff’s‌‌ 
property‌  ‌could‌  ‌not‌‌   be‌‌  legally‌‌   done‌‌  without‌‌   payment‌‌   of‌‌ 
11. In‌  ‌fine,‌  ‌the‌‌
  means‌‌  employed‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌
  accomplishment‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  a. Enactment‌‌of‌‌an‌‌ordinance‌,‌‌not‌‌just‌‌a‌‌resolution;‌  ‌
just‌‌compensation.‌  ‌
police‌  ‌objective‌  ‌must‌  ‌pass‌  ‌the‌  ‌test‌  ‌of‌  ‌reasonableness‌  ‌and,‌‌  b. Must‌‌  be‌‌
  for‌‌ a ‌‌‌public‌‌ use‌, ‌‌purpose‌‌ or‌‌ welfare,‌‌ or‌‌ for‌‌ 
the‌‌benefit‌‌of‌‌the‌‌poor‌‌and‌‌the‌‌landless;‌  ‌ b. In‌  ‌People‌‌   v.‌‌
  Fajardo‌, ‌‌a ‌‌municipal‌‌   ordinance‌‌   prohibiting‌‌ 
specifically,‌‌   conform‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  safeguards‌‌   embodied‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌ Bill‌‌ 
construction‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌building‌  ‌that‌  ‌would‌  ‌destroy‌  ‌the‌‌ 
of‌‌Rights‌‌for‌‌the‌‌protection‌‌of‌‌private‌‌rights.‌  ‌ c. Payment‌‌of‌j‌ ust‌‌compensation‌;‌‌and‌  ‌ view‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌plaza‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌highway‌  ‌was‌  ‌considered‌  ‌a ‌‌
d. Exercise‌‌  must‌‌
  be‌‌
  preceded‌‌
  by‌‌
  a ‌‌‌valid‌‌ and‌‌ definite‌‌  taking‌‌under‌‌the‌‌power‌‌of‌‌eminent‌‌domain.‌  ‌
Evasco,‌‌Jr.‌‌v.‌‌Montañez‌‌2
‌ 018‌  ‌ offer‌‌‌made‌‌to‌‌the‌‌owner,‌‌who‌‌rejects‌‌the‌‌same.‌  ‌ c. The‌  ‌right-of-way‌  ‌easement,‌  ‌resulting‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌restriction‌‌ 
Ordinance‌  ‌No.‌  ‌092-2000,‌  ‌which‌  ‌regulates‌  ‌the‌  ‌construction‌  ‌and‌‌  3. Conditions‌  ‌precedent‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌issuance‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌writ‌  ‌of‌‌  or‌‌
  limitation‌‌  on‌‌
  property‌‌  rights‌‌
  over‌‌
  the‌‌  land‌‌   traversed‌‌ 
installation‌‌  of‌‌  building‌‌   and‌‌
  other‌‌  structures‌‌ such‌‌ as‌‌ billboards‌‌  possession‌  ‌ by‌  ‌transmission‌  ‌lines‌  ‌is‌  ‌also‌  ‌an‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌‌ 
within‌  ‌Davao‌  ‌City,‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌exercise‌‌
  of‌‌
  ‌police‌‌
  power‌. ‌‌This‌‌
  ‌direct‌‌
  and‌‌  expropriation,‌‌as‌‌in‌N ‌ PC‌‌v.‌‌Aguirre-Paderanga‌. ‌ ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 5‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

City‌‌of‌‌Manila‌‌v.‌‌Prieto‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌
d. In‌  ‌NPC‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Ileto‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌prohibition‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌  10516,‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌Petrochemical‌  ‌Industrial‌  ‌Park‌  ‌is‌  ‌intended‌  ‌and‌‌ 
transmission‌  ‌lines,‌  ‌i.e.‌  ‌construction‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌‌  The‌  ‌SC‌  ‌adopted‌  ‌the‌  ‌ruling‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌CA‌  ‌wherein‌  ‌the‌  ‌latter‌  ‌found‌  ‌the‌‌  accordingly‌‌devoted‌‌by‌‌law‌‌as‌‌a‌‌commercial‌‌and‌‌business‌‌venture.‌  ‌
improvements‌  ‌or‌  ‌planting‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌trees‌  ‌that‌  ‌exceed‌  ‌3 ‌‌ following‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌to‌  ‌invalidate‌  ‌the‌  ‌expropriation‌  ‌done‌  ‌by‌‌ 
Thus,‌  ‌NGCP‌  ‌has‌  ‌the‌‌
  authority‌‌
  under‌‌
  Section‌‌
  4 ‌‌of‌‌
  R.A.‌‌
  No.‌‌
  9511‌‌ 
meters‌‌   within‌‌   the‌‌ ‌aerial‌‌ right‌‌ of‌‌ way‌, ‌‌clearly‌‌ interferes‌‌  petitioner:‌  ‌
to‌‌expropriate‌‌the‌‌subject‌‌property‌. ‌ ‌
with‌  ‌the‌  ‌landowners’‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌possess‌  ‌and‌  ‌enjoy‌  ‌their‌‌  1. The‌‌  records‌‌   lack‌‌  any‌‌
  evidence‌‌  to‌‌
  support‌‌
  petitioner's‌‌ claim‌‌ 
properties.‌  ‌ that‌  ‌an‌  ‌on-site‌  ‌development‌  ‌program‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌most‌‌ 
National‌‌Transmission‌‌Corp.‌‌v.‌‌Sps‌‌Taglao‌‌2
‌ 020‌  ‌
7. Requisites‌  ‌of‌  ‌Taking‌  ‌in‌  ‌Eminent‌  ‌Domain‌  ‌(according‌  ‌to‌‌  practicable‌‌   and‌‌  advantageous‌‌   for‌‌  the‌‌
  beneficiaries,‌‌ to‌‌ justify‌‌ 
Republic‌‌v.‌‌Castellvi‌) ‌ ‌ the‌  ‌non-applicability‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌list‌  ‌of‌  ‌priorities‌  ‌in‌  ‌land‌‌  True,‌‌   an‌‌
  ‌easement‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌right‌‌
  of‌‌
  way‌‌   transmits‌‌   no‌‌
  rights‌‌   except‌‌
  the‌‌ 
acquisition‌‌under‌‌Section‌‌9‌‌of‌‌R.A.‌‌No.‌‌7279‌.  ‌‌ ‌ easement‌  ‌itself,‌  ‌and‌‌   the‌‌
  respondents‌‌   would‌‌   retain‌‌  full‌‌
  ownership‌‌   of‌‌ 
a. The‌‌expropriator‌‌must‌e
‌ nter‌‌a‌‌private‌‌property‌; ‌ ‌
2. Petitioner‌  ‌failed‌  ‌to‌  ‌exhaust‌  ‌other‌  ‌modes‌  ‌of‌  ‌acquisition‌‌  the‌‌
  property‌‌   taken.‌‌
  Nonetheless,‌‌   the‌‌
  acquisition‌‌   of‌‌
  such‌‌   easement‌‌ is‌‌ 
b. The‌  ‌entry‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌for‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌  ‌a ‌ ‌momentary‌‌  before‌‌ it‌‌ resorted‌‌ to‌‌ expropriation‌‌ in‌‌ violation‌‌ of‌‌ ‌Section‌‌ 10‌‌  not‌  ‌gratis.‌  ‌The‌  ‌limitations‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌  ‌taken‌  ‌for‌  ‌an‌‌ 
period‌; ‌ ‌ of‌  ‌R.A.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌7279‌. ‌ ‌Failure‌  ‌to‌  ‌renegotiate‌  ‌the‌  ‌offer‌  ‌to‌‌  indefinite‌‌period‌‌would‌‌deprive‌‌its‌‌owner‌‌of‌‌the‌‌normal‌‌use‌‌thereof.‌‌   ‌
c. The‌‌
  entry‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ ‌under‌‌ warrant‌‌ ‌or‌‌ color‌‌ of‌‌ ‌legal‌‌  purchase‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌  ‌before‌  ‌filing‌  ‌the‌  ‌expropriation‌  ‌case‌  ‌ NPC‌‌
  v.‌‌ Sps‌‌ Aoque‌‌ ‌citing‌‌ ‌NPC‌‌ v.‌‌ Tiangco‌‌ held‌‌ that‌‌ if‌‌ the‌‌ ‌easement‌‌ ‌is‌‌ 
authority‌; ‌ ‌ warrants‌‌the‌‌dismissal‌‌of‌‌the‌‌complaint‌‌for‌‌expropriation.‌  ‌ intended‌  ‌to‌  ‌perpetually‌  ‌or‌  ‌indefinitely‌  ‌deprive‌  ‌the‌  ‌owner‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌‌ 
3. The‌‌
  intended‌‌  beneficiaries‌‌ of‌‌ petitioner's‌‌ socialized‌‌ housing‌‌  proprietary‌‌   rights,‌‌ then‌‌ ‌the‌‌ owner‌‌ should‌‌ be‌‌ compensated‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ 
d. The‌  ‌property‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌devoted‌  ‌to‌  ‌public‌  ‌use‌  ‌or‌‌ 
program‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌"‌underprivileged‌  ‌and‌  ‌homeless,‌" ‌ ‌in‌‌  monetary‌‌equivalent‌‌of‌‌the‌‌land.‌  ‌
otherwise‌  ‌informally‌  ‌appropriated‌  ‌or‌  ‌injuriously‌‌ 
violation‌‌of‌‌Section‌‌8.‌ ‌ ‌
affected;‌  ‌ In‌  ‌this‌  ‌case,‌  ‌considering‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌installation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌lines‌‌ 
Sec‌  ‌19‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌LGC‌  ‌states‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌  ‌delegated‌  ‌power‌‌  would‌  ‌definitely‌  ‌deprive‌  ‌Spouses‌  ‌Taglao‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌normal‌  ‌use‌‌   of‌‌
  their‌‌ 
e. The‌  ‌utilization‌  ‌of‌‌  the‌‌
  property‌‌   for‌‌
  public‌‌
  use‌‌
  must‌‌  should‌  ‌be‌  ‌pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌‌   and‌‌  pertinent‌‌   laws.‌‌
  ‌R.A.‌‌
  No.‌‌  property,‌‌they‌‌are‌‌entitled‌‌to‌‌the‌‌payment‌‌of‌‌a‌‌just‌‌compensation.‌  ‌
be‌  ‌in‌  ‌such‌  ‌a ‌ ‌way‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌oust‌  ‌the‌  ‌owner‌  ‌and‌‌  7279‌  ‌is‌  ‌such‌  ‌pertinent‌  ‌law‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌  ‌case‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌governs‌  ‌the‌  ‌local‌‌ 
deprive‌  ‌him‌  ‌of‌  ‌beneficial‌  ‌enjoyment‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  expropriation‌  ‌of‌  ‌properties‌  ‌for‌  ‌purposes‌‌   of‌‌
  urban‌‌   land‌‌  reform‌‌ 
property.‌  ‌ MCIAA‌‌v.‌‌Lozada,‌‌et‌‌al.‌‌2
‌ 010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
and‌‌housing‌.  ‌‌ ‌
8. Just‌  ‌Compensation.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌The‌  ‌determination‌  ‌of‌  ‌just‌‌  The‌‌
  case‌‌   of‌‌ ‌Estate‌‌ or‌‌ Heirs‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Late‌‌ Ex-Justice‌‌ Jose‌‌ B.L.‌‌ Reyes‌‌ v.‌‌  We‌  ‌now‌  ‌expressly‌  ‌hold‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌taking‌  ‌of‌  ‌private‌  ‌property,‌‌ 
compensation‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌judicial‌  ‌function‌  ‌which‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌‌  City‌  ‌of‌  ‌Manila‌  ‌emphatically‌  ‌ruled‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌are‌  strict‌  consequent‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Government's‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌eminent‌‌ 
curtailed‌  ‌or‌  ‌limited‌  ‌by‌  ‌legislation,‌  ‌much‌  ‌less‌  ‌by‌  ‌an‌‌  limitations‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌
  exercise‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  power‌‌ of‌‌ eminent‌‌ domain‌‌ by‌‌ local‌‌  domain,‌‌   is‌‌
  ‌always‌‌   subject‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  condition‌‌   that‌‌   the‌‌  property‌‌   be‌‌ 
administrative‌‌rule.‌‌‌(‌LBP‌‌v.‌‌Manzano‌‌‌2018‌‌Leonen,‌‌J‌) ‌ ‌ government‌‌units,‌‌especially‌‌with‌‌respect‌‌to:‌‌   ‌ devoted‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌specific‌  ‌public‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌for‌  ‌which‌  ‌it‌  ‌was‌  ‌taken.‌‌ 
Corollarily,‌‌   if‌‌
  this‌‌
  particular‌‌   purpose‌‌   or‌‌
  intent‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ initiated‌‌ or‌‌ 
a. According‌  ‌to‌  ‌De‌  ‌Knecht‌  ‌v.‌  ‌CA‌, ‌ ‌owner‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌all‌‌  1) the‌  ‌order‌  ‌of‌  ‌priority‌  ‌in‌  ‌acquiring‌  ‌land‌  ‌for‌  ‌socialized‌‌ 
not‌  ‌at‌  ‌all‌  ‌pursued,‌  ‌and‌  ‌is‌  ‌peremptorily‌  ‌abandoned,‌  ‌then‌  ‌the‌‌ 
those‌‌
  who‌‌   have‌‌  lawful‌‌ interest‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ property‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌  housing;‌‌and‌  ‌
former‌  ‌owners,‌  ‌if‌  ‌they‌  ‌so‌‌   desire,‌‌  may‌‌   seek‌‌   the‌‌  reversion‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
condemned,‌‌   including‌‌  a ‌‌‌mortgagee,‌‌   a ‌‌lessee,‌‌
  and‌‌   a ‌‌ 2) the‌  ‌resort‌  ‌to‌  ‌expropriation‌  ‌proceedings‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌means‌  ‌of‌‌  property‌, ‌ ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌return‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌   amount‌‌   of‌‌
  just‌‌
  compensation‌‌ 
vendee‌‌‌in‌‌possession‌‌under‌‌an‌‌executory‌‌contract.‌  ‌ acquiring‌‌it.‌‌   ‌ received.‌‌   In‌‌  such‌‌  a ‌‌case,‌‌ the‌‌ exercise‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ power‌‌ of‌‌ eminent‌‌ domain‌‌ 
b. The‌  ‌measure‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌the‌  ‌taker's‌  ‌gain,‌  ‌but‌  ‌the‌‌  Compliance‌‌with‌‌these‌‌conditions‌‌is‌‌mandatory.‌‌   ‌ has‌  ‌become‌  ‌improper‌  ‌for‌  ‌lack‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌required‌  ‌factual‌‌ 
owner's‌‌loss.‌  ‌ justification‌. ‌ ‌
PNOC‌‌Alternative‌‌Fuels‌‌v.‌‌NGCP‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌
c. The‌‌  owner‌‌   is‌‌ entitled‌‌ to‌‌ ‌payment‌‌ of‌‌ interest‌‌ ‌from‌‌ 
the‌  ‌time‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌taking‌‌   ‌until‌‌
  just‌‌  compensation‌‌   is‌‌  Republic‌  ‌v.‌  ‌East‌  ‌Silverlane‌  ‌Realty‌  ‌Development‌  ‌Corp‌. ‌ ‌held‌  ‌that‌‌  ⭐‌LBP‌‌v.‌‌Manzano‌‌‌2018‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌
actually‌  ‌paid‌  ‌to‌  ‌him.‌  ‌To‌  ‌be‌‌  just,‌‌
  the‌‌  compensation‌‌  when‌  ‌the‌  ‌subject‌  ‌property‌  ‌is‌  ‌classified‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌‌ 
The‌  ‌Special‌‌   Agrarian‌‌  Court‌‌  must‌‌   ensure‌‌   that‌‌  the‌‌
  amount‌‌   determined‌‌ 
must‌  ‌not‌  ‌only‌  ‌be‌  ‌the‌  ‌correct‌‌   amount‌‌   to‌‌
  be‌‌
  paid;‌‌
  it‌‌  industrial‌  ‌zone‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌subject‌  ‌property‌  ‌therein‌  ‌had‌  ‌been‌  ‌declared‌‌ 
at‌‌
  the‌‌
  end‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  proceedings‌‌   is‌‌
  equivalent‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  fair‌‌ market‌‌ value‌‌ 
must‌‌ also‌‌ be‌‌ paid‌‌ within‌‌ a ‌‌reasonable‌‌ time‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌  patrimonial‌. ‌‌Further,‌‌   it‌‌
  is‌‌
  apparent‌‌  from‌‌
  R.A.‌‌
  No.‌‌
  10516‌‌ and‌‌ its‌‌ IRR‌‌ 
of‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌taking‌, ‌ ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌a ‌‌
time‌‌   the‌‌
  land‌‌ is‌‌ taken‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌ owner.‌‌ (‌Apo‌‌ Fruits‌‌ v.‌‌  that‌  ‌the‌  ‌industrial‌  ‌estate‌  ‌is‌‌   being‌‌
  owned,‌‌   managed,‌‌   and‌‌
  operated‌‌   by‌‌ 
strict‌  ‌adherence‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌particular‌  ‌set‌‌   or‌‌  series‌‌   of‌‌
  rules‌‌   imposed‌‌ 
LBP‌‌‌2010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌) ‌ ‌ the‌  ‌State,‌  ‌not‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌  ‌sovereign‌  ‌capacity,‌  ‌but‌  ‌rather‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌  ‌private‌‌ 
by‌  ‌agricultural‌  ‌reform‌  ‌laws‌  ‌or‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌orders‌. ‌ ‌While‌‌ 
capacity.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌apparent‌  ‌from‌  ‌P.D.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌949,‌  ‌as‌‌
  amended‌‌   by‌‌
  R.A.‌‌  No.‌‌ 
Section‌  ‌17‌  ‌requires‌  ‌due‌  ‌consideration‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌   formula‌‌   prescribed‌‌
  by‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 6‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

DAR,‌  ‌the‌  ‌determination‌  ‌of‌  ‌just‌  ‌compensation‌  ‌is‌  ‌still‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  institute‌  ‌the‌  ‌proper‌  ‌expropriation‌  ‌or‌  ‌condemnation‌‌  1) establishment‌  ‌of‌  ‌easements‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌‌   where‌‌
  the‌‌
  landowner‌‌ 
final‌‌decision‌‌of‌‌the‌‌proper‌‌court.‌  ‌ proceedings‌  ‌and‌  ‌to‌  ‌pay‌  ‌the‌  ‌just‌  ‌compensation‌  ‌and‌‌  is‌  ‌perpetually‌  ‌deprived‌  ‌of‌‌
  his‌‌
  proprietary‌‌
  rights‌‌
  because‌‌
  of‌‌ 
consequential‌‌damages‌‌assessed‌‌therein;‌‌or‌  ‌ the‌‌ hazards‌‌ posed‌‌ by‌‌ electric‌‌ transmission‌‌ lines‌‌ constructed‌‌ 
City‌‌Government‌‌of‌‌Valenzuela‌‌v.‌‌Sps‌‌Abacan‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌ to‌‌
  ‌continue‌‌   with‌‌
  the‌‌
  case‌‌  as‌‌ if‌‌ it‌‌ were‌‌ an‌‌ expropriation‌‌ case‌‌  above‌‌his‌‌property‌‌or‌‌   ‌
and‌  ‌determine‌  ‌the‌  ‌just‌  ‌compensation‌  ‌and‌  ‌consequential‌‌  2) the‌  ‌compelled‌  ‌interconnection‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌telephone‌  ‌system‌‌ 
In‌  ‌Meralco‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Pineda,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌held‌  ‌that‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌issue‌  ‌is‌‌  damages‌  ‌pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌Rule‌  ‌67,‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌ejectment‌  ‌court‌  ‌has‌‌ 
determining‌  ‌the‌  ‌amount‌  ‌of‌  ‌just‌  ‌compensation‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌  ‌expropriation‌‌  between‌‌the‌‌government‌‌and‌‌a‌‌private‌‌company.‌  ‌
jurisdiction‌‌over‌‌the‌‌value‌‌of‌‌the‌‌subject‌‌land.‌  ‌
suit,‌‌  a ‌‌‌trial‌‌ before‌‌ the‌‌ commissioners‌‌ is‌‌ ‌indispensable‌. ‌‌However,‌‌  People‌‌v.‌‌Fajardo‌  ‌
while‌  ‌the‌  ‌appointment‌‌   of‌‌
  commissioners‌‌   is‌‌
  mandatory‌‌   in‌‌
  resolving‌‌  Agan,‌‌Jr.‌‌v.‌‌PIATCO‌  ‌
the‌  ‌issue‌  ‌of‌  ‌just‌  ‌compensation,‌  ‌courts‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌bound‌  ‌by‌  ‌their‌‌  A‌  ‌regulation‌  ‌which‌  ‌substantially‌  d ‌ eprives‌  ‌an‌  ‌owner‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌‌ 
findings‌. ‌ ‌Courts‌  ‌may‌‌   substitute‌‌
  their‌‌
  estimate‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  value,‌‌  ‌as‌‌
  long‌‌  Sec‌  ‌17‌  ‌Art‌  ‌XII‌  ‌pertains‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌in‌‌
  times‌‌
  of‌‌
  national‌‌  beneficial‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌property‌  ‌is‌  ‌confiscation‌  ‌and‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌‌
as‌‌it‌‌is‌‌supported‌‌by‌‌the‌‌evidence‌‌‌on‌‌record.‌  ‌ emergency,‌‌ and‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ exercise‌‌ of‌‌ its‌‌ police‌‌ power,‌‌ to‌‌ temporarily‌‌ take‌‌  deprivation‌. ‌ ‌
over‌‌the‌‌operation‌‌of‌a ‌ ny‌‌business‌‌affected‌‌with‌‌public‌‌interest‌. ‌  ‌ ‌
Republic‌‌v.‌‌Dela‌‌Cruz‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌ The‌  ‌term‌  ‌"‌national‌  ‌emergency‌" ‌ ‌was‌  ‌defined‌  ‌to‌  ‌include‌  ‌threat‌‌  Drugstore‌‌Association‌‌v.‌‌National‌‌Council‌‌on‌‌Disability‌‌Affairs‌‌ 
from‌  ‌external‌  ‌aggression‌, ‌ ‌calamities‌  ‌or‌  ‌national‌‌   disasters‌, ‌‌but‌‌  2016‌  ‌
Interest‌  ‌in‌  ‌eminent‌  ‌domain‌  ‌cases‌  ‌"runs‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌matter‌  ‌of‌  ‌law‌  ‌and‌‌  not‌  ‌strikes‌  ‌"u ‌ nless‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌  ‌proportion‌  ‌that‌  ‌would‌  ‌paralyze‌‌ 
follows‌‌   as‌‌
  a ‌‌matter‌‌
  of‌‌
  course‌‌
  from‌‌   the‌‌
  right‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌ ‌landowner‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌  government‌  ‌service.‌" ‌ ‌The‌  ‌temporary‌  ‌takeover‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌‌  The‌  ‌PWD‌  ‌mandatory‌  ‌discount‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌purchase‌  ‌of‌  ‌medicine‌  ‌is‌‌ 
placed‌‌   in‌‌
  as‌‌   good‌‌
  a ‌‌position‌‌   as‌‌
  money‌‌   can‌‌  accomplish‌, ‌‌as‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  extends‌  ‌only‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌operation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌business‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  supported‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌valid‌  ‌objective‌  ‌or‌  ‌purpose.‌  ‌It‌  ‌has‌  ‌a ‌ ‌valid‌  ‌subject‌‌ 
date‌‌of‌‌taking."‌‌   ‌ ownership‌  ‌thereof.‌  ‌As‌  ‌such‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌required‌  ‌to‌‌  considering‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ concept‌‌ of‌‌ public‌‌ use‌‌ is‌‌ no‌‌ longer‌‌ confined‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ 
compensate‌‌   the‌‌
  private‌‌   entity-owner‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ said‌‌ business‌‌ as‌‌ there‌‌  traditional‌  ‌notion‌  ‌of‌  ‌use‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌public,‌  ‌but‌  ‌held‌  ‌synonymous‌  ‌with‌‌ 
Export‌‌Processing‌‌Zone‌‌Authority‌‌v.‌‌Estate‌‌of‌‌Jimenez‌‌2
‌ 011‌  ‌ public‌  ‌interest,‌  ‌public‌  ‌benefit,‌  ‌public‌  ‌welfare,‌  ‌and‌  ‌public‌‌ 
is‌  ‌no‌  ‌transfer‌  ‌of‌  ‌ownership.‌  ‌The‌  ‌private‌  ‌entity-owner‌  ‌affected‌‌ 
The‌‌   Court‌‌  has‌‌
  held‌‌   that‌‌
  ‌compensation‌‌   cannot‌‌   be‌‌ just‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ owner‌‌  cannot,‌‌   likewise,‌‌  claim‌‌   just‌‌   compensation‌‌   as‌‌ the‌‌ temporary‌‌ takeover‌‌  convenience‌. ‌‌As‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌ case‌‌ of‌‌ senior‌‌ citizens,‌‌ the‌‌ discount‌‌ privilege‌‌ 
in‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌property‌  ‌that‌  ‌is‌  ‌immediately‌  ‌taken‌  ‌unless‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌‌  by‌‌  the‌‌
  government‌‌   is‌‌
  ‌in‌‌
  exercise‌‌   of‌‌  its‌‌
  police‌‌   power‌‌   ‌and‌‌ ‌not‌‌ of‌‌ its‌‌  to‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌PWDs‌  ‌are‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌is‌  ‌actually‌  ‌a ‌‌benefit‌‌   enjoyed‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌ 
prompt‌  ‌payment‌, ‌ ‌considering‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌
  owner‌‌  thereby‌‌   immediately‌‌  power‌‌of‌‌eminent‌‌domain‌. ‌ ‌ general‌  ‌public‌  ‌to‌‌   which‌‌   these‌‌
  citizens‌‌   belong.‌‌  The‌‌   means‌‌   employed‌‌ 
suffers‌‌   not‌‌  only‌‌   the‌‌
  loss‌‌  of‌‌
  his‌‌
  property‌‌ but‌‌ also‌‌ the‌‌ loss‌‌ of‌‌ its‌‌ fruits‌‌  in‌  ‌invoking‌  ‌the‌  ‌active‌  ‌participation‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  private‌‌   sector,‌‌   in‌‌
  order‌‌   to‌‌ 
Thus,‌  ‌requiring‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌  ‌to‌  ‌pay‌  ‌reasonable‌‌  achieve‌‌ the‌‌ purpose‌‌ or‌‌ objective‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ law,‌‌ is‌‌ reasonably‌‌ and‌‌ directly‌‌ 
or‌‌ income.‌‌ Thus,‌‌ in‌‌ addition,‌‌ the‌‌ ‌owner‌‌ is‌‌ entitled‌‌ to‌‌ legal‌‌ interest‌‌  compensation‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌
  reasonable‌‌   use‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  property‌‌ pursuant‌‌ 
from‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌taking‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌  ‌until‌  ‌the‌  ‌actual‌‌  related.‌  ‌Also,‌  ‌the‌‌  means‌‌   employed‌‌   to‌‌
  provide‌‌   a ‌‌fair,‌‌   just‌‌
  and‌‌   quality‌‌ 
to‌‌the‌‌operation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌business‌c‌ ontravenes‌t‌ he‌‌Constitution.‌  ‌ health‌  ‌care‌  ‌to‌  ‌PWDs‌  ‌are‌  ‌reasonably‌  ‌related‌  ‌to‌  ‌its‌  ‌accomplishment,‌‌ 
payment‌‌ ‌in‌‌ order‌‌ to‌‌ place‌‌ the‌‌ owner‌‌ in‌‌ a ‌‌position‌‌ as‌‌ good‌‌ as,‌‌ but‌‌ not‌‌ 
better‌‌than,‌‌the‌‌position‌‌he‌‌was‌‌in‌‌before‌‌the‌‌taking‌‌occurred.‌  ‌
 ‌
and‌‌   are‌‌
  not‌‌
  oppressive,‌‌   considering‌‌ that‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌form‌‌ of‌‌ reimbursement,‌‌ 
Manila‌‌Memorial‌‌Park‌‌v.‌‌Secretary‌‌of‌‌the‌‌DSWD‌‌‌2013‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ the‌  ‌discount‌  ‌extended‌  ‌to‌  ‌PWDs‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌purchase‌‌   of‌‌  medicine‌‌   can‌‌  be‌‌ 
claimed‌‌by‌‌the‌‌establishments‌‌as‌‌allowable‌‌tax‌‌deductions.‌  ‌
NTC‌‌v.‌‌Bermuda‌‌Development‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌
In‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌police‌‌
  power‌, ‌‌xxxx‌‌
  examples‌‌
  of‌‌
  these‌‌
  regulations‌‌ 
A‌  ‌case‌  ‌filed‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌landowner‌  ‌for‌  ‌recovery‌  ‌of‌  ‌possession‌  ‌or‌‌  are‌  ‌ iii. Taxation‌  ‌
ejectment‌  ‌against‌  ‌a ‌ ‌public‌  ‌utility‌‌   corporation,‌‌  which‌‌  has‌‌
  occupied‌‌  1) property‌  ‌condemned‌  ‌for‌  ‌being‌  ‌noxious‌  ‌or‌  ‌intended‌  ‌for‌‌ 
the‌  ‌land‌  ‌belonging‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌former‌  ‌without‌  ‌prior‌  ‌acquisition‌  ‌of‌  ‌title‌‌  1. Taxes‌  ‌are‌  ‌the‌  ‌enforced‌  ‌proportional‌  ‌contributions‌  ‌from‌‌ 
noxious‌‌purposes;‌  ‌
thereto‌‌ by‌‌ negotiated‌‌ purchase‌‌ or‌‌ expropriation‌‌ proceedings,‌‌ ‌will‌‌ not‌‌  persons‌  ‌and‌  ‌property,‌  ‌levied‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌by‌  ‌virtue‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌‌ 
prosper‌.  ‌‌ ‌ 2) zoning‌  ‌ordinances‌  p ‌ rohibiting‌  ‌the‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌property‌  ‌for‌‌  sovereignty,‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌
  support‌‌ of‌‌ government‌‌ and‌‌ for‌‌ all‌‌ public‌‌ 
purposes‌  ‌injurious‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌health,‌  ‌morals‌  ‌or‌  ‌safety‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
The‌‌proper‌‌recourse‌‌‌is‌‌for‌‌the‌‌ejectment‌‌court:‌‌   ‌ needs.‌‌Obligation‌‌to‌‌pay‌‌taxes‌‌is‌n ‌ ot‌‌based‌‌on‌‌contract‌. ‌ ‌
community.‌‌   ‌
to‌‌
  dismiss‌‌
  the‌‌
  case‌‌
  without‌‌   prejudice‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ landowner‌‌ filing‌‌ the‌‌  2. Except‌  ‌only‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌poll‌  ‌taxes,‌  ‌nonpayment‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌tax‌‌ 
On‌‌   the‌‌   other‌‌
  hand,‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌  exercise‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ power‌‌ of‌‌ ‌eminent‌‌ domain‌, ‌‌
proper‌  ‌action‌  ‌for‌  ‌recovery‌  ‌of‌  ‌just‌  ‌compensation‌  ‌and‌‌  it‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌settled‌‌  rule‌‌
  that‌‌  the‌‌  acquisition‌‌   of‌‌
  title‌‌
  or‌‌
  total‌‌
  destruction‌‌
  of‌‌  may‌‌be‌‌the‌‌subject‌‌of‌‌criminal‌‌prosecution‌‌and‌‌punishment.‌  ‌
consequential‌‌damages‌;‌‌or‌  ‌ the‌‌   property‌‌   is‌‌  not‌‌
  essential‌‌   for‌‌
  “taking”‌‌   under‌‌ the‌‌ power‌‌ of‌‌ eminent‌‌ 
to‌  ‌dismiss‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌and‌  ‌direct‌  ‌the‌  ‌public‌  ‌utility‌‌
  corporation‌‌
  to‌‌  domain‌‌to‌‌be‌‌present.‌‌Examples‌‌of‌‌these‌‌include‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 7‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

3. Taxes‌  ‌are‌  ‌the‌  ‌nation’s‌  ‌lifeblood‌  ‌through‌‌


  which‌‌
  government‌‌  a. substantive‌  ‌due‌  ‌process‌  ‌which‌  ‌requires‌  ‌the‌‌  accept‌  ‌the‌  ‌views‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌subordinate‌  ‌in‌  ‌arriving‌  ‌at‌  ‌a ‌‌
agencies‌  ‌continue‌  ‌to‌  ‌operate‌  ‌and‌  ‌with‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌‌  intrinsic‌  ‌validity‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌in‌‌
  interfering‌‌   with‌‌
  the‌‌  decision.‌  ‌
discharges‌‌its‌‌functions‌‌for‌‌the‌‌welfare‌‌of‌‌its‌‌constituents.‌  ‌ rights‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  person‌‌
  to‌‌
  his‌‌  life,‌‌
  liberty,‌‌
  or‌‌
  property,‌‌  g. The‌  ‌board‌  ‌or‌  ‌body‌  ‌should,‌  ‌in‌  ‌all‌  ‌controversial‌‌ 
4. Taxes‌  ‌= ‌ ‌levied‌  ‌to‌  ‌raise‌  ‌revenues;‌  ‌Licenses‌  ‌= ‌ ‌imposed‌‌  and‌‌   ‌ questions,‌‌   render‌‌   its‌‌ decision‌‌ in‌‌ such‌‌ a ‌‌manner‌‌ that‌‌ 
for‌‌regulatory‌‌purpose.‌  ‌ b. procedural‌‌
  due‌‌ process‌‌ ‌which‌‌ consists‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ two‌‌  the‌‌
  parties‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ proceeding‌‌ can‌‌ ‌know‌‌ the‌‌ various‌‌ 
5. In‌‌Angeles‌‌University‌‌Foundation‌‌v.‌‌City‌‌of‌‌Angeles‌,‌‌SC‌‌held‌‌  basic‌  ‌rights‌  ‌of‌  ‌notice‌  ‌and‌  ‌hearing‌, ‌ ‌as‌‌
  well‌‌
  as‌‌
  the‌‌  issues‌‌  involved,‌‌   and‌‌   the‌‌ reason‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ decision‌‌ 
that‌‌the‌‌payment‌‌of‌‌building‌‌permit‌‌fee‌‌is‌‌a‌‌regulatory‌‌  guarantee‌  ‌of‌  ‌being‌  ‌heard‌  ‌by‌  ‌an‌  ‌impartial‌  ‌and‌‌  rendered‌. ‌ ‌
imposition,‌‌and‌‌not‌‌a‌‌charge‌‌on‌‌property,‌‌and‌‌is‌‌therefore‌‌  competent‌‌tribunal.‌  ‌
not‌‌an‌‌imposition‌‌from‌‌which‌‌petitioner‌‌is‌‌exempt.‌  Agcaoili,‌‌Jr.‌‌v.‌‌Fariñas‌‌2
‌ 018‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
7. Judicial‌‌Due‌‌Process‌  ‌
6. Revenues‌  ‌received‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌imposition‌  ‌of‌  ‌taxes‌  ‌or‌  ‌levies‌‌  a. There‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌an‌  ‌impartial‌  ‌court‌  ‌or‌  ‌tribunal‌‌  In‌‌
  ‌Secretary‌‌
  of‌‌
  National‌‌  Defense‌‌  et‌‌
  al.‌‌
  v.‌‌
  Manalo‌‌   et‌‌
  al.,‌‌
  the‌‌ Court‌‌ 
cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌used‌  ‌for‌  ‌purely‌  ‌private‌  ‌purposes‌  ‌or‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌  clothed‌  ‌with‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌hear‌‌
  and‌‌
  determine‌‌  explained‌‌the‌‌concept‌‌of‌r
‌ ight‌‌to‌‌life‌‌‌in‌‌this‌‌wise:‌  ‌
exclusive‌‌benefit‌‌of‌‌private‌‌persons.‌  ‌ the‌‌matter‌‌before‌‌it.‌  ‌ While‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌life‌  ‌under‌  ‌Article‌  ‌III,‌  ‌Section‌  ‌1 ‌ ‌guarantees‌‌ 
7. In‌‌Planters‌‌Products‌‌Inc‌‌v.‌‌Fertiphil‌‌Corporation‌,‌‌the‌‌Court‌‌  b. Jurisdiction‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌lawfully‌  ‌acquired‌  ‌over‌  ‌the‌‌  essentially‌‌ the‌‌ right‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ alive—upon‌‌ which‌‌ the‌‌ enjoyment‌‌ of‌‌ all‌‌ 
declared‌‌that‌‌a‌‌tax‌‌levy‌‌on‌‌the‌‌sale‌‌of‌‌fertilizers‌‌for‌‌purposes‌‌  other‌  ‌rights‌  ‌is‌  ‌preconditioned—the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌security‌  ‌of‌‌ 
person‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌defendant‌  ‌and‌  ‌over‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌‌ 
of‌‌benefiting‌‌a‌‌private‌‌corporation,‌‌Philippine‌‌Planters‌‌Inc.,‌‌  person‌‌   is‌‌
  a ‌‌guarantee‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌   secure‌‌   quality‌‌ of‌‌ this‌‌ life.‌‌ In‌‌ a ‌‌broad‌‌ 
which‌‌is‌‌the‌‌subject‌‌matter‌‌of‌‌the‌‌proceeding.‌  ‌ sense,‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌security‌  ‌of‌  ‌person‌  ‌"‌emanates‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person's‌‌ 
is‌‌invalid.‌‌It‌‌may‌‌not‌‌be‌‌justified‌‌even‌‌as‌‌a‌‌valid‌‌exercise‌‌of‌‌ 
c. The‌‌
  defendant‌‌
  must‌‌
  be‌‌ given‌‌ an‌‌ ‌opportunity‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌  legal‌‌   and‌‌   uninterrupted‌‌   enjoyment‌‌   of‌‌
  his‌‌ life,‌‌ his‌‌ limbs,‌‌ his‌‌ body,‌‌ 
police‌‌power.‌  ‌ his‌  ‌health,‌‌   and‌‌   his‌‌
  reputation.‌‌   It‌‌
  includes‌‌   the‌‌  right‌‌   to‌‌
  exist,‌‌
  and‌‌ 
heard‌. ‌ ‌
the‌‌  right‌‌   to‌‌  enjoyment‌‌   of‌‌ life‌‌ while‌‌ existing‌, ‌‌and‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌ invaded‌‌ not‌‌ 
2. Bill‌‌of‌‌Rights‌  ‌ d. Judgment‌‌must‌‌be‌‌rendered‌‌upon‌l‌ awful‌‌hearing.‌  ‌ only‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌deprivation‌  ‌of‌  ‌life‌  ‌but‌‌   also‌‌  of‌‌
  those‌‌   things‌‌   which‌‌   are‌‌ 
necessary‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌enjoyment‌  ‌of‌  ‌life‌  ‌according‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌nature,‌‌ 
a. Due‌‌Process‌  ‌ 8. Administrative‌‌Due‌‌Process‌  ‌
temperament,‌‌and‌‌lawful‌‌desires‌‌of‌‌the‌‌individual."‌  ‌
a. The‌‌
  ‌right‌‌
  to‌‌
  a ‌‌hearing‌, ‌‌which‌‌ includes‌‌ the‌‌ right‌‌ to‌‌ 
1. Due‌  ‌process‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌guaranty‌‌
  against‌‌
  any‌‌
  arbitrariness‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌    ‌right‌‌
The‌‌   to‌‌
  liberty,‌  ‌on‌‌  the‌‌  other‌‌  hand,‌‌  was‌‌  defined‌‌  in‌‌  the‌‌  ‌City‌‌ of‌‌ 
present‌  ‌one’s‌  ‌case‌‌
  and‌‌
  submit‌‌
  evidence‌‌
  in‌‌
  support‌‌  Manila,‌‌et‌‌al.‌‌v.‌‌Hon.‌‌Laguio,‌‌Jr‌.,‌‌in‌‌this‌‌manner:‌  ‌
part‌‌of‌‌the‌‌government.‌  ‌
thereof.‌  ‌
2. Protects‌‌   all‌‌
  persons,‌‌ ‌natural‌‌ as‌‌ well‌‌ as‌‌ ‌juridical‌, ‌‌‌citizen‌‌ or‌‌  Liberty‌‌   ‌as‌‌ guaranteed‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ Constitution‌‌ was‌‌ defined‌‌ to‌‌ include‌‌ 
b. The‌  ‌tribunal‌  ‌must‌  ‌consider‌  ‌the‌  ‌evidence‌‌  "the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌exist‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌free‌  ‌from‌  ‌arbitrary‌‌ 
alien‌. ‌ ‌
presented.‌  ‌ restraint‌‌or‌‌servitude‌. ‌ ‌
3. Juridical‌  ‌persons‌  ‌are‌  ‌also‌  ‌covered‌‌
  but‌‌
  only‌‌
  insofar‌‌
  as‌‌
  their‌‌ 
c. The‌  ‌decision‌  ‌must‌  ‌have‌  ‌something‌  ‌to‌  ‌support‌‌  ⭐‌Acosta‌‌v.‌‌Ochoa‌‌‌2019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌
property‌‌‌is‌‌concerned.‌  ‌
itself.‌  ‌
4. To‌  ‌deprive‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌“take‌  ‌away‌  ‌forcibly,‌  ‌to‌  ‌prevent‌  ‌from‌  There‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌bear‌  ‌arms.‌  ‌Neither‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌‌ 
d. The‌‌evidence‌‌must‌‌be‌s‌ ubstantial.‌  ‌ ownership‌  ‌or‌  ‌possession‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌firearm‌  ‌a ‌ ‌property‌  ‌right.‌  ‌Persons‌‌ 
possessing,‌‌enjoying‌‌or‌‌using‌‌something.”‌  ‌
e. The‌  ‌decision‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌‌
  ‌rendered‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  evidence‌‌  intending‌  ‌to‌  ‌use‌  ‌a ‌ ‌firearm‌  ‌can‌  ‌only‌  ‌either‌  ‌accept‌  ‌or‌  ‌decline‌  ‌the‌‌ 
5. Deprivation‌‌
  is‌‌
  denial‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ right‌‌ to‌‌ life,‌‌ liberty‌‌ or‌‌ property.‌‌  government's‌  ‌terms‌  ‌for‌  ‌its‌  ‌use.‌  ‌The‌  ‌grant‌  ‌of‌  ‌license,‌  ‌however,‌  ‌is‌‌ 
presented‌‌at‌‌the‌‌hearing‌. ‌ ‌
It‌  ‌is‌  ‌per‌  ‌se‌  ‌not‌  ‌unconstitutional.‌  ‌What‌  ‌is‌  ‌prohibited‌  ‌is‌‌  without‌‌prejudice‌‌to‌‌the‌‌inviolability‌‌of‌‌the‌‌home.‌  ‌
deprivation‌‌without‌‌due‌‌process‌‌of‌‌law.‌  ‌ f. The‌  ‌tribunal‌  ‌or‌  ‌body‌‌
  or‌‌
  any‌‌
  of‌‌
  its‌‌
  judges‌‌
  must‌‌
  ‌act‌‌ 
With‌  ‌the‌  ‌bearing‌  ‌of‌  ‌arms‌  ‌being‌  ‌a ‌ ‌mere‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌granted‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
on‌‌
  its‌‌
  or‌‌
  his‌‌
  own‌‌  independent‌‌   consideration‌‌   of‌  State,‌  ‌there‌  ‌could‌  ‌not‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌a ‌ ‌deprivation‌  ‌of‌  ‌petitioners'‌‌ 
6. Due‌‌process‌i‌ s‌‌comprised‌‌of‌‌two‌‌(2)‌‌components‌‌—  ‌‌ ‌
the‌‌
  law‌‌
  and‌‌
  facts‌‌
  of‌‌  the‌‌ controversy‌‌ and‌‌ not‌‌ simply‌‌  right‌  ‌to‌  ‌due‌  ‌process‌  ‌in‌  ‌requiring‌  ‌a ‌ ‌license‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌possession‌  ‌of‌‌ 
firearms‌. ‌ ‌Article‌  ‌III,‌  ‌Section‌  ‌1 ‌ ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌is‌  ‌clear‌‌
  that‌‌
  ‌only‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 8‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

life,‌  ‌liberty,‌  ‌or‌  ‌property‌  ‌is‌  ‌protected‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌due‌  ‌process‌‌  Scrutiny‌  ‌ restricting‌‌the‌‌political‌‌  compelling‌,‌‌rather‌‌than‌‌  In‌‌
  ‌Samahan‌‌ ng‌‌ Progresibong‌‌ Kabataan‌‌ v.‌‌ Quezon‌‌ City‌, ‌‌this‌‌ Court‌‌ 
clause‌. ‌ ‌True‌  ‌property‌  ‌rights‌  ‌arise‌  ‌from‌  ‌legitimate‌  ‌claims‌  ‌of‌‌  process;‌‌regulation‌‌of‌‌  substantial‌‌governmental‌‌  summarized‌‌   the‌‌
  ‌three‌‌ (3)‌‌ tests‌‌ to‌‌ determine‌‌ the‌‌ reasonableness‌‌ 
entitlement‌‌ defined‌‌ by‌‌ existing‌‌ rules‌‌ or‌‌ understanding‌‌ that‌‌ stem‌‌ from‌‌  speech,‌‌gender,‌‌or‌‌race,‌‌  interest‌‌and‌‌on‌‌the‌‌absence‌‌  of‌‌a‌‌classification‌: ‌ ‌
an‌‌independent‌‌source,‌‌such‌‌as‌‌law.‌  ‌ other‌‌‌fundamental‌‌  of‌‌less‌‌restrictive‌‌means‌‌for‌‌ 
The‌‌strict‌‌scrutiny‌‌test‌a‌ pplies‌‌when‌‌a‌‌classification‌‌either‌‌   ‌
rights‌‌‌such‌‌as‌‌suffrage,‌‌  achieving‌‌that‌‌interest.‌  ‌
Assuming,‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌sake‌  ‌of‌  ‌argument,‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌possess‌  ‌a ‌‌ judicial‌‌access,‌‌  1. interferes‌  ‌with‌  t‌ he‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌fundamental‌  ‌rights‌, ‌‌
firearm‌  ‌was‌  ‌considered‌  ‌a ‌ ‌property‌  ‌right,‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌that‌‌  interstate‌‌travel‌  ‌ including‌  ‌the‌  ‌basic‌  ‌liberties‌  ‌guaranteed‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌‌ 
property‌‌rights‌‌are‌‌always‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌the‌‌State's‌‌police‌‌power.‌  ‌
Constitution,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
In‌‌terms‌‌of‌‌judicial‌‌  Determines‌‌the‌‌quality‌‌and‌‌ 
In‌‌re‌‌Abellana‌‌v.‌‌Paredes‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌ 2. burdens‌s‌ uspect‌‌classes‌.  ‌‌ ‌
review‌‌of‌‌statutes‌‌or‌‌  the‌‌amount‌‌of‌‌governmental‌‌ 
Jurisprudence‌‌   has‌‌ recognized‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ ‌writ‌‌ of‌‌ habeas‌‌ corpus‌‌ ‌may‌‌ also‌‌  ordinances:‌  ‌ interest‌‌brought‌‌to‌‌justify‌‌  The‌  ‌intermediate‌  ‌scrutiny‌  ‌test‌  ‌applies‌  ‌when‌  ‌a ‌ ‌classification‌‌ 
be‌‌
  availed‌‌
  of‌‌
  as‌‌  a ‌‌‌post-conviction‌‌   remedy‌‌   when,‌‌
  as‌‌  a ‌‌consequence‌‌  the‌‌regulation‌‌of‌‌  does‌‌  not‌‌
  involve‌‌  suspect‌‌
  classes‌‌   or‌‌
  fundamental‌‌
  rights,‌‌
  but‌‌ requires‌‌ 
sentence‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌circumstance‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌judicial‌  ‌proceeding,‌  ‌any‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  fundamental‌‌freedoms.‌  ‌ heightened‌‌   scrutiny,‌‌
  such‌‌
  as‌‌
  in‌‌
  classifications‌‌
  based‌‌ on‌‌ gender‌‌ and‌ 
following‌‌exceptional‌‌circumstances‌‌is‌‌attendant:‌‌   ‌ legitimacy.‌‌   ‌
Rational‌‌  Review‌‌for‌‌economic‌‌  Rationally‌‌further‌‌a ‌‌
1) there‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌a ‌ ‌deprivation‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌constitutional‌  ‌right‌‌  Basis‌‌  legislation;‌‌equal‌‌  legitimate‌‌governmental‌‌  Lastly,‌  ‌the‌  ‌rational‌  ‌basis‌  ‌test‌  ‌applies‌  ‌to‌  ‌all‌  ‌other‌  ‌subjects‌  ‌not‌‌ 
resulting‌‌in‌‌the‌‌restraint‌‌of‌‌a‌‌person‌; ‌ ‌ Standard‌  ‌ protection‌‌‌challenges‌  ‌ interest‌  ‌ covered‌‌by‌‌the‌‌first‌‌two‌‌tests.‌‌   ‌
2) the‌‌court‌‌had‌n
‌ o‌‌jurisdiction‌‌‌to‌‌impose‌‌the‌‌sentence;‌‌or‌  ‌
A‌  ‌"‌suspect‌  ‌class‌" ‌ ‌is‌  ‌"a‌  ‌class‌  ‌saddled‌  ‌with‌  ‌such‌  ‌disabilities,‌  ‌or‌‌ 
Heightened‌‌  Classification‌‌based‌‌on‌‌  Governmental‌‌interest‌‌is‌‌ 
3) the‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌excessive‌, ‌ ‌thus‌  ‌voiding‌  ‌the‌‌  subjected‌  ‌to‌  ‌such‌  ‌a ‌ ‌history‌  ‌of‌  ‌purposeful‌  ‌unequal‌  ‌treatment,‌  ‌or‌‌ 
or‌‌  gender‌‌and‌‌legitimacy‌  ‌ extensively‌‌examined‌‌and‌‌ 
sentence‌‌as‌‌such‌ ‌excess.‌  ‌ relegated‌  ‌to‌  ‌such‌  ‌a ‌ ‌position‌  ‌of‌  ‌political‌  ‌powerlessness‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌‌ 
Immediate‌‌  the‌‌availability‌‌of‌‌less‌‌ 
command‌  ‌extraordinary‌  ‌protection‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌majoritarian‌  ‌political‌‌ 
Even‌‌   if‌‌
  it‌‌
  were‌‌
  true‌‌
  that‌‌
  petitioner‌‌ or‌‌ his‌‌ counsel‌‌ were‌‌ not‌‌ notified‌‌ of‌‌  Scrutiny‌  ‌ restrictive‌‌measures‌‌ 
process.‌‌"  ‌‌ ‌
the‌  ‌scheduled‌  ‌hearing,‌  ‌it‌‌   is‌‌
  still‌‌
  ‌not‌‌
  enough‌‌
  to‌‌
  warrant‌‌   a ‌‌finding‌‌   of‌‌  considered.‌  ‌
denial‌  ‌of‌  ‌due‌  ‌process‌. ‌ ‌For‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌application‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  principle‌‌   of‌‌
  due‌‌  Juridical‌‌entities‌‌cannot‌‌be‌‌considered‌‌a‌‌"suspect‌‌class."‌  ‌
process,‌  ‌what‌  ‌is‌  ‌sought‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌safeguarded‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌lack‌  ‌of‌‌  previous‌‌  b. Equal‌‌Protection‌  ‌
The‌  ‌rational‌  ‌basis‌  ‌test‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌applied‌  ‌to‌  ‌determine‌  ‌the‌‌ 
notice‌‌but‌‌the‌‌denial‌‌of‌‌the‌‌‌opportunity‌‌to‌‌be‌‌heard‌. ‌ ‌
1. Requisites‌‌for‌‌valid‌‌classification‌  ‌ constitutionality‌  ‌of‌  ‌Republic‌  ‌Act‌  ‌No.‌  ‌8971,‌‌
  Section‌‌
  47.‌‌
  The‌‌
  rational‌ 
Ang‌‌v.‌‌Belaro,‌‌Jr.‌‌‌2019‌  ‌ basis‌‌test‌‌requires‌‌only‌‌that‌‌   ‌
a. Based‌‌upon‌‌substantial‌‌distinctions.‌  ‌
a) there‌‌be‌‌a‌l‌ egitimate‌‌government‌‌interest‌‌‌and‌‌that‌‌   ‌
The‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌heard‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌most‌  ‌basic‌  ‌principle‌‌   of‌‌
  due‌‌  process.‌‌  b. Germane‌‌to‌‌the‌‌purpose‌‌of‌‌the‌‌law.‌  ‌
There‌  ‌is‌  ‌only‌  ‌denial‌  ‌of‌  ‌due‌  ‌process‌  ‌when‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌total‌  ‌absence‌‌  or‌‌  b) there‌‌
  is‌‌
  a ‌‌reasonable‌‌
  connection‌‌ ‌between‌‌ it‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ means‌‌ 
lack‌‌of‌‌opportunity‌‌to‌‌be‌‌heard‌‌or‌‌to‌‌have‌‌one's‌‌day‌‌in‌‌court.‌  ‌ c. Not‌‌be‌‌limited‌‌to‌‌existing‌‌conditions‌‌‌only.‌  ‌ employed‌‌to‌‌achieve‌‌it.‌‌   ‌
Technical‌‌ rules‌‌ of‌‌ procedure‌‌ are‌‌ not‌‌ strictly‌‌ applied‌‌ in‌‌ administrative‌‌  d. Apply‌‌equally‌‌to‌‌all‌‌members‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌same‌‌class.‌  ‌ A‌  ‌longer‌  ‌period‌  ‌of‌  ‌redemption‌  ‌is‌  ‌given‌  ‌to‌  ‌natural‌  ‌persons‌‌  whose‌‌ 
proceedings‌  ‌and‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌due‌  ‌process‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌fully‌‌  mortgaged‌‌   properties‌‌   are‌‌
  more‌‌
  often‌‌ used‌‌ for‌‌ residential‌‌ purposes.‌‌ A ‌‌
equated‌  ‌with‌  ‌due‌  ‌process‌‌   in‌‌
  its‌‌
  strict‌‌
  judicial‌‌   sense.‌‌  The‌‌  essence‌‌
  of‌‌  DPWH‌‌Region‌‌IV-A‌‌v.‌‌COA‌‌2
‌ 019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌‌on‌‌Selective‌‌Prosecution‌  ‌ shorter‌  ‌period‌  ‌of‌  ‌redemption‌  ‌is‌  ‌given‌  ‌to‌  ‌juridical‌  ‌persons‌  ‌whose‌‌ 
due‌  ‌process‌  ‌is‌  ‌simply‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌heard,‌  ‌or‌  ‌as‌  ‌applied‌  ‌to‌  ‌administrative‌‌  properties‌‌   are‌‌
  more‌‌ often‌‌ used‌‌ for‌‌ commercial‌‌ purposes.‌  ‌Goldenway‌‌ 
proceedings,‌  ‌an‌  ‌opportunity‌  ‌to‌  ‌explain‌  ‌one's‌  ‌side,‌  ‌or‌  ‌an‌‌  In‌  ‌People‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Dela‌  ‌Piedra‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌declared‌  ‌that‌  ‌an‌  ‌erroneous‌‌  Merchandising‌    ‌explains‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌shorter‌  ‌period‌  ‌is‌  ‌aimed‌‌   to‌‌
  ensure‌‌ 
opportunity‌  ‌to‌  ‌seek‌  ‌a ‌ ‌reconsideration‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌action‌  ‌or‌  ‌ruling‌‌  performance‌  ‌of‌  ‌statutory‌  ‌duty‌  ‌— ‌ ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌  ‌apparent‌  ‌selective‌‌  the‌‌solvency‌‌and‌‌liquidity‌‌of‌‌banks.‌  ‌
complained‌‌of.‌  ‌ enforcement‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌statute‌  ‌— ‌ ‌could‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌a ‌‌
violation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌equal‌  ‌protection‌  ‌clause,‌  ‌unless‌  the‌  ‌element‌  ‌of‌  c. Freedom‌‌of‌‌Expression‌  ‌
 ‌
intentional‌‌or‌‌purposeful‌‌discrimination‌‌‌is‌‌shown.‌‌   ‌
Test‌  ‌ Deals‌‌with‌  ‌ How?‌  ‌ Sec‌  ‌4.‌  ‌No‌‌
  law‌‌
  shall‌‌   be‌‌
  passed‌‌  abridging‌‌   the‌‌
  freedom‌‌  of‌‌
  speech,‌‌ 
⭐‌Zomer‌‌Development‌‌v.‌‌CA‌‌‌2020‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌
of‌‌ expression,‌‌ or‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ press,‌‌ or‌‌ the‌‌ right‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ people‌‌ peaceably‌‌ 
Strict‌‌  Freedom‌‌of‌‌the‌‌mind;‌‌  Focus‌‌is‌‌on‌‌the‌‌presence‌‌of‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 9‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

to‌  ‌assemble‌  ‌and‌  ‌petition‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌  ‌for‌  ‌redress‌  ‌of‌‌  and‌  ‌thus‌  ‌constitutes‌  ‌prior‌  ‌restraint,‌  ‌censorship,‌  ‌and‌  ‌is‌‌ 
Content-based‌  ‌regulation‌  ‌bears‌  ‌a ‌ ‌heavy‌  ‌presumption‌  ‌of‌‌ 
grievances.‌  ‌ content-restrictive,‌‌   which‌‌  resulted‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌‌"chilling‌‌ effect"‌‌ in‌‌ violation‌‌ of‌‌ 
  and‌‌ this‌‌ court‌‌ has‌‌ used‌‌ the‌‌ ‌clear‌‌ and‌‌ present‌‌ danger‌‌ 
invalidity,‌‌
the‌‌freedom‌‌of‌‌the‌‌press.‌  ‌
rule‌‌‌as‌‌measure.‌‌   ‌
Sec‌  ‌18.‌  ‌No‌  ‌person‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌detained‌  ‌solely‌  ‌by‌  ‌reason‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  Our‌  ‌jurisprudence‌  ‌has‌  ‌recognized‌  ‌four‌  ‌aspects‌  ‌of‌  ‌freedom‌  ‌of‌‌ 
political‌‌beliefs‌‌and‌‌aspirations.‌‌xxxx‌  ‌ If‌  ‌we‌  ‌apply‌  ‌the‌  ‌test‌  ‌for‌  ‌content-neutral‌  ‌regulation,‌‌   the‌‌
  questioned‌‌ 
the‌‌press‌,‌‌to‌‌wit:‌‌   ‌
acts‌‌   of‌‌  COMELEC‌‌   will‌‌  not‌‌  pass‌‌
  the‌‌
  three‌‌   requirements‌‌ for‌‌ evaluating‌‌ 
Sec‌  ‌8.‌  ‌The‌  ‌right‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  people,‌‌
  including‌‌
  those‌‌
  employed‌‌  in‌‌
  the‌‌  1) freedom‌‌from‌‌prior‌‌restraint;‌  ‌ such‌  ‌restraints‌  ‌on‌  ‌freedom‌  ‌of‌  ‌speech.‌  ‌“When‌  ‌the‌  ‌speech‌  ‌restraints‌‌ 
public‌  ‌and‌  ‌private‌  ‌sectors,‌  ‌to‌  ‌form‌  ‌unions,‌  ‌associations,‌  ‌or‌‌  2) freedom‌‌from‌‌punishment‌‌subsequent‌‌to‌‌publication;‌  ‌ take‌  ‌the‌  ‌form‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌content-neutral‌  ‌regulation,‌  ‌only‌  ‌a ‌ ‌substantial‌‌ 
societies‌‌for‌‌purposes‌‌not‌‌contrary‌‌to‌‌law‌‌shall‌‌not‌‌be‌‌abridged.‌  ‌ governmental‌‌   interest‌‌   is‌‌
  required‌‌   ‌for‌‌ its‌‌ validity,”‌‌ and‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌ subject‌‌ 
3) freedom‌‌of‌‌access‌‌to‌‌information;‌‌and‌  ‌ only‌‌to‌‌the‌‌‌intermediate‌‌approach‌. ‌ ‌
⭐‌The‌‌Diocese‌‌of‌‌Bacolod‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 015‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌ 4) freedom‌‌of‌‌circulation.‌  ‌
A‌  ‌content-neutral‌  ‌government‌  ‌regulation‌  ‌is‌  ‌sufficiently‌‌ 
Prior‌  ‌restraint‌  ‌refers‌‌  to‌‌  official‌‌  governmental‌‌  restrictions‌‌  on‌‌  the‌‌  justified‌: ‌ ‌
The‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌freedom‌  ‌of‌  ‌expression‌  ‌applies‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌entire‌‌ 
press‌‌ or‌‌ other‌‌ forms‌‌ of‌‌ expression‌‌ in‌‌ advance‌‌ of‌‌ actual‌‌ publication‌‌ or‌‌ 
continuum‌  ‌of‌  ‌speech‌  ‌from‌  ‌utterances‌  ‌made‌‌   to‌‌
  conduct‌‌   enacted,‌‌
  and‌‌  1. if‌‌it‌‌is‌‌within‌‌the‌‌constitutional‌‌power‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Government;‌‌   ‌
dissemination.‌  ‌Freedom‌  ‌from‌  ‌prior‌  ‌restraint‌  ‌precludes‌‌ 
even‌  ‌to‌  ‌inaction‌  ‌itself‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌symbolic‌  ‌manner‌  ‌of‌  ‌communication.‌‌  2. if‌  ‌it‌  ‌furthers‌  ‌an‌  ‌important‌  ‌or‌  ‌substantial‌  ‌governmental‌‌ 
governmental‌‌acts‌‌that‌‌required‌‌   ‌
Ebralinag‌  ‌v.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Division‌  ‌Superintendent‌  ‌of‌  ‌Schools‌  ‌of‌  ‌Cebu‌‌  interest;‌  ‌
declares‌‌that:‌  ‌ a) approval‌‌of‌‌a‌‌proposal‌‌to‌‌publish;‌‌   ‌
3. if‌  ‌the‌  ‌governmental‌‌
  interest‌‌
  is‌‌
  unrelated‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  suppression‌‌ 
Freedom‌‌   of‌‌
  speech‌‌ includes‌‌ the‌‌ right‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ silent.‌‌ The‌‌ salute‌‌  b) licensing‌  ‌or‌  ‌permits‌  ‌as‌  ‌prerequisites‌  ‌to‌  ‌publication‌‌  of‌‌free‌‌expression;‌‌and‌  ‌
is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌symbolic‌  ‌manner‌  ‌of‌  ‌communication‌  ‌that‌  ‌conveys‌  ‌its‌‌  including‌  ‌the‌  ‌payment‌  ‌of‌  ‌license‌  ‌taxes‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌to‌‌ 
publish;‌‌and‌‌   ‌ 4. if‌‌ the‌‌ incident‌‌ restriction‌‌ is‌‌ no‌‌ greater‌‌ than‌‌ is‌‌ essential‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ 
message‌  ‌as‌  ‌clearly‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌written‌  ‌or‌  ‌spoken‌  ‌word.‌  ‌As‌  ‌a ‌ ‌valid‌‌ 
furtherance‌‌of‌‌that‌‌interest.‌  ‌
form‌‌   of‌‌
  expression,‌‌   it‌‌
  cannot‌‌   be‌‌
  compelled‌‌   any‌‌
  more‌‌ than‌‌ it‌‌ can‌‌  c) even‌‌injunctions‌‌against‌‌publication.‌‌   ‌
be‌  ‌prohibited‌  ‌in‌‌   the‌‌
  face‌‌
  of‌‌
  valid‌‌  religious‌‌
  objections‌‌   like‌‌
  those‌‌  In‌‌
  this‌‌
  case,‌‌ limiting‌‌ the‌‌ maximum‌‌ size‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ tarpaulin‌‌ would‌‌ render‌‌ 
raised‌‌in‌‌this‌‌petition.‌  ‌ Any‌‌
  law‌‌  or‌‌
  official‌‌
  that‌‌
  requires‌‌
  some‌‌  form‌‌
  of‌‌
  permission‌‌  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  had‌‌  ineffective‌  ‌petitioners’‌  ‌message‌  ‌and‌  ‌violate‌  ‌their‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌exercise‌‌ 
before‌  ‌publication‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌made,‌  ‌commits‌  ‌an‌  ‌infringement‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  freedom‌  ‌of‌  ‌expression.‌  ‌The‌  ‌restriction‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌
  present‌‌   case‌‌
  does‌‌
  not‌‌ 
The‌  ‌form‌  ‌of‌  ‌expression‌  ‌is‌  ‌just‌  ‌as‌  ‌important‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌information‌‌  constitutional‌‌right,‌‌and‌‌remedy‌‌can‌‌be‌‌had‌‌at‌‌the‌‌courts.‌  ‌ pass‌‌  even‌‌
  the‌‌  lower‌‌
  test‌‌
  of‌‌
  intermediate‌‌   scrutiny‌‌   for‌‌
  content-neutral‌‌ 
conveyed‌‌   that‌‌
  it‌‌
  forms‌‌
  part‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  expression.‌‌   The‌‌
  present‌‌   case‌‌
  is‌‌
  in‌‌ 
There‌‌   is‌‌ prior‌‌ restraint‌‌ when‌‌ the‌‌ government‌‌ totally‌‌ prohibits‌‌ and/or‌‌  regulations.‌  ‌
point.‌  ‌Large‌  ‌tarpaulins,‌  ‌therefore,‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌analogous‌  ‌to‌  ‌time‌  ‌and‌‌ 
place.‌  ‌They‌  ‌are‌  ‌fundamentally‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌expression‌  ‌protected‌  ‌under‌‌  in‌‌
  some‌‌   way,‌‌   ‌restricts‌‌   ‌the‌‌ expression‌‌ of‌‌ one's‌‌ view‌‌ or‌‌ the‌‌ manner‌‌ of‌‌ 
Art‌‌III,‌‌Section‌‌4.‌  ‌ expressing‌‌   oneself.‌‌   ‌There‌‌   is‌‌
  none‌‌ in‌‌ this‌‌ case.‌‌ ‌No‌‌ other‌‌ interpretation‌‌  Southern‌‌Hemisphere‌‌Engagement‌‌Network‌‌v.‌‌Anti-Terrorism‌‌ 
can‌  ‌be‌  ‌had‌  ‌of‌  ‌respondents'‌  ‌pronouncements‌  ‌except‌  ‌that‌‌   for‌‌
  being‌‌
  a ‌‌ Council‌‌2
‌ 010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌‌on‌‌Facial‌‌Challenge‌  ‌
  speech‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ protected‌‌ under‌‌ the‌‌ ‌safety‌‌ valve‌‌ theory.‌ ‌This‌‌ 
Free‌‌ reminder‌  ‌of‌  ‌prevailing‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌and‌  ‌jurisprudence,‌‌ 
provides‌  ‌that‌  ‌“nonviolent‌  ‌manifestations‌  ‌of‌  ‌dissent‌  ‌reduce‌  ‌the‌‌  applicable‌‌   to‌‌
  all‌‌
  and‌‌   not‌‌  only‌‌   to‌‌
  media‌‌   personalities,‌‌   that‌‌  resistance‌‌  A‌  ‌facial‌  ‌invalidation‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌statute‌  ‌is‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌only‌  ‌in‌  ‌free‌  ‌speech‌‌ 
likelihood‌  ‌of‌  ‌violence.”‌  ‌This‌  ‌court‌  ‌has‌  ‌held‌  ‌free‌  ‌speech‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌‌  or‌  ‌disobedience‌  ‌to‌  ‌lawful‌  ‌orders‌  ‌of‌  ‌authorities‌  ‌may‌  ‌result‌  ‌to‌‌  cases‌, ‌ ‌wherein‌  ‌certain‌  ‌rules‌  ‌of‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌litigation‌  ‌are‌  ‌rightly‌‌ 
intellectual‌  ‌freedoms‌  ‌as‌  ‌“highly‌  ‌ranked‌  ‌in‌  ‌our‌  ‌scheme‌  ‌of‌‌  criminal,‌‌and‌‌even‌‌administrative,‌‌liabilities.‌  ‌ excepted.‌  ‌
constitutional‌  ‌values.”‌  ‌These‌  ‌rights‌  ‌enjoy‌  ‌precedence‌  ‌and‌‌ 
⭐‌The‌‌Diocese‌‌of‌‌Bacolod‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 015‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌ NB:‌‌  While‌‌ this‌‌ Court‌‌ has‌‌ withheld‌‌ the‌‌ application‌‌ of‌‌ facial‌‌ challenges‌‌ 
primacy.‌  ‌
to‌‌
  strictly‌‌  penal‌‌  statutes,‌‌
  it‌‌
  has‌‌ ‌expanded‌‌ ‌its‌‌ scope‌‌ to‌‌ cover‌‌ statutes‌‌ 
This‌  ‌primordial‌  ‌right‌  ‌calls‌  ‌for‌  ‌utmost‌  ‌respect,‌  ‌more‌  ‌so‌  ‌“when‌‌  Content-based‌‌   regulations‌‌   can‌‌  either‌‌
  be‌‌
  based‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ viewpoint‌‌ of‌‌  not‌  ‌only‌  ‌regulating‌  ‌free‌  ‌speech,‌  ‌but‌  ‌also‌  ‌those‌  ‌involving‌  ‌religious‌‌ 
what‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌curtailed‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌‌
  dissemination‌‌
  of‌‌
  information‌‌   to‌‌
  make‌‌  the‌‌   speaker‌‌
  or‌‌
  the‌‌ subject‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ expression.‌Content-based‌‌
   restraint‌‌  freedom,‌‌and‌o ‌ ther‌‌fundamental‌‌rights‌.‌‌(‌Imbong‌‌v.‌‌Ochoa‌) ‌ ‌
more‌‌meaningful‌‌the‌‌equally‌‌vital‌‌right‌‌of‌‌suffrage.”‌  ‌ or‌  ‌censorship‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌restrictions‌  ‌“based‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌subject‌‌   matter‌‌
  of‌‌ 
the‌  ‌utterance‌  ‌or‌  ‌speech.”‌  ‌In‌  ‌contrast,‌  ‌content-neutral‌  ‌regulation‌‌  The‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌vagueness‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌overbreadth‌  ‌do‌‌ 
Tordesillas‌‌v.‌‌Puno‌‌2
‌ 018‌  ‌ NOT‌  ‌operate‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌plane.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌A ‌‌statute‌‌
  or‌‌
  act‌‌
  suffers‌‌
  from‌‌ 
includes‌‌   controls‌‌   merely‌‌   on‌‌ the‌‌ incidents‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ speech‌‌ such‌‌ as‌‌ time,‌‌ 
place,‌‌or‌‌manner‌‌of‌‌the‌‌speech.‌  ‌ the‌‌ defect‌‌ of‌‌ v
‌ agueness‌‌ ‌when‌‌ it‌‌ lacks‌‌ comprehensible‌‌ standards.‌  ‌It‌‌ 
WON‌  ‌the‌  ‌Advisory‌  ‌issued‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌
  respondents‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  content-neutral‌‌  is‌‌repugnant‌‌to‌‌the‌‌Constitution‌‌in‌‌two‌‌respects:‌‌   ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 10‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

the‌  ‌due‌  ‌process‌  ‌clause‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌utilized‌  ‌in‌  ‌examining‌  ‌the‌‌  overbreadth‌b
‌ ecause‌‌obscenity‌‌is‌‌unprotected‌‌speech‌.‌ 
1) it‌‌violates‌‌due‌‌process‌;‌‌and‌  ‌
constitutionality‌‌of‌‌criminal‌‌statutes‌. ‌ ‌
2) it‌  ‌leaves‌  ‌law‌  ‌enforcers‌‌
  unbridled‌‌
  discretion‌‌
  in‌‌
  carrying‌‌  out‌‌  The‌‌
  ‌overbreadth‌‌   ‌and‌‌  ‌vagueness‌‌ ‌doctrines‌‌ have‌‌ special‌‌ application‌‌ 
its‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌and‌  ‌becomes‌  ‌an‌  ‌arbitrary‌  ‌flexing‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  only‌‌   to‌‌
  free‌‌  speech‌‌   cases‌. ‌‌They‌‌   are‌‌
  ‌inapt‌‌   for‌‌  testing‌‌ the‌‌ validity‌‌ of‌‌ 
Nicolas-Lewis‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ penal‌  ‌statutes‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌doctrines‌‌   of‌‌
  ‌strict‌‌   scrutiny,‌‌   overbreadth,‌‌   and‌‌ 
Government‌‌muscle.‌  ‌
vagueness‌‌   ‌are‌‌
  analytical‌‌   tools‌‌
  developed‌‌   for‌‌  testing‌‌ "on‌‌ their‌‌ faces"‌‌ 
The‌  ‌overbreadth‌  ‌doctrine‌, ‌ ‌meanwhile,‌  ‌decrees‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌‌ At‌‌
  issue‌‌
  are‌‌
  Section‌‌  36.8‌‌ of‌‌ R.A.‌‌ 9189,‌‌ as‌‌ amended‌‌ by‌‌ R.A.‌‌ 10590‌‌ and‌‌ 
statutes‌‌in‌‌free‌‌speech‌‌cases.‌  ‌
Section‌  ‌74(II)(8)‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌COMELEC‌  ‌Resolution‌  ‌No.‌  ‌10035,‌  ‌which‌‌ 
governmental‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌to‌  ‌control‌  ‌or‌  ‌prevent‌  ‌activities‌‌ 
prohibit‌  ‌the‌  ‌engagement‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌person‌  ‌in‌  ‌partisan‌  ‌political‌‌  It‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌established‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌that‌  ‌unprotected‌‌ 
constitutionally‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌state‌‌
  regulations‌‌
  may‌‌   not‌‌
  be‌‌
  achieved‌‌
  by‌ 
activities‌‌abroad‌‌during‌‌the‌‌30-day‌‌overseas‌‌voting‌‌period‌. ‌ ‌ speech‌‌‌or‌‌low-value‌‌expression‌‌‌refers‌‌to‌‌   ‌
means‌  ‌which‌  ‌sweep‌  ‌unnecessarily‌  ‌broadly‌  ‌and‌  ‌thereby‌  ‌invade‌  ‌the‌‌ 
area‌  ‌of‌  ‌protected‌  ‌freedoms.‌  ‌As‌  ‌distinguished‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌vagueness‌‌  The‌‌ allowance‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌review‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌law‌‌ or‌‌ statute‌‌ on‌‌ its‌‌ face‌‌ in‌‌ free‌‌ speech‌‌  1) libelous‌‌statements,‌‌   ‌
doctrine,‌  ‌the‌  ‌overbreadth‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌assumes‌  ‌that‌  ‌individuals‌  ‌will‌‌  cases‌‌ is‌‌ justified‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ aim‌‌ to‌‌ avert‌‌ the‌‌ "‌chilling‌‌ effect"‌‌ on‌‌ protected‌‌  2) obscenity‌‌or‌‌pornography,‌‌   ‌
understand‌  ‌what‌  ‌a ‌ ‌statute‌  ‌prohibits‌  ‌and‌  ‌will‌  ‌accordingly‌  ‌refrain‌‌  speech,‌‌the‌‌exercise‌‌of‌‌which‌‌should‌‌not‌‌at‌‌all‌‌times‌‌be‌‌abridged.‌  ‌
from‌‌that‌‌behavior‌,‌‌even‌‌though‌‌some‌‌of‌‌it‌‌is‌‌protected.‌  ‌ 3) false‌‌or‌‌misleading‌‌advertisement,‌‌   ‌
Restraints‌‌
  on‌‌
  freedom‌‌  of‌‌
  expression‌‌
  are‌‌
  also‌‌ evaluated‌‌ by‌‌ either‌‌ or‌‌ a ‌‌
A‌  ‌"facial"‌  ‌challenge‌  ‌is‌  ‌likewise‌  ‌different‌  ‌from‌  ‌an‌  ‌"as-applied"‌‌  4) insulting‌‌  or‌‌
  "fighting‌‌  words,"‌‌   i.e.,‌‌  those‌‌  which‌‌
  by‌‌
  their‌‌
  very‌‌ 
combination‌‌of‌‌the‌‌following‌‌theoretical‌‌tests,‌‌to‌‌wit:‌‌   ‌
utterance‌‌   inflict‌‌
  injury‌‌
  or‌‌ tend‌‌ to‌‌ incite‌‌ an‌‌ immediate‌‌ breach‌‌ 
challenge.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Distinguished‌  ‌from‌  ‌an‌  ‌as-applied‌  ‌challenge‌‌   which‌‌ 
a) the‌‌dangerous‌‌tendency‌‌‌doctrine;‌  ‌ of‌‌peace‌‌and‌‌   ‌
considers‌  ‌only‌  ‌extant‌  ‌facts‌  ‌affecting‌  ‌real‌  ‌litigants‌, ‌ ‌a ‌ ‌facial‌‌ 
invalidation‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌examination‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌entire‌  ‌law‌, ‌‌pinpointing‌‌  its‌‌  b) the‌‌clear‌‌and‌‌present‌‌danger‌r‌ ule;‌‌and‌‌   ‌ 5) expression‌‌endangering‌‌national‌‌security.‌  ‌
flaws‌‌   and‌‌
  defects,‌‌  not‌‌
  only‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  basis‌‌
  of‌‌
  its‌‌
  actual‌‌ operation‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌  c) the‌‌balancing‌‌of‌‌interests‌t‌ est.‌  ‌ A‌‌
  litigant‌‌   who‌‌
  stands‌‌   charged‌‌   under‌‌   a ‌‌law‌‌   that‌‌ regulates‌‌ unprotected‌‌ 
parties,‌  ‌but‌  ‌also‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌assumption‌  ‌or‌  ‌prediction‌  ‌that‌  ‌its‌  ‌very‌‌  speech‌  ‌can‌  ‌still‌  ‌mount‌  ‌a ‌‌challenge‌‌   that‌‌   a ‌‌statute‌‌   is‌‌
  unconstitutional‌‌ 
When‌  ‌the‌  ‌speech‌  ‌restraints‌  ‌take‌  ‌the‌  ‌form‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌content-neutral‌‌ 
existence‌  ‌may‌  ‌cause‌  ‌others‌  ‌not‌  ‌before‌  ‌the‌  ‌court‌  ‌to‌  ‌refrain‌  ‌from‌‌  as‌‌
  it‌‌
  is‌‌
  applied‌‌   to‌‌
  him‌‌ or‌‌ her.‌‌ If‌‌ the‌‌ litigant‌‌ prevails,‌‌ the‌‌ courts‌‌ carve‌‌ 
regulation,‌  ‌only‌  ‌a ‌ ‌substantial‌  ‌governmental‌  ‌interest‌  ‌is‌  ‌required‌‌ 
constitutionally‌‌protected‌‌speech‌‌or‌‌activities‌. ‌ ‌ away‌  ‌the‌  ‌unconstitutional‌  ‌aspects‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌by‌  ‌invalidating‌  ‌its‌‌ 
for‌  ‌its‌  ‌validity.‌  ‌They‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌subject‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  strictest‌‌
  form‌‌
  of‌‌
  judicial‌‌ 
The‌  ‌vagueness‌  ‌and‌  ‌overbreadth‌  ‌doctrines,‌  ‌as‌  ‌grounds‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌facial‌‌  scrutiny‌  ‌but‌  ‌an‌  ‌intermediate‌‌   approach‌‌   ‌— ‌‌somewhere‌‌  between‌‌  improper‌‌applications‌‌on‌‌a‌‌case‌‌to‌‌case‌‌basis.‌  ‌
challenge,‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌applicable‌  ‌to‌  ‌penal‌  ‌laws.‌  ‌The‌  ‌allowance‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌ the‌  ‌mere‌  ‌rationality‌  ‌that‌  ‌is‌  ‌required‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌other‌  ‌law‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌  Pharmaceutical‌‌and‌‌Healthcare‌‌Association‌‌v.‌‌Duque‌‌III‌  ‌
facial‌  ‌challenge‌  ‌in‌  ‌free‌‌
  speech‌‌  cases‌  ‌is‌‌
  justified‌‌   by‌‌  the‌‌
  aim‌‌
  to‌‌
  avert‌‌  compelling‌‌interest‌‌standard‌‌‌applied‌‌to‌‌content-based‌‌restrictions.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌"‌chilling‌  ‌effect‌" ‌ ‌on‌  ‌protected‌  ‌speech,‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌which‌‌  The‌  ‌advertising‌  ‌and‌  ‌promotion‌  ‌of‌  ‌breastmilk‌  ‌substitutes‌  ‌properly‌ 
As‌‌explained‌‌in‌C
‌ havez‌,  ‌‌ ‌
should‌‌   not‌‌
  at‌‌
  all‌‌
  times‌‌
  be‌‌
  abridged.‌‌
  This‌‌   rationale‌‌   is‌‌
  inapplicable‌‌   to‌‌  falls‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌ambit‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌term‌  ‌commercial‌  ‌speech‌—that‌  ‌is,‌‌ 
plain‌  ‌penal‌  ‌statutes‌  ‌that‌  ‌generally‌  ‌bear‌  ‌an‌  ‌"‌in‌  ‌terrorem‌  ‌effect‌" ‌ ‌in‌‌  1) a‌  ‌content-based‌  ‌regulation‌  ‌is‌  ‌evaluated‌  ‌using‌  ‌the‌  ‌clear‌‌  speech‌‌that‌‌proposes‌‌an‌‌economic‌‌transaction.‌  ‌
deterring‌‌socially‌‌harmful‌‌conduct.‌  ‌ and‌‌present‌‌danger‌‌rule‌,  ‌‌ ‌
Central‌  ‌Hudson‌  ‌provides‌  ‌a ‌ ‌four-part‌  ‌analysis‌  ‌for‌  ‌evaluating‌  ‌the‌‌ 
By‌‌
  its‌‌ nature,‌‌ the‌‌ ‌overbreadth‌‌ doctrine‌‌ has‌‌ to‌‌ necessarily‌‌ apply‌‌ a ‌‌ 2) while‌  ‌courts‌  ‌will‌  ‌subject‌  ‌content-neutral‌  ‌restraints‌  ‌to‌‌  validity‌‌of‌‌regulations‌‌of‌‌commercial‌‌speech.‌‌   ‌
facial‌  ‌type‌  ‌of‌  ‌invalidation‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌most‌  ‌distinctive‌  ‌feature‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  intermediate‌‌scrutiny‌. ‌ ‌
overbreadth‌‌   technique‌‌   is‌‌
  that‌‌
  it‌‌
  marks‌‌
  an‌‌
  ‌exception‌‌
  to‌‌ some‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  1. To‌‌
  begin‌‌  with,‌‌
  the‌‌
  commercial‌‌
  speech‌‌ must‌‌ "concern‌‌ lawful‌‌ 
By‌  ‌banning‌  ‌partisan‌  ‌political‌  ‌activities‌  ‌or‌‌
  campaigning‌‌   even‌‌
  during‌‌  activity‌‌and‌‌not‌‌be‌‌misleading."‌  ‌
usual‌‌rules‌‌of‌‌constitutional‌‌litigation.‌‌   ‌ the‌‌
  campaign‌‌   period‌‌
  within‌‌   embassies,‌‌   consulates,‌‌ and‌‌ other‌‌ foreign‌‌ 
service‌  ‌establishments,‌  ‌regardless‌  ‌of‌  ‌whether‌  ‌it‌  ‌applies‌  ‌only‌  ‌to‌‌  2. Next,‌  ‌the‌  ‌asserted‌  ‌governmental‌  ‌interest‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌‌ 
Ordinarily‌, ‌ ‌a ‌ ‌particular‌  ‌litigant‌  ‌claims‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌statute‌  ‌is‌‌ 
substantial.‌‌   ‌
unconstitutional‌‌   as‌‌
  applied‌‌   to‌‌
  him‌‌   or‌‌
  her;‌‌
  if‌‌
  the‌‌
  litigant‌‌
  prevails,‌‌ the‌‌  candidates‌  ‌or‌  ‌whether‌  ‌the‌  ‌prohibition‌‌  extends‌‌   to‌‌
  private‌‌
  persons,‌‌  it‌‌ 
courts‌  ‌carve‌  ‌away‌  ‌the‌  ‌unconstitutional‌  ‌aspects‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌by‌‌  goes‌  ‌beyond‌  ‌the‌  ‌objective‌  ‌of‌  ‌maintaining‌  ‌order‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌  ‌voting‌‌  If‌  ‌both‌  ‌of‌  ‌these‌  ‌requirements‌  ‌are‌  ‌met,‌  ‌it‌  ‌must‌  ‌next‌  ‌be‌‌ 
invalidating‌  ‌its‌  ‌improper‌  ‌applications‌  ‌on‌  ‌a ‌ ‌case‌  ‌to‌  ‌case‌  ‌basis.‌  ‌ period‌‌and‌‌ensuring‌‌a‌‌credible‌‌election.‌  ‌ determined‌‌   ‌
Moreover,‌‌   challengers‌‌   to‌‌
  a ‌‌law‌‌ are‌‌ not‌‌ permitted‌‌ to‌‌ raise‌‌ the‌‌ rights‌‌ of‌‌  3. Whether‌  ‌the‌  ‌state‌  ‌regulation‌  ‌directly‌  ‌advances‌  ‌the‌‌ 
third‌‌ parties‌‌ and‌‌ can‌‌ only‌‌ assert‌‌ their‌‌ own‌‌ interests.‌  ‌In‌‌ overbreadth‌‌  ⭐‌Madrilejos‌‌v.‌‌Gatdula‌‌2
‌ 019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ governmental‌‌interest‌‌asserted,‌‌and‌‌   ‌
analysis‌,‌‌those‌‌rules‌‌give‌‌way.‌  ‌
4. Whether‌  ‌it‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  more‌‌
  extensive‌‌
  than‌‌
  is‌‌
  necessary‌‌
  to‌‌
  serve‌‌ 
SC‌‌
  dismissed‌‌
  the‌‌  petition‌‌
  on‌‌  the‌‌  ground‌‌
  that‌‌
  Ordinance‌‌ No.‌‌ 7780,‌‌ an‌‌ 
In‌‌
  this‌‌
  jurisdiction,‌‌ the‌‌ void-for-vagueness‌‌ doctrine‌‌ asserted‌‌ under‌‌  anti-obscenity‌  ‌law,‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌facially‌  ‌attacked‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌ground‌  ‌of‌‌  that‌‌interest.‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 11‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

See‌‌also‌D
‌ isini‌‌v.‌‌SOJ‌‌2
‌ 014‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ 1. upon‌‌probable‌‌cause‌‌   ‌ justification‌‌of‌‌the‌‌application;‌  ‌
To‌‌
  prohibit‌‌   the‌‌  transmission‌‌   of‌‌
  unsolicited‌‌   ads‌‌ would‌‌ deny‌‌ a ‌‌person‌‌  3) the‌  ‌questions‌  ‌should‌  ‌not‌  ‌merely‌  ‌be‌  ‌repetitious‌  ‌of‌  t‌ he‌‌ 
2. to‌‌be‌d
‌ etermined‌‌personally‌‌‌by‌‌the‌‌judge‌‌   ‌
the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌read‌  ‌his‌  ‌emails,‌  ‌even‌  ‌unsolicited‌  ‌commercial‌  ‌ads‌‌  averments‌  ‌stated‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌affidavits‌  ‌or‌  ‌depositions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
3. after‌  ‌examination‌  ‌under‌  ‌oath‌  ‌or‌  ‌affirmation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  applicant‌‌and‌‌the‌‌witnesses.‌‌   ‌
addressed‌  ‌to‌  ‌him.‌  ‌Commercial‌  ‌speech‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌separate‌  ‌category‌  ‌of‌‌ 
speech‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌accorded‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌level‌  ‌of‌  ‌protection‌  ‌as‌  ‌that‌‌  complainant‌‌and‌‌the‌‌witnesses‌‌he‌‌may‌‌produce,‌‌and‌‌   ‌
given‌‌   to‌‌
  other‌‌
  constitutionally‌‌   guaranteed‌‌   forms‌‌   of‌‌ expression‌‌ but‌‌ is‌‌  4. particularly‌  ‌describing‌  ‌the‌  ‌place‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌searched‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌  Fenix‌‌v.‌‌CA‌‌2
‌ 016‌  ‌
nonetheless‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌protection‌. ‌ ‌The‌‌   State‌‌  cannot‌‌   rob‌‌
  him‌‌
  of‌‌
  this‌‌ 
persons‌‌or‌‌things‌‌to‌‌be‌‌seized.‌  ‌ We‌  ‌uphold‌‌
  the‌‌  power‌‌  of‌‌
  judges‌‌  to‌‌  dismiss‌‌   a ‌‌criminal‌‌
  case‌‌
  when‌‌  the‌‌ 
right‌  ‌without‌  ‌violating‌  ‌the‌  ‌constitutionally‌  ‌guaranteed‌  ‌freedom‌  ‌of‌‌ 
expression.‌  ‌Unsolicited‌  ‌advertisements‌  ‌are‌  ‌legitimate‌  ‌forms‌‌   of‌‌  evidence‌  ‌on‌  ‌record‌  ‌clearly‌  ‌fails‌  ‌to‌  ‌establish‌  ‌probable‌  ‌cause‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌ 
Estrada‌‌v.‌‌Office‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Ombudsman‌‌2
‌ 015‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ issuance‌‌of‌‌a‌‌warrant‌‌of‌‌arrest.‌  ‌
expression.‌  ‌
Probable‌  ‌cause‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌established‌  ‌with‌  ‌hearsay‌  ‌evidence‌, ‌ ‌as‌‌  First‌, ‌ ‌judges‌  ‌have‌  ‌no‌  ‌capacity‌  ‌to‌  ‌review‌  ‌the‌  ‌prosecutor's‌‌ 
d. Rights‌‌During‌‌Expropriation‌  ‌ long‌  ‌as‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌substantial‌  ‌basis‌  ‌for‌  ‌crediting‌  ‌the‌  ‌hearsay.‌‌  determination‌  ‌of‌  ‌probable‌  ‌cause.‌  ‌That‌  ‌falls‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌office‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Hearsay‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌is‌  ‌admissible‌  ‌in‌  ‌determining‌  ‌probable‌‌   cause‌‌
  in‌‌
  a ‌‌ DOJ‌‌Secretary.‌‌   ‌
1. Owner’s‌  ‌failure‌  ‌to‌  ‌question‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌long‌  ‌period‌  ‌of‌  ‌time‌  ‌the‌‌  preliminary‌  ‌investigation‌  ‌because‌  ‌such‌  ‌investigation‌  ‌is‌  ‌merely‌‌ 
government’s‌  ‌failure‌  ‌to‌  ‌institute‌  ‌expropriation‌  ‌proceedings‌‌  preliminary,‌‌   and‌‌
  does‌‌   not‌‌
  finally‌‌
  adjudicate‌‌
  rights‌‌ and‌‌ obligations‌‌ of‌‌  Second‌, ‌ ‌once‌  ‌a ‌ ‌complaint‌  ‌or‌  ‌an‌  ‌Information‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌filed,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
constitutes‌  ‌a ‌‌waiver‌‌   of‌‌
  his‌‌
  right‌‌   to‌‌
  regain‌‌
  possession‌‌   of‌‌
  his‌‌  parties.‌‌   ‌ disposition‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌is‌  ‌addressed‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌sound‌  ‌discretion‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
property.‌‌
  His‌‌   only‌‌
  remedy‌‌   is‌‌ an‌‌ ‌action‌‌ for‌‌ payment‌‌ of‌‌ just‌‌  court,‌‌
  subject‌‌
  only‌‌   to‌‌ the‌‌ qualification‌‌ that‌‌ its‌‌ action‌‌ must‌‌ not‌‌ impair‌‌ 
compensation‌‌‌and‌‌may‌‌not‌‌sue‌‌for‌‌ejectment.‌  ‌ the‌‌
  substantial‌‌   rights‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌   accused‌‌
  or‌‌
  the‌‌  right‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ People‌‌ to‌‌ due‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Ramon‌‌‌2019‌  ‌ process‌‌of‌‌law.‌‌   ‌
2. Amount‌‌to‌‌be‌‌Deposited‌  ‌
The‌‌
  quantum‌‌   of‌‌
  proof‌‌
  to‌‌
  establish‌‌
  probable‌‌   cause‌‌ and‌‌ a ‌‌prima‌‌  Third‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌judge's‌  ‌determination‌  ‌of‌  ‌probable‌  ‌cause‌  ‌has‌  ‌a ‌ ‌different‌‌ 
a. Rule‌  ‌67‌  ‌— ‌ ‌an‌  ‌amount‌  ‌equivalent‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌full‌‌  assessed‌‌ 
facie‌‌
  case‌‌
  for‌‌
  purposes‌‌   of‌‌
  issuance‌‌
  of‌‌
  an‌‌ arrest‌‌ warrant‌‌ and‌‌ for‌‌  objective‌‌than‌‌that‌‌of‌‌the‌‌prosecutor.‌‌   ‌
value‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌  ‌in‌  ‌order‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌court‌‌
  to‌‌
  issue‌‌
  a ‌‌
preliminary‌‌investigation‌‌are‌‌one‌‌and‌‌the‌‌same.‌  ‌
writ‌‌of‌‌possession;‌  ‌ The‌‌   judge‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  compelled‌‌   to‌‌ follow‌‌ the‌‌ prosecutor's‌‌ certification‌‌ of‌‌ 
b. If‌  ‌the‌  ‌expropriator‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌LGU‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌amount‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌‌  If‌  ‌the‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌on‌  ‌record‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌clearly‌‌  establish‌‌  probable‌‌   cause‌‌  the‌  ‌existence‌  ‌of‌  ‌probable‌‌   cause.‌‌   As‌‌
  stated‌‌  in‌‌
  ‌People‌‌
  v.‌‌
  Inting‌, ‌‌"it‌‌
  is‌‌ 
deposited‌  ‌is‌  ‌only‌  ‌15%‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌assessed‌  ‌value‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  then‌  ‌the‌  ‌imperative‌  ‌is‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌prosecutor‌  ‌or‌‌   the‌‌
  judge‌‌
  to‌‌
  relieve‌‌   the‌‌  the‌‌ report,‌‌ the‌‌ affidavits,‌‌ the‌‌ transcripts‌‌ of‌‌ stenographic‌‌ notes,‌‌ and‌‌ all‌‌ 
property.‌‌   ‌ accused‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌ pain‌‌ of‌‌ going‌‌ through‌‌ trial.‌‌ Conversely,‌‌ if‌‌ the‌‌ finding‌‌  other‌  ‌supporting‌  ‌documents‌  ‌behind‌  ‌the‌  ‌prosecutor's‌  ‌certification‌‌ 
by‌  ‌the‌  ‌prosecutor‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌judge‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌on‌  ‌record‌‌  which‌‌are‌‌material‌‌in‌‌assisting‌‌the‌‌judge‌‌to‌‌make‌‌his‌‌determination."‌  ‌
c. In‌  ‌RA‌  ‌8974,‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌expropriation‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌‌ 
sufficiently‌‌   establishes‌‌   a ‌‌‌prima‌‌  facie‌‌
  case‌‌
  or‌‌
  probable‌‌   cause‌‌  against‌‌ 
implement‌‌   a ‌‌national‌‌ government‌‌ infrastructure‌‌ project,‌‌  the‌‌accused,‌‌the‌‌accused‌‌should‌‌be‌‌indicted‌‌and‌‌held‌‌for‌‌trial.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌panel's‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌resolving‌  ‌the‌  ‌complaint‌  ‌against‌  ‌petitioners‌  ‌and‌ 
what‌‌   needs‌‌  to‌‌  be‌‌
  done‌‌  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  a ‌‌deposit‌‌   but‌‌ payment‌‌ of‌‌  Ong‌  ‌primarily‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌basis‌  ‌of‌  ‌Doble's‌  ‌evidence,‌  ‌and‌‌
  in‌‌
  spite‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
BIR‌  ‌Zonal‌  ‌valuation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌property.‌  ‌This‌  ‌amount‌‌  People‌‌v.‌‌Gabiosa,‌‌Sr.‌‌2
‌ 020‌  ‌ timely‌  ‌submission‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌counter-affidavits,‌  ‌was‌‌   clearly‌‌   committed‌‌ 
deposited‌‌or‌‌paid‌‌is‌‌NOT‌‌the‌‌just‌‌compensation.‌  ‌ with‌‌grave‌‌abuse‌‌of‌‌discretion.‌  ‌
There‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌‌
  need‌‌
  to‌‌
  examine‌‌
  both‌‌  the‌‌
  applicant‌‌
  and‌‌
  the‌‌
  witnesses‌‌
  if‌‌ 
3. In‌  ‌NPC‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Pobre‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌expropriator‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌to‌‌ 
either‌‌one‌‌of‌‌them‌‌is‌‌sufficient‌‌to‌‌establish‌‌probable‌‌cause.‌  ‌ Dimal‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌2
‌ 018‌  ‌
unilaterally‌  ‌withdraw‌  ‌because‌  ‌damages‌  ‌may‌  ‌have‌  ‌already‌‌ 
been‌‌caused‌‌to‌‌the‌‌property.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌searching‌  ‌questions‌  ‌propounded‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌applicant‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌  A‌‌
  description‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌place‌‌
  to‌‌ be‌‌ searched‌‌ is‌‌ sufficient‌‌ if‌‌ the‌‌ officer‌‌ with‌‌ 
witnesses‌  ‌depend‌  ‌largely‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌discretion‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌judge.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌‌  the‌‌  warrant‌‌ ‌can‌‌ ascertain‌‌ and‌‌ identify‌‌ with‌‌ reasonable‌‌ effort‌‌ the‌‌ 
e. Searches‌‌and‌‌Seizure‌  ‌ axiomatic‌‌that‌‌   ‌ place‌  ‌intended,‌  ‌and‌  ‌distinguish‌  ‌it‌  ‌from‌  ‌other‌  ‌places‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
community‌. ‌‌A ‌‌designation‌‌ that‌‌ points‌‌ out‌‌ the‌‌ place‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ searched‌‌ to‌‌ 
Sec‌  ‌2 ‌ ‌Art‌  ‌III.‌  ‌The‌  ‌right‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  people‌‌   to‌‌
  be‌‌
  secure‌‌
  in‌‌
  their‌‌
  persons,‌‌  1) the‌  ‌examination‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌probing‌  ‌and‌  ‌exhaustive‌, ‌ ‌not‌‌ 
merely‌  ‌routinary,‌  ‌general,‌  ‌peripheral,‌  ‌perfunctory‌  ‌or‌‌  the‌‌  exclusion‌‌   of‌‌
  all‌‌  others,‌‌
  and‌‌   on‌‌ inquiry‌‌ unerringly‌‌ leads‌‌ the‌‌ peace‌‌ 
houses,‌  ‌papers,‌  ‌and‌  ‌effects‌  ‌against‌  ‌unreasonable‌  ‌searches‌  ‌and‌‌  officers‌‌to‌‌it,‌‌satisfies‌‌the‌‌constitutional‌‌requirement‌‌of‌‌definiteness.‌‌   ‌
pro-forma;‌  ‌
seizures‌‌   of‌‌
  whatever‌‌   nature‌‌  and‌‌
  for‌‌
  any‌‌  purpose‌‌  shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  inviolable,‌‌ 
2) the‌  ‌judge‌  ‌must‌  ‌not‌  ‌simply‌  ‌rehash‌  ‌the‌  ‌contents‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  In‌  ‌Vallejo‌  ‌v.‌  ‌CA,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  c‌ larified‌  ‌that‌  ‌technical‌  ‌precision‌  ‌of‌‌ 
and‌‌no‌‌search‌‌warrant‌‌or‌‌warrant‌‌of‌‌arrest‌‌shall‌‌issue‌e‌ xcept‌‌   ‌ description‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌required.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌only‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌that‌  ‌there‌  ‌be‌‌ 
affidavit‌  ‌but‌  ‌must‌  ‌make‌  ‌his‌  ‌own‌  ‌inquiry‌  ‌on‌‌
  the‌‌
  intent‌‌
  and‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 12‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

reasonable‌  ‌particularity‌  ‌and‌  ‌certainty‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌identity‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  3) Appointment‌‌   to‌‌
  any‌‌
  vacancy‌‌
  shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  only‌‌
  for‌‌ the‌‌ unexpired‌‌  Government,‌  ‌or‌  ‌any‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌subdivisions,‌  ‌agencies,‌  ‌or‌‌ 
property‌  ‌to‌‌
  be‌‌
  searched‌‌
  for‌‌
  and‌‌
  seized,‌‌
  so‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  warrant‌‌   shall‌‌  not‌‌  instrumentalities,‌  ‌including‌  ‌GOCCs‌  ‌with‌  ‌original‌‌ 
term‌‌of‌‌the‌‌predecessor.‌‌   ‌
be‌‌a‌‌mere‌r‌ oving‌‌commission‌. ‌ ‌ charters,‌‌and‌‌on‌‌a‌p
‌ ost-audit‌‌basis‌: ‌ ‌
4) In‌‌
  no‌‌
  case‌‌
  shall‌‌ any‌‌ Member‌‌ be‌‌ appointed‌‌ or‌‌ designated‌‌ in‌‌ a ‌‌ constitutional‌  ‌bodies,‌  ‌commissions‌  ‌and‌  ‌offices‌  ‌that‌‌ 
An‌  ‌otherwise‌  ‌overbroad‌  ‌warrant‌  ‌will‌  ‌comply‌  ‌with‌‌   the‌‌
  particularity‌‌ 
temporary‌‌or‌‌acting‌‌capacity.‌  ‌ have‌  ‌been‌  ‌granted‌  ‌fiscal‌  ‌autonomy‌  ‌under‌  ‌this‌‌ 
requirement‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌affidavit‌  ‌filed‌  ‌in‌  ‌support‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌warrant‌  ‌is‌‌ 
physically‌  ‌attached‌  ‌to‌  ‌it,‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌warrant‌  ‌expressly‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌   ‌
Constitution;‌  ‌
affidavit‌‌and‌‌incorporates‌‌it‌‌with‌‌suitable‌‌words‌‌of‌‌reference.‌  ‌ autonomous‌‌state‌‌colleges‌‌and‌‌universities;‌  ‌
CSC‌  ‌ As‌  ‌the‌  ‌central‌  ‌personnel‌  ‌agency‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Government,‌‌  other‌‌GOCCs‌‌and‌‌their‌‌subsidiaries;‌‌and‌  ‌
3. Composition‌‌and‌‌Powers‌‌of‌‌the‌‌  shall‌‌establish‌‌a‌‌career‌‌service.‌‌It‌‌shall‌‌   ‌
such‌  ‌non-governmental‌  ‌entities‌  ‌receiving‌  ‌subsidy‌  ‌or‌‌ 
Government‌ ‌Organs‌  ‌ 1. strengthen‌‌the‌‌merit‌‌and‌‌rewards‌‌system,‌‌   ‌ equity,‌  ‌directly‌  ‌or‌  ‌indirectly,‌  ‌from‌  ‌or‌  ‌through‌  ‌the‌‌ 
2. integrate‌  ‌all‌  ‌human‌  ‌resources‌  ‌development‌‌  Government,‌  ‌which‌  ‌are‌  ‌required‌  ‌by‌  ‌law‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Note:‌‌‌The‌‌compiler‌‌assumes‌‌this‌‌meant‌‌the‌‌Constitutional‌‌Commissions‌  ‌ programs‌‌for‌‌all‌‌levels‌‌and‌‌ranks,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ granting‌  ‌institution‌  ‌to‌  ‌submit‌  ‌to‌  ‌such‌  ‌audit‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌‌
condition‌‌of‌‌subsidy‌‌or‌‌equity.‌  ‌
Sec‌  ‌1.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Constitutional‌  ‌Commissions,‌  ‌which‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌  3. institutionalize‌‌ a ‌‌management‌‌ climate‌‌ conducive‌‌ to‌‌ 
public‌‌accountability.‌  ‌
independent‌,‌‌are‌  ‌   ‌
a) the‌‌Civil‌‌Service‌‌Commission‌,  ‌‌ ‌ Comelec‌  1. Enforce‌  ‌and‌  ‌administer‌  ‌all‌  ‌laws‌  ‌and‌  ‌regulations‌‌ 
relative‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌election,‌  ‌plebiscite,‌‌  4. Judicial‌‌Review‌  ‌
b) the‌‌Commission‌‌on‌‌Elections‌,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ initiative,‌‌referendum,‌‌and‌‌recall.‌  ‌
c) the‌‌Commission‌‌on‌‌Audit‌. ‌ ‌ 2. Exercise‌  ‌exclusive‌  ‌original‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌over‌  ‌all‌‌  Requisites‌  ‌
Sec‌  ‌5.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Commission‌  ‌shall‌  ‌enjoy‌  ‌fiscal‌  ‌autonomy‌. ‌ ‌Their‌‌  contests‌  ‌relating‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌elections,‌  ‌returns,‌  ‌and‌‌  1. Ripeness‌. ‌‌— ‌‌‌An‌‌ ‌actual‌‌ case‌‌ or‌‌ controversy‌ ‌calling‌‌ for‌‌ 
qualifications‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌  ‌elective‌  ‌regional,‌  ‌provincial,‌‌ 
approved‌  ‌annual‌  ‌appropriations‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌automatically‌  ‌and‌‌  the‌‌exercise‌‌of‌‌judicial‌‌power;‌  ‌
and‌‌
  city‌‌ officials,‌‌ and‌‌ appellate‌‌ jurisdiction‌‌ over‌‌ all‌ 
regularly‌‌released.‌  ‌ contests‌  ‌involving‌  ‌elective‌  ‌municipal‌  ‌officials‌‌  2. Locus‌  ‌standi.‌‌
  — ‌‌‌The‌‌
  person‌‌
  challenging‌‌
  the‌‌
  act‌‌
  must‌‌
  have‌‌ 
Sec‌  ‌7.‌‌
  Each‌‌
  Commission‌‌   shall‌‌
  decide‌‌
  by‌‌
  a ‌‌‌majority‌‌  vote‌‌
  of‌‌
  all‌‌  decided‌  ‌by‌  ‌trial‌  ‌courts‌  ‌of‌  ‌general‌  ‌jurisdiction,‌  ‌or‌‌  "‌standing‌"‌‌to‌‌challenge;‌  ‌
its‌‌
  Members,‌‌   any‌‌
  case‌‌ or‌‌ matter‌‌ brought‌‌ before‌‌ it‌‌ within‌‌ 60‌‌ days‌‌  involving‌  ‌elective‌  ‌barangay‌  ‌officials‌  ‌decided‌  ‌by‌‌  3. The‌  ‌question‌  ‌of‌  ‌constitutionality‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌raised‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌‌ 
trial‌‌courts‌‌of‌‌limited‌‌jurisdiction.‌  ‌ earliest‌‌possible‌‌opportunity‌;‌‌and‌  ‌
from‌‌the‌‌date‌‌of‌‌its‌‌submission‌‌for‌‌decision‌‌or‌‌resolution.‌  ‌
3. Decisions,‌  ‌final‌  ‌orders,‌  ‌or‌  ‌rulings‌  ‌on‌  ‌election‌‌  4. The‌‌  issue‌‌
  of‌‌
  constitutionality‌‌
  must‌‌
  be‌‌   very‌‌ ‌lis‌‌ mota‌ ‌of‌‌ 
  the‌‌
Additional‌‌Commonalities‌  ‌
contests‌‌  involving‌‌  elective‌‌
  municipal‌‌ and‌‌ barangay‌‌  the‌‌case.‌  ‌
1) How‌  ‌appointed‌  ‌and‌  ‌term‌  ‌of‌  ‌office.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌All‌  ‌chairpersons‌‌  offices‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌final,‌‌executory,‌‌and‌‌not‌‌appealable.‌  ‌
and‌‌
  commissioners‌‌   are‌‌
  appointed‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌
  President‌‌   with‌‌ the‌‌  4. Decide,‌‌  except‌‌
  those‌‌
  involving‌‌
  the‌‌
  right‌‌
  to‌‌
  vote,‌‌ all‌‌  Kilusang‌‌Mayo‌‌Uno‌‌v.‌‌Aquino‌‌III‌2
‌ 019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌
consent‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Commission‌‌   on‌‌ Appointments‌‌ for‌‌ a ‌‌term‌‌ of‌‌ ‌7 ‌‌ questions‌  ‌affecting‌  ‌elections,‌  ‌including‌‌ 
There‌‌
  is‌‌
  an‌‌
  actual‌‌
  case‌‌
  or‌‌  controversy‌‌   if‌‌
  there‌‌
  is‌‌
  a ‌‌"‌conflict‌‌
  of‌‌ legal‌‌ 
years‌w‌ ithout‌‌reappointment‌. ‌ ‌ determination‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌number‌  ‌and‌  ‌location‌  ‌of‌‌  right,‌  ‌an‌  ‌opposite‌  ‌legal‌  ‌claims‌  ‌susceptible‌  ‌to‌  ‌judicial‌‌ 
polling‌  ‌places,‌  ‌appointment‌  ‌of‌  ‌election‌  ‌officials‌‌ 
2) Staggering‌  ‌of‌  ‌terms.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Of‌  ‌those‌  ‌first‌  ‌appointed,‌  ‌the‌‌  resolution‌."‌  ‌A ‌ ‌petitioner‌  ‌bringing‌  ‌a ‌ ‌case‌  ‌before‌  ‌this‌  ‌Court‌  ‌must‌‌ 
and‌‌inspectors,‌‌and‌‌registration‌‌of‌‌voters.‌  ‌ establish‌  ‌that‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌legally‌  ‌demandable‌  ‌and‌  ‌enforceable‌‌ 
Chairman‌‌   shall‌‌
  hold‌‌  office‌‌
  for‌‌
  seven‌‌   years,‌‌ a ‌‌Commissioner‌‌ 
among‌‌others‌  ‌ right‌‌under‌‌the‌‌Constitution‌.‌‌There‌‌must‌‌be‌‌   ‌
for‌  ‌five‌  ‌years‌  ‌(2‌  ‌for‌  ‌Comelec),‌  ‌and‌  ‌another‌  ‌Commissioner‌‌ 
for‌  ‌three‌  ‌years‌  ‌(the‌  ‌remaining‌  ‌4 ‌ ‌for‌  ‌Comelec),‌  ‌without‌‌  COA‌  ‌ Shall‌  ‌have‌  ‌the‌  ‌power,‌  ‌authority,‌  ‌and‌  ‌duty‌  ‌to‌  ‌examine,‌‌  1. a‌‌real‌‌and‌‌substantial‌‌controversy,‌‌   ‌
reappointment.‌  ‌ audit,‌  ‌and‌  ‌settle‌  ‌all‌  ‌accounts‌‌   pertaining‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌  revenue‌‌  2. with‌  ‌definite‌  ‌and‌  ‌concrete‌  ‌issues‌  ‌involving‌  ‌the‌  ‌legal‌‌ 
and‌  ‌receipts‌  ‌of,‌  ‌and‌  ‌expenditures‌‌   or‌‌  uses‌‌  of‌‌
  funds‌‌  and‌‌  relations‌‌of‌‌the‌‌parties,‌‌and‌‌   ‌
property,‌‌   owned‌‌   or‌‌
  held‌‌ in‌‌ trust‌‌ by,‌‌ or‌‌ pertaining‌‌ to,‌‌ the‌‌  3. admitting‌‌of‌‌specific‌‌relief‌‌that‌‌courts‌‌can‌‌grant.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 13‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

6. Powers‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Supreme‌‌Court‌  ‌
Moreover,‌‌   an‌‌ actual‌‌ case‌‌ or‌‌ controversy‌‌ requires‌‌ that‌‌ ‌the‌‌ right‌‌ must‌‌  In‌  ‌some‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌similar‌  ‌to‌  ‌those‌  ‌in‌  ‌White‌  ‌Light,‌  ‌the‌  ‌third‌‌ 
be‌  ‌enforceable‌  ‌and‌  ‌legally‌  ‌demandable‌. ‌ ‌A ‌ ‌case‌  ‌is‌  ‌ripe‌  ‌for‌‌  parties‌  ‌represented‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌would‌  ‌have‌  ‌special‌  ‌and‌‌ 
adjudication‌‌   ‌when‌‌ the‌‌ challenged‌‌ governmental‌‌ act‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌completed‌‌  legitimate‌  ‌reasons‌  ‌why‌  ‌they‌  ‌may‌  ‌not‌  ‌bring‌  ‌the‌  ‌action‌  ‌themselves.‌‌  1. Exercise‌  ‌original‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌over‌  ‌cases‌  ‌affecting‌‌ 
action‌  ‌such‌‌   that‌‌  there‌‌
  is‌‌
  a ‌‌direct,‌‌
  concrete,‌‌
  and‌‌  adverse‌‌   effect‌‌  on‌‌  the‌‌  Understandably,‌  ‌the‌  ‌cost‌  ‌to‌  ‌patrons‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌White‌  ‌Light‌  ‌case‌  ‌to‌‌ 
ambassadors,‌  ‌other‌  ‌public‌  ‌ministers‌  ‌and‌  ‌consuls,‌  ‌and‌  ‌over‌ 
petitioner.‌  ‌In‌  ‌connection‌  ‌with‌  ‌acts‌  ‌of‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌agencies,‌‌  bring‌  ‌the‌  ‌action‌  ‌themselves—i.e.,‌  ‌the‌  ‌amount‌  ‌they‌‌   would‌‌
  pay‌‌ 
for‌  ‌the‌  ‌lease‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌motels—will‌  ‌be‌  ‌too‌  ‌small‌  ‌compared‌  ‌with‌‌  petitions‌  ‌for‌  ‌certiorari,‌  ‌prohibition,‌  ‌mandamus,‌  ‌quo‌  ‌warranto,‌‌ 
ripeness‌  ‌is‌  ‌ensured‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌exhaustion‌  ‌of‌‌ 
the‌‌   cost‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ suit‌. ‌‌This‌‌ is‌‌ the‌‌ ‌free‌‌ rider‌‌ problem‌‌ in‌‌ economics.‌‌ It‌‌  and‌‌habeas‌‌corpus.‌  ‌
administrative‌  ‌remedies‌. ‌ ‌One‌  ‌other‌  ‌concept‌  ‌pertaining‌  ‌to‌  ‌judicial‌‌ 
review‌  ‌is‌  ‌intrinsically‌  ‌connected‌  ‌to‌  ‌it:‌  ‌the‌  ‌concept‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌case‌  ‌being‌‌  is‌‌
  a ‌‌negative‌‌   externality‌‌ which‌‌ operates‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌‌disincentive‌‌ to‌‌ sue‌‌ and‌  2. Review,‌  ‌revise,‌  ‌reverse,‌  ‌modify,‌  ‌or‌  ‌affirm‌  ‌on‌  ‌appeal‌  ‌or‌‌ 
moot‌‌and‌‌academic‌. ‌ ‌ assert‌‌a‌‌transcendental‌‌right‌. ‌ ‌
certiorari‌, ‌ ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌Rules‌  ‌of‌  ‌Court‌  ‌may‌‌
  provide,‌‌
  final‌‌ 
As‌‌to‌‌actual‌‌controversy‌. ‌ ‌ judgments‌‌and‌‌orders‌‌of‌‌lower‌‌courts‌‌in:‌  ‌
As‌‌   ‌mootness‌, ‌‌Courts‌‌
  for‌‌   cannot‌‌ render‌‌ judgment‌‌ after‌‌ the‌‌ issue‌‌ has‌‌ 
already‌  ‌been‌  ‌resolved‌  ‌by‌  ‌or‌  ‌through‌  ‌external‌  ‌developments.‌‌  Only‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌rights‌  ‌shared‌  ‌by‌  ‌many‌  ‌and‌  ‌requiring‌  ‌a ‌‌ a. All‌  ‌cases‌  ‌in‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌constitutionality‌  ‌or‌  ‌validity‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌‌ 
However‌,‌‌Courts‌‌will‌‌decide‌‌cases,‌‌otherwise‌‌moot‌‌and‌‌academic,‌‌if:‌‌   grounded‌‌   level‌‌
  of‌‌
  urgency‌‌  can‌‌
  be‌‌
  ‌transcendent‌. ‌‌‌This‌‌
  Court‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  a ‌‌
treaty,‌‌ international‌‌ or‌‌ executive‌‌ agreement,‌‌ law,‌‌ presidential‌‌ 
forum‌  ‌to‌  ‌appeal‌‌  political‌‌
  and‌‌
  policy‌‌   choices‌‌
  made‌‌  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  Executive,‌‌ 
1. there‌‌is‌‌a‌g
‌ rave‌‌violation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Constitution‌;  ‌‌ ‌ Legislative,‌‌and‌‌other‌‌constitutional‌‌agencies‌‌and‌‌organs.‌  ‌ decree,‌  ‌proclamation,‌  ‌order,‌  ‌instruction,‌  ‌ordinance,‌  ‌or‌‌ 
2. the‌  ‌exceptional‌  ‌character‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌situation‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌  regulation‌‌is‌‌in‌‌question.‌  ‌
paramount‌‌public‌‌interest‌‌‌is‌‌involved;‌‌   ‌ 5. Supervision‌‌of‌‌Courts‌  ‌ b. All‌  ‌cases‌  ‌involving‌  ‌the‌  ‌legality‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌tax,‌  i‌ mpost,‌‌ 
3. when‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌issue‌  ‌raised‌  ‌requires‌  ‌formulation‌‌   of‌‌  assessment,‌  ‌or‌  ‌toll,‌  ‌or‌  ‌any‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌in‌  ‌relation‌‌ 
controlling‌  ‌principles‌  ‌to‌  ‌guide‌‌
  the‌‌
  bench,‌‌
  the‌‌
  bar,‌‌
  and‌‌
  the‌‌  Maceda‌‌v.‌‌Vasquez‌‌‌re‌‌supervision‌‌of‌‌lower‌‌courts‌‌and‌‌personnel‌  ‌
thereto.‌  ‌
public;‌‌and‌‌   ‌
Article‌  ‌VIII,‌  ‌Section‌  ‌6 ‌ ‌exclusively‌  vests‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Supreme‌  ‌Court‌‌  c. All‌  ‌cases‌  ‌in‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌jurisdiction‌‌
  of‌‌
  any‌‌
  lower‌‌
  court‌‌
  is‌‌
  in‌‌ 
4. the‌‌case‌‌is‌‌capable‌‌of‌‌repetition‌‌yet‌‌evading‌‌review‌. ‌ ‌ administrative‌  ‌supervision‌  ‌over‌  ‌all‌  ‌courts‌  ‌and‌  ‌court‌  ‌personnel.‌  ‌By‌‌  issue.‌  ‌
virtue‌‌
  of‌‌
  this‌‌
  power,‌‌
  it‌‌ is‌‌ only‌‌ the‌‌ Supreme‌‌ Court‌‌ that‌‌ can‌‌ oversee‌‌ the‌‌ 
Three‌‌   (3)‌‌
  circumstances‌‌   must‌‌
  be‌‌
  present‌‌  before‌‌
  this‌‌   Court‌‌
  may‌‌
  rule‌‌  d. All‌‌
  criminal‌‌ cases‌‌ in‌‌ which‌‌ the‌‌ penalty‌‌ imposed‌‌ is‌‌ reclusion‌‌ 
judges'‌‌
  and‌‌  court‌‌
  personnel's‌‌   compliance‌‌   with‌‌
  all‌‌
  laws,‌‌
  and‌‌
  take‌‌ the‌‌ 
on‌  ‌a ‌‌moot‌‌   issue.‌‌
  There‌‌
  must‌‌
  be‌‌
  an‌‌
  ‌issue‌‌
  raising‌‌  a ‌‌grave‌‌
  violation‌‌ 
proper‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌action‌  ‌against‌  ‌them‌  ‌if‌  ‌they‌  ‌commit‌  ‌any‌‌  perpetua‌‌or‌‌higher.‌  ‌
of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌, ‌ ‌involving‌  ‌an‌  ‌exceptional‌  ‌situation‌  ‌of‌‌ 
violation‌‌thereof.‌  ‌
paramount‌  ‌public‌  ‌interest‌  ‌that‌  ‌is‌  ‌capable‌  ‌of‌  ‌repetition‌  ‌yet‌‌  e. All‌  ‌cases‌  ‌in‌  ‌which‌  ‌only‌  ‌an‌  ‌error‌  ‌or‌  ‌question‌  ‌of‌  ‌law‌  ‌is‌‌ 
evading‌‌review‌. ‌ ‌ Thus,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Ombudsman‌  ‌should‌  ‌first‌  ‌refer‌  ‌the‌  ‌matter‌  ‌of‌‌  involved.‌  ‌
petitioner's‌‌   certificates‌‌   of‌‌
  service‌‌   to‌‌
  this‌‌ Court‌‌ ‌for‌‌ determination‌‌ 
3. Assign‌‌   temporarily‌‌   judges‌‌
  of‌‌  lower‌‌  courts‌‌
  to‌‌ other‌‌ stations‌‌ as‌‌ 
⭐‌Provincial‌‌Bus‌‌Operators‌‌Association‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines‌‌v.‌‌DOLE‌‌  of‌  ‌whether‌  ‌said‌  ‌certificates‌  ‌reflected‌  ‌the‌  ‌true‌  ‌status‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌pending‌‌ 
case‌  ‌load,‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌has‌  ‌the‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌records‌  ‌to‌  ‌make‌  ‌such‌  ‌a ‌‌ public‌  ‌interest‌  ‌may‌  ‌require.‌  ‌Such‌  ‌temporary‌  ‌assignment‌  ‌shall‌‌ 
2018‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌
determination.‌‌   ‌ not‌  ‌exceed‌  ‌six‌  ‌months‌  ‌without‌  ‌the‌  ‌consent‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌judge‌‌ 
Another‌  ‌exception‌‌   is‌‌
  the‌‌
  concept‌‌   ‌third-party‌‌
  of‌‌   standing.‌  ‌Under‌‌  Where‌  ‌a ‌ ‌criminal‌  ‌complaint‌  ‌against‌  ‌a ‌ ‌judge‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌court‌‌  concerned.‌  ‌
this‌  ‌concept,‌  ‌actions‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌brought‌  ‌on‌  ‌behalf‌  ‌of‌  ‌third‌  ‌parties‌‌  employee‌  ‌arises‌  ‌from‌  ‌their‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌duties,‌  ‌the‌‌  4. Order‌‌   a ‌‌change‌‌ of‌‌ venue‌or‌‌
   place‌‌ of‌‌ trial‌‌ to‌‌ avoid‌‌ a ‌‌miscarriage‌‌ 
provided‌‌the‌‌following‌‌criteria‌‌are‌‌met:‌‌   ‌ Ombudsman‌‌   must‌‌  defer‌‌   action‌‌ on‌‌ said‌‌ complaint‌‌ and‌‌ refer‌‌ the‌‌  of‌‌justice.‌  ‌
1. first‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌party‌  ‌bringing‌  ‌suit‌  ‌must‌  ‌have‌  ‌suffered‌  ‌an‌‌  same‌  ‌to‌  ‌this‌  ‌Court‌  ‌for‌  ‌determination‌  ‌whether‌  ‌said‌  ‌judge‌  ‌or‌‌ 
'‌injury-in-fact‌,'‌  ‌thus‌  ‌giving‌  ‌him‌  ‌or‌  ‌her‌  ‌a ‌ ‌sufficiently‌‌  court‌  ‌employee‌  ‌had‌  ‌acted‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌scope‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌‌  5. Promulgate‌‌   rules‌‌ concerning‌‌ the‌‌ protection‌‌ and‌‌ enforcement‌‌ of‌‌ 
concrete‌‌interest'‌‌in‌‌the‌‌outcome‌‌of‌‌the‌‌issue‌‌in‌‌dispute;‌  ‌ administrative‌‌duties.‌  ‌ constitutional‌  ‌rights,‌  ‌pleading,‌  ‌practice,‌  ‌and‌  ‌procedure‌  ‌in‌  ‌all‌‌ 
2. second‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌party‌  ‌must‌  ‌have‌  ‌a ‌ ‌close‌  ‌relation‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌third‌‌  courts,‌  ‌the‌  ‌admission‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌practice‌  ‌of‌  ‌law,‌  ‌the‌  ‌integrated‌‌
  bar,‌‌ 
party;‌‌and‌‌   ‌ and‌‌legal‌‌assistance‌‌to‌‌the‌‌under-privileged.‌  ‌
3. third‌, ‌‌there‌‌
  must‌‌
  exist‌‌
  some‌‌  ‌hindrance‌‌
  ‌to‌‌
  the‌‌ third‌‌ party's‌‌  6. Appoint‌  ‌all‌  ‌officials‌  ‌and‌  ‌employees‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Judiciary‌  ‌in‌‌ 
ability‌‌to‌‌protect‌‌his‌‌or‌‌her‌‌own‌‌interests.‌  ‌ accordance‌‌with‌‌the‌‌Civil‌‌Service‌‌Law.‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 14‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

7. Qualification,‌‌Disqualifications‌‌and‌‌Selection‌  ‌ Government‌  ‌or‌  ‌any‌  ‌subdivision,‌  ‌agency,‌  ‌or‌‌ 


1. such‌‌
  additional‌‌
  duties‌‌
  or‌‌
  functions‌‌  must‌‌
  be‌‌
  required‌‌
  by‌‌ the‌ 
instrumentality‌  ‌thereof,‌  ‌including‌  ‌GOCCs‌  ‌or‌  ‌their‌‌ 
 ‌

Position‌  ‌ Citizen‌  ‌ Age‌  ‌ Res‌  ‌ Reg‌  ‌ Term‌  ‌ Limit‌  ‌ primary‌‌functions‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌official‌‌concerned,‌‌   ‌


subsidiaries.‌  ‌
2. who‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌perform‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌  ‌ex-officio‌  ‌capacity‌  ‌as‌‌ 
Ineligible‌‌for‌‌  provided‌‌by‌‌law,‌‌   ‌
The‌‌  spouse‌‌  and‌‌
  relatives‌‌   by‌‌  consanguinity‌‌   or‌‌ affinity‌‌ within‌‌ the‌‌ 
any‌‌election;‌‌ 
Pres‌  ‌
Natural-‌‌ 
fourth‌‌   civil‌‌
  degree‌‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌  President‌‌ shall‌‌ not,‌‌ during‌‌ his‌‌ tenure,‌‌  3. without‌‌receiving‌‌any‌‌additional‌‌compensation‌‌‌therefor.‌  ‌
Born‌  ‌ 40‌  ‌ 10‌  ‌ PH‌  ‌ 6‌  ‌ Successor‌‌who‌‌ 
served‌‌at‌‌least‌‌4 ‌‌ be‌‌appointed‌‌as‌‌   ‌
years.‌  ‌ Public‌‌Interest‌‌Center‌‌v.‌‌Elma‌D
‌ ecision‌‌‌and‌R
‌ esolution‌  ‌
a) Members‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Constitutional‌‌Commissions,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
Natural-‌‌  b) the‌‌Office‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Ombudsman,‌‌or‌‌   ‌ The‌  ‌crucial‌  ‌test‌  ‌in‌  ‌determining‌  ‌whether‌  ‌incompatibility‌  ‌exists‌‌ 
VP‌  ‌ 40‌  ‌ 10‌  ‌ PH‌  ‌ 6‌  ‌ 2‌‌consecutive‌  ‌
Born‌  ‌ between‌‌   two‌‌
  offices‌‌
  was‌‌  laid‌‌
  out‌‌
  in‌People‌‌
    v.‌‌ Green‌‌ — ‌‌whether‌‌ one‌‌ 
as‌‌ Secretaries,‌‌ Undersecretaries,‌‌ chairmen‌‌ or‌‌ heads‌‌ of‌‌ bureaus‌‌ or‌‌  office‌‌  is‌‌
  ‌subordinate‌‌ ‌to‌‌ the‌‌ other,‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ sense‌‌ that‌‌ one‌‌ office‌‌ has‌‌ the‌‌ 
Natural-‌‌  offices,‌‌including‌‌GOCCs‌‌and‌‌their‌‌subsidiaries.‌‌   ‌ right‌‌to‌‌interfere‌‌with‌‌the‌‌other.‌  ‌
Senator‌  ‌
Born‌  ‌ 35‌  ‌ 2‌  ‌ PH‌  ‌ 6‌  ‌ 2‌‌consecutive‌  ‌
In‌‌
  this‌‌
  case,‌‌
  ‌an‌‌
  incompatibility‌‌   exists‌‌
  between‌‌   the‌‌ positions‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
Party-‌‌  Natural-‌‌  Civil‌‌Liberties‌‌Union‌‌v.‌‌Executive‌‌Secretary‌  ‌ PCGG‌  ‌Chairman‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌CPLC.‌  ‌The‌  ‌PCGG‌  ‌is,‌  ‌without‌  ‌question,‌  ‌an‌‌ 
List‌‌Rep‌  ‌ Born‌  ‌ 25‌1‌  ‌ 1‌  ‌ PH‌  ‌ 3‌  ‌ 3‌‌consecutive‌  ‌
agency‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌Executive‌  ‌Department.‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌the‌  ‌actions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
The‌  ‌prohibition‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌and‌  ‌his‌  ‌official‌‌  PCGG‌‌Chairman‌‌are‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌the‌‌review‌‌of‌‌the‌‌CPLC.‌  ‌
District‌‌  Natural-‌‌  family‌  ‌is‌  ‌all-embracing‌  ‌and‌  ‌covers‌  ‌both‌  ‌public‌  ‌and‌  ‌private‌‌ 
Rep‌  ‌ Born‌  ‌ 25‌  ‌ 1‌  ‌ District‌  ‌ 3‌  ‌ 3‌‌consecutive‌  ‌
office‌‌or‌‌employment.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌strict‌  ‌prohibition‌  ‌under‌  ‌Section‌  ‌13,‌  ‌Article‌  ‌VII‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌1987‌‌ 
Constitution‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌applicable‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌PCGG‌‌
  Chairman‌‌   nor‌‌  to‌‌  the‌‌ 
Section‌  ‌7,‌  ‌Article‌  ‌IX-B‌  ‌is‌  ‌meant‌  ‌to‌  ‌lay‌  ‌down‌  ‌the‌  ‌general‌  ‌rule‌‌  CPLC‌. ‌ ‌However,‌  ‌Elma‌  ‌remains‌  ‌covered‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌general‌  ‌prohibition‌‌ 
a. President‌‌and‌‌Vice‌‌President‌  ‌ applicable‌  ‌to‌  ‌all‌  ‌elective‌  ‌and‌  ‌appointive‌  ‌public‌  ‌officials‌  ‌and‌‌  under‌‌‌Section‌‌7,‌‌Article‌‌IX-B‌. ‌ ‌
employees,‌‌   while‌‌   Section‌‌   13,‌‌ Article‌‌ VII‌‌ is‌‌ meant‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ the‌‌ ‌exception‌‌ 
Sec‌  ‌4.‌  ‌The‌  ‌President‌  ‌and‌‌  the‌‌
  Vice-President‌‌   shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  elected‌‌
  by‌‌  ap­plicable‌  ‌only‌‌   to‌‌  the‌‌
  President,‌‌   the‌‌
  Vice-President,‌‌   Members‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  Elma's‌  ‌concurrent‌  ‌appointments‌  ‌as‌  ‌PCGG‌  ‌Chairman‌  ‌and‌  ‌CPLC‌  ‌are‌‌ 
direct‌‌   vote‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  people‌‌
  for‌‌ a ‌‌term‌‌ of‌‌ ‌6 ‌‌years‌‌ xxx.‌‌ The‌‌ President‌‌  Cabinet,‌  ‌their‌‌   deputies‌‌   and‌‌  assistants.‌‌   The‌‌   phrase‌‌
  "unless‌‌   otherwise‌‌  unconstitutional,‌‌   for‌‌
  being‌‌
  incompatible‌‌ offices.‌‌ This‌‌ ruling‌‌ does‌‌ not‌‌ 
shall‌n ‌ ot‌‌be‌‌eligible‌‌for‌‌any‌‌re-election‌.  ‌‌ ‌ provided‌‌   in‌‌
  this‌‌ Constitution"‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ given‌‌ a ‌‌literal‌‌ interpre­tation‌‌ to‌‌  render‌  ‌both‌  ‌appointments‌  ‌void.‌  ‌Following‌‌   the‌‌
  common-law‌‌   rule‌‌  on‌‌ 
refer‌‌ only‌‌ to‌‌ those‌‌ particular‌‌ instances‌‌ cited‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ Constitution‌‌ itself,‌‌  incompatibility‌  ‌of‌  ‌offices,‌  ‌Elma‌  ‌had,‌  ‌in‌  ‌effect,‌  ‌vacated‌  ‌his‌  ‌first‌‌ 
No‌  ‌person‌  ‌who‌  ‌has‌  ‌succeeded‌  ‌as‌  ‌President‌  ‌and‌  ‌has‌  ‌served‌  ‌as‌‌  to‌‌wit:‌   ‌ ‌ office‌  ‌as‌  ‌PCGG‌  ‌Chairman‌  ‌when‌  ‌he‌  ‌accepted‌  ‌the‌  ‌second‌  ‌office‌  ‌as‌‌ 
such‌‌   for‌‌
  ‌more‌‌ than‌‌ 4 ‌‌years‌‌ ‌shall‌‌ be‌‌ qualified‌‌ for‌‌ election‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌  CPLC.‌  ‌
1. the‌  ‌Vice-President‌  ‌being‌  ‌appointed‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌member‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
same‌‌office‌‌at‌‌any‌‌time.‌  ‌ Cabinet‌  ‌under‌  ‌Section‌  ‌3,‌  ‌par(2),‌  ‌Article‌  ‌VII;‌  ‌or‌  ‌acting‌  ‌as‌‌ 
No‌‌Vice-President‌‌shall‌‌serve‌‌for‌‌more‌‌than‌2
‌ ‌‌successive‌‌terms‌. ‌ ‌ President‌‌   in‌‌
  those‌‌
  instances‌‌   provided‌‌
  under‌‌   Section‌‌ 7,‌‌ pars.‌  Funa‌‌v.‌‌Executive‌‌Secretary‌2
‌ 010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
(2)‌‌and‌‌(3),‌‌Article‌‌VII;‌‌and,‌‌   ‌
Sec‌  ‌13.‌  ‌The‌  ‌President,‌  ‌Vice-President,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Members‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  Respondent‌  ‌Bautista‌  ‌being‌  ‌then‌  ‌the‌  ‌appointed‌  ‌Undersecretary‌  ‌of‌‌ 
2. the‌  ‌Secretary‌  ‌of‌  ‌Justice‌‌
  ‌being‌‌
  an‌‌
  ex-officio‌‌
  member‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌  DOTC,‌‌   she‌‌
  was‌‌ thus‌‌ covered‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ stricter‌‌ prohibition‌‌ under‌‌ Section‌‌ 
Cabinet,‌  ‌and‌  ‌their‌  ‌deputies‌  ‌or‌  ‌assistants‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌, ‌ ‌unless‌‌ 
Judicial‌‌and‌‌Bar‌‌Council‌‌by‌‌virtue‌‌of‌‌Sec‌‌8(1),‌‌Article‌‌VIII.‌  ‌ 13,‌  ‌Article‌  ‌VII‌  ‌and‌  ‌consequently‌  ‌she‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌invoke‌  ‌the‌  ‌exception‌‌ 
otherwise‌  ‌provided‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌‌
  Constitution‌, ‌‌‌hold‌‌
  ANY‌‌
  other‌‌   office‌‌ 
If‌  ‌the‌  ‌functions‌  ‌required‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌performed‌  ‌are‌  ‌merely‌  ‌inci­dental,‌‌  provided‌  ‌in‌  ‌Section‌  ‌7,‌  ‌paragraph‌  ‌2,‌  ‌Article‌  ‌IX-B‌  ‌where‌  ‌holding‌‌ 
or‌‌employment‌‌‌during‌‌their‌‌tenure‌.  ‌‌ ‌ another‌  ‌office‌  ‌is‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌by‌  ‌law‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌primary‌  ‌functions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
remotely‌‌ related,‌‌ inconsistent,‌‌ incompatible,‌‌ or‌‌ other­wise‌‌ alien‌‌ 
They‌s‌ hall‌‌not‌,‌‌during‌‌said‌‌tenure,‌‌directly‌‌or‌‌indirectly,‌‌   ‌ to‌  ‌the‌  ‌primary‌  ‌function‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌cabinet‌  ‌official,‌  ‌such‌  ‌additional‌‌  position.‌‌   Neither‌‌   was‌‌  she‌‌
  designated‌‌   OIC‌‌  of‌‌
  MARINA‌‌   in‌‌ an‌‌ ex-officio‌‌ 
functions‌  ‌would‌  ‌fall‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌purview‌  ‌of‌  ‌"‌any‌  ‌other‌  ‌office‌" ‌‌ capacity,‌‌which‌‌is‌‌the‌‌exception‌‌recognized‌‌in‌C ‌ ivil‌‌Liberties‌‌Union‌. ‌ ‌
a) practice‌‌any‌‌other‌‌profession,‌  ‌
prohibited‌b ‌ y‌‌the‌‌Constitution.‌ 
b) participate‌‌in‌‌any‌‌business,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
In‌  ‌order‌‌
  that‌‌
  such‌‌
  additional‌‌
  duties‌‌  or‌‌
  functions‌‌   may‌‌  not‌‌  transgress‌‌ 
c) be‌  ‌financially‌‌
  interested‌‌
  in‌‌
  any‌‌
  contract‌‌
  with,‌‌
  or‌‌
  in‌‌
  any‌‌  the‌  ‌prohibition‌  ‌embodied‌  ‌in‌  ‌Section‌  ‌13,‌  ‌Article‌  ‌VII‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌1987‌‌ 
franchise,‌  ‌or‌  ‌special‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌granted‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌  Constitution,‌‌   ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 15‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

b. Senators‌‌and‌‌Members‌‌of‌‌the‌‌House‌‌of‌‌  Does‌  ‌mandamus‌  ‌lie‌  ‌to‌  ‌compel‌  ‌the‌  ‌submission‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌shortlist‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Gonzales‌‌III‌‌v.‌‌Office‌‌of‌‌the‌‌President‌‌2
‌ 014‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
Representatives‌  ‌ nominees‌‌by‌‌the‌‌JBC?‌  ‌ Section‌  ‌8(2)‌  ‌of‌  ‌RA‌  ‌No.‌  ‌6770‌  ‌vesting‌  ‌disciplinary‌  ‌authority‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
NO‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌90-day‌  ‌period‌  ‌is‌  ‌directed‌‌   at‌‌
  the‌‌  President,‌‌   ‌not‌‌
  at‌‌
  the‌‌  President‌‌   over‌‌  the‌‌
  Deputy‌‌   Ombudsman‌‌   violates‌‌ the‌‌ independence‌‌ of‌‌ 
1) No‌‌
  Senator‌‌  or‌‌
  Member‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  House‌‌
  of‌‌ Representatives‌‌ may‌‌  the‌‌Office‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Ombudsman‌‌and‌‌is‌‌thus‌‌unconstitutional‌. ‌ ‌
JBC‌. ‌‌Thus,‌‌ the‌‌ JBC‌‌ should‌‌ start‌‌ the‌‌ process‌‌ of‌‌ selecting‌‌ the‌‌ candidates‌‌ 
hold‌‌  any‌‌
  other‌‌  office‌‌
  or‌‌
  employment‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  Government,‌‌
  or‌‌  to‌‌
  fill‌‌
  the‌‌
  vacancy‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  Supreme‌‌  Court‌‌ ‌before‌‌ ‌the‌‌ occurrence‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  The‌  ‌Office‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Ombudsman,‌  ‌by‌  ‌express‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌mandate,‌‌ 
any‌  ‌subdivision,‌  ‌agency,‌  ‌or‌  ‌instrumentality‌  ‌thereof,‌‌  vacancy.‌  ‌ includes‌  ‌its‌  ‌key‌  ‌officials,‌  ‌all‌  ‌of‌  ‌them‌  ‌tasked‌  ‌to‌  ‌support‌  ‌the‌‌ 
including‌  ‌GOCCs‌  ‌or‌  ‌their‌  ‌subsidiaries,‌  ‌during‌  ‌his‌  ‌term‌‌  Ombudsman‌  ‌in‌  ‌carrying‌  ‌out‌  ‌her‌  ‌mandate.‌  ‌What‌  ‌is‌  ‌true‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌ 
The‌‌ duty‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ JBC‌‌ to‌‌ submit‌‌ a ‌‌list‌‌ of‌‌ nominees‌‌ before‌‌ the‌‌ start‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
without‌‌forfeiting‌‌his‌‌seat.‌‌(I‌ ncompatible‌‌office‌) ‌ ‌ President's‌  ‌mandatory‌  ‌90-day‌  ‌period‌  ‌to‌‌   appoint‌‌   is‌‌
  ‌ministerial‌, ‌‌but‌‌  Ombudsman‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌equally‌  ‌and‌  ‌necessarily‌  ‌true‌  ‌for‌  ‌her‌‌ 
its‌  ‌selection‌  ‌of‌‌  the‌‌  candidates‌‌  whose‌‌   names‌‌   will‌‌
  be‌‌  in‌‌  the‌‌
  list‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌  Deputies‌  ‌who‌  ‌act‌  ‌as‌  ‌agents‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Ombudsman‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
2) Neither‌‌  shall‌‌
  he‌‌
  be‌‌ ‌appointed‌‌ ‌to‌‌ any‌‌ office‌‌ which‌‌ may‌‌ have‌‌ 
submitted‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌   President‌‌
  lies‌‌  within‌‌   the‌‌  ‌discretion‌‌   ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  JBC.‌‌
  For‌‌  performance‌‌of‌‌their‌‌duties.‌  ‌
been‌‌
  created‌‌ or‌‌ the‌‌ emoluments‌‌ thereof‌‌ increased‌‌ during‌‌ the‌‌ 
mandamus‌  ‌to‌  ‌lie‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌  ‌JBC,‌  ‌therefore,‌  ‌there‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌an‌‌ 
term‌f‌ or‌‌which‌‌he‌‌was‌‌elected.‌‌(F ‌ orbidden‌‌office‌) ‌ ‌ e. Members‌‌of‌‌Constitutional‌‌Commissions‌  ‌
unexplained‌  ‌delay‌  ‌on‌  ‌its‌  ‌part‌  ‌in‌  ‌recommending‌  ‌nominees‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Judiciary,‌‌that‌‌is,‌‌in‌‌submitting‌‌the‌‌list‌‌to‌‌the‌‌President.‌  ‌ 1) Natural-born‌‌citizens;‌  ‌
Liban‌‌v.‌‌Gordon‌  ‌
2) at‌‌least‌‌35‌‌years‌‌old‌a‌ t‌‌the‌‌time‌‌of‌‌appointment‌‌and‌‌   ‌
Not‌‌  being‌‌   a ‌‌government‌‌   official‌‌
  or‌‌
  employee,‌‌   the‌‌ PNRC‌‌ Chairman,‌‌ as‌‌  Aguinaldo‌‌v.‌‌Aquino‌‌III‌‌2
‌ 017‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌‌re‌‌ 
such,‌‌ does‌‌ not‌‌ hold‌‌ a ‌‌government‌‌ office‌‌ or‌‌ employment.‌‌ We‌‌ hold‌‌ that‌‌  clustering‌‌of‌‌nominees‌‌by‌‌the‌‌JBC‌  ‌ 3) must‌‌   not‌‌
  have‌‌
  been‌‌
  candidates‌‌
  for‌‌
  any‌‌ elective‌‌ position‌‌ in‌‌ 
the‌  ‌office‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌PNRC‌  ‌Chairman‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌ ‌government‌  ‌office‌  ‌or‌  ‌an‌‌  the‌‌elections‌‌immediately‌‌preceding‌‌their‌‌appointment.‌  ‌
office‌‌   in‌‌
  a ‌‌GOCC‌‌   for‌‌ purposes‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ prohibition‌‌ in‌‌ Section‌‌ 13,‌‌ Article‌‌  The‌  ‌clustering‌  ‌of‌  ‌nominees‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌six‌  ‌vacancies‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌ 
Sandiganbayan‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌JBC‌  ‌impaired‌  ‌the‌  ‌President's‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌‌  CSC‌  ‌ Comelec‌  ‌ COA‌  ‌
VI‌‌of‌‌the‌‌1987‌‌Constitution.‌  ‌
appoint‌‌  members‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Judiciary‌‌
  and‌‌
  to‌‌
  determine‌‌
  the‌‌
  seniority‌‌
  of‌‌ 
the‌‌newly-appointed‌‌Sandiganbayan‌‌Associate‌‌Justices.‌  ‌ 1‌‌Chair‌‌+‌‌2‌‌ 
c. Justices‌‌and‌‌Judges‌  ‌ Comms‌  ‌
1‌‌Chair‌‌+‌‌6‌‌Comms‌  1‌‌Chair‌‌+‌‌2‌‌Comms‌  ‌
It‌‌
  also‌‌
  bears‌‌  to‌‌
  point‌‌ out‌‌ that‌‌ part‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ President's‌‌ power‌‌ to‌‌ appoint‌‌ 
Sec‌  ‌7.‌  ‌No‌  ‌person‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌appointed‌  ‌Member‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  ‌Supreme‌‌  members‌  ‌of‌  ‌a‌  ‌collegiate‌  ‌court,‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌Sandiganbayan,‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌‌  7‌‌years‌‌‌without‌‌reappointment‌ 
Court‌  ‌or‌  ‌any‌  ‌lower‌  ‌collegiate‌  ‌court‌  ‌unless‌  ‌he‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌‌ power‌  ‌to‌  ‌determine‌‌   the‌‌   seniority‌‌   or‌‌
  order‌‌  ‌of‌‌
  preference‌‌   of‌‌
  such‌‌ 
newly‌  ‌appointed‌  ‌members‌  ‌by‌  ‌controlling‌  ‌the‌  ‌date‌  ‌and‌  ‌order‌  ‌of‌‌ 
natural-born‌  ‌citizen‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines.‌  ‌A ‌ ‌Member‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
issuance‌  ‌of‌  ‌said‌  ‌members'‌  ‌appointment‌  ‌or‌  ‌commission‌  ‌papers.‌‌   By‌‌  a‌‌majority‌‌thereof,‌‌  CPAs‌‌with‌‌not‌‌less‌‌than‌‌‌10‌‌ 
Supreme‌‌Court‌‌must‌‌be‌‌   ‌ already‌  ‌designating‌  ‌the‌  ‌numerical‌  ‌order‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌vacancies,‌  ‌the‌  ‌JBC‌‌  including‌‌the‌‌  years‌‌‌of‌‌auditing‌‌experience,‌‌ 
1. at‌‌least‌‌‌40‌‌years‌‌of‌‌age‌,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ would‌‌   be‌‌
  establishing‌‌   the‌‌  seniority‌‌   or‌‌ order‌‌ of‌‌ preference‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ new‌‌  Chair,‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌  OR‌‌members‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippine‌‌ 
with‌‌proven‌‌ 
Sandiganbayan‌  ‌Associate‌  ‌Justices‌  ‌even‌  ‌before‌  ‌their‌  ‌appointment‌‌   by‌‌  members‌‌of‌‌the‌‌  Bar‌‌who‌‌have‌‌been‌‌engaged‌‌in‌‌ 
2. must‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌for‌  ‌15‌  ‌years‌  ‌or‌  ‌more‌, ‌ ‌a ‌ ‌judge‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌ capacity‌‌for‌‌ 
the‌  ‌President‌  ‌and,‌  ‌thus,‌  ‌unduly‌  ‌arrogating‌  ‌unto‌  ‌itself‌‌   a ‌‌vital‌‌
  part‌‌
  of‌‌  Philippine‌‌Bar‌‌  the‌‌practice‌‌of‌‌law‌‌for‌‌at‌‌least‌‌ 
lower‌  ‌court‌  ‌or‌  ‌engaged‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌practice‌  ‌of‌  ‌law‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  public‌‌ 
the‌‌President's‌‌power‌‌of‌‌appointment.‌  ‌ who‌‌have‌‌been‌‌  10‌‌years.‌  ‌
Philippines.‌  ‌ administration‌  ‌
engaged‌‌in‌‌the‌‌ 
d. Ombudsman‌  ‌ practice‌‌of‌‌law‌‌for‌‌  At‌‌no‌‌time‌‌shall‌‌all‌‌Members‌‌ 
The‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌shall‌  ‌prescribe‌  ‌the‌  ‌qualifications‌  ‌of‌  ‌judges‌  ‌of‌‌  belong‌‌to‌‌the‌‌same‌‌profession.‌  ‌
at‌‌least‌‌10‌‌years‌. ‌ ‌
lower‌  ‌courts,‌  ‌but‌  ‌no‌  ‌person‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌appointed‌  ‌judge‌  ‌thereof‌‌  Art‌  ‌XI‌  ‌Sec‌  ‌9.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Ombudsman‌  ‌and‌  ‌his‌  ‌Deputies‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌ 
unless‌  ‌he‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌citizen‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Philippines‌‌
  and‌‌
  a ‌‌‌member‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌  appointed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌from‌  ‌a ‌ ‌list‌  ‌of‌  ‌at‌‌
  least‌‌
  six‌‌
  nominees‌‌ 
Philippine‌‌Bar‌. ‌ ‌ prepared‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌
  JBC,‌‌
  and‌‌
  from‌‌  a ‌‌list‌‌
  of‌‌
  three‌‌  nominees‌‌ for‌‌ every‌‌  Funa‌‌v.‌‌Villar‌‌2
‌ 012‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
A‌  ‌Member‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Judiciary‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person‌  ‌of‌  ‌proven‌‌  vacancy‌  ‌thereafter.‌  ‌Such‌  ‌appointments‌  ‌shall‌  ‌require‌  ‌no‌‌ 
The‌  ‌Court‌  ‌restates‌  ‌its‌  ‌ruling‌  ‌on‌  ‌Sec.‌  ‌1(2),‌  ‌Art.‌  ‌IX(D)‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
competence‌,‌‌integrity‌,‌‌probity‌,‌‌and‌‌independence‌. ‌ ‌ confirmation.‌‌   All‌‌
  vacancies‌‌  shall‌‌   be‌‌
  filled‌‌  within‌‌  three‌‌
  months‌‌  Constitution,‌‌viz‌: ‌ ‌
after‌‌they‌‌occur.‌  ‌
De‌‌Castro‌‌v.‌‌JBC‌‌2
‌ 010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ 1. The‌  ‌appointment‌  ‌of‌  ‌members‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌three‌‌ 
constitutional‌  ‌commissions,‌  ‌after‌  ‌the‌  ‌expiration‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 16‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

uneven‌  ‌terms‌  ‌of‌  ‌office‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌first‌  ‌set‌  ‌of‌  ‌commissioners,‌‌  not‌‌
  be‌‌
  impleaded‌‌   in‌‌
  any‌‌
  suit‌‌
  during‌‌
  his‌‌
  or‌‌
  her‌‌
  incumbency‌, ‌‌as‌‌  Congress‌‌ does‌‌ not‌‌ destroy‌‌ the‌‌ privilege.‌‌ The‌‌ disciplinary‌‌ authority‌‌ of‌‌ 
shall‌  ‌always‌  ‌be‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌fixed‌  ‌term‌  ‌of‌  ‌seven‌  ‌(7)‌  ‌years‌; ‌ ‌an‌‌  recently‌‌reiterated‌‌in‌K‌ ilusang‌‌Mayo‌‌Uno‌‌v.‌‌Aquino‌‌III‌. ‌ ‌ the‌‌  assembly‌‌   and‌‌
  the‌‌
  voters,‌‌
  not‌‌
  the‌‌
  courts,‌‌  can‌‌ properly‌‌ discourage‌‌ 
appointment‌‌for‌‌a‌‌lesser‌‌period‌‌is‌‌void‌‌and‌‌unconstitutional‌. ‌ ‌ or‌  ‌correct‌  ‌such‌  ‌abuses‌  ‌committed‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌name‌  ‌of‌  ‌parliamentary‌‌ 
2. Appointments‌  ‌to‌  ‌vacancies‌  ‌resulting‌‌   from‌‌   certain‌‌
  causes‌‌  b. Privileges‌‌of‌‌Legislators‌  ‌ immunity.‌  ‌
shall‌  ‌only‌  ‌be‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌unexpired‌  ‌portion‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌term‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  For‌‌  the‌‌  above‌‌
  reasons,‌‌   the‌‌
  plea‌‌
  of‌‌
  Senator‌‌
  Santiago‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌ dismissal‌‌ 
predecessor,‌  ‌but‌  ‌such‌  ‌appointments‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌less‌  ‌than‌‌  i. Freedom‌‌from‌‌Arrest‌  ‌
of‌‌
  the‌‌  complaint‌‌   for‌‌
  disbarment‌‌   or‌‌
  disciplinary‌‌
  action‌‌
  is‌‌
  well‌‌ taken.‌‌ 
the‌  ‌unexpired‌  ‌portion‌  ‌as‌  ‌this‌  ‌will‌  ‌likewise‌  ‌disrupt‌  ‌the‌‌  Indeed,‌  ‌her‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌speech‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌actionable‌  ‌criminally‌  ‌or‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌‌
Sec‌  ‌11.‌  ‌A ‌ ‌Senator‌  ‌or‌  ‌Member‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌House‌  ‌of‌‌ 
staggering‌‌of‌‌terms.‌  ‌ disciplinary‌‌proceeding‌‌under‌‌the‌‌Rules‌‌of‌‌Court.‌  ‌
Representatives‌  ‌shall,‌  ‌in‌  ‌all‌  ‌offenses‌‌
  punishable‌‌   by‌‌  not‌‌ 
3. Members‌‌   who‌‌  were‌‌
  appointed‌‌   for‌‌
  a ‌‌full‌‌
  term‌‌ of‌‌ seven‌‌ years‌ 
more‌  ‌than‌  ‌six‌  ‌years‌  ‌imprisonment,‌‌   be‌‌
  privileged‌‌
  from‌‌ 
and‌  ‌who‌  ‌served‌  ‌the‌  ‌entire‌  ‌period,‌  ‌are‌  ‌barred‌  ‌from‌‌ 
arrest‌w
‌ hile‌‌the‌‌Congress‌‌is‌‌in‌‌session.‌‌   ‌
9. Structure‌‌of‌‌Government‌  ‌
reappointment‌t‌ o‌‌any‌‌position‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Commission.‌  
No‌  ‌Member‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌questioned‌‌  nor‌‌
  be‌‌
  held‌‌
  liable‌‌
  in‌‌  any‌‌  a. Composition‌  ‌
4. A‌  ‌commissioner‌  ‌who‌  ‌resigns‌  ‌after‌  ‌serving‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Commission‌  ‌for‌  ‌less‌  ‌than‌  ‌seven‌  ‌years‌  ‌is‌  ‌eligible‌  ‌for‌  ‌an‌‌  other‌‌  place‌‌
  for‌‌
  any‌‌
  speech‌‌  or‌‌
  debate‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  Congress‌‌   or‌‌  in‌‌ 
i. Legislative‌  ‌
appointment‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌position‌  ‌of‌  ‌Chairman‌‌
  for‌‌  the‌‌
  unexpired‌‌  any‌‌committee‌‌thereof.‌  ‌
portion‌‌of‌‌the‌‌term‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌departing‌‌chairman.‌‌   ‌
a. Such‌  ‌appointment‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌covered‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌ban‌  ‌on‌‌  Trillanes‌‌IV‌‌v.‌‌Castillo-Marigomen‌‌2
‌ 018‌  ‌ Sema‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌  ‌
reappointment,‌  ‌provided‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌vacancy‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  The‌‌   office‌‌   of‌‌ a ‌‌legislative‌‌ district‌‌ representative‌‌ to‌‌ Congress‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌
position‌  ‌of‌  ‌Chairman‌  ‌resulted‌  ‌from‌  ‌death,‌‌  The‌  ‌questioned‌  ‌statements‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌  ‌case‌  ‌were‌  ‌admittedly‌  ‌made‌  ‌in‌‌ 
response‌  ‌to‌  ‌queries‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌media‌  ‌during‌  ‌gaps‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Senate's‌‌  national‌  ‌office‌, ‌ ‌and‌  ‌its‌  ‌occupant,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Member‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌House‌  ‌of‌‌ 
resignation,‌‌disability‌‌or‌‌removal‌‌by‌‌impeachment.‌‌   ‌
plenary‌  ‌and‌  ‌committee‌  ‌hearings‌, ‌ ‌thus,‌  ‌beyond‌  ‌the‌  ‌purview‌  ‌of‌‌  Representatives,‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ n ‌ ational‌  ‌official‌. ‌ ‌It‌  ‌would‌  ‌be‌  ‌incongruous‌‌ 
5. Any‌  ‌member‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Commission‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌appointed‌  ‌or‌‌  privileged‌‌speech‌‌or‌‌debate‌‌‌under‌‌Section‌‌11,‌‌Article‌‌VI.‌  ‌ for‌  ‌a ‌‌regional‌‌   legislative‌‌   body‌‌  like‌‌  the‌‌
  ARMM‌‌  Regional‌‌
  Assembly‌‌   to‌‌ 
designated‌‌in‌‌a‌t‌ emporary‌o ‌ r‌‌acting‌‌capacity.‌  ‌ create‌‌   a ‌‌national‌‌   office‌‌
  when‌‌  its‌‌  legislative‌‌
  powers‌‌ extend‌‌ only‌‌ to‌‌ its‌‌ 
Petitioner‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌successfully‌  ‌invoke‌  ‌parliamentary‌‌  regional‌‌territory.‌  ‌
8. Immunity‌‌and‌‌Privileges‌  ‌ non­accountability‌  ‌to‌  ‌insulate‌  ‌his‌  ‌statements,‌  ‌uttered‌  ‌outside‌  ‌the‌‌ 
"sphere‌‌of‌‌legislative‌‌activity,"‌‌‌from‌‌judicial‌‌review.‌  ‌ Aquino‌‌III‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
a. Presidential‌‌Immunity‌  ‌
ii. Privilege‌‌of‌‌Speech‌‌and‌‌Debate‌‌
   ‌ There‌‌   is‌‌
  ‌no‌‌ specific‌‌ provision‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ Constitution‌‌ ‌that‌‌ fixes‌‌ a ‌‌250,000‌‌ 
⭐‌De‌‌Lima‌‌v.‌‌Duterte‌‌2
‌ 019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
minimum‌‌   population‌‌   that‌‌
  must‌‌   compose‌‌   a ‌‌legislative‌‌ district.‌‌ While‌‌ 
The‌  ‌concept‌  ‌of‌  ‌presidential‌  ‌immunity‌  ‌under‌  ‌our‌  ‌governmental‌‌   and‌‌  Trillanes‌‌IV‌‌v.‌‌Pimentel,‌‌Sr.‌  ‌ a‌  ‌province‌  ‌is‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌a ‌ ‌representative,‌  ‌with‌  ‌nothing‌‌ 
constitutional‌  ‌system‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌distinguish‌  ‌whether‌  ‌or‌  ‌not‌  ‌the‌  ‌suit‌‌  mentioned‌  ‌about‌  ‌population,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌city‌  ‌must‌  ‌first‌  ‌meet‌  ‌a ‌ ‌population‌‌ 
pertains‌  ‌to‌  ‌an‌  ‌official‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌President.‌  ‌Neither‌  ‌does‌  ‌immunity‌‌  The‌  ‌performance‌  ‌of‌  ‌legitimate‌  ‌and‌  ‌even‌  ‌essential‌  ‌duties‌  ‌by‌  ‌public‌‌ 
minimum‌‌of‌‌250,000‌‌in‌‌order‌‌to‌‌be‌‌similarly‌‌entitled.‌  ‌
hinge‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌nature‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  suit.‌‌   The‌‌  lack‌‌
  of‌‌
  distinctions‌‌  prevents‌‌  us‌‌  officers‌  ‌has‌  ‌never‌‌
  been‌‌   an‌‌   excuse‌‌
  to‌‌
  free‌‌  a ‌‌person‌‌  validly‌‌
  in‌‌
  prison.‌  ‌
from‌‌making‌‌any‌‌distinctions.‌  ‌ The‌‌
  duties‌‌  imposed‌‌   by‌‌  the‌‌   "mandate‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌   people"‌‌ are‌‌ multifarious.‌  ‌ Plainly‌‌  read,‌‌   Section‌‌  5(3)‌‌
  requires‌‌ a ‌‌‌250,000‌‌ minimum‌‌ population‌‌ 
Never‌  ‌has‌  ‌the‌  ‌call‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌particular‌  ‌duty‌‌   lifted‌‌
  a ‌‌prisoner‌‌   into‌‌
  a ‌‌ only‌‌
  for‌‌  a ‌‌city‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  entitled‌‌
  to‌‌ a ‌‌representative,‌‌ but‌‌ not‌‌ so‌‌ for‌‌ a ‌‌
Separate‌‌concurring‌‌of‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌ different‌  ‌classification‌  ‌from‌  ‌those‌  ‌others‌  ‌who‌  ‌are‌  ‌validly‌‌  province‌. ‌ ‌
Presidential‌  ‌immunity‌  ‌from‌‌   suit‌‌
  only‌‌
  extends‌‌  to‌‌  civil,‌‌
  criminal,‌‌   and‌‌  restrained‌‌by‌‌law‌. ‌ ‌
Population‌‌   is‌‌
  not‌‌
  the‌‌
  only‌‌
  factor‌‌
  but‌‌ is‌‌ just‌‌ one‌‌ of‌‌ several‌‌ other‌‌ 
administrative‌  ‌liability.‌  ‌A ‌ ‌proceeding‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌issuance‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌writ‌  ‌of‌‌ 
habeas‌‌data,‌‌as‌‌in‌‌this‌‌case,‌‌does‌‌not‌‌determine‌‌any‌‌such‌‌liability.‌  ‌ factors‌‌in‌‌the‌‌composition‌‌of‌‌the‌‌additional‌‌district.‌  ‌
Pobre‌‌v.‌‌Santiago‌  ‌
However,‌  ‌the‌  ‌proper‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌habeas‌  ‌data‌  ‌case‌  ‌for‌‌  Courts‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌interfere‌  ‌with‌‌   the‌‌
  legislature‌‌   or‌‌  its‌‌
  members‌‌   in‌‌  Aldaba‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Resolution‌  ‌
pronouncements‌‌   made‌‌  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  President‌‌  in‌‌  his‌‌ official‌‌ capacity‌‌ is‌‌ the‌‌  the‌‌   manner‌‌   they‌‌ perform‌‌ their‌‌ functions‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ legislative‌‌ floor‌‌ 
Executive‌  ‌Secretary‌, ‌ ‌following‌  ‌the‌  ‌ruling‌‌   in‌‌
  ‌Aguinaldo‌‌   v.‌‌
  Aquino‌  or‌‌ in‌‌ committee‌‌ rooms‌. ‌‌Any‌‌ claim‌‌ of‌‌ an‌‌ unworthy‌‌ purpose‌‌ or‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  The‌  ‌constitutionality‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌legislative‌‌
  apportionment‌‌
  act‌‌
  is‌‌
  a ‌‌judicial‌‌ 
III‌.‌  ‌This‌  ‌is‌  ‌in‌  ‌accord‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌   president‌‌   should‌‌  falsity‌‌   and‌‌
  mala‌‌
  fides‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  statement‌‌   uttered‌‌
  by‌‌  the‌‌  member‌‌
  of‌‌ the‌‌  question,‌‌and‌‌not‌‌a‌‌political‌‌one.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 17‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

in‌‌gauging‌‌equality‌‌of‌‌representation.‌  ‌ RA‌  ‌No.‌  ‌7941‌  ‌mandates‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌four‌  ‌inviolable‌  ‌parameters‌. ‌‌
Aside‌  ‌from‌  ‌failing‌  ‌to‌  ‌comply‌  ‌with‌  ‌Section‌  ‌5(3),‌  ‌Article‌  ‌VI‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌ 
population‌  ‌requirement,‌  ‌the‌‌   creation‌‌   by‌‌
  RA‌‌
  9591‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌legislative‌‌  These‌‌are:‌  ‌
district‌  ‌for‌  ‌Malolos‌  ‌City,‌  ‌carving‌  ‌the‌  ‌city‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌former‌  ‌1st‌‌  Mariano,‌‌Jr.‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌  ‌ 1. First‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌twenty‌  ‌percent‌  ‌allocation‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Section‌  ‌5 ‌ ‌(2),‌‌ 
District,‌‌  leaves‌‌  the‌‌   town‌‌ of‌‌ Bulacan‌‌ isolated‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌ rest‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  Petitioners‌  ‌have‌  ‌not‌  ‌demonstrated‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌delineation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌land‌‌  Article‌‌   VI‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  mandatory.‌‌
  It‌‌
  merely‌‌
  provides‌‌  a ‌‌‌ceiling‌‌ ‌for‌‌ 
geographic‌‌   mass‌‌ of‌‌ that‌‌ district‌. ‌‌This‌‌ contravenes‌‌ the‌‌ requirement‌‌  area‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌proposed‌  ‌City‌  ‌of‌  ‌Makati‌  ‌will‌  ‌cause‌  ‌confusion‌  ‌as‌‌
  to‌‌
  its‌‌  party-list‌‌seats‌‌in‌‌Congress.‌  ‌
in‌  ‌Section‌  ‌5(3),‌  ‌Article‌  ‌VI‌  ‌that‌  ‌each‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌district‌  ‌shall‌‌  boundaries.‌‌   Section‌‌
  2 ‌‌stated‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  city's‌‌
  land‌‌
  area‌‌ “shall‌‌ comprise‌‌  2. Second,‌  ‌the‌  ‌two‌  ‌percent‌  ‌threshold‌  ‌— ‌ ‌as‌  ‌qualified‌  ‌by‌‌ 
"‌comprise,‌  ‌as‌  ‌far‌  ‌as‌  ‌practicable,‌  ‌contiguous,‌  ‌compact,‌  ‌and‌‌  the‌‌present‌‌‌territory‌‌of‌‌the‌‌municipality.”‌   BANAT‌  ‌
adjacent‌‌territory‌."‌ 
Even‌  ‌granting‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌population‌  ‌of‌  ‌Makati‌  ‌stood‌  ‌at‌  ‌450K,‌  ‌its‌‌  3. Third,‌t‌ he‌‌three-seat‌‌limit‌; ‌ ‌
legislative‌  ‌district‌  ‌may‌  ‌still‌  ‌be‌  ‌increased‌  ‌since‌  ‌it‌  ‌has‌  ‌met‌  ‌the‌‌  4. Fourth,‌p
‌ roportional‌‌representation‌. ‌ ‌
Bagabuyo‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌  ‌ minimum‌  ‌population‌  ‌requirement‌  ‌of‌  ‌250K‌. ‌ ‌Section‌  ‌3 ‌ ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Ordinance‌  ‌appended‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌provides‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌‌city‌‌   whose‌‌  The‌  ‌formula,‌  ‌therefore,‌  ‌for‌‌
  computing‌‌   the‌‌
  number‌‌
  of‌‌
  seats‌‌
  to‌‌
  which‌‌ 
Legislative‌  ‌apportionment‌  ‌is‌  ‌defined‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌determination‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
population‌  ‌has‌  ‌increased‌  ‌to‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌  ‌250K‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌
  entitled‌‌  to‌‌
  ‌at‌‌  the‌‌first‌‌party‌‌is‌‌entitled‌‌is‌‌as‌‌follows:‌  ‌
number‌‌  of‌‌
  representatives‌‌   which‌‌ a ‌‌State,‌‌ county‌‌ or‌‌ other‌‌ subdivision‌‌ 
may‌‌send‌‌to‌‌a‌‌legislative‌‌body.‌‌   ‌ least‌‌one‌‌congressional‌‌representative‌. ‌ ‌ N umber of  votes of  f irst party
T otal votes f or party −list system = P roportion of  votes of  1st party   ‌
Reapportionment‌, ‌‌on‌‌ the‌‌ other‌‌ hand,‌‌ is‌‌ the‌‌ ‌realignment‌‌ ‌or‌‌ change‌‌   ‌
Aldaba‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Decision‌  ‌
in‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌districts‌  ‌brought‌  ‌about‌  ‌by‌  ‌changes‌  ‌in‌‌
  population‌‌
  and‌‌  The‌  ‌next‌  ‌step‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌‌
  solve‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  number‌‌
  of‌‌
  additional‌‌
  seats‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌ 
mandated‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌requirement‌  ‌of‌  ‌equality‌  ‌of‌‌  Intercensal‌  ‌demographic‌  ‌projections‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌made‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌entire‌‌  other‌  ‌qualified‌  ‌parties‌  ‌are‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to,‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌proportional‌‌ 
representation‌. ‌ ‌ year.‌‌  In‌‌
  any‌‌  event,‌‌
  a ‌‌city‌‌   whose‌‌
  population‌‌   has‌‌  increased‌‌ to‌‌ 250,000‌‌  representation.‌  ‌
is‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌have‌  ‌a ‌ ‌legislative‌  ‌district‌  ‌only‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌"immediately‌‌ 
A‌‌
  pronounced‌‌   distinction‌‌   between‌‌ Article‌‌ VI,‌‌ Section‌‌ 5 ‌‌and,‌‌ Article‌‌ X,‌‌  N o. of  votes of  party
following‌‌election"‌‌‌after‌‌the‌‌attainment.‌  ‌ Addt′l seat  = N o. of  votes of  f irst party × N o. of  additional seats of  1st party   ‌
Section‌‌   10‌‌   is‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  requirement‌‌   a ‌‌‌plebiscite‌. ‌ ‌The‌‌
  of‌‌   Constitution‌‌ 
and‌  ‌the‌‌
  LGC‌‌   expressly‌‌   require‌‌
  a ‌‌plebiscite‌‌   to‌‌
  carry‌‌
  out‌‌
  any‌‌
  creation,‌‌  First‌, ‌ ‌certifications‌  ‌on‌  ‌demographic‌  ‌projections‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌issued‌‌ 
only‌  ‌if‌  ‌such‌  ‌projections‌  ‌are‌  ‌declared‌  ‌official‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌National‌‌  Bantay‌‌RA‌‌7941‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 007‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
division,‌  ‌merger,‌  ‌abolition‌  ‌or‌  ‌alteration‌  ‌of‌  ‌boundary‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌‌   ‌LGU‌. ‌ ‌In‌‌ 
contrast,‌‌   ‌no‌‌ plebiscite‌‌ requirement‌‌ exists‌‌ under‌‌ the‌‌ apportionment‌‌  Statistics‌‌Coordination‌‌Board‌‌‌(NSCB).‌‌   ‌ Comelec‌‌   has‌‌
  a ‌‌constitutional‌‌
  duty‌‌
  to‌‌
  disclose‌‌
  and‌‌
  release‌‌   the‌‌ names‌‌ 
or‌‌reapportionment‌‌provision‌. ‌  ‌ ‌ Second‌, ‌ ‌certifications‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌demographic‌  ‌projections‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌‌  of‌  ‌the‌  ‌nominees‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌party-list‌  ‌groups‌  ‌named‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌herein‌‌ 
petitions.‌  ‌
A‌‌
  legislative‌‌  apportionment‌‌   does‌‌  not‌‌ mean,‌‌ and‌‌ does‌‌ not‌‌ even‌‌ imply,‌‌  issued‌  ‌only‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌NSO‌  ‌Administrator‌  ‌or‌  ‌his‌  ‌designated‌‌ 
a‌‌
  division‌‌   of‌‌
  an‌‌
  LGU‌‌
  where‌‌ the‌‌ apportionment‌‌ takes‌‌ place.‌  ‌Thus,‌‌ the‌‌  certifying‌‌officer‌.  ‌‌ ‌
CIBAC‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 007‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
plebiscite‌‌   requirement‌‌   that‌‌
  applies‌‌   to‌‌ the‌‌ division‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌province,‌‌ city,‌‌  Third‌, ‌‌intercensal‌‌
  population‌‌
  projections‌‌
  must‌‌
  be‌‌
  ‌as‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ middle‌‌ 
municipality‌‌   or‌‌
  barangay‌‌   under‌‌   the‌‌  LGC‌‌   should‌‌ not‌‌ apply‌‌ to‌‌ and‌‌ be‌‌ a ‌‌ In‌‌
  determining‌‌   the‌‌
  number‌‌
  of‌‌  additional‌‌
  seats‌‌ for‌‌ each‌‌ party-list‌‌ that‌‌ 
of‌‌every‌‌year‌. ‌ ‌
requisite‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌validity‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌legislative‌  ‌apportionment‌  ‌or‌‌  has‌  ‌met‌  ‌the‌  ‌2%‌  ‌threshold,‌  ‌"‌proportional‌  ‌representation‌" ‌ ‌is‌  ‌the‌‌ 
reapportionment.‌  ‌ touchstone‌‌to‌‌ascertain‌‌entitlement‌‌to‌‌extra‌‌seats.‌S ‌ ee‌‌BANAT‌  ‌
Party-List‌‌System‌  ‌
Equality‌‌of‌‌representation.‌  ‌
Shall‌  ‌constitute‌  ‌20%‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌total‌  ‌number‌  ‌of‌  ‌representatives‌‌  Ang‌‌Bagong‌‌Bayani‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 001‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
The‌  ‌law‌  ‌clearly‌  ‌provides‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌basis‌  ‌for‌  ‌districting‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌the‌‌  including‌‌those‌‌under‌‌the‌‌party‌‌list.‌  ‌
1. The‌  ‌political‌  ‌party,‌  ‌sector,‌  ‌organization‌  ‌or‌  ‌coalition‌  ‌must‌‌ 
number‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌inhabitants‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌city‌  ‌or‌  ‌a ‌ ‌province,‌  ‌not‌  ‌the‌‌  Veterans‌‌Federation‌‌Party‌‌v.‌‌COMELEC‌‌2
‌ 000‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ represent‌  ‌the‌  ‌marginalized‌  ‌and‌  ‌underrepresented‌  ‌groups‌‌ 
number‌  ‌of‌  ‌registered‌  ‌voters‌  ‌therein‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌‌ 
identified‌  ‌in‌  ‌Section‌  ‌5 ‌ ‌of‌  ‌RA‌  ‌7941.‌  ‌Verily,‌  ‌majority‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌‌ 
require‌‌   mathematical‌‌   exactitude‌‌   or‌‌
  rigid‌‌   equality‌‌  as‌‌  a ‌‌standard‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 18‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

membership‌  ‌should‌  ‌belong‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌marginalized‌  ‌and‌‌  creates‌‌such‌‌additional‌‌party-list‌‌seats‌. ‌ ‌ 1. National‌  ‌parties‌  ‌or‌  ‌organizations‌  ‌and‌  ‌regional‌  ‌parties‌  ‌or‌‌ 
underrepresented‌. ‌ ‌ The‌  ‌filling-up‌  ‌of‌‌
  all‌‌
  available‌‌   party-list‌‌   seats‌‌
  is‌‌
  ‌not‌‌
  mandatory.‌‌  organizations‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌need‌‌
  to‌‌
  organize‌‌
  along‌‌
  sectoral‌‌
  lines‌‌
  and‌‌ 
2. Disqualifications‌u
‌ nder‌‌Sec‌‌6‌‌of‌‌RA‌‌7941:‌  ‌ Actual‌  ‌occupancy‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌party-list‌  ‌seats‌  ‌depends‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌number‌  ‌of‌‌  do‌  ‌not‌  ‌need‌  ‌to‌  ‌represent‌  ‌any‌  ‌“marginalized‌  ‌and‌‌ 
participants‌‌in‌‌the‌‌party-list‌‌election.‌  ‌ underrepresented”‌‌sector.‌  ‌
a. It‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌religious‌  ‌sect‌  ‌or‌  ‌denomination,‌  ‌organization‌  ‌or‌‌ 
association‌‌organized‌‌for‌‌religious‌‌purposes;‌  ‌ There‌  ‌are‌  ‌four‌  ‌parameters‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Philippine-style‌  ‌party-list‌  ‌election‌‌  2. Political‌‌  parties‌‌  can‌‌
  participate‌‌  in‌‌
  party-list‌‌
  elections‌‌ provided‌‌ 
b. It‌‌advocates‌‌violence‌‌‌or‌‌unlawful‌‌means‌‌to‌‌seek‌‌its‌‌goal;‌  ‌ system:‌  ‌ they‌  ‌register‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌party-list‌  ‌system‌  ‌and‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌field‌‌ 
1. Twenty‌  ‌percent‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌
  total‌‌
  number‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  membership‌‌   of‌‌  candidates‌‌in‌‌legislative‌‌district‌‌elections‌.  ‌‌ ‌
c. It‌‌is‌‌a‌‌foreign‌p
‌ arty‌‌or‌‌organization;‌  ‌
the‌  ‌House‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌maximum‌  ‌number‌  ‌of‌  ‌seats‌  ‌available‌  ‌to‌‌  A‌  ‌political‌  ‌party‌  ‌that‌  ‌fields‌  ‌candidates‌  ‌in‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌district‌‌ 
d. It‌  ‌is‌  ‌receiving‌  ‌support‌  ‌from‌  ‌any‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌government,‌‌  party-list‌  ‌organizations,‌  ‌such‌  ‌that‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌automatically‌‌  elections‌‌   can‌‌  participate‌‌   in‌‌
  party-list‌‌
  elections‌‌ ‌only‌‌ through‌‌ its‌‌ 
political‌‌party,‌‌foundation,‌‌organization;‌  ‌ one‌  ‌party-list‌  ‌seat‌  ‌for‌  ‌every‌  ‌four‌  ‌existing‌  ‌legislative‌‌  sectoral‌  ‌wing‌  ‌that‌  ‌can‌  ‌separately‌  ‌register‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌party-list‌‌ 
e. It‌‌ ‌violates‌‌ or‌‌ fails‌‌ to‌‌ comply‌‌ ‌with‌‌ laws,‌‌ rules‌‌ or‌‌ regulations‌‌  districts.‌  ‌ system.‌  ‌The‌  ‌sectoral‌  ‌wing‌  ‌is‌  ‌by‌  ‌itself‌  ‌an‌  ‌independent‌‌ 
relating‌‌to‌‌elections;‌  ‌ 2. Garnering‌  ‌two‌  ‌percent‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌total‌  ‌votes‌  ‌cast‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  sectoral‌  ‌party‌, ‌ ‌and‌  ‌is‌  ‌linked‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌political‌  ‌party‌  ‌through‌  ‌a ‌‌
f. It‌‌declares‌u
‌ ntruthful‌‌statements‌‌in‌‌its‌‌petition;‌  ‌ party-list‌  ‌elections‌  ‌guarantees‌  ‌a ‌ ‌party-list‌  ‌organization‌‌  coalition.‌  ‌
one‌‌seat.‌‌   ‌ 3. Sectoral‌‌parties‌‌‌or‌‌organizations‌‌may‌‌either‌‌be‌‌   ‌
g. It‌‌has‌‌ceased‌‌to‌‌exist‌‌for‌‌at‌‌least‌‌one‌‌(1)‌‌year‌;‌‌or‌  ‌
3. The‌  ‌additional‌  ‌seats‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌distributed‌  ‌to‌‌
  the‌‌
  party-list‌‌  a. “‌marginalized‌  ‌and‌  ‌underrepresented‌” ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌labor,‌‌ 
h. It‌  ‌fails‌  ‌to‌‌
  participate‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌  last‌‌  two‌‌
  (2)‌‌
  preceding‌‌  elections‌‌ 
organizations‌  ‌including‌  ‌those‌  ‌that‌  ‌received‌  ‌less‌  ‌than‌  ‌two‌‌  peasants,‌  ‌fisherfolk,‌  ‌urban‌  ‌poor,‌  ‌indigenous‌  ‌cultural‌‌ 
or‌  ‌fails‌  ‌to‌  ‌obtain‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌‌  two‌‌  ‌percentum‌‌   (2%)‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  votes‌‌ 
percent‌‌of‌‌the‌‌total‌‌votes.‌‌   ‌ communities,‌‌   handicapped,‌‌
  veterans,‌‌
  and‌‌ overseas‌‌ workers;‌‌ 
cast‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌party-list‌  ‌system‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌two‌  ‌(2)‌  ‌preceding‌‌ 
elections‌‌for‌‌the‌‌constituency‌‌in‌‌which‌‌it‌‌has‌‌registered.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌continued‌  ‌operation‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌  two‌‌  percent‌‌
  threshold‌‌   as‌‌
  it‌‌  or‌‌   ‌
3. The‌  ‌party‌  ‌or‌  ‌organization‌  ‌must‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌be‌  ‌an‌  ‌adjunct‌  ‌of,‌  ‌or‌  ‌a ‌‌ applies‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌allocation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌additional‌  ‌seats‌  ‌is‌  ‌now‌‌  b. lacking‌  ‌in‌  ‌“‌well-defined‌  ‌political‌  ‌constituencies.‌” ‌ ‌— ‌‌
unconstitutional.‌  ‌ professionals,‌‌the‌‌elderly,‌‌women,‌‌and‌‌the‌‌youth.‌  ‌
project‌  ‌organized‌  ‌or‌  ‌an‌  ‌entity‌  ‌funded‌  ‌or‌  ‌assisted‌  by,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
government.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌additional‌  ‌seats‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌distributed‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  parties‌‌
  in‌‌
  a ‌‌ 4. A‌‌
  ‌majority‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  members‌‌   of‌‌  sectoral‌‌   parties‌‌   ‌must‌‌ belong‌‌ 
4. The‌  ‌party‌  ‌must‌  ‌not‌  ‌only‌  ‌comply‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌requirements‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  second‌  ‌round‌  ‌of‌  ‌seat‌  ‌allocation‌  ‌until‌  ‌all‌  ‌available‌‌  to‌  ‌the‌  ‌“marginalized‌  ‌and‌  ‌underrepresented”‌  ‌sector‌  ‌they‌‌ 
law;‌‌its‌n
‌ ominees‌‌must‌‌likewise‌‌do‌‌so.‌‌   ‌ seats‌‌are‌‌completely‌‌distributed.‌  ‌ represent.‌  ‌Same‌  ‌rule‌  ‌applies‌  ‌to‌  ‌sectors‌  ‌that‌  ‌lack‌  ‌“well-defined‌‌ 
4. The‌‌‌three-seat‌‌cap‌‌‌is‌‌constitutional.‌  ‌ political‌‌constituencies.”‌  ‌
5. Not‌  ‌only‌  ‌the‌  ‌candidate‌  ‌party‌  ‌or‌  ‌organization‌  ‌must‌  ‌represent‌‌ 
marginalized‌  ‌and‌  ‌underrepresented‌  ‌sectors;‌  ‌so‌  ‌also‌  ‌must‌  ‌its‌‌  The‌‌nominees‌‌of‌‌sectoral‌‌parties‌‌or‌‌organizations‌‌either‌‌   ‌
nominees.‌  ‌ Phil‌‌Guardians‌‌Brotherhood‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ a. must‌‌belong‌‌to‌‌their‌‌respective‌‌sectors,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
6. While‌‌   lacking‌‌   a ‌‌well-defined‌‌  political‌‌
  constituency,‌‌ the‌‌ nominee‌‌  The‌  ‌COMELEC‌‌   may‌‌   ‌motu‌‌
  proprio‌‌
  ‌or‌‌
  upon‌‌  verified‌‌
  complaint‌‌   of‌‌
  any‌‌  b. must‌  ‌have‌  ‌a ‌ ‌track‌‌
  record‌‌
  of‌‌
  advocacy‌‌
  for‌‌
  their‌‌
  respective‌‌ 
must‌  ‌likewise‌  ‌be‌  ‌able‌  ‌to‌  ‌contribute‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌formulation‌  ‌and‌‌  interested‌‌  party,‌‌   ‌remove‌‌   or‌‌
  cancel‌, ‌‌after‌‌
  due‌‌
  notice‌‌ and‌‌ hearing,‌‌ the‌‌  sectors.‌‌   ‌
enactment‌  ‌of‌  ‌appropriate‌  ‌legislation‌‌   that‌‌
  will‌‌
  benefit‌‌
  the‌‌
  nation‌‌  registration‌‌ of‌‌ any‌‌ national,‌‌ regional‌‌ or‌‌ sectoral‌‌ party,‌‌ organization‌‌ or‌‌  The‌  ‌nominees‌  ‌of‌  ‌national‌  ‌and‌  ‌regional‌‌
  parties‌‌
  or‌‌
  organizations‌‌ 
as‌‌a‌‌whole.‌‌   ‌ coalition‌‌if‌‌it:‌‌   ‌ must‌‌be‌‌bona-fide‌m ‌ embers‌‌of‌‌such‌‌parties‌‌or‌‌organizations.‌ 
a) fails‌‌to‌‌participate‌‌in‌‌the‌‌last‌‌two‌‌(2)‌‌preceding‌‌elections‌;‌‌or‌‌  
BANAT‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 009‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Decision‌‌and‌‌Resolution‌  ‌ ii. Executive‌  ‌
b) fails‌  ‌to‌‌
  ‌qualify‌‌
  for‌‌
  a ‌‌seat‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  two‌‌
  preceding‌‌
  elections‌‌ 
There‌‌
  is‌‌
  no‌‌
  need‌‌  for‌‌
  legislation‌‌   to‌‌
  create‌‌ an‌‌ additional‌‌ party-list‌‌ seat‌‌  for‌‌the‌‌constituency‌‌in‌‌which‌‌it‌‌registered‌. ‌ ‌
Sec‌‌
  1 ‌‌Art‌‌
  VII.‌‌
  ‌THE‌‌
  ‌executive‌‌
  power‌‌
  shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  vested‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ 
whenever‌  ‌four‌  ‌additional‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌districts‌  ‌are‌  ‌created‌  ‌by‌  ‌law.‌‌ 
Section‌  ‌5(2),‌  ‌Article‌  ‌VI‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌1987‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌automatically‌‌  President‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines.‌  ‌
Atong‌‌Paglaum‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 013‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 19‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

iii. Judiciary‌  ‌
iii. Judiciary‌  ‌ hence,‌  ‌beyond‌  ‌the‌  ‌reach‌  ‌of‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌except‌  through‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Judicial‌  ‌power‌  ‌includes‌  ‌the‌  ‌duty‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌courts‌  ‌of‌‌
  justice‌‌
  to‌‌
  settle‌‌  impeachment.‌  ‌
Sec‌  ‌1 ‌ ‌Art‌  ‌VIII.‌  ‌The‌‌
  judicial‌‌
  power‌‌
  shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  vested‌‌
  in‌‌
  one‌‌  Section‌  ‌1 ‌ ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌applied‌  ‌to‌  ‌appearances‌  ‌of‌  ‌department‌‌ 
actual‌  ‌controversies‌  ‌involving‌  ‌rights‌  ‌which‌  ‌are‌  ‌legally‌‌ 
Supreme‌  ‌Court‌  ‌and‌  ‌in‌  ‌such‌  ‌lower‌  ‌courts‌  ‌as‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌‌  heads‌  ‌in‌  ‌inquiries‌  ‌in‌‌
  aid‌‌   of‌‌
  legislation‌. ‌‌Congress‌‌   is‌‌
  not‌‌
  bound‌‌
  in‌‌ 
demandable‌‌and‌‌enforceable‌. ‌ ‌
established‌‌by‌‌law.‌‌xxxx‌  ‌ such‌‌ instances‌‌ to‌‌ respect‌‌ the‌‌ refusal‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ department‌‌ head‌‌ to‌‌ appear‌‌ 
Judicial‌‌   Review‌. ‌‌— ‌‌and‌‌   to‌‌
  ‌determine‌‌   whether‌‌ or‌‌ not‌‌ there‌‌ has‌‌  in‌  ‌such‌  ‌inquiry,‌  ‌unless‌  ‌a ‌ ‌valid‌  ‌claim‌  ‌of‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌is‌  ‌subsequently‌‌ 
Sec‌  ‌4.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Supreme‌  ‌Court‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌composed‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Chief‌‌  been‌  ‌a ‌‌grave‌‌
  abuse‌‌   of‌‌
  discretion‌‌   amounting‌‌   to‌‌
  lack‌‌
  or‌‌
  excess‌‌  made,‌‌either‌‌by‌‌the‌‌President‌‌herself‌‌or‌‌by‌‌the‌‌Executive‌‌Secretary.‌  ‌
Justice‌‌  and‌‌
  ‌fourteen‌‌
  ‌Associate‌‌   Justices.‌‌   It‌‌ may‌‌ sit‌‌ en‌‌ banc‌‌  of‌‌
  jurisdiction‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌   part‌‌   of‌‌ any‌‌ branch‌‌ or‌‌ instrumentality‌‌ of‌‌ 
or‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌  ‌discretion,‌  ‌in‌  ‌division‌  ‌of‌  ‌three,‌  ‌five,‌  ‌or‌  ‌seven‌‌  the‌‌Government‌. ‌ ‌ Legislative‌‌Investigations‌  ‌
Members.‌  ‌Any‌  ‌vacancy‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌filled‌  ‌within‌  ‌90‌  ‌days‌‌  c. Powers‌‌and‌‌Privileges‌  ‌ Section‌  ‌21.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Senate‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌‌
  House‌‌  of‌‌
  Representatives‌‌   or‌‌
  any‌‌  of‌‌ 
from‌‌the‌‌occurrence‌‌thereof.‌‌xxxx‌  its‌  ‌respective‌  ‌committees‌  ‌may‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌inquiries‌  ‌in‌  ‌aid‌  ‌of‌‌ 
i. Legislative‌  ‌ legislation‌  ‌in‌  ‌accordance‌  ‌with‌  ‌its‌  ‌duly‌  ‌published‌  ‌rules‌  ‌of‌‌ 
b. Functions‌  ‌
 ‌ procedure.‌  ‌The‌  ‌rights‌‌  of‌‌
  persons‌‌   appearing‌‌   in,‌‌
  or‌‌
  affected‌‌
  by,‌‌
  such‌‌ 
i. Legislative‌  ‌ Legislative‌‌inquiries‌‌and‌‌oversight‌‌functions‌ 
inquiries‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌respected.‌  ‌

Legislative‌  ‌power‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌defined‌  ‌not‌  ‌only‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌‌  Question‌‌Hour‌  ‌ Bengzon‌‌v.‌‌Senate‌‌Blue‌‌Ribbon‌‌Committee‌  ‌
pass‌‌   laws‌‌
  but‌‌
  also‌‌
  the‌‌ power‌‌ to‌‌ alter‌‌ or‌‌ modify‌‌ them.‌‌ It‌‌ also‌‌ covers‌‌ 
Sec‌  ‌22.‌  ‌The‌  ‌heads‌  ‌of‌‌
  departments‌‌   may,‌‌   upon‌‌
  their‌‌  own‌‌
  initiative,‌‌  The‌‌
  power‌‌   of‌‌
  both‌‌  houses‌‌
  of‌‌
  Congress‌‌
  to‌‌
  conduct‌‌
  inquiries‌‌   in‌‌ aid‌‌ of‌‌ 
the‌  ‌amendment‌  ‌of‌  ‌existing‌  ‌legislations‌  ‌and‌  ‌that‌  ‌would‌  ‌still‌  ‌be‌‌ 
encompassed‌‌as‌‌legislative‌‌power.‌  ‌ legislation‌‌   is‌‌
  not,‌‌
  therefore,‌‌
  absolute‌‌
  or‌‌ unlimited.‌  ‌The‌‌ investigation‌‌ 
with‌  ‌the‌  ‌consent‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌President,‌  ‌or‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌request‌  ‌of‌  ‌either‌‌ 
must‌‌be‌‌   ‌
General‌‌   Plenary‌‌   Powers.‌‌  — ‌‌‌The‌‌ legislative‌‌ power‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ vested‌‌  House,‌‌   as‌‌  the‌‌
  rules‌‌
  of‌‌  each‌‌
  House‌‌
  shall‌‌   provide,‌‌   appear‌‌ before‌‌ and‌‌ 
in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌which‌  ‌shall‌‌   consist‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌Senate‌‌  a) in‌  ‌aid‌‌
  of‌‌
  legislation‌‌
  ‌in‌‌
  accordance‌‌
  with‌‌
  its‌‌
  duly‌‌
  published‌‌ 
be‌  ‌heard‌  ‌by‌  ‌such‌  ‌House‌  ‌on‌  ‌any‌  ‌matter‌  ‌pertaining‌  ‌to‌  ‌their‌‌ 
and‌‌   a ‌‌House‌‌   of‌‌
  Representatives,‌‌ ‌except‌‌ ‌to‌‌ the‌‌ extent‌‌ reserved‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌  rules‌‌of‌‌procedure‌‌and‌‌   ‌
departments.‌‌xxxx‌  ‌
people‌‌   by‌‌  the‌‌
  provision‌‌  on‌‌
  initiative‌‌   and‌‌ referendum‌. ‌‌(‌Sec‌‌ 1 ‌‌Art‌‌  b) that‌  ‌the‌  ‌rights‌  ‌of‌  ‌persons‌  ‌appearing‌‌
  in‌‌
  or‌‌
  affected‌‌
  by‌‌
  such‌‌ 
VI‌) ‌ ‌ ⭐‌Senate‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines‌‌v.‌‌Ermita‌  ‌ inquiries‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌respected.‌  ‌
ii. Executive‌  ‌ The‌‌   contemplated‌‌   inquiry‌‌   by‌‌  respondent‌‌   Committee‌‌   is‌‌
  not‌‌ really‌‌ "in‌‌ 
Section‌‌  22‌‌  which‌‌   provides‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌
  question‌‌   hour‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ interpreted‌‌ 
aid‌  ‌of‌  ‌legislation"‌  ‌because‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌related‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌purpose‌‌   within‌‌   the‌‌ 
vis-á-vis‌‌   Section‌‌  21‌‌  which‌‌  provides‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌
  power‌‌ of‌‌ either‌‌ House‌‌ of‌‌ 
Marcos‌‌v.‌‌Manglapus‌D
‌ ecision‌‌‌and‌R
‌ esolution‌  ‌ juris­diction‌‌   of‌‌
  Congress,‌‌   since‌‌   the‌‌
  aim‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  investigation‌‌   is‌‌
  to‌‌
  find‌‌ 
Congress‌  ‌to‌‌   "conduct‌‌   ‌inquiries‌‌   in‌‌
  aid‌‌
  of‌‌
  legislation‌."‌‌   A ‌‌distinction‌‌ 
out‌‌
  whether‌‌   or‌‌
  not‌‌  the‌‌
  relatives‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  President‌‌   or‌‌ Mr.‌‌ Ricardo‌‌ Lopa‌ 
The‌‌
  powers‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  President‌‌
  cannot‌‌   be‌‌
  said‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  limited‌‌
  only‌‌
  to‌‌ the‌‌  was‌  ‌made‌  ‌between‌  ‌inquiries‌  ‌in‌  ‌aid‌  ‌of‌  ‌legislation‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌question‌‌ 
had‌  ‌violated‌  ‌Section‌  ‌5 ‌ ‌of‌  ‌RA‌  ‌No.‌  ‌3019,‌  ‌the‌  ‌"Anti-Graft‌  ‌and‌  ‌Corrupt‌‌ 
specific‌  ‌powers‌  ‌enumerated‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution.‌  ‌In‌  ‌other‌  ‌words,‌‌  hour.‌  ‌While‌  ‌attendance‌  ‌was‌  ‌meant‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌discretionary‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Practices‌‌   Act",‌‌
  a ‌‌matter‌‌   that‌‌   appears‌‌   more‌‌   within‌‌   the‌‌ province‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
executive‌  ‌power‌  ‌is‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌  ‌the‌  ‌sum‌  ‌of‌  ‌specific‌  ‌powers‌  ‌so‌‌  question‌  ‌hour‌, ‌ ‌it‌  ‌was‌  ‌compulsory‌  ‌in‌  ‌inquiries‌  ‌in‌  ‌aid‌  ‌of‌‌ 
courts‌‌rather‌‌than‌‌of‌‌the‌‌legislature.‌‌   ‌
enumerated‌. ‌ ‌ legislation‌. ‌ ‌
This‌‌
  is‌‌
  so,‌‌
  notwithstanding‌‌   the‌‌   avowed‌‌   intent‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ members‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  In‌  ‌fine,‌  ‌the‌  ‌oversight‌  ‌function‌  ‌of‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌facilitated‌  ‌by‌‌  Negros‌‌Oriental‌‌II‌‌Electric‌‌Coop‌‌v.‌‌SP‌‌of‌‌Dumaguete‌  ‌
Constitutional‌  ‌Commission‌  ‌of‌  ‌1986—to‌  ‌limit‌  ‌the‌  ‌powers‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  compulsory‌  ‌process‌  ‌only‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌extent‌  ‌that‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌performed‌  ‌in‌‌ 
President,‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌result‌  ‌was‌  ‌a ‌ ‌limitation‌  ‌of‌  ‌specific‌  ‌powers‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  pursuit‌‌of‌‌legislation‌. ‌ ‌ The‌‌  exercise‌‌
  by‌‌  the‌‌   legislature‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ contempt‌‌ power‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌matter‌‌ of‌‌ 
President,‌  ‌particularly‌  ‌those‌  ‌relating‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌commander-in-chief‌‌  self-preservation‌  ‌as‌  ‌that‌  ‌branch‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌  ‌vested‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌‌ 
When‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌exercises‌  ‌its‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌inquiry,‌  ‌the‌  ‌only‌  ‌way‌  ‌for‌‌ 
clause,‌  ‌but‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌ ‌diminution‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌general‌  ‌grant‌  ‌of‌  ‌executive‌‌  legislative‌  ‌power,‌  ‌independently‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌branch,‌  ‌asserts‌  ‌its‌ 
department‌  ‌heads‌  ‌to‌  ‌exempt‌  ‌themselves‌  ‌therefrom‌  ‌is‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌valid‌‌ 
power.‌  ‌ authority‌  ‌and‌  ‌punishes‌  ‌contempts‌  ‌thereof.‌  ‌The‌‌   contempt‌‌  power‌‌   of‌‌ 
claim‌  ‌of‌  ‌privilege‌. ‌ ‌They‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌exempt‌  ‌by‌‌
  the‌‌
  mere‌‌
  fact‌‌
  that‌‌
  they‌‌ 
the‌‌
  legislature‌‌   is,‌‌
  therefore,‌‌   ‌sui‌‌
  generis‌, ‌‌and‌‌ ‌local‌‌ legislative‌‌ bodies‌‌ 
are‌  ‌department‌  ‌heads.‌  ‌Only‌  ‌one‌  ‌executive‌‌   official‌‌  may‌‌
  be‌‌
  exempted‌‌ 
cannot‌  ‌correctly‌‌   claim‌‌   to‌‌
  possess‌‌   it‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  same‌‌  reasons‌‌  that‌‌
  the‌‌ 
from‌‌   this‌‌ power‌‌ — ‌‌the‌‌ President‌‌ on‌‌ whom‌‌ executive‌‌ power‌‌ is‌‌ vested,‌‌ 
national‌‌legislature‌‌does.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 20‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

Arnault‌‌v.‌‌Nazareno‌  ‌ subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌balancing‌  ‌against‌  ‌other‌  ‌interest‌. ‌ ‌In‌  ‌other‌  ‌words,‌‌ 
Thus,‌‌
  Section‌‌  4(b)‌‌ is‌‌ ‌directly‌‌ repugnant‌‌ ‌with‌‌ Article‌‌ VI,‌‌ Section‌‌ 21.‌‌ 
confidentiality‌‌   in‌‌
  executive‌‌
  privilege‌‌
  is‌‌
  ‌not‌‌
  absolutely‌‌   protected‌‌
  by‌‌ 
Section‌  ‌4(b)‌  ‌exempts‌  ‌the‌  ‌PCGG‌  ‌members‌  ‌and‌  ‌staff‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Once‌  ‌an‌  ‌inquiry‌  ‌is‌  ‌admitted‌  ‌or‌  ‌established‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌‌  the‌‌Constitution.‌  ‌
Congress'‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌inquiry‌. ‌ ‌ This‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌countenanced.‌‌ 
jurisdiction‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌legislative‌‌
  body‌‌
  to‌‌
  make,‌‌   we‌‌  think‌‌   the‌‌
  investigating‌‌ 
 Nowhere‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌is‌  ‌any‌  ‌provision‌  ‌granting‌  ‌such‌‌ 
committee‌‌   has‌‌ the‌‌ power‌‌ to‌‌ require‌‌ a ‌‌witness‌‌ to‌‌ answer‌‌ any‌‌ question‌‌  Standard‌‌Chartered‌‌Bank‌‌v.‌‌Senate‌‌Committee‌‌on‌‌Banks‌  ‌
exemption. ‌  ‌
pertinent‌‌  to‌‌
  that‌‌  inquiry,‌‌
  subject‌‌
  of‌‌
  course‌‌   to‌‌
  his‌‌  constitutional‌‌ right‌‌ 
against‌‌self-incrimination.‌‌   ‌ Central‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court’s‌  ‌ruling‌  ‌in‌  ‌Bengzon‌  ‌was‌  ‌the‌  C
‌ ourt’s‌‌ 
Gudani‌‌v.‌‌Senga‌  ‌ determination‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌intended‌  ‌inquiry‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌  ‌in‌  ‌aid‌  ‌of‌‌ 
If‌  ‌the‌  ‌subject‌  ‌of‌  ‌investigation‌  ‌before‌  ‌the‌  ‌committee‌  ‌is‌  ‌within‌‌ 
legislation‌. ‌ ‌
the‌  ‌range‌  ‌of‌  ‌legitimate‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌inquiry‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌proposed‌‌  If‌‌
  the‌‌
  President‌‌   or‌‌  the‌‌   Chief‌‌  of‌‌
  Staff‌‌  refuses‌‌   to‌‌ allow‌‌ a ‌‌member‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
testimony‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌witness‌  ‌called‌  ‌relates‌  ‌to‌  ‌that‌  ‌subject,‌‌  AFP‌  ‌to‌  ‌appear‌  ‌before‌  ‌Congress,‌  ‌the‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌body‌  ‌seeking‌  ‌such‌‌  Indeed,‌‌  ‌the‌‌
  mere‌‌  filing‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌criminal‌‌
  or‌‌
  an‌‌
  administrative‌‌ complaint‌‌ 
obedience‌‌   to‌‌
  its‌‌
  process‌‌   may‌‌
  be‌‌  enforced‌‌  by‌‌  the‌‌
  committee‌‌   by‌‌  testimony‌  ‌may‌  ‌seek‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌relief‌  ‌to‌  ‌compel‌  ‌the‌  ‌attendance.‌‌  before‌‌
  a ‌‌court‌‌
  or‌‌
  a ‌‌quasi-judicial‌‌   body‌‌  should‌‌ not‌‌ automatically‌‌ bar‌‌ 
imprisonment‌. ‌ ‌ Such‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌action‌  ‌should‌‌   be‌‌  directed‌‌   at‌‌
  the‌‌  heads‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  executive‌‌  the‌‌conduct‌‌of‌‌legislative‌‌investigation‌. ‌ ‌
branch‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌armed‌  ‌forces,‌  ‌the‌  ‌persons‌  ‌who‌  ‌wield‌  ‌authority‌  ‌and‌‌ 
Senate‌‌Blue‌‌Ribbon‌‌Committee‌‌v.‌‌Majaducon‌  control‌  ‌over‌  ‌the‌  ‌actions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌officers‌  ‌concerned.‌  ‌The‌  ‌legislative‌‌  Romero‌‌II‌‌v.‌‌Estrada‌  ‌
purpose‌‌   of‌‌
  such‌‌   testimony,‌‌   as‌‌
  well‌‌  as‌‌  any‌‌  defenses‌‌   against‌‌ the‌‌ same‌‌ 
When‌  ‌the‌  ‌Senate‌  ‌Blue‌  ‌Ribbon‌  ‌Committee‌  ‌served‌  ‌subpoena‌  ‌on‌‌  —‌  ‌whether‌  ‌grounded‌  ‌on‌  ‌executive‌  ‌privilege,‌  ‌national‌  ‌security‌  ‌or‌‌  Suffice‌  ‌it‌  ‌to‌  ‌state‌  ‌that‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌Committee‌  ‌issued‌  ‌invitations‌  ‌and‌‌ 
respondent‌‌ Flaviano‌‌ to‌‌ appear‌‌ and‌‌ testify‌‌ before‌‌ it‌‌ in‌‌ connection‌‌ with‌‌  similar‌  ‌concerns‌  ‌— ‌ ‌would‌  ‌be‌  ‌accorded‌  ‌due‌  ‌judicial‌‌   evaluation.‌‌   All‌‌  subpoenas‌  ‌to‌  ‌petitioners‌  ‌to‌  ‌appear‌  ‌before‌  ‌it‌  ‌in‌  ‌connection‌  ‌with‌  ‌its‌‌ 
its‌  ‌investigation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌alleged‌  ‌misuse‌  ‌and‌  ‌mismanagement‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  the‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌considerations‌  ‌pertinent‌  ‌to‌  ‌either‌  ‌branch‌  ‌of‌  investigation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌aforementioned‌  ‌investments,‌  ‌it‌‌   did‌‌
  so‌‌
  pursuant‌‌ 
AFP-RSBS‌  ‌funds,‌  ‌it‌  ‌did‌  ‌so‌  ‌pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌its‌  ‌authority‌  ‌to‌  ‌conduct‌‌  government‌‌   may‌‌   be‌‌  raised,‌‌   assessed,‌‌   and‌‌ ultimately‌‌ weighed‌‌ against‌‌  to‌  ‌its‌  ‌authority‌  ‌to‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌inquiries‌  ‌in‌  ‌aid‌  ‌of‌  ‌legislation.‌  ‌And‌  ‌the‌‌ 
inquiries‌‌in‌‌aid‌‌of‌‌legislation.‌‌   ‌ each‌‌  other.‌‌  And‌‌  once‌‌   the‌‌  courts‌‌   speak‌‌   with‌‌   finality,‌‌ both‌‌ branches‌‌ of‌‌  Court‌‌   has‌‌   no‌‌
  authority‌‌  to‌‌ prohibit‌‌ a ‌‌Senate‌‌ committee‌‌ from‌‌ requiring‌‌ 
government‌  ‌have‌  ‌no‌  ‌option‌  ‌but‌  ‌to‌  ‌comply‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌decision‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  persons‌‌   to‌‌  appear‌‌
  and‌‌
  testify‌‌  before‌‌   it‌‌
  in‌‌
  connection‌‌ with‌‌ an‌‌ inquiry‌‌ 
In‌  ‌the‌  ‌instant‌  ‌case,‌  ‌no‌  ‌court‌  ‌had‌  ‌acquired‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌over‌‌   the‌‌ 
courts,‌‌whether‌‌the‌‌effect‌‌of‌‌the‌‌decision‌‌is‌‌to‌‌their‌‌liking‌‌or‌‌disfavor.‌  ‌ in‌  ‌aid‌  ‌of‌  ‌legislation‌  ‌in‌  ‌accordance‌  ‌with‌  ‌its‌  ‌duly‌  ‌published‌  ‌rules‌‌   of‌‌ 
matter‌. ‌ ‌Thus,‌  ‌there‌  ‌was‌  ‌as‌  ‌yet‌  ‌no‌  ‌encroachment‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌
  legislature‌‌ 
procedure.‌  ‌
into‌  ‌the‌  ‌exclusive‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌of‌‌   another‌‌  branch‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  government.‌‌ 
Clearly,‌  ‌there‌  ‌was‌  ‌no‌  ‌basis‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌Judge‌  ‌to‌  ‌apply‌  ‌the‌‌  Neri‌‌v.‌‌Senate‌‌Committee‌‌on‌‌Accountability‌‌of‌‌Public‌‌Officers‌‌and‌‌ 
Oversight‌  ‌
ruling‌‌ in‌‌ ‌Bengzon‌. ‌‌Hence,‌‌ the‌‌ denial‌‌ of‌‌ petitioner's‌‌ motion‌‌ to‌‌ dismiss‌‌  Investigation‌  ‌
the‌‌petition‌‌for‌‌prohibition‌‌amounted‌‌to‌‌grave‌‌abuse‌‌of‌‌discretion.‌  ‌ Separate‌‌Opinion,‌‌Justice‌‌Puno‌,‌‌Macalintal‌‌v.‌‌Comelec,‌‌et‌‌al‌.  ‌‌ ‌
Nixon,‌  ‌In‌  ‌Re‌  ‌Sealed‌  ‌Case‌  ‌and‌  ‌Judicial‌‌
  Watch‌, ‌‌somehow‌‌
  provide‌‌
  the‌‌ 
elements‌‌of‌‌presidential‌‌communications‌‌privilege‌,‌‌to‌‌wit:‌  ‌ Concept‌‌and‌‌bases‌‌of‌‌congressional‌‌oversight‌  ‌
In‌‌re‌‌Sabio‌  ‌
1) The‌  ‌protected‌  ‌communication‌  ‌must‌  ‌relate‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌‌ The‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌oversight‌  ‌embraces‌  ‌all‌  ‌activities‌  ‌undertaken‌  ‌by‌‌ 
The‌‌  1987‌‌  Constitution‌‌   recognizes‌‌   the‌‌ power‌‌ of‌‌ investigation,‌‌ not‌‌ just‌‌  "‌quintessential‌‌and‌‌non-delegable‌‌presidential‌‌power.‌" ‌ ‌ Congress‌  ‌to‌  ‌enhance‌  ‌its‌  ‌understanding‌  ‌of‌  ‌and‌  ‌influence‌  ‌over‌  ‌the‌‌ 
of‌‌
  Congress,‌‌   but‌‌
  also‌‌
  of‌‌  "‌any‌‌
  of‌‌ its‌‌ committees‌."‌  ‌This‌‌ is‌‌ significant‌‌  implementation‌  ‌of‌  ‌legislation‌  ‌it‌  ‌has‌  ‌enacted.‌  ‌Clearly,‌  ‌oversight‌‌ 
2) The‌  ‌communication‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌authored‌  ‌or‌  ‌"solicited‌  ‌and‌‌ 
because‌  ‌it‌  ‌constitutes‌  ‌a ‌ ‌direct‌  ‌conferral‌  ‌of‌  ‌investigatory‌  ‌power‌‌  concerns‌‌post-enactment‌‌measures‌‌undertaken‌‌by‌‌Congress.‌  ‌
received"‌‌  by‌‌ a ‌‌close‌‌ advisor‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ President‌‌ or‌‌ the‌‌ President‌‌ 
upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌committees‌  ‌and‌  ‌it‌  ‌means‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌mechanisms‌  ‌which‌‌   the‌‌  himself.‌  ‌The‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌test‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌  ‌an‌  ‌advisor‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌in‌‌  The‌  ‌power‌‌
  of‌‌
  oversight‌‌
  has‌‌  been‌‌  held‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌  ‌intrinsic‌‌
  ‌in‌‌
  the‌‌
  grant‌‌
  of‌‌ 
Houses‌  ‌can‌  ‌take‌  ‌in‌  ‌order‌  ‌to‌  ‌effectively‌  ‌perform‌  ‌its‌  ‌investigative‌‌  "‌operational‌‌proximity‌"‌‌with‌‌the‌‌President.‌  ‌ legislative‌  ‌power‌  ‌itself‌  ‌and‌  ‌integral‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌checks‌  ‌and‌  ‌balances‌‌ 
function‌‌are‌‌also‌‌available‌‌to‌‌the‌‌committees.‌  ‌ inherent‌‌in‌‌a‌‌democratic‌‌system‌‌of‌‌government.‌  ‌
3) The‌  ‌presidential‌  ‌communications‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌remains‌  ‌a ‌‌
Senate‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Ermita‌  ‌categorically‌  ‌ruled‌  ‌that ‌‌   "‌the‌‌   power‌‌   of‌‌
  inquiry‌‌
  is‌‌  qualified‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌that‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌overcome‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌showing‌  ‌of‌‌  Categories‌‌of‌‌congressional‌‌oversight‌‌functions‌  ‌
broad‌‌   enough‌‌   to‌‌
  cover‌‌  officials‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌   executive‌‌   branch.‌" ‌‌ Verily,‌‌  adequate‌  ‌need,‌  ‌such‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌information‌  ‌sought‌  ‌"likely‌‌  a. Scrutiny.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Its‌  ‌primary‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌determine‌  ‌economy‌‌ 
the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌reinforced‌  ‌the‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌in‌  ‌Arnault‌‌   that‌‌  "‌the‌‌
  operation‌‌   of‌‌  contains‌  ‌important‌  ‌evidence"‌  ‌and‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌
  unavailability‌‌   of‌‌  and‌‌
  efficiency‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ operation‌‌ of‌‌ government‌‌ activities‌. ‌‌It‌‌ is‌‌ 
government,‌  ‌being‌  ‌a ‌ ‌legitimate‌  ‌subject‌  ‌for‌  ‌legislation,‌  ‌ is‌  ‌a ‌‌ the‌‌
  information‌‌ elsewhere‌‌ by‌‌ an‌‌ appropriate‌‌ investigating‌‌  based‌  ‌primarily‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌appropriation‌  ‌of‌  ‌Congress.‌‌ 
proper‌‌   subject‌‌   for‌‌
  investigation‌" ‌‌and‌‌    that‌‌  "‌the‌‌ power‌‌ of‌‌ inquiry‌‌  authority.‌  ‌ Under‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution,‌  ‌the‌  ‌“‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌purse‌” ‌ ‌belongs‌  ‌to‌‌ 
is‌‌co-extensive‌‌with‌‌the‌‌power‌‌to‌‌legislate‌."‌  ‌
United‌  ‌States‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Nixon‌  ‌held‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌claim‌  ‌of‌  ‌executive‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌is‌‌  Congress.‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 21‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

5. the‌‌Ombudsman.‌  ‌
Likewise,‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌exercises‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌scrutiny‌  ‌thru‌  ‌its‌‌  is‌  ‌primarily‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌protection‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌people‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌body‌  ‌politic‌, ‌‌
power‌  ‌of‌  ‌confirmation.‌  ‌Through‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌confirmation,‌‌  and‌‌not‌‌for‌‌the‌‌punishment‌‌of‌‌the‌‌offender.‌  ‌
In‌‌re‌‌Gonzales‌  ‌
Congress‌‌shares‌‌in‌‌the‌‌appointing‌‌power‌‌of‌‌the‌‌executive.‌  ‌ The‌‌one-year‌‌bar‌‌rule‌  ‌
A‌  ‌public‌  ‌officer‌  ‌who‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌is‌  ‌required‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌‌
b. Investigation.‌‌
  — ‌‌‌Congressional‌‌ investigation‌‌ involves‌‌ a ‌‌more‌‌  Member‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌
  Philippine‌‌   Bar‌‌
  as‌‌
  a ‌‌qualification‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ office‌‌ held‌‌ by‌‌  Article‌  ‌XI,‌  ‌Section‌  ‌3,‌  ‌paragraph‌  ‌(5)‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌reads:‌  ‌"No‌‌ 
intense‌  ‌digging‌  ‌of‌  ‌facts.‌  ‌As‌  ‌now‌  ‌contained‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌1987‌‌  him‌  ‌and‌  ‌who‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌removed‌  ‌from‌  ‌office‌  ‌only‌  ‌by‌  ‌impeachment,‌‌  impeachment‌  ‌proceedings‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌initiated‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌ 
Constitution,‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌to‌  ‌investigate‌  ‌is‌‌  cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌charged‌  ‌with‌  ‌disbarment‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌‌   incumbency‌‌   of‌‌  official‌‌more‌‌than‌‌once‌‌within‌‌a‌‌period‌‌of‌‌one‌‌year."‌  ‌
circumscribed‌‌by‌‌three‌‌limitations,‌‌namely:‌‌   ‌ such‌‌public‌‌officer.‌‌   ‌ Francisco‌  states‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌term‌  ‌"‌initiate‌" ‌ ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌filing‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
a) it‌‌must‌‌be‌‌in‌‌aid‌‌of‌‌its‌‌legislative‌‌functions,‌  ‌ impeachment‌‌   complaint‌‌   coupled‌‌   with‌‌
  Congress'‌‌  taking‌‌   initial‌‌  action‌‌ 
A‌  ‌Member‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Supreme‌  ‌Court‌  ‌must‌  ‌first‌  ‌be‌‌  removed‌‌
  from‌‌  office‌‌ 
b) it‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌conducted‌  ‌in‌  ‌accordance‌  ‌with‌  ‌duly‌  ‌published‌‌  via‌‌  the‌‌
  constitutional‌‌   route‌‌
  of‌‌
  impeachment.‌‌ Should‌‌ the‌‌ tenure‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  of‌  ‌said‌  ‌complaint.‌  ‌The‌  ‌initial‌  ‌action‌  ‌taken‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌House‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌ 
rules‌‌of‌‌procedure,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ Supreme‌  ‌Court‌  ‌Justice‌  ‌be‌  ‌thus‌  ‌terminated‌‌   by‌‌   impeachment,‌‌   he‌‌
  may‌‌  complaint‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌referral‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌complaint‌  ‌to‌‌
  the‌‌   Committee‌‌   on‌‌ 
c) the‌  ‌persons‌  ‌appearing‌  ‌therein‌  ‌are‌  ‌afforded‌  ‌their‌‌  then‌‌be‌‌held‌‌to‌‌answer‌‌either‌‌criminally‌‌or‌‌administratively.‌  ‌ Justice‌. ‌ ‌
constitutional‌‌rights.‌  ‌ Referring‌  ‌the‌  ‌complaint‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌proper‌  ‌committee‌  ‌ignites‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Grounds.‌‌—‌f‌ or,‌‌and‌c
‌ onviction‌o
‌ f,‌‌   ‌
c. Supervision.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌This‌  ‌connotes‌  ‌a ‌ ‌continuing‌  ‌and‌  ‌informed‌‌  impeachment‌‌ proceeding‌. ‌‌ With‌‌ a ‌‌‌simultaneous‌‌ referral‌‌ of‌‌ multiple‌‌ 
awareness‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌congressional‌  ‌committee‌  ‌regarding‌‌  1. culpable‌‌violation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Constitution,‌‌   ‌ complaints‌‌   filed,‌‌
  more‌‌  than‌‌   one‌‌
  lighted‌‌
  matchsticks‌‌   light‌‌
  the‌‌
  candle‌‌ 
executive‌  ‌operations‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌given‌  ‌administrative‌‌   area.‌‌  While‌‌  both‌‌  at‌‌
  the‌‌
  same‌‌  time. ‌‌
  ‌What‌‌  is‌‌ important‌‌ is‌‌ that‌‌ there‌‌ should‌‌ only‌‌ be‌‌ 
2. treason,‌‌   ‌ ONE‌‌   CANDLE‌‌ that‌‌ is‌‌ kindled‌‌ in‌‌ a ‌‌year,‌‌ such‌‌ that‌‌ once‌‌ the‌‌ candle‌‌ 
congressional‌  ‌scrutiny‌  ‌and‌  ‌investigation‌  ‌involve‌  ‌inquiry‌  ‌into‌‌ 
past‌  ‌executive‌  ‌branch‌  ‌actions‌  ‌in‌  ‌order‌  ‌to‌  ‌influence‌  ‌future‌‌  3. bribery,‌‌   ‌ starts‌‌   burning,‌‌  subsequent‌‌   matchsticks‌‌ can‌‌ no‌‌ longer‌‌ rekindle‌‌ 
executive‌‌  branch‌‌ performance,‌‌ congressional‌‌ supervision‌‌ allows‌‌  the‌‌candle‌. ‌ ‌
4. graft‌‌and‌‌corruption,‌‌   ‌
Congress‌  ‌to‌  ‌scrutinize‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌delegated‌  ‌law-making‌  Indubitably,‌‌
  an‌‌
  impeachment‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ a ‌‌judicial‌‌ proceeding,‌‌ but‌‌ rather‌‌ a ‌‌
authority,‌  ‌and‌  ‌permits‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌to‌  ‌retain‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌‌
  that‌‌
  delegated‌‌  5. other‌‌high‌‌crimes,‌‌or‌‌   ‌ political‌‌exercise‌.‌‌(‌Resolution‌) ‌ ‌
authority.‌  ‌ 6. betrayal‌‌of‌‌public‌‌trust.‌ 
Non-legislative‌  ‌ Procedure‌  ‌ Gonzales‌‌III‌‌v.‌‌Office‌‌of‌‌the‌‌President‌‌2
‌ 014‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌

Informing‌‌function‌  ‌ Gutierrez‌‌v.‌‌The‌‌House‌‌of‌‌Representatives‌‌Committee‌‌on‌‌Justice‌‌  Section‌  ‌8(2)‌  ‌of‌  ‌RA‌  ‌No.‌  ‌6770‌  ‌vesting‌  ‌disciplinary‌  ‌authority‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
2011‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Decision‌  ‌ President‌‌   over‌‌  the‌‌
  Deputy‌‌   Ombudsman‌‌   violates‌‌ the‌‌ independence‌‌ of‌‌ 
The‌‌
  legislature’s‌‌   informing‌‌   function‌‌   should‌‌ be‌‌ preferred‌‌ to‌‌ its‌‌  the‌‌Office‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Ombudsman‌‌and‌‌is‌‌thus‌‌unconstitutional‌. ‌ ‌
legislative‌  ‌function‌. ‌ ‌Even‌  ‌more‌  ‌important‌  ‌than‌  ‌legislation‌  ‌is‌‌   the‌‌  The‌  ‌determination‌  ‌of‌  ‌sufficiency‌  ‌of‌  ‌form‌  ‌and‌  ‌substance‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌‌ 
The‌  ‌Office‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Ombudsman,‌  ‌by‌  ‌express‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌mandate,‌‌ 
instruction‌‌  and‌‌   guidance‌‌  in‌‌
  political‌‌ affairs‌‌ which‌‌ the‌‌ people‌‌ might‌‌  impeachment‌‌   complaint‌‌
  is‌‌
  an‌‌
  exponent‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  express‌‌ constitutional‌‌ 
includes‌  ‌its‌  ‌key‌  ‌officials,‌  ‌all‌  ‌of‌  ‌them‌  ‌tasked‌  ‌to‌  ‌support‌  ‌the‌‌ 
receive‌‌
  from‌‌  a ‌‌body‌‌   which‌‌  kept‌‌  all‌‌
  national‌‌  concerns‌‌
  suffused‌‌ in‌‌ a ‌ grant‌  ‌of‌  ‌rule-making‌  ‌powers‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  House‌‌  of‌‌
  Representatives‌‌   which‌‌ 
Ombudsman‌  ‌in‌  ‌carrying‌  ‌out‌  ‌her‌  ‌mandate.‌  ‌What‌  ‌is‌  ‌true‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌ 
broad‌  ‌daylight‌  ‌of‌  ‌discussion.‌  ‌(‌Separate‌  ‌Opinion,‌  ‌Justice‌  ‌Puno‌, ‌‌ committed‌‌such‌‌determinative‌‌function‌‌to‌‌public‌‌respondent.‌  ‌
Ombudsman‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌equally‌  ‌and‌  ‌necessarily‌  ‌true‌  ‌for‌  ‌her‌‌ 
Macalintal‌‌v.‌‌Comelec,‌‌et‌‌al‌.)‌  ‌ ‌ A‌  ‌determination‌  ‌of‌  ‌what‌  ‌constitutes‌  ‌an‌  ‌impeachable‌  ‌offense‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌‌ Deputies‌  ‌who‌  ‌act‌  ‌as‌  ‌agents‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Ombudsman‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
purely‌  ‌political‌  ‌question‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌has‌  ‌left‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  performance‌‌of‌‌their‌‌duties.‌  ‌
Power‌‌of‌‌impeachment‌  ‌
sound‌‌discretion‌‌of‌‌the‌‌legislature.‌  ‌
Who‌‌may‌‌be‌‌impeached.‌‌—  ‌‌ ‌ Effect‌‌   ‌
It‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  for‌‌
  this‌‌
  Court‌‌   to‌‌ tell‌‌ a ‌‌co-equal‌‌ branch‌‌ of‌‌ government‌‌ ‌how‌‌ to‌‌ 
1. The‌‌President,‌‌   ‌ promulgate‌‌   ‌when‌‌  the‌‌
  Constitution‌‌   itself‌‌
  has‌‌
  not‌‌ prescribed‌‌ a ‌‌specific‌‌  Art‌  ‌XI‌  ‌Sec‌  ‌3[7].‌  ‌Judgment‌  ‌in‌  ‌cases‌  ‌of‌  ‌impeachment‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌‌ 
method‌‌   of‌‌
  promulgation‌. ‌‌   ‌The‌‌   Court‌‌  is‌‌
  in‌‌
  no‌‌
  position‌‌  to‌‌
  dictate‌‌   a ‌‌ extend‌  ‌further‌‌   than‌‌  ‌removal‌‌  from‌‌  office‌‌  and‌‌
  ‌disqualification‌‌   to‌‌ 
2. the‌‌Vice-President,‌‌   ‌
mode‌‌of‌‌promulgation‌‌beyond‌‌the‌‌dictates‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Constitution.‌  hold‌  ‌any‌  ‌office‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌Republic‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines,‌  ‌but‌  ‌the‌‌ 
3. the‌‌Members‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Supreme‌‌Court,‌‌   ‌ party‌  ‌convicted‌  ‌shall‌  ‌nevertheless‌  ‌be‌  ‌liable‌  ‌and‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌‌ 
It‌  ‌bears‌  ‌stressing‌  ‌that,‌  ‌unlike‌  ‌the‌  ‌process‌  ‌of‌  ‌inquiry‌  ‌in‌  ‌aid‌  ‌of‌‌ 
4. the‌‌Members‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Constitutional‌‌Commissions,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ legislation‌‌   where‌‌ the‌‌ rights‌‌ of‌‌ witnesses‌‌ are‌‌ involved,‌‌ ‌impeachment‌‌  prosecution,‌‌trial,‌‌and‌‌punishment,‌‌according‌‌to‌‌law.‌‌   ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 22‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

Barcenas‌‌v.‌‌House‌‌of‌‌Representatives‌  ‌ b) the‌‌Office‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Ombudsman,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
Rufino‌‌v.‌‌Endriga‌  ‌
Section‌  ‌3 ‌ ‌(1)‌  ‌of‌  ‌Art‌  ‌XI‌  ‌speaks‌  ‌of‌  ‌initiating‌‌
  "‌cases‌‌
  of‌‌
  impeachment"‌‌  c) as‌  ‌Secretaries,‌  ‌Undersecretaries,‌  ‌chairmen‌  ‌or‌  ‌heads‌  ‌of‌‌ 
while‌  ‌Section‌  ‌3 ‌ ‌(5)‌  ‌pertains‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌initiation‌  ‌of‌  ‌"impeachment‌‌  The‌‌   President‌‌   appoints‌‌   the‌‌
  first‌‌ group‌‌ of‌‌ officers‌‌ ‌with‌‌ ‌the‌‌ consent‌  bureaus‌‌or‌‌offices,‌‌including‌‌GOCCs‌‌and‌‌their‌‌subsidiaries.‌  ‌
proceedings‌."‌  ‌"Cases,"‌  ‌no‌  ‌doubt,‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌those‌  ‌filed‌  ‌before‌  ‌the‌‌  of‌  ‌the‌  ‌CA.‌  ‌The‌  ‌President‌  ‌appoints‌‌   the‌‌  ‌second‌‌   and‌‌
  third‌‌   groups‌‌
  of‌‌ 
Senate.‌  ‌Its‌  ‌use‌  ‌and‌  ‌its‌  ‌sense‌  ‌are‌  ‌consistent‌  ‌throughout‌  ‌Section‌  ‌3.‌‌  officers‌‌   ‌without‌‌   ‌the‌‌
  consent‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌   CA.‌‌  The‌‌  President‌‌   appoints‌‌
  the‌‌  Sec‌  ‌15.‌‌
  ‌Two‌‌
  months‌‌   immediately‌‌   before‌‌  the‌‌   next‌‌
  presidential‌‌ 
Thus,‌  ‌Section‌  ‌3(6)‌  ‌states,‌  ‌“The‌  ‌Senate‌  ‌shall‌  ‌have‌  ‌the‌  ‌sole‌‌   power‌‌  to‌‌  third‌  ‌group‌  ‌of‌  ‌officers‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌is‌  ‌silent‌‌   on‌‌
  who‌‌
  is‌‌
  the‌‌
  appointing‌‌  elections‌  ‌and‌  ‌up‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌end‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌term‌, ‌ ‌a ‌ ‌President‌  ‌or‌  ‌Acting‌‌ 
decide‌  ‌all‌  ‌cases‌  ‌[not‌  ‌"proceedings"]‌  ‌of‌‌   impeachment."‌‌   Section‌‌
  3(7)‌‌  power,‌  ‌or‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌authorizing‌  ‌the‌  ‌head‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌department,‌  ‌agency,‌‌ 
President‌s‌ hall‌‌not‌‌make‌‌appointments‌,‌‌except‌‌   ‌
provides,‌  ‌"Judgment‌  ‌in‌  ‌cases‌  ‌[not‌  ‌"proceedings"]‌  ‌of‌  ‌impeachment‌  commission,‌‌   or‌‌  board‌‌   to‌‌
  appoint‌‌   is‌‌  declared‌‌   unconstitutional.‌‌ Thus,‌‌ 
shall‌‌
  not‌‌
  extend‌‌ further‌‌ than‌‌ removal‌‌ from‌‌ office‌‌ and‌‌ disqualification‌‌  if‌  ‌Section‌  ‌6(b)‌  ‌and‌  ‌(c)‌  ‌of‌  ‌PD‌  ‌15‌  ‌is‌  ‌found‌  ‌unconstitutional,‌  ‌the‌‌  a) temporary‌‌appointments‌‌   ‌
to‌‌hold‌‌any‌‌office...."‌  ‌ President‌  ‌shall‌  ‌appoint‌  ‌the‌  ‌trustees‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌CCP‌  ‌Board‌  ‌because‌  ‌the‌‌  b) to‌‌executive‌‌positions‌‌   ‌
trustees‌‌fall‌‌under‌‌the‌‌third‌‌group‌‌of‌‌officers.‌  ‌
ii. Executive‌  ‌ c) when‌  ‌continued‌  ‌vacancies‌  ‌therein‌  ‌will‌  ‌prejudice‌  ‌public‌‌ 
The‌  ‌CCP‌  ‌must‌  ‌fall‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌Executive‌  ‌branch.‌  ‌Under‌  ‌the‌  ‌Revised‌‌ 
service‌‌or‌‌endanger‌‌public‌‌safety.‌  ‌
 ‌ Administrative‌‌   Code‌‌   of‌‌
  1987,‌‌  any‌‌
  agency‌‌ "not‌‌ placed‌‌ by‌‌ law‌‌ or‌‌ order‌‌ 
creating‌‌   them‌‌
  under‌‌   any‌‌  specific‌‌
  department"‌‌   falls‌‌
  "under‌‌   the‌‌
  Office‌‌ 
Power‌‌of‌‌appointment‌  ‌ De‌‌Castro‌‌v.‌‌JBC‌‌2
‌ 010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
of‌‌the‌‌President."‌  ‌
Gov‌‌of‌‌Phil‌‌Islands‌‌v.‌‌Springer‌  ‌ Section‌  ‌6(b)‌  ‌and‌  ‌(c)‌  ‌of‌  ‌PD‌  ‌15‌  ‌makes‌  ‌the‌  ‌CCP‌  ‌a ‌ ‌self-perpetuating‌‌  Prohibition‌  ‌under‌  ‌Section‌  ‌15,‌  ‌Article‌  ‌VII‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌apply‌  ‌to‌‌ 
entity,‌  ‌virtually‌  ‌outside‌  ‌the‌  ‌control‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌  President.‌‌   ‌Such‌‌
  a ‌‌public‌‌  appointments‌‌   to‌‌
  fill‌‌
  a ‌‌vacancy‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ Supreme‌‌ Court‌‌ or‌‌ to‌‌ other‌‌ 
Appointment‌‌   to‌  ‌office‌‌
  is‌‌ intrinsically‌‌ an‌‌ executive‌‌ act‌‌ involving‌‌  office‌  ‌or‌  ‌board‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌legally‌  ‌exist‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌1987‌‌  appointments‌‌to‌‌the‌‌Judiciary.‌  ‌
the‌‌exercise‌‌of‌‌discretion.‌‌   ‌ Constitution‌. ‌ ‌ Given‌‌
  the‌‌
  background‌‌   and‌‌   rationale‌‌
  for‌‌  the‌‌ prohibition‌‌ in‌‌ Section‌‌ 15,‌‌ 
Art‌  ‌VII‌  ‌Sec‌  ‌16.‌  ‌The‌  ‌President‌  ‌shall‌  ‌nominate‌  ‌and,‌  ‌WITH‌  ‌the‌‌  Article‌  ‌VII,‌  ‌we‌  ‌have‌  ‌no‌  ‌doubt‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitutional‌  ‌Commission‌‌ 
Upon‌‌recommendation‌‌of‌‌JBC‌‌   ‌ confined‌  ‌the‌  ‌prohibition‌  ‌to‌  ‌appointments‌  ‌made‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
consent‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Commission‌‌on‌‌Appointments‌,‌‌appoint‌‌   ‌
a) Members‌‌   of‌‌
  SC‌‌  and‌‌
  all‌‌
  other‌‌
  courts.‌‌
  — ‌‌Art‌‌   VIII‌‌   Sec‌‌
  9.‌‌ ‌The‌‌  Executive‌  ‌Department.‌  ‌The‌  ‌framers‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌  ‌need‌  ‌to‌  ‌extend‌  ‌the‌‌ 
a) the‌‌heads‌‌of‌‌the‌‌executive‌‌departments,‌‌   ‌ prohibition‌  ‌to‌  ‌appointments‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Judiciary,‌  ‌because‌  ‌their‌‌ 
Members‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ Supreme‌‌ Court‌‌ and‌‌ judges‌‌ of‌‌ lower‌‌ courts‌‌ shall‌‌ 
b) ambassadors,‌‌other‌‌public‌‌ministers‌‌and‌‌consuls,‌‌or‌‌   ‌ establishment‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌JBC‌  ‌ensured‌  ‌that‌  ‌there‌  ‌would‌  ‌no‌  ‌longer‌  ‌be‌‌ 
be‌  ‌appointed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌from‌  ‌a ‌ ‌list‌  ‌of‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌three‌‌ 
midnight‌‌appointments‌‌to‌‌the‌‌Judiciary.‌‌   ‌
c) officers‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌armed‌  ‌forces‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌rank‌  ‌of‌  ‌colonel‌  ‌or‌‌  nominees‌  ‌preferred‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌Judicial‌  ‌and‌  ‌Bar‌  ‌Council‌  ‌for‌‌   every‌‌ 
naval‌‌captain,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ vacancy.‌S‌ uch‌‌appointments‌‌need‌‌no‌‌confirmation.‌  ‌ Interim‌‌or‌‌recess‌‌appointments‌‌   ‌

d) other‌  ‌officers‌  ‌whose‌  ‌appointments‌  ‌are‌  ‌vested‌  ‌in‌  ‌him‌  ‌in‌‌  b) Ombudsman‌  ‌and‌  ‌deputies.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Art‌  ‌XI‌  ‌Sec‌  ‌9.‌  ‌The‌‌  Art‌  ‌VII‌  ‌Sec‌  ‌16(2).‌  ‌The‌  ‌President‌  ‌shall‌  ‌have‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌make‌‌ 
this‌‌Constitution.‌‌   ‌ Ombudsman‌  ‌and‌  ‌his‌  ‌Deputies‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌appointed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌  appointments‌‌   during‌‌   the‌‌
  recess‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌ Congress,‌‌ whether‌‌ voluntary‌‌ 
President‌  ‌from‌  ‌a ‌ ‌list‌  ‌of‌  ‌at‌‌
  least‌‌
  six‌‌
  nominees‌‌   prepared‌‌  by‌‌  the‌‌  or‌‌  compulsory,‌‌   but‌‌
  such‌‌  appointments‌‌   shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  effective‌‌   only‌‌ until‌‌ 
i) The‌‌   regular‌‌
  members‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  JBC‌‌
  shall‌‌ be‌‌ appointed‌‌ by‌‌ 
JBC,‌  ‌and‌  ‌from‌  ‌a ‌ ‌list‌  ‌of‌  ‌three‌  ‌nominees‌  ‌for‌  ‌every‌  ‌vacancy‌‌  disapproved‌‌   by‌‌  the‌‌
  Commission‌‌   on‌‌  Appointments‌‌   or‌‌ until‌‌ the‌‌ next‌‌ 
the‌‌  President‌‌   for‌‌
  a ‌‌term‌‌  of‌‌ four‌‌ years‌‌ with‌‌ the‌‌ consent‌‌ 
thereafter.‌  ‌Such‌  ‌appointments‌  ‌shall‌  ‌require‌  ‌no‌‌  adjournment‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Congress.‌  ‌
of‌‌the‌‌CA.‌‌(A
‌ rt‌‌VIII‌‌Sec‌‌8[2]‌) ‌ ‌
confirmation.‌  ‌All‌  ‌vacancies‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌filled‌  ‌within‌  ‌three‌‌  Guevara‌‌v.‌‌Inocentes‌  ‌
He‌‌shall‌‌also‌‌appoint‌‌   ‌ months‌‌after‌‌they‌‌occur.‌  ‌
a) all‌  ‌other‌  ‌officers‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  Government‌‌
  whose‌‌
  appointments‌‌  It‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌clear‌  ‌intent‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌framers‌  ‌of‌  ‌our‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌to‌  ‌make‌  ‌a ‌‌
Prohibition‌‌against‌‌Nepotism‌‌and‌‌Midnight‌‌Appointments‌  ‌
recess‌‌appointment‌‌‌effective‌‌only‌‌   ‌
are‌‌not‌‌otherwise‌‌provided‌‌for‌‌by‌‌law,‌‌and‌‌   ‌
Sec‌  ‌13[2].‌  ‌The‌  ‌spouse‌  ‌and‌  ‌relatives‌  ‌by‌  ‌consanguinity‌  ‌or‌‌  a) until‌‌disapproval‌‌by‌‌the‌‌Commission‌‌on‌‌Appointments,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
b) those‌‌whom‌‌he‌‌may‌‌be‌‌authorized‌‌by‌‌law‌‌to‌‌appoint.‌‌   ‌ affinity‌‌
  within‌‌   the‌‌
  fourth‌‌   civil‌‌   degree‌‌   ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌ President‌‌ shall‌‌ not,‌‌ 
b) until‌  ‌the‌  ‌next‌  ‌adjournment‌  ‌of‌  ‌Congress,‌  ‌and‌  ‌never‌  ‌a ‌ ‌day‌‌ 
The‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌may,‌  ‌by‌‌   law,‌‌
  vest‌‌
  the‌‌
  appointment‌‌   of‌‌  ‌other‌‌   officers‌‌  during‌‌his‌‌tenure,‌‌be‌‌appointed‌‌as‌‌   ‌ longer‌‌regardless‌‌of‌‌the‌‌nature‌‌of‌‌the‌‌session‌‌adjourned.‌  ‌
lower‌‌   in‌‌ rank‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ President‌‌ alone,‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ courts,‌‌ or‌‌ ‌in‌‌ the‌‌ heads‌‌  a) Members‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Constitutional‌‌Commissions,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
of‌‌departments,‌‌agencies,‌‌commissions,‌‌or‌‌boards.‌  ‌ De‌‌Rama‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 23‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

Power‌‌of‌‌control‌‌and‌‌supervision‌  ‌
There‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌law‌  ‌that‌  ‌prohibits‌  ‌local‌  ‌elective‌  ‌officials‌  ‌from‌  ‌making‌‌ 
The‌‌phrase‌‌“w
‌ ithout‌‌reappointment‌”‌‌applies‌‌only‌‌to‌‌one‌‌who‌‌   ‌
appointments‌‌during‌‌the‌‌last‌‌days‌‌of‌‌his‌‌or‌‌her‌‌tenure.‌  ‌ Section‌  ‌17.‌  ‌The‌‌
  President‌‌
  shall‌‌   ‌control‌‌
  have‌‌   ‌of‌‌  all‌‌  the‌‌  executive‌‌ 
1. has‌‌been‌‌appointed‌b
‌ y‌‌the‌‌President‌‌and‌‌   ‌
The‌‌
  constitutional‌‌ prohibition‌‌ on‌‌ so-called‌‌ "midnight‌‌ appointments,"‌‌  departments,‌‌  bureaus,‌‌  and‌‌
  offices.‌‌   shall‌‌ ensure‌‌ that‌‌ the‌ ‌laws‌‌ be‌‌ 
  He‌‌
applies‌‌only‌‌to‌‌the‌‌President‌‌or‌‌Acting‌‌President.‌  ‌ 2. confirmed‌‌   ‌by‌‌ the‌‌ CA,‌‌ ‌whether‌‌ or‌‌ not‌‌ such‌‌ person‌‌ completes‌‌  faithfully‌‌executed‌. ‌ ‌
his‌‌term‌‌of‌‌office.‌   ‌ ‌
Matibag‌‌v.‌‌Benipayo‌  ‌ There‌‌
  must‌‌  be‌‌
  a ‌‌confirmation‌‌
  by‌‌ the‌‌ CA‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ previous‌‌ appointment‌‌  ⭐‌PIDS‌‌v.‌‌COA‌‌2
‌ 019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌
before‌‌the‌‌prohibition‌‌on‌‌reappointment‌‌can‌‌apply.‌  ‌
An‌‌   ‌ad‌‌
  interim‌‌   appointment‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌‌permanent‌‌ ‌appointment‌‌ because‌‌ it‌‌  There‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌‌
  absolute‌‌
  or‌‌
  categorical‌‌   rule‌‌
  stating‌‌  that‌‌
  a ‌‌Senior‌‌  Deputy‌‌ 
takes‌  ‌effect‌  ‌immediately‌  ‌and‌  ‌can‌  ‌no‌  ‌longer‌  ‌be‌  ‌withdrawn‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌  Power‌‌to‌‌remove‌‌   ‌ Executive‌  ‌Secretary‌  ‌has‌  ‌no‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌‌
  act‌‌
  on‌‌
  his‌‌
  own‌‌  or‌‌
  in‌‌
  default‌‌
  of‌‌ 
President‌‌   once‌‌   the‌‌
  appointee‌‌
  has‌‌   qualified‌‌  into‌‌ office.‌‌ The‌‌ fact‌‌ that‌‌ it‌‌  the‌  ‌Executive‌  ‌Secretary‌  ‌by‌  ‌authority‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌generally‌  ‌or‌‌ 
is‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌confirmation‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌CA‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌alter‌  ‌its‌  ‌permanent‌‌  Gonzales‌‌III‌‌v.‌‌OP‌‌2
‌ 012‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ specifically.‌  ‌
character.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Constitution‌‌   itself‌‌   makes‌‌
  an‌‌  ad‌‌
  interim‌‌   appointment‌‌  Under‌‌ the‌‌ ‌doctrine‌‌ of‌‌ implication‌, ‌‌the‌‌ power‌‌ to‌‌ appoint‌‌ carries‌‌ with‌‌  While‌‌
  this‌‌
  may‌‌
  be‌‌ true,‌‌ ‌the‌‌ authority‌‌ to‌‌ issue‌‌ the‌‌ exemption‌‌ must‌‌ 
permanent‌  ‌in‌  ‌character‌  ‌by‌  ‌making‌  ‌it‌  ‌effective‌  ‌until‌  ‌disapproved‌‌   by‌‌  it‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌remove.‌  ‌As‌  ‌a ‌ ‌general‌  ‌rule‌, ‌ ‌therefore,‌  ‌all‌  ‌officers‌‌  nonetheless‌  ‌be‌  ‌done‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌express‌  ‌designation‌  ‌and‌‌ 
the‌‌CA‌‌or‌‌until‌‌the‌‌next‌‌adjournment‌‌of‌‌Congress.‌  ‌ appointed‌‌by‌‌the‌‌President‌‌are‌‌also‌‌removable‌‌by‌‌him.‌‌   ‌ delegation‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌president‌  ‌through‌  ‌a ‌ ‌presidential‌  ‌or‌  ‌executive‌‌ 
A‌‌
  distinction‌‌  is‌‌
  thus‌‌
  made‌‌   between‌‌   the‌‌
  exercise‌‌
  of‌‌
  such‌‌ presidential‌‌  issuance.‌  ‌
The‌‌
  ‌exception‌‌
  ‌to‌‌
  this‌‌
  is‌‌
  when‌‌
  the‌‌ law‌‌ expressly‌‌ provides‌‌ otherwise.‌‌ 
prerogative‌  ‌requiring‌  ‌confirmation‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌CA‌  ‌when‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌is‌  ‌in‌‌  The‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌expressly‌  ‌separates‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌‌
  to‌‌
  remove‌‌  from‌‌
  the‌‌  Furthermore,‌  ‌it‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌stressed‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌Administrative‌  ‌Code‌‌ 
session‌‌‌and‌‌when‌‌it‌‌is‌‌‌in‌‌recess‌.  ‌‌ ‌ President's‌‌power‌‌to‌‌appoint.‌‌   ‌ explicitly‌  ‌grants‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌sign‌  ‌papers‌  ‌by‌  ‌authority‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
In‌‌
  the‌‌
  former,‌‌   the‌‌  President‌‌
  nominates,‌‌   and‌‌   only‌‌
  upon‌‌ the‌‌ consent‌‌ of‌‌  president‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌executive‌‌
  secretary‌. ‌‌‌It‌‌  grants‌‌
  no‌‌
  similar‌‌ authority‌‌ 
1. Under‌‌
  Sec‌‌  9 ‌‌Art‌‌
  VIII,‌‌
  the‌‌
  Members‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ Supreme‌‌ Court‌‌ and‌‌ 
the‌  ‌CA‌  ‌may‌  ‌the‌  ‌person‌  ‌thus‌  ‌named‌  ‌assume‌  ‌office.‌‌   It‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  so‌‌
  with‌‌  to‌‌a‌‌senior‌‌deputy‌‌executive‌‌secretary‌. ‌ ‌
judges‌‌of‌‌lower‌‌courts‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌appointed‌‌by‌‌the‌‌President.‌‌   ‌
reference‌  ‌to‌  ‌ad‌  ‌interim‌  ‌appointments.‌‌   It‌‌
  takes‌‌
  effect‌‌  at‌‌
  once.‌‌
  Thus,‌‌  There‌  ‌are‌  ‌powers‌  ‌vested‌  ‌in‌‌
  the‌‌
  President‌‌  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  Constitution‌‌   which‌‌ 
the‌  ‌term‌  ‌“‌ad‌  ‌interim‌  ‌appointment‌”,‌  ‌as‌  ‌used‌  ‌in‌  ‌letters‌  ‌of‌‌  a. However,‌  ‌Members‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Supreme‌  ‌Court‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌‌ 
may‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌‌
  delegated‌‌
  to‌‌
  or‌‌
  exercised‌‌  by‌‌
  an‌‌
  agent‌‌  or‌‌
  alter‌‌
  ego‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
appointment‌  ‌signed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌President,‌  ‌means‌  ‌a ‌ ‌permanent‌‌  removed‌‌  after‌‌
  ‌impeachment‌‌   ‌proceedings‌‌
  initiated‌‌ 
President.‌  ‌
appointment‌  ‌made‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌meantime‌  ‌that‌‌  by‌‌Congress‌‌(Sec‌‌2‌‌Art‌‌XI),‌‌   ‌
Congress‌‌is‌i‌ n‌‌recess‌. ‌ ‌ 1. The‌‌declaration‌‌of‌‌martial‌‌law,‌‌   ‌
b. while‌‌
  judges‌‌
  of‌‌
  lower‌‌
  courts‌‌
  may‌‌
  be‌‌
  removed‌‌ only‌‌ 
by‌‌the‌‌Supreme‌‌Court‌‌‌(Secs‌‌6‌‌and‌‌11,‌‌Art‌‌VIII).‌‌   ‌ 2. the‌‌suspension‌‌of‌‌the‌‌writ‌‌of‌‌habeas‌‌corpus,‌‌and‌‌   ‌
The‌‌Constitutionality‌‌of‌‌Renewals‌‌of‌‌Appointments‌  ‌
3. the‌‌exercise‌‌of‌‌the‌‌pardoning‌‌power,‌‌   ‌
There‌‌   is‌‌  no‌‌
  dispute‌‌   that‌‌  an‌‌
  ad‌‌
  interim‌‌  appointee‌‌
  disapproved‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌  2. The‌  ‌Chairpersons‌  ‌and‌  ‌Commissioners‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Constitutional‌‌ 
CA‌‌  can‌‌  no‌‌ longer‌‌ be‌‌ extended‌‌ a ‌‌new‌‌ appointment.‌  ‌The‌‌ disapproval‌‌ is‌‌  Commissions‌  ‌shall‌  ‌likewise‌‌   be‌‌
  appointed‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌
  President,‌‌  The‌  ‌list‌  ‌is‌‌
  by‌‌
  no‌‌
  means‌‌   exclusive,‌‌   but‌‌  there‌‌
  must‌‌
  be‌‌  a ‌‌showing‌‌
  that‌‌ 
a‌‌
  final‌‌
  decision‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ merits‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ CA‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ exercise‌‌ of‌‌ its‌‌ checking‌‌  but‌‌
  they‌‌
  may‌‌
  be‌‌
  removed‌‌   only‌‌
  by‌‌
  ‌impeachment‌‌ ‌(Sec‌‌ 2 ‌‌Art‌‌  the‌‌
  executive‌‌   power‌‌  in‌‌ question‌‌ is‌‌ of‌‌ similar‌‌ gravitas‌‌ and‌‌ exceptional‌‌ 
power‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌appointing‌  ‌authority‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌President.‌  ‌Since‌  ‌the‌‌  XI).‌‌   ‌ import.‌  ‌
Constitution‌‌   does‌‌   not‌‌  provide‌‌ for‌‌ any‌‌ appeal‌‌ from‌‌ such‌‌ decision,‌‌ the‌‌  3. The‌  ‌Ombudsman‌  ‌himself‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌appointed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
disapproval‌‌   is‌‌
  final‌‌   and‌‌   binding‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌
  appointee‌‌   as‌‌
  well‌‌  as‌‌ on‌  President‌  ‌(Sec‌  ‌9 ‌ ‌Art‌  ‌XI)‌  ‌but‌  ‌may‌  ‌also‌  ‌be‌  ‌removed‌  ‌only‌‌
  by‌‌  Nacino‌‌v.‌‌Office‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Ombudsman‌‌2
‌ 019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
the‌‌appointing‌‌power‌. ‌ ‌ impeachment‌‌(Sec‌‌2‌‌Art‌‌XI).‌  ‌
Aquino’s‌‌  actuations‌‌  do‌‌
  not‌‌
  constitute‌‌
  a ‌‌participation‌‌  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  planning‌‌ 
A‌  ‌by-passed‌  ‌appointment‌  ‌is‌  ‌one‌  ‌that‌  ‌has‌  ‌not‌  ‌been‌  ‌finally‌  ‌acted‌  In‌  ‌giving‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌remove‌‌   a ‌‌Deputy‌‌  Ombudsman‌‌  and‌  ‌implementation‌  ‌of‌  ‌Oplan‌  ‌Exodus‌  ‌since,‌  ‌as‌  ‌President‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
upon‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌
  merits‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌
  CA‌‌
  at‌‌
  the‌‌
  close‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ session‌‌ of‌‌ Congress.‌  ‌ and‌‌   Special‌‌  Prosecutor,‌‌
  Congress‌‌   simply‌‌   laid‌‌
  down‌‌   in‌‌
  express‌‌
  terms‌‌  Republic,‌‌  he‌‌
  does‌‌
  not‌‌  exercise‌‌  direct‌‌
  control‌‌  over‌‌ the‌‌ PNP‌‌ ‌under‌‌ 
There‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌final‌  ‌decision‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌CA.‌  ‌Absent‌  ‌such‌  ‌decision,‌  ‌the‌‌  an‌  ‌authority‌  ‌that‌  ‌is‌  ‌already‌  ‌implied‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌President's‌‌  the‌‌doctrine‌‌of‌‌qualified‌‌political‌‌agency.‌  ‌
President‌  ‌is‌  ‌free‌  ‌to‌  ‌renew‌  ‌the‌  ‌ad‌  ‌interim‌  ‌appointment‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌ constitutional‌‌ authority‌‌ to‌‌ appoint‌‌ the‌‌ aforesaid‌‌ officials‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ Office‌‌ 
by-passed‌‌appointee.‌  ‌ The‌‌  President‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  Republic‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Philippines‌‌   is‌‌
  NOT‌‌ part‌‌ of‌‌ 
of‌‌the‌‌Ombudsman.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌chain‌  ‌of‌  ‌command‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌PNP.‌  ‌Under‌  ‌Section‌  ‌26‌  ‌of‌  ‌RA‌  ‌No.‌‌ 
It‌  ‌is‌  ‌well‌  ‌settled‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌can‌‌  6975,‌‌   the‌‌
  command‌‌   and‌‌  direction‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ PNP‌‌ is‌‌ vested‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ Chief‌‌ of‌ 
renew‌‌the‌‌ad‌‌interim‌‌appointments‌‌of‌‌by-passed‌‌appointees.‌‌   ‌ the‌‌PNP.‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 24‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

The‌  ‌Court‌  ‌in‌  ‌Berdin‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Mascariñas‌  ‌expanded‌‌   the‌‌


  application‌‌   of‌‌  Art‌  ‌X ‌ ‌Sec‌  ‌4.‌  ‌The‌  ‌President‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌shall‌  ‌exercise‌ ‌
The‌  ‌President's‌  ‌power‌  ‌over‌  ‌the‌  ‌PNP‌  ‌is‌  ‌subsumed‌  ‌in‌  ‌his‌  ‌general‌‌ 
the‌‌ doctrine‌‌ of‌‌ qualified‌‌ political‌‌ agency‌. ‌‌In‌‌ that‌‌ case,‌‌ the‌‌ doctrine‌‌  general‌‌supervision‌‌‌over‌‌local‌‌governments.‌‌xxx.‌  ‌
power‌‌   of‌‌
  control‌‌  and‌‌ supervision‌‌ ‌over‌‌ the‌‌ executive‌‌ department‌‌ of‌‌ 
was‌‌   extended‌‌   to‌‌
  cover‌‌
  the‌‌  Assistant‌‌
  Regional‌‌ Director‌‌ as‌‌ an‌‌ alter‌‌ ego‌‌ 
the‌‌
  government.‌‌   In‌‌ fact,‌‌ ‌Carpio‌‌ v.‌‌ Executive‌‌ Secretary‌‌ held‌‌ that‌‌ "‌the‌‌  Section‌  ‌16.‌  ‌The‌  ‌President‌  ‌shall‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌general‌‌
  supervision‌ ‌
of‌‌the‌‌Finance‌‌Secretary.‌  ‌
national‌  ‌police‌  ‌force‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌fall‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌Commander-in-Chief‌‌ 
over‌  ‌autonomous‌  ‌regions‌  ‌to‌  ‌ensure‌  ‌that‌  ‌laws‌  ‌are‌  ‌faithfully‌‌ 
power‌  ‌of‌‌  the‌‌
  President.‌‌   As‌‌  a ‌‌civilian‌‌
  agency‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  government,‌‌
  it‌‌  is‌‌  While‌‌ this‌‌ Court‌‌ has‌‌ at‌‌ times‌‌ expanded‌‌ the‌‌ application‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ doctrine‌‌ 
only‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌‌  of‌  ‌qualified‌  ‌political‌  ‌agency,‌  ‌the‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌remains‌  ‌limited‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  executed.‌  ‌
executive‌‌control‌."‌  ‌ President's‌‌   executive‌‌   secretary‌‌ and‌‌ other‌‌ Cabinet‌‌ secretaries.‌‌ It‌‌ ‌does‌‌  Ganzon‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
not‌‌   extend‌‌   to‌‌
  deputy‌‌   executive‌‌
  secretaries‌‌   or‌‌
  assistant‌‌   deputy‌‌ 
Command‌  ‌responsibility‌  ‌has‌  ‌a ‌ ‌technical‌  ‌meaning.‌  ‌In‌  ‌Saez‌, ‌ ‌We‌‌  1. Local‌  ‌autonomy,‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution,‌  ‌involves‌  ‌a ‌ ‌mere‌‌ 
secretaries.‌  ‌
ruled‌  ‌that‌  ‌to‌  ‌hold‌  ‌someone‌  ‌liable‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌command‌‌  decentralization‌  ‌of‌  ‌administration‌, ‌ ‌not‌  ‌of‌  ‌power,‌  ‌in‌‌ 
responsibility,‌‌the‌‌following‌‌elements‌‌must‌‌obtain:‌‌   ‌ Executive‌‌departments‌‌and‌‌offices‌  ‌ which‌  ‌local‌  ‌officials‌  ‌remain‌  ‌accountable‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌central‌‌ 
a) the‌  ‌existence‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌superior-subordinate‌  ‌relationship‌‌  government‌‌in‌‌the‌‌manner‌‌the‌‌law‌‌may‌‌provide;‌  ‌
Biraogo‌‌v.‌‌Philippine‌‌Truth‌‌Commission‌‌2
‌ 010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
between‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌as‌  ‌superior‌  ‌and‌‌
  the‌‌
  perpetrator‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  2. The‌‌new‌‌Constitution‌‌does‌‌not‌‌prescribe‌‌federalism;‌ 
crime‌‌as‌‌his‌‌subordinate;‌  ‌ Does‌  ‌the‌  ‌creation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌PTC‌  ‌fall‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌ambit‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌  power‌‌
  to‌‌ 
3. The‌  ‌change‌  ‌in‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌language‌  ‌with‌  ‌respect‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
b) the‌  ‌superior‌  ‌knew‌  ‌or‌  ‌had‌  ‌reason‌  ‌to‌  ‌know‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌‌  reorganize‌  ‌as‌  ‌expressed‌  ‌in‌‌   Section‌‌   31‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Revised‌‌
  Administrative‌‌ 
supervision‌‌   clause‌‌ was‌‌ meant‌‌ but‌‌ to‌‌ deny‌‌ legislative‌‌ control‌‌ 
was‌‌about‌‌to‌‌be‌‌or‌‌had‌‌been‌‌committed;‌‌and‌  ‌ Code?‌  ‌NO.‌  ‌Section‌  ‌31‌  ‌contemplates‌‌   "‌reorganization‌" ‌‌as‌‌   limited‌‌
  by‌‌  over‌  ‌local‌  ‌governments;‌  ‌it‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌  ‌exempt‌  ‌the‌  ‌latter‌  ‌from‌‌ 
the‌‌following‌‌functional‌‌and‌‌structural‌‌lines:‌‌   ‌
c) the‌‌
  superior‌‌
  ‌failed‌‌
  to‌‌ take‌‌ the‌‌ necessary‌‌ and‌‌ reasonable‌‌  legislative‌‌  regulation‌‌   provided‌‌   regulation‌‌   is‌‌
  consistent‌‌   with‌‌ 
measures‌  ‌to‌  ‌prevent‌  ‌the‌  ‌criminal‌  ‌acts‌  ‌or‌  ‌punish‌  ‌the‌‌  1) restructuring‌  ‌the‌  ‌internal‌‌   organization‌‌
  of‌‌  the‌‌
  Office‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  the‌‌fundamental‌‌premise‌‌of‌‌autonomy;‌  ‌
perpetrators‌‌thereof.‌  ‌ President‌  ‌Proper‌  ‌by‌  ‌abolishing,‌  ‌consolidating‌  ‌or‌  ‌merging‌‌  4. Since‌‌
  local‌‌  governments‌‌   remain‌‌
  accountable‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  national‌‌ 
units‌  ‌thereof‌  ‌or‌  ‌transferring‌  ‌functions‌  ‌from‌  ‌one‌  ‌unit‌  ‌to‌‌  authority,‌‌
  the‌‌  latter‌‌
  may,‌‌
  by‌‌
  law,‌‌
  and‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌ manner‌‌ set‌‌ forth‌‌ 
In‌‌
  this‌‌
  case,‌‌
  since‌‌   Aquino‌‌  is‌‌ considered‌‌ a ‌‌superior‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ AFP‌‌ but‌‌ not‌‌ 
another;‌  ‌ therein,‌‌impose‌‌disciplinary‌‌action‌‌against‌‌local‌‌officials;‌  ‌
the‌‌  PNP‌‌  which‌‌  is‌‌ the‌‌ agency‌‌ involved‌‌ in‌‌ this‌‌ case,‌‌ the‌‌ first‌‌ element‌‌ is‌‌ 
not‌‌satisfied.‌  ‌ 2) transferring‌‌any‌‌function;‌‌or‌‌   ‌ 5. "‌Supervision‌" ‌ ‌and‌  ‌"‌investigation‌" ‌ ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌inconsistent‌‌ 
3) transferring‌‌   any‌‌
  agency‌, ‌‌under‌‌
  the‌‌
  Office‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ President‌‌  terms:‌  ‌"investigation"‌‌  does‌‌
  not‌‌
  signify‌‌
  "‌control‌" ‌‌‌which‌‌
  the‌ 
Doctrine‌‌of‌‌qualified‌‌political‌‌agency‌  ‌ to‌‌any‌‌other‌‌Department‌‌or‌‌Agency‌‌or‌‌vice‌‌versa;‌  ‌ President‌‌does‌‌not‌‌have.‌  ‌
DENR‌‌v.‌‌DENR‌‌Employees‌  ‌ The‌  ‌creation‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌office‌  ‌is‌  ‌nowhere‌  ‌mentioned‌, ‌ ‌much‌  ‌less‌‌ 
envisioned‌‌in‌‌said‌‌provision.‌  ‌ Dadole‌‌v.‌‌COA‌  ‌
It‌  ‌is‌  ‌apropos‌  ‌to‌  ‌reiterate‌  ‌the‌  ‌elementary‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌qualified‌‌ 
political‌  ‌agency‌. ‌ This‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌is‌  ‌corollary‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌control‌‌  While‌‌   the‌‌
  power‌‌   to‌‌ create‌‌ a ‌‌truth‌‌ commission‌‌ cannot‌‌ pass‌‌ muster‌‌ on‌‌  Whether‌‌LBC‌‌55‌‌of‌‌the‌‌DBM‌‌is‌‌void‌‌for‌‌going‌‌beyond‌‌the‌‌ 
power‌‌of‌‌the‌‌President‌‌‌as‌‌provided‌‌for‌‌under‌‌Article‌‌VII,‌‌Section‌‌17.‌  ‌ the‌‌   basis‌‌
  of‌‌
  P.D.‌‌ No.‌‌ 1416‌‌ as‌‌ amended‌‌ by‌‌ P.D.‌‌ No.‌‌ 1772,‌‌ ‌the‌‌ creation‌‌  supervisory‌‌powers‌‌of‌‌the‌‌President‌  ‌
of‌  ‌the‌  ‌PTC‌‌   finds‌‌   justification‌‌   under‌‌  S
‌ ection‌‌   17,‌‌
  Article‌‌   VII‌‌  ‌of‌‌  In‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌law,‌  ‌supervision‌  ‌means‌  ‌overseeing‌  ‌or‌‌   the‌‌
  power‌‌ 
In‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌at‌  ‌bar,‌  ‌the‌  ‌DENR‌  ‌Secretary‌  ‌can‌  ‌validly‌  ‌reorganize‌  ‌the‌‌ 
the‌‌   Constitution,‌‌   imposing‌‌   upon‌‌   the‌‌ President‌‌ the‌‌ duty‌‌ to‌‌ ensure‌‌ that‌‌  or‌  ‌authority‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌officer‌  ‌to‌  ‌see‌  ‌that‌  ‌subordinate‌  ‌officers‌  ‌perform‌‌ 
DENR‌‌   by‌‌  ordering‌‌   the‌‌  transfer‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌ DENR‌‌ XII‌‌ Regional‌‌ Offices‌‌ from‌‌ 
the‌‌laws‌‌are‌‌faithfully‌‌executed.‌‌(F ‌ aithful‌‌Execution‌‌Clause‌) ‌ ‌ their‌  ‌duties.‌  ‌Control‌, ‌ ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌hand,‌  ‌means‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌‌ 
Cotabato‌  ‌City‌  ‌to‌  ‌Koronadal,‌  ‌South‌  ‌Cotabato.‌  ‌The‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌this‌‌ 
authority‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌DENR‌  ‌Secretary,‌  ‌as‌‌   an‌‌  alter‌‌
  ego,‌‌
  is‌‌
  presumed‌‌  to‌‌
  be‌‌  One‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌recognized‌  ‌powers‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌granted‌  ‌pursuant‌  ‌to‌‌  officer‌  ‌to‌  ‌alter‌  ‌or‌  ‌modify‌  ‌or‌‌
  nullify‌‌   or‌‌
  set‌‌
  aside‌‌
  what‌‌
  a ‌‌subordinate‌‌ 
the‌  ‌acts‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌latter‌  ‌had‌‌  not‌‌
  expressly‌‌   repudiated‌‌  this‌  ‌constitutionally-mandated‌  ‌duty‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌create‌  ‌ad‌  ‌hoc‌‌  officer‌‌  has‌‌ done‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ performance‌‌ of‌‌ his‌‌ duties‌‌ and‌‌ to‌‌ substitute‌‌ the‌‌ 
the‌‌same.‌  ‌ committees‌. ‌‌This‌‌   flows‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌ obvious‌‌ need‌‌ to‌‌ ascertain‌‌ facts‌‌ and‌‌  judgment‌‌of‌‌the‌‌former‌‌for‌‌that‌‌of‌‌the‌‌latter.‌  ‌
determine‌  ‌if‌  ‌laws‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌faithfully‌  ‌executed.‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌in‌  ‌DOH‌  ‌v.‌‌  By‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌fiat,‌  ‌heads‌  ‌of‌  ‌political‌‌
  subdivisions‌‌   are‌‌  subject‌‌  to‌‌ 
In‌  ‌Chiongbian‌  ‌v.‌‌  Orbos‌, ‌‌this‌‌
  Court‌‌  stressed‌‌
  the‌‌
  rule‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  power‌‌ 
Camposano‌, ‌‌the‌‌   authority‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  President‌‌
  to‌‌
  create‌‌
  an‌‌ investigative‌‌  the‌  ‌President’s‌  ‌supervision‌  ‌only,‌‌   not‌‌
  control‌, ‌‌so‌‌
  long‌‌  as‌‌
  their‌‌
  acts‌‌ 
of‌‌  the‌‌
  President‌‌
  to‌‌
  reorganize‌‌  the‌‌ administrative‌‌ regions‌‌ carries‌‌ with‌‌ 
committee‌  ‌to‌  ‌look‌  ‌into‌  ‌the‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌charges‌  ‌filed‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌‌  are‌‌exercised‌‌within‌‌the‌‌sphere‌‌of‌‌their‌‌legitimate‌‌powers.‌‌   ‌
it‌‌the‌‌power‌‌to‌‌determine‌‌the‌‌regional‌‌centers.‌  ‌
employees‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌
  DOH‌‌   for‌‌ the‌‌ anomalous‌‌ purchase‌‌ of‌‌ medicines‌‌ was‌‌ 
upheld.‌  ‌ Any‌‌
  directive‌‌ therefore‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ President‌‌ or‌‌ any‌‌ of‌‌ his‌‌ or‌‌ her‌‌ alter‌‌ egos‌‌ 
⭐‌PIDS‌‌v.‌‌COA‌‌2
‌ 019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Leonen,‌‌J‌  ‌ seeking‌  ‌to‌  ‌alter‌  ‌the‌  ‌wisdom‌  ‌of‌‌
  a ‌‌law-conforming‌‌   judgment‌‌   on‌‌
  local‌‌ 
Local‌‌government‌‌units‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 25‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

related‌‌
  to‌‌
  rebellion‌‌  or‌‌
  invasion,‌‌
  the‌‌ Judge‌‌ need‌‌ not‌‌ inquire‌‌ into‌‌ 
affairs‌‌of‌‌an‌‌LGU‌‌is‌‌a‌‌patent‌n
‌ ullity‌. ‌ ‌
Generally,‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌repository‌  ‌of‌  ‌emergency‌  ‌powers.‌‌  the‌‌legality‌‌of‌‌his‌‌detention.‌  ‌
Does‌‌LBC‌‌55‌‌go‌‌beyond‌‌the‌‌law‌‌it‌‌seeks‌‌to‌‌implement?‌‌‌YES‌. ‌ ‌ Certainly,‌‌
  a ‌‌body‌‌   cannot‌‌   delegate‌‌  a ‌‌power‌‌  not‌‌  reposed‌‌   upon‌‌ it.‌‌  3. The‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌declare‌  ‌martial‌  ‌law‌. ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌For‌  ‌the‌  ‌latter‌  ‌two‌‌ 
The‌‌
  Framers‌‌   of‌‌
  our‌‌  Constitution‌‌ deemed‌‌ it‌‌ wise‌‌ to‌‌ allow‌‌ Congress‌‌ to‌‌ 
LBC‌  ‌55‌‌   provides‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌  additional‌‌   monthly‌‌   allowances‌‌   to‌‌
  be‌‌
  given‌‌  powers,‌‌the‌‌Constitution‌‌requires‌‌2‌‌requisites‌‌to‌‌concur:‌  ‌
grant‌  ‌emergency‌  ‌powers‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌President,‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌certain‌‌ 
by‌‌  an‌‌  LGU‌‌  ‌should‌‌   not‌‌  exceed‌‌   ‌P1K‌‌
  in‌‌
  provinces‌‌   and‌‌  cities‌‌
  and‌‌ P700‌‌  1) An‌‌actual‌‌invasion‌‌or‌‌rebellion‌;‌‌AND‌  ‌
conditions,‌‌thus:‌  ‌
in‌  ‌municipalities.‌  ‌Section‌  ‌458,‌  ‌par.‌  ‌(a)(1)(xi),‌  ‌of‌  ‌RA‌  ‌7160,‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌‌ 
that‌‌   supposedly‌‌   serves‌‌   as‌‌
  the‌‌
  legal‌‌
  basis‌‌  of‌‌
  LBC‌‌   55,‌‌
  allows‌‌ the‌‌ grant‌‌  1) There‌‌must‌‌be‌‌a‌w
‌ ar‌‌‌or‌‌other‌‌emergency‌. ‌ ‌ 2) That‌‌‌public‌‌safety‌‌‌requires‌‌it.‌  ‌
of‌  ‌additional‌  ‌allowances‌  ‌to‌  ‌judges‌  ‌“when‌  ‌the‌  ‌finances‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌city‌‌  2) The‌‌delegation‌‌must‌‌be‌‌for‌‌a‌l‌ imited‌‌period‌‌only‌. ‌ ‌ On‌‌declaring‌‌a‌‌state‌‌of‌‌rebellion‌  ‌
government‌  ‌allow.”‌  ‌The‌  ‌said‌  ‌provision‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌‌   authorize‌‌   setting‌‌
  a ‌‌ Section‌  ‌18,‌  ‌Article‌  ‌VII‌‌
  ‌does‌‌   not‌‌
  expressly‌‌   prohibit‌‌   ‌the‌‌
  President‌‌ 
definite‌‌maximum‌‌limit.‌  ‌ 3) The‌‌
  delegation‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ ‌subject‌‌ to‌‌ such‌‌ restrictions‌‌ as‌‌ the‌‌ 
from‌  ‌declaring‌  ‌a ‌ ‌state‌  ‌of‌  ‌rebellion.‌  ‌The‌  ‌President’s‌  ‌authority‌  ‌to‌‌ 
Congress‌‌may‌‌prescribe‌. ‌ ‌
declare‌‌   a ‌‌state‌‌
  of‌‌
  rebellion‌‌   springs‌‌  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  main‌‌ from‌‌ her‌‌ powers‌‌ ‌as‌‌ 
Emergency‌‌powers‌  ‌ 4) The‌  ‌emergency‌  ‌powers‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌exercised‌  ‌to‌  ‌carry‌  ‌out‌  ‌a ‌‌ chief‌  ‌executive‌  ‌and,‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌time,‌  ‌draws‌  ‌strength‌  ‌from‌  ‌her‌‌ 
national‌‌policy‌‌‌declared‌‌by‌‌Congress.‌  Commander-in-Chief‌‌powers.‌  ‌
Sec‌  ‌23(2)‌  ‌Art‌  ‌VI‌  ‌provides‌  ‌that‌  ‌in‌‌
  times‌‌
  of‌‌
  ‌war‌‌
  ‌or‌‌
  ‌other‌‌   national‌‌ 
emergency‌, ‌‌the‌‌ Congress‌‌ may,‌‌ ‌by‌‌ law‌, ‌‌authorize‌‌ the‌‌ President,‌‌ for‌‌  In‌  ‌Araneta‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Dinglasan‌, ‌ ‌this‌  ‌Court‌  ‌emphasized‌  ‌that‌  ‌legislative‌‌  In‌  ‌calling‌  ‌out‌  ‌the‌  ‌armed‌  ‌forces,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌declaration‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌state‌  ‌of‌‌ 
a‌  ‌limited‌  ‌period‌  ‌and‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌such‌  ‌restrictions‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌may‌‌  power,‌‌   through‌‌  which‌‌
  extraordinary‌‌   measures‌‌ are‌‌ exercised,‌‌ remains‌‌  rebellion‌‌   is‌‌
  an‌‌
  utter‌‌   ‌superfluity‌. ‌‌At‌‌   most,‌‌
  it‌‌
  only‌‌
  gives‌‌
  notice‌‌   to‌‌ 
prescribe,‌  ‌to‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌powers‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌and‌  ‌proper‌‌   to‌‌
  carry‌‌
  out‌‌
  a ‌‌ in‌‌Congress‌‌even‌‌in‌‌times‌‌of‌‌crisis.‌  the‌  ‌nation‌  ‌that‌  ‌such‌  ‌a ‌ ‌state‌  ‌exists.‌  ‌Sanlakas‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Reyes‌  ‌finds‌  ‌that‌‌ 
declared‌‌   national‌‌   policy‌. ‌‌Unless‌‌   sooner‌‌ withdrawn‌‌ by‌‌ resolution‌‌  such‌‌   a ‌‌declaration‌‌   is‌‌
  devoid‌‌   of‌‌  any‌‌
  legal‌‌  significance.‌  ‌For‌‌   all‌‌ legal‌‌ 
Here,‌  ‌PP‌  ‌1017‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌authorize‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌‌ 
of‌‌ the‌‌ Congress,‌‌ such‌‌ powers‌‌ shall‌‌ cease‌‌ upon‌‌ the‌‌ next‌‌ adjournment‌  emergency‌  ‌to‌  ‌temporarily‌  ‌take‌‌   over‌‌  or‌‌
  direct‌‌
  the‌‌
  operation‌‌   of‌‌  intents,‌t‌ he‌‌declaration‌‌is‌‌deemed‌‌not‌‌written.‌  ‌
thereof.‌  ‌ any‌  ‌privately‌  ‌owned‌  ‌public‌  ‌utility‌  ‌or‌  ‌business‌  ‌affected‌  ‌with‌‌  During‌‌  a ‌‌state‌‌
  of‌‌
  rebellion,‌‌ ‌Lacson‌‌ v.‌‌ Perez‌‌ tells‌‌ us‌‌ that‌‌ authorities‌‌ 
public‌‌interest‌‌without‌‌authority‌‌from‌‌Congress‌. ‌ ‌ may‌  ‌only‌  ‌resort‌  ‌to‌  ‌warrantless‌  ‌arrests‌  ‌of‌  ‌persons‌  ‌suspected‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Ampatuan‌‌v.‌‌Puno‌‌2
‌ 011‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌re‌‌Maguindanao‌‌Massacre‌  ‌
rebellion.‌‌   They‌‌
  should‌‌   not‌‌ be‌‌ based‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ declaration‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌"state‌‌ of‌‌ 
The‌  ‌President‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌  ‌proclaim‌  ‌a ‌ ‌national‌  ‌emergency‌  ‌invoking‌  ‌Sec‌‌  Agan‌‌v.‌‌PIATCO‌  ‌ rebellion."‌  ‌
23(2)‌  ‌of‌  ‌Art‌  ‌VI,‌  ‌only‌  ‌a ‌ ‌state‌  ‌of‌  ‌emergency‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌three‌  ‌places‌‌  Calling‌‌out‌‌powers‌  ‌
mentioned.‌  ‌The‌  ‌calling‌  ‌out‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌armed‌  ‌forces‌  ‌to‌  ‌prevent‌  ‌or‌‌  The‌  ‌temporary‌  ‌takeover‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌  ‌extends‌  ‌only‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
suppress‌  ‌lawless‌  ‌violence‌  ‌in‌  ‌such‌  ‌places‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌power‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌  operation‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  business‌‌  and‌‌
  not‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  ownership‌‌   thereof.‌‌  As‌‌
  such‌‌  IBP‌‌v.‌‌Zamora‌  ‌
Constitution‌  ‌directly‌  ‌vests‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌President.‌  ‌She‌‌   ‌did‌‌
  not‌‌
  need‌‌   a ‌‌ the‌  ‌government‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌required‌  ‌to‌  ‌compensate‌  ‌the‌  ‌private‌‌  When‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌calls‌  ‌the‌  ‌armed‌  ‌forces‌  ‌to‌  ‌prevent‌  ‌or‌  ‌suppress‌‌ 
congressional‌‌authority‌t‌ o‌‌exercise‌‌the‌‌same.‌  ‌ entity-owner‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌said‌  ‌business‌  ‌as‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌transfer‌  ‌of‌‌  lawless‌  ‌violence,‌  ‌invasion‌  ‌or‌  ‌rebellion,‌  ‌he‌  ‌necessarily‌  ‌exercises‌  ‌a ‌‌
ownership,‌  ‌whether‌  ‌permanent‌  ‌or‌  ‌temporary.‌  ‌The‌  ‌State‌  ‌in‌‌  effecting‌‌  discretionary‌  ‌power‌‌   ‌solely‌‌
  vested‌‌
  in‌‌
  his‌‌
  wisdom.‌‌   The‌‌
  Court,‌‌   thus,‌‌ 
On‌‌declaring‌‌a‌‌state‌‌of‌‌national‌‌emergency‌‌in‌D
‌ avid‌‌v.‌‌Arroyo‌  ‌ the‌‌temporary‌‌takeover‌‌is‌‌exercising‌‌its‌p ‌ olice‌‌power.‌  ‌ cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌called‌  ‌upon‌  ‌to‌  ‌overrule‌  ‌the‌  ‌President’s‌  ‌wisdom‌  ‌or‌‌ 
substitute‌‌its‌‌own.‌‌   ‌
A‌  ‌distinction‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌drawn‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌  ‌President's‌  ‌authority‌  ‌to‌‌  Commander-in-chief‌‌powers‌  ‌
declare‌  ‌"‌a ‌ ‌state‌  ‌of‌  ‌national‌  ‌emergency‌" ‌ ‌and‌  ‌to‌  ‌exercise‌‌  However‌, ‌ ‌this‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌prevent‌  ‌an‌  ‌examination‌  ‌of‌  ‌whether‌  ‌such‌‌ 
Graduated‌‌powers‌  ‌ power‌  ‌was‌  ‌exercised‌  ‌within‌  ‌permissible‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌limits‌  ‌or‌‌ 
emergency‌‌   powers‌. ‌‌To‌‌   the‌‌
  first,‌‌
  ‌Section‌‌
  18,‌‌
  Article‌‌
  VII‌‌
  grants‌‌ the‌‌ 
President‌  ‌such‌  ‌power,‌  ‌hence,‌  ‌no‌  ‌legitimate‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌objection‌‌  Sec‌  ‌18‌  ‌grants‌  ‌the‌  ‌President,‌  ‌as‌  ‌Commander-in-Chief,‌‌
  a ‌‌“‌sequence‌” ‌‌of‌‌  whether‌  ‌it‌  ‌was‌  ‌exercised‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌manner‌  ‌constituting‌  ‌grave‌  ‌abuse‌  ‌of‌‌ 
can‌‌be‌‌raised.‌‌But‌‌to‌‌the‌‌second,‌‌manifold‌‌constitutional‌‌issues‌‌arise.‌  ‌ “‌graduated‌‌powers.‌”‌‌From‌‌the‌‌most‌‌to‌‌the‌‌least‌‌benign,‌‌these‌‌are:‌‌   ‌ discretion.‌‌  It‌‌
  is‌‌
  ‌incumbent‌‌   upon‌‌   the‌‌
  petitioner‌‌  to‌‌
  show‌‌  that‌‌ the‌‌ 
President’s‌‌decision‌‌is‌‌totally‌‌bereft‌‌of‌‌factual‌‌basis.‌‌   ‌
President‌‌
  Arroyo‌‌
  ‌could‌‌
  validly‌‌
  declare‌‌   the‌‌
  existence‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌state‌‌ of‌‌  1. The‌  ‌calling‌  ‌out‌  ‌power.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌The‌  ‌only‌  ‌criterion‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌‌ 
national‌  ‌emergency‌  ‌even‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌absence‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Congressional‌‌  ‘‌whenever‌  ‌it‌‌
  becomes‌‌   necessary‌,’‌‌   the‌‌
  President‌‌
  may‌‌  call‌‌
  the‌‌  Congress‌‌   may‌‌
  revoke‌‌   the‌‌
  proclamation‌‌   of‌‌
  martial‌‌  law‌‌ or‌‌ suspension‌‌ 
enactment‌. ‌ ‌ armed‌‌ forces‌‌ ‘to‌‌ prevent‌‌ or‌‌ suppress‌‌ lawless‌‌ violence,‌‌ invasion‌‌  of‌  ‌the‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌writ‌  ‌of‌  ‌habeas‌  ‌corpus‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌may‌‌ 
or‌‌rebellion.’‌  ‌ review‌‌   the‌‌
  sufficiency‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  factual‌‌  basis‌‌ thereof.‌‌ However,‌‌ ‌there‌‌ is‌‌ 
But‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌emergency‌  ‌powers,‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌taking‌  ‌over‌  ‌of‌‌  no‌  ‌such‌  ‌equivalent‌  ‌provision‌  ‌dealing‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌revocation‌  ‌or‌‌ 
privately‌  ‌owned‌  ‌public‌  ‌utility‌  ‌or‌  ‌business‌  ‌affected‌  ‌with‌  ‌public‌‌  2. The‌‌ power‌‌ to‌‌ ‌suspend‌‌ the‌‌ privilege‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ writ‌ ‌of‌‌ habeas‌‌  review‌‌of‌‌the‌‌President’s‌‌action‌‌to‌‌call‌‌out‌‌the‌‌armed‌‌forces‌.  ‌‌ ‌
interest‌r‌ equires‌‌a‌‌delegation‌‌from‌‌Congress.‌  ‌ corpus.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌only‌  ‌the‌‌
  privilege‌‌
  that‌‌  is‌‌
  suspended,‌‌   not‌‌
  the‌‌ 
writ‌  ‌itself.‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌when‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person‌  ‌is‌  ‌detained‌  ‌for‌  ‌an‌  ‌offense‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 26‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

Declaration‌‌of‌‌martial‌‌law‌‌and‌‌suspension‌‌of‌‌the‌‌  being‌‌
  the‌‌
  only‌‌
  test‌‌
  for‌‌
  judicial‌‌
  review‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  President's‌‌ power‌‌  manner‌  ‌in‌  ‌which‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌deliberated‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌President's‌‌ 
privilege‌‌of‌‌the‌‌writ‌‌of‌‌habeas‌‌corpus;‌‌extension‌  ‌ to‌‌
  declare‌‌  martial‌‌
  law‌‌  and‌‌
  suspend‌‌  the‌‌
  privilege‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  writ‌‌
  of‌‌  request‌  ‌for‌  ‌extension‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌review‌. ‌‌
habeas‌‌corpus‌‌under‌‌Section‌‌18,‌‌Article‌‌VII.‌‌   ‌ (‌Lagman‌‌v.‌‌Pimentel‌‌III‌‌‌2018‌‌En‌‌Banc‌) ‌ ‌
1. Fortun‌‌   v.‌‌
  Arroyo‌‌   ‌2012‌‌   En‌‌
  Banc‌‌  ‌affirms‌‌ that‌‌ although‌‌ ‌Sec‌‌ 18‌‌ 
a. It‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌based‌  ‌only‌  ‌on‌  ‌facts‌  ‌or‌  ‌information‌‌  11. Checks‌  ‌and‌  ‌balances‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌martial‌  ‌law‌  ‌and‌‌ 
Art‌  ‌VII‌  ‌vests‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌proclaim‌  ‌martial‌‌ 
known‌‌   by‌‌  or‌‌
  available‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌  President‌‌   at‌‌
  the‌‌ time‌‌  suspension‌‌powers.‌‌—  ‌‌ ‌
law‌  ‌or‌  ‌suspend‌  ‌the‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌writ‌‌
  of‌‌
  habeas‌‌   corpus,‌‌   he‌‌ 
he‌‌made‌‌the‌‌declaration‌‌or‌‌suspension;‌  ‌ a. The‌  ‌President‌  ‌may‌  ‌declare‌‌   martial‌‌   law‌‌
  or‌‌
  suspend‌‌   of‌‌ 
shares‌‌such‌‌power‌‌with‌‌Congress‌.‌ ‌Thus:‌  ‌
b. The‌  ‌Court‌  ‌should‌  ‌look‌  ‌into‌  ‌the‌  ‌full‌  ‌complement‌‌   or‌‌  the‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌writ‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌of‌  ‌habeas‌‌ 
a. The‌  ‌President’s‌  ‌proclamation‌  ‌or‌  ‌suspension‌  ‌is‌‌ 
totality‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌factual‌  ‌basis‌, ‌‌and‌‌  ‌not‌‌  piecemeal‌‌
  or‌‌  corpus‌‌   ‌only‌‌
  when‌‌   there‌‌  is‌‌ an‌‌ invasion‌‌ or‌‌ rebellion‌‌ 
temporary,‌g‌ ood‌‌for‌‌only‌‌60‌‌days‌; ‌ ‌
individually‌.  ‌‌ ‌ and‌  ‌public‌  ‌safety‌  ‌requires‌  ‌such‌  ‌declaration‌  ‌or‌‌ 
b. He‌  ‌must,‌  ‌within‌  ‌48‌  ‌hours‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌proclamation‌  ‌or‌‌  suspension.‌  ‌
c. Neither‌  ‌should‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌expect‌  ‌absolute‌‌ 
suspension,‌‌   ‌report‌‌
  his‌‌
  action‌‌  in‌‌
  person‌‌ or‌‌ in‌‌ writing‌‌ 
correctness‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌facts‌  ‌stated‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌proclamation‌‌  b. The‌  ‌President's‌  ‌proclamation‌  ‌or‌  ‌suspension‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌ 
to‌‌Congress;‌  ‌
and‌‌in‌‌the‌‌written‌‌Report.‌‌   ‌ for‌‌a‌‌period‌‌‌not‌‌exceeding‌‌60‌‌days‌. ‌ ‌
c. Both‌‌  houses‌‌  of‌‌ Congress,‌‌ if‌‌ not‌‌ in‌‌ session‌‌ must‌‌ jointly‌‌ 
d. To‌‌
  require‌‌
  precision‌‌  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  President's‌‌  appreciation‌‌ of‌‌  c. Within‌  ‌48‌  ‌hours‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌proclamation‌  ‌or‌‌ 
convene‌  ‌within‌  ‌24‌  ‌hours‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌proclamation‌  ‌or‌‌ 
facts‌  ‌would‌  ‌unduly‌‌
  burden‌‌   him‌‌
  and‌‌
  therefore‌‌
  impede‌‌  suspension,‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌must‌  ‌submit‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Report‌  ‌in‌‌ 
suspension‌‌   for‌‌  the‌‌
  purpose‌‌   of‌‌ ‌reviewing‌‌ its‌‌ validity‌; ‌‌
the‌‌process‌‌of‌‌his‌‌decision-making.‌  ‌ person‌‌or‌‌in‌‌writing‌‌to‌‌Congress.‌  ‌
and‌  ‌
7. The‌  ‌parameters‌  ‌for‌  ‌determining‌  ‌the‌  ‌sufficiency‌  ‌of‌  ‌factual‌‌  d. The‌  ‌Congress‌, ‌ ‌voting‌  ‌jointly‌  ‌and‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌vote‌  ‌of‌  ‌at‌‌ 
d. The‌  ‌Congress,‌  ‌voting‌  ‌jointly,‌  ‌may‌  ‌revoke‌  ‌or‌  ‌affirm‌‌ 
the‌  ‌President’s‌  ‌proclamation‌  ‌or‌  ‌suspension,‌  ‌allow‌‌  basis‌‌are‌‌as‌‌follows:‌‌   ‌ least‌  ‌a ‌ ‌majority‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌  ‌its‌  ‌Members,‌  ‌can‌  ‌revoke‌  ‌the‌‌ 
their‌‌   limited‌‌ effectivity‌‌ to‌‌ lapse,‌‌ or‌‌ ‌extend‌‌ ‌the‌‌ same‌‌  a. actual‌‌rebellion‌‌or‌‌invasion‌; ‌ ‌ proclamation‌‌or‌‌suspension.‌  ‌
if‌‌Congress‌‌deems‌‌warranted.‌  ‌ b. public‌  ‌safety‌  ‌requires‌  ‌it;‌  ‌the‌  ‌first‌  ‌two‌  ‌requirements‌‌  e. The‌  ‌President‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌set‌  ‌aside‌  ‌the‌  ‌Congress'‌‌ 
2. The‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌validity‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌President’s‌  ‌proclamation‌‌   of‌‌  must‌‌concur;‌‌and‌  ‌ revocation‌‌‌of‌‌his‌‌proclamation‌‌or‌‌suspension.‌  ‌
martial‌‌  law‌‌
  or‌‌
  suspension‌‌
  of‌‌  the‌‌  writ‌‌  of‌‌
  habeas‌‌ corpus‌‌ is‌‌ ‌first‌‌  c. there‌  ‌is‌  ‌probable‌  ‌cause‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌to‌‌
  believe‌‌  f. The‌  ‌President‌  ‌cannot,‌  ‌by‌  h
‌ imself,‌  ‌extend‌  ‌his‌‌ 
a‌  ‌political‌  ‌question‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌hands‌  ‌of‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌before‌  ‌it‌‌  that‌‌there‌‌is‌‌actual‌‌rebellion‌‌or‌‌invasion.‌  ‌ proclamation‌  ‌or‌  ‌suspension.‌  ‌He‌  ‌should‌  ‌ask‌  ‌the‌‌ 
becomes‌‌a‌‌justiciable‌‌one‌‌‌in‌‌the‌‌hands‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Court.‌  ‌ Congress'‌‌approval‌. ‌ ‌
8. Public‌‌  safety‌‌  ‌"involves‌‌
  the‌‌
  prevention‌‌   of‌‌
  and‌‌   protection‌‌  from‌‌ 
3. Lansang‌  ‌held‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌factual‌  ‌basis‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌declaration‌  ‌of‌‌  events‌‌
  that‌‌ could‌‌ endanger‌‌ the‌‌ safety‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ general‌‌ public‌‌ from‌‌  g. Upon‌‌
  such‌‌
  initiative‌‌  or‌‌ request‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌ President,‌‌ the‌‌ 
martial‌  ‌law‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌suspension‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  privilege‌‌  of‌‌  the‌‌
  writ‌‌
  of‌‌  significant‌  ‌danger,‌  ‌injury/harm,‌  ‌or‌  ‌damage,‌‌   such‌‌
  as‌‌
  crimes‌‌  or‌‌  Congress‌, ‌ ‌voting‌  ‌jointly‌  ‌and‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌vote‌  ‌of‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌a ‌‌
habeas‌  ‌corpus‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌ ‌political‌  ‌question‌  ‌and‌  ‌is‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌‌  disasters."‌  ‌ majority‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌  ‌its‌  ‌Members,‌  ‌can‌  ‌extend‌  ‌the‌‌ 
ambit‌‌of‌‌judicial‌‌review.‌‌   ‌ proclamation‌‌or‌‌suspension.‌  ‌
On‌‌extending‌‌martial‌‌law‌  ‌
4. The‌‌
  phrase‌‌  "‌in‌‌  an‌‌
  appropriate‌‌ proceeding‌" ‌‌appearing‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌  h. The‌  ‌extension‌  ‌shall‌  ‌only‌  ‌be‌  ‌approved‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌‌ 
third‌  ‌paragraph‌  ‌of‌  ‌Section‌  ‌18,‌  ‌Article‌‌   VII‌‌
  refers‌‌
  to‌‌
  ‌any‌‌  action‌  9. The‌‌  only‌‌
  limitations‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  exercise‌‌
  of‌‌
  congressional‌‌ authority‌‌  invasion‌  ‌or‌  ‌rebellion‌  ‌persists‌  ‌and‌  ‌public‌  ‌safety‌‌ 
initiated‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌citizen‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌questioning‌  ‌the‌‌  to‌e
‌ xtend‌s‌ uch‌‌proclamation‌‌or‌‌suspension‌‌are‌‌that:‌‌   ‌ requires‌‌it.‌  ‌
sufficiency‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  factual‌‌   basis‌‌   of‌‌   the‌‌  exercise‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌
  Chief‌‌  a. the‌  ‌extension‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌President's‌‌  i. The‌  ‌SC‌  ‌may‌  ‌review‌  ‌the‌  ‌sufficiency‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌factual‌‌ 
Executive's‌‌   emergency‌‌   powers.‌‌   ‌It‌‌ could‌‌ be‌‌ denominated‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌ initiative‌; ‌ ‌ basis‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌proclamation‌  ‌or‌  ‌suspension‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌‌ 
complaint,‌‌a‌‌petition,‌‌or‌‌a‌‌matter‌‌to‌‌be‌‌resolved‌‌by‌‌the‌‌Court.‌  ‌ extension‌  ‌thereof,‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌  ‌appropriate‌  ‌proceeding‌  ‌filed‌‌ 
b. it‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌grounded‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌persistence‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
5. In‌  ‌Lagman‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Medialdea‌  ‌2017‌  ‌En‌  ‌Banc‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌had‌  ‌the‌‌  invasion‌  ‌or‌  ‌rebellion‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌demands‌  ‌of‌  ‌public‌‌  by‌‌any‌‌citizen‌. ‌ ‌
occasion‌  ‌to‌  ‌reexamine‌  ‌Fortun‌  ‌and‌  ‌clarify‌‌   that‌‌  ‌the‌‌
  Court‌‌  can‌‌  safety;‌‌and‌  ‌ j. The‌  ‌SC‌‌
  must‌‌
  promulgate‌‌   its‌‌
  decision‌‌
  ‌within‌‌
  30‌‌
  days‌‌ 
simultaneously‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌its‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌review‌  ‌with,‌  ‌and‌‌  from‌‌the‌‌filing‌o‌ f‌‌the‌‌appropriate‌‌proceeding.‌  ‌
c. it‌‌
  is‌‌
  subject‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  Court's‌‌
  ‌review‌‌ ‌of‌‌ the‌‌ sufficiency‌‌ of‌‌ 
independently‌‌   from,‌‌  the‌‌
  power‌‌  to‌‌
  revoke‌‌
  by‌‌ Congress.‌‌ In‌‌ other‌‌ 
its‌  ‌factual‌  ‌basis‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌petition‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌citizen.‌‌  k. Martial‌‌
  law‌‌
  ‌does‌‌
  not‌‌
  suspend‌‌
  the‌‌
  operation‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
words,‌  ‌the‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌review‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌dependent‌  ‌on‌‌ 
(‌Lagman‌‌v.‌‌Medialdea‌‌2 ‌ 019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌) ‌ ‌ Constitution‌. ‌ ‌
whether‌‌   Congress‌‌   exercised‌‌  its‌‌
  own‌‌   power‌‌  to‌‌
  review‌‌ the‌‌ act‌‌ of‌‌ 
the‌‌President.‌‌   ‌ 10. The‌‌  Court‌‌
  is‌‌
  ‌not‌‌  barred‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌  doctrine‌‌  of‌  ‌conclusiveness‌‌  l. Martial‌‌   law‌‌
  ‌does‌‌   not‌‌
  supplant‌‌   the‌‌
  functioning‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ 
of‌‌
  judgment‌‌   from‌‌  examining‌  ‌the‌‌ persistence‌‌ of‌‌ rebellion.‌‌ The‌‌  civil‌  ‌courts‌  ‌or‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌assemblies,‌  ‌nor‌  ‌authorize‌‌ 
6. Lagman‌  ‌established‌  ‌the‌  ‌sufficiency‌  ‌of‌  ‌factual‌  ‌basis‌‌
  test‌‌
  as‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 27‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

the‌  ‌conferment‌  ‌of‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌on‌‌


  military‌‌   courts‌‌
  and‌‌  Torres‌‌v.‌‌Gonzales‌  ‌
Former‌‌   President‌‌   Estrada‌‌   was‌‌
  granted‌‌ an‌‌ ‌absolute‌‌ pardon‌‌ that‌‌ fully‌‌ 
agencies‌  ‌over‌  ‌civilians‌  ‌where‌  ‌civil‌  ‌courts‌‌   are‌‌
  able‌‌  to‌‌ 
restored‌‌   all‌‌
  his‌‌ civil‌‌ and‌‌ political‌‌ rights,‌‌ which‌‌ naturally‌‌ includes‌‌ the‌‌ 
function.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌grant‌  ‌of‌  ‌pardon‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌determination‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌terms‌  ‌and‌‌ 
right‌‌
  to‌‌
  seek‌‌ public‌‌ elective‌‌ office,‌‌ the‌‌ focal‌‌ point‌‌ of‌‌ this‌‌ controversy.‌‌ 
m. The‌  ‌suspension‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌writ‌  ‌applies‌‌  conditions‌‌   of‌‌
  a‌‌
  conditional‌‌   pardon‌‌  are‌‌
  purely‌‌ executive‌‌ acts‌‌ which‌‌ 
The‌  ‌only‌  ‌instances‌  ‌in‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌may‌  ‌not‌  ‌extend‌  ‌pardon‌‌ 
only‌  ‌to‌  ‌persons‌  ‌judicially‌  ‌charged‌‌   for‌‌
  rebellion‌‌   ‌or‌‌  are‌ n
‌ ot‌ s
‌ ubject‌ t
‌ o‌ j
‌ udicial‌ s
‌ crutiny.‌  ‌
remain‌‌to‌‌be‌‌in:‌‌   ‌
offenses‌  ‌inherent‌  ‌in‌  ‌or‌  ‌directly‌  ‌connected‌  ‌with‌‌ 
Pardon‌‌distinguished‌‌from‌‌amnesty‌‌   ‌ 1) impeachment‌‌cases;‌  ‌
invasion.‌  ‌
n.   the‌‌  Barrioquinto‌‌v.‌‌Fernandez‌  ‌
Finally,‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌  ‌suspension‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌of‌‌ 2) cases‌‌that‌‌have‌‌not‌‌yet‌‌resulted‌‌in‌‌a‌‌final‌‌conviction;‌‌and‌‌   ‌
writ,‌  ‌any‌  ‌person‌  ‌thus‌  ‌arrested‌  ‌or‌  ‌detained‌‌
  should‌‌   be‌‌  1. Pardon‌‌   ‌is‌‌
  a ‌‌‌private‌‌
  ‌act‌‌
  which‌‌   must‌‌
  be‌‌
  pleaded‌‌
  and‌‌ proved‌‌  3) cases‌  ‌involving‌  ‌violations‌  ‌of‌  ‌election‌  ‌laws,‌  r‌ ules‌  ‌and‌‌ 
judicially‌  ‌charged‌  ‌within‌  ‌three‌  ‌days‌, ‌ ‌otherwise‌  ‌he‌‌  by‌  ‌the‌  ‌person‌  ‌pardoned,‌  ‌because‌  ‌the‌  ‌courts‌  ‌take‌‌   no‌‌
  notice‌‌  regulations‌  ‌in‌  ‌which‌  ‌there‌  ‌was‌  ‌no‌  f‌ avorable‌‌ 
should‌‌be‌‌released.‌  ‌ thereof;‌  ‌while‌  ‌amnesty‌‌   ‌is‌‌
  a ‌‌‌public‌‌
  ‌act‌‌
  of‌‌
  which‌‌
  the‌‌
  courts‌‌  recommendation‌‌coming‌‌from‌‌the‌‌COMELEC.‌‌   ‌
Executive‌‌clemency‌  ‌ should‌‌take‌‌judicial‌‌notice.‌‌   ‌ Therefore,‌‌   it‌‌
  can‌‌   be‌‌
  argued‌‌   that‌‌
  any‌‌
  act‌‌ of‌‌ Congress‌‌ by‌‌ way‌‌ of‌‌ statute‌‌ 
2. Pardon‌  ‌is‌  ‌granted‌  ‌to‌‌  one‌‌
  ‌after‌‌
  ‌conviction;‌‌
  while‌‌
  ‌amnesty‌‌  cannot‌  ‌operate‌‌   to‌‌
  delimit‌‌   the‌‌  pardoning‌‌   power‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  President.‌‌   The‌‌ 
Sec‌‌  19.‌‌
  ‌Except‌‌
  in‌‌ cases‌‌ of‌‌ ‌impeachment‌, ‌‌or‌‌ as‌‌ otherwise‌‌ provided‌‌ 
is‌‌
  granted‌‌ to‌‌ classes‌‌ of‌‌ persons‌‌ or‌‌ communities‌‌ who‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌  foregoing‌  ‌pronouncements‌  ‌solidify‌  ‌the‌  ‌thesis‌  ‌that‌  ‌Articles‌‌   36‌‌
  and‌‌ 
in‌  ‌this‌  ‌Constitution,‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌may‌  ‌grant‌  ‌reprieves,‌‌  41‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  RPC‌‌   cannot,‌‌   in‌‌  any‌‌  way,‌‌
  serve‌‌   to‌‌
  abridge‌‌   or‌‌
  diminish‌‌ 
guilty‌  ‌of‌  ‌political‌  ‌offenses,‌  ‌generally‌  ‌before‌  ‌or‌  ‌after‌  ‌the‌‌ 
commutations,‌  ‌and‌  ‌pardons,‌  ‌and‌  ‌remit‌  ‌fines‌  ‌and‌  ‌forfeitures,‌  ‌after‌‌  institution‌  ‌of‌‌  the‌‌
  criminal‌‌   prosecution‌‌   and‌‌
  sometimes‌‌   after‌‌  the‌‌  exclusive‌‌   power‌‌   and‌‌   prerogative‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ President‌‌ to‌‌ pardon‌‌ 
conviction‌‌by‌‌final‌‌judgment.‌  ‌ conviction.‌‌   ‌ persons‌‌convicted‌‌of‌‌violating‌‌penal‌‌statutes.‌  ‌
He‌  ‌shall‌  ‌also‌  ‌have‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌grant‌  ‌amnesty‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌‌  3. Pardon‌  ‌looks‌  ‌forward‌; ‌ ‌while‌  ‌amnesty‌  ‌looks‌  ‌backward‌‌  Who‌‌may‌‌avail‌‌of‌‌amnesty‌‌   ‌
concurrence‌o ‌ f‌‌a‌‌majority‌‌of‌‌ALL‌‌the‌‌Members‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Congress.‌  ‌ and‌‌   abolishes‌‌  and‌‌  puts‌‌   into‌‌
  oblivion‌‌ the‌‌ offense‌‌ with‌‌ which‌‌ 
he‌  ‌is‌  ‌charged‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌person‌  ‌released‌  ‌by‌  ‌amnesty‌  ‌stands‌‌  Macaga-an‌‌v.‌‌People‌  ‌
Art‌  ‌IX-C‌  ‌Sec‌  ‌5.‌  ‌No‌  ‌pardon,‌  ‌amnesty,‌  ‌parole,‌  ‌or‌  ‌suspension‌  ‌of‌‌ 
before‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌precisely‌  ‌as‌  ‌though‌  ‌he‌  ‌had‌  ‌committed‌  ‌no‌‌ 
sentence‌‌   for‌‌
  ‌violation‌‌  of‌‌
  ‌election‌‌  ‌laws,‌‌  rules,‌‌ and‌‌ regulations‌‌ shall‌‌  The‌  ‌crimes‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌amnestied‌  ‌must‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌for‌  ‌violations‌  ‌of‌‌ 
offense.‌  ‌
be‌‌
  granted‌‌   by‌‌   the‌‌
  President‌‌   without‌‌   the‌‌
  favorable‌‌ recommendation‌‌  subversion‌  ‌laws‌  ‌or‌  ‌those‌  ‌defined‌  ‌and‌  ‌proscribed‌  ‌under‌  ‌crimes‌‌ 
against‌‌public‌‌order‌‌‌under‌‌the‌‌RPC.‌  ‌
of‌‌the‌‌Comelec.‌  ‌ Vera‌‌v.‌‌People‌  ‌
Pardon‌‌distinguished‌‌from‌‌probation‌‌   Diplomatic‌‌power‌  ‌
Whether‌‌   or‌‌  not‌‌ a ‌‌person‌‌ invoking‌‌ the‌‌ benefit‌‌ of‌‌ amnesty‌‌ should‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Vera‌  ‌ first‌  ‌admit‌  ‌having‌  ‌committed‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌  ‌of‌  ‌which‌  ‌they‌  ‌were‌‌  Sec‌  ‌21.‌  ‌No‌  ‌treaty‌  ‌or‌  ‌international‌  ‌agreement‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌valid‌  ‌and‌‌ 
accused.‌  ‌ effective‌‌ unless‌‌ concurred‌‌ in‌‌ by‌‌ at‌‌ least‌‌ ‌2/3‌‌ of‌‌ all‌‌ the‌‌ Members‌‌ 
The‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌suspend‌  ‌sentence‌  ‌was‌  ‌always‌  ‌a ‌ ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌judicial‌‌ 
power;‌‌   the‌‌
  power‌‌ to‌‌ grant‌‌ reprieves‌‌ and‌‌ pardons‌‌ was‌‌ always‌‌ a ‌‌part‌‌ of‌‌  It‌  ‌is‌  ‌rank‌  ‌inconsistency‌  ‌for‌  ‌appellant‌  ‌to‌  ‌justify‌  ‌an‌  ‌act,‌  ‌or‌  ‌seek‌‌  of‌‌the‌‌Senate.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌executive‌  ‌power.‌  ‌The‌  ‌suspension‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌sentence‌  ‌simply‌‌  forgiveness‌‌   for‌‌ an‌‌ act‌‌ which,‌‌ according‌‌ to‌‌ him,‌‌ he‌‌ has‌‌ not‌‌ committed.‌‌ 
Bayan‌‌v.‌‌Zamora‌‌‌re‌‌VFA‌  ‌
postpones‌  ‌the‌  ‌judgment‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌
  court‌‌
  temporarily‌‌   or‌‌
  indefinitely,‌‌
  but‌‌  (‌superseding‌‌‌Barrioquinto‌) ‌ ‌
the‌  ‌conviction‌  ‌and‌  ‌liability‌  ‌following‌  ‌it,‌  ‌and‌  ‌all‌  ‌civil‌  ‌disabilities,‌  Section‌  ‌21,‌  ‌Article‌  ‌VII‌  ‌deals‌  ‌with‌  ‌treatise‌  ‌or‌  ‌international‌‌ 
remain‌‌and‌‌become‌‌operative‌‌when‌‌judgment‌‌is‌‌rendered.‌‌   ‌ Effect‌‌of‌‌Pardon‌‌   ‌
agreements‌  ‌in‌‌   general.‌‌   This‌‌
  provision‌‌   lays‌‌  down‌‌   ‌general‌‌
  the‌‌   rule‌ ‌
A‌  ‌pardon‌  ‌reaches‌  ‌both‌  ‌the‌  ‌punishment‌  ‌prescribed‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌offense‌‌  Monsanto‌‌v.‌‌Factoran‌  ‌ on‌  ‌treatise‌  ‌or‌  ‌international‌  ‌agreements‌. ‌ ‌All‌  ‌treaties‌  ‌or‌‌ 
and‌‌  the‌‌
  guilt‌‌
  of‌‌ the‌‌ offender.‌‌ It‌‌ releases‌‌ the‌‌ punishment,‌‌ and‌‌ blots‌‌ out‌‌  international‌  ‌agreements‌  ‌entered‌  ‌into‌  ‌by‌‌   the‌‌
  Philippines,‌‌   regardless‌‌ 
The‌  ‌pardon‌  ‌granted‌  ‌to‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌has‌  ‌resulted‌  ‌in‌  ‌removing‌  ‌her‌‌  of‌  ‌subject‌  ‌matter,‌  ‌coverage,‌  ‌or‌‌
  particular‌‌
  designation‌‌   or‌‌
  appellation,‌‌ 
of‌‌
  existence‌‌   the‌‌   guilt,‌‌
  so‌‌
  that‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  eye‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  law,‌‌
  the‌‌   offender‌‌  is‌‌ as‌‌  disqualification‌  ‌from‌  ‌holding‌  ‌public‌  ‌employment‌  ‌but‌  ‌it‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌go‌‌ 
innocent‌  ‌as‌  ‌if‌  ‌he‌  ‌had‌  ‌never‌  ‌committed‌  ‌the‌  ‌offense.‌  ‌It‌  ‌removes‌  ‌the‌‌  requires‌‌the‌‌concurrence‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Senate‌‌to‌‌be‌‌valid‌‌and‌‌effective.‌  ‌
beyond‌‌   that.‌  ‌To‌‌ regain‌‌ her‌‌ former‌‌ post‌‌ as‌‌ assistant‌‌ city‌‌ treasurer,‌‌ she‌‌ 
penalties‌  ‌and‌  ‌disabilities,‌  ‌and‌  ‌restores‌  ‌him‌  ‌to‌  ‌his‌  ‌civil‌  ‌rights.‌  ‌It‌‌  In‌  ‌contrast,‌  ‌Section‌  ‌25,‌  ‌Article‌  ‌XVIII‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌special‌  ‌provision‌  ‌that‌‌ 
must‌  ‌reapply‌  ‌and‌  ‌undergo‌  ‌the‌  ‌usual‌  ‌procedure‌  ‌required‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌‌new‌‌ 
makes‌  ‌him,‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌were,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌new‌  ‌man,‌  ‌and‌‌
  gives‌‌  him‌‌  a ‌‌new‌‌   credit‌‌
  and‌‌  appointment.‌  ‌ applies‌  ‌to‌  ‌treaties‌  ‌which‌  ‌involve‌  ‌the‌  ‌presence‌  ‌of‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌military‌‌ 
capacity.‌  ‌ bases,‌  ‌troops‌  ‌or‌  ‌facilities‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines.‌  ‌It‌  ‌disallows‌  ‌foreign‌‌ 
military‌  ‌bases,‌  ‌troops,‌  ‌or‌  ‌facilities‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌country,‌  ‌unless‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Pardon‌‌distinguished‌‌from‌‌parole‌‌   ‌ Risos-Vidal‌‌v.‌‌COMELEC‌‌2
‌ 015‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 28‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

Powers‌‌relative‌‌to‌‌appropriation‌‌measures‌  ‌
following‌‌conditions‌‌are‌‌sufficiently‌‌met,‌v‌ iz‌:  ‌‌ ‌
Explicit‌  ‌is‌‌
  the‌‌
  requirement‌‌  that‌‌
  a ‌‌provision‌‌  in‌‌
  the‌‌  Appropriations‌‌ 
a) it‌‌must‌‌be‌‌under‌‌a‌t‌ reaty‌; ‌ ‌ Pimentel,‌‌Jr.‌‌v.‌‌Aguirre‌  ‌ Bill‌  ‌should‌  ‌relate‌  ‌specifically‌  ‌to‌  ‌some‌  ‌"particular‌‌ 
b) the‌  ‌treaty‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌duly‌  ‌concurred‌‌   in‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌  Senate‌‌  and,‌‌  Section‌  ‌4 ‌ ‌of‌  ‌AO‌  ‌372‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌‌   upheld.‌‌   ‌A ‌‌basic‌‌   feature‌‌   of‌‌
  local‌‌  appropriation"‌  ‌therein.‌  ‌The‌  ‌challenged‌  ‌"provisions"‌  ‌fall‌  ‌short‌  ‌of‌‌ 
when‌  ‌so‌  ‌required‌  ‌by‌  ‌congress,‌‌   ratified‌‌
  by‌‌
  a ‌‌majority‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  fiscal‌  ‌autonomy‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌‌   ‌automatic‌‌   release‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  shares‌‌   of‌‌
  LGUs‌‌  this‌  ‌requirement.‌  ‌Consequently,‌  ‌Section‌  ‌55‌  ‌(FY‌  ‌'89)‌  ‌and‌  ‌Section‌‌   16‌‌ 
votes‌‌cast‌‌by‌‌the‌‌people‌‌in‌‌a‌‌national‌‌referendum;‌‌and‌  ‌ in‌‌
  the‌‌  National‌‌ internal‌‌ revenue.‌‌ This‌‌ is‌‌ mandated‌‌ by‌‌ no‌‌ less‌‌ than‌‌  (FY‌  ‌‘90),‌  ‌although‌  ‌labelled‌  ‌as‌  ‌"provisions,"‌  ‌are‌  ‌actually‌‌ 
the‌  ‌Constitution.‌  ‌The‌  ‌LGC‌  ‌specifies‌  ‌further‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌   release‌‌   shall‌‌  be‌‌  inappropriate‌‌   provisions‌‌
  that‌‌  should‌‌
  be‌‌
  treated‌‌   as‌‌ items‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ 
c) recognized‌‌as‌‌a‌‌treaty‌‌‌by‌‌the‌‌other‌‌contracting‌‌state.‌  ‌ purpose‌‌of‌‌the‌‌President's‌‌veto‌‌power.‌  ‌
made‌  ‌directly‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌   LGU‌‌   concerned‌‌   within‌‌   five‌‌  (5)‌‌
  days‌‌   after‌‌  every‌‌ 
The‌  ‌phrase‌  ‌"recognized‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌treaty"‌  ‌means‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌‌  quarter‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  year‌‌  and‌‌  “‌shall‌‌  not‌‌
  be‌‌
  subject‌‌   to‌‌
  any‌‌  lien‌‌
  or‌‌  holdback‌‌ 
contracting‌‌   party‌‌
  accepts‌‌
  or‌‌
  acknowledges‌‌   the‌‌
  agreement‌‌   as‌‌
  a ‌‌ that‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌national‌  ‌government‌  ‌for‌  ‌whatever‌‌  PHILCONSA‌‌v.‌‌Enriquez‌  ‌
treaty‌.  ‌‌ ‌ purpose.‌” ‌ ‌As‌  ‌a ‌ ‌rule,‌  ‌the‌  ‌term‌  ‌“‌SHALL‌” ‌ ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌word‌  ‌of‌  ‌command‌  ‌that‌‌ 
must‌  ‌be‌  ‌given‌  ‌a ‌ ‌compulsory‌  ‌meaning.‌  ‌The‌  ‌provision‌  ‌is,‌  ‌therefore,‌‌  Veto‌‌of‌‌Provision‌‌on‌‌Debt‌‌Ceiling‌‌—‌V
‌ OID‌  ‌
Moreover,‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌inconsequential‌  ‌whether‌  ‌the‌  ‌United‌  ‌States‌‌   treats‌‌
  the‌‌ 
VFA‌  ‌only‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌  ‌executive‌  ‌agreement‌‌   ‌because,‌‌   under‌‌
  international‌‌  IMPERATIVE.‌  ‌ Also‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌included‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌category‌  ‌of‌  ‌"‌inappropriate‌‌ 
law,‌  ‌an‌  ‌executive‌  ‌agreement‌  ‌is‌  ‌as‌‌
  binding‌‌  as‌‌
  a ‌‌treaty.‌‌
  To‌‌
  be‌‌  sure,‌‌
  as‌‌  provisions‌" ‌ ‌are‌‌  unconstitutional‌‌  provisions‌‌  and‌‌  provisions‌‌  which‌‌ 
Veto‌‌powers‌‌
   ‌
long‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌VFA‌  ‌possesses‌  ‌the‌  ‌elements‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌agreement‌  ‌under‌‌  are‌‌ intended‌‌ to‌‌ amend‌‌ other‌‌ laws,‌‌ because‌‌ clearly‌‌ these‌‌ kinds‌‌ of‌‌ laws‌‌ 
international‌‌law,‌‌the‌‌said‌‌agreement‌‌is‌‌to‌‌be‌‌taken‌‌equally‌‌as‌‌a‌‌treaty.‌  1) General‌‌veto‌‌power.‌‌‌‌—‌‌veto‌‌of‌‌entire‌‌bill.‌  ‌ have‌‌no‌‌place‌‌in‌‌an‌‌appropriations‌‌bill.‌  ‌
In‌  ‌our‌  ‌jurisdiction,‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌ratify‌  ‌is‌  ‌vested‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  2) Item-veto.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌The‌  ‌President‌  ‌shall‌‌   have‌‌  the‌‌  power‌‌   to‌‌
  veto‌‌
  any‌‌  These‌‌   provisos‌‌   are‌‌
  germane‌‌  to‌‌
  and‌‌
  have‌‌ a ‌‌direct‌‌ connection‌‌ with‌‌ the‌‌ 
President‌  ‌and‌  ‌not,‌  ‌as‌  ‌commonly‌  ‌believed,‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌legislature.‌‌  particular‌  ‌item‌  ‌or‌  ‌items‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌  ‌Appropriation,‌  ‌Revenue,‌  ‌or‌‌  item‌  ‌on‌  ‌debt‌  ‌service.‌  ‌Inherent‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌‌  of‌‌
  appropriation‌‌   is‌‌ 
The‌  ‌role‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Senate‌  ‌is‌‌
  limited‌‌
  only‌‌
  to‌‌
  giving‌‌
  or‌‌
  withholding‌‌  the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌specify‌  ‌how‌  ‌the‌  ‌money‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌spent.‌  ‌The‌  ‌said‌‌ 
Tariff‌  ‌bill,‌  ‌but‌  ‌the‌  ‌veto‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌affect‌  ‌the‌  ‌item‌  ‌or‌  ‌items‌  ‌to‌‌ 
its‌‌consent,‌‌or‌‌concurrence,‌‌to‌‌the‌‌ratification.‌  ‌ provisos,‌  ‌being‌  ‌appropriate‌  ‌provisions,‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌vetoed‌‌ 
which‌‌he‌‌does‌‌not‌‌object.‌  ‌
separately‌.‌‌Hence,‌‌the‌‌item‌‌veto‌‌of‌‌said‌‌provisions‌‌is‌v ‌ oid‌. ‌ ‌
Pimentel‌‌v.‌‌Executive‌‌Secretary‌  ‌ Bolinao‌‌Electronics‌‌v.‌‌Valencia‌  ‌ Veto‌‌of‌‌provision‌‌on‌‌ratio‌‌for‌‌road‌‌maintenance‌‌—‌V
‌ OID‌  ‌
The‌  ‌usual‌  ‌steps‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌treaty-making‌  ‌process‌  ‌are:‌  ‌negotiation‌, ‌‌ When‌‌   a ‌‌provision‌‌   of‌‌
  an‌‌
  appropriation‌‌   bill‌‌
  affects‌‌
  one‌‌
  or‌‌
  more‌‌
  items‌‌  It‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌‌
  alien‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  appropriation‌‌   for‌‌
  road‌‌  maintenance,‌‌
  and‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌ 
signature‌, ‌ ‌ratification‌, ‌ ‌and‌  ‌exchange‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌instruments‌  ‌of‌‌  of‌  ‌the‌  ‌same,‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌veto‌  ‌the‌‌  provision‌‌
  without‌‌
  at‌‌
  the‌‌  other‌‌   hand,‌‌  it‌‌
  specifies‌‌   how‌‌
  the‌‌
  said‌‌
  item‌‌  shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  expended‌‌ — ‌‌70%‌‌ 
ratification.‌  ‌The‌‌   treaty‌‌  may‌‌   then‌‌
  be‌‌
  submitted‌‌  for‌‌
  ‌registration‌‌   ‌and‌‌  same‌‌time‌‌vetoing‌‌the‌‌particular‌‌item‌‌or‌‌items‌‌to‌‌which‌‌it‌‌relates.‌  ‌ by‌‌administrative‌‌and‌‌30%‌‌by‌‌contract.‌  ‌
publication‌‌   ‌under‌‌ the‌‌ U.N.‌‌ Charter,‌‌ although‌‌ this‌‌ step‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ essential‌‌ 
Whether‌‌  the‌‌
  President‌‌
  may‌‌  legally‌‌
  veto‌‌
  a ‌‌condition‌‌ attached‌‌ to‌‌  Veto‌‌of‌‌provision‌‌on‌‌purchase‌‌of‌‌medicines‌‌by‌‌AFP‌‌—‌V
‌ OID‌  ‌
to‌‌the‌‌validity‌‌of‌‌the‌‌agreement‌‌as‌‌between‌‌the‌‌parties.‌  ‌
an‌‌appropriation‌‌or‌‌item‌‌‌in‌‌the‌‌appropriation‌‌bill.‌N‌ O‌.  ‌‌ ‌ Being‌‌  directly‌‌  related‌‌
  to‌‌
  and‌‌ inseparable‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌ appropriation‌‌ item‌‌ 
The‌‌   ‌signature‌‌   ‌is‌‌ primarily‌‌ intended‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌means‌‌ of‌‌ authenticating‌‌ the‌‌ 
If‌  ‌the‌  ‌veto‌‌
  is‌‌
  unconstitutional,‌‌
  it‌‌
  follows‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  same‌‌
  produced‌‌
  no‌‌  on‌‌
  purchases‌‌   of‌‌
  medicines‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌
  AFP,‌‌
  the‌‌
  special‌‌
  provision‌‌ ‌cannot‌‌ 
instrument‌  ‌and‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌symbol‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌good‌  ‌faith‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌parties.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌‌ 
effect‌  ‌whatsoever,‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌restriction‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌  be‌  ‌vetoed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌without‌  ‌also‌  ‌vetoing‌  ‌the‌  ‌said‌  ‌item‌‌ 
usually‌  ‌performed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌state's‌  ‌authorized‌  ‌representative‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
appropriation‌‌bill,‌‌therefore,‌‌remains‌.  ‌‌ ‌ following‌B ‌ olinao‌‌Electronics‌. ‌ ‌
diplomatic‌  ‌mission.‌  ‌Ratification‌, ‌ ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌hand,‌‌   is‌‌
  the‌‌
  formal‌‌ 
act‌  ‌by‌‌   which‌‌
  a ‌‌state‌‌   confirms‌‌  and‌‌
  accepts‌‌   the‌‌
  provisions‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌treaty‌‌  Veto‌‌
  of‌‌
  provision‌‌
  on‌‌
  prior‌‌
  approval‌‌
  of‌‌
  Congress‌‌
  for‌‌
  purchase‌‌ of‌‌ 
concluded‌  ‌by‌  ‌its‌  ‌representative.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌generally‌  ‌held‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌an‌‌  Gonzales‌‌v.‌‌Macaraig‌  ‌ military‌‌equipment‌‌—‌V ‌ ALID‌  ‌
executive‌  ‌act‌, ‌ ‌undertaken‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌head‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌state‌  ‌or‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
The‌‌
  power‌‌  given‌‌
  the‌‌
  executive‌‌  to‌‌
  disapprove‌‌   any‌‌
  item‌‌ or‌‌ items‌‌ in‌‌ an‌‌  Any‌  ‌provision‌  ‌blocking‌  ‌an‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌action‌‌  in‌‌
  implementing‌‌   a ‌‌
government.‌  ‌
Appropriations‌  ‌Bill‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌‌
  grant‌‌  the‌‌
  authority‌‌
  to‌‌
  veto‌‌
  a ‌‌part‌‌
  of‌‌
  an‌‌  law‌  ‌or‌  ‌requiring‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌approval‌  ‌of‌  ‌executive‌  ‌acts‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌ 
Although‌‌   the‌‌
  refusal‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌state‌‌ to‌‌ ratify‌‌ a ‌‌treaty‌‌ which‌‌ has‌‌ been‌‌ signed‌‌  item‌‌and‌‌to‌‌approve‌‌the‌‌remaining‌‌portion‌‌of‌‌the‌‌same‌‌item.‌  ‌ incorporated‌‌in‌‌a‌‌separate‌‌and‌‌substantive‌‌bill.‌‌   ‌
in‌  ‌its‌  ‌behalf‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌serious‌  ‌step‌  ‌that‌‌
  should‌‌   not‌‌
  be‌‌
  taken‌‌
  lightly,‌‌
  such‌‌ 
The‌‌   terms‌‌
  ‌item‌‌   ‌and‌‌
  ‌provision‌‌   ‌in‌‌
  budgetary‌‌   legislation‌‌   and‌‌  practice‌‌  Furthermore,‌  ‌Special‌  ‌Provision‌  ‌No.‌  ‌3,‌  ‌prohibiting‌  ‌the‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
decision‌  ‌is‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌competence‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌alone,‌  ‌which‌‌ 
are‌  ‌concededly‌  ‌different.‌  ‌An‌‌   ‌item‌‌   ‌in‌‌
  a ‌‌bill‌‌
  refers‌‌   to‌‌  the‌‌
  particulars,‌‌  Modernization‌  ‌Fund‌  ‌for‌  ‌payment‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌trainer‌‌
  planes‌‌  and‌‌  armored‌‌ 
cannot‌‌be‌‌encroached‌‌by‌‌this‌‌Court‌‌via‌‌a‌‌writ‌‌of‌‌mandamus‌. ‌ ‌
the‌  ‌details,‌  ‌the‌‌
  distinct‌‌   and‌‌
  severable‌‌   parts‌‌   x ‌‌x ‌‌x ‌‌of‌‌
  the‌‌  bill.‌  ‌It‌‌
  is‌‌
  an‌‌  personnel‌  ‌carriers,‌  ‌which‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌contracted‌  ‌for‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌AFP,‌  ‌is‌‌ 
indivisible‌‌sum‌‌of‌‌money‌‌dedicated‌‌to‌‌a‌‌stated‌‌purpose.‌  ‌ violative‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ Constitutional‌‌ prohibition‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ passage‌‌ of‌‌ laws‌‌ that‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 29‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

impair‌‌
  the‌‌
  obligation‌‌  of‌‌
  contracts‌‌
  (Art‌‌
  III‌‌
  Sec‌‌ 10),‌‌ more‌‌ so,‌‌ contracts‌‌  regulates‌  ‌procedure‌, ‌ ‌that‌  ‌is,‌  ‌the‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌process‌  ‌for‌  ‌enforcing‌‌ 
Each‌  ‌branch‌  ‌is‌  ‌considered‌  ‌separate,‌  ‌co-equal,‌  ‌coordinate‌  ‌and‌‌ 
entered‌‌into‌‌by‌‌the‌‌Government‌‌itself.‌  ‌ rights‌  ‌and‌  ‌duties‌  ‌recognized‌  ‌by‌  ‌substantive‌  ‌law‌  ‌and‌  ‌for‌  ‌justly‌‌ 
supreme‌  ‌within‌  ‌its‌  ‌own‌  ‌sphere,‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌legal‌  ‌and‌  ‌political‌‌ 
administering‌  ‌remedy‌  ‌and‌  ‌redress‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌disregard‌  ‌or‌  ‌infraction‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Veto‌  ‌of‌  ‌provision‌  ‌on‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌savings‌  ‌to‌  ‌augment‌  ‌AFP‌  ‌pension‌‌  reality‌  ‌of‌  ‌one‌  ‌overarching‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌that‌  ‌governs‌  ‌one‌‌ 
them.‌‌   ‌If‌‌
  the‌‌  rule‌‌
  takes‌‌   away‌‌   a ‌‌vested‌‌   right,‌‌   it‌‌
  is‌‌ not‌‌ procedural‌. ‌‌
funds.‌‌—‌V ‌ ALID‌  ‌ government‌  ‌and‌  ‌one‌  ‌nation‌  ‌for‌  ‌whose‌  ‌benefit‌  ‌all‌  ‌the‌  ‌three‌‌ 
If‌  ‌the‌  ‌rule‌  ‌creates‌  ‌a ‌ ‌right‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌appeal,‌  ‌it‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌‌ 
separate‌‌branches‌‌must‌‌act‌‌with‌‌unity.‌‌   ‌
The‌‌   Special‌‌
  Provision,‌‌   which‌‌
  allows‌‌   the‌‌
  Chief‌‌
  of‌‌
  Staff‌‌
  to‌‌
  use‌‌ savings‌‌  classified‌  ‌as‌  ‌a‌  ‌substantive‌  ‌matter;‌  ‌but‌  ‌if‌  ‌it‌  ‌operates‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌means‌  ‌of‌‌ 
to‌  ‌augment‌  ‌the‌  ‌pension‌  ‌fund‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌AFP‌  ‌being‌  ‌managed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌  implementing‌  ‌an‌  ‌existing‌  ‌right‌  ‌then‌  ‌the‌  ‌rule‌  ‌deals‌  ‌merely‌  ‌with‌‌  A‌  ‌lesser‌  ‌known‌  ‌but‌  ‌no‌  ‌less‌  ‌important‌  ‌aspect‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌principle‌  ‌of‌‌ 
AFP-RSBS‌‌is‌v ‌ iolative‌‌‌of‌‌Secs‌‌25(5)‌‌and‌‌29(1)‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Art‌‌VI.‌  ‌ procedure.‌  ‌ separation‌‌   of‌‌
  powers‌‌
  is‌‌
  the‌‌  ‌principle‌‌
  of‌‌  comity‌ ‌or‌‌ the‌‌ practice‌‌ of‌‌ 
Condition‌‌on‌‌the‌‌deactivation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌CAFGU‌‌—‌V
‌ OID‌  ‌ Section‌‌ 23‌‌ of‌‌ Republic‌‌ Act‌‌ No.‌‌ 9165‌‌ is‌‌ declared‌‌ ‌unconstitutional‌‌ ‌for‌‌  voluntarily‌  ‌observing‌  ‌inter-departmental‌  ‌courtesy‌  ‌in‌  ‌undertaking‌‌ 
being‌  ‌contrary‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌
  ‌rule-making‌‌   authority‌‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Supreme‌‌
  Court‌‌  their‌  ‌assigned‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌duties‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌harmonious‌  ‌working‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Such‌  ‌intention‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌embodied‌  ‌and‌  ‌manifested‌  ‌in‌  ‌another‌  ‌law‌  government.‌  ‌
under‌‌Section‌‌5(5),‌‌Article‌‌VIII.‌  ‌
considering‌  ‌that‌  ‌it‌  ‌abrades‌  ‌the‌  ‌powers‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Commander-in-Chief‌‌ 
and‌  ‌there‌  ‌are‌  ‌existing‌  ‌laws‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌creation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌CAFGU‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌‌  e. System‌‌of‌‌Checks‌‌and‌‌Balances‌  ‌
d. Separation‌‌of‌‌Powers‌  ‌
amended.‌  ‌Again‌  ‌we‌  ‌state:‌  ‌a ‌ ‌provision‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌  ‌appropriations‌  ‌act‌‌ 
cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌used‌  ‌to‌  ‌repeal‌‌  or‌‌
  amend‌‌   other‌‌
  laws‌, ‌‌in‌‌  this‌‌
  case,‌‌
  P.D.‌‌  The‌‌   separation‌‌
  of‌‌
  powers‌‌  is‌‌
  a ‌‌fundamental‌‌   principle‌‌ in‌‌ our‌‌ system‌‌  Separate‌‌Opinion,‌‌Justice‌‌Puno‌,‌‌Macalintal‌‌v.‌‌Comelec,‌‌et‌‌al‌.  ‌‌ ‌
No.‌‌1597‌‌and‌‌R.A.‌‌No.‌‌6758.‌  ‌ of‌  ‌government.‌  ‌It‌  ‌obtains‌  ‌not‌  ‌through‌  ‌express‌  ‌provision‌  ‌but‌  ‌by‌‌ 
actual‌‌division‌‌in‌‌our‌‌Constitution.‌  ‌ For‌  ‌its‌  ‌part,‌  ‌this‌  ‌Court‌  checks‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌ 
iii. Judiciary‌  ‌ branches‌‌   of‌‌
  government‌‌ through‌‌ judicial‌‌ review.‌‌ Since‌‌ then,‌‌ the‌‌ Court‌‌ 
Separate‌‌Opinion,‌‌Justice‌‌Puno‌,‌‌Macalintal‌‌v.‌‌Comelec,‌‌et‌‌al‌.  ‌‌ ‌ has‌  ‌used‌  ‌its‌  ‌expanded‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌check‌  ‌acts‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌House‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Estipona,‌‌Jr.‌‌v.‌‌Lobrigo‌‌2
‌ 017‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌‌re‌‌Plea-bargaining‌  ‌ Representatives,‌‌   the‌‌
  President,‌‌
  and‌‌
  even‌‌  of‌‌
  independent‌‌   bodies‌‌   such‌‌ 
The‌  ‌principle‌‌  of‌‌
  separation‌‌   of‌‌
  powers‌‌   prevents‌‌   the‌‌   concentration‌‌  as‌‌the‌‌Electoral‌‌Tribunal,‌‌the‌‌Comelec,‌‌and‌‌the‌‌CSC.‌  ‌
The‌‌   SC‌‌
  has‌‌
  rejected‌‌   previous‌‌
  attempts‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  part‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Congress,‌‌ in‌‌  of‌  ‌legislative,‌  ‌executive,‌  ‌and‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌powers‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌single‌  ‌branch‌  ‌of‌‌ 
government‌‌ by‌‌ deftly‌‌ allocating‌‌ their‌‌ exercise‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ three‌‌ branches‌‌ of‌‌ 
Congress‌  ‌checks‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌branches‌  ‌of‌  ‌government‌  ‌primarily‌‌ 
the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌‌
  legislative‌‌
  power,‌‌
  to‌‌
  amend‌‌   the‌‌  Rules‌‌   of‌‌
  Court,‌‌
  to‌‌  through‌  ‌its‌  ‌law‌  ‌making‌  ‌powers.‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌can‌‌   create‌‌
  administrative‌‌ 
wit:‌  ‌ government.‌  ‌
agencies,‌‌   define‌‌   their‌‌  powers‌‌   and‌‌
  duties,‌‌ fix‌‌ the‌‌ terms‌‌ of‌‌ officers‌‌ and‌‌ 
1. Fabian‌‌ v.‌‌ Desierto‌‌ ‌— ‌‌Appeal‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌ decision‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Office‌‌  It‌‌is‌‌now‌‌beyond‌‌debate‌‌that‌‌the‌‌principle‌‌of‌‌separation‌‌of‌‌powers‌‌   ‌ their‌‌  compensation.‌‌   It‌‌
  can‌‌ also‌‌ create‌‌ courts,‌‌ define‌‌ their‌‌ jurisdiction‌‌ 
of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Ombudsman‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌disciplinary‌  ‌case‌‌  1) allows‌‌   “‌blending‌” ‌‌of‌‌
  the‌‌   some‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ executive,‌‌ legislative,‌‌  and‌  ‌reorganize‌  ‌the‌  ‌judiciary‌  ‌so‌  ‌long‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌undermine‌  ‌the‌‌ 
should‌‌   be‌‌
  taken‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌ CA‌‌ under‌‌ the‌‌ provisions‌‌ of‌‌ Rule‌‌ 43‌‌ of‌‌  or‌‌judicial‌‌powers‌‌in‌‌one‌‌body;‌‌   ‌ security‌  ‌of‌  ‌tenure‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌members.‌  ‌Concomitant‌  ‌with‌  ‌its‌  ‌principal‌‌ 
the‌  ‌Rules‌  ‌instead‌  ‌of‌  ‌appeal‌  ‌by‌  ‌certiorari‌  ‌under‌  ‌Rule‌  ‌45‌  ‌as‌‌  power‌  ‌to‌  ‌legislate‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌auxiliary‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌ensure‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌laws‌  ‌it‌‌ 
provided‌‌in‌‌Section‌‌27‌‌of‌‌R.A.‌‌No.‌‌6770.‌  ‌ 2) does‌  ‌not‌  ‌prevent‌  ‌one‌  ‌branch‌‌   of‌‌
  government‌‌  from‌‌  inquiring‌‌  enacts‌‌are‌‌faithfully‌‌executed.‌‌   ‌
into‌‌
  the‌‌
  affairs‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ other‌‌ branches‌‌ to‌‌ maintain‌‌ the‌‌ balance‌‌ 
2. Cathay‌  ‌Metal‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Laguna‌  ‌West‌  ‌Multi-Purpose‌‌  of‌‌power;‌‌   ‌
Cooperative,‌  ‌Inc.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌The‌  ‌Cooperative‌  ‌Code‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌on‌‌  10. Process‌‌of‌‌Legislation‌  ‌
notices‌‌   cannot‌‌  replace‌‌
  the‌‌
  rules‌‌
  on‌‌ summons‌‌ under‌‌ Rule‌‌ 14‌‌  3) but‌  ‌ensures‌  ‌that‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌encroachment‌  ‌on‌  ‌matters‌‌ 
of‌‌the‌‌Rules.‌  ‌ within‌‌the‌‌exclusive‌‌jurisdiction‌‌of‌‌the‌‌other‌‌branches.‌  ‌ Subject‌‌and‌‌Title‌  ‌
3. Carpio-Morales‌‌   v.‌‌ CA‌‌ ‌2015‌‌ En‌‌ Banc‌‌ — ‌‌The‌‌ first‌‌ paragraph‌‌  De‌‌la‌‌Cruz‌‌v.‌‌Paras‌  ‌
of‌‌
  Section‌‌ 14‌‌ of‌‌ R.A.‌‌ No.‌‌ 6770,‌‌ which‌‌ prohibits‌‌ courts‌‌ except‌‌  In‌‌Re‌‌Production‌‌of‌‌Court‌‌Records‌‌2
‌ 012‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌   ‌
the‌‌
  Supreme‌‌   Court‌‌   from‌‌   issuing‌‌ temporary‌‌ restraining‌‌ order‌‌  The‌‌   title‌‌ was‌‌ not‌‌ in‌‌ any‌‌ way‌‌ altered.‌‌ It‌‌ was‌‌ not‌‌ changed‌‌ one‌‌ whit.‌‌ The‌‌ 
The‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌separation‌  ‌of‌  ‌powers‌  ‌inures‌  ‌not‌  ‌by‌  ‌express‌‌ 
and/or‌  ‌writ‌  ‌of‌  ‌preliminary‌  ‌injunction‌  ‌to‌  ‌enjoin‌  ‌an‌‌  exact‌  ‌wording‌  ‌was‌  ‌followed.‌  ‌The‌  ‌power‌  ‌granted‌  ‌remains‌  ‌that‌  ‌of‌‌ 
provision‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution,‌  ‌but‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌  ‌underlying‌  ‌principle‌  ‌that‌‌ 
investigation‌  ‌conducted‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌Ombudsman,‌  ‌Is‌‌  regulation,‌  ‌not‌  ‌prohibition.‌  ‌There‌  ‌is‌  ‌thus‌  ‌support‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌view‌‌ 
constitutes‌  ‌the‌  ‌bedrock‌  ‌of‌  ‌our‌  ‌system‌  ‌of‌  ‌checks‌  ‌and‌  ‌balances‌  ‌in‌‌ 
unconstitutional‌‌as‌‌it‌‌contravenes‌‌Rule‌‌58‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Rules.‌  ‌ advanced‌  ‌by‌  ‌petitioners‌  ‌that‌  ‌to‌  ‌construe‌  ‌Republic‌  ‌Act‌  ‌No.‌  ‌938‌  ‌as‌‌ 
government.‌‌   It‌‌
  divides‌‌ the‌‌ government‌‌ into‌‌ three‌‌ branches,‌‌ each‌‌ with‌‌ 
allowing‌  ‌the‌  ‌prohibition‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌operation‌  ‌of‌  ‌night‌‌   clubs‌‌
  would‌‌   give‌‌ 
In‌  ‌determining‌  ‌whether‌  ‌a ‌ ‌rule‌‌  prescribed‌‌   by‌‌  the‌‌
  Supreme‌‌   Court,‌‌
  for‌‌  well-defined‌‌   powers.‌‌   In‌‌
  its‌‌
  most‌‌  basic‌‌ concept,‌‌ the‌‌ doctrine‌‌ declares‌‌ 
rise‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌‌constitutional‌‌   question.‌‌   The‌‌  Constitution‌‌   mandates:‌‌   "Every‌‌ 
the‌‌   practice‌‌
  and‌‌
  procedure‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  lower‌‌ courts,‌‌ abridges,‌‌ enlarges,‌‌ or‌‌  that‌  ‌the‌  ‌legislature‌  ‌enacts‌  ‌the‌  ‌law,‌  ‌the‌  ‌executive‌‌
  implements‌‌   it,‌‌
  and‌‌ 
bill‌  ‌shall‌  ‌embrace‌  ‌only‌  ‌one‌‌   subject‌‌  which‌‌   shall‌‌
  be‌‌  expressed‌‌  in‌‌
  the‌‌ 
modifies‌  ‌any‌  ‌substantive‌  ‌right,‌  ‌the‌  ‌test‌‌  is‌‌
  ‌whether‌‌   the‌‌
  rule‌‌
  really‌‌  the‌‌judiciary‌‌interprets‌‌it.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 30‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

title‌‌  thereof."‌‌   Since‌‌  there‌‌


  is‌‌
  no‌‌   dispute‌‌ as‌‌ the‌‌ title‌‌ limits‌‌ the‌‌ power‌‌ to‌‌  substitute‌  ‌bill‌  ‌in‌  ‌anticipation‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌receipt‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌bill‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌ 
The‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌augment‌‌  was‌‌  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  used‌‌
  only‌‌  when‌‌   the‌‌  purpose‌‌   for‌‌ 
regulating,‌‌   not‌‌
  prohibiting,‌‌   it‌‌ would‌‌ result‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ statute‌‌ being‌‌ invalid‌‌  House,‌‌
  so‌‌  long‌‌
  as‌‌
  action‌‌  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  Senate‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌body‌‌ is‌‌ withheld‌‌ pending‌‌ 
which‌  ‌the‌  ‌funds‌  ‌had‌  ‌been‌  ‌allocated‌  ‌were‌‌   already‌‌   satisfied,‌‌   or‌‌ 
if,‌‌ as‌‌ was‌‌ done‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ Municipality‌‌ of‌‌ Bocaue,‌‌ the‌‌ operation‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌night‌‌  receipt‌‌of‌‌the‌‌House‌‌bill.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌need‌‌
  for‌‌  such‌‌  funds‌‌  had‌‌   ceased‌‌  to‌‌
  exist‌, ‌‌for‌‌  only‌‌
  then‌‌
  could‌‌ 
club‌‌was‌‌prohibited.‌  ‌
savings‌‌be‌‌properly‌‌realized.‌  ‌
Demetria‌‌v.‌‌Alba‌  ‌
As‌‌to‌‌specific‌‌laws‌  ‌ According‌  ‌to‌  ‌Philconsa‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Enriquez‌, ‌ ‌impoundment‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌‌
The‌‌
  purpose‌‌   and‌‌ conditions‌‌ for‌‌ which‌‌ funds‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌ transferred‌‌ were‌‌  refusal‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌President,‌  ‌for‌  ‌whatever‌  ‌reason,‌  ‌to‌‌   spend‌‌   funds‌‌  made‌‌ 
1. Art‌  ‌VII‌  ‌Sec‌  ‌22.‌  ‌The‌  ‌President‌  ‌shall‌  ‌submit‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Congress,‌‌ 
specified,‌‌i.e.‌‌   ‌ available‌  ‌by‌  ‌Congress.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌failure‌  ‌to‌  ‌spend‌  ‌or‌  ‌obligate‌  ‌budget‌‌ 
within‌‌   thirty‌‌  days‌‌   from‌‌  the‌‌ opening‌‌ of‌‌ every‌‌ regular‌‌ session‌‌ as‌‌  authority‌‌of‌‌any‌‌type.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌basis‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌general‌  ‌appropriations‌  ‌bill‌, ‌ ‌a ‌ ‌budget‌  ‌of‌‌  1. transfer‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌‌
  augmenting‌‌ 
an‌‌item‌‌and‌‌   ‌ It‌‌
  is‌‌ the‌‌ President‌‌ who‌‌ proposes‌‌ the‌‌ budget‌‌ but‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌ Congress‌‌ that‌‌ has‌‌ 
expenditures‌  ‌and‌  ‌sources‌  ‌of‌  ‌financing‌, ‌ ‌including‌  ‌receipts‌‌ 
the‌  ‌final‌  ‌say‌  ‌on‌  ‌matters‌  ‌of‌  ‌appropriations.‌  ‌For‌  ‌this‌  ‌purpose,‌‌ 
from‌‌existing‌‌and‌‌proposed‌‌revenue‌‌measures.‌  ‌ 2. such‌  ‌transfer‌‌
  may‌‌  be‌‌
  made‌‌
  only‌‌
  ‌if‌‌
  there‌‌   are‌‌
  savings‌‌
  from‌‌ 
another‌‌   item‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  appropriation‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  government‌‌ branch‌‌  appropriation‌i‌ nvolves‌‌two‌‌governing‌‌principles,‌‌namely:‌‌   ‌
2. Art‌  ‌VI‌  ‌Sec‌  ‌24.‌  ‌All‌  ‌appropriation,‌  ‌revenue‌  ‌or‌‌
  tariff‌‌
  bills,‌‌
  bills‌‌ 
or‌‌constitutional‌‌body.‌  ‌ 1) a‌  ‌Principle‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Public‌  ‌Fisc‌, ‌ ‌asserting‌  ‌that‌  ‌all‌  ‌monies‌‌ 
authorizing‌  ‌increase‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌public‌  ‌debt,‌  ‌bills‌  ‌of‌  ‌local‌‌  received‌  ‌from‌  ‌whatever‌  ‌source‌  ‌by‌  ‌any‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
application,‌  ‌and‌  ‌private‌  ‌bills,‌  ‌shall‌  ‌originate‌  ‌exclusively‌  ‌in‌‌  Abakada‌‌Guro‌‌v.‌‌Ermita‌  ‌ government‌‌are‌‌public‌‌funds;‌‌and‌  ‌
the‌‌
  House‌‌   of‌‌ Representatives‌, ‌‌but‌‌ the‌‌ Senate‌‌ may‌‌ propose‌‌ or‌‌  2) a‌  ‌Principle‌  ‌of‌  ‌Appropriations‌  ‌Control‌, ‌ ‌prohibiting‌‌ 
concur‌‌with‌‌amendments.‌  ‌ Since‌‌   there‌‌   is‌‌
  no‌‌  question‌‌   that‌‌ the‌‌ revenue‌‌ bill‌‌ exclusively‌‌ originated‌‌  expenditure‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌public‌  ‌money‌  ‌without‌  ‌legislative‌‌ 
in‌‌
  the‌‌  House,‌‌   the‌‌ Senate‌‌ was‌‌ acting‌‌ within‌‌ its‌‌ constitutional‌‌ power‌‌ to‌‌  authorization.‌  ‌
3. Sec‌  ‌25.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌may‌  ‌not‌  ‌increase‌  ‌the‌  ‌appropriations‌‌  introduce‌‌   amendments‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌ House‌‌ bill‌‌ when‌‌ it‌‌ included‌‌ provisions‌‌ 
recommended‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌operation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  in‌‌
  Senate‌‌ Bill‌‌ No.‌‌ 1950‌‌ amending‌‌ corporate‌‌ income‌‌ taxes,‌‌ percentage,‌‌  On‌‌Cross-border‌‌augmentations‌  ‌
Government‌‌as‌‌specified‌‌in‌‌the‌‌budget.‌‌   ‌ excise‌‌   and‌‌  franchise‌‌   taxes.‌‌   The‌‌   sections‌‌
  introduced‌‌   by‌‌ the‌‌ Senate‌‌ are‌‌ 
Section‌‌   25(5)‌‌   has‌‌
  delineated‌‌   borders‌‌   between‌‌   their‌‌ offices,‌‌ such‌‌ that‌‌ 
4. No‌  ‌provision‌  ‌or‌  ‌enactment‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌embraced‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌general‌‌  germane‌‌   to‌‌  the‌‌  subject‌‌   matter‌‌   and‌‌ purposes‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ house‌‌ bills,‌‌ which‌‌ 
funds‌  ‌appropriated‌  ‌for‌  ‌one‌  ‌office‌‌   are‌‌   prohibited‌‌   from‌‌   crossing‌‌
  over‌‌ 
is‌‌
  to‌‌
  supplement‌‌   our‌‌ country’s‌‌ fiscal‌‌ deficit,‌‌ among‌‌ others.‌‌ Thus,‌‌ the‌‌ 
appropriations‌  ‌bill‌  ‌unless‌  ‌it‌  ‌relates‌  ‌specifically‌  ‌to‌  ‌some‌‌  to‌‌
  another‌‌   office‌‌
  even‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ guise‌‌ of‌‌ augmentation‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌deficient‌‌ item‌‌ 
Senate‌‌acted‌‌within‌‌its‌‌power‌‌to‌‌propose‌‌those‌‌amendments.‌  ‌
particular‌  ‌appropriation‌  ‌therein.‌  ‌Any‌  ‌such‌  ‌provision‌  ‌or‌‌  or‌‌
  items.‌‌   Cross-border‌‌   transfers,‌‌   whether‌‌   as‌‌
  augmentation,‌‌ or‌‌ as‌‌ aid,‌‌ 
were‌p ‌ rohibited‌u ‌ nder‌‌Section‌‌25(5).‌  ‌
enactment‌‌   shall‌‌  be‌‌
  limited‌‌ in‌‌ its‌‌ operation‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ appropriation‌‌ 
Araullo‌‌v.‌‌Aquino‌‌III‌‌2 ‌ 014‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
to‌‌which‌‌it‌‌relates.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌transfer‌  ‌of‌  ‌appropriated‌  ‌funds‌, ‌ ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌valid‌  ‌under‌  ‌Section‌‌ 
Pork‌‌barrel‌‌system‌‌
   ‌
5. No‌  ‌law‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌passed‌  ‌authorizing‌  ‌any‌  ‌transfer‌  ‌of‌‌ 
25(5)‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌made‌  ‌upon‌  ‌a ‌ ‌concurrence‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌following‌‌  Belgica‌‌v.‌‌Ochoa‌‌2
‌ 013‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
appropriations‌; ‌ ‌however‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌President,‌  ‌the‌‌   President‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌  requisites‌,‌‌namely:‌  ‌
Senate,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Speaker‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌House‌  ‌of‌‌  Representatives,‌‌   the‌‌
  Chief‌‌  The‌  ‌Legislative‌  ‌branch‌  ‌of‌  ‌government,‌  ‌much‌  ‌more‌  ‌any‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌‌ 
1) There‌‌   is‌‌
  a ‌‌‌law‌‌ ‌authorizing‌‌ the‌‌ President,‌‌ the‌‌ President‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
Justice‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Supreme‌  ‌Court,‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌heads‌  ‌of‌‌   Constitutional‌‌  members,‌  ‌should‌  ‌not‌  ‌cross‌  ‌over‌  ‌the‌  ‌field‌  ‌of‌  ‌implementing‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Senate,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Speaker,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Chief‌  ‌Justice,‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌heads‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Commissions‌‌ may,‌‌ ‌by‌‌ law‌, ‌‌be‌‌ authorized‌‌ to‌‌ ‌augment‌‌ ‌any‌‌ item‌  Constitutional‌  ‌Commissions‌  ‌to‌  ‌transfer‌  ‌funds‌  ‌within‌  ‌their‌‌  national‌  ‌budget‌  ‌since,‌  ‌as‌  ‌earlier‌  ‌stated,‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌is‌  ‌properly‌  ‌the‌‌ 
in‌  ‌the‌  ‌general‌  ‌appropriations‌  ‌law‌  ‌for‌  ‌their‌  ‌respective‌  ‌offices‌‌  respective‌‌offices;‌  ‌ domain‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Executive.‌  ‌Upon‌  ‌approval‌  ‌and‌  ‌passage‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌GAA,‌‌ 
from‌s‌ avings‌i‌ n‌‌other‌‌items‌‌of‌‌their‌‌respective‌‌appropriations.‌  ‌ Congress‘‌  ‌law-making‌  ‌role‌  ‌necessarily‌  ‌comes‌  ‌to‌  ‌an‌  ‌end‌  ‌and‌  ‌from‌‌ 
2) The‌  ‌funds‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌‌   transferred‌‌
  are‌‌  ‌savings‌‌  ‌generated‌‌   from‌‌   the‌‌  there‌  ‌the‌  ‌Executive‘s‌  ‌role‌  ‌of‌  ‌implementing‌  ‌the‌  ‌national‌  ‌budget‌‌ 
appropriations‌‌for‌‌their‌‌respective‌‌offices;‌‌and‌  ‌ begins.‌  ‌
Tolentino‌‌v.‌‌SOF‌  ‌
3) The‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌transfer‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌augment‌  ‌an‌  ‌item‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  The‌  ‌foregoing‌  ‌cardinal‌  ‌postulates‌  ‌were‌  ‌definitively‌  ‌enunciated‌  ‌in‌‌ 
It‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌– ‌ ‌but‌  ‌the‌  ‌revenue‌  ‌bill‌  ‌– ‌ ‌which‌‌
  is‌‌
  required‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌  general‌‌appropriations‌‌law‌‌for‌‌their‌‌respective‌‌offices.‌  ‌
Abakada‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌held‌  ‌that‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌moment‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌‌ 
Constitution‌  ‌to‌  ‌"originate‌  ‌exclusively"‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌House‌  ‌of‌‌ 
To‌  ‌comply‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌first‌  ‌requisite,‌  ‌the‌  ‌GAAs‌  ‌should‌  ‌expressly‌‌  becomes‌‌   effective,‌‌ any‌‌ provision‌‌ of‌‌ law‌‌ that‌‌ empowers‌‌ Congress‌‌ 
Representatives.‌  ‌
authorize‌‌the‌‌transfer‌‌of‌‌funds‌.‌‌Savings‌‌should‌‌be‌a ‌ ctual‌. ‌ ‌ or‌‌
  any‌‌  of‌‌
  its‌‌
  members‌‌ to‌‌ play‌‌ ‌any‌‌ role‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ implementation‌‌ or‌‌ 
Nor‌  ‌does‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌prohibit‌  ‌the‌  ‌filing‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Senate‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌ enforcement‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌violates‌  ‌the‌  ‌principle‌  ‌of‌  ‌separation‌  ‌of‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 31‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

powers‌‌and‌‌is‌‌thus‌‌unconstitutional.‌  ‌ of‌‌the‌‌four‌‌classes‌‌will‌‌render‌‌the‌‌entire‌‌IPRA‌‌law‌‌a‌‌nullity.‌   ‌‌ ‌
Simply‌  ‌stated,‌  ‌the‌  ‌ICCs/IPs'‌  ‌rights‌  ‌over‌  ‌the‌  ‌natural‌  ‌resources‌‌ 
The‌‌ Court‌‌ must‌‌ therefore‌‌ ‌abandon‌‌ its‌‌ ruling‌‌ in‌‌ ‌Philconsa‌‌ ‌which‌‌  Sections‌‌7‌‌(a),‌‌7‌‌(b)‌‌and‌‌57‌‌of‌‌the‌‌IPRA‌‌Do‌‌Not‌‌Violate‌‌the‌‌  take‌‌the‌‌form‌‌of‌m ‌ anagement‌‌or‌‌stewardship‌. ‌ ‌
sanctioned‌‌   the‌‌
  conduct‌‌
  of‌‌
  legislator‌‌
  identification‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌
  guise‌‌  Regalian‌‌Doctrine‌‌Enshrined‌‌in‌‌Section‌‌2,‌‌Article‌‌XII‌  ‌
that‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌is‌  ‌merely‌  ‌recommendatory‌  ‌and,‌  ‌as‌  ‌such,‌‌  The‌‌Large-Scale‌‌Utilization‌‌of‌‌Natural‌‌Resources‌‌Is‌A ‌ llowed‌‌ 
respondents‘‌‌reliance‌‌on‌‌the‌‌same‌‌falters‌‌altogether.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌provides‌  ‌that‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌exploration,‌  ‌development‌‌  Under‌‌Paragraphs‌‌1‌‌and‌‌4,‌‌Section‌‌2,‌‌Article‌‌XII‌  ‌
and‌  ‌utilization‌  ‌of‌  ‌natural‌  ‌resources,‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌exercises‌  ‌full‌‌ 
Procedure‌‌for‌‌passage‌‌of‌‌bills‌‌   ‌ Interpreting‌‌   Section‌‌   2,‌‌
  Article‌‌   XII‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  1987‌‌ Constitution‌‌ in‌‌ relation‌‌ 
control‌  ‌and‌  ‌supervision‌, ‌ ‌and‌  ‌may‌  ‌undertake‌  ‌the‌‌
  same‌‌  in‌‌
  four‌‌
  (4)‌‌ 
to‌‌
  Section‌‌   57‌‌  of‌‌
  IPRA,‌‌   the‌‌
  State,‌‌   as‌‌   owner‌‌   of‌‌
  these‌‌
  natural‌‌ resources,‌‌ 
Tolentino‌‌v.‌‌SOF‌  ‌ modes:‌  ‌
may‌  ‌directly‌  ‌undertake‌  ‌the‌  ‌development‌  ‌and‌  ‌exploitation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
The‌  ‌presidential‌  ‌certification‌‌   ‌dispensed‌‌   with‌‌  the‌‌
  requirement‌‌   not‌‌  1. The‌‌State‌‌may‌d
‌ irectly‌u
‌ ndertake‌‌such‌‌activities;‌‌or‌  ‌ natural‌‌
  resources‌‌   by‌‌   itself,‌‌  ‌or‌‌
  in‌‌ the‌‌ alternative‌, ‌‌it‌‌ may‌‌ recognize‌‌ the‌‌ 
only‌‌
  of‌‌
  printing‌‌
  but‌‌
  also‌‌ that‌‌ of‌‌ reading‌‌ the‌‌ bill‌‌ on‌‌ separate‌‌ days.‌‌ The‌‌  2. The‌  ‌State‌  ‌may‌  ‌enter‌  ‌into‌  ‌co-production,‌  ‌joint‌‌
  venture‌‌   or‌‌  priority‌‌   rights‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌   ICCs/IPs‌‌   as‌‌   owners‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  land‌‌
  on‌‌  which‌‌ the‌‌ 
phrase‌  ‌"except‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌certifies‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌necessity‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌‌  natural‌  ‌resources‌  ‌are‌  ‌found‌  ‌by‌  ‌entering‌  ‌into‌  ‌a ‌ ‌co-production,‌  ‌joint‌‌ 
production-sharing‌  ‌agreements‌‌   with‌‌
  Filipino‌‌  citizens‌‌
  or‌‌ 
immediate‌‌   enactment,‌‌   etc."‌‌
  in‌‌
  Art‌‌   VI,‌‌
  §26(2)‌‌
  qualifies‌‌   the‌‌
  two‌‌
  stated‌‌ 
qualified‌‌corporations;‌  ‌ venture,‌‌or‌‌production-sharing‌‌agreement‌‌with‌‌them.‌  ‌
conditions‌‌before‌‌a‌‌bill‌‌can‌‌become‌‌a‌‌law:‌‌   ‌
1) the‌‌bill‌‌has‌‌passed‌‌‌three‌‌readings‌‌on‌‌separate‌‌days‌‌‌and‌‌   ‌ 3. Congress‌  ‌may,‌  ‌by‌  ‌law,‌  ‌allow‌  ‌small-scale‌  ‌utilization‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Shuley‌‌Mine‌‌v.‌‌DENR‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌
natural‌‌resources‌‌by‌‌Filipino‌‌citizens;‌  ‌
2) it‌‌
  has‌‌
  been‌‌
  ‌printed‌‌   ‌in‌‌
  its‌‌
  final‌‌
  form‌‌
  ‌and‌‌ distributed‌‌ three‌‌ 
days‌‌before‌‌it‌‌is‌‌finally‌‌approved.‌  ‌ 4. For‌  ‌the‌  ‌large-scale‌  ‌exploration,‌  ‌development‌  ‌and‌‌  The‌‌
  ‌Regalian‌‌   Doctrine‌‌   espouses‌‌   that‌‌
  all‌‌ lands‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ public‌‌ domain‌‌ 
utilization‌  ‌of‌  ‌minerals,‌  ‌petroleum‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌mineral‌  ‌oils,‌‌  belong‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌State,‌‌
  and‌‌
  that,‌‌
  as‌‌
  a ‌‌consequence‌‌   thereof,‌‌   any‌‌
  asserted‌‌ 
Art‌‌ VI‌‌ §26(2)‌‌ must,‌‌ therefore,‌‌ be‌‌ construed‌‌ as‌‌ ‌referring‌‌ only‌‌ to‌‌ bills‌‌  right‌‌of‌‌ownership‌‌over‌‌land‌‌necessarily‌‌traces‌‌back‌‌to‌‌the‌‌State.‌  ‌
the‌‌
  President‌‌  may‌‌  enter‌‌ into‌‌ agreements‌‌ with‌‌ foreign-owned‌‌ 
introduced‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌ first‌‌ time‌‌ in‌‌ either‌‌ house‌‌ of‌‌ Congress‌, ‌‌NOT‌‌ to‌‌ 
the‌‌conference‌‌committee‌‌report.‌  ‌ corporations‌‌involving‌t‌ echnical‌‌or‌‌financial‌‌assistance‌. ‌ ‌ The‌  ‌mineral‌  ‌agreements‌  ‌entered‌  ‌into‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌with‌  ‌private‌‌ 
persons‌‌and‌‌entities‌‌partake‌‌of‌‌two‌‌natures:‌  
Examining‌‌   the‌‌
  IPRA,‌‌
  ‌there‌‌ is‌‌ nothing‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ law‌‌ that‌‌ grants‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ 
11. Nationalization‌‌Principle‌  ‌ ICCs/IPs‌  ‌ownership‌  ‌over‌  ‌the‌  ‌natural‌  ‌resources‌  ‌within‌  ‌their‌‌  a) a‌‌permit‌;‌‌and‌  ‌

a. Natural‌‌Resources‌  ‌ ancestral‌‌   domains‌. ‌ ‌The‌‌ right‌‌ of‌‌ ICCs/IPs‌‌ in‌‌ their‌‌ ancestral‌‌ domains‌‌  b) a‌‌contract‌. ‌ ‌


includes‌‌ ownership,‌‌ but‌‌ this‌‌ "‌ownership‌" ‌‌is‌‌ ‌expressly‌‌ defined‌‌ and‌‌  Consistent‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌Regalian‌  ‌Doctrine‌, ‌ ‌all‌  ‌unexplored‌  ‌or‌‌ 
Cruz‌‌v.‌‌SENR‌‌‌re‌‌Constitutionality‌‌of‌‌IPRA‌‌and‌‌its‌‌IRR‌  ‌ limited‌‌‌in‌‌Section‌‌7‌‌(a).‌  ‌ unextracted‌  ‌mineral‌  ‌resources‌  ‌belong‌  ‌to‌  ‌every‌  ‌Filipino.‌  ‌Issues‌‌ 
regarding‌‌   the‌‌   exploration,‌‌   extraction‌‌ and‌‌ utilization‌‌ of‌‌ mineral‌‌ 
Ancestral‌‌Domains‌‌and‌‌Ancestral‌‌Lands‌‌are‌‌the‌‌Private‌‌  The‌‌Small-Scale‌‌Utilization‌‌of‌‌Natural‌‌Resources‌‌Is‌A
‌ llowed‌‌ 
resources‌  ‌are‌  ‌imbued‌  ‌with‌  ‌public‌  ‌interest‌. ‌ ‌This‌  ‌striking‌‌ 
Property‌‌of‌‌Indigenous‌‌Peoples‌‌and‌‌Do‌‌Not‌‌Constitute‌‌Part‌‌of‌‌  Under‌‌Paragraph‌‌3,‌‌Section‌‌2‌‌of‌‌Article‌‌XII‌  ‌ constitutional‌‌ realization‌‌ justifies‌‌ a ‌‌‌strict‌‌ interpretation‌‌ in‌‌ favor‌‌ of‌‌ 
the‌‌Land‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Public‌‌Domain.‌  ‌ Ownership‌  ‌over‌  ‌the‌  ‌natural‌  ‌resources‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌ancestral‌  ‌domains‌‌  preserving‌  ‌the‌  ‌possession‌  ‌of‌  ‌mineral‌‌   resources‌‌   in‌‌
  favor‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
State‌  ‌and‌  ‌in‌  ‌trust‌  ‌for‌  ‌its‌  ‌citizens‌  ‌pending‌  ‌controversies‌  ‌regarding‌‌ 
The‌‌  private‌‌   character‌‌   of‌‌
  ancestral‌‌
  lands‌‌ and‌‌ domains‌‌ as‌‌ laid‌‌ down‌‌ in‌‌  remains‌‌  with‌‌
  the‌‌
  State‌‌
  and‌‌
  the‌‌
  ICCs/IPs‌‌
  are‌‌
  ‌merely‌‌ granted‌‌ the‌‌ right‌‌ 
their‌‌exploration,‌‌extraction,‌‌transportation‌‌or‌‌exportation.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌IPRA‌  ‌is‌  ‌further‌  ‌strengthened‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌option‌  ‌given‌  ‌to‌  ‌individual‌‌  to‌‌   ‌
ICCs/IPs‌‌over‌‌their‌‌individually-owned‌‌ancestral‌‌lands.‌  ‌ Thus,‌‌ the‌‌ CA‌‌ is‌‌ correct‌‌ in‌‌ declaring‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ RTC‌‌ erred‌‌ in‌‌ enjoining‌‌ the‌‌ 
1. "manage‌‌and‌‌conserve"‌‌‌them‌‌for‌‌future‌‌generations,‌‌   ‌
DENR-MGB‌  ‌in‌  ‌suspending‌  ‌petitioner's‌‌   mining‌‌   operations‌‌   as‌‌
  well‌‌
  as‌‌ 
Section‌‌   3 ‌‌of‌‌
  Article‌‌  XII‌‌  on‌‌
  National‌‌   Economy‌‌   and‌‌
  Patrimony‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  2. "benefit‌  ‌and‌  ‌share"‌  ‌the‌  ‌profits‌  ‌from‌  ‌their‌  ‌allocation‌  ‌and‌‌  withholding‌‌the‌‌issuance‌‌of‌‌its‌‌OTPs‌‌and‌‌MOEPs.‌‌   ‌
1987‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌classifies‌  ‌lands‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌public‌  ‌domain‌‌   ‌into‌‌
  four‌‌  utilization,‌‌and‌‌   ‌
categories:‌  ‌(a)‌  ‌agricultural,‌  ‌(b)‌  ‌forest‌  ‌or‌  ‌timber,‌  ‌(c)‌  ‌mineral‌  ‌lands,‌‌  b. Economic‌‌Activities‌  ‌
3. "negotiate‌‌
  the‌‌
  terms‌‌ and‌‌ conditions‌‌ for‌‌ their‌‌ exploration"‌‌ for‌‌ 
and‌  ‌(d)‌  ‌national‌  ‌parks. ‌  ‌Section‌  ‌5 ‌ ‌mentions‌  ‌ancestral‌  ‌lands‌  ‌and‌‌  the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌"ensuring‌  ‌ecological‌  ‌and‌  ‌environmental‌‌  Section‌  ‌6.‌  ‌The‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌property‌  ‌bears‌  ‌a ‌ ‌social‌‌
  function,‌‌
  and‌‌
  all‌‌ 
ancestral‌‌   domains‌‌   but‌‌  it‌‌
  does‌‌ not‌‌ classify‌‌ them‌‌ under‌‌ any‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ said‌‌  protection‌‌and‌‌conservation‌‌measures."‌‌   ‌ economic‌  ‌agents‌  ‌shall‌  ‌contribute‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌common‌  ‌good.‌‌ 
four‌  ‌categories. ‌  ‌To‌‌  classify‌‌   them‌‌   as‌‌
  public‌‌  lands‌‌  under‌‌   any‌‌  one‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 32‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

Individuals‌  ‌and‌  ‌private‌  ‌groups,‌  ‌including‌  ‌corporations,‌‌  or‌‌


  direct‌‌
  the‌‌
  operation‌‌ of‌‌ any‌‌ privately-owned‌‌ public‌‌ utility‌‌ or‌‌  owing‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌creditors‌  ‌of‌  ‌AGRIX‌  ‌is‌  ‌arbitrarily‌  ‌destroyed.‌  ‌There‌  ‌is‌‌ 
cooperatives,‌‌   and‌‌
  similar‌‌ collective‌‌ organizations,‌‌ shall‌‌ have‌‌ the‌‌  business‌‌affected‌‌with‌‌public‌‌interest‌. ‌ ‌ discrimination‌‌   as‌‌
  well.‌‌ In‌‌ extinguishing‌‌ the‌‌ mortgage‌‌ and‌‌ other‌‌ liens,‌‌ 
right‌  ‌to‌  ‌own,‌  ‌establish,‌  ‌and‌  ‌operate‌  ‌economic‌  ‌enterprises,‌‌  the‌‌
  decree‌‌   lumps‌‌   the‌‌
  secured‌‌   creditors‌‌
  with‌‌
  the‌‌
  unsecured‌‌  creditors‌‌ 
Section‌‌   18.‌‌ The‌‌ State‌‌ may,‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ interest‌‌ of‌‌ ‌national‌‌ welfare‌‌ or‌‌  and‌  ‌places‌  ‌them‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌level‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌prosecution‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌ 
subject‌‌   to‌‌ the‌‌ duty‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ State‌‌ to‌‌ promote‌‌ distributive‌‌ justice‌‌ and‌‌ 
defense‌, ‌ ‌establish‌  ‌and‌  ‌operate‌  ‌vital‌  ‌industries‌  ‌and,‌  ‌upon‌‌  respective‌  ‌claims.‌  ‌In‌  ‌this‌  ‌respect,‌  ‌all‌  ‌of‌  ‌them‌  ‌are‌  ‌considered‌‌ 
to‌  ‌intervene‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌common‌  ‌good‌  ‌so‌  ‌demands.‌‌  unsecured‌‌creditors‌‌violative‌‌of‌‌the‌e ‌ qual‌‌protection‌‌clause‌. ‌ ‌
(Stewardship‌‌Concept)‌  ‌ payment‌  ‌of‌  ‌just‌  ‌compensation,‌  ‌transfer‌  ‌to‌  ‌public‌  ‌ownership‌‌ 
utilities‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌private‌  ‌enterprises‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌operated‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌  On‌  ‌top‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌  ‌this,‌  ‌New‌  ‌Agrix,‌  ‌Inc.‌  ‌was‌  ‌created‌  ‌by‌  ‌special‌  ‌decree‌‌ 
Section‌  ‌12.‌  ‌The‌  ‌State‌  ‌shall‌  ‌promote‌  ‌the‌  ‌preferential‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌‌  Government.‌  ‌ notwithstanding‌  ‌the‌  ‌provision‌  ‌of‌  ‌Article‌  ‌XIV,‌  ‌Section‌  ‌4 ‌ ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌   1973‌‌ 
Constitution‌‌   proscribing‌‌   the‌‌
  formation,‌‌ organization,‌‌ or‌‌ regulation‌‌ of‌‌ 
Filipino‌  ‌labor,‌  ‌domestic‌  ‌materials‌  ‌and‌  ‌locally‌  ‌produced‌‌  goods,‌‌ 
private‌‌corporations‌‌by‌‌the‌‌government.‌  ‌
and‌‌adopt‌‌measures‌‌that‌‌help‌‌make‌‌them‌‌competitive.‌  ‌ Albano‌‌v.‌‌Reyes‌  ‌
The‌  ‌decree‌  ‌also‌  ‌impairs‌  ‌the‌  ‌obligation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌contract‌  ‌between‌‌ 
Section‌‌  13.‌‌
  The‌‌
  State‌‌
  shall‌‌
  pursue‌‌   a ‌‌trade‌‌ policy‌‌ that‌‌ serves‌‌ the‌‌  Art.‌‌ XII,‌‌ Sec.‌‌ 11‌‌ ‌does‌‌ not‌‌ necessarily‌‌ imply‌‌ ‌that‌‌ only‌‌ Congress‌‌ has‌‌  AGRIX‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌private‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌without‌  ‌justification.‌  ‌While‌‌   it‌‌
  is‌‌ 
the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌grant‌  ‌such‌  ‌authorization‌. ‌ ‌Our‌  ‌statute‌  ‌books‌  ‌are‌‌  true‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌police‌  ‌power‌‌  is‌‌
  superior‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  impairment‌‌   clause,‌‌   the‌‌ 
general‌  ‌welfare‌  ‌and‌  ‌utilizes‌  ‌all‌  ‌forms‌  ‌and‌  ‌arrangements‌  ‌of‌‌ 
replete‌‌   with‌‌   laws‌‌
  granting‌‌   specified‌‌
  agencies‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ Executive‌‌ Branch‌‌  principle‌  ‌will‌  ‌apply‌  ‌only‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌contract‌  ‌is‌  ‌so‌  ‌related‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
exchange‌‌on‌‌the‌‌basis‌‌of‌‌equality‌‌and‌‌reciprocity.‌  ‌ the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌issue‌  ‌such‌  ‌authorization‌  ‌for‌  ‌certain‌  ‌classes‌  ‌of‌  ‌public‌‌  public‌  ‌welfare‌  ‌that‌  ‌it‌  ‌will‌‌
  be‌‌
  considered‌‌  congenitally‌‌   susceptible‌‌   to‌‌ 
utilities.‌  ‌ change‌‌by‌‌the‌‌legislature‌‌in‌‌the‌‌interest‌‌of‌‌the‌‌greater‌‌number.‌  ‌
Organization‌  ‌and‌  ‌Regulation‌  ‌of‌  ‌Private‌  ‌Corporations‌  ‌— ‌‌
Section‌  ‌16.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not,‌  ‌except‌  ‌by‌  ‌general‌  ‌law‌, ‌‌ In‌‌
  the‌‌  instant‌‌   case,‌‌
  the‌‌   PPA,‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌ exercise‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ option‌‌ granted‌‌ it‌‌ by‌‌ 
P.D.‌‌  No.‌‌
  857,‌‌  chose‌‌   to‌‌
  contract‌‌   out‌‌  the‌‌
  operation‌‌   and‌‌ management‌‌ of‌‌  Liban‌‌v.‌‌Gordon‌‌2
‌ 011‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌Resolution‌  ‌
provide‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌formation,‌‌   organization,‌‌
  or‌‌  regulation‌‌   of‌‌
  private‌‌ 
the‌‌  MICP‌‌   to‌‌
  a ‌‌private‌‌  corporation.‌  ‌This‌‌ is‌‌ clearly‌‌ within‌‌ its‌‌ power‌‌ to‌‌ 
corporations.‌  ‌GOCCs‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌created‌  ‌or‌  ‌established‌  ‌by‌  ‌special‌‌  The‌‌   structure‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ PNRC‌‌ is‌‌ sui‌‌ generis‌, ‌‌being‌‌ neither‌‌ strictly‌‌ private‌‌ 
do.‌  ‌The‌  ‌contract‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌  ‌PPA‌  ‌and‌  ‌ICTSI,‌  ‌coupled‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌‌ 
charters‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌interest‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  common‌‌   good‌‌  and‌‌
  ‌subject‌‌   to‌‌  President's‌  ‌written‌  ‌approval,‌  ‌constitute‌  ‌the‌  ‌necessary‌‌   authorization‌‌  nor‌‌  public‌‌
  in‌‌
  nature.‌‌   R.A.‌‌
  No.‌‌  95‌‌
  remains‌‌   valid‌‌
  and‌‌
  constitutional‌‌ in‌‌ 
the‌‌test‌‌of‌‌economic‌‌viability.‌  ‌ for‌‌ICTSI's‌‌operation‌‌and‌‌management‌‌of‌‌the‌‌MICP.‌‌   ‌ its‌‌entirety.‌  ‌

Operation‌  ‌of‌  ‌Public‌  ‌Utilities.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Section‌  ‌11.‌  ‌No‌  ‌franchise,‌‌  c. Advertising‌‌and‌‌Media‌  ‌
Republic‌‌v.‌‌PLDT‌  ‌
certificate,‌‌ or‌‌ any‌‌ other‌‌ form‌‌ of‌‌ authorization‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ operation‌‌ of‌‌ 
Sec‌‌   10‌‌  Art‌‌  XVI‌‌
  . ‌‌‌The‌‌
  State‌‌ shall‌‌ provide‌‌ the‌‌ policy‌‌ environment‌‌ 
a‌‌public‌‌utility‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌granted‌‌except‌‌   ‌ There‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌reason‌‌   why‌‌  the‌‌
  State‌‌
  may‌‌   not‌‌
  require‌‌
  a ‌‌public‌‌
  utility‌‌  to‌‌ 
render‌‌   services‌‌   in‌‌ the‌‌ general‌‌ interest,‌‌ provided‌‌ just‌‌ compensation‌‌ is‌‌  for‌‌
  the‌‌ full‌‌ development‌‌ of‌‌ Filipino‌‌ capability‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ emergence‌‌ 
a) to‌c‌ itizens‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines‌‌or‌‌   ‌ of‌  ‌communication‌  ‌structures‌  ‌suitable‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌needs‌  ‌and‌‌ 
paid‌  ‌therefor.‌  ‌Ultimately,‌  ‌the‌  ‌beneficiary‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌interconnecting‌‌ 
b) to‌  ‌corporations‌  ‌or‌  ‌associations‌  ‌organized‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌‌  service‌  ‌would‌  ‌be‌  ‌the‌  ‌users‌  ‌of‌  ‌both‌  ‌telephone‌  ‌systems,‌  ‌so‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌  aspirations‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌nation‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌balanced‌  ‌flow‌  ‌of‌  ‌information‌‌ 
laws‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Philippines,‌‌
  ‌at‌‌
  least‌‌
  60%‌‌
  of‌‌
  whose‌‌
  capital‌‌  condemnation‌‌would‌‌be‌‌for‌‌public‌‌use.‌  ‌ into,‌‌   out‌‌
  of,‌‌
  and‌‌
  across‌‌   the‌‌
  country,‌‌   in‌‌
  accordance‌‌  with‌‌  a ‌‌policy‌‌ 
is‌‌owned‌‌by‌‌such‌‌citizens;‌‌   ‌ that‌‌respects‌‌the‌‌freedom‌‌of‌‌speech‌‌and‌‌of‌‌the‌‌press.‌ 
NADECO‌‌v.‌‌PVB‌  ‌
nor‌‌ shall‌‌ such‌‌ franchise,‌‌ certificate,‌‌ or‌‌ authorization‌‌ be‌‌ exclusive‌‌  Sec‌‌
  11.‌‌
  ‌The‌‌
  ownership‌‌   and‌‌ management‌‌ of‌‌ mass‌‌ media‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ 
in‌‌character‌‌or‌‌for‌‌a‌‌longer‌‌period‌‌than‌‌‌50‌‌years‌.  ‌‌ ‌ The‌‌   interests‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ public‌‌ are‌‌ not‌‌ sufficiently‌‌ involved‌‌ to‌‌ warrant‌‌ the‌‌  limited‌  ‌to‌  ‌citizens‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines,‌  ‌or‌  ‌to‌  ‌corporations,‌‌ 
The‌  ‌State‌  ‌shall‌  ‌encourage‌  ‌equity‌  ‌participation‌  ‌in‌  ‌public‌‌  interference‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  government‌‌   with‌‌
  the‌‌ private‌‌ contracts‌‌ of‌‌ AGRIX.‌‌ It‌‌  cooperatives‌  ‌or‌  ‌associations,‌  ‌wholly-owned‌  ‌and‌  ‌managed‌  ‌by‌‌ 
would‌‌   appear‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ decree‌‌ was‌‌ issued‌‌ only‌‌ to‌‌ favor‌‌ a ‌‌special‌‌ group‌‌  such‌‌citizens.‌  ‌
utilities‌‌‌by‌‌the‌‌general‌‌public.‌‌   ‌ of‌  ‌investors‌  ‌who‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌preferred‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌legitimate‌  ‌creditors‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Section‌  ‌17.‌  ‌In‌  ‌times‌  ‌of‌‌
  ‌national‌‌  emergency‌, ‌‌when‌‌   the‌‌
  public‌‌  AGRIX.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌shall‌  ‌regulate‌  ‌or‌  ‌prohibit‌  ‌monopolies‌  ‌in‌‌ 
interest‌  ‌so‌  ‌requires,‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌may,‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌  ‌emergency‌  ‌and‌‌  Also,‌  ‌the‌  ‌means‌  ‌employed‌  ‌to‌‌  rehabilitate‌‌   AGRIX‌‌
  fall‌‌
  far‌‌
  short‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  commercial‌‌ mass‌‌ media‌‌ when‌‌ the‌‌ public‌‌ interest‌‌ so‌‌ requires.‌‌ No‌‌ 
under‌‌
  reasonable‌‌   terms‌‌ prescribed‌‌ by‌‌ it,‌‌ temporarily‌‌ take‌‌ over‌‌  requirement‌  ‌that‌  ‌they‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌unduly‌‌
  oppressive.‌‌   The‌‌
  right‌‌   to‌‌  combinations‌  ‌in‌  ‌restraint‌‌
  of‌‌
  trade‌‌
  or‌‌
  unfair‌‌
  competition‌‌   therein‌‌ 
property‌  ‌in‌  ‌all‌  ‌mortgages,‌  ‌liens,‌  ‌interests,‌  ‌penalties‌  ‌and‌  ‌charges‌‌  shall‌‌be‌‌allowed.‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 33‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌  ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

Sources‌‌of‌‌International‌‌Law‌  ‌
The‌‌ ‌advertising‌‌ industry‌‌ is‌‌ impressed‌‌ with‌‌ public‌‌ interest,‌‌ and‌‌  b. by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌majority‌  ‌vote‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌  ‌its‌  ‌Members‌, ‌ ‌submit‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
electorate‌‌the‌‌question‌‌of‌‌calling‌‌such‌‌a‌‌convention.‌  ‌ Article‌‌38,‌‌International‌‌Court‌‌of‌‌Justice‌‌Statute‌  ‌
shall‌‌  be‌‌
  regulated‌‌ by‌‌ law‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ protection‌‌ of‌‌ consumers‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ 
promotion‌‌of‌‌the‌‌general‌‌welfare.‌  ‌ Section‌‌
  4.‌‌
  ‌Any‌‌
  amendment‌‌
  to,‌‌
  or‌‌
  revision‌‌
  of,‌‌
  this‌‌ Constitution‌‌ shall‌‌  Customary‌‌International‌‌Law‌  ‌
Only‌  ‌Filipino‌  ‌citizens‌‌
  or‌‌
  corporations‌‌
  or‌‌   ‌at‌‌
  associations‌‌   least‌‌  be‌  ‌valid‌  ‌when‌  ‌ratified‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌majority‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌votes‌  ‌cast‌‌
  in‌‌
  a ‌‌
General‌‌Principles‌‌of‌‌Law‌  ‌
seventy‌‌
  per‌‌
  centum‌‌
  (70%)‌  ‌of‌‌  the‌‌  capital‌‌ of‌‌ which‌‌ is‌‌ owned‌‌  plebiscite‌  ‌which‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌held‌  ‌not‌  ‌earlier‌  ‌than‌  ‌sixty‌  ‌days‌  ‌nor‌‌ 
later‌‌than‌‌ninety‌‌days‌‌   ‌ Effect‌‌of‌‌UN‌‌Declarations,‌‌Security‌‌Council‌‌Resolutions‌  ‌
by‌  ‌such‌  ‌citizens‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌to‌  ‌engage‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌advertising‌‌ 
industry.‌  ‌ a. after‌  ‌the‌  ‌approval‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌  ‌amendment‌  ‌or‌  ‌revision;‌‌  Effect‌  ‌of‌  ‌actions‌  ‌of‌  ‌organs‌  ‌of‌  ‌international‌  ‌organizations‌‌ 
(‌Constituent‌‌Assembly‌‌or‌‌Constitutional‌‌Convention‌)‌‌OR‌  ‌
The‌  ‌participation‌  ‌of‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌investors‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌governing‌‌   body‌‌
  of‌‌  created‌‌by‌‌treaty‌  ‌
entities‌  ‌in‌  ‌such‌  ‌industry‌  ‌shall‌‌   be‌‌
  limited‌‌   to‌‌
  their‌‌
  proportionate‌‌  b. after‌‌
  the‌‌ ‌certification‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ Comelec‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ sufficiency‌‌ of‌‌ 
Relationship‌‌with‌‌Domestic‌‌Law‌  ‌
share‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌capital‌  ‌thereof,‌  ‌and‌  ‌all‌‌
  the‌‌
  executive‌‌   and‌‌
  managing‌‌  the‌‌petition‌.‌‌(‌People’s‌‌Initiative‌) ‌ ‌
officers‌‌of‌‌such‌‌entities‌‌must‌‌be‌‌citizens‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines.‌  ‌
1. Sources‌‌of‌‌International‌‌Law‌  ‌
Lambino‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌  ‌
12. Amendment‌‌and‌‌Revision‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Constitution‌  ‌ Article‌‌38,‌I‌ nternational‌‌Court‌‌of‌‌Justice‌‌Statute‌  ‌
The‌  ‌framers‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌intended‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌"‌draft‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌ 
The‌‌
  Court,‌‌
  whose‌‌
  function‌‌   is‌‌
  to‌‌ decide‌‌ in‌‌ accordance‌‌ with‌‌ international‌‌ 
proposed‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌amendment‌" ‌ ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌"‌ready‌  ‌and‌‌ 
Article‌  ‌XVII‌. ‌ ‌Section‌  ‌1.‌  ‌Any‌  ‌amendment‌  ‌to,‌  ‌or‌  ‌revision‌  ‌of,‌  ‌this‌‌  law‌‌such‌‌disputes‌‌as‌‌are‌‌submitted‌‌to‌‌it,‌‌shall‌‌apply:‌  ‌
shown‌"‌‌to‌‌the‌‌people‌‌"b ‌ efore‌"‌‌they‌‌sign‌‌such‌‌proposal.‌  ‌
Constitution‌‌may‌‌be‌‌proposed‌‌by:‌  ‌ a. international‌  ‌conventions‌, ‌ ‌whether‌  ‌general‌  ‌or‌  p ‌ articular,‌‌ 
A‌‌
  ‌people's‌‌
  initiative‌‌
  to‌‌
  change‌‌
  the‌‌
  Constitution‌‌
  applies‌‌ ‌ONLY‌‌ to‌‌ an‌‌ 
establishing‌  ‌rules‌  ‌expressly‌  ‌recognized‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌contesting‌‌ 
1. The‌  ‌Congress‌, ‌ ‌upon‌  ‌a ‌ ‌vote‌  ‌of‌  ‌three-fourths‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌  ‌its‌‌  amendment‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌and‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌to‌  ‌its‌  r‌ evision‌. ‌‌
states;‌  ‌
Members;‌‌or‌  ‌ Revision‌b‌ roadly‌‌implies‌‌a‌‌change‌‌that‌‌   ‌
b. international‌  ‌custom‌, ‌ ‌as‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌general‌  ‌practice‌‌ 
2. A‌‌constitutional‌‌convention‌. ‌ ‌ a. alters‌  ‌a ‌ ‌basic‌  ‌principle‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌   constitution‌, ‌‌like‌‌   altering‌‌ 
accepted‌‌as‌‌law;‌  ‌
the‌  ‌principle‌  ‌of‌  ‌separation‌  ‌of‌  ‌powers‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌system‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Section‌  ‌2.‌  ‌Amendments‌  ‌to‌  ‌this‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌may‌  ‌likewise‌  ‌be‌‌  checks-and-balances.‌‌   ‌ c. the‌‌general‌‌principles‌‌of‌‌law‌‌‌recognized‌‌by‌‌civilized‌‌nations;‌  ‌
directly‌‌ proposed‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ people‌‌ through‌‌ ‌initiative‌‌ ‌upon‌‌ a ‌‌petition‌‌ 
There‌‌is‌‌also‌‌revision‌‌if‌‌the‌‌change‌‌   ‌ d. subject‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  provisions‌‌   of‌‌
  Article‌‌
  59,‌‌
  ‌judicial‌‌   decisions‌‌
  ‌and‌‌ 
of‌‌   ‌ the‌  ‌teachings‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌most‌  ‌highly‌  ‌qualified‌  ‌publicists‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
b. alters‌  ‌the‌  ‌substantial‌  ‌entirety‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌constitution,‌  ‌as‌‌ 
a. at‌  ‌least‌  ‌twelve‌  ‌per‌  ‌centum‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌total‌  ‌number‌  ‌of‌‌  various‌‌   nations,‌‌  as‌‌
  ‌subsidiary‌‌   ‌means‌‌  for‌‌
  the‌‌ determination‌‌ of‌‌ 
when‌  ‌the‌  ‌change‌  ‌affects‌  ‌substantial‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
registered‌‌voters‌,‌‌   ‌ constitution‌.  ‌‌ ‌ rules‌‌of‌‌law.‌  ‌
b. of‌‌
  which‌‌
  every‌‌
  legislative‌‌ district‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ represented‌‌ by‌‌ ‌at‌‌  A‌‌
  ‌two-part‌‌  test‌‌
  is‌‌
  thus‌‌
  used:‌‌ the‌‌ quantitative‌‌ test‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ qualitative‌‌  This‌  ‌provision‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌prejudice‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌to‌  ‌decide‌‌
  a ‌‌
least‌‌three‌‌per‌‌centum‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌registered‌‌voters‌‌therein.‌‌   ‌ test.‌  ‌The‌  ‌quantitative‌  ‌test‌  ‌examines‌  ‌only‌  ‌the‌  ‌number‌  ‌of‌‌  case‌‌‌ex‌‌aequo‌‌et‌‌bono‌,‌‌if‌‌the‌‌parties‌‌agree‌‌thereto.‌  ‌
No‌  ‌amendment‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌authorized‌  ‌within‌  ‌five‌  ‌years‌  ‌following‌  ‌the‌‌  provisions‌‌affected‌‌and‌‌does‌‌not‌‌consider‌‌the‌‌degree‌‌of‌‌the‌‌change.‌  ‌ 1. There‌‌are‌‌‌2‌‌instances‌‌where‌e
‌ quity‌m
‌ ay‌‌be‌‌applied‌:  ‌‌ ‌
ratification‌  ‌of‌  ‌this‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌nor‌  ‌oftener‌  ‌than‌  ‌once‌  ‌every‌  ‌five‌‌  The‌  ‌qualitative‌  ‌test‌  ‌inquires‌  ‌into‌  ‌the‌  ‌qualitative‌  ‌effects‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  a. Ex‌  ‌Aequo‌  ‌et‌  ‌Bono‌‌   ‌— ‌‌there‌‌
  is‌‌
  the‌‌
  requirement‌‌   of‌‌
  ‌agreement‌‌ 
years‌‌‌thereafter.‌  ‌ proposed‌‌   change‌‌   in‌‌ the‌‌ constitution.‌‌ The‌‌ main‌‌ inquiry‌‌ is‌‌ whether‌‌ the‌‌  by‌‌
  the‌‌   parties‌‌  by‌‌
  permitting‌‌ the‌‌ ICJ‌‌ to‌‌ resolve‌‌ the‌‌ case‌‌ ‌on‌‌ the‌‌ 
Section‌‌3.‌‌‌The‌‌Congress‌m
‌ ay,‌‌   ‌ change‌  ‌will‌  ‌"accomplish‌  ‌such‌  ‌far‌  ‌reaching‌  ‌changes‌  ‌in‌‌  the‌‌
  nature‌‌
  of‌‌  basis‌‌  e
  of‌‌‌ quity‌‌ ‌instead‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ applicable‌‌ rules‌‌ of‌‌ international‌‌ 
our‌‌basic‌‌governmental‌‌plan‌‌as‌‌to‌‌amount‌‌to‌‌a‌‌revision.".‌  ‌ law.‌  ‌
a. by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌vote‌  ‌of‌  two-thirds‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌  ‌its‌  ‌Members‌, ‌ ‌call‌  ‌a ‌‌
 ‌ b. Non‌‌   liquet.‌‌
  — ‌‌“it‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌ clear,”‌‌ refers‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌‌situation‌‌ where‌‌ there‌‌ 
constitutional‌‌convention,‌O ‌ R‌‌   ‌
DAY1‌‌|‌‌AM‌‌International‌‌Law‌  ‌ is‌  ‌no‌  ‌applicable‌  ‌law‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌parties‌  ‌have‌  ‌not‌  ‌agreed‌  ‌to‌  ‌have‌‌ 
their‌‌case‌‌decided‌‌ex‌‌aequo‌‌et‌‌bono‌. ‌ ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 34‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

2. Equity‌‌can‌‌perform‌‌three‌‌functions‌  ‌ addresses‌  ‌a ‌ ‌jus‌  ‌cogens‌  ‌norm‌  ‌in‌  ‌order‌  ‌to‌  ‌protect,‌  ‌promote‌  ‌and‌‌ 
preserve‌‌a‌‌jus‌‌cogens‌‌‌norm.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌raison‌  ‌d'etre‌  ‌of‌  ‌executive‌  ‌agreements‌  ‌hinges‌  ‌on‌  ‌prior‌‌ 
a. Equity‌i‌ nfra‌‌legem‌—
‌ ‌‌to‌‌adapt‌‌to‌‌the‌‌facts‌‌of‌‌individual‌‌cases;‌  ‌ constitutional‌‌or‌‌legislative‌‌authorizations.‌  ‌
10. Unilateral‌  ‌Declaration‌  ‌of‌  ‌State‌  ‌Doctrine.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌A ‌ ‌unilateral‌‌ 
b. Equity‌p
‌ raeter‌‌legem‌‌‌—‌‌to‌‌fill‌‌gaps‌‌in‌‌the‌‌law;‌  ‌
declaration‌‌binds‌‌the‌‌state‌‌internationally‌‌when:‌‌   ‌
c. Equity‌‌ ‌contra‌‌ legem‌‌ — ‌‌as‌‌ a ‌‌reason‌‌ for‌‌ refusing‌‌ to‌‌ apply‌‌ unjust‌‌ 
Customary‌‌International‌‌Law‌  ‌
a. Publicly‌‌made‌‌and‌‌manifesting‌‌will‌‌to‌‌be‌‌bound;‌  ‌
laws.‌  ‌ 11. CIL‌‌
  consists‌‌  of‌‌
  rules‌‌   of‌‌
  law‌‌
  derived‌‌   from‌‌  the‌‌ consistent‌‌ conduct‌‌ of‌‌ 
b. Made‌‌by‌‌an‌‌authority‌‌vested‌‌with‌‌the‌‌power‌‌to‌‌do‌‌so;‌  ‌
3. How‌‌is‌‌PIL‌‌formed?‌‌   ‌ States‌‌  acting‌‌
  out‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  belief‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌  law‌‌
  required‌‌  them‌‌  to‌‌ act‌‌ that‌‌ 
c. Made‌‌orally‌‌or‌‌in‌‌writing;‌  ‌ way.‌  ‌
a. Through‌‌state‌‌practice‌‌‌—‌‌2‌‌elements:‌‌   ‌
d. Addressed‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌international‌  ‌community‌‌
  or‌‌
  to‌‌
  specific‌‌
  state‌‌  12. The‌‌elements‌‌of‌‌customary‌‌norms‌‌‌are:‌  ‌
i. objective‌‌element‌‌(general‌‌state‌‌practice);‌  ‌
or‌‌entity;‌  ‌
a. Duration‌o
‌ r‌‌long‌‌State‌‌practice;‌  ‌
ii. subjective‌‌element‌‌(o
‌ pinio‌‌juris‌‌sive‌‌necessitatis‌)  ‌‌ ‌ e. Stated‌‌in‌‌clear‌‌and‌‌specific‌‌terms;‌  ‌
b. Consistency‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  State‌‌
  practice‌‌
  or‌‌
  the‌‌
  widespread‌‌
  repetition‌‌ 
b. Through‌  ‌agreement‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌states‌  ‌— ‌‌Through‌‌
  conventions‌‌ 
f. Consistent‌‌with‌‌jus‌‌cogens;‌  ‌ by‌‌States‌‌of‌‌similar‌‌international‌‌acts‌‌over‌‌time;‌  ‌
or‌‌treaties.‌  ‌
g. Will‌‌not‌‌bind‌‌third‌‌states‌‌who‌‌do‌‌not‌‌accept‌‌it;‌  ‌ c. Generality‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  State‌‌
  practice‌‌  or‌‌  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  acts‌‌
  are‌‌   taken‌‌
  by‌‌
  a ‌‌
4. Lotus‌‌
  Doctrine.‌‌   ‌— ‌‌A ‌‌state‌‌
  is‌‌
  barred‌‌  to‌‌
  do‌‌ an‌‌ act‌‌ only‌‌ when‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌ so‌‌ 
h. Not‌‌validly‌‌revoked.‌  ‌ significant‌  ‌number‌  ‌of‌  ‌States‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌rejected‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌significant‌‌ 
prohibited‌  ‌under‌  ‌a ‌ ‌treaty‌  ‌or‌  ‌CIL‌  ‌because‌  ‌restriction‌  ‌to‌  ‌state‌‌ 
number‌‌of‌‌States;‌‌and‌  ‌
sovereignty‌‌is‌‌not‌‌presumed.‌  ‌
Bayan‌‌Muna‌‌v.‌‌Romulo‌‌2
‌ 011‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌re‌‌Executive‌‌Agreements‌  ‌
d. Opinio‌‌
  Juris‌‌
  Sive‌‌ Necessitatis‌‌ ‌or‌‌ the‌‌ requirement‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ acts‌‌ 
5. Relevant‌  ‌State‌  ‌Practice‌  ‌Doctrine‌. ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌Practice‌  ‌of‌  ‌those‌  ‌states‌‌ 
International‌‌agreements‌‌may‌‌be‌‌in‌‌the‌‌form‌‌of‌‌   ‌ must‌‌occur‌‌out‌‌of‌‌a‌‌sense‌‌of‌‌obligation.‌  ‌
whose‌‌interests‌‌are‌‌specially‌‌affected‌. ‌ ‌
1) treaties‌  ‌that‌  ‌require‌‌
  legislative‌‌
  concurrence‌‌
  after‌‌
  executive‌‌  General‌‌Principles‌‌of‌‌Law‌  ‌
6. What‌‌is‌‌the‌‌Persistent‌‌Objector‌‌Doctrine‌‌(POD)?‌‌   ‌
ratification;‌‌or‌‌   ‌
The‌‌important‌‌elements‌‌to‌‌consider‌‌in‌‌this‌‌case‌‌are:‌‌   ‌ 13. Are‌  ‌those‌  ‌which‌  ‌are‌  ‌recognized‌  ‌by‌  ‌civilized‌  ‌nations‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌so‌‌ 
2) executive‌  ‌agreements‌  ‌that‌  ‌are‌  ‌similar‌  ‌to‌  ‌treaties,‌  ‌except‌‌  fundamental‌‌ that‌‌ they‌‌ are‌‌ a ‌‌basic‌‌ tenet‌‌ in‌‌ virtually‌‌ every‌‌ major‌‌ legal‌‌ 
a. The‌‌
  objection‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌ dissenter‌‌ must‌‌ have‌‌ been‌‌ done‌‌ ‌before‌‌ ‌the‌‌  that‌  ‌they‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌require‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌concurrence‌  ‌and‌  ‌are‌‌  system.‌‌   They‌‌ are‌‌ derived‌‌ from‌‌ domestic‌‌ law.‌‌ They‌‌ find‌‌ relevance‌‌ in‌‌ 
norm‌‌has‌‌ripened‌‌to‌‌CIL‌‌or‌‌at‌‌the‌‌outset.‌  ‌ usually‌‌ less‌‌ formal‌‌ and‌‌ deal‌‌ with‌‌ a ‌‌narrower‌‌ range‌‌ of‌‌ subject‌‌ 
filling‌‌gaps‌‌‌left‌‌by‌‌treaties‌‌and‌‌CIL.‌  ‌
matters‌‌than‌‌treaties.‌  ‌
b. The‌‌objection‌‌must‌‌be‌c‌ onsistent‌. ‌ ‌ 14. In‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌Corfu‌‌ Channel‌‌ Case‌, ‌‌the‌‌ ICJ‌‌ held‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ obligation‌‌ of‌‌ Albania‌‌ 
Under‌  ‌international‌  ‌law,‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌difference‌  ‌between‌  ‌treaties‌‌ 
c. The‌  ‌objection‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌categorical,‌  ‌clear‌  ‌and‌  ‌equivocal‌‌  to‌‌ notify‌‌ the‌‌ UK‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ existence‌‌ of‌‌ minefield‌‌ in‌‌ its‌‌ territory‌‌ is‌‌ based‌‌ 
and‌‌executive‌‌agreements‌‌in‌‌terms‌‌of‌‌their‌‌binding‌‌effects‌. ‌ ‌
dissent‌‌must‌‌be‌‌shown.‌  ‌ on‌‌certain‌‌general‌‌and‌‌well-recognized‌‌principles‌‌of‌‌IL:‌ 
7. What‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌value‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌POD?‌  ‌Since‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌CIL,‌  ‌all‌‌
  states‌‌  must‌‌  Saguisag‌‌v.‌‌Executive‌‌Secretary‌‌2 ‌ 016‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌re‌‌EDCA‌  ‌ a. Elementary‌‌   considerations‌‌ of‌‌ humanity‌, ‌‌even‌‌ more‌‌ exacting‌‌ 
comply‌‌   because‌‌   all‌‌
  states‌‌  are‌‌
  bound‌‌   by‌‌
  it.‌‌ However,‌‌ when‌‌ the‌‌ state‌‌  in‌‌peace‌‌than‌‌in‌‌war;‌  ‌
qualifies‌‌   as‌‌
  a ‌‌persistent‌‌   objector,‌‌  it‌‌ may‌‌ not‌‌ be‌‌ compelled‌‌ to‌‌ follow‌‌  Executive‌  ‌agreements‌  ‌may‌  ‌dispense‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌requirement‌‌   of‌‌
  Senate‌‌ 
b. Principle‌‌of‌‌freedom‌‌of‌‌maritime‌‌communication;‌‌and‌  ‌
the‌‌CIL.‌  ‌ concurrence‌   b
‌ ecause‌   o
‌ f‌
  t
‌ he‌  l
‌ egal‌
  m
‌ andate‌   w
‌ ith‌   w
‌ hich‌
  t
‌ hey‌   ‌are‌‌ 
concluded.‌  ‌They‌  ‌merely‌  ‌involve‌  ‌arrangements‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌  c. Every‌  ‌State‌  ‌has‌  ‌an‌  ‌obligation‌  ‌not‌  ‌to‌  ‌allow‌  ‌knowingly‌  ‌its‌‌ 
8. There‌  ‌is‌  n‌ o‌  ‌stare‌  ‌decisis‌  ‌on‌  ‌ICJ‌  ‌decisions‌  ‌because‌  ‌Art‌  ‌59‌‌  implementation‌‌   of‌‌
  existing‌‌   policies,‌‌ rules,‌‌ laws,‌‌ or‌‌ agreements.‌‌ They‌‌  territory‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌used‌  ‌for‌  ‌acts‌  ‌contrary‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌rights‌  ‌of‌  ‌other‌‌ 
provides‌  ‌that‌‌   decisions‌‌   of‌‌
  ICJ‌‌
  shall‌‌
  apply‌‌   only‌‌   between‌‌   the‌‌
  parties‌‌  are‌‌concluded‌‌   ‌ States.‌  ‌
and‌‌only‌‌in‌‌a‌‌particular‌‌case.‌  ‌ 1) to‌‌adjust‌‌the‌‌details‌‌of‌‌a‌‌treaty;‌  ‌ 15. The‌‌
  ‌Aramco‌‌   Arbitration‌‌   Case‌‌   declared‌‌
  the‌‌
  principle‌‌
  of‌‌ ‌respect‌‌ for‌‌ 
9. Obligations‌  ‌Erga‌  ‌Omnes.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Obligations‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌state‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  2) pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌or‌  ‌upon‌  ‌confirmation‌  ‌by‌  ‌an‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  acquired‌  ‌rights‌  ‌as‌  ‌one‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  fundamental‌‌   principles‌‌   of‌‌
  both‌‌
  PIL‌‌ 
international‌  ‌community.‌  ‌Obligations‌  ‌for‌  ‌which‌  ‌all‌  ‌states‌  ‌have‌  ‌a ‌‌ Legislature;‌  ‌ and‌‌of‌‌the‌‌municipal‌‌law‌‌of‌‌most‌‌civilized‌‌States.‌  ‌
legal‌‌
  interest‌‌
  in‌‌  the‌‌  fulfillment‌‌
  by‌‌
  reason‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ importance‌‌ of‌‌ their‌‌  3) in‌‌
  the‌‌
  exercise‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  President's‌‌
  independent‌‌
  powers‌‌
  under‌‌  16. The‌‌
  principle‌‌
  of‌‌
  ‌estoppel‌‌   ‌is‌‌
  also‌‌
  considered‌‌
  a ‌‌general‌‌ principle‌‌ of‌‌ 
subject‌  ‌matter‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌
  international‌‌  community.‌‌   Whether‌‌
  such‌‌  duty‌‌  the‌‌Constitution.‌  ‌ law‌‌as‌‌applied‌‌in‌‌the‌C‌ ase‌‌Concerning‌‌the‌‌Temple‌‌of‌‌Preah‌‌Vihear‌. ‌ ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 35‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

17. Our‌  ‌own‌  ‌SC‌‌


  in‌‌
  ‌Kuroda‌‌
  v.‌‌
  Jalandoni‌‌   has‌‌
  declared‌‌  that‌‌
  the‌‌   and‌‌  24. The‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌organ‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌State‌  ‌or‌  ‌an‌  ‌organ‌  ‌or‌  ‌agent‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌‌ 
  rules‌‌ notice‌‌
  and‌‌
  hearing‌‌   will‌‌
  not‌‌
  go‌‌
  against‌‌
  the‌‌ treaty‌‌ or‌‌ the‌‌ implementing‌‌ 
regulations‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Hague‌  ‌Conventions‌  ‌are‌  ‌generally‌  ‌accepted‌‌  international‌  ‌organization‌  ‌that‌  ‌is‌‌   placed‌‌   at‌‌
  the‌‌  disposal‌‌   of‌‌  another‌‌  law.‌‌
  Neither‌‌  the‌‌ Treaty‌‌ nor‌‌ the‌‌ Extradition‌‌ Law‌‌ precludes‌‌ these‌‌ rights‌‌ 
principles‌‌   of‌‌
  law.‌‌  Therefore,‌‌   they‌‌
  form‌‌  part‌‌
  of‌‌
  our‌‌
  laws‌‌  even‌‌  if‌‌
  the‌‌  international‌  o ‌ rganization‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌under‌‌   international‌‌  from‌‌a‌‌prospective‌‌extraditee.‌  ‌
Philippines‌‌was‌‌not‌‌a‌‌signatory‌‌to‌‌the‌‌conventions.‌  ‌ law‌  a
‌ n‌
  a
‌ ct‌
  o
‌ f‌  ‌
t he‌  l
‌ atter‌
  o
‌ rganization‌   i
‌ f‌
  t
‌ he‌   o
‌ rganization‌   ‌exercises‌‌ 
effective‌‌control‌o ‌ ver‌‌that‌‌conduct.‌  ‌ Ang‌‌Ladlad‌‌v.‌‌Comelec‌‌2
‌ 010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
Effect‌‌of‌‌UN‌‌Declarations,‌‌Security‌‌Council‌‌Resolutions‌  ‌
18. Resolutions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌UN‌  ‌General‌  ‌Assembly‌  ‌are‌  ‌mere‌‌  2. Relationship‌‌with‌‌Domestic‌‌Law‌  ‌ We‌  ‌explicitly‌  ‌recognize‌  ‌the‌  ‌principle‌  ‌of‌  ‌non-discrimination‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌‌ 
recommendations‌‌   on‌‌ questions‌‌ or‌‌ matters‌‌ within‌‌ the‌‌ scope‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  Philip‌‌Morris‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ relates‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  right‌‌
  to‌‌
  electoral‌‌
  participation,‌‌   enunciated‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ UDHR‌‌ 
and‌‌the‌‌ICCPR.‌  ‌
present‌‌UN‌‌Charter.‌‌   ‌
The‌  ‌fact‌  ‌that‌  ‌international‌  ‌law‌‌   has‌‌
  been‌‌   made‌‌
  part‌‌  of‌‌  the‌‌   law‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  The‌  ‌principle‌  ‌of‌  ‌non-discrimination‌  ‌requires‌  ‌that‌‌   laws‌‌   of‌‌
  general‌‌ 
The‌  ‌resolutions,‌  ‌however,‌  ‌may‌  ‌constitute‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  land‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌‌   by‌‌  any‌‌  means‌‌  imply‌‌  the‌‌  primacy‌‌   of‌‌
  international‌‌   law‌‌ 
application‌  ‌relating‌  ‌to‌  ‌elections‌  ‌be‌  ‌applied‌  ‌equally‌  ‌to‌  ‌all‌  ‌persons,‌‌ 
existence‌‌of‌‌international‌‌customs‌. ‌ ‌ over‌  ‌national‌  ‌law‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌municipal‌  ‌sphere.‌  ‌Under‌  ‌the‌‌   ‌doctrine‌‌   of‌‌  regardless‌  ‌of‌  ‌sexual‌  ‌orientation.‌  ‌Although‌  ‌sexual‌  ‌orientation‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌‌ 
19. Under‌  ‌Art‌  ‌25‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌UN‌  ‌Charter,‌  ‌all‌  ‌members‌  ‌agree‌  ‌to‌  ‌accept‌  ‌and‌‌  incorporation‌‌   ‌
a s‌‌
  applied‌‌
  i n‌‌
  m ost‌‌
  c ountries,‌‌  rules‌‌   o f‌‌  i nternational‌‌   specifically‌  ‌enumerated‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌status‌  ‌or‌  ‌ratio‌  ‌for‌  ‌discrimination‌  ‌in‌‌ 
law‌‌   are‌‌
  given‌‌   a ‌‌standing‌‌  e
‌ qual‌, ‌‌‌not‌‌ superior‌, ‌‌to‌‌ national‌‌ legislative‌‌  Article‌  ‌26‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌ICCPR,‌  ‌the‌  ‌ICCPR‌  ‌Human‌  ‌Rights‌  ‌Committee‌  ‌has‌‌ 
carry‌‌   out‌‌
  the‌‌ decisions‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ ‌Security‌‌ Council.‌‌ While‌‌ other‌‌ organs‌‌ 
enactments.‌  ‌ opined‌‌   that‌‌ the‌‌ reference‌‌ to‌‌ "sex"‌‌ in‌‌ Article‌‌ 26‌‌ should‌‌ be‌‌ construed‌‌ to‌‌ 
of‌  ‌the‌  ‌UN‌  ‌make‌  ‌recommendations‌  ‌to‌  ‌Governments,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Council‌‌ 
include‌‌"sexual‌‌orientation."‌‌   ‌
alone‌  ‌has‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌make‌  ‌decisions‌  ‌which‌  ‌Member‌  ‌States‌‌   are‌‌ 
Tanada‌‌v.‌‌Angara‌  ‌ The‌‌
  ‌Yogyakarta‌‌   Principles‌, ‌‌consisting‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌declaration‌‌ formulated‌‌ by‌‌ 
obligated‌u ‌ nder‌‌the‌‌Charter‌‌to‌‌carry‌‌out.‌  ‌
In‌  ‌its‌  ‌Declaration‌  ‌of‌  ‌Principles‌  ‌and‌  ‌State‌  ‌Policies,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌‌  various‌‌   international‌‌
  law‌‌ professors,‌‌ are‌‌ — ‌‌at‌‌ best‌‌ - ‌‌‌de‌‌ lege‌‌ ferenda‌‌ 
Effect‌‌of‌‌actions‌‌of‌‌organs‌‌of‌‌international‌‌organizations‌‌  —‌‌and‌‌do‌‌not‌‌constitute‌‌binding‌‌obligations‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Philippines.‌  ‌
“‌adopts‌  ‌the‌  ‌generally‌  ‌accepted‌  ‌principles‌  ‌of‌  ‌international‌  ‌law‌‌ 
created‌‌by‌‌treaty‌  ‌ as‌‌  part‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ law‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ land,‌‌ and‌‌ adheres‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ policy‌‌ of‌‌ peace,‌‌ 
equality,‌   ‌justice,‌  ‌freedom,‌  ‌cooperation‌  ‌and‌  ‌amity,‌  ‌with‌  ‌all‌‌  Compare‌D
‌ octrine‌‌of‌‌Transformation‌‌‌in‌U
‌ S‌‌v.‌‌Purganan‌  ‌
20. Art‌  ‌2(a)‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌2011‌  ‌Draft‌  ‌Articles‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌Responsibility‌  ‌of‌‌ 
nations‌."‌‌   By‌‌ the‌‌ ‌doctrine‌‌ of‌‌ incorporation‌, ‌‌the‌‌ country‌‌ is‌‌ bound‌‌ by‌‌ 
International‌  ‌Organizations‌, ‌ ‌an‌  ‌“‌international‌  ‌organization‌” ‌ ‌is‌‌  generally‌  ‌accepted‌  ‌principles‌  ‌of‌  ‌international‌  ‌law,‌  ‌which‌  ‌are‌‌  The‌  ‌US-RP‌  ‌Extradition‌  ‌Treaty‌  ‌in‌  ‌particular,‌  ‌undoubtedly‌  ‌affects‌  ‌not‌‌ 
one‌  ‌established‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌treaty‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌instrument‌  ‌governed‌  ‌by‌‌  considered‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌automatically‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌our‌  ‌own‌  ‌laws.‌  ‌One‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  only‌‌  state‌‌
  organs‌‌  but‌‌
  also‌‌  private‌‌
  individuals‌‌   as‌‌
  well.‌‌
  It‌‌
  is‌‌
  said‌‌
  that,‌‌ 
international‌  ‌law‌  ‌and‌  ‌possessing‌  ‌its‌  ‌own‌  ‌international‌  ‌legal‌‌  oldest‌  ‌and‌  ‌most‌  ‌fundamental‌  ‌rules‌  ‌in‌  ‌international‌  ‌law‌  ‌is‌  ‌pacta‌‌  in‌‌
  treaties‌‌
  of‌‌
  this‌‌
  nature,‌‌
  it‌‌
  should‌‌  behoove‌‌   the‌‌
  state‌‌
  to‌‌  undertake‌‌ or‌‌ 
personality.‌  ‌International‌  ‌organizations‌  ‌may‌  ‌include‌  ‌as‌  ‌members,‌‌  adopt‌  ‌the‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌steps‌  ‌to‌  ‌make‌  ‌the‌  ‌treaty‌  ‌binding‌  ‌upon‌  ‌said‌‌ 
sunt‌  ‌servanda‌  ‌— ‌‌international‌‌  agreements‌‌  must‌‌  be‌‌  performed‌‌  in‌‌  subjects‌‌either‌‌by‌i‌ ncorporation‌o ‌ r‌‌transformation‌. ‌ ‌
in‌‌addition‌‌to‌‌States,‌‌other‌‌entities.‌  ‌ good‌‌faith.‌‌   ‌
Existing‌‌   legislation‌‌   contrary‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  provisions‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  treaty‌‌   becomes‌‌ 
21. Every‌  ‌internationally‌  ‌wrongful‌‌
  act‌‌
  of‌‌
  an‌‌
  international‌‌
  organization‌‌ 
SOJ‌‌v.‌‌Lantion‌  ‌ invalid,‌‌  but‌‌
  legislation‌‌   is‌‌
  necessary‌‌   to‌‌
  put‌‌
  the‌‌   treaty‌‌
  into‌‌
  effect.‌  ‌The‌‌ 
entails‌‌the‌‌international‌‌responsibility‌‌of‌‌that‌‌organization.‌  ‌ constitutional‌‌   requirement‌‌   that‌‌   the‌‌  treaty‌‌ be‌‌ concurred‌‌ in‌‌ by‌‌ no‌‌ less‌‌ 
22. There‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌internationally‌  ‌wrongful‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌international‌‌  The‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌incorporation‌  ‌is‌  ‌applied‌  ‌whenever‌  ‌municipal‌‌  than‌  ‌two-thirds‌  ‌of‌‌  all‌‌
  members‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  Senate‌‌   is,‌‌
  for‌‌
  legal‌‌
  intent‌‌
  and‌‌ 
organization‌‌when‌‌conduct‌‌consisting‌‌of‌‌an‌‌action‌‌or‌‌omission:‌‌   ‌ tribunals‌‌   are‌‌  confronted‌‌   with‌‌   situations‌‌  in‌‌ which‌‌ there‌‌ appears‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌  purposes,‌  ‌an‌  ‌equivalent‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌required‌  ‌transformation‌  ‌of‌‌ 
a‌  ‌conflict‌  ‌between‌  ‌a ‌ ‌rule‌  ‌of‌  ‌international‌‌   law‌‌   and‌‌
  the‌‌  provisions‌‌   of‌‌  treaty‌‌law‌‌into‌‌municipal‌‌law‌.‌  ‌
a) is‌‌attributable‌‌to‌‌that‌‌organization‌‌under‌‌IL;‌‌and‌  ‌ the‌  ‌constitution‌  ‌or‌  ‌statute‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌local‌  ‌state.‌  ‌Efforts‌  ‌should‌  ‌first‌‌
  be‌‌ 
In‌  ‌preserving‌  ‌harmony‌  ‌between‌  ‌treaty‌  ‌law‌  ‌and‌  ‌municipal‌  ‌law,‌  ‌it‌‌
  is‌‌ 
b) constitutes‌‌a‌‌breach‌‌of‌‌an‌‌international‌‌obligation.‌  ‌ exerted‌‌to‌h ‌ armonize‌t‌ hem,‌‌so‌‌as‌‌to‌‌give‌‌effect‌‌to‌‌both.‌  ‌ submitted‌‌—  ‌‌ ‌
23. The‌‌  conduct‌‌
  of‌‌
  an‌‌
  organ‌‌ or‌‌ agent‌‌ of‌‌ an‌‌ international‌‌ organization‌‌ in‌‌  In‌  ‌a ‌ ‌situation,‌  ‌however,‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌conflict‌  ‌is‌  ‌irreconcilable‌  ‌and‌  ‌a ‌‌
1) That‌‌  treaty‌‌
  law‌‌
  has‌‌
  the‌‌
  effect‌‌ of‌‌ amending,‌‌ or‌‌ even‌‌ repealing‌‌ 
the‌  ‌performance‌  ‌of‌  ‌functions‌  ‌of‌  ‌that‌  ‌organ‌  ‌or‌  ‌agent‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌  choice‌  ‌has‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌made‌  ‌between‌  ‌a ‌ ‌rule‌  ‌of‌  ‌international‌  ‌law‌  ‌and‌‌ 
an‌‌
  inconsistent‌‌   municipal‌‌   statute,‌‌  a ‌‌‌later‌‌
  enactment‌‌ being‌‌ 
municipal‌‌   law,‌‌
  jurisprudence‌‌ dictates‌‌ that‌‌ ‌municipal‌‌ law‌‌ should‌‌ be‌‌  controlling,‌  ‌
considered‌  ‌an‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌that‌  ‌organization‌  ‌under‌  ‌international‌  ‌law,‌‌ 
upheld‌‌‌by‌‌the‌‌municipal‌‌courts.‌‌   ‌
whatever‌  ‌position‌  ‌the‌  ‌organ‌  ‌or‌  ‌agent‌  ‌holds‌  ‌in‌  ‌respect‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
In‌‌
  the‌‌
  absence‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌law‌‌
  or‌‌
  principle‌‌   of‌‌  law,‌‌  we‌‌ must‌‌ apply‌‌ the‌‌ ‌rules‌‌  2) but‌  ‌that‌  ‌an‌  ‌inconsistent‌  ‌municipal‌  ‌statute‌  ‌subsequently‌‌ 
organization.‌  ‌
of‌‌
  fair‌‌
  play‌. ‌‌An‌‌  application‌‌  of‌‌  the‌‌  basic‌‌  twin‌‌  due‌‌  process‌‌  rights‌‌  of‌‌  passed‌‌   cannot‌‌   modify‌‌ treaty‌‌ law,‌‌ without‌‌ the‌‌ concurrence‌‌ of‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 36‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

the‌  ‌other‌  ‌state‌  ‌party‌  ‌thereto,‌  ‌following‌  ‌the‌  ‌generally‌‌  a) Workers‌  ‌can‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌dismissed‌  ‌without‌‌
  just‌‌
  or‌‌
  authorized‌‌ 
1. afford‌  ‌full‌  ‌protection‌  ‌to‌  ‌labor‌, ‌ ‌local‌  ‌and‌  ‌overseas,‌‌ 
accepted‌‌principle‌‌of‌p ‌ acta‌‌sunt‌‌servanda.‌  ‌ causes.‌  ‌
organized‌‌and‌‌unorganized,‌‌and‌‌   ‌
 ‌
b) Probationary‌  ‌employees‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌made‌  ‌regular‌  ‌after‌  ‌6 ‌‌
2. promote‌‌
  full‌‌
  employment‌‌   and‌‌
  equality‌‌
  of‌‌
  employment‌‌ 
DAY1‌‌|‌‌AM‌‌Labor‌‌Law‌  ‌ opportunities‌‌‌for‌‌all.‌  ‌
months‌‌‌unless‌‌a‌‌different‌‌period‌‌is‌‌agreed.‌  ‌
c) It‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee‌  ‌to‌  ‌continue‌  ‌to‌  ‌work‌  ‌until‌‌ 
Basic‌‌Principles‌  ‌ Collective‌  ‌Rights‌  ‌of‌  ‌Workers.‌‌
  — ‌‌‌It‌‌
  shall‌‌
  guarantee‌‌
  the‌‌
  rights‌‌
  of‌‌
  all‌‌  terminated‌‌for‌‌just‌‌or‌‌authorized‌‌cause‌‌as‌‌provided‌‌by‌‌law.‌  ‌
workers‌‌to‌  
Existence‌‌of‌‌ER-EE‌‌Relationship;‌‌Tests‌  ‌
1. self-organization,‌‌   ‌ ARTICLE‌  ‌294.‌  ‌Security‌  ‌of‌  ‌Tenure.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌In‌  ‌cases‌  ‌of‌  ‌regular‌‌ 
The‌‌Four-Fold‌‌Test‌  ‌ employment,‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌terminate‌  ‌the‌  ‌services‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌‌ 
2. collective‌‌bargaining‌‌and‌‌negotiations,‌‌and‌‌   ‌
Economic‌‌Reality‌‌or‌‌the‌‌Two-Tiered‌‌Test‌  ‌ employee‌  ‌except‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ j‌ ust‌  ‌cause‌  ‌or‌  ‌when‌  a
‌ uthorized‌  ‌by‌  ‌this‌‌ 
3. peaceful‌‌
  concerted‌‌
  activities,‌‌
  including‌‌
  the‌‌
  right‌‌
  to‌‌
  strike‌‌
  ‌in‌‌ 
Title.‌  ‌An‌  ‌employee‌  ‌who‌  ‌is‌‌
  ‌unjustly‌‌
  dismissed‌‌   from‌‌
  work‌‌
  shall‌‌
  be‌‌ 
Termination‌‌of‌‌Employment‌  ‌ accordance‌‌with‌‌law‌.  ‌‌ ‌
entitled‌‌to‌  ‌
Just‌‌Causes‌  ‌ Individual‌‌Rights‌‌of‌‌Workers.‌‌—‌T
‌ hey‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌entitled‌‌to‌‌   ‌
a) reinstatement‌  ‌without‌  ‌loss‌  ‌of‌  ‌seniority‌  ‌rights‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌‌ 
Authorized‌‌Causes‌  ‌ 1. security‌‌of‌‌tenure,‌‌   ‌ privileges‌‌and‌  ‌
2. humane‌‌conditions‌‌of‌‌work,‌‌and‌‌a  ‌‌ ‌ b) his‌‌full‌‌backwages‌,‌‌inclusive‌‌of‌‌allowances,‌‌and‌  ‌
Procedural‌‌Due‌‌Process‌  ‌
3. living‌‌wage.‌‌   ‌ c) his‌  ‌other‌  ‌benefits‌  ‌or‌‌
  their‌‌
  monetary‌‌  equivalent‌‌
  computed‌‌ 
Constructive‌‌Dismissal‌  ‌
from‌‌   the‌‌
  time‌‌
  his‌‌
  compensation‌‌   was‌‌
  withheld‌‌  from‌‌  him‌‌
  up‌‌ 
Right‌‌
  to‌‌
  Participate.‌‌
  — ‌‌‌They‌‌
  shall‌‌
  also‌‌
  participate‌‌   in‌‌ policy‌‌ and‌‌  to‌‌the‌‌time‌‌of‌‌his‌‌actual‌‌reinstatement.‌  ‌
Reliefs‌‌from‌‌illegal‌‌dismissal‌  ‌
decision-making‌  ‌processes‌  ‌affecting‌  ‌their‌  ‌rights‌  ‌and‌  ‌benefits‌  ‌as‌‌ 
By‌‌Employee‌  may‌‌be‌‌provided‌‌by‌‌law.‌  ‌ 2. Social‌‌justice‌  ‌
Retirement‌  ‌ The‌‌State‌‌shall‌‌promote‌‌   ‌ The‌‌  promotion‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  welfare‌‌
  of‌‌ all‌‌ the‌‌ people,‌‌ the‌‌ adoption‌‌ by‌‌ 
Requirement‌‌for‌‌Labor-only‌‌Contracting‌  ‌ 1. the‌  ‌principle‌  ‌of‌  ‌shared‌  ‌responsibility‌  ‌between‌  ‌workers‌‌  the‌  ‌Government‌  ‌of‌  ‌measures‌  ‌calculated‌  ‌to‌  ‌insure‌  ‌economic‌‌ 
and‌‌employers‌‌and‌‌   ‌ stability‌‌
  of‌‌
  all‌‌
  the‌‌
  component‌‌   elements‌‌   of‌‌
  society,‌‌  through‌‌
  the‌‌ 
Rights‌‌
  of‌‌
  Employees‌‌ and‌‌ of‌‌ Labor‌‌ Organizations;‌‌ Membership‌‌  maintenance‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌proper‌  ‌economic‌  ‌and‌  ‌social‌  ‌equilibrium‌  ‌in‌‌ 
2. the‌  ‌preferential‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌voluntary‌  ‌modes‌  ‌in‌  ‌settling‌‌ 
in‌‌Unions‌  ‌ the‌  ‌interrelation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌members‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌community,‌‌ 
disputes‌, ‌ ‌including‌  ‌conciliation,‌  ‌and‌  ‌shall‌  ‌enforce‌  ‌their‌‌ 
constitutionally,‌  ‌through‌  ‌the‌  ‌adoption‌  ‌of‌  ‌measures‌  ‌legally‌‌ 
Management‌‌Prerogative‌  ‌ mutual‌‌compliance‌‌therewith‌‌to‌‌foster‌‌industrial‌‌peace.‌ 
justifiable,‌  ‌or‌  ‌extra-constitutionally‌  ‌through‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Illegal‌‌Recruitment‌‌of‌‌OFWs‌  ‌ The‌  ‌State‌  ‌shall‌  ‌regulate‌  ‌the‌  ‌relations‌  ‌between‌  ‌workers‌  ‌and‌‌  powers‌  ‌underlying‌  ‌the‌  ‌existence‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌  ‌Governments‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌ 
employers,‌‌recognizing‌‌   ‌ time-honored‌  ‌principle‌  ‌of‌  ‌Salus‌  ‌Populi‌  ‌est‌  ‌suprema‌  ‌lex‌. ‌‌
Remedies‌‌for‌‌Labor‌‌Standards‌‌Violation‌  ‌ (‌Calalang‌‌v.‌‌Williams‌) ‌ ‌
1. the‌‌
  ‌right‌‌
  of‌‌
  labor‌‌ to‌‌ its‌‌ just‌‌ share‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ fruits‌‌ of‌‌ production‌‌ 
3. Equal‌‌work‌‌opportunities‌  ‌
1. Basic‌‌Principles‌  ‌ and‌‌   ‌
a) The‌  ‌State‌  ‌shall‌  ‌promote‌  ‌full‌  ‌employment‌  ‌and‌  ‌equality‌‌
  of‌‌ 
2. the‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌enterprises‌  ‌to‌  ‌reasonable‌  ‌returns‌  ‌to‌‌ 
SEC‌‌3‌‌ART‌‌XIII.‌T
‌ he‌‌State‌‌shall‌‌   ‌ employment‌‌opportunities‌‌for‌‌all.‌  ‌
investments,‌‌and‌‌to‌‌expansion‌‌and‌‌growth.‌  ‌

1. Security‌‌of‌‌tenure‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 37‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

b) A‌  ‌manifestation‌  ‌of‌  ‌this‌  ‌is‌‌


  the‌‌
  enactment‌‌
  of‌‌
  ‌RA‌‌
  10911‌‌
  or‌‌  c) The‌  ‌rule‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌speaks‌  ‌in‌  ‌clear‌  ‌and‌‌  In‌  ‌illegal‌  ‌dismissal‌  ‌cases,‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer‌  ‌is‌  ‌burdened‌  ‌to‌  ‌prove‌  ‌just‌‌ 
the‌  ‌Anti-Age‌  ‌Discrimination‌  ‌in‌  ‌Employment‌  ‌Act‌. ‌ ‌The‌‌  categorical‌  ‌language,‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌room‌  ‌for‌  ‌interpretation;‌‌  cause‌‌   ‌for‌‌  terminating‌‌  the‌‌  employment‌‌  of‌‌  its‌‌  employee‌‌ w‌ ith‌‌ clear‌‌ 
law‌‌however‌‌accepts‌‌of‌e‌ xceptions‌  ‌ there‌  ‌is‌  ‌only‌  ‌room‌  ‌for‌  ‌application.‌  ‌Only‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌‌
  law‌‌
  is‌‌  and‌  ‌convincing‌  ‌evidence‌.‌  ‌This‌  ‌principle‌  ‌is‌  ‌designed‌  ‌to‌  ‌give‌‌ 
i) Age‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌bona‌  ‌fide‌  ‌occupational‌  ‌qualification‌‌  ambiguous‌‌   or‌‌
  of‌‌
  doubtful‌‌   meaning‌‌
  may‌‌ the‌‌ court‌‌ interpret‌‌  flesh‌  ‌and‌  ‌blood‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌guaranty‌  ‌of‌‌
  security‌‌  of‌‌  tenure‌‌
  granted‌‌
  by‌‌  the‌‌ 
reasonably‌‌   necessary‌‌   in‌‌ the‌‌ normal‌‌ operation‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌ or‌‌
  construe‌‌ its‌‌ true‌‌ intent.‌‌ (‌Leoncio‌‌ v.‌‌ MST‌‌ Marine‌‌ Services‌‌  Constitution‌‌to‌‌employees‌‌under‌‌the‌‌Labor‌‌Code.‌  ‌
particular‌‌   business‌‌  or‌‌   where‌‌   the‌‌ differentiation‌‌ is‌‌  2017‌) ‌ ‌
based‌‌on‌‌reasonable‌‌factors‌‌other‌‌than‌‌age;‌  ‌ 6. Burden‌‌of‌‌proof‌‌and‌‌quantum‌‌of‌‌evidence‌  ‌
2. Existence‌‌of‌‌ER-EE‌‌Relationship;‌‌Tests‌  ‌
ii) The‌  ‌intent‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌observe‌  ‌the‌‌  terms‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌‌bona‌‌
  fide‌‌  a. It‌  ‌is‌  ‌in‌  ‌personam‌  ‌and‌  ‌involves‌  ‌the‌  ‌rendition‌  ‌of‌  ‌personal‌‌ 
Maula‌‌v.‌‌Ximex‌‌Delivery‌‌Express‌‌‌2017‌  ‌
seniority‌‌  system‌‌   that‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  intended‌‌  to‌‌ evade‌‌ the‌‌  service‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee,‌  ‌and‌  ‌partakes‌  ‌of‌  ‌master‌  ‌and‌  ‌servant‌‌ 
purpose‌‌of‌‌this‌‌Act;‌  ‌ In‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌and‌  ‌quasi-judicial‌  ‌proceedings,‌  ‌the‌  ‌quantum‌  ‌of‌‌  relationship.‌  ‌
evidence‌  ‌required‌  ‌is‌  ‌substantial‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌or‌  ‌"such‌  ‌relevant‌‌ 
iii) The‌  ‌intent‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌observe‌  ‌the‌‌
  terms‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌bona‌‌
  fide‌‌  b. Its‌  ‌existence‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌question‌  ‌of‌  ‌law‌  ‌and‌  ‌fact.‌  ‌In‌  ‌the‌  ‌2016‌‌ 
evidence‌‌  as‌‌
  a ‌‌reasonable‌‌  mind‌‌  might‌‌ accept‌‌ as‌‌ adequate‌‌ to‌‌ support‌‌ a ‌‌
employee‌  ‌retirement‌  ‌or‌  ‌a ‌ ‌voluntary‌  ‌early‌‌  conclusion."‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌unsubstantiated‌  ‌suspicions,‌  ‌accusations,‌  ‌and‌‌  Century‌‌   Properties‌‌   case,‌‌
  SC‌‌
  said‌‌  that‌‌
  the‌‌ employment‌‌ status‌‌ of‌‌ 
retirement‌  ‌plan‌  ‌consistent‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌‌  conclusions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌provide‌  ‌legal‌  ‌justification‌  ‌for‌‌  a‌  ‌person‌  ‌is‌  ‌defined‌  ‌and‌  ‌prescribed‌‌   by‌‌  law‌‌
  and‌‌
  not‌‌  by‌‌
  what‌‌ 
this‌‌Act;‌‌or‌  ‌ dismissing‌‌the‌‌employee.‌  ‌ the‌‌   parties‌‌
  say‌‌  it‌‌
  should‌‌  be.‌‌
  It‌‌
  can‌‌
  not‌‌
  be‌‌
  negated‌‌
  by‌‌ expressly‌‌ 
repudiating‌‌it‌‌in‌‌a‌‌contract.‌  ‌
iv) The‌‌action‌‌is‌‌duly‌‌certified‌‌by‌‌the‌‌SOLE.‌  ‌ Minsola‌‌v.‌‌New‌‌City‌‌Builders,‌‌Inc.‌‌‌2018‌‌re‌‌Money‌‌Claims‌  ‌
c. In‌  ‌the‌  ‌2011‌  ‌Tongko‌  ‌case,‌  ‌SC‌  ‌aptly‌  ‌described‌  ‌the‌‌
  primary‌‌
  and‌‌ 
4. Right‌‌to‌‌self-organization‌‌and‌‌collective‌‌bargaining‌  ‌ In‌  ‌claims‌  ‌for‌  ‌payment‌  ‌of‌  ‌salary‌  ‌differential,‌  ‌service‌  ‌incentive‌‌  controlling‌  ‌test‌  ‌in‌  ‌determining‌  ‌the‌  ‌existence‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌ER-EE‌‌ 
a) An‌  ‌employee‌  ‌can‌  ‌join‌  ‌a ‌ ‌union‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌first‌  ‌day‌  ‌of‌‌  leave,‌  ‌holiday‌  ‌pay‌  ‌and‌‌   13th‌‌  month‌‌   pay‌, ‌‌the‌‌
  ‌burden‌‌   ‌rests‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌ 
relationship‌‌   as‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌control‌‌  over‌‌ the‌‌ performance‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ task‌‌ 
employment.‌  ‌ employer‌  ‌to‌  ‌prove‌  ‌payment.‌  ‌This‌  ‌standard‌  ‌follows‌‌  the‌‌  basic‌‌  rule‌‌ 
of‌‌the‌‌one‌‌providing‌‌the‌‌service‌  ‌
that‌‌   in‌‌
  all‌‌
  illegal‌‌ dismissal‌‌ cases‌‌ the‌‌ burden‌‌ rests‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ defendant‌‌ to‌‌ 
b) Collective‌‌
  bargaining‌‌   is‌‌
  a ‌‌contract‌‌
  between‌‌  workers‌‌  and‌‌  prove‌‌payment‌‌rather‌‌than‌‌on‌‌the‌‌plaintiff‌‌to‌‌prove‌‌non-payment.‌‌   ‌ The‌‌Four-Fold‌‌Test‌  ‌
employers‌  ‌on‌  ‌terms‌  ‌and‌  ‌conditions‌  ‌of‌  ‌employment‌  ‌over‌‌ 
On‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌hand,‌  ‌for‌‌
  ‌overtime‌‌   pay,‌‌
  premium‌‌   pays‌‌  for‌‌  holidays‌‌ 
and‌‌above‌‌those‌‌mandated‌‌by‌‌law.‌  ‌ 1) Selection‌‌and‌‌Engagement‌‌‌of‌‌employees;‌  ‌
and‌  ‌rest‌  ‌days‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌burden‌  ‌is‌  ‌shifted‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee‌, ‌ ‌as‌  ‌these‌‌ 
5. Construction‌‌in‌‌favor‌‌of‌‌labor‌  ‌ monetary‌‌   claims‌‌ are‌‌ not‌‌ incurred‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ normal‌‌ course‌‌ of‌‌ business.‌‌ It‌‌  2) Payment‌‌of‌‌Wages;‌  ‌
is‌  ‌thus‌  ‌incumbent‌  ‌upon‌‌   the‌‌
  employee‌‌   to‌‌
  first‌‌
  prove‌‌
  that‌‌  he‌‌
  actually‌‌  3) Power‌‌of‌‌Dismissal‌; ‌ ‌
rendered‌  ‌service‌  ‌in‌  ‌excess‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  regular‌‌
  eight‌‌
  working‌‌   hours‌‌   a ‌‌day,‌‌ 
ARTICLE‌  ‌4.‌  ‌Construction‌  ‌in‌  ‌Favor‌  ‌of‌  ‌Labor‌. ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌All‌  ‌doubts‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  and‌‌that‌‌he‌‌in‌‌fact‌‌worked‌‌on‌‌holidays‌‌and‌‌rest‌‌days.‌  ‌ 4) ⭐‌  ‌Power‌  ‌of‌  ‌Control‌  ‌over‌  ‌employee’s‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌and‌‌ 
implementation‌  ‌and‌  ‌interpretation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌of‌  ‌this‌  ‌Code,‌‌  over‌  ‌the‌  ‌means,‌  ‌manner‌  ‌and‌  ‌method‌  ‌by‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌‌ 
including‌  ‌its‌  ‌implementing‌  ‌rules‌  ‌and‌  ‌regulations,‌  ‌shall‌‌   be‌‌
  resolved‌‌  Remoticado‌‌v.‌‌Typical‌‌Construction‌‌Trading‌‌‌2018‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ work‌‌is‌‌to‌‌be‌‌accomplished.‌  ‌
in‌‌favor‌‌of‌‌labor‌. ‌ ‌ re‌‌Illegal‌‌Dismissal‌  ‌
Economic‌‌Reality‌‌or‌‌the‌‌Two-Tiered‌‌Test‌  ‌
There‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌no‌  ‌case‌  ‌for‌  ‌illegal‌  ‌termination‌  ‌of‌  ‌employment‌  ‌when‌‌ 
there‌  ‌was‌  ‌no‌  ‌termination‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer.‌  ‌While,‌  ‌in‌  ‌illegal‌‌  This‌  ‌test‌  ‌is‌  ‌used‌  ‌when‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌existing‌  ‌employment‌‌ 
a) In‌  ‌Peñaflor‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Outdoor‌  ‌Clothing‌  ‌2010‌, ‌ ‌this‌  ‌principle‌  ‌has‌‌ 
termination‌  ‌cases,‌  ‌the‌  ‌burden‌  ‌is‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer‌  ‌to‌  ‌show‌  ‌just‌‌  contract.‌  ‌
been‌‌   extended‌‌   to‌‌
  cover‌‌ ‌doubts‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ evidence‌‌ presented‌‌ 
cause‌  ‌for‌  ‌termination‌  ‌of‌  ‌employment,‌  ‌such‌  ‌a ‌ ‌burden‌  ‌arises‌  ‌only‌‌  if‌‌  1) The‌  ‌putative‌  ‌employer’s‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌control‌  ‌the‌‌ 
by‌‌the‌‌employer‌‌and‌‌the‌‌employee.‌  ‌ the‌‌
  complaining‌‌   ‌employee‌‌   ‌has‌‌
  shown,‌‌  by‌‌ s
‌ ubstantial‌‌ evidence‌, ‌‌
employee‌‌   with‌‌
  respect‌‌  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  manner‌‌
  and‌‌ methods‌‌ by‌‌ 
b) If‌  ‌doubt‌  ‌exists‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌presented‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌  the‌‌fact‌‌of‌‌termination‌b ‌ y‌‌the‌‌employer.‌  ‌
which‌‌the‌‌work‌‌is‌‌to‌‌be‌‌accomplished;‌‌and‌  ‌
employer‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee,‌‌   the‌‌  scales‌‌
  of‌‌
  justice‌‌
  must‌‌
  be‌‌ 
Duty‌‌Free‌‌Philippines‌‌v.‌‌Tria‌‌‌2012‌‌ 
tilted‌  ‌in‌  ‌favor‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌latter.‌  ‌(‌Dreamland‌  ‌Hotel‌  ‌Resort‌  ‌v.‌‌ 
re‌‌Clear‌‌and‌‌Convincing‌‌Evidence‌  ‌
Johnson‌‌2 ‌ 014‌) ‌ ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 38‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

2) The‌  ‌underlying‌  ‌economic‌  ‌realities‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌activity‌  ‌or‌‌ 


between‌  ‌BSP‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌security‌  ‌guards‌  ‌assigned‌  ‌to‌  ‌it‌  ‌by‌  ‌an‌  ‌agency‌‌  sufficient‌‌evidence‌‌to‌‌prove‌‌the‌‌existence‌‌of‌‌EER.‌  ‌
relationship,‌  ‌i.e.‌  ‌employee’s‌  ‌economic‌  ‌dependence‌‌  pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Guard‌  ‌Service‌  ‌Contract.‌  ‌In‌  ‌the‌  ‌absence‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌‌ 
on‌‌the‌‌employer.‌  ‌ Kalookan‌  ‌Slaughterhouse,‌  ‌through‌  ‌Tablit,‌  ‌was‌  ‌the‌  ‌one‌‌   who‌‌   engaged‌‌ 
relationship,‌  ‌vicarious‌  ‌liability‌‌   under‌‌   Article‌‌
  2180‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Civil‌‌  Code‌‌ 
petitioner,‌  ‌paid‌  ‌for‌  ‌his‌  ‌salaries,‌  ‌and‌  ‌in‌  ‌effect‌  ‌had‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌‌ 
Depends‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌whole‌  ‌economic‌‌  cannot‌‌  apply‌‌   as‌‌
  against‌‌
  BSP.‌‌
  Similarly,‌‌   we‌‌
  find‌‌
  no‌‌
  EER‌‌   between‌‌   MCS‌‌ 
dismiss‌  ‌him.‌  ‌Further,‌  ‌Kalookan‌  ‌Slaughterhouse‌  ‌exercised‌  ‌control‌‌ 
and‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌guards.‌  ‌The‌  ‌guards‌  ‌were‌  ‌merely‌  ‌assigned‌  ‌by‌‌ 
activity:‌  ‌ over‌  ‌petitioner's‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌through‌  ‌De‌  ‌Guzman.‌  ‌To‌  ‌the‌  ‌mind‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Grandeur‌‌   to‌‌ secure‌‌ MCS'‌‌ premises‌‌ pursuant‌‌ to‌‌ their‌‌ Contract‌‌ of‌‌ Guard‌‌ 
1) The‌‌  ‌broad‌‌
  ‌extent‌‌
  to‌‌
  which‌‌
  the‌‌
  services‌‌
  performed‌‌ are‌‌  Court,‌  ‌Kalookan‌  ‌Slaughterhouse‌  ‌was‌  ‌petitioner's‌  ‌employer‌  ‌and‌  ‌it‌‌ 
Services.‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌MCS‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌held‌  ‌vicariously‌  ‌liable‌  ‌for‌  ‌damages‌‌ 
exercised‌  ‌its‌  ‌rights‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌  ‌employer‌  ‌through‌  ‌Tablit‌  ‌and‌  ‌De‌‌   Guzman,‌‌ 
an‌‌integral‌‌part‌‌of‌‌the‌‌employer’s‌‌business‌. ‌ ‌ caused‌‌by‌‌these‌‌guards'‌‌acts‌‌or‌‌omissions.‌  ‌
who‌‌were‌‌its‌‌employees.‌  ‌
2) The‌‌
  ‌limited‌‌
  ‌extent‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌worker’s‌‌
  investment‌‌
  in‌‌ the‌‌  Loreche-Amit‌‌v.‌‌Cagayan‌‌De‌‌Oro‌‌Medical‌‌Center‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌
equipment‌‌and‌‌facilities.‌  ‌ American‌‌Power‌‌Conversion‌‌Corp‌‌v.‌‌Lim‌‌2
‌ 018‌‌re‌‌Quasi-Contract‌  ‌
ECONOMIC‌  ‌REALITY‌  ‌TEST.‌  ‌The‌  ‌benchmark‌  ‌of‌  ‌economic‌‌
  reality‌‌
  is‌‌ 
3) The‌‌nature‌‌and‌‌high‌‌degree‌‌of‌‌control‌‌by‌‌the‌‌employer;‌  ‌ We‌  ‌have‌  ‌this‌  ‌unique‌  ‌situation‌  ‌where‌  ‌respondent‌‌   was‌‌   hired‌‌   directly‌‌ 
the‌‌economic‌‌dependence‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌worker‌‌on‌‌his‌‌employer.‌  ‌
by‌  ‌APCC‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌USA,‌  ‌but‌  ‌was‌  ‌being‌  ‌paid‌  ‌his‌  ‌remuneration‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌‌
4) The‌  ‌worker’s‌  ‌limited‌  ‌opportunities‌  ‌for‌  ‌profit‌  ‌and‌‌  WON‌‌Loreche-Amit‌‌was‌‌an‌‌employee‌‌of‌‌CDMC.‌  ‌ separate‌‌  entity‌‌   — ‌‌APCP‌‌   BV‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Philippines,‌‌   and‌‌ is‌‌ supervised‌‌ and‌‌ 
growth;‌  ‌ controlled‌‌   by‌‌
  APCS‌‌   from‌‌   Singapore‌‌   and‌‌  APC‌‌ Japan‌‌ - ‌‌all‌‌ in‌‌ furtherance‌‌ 
NO‌.‌‌CDMC‌‌does‌‌not‌‌exercise‌‌the‌‌power‌‌of‌‌control‌‌‌over‌‌petitioner.‌  ‌ of‌‌
  APCC's‌‌   objective‌‌   of‌‌
  doing‌‌   business‌‌   here‌‌ unfettered‌‌ by‌‌ government‌‌ 
5) The‌  ‌small‌  ‌amount‌  ‌of‌  ‌initiative,‌  ‌skill,‌  j‌udgment‌  ‌or‌‌ 
Petitioner‌‌  was‌‌   working‌‌  for‌‌ two‌‌ other‌‌ hospitals‌‌ aside‌‌ from‌‌ CDMC,‌‌ not‌‌  regulation.‌‌For‌‌all‌‌legal‌‌purposes,‌‌APCC‌‌is‌‌respondent's‌‌employer.‌  ‌
foresight‌  ‌required‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌success‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌claimed‌‌ 
to‌  ‌mention‌  ‌those‌  ‌other‌  ‌hospitals‌  ‌which‌  ‌she‌  ‌caters‌  ‌to‌  ‌when‌  ‌her‌‌ 
independent‌‌enterprise;‌  ‌
services‌  ‌are‌  ‌needed.‌  ‌Such‌  ‌fact‌  ‌evinces‌  ‌that‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌controls‌  ‌her‌‌  3. Termination‌‌of‌‌Employment‌  ‌
6) The‌  ‌high‌  ‌degree‌  ‌of‌  ‌permanency‌  ‌and‌  ‌duration‌  ‌of‌‌  working‌‌hours.‌‌On‌‌this‌‌note,‌‌relevant‌‌is‌‌the‌‌economic‌‌reality‌‌test.‌  ‌
relationship;‌  ‌ Just‌‌Causes‌  ‌
Thus,‌  ‌the‌  ‌fact‌  ‌that‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌continued‌  ‌to‌  ‌work‌  ‌for‌‌
  other‌‌
  hospitals‌‌ 
7) The‌  ‌degree‌  ‌of‌  ‌dependency‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌worker‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌‌  strengthens‌‌   the‌‌  proposition‌‌ that‌‌ petitioner‌‌ was‌‌ not‌‌ wholly‌‌ dependent‌‌  ARTICLE‌  ‌297.‌  ‌Termination‌  ‌by‌  ‌Employer.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌An‌  ‌employer‌  ‌may‌‌ 
employer‌‌for‌‌his‌‌continued‌‌employment..‌  ‌ on‌‌CDMC.‌  ‌ terminate‌‌an‌‌employment‌‌for‌‌any‌‌of‌‌the‌‌following‌‌causes:‌  ‌
Lu‌‌v.‌‌Enopia‌‌2
‌ 017‌  ‌ Petitioner‌‌
  likewise‌‌  admitted‌‌   that‌‌
  she‌‌  receives‌‌
  in‌‌ full‌‌ her‌‌ 4%‌‌ share‌‌ in‌‌ 
a) Serious‌  ‌misconduct‌  ‌or‌  ‌willful‌  ‌disobedience‌  ‌by‌‌
  the‌‌ 
the‌‌
  Clinical‌‌
  Section‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  hospital‌‌   regardless‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ number‌‌ of‌‌ hours‌‌ 
The‌  ‌fact‌  ‌that‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌had‌  ‌registered‌  ‌the‌  ‌respondents‌  ‌with‌  ‌SSS‌  ‌is‌‌  she‌‌worked‌‌therein.‌T ‌ he‌‌rule‌‌is‌‌that‌‌   ‌ employee‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌lawful‌  ‌orders‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌employer‌  ‌or‌‌ 
proof‌‌ that‌‌ they‌‌ were‌‌ indeed‌‌ his‌‌ employees.‌‌ The‌‌ coverage‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Social‌‌  representative‌‌in‌‌connection‌‌with‌‌his‌‌work;‌  ‌
a. where‌‌a‌‌person‌‌who‌‌works‌‌for‌‌another‌‌   ‌
Security‌‌Law‌‌is‌‌predicated‌‌on‌‌the‌‌existence‌‌of‌‌an‌‌EER.‌  ‌
b. performs‌‌his‌‌job‌‌more‌‌or‌‌less‌‌at‌‌his‌‌own‌‌pleasure,‌‌   ‌ b) Gross‌  ‌and‌  ‌habitual‌  ‌neglect‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌‌ 
It‌‌
  was‌‌
  established‌‌   that‌‌ petitioner‌‌ exercised‌‌ control‌‌ over‌‌ respondents.‌‌  duties;‌  ‌
The‌  ‌control‌  ‌test‌  ‌merely‌  ‌calls‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌existence‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌‌  c. in‌‌the‌‌manner‌‌he‌‌sees‌‌fit,‌‌   ‌
control,‌‌‌and‌‌not‌‌necessarily‌‌the‌‌exercise‌‌thereof.‌‌   ‌ d. not‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌definite‌‌hours‌‌or‌‌conditions‌‌of‌‌work,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ c) Fraud‌  ‌or‌  ‌willful‌  ‌breach‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌trust‌‌ 
The‌‌  payment‌‌   of‌‌
  respondents'‌‌   wages‌‌   based‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ percentage‌‌ share‌‌ of‌‌  e. is‌‌
  compensated‌‌  according‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  result‌‌ of‌‌ his‌‌ efforts‌‌ and‌‌ not‌‌  reposed‌  ‌in‌  ‌him‌  ‌by‌  ‌his‌  ‌employer‌  ‌or‌  ‌duly‌  ‌authorized‌‌ 
the‌  ‌fish‌  ‌catch‌  ‌would‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌sufficient‌  ‌to‌  ‌negate‌  ‌the‌  ‌EER‌  ‌existing‌‌  the‌‌amount‌‌thereof,‌‌   ‌ representative;‌  ‌
between‌‌them.‌  ‌ no‌‌employer-employee‌‌relationship‌‌exists.‌  ‌ d) Commission‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌crime‌  ‌or‌  ‌offense‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee‌‌ 
Petitioner‌‌
  wielded‌‌   the‌‌
  power‌‌   of‌‌
  dismissal‌‌ over‌‌ respondents‌‌ when‌‌ he‌‌  against‌  ‌the‌  ‌person‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌employer‌  ‌or‌  ‌any‌  ‌immediate‌‌ 
dismissed‌  ‌them‌  ‌after‌  ‌they‌  ‌refused‌  ‌to‌  ‌sign‌  ‌the‌  ‌joint‌  ‌fishing‌  ‌venture‌‌  Fernandez‌‌v.‌‌Kalookan‌‌Slaughterhouse‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌
member‌‌ of‌‌ his‌‌ family‌‌ or‌‌ his‌‌ duly‌‌ authorized‌‌ representatives;‌‌ 
agreement.‌  ‌ WON‌‌Fernandez‌‌was‌‌an‌‌employee‌‌of‌‌Kalookan‌‌Slaughterhouse.‌  ‌ and‌  ‌
Reyes‌‌v.‌‌Doctolero‌‌2
‌ 017‌  ‌ YES‌. ‌‌The‌‌  Court‌‌ in‌‌ ‌Masonic‌‌ Contractor,‌‌ Inc.‌‌ v.‌‌ Madjos‌‌ ‌ruled‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌  e) Other‌‌causes‌‌analogous‌t‌ o‌‌the‌‌foregoing.‌  ‌
fact‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌company‌  ‌provided‌  ‌identification‌  ‌cards‌  ‌and‌‌ 
In‌  ‌Mamaril‌  ‌v.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Boy‌  ‌Scout‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌, ‌ ‌there‌  ‌was‌  ‌no‌  ‌EER‌‌ 
uniforms‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌vague‌  ‌affidavit‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌purported‌  ‌employer‌  ‌were‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 39‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

1) Serious‌  ‌Misconduct.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Misconduct‌  ‌is‌  ‌improper‌  ‌or‌‌  4) Fraud‌‌or‌‌Willful‌‌Breach‌‌of‌‌Trust.‌—


‌   ‌‌ ‌ iii) The‌  ‌employee‌  ‌concerned‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌holding‌  ‌a ‌‌
wrong‌  ‌conduct.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌transgression‌‌   of‌‌
  some‌‌   established‌‌   and‌‌  position‌‌of‌‌trust‌‌and‌‌confidence‌; ‌ ‌
a) There‌‌are‌‌two‌‌(2)‌‌classes‌‌of‌p
‌ ositions‌‌of‌‌trust‌.  ‌‌ ‌
definite‌  ‌rule‌  ‌of‌  ‌action,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌forbidden‌  ‌act,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌dereliction‌  ‌of‌  ‌duty,‌‌ 
iv) The‌  ‌loss‌  ‌of‌  ‌trust‌  ‌and‌  ‌confidence‌  ‌should‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌‌ 
willful‌‌   in‌‌
  character‌‌  and‌‌ implies‌‌ wrongful‌‌ intent‌‌ and‌‌ not‌‌ merely‌‌  i) The‌  ‌first‌  ‌class‌  ‌consists‌  ‌of‌  ‌managerial‌‌ 
simulated‌;‌  ‌
error‌  ‌in‌  ‌judgment.‌  ‌It‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌in‌  ‌connection‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌EE’s‌‌  employees‌, ‌‌or‌‌
  those‌‌
  vested‌‌
  with‌‌
  the‌‌ power‌‌ to‌‌ lay‌‌ 
work‌‌‌to‌‌constitute‌‌just‌‌cause‌‌for‌‌his‌‌separation.‌  ‌ down‌‌management‌‌policies;‌‌and‌‌   ‌ v) It‌‌
  should‌‌ ‌not‌‌ be‌‌ used‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌subterfuge‌‌ for‌‌ causes‌‌ 
a) There‌‌must‌‌be‌m
‌ isconduct‌; ‌ ‌ ii) The‌  ‌second‌  ‌class‌  ‌consists‌  ‌of‌  ‌cashiers,‌  ‌auditors,‌‌  which‌‌are‌‌improper,‌‌illegal,‌‌or‌‌unjustified;‌‌and‌  ‌
property‌  ‌custodians‌  ‌or‌  ‌those‌  ‌who,‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌  normal‌‌  vi) It‌‌
  must‌‌
  be‌‌ ‌genuine‌‌ ‌and‌‌ not‌‌ a ‌‌mere‌‌ afterthought‌‌ to‌‌ 
b) The‌  ‌misconduct‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌  ‌grave‌  ‌and‌‌ 
and‌‌
  routine‌‌  exercise‌‌   of‌‌
  their‌‌
  functions,‌‌   ‌regularly‌‌  justify‌‌an‌‌earlier‌‌action‌‌taken‌‌in‌‌bad‌‌faith.‌  ‌
aggravated‌‌‌character;‌  ‌ handle‌  ‌significant‌  ‌amounts‌  ‌of‌  ‌money‌  ‌or‌‌ 
5) Commission‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Crime.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌By‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee‌  ‌against‌‌  the‌‌ 
c) It‌  ‌must‌  ‌relate‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌performance‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  employee's‌‌  property‌. ‌ ‌
person‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌employer‌‌
  or‌‌
  his‌‌
  immediate‌‌
  family‌‌
  or‌‌
  authorized‌‌ 
duties;‌‌AND‌  ‌ b) Requisites‌‌of‌‌Fraud‌  ‌
representatives.‌  ‌
d) There‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌‌
  showing‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌   ‌becomes‌‌ 
  employee‌‌ i) There‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌an‌  ‌act,‌  ‌omission,‌  ‌or‌‌  a) There‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌an‌  ‌act‌  ‌or‌  ‌omission‌‌ 
unfit‌‌‌to‌‌continue‌‌working‌‌for‌‌the‌‌employer.‌  ‌ concealment‌; ‌ ‌
punishable/prohibited‌‌by‌‌law;‌‌and‌  ‌
2) Willful‌‌Disobedience‌‌or‌‌Insubordination.‌‌‌—  ‌‌ ‌ ii) The‌  ‌act,‌  ‌omission‌  ‌or‌  ‌concealment‌  ‌involves‌  ‌a ‌‌
b) The‌  ‌act‌‌
  or‌‌
  omission‌‌
  was‌‌
  committed‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  employee‌‌ 
breach‌  ‌of‌  ‌legal‌  ‌duty,‌  ‌trust,‌  ‌or‌  ‌confidence‌  ‌justly‌‌ 
a) There‌‌must‌‌be‌‌disobedience‌‌or‌‌insubordination;‌  ‌ against‌‌the‌‌person‌‌of‌‌   ‌
reposed;‌  ‌
b) The‌  ‌disobedience‌  ‌or‌  ‌insubordination‌  ‌must‌‌
  be‌‌
  willful‌‌  i) employer,‌‌   ‌
iii) It‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌committed‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer‌‌
  or‌‌ 
or‌  ‌intentional‌  ‌characterized‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌wrongful‌  ‌and‌‌  his/her‌‌representative;‌‌and‌  ‌ ii) any‌‌immediate‌‌member‌‌of‌‌his/her‌‌family,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
perverse‌‌attitude;‌  ‌
iv) It‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌in‌  ‌connection‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌employees'‌‌  iii) his/her‌‌duly‌‌authorized‌‌representative.‌ 
c) The‌  ‌order‌  ‌violated‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌reasonable,‌  ‌lawful,‌  ‌and‌‌  work.‌  ‌ 6) Analogous‌  ‌Causes.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌No‌  ‌act‌  ‌or‌  ‌omission‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌ 
made‌‌known‌‌to‌‌the‌‌employee;‌‌and‌  ‌
c) Requisites‌‌of‌‌Breach‌‌of‌‌Trust‌  ‌ considered‌  ‌as‌  ‌analogous‌  ‌cause‌  ‌unless‌  ‌expressly‌  ‌specified‌  ‌in‌‌ 
d) The‌  ‌order‌  ‌must‌  ‌pertain‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌duties‌  ‌which‌  ‌he‌  ‌has‌‌  the‌‌company‌‌rules‌‌and‌‌regulations‌‌or‌‌policies.‌  ‌
i) The‌  ‌employee‌  ‌holds‌  ‌a ‌ ‌position‌  ‌of‌  ‌trust‌  ‌and‌‌ 
been‌‌engaged‌‌to‌‌discharge.‌  ‌
confidence‌; ‌ ‌ a) Abandonment‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌deliberate‌  ‌and‌  ‌unjustified‌‌ 
3) Gross‌‌and‌‌Habitual‌‌Neglect‌‌of‌‌Duty‌.‌‌—  ‌‌ ‌ ii) There‌‌
  exists‌‌
  an‌‌
  ‌act‌‌
  ‌justifying‌‌
  the‌‌
  loss‌‌ of‌‌ trust‌‌ and‌‌  refusal‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌employee‌  ‌to‌  ‌resume‌  ‌his‌  ‌employment.‌‌ 
a) Gross‌  ‌Neglect‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌absence‌‌
  of‌‌
  that‌‌
  diligence‌‌  confidence;‌  ‌ Two‌‌factors‌‌should‌‌be‌‌present‌:  ‌‌ ‌
that‌  ‌an‌  ‌ordinary‌  ‌prudent‌  ‌man‌  ‌would‌  ‌use‌  ‌in‌  ‌his/her‌‌  iii) The‌‌employee’s‌‌breach‌‌must‌‌be‌w
‌ illful‌; ‌ ‌ i) the‌‌
  failure‌‌
  to‌‌
  report‌‌ for‌‌ work‌‌ or‌‌ ‌absence‌‌ without‌‌ 
own‌‌affairs.‌  ‌ valid‌‌or‌‌justifiable‌‌reason‌;‌‌and‌  ‌
iv) The‌  ‌act‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌in‌  ‌relation‌  ‌to‌  ‌his‌  ‌work‌  ‌which‌‌ 
b) Habitual‌‌
  Neglect‌‌
  refers‌‌ to‌‌ repeated‌‌ failure‌‌ to‌‌ perform‌‌  ii) a‌‌
  ‌clear‌‌
  intention‌‌
  to‌‌
  sever‌‌
  EER‌‌
  — ‌‌manifested‌‌ by‌‌ 
would‌‌render‌‌him‌u
‌ nfit‌‌to‌‌continue.‌  ‌
one's‌‌
  duties‌‌
  over‌‌
  a ‌‌period‌‌ of‌‌ time,‌‌ depending‌‌ upon‌‌ the‌‌  overt‌  ‌acts‌‌
  from‌‌
  which‌‌
  it‌‌
  may‌‌
  be‌‌
  deduced‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌ 
d) Requisites‌‌of‌‌Loss‌‌of‌‌Confidence‌  ‌
circumstances.‌‌   ‌ employees‌‌have‌‌no‌‌more‌‌intention‌‌to‌‌work.‌  ‌
i) There‌‌must‌‌be‌‌an‌a
‌ ct,‌‌omission‌‌or‌‌concealment‌; ‌ ‌
GR‌:‌‌  ‌Neglect‌  ‌of‌  ‌duty‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌BOTH‌  ‌Gross‌  ‌and‌‌  b) Sexual‌  ‌Harassment.‌  ‌— ‌‌The‌‌
  gravamen‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  offense‌‌ 
Habitual‌. ‌ ‌ ii) The‌  ‌act,‌  ‌omission‌  ‌or‌  ‌concealment‌  ‌justifies‌  ‌the‌‌  is‌  ‌not‌  ‌the‌  ‌mere‌  ‌violation‌  ‌of‌  ‌one’s‌  ‌sexuality,‌  ‌but‌  ‌the‌‌ 
EXC‌:‌‌  Even‌  ‌if‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌habitual,‌  ‌but‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌‌  loss‌‌
  of‌‌ trust‌‌ and‌‌ confidence‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ employer‌‌ to‌‌ the‌  abuse‌  ‌of‌  ‌power‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer‌  ‌who‌  ‌has‌  ‌a ‌‌duty‌‌   to‌‌ 
SUBSTANTIAL‌‌DAMAGE‌‌‌or‌‌injury‌‌to‌‌the‌‌ER.‌  ‌ employee;‌  ‌ protect‌‌his‌‌employee‌‌against‌‌over-sex.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 40‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

c) Gross‌‌Inefficiency‌‌or‌‌poor‌‌performance.‌‌—  ‌‌ ‌ NLRC‌‌2
‌ 010‌) ‌ ‌ Mamaril‌‌v.‌‌Red‌‌System‌‌Company‌‌2
‌ 018‌  ‌
i) Employer‌‌has‌‌set‌‌standards‌‌of‌‌performance;‌  ‌ Sterling‌‌Paper‌‌Products‌‌Enterprises‌‌v.‌‌KMM-Katipunan‌‌2
‌ 017‌  ‌
WON‌  ‌Mamaril‌  ‌was‌  ‌illegally‌  ‌dismissed‌  ‌by‌  ‌Red‌  ‌System,‌  ‌and‌  ‌is‌‌ 
ii) Standards‌  ‌are‌  ‌reasonable‌  ‌and‌  ‌in‌  ‌connection‌‌  with‌‌  The‌  ‌utterance‌  ‌of‌  ‌obscene,‌  ‌insulting‌  ‌or‌  ‌offensive‌  ‌words‌  ‌against‌  ‌a ‌‌ consequently‌‌entitled‌‌to‌‌reinstatement‌‌and‌‌full‌‌backwages;‌‌and‌‌   ‌
employee’s‌‌work;‌‌AND‌  ‌ superior‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌only‌  ‌destructive‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌morale‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌‌
  co-employees‌‌  NO‌. ‌ ‌Mamaril‌  ‌was‌  ‌validly‌  ‌dismissed‌  ‌on‌  ‌account‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌willful‌‌ 
iii) Proof‌‌
  that‌‌
  EE‌‌
  failed‌‌
  to‌‌
  meet‌‌
  the‌‌  standards‌‌  despite‌‌  and‌  ‌a ‌ ‌violation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌company‌  ‌rules‌  ‌and‌  ‌regulations,‌  ‌but‌  ‌also‌‌  disobedience‌o ‌ f‌‌the‌‌lawful‌‌orders‌‌of‌‌Red‌‌System.‌  ‌
given‌‌reasonable‌‌opportunity‌‌to‌‌meet‌‌the‌‌same.‌  ‌ constitutes‌‌gross‌‌misconduct‌. ‌ ‌
Red‌  ‌System‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌  ‌remiss‌  ‌in‌  ‌reminding‌  ‌its‌  ‌drivers‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
d) Drug‌  ‌use‌  ‌or‌  ‌abuse.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌specifies‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌  WON‌‌Esponga‌‌was‌‌validly‌‌dismissed‌‌for‌s‌ erious‌‌misconduct‌. ‌ ‌ importance‌  ‌of‌  ‌abiding‌  ‌by‌  ‌their‌‌
  safety‌‌
  regulations.‌‌   Notably,‌‌
  Mamaril‌‌ 
procedure‌‌ shall‌‌ employ‌two‌‌    testing‌‌ methods‌, ‌‌i.e.,‌‌ the‌‌  YES‌. ‌ ‌In‌  ‌de‌  ‌La‌  ‌Cruz‌  ‌v.‌  ‌NLRC‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌dismissed‌  ‌employee‌  ‌shouted,‌‌  violated‌  ‌Red‌  ‌System's‌  ‌safety‌  ‌rules‌  ‌twice,‌  ‌and‌  ‌caused‌  ‌damage‌‌ 
screening‌  ‌test‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌confirmatory‌  ‌test.‌‌
  (‌Nacague‌‌   v.‌‌  "Sayang‌  ‌ang‌  ‌pagka-professional‌  ‌mo!"‌  ‌and‌  ‌"Putang‌  ‌ina‌  ‌mo"‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌‌  amounting‌  ‌to‌  ‌over‌  ‌Php‌  ‌40,000.00.‌  ‌To‌  ‌make‌  ‌matters‌‌
  worse,‌‌
  he‌‌
  even‌‌ 
company‌‌physician‌‌when‌‌the‌‌latter‌‌refused‌‌to‌‌give‌‌him‌‌a‌‌referral‌‌slip.‌  ‌ deliberately‌‌and‌‌willfully‌‌concealed‌‌his‌‌transgressions.‌  ‌
Sulpicio‌‌Lines‌‌2‌ 010‌) ‌ ‌
e) Attitude‌  ‌Problem.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌An‌  ‌employee‌  ‌who‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌get‌‌  Likewise,‌  ‌in‌  ‌Autobus‌  ‌Workers'‌  ‌Union‌  ‌(AWU)‌  ‌v.‌  ‌NLRC‌, ‌ ‌the‌‌  Alaska‌‌Milk‌‌v.‌‌Ponce‌‌2
‌ 017‌ 
dismissed‌  ‌employee‌  ‌told‌  ‌his‌  ‌supervisor‌  ‌"Gago‌  ‌ka"‌  ‌and‌  ‌taunted‌  ‌the‌‌ 
along‌  ‌with‌  ‌his‌  ‌co-employees‌  ‌is‌  ‌detrimental‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  WON‌‌Ponce‌‌was‌‌guilty‌‌of‌‌‌gross‌‌and‌‌habitual‌‌neglect‌o
‌ f‌‌duties.‌  ‌
latter‌‌by‌‌saying,‌‌"Bakit‌‌anong‌‌gusto‌‌mo,‌‌tang‌‌ina‌‌mo."‌  ‌
company‌  ‌for‌  ‌he‌  ‌can‌  ‌upset‌  ‌and‌  ‌strain‌  ‌the‌  ‌working‌‌ 
Moreover,‌  ‌in‌  ‌Asian‌  ‌Design‌  ‌and‌  ‌Manufacturing‌  ‌Corporation‌  ‌v.‌‌  NO‌. ‌ ‌Fault‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌rest‌  ‌upon‌  ‌Ponce's‌  ‌shoulders‌  ‌alone,‌  ‌inasmuch‌  ‌as‌‌ 
environment.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌situation‌  ‌analogous‌  ‌to‌  ‌loss‌  ‌of‌‌  Deputy‌‌
  Minister‌‌   of‌‌
  Labor‌, ‌‌the‌‌
  dismissed‌‌
  employee‌‌
  made‌‌
  false‌‌ and‌‌  satisfactory‌  ‌completion‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌assigned‌  ‌tasks‌  ‌was‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌an‌‌ 
trust‌‌
  and‌‌ confidence‌‌ that‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ duly‌‌ proved‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌  malicious‌‌statements‌‌against‌‌the‌‌foreman‌‌(his‌‌superior).‌  interplay‌  ‌of‌  ‌factors‌  ‌beyond‌  ‌his‌  ‌sole‌  ‌control.‌  ‌The‌  ‌fact‌  ‌that‌  ‌Ponce‌‌ 
employer.‌‌(H‌ eavylift‌‌Manila‌‌v.‌‌CA‌) ‌ ‌ In‌  ‌Reynolds‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌Corporation‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Eslava‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌dismissed‌‌  admitted‌‌   to‌‌  having‌‌ been‌‌ delayed‌‌ in‌‌ some‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ tasks‌‌ assigned‌‌ to‌‌ him‌‌ 
employee‌‌   circulated‌‌  several‌‌   letters‌‌
  to‌‌ the‌‌ members‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ company's‌‌  does‌‌not‌‌establish‌‌gross‌‌and‌‌habitual‌‌neglect‌‌of‌‌duties.‌  ‌
f) Enforcement‌‌of‌‌union‌‌security‌‌clause.‌‌‌—  ‌‌ ‌
board‌  ‌of‌  ‌directors‌  ‌calling‌  ‌the‌  ‌executive‌  ‌vice-president‌  ‌and‌  ‌general‌‌  WON‌‌Ponce‌‌can‌‌be‌‌terminated‌‌for‌l‌ oss‌‌of‌‌trust‌‌and‌‌confidence.‌  ‌
i) The‌‌union‌‌security‌‌clause‌‌is‌‌applicable;‌  ‌ manager‌‌a‌‌"big‌‌fool,"‌‌"anti-Filipino".‌  ‌
YES‌. ‌‌As‌‌
  regards‌‌
  a ‌‌managerial‌‌ employee,‌‌ the‌‌ mere‌‌ existence‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌basis‌‌ 
ii) The‌  ‌bargaining‌  ‌union‌  ‌is‌  ‌requesting‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌  Hence,‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌well-settled‌  ‌that‌  ‌accusatory‌  ‌and‌  ‌inflammatory‌‌  for‌  ‌believing‌  ‌that‌  ‌such‌  ‌employee‌  ‌has‌  ‌breached‌  ‌the‌  ‌trust‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌‌ 
termination‌‌   of‌‌
  employment‌‌ due‌‌ to‌‌ enforcement‌‌ of‌‌  language‌  ‌used‌  ‌by‌  ‌an‌  ‌employee‌  ‌towards‌  ‌his‌  ‌employer‌  ‌or‌‌ 
employer‌‌would‌‌suffice‌‌for‌‌his‌‌dismissal.‌‌   ‌
superior‌‌can‌‌be‌‌a‌‌ground‌‌for‌‌dismissal‌‌or‌‌termination‌. ‌ ‌
the‌‌clause‌‌in‌‌the‌‌CBA;‌A
‌ ND‌  ‌
Ponce‌‌   held‌‌   the‌‌  position‌‌   of‌‌
  Director‌‌
  for‌‌
  Engineering‌‌ Services‌‌ and‌‌ that‌‌ 
iii) There‌‌
  is‌‌ sufficient‌‌ evidence‌‌ to‌‌ support‌‌ the‌‌ union’s‌‌  Transglobal‌‌Maritime‌‌Agency‌‌v.‌‌Chua‌‌2
‌ 017‌  ‌ he‌‌
  was‌‌  in‌‌
  charge‌‌   of‌‌ managing‌‌ AMC's‌‌ Engineering‌‌ Department.‌‌ Hence,‌‌ 
decision‌  ‌to‌  ‌expel‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌union.‌‌  he‌‌
  belongs‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌  ‌first‌‌
  class‌‌  of‌‌
  employees‌‌  who‌‌
  occupy‌‌  a ‌‌position‌‌ of‌‌ 
There‌‌
  must‌‌  be‌‌
  reasonable‌‌
  proportionality‌‌  between,‌‌   on‌‌  the‌‌ one‌‌ hand,‌‌ 
trust‌‌and‌‌confidence.‌  ‌
(‌Slord‌‌Development‌‌v.‌‌Noya‌‌2 ‌ 019‌) ‌ ‌ the‌‌
  willful‌‌
  disobedience‌‌  by‌‌  the‌‌
  employee‌‌
  and,‌‌
  on‌‌ the‌‌ other‌‌ hand,‌‌ the‌‌ 
penalty‌‌imposed‌‌therefor.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌Court‌  ‌rules‌  ‌that‌  ‌his‌  ‌dismissal‌  ‌from‌  ‌employment‌  ‌is‌  ‌justified.‌‌ 
g) Commission‌‌of‌‌prohibited‌‌acts‌‌during‌‌strike.‌‌—  ‌‌ ‌
First‌, ‌‌The‌‌ opening‌‌ sentence‌‌ of‌‌ Ponce's‌‌ R/A‌‌ e-mail‌‌ readily‌‌ exposes‌‌ the‌‌ 
WON‌‌Chua‌‌was‌‌validly‌‌dismissed‌‌for‌i‌ nsubordination‌. ‌ ‌ attendant‌‌   willfulness‌‌  in‌‌
  his‌‌  act.‌‌
  ‌Second‌, ‌‌the‌‌
  act‌‌
  of‌‌
  soliciting‌‌  receipts‌‌ 
i) A‌  ‌worker‌  ‌merely‌  ‌participating‌‌   in‌‌
  an‌‌
  illegal‌‌
  strike‌‌ 
may‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌terminated‌  ‌from‌  ‌employment.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌‌  NO‌. ‌ ‌By‌  ‌virtue‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌POEA-SEC,‌  ‌Chua‌  ‌is‌  ‌indeed‌  ‌bound‌  ‌to‌  ‌obey‌  ‌the‌‌  from‌  ‌colleagues‌  ‌constitutes‌‌   dishonesty,‌‌   inimical‌‌   to‌‌
  AMC's‌‌
  interests,‌‌ 
only‌  ‌when‌  ‌he‌  ‌commits‌  ‌illegal‌  ‌acts‌  ‌during‌  ‌a ‌‌ lawful‌‌   commands‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  captain‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ ship,‌‌ but‌‌ only‌‌ as‌‌ long‌‌ as‌‌ these‌‌  for‌  ‌the‌  ‌simple‌  ‌reason‌  ‌that‌  ‌Ponce‌  ‌would‌  ‌be‌  ‌collecting‌  ‌receipted‌‌ 
pertain‌  ‌to‌  ‌his‌  ‌duties.There‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌relevance‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  order‌‌   to‌‌
  sign‌‌  the‌‌  allowance‌  ‌from‌  ‌expenses‌  ‌he‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌  ‌actually‌  ‌incur.‌  ‌Third‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌R/A‌‌ 
strike‌  ‌that‌  ‌he‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌declared‌  ‌to‌  ‌have‌  ‌lost‌‌ 
documents‌‌in‌‌Chua's‌‌performance‌‌of‌‌his‌‌duty‌‌as‌‌a‌‌seaman.‌  ‌ e-mail‌  ‌betrays‌  ‌a ‌ ‌truly‌  ‌sinister‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌which‌  ‌AMC‌  ‌had‌  ‌a ‌ ‌right‌  ‌to‌‌ 
employment‌‌status.‌‌(S‌ olidbank‌‌v.‌‌Gamier‌‌2 ‌ 010‌) ‌ ‌ guard‌‌against.‌  ‌
To‌‌
  amount‌‌   to‌‌
  a ‌‌valid‌‌
  dismissal,‌‌   an‌‌
  erring‌‌  seafarer‌‌   must‌‌   be‌‌
  handed‌‌ a ‌‌
ii) A‌  ‌union‌‌  officer‌‌
  who‌‌
  knowingly‌‌   participates‌‌   in‌‌
  an‌‌ 
written‌  ‌notice‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌charge‌  ‌against‌  ‌him‌  ‌and‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌given‌  ‌the‌‌  Bravo‌‌v.‌‌Urios‌‌College‌‌2
‌ 017‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌
illegal‌  ‌strike‌  ‌is‌  ‌deemed‌  ‌to‌  ‌have‌  ‌lost‌  ‌his‌‌  opportunity‌  ‌to‌  ‌explain‌  ‌himself‌  ‌— ‌ ‌unless,‌‌   of‌‌
  course,‌‌   there‌‌   is‌‌
  a ‌‌clear‌‌ 
employment‌  ‌status,‌  ‌but‌  ‌a ‌ ‌union‌  ‌member‌  ‌who‌  ‌is‌‌  and‌  ‌existing‌  ‌danger‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌  ‌safety‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌crew‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌vessel‌  ‌in‌‌  WON‌‌Bravo‌‌was‌‌properly‌‌dismissed‌‌for‌‌a‌‌just‌‌cause.‌  ‌
merely‌  ‌instigated‌  ‌or‌‌
  induced‌‌   to‌‌   participate‌‌  in‌‌
  the‌‌  which‌‌case‌‌notice‌‌may‌‌be‌‌dispensed‌‌with.‌  ‌
YES‌. ‌ ‌Petitioner's‌  ‌act‌  ‌in‌  ‌assigning‌  ‌to‌  ‌himself‌  ‌a ‌ ‌higher‌  ‌salary‌  ‌rate‌‌ 
illegal‌  ‌strike‌‌
  is‌‌
  more‌‌
  benignly‌‌   treated.‌‌  (‌Escario‌‌   v.‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 41‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

without‌  ‌proper‌  ‌authorization‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌clear‌  ‌breach‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌trust‌  ‌and‌‌  company's‌  ‌Special‌  ‌Accounts‌  ‌held‌  ‌in‌  ‌trust‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌rightful‌‌
  copyright‌‌ 
It‌‌ can‌‌ be‌‌ gathered‌‌ that‌‌ respondent's‌‌ departure‌‌ was‌‌ merely‌‌ a ‌‌precursor‌‌ 
confidence‌‌   ‌reposed‌‌
  in‌‌
  him.‌‌   In‌‌
  addition,‌‌
  there‌‌
  was‌‌  no‌‌
  reason‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌  owners,‌  ‌Gaite's‌  ‌ability‌  ‌to‌  ‌duly‌  ‌perform‌  ‌and‌  ‌accomplish‌  ‌her‌  ‌duties‌‌ 
to‌  ‌his‌  ‌scheme‌  ‌to‌  ‌turn‌  ‌the‌  ‌table‌‌
  against‌‌
  petitioner.‌‌
  Realizing‌‌  that‌‌
  his‌‌ 
Comptroller's‌  ‌Office‌  ‌to‌  ‌undertake‌  ‌the‌  ‌preparation‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌own‌‌  and‌  ‌responsibilities‌‌   as‌‌
  General‌‌   Manager‌‌  has‌‌  been‌‌  seriously‌‌   put‌‌
  into‌‌ 
employment‌  ‌was‌  ‌at‌  ‌serious‌  ‌risk‌  ‌due‌  ‌to‌  ‌his‌  ‌habitual‌  ‌neglect‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌‌ 
summary‌‌   table‌‌ because‌‌ this‌‌ was‌‌ a ‌‌function‌‌ that‌‌ exclusively‌‌ pertained‌‌  question.‌  ‌
duties,‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌jumped‌  ‌the‌  ‌gun‌  ‌on‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌by‌  ‌lodging‌  ‌a ‌‌
to‌‌the‌‌Human‌‌Resources‌‌Department.‌  ‌
On‌  ‌the‌  ‌second‌  ‌ground‌  ‌for‌  ‌termination,‌‌
  the‌‌
  Court‌‌
  finds‌‌
  that‌‌
  FILSCAP‌  baseless‌  ‌complaint‌  ‌for‌  ‌illegal‌  ‌dismissal‌  ‌even‌‌   though‌‌
  it‌‌
  was‌‌
  he‌‌
  who‌‌ 
Panaligan‌‌v.‌‌Phyvita‌‌Enterprises‌‌2
‌ 017‌  ‌ validly‌‌   terminated‌‌   Gaite's‌‌ employment‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ ground‌‌ of‌‌ loss‌‌ of‌‌ trust‌‌  abandoned‌‌his‌‌employment.‌  ‌
and‌‌confidence‌.  ‌‌ ‌
WON‌  ‌there‌  ‌exists‌  ‌just‌  ‌and‌  ‌valid‌  ‌cause‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌termination‌  ‌of‌‌  Maria‌‌De‌‌Leon‌‌Transportation‌‌Inc.,‌‌et‌‌al.‌‌v.‌‌Macuray‌‌2
‌ 018‌  ‌
PANALIGAN,‌‌et‌‌al.'s,‌‌employment‌‌by‌‌PHYVITA.‌‌   Claudia’s‌‌Kitchen‌‌Inc.‌‌v.‌‌Tanguin‌‌2
‌ 017‌  ‌
An‌  ‌employee‌  ‌can‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌said‌  ‌to‌  ‌have‌  ‌abandoned‌  ‌his‌  ‌employment‌‌ 
NO‌. ‌ ‌No‌  ‌direct‌  ‌evidence‌‌  was‌‌  presented‌‌  to‌‌  link‌‌  PANALIGAN,‌‌  et‌‌  al.,‌‌  to‌‌  In‌  ‌abandonment‌, ‌ ‌absence‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌accompanied‌  ‌by‌  ‌overt‌  ‌acts‌‌  when‌‌   he‌‌
  merely‌‌   availed‌‌  of‌‌
  a ‌‌company‌‌ practice‌‌ of‌‌ taking‌‌ ‌sabbaticals‌‌ 
the‌‌theft‌‌that‌‌they‌‌allegedly‌‌committed.‌  ‌ unerringly‌  ‌pointing‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌fact‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee‌  ‌simply‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌‌  in‌  ‌order‌‌
  to‌‌
  afford‌‌   them‌‌
  the‌‌  opportunity‌‌   to‌‌
  recover‌‌  from‌‌
  the‌‌
  stresses‌‌ 
want‌  ‌to‌  ‌work‌  ‌anymore.‌  ‌Mere‌  ‌absence‌  ‌or‌  ‌failure‌  ‌to‌‌   report‌‌   for‌‌
  work,‌‌  of‌  ‌driving‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌long‌  ‌and‌  ‌monotonous‌  ‌bus‌  ‌routes‌  ‌by‌  ‌accepting‌‌ 
Taking‌  ‌into‌  ‌consideration‌  ‌the‌  ‌fact‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌  DOLE-NCR‌‌   conducted‌‌   an‌‌  even‌‌   after‌‌ a ‌‌notice‌‌ to‌‌ return‌‌ to‌‌ work‌‌ has‌‌ been‌‌ served,‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ enough‌‌ to‌‌  jobs‌‌elsewhere.‌  ‌
inspection‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌respondent's‌  ‌premises‌  ‌on‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌result‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  labor‌‌  amount‌‌to‌‌an‌‌abandonment‌‌of‌‌employment.‌  ‌
complaint‌‌   filed‌‌ by‌‌ PANALIGAN,‌‌ et‌‌ al.,‌‌ and‌‌ they‌‌ were‌‌ implicated‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌  WON‌  ‌there‌  ‌was‌  ‌just‌  ‌cause‌  ‌for‌  ‌dismissing‌  ‌Macuray‌  ‌due‌  ‌to‌‌ 
alleged‌  ‌theft‌  ‌incident‌  ‌only‌  ‌thereafter,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌reasonable‌  ‌inference‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌‌  Here,‌  ‌there‌‌   was‌‌   no‌‌  abandonment‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌
  part‌‌
  of‌‌
  respondent.‌‌   Records‌‌  abandonment.‌  ‌
made‌‌  that‌‌
  PANALIGAN,‌‌   et‌‌
  al.'s,‌‌
  termination‌‌ of‌‌ employment‌‌ may‌‌ have‌‌  are‌  ‌bereft‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌indication‌‌
  that‌‌
  Tanguin's‌‌   failure‌‌   to‌‌
  report‌‌
  for‌‌  work‌‌ 
NO‌. ‌ ‌Macuray‌‌
  was‌‌
  not‌‌
  dismissed‌‌
  from‌‌
  work‌‌
  and‌‌
  he‌‌
  did‌‌
  not‌‌
  abandon‌‌ 
been‌  ‌indeed‌  ‌a ‌ ‌retaliatory‌  ‌measure‌  ‌designed‌  ‌to‌  ‌coerce‌  ‌them‌  ‌into‌‌  was‌‌ with‌‌ a ‌‌clear‌‌ intent‌‌ to‌‌ sever‌‌ her‌‌ employment‌‌ relationship‌‌ with‌‌ the‌‌ 
his‌‌employment.‌  ‌
withdrawing‌  ‌their‌  ‌complaint‌  ‌for‌  ‌underpayment‌  ‌of‌  ‌wages‌  ‌and‌‌  petitioners.‌  ‌Moreover,‌  ‌Tanguin's‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌filing‌  ‌a ‌ ‌complaint‌‌   for‌‌  illegal‌‌ 
nonpayment‌  ‌of‌  ‌other‌  ‌labor‌  ‌standard‌  ‌benefits.‌  ‌Such‌  ‌an‌  ‌act‌  ‌is‌‌  dismissal‌  ‌with‌  ‌prayer‌  ‌for‌  ‌reinstatement‌  ‌negates‌  ‌any‌  ‌intention‌  ‌to‌‌  Even‌‌   assuming‌‌   that‌‌
  respondent‌‌   was‌‌
  indeed‌‌  told‌‌
  by‌‌ respondent's‌‌ bus‌‌ 
proscribed‌‌by‌A ‌ rticle‌‌118‌o ‌ f‌‌the‌‌Labor‌‌Code.‌  ‌ abandon‌‌her‌‌employment.‌  ‌ dispatcher‌‌   Roger‌‌   Pasion‌‌  that‌‌
  he‌‌
  was‌‌
  AWOL,‌‌   this‌‌ was‌‌ not‌‌ tantamount‌‌ 
to‌  ‌dismissal,‌  ‌actual‌  ‌or‌  ‌constructive.‌  ‌An‌  ‌ordinary‌  ‌bus‌  ‌dispatcher‌‌ 
Aluag‌‌v.‌‌BIR‌‌Multi-Purpose‌‌Cooperative‌‌2
‌ 017‌  ‌ Mehitabel‌‌Inc‌‌v.‌‌Alcuizar‌‌2
‌ 017‌  ‌ has‌‌no‌‌power‌‌to‌‌dismiss‌‌an‌‌employee‌. ‌ ‌
WON‌‌BIRMPC‌‌had‌‌just‌‌cause‌‌to‌‌terminate‌‌Aluag's‌‌employment.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌filing‌  ‌of‌  ‌a‌  ‌complaint‌  ‌for‌  ‌illegal‌  ‌dismissal‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌ipso‌  ‌facto‌‌ 
foreclose‌‌   the‌‌  possibility‌‌   of‌‌
  abandonment.‌‌   It‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  the‌‌
  sole‌‌ indicator‌‌ 
Authorized‌‌Causes‌  ‌
YES‌. ‌ ‌One‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌infractions‌  ‌that‌  ‌BIRMPC‌  ‌cited‌  ‌in‌  ‌justifying‌  ‌Aluag's‌‌  in‌  ‌determining‌  ‌whether‌  ‌or‌  ‌not‌  ‌there‌  ‌was‌  ‌desertion.‌  ‌Other‌‌ 
dismissal‌‌   is‌‌
  her‌‌  failure‌‌
  to‌‌
  deposit‌‌   checks‌‌ on‌‌ due‌‌ dates,‌‌ pursuant‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌‌ ARTICLE‌‌   298.‌‌
  ‌Closure‌‌
  of‌‌
  Establishment‌‌ and‌‌ Reduction‌‌ of‌‌ Personnel.‌‌ 
circumstances‌  ‌surrounding‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌taken‌  ‌into‌  ‌account‌  ‌in‌‌ 
member/debtor's‌‌ request.‌‌ The‌‌ task‌‌ of‌‌ depositing‌‌ checks‌‌ on‌‌ due‌‌ dates‌‌  —‌  ‌The‌  ‌employer‌  ‌may‌  ‌also‌  ‌terminate‌  ‌the‌  ‌employment‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌‌ 
resolving‌‌the‌‌issue‌‌of‌‌whether‌‌or‌‌not‌‌there‌‌was‌‌abandonment.‌  ‌
definitely‌‌falls‌‌within‌‌Aluag's‌‌scope‌‌of‌‌responsibilities.‌‌   ‌ employee‌‌due‌‌to‌  ‌
WON‌‌Alcuizar‌‌was‌‌dismissed‌‌by‌‌Mehitabel.‌  ‌
BIRMPC‌  ‌had‌  ‌ample‌  ‌reason‌  ‌to‌  ‌lose‌  ‌the‌  ‌trust‌  ‌and‌  ‌confidence‌  ‌it‌‌  1. the‌‌installation‌‌of‌‌labor-saving‌‌devices,‌‌   ‌
reposed‌‌upon‌‌her‌‌and‌‌thereby,‌‌terminate‌‌her‌‌employment.‌  ‌ NO‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌publications‌  ‌were‌  ‌made‌  ‌through‌  ‌sheer‌  ‌inadvertence,‌  ‌and‌‌ 
that‌  ‌the‌  ‌vacancy‌  ‌is‌  ‌actually‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌position‌  ‌of‌  ‌Purchasing‌  ‌Officer,‌‌  2. redundancy,‌‌   ‌
Gaite‌‌v.‌‌Filipino‌‌Society‌‌of‌‌Composers‌‌2
‌ 018‌  ‌ rather‌‌than‌‌Purchasing‌‌Manager.‌  ‌
3. retrenchment‌‌to‌‌prevent‌‌losses‌‌or‌‌   ‌
WON‌  ‌Gaite‌  ‌was‌  ‌validly‌  ‌dismissed‌  ‌due‌  ‌to‌  ‌loss‌  ‌of‌  ‌trust‌  ‌and‌‌  Alcuizar‌‌   was‌‌   informed‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  error‌‌
  committed,‌‌
  and‌‌  that‌‌
  it‌‌
  was‌‌ made‌‌ 
confidence‌. ‌ ‌ clear‌‌
  to‌‌
  him‌‌   that‌‌ he‌‌ was‌‌ never‌‌ terminated‌‌ from‌‌ service‌‌ at‌‌ that‌‌ time‌‌ in‌‌  4. the‌  ‌closing‌  ‌or‌  ‌cessation‌  ‌of‌  ‌operation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
spite‌‌of‌‌his‌‌poor‌‌performance.‌  ‌ establishment‌‌or‌‌undertaking‌‌   ‌
YES‌. ‌ ‌Gaite's‌  ‌actuations‌  ‌constitute‌  ‌serious‌  ‌misconduct‌. ‌ ‌First‌, ‌ ‌not‌‌ 
only‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌amount‌  ‌involved‌  ‌herein‌‌   a ‌‌staggering‌‌  amount‌‌  of‌‌
  P17.7M,‌‌  WON‌‌Alcuizar‌‌abandoned‌‌his‌‌employment.‌  ‌ unless‌‌  the‌‌  closing‌‌   is‌‌
  for‌‌ the‌‌ purpose‌‌ of‌‌ circumventing‌‌ the‌‌ provisions‌‌ 
the‌  ‌alleged‌  ‌reallocation‌  ‌violated‌  ‌an‌  ‌express‌  ‌provision‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
YES‌. ‌‌Respondent's‌‌ non-compliance‌‌ with‌‌ the‌‌ directive‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ Return‌‌ to‌‌  of‌‌
  this‌‌ Title,‌‌ by‌‌ serving‌‌ a ‌‌written‌‌ notice‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ workers‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ DOLE‌‌ 
company's‌‌   Distribution‌‌   Rules.‌‌  ‌Second‌, ‌‌Gaite‌‌ committed‌‌ said‌‌ transfer‌‌ 
Work‌  ‌to‌  ‌Our‌  ‌mind,‌  ‌signifies‌  ‌his‌  ‌intention‌‌
  to‌‌
  sever‌‌
  the‌‌
  employment‌‌  at‌‌least‌‌one‌‌(1)‌‌month‌‌‌before‌‌the‌‌intended‌‌date‌‌thereof.‌‌   ‌
in‌  ‌the‌  ‌performance‌  ‌of‌  ‌her‌  ‌duties‌  ‌as‌  ‌General‌  ‌Manager‌  ‌of‌  ‌FILSCAP.‌‌ 
relation‌‌  with‌‌
  petitioner,‌‌ and‌‌ gives‌‌ credence‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ latter's‌‌ claim‌‌ that‌‌ it‌‌ 
Third‌, ‌ ‌because‌  ‌of‌  ‌this‌  ‌grave‌  ‌infraction‌  ‌causing‌  ‌the‌  ‌depletion‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
was‌‌respondent‌‌who‌‌abandoned‌‌his‌‌job.‌‌   ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 42‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

a) There‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌introduction‌  ‌of‌‌


  machinery,‌‌
  equipment‌‌  b) The‌  ‌losses,‌  ‌if‌  ‌already‌  ‌incurred,‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌merely‌  ‌de‌‌ 
In‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌termination‌  ‌due‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌installation‌  ‌of‌  ‌labor-saving‌‌  or‌‌other‌‌devices;‌  ‌ minimis‌, ‌ ‌but‌  ‌substantial,‌  ‌serious,‌‌   actual‌‌
  and‌‌
  real,‌‌
  or,‌‌ 
devices‌‌   or‌‌ redundancy‌, ‌‌the‌‌ worker‌‌ affected‌‌ thereby‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ entitled‌‌  if‌‌only‌‌expected,‌‌are‌‌reasonably‌‌imminent;‌  ‌
b) The‌‌introduction‌‌must‌‌be‌‌done‌‌in‌‌good‌‌faith;‌  ‌
to‌‌
  a‌‌
  separation‌‌   pay‌‌
  equivalent‌‌   to‌‌
  at‌‌
  least‌‌
  his‌‌ one‌‌ (1)‌‌ month‌‌ pay‌‌ or‌‌ to‌‌ 
c) The‌‌
  purpose‌‌
  for‌‌
  such‌‌
  introduction‌‌
  must‌‌ be‌‌ valid‌‌ such‌‌  c) The‌  ‌expected‌  ‌or‌  ‌actual‌  ‌losses‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌proved‌  ‌by‌‌ 
at‌  ‌least‌  ‌one‌  ‌(1)‌  ‌month‌  ‌pay‌  ‌for‌  ‌every‌  ‌year‌  ‌of‌  ‌service,‌  ‌whichever‌  ‌is‌‌ 
higher.‌‌   ‌ as‌  ‌to‌  ‌save‌  ‌on‌  ‌cost,‌  ‌enhance‌  ‌efficiency‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌‌  sufficient‌‌and‌‌convincing‌‌evidence‌; ‌ ‌

In‌‌
  case‌‌  of‌‌  retrenchment‌‌   to‌‌ prevent‌‌ losses‌‌ and‌‌ in‌‌ cases‌‌ of‌‌ ‌closures‌‌ or‌‌  justifiable‌‌economic‌‌reasons;‌  ‌ d) The‌  ‌retrenchment‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌in‌  ‌good‌  ‌faith‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌ 
cessation‌‌   of‌‌ operations‌‌ ‌of‌‌ establishment‌‌ or‌‌ undertaking‌‌ ‌not‌‌ due‌‌ to‌‌  d) There‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌other‌  ‌option‌  ‌available‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer‌‌  advancement‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌interest‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌to‌  ‌defeat‌  ‌or‌‌ 
serious‌  ‌business‌  ‌losses‌  ‌or‌‌   financial‌‌   reverses‌, ‌‌the‌‌   separation‌‌  pay‌‌  than‌  ‌the‌  ‌introduction‌  ‌of‌  ‌machinery,‌  ‌equipment‌  ‌or‌‌  circumvent‌‌   the‌‌
  employees'‌‌   right‌‌
  to‌‌
  security‌‌   of‌‌
  tenure;‌‌ 
shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌equivalent‌  ‌to‌  ‌one‌  ‌(1)‌  ‌month‌  ‌pay‌  ‌or‌  ‌at‌‌
  least‌‌
  one-half‌‌
  (1/2)‌‌  device‌‌   and‌‌ the‌‌ consequent‌‌ termination‌‌ of‌‌ employment‌‌  and‌  ‌
month‌‌pay‌‌for‌‌every‌‌year‌‌of‌‌service,‌‌whichever‌‌is‌‌higher.‌‌   ‌ of‌‌those‌‌affected‌‌thereby;‌‌and‌  ‌ e) There‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌fair‌  ‌and‌  ‌reasonable‌  ‌criteria‌  ‌in‌ 
A‌  ‌fraction‌  ‌of‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌six‌  ‌(6)‌  ‌months‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌one‌  ‌(1)‌‌  e) There‌‌
  must‌‌
  be‌‌
  fair‌‌
  and‌‌
  reasonable‌‌ criteria‌‌ in‌‌ selecting‌‌  ascertaining‌‌   who‌‌
  would‌‌  be‌‌
  dismissed‌‌
  and‌‌ who‌‌ would‌‌ 
whole‌‌year.‌  ‌ employees‌‌to‌‌be‌‌terminated.‌  ‌ be‌  ‌retained‌  ‌among‌  ‌the‌  ‌employees,‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌status,‌‌ 
efficiency,‌  ‌seniority,‌  ‌physical‌  ‌fitness,‌  ‌age,‌  ‌and‌‌ 
2) Redundancy.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌exists‌  ‌when‌  ‌"the‌  ‌services‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌employee‌‌ 
Common‌‌Requisites‌  ‌ financial‌‌hardship‌‌for‌‌certain‌‌workers.‌  ‌
are‌  ‌in‌  ‌excess‌  ‌of‌  ‌what‌  ‌is‌  ‌reasonably‌  ‌demanded‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌actual‌‌ 
a) Good‌‌faith;‌  ‌ requirements‌‌of‌‌the‌‌enterprise."‌  ‌ 4) Closing‌  ‌or‌  ‌cessation‌  ‌of‌  ‌operation‌. ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌Refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
complete‌  ‌or‌  ‌partial‌  ‌cessation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌operations‌  ‌and/or‌‌ 
b) Termination‌‌is‌‌matter‌‌of‌l‌ ast‌‌resort‌; ‌ ‌ a) written‌‌
  notice‌‌
  served‌‌
  on‌‌
  both‌‌
  the‌‌ employees‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ 
shut-down‌‌of‌‌the‌‌establishment‌‌of‌‌the‌‌employer.‌  ‌
c) Two‌  ‌(2)‌  ‌Separate‌  ‌notices‌  ‌served‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌affected‌  ‌EE‌  ‌and‌‌  DOLE‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌one‌‌
  month‌‌
  prior‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  intended‌‌
  date‌‌ 
of‌‌retrenchment;‌  ‌ a) There‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌ ‌decision‌‌
  to‌‌
  close‌‌
  or‌‌
  cease‌‌
  operation‌‌ 
DOLE‌‌ONE‌‌MONTH‌‌‌prior‌‌to‌‌intended‌‌date‌‌of‌‌termination;‌  ‌
of‌‌the‌‌enterprise‌‌by‌‌the‌‌management;‌  ‌
d) Separation‌‌pay‌; ‌ ‌ b) payment‌‌   of‌‌
  ‌separation‌‌   pay‌‌
  equivalent‌‌   to‌‌
  at‌‌
  least‌‌ one‌‌ 
month‌‌
  pay‌‌  or‌‌
  at‌‌
  least‌‌
  one‌‌
  month‌‌  pay‌‌ for‌‌ every‌‌ year‌‌ of‌‌  b) The‌‌decision‌‌was‌‌made‌‌in‌‌good‌‌faith;‌‌and‌  ‌
i. Installation‌‌ of‌‌ labor‌‌ saving‌‌ Device‌‌ or‌‌ Redundancy‌‌ — ‌‌1 ‌‌
service,‌‌whichever‌‌is‌‌higher;‌  ‌ c) There‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌other‌  ‌option‌  ‌available‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer‌‌ 
month‌  ‌pay‌  ‌or‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌1 ‌ ‌month‌  ‌pay‌  ‌for‌  ‌every‌‌
  year‌‌
  of‌‌ 
c) good‌‌faith‌‌‌in‌‌abolishing‌‌the‌‌redundant‌‌positions;‌‌and‌  ‌ except‌‌to‌‌close‌‌or‌‌cease‌‌operations.‌  ‌
service‌‌whichever‌‌is‌‌higher;‌  ‌
d) fair‌  ‌and‌  ‌reasonable‌  ‌criteria‌  ‌in‌  ‌ascertaining‌  ‌what‌‌  5) Disease.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌To‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌ ‌valid‌  ‌ground‌  ‌for‌  ‌termination,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
ii. Retrenchment‌  ‌or‌‌
  closure‌‌
  not‌‌
  due‌‌
  to‌‌
  serious‌‌
  losses‌‌
  — ‌‌
positions‌‌ are‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ declared‌‌ redundant‌‌ and‌‌ accordingly‌‌  following‌‌must‌‌be‌‌present:‌‌   ‌
1‌‌
  month‌‌  pay‌‌
  or‌‌
  at‌‌
  least‌‌
  1/2‌‌
  month‌‌
  pay‌‌
  for‌‌
  every‌‌
  year‌‌ 
abolished.‌  ‌ a) The‌‌employee‌‌must‌‌be‌‌suffering‌‌from‌‌any‌‌disease;‌‌   ‌
of‌‌service‌‌whichever‌‌is‌‌higher;‌  ‌
iii. Closure‌‌due‌‌to‌‌serious‌‌losses‌‌—‌‌NONE.‌  ‌ 3) Retrenchment.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌or‌  ‌downsizing‌  ‌is‌‌
  a ‌‌mode‌‌
  of‌‌
  terminating‌‌  b) The‌  ‌continued‌  ‌employment‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee‌  ‌is‌‌ 
employment‌  ‌initiated‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer‌‌   through‌‌   no‌‌
  fault‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  prohibited‌‌   by‌‌   law‌‌  or‌‌
  ‌prejudicial‌‌  to‌‌ his/her‌‌ health‌‌ 
iv. CBA‌‌provision‌‌shall‌‌prevail.‌  ‌
employee‌  ‌and‌  ‌without‌  ‌prejudice‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌latter,‌  ‌resorted‌  ‌to‌  ‌by‌‌  as‌  ‌well‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌health‌  ‌of‌  ‌his/her‌  ‌co-employees‌; ‌‌
e) Fair‌‌and‌‌reasonable‌‌criteria.‌  ‌ management‌  ‌during‌  ‌periods‌  ‌of‌  ‌business‌  ‌recession,‌  ‌industrial‌‌  and‌‌   ‌
1) Installation‌  ‌of‌  ‌labor-saving‌  ‌devices.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  depression‌  ‌or‌  ‌seasonal‌  ‌fluctuations‌  ‌or‌  ‌during‌  ‌lulls‌  ‌over‌‌ 
c) There‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌‌
  ‌certification‌‌   by‌‌
  a ‌‌competent‌‌   public‌‌ 
reduction‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌number‌  ‌of‌  ‌workers‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌workplace‌  ‌made‌‌  shortage‌‌of‌‌materials.‌  ‌
health‌  ‌authority‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌disease‌  ‌is‌  ‌incurable‌‌ 
necessary‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌introduction‌  ‌of‌  ‌labor-saving‌  ‌machinery‌  ‌or‌‌  a) The‌  ‌retrenchment‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌reasonably‌  ‌necessary‌‌
  and‌‌  within‌‌   a ‌‌period‌‌   of‌‌
  six‌‌
  (6)‌‌
  months‌‌   ‌even‌‌
  with‌‌ proper‌ 
devices.‌  ‌ likely‌‌to‌p
‌ revent‌‌business‌‌losses‌; ‌ ‌ medical‌‌treatment.‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 43‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

d) As‌‌ to‌‌ procedural‌‌ due‌‌ process.‌‌ — ‌‌‌The‌‌ employer‌‌ must‌‌  Acosta‌‌v.‌‌Matiere‌‌SAS‌‌2 ‌ 019‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌ criterion‌  ‌for‌  ‌retrenching‌  ‌an‌  ‌employee.‌  ‌Retrenchment‌  ‌that‌ 
furnish‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee‌  ‌two‌  ‌written‌  ‌notices‌  ‌in‌‌  disregards‌  ‌an‌  ‌employee's‌  ‌record‌  ‌and‌  ‌length‌  ‌of‌  ‌service‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌‌ 
terminations‌‌due‌‌to‌‌disease,‌‌namely:‌  ‌ In‌  ‌redundancy‌, ‌ ‌an‌  ‌employer‌  ‌must‌  ‌show‌  ‌that‌  ‌it‌  ‌applied‌  ‌fair‌  ‌and‌‌ 
illegal‌‌termination‌‌of‌‌employment.‌  ‌
reasonable‌‌
  criteria‌‌
  in‌‌ determining‌‌ what‌‌ positions‌‌ have‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ declared‌‌ 
i) the‌  ‌notice‌  ‌to‌  ‌apprise‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  redundant.‌  ‌Otherwise,‌  ‌it‌  ‌will‌  ‌be‌  ‌held‌  ‌liable‌  ‌for‌‌
  illegally‌‌
  dismissing‌‌  WON‌‌   Pascua's‌‌
  retrenchment‌‌   was‌‌
  valid‌‌ based‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ criteria‌‌ that‌‌ she‌‌ 
ground‌‌for‌‌which‌‌his‌‌dismissal‌‌is‌‌sought;‌‌and‌  the‌‌employee‌‌affected‌‌by‌‌the‌‌redundancy.‌  ‌ had‌‌the‌‌highest‌‌rate‌‌of‌‌pay.‌  ‌
ii) the‌  ‌notice‌  ‌informing‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌‌  WON‌  ‌Acosta‌‌
  was‌‌  validly‌‌
  dismissed‌‌
  from‌‌
  employment‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  ground‌‌  NO‌. ‌ ‌Jurisprudence‌  ‌requires‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌necessity‌  ‌of‌  ‌retrenchment‌  ‌to‌‌ 
dismissal,‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ issued‌‌ after‌‌ the‌‌ employee‌‌ has‌‌  of‌r‌ edundancy‌. ‌ ‌ stave‌  ‌off‌  ‌genuine‌  ‌and‌  ‌significant‌  ‌business‌  ‌losses‌  ‌or‌  ‌reverses‌  ‌be‌‌ 
demonstrated‌  ‌by‌  ‌an‌  ‌employer's‌  ‌independently‌  ‌audited‌‌ 
been‌  ‌given‌‌
  reasonable‌‌   opportunity‌‌   to‌‌
  answer‌‌  NO‌. ‌ ‌Respondents'‌  ‌only‌  ‌basis‌  ‌for‌  ‌declaring‌  ‌petitioner's‌  ‌position‌‌ 
redundant‌  ‌was‌  ‌that‌  ‌his‌‌  function,‌‌  which‌‌   was‌‌  to‌‌
  monitor‌‌   the‌‌   delivery‌‌ 
financial‌  ‌statements‌. ‌ ‌Documents‌  ‌that‌‌  have‌‌  not‌‌  been‌‌  the‌‌  subject‌‌ 
and‌‌to‌‌be‌‌heard‌‌on‌‌his‌‌defense.‌  ‌
of‌‌
  supplies,‌‌
  became‌‌   unnecessary‌‌   upon‌‌
  completion‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ shipments.‌‌  of‌‌an‌‌independent‌‌audit‌‌may‌‌very‌‌well‌‌be‌‌self-serving.‌  ‌
Manggagawa‌‌ng‌‌Komunikasyon‌‌sa‌‌Pilipinas‌‌v.‌‌PLDT‌‌2
‌ 017‌‌Leonen‌  ‌ However,‌  ‌there‌  ‌was‌  ‌no‌  ‌mention‌  ‌of‌‌   monitoring‌‌   shipments‌‌   as‌‌  part‌‌
  of‌‌  The‌  ‌records‌  ‌indicate‌  ‌that‌  ‌La‌  ‌Consolacion‌  ‌suffered‌‌  serious‌‌
  business‌‌ 
An‌‌order‌‌of‌‌reinstatement‌‌is‌‌different‌‌from‌‌a‌‌return-to-work‌‌order.‌‌   ‌ petitioner's‌  ‌tasks.‌  ‌If‌  ‌his‌  ‌work‌  ‌pertains‌  ‌mainly‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌delivery‌  ‌of‌‌  reverses‌  ‌or‌  ‌an‌  ‌aberrant‌  ‌drop‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌  ‌revenue‌  ‌and‌  ‌income,‌  ‌thus,‌‌ 
supplies,‌  ‌it‌  ‌should‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌specifically‌  ‌stated‌  ‌in‌  ‌his‌  ‌job‌‌  compelling‌‌it‌‌to‌‌retrench‌‌employees.‌  ‌
1. The‌  ‌award‌  ‌of‌  ‌reinstatement‌, ‌ ‌including‌  ‌backwages,‌  ‌is‌‌  description.‌  ‌There‌  ‌was,‌  ‌hence‌  ‌no‌  ‌basis‌‌   for‌‌
  respondents‌‌   to‌‌  consider‌‌ 
awarded‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Labor‌  ‌Arbiter‌  ‌to‌  ‌an‌  ‌illegally‌  ‌dismissed‌‌  his‌‌position‌‌irrelevant‌‌when‌‌the‌‌shipments‌‌had‌‌been‌‌completed.‌  ‌ La‌  ‌Consolacion's‌  ‌failure‌  ‌was‌  ‌non-compliance‌  ‌with‌  ‌using‌  ‌fair‌  ‌and‌‌ 
employee‌‌pursuant‌‌to‌‌Article‌‌294.‌‌   ‌ reasonable‌  ‌criteria‌  ‌that‌  ‌considered‌  ‌the‌‌
  status‌‌
  and‌‌
  seniority‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌ 
Likewise,‌  ‌respondents‌  ‌failed‌  ‌to‌  ‌show‌  ‌that‌  ‌they‌  ‌used‌  ‌fair‌  ‌and‌‌  retrenched‌‌employee.‌  ‌
2. On‌‌
  the‌‌
  other‌‌   hand,‌‌  a ‌‌‌return-to-work‌‌ order‌‌ is‌‌ issued‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌  reasonable‌  ‌criteria‌  ‌in‌  ‌determining‌  ‌what‌  ‌positions‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌‌ 
SOLE‌  ‌when‌  ‌he‌  ‌or‌  ‌she‌  ‌assumes‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌over‌  ‌a ‌ ‌labor‌‌  declared‌‌redundant.‌  ‌ La‌  ‌Consolacion's‌  ‌disregard‌  ‌of‌  ‌respondent's‌  ‌seniority‌  ‌and‌  ‌preferred‌‌ 
dispute‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌  ‌industry‌  ‌that‌  ‌is‌  ‌considered‌  ‌indispensable‌  ‌to‌‌  status‌  ‌relative‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌part-time‌  ‌employee‌  ‌indicates‌  ‌its‌  ‌resort‌  ‌to‌  ‌an‌‌ 
the‌‌national‌‌interest.‌  ‌ In‌  ‌Panlilio‌  ‌v.‌‌
  NLRC‌, ‌‌this‌‌
  Court‌‌
  held‌‌
  that‌‌
  fair‌‌
  and‌‌
  reasonable‌‌
  criteria‌‌  unfair‌‌and‌‌unreasonable‌‌criterion‌‌for‌‌retrenchment.‌  ‌
may‌  ‌take‌  ‌into‌  ‌account‌  ‌the‌  ‌preferred‌  ‌status,‌  ‌efficiency,‌  ‌and‌‌ 
WON‌‌the‌‌2002‌‌redundancy‌‌program‌‌of‌‌PLDT‌‌was‌‌valid.‌  ‌ seniority‌‌of‌‌employees‌‌to‌‌be‌‌dismissed‌‌due‌‌to‌‌redundancy.‌  ‌ Employees‌‌  who‌‌
  have‌‌
  earned‌‌  their‌‌
  keep‌‌   by‌‌
  demonstrating‌‌   exemplary‌‌ 
performance‌  ‌and‌  ‌securing‌  ‌roles‌  ‌in‌  ‌their‌  ‌respective‌  ‌organizations‌‌ 
YES‌. ‌‌To‌‌  establish‌‌  good‌‌  faith,‌‌  the‌‌  company‌‌  must‌‌  provide‌‌ substantial‌‌  cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌summarily‌  ‌disregarded‌  ‌by‌  ‌nakedly‌  ‌pecuniary‌‌ 
Read-Rite‌‌Phils‌‌v.‌‌Francisco,‌‌et‌‌al.‌‌2
‌ 017‌  ‌
proof‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌services‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌employees‌  ‌are‌  ‌in‌  ‌excess‌  ‌of‌  ‌what‌  ‌is‌‌  considerations.‌  ‌
required‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌company,‌  ‌and‌  ‌that‌  ‌fair‌  ‌and‌  ‌reasonable‌‌  criteria‌‌   were‌‌  Given‌  ‌the‌  ‌diametrical‌  ‌nature‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌involuntary‌  ‌and‌  ‌a ‌ ‌voluntary‌‌ 
used‌‌to‌‌determine‌‌the‌‌redundant‌‌positions.‌  ‌ separation‌‌   from‌‌
  service,‌‌
  one‌‌
  necessarily‌‌ excludes‌‌ the‌‌ other.‌‌ For‌‌ sure,‌‌ 
Fuji‌‌Television‌‌v.‌‌Espiritu‌‌2
‌ 014‌‌Leonen,‌‌J‌  ‌
PLDT's‌  ‌declaration‌  ‌of‌  ‌redundancy‌  ‌was‌  ‌backed‌  ‌by‌  ‌substantial‌‌  an‌  ‌employee's‌  ‌termination‌  ‌from‌  ‌service‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌voluntary‌‌ 
evidence‌‌  showing‌‌   a ‌‌consistent‌‌
  decline‌‌
  for‌‌
  operator-assisted‌‌ calls‌‌ for‌‌  and‌‌involuntary‌‌at‌‌the‌‌same‌‌time‌. ‌ ‌ There‌‌   is‌‌
  no‌‌  evidence‌‌   showing‌‌   that‌‌   Arlene‌‌ was‌‌ accorded‌‌ due‌‌ process.‌‌ 
both‌‌local‌‌and‌‌international‌‌calls‌‌because‌‌of‌‌cheaper‌‌alternatives.‌  ‌ After‌  ‌informing‌  ‌her‌  ‌employer‌  ‌of‌  ‌her‌  ‌lung‌‌   cancer,‌‌   she‌‌  was‌‌   not‌‌
  given‌‌ 
Flight‌‌Attendants‌‌and‌‌Stewards‌‌Association‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Phils.‌‌v.‌‌PAL‌‌ 
Aquino‌‌ v.‌‌ NLRC‌‌ differentiated‌‌ between‌‌ separation‌‌ pay‌‌ and‌‌ retirement‌‌  the‌  ‌chance‌  ‌to‌  ‌present‌  ‌medical‌  ‌certificates.‌  ‌Fuji‌  ‌immediately‌‌ 
2018‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ concluded‌‌   that‌‌  Arlene‌‌   could‌‌  no‌‌   longer‌‌   perform‌‌ her‌‌ duties‌‌ because‌‌ of‌‌ 
benefits:‌  ‌
In‌‌
  determining‌‌   the‌‌
  validity‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌retrenchment,‌‌   judicial‌‌
  notice‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌  chemotherapy.‌‌   It‌‌
  did‌‌   not‌‌  ask‌‌
  her‌‌   how‌‌   her‌‌
  condition‌‌   would‌‌ affect‌‌ her‌‌ 
1. Separation‌  ‌pay‌  ‌is‌  ‌required‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌cases‌  ‌enumerated‌  ‌in‌‌  work.‌  ‌Neither‌  ‌did‌‌   it‌‌
  suggest‌‌   for‌‌   her‌‌   to‌‌  take‌‌  a ‌‌leave,‌‌   even‌‌  though‌‌   she‌‌ 
taken‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌financial‌  ‌losses‌  ‌incurred‌  ‌by‌  ‌an‌  ‌employer‌  ‌undergoing‌‌ 
Articles‌‌
  283‌‌
  and‌‌ 284.‌‌ We‌‌ have‌‌ held‌‌ that‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌statutory‌‌ right‌‌  was‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌sick‌  ‌leaves.‌  ‌Worse,‌‌   it‌‌
  did‌‌  not‌‌   present‌‌   any‌‌  certificate‌‌ 
corporate‌  ‌rehabilitation.‌  ‌In‌  ‌such‌  ‌a ‌ ‌case,‌  ‌the‌  ‌presentation‌‌   of‌‌
  audited‌‌ 
designed‌  ‌to‌  ‌provide‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌wherewithal‌‌  from‌  ‌a ‌ ‌competent‌  ‌public‌  ‌health‌  ‌authority.‌  ‌What‌  ‌Fuji‌  ‌did‌  ‌was‌  ‌to‌‌ 
financial‌  ‌statements‌  ‌may‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌to‌  ‌establish‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌ 
during‌‌the‌‌period‌‌that‌‌he‌‌is‌‌looking‌‌for‌‌another‌‌employment.‌  ‌ inform‌  ‌her‌  ‌that‌‌   her‌‌   contract‌‌   would‌‌   no‌‌   longer‌‌   be‌‌
  renewed,‌‌   and‌‌
  when‌‌ 
employer‌‌is‌‌suffering‌‌from‌‌severe‌‌financial‌‌losses.‌  ‌
2. Retirement‌  ‌benefits,‌  ‌where‌‌   not‌‌
  mandated‌‌   by‌‌
  law,‌‌
  may‌‌
  be‌‌  she‌‌ did‌‌ not‌‌ agree,‌‌ her‌‌ salary‌‌ was‌‌ withheld.‌‌ Thus,‌‌ the‌‌ Court‌‌ of‌‌ Appeals‌‌ 
granted‌  ‌by‌  ‌agreement‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  employees‌‌   and‌‌
  their‌‌
  employer‌‌  La‌‌Consolacion‌‌College‌‌of‌‌Manila,‌‌et‌‌al.‌‌v.‌‌Pascua‌‌2
‌ 018‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌ correctly‌  ‌upheld‌  ‌the‌  ‌finding‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌NLRC‌  ‌that‌  ‌for‌  ‌failure‌  ‌of‌  ‌Fuji‌  ‌to‌‌ 
or‌‌
  as‌‌
  a ‌‌voluntary‌‌
  act‌‌
  on‌‌ the‌‌ part‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ employer.‌‌ Retirement‌‌  comply‌‌with‌‌due‌‌process,‌‌Arlene‌‌was‌‌illegally‌‌dismissed.‌  ‌
When‌  ‌termination‌‌   of‌‌  employment‌‌
  is‌‌
  occasioned‌‌   by‌‌
  retrenchment‌‌  to‌‌ 
benefits‌  ‌are‌  ‌intended‌  ‌to‌  ‌help‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee‌  ‌enjoy‌  ‌the‌‌ 
prevent‌  ‌losses,‌  ‌an‌  ‌employer‌  ‌must‌  ‌declare‌  ‌a ‌ ‌reasonable‌  ‌cause‌  ‌or‌‌ 
remaining‌‌years‌‌of‌‌his‌‌life.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 44‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

Procedural‌‌Due‌‌Process‌  ‌ a. all‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌involving‌  ‌the‌  ‌charge‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌‌ 


NO‌. ‌ ‌Respondent‌  ‌was‌  ‌excluded‌  ‌from‌  ‌important‌  ‌HR‌  ‌decisions‌  ‌which‌‌ 
Termination‌‌   of‌‌ Employment‌‌ Based‌‌ on‌‌ Just‌‌ Causes.‌‌ ‌As‌‌ defined‌‌ in‌‌  employee‌‌have‌‌been‌‌considered;‌‌and‌  ‌
she‌‌
  was‌‌  expected‌‌
  not‌‌
  only‌‌
  to‌‌ be‌‌ privy‌‌ to,‌‌ but‌‌ also‌‌ to‌‌ have‌‌ a ‌‌say‌‌ in,‌‌ by‌‌ 
Article‌‌
  297,‌‌
  the‌‌
  requirement‌‌
  of‌‌
  two‌‌
  written‌‌  notices‌‌
  served‌‌   on‌‌ the‌‌  b. the‌  ‌grounds‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌established‌  ‌to‌  ‌justify‌  ‌the‌‌  virtue‌‌of‌‌her‌‌position‌‌in‌‌the‌‌company.‌  ‌
employee‌‌shall‌‌observe‌‌the‌‌following:‌  ‌ severance‌‌of‌‌their‌‌employment.‌  ‌ There‌  ‌is‌  ‌constructive‌  ‌dismissal‌  ‌when‌  ‌an‌  ‌employee's‌  ‌functions,‌‌ 
1. The‌‌first‌w
‌ ritten‌‌notice‌‌should‌‌contain:‌  ‌ The‌  ‌foregoing‌  ‌notices‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌served‌  ‌personally‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  which‌‌  were‌‌   originally‌‌  supervisory‌‌   in‌‌
  nature,‌‌ were‌‌ reduced;‌‌ and‌‌ such‌‌ 
reduction‌‌   is‌‌
  not‌‌ grounded‌‌ on‌‌ valid‌‌ grounds‌‌ such‌‌ as‌‌ genuine‌‌ business‌‌ 
a. The‌‌‌specific‌‌causes‌‌or‌‌grounds‌‌for‌‌termination‌; ‌ ‌ employee‌‌or‌‌to‌‌the‌‌employee's‌‌last‌‌known‌‌address.‌  ‌ necessity.‌  ‌
b. Detailed‌  ‌narration‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  facts‌‌
  and‌‌
  circumstances‌‌
  that‌  Constructive‌‌Dismissal‌  ‌ The‌  ‌reduction‌  ‌in‌  ‌respondent's‌  ‌duties‌  ‌and‌  ‌responsibilities‌  ‌as‌  ‌HR‌‌ 
will‌  ‌serve‌  ‌as‌  ‌basis‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌charge‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌‌  1. Occurs‌  ‌when‌  ‌an‌  ‌employee‌  ‌quits‌  ‌because‌  ‌continued‌‌  Manager‌  ‌amounted‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌demotion‌  ‌that‌  ‌was‌  ‌tantamount‌  ‌to‌‌ 
employee.‌‌   A ‌‌‌general‌‌
  description‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ charge‌‌ will‌‌ not‌‌  constructive‌‌dismissal.‌  ‌
employment‌  ‌is‌  ‌rendered‌  ‌impossible,‌  ‌unreasonable‌  ‌or‌‌ 
suffice‌;‌‌and‌  ‌ unlikely‌  ‌as‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌offer‌‌
  of‌‌
  demotion‌‌
  in‌‌
  rank‌‌
  and‌‌
  a ‌‌ The‌  ‌above-cited‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌indubitably‌  ‌present‌  ‌a ‌ ‌hostile‌  ‌and‌‌ 
unbearable‌  ‌working‌  ‌environment‌  ‌that‌  ‌reasonably‌  ‌compelled‌‌ 
c.   ‌directive‌‌ ‌that‌‌ the‌‌ employee‌‌ is‌‌ given‌‌ opportunity‌‌ to‌‌ 
A‌‌ diminution‌‌in‌‌pay.‌  ‌
respondent‌  ‌to‌  ‌leave‌  ‌her‌  ‌employment.‌  ‌Respondent,‌  ‌therefore,‌  ‌was‌‌ 
submit‌  ‌a ‌ ‌written‌  ‌explanation‌  ‌within‌  ‌a ‌ ‌reasonable‌‌  2. The‌  ‌TEST‌  ‌of‌‌   constructive‌‌   dismissal‌‌   is‌‌
  whether‌‌  a ‌‌reasonable‌‌  constructively‌‌dismissed.‌  ‌
period.‌  ‌ person‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌position‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  EE‌‌
  would‌‌   have‌‌
  felt‌‌
  compelled‌‌   to‌‌ 
"‌Reasonable‌  ‌period‌" ‌ ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌construed‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌period‌  ‌of‌  ‌at‌‌  give‌  ‌up‌  ‌his‌  ‌position‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌circumstances.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌act‌‌  Reliefs‌‌from‌‌illegal‌‌dismissal‌  ‌
least‌‌five‌‌(5)‌‌calendar‌‌days‌‌‌from‌‌receipt‌‌of‌‌the‌‌notice.‌  ‌ amounting‌  ‌to‌  ‌dismissal‌  ‌but‌  ‌made‌  ‌to‌  ‌appear‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌not.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌‌  1. Effect‌‌
  or‌‌
  Consequences‌‌   of‌‌
  Dismissal.‌‌ — ‌‌‌An‌‌ employee‌‌ who‌‌ is‌‌ 
therefore‌‌a‌d ‌ ismissal‌‌in‌‌disguise‌. ‌ ‌ unjustly‌‌dismissed‌‌from‌‌work‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌entitled‌‌to‌‌   ‌
2. After‌  ‌serving‌  ‌the‌  ‌first‌  ‌notice,‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer‌  ‌should‌  ‌afford‌  ‌the‌‌ 
employee‌  ‌ample‌  ‌opportunity‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌heard‌  ‌and‌  ‌to‌‌  3. Constructive‌‌
  dismissal‌‌
  is‌‌
  distinguished‌‌
  from‌‌ ‌illegal‌‌ dismissal‌‌  a. reinstatement‌‌ ‌without‌‌ loss‌‌ of‌‌ seniority‌‌ rights‌‌ and‌‌ other‌‌ 
defend‌  ‌himself‌‌  with‌‌  the‌‌  assistance‌‌  of‌‌  his‌‌  representative‌‌ if‌‌ he‌‌  in‌  ‌that‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌latter,‌‌
  intent‌‌
  to‌‌
  dismiss‌‌
  is‌‌
  ‌clearly‌‌  expressed‌‌   by‌‌  privileges‌‌and‌‌to‌‌his‌‌   ‌
the‌  ‌ER.‌  ‌In‌  ‌the‌  ‌former‌  ‌however,‌  ‌ER‌  ‌NEVER‌‌   indicates‌‌
  that‌‌
  he‌‌
  is‌‌  b. full‌‌backwages,‌‌‌inclusive‌‌of‌‌allowances,‌‌and‌‌to‌‌his‌‌   ‌
so‌‌desires.‌  ‌
terminating‌‌the‌‌EE.‌  ‌
"‌Ample‌  ‌opportunity‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌heard‌" ‌ ‌means‌  ‌any‌  ‌meaningful‌‌  c. other‌‌benefits‌‌or‌‌their‌‌monetary‌‌equivalent‌‌   ‌
4. The‌‌
  unilateral‌‌
  and‌‌
  arbitrary‌‌
  reduction‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  work‌‌
  day‌‌ scheme‌‌ 
opportunity‌  ‌given‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee‌  ‌to‌  ‌answer‌  ‌the‌  ‌charges‌‌  computed‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌his‌  ‌compensation‌  ‌was‌  ‌withheld‌‌ 
that‌  ‌significantly‌  ‌reduced‌  ‌employees’‌  ‌salaries‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌form‌  ‌of‌‌ 
against‌  ‌him‌  ‌and‌  ‌submit‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌in‌  ‌support‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌defense,‌‌  from‌‌him‌‌up‌‌to‌‌the‌‌time‌‌of‌‌his‌‌actual‌‌reinstatement.‌  ‌
whether‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌hearing,‌  ‌conference‌  ‌or‌  ‌some‌  ‌other‌  ‌fair,‌  ‌just‌  ‌and‌‌  constructive‌‌dismissal.‌‌(I‌ ntec‌‌Cebu‌‌v.‌‌CA‌‌‌2016‌) ‌ ‌
GR‌:‌‌  ‌ hen‌  ‌an‌  ‌EE‌  ‌is‌  ‌validly‌  ‌dismissed,‌  ‌NO‌‌ 
W
reasonable‌  ‌way.‌  ‌A ‌ ‌formal‌  ‌hearing‌  ‌or‌  ‌conference‌  ‌becomes‌‌  5. A‌  ‌college‌  ‌professor‌  ‌that‌  ‌was‌  ‌later‌  ‌appointed‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌laboratory‌‌ 
separation‌‌pay‌‌is‌‌given.‌  ‌
mandatory‌‌‌only‌‌   ‌ custodian,‌  ‌divesting‌  ‌him‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌teaching‌  ‌load,‌  ‌was‌‌ 
constructively‌  ‌dismissed.‌  ‌(‌Divine‌  ‌Word‌  ‌College‌  ‌of‌  ‌Laoag‌  ‌v.‌‌  EXC‌:‌‌  Such‌  ‌cause‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌constitute‌  ‌serious‌‌ 
a. when‌‌requested‌‌by‌‌the‌‌employee‌‌in‌‌writing‌‌or‌‌   ‌ misconduct‌  ‌nor‌  ‌reflect‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌EE’s‌  ‌moral‌‌ 
Mina‌‌2
‌ 016‌) ‌ ‌
b. substantial‌  ‌evidentiary‌  ‌disputes‌  ‌exist‌  ‌or‌  ‌a ‌ ‌company‌‌  character,‌  ‌separation‌  ‌pay‌  ‌MAY‌  ‌be‌  ‌validly‌‌ 
Diwa‌‌Asia‌‌Publishing‌‌et‌‌al.‌‌v.‌‌De‌‌Leon‌‌2
‌ 018‌  ‌
rule‌‌or‌‌   ‌ awarded.‌  ‌This‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌DISCERNING‌‌ 
WON‌  ‌the‌  ‌issuance‌  ‌of‌  ‌communications‌‌   to‌‌
  reprimand‌‌  and/or‌‌  correct‌‌  COMPASSION‌‌‌doctrine.‌  ‌
c. practice‌‌requires‌‌it,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
an‌  ‌erring‌  ‌employee‌  ‌forms‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer's‌  ‌management‌‌  2. Reinstatement.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Separation‌  ‌pay‌  ‌is‌  ‌made‌  ‌an‌  ‌alternative‌‌ 
d. when‌‌similar‌‌circumstances‌‌justify‌‌it.‌  ‌ prerogatives‌  ‌and‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌‌
  tantamount‌‌
  to‌‌  harassment,‌‌
  let‌‌
  alone‌‌
  illegal‌‌ 
relief‌‌in‌‌lieu‌‌of‌‌reinstatement‌‌in‌‌certain‌‌circumstances,‌‌like:‌‌   ‌
dismissal.‌  ‌
3. After‌  ‌determining‌  ‌that‌‌
  termination‌‌
  of‌‌
  employment‌‌
  is‌‌
  justified,‌‌ 
the‌  ‌employer‌  ‌shall‌  ‌serve‌  ‌the‌‌   a ‌‌‌written‌‌
  employee‌‌   notice‌‌
  of‌‌ 
termination‌‌‌indicating‌‌that:‌‌   ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 45‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

a. when‌  ‌reinstatement‌  ‌can‌  ‌no‌  ‌longer‌  ‌be‌  ‌effected‌  ‌in‌  ‌view‌  ‌of‌‌  By‌‌Employee‌  ‌ 1) Retirement‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌defined‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌withdrawal‌  ‌from‌  ‌office,‌‌ 
the‌  ‌passage‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌long‌  ‌period‌  ‌of‌  ‌time‌  ‌or‌  ‌because‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  public‌  ‌station,‌  ‌business,‌  ‌occupation,‌  ‌or‌  ‌public‌  ‌duty.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌‌ 
realities‌‌of‌‌the‌‌situation;‌‌   ‌ ARTICLE‌  ‌300.‌  ‌Termination‌  ‌by‌  ‌Employee.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌(a)‌  ‌An‌  ‌employee‌‌   may‌‌  result‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌bilateral‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌parties,‌‌
  a ‌‌voluntary‌‌
  agreement‌‌ 
terminate‌‌   without‌‌  just‌‌
  cause‌‌   the‌‌  employee-employer‌‌   relationship‌‌ by‌‌  between‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee‌  ‌whereby‌  ‌the‌  ‌latter,‌‌ 
b. reinstatement‌‌is‌‌inimical‌‌to‌‌the‌‌employer’s‌‌interest;‌‌   ‌
serving‌‌   a ‌‌written‌‌
  notice‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌  employer‌at‌‌
    least‌‌
  one‌‌ (1)‌‌ month‌‌ in‌  after‌‌
  reaching‌‌   a ‌‌certain‌‌ age,‌‌ agrees‌‌ and/or‌‌ consents‌‌ to‌‌ sever‌‌ his‌‌ 
c. reinstatement‌‌is‌‌no‌‌longer‌‌feasible;‌  ‌ advance.‌  ‌The‌‌   employer‌‌   upon‌‌   whom‌‌   no‌‌
  such‌‌
  notice‌‌
  was‌‌  served‌‌
  may‌‌  employment‌‌with‌‌the‌‌former.‌  ‌
d. reinstatement‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌serve‌  ‌the‌  ‌best‌  ‌interests‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  hold‌‌the‌‌employee‌‌liable‌‌for‌‌damages.‌  ‌
parties‌‌involved;‌‌   ‌ 2) Under‌  ‌the‌  ‌Labor‌‌   Code,‌‌   only‌‌  unjustly‌‌   dismissed‌‌  employees‌‌   are‌‌ 
(b)‌‌
  An‌‌
  employee‌‌ may‌‌ put‌‌ an‌‌ end‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ relationship‌‌ ‌without‌‌ serving‌‌ 
entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌retirement‌  ‌benefits‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌privileges‌  ‌including‌‌ 
e. the‌  ‌employer‌  ‌is‌  ‌prejudiced‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌workers’‌  ‌continued‌‌  any‌‌notice‌‌‌on‌‌the‌‌employer‌‌for‌‌any‌‌of‌‌the‌‌following‌‌just‌‌causes:‌  ‌
reinstatement‌‌   and‌‌   backwages.‌‌   Since‌‌
  petitioner’s‌‌ dismissal‌‌ was‌‌ 
employment;‌  ‌ for‌‌
  a ‌‌just‌‌
  cause,‌‌
  he‌‌   is‌‌
  not‌‌  entitled‌‌ to‌‌ any‌‌ retirement‌‌ benefit.‌‌ (‌Sy‌‌ 
a) Serious‌‌
  insult‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  employer‌‌
  or‌‌ his‌‌ representative‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ 
f. facts‌  ‌that‌  ‌make‌  ‌execution‌  ‌unjust‌  ‌or‌  ‌inequitable‌  ‌have‌‌  honor‌‌and‌‌person‌‌of‌‌the‌‌employee;‌  ‌ v.‌‌Metrobank‌) ‌ ‌
supervened;‌‌or‌  ‌ 3) ⭐An‌  ‌employee‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌private‌  ‌sector‌  ‌who‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌  ‌expressly‌‌ 
b) Inhuman‌  ‌and‌  ‌unbearable‌  ‌treatment‌  ‌accorded‌  ‌the‌‌ 
g. strained‌‌relations‌b
‌ etween‌‌the‌‌employer‌‌and‌‌employee‌  ‌ employee‌‌by‌‌the‌‌employer‌‌or‌‌his‌‌representative;‌  ‌ agree‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌terms‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌early‌  ‌retirement‌  ‌plan‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌‌ 
3. Award‌‌When‌‌Reinstatement‌‌not‌‌Viable‌  ‌ separated‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌service‌  ‌before‌  ‌he‌  ‌reaches‌  ‌the‌  ‌age‌  ‌of‌  ‌65‌‌ 
c) Commission‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌crime‌‌   ‌or‌‌
  offense‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  employer‌‌  or‌‌
  his‌‌ 
years.‌  ‌The‌  ‌employer‌  ‌who‌  ‌retires‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee‌‌ 
a. Backwages‌  ‌from‌  ‌date‌  ‌of‌  ‌dismissal‌  ‌until‌  ‌finality‌  ‌of‌‌  representative‌  ‌against‌‌   the‌‌
  person‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  employee‌‌
  or‌‌
  any‌‌  of‌‌ 
prematurely‌  ‌is‌  ‌guilty‌  ‌of‌  ‌illegal‌  ‌dismissal‌, ‌ ‌and‌  ‌is‌  ‌liable‌  ‌to‌‌ 
decision;‌‌   ‌ the‌‌immediate‌‌members‌‌of‌‌his‌‌family;‌‌and‌  ‌
pay‌  ‌his‌  ‌back‌  ‌wages‌  ‌and‌  ‌to‌  ‌reinstate‌  ‌him‌  ‌without‌  ‌loss‌  ‌of‌‌ 
b. Separation‌  ‌pay‌  ‌from‌  ‌date‌  ‌of‌  ‌employment‌  ‌until‌  ‌finality‌‌
  of‌‌  d) Other‌‌causes‌‌analogous‌‌to‌‌any‌‌of‌‌the‌‌foregoing.‌  ‌ seniority‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌benefits,‌  ‌unless‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee‌  ‌has‌‌ 
decision‌‌(not‌‌date‌‌of‌‌dismissal);‌‌   ‌ meanwhile‌  ‌reached‌  ‌the‌  ‌mandatory‌  ‌retirement‌  ‌age,‌  ‌in‌  ‌which‌‌ 
c. 10%‌‌attorney’s‌‌fees‌‌based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌awards‌‌computed;‌‌and‌‌   ‌ Doble,‌‌Jr.‌‌v.‌‌ABB‌‌Inc.‌‌‌2017‌  ‌ case‌‌   he‌‌
  is‌‌
  entitled‌‌
  to‌‌  ‌separation‌‌   pay‌‌   pursuant‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌ terms‌‌ of‌‌ 
Constructive‌  ‌dismissal‌  ‌is‌  ‌defined‌  ‌as‌  ‌quitting‌  ‌or‌  ‌cessation‌  ‌of‌‌  the‌  ‌plan,‌  ‌with‌  ‌legal‌  ‌interest‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌backwages‌‌   and‌‌   separation‌‌ 
d. Interest‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌awards‌  ‌computed‌  ‌from‌  ‌date‌  ‌of‌  ‌finality‌  ‌of‌‌ 
work‌  ‌because‌  ‌continued‌  ‌employment‌  ‌is‌  ‌rendered‌  ‌impossible,‌‌  pay‌  ‌reckoned‌‌   from‌‌  the‌‌   finality‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  decision.‌‌
  (‌Laya,‌‌   Jr‌‌
  v.‌‌
  CA‌‌ 
decision‌  ‌until‌  ‌they‌  ‌are‌‌
  paid,‌‌
  these‌‌  monetary‌‌   claims‌‌   being‌‌ 
unreasonable‌  ‌or‌‌
  unlikely.‌‌
  ‌There‌‌
  is‌‌
  involuntary‌‌
  resignation‌‌   due‌‌
  to‌‌  2018‌‌En‌‌Banc‌) ‌ ‌
equivalent‌‌   to‌‌  a ‌‌forbearance‌‌
  of‌‌  credit‌‌
  (‌Javellana,‌‌
  Jr‌‌
  v.‌‌
  Belen‌‌ 
the‌‌harsh,‌‌hostile,‌‌and‌‌unfavorable‌‌conditions‌‌set‌‌by‌‌the‌‌employer.‌  ‌ 4) However,‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌informed‌  ‌and‌  ‌had‌‌ 
2010‌) ‌ ‌
On‌‌  the‌‌  other‌‌   ‌resignation‌‌
  hand,‌‌   ‌is‌‌ the‌‌ voluntary‌‌ act‌‌ of‌‌ an‌‌ employee‌‌  consented,‌  ‌as‌  ‌when‌‌   in‌‌
  accepting‌‌   the‌‌
  employment‌‌   offer,‌‌
  he‌‌
  has‌‌ 
4. Backwages‌  ‌in‌  ‌general‌  ‌are‌  ‌granted‌  ‌on‌  ‌grounds‌  ‌of‌  ‌equity‌  ‌for‌‌ 
who‌‌   is‌‌ in‌‌ a ‌‌situation‌‌ where‌‌ one‌‌ believes‌‌ that‌‌ personal‌‌ reasons‌‌ cannot‌‌  assented‌  ‌to‌  ‌all‌  ‌existing‌  ‌rules,‌  ‌regulations‌  ‌and‌  ‌policy‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
earnings‌‌   which‌‌   a ‌‌worker‌‌ or‌‌ employee‌‌ has‌‌ lost‌‌ due‌‌ to‌‌ his‌‌ illegal‌‌  be‌  ‌sacrificed‌  ‌in‌  ‌favor‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  exigency‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  service,‌‌
  and‌‌   one‌‌
  has‌‌
  no‌‌  employer‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌  employment‌‌   contract,‌‌   and‌‌ furthermore,‌‌ he‌‌ did‌‌ 
dismissal.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌private‌  ‌compensation‌  ‌or‌  ‌damages‌  ‌but‌  ‌is‌‌  other‌  ‌choice‌  ‌but‌  ‌to‌  ‌dissociate‌  ‌oneself‌  ‌from‌  ‌employment.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌‌ not‌  ‌object‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌compulsory‌  ‌age‌  ‌of‌  ‌retirement‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
awarded‌‌   in‌‌
  furtherance‌‌   and‌‌
  effectuation‌‌
  of‌‌  the‌‌
  public‌‌ objective‌‌  formal‌  ‌pronouncement‌  ‌or‌  ‌relinquishment‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌office,‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Retirement‌  ‌Plan,‌  ‌he‌  ‌is‌  ‌deemed‌  ‌bound‌  ‌thereto.‌  ‌(‌Banco‌  ‌de‌  ‌Oro‌‌ 
of‌‌the‌‌Labor‌‌Code.‌  ‌ intention‌  ‌of‌  ‌relinquishing‌  ‌the‌  ‌office‌  ‌accompanied‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌‌ 
relinquishment.‌‌   ‌ Unibank‌‌v.‌‌Sagaysay‌‌2 ‌ 015‌) ‌ ‌
5. The‌  ‌rule‌  ‌in‌  ‌Bustamante‌  ‌is‌  ‌controlling‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌dismissed‌‌ 
5) Jurisprudence‌  ‌is‌  ‌replete‌  ‌with‌‌
  cases‌‌
  discussing‌‌  the‌‌  employer's‌‌ 
employee‌‌   is‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  paid‌‌
  backwages‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌
  entire‌‌
  period‌‌   that‌‌ he‌‌  Retirement‌  ‌
prerogative‌  ‌to‌  ‌lower‌‌
  the‌‌
  compulsory‌‌   retirement‌‌  age‌‌  subject‌‌
  to‌‌ 
was‌‌without‌‌work,‌‌without‌‌deduction‌‌and‌‌without‌‌qualification‌‌   ‌
GR‌:‌‌  ‌Employees‌  ‌dismissed‌  ‌for‌  ‌just‌‌  cause‌‌
  are‌‌
  generally‌‌
  entitled‌‌  the‌‌consent‌‌of‌‌its‌‌employees.‌‌   ‌
6. The‌  ‌base‌  ‌figure‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌wage‌  ‌rate‌  ‌at‌  ‌time‌  ‌of‌  ‌dismissal‌‌ 
due‌‌to‌‌vested‌‌rights‌  6) In‌  ‌Pantranco‌  ‌North‌  ‌Express,‌  ‌Inc.‌  ‌v.‌  ‌NLRC‌, ‌‌the‌‌
  Court‌‌
  upheld‌‌ 
inclusive‌‌   of‌‌
  “allowances”,‌‌ ‌excluding‌‌ salary‌‌ increases‌. ‌‌‌Salary‌‌ 
EXC‌:‌‌  Where‌  ‌just‌  ‌cause‌  ‌termination‌  ‌proscribes‌  ‌the‌  ‌claim‌  ‌of‌‌  the‌  ‌retirement‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌private‌  ‌respondent‌‌
  therein‌‌  pursuant‌‌  to‌‌
  a ‌
increases‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌akin‌  ‌to‌  ‌allowances‌  ‌or‌  ‌benefits‌, ‌ ‌and‌‌ 
retirement‌‌pay‌‌as‌‌cited‌‌in‌‌the‌r‌ etirement‌‌plan‌. ‌ ‌ CBA‌  ‌allowing‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer‌  ‌to‌  ‌compulsorily‌‌   retire‌‌  employees‌‌ 
cannot‌‌be‌‌confused‌‌with‌‌either.‌‌(E ‌ quitable‌‌Banking‌‌v.‌‌Sadac‌) ‌ ‌
upon‌‌completing‌‌25‌‌years‌‌of‌‌service‌‌to‌‌the‌‌company.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 46‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

7) In‌  ‌Progressive‌  ‌Development‌  ‌Corporation‌  ‌v.‌  ‌NLRC‌, ‌ ‌the‌‌  the‌  ‌ground‌  ‌that‌  ‌he‌  ‌was‌  ‌a ‌ ‌part-time‌  ‌employee‌  ‌as‌  ‌part-time‌‌ 
dismissal‌‌   case‌‌  in‌‌
  order‌‌
  to‌‌
  recover‌‌
  the‌‌
  proper‌‌   benefits‌‌
  due‌‌  to‌‌ him.‌‌ In‌‌ 
retirement‌  ‌plan,‌  ‌which‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer‌  ‌to‌  ‌retire‌‌  employees‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌among‌  ‌those‌  ‌specifically‌  ‌exempted‌‌  fact,‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌telling‌  ‌that‌‌
  he‌‌
  never‌‌  asked‌‌   to‌‌
  be‌‌
  reinstated‌‌   as‌‌  he‌‌
  only‌‌ 
employees‌  ‌who‌  ‌had‌  ‌rendered‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌  ‌20‌  ‌years‌  ‌of‌  ‌service,‌‌  under‌  ‌RA‌  ‌No.‌  ‌7641‌  ‌or‌  ‌its‌  ‌Implementing‌  ‌Rules.‌  ‌(‌Dela‌  ‌Salle‌  sought‌  ‌the‌  ‌payment‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌retirement‌  ‌benefits‌. ‌ ‌In‌  ‌view‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
was‌  ‌declared‌  ‌valid‌  ‌and‌  ‌enforceable‌  ‌even‌  ‌though‌  ‌it‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌‌  Araneta‌‌U‌‌v.‌‌Bernardo‌‌2 ‌ 017‌) ‌ ‌ foregoing,‌  ‌respondents‌  ‌must‌  ‌duly‌  ‌pay‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌not‌  ‌only‌  ‌his‌‌ 
embodied‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌CBA.‌  ‌In‌  ‌that‌  ‌case,‌‌   the‌‌
  Court‌‌   concluded‌‌   that‌‌  the‌‌  Catotocan‌‌v.‌‌Lourdes‌‌School‌‌of‌‌Quezon‌‌City‌‌2 ‌ 017‌  ‌ retirement‌‌benefits,‌‌but‌‌also‌‌his‌‌other‌‌monetary‌‌claims.‌  ‌
employees,‌  ‌who‌  ‌were‌  ‌hired‌  ‌before‌  ‌the‌  ‌execution‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  On‌  ‌this‌  ‌note,‌  ‌case‌  ‌law‌  ‌instructs‌  ‌that‌  ‌in‌  ‌labor‌  ‌cases‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌‌ 
employer's‌  ‌retirement‌  ‌plan,‌  ‌were‌  ‌bound‌  ‌by‌  ‌it‌  ‌because‌  ‌the‌‌  RETIREMENT‌  ‌PLAN.‌  ‌Acceptance‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌employees‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌early‌‌ 
concerned‌‌   employee‌‌   is‌‌ entitled‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ wages/benefits‌‌ prayed‌‌ for,‌‌ said‌‌ 
retirement‌  ‌age‌  ‌option‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌explicit,‌  ‌voluntary,‌  ‌free,‌  ‌and‌‌  employee‌  ‌is‌  ‌also‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌  attorney's‌  ‌fees‌  ‌amounting‌  ‌to‌  ‌ten‌‌ 
retirement‌  ‌plan‌  ‌was‌  ‌expressly‌  ‌made‌  ‌known‌  ‌and‌  ‌accepted‌‌ 
uncompelled‌.‌  ‌ percent‌‌(10%)‌‌of‌‌the‌‌total‌‌monetary‌‌award‌‌‌due‌‌him.‌  ‌
by‌‌them‌. ‌ ‌
WON‌‌   Catotocan's‌‌   receipt‌‌   of‌‌
  her‌‌  retirement‌‌   benefits‌‌   will‌‌ not‌‌ stop‌‌ her‌‌ 
8) In‌‌
  ‌contrast‌, ‌‌the‌‌   case‌‌ of‌‌ ‌Jaculbe‌‌ v.‌‌ Silliman‌‌ University‌‌ did‌‌ not‌‌ 
from‌‌pursuing‌‌an‌‌illegal‌‌dismissal‌‌complaint‌‌against‌‌LSQC.‌  ‌ 4. Requirement‌‌for‌‌Labor-only‌‌Contracting‌  ‌
allow‌‌   the‌‌   application‌‌   of‌‌   a ‌‌lower‌‌  retirement‌‌   age.‌‌   The‌‌  petitioner‌‌ 
in‌  ‌the‌  ‌said‌  ‌case‌  ‌was‌  ‌employed‌  ‌sometime‌  ‌in‌  ‌1958‌  ‌while‌  ‌the‌‌  NO‌. ‌ ‌LSQC‌  ‌did‌‌   not‌‌  illegally‌‌   dismiss‌‌   Catotocan‌‌   from‌‌   service.‌‌   While‌‌   it‌‌  a. Elements‌  ‌
may‌  ‌be‌  ‌true‌  ‌that‌  ‌Catotocan‌  ‌was‌  ‌initially‌  ‌opposed‌  ‌to‌‌   the‌‌  idea‌‌
  of‌‌
  her‌‌ 
retirement‌‌   plan,‌‌  which‌‌   automatically‌‌ retired‌‌ its‌‌ members‌‌ upon‌‌  1) There‌  ‌is‌  ‌"labor-only"‌  ‌contracting‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌person‌‌ 
retirement‌  ‌at‌  ‌an‌  ‌age‌  ‌below‌  ‌60‌  ‌years,‌  ‌it‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌stressed‌  ‌that‌‌ 
reaching‌‌   the‌‌ age‌‌ of‌‌ 65‌‌ or‌‌ after‌‌ 35‌‌ years‌‌ of‌‌ uninterrupted‌‌ service‌‌  Catotocan's‌  ‌subsequent‌  ‌actions‌  ‌after‌  ‌her‌  ‌"retirement"‌  ‌are‌  ‌actually‌‌  supplying‌‌workers‌‌to‌‌an‌‌employer‌‌   ‌
to‌‌
  the‌‌  university,‌‌   came‌‌   into‌‌   being‌‌  in‌‌
  1970.‌‌   The‌‌ said‌‌ retirement‌‌  tantamount‌‌   to‌‌
  her‌‌  consent‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌  addendum‌‌   to‌‌ the‌‌ LSQC's‌‌ retirement‌‌  a) does‌  ‌not‌  ‌have‌  ‌substantial‌‌  capital‌‌
  or‌‌
  investment‌‌
  in‌‌ 
plan‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌  ‌applied‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌because‌‌   there‌‌   was‌‌   n‌o ‌‌ policy‌  ‌of‌  ‌retiring‌  ‌her‌  ‌from‌  ‌service‌  ‌upon‌  ‌serving‌  ‌the‌  ‌school‌  ‌for‌  ‌at‌‌ 
the‌  ‌form‌  ‌of‌  ‌tools,‌  ‌equipment,‌  ‌machineries,‌  ‌work‌‌ 
agreement‌t‌ o‌‌which‌‌the‌‌latter‌‌assented‌. ‌ ‌ least‌‌ thirty‌‌ (30)‌‌ continuous‌‌ years.‌‌ Catotocan‌‌ performed‌‌ all‌‌ the‌‌ acts‌‌ to‌‌ 
ratify‌‌her‌‌retirement‌‌in‌‌accordance‌‌with‌‌LSQC's‌‌retirement‌‌policy.‌  ‌ premises,‌‌among‌‌others,‌‌and‌‌   ‌
9) Similarly,‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌Cercado‌  ‌v.‌  ‌UNIPROM‌  ‌Inc.‌, ‌ ‌involved‌  ‌a ‌‌
Catotocan's‌  ‌repeated‌  ‌application‌  ‌and‌  ‌availment‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌re-hiring‌‌  b) the‌  ‌workers‌  ‌recruited‌  ‌and‌  ‌placed‌  ‌by‌  ‌such‌‌
  person‌‌
  are‌‌ 
non-contributory‌  ‌retirement‌  ‌plan‌  ‌which‌  ‌provided‌  ‌that‌  ‌any‌‌ 
program‌  ‌of‌  ‌LSQC‌  ‌for‌  ‌qualified‌  ‌retirees‌  ‌for‌  ‌3 ‌ ‌consecutive‌  ‌years‌  ‌is‌‌   a ‌‌ performing‌‌   activities‌‌   which‌‌   are‌‌
  directly‌‌ related‌‌ ‌to‌‌ 
employee‌‌   with‌‌  twenty‌‌   (20)‌‌   years‌‌  of‌‌
  service,‌‌   regardless‌‌   of‌‌
  age,‌‌ 
supervening‌‌   event‌‌   that‌‌
  would‌‌   reveal‌‌   that‌‌  she‌‌   has‌‌ already‌‌ voluntarily‌‌  the‌‌principal‌‌business‌‌of‌‌such‌‌employer.‌‌   ‌
may‌  ‌be‌  ‌retired‌  ‌at‌  ‌his‌  ‌option‌  ‌or‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌‌   option‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  company.‌‌  and‌  ‌freely‌  ‌signified‌  ‌her‌‌   consent‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌  retirement‌‌   policy‌‌   despite‌‌   her‌‌ 
The‌  ‌said‌  ‌plan‌  ‌was‌  ‌adopted‌  ‌while‌  ‌the‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌therein‌  ‌was‌‌  2) Labor-only‌  ‌contracting‌, ‌ ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌totally‌  ‌prohibited‌, ‌‌
initial‌‌opposition‌‌to‌‌it.‌  ‌
employed‌  ‌earlier.‌  ‌There‌  ‌was‌  ‌no‌  ‌voluntary‌‌   acquiescence‌‌   to‌‌  refers‌‌to:‌  ‌
UNIPROM's‌‌early‌‌retirement‌‌age‌‌option‌‌on‌‌her‌‌part.‌  ‌ PAL‌‌v.‌‌Hassaram‌‌2 ‌ 017‌  ‌ a) an‌‌arrangement‌‌where‌  ‌
10) On‌‌
  the‌‌   other‌‌
  hand,‌‌   in‌‌
  ‌Obusan‌‌   v.‌‌
  PNB‌, ‌‌the‌‌   petitioner,‌‌   who‌‌   was‌‌  The‌  ‌determining‌  ‌factor‌  ‌in‌  ‌choosing‌  ‌which‌  ‌retirement‌  ‌scheme‌  ‌to‌‌  i) The‌  ‌contractor‌  ‌or‌  ‌subcontractor‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌‌ 
hired‌  ‌by‌  ‌PNB‌  ‌in‌  ‌1979,‌  ‌was‌  ‌deemed‌‌   covered‌‌   by‌‌
  its‌‌
  retirement‌‌  apply‌‌is‌‌still‌s‌ uperiority‌‌in‌‌terms‌‌of‌‌benefits‌‌‌provided.‌  ‌ have‌‌substantial‌‌capital‌,‌‌OR‌  ‌
plan‌  ‌adopted‌  ‌in‌  ‌2000.‌  ‌Considering‌‌   that‌‌  on‌‌   February‌‌   21,‌‌  2001,‌‌  ii) The‌  ‌contractor‌  ‌or‌  ‌subcontractor‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌‌ 
Barroga‌‌v.‌‌Quezon‌‌Colleges‌‌of‌‌the‌‌North‌‌2 ‌ 018‌  ‌
PNB‌  ‌had‌  ‌informed‌  ‌all‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌‌  officers‌‌   and‌‌  employees‌‌   about‌‌   the‌‌  have‌  ‌investments‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌form‌  ‌of‌  ‌tools,‌‌ 
said‌‌   retirement‌‌   plan,‌‌   the‌‌
  said‌‌
  plan‌‌ was‌‌ then‌‌ registered‌‌ with‌‌ the‌‌  While‌  ‌retirement‌  ‌from‌  ‌service‌  ‌is‌  ‌similar‌  ‌to‌  ‌termination‌  ‌of‌‌ 
equipment,‌  ‌machineries,‌  ‌supervision,‌  ‌work‌‌ 
BIR‌  ‌and‌  ‌was‌  ‌later‌  ‌recognized‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philnabank‌  ‌Employees‌‌  employment‌  ‌insofar‌  ‌as‌  ‌they‌  ‌are‌  ‌common‌  ‌modes‌  ‌of‌  ‌ending‌‌ 
employment,‌  ‌they‌  ‌are‌  ‌mutually‌  ‌exclusive,‌  ‌with‌  ‌varying‌  ‌juridical‌‌  premises,‌‌among‌‌others,‌‌AND‌  ‌
Association‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌  ‌CBA.‌  ‌Despite‌  ‌the‌  ‌proper‌  ‌dissemination‌  ‌of‌‌ 
bases‌  ‌and‌  ‌resulting‌  ‌benefits.‌  ‌Retirement‌  ‌from‌  ‌service‌  ‌is‌‌  iii) The‌  ‌contractor's‌  ‌or‌  ‌subcontractor's‌‌ 
information,‌‌ ‌no‌‌ one‌‌ questioned‌‌ the‌‌ retirement‌‌ plan‌. ‌‌Hence,‌‌ 
contractual,‌‌while‌t‌ ermination‌‌of‌‌employment‌‌is‌‌statutory.‌  ‌ employees‌  ‌recruited‌  ‌and‌  ‌placed‌  ‌are‌‌ 
the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌deemed‌  ‌it‌  ‌valid‌  ‌and‌  ‌effective‌  ‌as‌  ‌due‌  ‌notice‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌ 
employer's‌‌   decision‌‌ to‌‌ retire‌‌ an‌‌ employee‌‌ was‌‌ adequately‌‌  WON‌  ‌the‌  ‌CA‌  ‌correctly‌  ‌ruled‌  ‌that‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌  ‌illegally‌‌  performing‌  ‌activities‌  ‌which‌  ‌are‌  ‌directly‌‌ 
dismissed‌  ‌by‌  ‌respondents,‌  ‌but‌  ‌rather,‌  ‌retired‌  ‌from‌  ‌his‌  ‌employment‌  related‌‌  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  main‌‌
  business‌‌
  operation‌‌ of‌‌ 
provided‌. ‌ ‌
with‌‌the‌‌latter.‌  the‌‌principal;‌‌OR‌  ‌
11) ⭐‌Retirement‌  ‌of‌  ‌Part-time‌  ‌Faculty‌. ‌ ‌Under‌  ‌the‌  ‌rule‌  ‌of‌‌ 
YES‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌Court‌  ‌is‌  ‌inclined‌  ‌to‌  ‌hold‌  ‌that‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌retired‌  ‌from‌‌ 
statutory‌  ‌construction‌  ‌of‌  ‌expressio‌  ‌unius‌‌   est‌‌
  exclusio‌‌   alterius‌, ‌ service,‌  ‌but‌  ‌nonetheless,‌  ‌pursued‌  ‌the‌  ‌filing‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌instant‌  ‌illegal‌‌ 
Bernardo's‌  ‌claim‌  ‌for‌  ‌retirement‌  ‌benefits‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌denied‌  ‌on‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 47‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

b) The‌  ‌contractor‌  ‌or‌  ‌subcontractor‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌exercise‌‌  2) the‌  ‌contractor‌  ‌or‌  ‌subcontractor‌  ‌which‌‌
  has‌‌
  the‌‌
  capacity‌‌ 
mere‌‌labor-only‌‌contractor‌‌from‌‌arising.‌  ‌
the‌‌  right‌‌ to‌‌ control‌‌ over‌‌ the‌‌ performance‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ work‌‌  to‌  ‌independently‌  ‌undertake‌  ‌the‌  ‌performance‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌job,‌‌ 
of‌‌the‌‌employee.‌  ‌ work‌‌or‌‌service,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ The‌‌
  facts‌‌   failed‌‌  to‌‌  establish‌‌   that‌‌
  there‌‌   is‌‌
  any‌‌
  circumvention‌‌   of‌‌
  labor‌‌ 
laws‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌call‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌creation‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌statute‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌EER‌  ‌between‌‌ 
3) "Substantial‌  ‌capital"‌  —‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌paid-up‌  ‌capital‌‌  3) the‌  ‌contractual‌  ‌workers‌  ‌engaged‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌contractor‌  ‌or‌‌  Classique‌‌Vinyl‌‌and‌‌Valencia.‌  ‌
stock/shares‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌P5M‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌corporations,‌‌  subcontractor‌‌to‌‌accomplish‌‌the‌‌job‌‌work‌‌or‌‌service.‌  ‌
Mago‌‌et‌‌al.‌‌v.‌‌Sunpower‌‌Manufacturing‌‌Ltd.‌‌2
‌ 018‌  ‌
partnerships‌  ‌and‌  ‌cooperatives;‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌single‌‌  c. Liabilities.‌‌—‌‌Effects‌‌of‌‌Labor-only‌‌Contracting‌  ‌
‌ t‌‌least‌‌P5M‌. ‌ ‌
proprietorship,‌‌a‌‌net‌‌worth‌‌of‌a A‌  ‌contractor‌  ‌is‌  ‌presumed‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌ ‌labor-only‌  ‌contractor,‌‌
  ‌unless‌‌
  ‌the‌‌ 
i. Principal‌  ‌is‌  ‌deemed‌  ‌direct‌  ‌employer‌  ‌of‌‌  contractor‌  ‌is‌  ‌able‌  ‌to‌  ‌discharge‌  ‌the‌  ‌burden‌  ‌of‌  ‌overcoming‌  ‌this‌‌ 
4) Contracting‌  ‌or‌  ‌subcontracting‌  ‌shall‌  ‌only‌  ‌be‌  ‌ALLOWED‌  ‌if‌‌  contractor’s‌‌employees;‌  ‌ presumption.‌  ‌
all‌‌the‌‌following‌‌circumstances‌‌concur:‌  ‌
ii. Contractor‌‌will‌‌be‌‌treated‌‌as‌a
‌ gent‌‌of‌‌principal;‌  ‌ WON‌‌Jobcrest‌‌is‌‌a‌‌legitimate‌‌and‌‌independent‌‌contractor.‌  ‌
a) The‌  ‌contractor‌  ‌or‌  ‌subcontractor‌  ‌is‌  ‌engaged‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌‌
iii. Principal’s‌  ‌liability‌  ‌is‌  ‌comprehensive‌  ‌— ‌ ‌all‌‌  YES‌. ‌ ‌Since‌  ‌the‌  ‌petitioners‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌dispute‌  ‌that‌  ‌Jobcrest‌  ‌was‌  ‌a ‌‌
distinct‌‌   and‌‌  independent‌‌   business‌‌  and‌‌  undertakes‌‌ 
liabilities‌‌under‌‌labor‌‌laws,‌‌not‌‌only‌‌to‌‌unpaid‌‌wages.‌  ‌ duly-registered‌  ‌contractor‌  ‌under‌  ‌Section‌  ‌11‌  ‌of‌  ‌DOLE‌  ‌DO‌  ‌No.‌‌ 
to‌  ‌perform‌  ‌the‌‌
  job‌‌
  or‌‌
  work‌‌
  on‌‌
  its‌‌
  own‌‌
  responsibility,‌‌  18-02,‌‌
  ‌there‌‌
  is‌‌ no‌‌ operative‌‌ presumption‌‌ that‌‌ Jobcrest‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌labor-only‌‌ 
according‌‌to‌‌its‌‌own‌‌manner‌‌and‌‌method;‌  ‌ Nestle‌‌Philippines‌‌Inc.‌‌v.‌‌Puedan,‌‌Jr‌‌2
‌ 017‌  ‌
contractor.‌  ‌
b) The‌  ‌contractor‌  ‌or‌  ‌subcontractor‌  ‌has‌  ‌substantial‌‌  WON‌‌   ODSI‌‌
  is‌‌ a ‌‌labor-only‌‌ contractor‌‌ of‌‌ NPI,‌‌ and‌‌ consequently,‌‌ NPI‌‌ is‌‌  Conversely,‌  ‌the‌  ‌fact‌  ‌of‌  ‌registration‌  ‌with‌  ‌DOLE‌  ‌does‌‌   not‌‌
  necessarily‌‌ 
capital‌‌ ‌to‌‌ carry‌‌ out‌‌ the‌‌ job‌‌ farmed‌‌ out‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ principal‌‌  respondents'‌  ‌true‌  ‌employer‌  ‌and,‌  ‌thus,‌  ‌deemed‌  ‌jointly‌‌   and‌‌
  severally‌‌  create‌  ‌a ‌ ‌presumption‌  ‌that‌  ‌Jobcrest‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌legitimate‌  ‌and‌  ‌independent‌‌ 
liable‌‌with‌‌ODSI‌‌for‌‌respondents'‌‌monetary‌‌claims.‌  ‌ contractor.‌  ‌The‌  ‌petitioners‌  ‌must‌  ‌overcome‌  ‌the‌  ‌presumption‌  ‌of‌‌ 
on‌‌
  his‌‌
  account,‌‌   manner‌‌ and‌‌ method,‌‌ investment‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ 
NO‌. ‌ ‌A ‌ ‌closer‌  ‌examination‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  Distributorship‌‌  Agreement‌‌  reveals‌‌  regularity‌‌accorded‌‌to‌‌the‌‌official‌‌act‌‌of‌‌DOLE.‌  ‌
form‌‌of‌‌tools,‌‌equipment,‌‌machinery‌‌and‌‌supervision;‌  ‌
that‌‌
  the‌‌
  relationship‌‌  of‌‌
  NPI‌‌
  and‌‌
  ODSI‌‌  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  that‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌principal‌‌
  and‌‌
  a ‌‌ Jobcrest‌‌has‌‌substantial‌‌capital.‌  ‌
c) In‌  ‌performing‌  ‌the‌  ‌work‌  ‌farmed‌‌
  out,‌‌
  the‌‌
  contractor‌‌
  or‌‌  contractor,‌‌but‌‌that‌‌of‌‌a‌‌seller‌‌and‌‌a‌‌buyer/re-seller.‌‌   ‌
subcontractor‌  ‌is‌  ‌free‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌control‌  ‌and/or‌‌  Jobcrest‌  ‌had‌  ‌substantial‌  ‌capital‌  ‌to‌  ‌perform‌  ‌the‌  ‌business‌  ‌process‌‌ 
The‌  ‌stipulations‌  ‌in‌‌   the‌‌
  Distributorship‌‌   Agreement‌‌   do‌‌
  not‌‌   operate‌‌  to‌‌  services‌  ‌it‌  ‌provided‌  ‌Sunpower.‌  ‌It‌  ‌has‌  ‌its‌  ‌own‌  ‌office,‌  ‌to‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌‌ 
direction‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌principal‌  ‌in‌  ‌all‌  ‌matters‌  ‌connected‌‌  control‌  ‌or‌‌  fix‌‌
  the‌‌
  methodology‌‌   on‌‌  how‌‌
  ODSI‌‌   should‌‌
  do‌‌  its‌‌
  business‌‌  petitioners‌  ‌admittedly‌  ‌reported‌  ‌to,‌  ‌possessed‌  ‌numerous‌  ‌assets‌  ‌for‌‌ 
with‌  ‌the‌  ‌performance‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌work‌  ‌except‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  as‌‌
  a ‌‌distributor‌‌   of‌‌
  NPI‌‌
  products,‌‌   but‌‌ merely‌‌ provide‌‌ rules‌‌ of‌‌ conduct‌‌  the‌‌
  conduct‌‌   of‌‌
  its‌‌
  business,‌‌
  and‌‌
  even‌‌ continuously‌‌ earned‌‌ profit‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌
result‌‌thereto;‌‌and‌  ‌ or‌  ‌guidelines‌  ‌towards‌  ‌the‌  ‌achievement‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌mutually‌‌   desired‌‌   result‌‌  result.‌  ‌
—‌‌which‌‌in‌‌this‌‌case‌‌is‌‌the‌‌sale‌‌of‌‌NPI‌‌products‌‌to‌‌the‌‌end‌‌consumer.‌  ‌
d) The‌  ‌Service‌  ‌Agreement‌  ‌ensures‌  ‌compliance‌  ‌with‌‌  Sunpower‌‌does‌‌not‌‌control‌‌the‌‌manner‌‌by‌‌which‌‌the‌‌petitioners‌‌ 
all‌‌
  the‌‌
  rights‌‌
  and‌‌
  benefits‌‌
  for‌‌
  all‌‌
  the‌‌
  employees‌‌
  of‌‌ the‌‌  Thus,‌‌
  the‌‌
  foregoing‌‌
  circumstances‌‌
  show‌‌
  that‌‌
  ‌ODSI‌‌
  was‌‌
  not‌‌
  a ‌‌labor­ ‌‌ accomplished‌‌their‌‌work.‌  ‌
only‌‌contractor‌‌of‌‌NPI‌. ‌ ‌
contractor‌‌or‌‌subcontractor‌‌under‌‌the‌‌labor‌‌laws.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌fact‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌petitioners‌  ‌were‌  ‌working‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌premises‌  ‌of‌‌ 
b. Trilateral‌  ‌relationship.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌In‌  ‌legitimate‌  ‌contracting,‌  ‌there‌‌  Valencia‌‌v.‌‌Classique‌‌Vinyl‌‌Products‌‌Corp‌‌2
‌ 017‌  ‌ Sunpower,‌  ‌by‌  ‌itself,‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌negate‌  ‌Jobcrest's‌  ‌control‌  ‌over‌  ‌the‌‌ 
means,‌  ‌method,‌  ‌and‌  ‌result‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  petitioners'‌‌  work.‌‌   The‌‌
  petitioners,‌‌ 
exists‌  ‌a ‌ ‌trilateral‌  ‌relationship‌  ‌under‌  ‌which‌  ‌there‌‌  is‌‌
  a ‌‌contract‌‌  WON‌‌Valencia‌‌is‌‌an‌‌employee‌‌of‌‌CMS‌‌and‌‌not‌‌Classique‌‌Vinyl.‌  ‌ despite‌‌   working‌‌   in‌‌
  Sunpower's‌‌   plant‌‌
  for‌‌
  most‌‌  of‌‌ the‌‌ time,‌‌ admit‌‌ that‌‌ 
for‌‌ a ‌‌specific‌‌ job,‌‌ work‌‌ or‌‌ service‌‌ between‌‌ the‌‌ principal‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌  whenever‌  ‌they‌  ‌file‌  ‌their‌  ‌leave‌  ‌application,‌‌   or‌‌
  whenever‌‌   required‌‌   by‌‌ 
YES‌. ‌ ‌Valencia's‌  ‌selection‌  ‌and‌  ‌engagement‌  ‌was‌  ‌undertaken‌  ‌by‌  ‌CMS‌‌ 
contractor‌  ‌or‌  ‌subcontractor,‌  ‌and‌  ‌a ‌ ‌contract‌  ‌of‌  ‌employment‌‌  their‌  ‌supervisors‌  ‌in‌  ‌Jobcrest,‌  ‌they‌  ‌report‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Jobcrest‌  ‌office.‌‌ 
and‌‌
  conversely,‌‌
  this‌‌  negates‌‌
  the‌‌
  existence‌‌
  of‌‌
  such‌‌
  element‌‌ insofar‌‌ as‌‌ 
between‌  ‌the‌  ‌contractor‌  ‌or‌  ‌subcontractor‌  ‌and‌  ‌its‌  ‌workers.‌‌  Classique‌‌Vinyl‌‌is‌‌concerned.‌  ‌ Designated‌  ‌on-site‌  ‌supervisors‌  ‌from‌  ‌Jobcrest‌  ‌were‌  ‌the‌  ‌ones‌  ‌who‌‌ 
Hence,‌‌there‌‌are‌‌three‌‌parties‌‌involved‌‌in‌‌these‌‌arrangements,‌‌   ‌ oversaw‌  ‌the‌  ‌performance‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌employees'‌  ‌work‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Here,‌  ‌Classique‌‌   Vinyl‌‌  presented‌‌   the‌‌   CMS’s‌‌
  Certificate‌‌
  of‌‌
  Registration‌‌  premises‌‌of‌‌Sunpower.‌  ‌
1) the‌‌
  ‌principal‌‌
  ‌which‌‌
  decides‌‌ to‌‌ farm‌‌ out‌‌ a ‌‌job‌‌ or‌‌ service‌‌ to‌‌  with‌  ‌the‌  ‌DTI‌  ‌and‌  ‌license‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌private‌  ‌recruitment‌  ‌and‌  ‌placement‌‌ 
a‌‌contractor‌‌or‌‌subcontractor,‌‌   ‌ agency‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌DOLE.‌  ‌Indeed,‌‌   these‌‌   documents‌‌   are‌‌
  not‌‌
  conclusive‌‌  Abuda‌‌et‌‌al.‌‌v.‌‌L.‌‌Natividad‌‌Poultry‌‌Farms‌‌2
‌ 018‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌
evidence‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌status‌  ‌of‌‌
  CMS‌‌  as‌‌   a ‌‌contractor.‌‌  However,‌‌   such‌‌
  fact‌‌
  of‌‌ 
registration‌  ‌of‌  ‌CMS‌  ‌prevented‌  ‌the‌  ‌legal‌  ‌presumption‌  ‌of‌  ‌it‌  ‌being‌  ‌a ‌‌ WON‌  ‌the‌  ‌maintenance‌‌
  personnel‌‌
  in‌‌
  L.‌‌
  Natividad‌‌
  Poultry‌‌
  Farms‌‌
  can‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 48‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

be‌‌considered‌‌as‌‌its‌‌regular‌‌employees.‌  ‌
WON‌‌petitioners‌‌were‌‌regular‌‌employees‌‌of‌‌CCBPI.‌  ‌ ✔‌‌T‌ hose‌‌employed‌‌in‌‌  ✘‌  ‌EEs‌  ‌of‌  ‌GOCCs‌  ‌under‌  ‌Special‌‌ 
YES‌. ‌ ‌San‌  ‌Mateo‌  ‌and‌  ‌petitioner‌‌  Del‌‌  Remedios‌‌  were‌‌  not‌‌  independent‌‌  commercial,‌‌industrial‌‌and‌‌  charters;‌  ‌
YES‌. ‌ ‌Petitioners'‌  ‌duties‌  ‌were‌  ‌reasonably‌  ‌connected‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌very‌‌ 
contractors‌  ‌but‌  ‌labor-only‌  ‌contractors‌  ‌since‌  ‌they‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌  ‌have‌‌  business‌  ‌of‌  ‌CCBPI.‌  ‌They‌  ‌were‌  ‌indispensable‌  ‌to‌  ‌such‌  ‌business‌‌ 
substantial‌  ‌investment‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌form‌  ‌of‌  ‌tools,‌  ‌equipment,‌  ‌or‌  ‌work‌‌  agricultural‌‌enterprises;‌  ‌ ✘‌‌‌Managerial‌‌EEs;‌  ‌
because‌  ‌without‌  ‌them‌  ‌the‌  ‌products‌  ‌of‌  ‌CCBPI‌  ‌would‌  ‌not‌  ‌reach‌  ‌its‌‌ 
premises.‌  ‌As‌  ‌labor-only‌  ‌contractors,‌  ‌they‌  ‌were‌  ‌considered‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌‌ 
customers.‌  ‌ ✔‌‌‌EEs‌‌of‌‌GOCCs‌‌WITHOUT‌‌  ★ They‌  ‌are‌  ‌those‌  ‌who‌  ‌are‌‌ 
agents‌‌of‌‌L.‌‌Natividad.‌  ‌
In‌  ‌Pacquing‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Coca-Cola‌  ‌Philippines,‌  ‌Inc.,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌ruled‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌  original‌‌charters‌‌(Corpo‌‌Code);‌  ‌ vested‌  ‌with‌  ‌powers‌  ‌or‌‌ 
Phil.‌‌Pizza‌‌Inc.‌‌v.‌‌Porras‌‌2
‌ 018‌  ‌ sales‌‌   route‌‌
  helpers‌‌   of‌‌
  CCBPI‌‌
  were‌‌
  its‌‌ regular‌‌ employees.‌‌ In‌‌ this‌‌ case,‌‌  ✔‌‌‌EEs‌‌of‌‌religious,‌‌charitable,‌‌  prerogatives‌‌ to‌‌ lay‌‌ down‌‌ and‌‌ 
petitioners‌  ‌had‌  ‌similarly‌‌   undertook‌‌   to‌‌
  bring‌‌  CCBPI's‌‌
  products‌‌   to‌‌
  its‌‌  execute‌  ‌management‌‌ 
Although‌‌   not‌‌ a ‌‌conclusive‌‌ proof‌‌ of‌‌ legitimacy,‌‌ ‌the‌‌ certification‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌  customers‌‌at‌‌their‌‌delivery‌‌points.‌  ‌ medical‌‌or‌‌educational‌‌ 
DOLE‌  ‌nonetheless‌  ‌prevents‌  ‌the‌  ‌presumption‌  ‌of‌  ‌labor-only‌‌  institutions,‌‌for‌‌profit‌‌or‌‌not;‌  ‌ policies‌  ‌and/or‌  ‌hire,‌‌ 
contracting‌  ‌from‌  ‌arising.‌  ‌It‌  ‌gives‌  ‌rise‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌disputable‌  ‌presumption‌‌  WON‌  ‌MDTC‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌independent‌  ‌contractor‌  ‌and‌  ‌employers‌  ‌of‌‌  transfer,‌  ‌suspend,‌  ‌lay-off,‌‌ 
that‌‌the‌‌contractor's‌‌operations‌‌are‌‌legitimate.‌  ‌ petitioners.‌  ‌ ✔‌‌‌Alien‌‌EEs‌  ‌ recall,‌  ‌discharge,‌  ‌assign‌  ‌or‌‌ 
CBMI‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌legitimate‌  ‌job‌  ‌contractor‌, ‌ ‌and‌  ‌consequently,‌  ‌the‌‌  NO‌. ‌‌CCBPI's‌‌
  contention‌‌
  that‌‌
  MDTC‌‌  was‌‌
  a ‌‌legitimate‌‌
  labor‌‌
  contractor‌‌  1. Working‌‌in‌‌the‌‌country;‌  ‌ discipline‌‌employees.‌  ‌
employer‌  ‌of‌  ‌respondents.‌  ‌CBMI‌  ‌retained‌  ‌control‌  ‌over‌‌  and‌‌was‌‌the‌‌actual‌‌employer‌‌of‌‌petitioners‌‌does‌‌not‌‌hold‌‌water.‌  ‌
2. With‌‌valid‌‌working‌‌permits‌‌  ★ Supervisory‌  ‌EEs‌  ‌are‌‌ 
respondents‌, ‌ ‌as‌‌   shown‌‌   by‌‌  the‌‌
  deployment‌‌   of‌‌
  at‌‌
  least‌‌
  one‌‌
  (1)‌‌
  CBMI‌‌ 
issued‌‌by‌‌DOLE;‌  ‌ RELATIVELY‌  ‌prohibited‌  ‌in‌‌ 
supervisor‌  ‌in‌  ‌each‌  ‌Pizza‌  ‌Hut‌  ‌branch‌  ‌to‌  ‌regularly‌  ‌oversee,‌  ‌monitor,‌‌  5. Rights‌‌of‌‌Employees‌‌and‌‌of‌‌Labor‌‌Organizations;‌‌ 
and‌  ‌supervise‌  ‌the‌  ‌employees'‌  ‌attendance‌  ‌and‌  ‌performance.‌‌  that‌  ‌they‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌allowed‌‌   to‌‌ 
Respondents‌  ‌applied‌  ‌for‌  ‌work‌  ‌with‌  ‌CBMI‌  ‌and‌  ‌were‌  ‌consequently‌‌ 
Membership‌‌in‌‌Unions‌  ‌ 3. Nationals‌‌of‌‌countries‌‌ 
 ‌
granting‌‌same‌‌rights‌‌to‌‌  join‌  ‌unions‌  ‌of‌  ‌rank‌  ‌and‌  ‌file‌‌ 
selected‌‌and‌‌hired‌‌by‌‌the‌‌latter.‌  ‌
ARTICLE‌‌   253.‌‌
  ‌Coverage‌‌  and‌‌   Employees'‌‌   Right‌‌   to‌‌
  Self-Organization‌. ‌‌ Filipinoworkers‌‌  by‌  ‌virtue‌  ‌of‌  ‌separation‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Lingnam‌‌Restaurant‌‌v.‌‌Skills‌‌&‌‌Talent‌‌Employment‌‌2
‌ 018‌  ‌ —‌  ‌All‌  ‌persons‌  ‌employed‌  ‌in‌‌   commercial,‌‌   industrial‌‌   and‌‌
  agricultural‌‌  (‌RECIPROCITY‌‌rule)‌;‌‌and‌  ‌ unions‌‌doctrine.‌  ‌

The‌‌
  legitimate‌‌   job‌‌ contractor‌‌ provides‌‌ ‌services‌, ‌‌while‌‌ the‌‌ labor-only‌‌  enterprises‌  ‌and‌  ‌in‌  ‌religious,‌  ‌charitable,‌  ‌medical,‌  ‌or‌  ‌educational‌‌  4. Country‌‌of‌‌origin‌‌has‌‌ratified‌‌  ✘‌‌‌Confidential‌‌EEs‌  ‌
contractor‌  ‌provides‌  ‌only‌  ‌manpower‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌legitimate‌  ‌job‌  ‌contractor‌‌  institutions,‌  ‌whether‌  ‌operating‌  ‌for‌‌   profit‌‌   or‌‌
  not,‌‌
  shall‌‌
  have‌‌
  the‌‌
  right‌‌ 
ILO‌‌87‌‌and‌‌98‌‌as‌‌certified‌‌by‌‌  ✘‌‌‌Members‌‌of‌‌a‌‌Cooperative;‌  ‌
undertakes‌  ‌to‌  ‌perform‌  ‌a ‌ ‌specific‌  ‌job‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌principal‌  ‌employer,‌‌  to‌‌
  self-organization‌‌   and‌‌
  to‌‌
  form,‌‌ join,‌‌ or‌‌ assist‌‌ labor‌‌ organizations‌‌ of‌‌ 
DFA.‌  ‌
while‌  ‌the‌  ‌labor-only‌  ‌contractor‌  ‌merely‌  ‌provides‌  ‌the‌  ‌personnel‌  ‌to‌‌  their‌‌own‌‌choosing‌‌‌for‌‌purposes‌‌of‌‌collective‌‌bargaining‌.  ‌‌ ‌ ★ Owners‌  ‌cannot‌‌
  bargain‌‌
  with‌‌ 
work‌‌for‌‌the‌‌principal‌‌employer‌. ‌ ‌
Ambulant,‌  ‌intermittent‌‌   and‌‌  itinerant‌‌
  workers,‌‌   self-employed‌‌   people,‌‌  ✔‌‌‌All‌‌other‌‌workers‌‌FOR‌‌mutual‌‌  themselves.‌  ‌
WON‌‌STEP‌‌is‌‌engaged‌‌in‌‌labor-only‌‌contracting.‌  ‌ rural‌  ‌workers‌  ‌and‌  ‌those‌  ‌without‌  ‌any‌  ‌definite‌  ‌employers‌  ‌may‌  ‌form‌‌  aid‌‌and‌‌protection‌‌and‌‌NOT‌‌for‌‌ 
collective‌‌bargaining;‌  ‌
✘‌  ‌Members‌  ‌of‌  ‌International‌‌ 
YES‌. ‌‌STEP‌‌  merely‌‌  acted‌‌  as‌‌  a ‌‌placement‌‌ agency‌‌ providing‌‌ manpower‌‌  labor‌‌organizations‌f‌ or‌‌their‌‌mutual‌‌aid‌‌and‌‌protection‌.‌ 
Orgs;‌  ‌
to‌  ‌Lingnam‌  ‌Restaurant.‌  ‌The‌  ‌service‌  ‌rendered‌  ‌by‌  ‌STEP‌  ‌in‌  ‌favor‌  ‌of‌‌   ‌
✔‌‌‌Security‌‌guards;‌  ‌
Lingnam‌‌ Restaurant‌‌ was‌‌ not‌‌ the‌‌ performance‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌specific‌‌ job,‌‌ but‌‌ the‌‌  ★ By‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌‌ 
supply‌‌of‌‌personnel.‌  ‌ ARTICLE‌  ‌254.‌  ‌Right‌  ‌of‌  ‌Employees‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Public‌  ‌Service‌. ‌ ‌— ‌‌ ✔‌‌‌Workers‌‌in‌‌EPZs.‌  ‌ incorporation‌, ‌ ‌they‌  ‌are‌‌ 
Employees‌  ‌of‌  ‌government‌  ‌corporations‌  ‌established‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌‌  immune‌‌from‌‌suit.‌  ‌
Lingat‌‌v.‌‌Coca-Cola‌‌Bottlers‌‌Phils,‌‌Inc.‌‌2
‌ 018‌  ‌ Corporation‌  ‌Code‌  ‌shall‌  ‌have‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌organize‌  ‌and‌  ‌to‌  ‌bargain‌‌ 
To‌  ‌determine‌  ‌whether‌  ‌one‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌independent‌  ‌contractor‌, ‌ ‌the‌‌  collectively‌  ‌with‌‌   their‌‌
  respective‌‌   employers.‌‌   All‌‌
  other‌‌
  employees‌‌  in‌‌  Doctrine‌‌of‌‌necessary‌‌implication‌  ‌
possession‌‌   of‌‌
  substantial‌‌  capital‌‌
  is‌‌
  only‌‌  one‌‌ element.‌‌ It‌‌ is‌‌ necessary‌‌  the‌  ‌civil‌  ‌service‌  ‌shall‌  ‌have‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌form‌  ‌associations‌  ‌for‌‌  1) Confidential‌  ‌employees,‌  ‌by‌  ‌Doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌Necessary‌‌ 
to‌  ‌prove‌  ‌not‌  ‌only‌  ‌substantial‌  ‌capital‌  ‌or‌  ‌investment‌  ‌in‌  ‌tools,‌‌  purposes‌‌not‌‌contrary‌‌to‌‌law‌. ‌ ‌ Implication‌, ‌‌are‌‌ also‌‌ disqualified‌‌ for‌‌ union‌‌ membership.‌‌ They‌‌ 
equipment,‌‌   work‌‌   premises,‌‌   among‌‌
  others,‌‌   but‌‌ ‌ALSO‌‌ ‌that‌‌ the‌‌ work‌‌ of‌‌ 
are‌‌those‌‌who‌‌   ‌
the‌  ‌employee‌  ‌is‌  ‌directly‌  ‌related‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌work‌  ‌that‌  ‌contractor‌  ‌is‌‌  Who‌‌may‌‌or‌‌may‌‌not‌‌exercise‌‌the‌‌right‌  ‌
required‌‌to‌‌perform‌‌for‌‌the‌‌principal‌. ‌ ‌ a) assist‌‌or‌‌act‌‌in‌‌a‌‌confidential‌‌capacity‌‌in‌‌regard‌  ‌
Qualified‌‌   ‌ Disqualified‌‌   ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 49‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

b) to‌  ‌persons‌  ‌who‌  ‌formulate,‌  ‌determine,‌  ‌and‌  ‌effectuate‌‌  4) Rights‌‌over‌M


‌ ONEY‌‌matters;‌  ‌ individual‌  ‌written‌  ‌authorization‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌non-union‌  ‌employees‌‌ 
management‌  ‌policies,‌  ‌specifically‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌field‌  ‌of‌  ‌labor‌‌  Non-abridgment‌‌of‌‌right‌‌to‌‌self-organization‌  ‌ accept‌‌the‌‌benefits‌‌under‌‌the‌‌CBA.‌  ‌
relations‌.  ‌‌ ‌ 3. The‌  ‌union’s‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌agency‌  ‌fees‌  ‌is‌  ‌neither‌  ‌contractual‌  ‌nor‌‌ 
GR‌:‌‌  ‌ he‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌person‌  ‌to‌  ‌join‌  ‌an‌  ‌organization‌  ‌also‌‌ 
T
2) For‌‌the‌‌disqualification‌‌to‌‌apply‌  ‌ statutory‌‌but‌q
‌ uasi-contractual‌. ‌ ‌
includes‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌leave‌  ‌that‌  ‌organization‌  ‌and‌  ‌join‌‌ 
a) He‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌fiduciary‌  ‌relationship‌  ‌with‌  ‌another‌  ‌to‌‌  another‌‌one.‌‌   ‌ 4. Requisites‌  ‌for‌  ‌validity‌  ‌of‌  ‌union‌  ‌dues‌  ‌and‌  ‌special‌‌ 
whom‌‌he‌‌reports‌‌or‌‌whom‌‌he‌‌assists;‌  ‌ assessments‌  ‌
EXC‌:‌‌  ‌The‌‌ right‌‌ to‌‌ refrain‌‌ from‌‌ joining‌‌ labor‌‌ organizations‌‌ is,‌‌ 
b) The‌  ‌latter‌  ‌possesses‌  ‌labor-management‌  ‌relations‌‌  however,‌‌
  limited.‌‌
  It‌‌
  is‌‌
  withdrawn‌‌  by‌‌
  operation‌‌
  of‌‌ law,‌‌  a. Authorization‌‌   by‌‌
  a ‌‌written‌‌
  resolution‌‌
  of‌‌ the‌‌ majority‌‌ of‌‌ all‌‌ 
information;‌‌and‌  ‌ where‌‌the‌‌parties‌‌have‌‌agreed‌‌on‌‌a‌c‌ losed‌‌shop‌. ‌ ‌ the‌‌
  members‌‌   at‌‌
  a ‌‌general‌‌ membership‌‌ meeting‌‌ duly‌‌ called‌‌ 
c) He‌  ‌has‌  ‌access‌  ‌to‌  ‌that‌  ‌information‌  ‌by‌  ‌reason‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌‌  EXC‌‌TO‌‌THE‌‌EXC‌  ‌ for‌‌the‌‌purpose;‌  ‌
position.‌  ‌
1. Members‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌religious‌  ‌sect‌  ‌which‌  ‌prohibit‌‌  b. Secretary’s‌‌record‌‌of‌‌the‌‌minutes‌‌of‌‌said‌‌meeting;‌  ‌
3) The‌‌disqualification‌‌will‌‌NOT‌‌apply‌‌if‌  ‌
affiliation‌‌
  of‌‌
  their‌‌ members‌‌ in‌‌ such‌‌ labor‌‌ organization‌‌  c. Individual‌  ‌written‌  ‌authorization‌  ‌(IWA)‌  ‌for‌  ‌check-off‌  ‌duly‌‌ 
a) The‌‌information‌‌is‌‌business‌‌information;‌‌and‌  ‌ (‌1974‌‌Basa‌);‌  ‌ signed‌‌by‌‌the‌‌employees‌‌concerned.‌  ‌
b) The‌  ‌information‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌labor-management‌  ‌relations‌  ‌in‌‌  2. Employees‌‌
  who‌‌ are‌‌ already‌‌ members‌‌ of‌‌ another‌‌ union‌‌  5. When‌‌not‌‌to‌‌require‌‌IWA‌  ‌
nature‌‌but‌‌the‌‌employee’s‌‌access‌‌thereto‌‌is‌‌accidental‌‌only.‌  ‌ at‌‌the‌‌time‌‌of‌‌the‌‌signing‌‌of‌‌the‌‌CBA‌‌(Art‌‌248‌‌[e]);‌  ‌
a. Assessment‌‌from‌‌non-members‌‌of‌‌SEBA‌‌of‌a
‌ gency‌‌fees‌; ‌ ‌
a. Commingling‌‌or‌‌mixture‌‌of‌‌membership‌  ‌ 3. Confidential‌  ‌employees‌  ‌who‌  ‌are‌  ‌excluded‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌ 
b. Deductions‌  ‌for‌  ‌fees‌  ‌from‌  ‌mandatory‌  ‌activities‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌‌ 
1) Mixed-membership‌‌   is‌‌ NOT‌‌ a ‌‌ground‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ cancellation‌‌ of‌‌  bargaining‌‌unit‌‌(2
‌ 010‌‌Bank‌‌of‌‌Phil‌‌Islands‌);‌  ‌
labor‌‌relations‌‌seminars;‌  ‌
a‌  ‌union’s‌  ‌certificate‌  ‌of‌  ‌registration.‌  ‌The‌  ‌grounds‌  ‌are‌‌  4. Employees‌  ‌excluded‌  ‌by‌  ‌express‌  ‌terms‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
limited‌‌to‌‌the‌‌following:‌  ‌ c. Withholding‌‌tax;‌  ‌
agreement.‌  ‌
a) Fraud‌‌in‌‌the‌‌ratification‌‌of‌‌Constitution‌‌and‌‌Bylaws;‌  ‌ d. EE’s‌‌debt‌‌to‌‌ER‌‌which‌‌is‌‌already‌‌due‌‌and‌‌demandable;‌  ‌
ARTICLE‌  ‌113‌. ‌ ‌Wage‌  ‌Deduction.‌‌   — ‌‌No‌‌  employer,‌‌   in‌‌
  his‌‌
  own‌‌
  behalf‌‌ 
b) Fraud‌‌in‌‌election‌‌of‌‌officers;‌  ‌ e. Judgment‌‌
  ‌against‌‌
  the‌‌
  worker‌‌ where‌‌ wages‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌ subject‌‌ 
or‌‌
  in‌‌  behalf‌‌
  of‌‌
  any‌‌
  person,‌‌   shall‌‌
  make‌‌   any‌‌ deduction‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌ wages‌‌ 
of‌  ‌attachment‌‌
  or‌‌
  execution‌‌  but‌‌
  only‌‌
  for‌‌
  debts‌‌
  incurred‌‌
  for‌‌ 
c) Voluntary‌‌dissolution‌  ‌ of‌‌his‌‌employees,‌e‌ xcept‌: ‌ ‌
xxxx‌  ‌ food,‌‌clothing,‌‌shelter,‌‌and‌‌medical‌‌attendance.‌  ‌
i) By‌⅔
‌ ‌‌of‌‌members;‌  ‌
(b)‌  ‌For‌  u
‌ nion‌  ‌dues‌, ‌ ‌in‌  ‌cases‌‌
  where‌‌   the‌‌
  right‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  worker‌‌
  or‌‌
  his‌‌  f. Via‌‌court‌‌order‌; ‌ ‌
ii) In‌‌a‌‌meeting‌‌called‌‌for‌‌the‌‌purpose;‌  ‌
union‌  ‌to‌  ‌check-off‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌recognized‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer‌  ‌or‌‌  g. Authorized‌‌
  by‌‌
  law‌‌
  such‌‌
  as‌premiums‌‌
    ‌for‌‌
  SSS,‌‌ PhilHealth,‌‌ 
iii) An‌  ‌application‌  ‌to‌  ‌cancel‌  ‌submitted‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌board‌‌  authorized‌‌in‌‌writing‌‌by‌‌the‌‌individual‌‌worker‌‌concerned;‌  ‌ Pag-ibig.‌  ‌
attested‌‌to‌‌by‌‌the‌‌president;‌  ‌
iv) Filed‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌RO‌  ‌which‌  ‌issued‌  ‌the‌  ‌Certificate‌  ‌of‌‌  1. There‌‌may‌‌be‌‌some‌S
‌ PECIAL‌‌ASSESSMENTS‌: ‌ ‌ 6. Management‌‌Prerogative‌  ‌
Registration.‌  ‌ a. Authorized‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌written‌  ‌resolution‌  ‌of‌  ‌majority‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌‌  Transfer‌‌or‌‌employees‌ 
members;‌‌AND‌  ‌
b. Rights‌‌and‌‌conditions‌‌of‌‌membership‌  ‌ 1) The‌  ‌lateral‌  ‌movement‌  ‌from‌  ‌one‌  ‌position‌  ‌to‌  ‌another‌  ‌of‌‌ 
b. Purpose‌‌is‌‌stated.‌  ‌
1) POLITICAL‌R
‌ ights‌‌—‌5
‌ ‌‌YEAR‌‌‌term‌‌for‌‌officers.‌  ‌ equivalent‌‌rank,‌‌level‌‌or‌‌salary.‌‌Could‌‌be‌‌a‌‌movement:‌  ‌
2. Union‌  ‌Dues‌  ‌vs.‌  ‌Agency‌  ‌Fees.‌  ‌— ‌‌‌Assessment‌‌   of‌‌
  ‌agency‌‌
  fees‌‌ 
2) Right‌‌to‌I‌ NFORMATION‌; ‌ ‌ a) From‌‌one‌p
‌ osition‌‌‌to‌‌another;‌‌or‌ 
from‌  ‌non-union‌  ‌employees‌  ‌and‌  ‌deduction‌  ‌thereof‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌ 
3) Deliberative‌‌and‌‌Decision-Making‌‌Right;‌  ‌ employees’‌  ‌salaries‌  ‌(Art.‌  ‌248‌  ‌[e])‌  ‌even‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌absence‌  ‌of‌‌  b) From‌  ‌one‌  ‌office‌  ‌to‌‌
  another‌‌
  within‌‌
  the‌‌
  same‌‌
  business‌‌ 
establishment.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 50‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

2) This‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌inherent‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌control‌  ‌or‌  ‌manage‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌ER.‌‌  b) Additional‌‌expenses;‌  ‌ order‌‌  of‌‌
  management.‌‌   Verily,‌‌  the‌‌
  right‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌  employee‌‌ to‌‌ security‌‌ of‌‌ 
Consent‌‌of‌‌EE‌N ‌ OT‌‌required.‌  ‌ tenure‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌give‌  ‌her‌‌
  a ‌‌vested‌‌   right‌‌
  to‌‌  her‌‌  position‌‌
  as‌‌
  to‌‌
  deprive‌‌ 
c) Inconvenience;‌  ‌ management‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌authority‌  ‌to‌  ‌transfer‌  ‌or‌  ‌re-assign‌  ‌her‌  ‌where‌‌   she‌‌ 
3) This‌‌   is‌‌
  exercised‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌
  ER‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  best‌‌   interest‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ company‌‌  will‌‌be‌‌most‌‌useful.‌  ‌
d) Hardship‌‌and‌‌anguish.‌  ‌
to‌  ‌see‌  ‌where‌  ‌a ‌ ‌particular‌  ‌EE‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌best‌  ‌maximized.‌  ‌For‌  ‌a ‌‌
transfer‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌valid,‌  ‌the‌  ‌following‌  ‌REQUISITES‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌‌  Peckson‌‌v.‌‌Robinsons‌‌Supermarket‌‌2 ‌ 013‌  ‌ Change‌‌of‌‌working‌‌hours‌  ‌
observed:‌  ‌ Concerning‌  ‌the‌  ‌transfer‌  ‌of‌  ‌employees,‌  ‌these‌  ‌are‌  ‌the‌  ‌following‌‌  CCBPI‌‌v.‌‌Iloilo‌‌Coca-Cola‌‌Plant‌‌Employees‌‌Union‌‌2
‌ 018‌  ‌
jurisprudential‌‌guidelines:‌‌   ‌
a) Must‌‌be‌r‌ easonable‌o ‌ r‌‌have‌‌a‌‌sound‌‌purpose‌; ‌ ‌ WON‌  ‌scheduling‌  ‌Saturday‌  ‌work‌  ‌has‌  ‌ripened‌  ‌into‌  ‌a ‌ ‌company‌‌ 
a) a‌  ‌transfer‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌movement‌  ‌from‌  ‌one‌  ‌position‌  ‌to‌  ‌another‌  ‌of‌‌  practice,‌‌the‌‌removal‌‌of‌‌which‌‌constituted‌‌a‌‌diminution‌‌of‌‌benefits.‌  ‌
b) Must‌n ‌ ot‌‌inconvenient‌t‌ he‌‌welfare‌‌of‌‌the‌‌EE;‌  ‌ equivalent‌‌   rank,‌‌   level‌‌
  or‌‌
  salary‌‌
  without‌‌
  break‌‌
  in‌‌ the‌‌ service‌‌ 
or‌  ‌a ‌ ‌lateral‌  ‌movement‌  ‌from‌  ‌one‌  ‌position‌  ‌to‌  ‌another‌  ‌of‌‌  NO‌. ‌ ‌In‌  ‌Royal‌  ‌Plant‌‌
  Workers‌‌   Union‌‌  v.‌‌
  Coca-Cola‌‌  Bottlers‌‌   Philippines,‌‌ 
c) Not‌p ‌ rejudicial‌‌‌to‌‌the‌‌EE;‌  ‌ equivalent‌‌rank‌‌or‌‌salary;‌‌   ‌ Inc.-Cebu‌  ‌Plant‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌had‌  ‌the‌  ‌occasion‌  ‌to‌  ‌rule‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌term‌‌ 
"‌benefits‌" ‌ ‌mentioned‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌non-diminution‌  ‌rule‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌‌ 
d) Not‌i‌ nvolve‌‌a‌d
‌ emotion‌‌of‌‌rank‌‌or‌‌status;‌  ‌ b) the‌‌
  employer‌‌
  has‌‌ the‌‌ inherent‌‌ right‌‌ to‌‌ transfer‌‌ or‌‌ reassign‌‌ an‌‌ 
monetary‌  ‌benefits‌  ‌or‌  ‌privileges‌  ‌given‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee‌  ‌with‌‌ 
employee‌‌for‌‌legitimate‌‌business‌‌purposes;‌  ‌
e) Not‌‌be‌‌motivated‌‌by‌d
‌ iscrimination‌; ‌ ‌ monetary‌  ‌equivalents‌. ‌ ‌Stated‌  ‌otherwise,‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee‌  ‌benefits‌‌ 
c) a‌  ‌transfer‌  ‌becomes‌  ‌unlawful‌  ‌where‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌motivated‌  ‌by‌‌  contemplated‌  ‌by‌  ‌Article‌  ‌100‌  ‌are‌  ‌those‌‌   which‌‌
  are‌‌  ‌capable‌‌   of‌‌
  being‌‌ 
f) Not‌‌made‌‌in‌‌bad‌‌faith‌; ‌ ‌ discrimination‌  ‌or‌  ‌bad‌  ‌faith‌  ‌or‌  ‌is‌  ‌effected‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌form‌  ‌of‌‌  measured‌‌in‌‌terms‌‌of‌‌money‌.  ‌‌ ‌
punishment‌‌or‌‌is‌‌a‌‌demotion‌‌without‌‌sufficient‌‌cause;‌   ‌ ‌
g) Not‌  ‌be‌  ‌effected‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌form‌  ‌of‌  ‌punishment‌  ‌without‌‌  CCBPI‌  ‌withdrew‌  ‌the‌  ‌Saturday‌  ‌work‌‌   itself,‌‌
  pursuant,‌‌   as‌‌
  already‌‌
  held,‌‌ 
d) the‌  ‌employer‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌able‌  ‌to‌  ‌show‌  ‌that‌‌
  the‌‌
  transfer‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌  to‌  ‌its‌  ‌management‌  ‌prerogative‌. ‌ ‌In‌  ‌fact,‌  ‌this‌  ‌management‌‌ 
sufficient‌‌cause.‌  ‌ unreasonable,‌‌inconvenient,‌‌or‌‌prejudicial‌‌to‌‌the‌‌employee‌  ‌ prerogative‌  ‌highlights‌  ‌the‌  ‌fact‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌scheduling‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Saturday‌‌ 
4) Failure‌  ‌to‌  ‌observe‌  ‌these‌  ‌requisites,‌  ‌the‌  ‌transfer‌  ‌is‌  ‌deemed‌‌  work‌‌   was‌‌   actually‌‌
  made‌‌ subject‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌‌condition,‌‌ i.e.,‌‌ the‌‌ prerogative‌‌ to‌‌ 
Chateau‌‌Royale‌‌Sports‌‌&‌‌Country‌‌Club‌‌v.‌‌Balba,‌‌et‌‌al.‌‌2
‌ 017‌  ‌
CONSTRUCTIVE‌  ‌DISMISSAL.‌  ‌Same‌  ‌reliefs‌  ‌as‌  ‌that‌  ‌of‌  ‌illegal‌‌  provide‌‌   the‌‌  company's‌‌
  employees‌‌   with‌‌   Saturday‌‌ work‌‌ ‌based‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ 
The‌‌  burden‌‌
  of‌‌
  proof‌‌
  lies‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  employer‌‌   prove‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ ‌transfer‌‌ 
  to‌‌ existence‌‌of‌‌operational‌‌necessity.‌  ‌
demotion.‌  ‌
of‌‌
  the‌‌
  employee‌‌   from‌‌ one‌‌ area‌‌ of‌‌ operation‌‌ to‌‌ another‌‌ was‌‌ for‌‌ a ‌‌valid‌‌  In‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌at‌  ‌bar,‌  ‌CCBPI's‌  ‌employees‌  ‌were‌  ‌not‌  ‌illegally‌  ‌prevented‌‌ 
5) An‌  ‌EE‌  ‌who‌  ‌refuses‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌transferred‌  ‌when‌  ‌such‌  ‌is‌  ‌valid,‌  ‌is‌‌  and‌‌legitimate‌‌ground,‌‌like‌‌genuine‌‌business‌‌necessity.‌  ‌ from‌  ‌working‌  ‌on‌  ‌Saturdays.‌  ‌The‌‌   company‌‌   was‌‌
  simply‌‌   exercising‌‌ 
guilty‌‌  of‌‌ ‌insubordination‌‌ or‌‌ willful‌‌ disobedience‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌lawful‌‌  The‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee‌  ‌to‌  ‌security‌  ‌of‌  ‌tenure‌  ‌does‌‌
  not‌‌
  give‌‌
  her‌‌
  a ‌‌ its‌  ‌option‌  ‌not‌  ‌to‌  ‌schedule‌  ‌work‌  ‌pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌CBA‌  ‌provision‌‌ 
order‌‌of‌‌an‌‌ER‌‌under‌A ‌ rt‌‌297[282]‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌LC.‌  ‌ vested‌‌   right‌‌
  to‌‌ her‌‌ position‌‌ as‌‌ to‌‌ deprive‌‌ management‌‌ of‌‌ its‌‌ authority‌‌  which‌  ‌gave‌  ‌it‌  ‌the‌  ‌prerogative‌  ‌to‌  ‌do‌  ‌so.‌  ‌It‌  ‌therefore‌  ‌follows‌‌  that‌‌
  the‌‌ 
to‌‌transfer‌‌or‌‌re-assign‌‌her‌‌where‌‌she‌‌will‌‌be‌‌most‌‌useful.‌  ‌ principle‌‌of‌‌"no‌‌work,‌‌no‌‌pay"‌‌finds‌‌application‌‌in‌‌the‌‌instant‌‌case.‌  ‌
6) Refusal‌t‌ o‌‌be‌‌transferred‌‌is‌V
‌ ALID‌i‌ n‌‌the‌‌following‌‌cases‌  ‌
WON‌  ‌the‌‌
  transfer‌‌
  of‌‌
  respondents‌‌
  to‌‌
  petitioner's‌‌
  Manila‌‌
  office‌‌
  was‌‌
  a ‌‌ Bona‌‌fide‌‌occupational‌‌qualifications‌  ‌
a) Overseas‌‌assignment;‌  ‌ valid‌‌exercise‌‌of‌‌management‌‌prerogative.‌  ‌
1) To‌‌
  be‌‌
  considered‌‌
  a ‌‌‌bona‌‌ fide‌‌ occupational‌‌ qualification‌, ‌‌the‌‌ 
b) Consequent‌‌to‌p
‌ romotion‌; ‌ ‌ YES‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌transfer‌  ‌could‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌validly‌  ‌assailed‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌form‌  ‌of‌‌ 
policy‌‌must‌  ‌
constructive‌‌   dismissal,‌‌ for,‌‌ as‌‌ held‌‌ in‌‌ ‌Benguet‌‌ Electric‌‌ Cooperative‌‌ 
This‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌scalar‌  ‌transfer.‌  ‌The‌‌
  EE‌‌
  may‌‌
  refuse‌‌
  as‌‌
  this‌‌  v.‌  ‌Fianza‌, ‌ ‌management‌  ‌had‌  ‌the‌  ‌prerogative‌  ‌to‌  ‌determine‌  ‌the‌  ‌place‌‌  a) Serve‌‌a‌‌legitimate‌‌business‌‌purpose;‌  ‌
entails‌‌additional‌‌responsibilities.‌  ‌ where‌‌   the‌‌
  employee‌‌  is‌‌
  ‌best‌‌   qualified‌‌ to‌‌ serve‌‌ the‌‌ interests‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
b) Be‌‌specific‌‌to‌‌the‌‌occupation‌‌at‌‌issue;‌‌and‌  ‌
business‌  ‌given‌  ‌the‌  ‌qualifications,‌  ‌training‌  ‌and‌  ‌performance‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
c) To‌‌avoid‌‌conflict‌‌of‌‌interest;‌  ‌
affected‌‌employee.‌  ‌ c) Reflect‌  ‌an‌  ‌inherent‌  ‌quality‌  ‌that‌  ‌would‌  ‌reasonably‌‌ 
d) Occasioned‌‌by‌‌the‌‌abolition‌‌of‌‌the‌‌position.‌  ‌ According‌  ‌to‌  ‌Abbot‌  ‌Laboratories‌  ‌(Phils.),‌  ‌Inc.‌  ‌v.‌  ‌NLRC‌, ‌ ‌the‌‌  guarantee‌‌work‌‌efficiency.‌  ‌
employee‌‌   who‌‌  has‌‌  consented‌‌  to‌‌
  the‌‌ company's‌‌ policy‌‌ of‌‌ hiring‌‌ sales‌‌  2) Employment‌‌
  may‌‌
  not‌‌
  be‌‌
  limited‌‌
  to‌‌
  persons‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌particular‌‌ sex,‌‌ 
7) Refusal‌i‌ s‌I‌ NVALID‌  ‌
staff‌‌  willing‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌ assigned‌‌ anywhere‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ Philippines‌‌ as‌‌ demanded‌‌ 
religion,‌‌
  or‌‌
  national‌‌
  origin‌‌
  ‌unless‌‌
  the‌‌
  employer‌‌
  cas‌‌
  show‌‌
  that‌‌ 
a) Due‌‌to‌‌parental‌‌obligations;‌  ‌ by‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer's‌  ‌business‌  ‌has‌  ‌no‌  ‌reason‌  ‌to‌  ‌disobey‌  ‌the‌  ‌transfer‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 51‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

such‌‌
  qualifications‌‌
  are‌‌
  necessary‌‌  in‌‌
  the‌‌ performance‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ job‌‌  b) Disparate‌  ‌Impact‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Plaintiff‌  ‌must‌  ‌prove‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌‌ License‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌document‌  ‌issued‌‌  by‌‌  the‌‌  SOLE‌‌  authorizing‌‌  a ‌‌
involved.‌E
‌ xceptions‌t‌ o‌‌BFOQ:‌  ‌ facially‌‌  neutral‌‌  policy‌‌
  has‌‌
  a ‌‌disproportionate‌‌ effect‌‌ on‌‌  person,‌  ‌partnership‌  ‌or‌  ‌corporation‌  ‌to‌  ‌operate‌  a‌  ‌ ‌private‌‌ 
a) Employment‌  ‌qualification‌  ‌is‌  ‌reasonably‌  ‌related‌  ‌to‌‌  a‌‌part‌‌of‌‌the‌‌class.‌  ‌ recruitment/manning‌‌agency.‌  ‌
the‌‌essential‌‌operation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌job‌‌involved;‌‌and‌  ‌ Duncan‌‌Assoc.‌‌of‌‌Detailman-PTGWO‌‌v.‌‌Glaxo‌‌Wellcome‌‌Phils.‌  ‌ Any‌‌
  recruitment‌‌   activities,‌‌
  including‌‌
  the‌‌
  prohibited‌‌ practices,‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ 
b) There‌  ‌is‌  ‌a‌  ‌factual‌  ‌basis‌  ‌for‌  ‌believing‌  ‌that‌  ‌all‌  ‌or‌‌  undertaken‌  ‌by‌  ‌non-licensees‌  ‌or‌  ‌non-holders‌  ‌of‌  ‌authority‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌ 
No‌  ‌reversible‌  ‌error‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌ascribed‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  Court‌‌
  of‌‌
  Appeals‌‌
  when‌‌   it‌‌ 
substantially‌  ‌all‌  ‌persons‌  ‌meeting‌  ‌the‌  ‌qualification‌‌  ruled‌  ‌that‌  ‌Glaxo’s‌  ‌policy‌  ‌prohibiting‌  ‌an‌  ‌employee‌  ‌from‌  ‌having‌  ‌a ‌‌ deemed‌i‌ llegal‌. ‌ ‌
would‌‌   be‌‌
  unable‌‌
  to‌‌
  properly‌‌
  perform‌‌   the‌‌ duties‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  relationship‌  ‌with‌  ‌an‌  ‌employee‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌competitor‌  ‌company‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌valid‌‌  The‌‌characteristics‌‌of‌‌a‌‌recruitment‌‌license‌‌are:‌  ‌
exercise‌‌of‌‌management‌‌prerogative.‌  ‌
job.‌  ‌ 1) It‌‌is‌‌place-specific‌; ‌ ‌
Glaxo‌  ‌has‌  ‌a ‌‌right‌‌
  to‌‌
  guard‌‌
  its‌‌
  trade‌‌
  secrets,‌‌
  manufacturing‌‌   formulas,‌‌ 
Post-employment‌‌restrictions‌  ‌ marketing‌  ‌strategies‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌confidential‌  ‌programs‌  ‌and‌‌  2) It‌‌is‌‌person-specific‌;‌‌and‌  ‌
1) An‌‌
  EE‌‌
  is‌‌
  prohibited‌‌
  after‌‌
  separation‌‌
  from‌‌
  joining‌‌
  a ‌‌competitor.‌‌  information‌‌ from‌‌ competitors,‌‌ especially‌‌ so‌‌ that‌‌ it‌‌ and‌‌ Astra‌‌ are‌‌ rival‌‌  3) It‌‌is‌‌prospective‌. ‌ ‌
companies‌‌in‌‌the‌‌highly‌‌competitive‌‌pharmaceutical‌‌industry.‌  ‌
VALID,‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌limitations‌‌as‌‌to‌‌duration‌‌and‌‌place.‌  ‌
1. Elements‌  ‌
2) Restrictive‌  ‌covenant‌‌   clauses.‌‌   — ‌‌‌In‌‌
  determining‌‌  whether‌‌
  the‌‌  Coca-Cola‌‌Bottlers‌‌Phils‌‌Inc.‌‌v.‌‌CCBPI‌‌Sta‌‌Rosa‌‌Plant‌‌Employees‌‌ 
a) Essential‌  ‌Element‌. ‌ ‌Presupposes‌  ‌deceit‌  ‌or‌‌ 
contract‌  ‌is‌  ‌reasonable‌  ‌or‌  ‌not,‌  ‌the‌  ‌following‌‌  factors‌‌
  should‌‌
  be‌‌  Union‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌
misrepresentation‌. ‌ ‌
considered:‌  ‌ The‌  ‌employer‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌have‌  ‌the‌  ‌prerogative‌  ‌to‌  ‌impose‌  ‌other‌‌ 
i) Without‌‌being‌‌duly‌‌authorized;‌  ‌
a) whether‌‌
  the‌‌
  covenant‌‌
  protects‌‌
  a ‌‌‌legitimate‌‌
  business‌‌  conditions‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌amount‌  ‌of‌  ‌loan‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌taken‌  ‌which‌  ‌does‌‌
  not‌‌ 
involve‌‌its‌‌duty‌‌to‌‌collect‌‌and‌‌remit‌‌amortizations.‌  ‌ ii) Gave‌  ‌distinct‌  ‌impression‌  ‌that‌  ‌he‌  ‌had‌  ‌power‌  ‌or‌‌ 
interes‌t‌‌of‌‌the‌‌employer;‌  ‌
ability‌‌to‌‌deploy‌‌workers;‌  ‌
b) whether‌  ‌the‌  ‌covenant‌  ‌creates‌  ‌an‌  ‌undue‌  ‌burden‌  ‌on‌‌  In‌  ‌carrying‌  ‌out‌  ‌the‌  ‌50%‌  ‌cap‌  ‌policy,‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌effectively‌  ‌limits‌  ‌its‌‌ 
employees‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌
  utilization‌‌   of‌‌ their‌‌ salaries‌‌ when‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌ apparent‌‌ that‌‌  iii) Complainants‌  ‌were‌  ‌convinced‌  ‌to‌  ‌part‌  ‌with‌  ‌their‌‌ 
the‌‌employee;‌  ‌
as‌  ‌long‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌employee‌  ‌is‌  ‌qualified‌  ‌to‌  ‌avail‌‌  the‌‌
  same,‌‌   he/she‌‌
  may‌‌  money‌‌by‌‌such‌‌impression;‌1‌  ‌
c) whether‌  ‌the‌  ‌covenant‌  ‌is‌  ‌injurious‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌public‌‌  apply‌  ‌for‌  ‌an‌  ‌SSS‌  ‌loan.‌  ‌This‌  ‌is‌  ‌in‌  ‌contravention‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌‌ 
iv) There‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌a ‌ ‌promise‌  ‌or‌  ‌offer‌  ‌of‌‌ 
welfare‌; ‌ ‌ prohibition‌  ‌on‌  ‌interfering‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌disposal‌  ‌of‌  ‌wages‌  ‌under‌‌ 
employment.‌2‌ 
Article‌‌112‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Labor‌‌Code.‌  ‌
d) whether‌  ‌the‌‌
  time‌‌
  and‌‌
  territorial‌‌
  limitations‌‌
  contained‌‌  b) Recruitment‌‌   and‌‌   Placement;‌‌
  Presumption.‌‌   Where‌‌   a ‌‌fee‌‌ 
in‌‌the‌‌covenant‌‌are‌r‌ easonable‌;‌‌and‌  ‌ 7. Illegal‌‌Recruitment‌‌of‌‌OFWs‌  ‌ is‌  ‌collected‌  ‌in‌  ‌consideration‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌promise‌  ‌or‌  ‌offer‌  ‌of‌‌ 
e) whether‌  ‌the‌  ‌restraint‌  ‌is‌  ‌reasonable‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌  employment‌‌to‌t‌ wo‌‌or‌‌more‌‌‌prospective‌‌workers.‌  ‌
Any‌‌
  act‌‌
  of‌‌
  canvassing,‌‌  enlisting,‌‌ contracting,‌‌ transporting,‌‌ utilizing,‌‌ 
standpoint‌‌of‌p
‌ ublic‌‌policy‌. ‌ ‌ c) Additional‌‌elements‌  ‌
hiring,‌  ‌or‌  ‌procuring‌  ‌workers‌  ‌and‌  ‌includes‌  ‌referring,‌  ‌contract‌‌ 
Marriage‌‌between‌‌employees‌‌of‌‌competitor-employers‌  ‌ services,‌  ‌promising‌  ‌or‌  ‌advertising‌  ‌for‌  ‌employment‌  ‌abroad,‌‌  i)   ‌by‌‌
For‌  ‌syndicated.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌committed‌‌   ‌three‌‌  or‌‌  more‌‌ 
whether‌‌   for‌‌
  profit‌‌
  or‌‌  not‌, ‌‌when‌‌  undertaken‌‌  by‌‌  a ‌‌non-l‌icensee‌‌  persons‌  ‌conspiring‌  ‌and‌  ‌confederating‌  ‌with‌  ‌one‌‌ 
1) A‌‌
  policy‌‌
  prohibiting‌‌   spouses‌‌ from‌‌ being‌‌ employed‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ same‌‌  another.‌‌(P
‌ eople‌‌v.‌‌Hashim‌‌‌2012‌) ‌ ‌
or‌‌non-holder‌‌of‌‌authority.‌  ‌
company.‌  ‌There‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌‌   c‌ompelling‌‌   business‌‌   necessity‌‌   for‌‌  ii) For‌  ‌large‌  ‌scale.‌‌
  — ‌‌committed‌‌  ‌against‌‌   ‌three‌‌  or‌‌ 
which‌  ‌no‌  ‌alternative‌  ‌exists‌  ‌other‌  ‌than‌  ‌the‌  ‌discriminatory‌‌  Authority‌‌ ‌refers‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌‌document‌‌ issued‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ SOLE‌‌ authorizing‌‌ the‌‌ 
more‌‌   persons,‌‌
  individually‌‌
  or‌‌
  as‌‌  a ‌‌group.‌‌ (‌People‌‌ 
practice‌‌for‌‌it‌‌to‌‌be‌‌VALID.‌  ‌ officers,‌  ‌personnel,‌  ‌agents‌  ‌or‌  ‌representatives‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌licensed‌‌ 
v.‌‌Tuguinay‌‌‌2012‌) ‌ ‌
recruitment/manning‌  ‌agency‌  ‌to‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌recruitment‌  ‌and‌ 
2) Theories‌‌on‌‌Employment‌‌Discrimination‌  ‌
placement‌‌   activities‌‌
  in‌‌
  a ‌‌place‌‌ stated‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ license‌‌ or‌‌ in‌‌ a ‌‌specified‌‌ 
a) Disparate‌‌
  Treatment‌‌   — ‌‌Plaintiff‌‌
  must‌‌
  prove‌‌
  that‌‌ an‌‌  place.‌  ‌
employment‌‌policy‌‌is‌‌discriminating‌‌on‌‌its‌‌face;‌  ‌ 1
‌ eople‌‌v.‌‌Goce‌,‌‌GR‌‌No‌‌113161,‌‌August‌‌29,‌‌1995‌  ‌
P
2
D
‌ arvin‌‌v.‌‌CA‌‌and‌‌People‌,‌‌GR‌‌No‌‌125044,‌‌July‌‌13,‌‌1998‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 52‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

2. Types‌  ‌ Exercised‌‌by‌‌SOLE‌‌or‌‌any‌‌of‌‌his‌‌  RD‌‌or‌‌any‌‌duly‌‌authorized‌‌ 


3. SOLE‌‌  may‌‌   order‌‌
  stoppage‌‌
  of‌‌
  work‌‌ or‌‌ suspension‌‌ of‌‌ operations‌‌ 
duly‌‌authorized‌‌representatives,‌‌  hearing‌‌officer‌‌of‌‌DOLE‌  ‌ of‌‌unit‌‌or‌‌department‌‌concerned;‌  ‌
a) One‌  ‌is‌  ‌simple‌  ‌illegal‌  ‌recruitment‌  ‌committed‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌‌
licensee‌‌or‌‌holder‌‌of‌‌authority.‌  ‌ i.e.‌‌the‌‌RD‌  ‌ 4. Within‌  ‌24‌  ‌hours,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌hearing‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌conducted‌  ‌to‌  ‌determine‌‌ 
b) Any‌  ‌person‌  ‌“who‌  ‌is‌  ‌neither‌  ‌a ‌ ‌licensee‌  ‌nor‌  ‌a ‌ ‌holder‌  ‌of‌‌  whether‌‌said‌‌stoppage‌‌order‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌lifted‌‌or‌‌not.‌  ‌
Appealable‌‌to‌‌SOLE,‌‌then‌‌to‌‌CA‌  ‌ Appealable‌‌to‌‌NLRC‌  ‌
authority”‌‌commits‌‌the‌‌second‌‌type‌‌of‌‌illegal‌‌recruitment.‌  ‌ a. If‌  ‌violation‌  ‌is‌  ‌attributable‌  ‌to‌  ‌ER,‌  ‌he‌  ‌shall‌  ‌pay‌  ‌the‌‌ 
c) Large‌  ‌scale‌  ‌or‌  ‌Qualified.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌The‌  ‌third‌  ‌type‌  ‌of‌  ‌illegal‌‌  Recovery‌‌of‌‌Wages‌‌and‌‌Simple‌‌Money‌‌Claims‌  ‌ wages‌  ‌of‌  ‌EEs‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌  ‌period‌  ‌of‌  ‌stoppage‌  ‌or‌‌ 
suspension‌‌of‌‌operations.‌  ‌
recruitment‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌offenders‌  ‌who‌  ‌either‌  ‌commit‌  ‌the‌‌  1. Requisites‌: ‌ ‌
offense‌  ‌alone‌  ‌or‌  ‌with‌  ‌another‌  ‌person‌  ‌against‌  ‌three‌  ‌or‌‌  b. Suspension‌‌should‌‌not‌‌exceed‌6
‌ ‌‌months.‌  ‌
a. Claimant‌‌is‌‌an‌‌employee‌‌or‌‌domestic‌‌worker;‌  ‌
more‌‌‌persons‌‌individually‌‌or‌‌as‌‌a‌‌group.‌‌   ‌ 5. see‌  ‌RA‌  ‌11058‌, ‌ ‌Strengthening‌  ‌Compliance‌  ‌with‌‌ 
b. Claim‌‌does‌‌not‌‌exceed‌‌P5K;‌  ‌
d) Syndicated‌  ‌—A ‌ ‌  ‌syndicate‌  ‌or‌  ‌a ‌ ‌group‌  ‌of‌  ‌three‌‌   or‌‌
  more‌‌  Occupational‌‌Safety‌‌&‌‌Health‌‌Standards‌; ‌ ‌
persons‌  ‌conspiring‌‌   and‌‌
  confederating‌‌   with‌‌   one‌‌
  another‌‌  in‌‌  c. No‌‌claim‌‌of‌‌reinstatement;‌  ‌
6. SEC.‌  ‌23.‌  ‌Payment‌  ‌of‌  ‌Workers‌  ‌During‌  ‌Work‌  ‌Stoppage‌  ‌Due‌  ‌to‌‌ 
carrying‌‌   out‌‌
  the‌‌   act‌‌
  circumscribed‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ law‌‌ commits‌‌ the‌  d. Claim‌‌arose‌‌from‌‌ER-EE‌‌relationship.‌  ‌ Imminent‌  ‌Danger.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌If‌  ‌stoppage‌  ‌of‌  ‌work‌  ‌due‌  ‌to‌  ‌imminent‌‌ 
fourth‌  ‌type‌  ‌of‌  ‌illegal‌  ‌recruitment‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌law.‌  ‌(‌People‌  ‌v.‌‌  2. Employee‌‌files‌‌a‌p
‌ ro-forma‌‌complaint‌‌‌with‌‌the‌‌RD‌; ‌ ‌ danger‌  ‌occurs‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌result‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer's‌  ‌violation‌  ‌or‌‌ 
Sadiosa‌) ‌ ‌ fault‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌employer‌  ‌shall‌  ‌pay‌  ‌the‌  ‌workers‌  ‌concerned‌  ‌their‌‌ 
3. RD‌‌dockets‌‌the‌‌complaint‌‌as‌s‌ imple‌‌money‌‌claim;‌  ‌
Under‌  ‌RA‌  ‌8042,‌  ‌the‌  ‌third‌  ‌and‌  ‌fourth‌  ‌types‌  ‌herein‌  ‌are‌‌  wages‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌  ‌period‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌  ‌stoppage‌  ‌of‌  ‌work‌  ‌or‌‌ 
4. RD‌  ‌issues‌  ‌summons‌  ‌served‌  ‌upon‌  ‌employer‌  ‌as‌  ‌respondent,‌‌  suspension‌‌of‌‌operations.‌‌   ‌
considered‌‌Illegal‌‌Recruitment‌‌as‌‌‌Economic‌‌Sabotage‌. ‌ ‌
together‌‌with‌‌the‌‌copy‌‌of‌‌complaint;‌  ‌
7. In‌  ‌National‌  ‌Mines‌  ‌and‌  ‌Allied‌  ‌Workers‌  ‌Union‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Marcopper‌‌ 
8. Remedies‌‌for‌‌Labor‌‌Standards‌‌Violation‌  ‌ 5. ER‌‌is‌‌given‌5
‌ ‌‌calendar‌‌days‌‌‌to‌‌answer;‌  ‌ Mining‌, ‌ ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌suspension‌  ‌of‌  ‌operations‌  ‌was‌  ‌ordered‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌‌
6. After‌‌receiving‌‌the‌‌answer,‌‌RD‌‌calls‌‌for‌‌a‌s‌ ummary‌‌hearing;‌  ‌ government‌‌   agency‌‌   other‌‌
  than‌‌ the‌‌ DOLE,‌‌ the‌‌ general‌‌ "no‌‌ work,‌‌ 
Visitorial‌‌and‌‌Enforcement‌‌ 
Simple‌‌Money‌‌Claim‌  ‌ 7. RD‌‌
  ‌decides‌‌
  within‌‌ ‌30‌‌ calendar‌‌ days‌‌ from‌‌ date‌‌ of‌‌ filing‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  no‌‌ pay"‌‌ rule‌‌ should‌‌ prevail‌‌ with‌‌ respect‌‌ to‌‌ employees'‌‌ wages‌‌ 
Power‌  ‌
complaint;‌  ‌ during‌‌  the‌‌
  suspension‌‌   period,‌‌
  subject‌‌  to‌‌ existing‌‌ CBA‌‌ terms‌‌ on‌‌ 
Art‌‌128‌  ‌ Art‌‌129‌  ‌ leave‌‌credits‌‌and‌‌similar‌‌benefits‌‌of‌‌employees.‌  ‌
8. ER‌  ‌may‌  ‌appeal‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌NLRC‌  ‌within‌  ‌5 ‌ ‌calendar‌  ‌days‌  ‌from‌‌ 
8. DOLE‌  ‌D.O.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌198,‌  ‌S.‌  ‌2018‌, ‌ ‌distinguished‌  ‌from‌  ‌Bona‌  ‌fide‌‌ 
Police‌‌power‌‌-‌‌Inspection‌‌and‌‌  Quasi-judicial‌‌-‌‌Adjudication‌‌  receipt‌‌of‌‌decision.‌‌Appeal‌‌must‌‌be‌‌with‌‌cash‌‌or‌‌security‌‌bond.‌  ‌
suspension‌‌of‌‌operations‌‌‌(Art‌‌301).‌  ‌
issuance‌‌of‌‌orders‌‌to‌‌compel‌‌  through‌‌summary‌‌proceedings‌  ‌ 9. ER‌‌may‌‌the‌‌file‌‌MR‌‌from‌‌an‌‌adverse‌‌decision‌‌of‌‌the‌‌NLRC;‌  ‌
compliance‌  ‌ Closure‌‌of‌‌Business‌‌under‌‌RA‌‌9231‌‌
   ‌
10. Petition‌‌  for‌‌
  Certiorari‌‌
  under‌‌
  Rule‌‌
  65‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ CA‌‌ not‌‌ later‌‌ than‌‌ ‌60‌‌ 
Enforcement‌‌of‌‌labor‌‌legislation‌‌  Monetary‌‌claims‌‌which‌‌only‌‌  days‌‌‌from‌‌notice;‌  ‌ DOLE‌‌DC‌‌03-09‌  ‌
in‌‌general‌  ‌ involve‌‌labor‌‌standards‌‌law‌  ‌ 11. Appeal‌  ‌by‌  ‌certiorari‌  ‌under‌  ‌Rule‌  ‌45‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌SC‌  ‌within‌  ‌15‌‌
  days‌‌  SOLE‌  ‌or‌  ‌RD‌  ‌may‌‌
  order‌‌
  closure‌‌
  of‌‌
  business‌‌
  found‌‌  to‌‌
  have‌‌
  violated‌‌ 
from‌‌notice‌‌on‌p ‌ ure‌‌questions‌‌of‌‌law.‌  ‌ any‌‌provisions‌‌of‌‌RA‌‌9231‌m ‌ ore‌‌than‌‌3‌‌times‌. ‌ ‌
Offshoots‌‌of‌‌inspections‌‌done‌‌by‌‌  Sworn‌‌complaints‌‌by‌‌interested‌‌ 
labor‌‌officers‌‌or‌‌safety‌‌engineers‌  ‌ party‌  ‌ Enforcement‌‌Power‌‌on‌‌Health‌‌and‌‌Safety‌‌of‌‌Workers‌  ‌ GR‌:‌‌  Prior‌  ‌notice‌  ‌and‌  ‌hearing‌  ‌is‌  ‌required‌  ‌before‌  ‌issuance‌  ‌of‌‌ 
such‌‌Closure‌‌Order‌,‌‌unless:‌  ‌
Involves‌‌employees‌‌still‌‌in‌‌  Present‌‌or‌‌past‌‌employees‌‌at‌‌the‌‌  1. An‌‌inspection‌‌is‌‌made‌‌via‌‌Art‌‌128;‌  ‌
service‌  ‌ time‌‌of‌‌complaint‌‌provided‌‌there‌  EX‌: ‌ ‌
is‌‌no‌‌demand‌‌for‌‌reinstatement‌  ‌ 2. Non-compliance‌  ‌was‌  ‌discovered‌  ‌that‌  ‌poses‌  ‌grave‌  ‌and‌‌ 
a. Violation‌  ‌resulted‌  ‌to‌  ‌death,‌  ‌insanity,‌  ‌or‌  ‌serious‌  ‌physical‌‌ 
imminent‌  ‌danger‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌health‌  ‌and‌  ‌safety‌  ‌of‌‌
  workers‌‌
  in‌‌ 
injury‌‌to‌‌a‌‌child‌‌employed;‌  ‌
No‌‌maximum‌‌monetary‌‌amount‌  ‌ Claim‌‌per‌‌claimant‌‌not‌‌to‌‌exceed‌‌  the‌‌workplace‌. ‌ ‌
P5K‌  ‌ b. Prostitution‌‌or‌‌obscene‌‌or‌‌lewd‌‌shows;‌‌or‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 53‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

c. There‌‌is‌‌imminent‌‌danger‌‌in‌‌the‌‌life‌‌and‌‌limb‌‌of‌‌a‌‌child.‌  ‌ 8.‌‌Compliance‌‌requirements‌  ‌ mask‌  ‌to‌  ‌exact‌  ‌funds‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌public‌  ‌when‌  ‌its‌  ‌true‌  ‌intent‌‌
  is‌‌
  to‌‌
  give‌ 
Under‌‌   any‌‌
  such‌‌
  circumstance,‌‌
  SOLE‌‌ or‌‌ RD‌‌ must,‌‌ within‌‌ ‌5 ‌‌working‌‌  undue‌‌  benefit‌‌  and‌‌   advantage‌‌   to‌‌
  a ‌‌private‌‌
  enterprise,‌‌ that‌‌ law‌‌ will‌‌ not‌‌ 
Donor’s‌‌Tax‌  ‌
satisfy‌‌the‌‌requirement‌‌of‌‌“public‌‌purpose.”‌  ‌
days‌‌‌from‌‌receipt‌‌of‌‌complaint,‌‌order‌‌immediate‌‌closure.‌  ‌
1.‌‌Basic‌‌Principles,‌‌Concept,‌‌and‌‌Definition‌  ‌
A‌‌
  ‌close-now-hear-later‌‌
  process‌‌
  is‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ adhered‌‌ to,‌‌ which‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌  The‌‌  purpose‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌law‌‌  is‌‌
  evident‌‌  from‌‌  its‌‌
  text‌‌
  or‌‌
  inferable‌‌
  from‌‌ other‌‌ 
summary‌‌in‌‌nature.‌  ‌ 2.‌‌Requisites‌‌of‌‌a‌‌Valid‌‌Donation‌  ‌ secondary‌‌   sources.‌‌   Here,‌‌  the‌‌
  levy‌‌  imposed‌‌   under‌‌   LOI‌‌
  No.‌‌
  1465‌‌
  was‌‌ 
not‌‌for‌‌a‌‌public‌‌purpose.‌  ‌
3.‌‌Transfers‌‌which‌‌may‌‌be‌‌considered‌‌as‌‌donation‌  ‌
DAY1‌‌|‌‌AM‌‌Taxation‌‌Law‌  ‌ Requisites‌‌of‌‌a‌‌Valid‌‌Taxpayer’s‌‌Suit‌  ‌
4.‌‌Classification‌‌of‌‌Donor‌  ‌
1. The‌‌
  tax‌‌
  money‌‌
  is‌‌
  being‌‌
  extracted‌‌
  and‌‌
  spent‌‌
  in‌‌ violation‌‌ of‌‌ 
Basic‌‌Principles‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Constitution‌  ‌ 5.‌‌Determination‌‌of‌‌Gross‌‌Gift‌  ‌ specific‌  ‌constitutional‌  ‌protection‌  ‌against‌  ‌abuses‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Income‌‌Tax‌  ‌ legislative‌‌power;‌  ‌
6.‌‌Tax‌‌credit‌‌for‌‌donor's‌‌taxes‌‌paid‌‌to‌‌a‌‌foreign‌‌country‌  ‌
2. Public‌‌money‌‌is‌‌being‌‌deflected‌‌to‌‌any‌‌improper‌‌purpose;‌  ‌
1.‌‌Definition,‌‌Nature,‌‌and‌‌General‌‌Principles‌  ‌ 7.‌‌Filing‌‌of‌‌return‌‌and‌‌payment‌  ‌
3. Petitioner‌  ‌seeks‌  ‌to‌  ‌restrain‌  ‌wastage‌  ‌of‌  ‌public‌  ‌funds‌‌ 
2.‌‌Concept‌‌of‌‌Income‌  ‌ Remedies‌  ‌ through‌‌enforcement‌‌of‌‌an‌‌invalid‌‌law.‌  ‌
3.‌‌Gross‌‌Income‌  ‌ Jurisdiction‌‌of‌‌Courts‌  ‌ Important‌‌Concepts‌‌Regarding‌‌Taxpayer’s‌‌Suit‌  ‌

4.‌‌Deductions‌  ‌ 1. The‌‌public‌‌funds‌‌must‌‌be‌‌derived‌‌from‌‌taxation;‌  ‌
Prescription‌  ‌
2. Does‌  ‌not‌  ‌apply‌  ‌to‌  ‌donations‌  ‌and‌  ‌contributions‌  ‌made‌  ‌by‌‌ 
5.‌‌Income‌‌Tax‌‌on‌‌Individuals‌  ‌ Against‌‌Assessment‌‌Notices‌  ‌ public‌‌individuals‌‌or‌‌private‌‌entities;‌  ‌
6.‌‌Income‌‌Tax‌‌on‌‌Corporations‌  ‌ 3. Taxpayer‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  relieved‌‌
  from‌‌   the‌‌
  obligation‌‌ to‌‌ pay‌‌ tax‌‌ just‌‌ 
1. Basic‌‌Principles‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Constitution‌  ‌
7.‌‌Filing‌‌of‌‌Returns‌‌and‌‌Payment‌  ‌ because‌‌of‌‌his‌‌belief‌‌that‌‌it‌‌is‌‌being‌‌misappropriated;‌  ‌
INHERENT‌‌LIMITATIONS‌  ‌
4. A‌‌
  taxpayer‌‌
  has‌‌
  no‌‌
  legal‌‌
  standing‌‌ to‌‌ question‌‌ acts‌‌ which‌‌ do‌‌ 
8.‌‌Withholding‌‌Tax‌  ‌
 ‌

1) P‌ublic‌  ‌Purpose‌. ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌has‌  ‌now‌  ‌evolved‌  ‌to‌  ‌include‌  ‌social‌‌  not‌‌involve‌‌the‌‌use‌‌of‌‌public‌‌funds.‌‌   ‌
VAT‌  ‌ justice.‌  ‌ 2) E‌xemption‌‌from‌‌taxation‌‌of‌‌Government‌‌entities‌  ‌
1.‌‌Nature‌‌and‌‌characteristics‌‌of‌‌VAT‌  ‌ ‌Determination‌‌that‌‌the‌‌tax‌‌is‌‌for‌‌public‌‌purpose‌‌   ‌ Refers‌‌only‌‌to‌‌real‌‌property‌‌tax.‌  ‌
2.‌‌Persons‌‌liable‌‌to‌‌VAT‌  ‌ a. Used‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌support‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌government,‌  ‌specifically‌‌  GR‌:‌‌  Agencies‌  ‌and‌  ‌instrumentalities‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌‌ 
on‌‌its‌‌governmental‌‌functions;‌  ‌ performing‌  ‌governmental‌  ‌functions‌  ‌are‌  ‌tax‌‌
  exempt.‌‌
  If‌‌ 
3.‌‌Imposition‌‌of‌‌VAT‌  ‌
b. For‌‌any‌‌of‌‌the‌‌recognized‌‌objects‌‌of‌‌the‌‌government;‌‌   ‌ performing‌‌proprietary‌‌functions,‌‌taxable.‌‌   ‌
4.‌  ‌Zero-rated‌  ‌and‌  ‌effectively‌  ‌zero-rated‌  ‌sales‌  ‌of‌  ‌goods‌  ‌or‌‌  c. Promotes‌‌the‌‌welfare‌‌of‌‌the‌‌community.‌  ‌ EXC‌:‌‌  Even‌  ‌if‌  ‌performing‌  ‌proprietary‌  ‌functions,‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌‌ 
properties,‌‌and‌‌services‌  ‌ franchise‌  ‌or‌  ‌law‌  ‌creating‌  ‌them‌  ‌exempts‌  ‌them‌  ‌— ‌ ‌tax‌‌ 
d. Public‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌is‌  ‌determined‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
exempt.‌  ‌
Zero-rated‌‌sale‌  ‌ enactment‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌tax‌  ‌law‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌‌
  at‌‌
  the‌‌
  time‌‌
  of‌‌
  its‌‌ 
implementation.‌‌   ‌ If‌‌taxing‌‌authority‌‌is‌‌LGU‌  ‌
5.‌‌VAT-exempt‌‌transactions‌  ‌ a. TAX‌‌ EXEMPT‌‌ — ‌‌GOCCs‌‌ with‌‌ original‌‌ charter;‌‌ attached‌‌ 
Planters‌‌Products,‌‌Inc.‌‌v.‌‌Fertiphil‌  ‌
6.‌‌Input‌‌and‌‌output‌‌tax‌  ‌ to‌‌the‌‌government;‌‌unincorporated;‌  ‌
Public‌‌
  purpose‌‌
  is‌‌
  the‌‌
  heart‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌tax‌‌
  law‌. ‌‌When‌‌
  a ‌‌tax‌‌
  law‌‌ is‌‌ only‌‌ a ‌‌ Exempt‌‌from‌‌Income‌‌Tax‌  ‌
7.‌‌Refund‌‌or‌‌tax‌‌credit‌‌of‌‌excess‌‌input‌‌tax;‌‌procedure‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 54‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

1. GSIS‌‌   ‌ 12%‌  ‌rate‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌existence‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌conditions‌  ‌specified‌  ‌by‌‌  Southern‌‌Cross‌‌Cement‌‌Corporation‌‌v.‌‌CMAP‌  ‌
2. SSS‌‌   ‌ Congress.‌  ‌This‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌duty‌  ‌which‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌evaded‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌
  President.‌‌ 
There‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌undue‌  ‌delegation‌  ‌of‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌power‌  ‌but‌  ‌only‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  The‌  ‌Court‌  ‌recognizes‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌authority‌  ‌delegated‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌‌ 
3. PHIC‌‌   ‌ discretion‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌execution‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌law.‌  ‌This‌  ‌is‌  ‌constitutionally‌‌  under‌  ‌Section‌  ‌28(2),‌  ‌Article‌  ‌VI‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌exercised‌, ‌ ‌in‌  ‌accordance‌‌ 
4. PCSO‌  ‌ permissible‌. ‌ ‌ with‌  ‌legislative‌‌
  sanction,‌‌  by‌‌  the‌‌  alter‌‌
  egos‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  President‌, ‌‌such‌‌ 
5. PAGCOR‌  ‌(but‌  ‌not‌  ‌exempted‌  ‌from‌  ‌business‌‌  as‌‌department‌‌secretaries.‌‌   ‌
Delegation‌‌to‌‌LGU‌  ‌
tax)‌  ‌ Only‌  ‌provinces‌  ‌and‌  ‌cities‌  ‌are‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌to‌  ‌impose‌  ‌a ‌ ‌tax‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌  There‌  ‌is‌  ‌only‌  ‌one‌  ‌viable‌  ‌ground‌  ‌for‌  ‌challenging‌  ‌the‌  ‌legality‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
b. TAXABLE‌  ‌—‌  ‌GOCCs‌  ‌with‌  ‌special‌‌
  charter;‌‌
  personality‌‌  transfer‌‌of‌‌ownership‌‌of‌‌real‌‌property.‌‌   ‌ limitations‌  ‌and‌  ‌restrictions‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌by‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌under‌  ‌Section‌‌ 
distinct‌‌from‌‌the‌‌government;‌‌incorporated‌‌   ‌ 28(2)‌  ‌Article‌‌  VI,‌‌
  and‌‌  that‌‌
  is‌‌
  ‌such‌‌   limitations‌‌   and‌‌   restrictions‌‌   are‌‌ 
NPC‌‌v.‌‌City‌‌of‌‌Cabanatuan‌  ‌ themselves‌  ‌violative‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌. ‌ ‌Thus,‌  ‌no‌  ‌matter‌  ‌how‌‌ 
3) N‌on-delegation‌  ‌ distasteful‌  ‌or‌  ‌noxious‌  ‌these‌  ‌limitations‌  ‌and‌  ‌restrictions‌‌   may‌‌
  seem,‌‌ 
The‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌tax‌  ‌is‌‌
  no‌‌
  longer‌‌
  vested‌‌
  exclusively‌‌
  on‌‌
  Congress;‌‌   local‌‌  the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌has‌  ‌no‌  ‌choice‌  ‌but‌  ‌to‌  ‌uphold‌  ‌their‌  ‌validity‌  ‌unless‌  ‌their‌‌ 
‌Matters‌‌which‌‌cannot‌‌be‌‌delegated‌‌   ‌
legislative‌  ‌bodies‌  ‌are‌  ‌now‌‌   given‌‌  direct‌‌
  authority‌‌  to‌‌
  levy‌‌  taxes,‌‌  constitutional‌‌infirmity‌‌can‌‌be‌‌demonstrated.‌  ‌
1. N‌ature‌‌of‌‌taxation;‌  ‌ fees‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌charges‌  ‌pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌Art‌  ‌X ‌ ‌Sec‌  ‌5 ‌ ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌1987‌‌ 
Constitution.‌  ‌ 4) I‌nternational‌‌Comity‌  ‌
2. O‌bject‌‌and‌‌purpose;‌  ‌
1. Doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌sovereign‌  ‌equality‌  ‌among‌  ‌states‌  ‌— ‌ ‌as‌‌ 
3. S‌ubject‌‌or‌‌coverage;‌  ‌ To‌‌
  determine‌‌  whether‌‌
  the‌‌
  petitioner‌‌
  is‌‌
  covered‌‌
  by‌‌ the‌‌ franchise‌‌ tax‌‌ 
in‌‌question,‌‌the‌‌following‌‌requisites‌‌should‌‌concur:‌‌   ‌ between‌  ‌equals,‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌sovereign.‌  ‌One‌  ‌state‌  ‌cannot‌‌ 
4. A‌mount‌‌or‌‌rate‌‌of‌‌tax;‌  ‌ exercise‌‌its‌‌sovereign‌‌powers‌‌over‌‌another.‌  ‌
1) that‌‌
  petitioner‌‌
  has‌‌
  a ‌‌“franchise”‌‌
  in‌‌ the‌‌ sense‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌‌secondary‌‌  2. Non-suability‌  ‌of‌  ‌State‌s ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌under‌  ‌international‌  ‌law,‌  ‌a ‌‌
5. M‌anner,‌‌means‌‌and‌‌agencies‌‌of‌‌collection;‌  ‌
or‌‌special‌‌franchise‌;‌‌and‌  ‌
foreign‌  ‌government‌  ‌may‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌‌   sued‌‌   without‌‌   its‌‌
  consent.‌‌ 
6. S‌itus.‌  ‌ 2) that‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌exercising‌  ‌its‌  ‌rights‌  ‌or‌  ‌privileges‌  ‌under‌  t‌ his‌‌  Hence,‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌useless‌  ‌to‌  ‌impose‌  ‌a ‌ ‌tax‌  ‌which‌  ‌could‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌‌ 
franchise‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌territory‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌city‌‌ 
Abakada‌‌Guro‌‌Party‌‌List‌‌v.‌‌Ermita‌  ‌ collected.‌  ‌
government.‌  ‌
3. Usage‌  ‌among‌  ‌state‌s ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌when‌  ‌a ‌‌foreign‌‌   sovereign‌‌   enters‌‌ 
The‌‌  general‌‌
  rule‌‌
  barring‌‌
  delegation‌‌ of‌‌ legislative‌‌ powers‌‌ is‌‌ subject‌‌ to‌‌  Fulfilling‌‌
  both‌‌   requisites,‌‌
  petitioner‌‌ is,‌‌ and‌‌ ought‌‌ to‌‌ be,‌‌ subject‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  the‌  ‌territorial‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌of‌  ‌another,‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌implied‌‌ 
the‌‌following‌‌recognized‌‌limitations‌‌or‌e‌ xceptions‌: ‌ ‌ franchise‌  ‌tax‌  ‌in‌  ‌question.‌  ‌To‌  ‌stress,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌franchise‌  ‌tax‌  ‌is‌  ‌imposed‌‌  understanding‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌former‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌‌   intend‌‌   to‌‌
  degrade‌‌ 
1) Delegation‌‌   of‌‌
  tariff‌‌
  powers‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ President‌‌ under‌‌ Section‌‌ 28‌‌  based‌  ‌not‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌ownership‌  ‌but‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
its‌  ‌dignity‌  ‌by‌  ‌placing‌  ‌itself‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌of‌‌ 
(2)‌‌of‌‌Article‌‌VI‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Constitution;‌  ‌ corporation‌‌of‌‌a‌‌privilege‌‌to‌‌do‌‌business‌.  ‌‌ ‌
another.‌  ‌
2) Delegation‌  ‌of‌  ‌emergency‌  ‌powers‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌President‌  ‌under‌‌  Delegation‌‌to‌‌the‌‌President‌  ‌
Section‌‌23‌‌(2)‌‌of‌‌Article‌‌VI‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Constitution;‌  ‌ 5) S‌itus‌  ‌
The‌‌   authority‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ President,‌  ‌upon‌‌ the‌‌ recommendation‌‌ of‌‌ NEDA,‌‌ 
3) Delegation‌‌to‌‌the‌‌people‌‌at‌‌large;‌  ‌ GR‌:‌‌  ‌ axation‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌exercised‌  ‌only‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌‌
T   territorial‌‌ 
to‌  ‌fix‌  ‌tariff‌  ‌rates,‌  ‌import‌  ‌and‌‌
  export‌‌
  quotas,‌‌
  tonnage‌‌
  and‌‌
  wharfage‌‌ 
4) Delegation‌‌to‌‌local‌‌governments;‌‌and‌  ‌ jurisdiction‌‌of‌‌the‌‌taxing‌‌authority.‌‌   ‌
dues,‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌duties‌  ‌or‌  ‌imposts.‌  ‌[‌Sec‌  ‌28(2)‌  ‌Art‌  ‌VI,‌  ‌1987‌‌ 
5) Delegation‌‌to‌‌administrative‌‌bodies.‌  ‌ Constitution‌] ‌ ‌ EXC‌:‌‌  Where‌‌privity‌‌of‌‌relationship‌‌exists.‌‌   ‌

The‌‌
  case‌‌
  before‌‌  the‌‌ Court‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ a ‌‌delegation‌‌ of‌‌ legislative‌‌ power.‌‌ It‌‌ is‌‌  Delegation‌‌to‌‌Administrative‌‌Bodies‌  ‌
DIRECT‌‌CONSTITUTIONAL‌‌LIMITATIONS‌  ‌
simply‌  ‌a ‌ ‌delegation‌  ‌of‌  ‌ascertainment‌  ‌of‌  ‌facts‌  ‌upon‌  ‌which‌‌  1. Power‌‌to‌‌value‌‌property‌‌for‌‌purposes‌‌of‌‌taxation;‌  ‌  ‌

enforcement‌‌   and‌‌
  administration‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  increase‌‌   rate‌‌
  under‌‌
  the‌‌ law‌‌ is‌‌  1. Revenue‌‌bill‌‌must‌‌originate‌‌exclusively‌‌in‌‌the‌‌House‌‌of‌‌ 
contingent.‌‌   ‌ 2. Power‌‌to‌‌assess‌‌and‌‌collect‌‌taxes;‌  ‌
Representatives‌‌but‌‌the‌‌Senate‌‌may‌‌propose‌‌ 
3. Power‌  ‌to‌  ‌perform‌‌
  an‌‌
  innumerable‌‌
  details‌‌
  of‌‌
  computation,‌‌ 
It‌‌
  is‌‌
  the‌‌ ‌ministerial‌‌ duty‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ President‌‌ to‌‌ immediately‌‌ impose‌‌ the‌‌  amendments.‌‌(‌Sec‌‌24(4)‌‌Art‌‌VI‌) ‌ ‌
appraisal‌‌and‌‌adjustment.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 55‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

It‌‌is‌‌not‌‌the‌‌statute‌‌that‌‌must‌‌originate‌‌in‌‌the‌‌HREP‌‌but‌‌the‌‌bill.‌‌   ‌ 6. Exemption‌‌of‌‌non-stock,‌‌non-profit‌‌educational‌‌ 
Uniformity‌  ‌in‌  ‌taxation‌  ‌means‌  ‌that‌  ‌all‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌articles‌  ‌or‌  ‌kinds‌  ‌of‌‌ 
property‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌class‌‌   shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  taxed‌‌
  at‌‌
  the‌‌
  same‌‌
  rate.‌‌
  Different‌‌  institutions‌‌from‌‌taxation‌  ‌
Abakada‌‌Guro‌‌Party‌‌List‌‌v.‌‌Ermita‌  ‌ articles‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌taxed‌  ‌at‌  ‌different‌  ‌amounts‌  ‌provided‌  ‌that‌‌
  the‌‌
  rate‌‌
  is‌‌  a. Covers‌  ‌income,‌  ‌property,‌  ‌and‌  ‌donor‘s‌  ‌taxes,‌  ‌custom‌‌ 
uniform‌‌on‌‌the‌‌same‌‌class‌‌everywhere‌‌with‌‌all‌‌people‌‌at‌‌all‌‌times.‌  ‌ duties,‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌taxes‌‌  imposed‌‌   by‌‌
  either‌‌
  or‌‌
  both‌‌   the‌‌ 
Article‌  ‌VI,‌  ‌Section‌  ‌24‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌contain‌  ‌any‌‌ 
prohibition‌  ‌or‌  ‌limitation‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌   extent‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  amendments‌‌   that‌‌
  may‌‌  national‌‌   government‌‌   or‌‌
  political‌‌
  subdivisions‌‌   on‌‌
  ‌ALL‌‌ 
In‌  ‌this‌  ‌case,‌  ‌the‌  ‌tax‌  ‌law‌‌
  is‌‌
  uniform‌‌
  as‌‌
  it‌‌
  provides‌‌
  a ‌‌standard‌‌
  rate‌‌
  of‌‌ 
be‌‌introduced‌‌by‌‌the‌‌Senate‌‌to‌‌the‌‌House‌‌revenue‌‌bill.‌  ‌ 0%‌‌ or‌‌ 10%‌‌ (or‌‌ 12%)‌‌ on‌‌ all‌‌ goods‌‌ and‌‌ services.‌‌ ‌The‌‌ rule‌‌ of‌‌ uniform‌‌  revenues,‌‌ assets,‌‌ property‌‌ or‌‌ donations,‌‌ used‌‌ ‌actually,‌‌ 
taxation‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌deprive‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌classify‌‌  directly‌‌and‌‌exclusively‌‌for‌‌educational‌‌purposes‌.  ‌‌ ‌
Likewise,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌finds‌  ‌the‌  ‌sections‌  ‌referring‌  ‌to‌  ‌other‌‌
  percentage‌‌  subjects‌  ‌of‌  ‌taxation‌, ‌ ‌and‌  ‌only‌  ‌demands‌  ‌uniformity‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌‌  b. Does‌‌  not‌‌
  cover‌‌
  revenues‌‌  derived‌‌
  from,‌‌   or‌‌
  assets‌‌ used‌‌ 
and‌  ‌excise‌  ‌taxes‌  ‌germane‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌reforms‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌system‌, ‌ ‌as‌‌  particular‌‌class.‌  ‌
these‌‌sections‌‌would‌‌cushion‌‌the‌‌effects‌‌of‌‌VA‌T‌‌on‌‌consumers.‌  ‌ in,‌‌unrelated‌a‌ ctivities‌‌or‌‌enterprise.‌‌   ‌
Taxation‌  ‌is‌  ‌progressive‌  ‌when‌  ‌its‌  ‌rate‌  ‌goes‌  ‌up‌  ‌depending‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌  c. Lands,‌  ‌buildings,‌‌
  and‌‌
  improvements‌‌   actually,‌‌   directly‌‌ 
2. Concurrence‌‌of‌‌a‌‌majority‌‌of‌‌all‌‌the‌‌members‌‌of‌‌Congress‌‌  resources‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌person‌  ‌affected.‌  ‌The‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌antithesis‌  ‌of‌‌  and‌  ‌exclusively‌  ‌used‌  ‌for‌  ‌educational‌  ‌purposes‌  ‌are‌‌ 
for‌‌the‌‌passage‌‌of‌‌a‌‌law‌‌granting‌‌tax‌‌exemption‌(‌ ‌Sec‌‌28(4)‌‌  progressive‌‌taxation.‌‌By‌‌its‌‌very‌‌nature,‌‌it‌‌is‌‌regressive.‌  ‌ exempt‌‌   from‌‌
  property‌‌  tax‌‌
  (‌Sec‌‌
  28‌‌
  (3)‌‌
  Art‌‌ VI‌),‌‌ whether‌‌ 
Art‌‌VI‌) ‌ ‌ the‌‌educational‌‌institution‌‌is‌‌proprietary‌‌or‌‌non-profit.‌  ‌
Nevertheless,‌‌ the‌‌ Constitution‌‌ does‌‌ not‌‌ really‌‌ prohibit‌‌ the‌‌ imposition‌‌ 
Votes‌‌required‌‌   ‌ of‌  ‌indirect‌  ‌taxes,‌  ‌like‌  ‌the‌  ‌VAT.‌  ‌What‌  ‌it‌  ‌simply‌  ‌provides‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌‌  d. The‌‌test‌‌is‌u
‌ sage‌‌and‌‌not‌‌ownership.‌  ‌
a. For‌‌  the‌‌
  ‌GRANT‌‌
  ‌of‌‌ tax‌‌ exemption‌‌ — ‌‌‌absolute‌‌ ‌majority‌‌  Congress‌‌shall‌‌"e ‌ volve‌‌‌a‌‌progressive‌‌system‌‌of‌‌taxation."‌  ‌
e. Similar‌‌
  tax‌‌ exemptions‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌ extended‌‌ to‌‌ proprietary‌‌ 
of‌‌
  the‌‌  members‌‌  of‌‌   Congress‌‌
  (50+1‌‌
  of‌‌ all‌‌ the‌‌ members‌‌  educational‌  ‌institutions‌  ‌by‌  ‌law‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌such‌‌ 
5. Exemption‌‌of‌‌religious,‌‌charitable‌‌and‌‌educational‌‌ 
voting‌‌separately)‌  ‌ limitations‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌may‌  ‌provide,‌  ‌including‌  ‌restrictions‌‌ 
entities,‌‌nonprofit‌‌cemeteries,‌‌and‌‌churches‌‌from‌‌ 
b. For‌  ‌WITHDRAWAL‌  ‌of‌  ‌tax‌  ‌exemption‌  ‌— ‌ ‌relative‌‌  property‌‌taxation‌‌‌(‌Sec‌‌28(3)‌‌Art‌‌VI‌)‌  on‌‌dividends‌‌and‌‌provisions‌‌for‌‌reinvestment.‌  ‌
majority‌‌or‌‌majority‌‌of‌‌the‌‌quorum.‌  ‌ Requisites‌‌for‌‌the‌‌application‌‌of‌‌the‌1
‌ 0%‌‌preferential‌‌rate:‌‌   ‌
Important‌‌Principles‌  ‌
3. Rule‌‌of‌‌uniformity‌‌and‌‌equity‌‌in‌‌taxation‌  ‌ 1. It‌‌must‌‌be‌‌private‌; ‌ ‌
a. The‌  ‌tax‌  ‌exemption‌  ‌of‌  ‌religious,‌  ‌charitable‌  ‌and‌‌ 
Valid‌‌Classification‌  educational‌  ‌institutions‌  ‌covers‌  ‌real‌  ‌property‌  ‌tax‌‌  2. It‌‌has‌‌permit‌‌to‌‌operate‌‌as‌‌an‌‌educational‌‌institution;‌  ‌
a. It‌  ‌is‌  ‌based‌  ‌upon‌  ‌substantial‌  ‌distinctions‌  ‌which‌‌  only.‌  ‌ 3. It‌‌is‌‌non-profit‌;‌‌AND‌  ‌
make‌‌real‌‌differences;‌  ‌ b. The‌  ‌test‌  ‌is‌  ‌usage‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌ownership.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Actual‌, ‌‌ 4. Its‌  ‌gross‌  ‌income‌  ‌from‌  ‌unrelated‌  ‌trade‌  ‌or‌  ‌business‌‌ 
b. These‌  ‌are‌  ‌germane‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  legislation‌‌  direct‌, ‌‌and‌‌  ‌exclusive‌‌  ‌use‌‌
  for‌‌ religious,‌‌ charitable‌‌ and‌‌  must‌‌   not‌‌
  exceed‌‌
  50%‌‌   ‌of‌‌
  its‌‌
  total‌‌
  gross‌‌
  income‌‌ from‌‌ 
or‌‌ordinance;‌  ‌ educational‌‌purposes.‌  ‌ all‌‌sources,‌‌   ‌
c. Applies,‌  ‌not‌  ‌only‌  ‌to‌  ‌present‌  ‌conditions,‌  ‌but,‌  ‌also,‌  ‌to‌‌  c. The‌  ‌exemption‌  ‌extends‌  ‌to‌  ‌facilities‌  ‌which‌  a‌ re‌‌  otherwise,‌  ‌it‌  ‌will‌‌
  be‌‌
  subject‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌30%‌‌
  corporate‌‌
  income‌‌
  tax‌‌ 
future‌  ‌conditions‌  ‌substantially‌  ‌identical‌  ‌to‌‌   those‌‌   of‌‌  incidental‌  ‌to‌  ‌or‌  ‌reasonably‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌  rate.‌  ‌
the‌‌present;‌  ‌ accomplishment‌‌of‌‌said‌‌purpose.‌‌   ‌
The‌‌10%‌‌preferential‌‌tax‌‌rate‌d
‌ oes‌‌not‌‌apply‌t‌ o‌‌the‌‌following:‌‌   ‌
d. Applies‌  ‌equally‌  ‌to‌  ‌all‌  ‌those‌  ‌who‌‌
  belong‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  same‌‌  Scope‌  ‌of‌  ‌exemption.‌  ‌Real‌  ‌property‌  ‌taxes‌  ‌on‌  ‌facilities‌  ‌which‌‌ 
a. The‌  ‌passive‌  ‌income‌  ‌derived‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌educational‌‌ 
class.‌  ‌ are:‌‌   ‌
institution,‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌final‌  ‌income‌  ‌tax,‌  ‌i.e.‌‌ 
4. Progressive‌‌system‌‌of‌‌taxation‌  ‌ a. Actual;‌  ‌ rent‌‌income‌‌or‌‌interest‌‌in‌‌income;‌  ‌
b. Incidental;‌  ‌ b. Engaged‌  ‌in‌  ‌unrelated‌  ‌trade‌  ‌or‌  ‌business‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌‌ 
Abakada‌‌Guro‌‌Party‌‌List‌‌v.‌‌Ermita‌  ‌
c. Reasonably‌‌   necessary‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  accomplishment‌‌
  of‌‌ said‌‌  activity‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌gross‌  ‌income‌  ‌from‌  ‌such‌  ‌exceeds‌‌ 
purpose.‌  ‌ 50%‌‌of‌‌the‌‌total‌‌gross‌‌income.‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 56‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

CIR‌‌v.‌‌CTA,‌‌Manila‌‌Golf‌‌&‌‌Country‌‌Club‌  ‌
When‌  ‌a ‌ ‌non-stock,‌  ‌non-profit‌  ‌educational‌  ‌institution‌  ‌proves‌  ‌that‌  ‌it‌‌  The‌  ‌Supreme‌  ‌Court‌  ‌shall‌  ‌have‌  ‌the‌  ‌following‌  ‌powers:‌  ‌(2)‌‌ 
uses‌  ‌its‌  ‌revenues‌  ‌actually,‌  ‌directly,‌  ‌and‌‌   exclusively‌‌   for‌‌
  educational‌‌  Review,‌‌   revise,‌‌   modify‌‌   or‌‌
  affirm‌‌
  on‌‌
  appeal‌‌   or‌‌ certiorari,‌‌ as‌‌ the‌‌  An‌  ‌“item”‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌revenue‌  ‌bill‌  ‌does‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌refer‌  ‌to‌  ‌an‌  ‌entire‌‌ 
purposes,‌‌   it‌‌
  shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  ‌exempted‌‌   from‌‌ income‌‌ tax,‌‌ VAT,‌‌ and‌‌ LBT.‌‌ ‌On‌‌  laws‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌Rules‌  ‌of‌  ‌Court‌  ‌may‌  ‌provide,‌  ‌final‌  ‌judgments‌  ‌and‌‌ 
section‌  ‌imposing‌‌ a ‌‌particular‌‌ kind‌‌ of‌‌ tax,‌‌ but‌‌ rather‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ subject‌‌ of‌‌ 
the‌‌
  other‌‌   hand,‌‌   when‌‌   it‌‌
  also‌‌
  shows‌‌   that‌‌ it‌‌ uses‌‌ its‌‌ ‌assets‌‌ ‌in‌‌ the‌‌ form‌‌  orders‌  ‌of‌  ‌lower‌  ‌courts‌  ‌in‌  ‌xxx‌  ‌(b)‌  ‌all‌  ‌cases‌  ‌involving‌  ‌the‌ 
the‌‌
  tax‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ tax‌‌ rate.‌  ‌In‌‌ the‌‌ portion‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌revenue‌‌ bill‌‌ which‌‌ actually‌‌ 
of‌‌
  real‌‌ property‌‌ for‌‌ educational‌‌ purposes,‌‌ it‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ ‌exempted‌‌ from‌‌  legality‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌tax,‌  ‌impost,‌  ‌assessment‌  ‌or‌  ‌toll‌  ‌or‌  ‌any‌‌ 
imposes‌‌   a ‌‌tax,‌‌ a ‌‌section‌‌ identifies‌‌ the‌‌ tax‌‌ and‌‌ enumerates‌‌ the‌‌ persons‌‌ 
RPT.‌  ‌ penalty‌‌imposed‌‌in‌‌relation‌‌thereto‌. ‌ ‌
liable‌‌therefor‌‌with‌‌the‌‌corresponding‌‌tax‌‌rate.‌‌   ‌
The‌‌
  crucial‌‌ point‌‌ of‌‌ inquiry‌‌ then‌‌ is‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ ‌use‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ assets‌‌ or‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌  9. Prohibition‌‌on‌‌the‌‌use‌‌of‌‌special‌‌fund‌(‌ ‌Sec‌‌29(3)‌‌Art‌‌VI‌)  ‌‌ ‌ To‌‌
  construe‌‌   the‌‌
  word‌‌
  “item”‌‌   as‌‌
  referring‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  whole‌‌
  section‌‌ would‌‌ 
use‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌revenues‌. ‌ ‌So‌  ‌long‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌assets‌  ‌or‌  ‌revenues‌  ‌are‌  ‌used‌‌ 
All‌  ‌money‌  ‌collected‌  ‌on‌  ‌any‌  ‌tax‌  ‌levied‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌special‌  ‌purpose‌‌  tie‌  ‌the‌  ‌President’s‌  ‌hand‌  ‌in‌  ‌choosing‌  ‌either‌  ‌to‌  ‌approve‌  ‌the‌  ‌whole‌‌ 
actually,‌  ‌directly‌  ‌and‌  ‌exclusively‌  ‌for‌  ‌educational‌  ‌purposes‌, ‌‌they‌‌   are‌‌ 
shall‌‌  be‌‌   treated‌‌  as‌‌
  a ‌‌special‌‌ fund‌‌ and‌‌ paid‌‌ out‌‌ for‌‌ such‌‌ purpose‌‌  section‌‌   at‌‌
  the‌‌  expense‌‌ of‌‌ also‌‌ approving‌‌ a ‌‌provision‌‌ therein‌‌ which‌‌ he‌‌ 
exempt‌‌from‌‌duties‌‌and‌‌taxes.‌  ‌
only.‌  ‌If‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌for‌  ‌which‌  ‌a ‌ ‌special‌  ‌fund‌‌  was‌‌  created‌‌
  has‌‌  deems‌  ‌unacceptable‌  ‌or‌  ‌veto‌  ‌the‌  ‌entire‌  ‌section‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌expense‌  ‌of‌‌ 
The‌  ‌tax‌  ‌exemption‌  ‌granted‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌Constitution‌  ‌to‌  ‌non-stock,‌‌  been‌  ‌fulfilled‌  ‌or‌  ‌abandoned,‌  ‌the‌  ‌balance,‌  ‌if‌  ‌any,‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌  foregoing‌‌the‌‌collection‌‌of‌‌the‌‌kind‌‌of‌‌tax‌‌altogether.‌  ‌
non-profit‌  ‌educational‌  ‌institutions,‌  ‌unlike‌  ‌the‌  ‌exemption‌‌   that‌‌  transferred‌‌to‌‌the‌‌general‌‌funds‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Government.‌  ‌  ‌

may‌‌ be‌‌ availed‌‌ of‌‌ by‌‌ proprietary‌‌ educational‌‌ institutions,‌‌ is‌‌ ‌not‌‌ 
INDIRECT‌‌CONSTITUTIONAL‌‌LIMITATIONS‌  ‌
subject‌‌to‌‌limitations‌‌imposed‌‌by‌‌law.‌(‌ C ‌ IR‌‌v.‌‌DLSU‌‌‌2016)‌  ‌ PKSMMN,‌‌et‌‌al.‌‌v.‌‌Executive‌‌Secretary,‌‌et‌‌al.‌‌2
‌ 012‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌  ‌

 ‌

1) Due‌‌process‌‌of‌‌law‌  ‌
Coco-levy‌  ‌funds‌‌   are‌‌   not‌‌
  only‌‌  affected‌‌
  with‌‌   public‌‌
  interest;‌‌   they‌‌  are,‌‌ 
Summary‌‌for‌‌Charitable,‌‌Religious‌‌and‌‌Educational‌‌Entities‌  ‌
in‌  ‌fact,‌  ‌prima‌  ‌faci‌e ‌ ‌public‌‌   funds‌. ‌‌They‌‌
  were‌‌   raised‌‌  with‌‌   the‌‌  use‌‌  of‌‌  a. The‌  ‌validity‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌statute‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌contested‌  ‌only‌  ‌by‌  ‌one‌‌ 
Non-Stock,‌‌Non-Profit‌‌  the‌‌   police‌‌ and‌‌ taxing‌‌ powers‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ State‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ benefit‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ coconut‌‌  who‌  ‌sustained‌  ‌or‌  ‌stands‌  ‌to‌  ‌sustain‌  ‌direct‌  ‌injury‌  ‌in‌‌ 
 ‌ Charitable‌‌or‌‌Religious‌  ‌
Educational‌  ‌ industry‌‌and‌‌its‌‌farmers‌‌in‌‌general.‌‌   ‌ consequence‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌performance‌  ‌EXC‌: ‌ ‌Transcendental‌‌ 
importance,‌‌taxpayer‘s‌‌suit.‌  ‌
Real‌‌  E.O.‌  ‌313‌  ‌runs‌  ‌counter‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌constitutional‌‌   provision‌‌   which‌‌
  directs‌‌ 
Exempt‌‌from‌‌RPT‌‌If‌‌used‌‌ADE‌‌for‌‌intended‌‌purpose.‌  ‌ 2) Equal‌‌protection‌‌of‌‌the‌‌laws‌  ‌
Property‌  ‌
that‌‌  all‌‌
  money‌‌   collected‌‌   on‌‌
  any‌‌  tax‌‌ levied‌‌ for‌‌ a ‌‌special‌‌ purpose‌‌ shall‌‌ 
a. All‌‌
  persons,‌‌   businesses,‌‌   and‌‌
  properties‌‌   should‌‌  be‌‌  taxed‌‌ at‌‌ 
Income‌  ‌ Exempt‌‌from‌‌Income‌‌Tax‌  ‌ be‌  ‌treated‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌special‌  ‌fund‌  ‌and‌  ‌paid‌  ‌out‌  ‌for‌  ‌such‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌only.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌same‌  ‌rate,‌  ‌so‌  ‌long‌  ‌as‌  ‌they‌  ‌belong‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌‌ 
Assisting‌  ‌other‌  ‌agriculturally-related‌  ‌programs‌  ‌is‌  ‌way‌  ‌off‌  ‌the‌‌ 
classification.‌ ‌Equality‌‌among‌‌equals.‌‌   ‌
Revenues‌‌from‌‌properties‌‌  coco-fund’s‌  ‌objective‌  ‌of‌  ‌promoting‌  ‌the‌  ‌general‌  ‌interests‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Income‌‌from‌‌properties‌‌ 
Income‌‌  or‌‌activities‌‌conducted‌‌  coconut‌‌industry‌‌and‌‌its‌‌farmers.‌  ‌ b. Does‌‌not‌‌require‌‌territorial‌‌uniformity‌‌of‌‌laws.‌(‌ Tiu‌‌v‌‌CA)‌  ‌
or‌‌activities‌‌conducted‌‌ 
from‌‌  FOR‌p ‌ rofit‌‌that‌‌are‌‌ADE‌‌ 
FOR‌‌profit‌‌are‌t‌ axable‌‌  TESTS‌‌TO‌‌DETERMINE‌‌VALID‌‌CLASSIFICATION‌‌   ‌
Property‌  ‌ for‌‌educational‌‌purposes‌‌  10. Power‌‌of‌‌the‌‌President‌‌to‌‌veto‌‌any‌‌particular‌‌items‌‌in‌‌a ‌‌
regardless‌‌of‌‌disposition‌  ‌
are‌‌t‌ ax-exempt.‌  ‌ 1. Compelling‌  ‌State‌  ‌Interest‌  ‌Test‌  ‌– ‌ ‌State‌  ‌balances‌‌   the‌‌ 
revenue‌‌or‌‌tariff‌‌bill‌  ‌
public‌  ‌interest‌‌   against‌‌
  religious‌‌
  freedom.‌‌   The‌‌
  need‌‌   to‌‌ 
7. Non-imprisonment‌‌for‌‌non-payment‌‌of‌‌a‌‌poll‌‌tax‌(‌ ‌Sec‌‌20‌‌  GR‌: ‌ ‌ The‌‌ President‌‌ has‌‌ to‌‌ approve‌‌ or‌‌ disapprove‌‌ a ‌‌bill‌‌ in‌‌ its‌‌  advance‌  ‌the‌  ‌constitution‌  ‌and‌  ‌public‌  ‌interest.‌  ‌In‌  ‌case‌‌ 
Art‌‌III‌) ‌ ‌ entirety.‌‌   ‌ there‌  ‌are‌  ‌less‌  ‌restrictive‌  ‌means‌  ‌to‌  ‌advance‌  ‌a ‌ ‌right‌‌ 
Poll‌  ‌tax‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌tax‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌fixed‌  ‌amount‌  ‌fixed‌  ‌on‌  ‌persons‌  ‌residing‌‌  EXC‌‌  ‌where‌‌partial‌‌or‌‌item‌‌veto‌‌is‌‌allowed‌  ‌ under‌‌the‌‌constitution.‌  ‌
within‌  ‌a ‌ ‌specified‌  ‌territory,‌  ‌whether‌  ‌resident‌  ‌or‌  ‌not,‌  ‌without‌‌  2. Rational‌  ‌Basis‌‌   Test‌‌  – ‌‌The‌‌   classification‌‌
  is‌‌
  valid‌‌
  if‌‌
  it‌‌ 
regard‌‌   to‌‌
  their‌‌   property‌‌   or‌‌ the‌‌ occupation‌‌ of‌‌ business‌‌ in‌‌ which‌‌  a. A‌ppropriation‌‌bill;‌  ‌
is‌  ‌rationally‌  ‌related‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌constitutionally‌‌
  permissible‌‌ 
they‌‌may‌‌be‌‌engaged.‌  ‌ b. R‌evenue‌‌bill;‌  ‌ state‌‌interest.‌ ‌e.g.‌‌Senior‌‌Citizens‌‌Act‌‌   ‌
8. Non-impairment‌‌of‌‌the‌‌jurisdiction‌‌of‌‌the‌‌SC‌‌in‌‌tax‌‌cases‌‌  c. T‌ariff‌‌bill.‌  ‌ 3. Quasi-Suspect‌  ‌Case‌  ‌– ‌ ‌Available‌  ‌if‌  ‌needed.‌  ‌Based‌‌
  on‌‌ 
(‌Sec‌‌5(2)‌‌Art‌‌VIII‌)  ‌‌ ‌ gender/legitimacy.‌  ‌It‌  ‌points‌  ‌out‌  ‌a ‌ ‌specific‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 57‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

constitutionally‌  ‌granted‌  ‌state‌  ‌interest‌  s‌ uch‌  ‌as‌‌  GR:‌ ‌ o‌  ‌appropriation‌  ‌is‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌in‌  ‌favor‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌sect,‌‌  a.‌‌Income‌‌Tax‌‌Systems‌  ‌
N
protection‌  ‌of‌  ‌women‌  ‌where‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  a‌  ‌ ‌valid‌‌  church,‌‌or‌‌any‌‌priest,‌‌minister,‌‌etc.‌‌   ‌ a) Schedular‌  ‌— ‌ ‌The‌  ‌items‌  ‌are‌  ‌classified‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌kind‌  ‌or‌‌ 
classification‌‌between‌‌men‌‌and‌‌women.‌‌   ‌ EXC‌:‌‌  When‌  ‌such‌  ‌priest‌  ‌is‌  ‌assigned‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌armed‌  ‌forces,‌‌  category‌  ‌of‌  ‌income‌  ‌and‌  ‌this‌  ‌is‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌different‌  ‌tax‌  ‌rates‌‌ 
3) Non-impairment‌‌of‌‌the‌‌obligations‌‌of‌‌contracts‌  ‌ penal‌  ‌institution‌  ‌or‌  ‌government‌  ‌orphanage‌  ‌or‌‌  based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌income‌‌classification.‌‌   ‌
a. If‌  ‌the‌  ‌exemption‌  ‌was‌  ‌granted‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌valuable‌‌  leprosarium.‌  ‌ b) Global‌  ‌— ‌ ‌lump‌  ‌all‌  ‌items‌  ‌of‌  ‌income‌  ‌and‌  ‌a ‌ ‌single/‌‌ 
consideration‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌basis‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌contract‌  ‌– ‌ ‌it‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌‌  6) Non-infringement‌‌of‌‌the‌‌freedom‌‌of‌‌the‌‌press‌  ‌ proportional/uniform‌‌income‌‌tax‌‌rate‌‌is‌‌imposed.‌‌   ‌
revoked‌  ‌by‌  ‌passing‌  ‌another‌  ‌law.‌  ‌The‌  ‌non-impairment‌‌  There‌  ‌is‌‌
  curtailment‌‌   of‌‌
  press‌‌  freedom‌‌   and‌‌  freedom‌‌
  of‌‌
  thought‌‌  c) Mixed‌  ‌(‌applicable‌  ‌in‌  ‌PH)‌  ‌— ‌ ‌it‌‌  is‌‌
  schedular‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  sense‌‌   that‌‌ 
clause‌‌applies‌. ‌ ‌ and‌‌
  expression‌‌   if‌‌
  a ‌‌tax‌‌
  is‌‌
  levied‌‌  in‌‌ order‌‌ to‌‌ suppress‌‌ this‌‌ basic‌‌  we‌  ‌lump‌‌  different‌‌  items‌‌  of‌‌
  income‌‌   per‌‌
  type‌‌  or‌‌   category‌‌  and‌‌   it‌‌ 
b. If‌‌
  the‌‌
  exemption‌‌ is‌‌ granted‌‌ by‌‌ virtue‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌‌contract‌‌ ‌between‌‌  right‌‌and‌‌impose‌‌prior‌‌restraint.‌‌   ‌ is‌‌
  global‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  sense‌‌  that‌‌
  we‌‌  subject‌‌  all‌‌ the‌‌ items‌‌ in‌‌ this‌‌ lump‌‌ 
a‌  ‌private‌  ‌corporation‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌  ‌– ‌ ‌it‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌‌  to‌‌one‌‌tax‌‌rate.‌  ‌
revoked‌  ‌unilaterally‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌government.‌  ‌The‌‌  CREBA‌‌v.‌‌Romulo‌‌2
‌ 010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
b.‌‌Features‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippine‌‌Income‌‌tax‌‌law‌  ‌
non-impairment‌‌clause‌‌applies‌. ‌ ‌  ‌

Certainly,‌  ‌an‌  ‌income‌‌   tax‌‌


  is‌‌
  arbitrary‌‌   and‌‌  confiscatory‌‌   if‌‌
  it‌‌
  taxes‌‌ 
c. If‌  ‌the‌  ‌basis‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌tax‌  ‌exemption‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌mere‌  ‌franchise‌‌  capital‌  ‌because‌  ‌capital‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌‌  income.‌‌   In‌‌
  other‌‌
  words,‌‌
  it‌‌
  is‌‌
  income,‌‌  Feature‌  ‌ Individual‌  ‌ Corporate‌  ‌
granted‌  ‌by‌‌ Congress‌‌ – ‌‌it‌‌ can‌‌ be‌‌ unilaterally‌‌ revoked‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌  not‌‌
  capital,‌‌
  which‌‌  is‌‌
  subject‌‌   to‌‌ income‌‌ tax.‌‌ However,‌‌ the‌‌ ‌MCIT‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ 
government.‌‌NIC‌d ‌ oes‌‌not‌‌apply.‌  ‌ a‌‌tax‌‌on‌‌capital‌. ‌ ‌ Schedular‌  ‌ Global‌  ‌
1) It‌‌classifies‌‌income;‌  ‌ 1) Generally‌‌provides‌‌ 
4) Non-infringement‌‌of‌‌religious‌‌freedom‌  ‌ The‌  ‌MCIT‌  ‌is‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌on‌  ‌gross‌  ‌income‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌arrived‌  ‌at‌  ‌by‌‌  2) Provides‌‌for‌‌  for‌‌uniform‌‌rules;‌  ‌
The‌‌   free‌‌
  exercise‌‌   of‌‌
  religion‌‌  clause,‌‌   however,‌‌ does‌‌ not‌‌ prohibit‌‌  deducting‌‌   the‌‌
  capital‌‌  spent‌‌  by‌‌  a ‌‌corporation‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  sale‌‌
  of‌‌
  its‌‌
  goods,‌‌  Tax‌‌ 
different‌‌tax‌‌rules;‌  ‌ 2) Generally‌‌imposes‌‌ 
i.e.,‌  ‌the‌  ‌cost‌  ‌of‌  ‌goods‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌direct‌  ‌expenses‌  ‌from‌  ‌gross‌  ‌sales.‌‌  Treatment‌  ‌
imposing‌  ‌a ‌ ‌generally‌  ‌applicable‌  ‌sales‌  ‌tax‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌sale‌  ‌of‌‌  3) Imposes‌‌different‌‌  uniform‌‌tax‌‌rate;‌  ‌
Clearly,‌‌the‌c‌ apital‌‌is‌‌not‌‌being‌‌taxed‌. ‌ ‌
religious‌  ‌materials‌  ‌by‌  ‌religious‌  ‌organizations.‌  ‌The‌  ‌sale‌  ‌of‌‌  tax‌‌rates.‌  ‌ 3) Does‌‌not‌g‌ enerally‌‌ 
religious‌‌   articles‌‌  can‌‌  be‌‌
  subject‌‌   to‌‌ VAT,‌‌ what‌‌ cannot‌‌ be‌‌ taxed‌‌ is‌‌  No‌‌violation‌‌of‌‌Equal‌‌Protection‌  ‌ classify‌‌income.‌  ‌
the‌‌
  exercise‌‌   of‌‌
  religious‌‌   worship‌‌   or‌‌
  activity.‌‌ The‌‌ income‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
priest‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌religious‌  ‌activity‌  ‌cannot‌‌   also‌‌   be‌‌  The‌  ‌taxing‌  ‌power‌  ‌has‌  ‌the‌  ‌authority‌  ‌to‌  ‌make‌  ‌reasonable‌‌  1) RC;‌  ‌ 1) DC;‌  ‌
classifications‌  ‌for‌  ‌purposes‌  ‌of‌  ‌taxation.‌  ‌Inequalities‌  ‌which‌  ‌result‌‌ 
taxed.‌‌(T ‌ olentino‌‌v.‌‌SOF)‌  ‌ Net‌‌Income‌‌  2) NRC;‌  ‌ 2) RFC.‌  ‌
from‌‌  a ‌‌singling‌‌   out‌‌
  of‌‌
  one‌‌
  particular‌‌ class‌‌ for‌‌ taxation,‌‌ or‌‌ exemption,‌‌ 
Taxation‌  ‌ 3) RA;‌  ‌
infringe‌‌   no‌‌  constitutional‌‌ limitation.‌‌ ‌The‌‌ real‌‌ estate‌‌ industry‌‌ is‌, ‌‌by‌‌ 
American‌‌Bible‌‌Society‌‌v.‌‌City‌‌of‌‌Manila‌  ‌ 4) NRA-ETB.‌  ‌
itself,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌class‌  ‌and‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌validly‌  ‌treated‌‌  differently‌‌   from‌‌  other‌‌ 
We‌  ‌believe‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌of‌  ‌City‌  ‌of‌  ‌Manila‌  ‌Ordinance‌  ‌No.‌‌  business‌‌enterprises‌. ‌ ‌
Gross‌‌Income‌‌  NRA-NETB‌  ‌ NRFC‌  ‌
2529,‌  ‌as‌‌   amended,‌‌   cannot‌‌   be‌‌
  applied‌‌   to‌‌
  appellant,‌‌   ‌for‌‌  in‌‌
  doing‌‌  Taxation‌  ‌
so‌  ‌it‌  ‌would‌  ‌impair‌  ‌its‌  ‌free‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌and‌  ‌enjoyment‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌religious‌‌  2. Income‌‌Tax‌  ‌
profession‌  ‌and‌  ‌worship‌  ‌as‌  ‌well‌  ‌as‌  ‌its‌  ‌rights‌  ‌of‌  ‌dissemination‌  ‌of‌‌   ‌ 1) Residence‌‌—‌‌RA,‌‌  1) Residence‌‌—‌‌RFC;‌  ‌
religious‌‌beliefs.‌  ‌
1.‌‌Definition,‌‌Nature,‌‌and‌‌General‌‌Principles‌  ‌ RC;‌  ‌ 2) Place‌‌—‌‌NRFC;‌  ‌
Situs‌  ‌
With‌‌   respect‌‌   to‌‌
  Ordinance‌‌   No.‌‌   3000,‌‌ as‌‌ amended,‌‌ which‌‌ requires‌‌ the‌‌  2) Place‌‌—‌‌NRA,‌‌NRC;‌  ‌ 3) Nationality‌‌—‌‌DC.‌  ‌
obtention‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Mayor's‌  ‌permit‌‌   before‌‌
  any‌‌  person‌‌
  can‌‌
  engage‌‌   in‌‌  INCOME‌‌   TAX‌‌
  ‌is‌‌
  a ‌‌direct‌‌
  tax‌‌
  on‌‌
  all‌‌
  yearly‌‌
  profits‌‌
  arising‌‌  from‌‌
  property,‌‌  3) Citizenship‌‌—‌‌RC.‌  ‌
any‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  businesses,‌‌   trades‌‌   or‌‌   occupations‌‌ enumerated‌‌ therein,‌‌ We‌‌  professions,‌  ‌trades‌  ‌or‌  ‌offices‌  ‌or‌  ‌a ‌ ‌tax‌  ‌on‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person's‌  ‌income,‌‌ 
do‌‌
  not‌‌  find‌‌
  that‌‌
  it‌‌
  imposes‌‌   any‌‌   charge‌‌   upon‌‌  the‌‌
  enjoyment‌‌  of‌‌ a ‌‌right‌‌  emoluments,‌‌profits,‌‌and‌‌the‌‌like.‌‌   ‌ Common‌‌Features‌  ‌
granted‌‌by‌‌the‌‌Constitution,‌‌nor‌‌tax‌‌the‌‌exercise‌‌of‌‌religious‌‌practices.‌  ‌
1) Pay‌‌as‌‌you‌‌file‌‌system.‌‌—  ‌‌ ‌
5) No‌‌appropriation‌‌for‌‌religious‌‌purposes‌  ‌
a) Individuals‌‌—‌‌upon‌‌filing‌‌of‌‌ITRs;‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 58‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

taxable‌  ‌only‌  ‌on‌  ‌income‌  ‌derived‌  ‌from‌  ‌sources‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌‌  f.‌‌Kinds‌‌of‌‌taxpayers‌  ‌
b) Corporations‌  ‌— ‌ ‌upon‌  ‌filing‌  ‌of‌  ‌quarterly‌  ‌corporate‌‌ 
Philippines:‌‌   ‌
ITRs‌‌and‌‌final‌‌adjustment‌‌corporate‌‌returns;‌  ‌
Provided‌, ‌‌That‌‌  a ‌‌seaman‌‌ who‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌citizen‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Philippines‌‌ and‌‌ 
2) Creditable‌‌Withholding‌‌Tax‌‌System‌  ‌
who‌  ‌receives‌  ‌compensation‌  ‌for‌‌   services‌‌   rendered‌‌   abroad‌‌
  as‌‌
  a ‌‌
a) Withholding‌  ‌agent‌  ‌— ‌‌withholds‌‌
  tax‌‌
  and‌‌
  remits‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌  member‌  ‌of‌‌  the‌‌
  complement‌‌   of‌‌  a ‌‌vessel‌‌
  engaged‌‌   exclusively‌‌  in‌‌ 
BIR;‌  ‌ international‌  ‌trade‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌treated‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌  ‌overseas‌  ‌contract‌‌ 
worker;‌  ‌
b) Tax‌‌withheld‌‌—‌‌creditable‌‌against‌‌income‌‌tax‌‌due.‌  ‌
d) An‌  ‌alien‌  ‌individual,‌  ‌whether‌  ‌a ‌ ‌resident‌  ‌or‌  ‌not‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
3) Final‌‌Withholding‌‌Tax‌‌System‌  ‌ Philippines,‌  ‌is‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌only‌  ‌on‌  ‌income‌  ‌derived‌  ‌from‌  ‌sources‌‌ 
a) Withholding‌  ‌agent‌  ‌— ‌‌withholds‌‌
  tax‌‌
  and‌‌
  remits‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌  within‌‌the‌‌Philippines;‌  ‌
BIR;‌  ‌ e) A‌‌
  ‌domestic‌‌
  corporation‌‌ ‌is‌‌ taxable‌‌ on‌‌ all‌‌ income‌‌ derived‌‌ from‌‌ 
b) Tax‌‌
  withheld‌‌
  — ‌‌final‌‌
  settlement‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  tax‌‌
  liability‌‌ on‌‌  sources‌‌within‌‌and‌‌without‌‌the‌‌Philippines;‌‌and‌  ‌
 
the‌‌income‌‌covered.‌  ‌ f) A‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌corporation‌, ‌ ‌whether‌  ‌engaged‌  ‌or‌  ‌not‌  ‌in‌  ‌trade‌  ‌or‌‌   ‌

business‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  Philippines,‌‌
  is‌‌
  taxable‌‌
  only‌‌
  on‌‌
  income‌‌ derived‌‌   ‌ ‌Within‌‌and‌‌Without‌  ‌  ‌ ‌Within‌  ‌   ‌ ‌Final‌‌Tax‌‌Rate‌‌of‌‌25%‌‌within‌  ‌
c.‌‌Criteria‌‌in‌‌imposing‌‌Philippine‌‌income‌‌tax‌  ‌
from‌‌sources‌‌within‌‌the‌‌Philippines.‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌23‌) ‌ ‌  ‌
1. Citizenship‌  ‌or‌  ‌Nationality‌  ‌Principle‌  ‌— ‌ ‌a ‌ ‌citizen‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  RESIDENT‌‌CITIZEN‌  ‌
In‌  ‌short…‌  ‌Only‌  ‌RESIDENT‌  ‌CITIZENS‌  ‌and‌  ‌DOMESTIC‌‌   CORPORATIONS‌‌ 
Philippines‌‌is‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌Philippine‌‌income‌‌tax‌‌   ‌
are‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌on‌  ‌income‌  ‌derived‌  ‌from‌  ‌ALL‌  ‌sources.‌  ‌All‌  ‌others‌  ‌are‌  ‌only‌‌ 
1) Those‌  ‌who‌  ‌are‌  ‌citizens‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
a. On‌‌  his‌‌
  worldwide‌‌
  income,‌‌
  if‌‌
  he‌‌
  resides‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ Philippines,‌‌  taxable‌‌on‌‌income‌‌derived‌‌from‌‌sources‌‌within‌‌PH.‌  ‌
adoption‌‌of‌‌this‌‌Constitution;‌  ‌
or‌  ‌
e.‌‌Types‌‌of‌‌Philippine‌‌income‌‌taxes‌  ‌ 2) Those‌‌whose‌‌fathers‌‌or‌‌mothers‌‌are‌‌citizens‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines;‌  ‌
b. Only‌  ‌on‌  ‌his‌‌
  Philippine-source‌‌
  income,‌‌   if‌‌
  he‌‌
  qualifies‌‌
  as‌‌
  a ‌‌
1. Personal‌‌Income‌‌Tax‌‌on‌‌Individuals‌‌(S‌ ecs‌‌24-25‌);‌  ‌ 3) Those‌‌   born‌‌
  before‌‌
  January‌‌
  17,‌‌
  1973,‌‌  of‌‌
  Filipino‌‌   mothers,‌‌  who‌‌ 
non-resident‌  ‌citizen;‌  ‌hence,‌  ‌his‌  ‌foreign-source‌  ‌income‌‌ 
shall‌‌be‌‌exempt.‌  ‌ 2. Regular‌‌Corporate‌‌Income‌‌Tax‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌27[A]‌);‌  ‌ elect‌  ‌Philippine‌  ‌citizenship‌‌  upon‌‌  reaching‌‌   the‌‌
  age‌‌
  of‌‌
  majority;‌‌ 
3. Minimum‌‌Corporate‌‌Income‌‌Tax‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌27[E]‌);‌  ‌ and‌‌   ‌
2. Residence‌  ‌or‌  ‌Domicile‌  ‌Principle‌  ‌— ‌ ‌an‌  ‌alien‌  ‌is‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌‌ 
income‌‌tax‌‌because‌‌of‌‌his‌‌residence‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Philippines.‌‌   ‌ 4) Those‌‌who‌‌are‌‌naturalized‌‌in‌‌accordance‌‌with‌‌law.‌‌   ‌
4. Capital‌‌Gains‌‌Tax;‌  ‌
3. Source‌  ‌of‌  ‌Income‌  ‌Principle‌  ‌— ‌ ‌an‌  ‌alien‌  ‌is‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌‌  5. Tax‌‌on‌‌passive‌‌investment‌‌income;‌  ‌ A‌  ‌Resident‌  ‌Citizen‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Filipino‌‌
  citizen‌‌
  who‌‌
  stayed‌‌
  permanently‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌ 
Philippine‌‌
  income‌‌  tax‌‌ because‌‌ he‌‌ derives‌‌ income‌‌ from‌‌ sources‌‌  Philippines‌‌   or‌‌
  stayed‌‌  ‌outside‌‌ the‌‌ Philippines‌‌ for‌‌ less‌‌ than‌‌ 183‌‌ days‌‌ 
6. Fringe‌‌Benefits‌‌Tax‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌33‌);‌  ‌
within‌‌the‌‌Philippines.‌  ‌ during‌‌the‌‌taxable‌‌year.‌‌   ‌
7. Branch‌‌Profit‌‌Remittance‌‌Tax‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌27‌);‌  ‌
d.‌‌General‌‌principles‌‌of‌‌income‌‌taxation‌  ‌ NON-RESIDENT‌‌CITIZEN‌  ‌
8. Improperly‌‌Accumulated‌‌Earnings‌‌Tax‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌29‌);‌‌and‌  ‌
a) A‌‌
  ‌citizen‌‌
  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Philippines‌‌
  residing‌‌
  therein‌‌
  is‌‌
  taxable‌‌ on‌‌ all‌ 
9. Final‌‌Withholding‌‌Income‌‌Tax.‌  ‌ 1) A‌‌
  citizen‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Philippines‌‌
  who‌‌   establishes‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌ satisfaction‌‌ 
income‌  ‌derived‌  ‌from‌  ‌sources‌  ‌within‌  ‌and‌  ‌without‌  ‌the‌‌ 
of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Commissioner‌  ‌the‌  ‌fact‌  ‌of‌‌
  his‌‌
  physical‌‌
  presence‌‌   abroad‌‌ 
Philippines;‌  ‌
with‌‌a‌‌definite‌‌intention‌‌to‌‌reside‌‌therein‌. ‌ ‌
b) A‌‌
  ‌nonresident‌‌  citizen‌‌
  ‌is‌‌ taxable‌‌ only‌‌ on‌‌ income‌‌ derived‌‌ from‌‌ 
2) A‌  ‌citizen‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Philippines‌‌   who‌‌
  leaves‌‌   the‌‌
  Philippines‌‌
  during‌‌ 
sources‌‌within‌‌the‌‌Philippines;‌  ‌
the‌‌   taxable‌‌ year‌‌ to‌‌ reside‌‌ abroad,‌‌ either‌‌ as‌‌ an‌‌ ‌immigrant‌‌ ‌or‌‌ for‌‌ 
c) An‌  ‌individual‌  ‌citizen‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌who‌  ‌is‌  ‌working‌  ‌and‌‌  employment‌‌on‌‌a‌‌permanent‌‌basis‌.  ‌‌ ‌
deriving‌‌  income‌‌   from‌‌ abroad‌‌ as‌‌ an‌‌ overseas‌‌ contract‌‌ worker‌‌ is‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 59‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

3) A‌  ‌citizen‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌who‌  ‌works‌  ‌and‌  ‌derives‌  ‌income‌‌  b. 25%‌‌final‌‌tax‌‌on‌‌gross‌‌income‌   ‌ ‌ 1. Where‌  ‌the‌  ‌income‌  ‌is‌  ‌accumulated‌  ‌or‌  ‌held‌  ‌for‌  ‌future‌‌ 
from‌‌   abroad‌‌   and‌‌ whose‌‌ employment‌‌ thereat‌‌ requires‌‌ him‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌  distribution‌‌‌by‌‌the‌‌trustee;‌  ‌
SPECIAL‌‌EMPLOYEES‌  ‌
physically‌  ‌present‌  ‌abroad‌  ‌most‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌‌ 
2. Where‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌up‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌fiduciary‌  ‌whether‌  ‌there‌  ‌will‌  ‌be‌‌ 
taxable‌‌year.‌   ‌ ‌ Special‌  ‌employees‌  ‌are‌  ‌alien‌  ‌individuals‌  ‌or‌  ‌Filipino‌  ‌citizens‌  ‌who‌  ‌are‌‌ 
distribution‌‌or‌‌not;‌  ‌
- At‌‌least‌‌183‌‌days.‌  ‌ subject‌‌to‌‌15%‌‌tax‌‌based‌‌on‌‌their‌‌gross‌‌compensation‌‌income‌‌when:‌‌   ‌
3. Where‌  ‌the‌  ‌income‌  ‌is‌  ‌collected‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌guardian‌‌
  of‌‌
  an‌‌
  infant‌‌ 
- Temporary‌e‌ mployment‌  ‌ 1. They‌  ‌are‌  ‌employed‌‌
  occupying‌‌
  ‌managerial‌‌
  and/or‌‌   technical‌‌ 
which‌‌is‌‌to‌‌be‌‌held‌‌or‌‌distributed‌‌as‌‌the‌‌court‌‌may‌‌direct.‌  ‌
positions‌‌‌with‌‌regional‌‌or‌‌area‌‌headquarters‌‌‌of‌‌   ‌
4) Hybrid.‌‌   — ‌‌‌A ‌‌citizen‌‌  who‌‌
  has‌‌
  been‌‌  ‌previously‌‌ considered‌‌ as‌‌ 
 ‌

non-resident‌‌   citizen‌‌ and‌‌ who‌‌ arrives‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ Philippines‌‌ at‌‌ any‌‌  a. multinational‌‌corporations,‌‌   ‌ CORPORATIONS‌  ‌


time‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌year‌  ‌to‌  ‌reside‌  ‌permanently‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  b. petroleum‌‌service‌‌contractors‌‌and‌‌subcontractors,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
Philippines‌  ‌shall‌  ‌likewise‌  ‌be‌  ‌treated‌‌   as‌‌
  a ‌‌non-resident‌‌  citizen‌‌  The‌‌term‌'‌ corporation'‌s‌ hall‌‌include‌‌   ‌
c. offshore‌‌banking‌‌units.‌‌   ‌
for‌‌
  the‌‌
  taxable‌‌   year‌‌
  in‌‌
  which‌‌
  he‌‌
  arrives‌‌   in‌‌ the‌‌ Philippines‌‌ with‌‌  a) partnerships,‌‌no‌‌matter‌‌how‌‌created‌‌or‌‌organized,‌‌   ‌
respect‌  ‌to‌  ‌his‌  ‌income‌  ‌derived‌  ‌from‌  ‌sources‌  ‌abroad‌  ‌until‌  ‌the‌‌  2. If‌  ‌the‌  ‌special‌  ‌taxpayer‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌alien‌, ‌ ‌all‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌gross‌‌ 
date‌‌of‌‌his‌‌arrival‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Philippines.‌‌   ‌ compensation‌‌income‌‌received‌‌is‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌‌15%‌‌final‌‌tax‌. ‌ ‌ b) joint-stock‌‌companies,‌‌   ‌
5) Receives‌  ‌compensation‌  ‌for‌  ‌services‌  ‌rendered‌  ‌abroad‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌‌ 3. If‌  ‌the‌  ‌taxpayer‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Filipino‌  ‌citizen,‌  ‌he‌  ‌has‌  ‌the‌  ‌option‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌‌  c) joint‌‌accounts‌‌(‌cuentas‌‌en‌‌participación‌),‌‌   ‌
seaman‌.  ‌‌ ‌ taxed‌‌   at‌‌ 15%‌‌ final‌‌ tax‌‌ based‌‌ on‌‌ his‌‌ gross‌‌ compensation‌‌ income‌‌ 
received‌‌   or‌‌
  at‌‌
  a ‌‌regular‌‌ income‌‌ tax‌‌ rate‌‌ (0%-35%)‌‌ based‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌  d) association,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
a. He‌‌is‌‌a‌‌member‌‌of‌‌the‌‌complement‌‌of‌‌a‌‌vessel‌‌   ‌
net‌‌   taxable‌‌   compensation‌‌   income‌‌  ‌if‌‌
  his‌‌ gross‌‌ annual‌‌ taxable‌‌  e) insurance‌‌companies,‌‌   ‌
b. The‌  ‌vessel‌  ‌is‌  ‌engaged‌  ‌exclusively‌  ‌in‌  ‌international‌‌  compensation‌‌   is‌‌
  at‌‌
  least‌‌  P975,000‌‌   (whether‌‌   or‌‌ not‌‌ actually‌‌ 
trade‌.  ‌‌ ‌ but‌‌does‌‌not‌‌include‌‌   ‌
received).‌‌   ‌
RESIDENT‌‌ALIEN‌  ‌ TN:‌ 15%‌‌preferential‌‌tax‌‌rate‌‌vetoed‌‌   ‌ a) general‌‌professional‌‌partnerships‌‌and‌  

ESTATES‌‌AND‌‌TRUSTS‌  ‌ b) a‌‌
  joint‌‌
  venture‌‌   ‌or‌‌
  ‌consortium‌‌
  ‌formed‌‌
  for‌‌ the‌‌ purpose‌‌ of‌‌ 
A‌  ‌resident‌  ‌alien‌  ‌is‌  ‌one‌  ‌who‌  ‌has‌  ‌a ‌ ‌residence‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌‌ 
undertaking‌  ‌construction‌  ‌projects‌  ‌or‌  ‌engaging‌  ‌in‌‌ 
although‌  ‌he‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Filipino‌  ‌citizen.‌  ‌He‌  ‌has‌  ‌no‌‌
  definite‌‌
  period‌‌
  of‌‌  An‌  ‌ESTATE‌  ‌is‌  ‌composed‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌  ‌properties,‌  ‌rights‌  ‌and‌  ‌obligations‌‌ 
petroleum,‌  ‌coal,‌  ‌geothermal‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌energy‌  ‌operations‌‌ 
stay‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Philippines.‌‌   ‌ including‌  ‌those‌  ‌properties,‌  ‌earnings‌  ‌or‌  ‌obligations‌  ‌that‌  ‌have‌‌  pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌an‌  ‌operating‌  ‌consortium‌  ‌agreement‌  ‌under‌  ‌a ‌‌
He‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌‌mere‌‌
  transient‌‌
  or‌‌
  sojourner.‌‌
  His‌‌   ‌definite‌‌   purpose‌‌   for‌‌  accrued‌‌  thereto‌‌  since‌‌ the‌‌ opening‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ succession.‌‌ The‌‌ estate‌‌ is‌‌ to‌‌ 
service‌‌contract‌‌with‌‌the‌‌Government.‌‌   ‌
staying‌  ‌requires‌  ‌an‌  ‌extended‌  ‌stay‌  ‌and‌  ‌to‌  ‌that‌  ‌end,‌  ‌he‌  ‌makes‌  ‌his‌‌  be‌‌
  transferred‌‌  from‌‌  the‌‌ decedent‌‌ to‌‌ his‌‌ successors.‌‌ Its‌‌ ‌status‌‌ is‌‌ the‌‌ 
same‌‌as‌‌that‌‌of‌‌the‌‌decedent‌‌prior‌‌to‌‌his‌‌death.‌  ‌ '‌General‌  ‌professional‌  ‌partnerships‌' ‌‌are‌‌   partnerships‌‌   formed‌‌
  by‌‌ 
home‌‌temporarily‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Philippines.‌  ‌
persons‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌sole‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌exercising‌  ‌their‌  ‌common‌‌ 
It‌  ‌will‌  ‌only‌  ‌be‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌when‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌under‌  ‌administration‌  ‌or‌‌ 
NON-RESIDENT‌‌ALIEN‌  ‌ profession,‌‌   no‌‌
  part‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ income‌‌ of‌‌ which‌‌ is‌‌ derived‌‌ from‌‌ engaging‌‌ 
settlement‌. ‌ ‌
in‌‌any‌‌trade‌‌or‌‌business.‌  ‌
The‌‌  test‌‌
  to‌‌
  classify‌‌
  NRA‌‌ is‌‌ the‌‌ length‌‌ of‌‌ stay‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ Philippines,‌‌ whether‌‌  GR‌:‌‌  An‌  ‌estate‌  ‌under‌‌
  ‌judicial‌‌
  settlement‌‌
  is‌‌
  subject‌‌
  to‌‌
  income‌‌ 
tax.‌  ‌ Domestic‌  ‌corporations‌  ‌are‌  ‌those‌  ‌created‌  ‌or‌  ‌organized‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
he‌‌stays‌‌for‌‌more‌‌than‌‌180‌‌days‌‌or,‌1 ‌ 80‌‌days‌‌or‌‌less‌. ‌ ‌
Philippines‌‌or‌‌under‌‌its‌‌laws.‌‌Otherwise,‌f‌ oreign‌‌corporations‌. ‌ ‌
NRA-ETB‌‌   ‌ EXC‌:‌‌  The‌  ‌distribution‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌heirs‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌year‌  ‌of‌‌ 
estate‌‌  income‌‌   is‌‌
  deductible‌‌   from‌‌   the‌‌ taxable‌‌ income‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  g.‌‌Taxable‌‌period‌  ‌
a. More‌‌than‌‌180‌‌days‌  ‌
estate.‌  ‌Such‌  ‌will‌  ‌form‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌income‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  1) '‌Taxable‌  ‌year‌' ‌ ‌means‌  ‌the‌  ‌calendar‌  ‌year‌, ‌ ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌fiscal‌  ‌year‌‌ 
b. 0-35%‌‌tax‌‌on‌‌net‌‌income‌‌   ‌
heirs.‌  ‌ ending‌  ‌during‌‌
  such‌‌  calendar‌‌   year,‌‌
  upon‌‌
  the‌‌
  basis‌‌   of‌‌  which‌‌   the‌‌ 
NRA-NETB‌‌   ‌
A‌  ‌TRUST‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌obligation‌‌
  imposed‌‌
  or‌‌
  a ‌‌right‌‌
  to‌‌
  administer‌‌
  over‌‌
  a ‌‌ net‌‌income‌‌is‌‌computed.‌  ‌
a. 180‌‌days‌‌or‌‌less‌  ‌ property‌‌given‌‌to‌‌a‌‌person‌‌for‌‌the‌‌benefit‌‌of‌‌another.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 60‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

2.‌‌Concept‌‌of‌‌Income‌  ‌ 7) All-events‌  ‌- ‌ ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌collect‌  ‌income‌  ‌the‌  ‌amount‌  ‌of‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌‌  The‌  ‌accrual‌  ‌of‌  ‌income‌  ‌and‌  ‌expense‌  ‌is‌  ‌permitted‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌ ‌
liquidated‌‌or‌‌certain.‌  ‌ all-events‌t‌ est‌‌has‌‌been‌‌met.‌‌This‌‌test‌‌requires:‌‌   ‌
a.‌‌Definition‌  ‌
In‌  ‌the‌  ‌broad‌‌  ‌sense,‌‌
  ‌INCOME‌‌   ‌refers‌‌  to‌‌
  all‌‌
  wealth‌‌  which‌‌   into‌‌  i.‌‌Realization‌‌test‌  ‌
  flows‌‌ 1) fixing‌‌of‌‌a‌‌right‌‌to‌‌income‌‌or‌‌liability‌‌to‌‌pay;‌‌and‌ 
the‌  ‌taxpayer‌  ‌other‌  ‌than‌  ‌those‌  ‌that‌  ‌are‌  ‌mere‌  ‌return‌  ‌of‌  ‌capital.‌‌
  It‌‌
  is‌‌  2) the‌‌
  availability‌‌
  of‌‌ the‌‌ reasonable‌‌ accurate‌‌ determination‌‌ of‌‌ 
Income‌‌is‌‌recognized‌‌when‌‌both‌‌conditions‌‌are‌‌met:‌  ‌
return‌‌   on‌‌
  capital‌‌
  or‌‌
  return‌‌
  above‌‌ the‌‌ capital‌‌ as‌‌ opposed‌‌ to‌‌ return‌‌ of‌‌  such‌‌income‌‌or‌‌liability.‌  ‌
capital.‌  ‌ a) The‌‌earning‌‌is‌‌complete‌‌or‌‌virtually‌‌complete;‌‌AND‌  ‌
The‌‌all-events‌‌test‌‌is‌‌satisfied‌‌   ‌
CAPITAL‌  ‌denotes‌  ‌the‌  ‌original‌  ‌investment‌‌  or‌‌   fund‌‌  used‌‌   in‌‌
  order‌‌
  to‌‌  b) An‌‌exchange‌‌has‌‌taken‌‌place.‌  ‌
generate‌‌
  earnings‌‌  which‌‌   is‌‌
  called‌‌
  income.‌‌
  It‌‌ is‌‌ the‌‌ fund‌‌ or‌‌ property‌‌  a) where‌  ‌computation‌  ‌remains‌  ‌uncertain,‌  ‌if‌  ‌its‌  ‌basis‌  ‌is‌‌ 
ii.‌‌Claim‌‌of‌‌right‌‌doctrine‌‌or‌‌doctrine‌‌of‌‌ownership,‌‌command‌‌or‌‌
  unchangeable;‌  ‌
existing‌‌at‌‌one‌‌point‌‌in‌‌time.‌‌   ‌
control‌  ‌
REVENUE‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌amount‌  ‌received‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌business‌  ‌from‌‌  b) where‌‌  a ‌‌computation‌‌
  may‌‌
  be‌‌ unknown,‌‌ but‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ as‌‌ much‌‌ 
selling‌‌main‌‌goods‌‌or‌‌services‌‌to‌‌its‌‌customers‌‌during‌‌the‌‌period.‌  ‌ If‌‌
  the‌‌
  taxpayer‌‌
  receives‌‌  earnings‌‌
  under‌‌
  a ‌‌claim‌‌ of‌‌ right‌‌ and‌‌ without‌‌  as‌‌unknowable,‌‌within‌‌the‌‌taxable‌‌year.‌‌   ‌
b.‌‌When‌‌income‌‌is‌‌taxable‌  ‌ restriction‌‌as‌‌to‌‌its‌‌disposition.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌amount‌  ‌of‌  ‌liability‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌‌
  have‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  determined‌‌
  exactly;‌‌   it‌‌ 
1. There‌‌is‌‌gain‌‌or‌‌profit;‌  ‌ iii.‌‌Economic‌‌benefit‌‌test‌‌or‌‌doctrine‌‌of‌‌proprietary‌‌interest‌  ‌ must‌‌   be‌‌
  determined‌‌   with‌‌  "‌reasonable‌‌   accuracy.‌" ‌‌Accordingly,‌‌ the‌‌ 
term‌‌  "reasonable‌‌   accuracy"‌‌ implies‌‌ something‌‌ less‌‌ than‌‌ an‌‌ exact‌‌ or‌‌ 
2. Gain‌  ‌or‌  ‌profit‌  ‌is‌  ‌realized‌  ‌or‌  ‌received‌  ‌(actually‌  ‌or‌‌  Anything‌  ‌that‌  ‌benefits‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person‌  ‌materially‌  ‌or‌  ‌economically.‌  ‌Note‌‌  completely‌‌accurate‌‌amount.‌  ‌
constructively);‌C ‌ onstructive‌r‌ eceipt:‌  ‌ however‌‌   that‌‌
  there‌‌
  must‌‌
  first‌‌
  be‌‌
  actual‌‌  realization,‌‌ such‌‌ as‌‌ through‌‌ 
ii.‌‌Special‌‌method:‌‌installment,‌‌deferred‌‌payment,‌‌percentage‌‌  
a. Matured‌‌interest‌‌coupons;‌  ‌ sale‌‌or‌‌disposition.‌‌   ‌
of‌‌completion‌‌(in‌‌long-term‌‌contracts)‌  ‌
b. Interest‌‌on‌‌savings‌‌bank‌‌deposit;‌  ‌ Mere‌‌increase‌‌in‌‌the‌‌value‌‌of‌‌property‌‌is‌‌not‌‌income.‌  ‌
c. Dividends‌‌applied‌‌to‌‌indebtedness‌‌of‌‌a‌‌shareholder;‌  ‌ 1) '‌Long-term‌‌contracts‌'‌‌means‌‌   ‌
iv.‌‌Severance‌‌test‌  ‌
d. Share‌‌in‌‌the‌‌profits‌‌of‌‌a‌‌partner‌‌in‌‌GPP.‌  ‌ a) building,‌‌installation‌‌or‌‌construction‌‌contracts‌‌   ‌
Income‌‌   is‌‌  recognized‌‌  when‌‌   there‌‌  is‌‌
  separation‌‌ of‌‌ something‌‌ which‌‌ 
3. Such‌‌gain‌‌or‌‌profit‌‌is‌N
‌ OT‌e‌ xempted‌‌by‌‌any‌‌treaty‌‌or‌‌law.‌  ‌ is‌‌of‌‌exchangeable‌‌value.‌  ‌ b) covering‌‌a‌‌period‌‌in‌‌excess‌‌of‌‌one‌‌(1)‌‌year.‌‌   ‌
c.‌‌Tests‌‌in‌‌determining‌‌whether‌‌income‌‌
  d.‌‌Methods‌‌of‌‌accounting‌  ‌ Persons‌  ‌whose‌  ‌gross‌  ‌income‌  ‌is‌  ‌derived‌  ‌in‌  ‌whole‌  ‌or‌  ‌in‌  ‌part‌‌ 
is‌‌earned‌‌for‌‌tax‌‌purposes‌  ‌ from‌‌
  such‌‌  contracts‌‌ shall‌‌ report‌‌ such‌‌ income‌‌ upon‌‌ the‌‌ basis‌‌ of‌‌ 
An‌  ‌accounting‌  ‌method‌  ‌is‌‌
  a ‌‌"set‌‌
  of‌‌
  rules‌‌
  for‌‌
  determining‌‌
  when‌‌
  and‌‌ 
1) Flow‌  ‌of‌  ‌Wealth‌  ‌- ‌ ‌whether‌  ‌any‌  ‌gain‌  ‌was‌  ‌derived‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌  percentage‌‌of‌‌completion‌.  ‌‌ ‌
how‌‌to‌‌report‌‌income‌‌and‌‌deductions."‌  ‌
transaction.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌return‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌‌
  accompanied‌‌   by‌‌
  a ‌‌return‌‌
  certificate‌‌
  of‌‌ 
i.‌‌Distinguish:‌‌cash‌‌and‌‌accrual‌‌method‌  ‌
2) Realization‌‌‌-‌‌Revenue‌‌is‌‌realized‌‌when‌  ‌ architects‌  ‌or‌  ‌engineers‌  ‌showing‌  ‌the‌  ‌percentage‌‌   of‌‌
  completion‌ 
a) The‌‌earning‌‌process‌‌is‌‌complete;‌‌AND‌  ‌ The‌  ‌accrual‌  ‌method‌  ‌relies‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌taxpayer’s‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌receive‌‌  during‌  ‌the‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌year‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌entire‌  ‌work‌  ‌performed‌  ‌under‌‌ 
amounts‌  ‌or‌  ‌its‌  ‌obligation‌  ‌to‌  ‌pay‌  ‌them,‌  ‌in‌  ‌opposition‌  ‌to‌  ‌actual‌‌  contract.‌  ‌
b) An‌‌exchange‌‌has‌‌taken‌‌place.‌  ‌
receipt‌  ‌or‌  ‌payment,‌  ‌which‌  ‌characterizes‌  ‌the‌  ‌cash‌  ‌method‌  ‌of‌‌  2) Installment‌‌Basis.‌—
‌  ‌ ‌
3) Economic-Benefit‌  ‌- ‌ ‌taxable‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌extent‌  ‌the‌  ‌taxpayer‌  ‌is‌‌ 
accounting.‌‌   ‌
economically‌‌benefited.‌  ‌ a) Sales‌‌  of‌‌
  Dealers‌‌   in‌‌
  Personal‌‌   Property.‌‌   — ‌‌a ‌‌person‌‌ who‌‌ 
For‌‌   a ‌‌taxpayer‌‌ using‌‌ the‌‌ accrual‌‌ method,‌‌ the‌‌ determinative‌‌ question‌‌  regularly‌‌   sells‌‌
  or‌‌
  otherwise‌‌   disposes‌‌   of‌‌ personal‌‌ property‌‌ 
4) Net‌‌Effect‌‌‌-‌‌substance‌‌of‌‌whole‌‌transaction.‌  ‌
is,‌‌
  ‌when‌‌   do‌‌
  the‌‌
  facts‌‌
  present‌‌
  themselves‌‌   in‌‌
  such‌‌ a ‌‌manner‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  installment‌‌   plan‌‌ may‌‌ return‌‌ as‌‌ income‌‌ therefrom‌‌ in‌‌ 
5) Claim‌‌of‌‌Right‌‌‌-‌‌if‌‌there‌‌is‌‌control‌‌over‌‌the‌‌fund.‌  ‌ taxpayer‌‌must‌‌recognize‌‌income‌‌or‌‌expense?‌‌   ‌ any‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌year‌  ‌that‌  ‌proportion‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌installment‌‌ 
6) Recovery‌‌of‌‌Capital‌‌Doctrine‌. ‌ ‌ payments‌  ‌actually‌  ‌received‌  ‌in‌  ‌that‌  ‌year‌, ‌ ‌which‌‌   the‌‌
  gross‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 61‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

profit‌  ‌realized‌  ‌or‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌realized‌  ‌when‌  ‌payment‌  ‌is‌‌ 


goods‌‌manufactured‌‌and‌‌sold‌  ‌
3.‌‌Gross‌‌Income‌  ‌
completed,‌‌bears‌‌to‌‌the‌‌total‌‌contract‌‌price.‌ 
a. Within‌‌PH‌‌-‌‌Purely‌‌within;‌  ‌ a.‌‌Definition‌  ‌
b) Sales‌  ‌of‌  ‌Realty‌  ‌and‌  ‌Casual‌  ‌Sales‌  ‌of‌  ‌Personality.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌In‌‌  b. Outside‌‌-‌‌Purely‌‌without;‌  ‌
the‌‌case‌‌   ‌ c. Place‌‌of‌‌manufacture‌‌and‌‌selling‌‌  In‌  ‌a ‌ ‌narrow‌  ‌sense,‌  ‌gross‌  ‌income‌  ‌means‌  ‌all‌  ‌income‌  ‌derived‌  ‌from‌‌ 
different‌‌-‌‌Proportionate.‌  ‌ whatever‌‌source,‌‌including‌‌but‌‌not‌‌limited‌‌to‌C
‌ G‌2‌IR‌2‌DAP‌3‌.‌  ‌
i) of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌casual‌  ‌sale‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌casual‌  ‌disposition‌  ‌of‌‌ 
personal‌‌property,‌‌for‌‌a‌‌price‌‌exceeding‌‌P1K,‌‌or‌‌   ‌ In‌‌
  a ‌‌broad‌‌   sense,‌‌
  it‌‌
  means‌‌  all‌‌
  items‌‌
  of‌‌ income‌‌ less‌‌ exclusions.‌‌ It‌‌ is‌‌ 
1.‌‌Personal‌‌-‌‌Place‌‌of‌‌sale;‌  ‌
From‌‌sale‌‌  2.‌‌Sale‌‌of‌‌transport‌‌documents‌‌-‌‌place‌‌  the‌‌
  total‌‌ income‌‌ from‌‌ all‌‌ sources‌‌ ‌before‌‌ deductions,‌‌ exemptions‌‌ or‌‌ 
ii) of‌‌a‌‌sale‌‌or‌‌other‌‌disposition‌‌of‌r‌ eal‌p
‌ roperty,‌‌   ‌
or‌‌exchange‌‌  other‌‌tax‌‌reductions.‌  ‌
where‌‌sold;‌  ‌
if‌‌
  in‌‌
  either‌‌  case‌‌  the‌‌
  ‌initial‌‌  payments‌‌  do‌‌  not‌‌  exceed‌‌ ‌25%‌‌  of‌‌property‌  ‌
3.‌‌Real‌‌-‌‌Location.‌  ‌ b.‌‌Distinguish:‌‌gross‌‌income,‌‌net‌‌income,‌‌and‌‌taxable‌‌
 
of‌  ‌the‌  ‌selling‌  ‌price,‌  ‌the‌  ‌income‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌returned‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌ 
income‌  ‌
basis‌‌and‌‌in‌‌the‌‌manner‌‌above‌‌prescribed.‌‌   ‌
Interest‌  ‌ Residence‌‌of‌‌debtor‌  ‌
'‌Initial‌  ‌payments‌' ‌ ‌means‌  ‌the‌  ‌payments‌  ‌received‌  ‌during‌‌  a) GROSS‌‌
  INCOME‌‌   TAXATION‌‌ — ‌‌This‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌system‌‌ based‌‌ on‌‌ gross‌‌ 
the‌‌
  taxable‌‌  period‌‌
  in‌‌
  which‌‌
  the‌‌ sale‌‌ or‌‌ other‌‌ disposition‌‌ is‌‌  Rent‌  ‌ Property‌‌located‌  ‌ income,‌‌
  which‌‌  doesn‘t‌‌ allow‌‌ deductions‌‌ but‌‌ allows‌‌ exclusions.‌‌ 
made.‌  ‌ Applicable‌‌to‌‌passive‌‌income.‌  ‌
Royalties‌  ‌ Where‌‌intangible‌‌is‌‌used‌  ‌
c) Sales‌‌   of‌‌
  Real‌‌   Property‌‌   Considered‌‌   as‌‌
  Capital‌‌   Asset‌‌  by‌‌  GROSS IN COM E  =  Income – Exclusions   ‌
Individuals.‌  ‌—‌  ‌An‌  ‌individual‌  ‌who‌  ‌sells‌  ‌or‌  ‌disposes‌  ‌of‌‌  1.‌‌From‌‌Domestic‌‌Corp‌‌-‌‌income‌‌purely‌‌ 
real‌‌
  property,‌‌   considered‌‌   as‌‌
  capital‌‌ asset,‌‌ and‌‌ is‌‌ otherwise‌‌  within;‌  ‌ b) NET‌  ‌INCOME‌  ‌TAXATION‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Certain‌  ‌deductions‌  ‌are‌  ‌allowed‌‌ 
qualified‌  ‌to‌  ‌report‌  ‌the‌  ‌gain‌  ‌therefrom‌  ‌under‌  ‌(B)‌‌   may‌‌
  pay‌‌  2.‌‌From‌‌Foreign‌‌Corp‌‌-‌‌if‌‌income‌‌derived‌‌  and‌  ‌subtracted‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌aggregate‌  ‌of‌  ‌incomes‌  ‌not‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌‌ 
the‌‌capital‌‌gains‌‌tax‌‌in‌‌installments.‌  ‌ Dividend‌  ‌ from‌‌PH:‌  ‌ final‌  ‌tax,‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌tax‌  ‌computed‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌resulting‌  ‌net‌‌ 
a. >‌‌85%‌‌=‌‌purely‌‌within;‌  ‌ income.‌  ‌
d) Change‌  ‌from‌  ‌Accrual‌  ‌to‌  ‌Installment‌  ‌Basis.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌If‌  ‌a ‌‌
b. <50%‌‌=‌‌purely‌‌without;‌  ‌
taxpayer‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌benefits‌  ‌of‌  ‌(A)‌  ‌elects‌  ‌for‌  ‌any‌‌ 
c. 50%-85%‌‌=‌‌allocation.‌  ‌ N ET  IN COM E  =  Gross Income – Deductions   ‌
taxable‌  ‌year‌  ‌to‌  ‌report‌  ‌his‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌income‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌ 
installment‌  ‌basis,‌  ‌then‌  ‌in‌  ‌computing‌  ‌his‌  ‌income‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Annuities‌  Place‌‌of‌‌contract‌  ‌ c.‌‌Sources‌‌of‌‌income‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌tax‌  ‌
year‌  ‌of‌  ‌change‌  ‌or‌  ‌any‌  ‌subsequent‌  ‌year,‌  ‌amounts‌  ‌actually‌‌ 
received‌‌   during‌‌
  any‌‌   such‌‌  year‌‌
  on‌‌  account‌‌ of‌‌ sales‌‌ or‌‌ other‌‌  CG‌2‌IR‌2‌DAP‌3‌  ‌
Either‌‌where‌‌services‌‌rendered‌‌or‌‌where‌‌ 
dispositions‌  ‌of‌  ‌property‌  ‌made‌‌   in‌‌
  any‌‌
  prior‌‌
  year‌‌  shall‌‌   not‌‌  Prizes‌  ‌ 1) Compensation‌  ‌for‌  ‌services‌  ‌in‌‌   whatever‌‌  form‌‌  paid,‌‌
  including,‌‌ 
given.‌  ‌
be‌‌excluded.‌  ‌ but‌  ‌not‌  ‌limited‌  ‌to‌  ‌fees,‌  ‌salaries,‌  ‌wages,‌  ‌commissions,‌  ‌and‌‌ 
Where‌‌given‌‌on‌‌account‌‌of‌‌services‌‌  similar‌‌items;‌  ‌
e.‌‌Situs‌‌of‌‌Income‌  ‌ Pension‌  ‌
rendered.‌  ‌ 2) Gross‌‌  income‌‌ ‌derived‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌ conduct‌‌ of‌‌ trade‌‌ or‌‌ business‌‌ or‌‌ 
Source‌  ‌ Situs‌  ‌
the‌‌exercise‌‌of‌‌a‌‌profession;‌  ‌
Professiona‌
Compensati‌ Where‌‌service‌‌rendered‌  l‌‌income‌‌of‌  Exercise‌‌of‌‌profession‌  ‌ 3) Gains‌‌derived‌‌from‌‌dealings‌‌in‌‌property;‌  ‌
on‌  ‌ partners‌  ‌ 4) Interests‌; ‌ ‌
Merchandising,‌‌Farming,‌‌Mining‌  ‌ 5) Rents‌; ‌ ‌
Business‌  ‌ - Where‌‌business‌‌undertaken.‌  ‌ 6) Royalties‌; ‌ ‌
Manufacturing‌‌   ‌
7) Dividends‌; ‌ ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 62‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

8) Annuities‌; ‌ ‌ of‌  ‌the‌  ‌payments‌  ‌or‌  ‌by‌  ‌any‌  ‌officer‌  ‌or‌  ‌employee‌  ‌duly‌‌
  designated‌‌
  for‌‌  higher‌  ‌ Monthly‌‌Value‌‌= ‌‌
9) Prizes‌‌and‌‌winnings;‌  ‌ such‌‌purpose.‌  ‌ AV/12‌  ‌

10) Pensions‌;‌‌and‌  ‌ ii.‌‌Fringe‌‌benefits‌  ‌ ER‌‌purchases‌‌house‌‌on‌‌  5%‌‌of‌‌ 


50%‌‌x‌‌Monthly‌‌ 
11) Partner's‌  ‌distributive‌  ‌share‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌net‌  ‌income‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  installment,‌‌assigns‌‌use‌‌to‌‌  acquisition‌‌cost,‌‌ 
Any‌  ‌good,‌  ‌service‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌benefit‌  ‌furnished‌  ‌or‌  ‌granted‌  ‌in‌  ‌cash‌  ‌or‌  ‌in‌‌  Value‌  ‌
EE‌  ‌ exc‌‌interest‌  ‌
general‌‌professional‌‌partnership.‌ 
kind‌  ‌by‌  ‌an‌  ‌employer‌  ‌to‌  ‌an‌  ‌individual‌  ‌employee‌  ‌(‌except‌  ‌rank‌‌   and‌‌  file‌‌ 
i.‌‌Compensation‌‌income‌  ‌ employees‌)‌‌H EVHIMEHEL‌  ‌ ER‌‌purchases‌‌then‌‌transfers‌  Acquisition‌‌cost‌‌ 
NA‌  ‌
ownership‌‌to‌‌EE‌  ‌ or‌‌FMV‌  ‌
It‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌all‌‌
  remuneration‌‌
  for‌‌
  services‌‌
  rendered‌‌
  by‌‌
  an‌‌
  employee‌‌  1. H‌ousing‌  ‌
for‌‌his‌‌employer,‌‌unless‌‌specifically‌‌excluded‌‌under‌‌the‌‌Tax‌‌Code.‌  ‌ ER‌‌purchases‌‌then‌‌transfers‌  Zonal‌‌Value‌‌or‌‌ 
2. E‌xpense‌‌Account‌  ‌ ownership‌‌to‌‌EE‌‌at‌‌a‌‌lower‌‌  NA‌  ‌ Assessed‌‌Value,‌‌ 
First‌‌Lepanto‌‌v.‌‌CIR‌‌2
‌ 013‌  ‌
price‌  ‌ minus‌‌cost‌‌of‌‌EE‌  ‌
The‌  ‌imposition‌  ‌of‌  ‌withholding‌  ‌tax‌  ‌on‌  ‌compensation‌  ‌hinges‌  ‌upon‌‌ 
3. V‌ehicle‌‌of‌‌any‌‌kind‌  ‌
the‌‌nature‌‌of‌‌work‌‌performed‌‌by‌‌such‌‌individuals‌‌in‌‌the‌‌company.‌  ‌ 4. H‌ousehold‌‌Personnel‌  ‌ Exceptions‌(‌ Not‌‌taxable):‌  ‌
In‌‌Kind:‌  ‌ 5. I‌nterest‌‌on‌‌loan‌  ‌ 1. AFP,‌‌Navy,‌‌Air‌‌Force;‌  ‌
a. Stock‌  ‌Options.‌  ‌Stock‌  ‌options‌  ‌are‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌as‌  ‌compensation‌‌  2. Housing‌‌
  unit‌‌
  inside‌‌
  or‌‌
  within‌‌
  a ‌‌maximum‌‌
  of‌‌
  ‌50‌‌
  meters‌‌
  ‌from‌‌ 
6. M‌embership‌‌Fees‌  ‌
income‌  ‌taxed‌  ‌only‌  ‌if‌‌
  there‌‌  is‌‌
  a ‌‌benefit‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  employee‌‌   such‌‌  perimeter‌‌of‌‌business;‌  ‌
as‌‌
  when‌‌   he‌‌
  can‌‌ buy‌‌ the‌‌ share‌‌ at‌‌ a ‌‌more‌‌ favorable‌‌ price‌‌ than‌‌ the‌‌  7. E‌xpense‌‌for‌‌Foreign‌‌Travel‌  ‌
3. Temporary‌‌housing‌‌=‌3 ‌ ‌‌months‌‌or‌‌less‌; ‌ ‌
public.‌‌   ‌
8. H‌oliday‌‌and‌‌Vacation‌‌Expense‌  ‌ 4. Granted‌‌to‌‌rank‌‌and‌‌file.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌tax‌  ‌will‌  ‌be‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌amount‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌difference‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌‌ 
book‌  ‌value‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌FMV‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌stock,‌‌   whichever‌‌   is‌‌
  higher,‌‌
  and‌‌ 
9. E‌ducational‌‌Assistance‌  ‌ EXPENSE‌‌ACCOUNT‌  ‌
the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌price.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌whether‌  ‌or‌  ‌not‌  ‌the‌  ‌stock‌‌  10. L‌ife‌‌or‌‌Health‌‌Insurance‌  ‌ a. In‌‌
  ‌general‌, ‌‌expenses‌‌
  incurred‌‌
  by‌‌
  EE‌‌
  but‌‌
  are‌‌ paid‌‌ by‌‌ his‌‌ ER‌‌ are‌‌ 
option‌‌is‌‌exercised.‌‌   ‌ taxable,‌e‌ xcept‌‌‌when:‌  ‌
TN‌:‌‌  This‌‌list‌‌is‌‌NOT‌‌exclusive‌. ‌ ‌
b. Promissory‌  ‌Notes.‌  ‌Equivalent‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌face‌  ‌value‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  i. They‌‌are‌d
‌ uly‌‌receipted;‌  ‌
Conditions‌‌for‌‌FB‌‌to‌‌be‌‌taxable‌  ‌
promissory‌  ‌note,‌  ‌unless‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌discounted.‌  ‌For‌  ‌a ‌ ‌discounted‌‌ 
a. Given‌‌to‌m‌ anagerial‌‌or‌‌supervisory‌‌employees;‌  ‌ ii. In‌‌the‌‌name‌‌of‌‌ER;‌‌and‌  ‌
promissory‌‌note,‌‌the‌‌cash‌‌discounted‌‌value.‌  ‌
b. Good,‌‌service‌‌furnished‌‌or‌‌granted‌‌in‌‌cash‌‌or‌‌in‌‌kind;‌  ‌ iii. Do‌‌not‌‌partake‌‌the‌‌nature‌‌of‌‌a‌‌personal‌‌expense;‌ 
c. Cancellation‌‌  of‌‌
  Debt.‌‌
  ‌Considered‌‌   an‌‌
  income‌‌ when‌‌ you‌‌ render‌‌ 
services‌‌and‌‌in‌‌exchange,‌‌your‌‌debt‌‌is‌‌forgiven.‌  ‌ c. Must‌‌NOT‌‌be‌‌for‌‌the‌‌benefit‌‌or‌‌convenience‌‌of‌‌the‌‌employer.‌  ‌ b. Expenses‌  ‌paid‌  ‌for‌  ‌by‌  ‌EE,‌  ‌but‌  ‌reimbursed‌  ‌by‌  ‌ER‌  ‌are‌  ‌taxable,‌‌ 
except‌w
‌ hen‌‌(same‌‌as‌‌a);‌  ‌
d. Tax‌  ‌Liability.‌  ‌When‌  ‌the‌  e‌ mployer‌  ‌shoulders‌  ‌your‌  ‌tax‌  ‌on‌‌  HOUSING‌  ‌
compensation‌  ‌instead‌  ‌of‌  ‌you‌  ‌getting‌  ‌less‌  ‌than‌  ‌your‌  ‌gross‌‌   ‌
c. Personal‌  ‌expenses‌  ‌of‌  ‌EE‌  ‌paid‌  ‌for‌  ‌or‌  ‌reimbursed‌  ‌by‌  ‌ER‌  ‌are‌‌ 
monthly‌‌salary.‌  ‌ Case‌  ‌ Annual‌‌Value‌  ‌ Monthly‌‌MV‌  ‌ taxable,‌  ‌regardless‌‌
  if‌‌
  they‌‌  are‌‌
  receipted‌‌   or‌‌
  not‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  name‌‌
  of‌‌ 
ER;‌  ‌
COURAGE‌‌v.‌‌CIR‌‌‌2018‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ 50%‌‌x‌‌Monthly‌‌ 
ER‌‌leases‌‌house‌‌for‌‌use‌‌of‌‌EE‌  ‌ NA‌  ‌ d. RATA‌  ‌are‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌fringe‌  ‌benefits,‌  ‌but‌  ‌are‌  ‌taxable‌‌ 
Withholding‌  ‌tax‌  ‌on‌  ‌compensation‌  ‌applies‌  ‌to‌‌
  the‌‌
  Government‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌  Rent‌  ‌
compensation‌‌income:‌  ‌
Philippines,‌  ‌including‌  ‌its‌  ‌agencies,‌  ‌instrumentalities,‌  ‌and‌  ‌political‌‌ 
5%‌‌of‌‌FMV,‌‌or‌‌  50%‌‌x‌‌Monthly‌‌  i. Fixed‌‌in‌‌amounts;‌  ‌
subdivisions.‌  ‌ ER‌‌owns‌‌house,‌‌assigns‌‌use‌‌ 
Zonal‌‌Value,‌‌  Value‌  ‌
to‌‌EE‌  ‌ ii. Regularly‌‌received‌‌by‌‌EE;‌  ‌
Withholding‌‌
  shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  made‌‌
  by‌‌ the‌‌ officer‌‌ or‌‌ employee‌‌ having‌‌ control‌‌  whichever‌‌is‌‌   ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 63‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

iii. Part‌‌of‌‌Monthly‌‌compensation‌‌income.‌  ‌ a. Reasonable‌  ‌business‌  ‌expenses‌‌


  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  purpose‌‌
  of‌‌
  attending‌‌  i. Heir‌‌—‌‌income‌‌of‌‌EE;‌  ‌
business‌‌meetings‌‌or‌‌conventions‌‌are‌N
‌ OT‌‌‌taxable‌‌FBs.‌  ‌ ii. If‌‌EE‌‌managerial‌‌or‌‌supervisory‌‌—‌‌FB‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌tax;‌  ‌
MOTOR‌‌VEHICLES‌  ‌
 ‌
Inland‌‌
  travel‌‌
  expenses‌‌
  must‌‌
  not‌‌
  exceed‌‌
  300‌‌ USD,‌‌ not‌‌ including‌‌  iii. Company‌‌—‌N
‌ OT‌F
‌ B;‌  ‌
Case‌  ‌ Monetary‌‌Value‌  ‌ lodging‌‌cost.‌  ‌
iv. For‌‌Group‌‌of‌‌EEs‌‌—‌N
‌ OT‌F
‌ B.‌  ‌
b. Economy‌‌   and‌‌  business‌‌ class‌‌ NOT‌‌ taxable.‌‌ ‌30%‌‌ of‌‌ cost‌‌ of‌‌ First‌‌   ‌

Purchases‌‌vehicle‌‌in‌‌the‌‌name‌‌of‌‌  Acquisition‌‌Cost‌  ‌
class‌‌ticket‌ ‌taxable.‌  ‌ Exemption‌‌from‌‌FBT‌  ‌
EE‌  ‌
c. There‌‌   should‌‌
  be‌‌
  documentary‌‌   evidence‌‌
  proving‌‌
  the‌‌
  travel‌‌ was‌‌ 
Provides‌‌EE‌‌with‌‌cash‌‌for‌‌  Cash‌‌received‌‌by‌‌EE‌  ‌ in‌‌
  connection‌‌   with‌‌ a ‌‌meeting‌‌ or‌‌ convention.‌‌ Otherwise,‌‌ taxable‌‌  1) Authorized‌‌and‌e
‌ xempted‌u
‌ nder‌‌the‌‌NIRC‌‌or‌‌special‌‌laws;‌  ‌
purchase‌  ‌ FB.‌  ‌ 2) For‌  ‌EE’s‌  ‌retirement,‌  ‌insurance‌  ‌and‌  ‌hospitalization‌  ‌(GROUP‌‌ 
d. If‌‌for‌‌the‌‌family‌‌members‌‌of‌‌EE,‌‌paid‌‌by‌‌ER,‌‌taxable.‌  ‌ INSURANCE);‌  ‌
Shoulders‌‌a‌‌portion‌‌of‌‌the‌‌  Amount‌‌shouldered‌  ‌
purchase‌‌price‌  ‌ HOLIDAY‌‌AND‌‌VACATION‌‌EXPENSES‌  ‌ 3) Given‌‌to‌R
‌ ank‌‌and‌‌File‌; ‌ ‌
4) Required‌‌  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  nature‌‌
  of,‌‌
  or‌‌
  ‌necessary‌‌
  ‌to‌‌
  the‌‌
  trade,‌‌
  business‌‌ 
Purchases‌‌car‌‌on‌‌installment‌‌in‌‌  Acquisition‌‌cost‌‌(excl‌‌interest)‌‌/ ‌‌
the‌‌name‌‌of‌‌EE‌  ‌ 5‌‌years.‌  ‌ Everything‌‌
  is‌‌
  considered‌‌  as‌‌
  fringe‌‌
  benefit‌‌
  since‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ pursuant‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌  or‌‌profession‌‌of‌‌ER;‌  ‌
purpose‌‌of‌‌the‌‌business‌‌of‌‌the‌‌employer.‌  ‌ 5) For‌‌the‌c‌ onvenience‌o
‌ f‌‌ER;‌  ‌
Owns‌‌a‌‌fleet‌‌of‌‌vehicles‌‌for‌‌the‌‌  Acquisition‌‌cost‌‌of‌‌all‌‌motor‌‌ 
use‌‌of‌‌EEs‌  ‌ vehicles‌n
‌ ot‌‌normally‌‌used‌‌in‌‌  EDUCATIONAL‌‌ASSISTANCE‌  ‌ 6) De‌‌minimis‌‌‌benefits.‌  ‌
business‌‌‌/‌‌5‌‌years‌‌x‌‌50%‌  ‌ DE‌‌MINIMIS‌  ‌
To‌‌the‌‌EE:‌  ‌
Leases‌‌and‌‌maintains‌‌fleet‌‌of‌‌  Amount‌‌of‌‌rent‌‌x‌‌50%‌  ‌
GR‌:‌ ‌Taxable;‌  ‌ Are‌  ‌of‌  ‌relatively‌  ‌small‌  ‌value‌  ‌and‌  ‌are‌  ‌offered‌  ‌or‌  ‌furnished‌‌
  merely‌‌
  as‌‌
  a ‌‌
vehicles‌  ‌
EXC:‌  ‌ means‌  ‌of‌  ‌promoting‌  ‌goodwill,‌  ‌contentment‌  ‌or‌  ‌efficiency‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌‌ 
Use‌‌of‌‌yacht‌  ‌ Depreciation‌‌at‌‌20‌‌years‌‌of‌‌  employees.‌  ‌
1. Directly‌‌   connected‌‌ with‌‌ ER’s‌‌ trade,‌‌ business‌‌ or‌‌ profession;‌‌ 
useful‌‌life.‌  ‌
 ‌
AND‌  ‌ Benefit‌  ‌ Monthly‌  ‌ Annual‌  ‌
2. There‌‌  is‌‌
  a ‌‌‌written‌‌
  contract‌‌
  to‌‌ the‌‌ effect‌‌ that‌‌ EE‌‌ is‌‌ obliged‌‌ 
HOUSEHOLD‌‌EXPENSES‌  ‌
to‌‌remain‌‌in‌‌the‌‌employ‌‌of‌‌ER‌‌for‌‌a‌‌mutually‌‌agreed‌‌period.‌  ‌ Monetized‌‌unused‌‌VL‌‌not‌‌exceeding‌‌10‌‌days‌  ‌ NA‌  NA‌ 

For‌  ‌household‌‌  personnel,‌‌


  such‌‌
  as‌‌
  salaries‌‌
  of‌‌
  household‌‌
  help,‌‌
  personal‌‌  To‌‌the‌‌Dependent‌‌of‌‌EE:‌  ‌
Monetized‌‌value‌‌of‌‌VL‌‌and‌‌SL‌‌credits‌‌of‌‌Public‌‌  NA‌  NA‌ 
driver‌‌of‌‌the‌‌employee,‌‌or‌‌other‌‌similar‌‌personal‌‌expenses.‌  ‌ GR‌:‌‌  ‌Taxable;‌  ‌ employees‌  ‌

INTEREST‌‌ON‌‌LOAN‌‌at‌‌less‌‌than‌‌Market‌‌Rate‌  ‌ EXC:‌‌  ‌Assistance‌‌provided‌‌through‌‌a‌c‌ ompetitive‌‌scheme.‌  ‌ Medical‌‌cash‌‌allowance‌  ‌ 250‌  3,000‌ 


LIFE‌‌OR‌‌HEALTH‌‌INSURANCE‌  ‌
Rice‌‌subsidy‌  ‌ 2,000‌  24,000‌ 
Market‌‌rate‌‌is‌‌at‌‌ ‌12%‌. ‌ ‌
GR‌:‌‌  ‌Taxable;‌  ‌
MEMBERSHIP‌‌FEES‌  ‌ Uniform‌‌and‌‌Clothing‌  ‌ 500‌  6,000‌ 
EXC:‌  ‌
a. Should‌‌not‌‌be‌‌pursuant‌‌to‌‌the‌‌nature‌‌of‌‌the‌‌business‌‌of‌‌ER;‌  ‌ a) Pursuant‌‌to‌‌existing‌‌law,‌‌i.e.‌‌SSS,‌‌GSIS;‌‌AND‌  ‌ Actual‌‌medical‌‌assistance‌  ‌   10,000‌ 

b. Should‌‌not‌‌be‌‌necessary‌‌for‌‌the‌‌position.‌  ‌ b) Cost‌‌
  of‌‌
  premiums‌‌
  borne‌‌ by‌‌ ER‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ ‌group‌‌ insurance‌‌ of‌‌  Laundry‌  ‌ 300‌  3,600‌ 
EEs.‌  ‌
EXPENSES‌‌FOR‌‌FOREIGN‌‌TRAVEL‌  ‌ Awards‌  ‌   10,000‌ 
Beneficiary‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 64‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

4. property‌  ‌used‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌trade‌  ‌or‌  ‌business‌, ‌ ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌character‌‌  c)‌‌Special‌‌rules‌‌pertaining‌‌to‌‌income‌‌or‌‌loss‌‌from‌‌dealings‌‌in‌‌ 
Gifts‌‌during‌‌Christmas,‌‌etc‌  ‌   5,000‌ 
which‌  ‌is‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌allowance‌  ‌for‌  ‌depreciation‌‌  capital‌‌asset‌‌   ‌
Daily‌‌Meal‌‌Allowance‌‌for‌‌OT,‌‌night-shift‌  ‌ <‌‌25%‌‌of‌‌MW‌  provided‌‌in‌‌Subsection‌‌(F)‌‌of‌‌Section‌‌34;‌‌or‌‌   ‌  ‌ Rule‌  ‌ Applies‌‌to‌  ‌
By‌‌virtue‌‌of‌‌CBA,‌‌productivity‌‌incentive‌‌    10,000‌  5. real‌‌property‌‌used‌‌in‌‌trade‌‌or‌‌business‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌taxpayer.‌  ‌
Loss‌‌  Capital‌‌losses‌‌are‌‌allowed‌‌only‌‌  Individuals‌‌ 
scheme‌  ‌ For‌  ‌specific‌  ‌guidelines‌  ‌in‌  ‌determining‌  ‌WON‌  ‌real‌  ‌property‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌‌
limitatio‌ to‌‌the‌‌extent‌‌of‌‌capital‌‌gains.‌  ‌ and‌‌ 
Threshold‌‌of‌‌P90,000‌‌   ‌ capital‌‌or‌‌ordinary‌‌asset,‌‌please‌‌see‌R ‌ R‌‌7-2003‌. ‌ ‌
n‌  ‌ a) Ordinary‌‌loss‌‌deductible‌‌  corporation‌
The‌  ‌list‌  ‌of‌  ‌de‌  ‌minimis‌  ‌benefits‌  ‌is‌  ‌exclusive‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌threshold‌‌   now‌‌  Main‌  ‌takeaway‌  ‌— ‌ ‌a ‌ ‌taxpayer‌  ‌habitually‌  ‌engaged‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌real‌‌  from‌‌ordinary‌‌gain;‌  ‌ s‌‌except‌‌ 
under‌‌   the‌‌  TRAIN‌‌   Law‌‌
  is‌‌
  P90,000.‌‌   The‌‌  amount‌‌ in‌‌ excess‌‌ of‌‌ P90,000‌‌  estate‌‌business‌‌‌is‌‌someone:‌  ‌ b) Capital‌‌loss‌‌deductible‌‌from‌‌  trust‌‌ 
will‌‌
  be‌‌ subject‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ normal‌‌ income‌‌ tax‌‌ rate‌‌ or‌‌ fringe‌‌ benefit‌‌ tax,‌‌ as‌‌  a. Registered‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌HLURB‌  ‌or‌  ‌HUDCC‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌real‌  ‌estate‌‌  capital‌‌gain;‌  ‌ companies‌‌ 
the‌‌case‌‌may‌‌be.‌  ‌ dealer‌‌or‌‌developer;‌‌or‌  ‌ c) Capital‌‌loss‌‌NOT‌d ‌ eductible‌‌  and‌‌banks.‌  ‌
from‌‌ordinary‌‌gain;‌  ‌
iii.‌‌Professional‌‌income‌  ‌ b. If‌  ‌not‌  ‌registered‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌above,‌  ‌having‌  ‌consummated‌‌  d) Ordinary‌‌loss‌‌deductible‌‌ 
during‌  ‌the‌  ‌preceding‌  ‌year‌  ‌of‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌six‌‌
  (6)‌‌
  ‌taxable‌‌  real‌‌  from‌‌capital‌‌gain.‌  ‌
Professionals.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌refer‌  ‌to‌  ‌persons‌  ‌who‌  ‌derive‌  ‌their‌‌
  income‌‌
  from‌‌ 
the‌‌practice‌‌of‌‌their‌‌profession.‌  estate‌‌sale‌‌transactions,‌‌regardless‌‌of‌‌amount;‌‌or‌  ‌
Loss‌‌  Shall‌‌be‌‌treated‌‌in‌‌the‌‌succeeding‌‌  Individuals‌  ‌
iv.‌‌Income‌‌from‌‌business‌  ‌ c. Registered‌  ‌as‌  ‌habitually‌  ‌engaged‌  ‌in‌  ‌real‌  ‌estate‌  ‌business‌‌ 
carry-ove‌ taxable‌y ‌ ear‌‌as‌‌loss‌‌from‌‌the‌‌sale‌‌ 
with‌‌the‌‌LGU‌‌or‌‌BIR.‌  ‌
r‌  ‌ or‌‌exchange‌‌of‌‌capital‌‌asset‌‌held‌‌ 
1) Self-employment‌  ‌income‌  ‌consists‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌  earnings‌‌
  derived‌‌   by‌‌  b)‌‌Types‌‌of‌‌gains‌  ‌ for‌‌not‌‌more‌‌than‌‌12‌‌months.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌individual‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌practice‌  ‌of‌  ‌profession‌  ‌or‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌of‌‌ 
1) CAPITAL‌‌GAINS‌  ‌ Loss‌‌must‌‌be‌‌in‌‌an‌‌amount‌‌not‌‌in‌‌ 
trade‌‌   or‌‌
  business‌‌ carried‌‌ on‌‌ by‌‌ him‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌sole‌‌ proprietor‌‌ or‌‌ by‌‌ a ‌‌
excess‌‌of‌‌the‌‌net‌‌income‌‌of‌‌such‌‌ 
partnership‌‌by‌‌which‌‌he‌‌is‌‌a‌‌member.‌  ‌ Gains‌  ‌or‌  ‌income‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌sale‌  ‌or‌  ‌exchange‌  ‌of‌  ‌capital‌  ‌assets,‌‌ 
year.‌  ‌
including:‌  ‌
2) Business‌  ‌is‌  ‌any‌  ‌activity‌  ‌that‌  ‌entails‌  ‌the‌  ‌time,‌  ‌attention‌  ‌and‌‌ 
effort‌‌
  of‌‌
  an‌‌
  individual‌‌  or‌‌
  group‌‌   of‌‌ individuals‌‌ for‌‌ livelihood‌‌ or‌‌  a. Income‌‌
  from‌‌
  dealings‌‌
  in‌‌
  shares‌‌
  of‌‌
  stocks‌‌ or‌‌ domestic‌‌  Holding‌‌  100%‌‌—‌‌asset‌‌was‌‌held‌‌for‌‌  Individuals‌  ‌
profit.‌  ‌ corporation‌W‌ ON‌‌‌through‌‌the‌‌stock‌‌exchange;‌  ‌ period‌  ‌ NOT‌‌more‌‌than‌‌12‌‌months;‌  ‌
b. Income‌‌from‌‌dealings‌‌in‌‌real‌‌property‌‌located‌‌in‌‌PH;‌  ‌ 50%‌‌—‌‌asset‌‌was‌‌held‌‌for‌‌more‌‌ 
v.‌‌Income‌‌from‌‌dealings‌‌in‌‌property‌  ‌
than‌‌12‌‌months‌  ‌
c. Income‌‌from‌‌dealings‌‌in‌‌other‌‌capital‌‌assets.‌  ‌
a)‌‌Distinguish‌‌ordinary‌‌asset‌‌and‌‌capital‌‌asset‌  ‌
2) ORDINARY‌‌GAINS‌  ‌ CIR‌‌v.‌‌Ocier‌‌‌2018‌  ‌
The‌  ‌term‌  ‌'‌capital‌  ‌assets'‌  ‌means‌  ‌property‌  ‌held‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌taxpayer‌‌ 
Gains‌‌
  or‌‌
  income‌‌
  from‌‌
  the‌‌
  sale‌‌
  or‌‌ exchange‌‌ of‌‌ properties‌‌ which‌‌  The‌  ‌taxpayer‌  ‌is‌  ‌liable‌  ‌to‌  ‌pay‌  ‌capital‌  ‌gains‌  ‌taxes‌‌  for‌‌
  the‌‌  sale,‌‌
  barter,‌‌ 
(whether‌  ‌or‌  ‌not‌  ‌connected‌  ‌with‌  ‌his‌  ‌trade‌  ‌or‌  ‌business),‌  ‌but‌‌
  does‌‌ 
are‌‌not‌‌capital‌‌assets.‌  ‌ exchange‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌disposition‌  ‌of‌  ‌shares‌  ‌of‌  ‌stock‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌domestic‌‌ 
not‌‌include‌‌‌(‌ordinary‌‌assets)‌  ‌
a. Business‌‌income;‌  ‌ corporation‌  ‌except‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌sale‌  ‌or‌  ‌disposition‌  ‌is‌  ‌through‌  ‌the‌  ‌stock‌‌ 
1. stock‌‌in‌‌trade‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌taxpayer;‌‌   ‌ exchange.‌‌   For‌‌  this‌‌  purpose,‌‌   the‌‌  term‌‌  ‌disposition‌‌   ‌includes‌‌   any‌‌  act‌‌ of‌‌ 
b. Compensation‌‌income;‌  ‌ disposing,‌‌   transferring‌‌   or‌‌  parting‌‌   with,‌‌  or‌‌
  alienation‌‌   of,‌‌
  or‌‌  giving‌‌  up‌‌ 
2. other‌‌   property‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌kind‌‌ which‌‌ would‌‌ properly‌‌ be‌‌ included‌‌ 
c. Passive‌‌income;‌  ‌ of‌‌property‌‌to‌‌another.‌  ‌
in‌  ‌the‌  ‌inventory‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌taxpayer‌‌
  if‌‌
  on‌‌
  hand‌‌
  at‌‌
  the‌‌
  close‌‌
  of‌‌ 
the‌‌taxable‌‌year;‌  ‌ d. Others.‌  ‌ Republic‌‌v.‌‌Sps‌‌Bunsay‌‌‌2019‌  ‌
3. property‌  ‌held‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌taxpayer‌  ‌primarily‌  ‌for‌  ‌sale‌  ‌to‌‌ 
CGT,‌  ‌being‌  ‌a ‌‌tax‌  ‌on‌  ‌passive‌  ‌income,‌  ‌is‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌NIRC‌‌ ‌on‌  ‌
customers‌‌in‌‌the‌‌ordinary‌‌course‌‌of‌‌his‌‌trade‌‌or‌‌business;‌  ‌ the‌  ‌seller‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌consequence‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌latter's‌‌   presumed‌  ‌income‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 65‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

from‌ ‌the‌ ‌sale‌ ‌or‌ ‌exchange‌ ‌of‌ ‌real‌ ‌property.‌  ‌ d) as‌‌


  a ‌‌result‌‌
  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  exchange‌‌
  the‌‌
  transferor,‌‌
  alone‌‌
  or‌‌
  together‌‌  c) Dividend‌‌received‌‌from‌‌DC‌‌by‌‌an‌‌individual‌‌or‌‌NRFC;‌  ‌
In‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌transfer‌  ‌by‌  ‌expropriation‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌expropriating‌  ‌authority‌‌  with‌  ‌others,‌  ‌not‌  ‌exceeding‌  ‌four,‌  ‌gains‌  ‌control‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  d) Prizes‌‌of‌‌>‌‌Php‌‌10K;‌  ‌
shall‌  ‌shoulder‌  ‌the‌  ‌CGT,‌  ‌other‌  ‌taxes‌  ‌and‌  ‌fees‌  ‌as‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌just‌‌  transferee.‌ 
compensation‌‌due‌‌to‌‌the‌‌affected‌‌owner‌‌of‌‌the‌‌property.‌  ‌ e) Winnings‌‌except‌‌‌sweepstakes‌‌and‌‌lotto;‌  ‌
The‌‌
  exchange‌‌   of‌‌ property‌‌ for‌‌ stocks‌‌ between‌‌ FDC,‌‌ FAI‌‌ and‌‌ FLI‌‌ clearly‌‌ 
qualifies‌‌as‌‌a‌‌tax-free‌‌transaction.‌  ‌ f) Partner’s‌  ‌share‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌net‌  ‌income‌  ‌after‌  ‌tax‌‌
  of‌‌
  business‌‌ 
d)‌‌Tax-free‌‌exchanges‌  ‌
partnership,‌‌joint‌‌account,‌‌joint‌‌venture‌‌or‌‌consortium.‌  ‌
GR‌:‌‌  Upon‌‌  the‌‌
  sale‌‌
  or‌‌
  exchange‌‌
  or‌‌ property,‌‌ the‌‌ entire‌‌ amount‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  Bearing‌‌   in‌‌ mind‌‌ the‌‌ meaning‌‌ of‌‌ "gross‌‌ income",‌‌ it‌‌ cannot‌‌ be‌‌ gainsaid,‌‌ 
even‌  ‌then,‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌mere‌  ‌increase‌  ‌or‌  ‌appreciation‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌   value‌‌
  of‌‌  a)‌‌Interest‌  ‌
gain‌‌or‌‌loss,‌‌as‌‌the‌‌case‌‌may‌‌be,‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌recognized.‌  ‌
said‌‌ shares‌‌ cannot‌‌ be‌‌ considered‌‌ income‌‌ for‌‌ taxation‌‌ purposes‌. ‌ ‌ Amount‌‌   of‌‌
  compensation‌‌   paid‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  use‌‌  of‌‌
  money‌‌ or‌‌ forbearance‌‌ 
EXC‌:‌ No‌‌
  gain‌‌
  or‌‌
  loss‌‌
  shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  recognized‌‌
  if‌‌
  in‌‌ pursuance‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌plan‌‌ of‌‌  It‌  ‌"constitutes‌  ‌and‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌treated‌  ‌merely‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌  ‌increase‌  ‌of‌‌ 
merger‌‌or‌‌consolidation‌‌‌— ‌ ‌ from‌‌   such‌‌  use.‌‌
  ‌However‌, ‌‌interest‌‌   income‌‌   which‌‌ are‌‌ already‌‌ subject‌‌ 
capital‌."‌  ‌Hence,‌‌  the‌‌  CIR‌‌  has‌‌  no‌‌  factual‌‌  and‌‌  legal‌‌  basis‌‌  in‌‌ assessing‌‌ 
to‌‌
  final‌‌
  tax‌‌
  need‌‌  not‌‌ be‌‌ included‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ computation‌‌ for‌‌ a ‌‌taxpayer’s‌‌ 
1. A‌  ‌corporation‌, ‌‌which‌‌   is‌‌
  a ‌‌party‌‌
  to‌‌
  a ‌‌merger‌‌   or‌‌
  consolidation,‌‌  income‌‌   tax‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ increase‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ value‌‌ of‌‌ FDC's‌‌ shareholdings‌‌ in‌‌ FAC‌‌ 
until‌‌the‌‌same‌‌is‌‌actually‌‌sold‌‌at‌‌a‌‌profit.‌  ‌ annual‌‌ITR.‌  ‌
exchanges‌‌   property‌‌
  ‌solely‌‌   for‌‌
  stock‌‌   in‌‌
  a ‌‌corporation,‌‌ which‌‌ is‌‌ 
a‌‌party‌‌to‌‌the‌‌merger‌‌or‌‌consolidation;‌‌or‌  ‌ b)‌‌Dividend‌  ‌
CIR‌‌v.‌‌Lucio‌‌Co‌‌‌2020‌f‌ urther‌‌clarifying‌‌Filinvest‌  ‌
2. A‌  ‌shareholder‌  ‌exchanges‌  ‌stock‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌corporation,‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌‌ Any‌‌   ‌distribution‌‌   ‌made‌‌
  by‌‌
  a ‌‌corporation‌‌ to‌‌ its‌‌ shareholders‌‌ ‌out‌‌ of‌‌ 
party‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌merger‌  ‌or‌  ‌consolidation,‌  ‌solely‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌stock‌  ‌of‌‌  As‌  ‌regards‌  ‌the‌  ‌element‌  ‌of‌  ‌control,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court,‌‌   in‌‌
  ‌Filinvest‌, ‌‌clarified‌‌ 
its‌‌
  earnings‌‌   or‌‌
  profits‌‌ and‌‌ payable‌‌ to‌‌ its‌‌ shareholders,‌‌ whether‌‌ in‌‌ 
that‌‌  it‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ necessary‌‌ that,‌‌ after‌‌ the‌‌ exchange,‌‌ each‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ transferors‌‌ 
another‌  ‌corporation‌  ‌also‌  ‌a ‌ ‌party‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌merger‌  ‌or‌‌  money‌‌or‌‌in‌‌other‌‌property.‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌73‌) ‌ ‌
individually‌‌gains‌‌control‌‌of‌‌the‌‌transferee‌‌corporation.‌  ‌
consolidation;‌‌or‌  ‌
It‌‌
  also‌‌
  does‌‌   not‌‌
  prohibit‌‌   instances‌‌
  when‌‌ the‌‌ transferor‌‌ gains‌‌ further‌‌  1) Cash‌‌dividend‌—
‌ ‌‌paid‌‌in‌‌given‌‌sum‌‌of‌‌money;‌  ‌
3. A‌  ‌security‌  ‌holder‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌corporation,‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌party‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  control‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌transferee‌  ‌corporation.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Court‌  ‌explained‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌ 
merger‌  ‌or‌  ‌consolidation,‌  ‌exchanges‌  ‌his‌  ‌securities‌  ‌in‌  ‌such‌‌  2) Property‌  ‌dividend‌  ‌— ‌ ‌one‌  ‌paid‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌corporation‌  ‌in‌‌ 
element‌‌   of‌‌ control‌‌ is‌‌ satisfied‌‌ even‌‌ if‌‌ one‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ transferors‌‌ is‌‌ already‌‌ 
corporation,‌‌   solely‌‌
  for‌‌
  stock‌‌   or‌‌
  securities‌‌
  in‌‌ such‌‌ corporation,‌‌  owning‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌51%‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌shares‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌transferee‌‌   corporation,‌‌   as‌‌  securities‌‌(not‌‌its‌‌own‌‌stock)‌‌or‌‌other‌‌property;‌  ‌
a‌‌party‌‌to‌‌the‌‌merger‌‌or‌‌consolidation.‌  ‌ long‌  ‌as‌  ‌after‌  ‌the‌  ‌exchange,‌  ‌the‌  ‌transferors,‌  ‌not‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌  ‌five,‌‌  3) Stock‌‌ dividend‌‌ — ‌‌one‌‌ paid‌‌ by‌‌ a ‌‌corporation‌‌ with‌‌ its‌‌ OWN‌‌ 
collectively‌  ‌increase‌  ‌their‌‌   equity‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌  transferee‌‌   corporation‌‌   by‌‌ 
Also‌  ‌ stock.‌‌   ‌
51%‌‌or‌‌more.‌  ‌
4. If‌  ‌property‌  ‌is‌  ‌transferred‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌corporation‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person‌  ‌in‌‌  There‌  ‌is‌  ‌nothing‌‌
  in‌‌
  Section‌‌
  40(C)(2)‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  NIRC‌‌
  which‌‌
  requires‌‌
  the‌‌  GR‌:‌‌  NOT‌‌taxable‌‌since‌‌they‌‌are‌‌considered‌‌unrealized‌‌gain.‌  ‌
exchange‌  ‌for‌  ‌stock‌  ‌or‌  ‌unit‌  ‌of‌  ‌participation‌  ‌in‌  ‌such‌  ‌a ‌‌ taxpayer‌  ‌to‌  ‌first‌  ‌secure‌  ‌a ‌ ‌prior‌  ‌confirmatory‌  ‌ruling‌  ‌before‌  ‌the‌‌  EXC:‌  ‌
corporation‌‌   of‌‌
  which‌‌
  as‌‌  a ‌‌result‌‌
  of‌‌
  such‌‌
  exchange‌‌ said‌‌ person,‌‌  transaction‌‌may‌‌be‌‌considered‌‌as‌‌a‌‌tax-free‌‌exchange.‌  ‌
a) Change‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  stockholder’s‌‌
  equity,‌‌
  right‌‌
  or‌‌
  interest‌‌ in‌‌ 
alone‌  ‌or‌  ‌together‌  ‌with‌  ‌others,‌‌   not‌‌
  exceeding‌‌
  four‌‌
  (4)‌‌   persons,‌‌ 
vi.‌‌Passive‌‌investment‌‌income‌  ‌ the‌‌net‌‌assets‌‌of‌‌the‌‌corporation;‌  ‌
gains‌‌control‌‌of‌‌said‌‌corporation.‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌40[c]‌) ‌ ‌
b) Recipient‌‌  is‌‌
  other‌‌ than‌‌ the‌‌ shareholder.‌‌ Stock‌‌ dividend‌‌ 
CIR‌‌v.‌‌Filinvest‌‌‌2011‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌re‌‌Tax-free‌‌Exchange‌  ‌ 1. It‌‌is‌‌an‌‌income‌‌subject‌‌to‌F
‌ WT‌. ‌ ‌
is‌‌taxable‌‌to‌‌the‌‌usufructuary.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌requisites‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌non-recognition‌  ‌of‌  ‌gain‌  ‌or‌  ‌loss‌  ‌are‌  ‌as‌‌  2. The‌  ‌recipient‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌required‌  ‌to‌  ‌include‌  ‌the‌  ‌income‌  ‌in‌  ‌his‌  ‌gross‌‌ 
c) Cancellation‌‌or‌‌redemption‌‌of‌‌shares‌‌of‌‌stock;‌  ‌
follows:‌‌   ‌ income‌‌nor‌‌in‌‌his‌‌taxable‌‌income.‌  ‌
d) Distribution‌‌of‌‌treasury‌‌stocks;‌  ‌
a) the‌‌transferee‌‌is‌‌a‌‌corporation;‌  ‌ 3. Taxpayer‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  required‌‌  to‌‌
  file‌‌
  ITR‌‌
  if‌‌ his‌‌ income‌‌ consists‌‌ solely‌‌ of‌‌ 
b) the‌‌  transferee‌‌
  exchanges‌‌
  its‌‌
  shares‌‌
  of‌‌
  stock‌‌ for‌‌ property/ies‌‌  income‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌final‌‌tax.‌E‌ xamples‌‌of‌‌passive‌‌investment‌‌income:‌  ‌ e) Dividends‌  ‌declared‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌guise‌  ‌of‌  ‌treasury‌  ‌stock‌‌ 
of‌‌the‌‌transferor;‌  dividend‌‌to‌‌avoid‌‌income‌‌taxation;‌  ‌
a) Interest‌‌income‌‌from‌‌bank‌‌deposit;‌  ‌
c) the‌  ‌transfer‌  ‌is‌  ‌made‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person,‌  ‌acting‌  ‌alone‌  ‌or‌  ‌together‌‌  f) Different‌‌classes‌‌of‌‌stocks‌‌were‌‌issued.‌  ‌
with‌‌others,‌n ‌ ot‌‌exceeding‌‌four‌‌persons‌;‌‌and,‌  ‌ b) Royalties;‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 66‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

4) Liquidating‌  ‌dividend‌  ‌— ‌ ‌one‌  ‌resulting‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌  a) Shares‌‌


  are‌‌
  redeemed‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  absence‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  availability‌‌  How‌‌about‌‌advance‌‌rentals?‌  ‌
distribution‌‌ by‌‌ a‌‌ corporation‌‌ of‌‌ all‌‌ its‌‌ property‌‌ or‌‌ assets‌‌ in‌‌  of‌‌unrestricted‌‌earnings;‌  ‌
1) Prepaid‌‌ rentals‌‌ ‌— ‌‌‌taxable‌‌ ‌if‌‌ so‌‌ received‌‌ under‌‌ a ‌‌claim‌‌ of‌‌ 
complete‌‌liquidation‌‌or‌‌dissolution.‌  ‌
b) Not‌‌in‌‌the‌‌nature‌‌of‌‌a‌‌recurring‌‌return‌‌on‌‌stock;‌  ‌ right‌‌and‌‌without‌‌restriction‌‌as‌‌to‌‌use.‌  ‌
Generally‌  ‌a ‌ ‌return‌  ‌of‌  ‌capital,‌  ‌and‌  ‌hence,‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌income.‌‌ 
c) The‌  ‌source‌  ‌of‌  ‌redemption‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌original‌  ‌capital‌‌  2) Security‌  ‌deposit‌  ‌— ‌ ‌not‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌unless‌  ‌lessee‌  ‌violates‌‌ 
However‌, ‌ ‌it‌  ‌is‌‌
  ‌taxable‌‌
  ‌income‌‌   with‌‌
  respect‌‌  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌excess‌‌ 
subscription‌‌   upon‌‌   establishment‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ corporation‌‌ or‌‌  any‌‌provision‌‌of‌‌the‌‌contract.‌  ‌
of‌‌amount‌‌received‌‌over‌‌cost‌‌of‌‌the‌‌share‌‌surrendered.‌  ‌
initial‌‌capital‌‌investment‌‌in‌‌an‌‌existing‌‌enterprise.‌  ‌
3) Loan‌—
‌ ‌‌not‌‌taxable‌. ‌ ‌
CIR‌‌v.‌‌Premium‌‌Leisure‌‌Corp‌‌‌2019‌  ‌
2) Taxable‌—
‌   ‌‌ ‌
vii.‌‌Annuities‌‌and‌‌proceeds‌‌from‌‌life‌‌insurance‌‌or‌‌other‌‌types‌‌of‌‌
 
The‌  ‌distribution‌  ‌of‌  ‌liquidating‌  ‌dividends‌  ‌on‌  ‌account‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
a) The‌  ‌redeemed‌  ‌shares‌  ‌are‌  ‌from‌  ‌stock‌  ‌dividend‌‌  insurance‌  ‌
dissolution‌‌   of‌‌ a ‌‌corporation‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ treated‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌sale‌‌ for‌‌ purposes‌‌ 
of‌  ‌the‌  ‌imposition‌  ‌of‌  ‌capital‌  ‌gains‌  ‌tax.‌  ‌Under‌  ‌Section‌  ‌73‌  ‌(A)‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  declarations‌‌other‌‌than‌‌as‌‌initial‌‌capital‌‌investment.‌  ‌
1997‌‌   NIRC,‌‌ receipt‌‌ by‌‌ a ‌‌stockholder,‌‌ whether‌‌ corporate‌‌ or‌‌ individual,‌‌  Annuity‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌sum‌  ‌of‌  ‌money‌  ‌payable‌‌
  yearly‌‌
  or‌‌
  at‌‌
  regular‌‌
  intervals.‌‌ 
b) There‌  ‌is‌  ‌redemption‌  ‌or‌  ‌cancellation;‌  ‌the‌  ‌transaction‌‌ 
of‌  ‌liquidating‌  ‌dividends‌  ‌is‌‌   ‌subject‌‌  to‌‌
  ordinary‌‌   income‌‌   tax‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌  Note‌  ‌however‌  ‌that‌  ‌life‌  ‌insurance‌  ‌annuities‌  ‌are‌  ‌excluded‌  ‌from‌‌ 
involves‌  ‌stock‌  ‌dividends;‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌
  “time‌‌  and‌‌
  manner”‌‌ 
part‌‌of‌‌the‌‌individual‌‌stockholder.‌  ‌ gross‌‌income.‌  ‌
of‌  ‌the‌‌
  transaction‌‌
  makes‌‌   it‌‌
  essentially‌‌  equivalent‌‌  to‌‌
  a ‌‌
 ‌

distribution‌‌of‌‌taxable‌‌dividends.‌  ‌ viii.‌‌Prizes‌‌and‌‌awards‌  ‌
Giver‌  ‌ Recipient‌  ‌ Tax‌‌Rate‌  ‌
c)‌‌Royalty‌‌income‌  ‌ GR‌:‌‌  Taxable.‌  ‌
Domesti‌ DC,‌‌RFC‌  ‌ Exempt‌  ‌ Any‌‌
  payment‌‌   of‌‌ any‌‌ kind‌‌ received‌‌ as‌‌ consideration‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ use‌‌ of‌‌ or‌‌  EXC:‌  ‌
c‌  ‌ right‌‌to‌‌use:‌  ‌
RC,‌‌NRC,‌‌  10%‌  ‌ 1) If‌‌
  the‌‌
  recipient‌‌   was‌‌
  selected‌‌ without‌‌ any‌‌ action‌‌ on‌‌ his‌‌ part‌‌ 
RA‌  ‌ 1) Any‌‌patent,‌‌trademark,‌‌design‌‌or‌‌model;‌  ‌ to‌  ‌enter‌  ‌the‌  ‌contest‌  ‌and‌  ‌he‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌  ‌required‌  ‌to‌  ‌render‌‌ 
substantial‌‌   future‌‌
  services‌‌   as‌‌
  a ‌‌condition‌‌   for‌‌ receiving‌‌ the‌‌ 
2) Secret‌‌formula‌‌or‌‌process;‌  ‌ prize‌‌or‌‌award;‌  ‌
NRA‌‌-‌‌ETB‌  ‌ 20%‌  ‌
3) Industrial,‌‌commercial‌‌or‌‌scientific‌‌equipment;‌  ‌ 2) Those‌‌
  granted‌‌
  to‌‌
  athletes‌‌
  in‌‌
  local‌‌
  and‌‌
  international‌‌
  sports‌‌ 
NRA‌‌- ‌‌ 25%‌  ‌
4) Information‌  ‌concerning‌  ‌industrial,‌  ‌commercial‌  ‌or‌‌  competitions‌  ‌sanctioned‌  ‌by‌  ‌their‌  ‌respective‌  ‌national‌‌ 
NETB‌  ‌
scientific‌‌experience.‌  ‌ sports‌‌associations;‌‌and‌  ‌
NRFC‌  ‌ 15%‌‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌allowance‌‌for‌‌tax‌  d)‌‌Rental‌‌income‌  ‌ 3) Those‌‌that‌‌are‌‌in‌‌the‌‌nature‌‌of‌‌gifts.‌  ‌
credit‌‌or‌‌the‌t‌ ax‌‌sparing‌‌rule‌;‌‌ 
Fixed‌  ‌sum‌  ‌either‌  ‌in‌  ‌cash‌  ‌or‌  ‌property‌  ‌equivalent,‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌paid‌  ‌at‌  ‌a ‌‌ ix.‌‌Pension,‌‌retirement‌‌benefit,‌‌or‌‌separation‌‌pay‌  ‌
otherwise,‌‌30%‌  ‌
definite‌‌period‌‌for‌‌the‌‌use‌‌or‌‌enjoyment‌‌of‌‌a‌‌thing‌‌or‌‌right.‌  ‌
A‌  ‌pension‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌gratuity‌  ‌granted‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌favor‌  ‌or‌  ‌reward‌  ‌or‌  ‌one‌  ‌paid‌‌ 
★ Dividend‌  ‌received‌  ‌from‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌corporation‌  ‌is‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌PH‌‌  Value‌  ‌of‌  ‌permanent‌  ‌improvements‌  ‌made‌  ‌by‌  ‌lessee‌  ‌on‌  ‌leased‌‌  under‌  ‌given‌  ‌conditions‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person‌  ‌following‌  ‌retirement‌  ‌from‌‌ 
income‌  ‌tax‌  ‌if‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌50%‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌world‌‌  income‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌  FC‌‌
  is‌‌  property‌  ‌that‌  ‌will‌  ‌become‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌lessor‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌‌  service‌‌ or‌‌ to‌‌ surviving‌‌ dependents.‌‌ Note‌‌ however‌‌ that‌‌ pensions‌‌ and‌‌ 
derived‌  ‌from‌  ‌PH‌‌   for‌‌
  3 ‌‌years‌‌
  preceding‌‌   the‌‌
  declaration‌‌   of‌‌
  such‌‌  expiration‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌lease.‌  ‌The‌  ‌lessor‌  ‌shall‌  ‌report‌  ‌such‌  ‌an‌  ‌income‌  retirement‌  ‌benefits‌  ‌under‌  ‌RA‌  ‌7641‌  ‌are‌  excluded‌  ‌from‌  ‌gross‌‌ 
dividend.‌  ‌ under‌‌any‌‌of‌‌the‌‌following‌‌methods:‌  ‌ income.‌  ‌
Rules‌‌on‌‌redemption‌‌of‌‌share‌‌of‌‌stock‌  ‌ 1) Outright‌  ‌method‌  ‌— ‌ ‌FMV‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌completed‌  ‌building‌  ‌or‌‌  x.‌‌Income‌‌from‌‌any‌‌source‌  ‌
1) NOT‌‌taxable‌‌‌— ‌ ‌ improvement‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌reported‌‌as‌‌additional‌‌rent‌‌income.‌  ‌
a)‌‌Condonation‌‌of‌‌indebtedness‌  ‌
2) Spread‌‌ out‌‌ method‌‌ — ‌‌Allocate‌‌ the‌‌ depreciated‌‌ value‌‌ over‌‌ 
the‌‌remaining‌‌term‌‌of‌‌the‌‌lease‌‌contract.‌  ‌ Cancellation‌‌or‌‌forgiveness‌‌of‌‌debt‌‌may‌‌amount‌‌to‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 67‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

a) Payment‌‌of‌‌income‌‌—‌‌taxable;‌  ‌ 1. Paid‌‌to‌‌heirs;‌  ‌ reasonable‌  ‌private‌  ‌benefit‌  ‌plan‌  ‌maintained‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 


2. Paid‌‌upon‌‌death‌‌of‌‌the‌‌insured;‌  ‌ employer:‌‌xxxx‌  ‌
b) Payment‌‌of‌‌dividends‌‌—‌‌taxable;‌  ‌
3. Paid‌‌in‌‌a‌‌single‌‌sum‌‌or‌‌in‌‌installment.‌‌   ‌ REQUISITES:‌  ‌
c) Gift‌‌—‌‌exempt.‌  ‌
EXC‌:‌‌  (When‌‌taxable)‌‌   ‌ 1. At‌‌least‌‌50‌‌years‌‌old;‌  ‌
b)‌‌Recovery‌‌of‌‌accounts‌‌previously‌‌written‌‌off‌  ‌
1. Used‌‌to‌‌secure‌‌money‌‌obligation;‌  ‌ 2. At‌  ‌least‌  ‌10‌  ‌years‌  ‌of‌  ‌service‌  ‌in‌  ‌same‌  ‌company‌‌ 
Recovery‌  ‌of‌  ‌bad‌  ‌debts‌  ‌previously‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌as‌  ‌deduction‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  (‌aggregate,‌‌not‌‌necessarily‌‌continuous‌);‌  ‌
2. Transfer‌‌for‌‌valuable‌‌consideration.‌  ‌
preceding‌‌   years‌‌
  shall‌‌   be‌‌
  included‌‌ as‌‌ part‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ gross‌‌ income‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌  3. Reasonable‌‌private‌‌benefit‌‌plan;‌  ‌
year‌  ‌of‌  ‌recovery‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌extent‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌income‌  ‌tax‌  ‌benefit‌  ‌of‌  ‌said‌‌ 
I N COM E  =  P roceeds – (P urchase P rice  +  P remiums P aid)   ‌ 4. In‌‌
  the‌‌
  nature‌‌
  of‌‌
  pension,‌‌
  plan,‌‌
  profit‌‌ sharing‌‌ plan,‌‌ 
deduction.‌‌(‌Sec‌‌34[e][1]‌) ‌ ‌
stock‌‌bonus‌‌or‌‌gratuity;‌  ‌
c)‌‌Receipt‌‌of‌‌tax‌‌refunds‌‌or‌‌credit‌  ‌
2) Amount‌‌Received‌‌by‌‌Insured‌‌as‌‌Return‌‌of‌‌Premium.‌‌‌—  ‌‌ ‌ 5. Approved‌‌by‌‌the‌‌BIR;‌  ‌
Taxes‌  ‌which‌  ‌were‌  ‌previously‌  ‌claimed‌  ‌and‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌as‌  ‌deductions‌‌  6. Employer‌  ‌must‌  ‌give‌  ‌contribution‌  ‌and‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌‌ 
but‌  ‌were‌  ‌subsequently‌‌   refunded‌‌  or‌‌
  granted‌‌
  as‌‌  tax‌‌
  credit‌‌
  should‌‌
  be‌‌  I N COM E  =  Endowment –  P remiums P aid   ‌
established‌‌for‌‌the‌c‌ ommon‌‌benefit‌‌‌of‌‌ALL.‌  ‌
declared‌‌as‌‌part‌‌of‌‌gross‌‌income‌‌of‌‌that‌‌year.‌E ‌ xcept‌  ‌
3) Gifts,‌‌
  Bequests,‌‌   and‌‌   Devises.‌‌  ‌— ‌‌‌However,‌‌
  ‌income‌‌
  from‌‌ such‌‌  7. Availed‌  ‌of‌  ‌only‌  ‌ONCE.‌  ‌(‌except‌‌
  if‌‌
  2nd‌‌
  employer‌‌
  is‌‌ 
a) Estate‌‌and‌‌donor’s‌‌tax;‌  ‌ property,‌  ‌as‌  ‌well‌‌
  as‌‌  gift,‌‌
  bequest,‌‌  devise‌‌
  or‌‌
  descent‌‌
  of‌‌
  income‌‌  Government‌— ‌ ‌‌still‌‌exempt)‌  ‌
b) Income,‌  ‌war-profit‌  ‌and‌  ‌excess‌  ‌profit‌  ‌taxes‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌‌ from‌‌
  any‌‌  property,‌‌   in‌‌  cases‌‌
  of‌‌
  transfers‌‌  of‌‌
  divided‌‌ interest‌, ‌‌ b) Any‌‌   amount‌‌   received‌‌   by‌‌
  an‌‌  official‌‌
  or‌‌
  employee‌‌   or‌‌
  by‌‌
  his‌‌ 
foreign‌‌country;‌  ‌ shall‌‌be‌‌included‌‌in‌‌gross‌‌income.‌  ‌ heirs‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌employer‌‌   as‌‌
  a ‌‌consequence‌‌  of‌‌
  ‌separation‌‌ 
4) Compensation‌‌   for‌‌ Injuries‌‌ or‌‌ Sickness.‌‌ — ‌‌amounts‌‌ received‌‌  of‌  ‌such‌  ‌official‌  ‌or‌  ‌employee‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌service‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
c) Taxes‌  ‌assessed‌  ‌against‌  ‌local‌  ‌benefits‌  ‌of‌‌
  a ‌‌kind‌‌
  tending‌‌
  to‌‌ 
as‌  ‌compensation‌  ‌for‌  ‌personal‌  ‌injuries‌  ‌or‌  ‌sickness,‌  ‌plus‌  ‌the‌‌  employer‌  ‌because‌  ‌of‌  ‌death‌  ‌sickness‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌physical‌‌ 
increase‌‌the‌‌value‌‌of‌‌the‌‌property‌‌assessed;‌  ‌
amounts‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌damages‌  ‌received,‌  ‌whether‌  ‌by‌  ‌suit‌  ‌or‌‌  disability‌  ‌or‌  ‌for‌  ‌any‌  ‌cause‌  ‌beyond‌  ‌the‌  ‌control‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
d) Stock‌‌transaction‌‌tax;‌  ‌ agreement,‌‌on‌‌account‌‌of‌‌such‌‌injuries‌‌or‌‌sickness.‌  ‌ said‌‌official‌‌or‌‌employee‌. ‌ ‌
e) Taxes‌‌which‌‌are‌‌not‌‌allowable‌‌as‌‌deductions‌‌under‌‌the‌‌law.‌  ‌ EXC‌‌(Taxable)‌: ‌ ‌ c) The‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌existing‌  ‌law‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌contrary‌‌ 
notwithstanding,‌  ‌social‌  ‌security‌  ‌benefits,‌  ‌retirement‌‌ 
d.‌‌Exclusions‌  ‌ a. Actual‌‌damages‌‌for‌‌loss‌‌of‌‌anticipated‌‌profits;‌ 
gratuities,‌‌
  pensions‌‌   and‌‌
  other‌‌
  similar‌‌
  benefits‌‌  received‌‌ by‌‌ 
LAGCIRM‌  ‌ b. Moral‌  ‌and‌  ‌exemplary‌  ‌damages‌‌
  awarded‌‌
  as‌‌
  a ‌‌result‌‌
  of‌‌  resident‌  ‌or‌  ‌nonresident‌  ‌citizens‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌or‌‌ 
1) Life‌  ‌Insurance.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌If‌  ‌the‌  ‌company‌  ‌insures‌  ‌its‌  ‌employee‌  ‌and‌‌  breach‌‌of‌‌contract;‌  ‌ aliens‌‌  who‌‌
  come‌‌  to‌‌
  reside‌‌  permanently‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  Philippines‌‌ 
makes‌  ‌the‌  ‌latter’s‌  ‌estate‌  ‌the‌  ‌beneficiary,‌  ‌THE‌  ‌PREMIUM‌  ‌IS‌  c. Interest‌‌for‌‌non-taxable‌‌damages‌‌above;‌  ‌ from‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌government‌  ‌agencies‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌institutions,‌‌ 
TAXABLE,‌‌while‌‌the‌‌proceeds‌‌NOT‌‌TAXABLE.‌  ‌ d. Damages‌‌as‌‌compensation‌‌for‌‌unrealized‌‌income.‌  ‌ private‌‌or‌‌public.‌  ‌
When‌‌taxable?‌  ‌ 5) Income‌‌   Exempt‌‌   under‌‌  Treaty.‌‌   — ‌‌Income‌‌  of‌‌
  any‌‌
  kind,‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌  d) Payments‌  ‌of‌‌   benefits‌‌  due‌‌
  or‌‌
  to‌‌
  become‌‌
  due‌‌  to‌‌
  any‌‌
  person‌‌ 
a. Insurer‌  ‌and‌  ‌insured‌  ‌agreed‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌amount‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  extent‌  ‌required‌  ‌by‌  ‌any‌  ‌treaty‌  ‌obligation‌  ‌binding‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌‌  residing‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌laws‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌US‌‌ 
proceeds‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌withheld‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌insurer‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌‌  Government‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines.‌  ‌ administered‌‌by‌‌the‌‌US‌‌Veterans‌‌Administration.‌  ‌
obligation‌‌  to‌‌
  pay‌‌
  interest‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  same‌‌   – ‌‌the‌‌
  interest‌‌
  is‌‌  6) Retirement‌‌Benefits,‌‌Pensions,‌‌Gratuities,‌‌etc.‌‌‌— ‌  ‌ ‌ e) Benefits‌‌received‌‌from‌‌or‌‌enjoyed‌‌under‌‌the‌‌SSS.‌  ‌
the‌‌one‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌tax.‌  ‌ f) Benefits‌‌received‌‌from‌‌the‌‌GSIS.‌  ‌
a) Retirement‌‌   benefits‌‌
  received‌‌   under‌‌
  RA‌‌
  No.‌‌ 7641‌‌ and‌‌ those‌‌ 
b. There‌‌is‌‌transfer‌‌of‌‌the‌‌insurance‌‌policy.‌‌   ‌ received‌  ‌by‌  ‌officials‌  ‌and‌  ‌employees‌  ‌of‌  ‌private‌  ‌firms,‌‌  Santos‌‌v.‌‌Servier‌‌Phil.,‌‌Inc‌.‌‌on‌‌Retirement‌‌Benefits‌  ‌
GR‌:‌‌  NOT‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌regardless‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌beneficiaries.‌  ‌ whether‌  ‌individual‌  ‌or‌  ‌corporate,‌  ‌in‌  ‌accordance‌  ‌with‌  ‌a ‌‌
⭐For‌  ‌the‌  ‌retirement‌  ‌benefits‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌exempt‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Conditions‌:  ‌‌ ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 68‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

f) GSIS,‌‌SSS,‌‌Medicare‌‌and‌‌Other‌‌Contributions.‌  ‌
withholding‌‌   tax‌, ‌‌the‌‌
  taxpayer‌‌
  is‌‌
  burdened‌‌
  to‌‌
  prove‌‌ the‌‌ concurrence‌‌  Compensation‌‌for‌‌  Compensatory;‌‌not‌‌gain‌‌or‌‌profit‌  ‌
of‌‌the‌‌following‌‌elements:‌‌   ‌ g) Gains‌‌   from‌‌  the‌‌ Sale‌‌ of‌‌ Bonds,‌‌ Debentures‌‌ or‌‌ other‌‌  injuries‌‌or‌‌sickness‌  ‌
1) a‌  ‌reasonable‌  ‌private‌  ‌benefit‌  ‌plan‌  ‌is‌  ‌maintained‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌  Certificate‌  ‌of‌  ‌Indebtedness.‌  ‌— ‌‌Gains‌‌   realized‌‌
  from‌‌ 
employer;‌  ‌ the‌  ‌same‌  ‌or‌  ‌exchange‌  ‌or‌  ‌retirement‌  ‌of‌  ‌bonds,‌‌  Income‌‌exempt‌‌under‌‌  Adherence‌‌to‌‌generally‌‌accepted‌‌principles‌‌ 
2) the‌  ‌retiring‌  ‌official‌  ‌or‌  ‌employee‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌in‌‌
  the‌‌
  service‌‌
  of‌‌  debentures‌‌   or‌‌
  other‌‌
  certificate‌‌
  of‌‌  indebtedness‌‌ ‌with‌‌ a ‌‌ treaty‌  ‌ of‌‌international‌‌law‌  ‌
the‌‌same‌‌employer‌‌for‌a ‌ t‌‌least‌‌ten‌‌(10)‌‌years‌; ‌ ‌ maturity‌‌of‌‌more‌‌than‌‌five‌‌(5)‌‌years.‌  ‌
Retirement‌‌benefits,‌‌  Gratuity‌‌for‌‌years‌‌of‌‌service‌  ‌
3) the‌  ‌retiring‌  ‌official‌  ‌or‌  ‌employee‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌less‌‌
  than‌‌
  ‌fifty‌‌
  (50)‌‌  ★ Debentures‌  ‌are‌  ‌used‌  ‌for‌  ‌bonds,‌  ‌backed‌  ‌by‌‌ 
years‌‌of‌‌age‌‌‌at‌‌the‌‌time‌‌of‌‌his‌‌retirement;‌‌and‌  ‌ pensions,‌‌gratuities‌  ‌
general‌  ‌credit‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌issuer‌  ‌rather‌  ‌than‌  ‌a ‌‌
4) the‌‌benefit‌‌had‌‌been‌a
‌ vailed‌‌of‌‌only‌‌once‌. ‌ ‌ particular‌  ‌asset.‌  ‌They‌  ‌are‌  ‌unsecured‌‌ 
Income‌‌received‌‌by‌‌  To‌‌lessen‌‌the‌‌burden‌‌of‌‌foreign‌‌loans‌‌ 
liabilities.‌‌
  This‌‌
  is‌‌ like‌‌ a ‌‌bank‌‌ letting‌‌ someone‌‌ 
Petitioner‌‌   was‌‌
  qualified‌‌   for‌‌  disability‌‌ retirement.‌  ‌At‌‌ the‌‌ time‌‌ of‌‌ such‌‌  foreign‌‌governments‌‌  inasmuch‌‌as‌‌the‌‌interest‌‌of‌‌these‌‌loans‌‌are,‌‌ 
owe‌‌money‌‌without‌‌any‌‌collateral.‌  ‌
retirement,‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌was‌‌   only‌‌  41‌‌
  years‌‌  of‌‌
  age;‌‌
  and‌‌   had‌‌
  been‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌  from‌‌their‌‌investments‌‌  by‌‌contractual‌‌arrangement,‌‌borne‌‌by‌‌ 
service‌‌   for‌‌ more‌‌ or‌‌ less‌‌ eight‌‌ (8)‌‌ years.‌  ‌As‌‌ such,‌‌ the‌‌ above‌‌ provision‌  h) Gains‌‌from‌‌Redemption‌‌of‌‌Shares‌‌in‌‌Mutual‌‌Fund.‌‌   ‌ in‌‌PH‌  ‌ domestic‌‌borrowers.‌  ‌
is‌  ‌not‌  ‌applicable‌  ‌for‌  ‌failure‌  ‌to‌  ‌comply‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌age‌  ‌and‌  ‌length‌  ‌of‌‌  i) Income‌‌   Derived‌‌   from‌‌   the‌‌
  Sale‌‌   of‌‌ Gold‌‌ Pursuant‌‌ to‌‌ 
service‌  ‌requirements.‌  ‌Therefore,‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌faulted‌  ‌for‌‌ 
RA‌  ‌No.‌  ‌7076‌. ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌Income‌  ‌derived‌  ‌from‌‌   following‌‌  ii.‌‌Distinguish:‌‌exclusions,‌‌deductions,‌‌and‌‌tax‌‌credits‌  ‌
  the‌‌
deducting‌  ‌from‌  ‌petitioner's‌  ‌total‌  ‌retirement‌  ‌benefits‌  ‌the‌  ‌amount‌  ‌of‌‌ 
P362,386.87,‌‌for‌‌taxation‌‌purposes.‌  ‌ transactions:‌  ‌
Exclusions‌  ‌from‌  ‌gross‌  ‌income‌  ‌refer‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌flow‌  ‌of‌  ‌wealth‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
i. The‌  ‌sale‌  ‌of‌  ‌gold‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌BSP‌  ‌by‌  ‌registered‌‌  taxpayer‌‌  which‌‌ are‌‌ not‌‌ treated‌‌ as‌‌ part‌‌ of‌‌ gross‌‌ income,‌‌ for‌‌ purposes‌‌ 
7) Miscellaneous‌‌Items.‌‌—  ‌‌ ‌
small-scale‌  ‌miners‌  ‌and‌  ‌accredited‌  ‌traders;‌‌  of‌  ‌computing‌  ‌the‌  ‌taxpayer’s‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌income‌  ‌either‌  ‌because‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌‌ 
a) Income‌‌Derived‌‌by‌‌Foreign‌‌Government.‌‌   ‌ and‌  ‌ exempted‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌
  constitution,‌‌ by‌‌ statute,‌‌ or‌‌ it‌‌ does‌‌ not‌‌ come‌‌ within‌‌ 
b) Income‌‌
  Derived‌‌   by‌‌ the‌‌ Government‌‌ or‌‌ its‌‌ Political‌‌  ii. The‌  ‌sale‌  ‌of‌  ‌gold‌  ‌by‌  ‌registered‌  ‌small-scale‌‌  the‌‌definition‌‌of‌‌income.‌  ‌
Subdivisions.‌‌   ‌ miners‌‌   to‌‌
  accredited‌‌
  traders‌‌
  for‌‌
  eventual‌‌ sale‌‌  Deductions‌  ‌from‌  ‌gross‌  ‌income‌  ‌are‌  ‌the‌  ‌amounts‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌‌ 
c) Prizes‌  ‌and‌  ‌Awards.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Prizes‌  ‌and‌  ‌awards‌  ‌made‌‌  to‌‌the‌‌BSP.‌‌(R‌ A‌‌11256‌) ‌ ‌ allows‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌deducted‌  ‌from‌  ‌gross‌‌
  income‌‌
  in‌‌
  order‌‌
  to‌‌
  arrive‌‌
  at‌‌
  net‌‌ 
primarily‌  ‌in‌  ‌recognition‌  ‌of‌  ‌religious,‌  ‌charitable,‌‌  i.‌‌Rationale‌  ‌ income.‌  ‌
scientific,‌  ‌educational,‌  ‌artistic,‌  ‌literary,‌  ‌or‌  ‌civic‌‌ 
Generally,‌  ‌they‌  ‌are‌  ‌excluded‌  ‌because‌  ‌they‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌fall‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌‌  Tax‌‌credits‌‌‌are‌‌directly‌‌deducted‌‌from‌‌tax‌‌liability.‌  ‌
achievement‌‌‌but‌‌only‌‌if:‌  ‌
definition‌‌
  of‌‌
  income‌‌   for‌‌
  income‌‌
  tax‌‌
  purposes‌‌   or‌‌
  a ‌‌provision‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌  iii.‌‌Exclusions‌‌under‌‌the‌‌Constitution‌  ‌
i. The‌  ‌recipient‌  ‌was‌  ‌selected‌  ‌without‌  ‌any‌‌ 
Tax‌‌Code‌‌or‌‌special‌‌law‌‌exempts‌‌them‌‌from‌‌income‌‌tax.‌  ‌
action‌  ‌on‌  ‌his‌  ‌part‌  ‌to‌  ‌enter‌  ‌the‌  ‌contest‌  ‌or‌‌ 
All‌  ‌revenues‌  ‌and‌  ‌assets‌  ‌of‌  ‌non-stock,‌  ‌non-profit‌  ‌educational‌‌ 
proceeding;‌‌and‌  ‌ Exclusion‌  ‌ Rationale‌  ‌
institutions‌  ‌used‌  ‌actually,‌  ‌directly,‌‌
  and‌‌
  exclusively‌‌
  for‌‌
  educational‌‌ 
ii. The‌  ‌recipient‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌required‌  ‌to‌  ‌render‌‌  purposes‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌exempt‌‌from‌‌taxes‌‌and‌‌duties.‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌4‌‌Art‌‌XIV‌) ‌ ‌
Proceeds‌‌of‌‌Life‌‌  Indemnity‌‌rather‌‌than‌‌as‌‌gain‌‌or‌‌profit.‌  ‌
substantial‌‌ future‌‌ services‌‌ ‌as‌‌ a ‌‌condition‌‌ to‌‌ 
Insurance‌  ‌ 4.‌‌Deductions‌  ‌
receiving‌‌the‌‌prize‌‌or‌‌award.‌  ‌
d) Prizes‌  ‌and‌  ‌Awards‌  ‌in‌  ‌Sports‌  ‌Competition.‌  ‌— ‌‌ Amount‌‌received‌‌as‌‌  Return‌‌of‌‌capital‌  ‌ Who‌‌are‌‌not‌‌allowed‌‌to‌‌avail‌‌of‌‌the‌‌deductions‌‌under‌‌Sec‌‌34?‌  ‌
sanctioned‌‌by‌‌their‌‌national‌‌sports‌‌associations.‌  ‌ return‌‌of‌‌premium‌  ‌ Taxpayers‌‌  earning‌‌ compensation‌‌ income‌‌ arising‌‌ from‌‌ personal‌‌ services‌‌ 
e) 13th‌  ‌Month‌  ‌Pay‌  ‌and‌  ‌Other‌  ‌Benefits.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Provided‌, ‌‌ rendered‌‌under‌‌an‌‌employer-employee‌‌relationship.‌  ‌
Gifts,‌‌bequests‌‌and‌‌  Not‌‌a‌‌product‌‌of‌‌capital‌‌or‌‌industry‌  ‌
however,‌  ‌That‌  ‌the‌  ‌total‌  ‌exclusion‌  ‌under‌  ‌this‌‌ 
devises‌  ‌ 1. Citizens‌  ‌and‌  ‌Resident‌  ‌Aliens‌  ‌whose‌  ‌income‌  ‌is‌  ‌purely‌‌ 
subparagraph‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌exceed‌  ‌Ninety‌  ‌thousand‌‌ 
compensation‌‌income;‌  ‌
pesos‌‌(P90,000)‌. ‌ ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 69‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

2. NRA-NETB;‌  ‌ b) A‌dvertising‌‌and‌‌Promotional‌‌Expense;‌  ‌ ii) Extraordinary‌  ‌- ‌ ‌> ‌ ‌1 ‌ ‌year;‌  ‌Capitalized,‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌‌ 
To‌‌be‌‌deductible‌o
‌ utright:‌  ‌ depreciation.‌  ‌
3. NRFC.‌  ‌
i) Must‌‌be‌‌reasonable;‌‌AND‌  ‌ g) S‌upplies‌  ‌and‌  ‌Materials.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Must‌  ‌be‌  ‌actually‌  ‌consumed‌‌ 
a.‌‌General‌‌Rule‌‌—‌‌Deductions‌  ‌
during‌‌the‌‌taxable‌‌year.‌  ‌
ii) Incurred‌‌
  to‌‌
  stimulate‌‌  ‌current‌‌
  sales‌‌
  and‌‌
  not‌‌ establish‌‌ 
ExInTaLoBaChaRePenDepDep‌  ‌ h) Litigation‌  ‌Expense.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌If‌  ‌incurred‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌defense‌  ‌or‌‌ 
goodwill‌‌or‌‌future‌‌sales.‌  ‌
1) Ex‌penses;‌  ‌ protection‌‌of‌‌title‌‌=‌‌capital‌‌in‌‌nature,‌‌NOT‌‌deductible.‌  ‌
c) R‌ent‌; ‌ ‌
Option‌‌to‌‌Private‌‌Educational‌‌Institutions:‌  ‌
2) In‌terest;‌  ‌ i) Required‌  ‌as‌  ‌condition‌  ‌for‌  ‌continued‌  ‌use‌  ‌or‌‌ 
a) Outright‌‌Method;‌‌OR‌  ‌
3) Ta‌xes;‌  ‌ possession;‌  ‌
b) Spread-out‌‌Method‌‌=‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌depreciation.‌  ‌
ii) Purpose‌‌is‌‌for‌‌trade,‌‌business,‌‌profession;‌  ‌
4) Lo‌sses;‌  ‌ CIR‌‌v.‌‌General‌‌Foods‌‌‌on‌‌Advertising‌‌Expense‌  ‌
iii) Taxpayer‌‌not‌‌owner‌‌of‌‌property‌‌leased;‌  ‌
5) Ba‌d‌‌Debts;‌  ‌ iv) Subject‌‌to‌‌withholding‌‌tax‌‌of‌5
‌ %.‌  ‌ To‌‌
  be‌‌
  deductible‌‌
  from‌‌
  gross‌‌
  income,‌‌
  the‌‌
  subject‌‌
  advertising‌‌ expense‌‌ 
must‌‌comply‌‌with‌‌the‌‌following‌‌requisites:‌‌   ‌
6) Cha‌ritable‌‌Contributions;‌  ‌ d) T‌ravelling‌‌Expense;‌  ‌
a) the‌‌expense‌‌must‌‌be‌o
‌ rdinary‌‌and‌‌necessary‌; ‌ ‌
7) Re‌search‌‌and‌‌Development;‌  ‌ i) Reasonable‌‌and‌‌necessary;‌  ‌
b) it‌‌must‌‌have‌‌been‌‌paid‌‌or‌‌incurred‌‌during‌‌the‌‌taxable‌‌year;‌‌   ‌
ii) Incurred‌  ‌or‌  ‌paid‌  ‌while‌  ‌away‌  ‌from‌  ‌home‌  ‌- ‌ ‌station‌‌ 
8) Pen‌sion;‌  ‌ c) it‌  ‌must‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌‌
  paid‌‌
  or‌‌
  incurred‌‌
  in‌‌
  carrying‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  trade‌‌ 
assignment‌‌or‌‌principal‌‌place‌‌of‌‌business;‌  ‌ or‌‌business‌‌of‌‌the‌‌taxpayer;‌‌and‌  ‌
9) Dep‌reciations;‌  ‌ iii) In‌‌the‌‌conduct‌‌of‌‌trade‌‌or‌‌business.‌  ‌ d) it‌‌
  must‌‌
  be‌‌
  supported‌‌
  by‌‌
  receipts,‌‌
  records‌‌
  or‌‌
  other‌‌ pertinent‌‌ 
10) Dep‌letion.‌  ‌ e) E‌ntertainment,‌‌Amusement‌‌and‌‌Recreational;‌  ‌ papers.‌  ‌
The‌‌   subject‌‌ advertising‌‌ expense‌‌ was‌‌ ‌not‌‌ ordinary‌‌ ‌on‌‌ the‌‌ ground‌‌ that‌‌ 
i) Paid‌‌or‌‌incurred‌‌during‌‌taxable‌‌year;‌  ‌
EXPENSES‌  ‌ it‌‌failed‌‌the‌‌two‌‌conditions:‌‌   ‌
ii) In‌  ‌carrying‌  ‌or‌  ‌which‌  ‌are‌  ‌directly‌  ‌attributable‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  1. first‌,‌‌“‌reasonableness‌”‌‌of‌‌the‌‌amount‌‌incurred‌‌and‌‌   ‌
KINDS‌‌[‌CARTERS‌] ‌ ‌ development,‌  ‌management,‌  ‌operation‌‌   and/or‌‌
  conduct‌‌ 
2. second‌, ‌‌the‌‌
  amount‌‌
  incurred‌‌ ‌must‌‌ not‌‌ be‌‌ a ‌‌capital‌‌ outlay‌‌ ‌to‌‌ 
of‌‌the‌‌trade,‌‌business‌‌or‌‌exercise‌‌of‌‌profession;‌  ‌ create‌  ‌“goodwill”‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌product‌  ‌and/or‌  ‌private‌ 
a) C‌ompensation‌; ‌ ‌
iii) Supported‌‌by‌‌adequate‌‌invoices‌‌or‌‌receipts;‌  ‌ respondent’s‌‌business.‌‌   ‌
1. Must‌‌be‌‌reasonable;‌  ‌
iv) Not‌‌contrary‌‌to‌‌law,‌‌public‌‌policy‌‌or‌‌moral;‌  ‌ The‌‌  right‌‌
  to‌‌
  a ‌‌deduction‌‌
  depends‌‌
  on‌‌
  a ‌‌number‌‌
  of‌‌
  factors‌‌ such‌‌ as‌‌ but‌‌ 
2. Payment‌‌for‌‌actual‌‌services‌‌rendered.‌  ‌ not‌‌limited‌‌to:‌‌   ‌
v) Not‌‌a‌‌bribe;‌  ‌
Additional‌‌for‌‌Bonuses‌: ‌ ‌ 1. the‌  ‌type‌  ‌and‌  ‌size‌  ‌of‌  ‌business‌  ‌in‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌taxpayer‌  ‌is‌‌ 
vi) Properly‌‌withheld‌‌appropriate‌‌tax;‌  ‌ engaged;‌‌   ‌
3. Made‌‌in‌‌good‌‌faith;‌  ‌
vii) Limitation:‌  ‌ 2. the‌‌volume‌‌and‌‌amount‌‌of‌‌its‌‌net‌‌earnings;‌‌   ‌
4. Consider:‌  ‌
1) Sale‌‌of‌‌goods‌‌=‌‌0.5%‌‌of‌‌net‌‌sales;‌  ‌ 3. the‌‌nature‌‌of‌‌the‌‌expenditure‌‌itself;‌‌   ‌
a. Nature‌‌of‌‌Business;‌  ‌
2) Service‌‌=‌‌1%‌‌of‌‌net‌‌revenue.‌  4. the‌  ‌intention‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌taxpayer‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌general‌  ‌economic‌‌ 
b. Financial‌‌capacity‌‌of‌‌taxpayer;‌‌AND‌  ‌ conditions.‌‌   ‌
f) R‌epair‌‌and‌‌Maintenance;‌  ‌ The‌‌  subject‌‌
  media‌‌   advertising‌‌
  expense‌‌  for‌‌
  “Tang”‌‌ was‌‌ almost‌‌ double‌‌ 
c. Extent‌‌of‌‌services‌‌rendered;‌  ‌
i) Ordinary‌  ‌- ‌ ‌cost‌  ‌of‌  ‌repair‌  ‌increases‌  ‌the‌  ‌life‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌‌  the‌  ‌amount‌  ‌of‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌corporation’s‌  ‌general‌  ‌and‌  ‌administrative‌‌ 
5. General‌‌economic‌‌condition‌  ‌ expenses.‌  ‌We‌  ‌find‌  ‌the‌  ‌subject‌  ‌expense‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌advertisement‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌
asset‌‌for‌‌a‌‌period‌n‌ ot‌‌more‌‌than‌‌1‌‌year;‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 70‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

d. Parties‌‌to‌‌a‌‌trust‌  ‌ a) Per‌‌Country;‌  ‌
single‌  ‌product‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌inordinately‌  ‌large.‌  ‌Therefore,‌  ‌even‌  ‌if‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌‌ 
necessary,‌‌it‌c‌ annot‌‌be‌‌considered‌‌an‌‌ordinary‌‌expense‌. ‌ ‌ i. Grant‌‌or‌‌Fiduciary;‌  ‌ b) Global.‌  ‌
Advertising‌i‌ s‌‌generally‌‌of‌‌two‌‌kinds:‌‌   ‌ ii. One‌‌grantor,‌‌different‌‌fiduciaries;‌  ‌
LOSSES‌  ‌
1) advertising‌  ‌to‌  ‌stimulate‌  ‌the‌  ‌current‌‌
  sale‌‌
  ‌of‌‌
  merchandise‌‌  iii. Beneficiary‌‌and‌‌Fiduciary.‌  ‌
or‌‌use‌‌of‌‌services‌‌-‌‌DEDUCTIBLE;‌  ‌ NET‌‌  OPERATING‌‌   LOSS‌‌   CARRY‌‌   OVER‌‌   (NOLCO‌).‌‌ The‌‌ net‌‌ operating‌‌ 
4. Interest‌‌paid‌‌or‌‌calculated‌‌for‌‌cost-keeping‌‌purposes;‌  ‌
2) advertising‌  ‌designed‌  ‌to‌  ‌stimulate‌  ‌the‌  ‌future‌  ‌sale‌  ‌of‌‌  loss‌‌
  of‌‌  the‌‌  business‌‌
  or‌‌
  enterprise‌‌   for‌‌
  any‌‌ taxable‌‌ year‌‌ immediately‌‌ 
merchandise‌‌or‌‌use‌‌of‌‌services‌‌-‌‌SPREAD‌‌OUT.‌‌   ‌ 5. Paid‌‌in‌‌advance‌‌through‌‌discount;‌  ‌ preceding‌  ‌the‌  ‌current‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌year,‌‌   which‌‌   had‌‌
  not‌‌
  been‌‌  previously‌‌ 
The‌‌   second‌‌  type‌‌  involves‌‌   expenditures‌‌   incurred,‌‌   in‌‌
  whole‌‌ or‌‌ in‌‌ part,‌‌  6. On‌‌obligation‌‌to‌‌finance‌‌petroleum‌‌exploration;‌  ‌ offset‌  ‌as‌  ‌deduction‌  ‌from‌  ‌gross‌  ‌income‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌carried‌  ‌over‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌‌
to‌‌   or‌‌ maintain‌‌ some‌‌ form‌‌ of‌‌ ‌goodwill‌‌ ‌for‌‌ the‌‌ taxpayer’s‌‌ trade‌‌ 
  create‌‌ 7. On‌‌unclaimed‌‌salaries‌‌of‌‌employees;‌  ‌ deduction‌‌ from‌‌ gross‌‌ income‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ next‌‌ three‌‌ (3)‌‌ consecutive‌‌ 
or‌‌
  business‌‌   or‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌ industry‌‌ or‌‌ profession‌‌ of‌‌ which‌‌ the‌‌ taxpayer‌‌ is‌‌  years‌‌‌immediately‌‌following‌‌the‌‌year‌‌of‌‌such‌‌loss.‌  ‌
a‌‌member.‌‌   ‌ 8. 33%‌‌of‌‌the‌‌interest‌‌income‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌final‌‌tax.‌  ‌
 ‌
When‌‌NOLCO‌‌is‌n
‌ ot‌‌deductible‌‌   ‌
INTEREST‌  ‌ TAXES‌  ‌ 1. Incurred‌‌during‌t‌ ax‌‌holiday‌; ‌ ‌
Exceptions‌: ‌ ‌ 2. Tax‌‌is‌‌based‌‌on‌‌gross‌‌income‌‌or‌‌receipts;‌  ‌
Arbitrage‌‌rule‌  ‌
The‌  ‌taxpayer’s‌  ‌allowable‌  ‌deduction‌  ‌for‌  ‌interest‌  ‌expense‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌  1) Special‌‌Assessment;‌  ‌ 3. OSD‌‌is‌‌claimed;‌  ‌
reduced‌  ‌by‌  ‌an‌  ‌amount‌  ‌equal‌  ‌to‌  ‌33%‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  interest‌‌
  income‌‌
  earned‌‌
  by‌‌  2) Income‌‌Tax;‌  ‌ 4. MCIT‌‌is‌‌imposed;‌  ‌
him‌‌which‌‌has‌‌been‌‌subjected‌‌to‌‌final‌‌tax.‌  ‌ 3) Not‌‌connected‌‌with‌‌trade,‌‌business,‌‌profession;‌  ‌ 5. Substantial‌‌change‌‌in‌‌ownership‌‌(75%).‌  ‌
Theoretical‌‌interest‌‌   ‌ 4) Estate,‌‌Donor’s;‌  ‌ NOLCO‌  ‌ NCLCO‌  ‌
An‌  ‌interest‌  ‌computed‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌
  purposes‌‌   of‌‌  determining‌‌   the‌‌
  opportunity‌‌  5) VAT;‌  ‌
cost‌‌   of‌‌
  investing‌‌
  in‌‌
  a ‌‌business.‌‌ This‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ paid‌‌ or‌‌ incurred.‌‌ Theoretical‌‌  Excess‌‌of‌‌deductions‌‌over‌‌gross‌‌  Loss‌‌from‌‌sale‌‌or‌‌exchange‌‌of‌‌ 
6) Final‌‌Taxes;‌  ‌ income‌‌for‌‌any‌‌taxable‌‌year‌  ‌ capital‌‌asset‌  ‌
interest‌  ‌income‌  ‌and‌  ‌theoretical‌  ‌interest‌  ‌expense‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌longer‌‌ 
applicable‌  ‌in‌  ‌our‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌since‌  ‌the‌‌   interest‌‌
  must‌‌  be‌‌
  stipulated‌‌
  in‌‌  7) Excess‌‌electric‌‌consumption‌‌tax;‌  ‌
Additional‌‌deductible‌‌item‌‌from‌‌  Capital‌‌losses‌‌are‌‌allowed‌‌only‌‌ 
writing‌‌to‌‌be‌‌demandable.‌  ‌ 8) Foreign‌‌   income‌‌   tax,‌‌
  war‌‌
  profits‌‌
  and‌‌
  excess‌‌
  profits‌‌
  tax‌‌
  - ‌‌if‌‌ used‌‌  gross‌‌income‌‌similar‌‌to‌‌other‌‌  to‌‌the‌‌extent‌‌of‌‌capital‌‌gains‌  ‌
Non-deductible‌‌interest‌‌expense‌  ‌ as‌‌tax‌‌credit‌; ‌ ‌ allowable‌‌deductions‌  ‌
1. Interest‌‌expense‌‌on‌‌preferred‌‌stock;‌  ‌ 9) Paid‌‌for‌‌commodities‌‌not‌‌connected‌‌with‌‌business.‌  ‌
Holding‌‌period‌‌is‌‌NOT‌‌  Holding‌‌period‌‌is‌‌applicable‌‌in‌‌ 
2. When‌‌there‌‌is‌‌no‌‌agreement‌‌in‌‌writing‌‌to‌‌pay‌‌interest;‌  ‌ Who‌‌may‌‌claim‌‌tax‌‌credit‌‌for‌‌taxes‌‌of‌‌foreign‌‌countries‌  ‌ applicable‌  ‌ case‌‌of‌‌individual‌‌taxpayer‌  ‌
3. On‌‌loan‌‌entered‌‌into‌‌between‌r‌ elated‌t‌ axpayers;‌  ‌ 1) Resident‌C
‌ itizens;‌  ‌
Can‌‌be‌‌carried‌‌over‌‌in‌‌the‌n
‌ ext‌‌3 ‌‌ Treated‌‌in‌‌the‌s‌ ucceeding‌‌yea‌r‌‌ 
a. Members‌‌of‌‌family‌  ‌ 2) Domestic‌‌Corporations;‌  ‌ consecutive‌‌years‌‌‌immediately‌  as‌‌a‌‌deduction‌‌as‌‌short-term‌‌ 
following‌‌the‌‌year‌‌of‌‌such‌‌loss‌  ‌ capital‌‌loss‌‌from‌‌the‌‌net‌‌capital‌‌ 
i. Spouses;‌  ‌ 3) Members‌‌of‌‌GPPS;‌  ‌
gains‌‌in‌‌case‌‌of‌‌individual‌‌ 
ii. Siblings;‌  ‌ 4) Beneficiaries‌‌of‌‌estates‌‌and‌‌trusts.‌  ‌ taxpayer‌  ‌
iii. Descendants‌‌and‌‌ascendants.‌  ‌ Options‌‌of‌‌Taxpayer‌‌qualified‌‌for‌‌a‌‌credit‌  ‌ LOSSES‌‌   ARISING‌‌   FROM‌‌   SECURITIES‌. ‌‌When‌‌   the‌‌  securities‌‌  which‌‌ 
b. Between‌  ‌2 ‌ ‌corporations‌  ‌owned‌  ‌and‌  ‌controlled‌  ‌by‌  ‌1 ‌‌ 1) Deducting‌t‌ he‌‌foreign‌‌income‌‌tax‌‌from‌‌gross‌‌income;‌‌or‌  ‌ can‌  ‌be‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌form‌  ‌of‌  ‌shares‌  ‌of‌  ‌stocks‌  ‌or‌  ‌loan‌  ‌receivables‌  ‌be‌‌ 
individual;‌  ‌ considered‌  ‌as‌  ‌worthless,‌  ‌the‌  ‌losses‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌deducted.‌  ‌It‌  ‌will‌  ‌be‌‌ 
2) Claiming‌‌tax‌‌credit‌. ‌ ‌
c. Between‌‌a‌‌corporation‌‌and‌‌its‌‌majority‌‌shareholder;‌  worthless‌‌   when‌‌   the‌‌
  company‌‌   loses‌‌   operations‌‌   in‌‌
  which‌‌  the‌‌ shares‌‌ 
Limitations‌‌on‌‌Credit‌  ‌ belong.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 71‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

China‌‌Banking‌‌Corp.‌‌v.‌‌CA‌‌o
‌ n‌‌Worthless‌‌Securities‌  ‌ WAGERING‌  ‌LOSSES.‌  ‌Losses‌  ‌from‌  ‌wagering‌  ‌transactions‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌  a. 5%‌‌for‌‌Corporations;‌  ‌
allowed‌‌only‌‌to‌‌the‌‌extent‌‌of‌‌the‌‌gains‌‌from‌‌such‌‌transactions.‌  ‌ b. 10%‌‌for‌‌Individuals.‌  ‌
An‌  ‌equity‌  ‌investment‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌capital‌, ‌ ‌not‌  ‌ordinary,‌  ‌asset‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
investor‌‌   the‌‌  sale‌‌
  or‌‌
  exchange‌‌  of‌‌
  which‌‌   results‌‌
  in‌‌ either‌‌ a ‌‌capital‌‌ gain‌‌  CASUALTY‌‌   LOSSES.‌‌  The‌‌
  loss‌‌
  is‌‌
  caused‌‌ by‌‌ fortuitous‌‌ event‌‌ or‌‌ force‌‌  2. Special‌–‌ ‌‌deductible‌‌in‌‌full‌‌from‌‌gross‌‌income‌‌   ‌
or‌  ‌a ‌ ‌capital‌  ‌loss.‌  ‌When‌  ‌the‌  ‌shares‌  ‌held‌  ‌by‌  ‌such‌  ‌investor‌  ‌become‌‌  majeure.‌‌Requisites‌‌for‌‌deductibility‌‌   ‌
worthless,‌‌   the‌‌
  loss‌‌  is‌‌
  deemed‌‌   to‌‌
  be‌‌
  a ‌‌loss‌‌  from‌‌  the‌‌  sale‌‌ or‌‌ exchange‌‌  Conditions‌‌if‌‌Recipient‌‌is‌‌an‌‌NGO‌  ‌
a. Report‌  ‌to‌  ‌taxing‌  ‌authorities‌  ‌within‌  ‌45‌  ‌days‌  ‌from‌‌ 
of‌‌
  capital‌‌ assets.‌‌ A ‌‌capital‌‌ gain‌‌ or‌‌ a ‌‌capital‌‌ loss‌‌ normally‌‌ requires‌‌ the‌‌  a. Organized‌  ‌and‌  ‌operated‌  ‌exclusively‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌aforementioned‌‌ 
concurrence‌‌of‌‌two‌‌conditions‌‌for‌‌it‌‌to‌‌result:‌‌   ‌ occurrence‌‌of‌‌the‌‌loss;‌  ‌
purposes‌‌
  or‌‌
  a ‌‌combination‌‌ thereof,‌‌ no‌‌ part‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ net‌‌ income‌‌ of‌‌ 
1) There‌‌is‌‌a‌‌sale‌‌or‌‌exchange;‌‌and‌  ‌ b. Related‌‌to‌‌trade‌‌and‌‌business;‌  ‌ which‌‌inures‌‌to‌‌the‌‌benefit‌‌of‌‌any‌‌private‌‌individual;‌  ‌
2) The‌‌thing‌‌sold‌‌or‌‌exchanged‌‌is‌‌a‌‌capital‌‌asset.‌‌   ‌ c. Evidenced‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌closed‌  ‌and‌  ‌completed‌  ‌transaction‌‌  b. The‌‌
  donation‌‌   must‌‌
  be‌‌
  utilized‌‌ ‌not‌‌ later‌‌ than‌‌ the‌‌ 15th‌‌ day‌‌ of‌‌ 
(perfected‌‌sale);‌  ‌ the‌‌
  3rd‌‌   month‌‌  following‌‌   the‌‌
  close‌‌   of‌‌
  its‌‌
  taxable‌‌ year.(taxable‌‌ 
When‌  ‌securities‌  ‌become‌  ‌worthless,‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌strictly‌  ‌no‌  ‌sale‌  ‌or‌‌ 
exchange‌‌   but‌‌
  ‌the‌‌
  law‌‌
  deems‌‌
  the‌‌
  loss‌‌
  ‌anyway‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ "a‌‌ loss‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌  d. Actually‌‌sustained‌‌during‌‌the‌‌taxable‌‌year;‌  ‌ year‌‌of‌‌the‌‌NGO‌‌concerned‌‌not‌‌the‌‌taxpayer);‌  ‌
sale‌‌or‌‌exchange‌‌of‌‌capital‌‌assets.”‌  ‌ e. Must‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌compensated‌  ‌by‌‌
  insurance‌‌
  or‌‌
  other‌‌
  forms‌‌
  of‌‌  c. The‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌expense‌  ‌must‌  ‌not‌  ‌exceed‌  ‌30%‌  ‌of‌  ‌total‌‌ 
indemnity.‌  ‌ expenses;‌  ‌
The‌  ‌loss‌  ‌of‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌bank‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌  ‌equity‌  ‌investment‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Hongkong‌  ‌subsidiary‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌deductible‌  ‌as‌‌   a ‌‌bad‌‌  debt‌. ‌‌The‌‌  ABANDONMENT‌  ‌LOSSES.‌  ‌In‌  ‌the‌  ‌event‌  ‌a ‌ ‌contract‌  ‌area‌  ‌where‌‌  d. Upon‌  ‌dissolution,‌‌   assets‌‌   would‌‌   be‌‌
  distributed‌‌   to‌‌  another‌‌ 
shares‌‌   of‌‌
  stock‌‌  in‌‌
  question‌‌   do‌‌
  not‌‌
  constitute‌‌   a ‌‌loan‌‌ extended‌‌ by‌‌ it‌‌ to‌‌  petroleum‌  ‌operations‌  ‌are‌  ‌undertaken‌  ‌is‌  ‌partially‌  ‌or‌  ‌wholly‌‌  nonprofit‌  ‌domestic‌  ‌corporation‌‌   organized‌‌   for‌‌
  similar‌‌   purpose‌‌ 
its‌  ‌subsidiary‌  ‌(First‌  ‌CBC‌  ‌Capital)‌  ‌or‌  ‌a ‌ ‌debt‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌obligatory‌‌  abandoned,‌  ‌all‌  ‌accumulated‌  ‌exploration‌  ‌and‌  ‌development‌‌  or‌  ‌purposes,‌  ‌or‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌state‌  ‌for‌  ‌public‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌,or‌  ‌would‌  ‌be‌ 
repayment‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌latter,‌  ‌essential‌‌
  elements‌‌   to‌‌  constitute‌‌   a ‌‌bad‌‌
  debt,‌‌ 
expenditures‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌allowed‌‌as‌‌a‌‌deduction.‌  distributed‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌court‌  ‌to‌  ‌another‌  ‌organization‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌used‌  ‌in‌‌ 
but‌‌a‌‌long‌‌term‌‌investment‌‌made‌‌by‌‌CBC.‌  ‌
such‌  ‌manner‌  ‌as‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌judgment‌  ‌of‌  ‌said‌  ‌court‌  ‌shall‌  ‌best‌‌ 
BAD‌‌DEBTS‌  ‌ accomplish‌  ‌the‌  ‌general‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌for‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌dissolved‌‌ 
In‌‌sum‌‌— ‌ ‌
a) The‌  ‌equity‌  ‌investment‌  ‌in‌  ‌shares‌  ‌of‌  ‌stock‌  ‌held‌  ‌by‌  ‌CBC‌  ‌of‌‌  When‌  ‌are‌  ‌bad‌  ‌debts‌  ‌ascertained‌  ‌to‌‌
  be‌‌
  worthless?‌‌
  ‌A ‌‌court‌‌
  order‌‌
  is‌‌  organization‌‌was‌‌organized.‌‌   ‌
approximately‌  ‌53%‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌  ‌Hongkong‌  ‌subsidiary‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌an‌‌  necessary‌‌and‌‌the‌‌regular‌‌procedure‌‌is‌‌as‌‌follows:‌‌   ‌
indebtedness‌,‌‌and‌‌it‌‌is‌‌a‌‌capital,‌‌not‌‌an‌‌ordinary,‌‌asset.‌  ‌ RESEARCH‌‌AND‌‌DEVELOPMENT‌  ‌
1. Creditor‌  ‌sends‌  ‌a ‌ ‌statement‌  ‌of‌  ‌Account‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌debtor‌  ‌which‌‌ 
b) Assuming‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌equity‌  ‌investment‌  ‌of‌  ‌CBC‌  ‌has‌  ‌indeed‌‌  states‌‌the‌‌maturity‌‌date‌‌and‌‌amount‌‌due;‌  ‌ The‌‌deduction‌‌shall‌‌NOT‌‌apply‌‌   ‌
become‌‌
  "worthless,"‌‌   ‌the‌‌
  loss‌‌
  sustained‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌capital‌, ‌‌not‌‌ an‌‌ 
2. If‌  ‌no‌  ‌payment‌  ‌is‌  ‌made,‌  ‌then‌  ‌the‌  ‌creditor‌  ‌sends‌  ‌a ‌ ‌collection‌‌  1. Any‌‌  expenditure‌‌   or‌‌
  the‌‌
  acquisition‌‌   or‌‌
  improvement‌‌   of‌‌
  land,‌‌ or‌‌ 
ordinary,‌l‌ oss‌. ‌ ‌
letter‌‌to‌‌the‌‌debtor;‌  ‌ for‌‌
  the‌‌
  improvement‌‌   of‌‌
  property‌‌
  to‌‌  be‌‌ used‌‌ in‌‌ connection‌‌ with‌‌ 
c) The‌‌
  capital‌‌
  loss‌‌  sustained‌‌   by‌‌
  CBC‌‌ can‌‌ only‌‌ be‌‌ deducted‌‌ 
research‌  ‌and‌  ‌development‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌character‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌‌ 
from‌  ‌capital‌  ‌gains‌  ‌if‌  ‌any‌  ‌derived‌  ‌by‌  ‌it‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌‌  3. Still‌‌
  no‌‌
  payment‌‌
  is‌‌ made,‌‌ then‌‌ the‌‌ creditor‘s‌‌ lawyer‌‌ will‌‌ send‌‌ a ‌‌
taxable‌‌year‌‌that‌‌the‌‌securities‌‌have‌‌become‌‌"worthless."‌  ‌ depreciation‌‌and‌‌depletion;‌‌and‌  ‌
formal‌‌demand‌‌letter‌‌to‌‌the‌‌debtor;‌  ‌
2. Any‌  ‌expenditure‌  ‌paid‌  ‌or‌  ‌incurred‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌‌ 
LOSSES‌  ‌FROM‌  ‌SHARE‌  ‌TRANSACTIONS‌. ‌ ‌Losses‌  ‌from‌  ‌share‌‌  4. Still‌‌failed‌‌to‌‌pay,‌‌then‌‌an‌‌action‌‌is‌‌filed‌‌in‌‌court‌‌for‌‌collection;‌  ‌
ascertaining‌  ‌the‌  ‌existence,‌  ‌location,‌  ‌extent,‌  ‌or‌  ‌quality‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌‌ 
transactions‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌claimed‌  ‌as‌  ‌deduction‌  ‌upon‌  ‌realization‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  5. No‌‌
  payment‌‌  despite‌‌
  the‌‌ order‌‌ of‌‌ court,‌‌ then‌‌ the‌‌ account‌‌ will‌‌ be‌‌  deposit‌‌of‌‌ore‌‌or‌‌other‌‌mineral,‌‌including‌‌oil‌‌or‌‌gas.‌  ‌
loss.‌‌
  Shrinkage‌‌  in‌‌
  value‌‌  of‌‌ shares‌‌ of‌‌ stocks‌‌ cannot‌‌ be‌‌ used‌‌ to‌‌ claim‌‌  considered‌‌as‌‌bad‌‌debt.‌  ‌
TYPES‌‌OF‌‌R&D‌‌   ‌
for‌‌
  the‌‌
  deduction‌‌   as‌‌ loss‌‌ because‌‌ you‌‌ haven't‌‌ realized‌‌ it‌‌ yet.‌‌ Only‌‌ if‌‌ 
you‌‌sold‌‌it‌‌then‌‌if‌‌there‌‌is‌‌any‌‌loss,‌‌you‌‌can‌‌claim‌‌it‌‌as‌‌a‌‌deduction.‌‌   ‌ CHARITABLE‌‌CONTRIBUTIONS‌  ‌ 1. Not‌  ‌chargeable‌  ‌to‌‌
  capital‌‌
  account‌‌
  ‌— ‌‌deducted‌‌
  outright,‌‌
  Ex.‌‌ 
LOSSES‌  ‌FROM‌‌   WASH‌‌   SALES.‌‌   ‌A ‌‌wash‌‌
  sale‌‌   is‌‌
  the‌‌
  buying‌‌   or‌‌
  selling‌‌  Project‌‌feasibility‌‌study;‌  ‌
Kinds‌‌of‌‌Charitable‌‌Contributions‌‌   ‌
of‌‌
  the‌‌  same‌‌ type‌‌ of‌‌ stock‌‌ or‌‌ security‌‌ at‌‌ a ‌‌loss‌‌ within‌‌ 30‌‌ days‌‌ before‌‌  2. Chargeable‌‌   to‌‌
  a ‌‌capital‌‌
  account‌‌
  — ‌‌spread‌‌
  out‌‌
  or‌‌
  amortized‌‌ 
1. Ordinary‌  ‌– ‌ ‌those‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌limitations‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌amount‌‌ 
the‌‌  date‌‌
  of‌‌
  sale‌‌
  or‌‌
  30‌‌ days‌‌ after‌‌ date‌‌ of‌‌ sale.‌‌ It‌‌ cannot‌‌ be‌‌ claimed‌‌ as‌‌  over‌‌a‌‌period‌‌of‌‌60‌‌months.‌  ‌
deductible‌‌from‌‌gross‌‌income‌‌   ‌
allowable‌‌deduction.‌‌   ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 72‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

PENSION‌  ‌ 1) Sale‌  ‌of‌  ‌inventory‌  ‌of‌  ‌goods‌  ‌by‌  ‌manufacturers‌  ‌and‌‌ 


ledger‌‌  is‌‌
  gathered‌‌
  from‌‌
  source‌‌ documents‌‌ such‌‌ as‌‌ account‌‌ vouchers,‌‌ 
purchase‌  ‌orders‌  ‌and‌  ‌sales‌  ‌invoices.‌  ‌In‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌variance‌  ‌between‌‌  dealers‌  ‌of‌  ‌properties‌  ‌— ‌ ‌That‌  ‌portion‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌receipt‌‌ 
Current‌‌  Service‌‌
  Cost‌‌
  is‌‌
  the‌‌
  cost‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  services‌‌
  rendered‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌  the‌  ‌source‌  ‌document‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌general‌  ‌ledger,‌  ‌the‌  ‌former‌  ‌is‌‌  representing‌‌return‌‌of‌‌capital‌‌is‌‌not‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌income‌‌tax.‌  ‌
time‌‌the‌‌pension‌‌trust‌‌is‌‌set‌‌up‌‌until‌‌its‌‌retirement.‌‌   ‌ preferred‌. ‌ ‌
Thus,‌‌   cost‌‌
  of‌‌
  goods‌‌ manufactured‌‌ and‌‌ sold‌‌ or‌‌ cost‌‌ of‌‌ sales‌‌ 
Past‌‌  Service‌‌  Cost‌‌
  is‌‌
  the‌‌
  cost‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  services‌‌ relating‌‌ to‌‌ those‌‌ prior‌‌   ‌
is‌  ‌deducted‌  ‌from‌  ‌gross‌  ‌sales‌  ‌and‌  ‌is‌  ‌reflected‌  ‌above‌  ‌the‌‌ 
to‌‌the‌‌setting‌‌up‌‌of‌‌the‌‌pension‌‌trust.‌‌   ‌ DEPLETION‌  ‌ gross‌‌income‌‌line‌‌in‌‌profit‌‌and‌‌loss‌‌statement.‌  ‌

DEPRECIATION‌  ‌ The‌  ‌exhaustion‌  ‌of‌  ‌natural‌  ‌resources‌  ‌like‌‌   mines‌‌


  and‌‌
  oil‌‌
  and‌‌
  gas‌‌
  as‌‌  2) Sale‌  ‌of‌  ‌stock‌  ‌in‌  ‌trade‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌real‌  ‌estate‌  ‌dealer‌  ‌and‌‌ 
well‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌result‌  ‌of‌  ‌production‌  ‌or‌  ‌severance‌‌
  from‌‌  such‌‌   mines‌‌
  or‌‌  dealer‌‌in‌‌securities.‌  ‌
Depreciable‌  ‌amount‌  ‌or‌  ‌cost‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌cost‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌asset‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌‌  wells.‌  ‌These‌  ‌are‌  ‌non-replaceable‌  ‌assets.‌  ‌This‌  ‌is‌  ‌applicable‌  ‌to‌‌ 
amount‌‌substituted‌‌for‌‌cost,‌‌less‌‌its‌‌residual‌‌value.‌‌   ‌ 3) Sale‌  ‌of‌  ‌services‌  ‌—‌‌  Generally,‌‌  the‌‌  entire‌‌  gross‌‌
  receipts‌‌
  of‌‌ 
wasting‌‌asset‌e‌ ntities.‌  ‌
sellers‌‌  of‌‌  services‌‌
  are‌‌
  treated‌‌
  as‌‌
  part‌‌  of‌‌
  income.‌‌   However,‌‌ 
Salvage‌‌   value‌  ‌is‌‌   the‌‌
  estimated‌‌   net‌‌  amount‌‌   currently‌‌ obtainable‌‌ if‌‌  Cost‌‌   Depletion‌‌   Method‌. ‌‌The‌‌ method‌‌ allowed‌‌ under‌‌ the‌‌ tax‌‌ code‌‌ is‌‌  some‌  ‌have‌  ‌cost‌  ‌of‌  ‌services‌  ‌that‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌deducted‌  ‌from‌‌ 
the‌‌
  asset‌‌  is‌‌
  at‌‌
  the‌‌
  end‌‌
  of‌‌ the‌‌ useful‌‌ life.‌‌ It‌‌ is‌‌ the‌‌ value‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ asset‌‌ at‌‌  the‌‌
  cost‌‌
  depletion‌‌  method.‌‌   This‌‌  is‌‌
  similar‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ unit‌‌ of‌‌ production‌‌  their‌‌gross‌‌receipt‌‌in‌‌order‌‌to‌‌arrive‌‌at‌‌their‌‌gross‌‌income.‌  ‌
the‌‌end‌‌of‌‌its‌‌useful‌‌life.‌  ‌ method.‌  ‌The‌  ‌depletable‌  ‌amount‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌   wasting‌‌  asset‌‌  is‌‌
  divided‌‌  by‌‌ 
Useful‌‌ life‌‌ is‌‌ either‌‌ the‌‌ period‌‌ over‌‌ which‌‌ an‌‌ asset‌‌ is‌‌ expected‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌  the‌  ‌units‌  ‌estimated‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌extracted‌  ‌to‌  ‌obtain‌  ‌a ‌ ‌depletion‌  ‌rate‌  ‌per‌‌  c.‌‌Distinguish:‌‌Itemized‌‌Deductions‌‌  
available‌  ‌for‌  ‌use‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌entity,‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌number‌  ‌of‌  ‌production‌  ‌or‌‌  unit.‌  ‌The‌  ‌depletion‌  ‌rate‌  ‌per‌  ‌unit‌  ‌is‌  ‌then‌  ‌multiplied‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌units‌‌  and‌‌Optional‌‌Standard‌‌Deduction‌‌  
similar‌‌units‌‌expected‌‌to‌‌be‌‌obtained‌‌from‌‌the‌‌asset‌‌by‌‌the‌‌entity.‌  ‌ extracted‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌  ‌year‌  ‌to‌  ‌arrive‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌depletion‌‌
  for‌‌  the‌‌
  period.‌‌  (OSD)‌   ‌
The‌  ‌depletable‌  ‌amount‌  ‌is‌  ‌equivalent‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌cost‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌asset‌  ‌less‌‌  1. Optional‌  ‌Standard‌  ‌Deduction‌  ‌or‌  ‌OSD‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌standard‌‌ 
METHODS‌‌OF‌‌DEPRECIATION‌‌   ‌
salvage‌‌value,‌‌if‌‌any.‌  ‌ deduction‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌amount‌‌
  not‌‌   ‌40%‌  ‌of‌‌
  exceeding‌‌   gross‌‌
  sales‌‌
  or‌‌ 
1. Straight‌‌line‌‌method‌  ‌
Essential‌‌Factors‌  ‌ receipts‌  ‌(for‌  ‌individuals),‌  ‌or‌‌  gross‌‌
  income‌‌
  (for‌‌
  corporations),‌‌ 
Annual Depreciation  =   Acquisition Cost  − Salvage V alue
U sef ul Lif e
 ‌ 1. Basis‌‌of‌‌the‌‌property;‌  ‌ as‌‌the‌‌case‌‌may‌‌be,‌i‌ n‌‌lieu‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌itemized‌‌deductions.‌  ‌

2. Declining‌‌balance‌‌method;‌  ‌ 2. Estimated‌‌total‌‌recoverable‌‌units;‌‌AND‌  ‌ 2. It‌‌may‌‌be‌‌availed‌‌of‌‌by:‌  ‌


3. Sum‌‌of‌‌the‌‌years‌‌digit‌‌method.‌  ‌ 3. Number‌‌of‌‌units‌‌recovered‌‌during‌‌the‌‌taxable‌‌year.‌  a. A‌‌citizen;‌  ‌
Kepco‌‌Phil.‌‌Corp.‌‌v.‌‌CIR‌  ‌ b.‌‌Concept‌‌of‌‌Return‌‌of‌‌Capital‌  ‌ b. Resident‌‌alien;‌  ‌
"‌Capital‌‌goods‌‌or‌‌properties‌"‌‌refer‌‌to‌‌goods‌‌or‌‌properties‌‌   ‌ The‌‌  amount‌‌
  representing‌‌   return‌‌   of‌‌ capital‌‌ should‌‌ be‌‌ deducted‌‌ from‌‌  c. Domestic‌‌corporation;‌  ‌
1. with‌‌estimated‌‌useful‌‌life‌‌greater‌‌than‌‌one‌‌year‌a‌ nd‌‌   ‌ the‌  ‌proceeds‌  ‌from‌  ‌sales‌  ‌of‌  ‌assets‌  ‌and‌  ‌should‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌be‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌‌ 
d. Resident‌‌foreign‌‌corporation;‌  ‌
income‌‌tax.‌  ‌
2. which‌  ‌are‌  ‌treated‌  ‌as‌  ‌depreciable‌  ‌assets‌  ‌under‌‌
  Section‌‌
  29‌‌ 
(f),‌  ‌ e. Partnership;‌‌and‌  ‌
Costs‌  ‌of‌  ‌goods‌  ‌purchased‌  ‌for‌  ‌resale,‌  ‌with‌  ‌proper‌  ‌adjustment‌  ‌for‌‌ 
3. used‌  ‌directly‌  ‌or‌  ‌indirectly‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌production‌  ‌or‌  ‌sale‌  ‌of‌‌  opening‌  ‌and‌  ‌closing‌  ‌inventories,‌  ‌is‌  ‌deducted‌  ‌from‌  ‌gross‌  ‌sales‌  ‌in‌‌  f. Taxable‌‌estate‌‌and‌‌trust.‌  ‌
taxable‌‌goods‌‌or‌‌services.‌  ‌ computing‌‌gross‌‌income.‌  ‌
In‌‌other‌‌words‌,‌‌NRAs‌‌and‌‌NRFCs‌c‌ annot‌‌claim‌‌OSD.‌  ‌
From‌  ‌petitioner's‌  ‌evidence,‌  ‌the‌  ‌account‌  ‌vouchers‌  ‌specifically‌‌  Payment‌‌   of‌‌
  principal‌‌
  by‌‌
  a ‌‌debtor‌‌  to‌‌  a ‌‌creditor‌‌ is‌‌ deducted‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌ 
3. With‌‌
  the‌‌
  election‌‌
  of‌‌
  OSD,‌‌
  there‌‌ is‌‌ no‌‌ more‌‌ need‌‌ to‌‌ substantiate‌‌ 
indicate‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌disallowed‌  ‌purchases‌  ‌were‌  ‌recorded‌  ‌under‌‌  total‌‌ amount‌‌ received‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ latter‌‌ in‌‌ order‌‌ to‌‌ determine‌‌ his‌‌ interest‌‌ 
with‌‌receipts.‌  ‌
inventory‌‌accounts‌,‌‌instead‌‌of‌‌depreciable‌‌accounts‌.  ‌‌ ‌ income.‌  ‌
4. Those‌‌not‌‌allowed‌‌to‌‌use‌‌OSD‌‌are‌‌   ‌
A‌  ‌general‌  ‌ledger‌  ‌is‌‌
  a ‌‌record‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌business‌‌
  entity's‌‌
  accounts‌‌   which‌‌ 
make‌‌   up‌‌
  its‌‌
  financial‌‌
  statements.‌‌   Information‌‌   contained‌‌
  in‌‌
  a ‌‌general‌‌  a. those‌‌that‌‌are‌‌exempt,‌‌with‌‌no‌‌other‌‌taxable‌‌income;‌‌or‌‌  
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 73‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

b. those‌  ‌with‌  ‌income‌‌


  subject‌‌
  to‌‌
  a ‌‌special‌‌
  or‌‌
  preferential‌‌ 
tax‌‌rate.‌  ‌ f. Interest‌  ‌must‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌stipulated‌  ‌in‌‌  d. Uncollectible‌‌in‌‌the‌‌near‌‌future;‌  ‌
writing;‌  ‌ e. Arise‌  ‌from‌  ‌trade‌  ‌or‌  ‌business‌  ‌or‌‌ 
c. those‌‌earning‌p
‌ urely‌‌compensation‌‌‌income.‌  ‌
g. Legally‌‌due;‌  ‌ profession‌‌of‌‌taxpayer.‌  ‌
5. The‌  ‌taxpayer‌  ‌must‌  ‌signify‌  ‌in‌  ‌his‌  ‌return‌  ‌his‌  ‌intention‌  ‌to‌‌
  elect‌‌ 
h. Not‌‌between‌‌related‌‌taxpayers;‌  ‌
the‌‌
  OSD.‌‌  Such‌‌  election‌‌
  shall‌‌  be‌‌  irrevocable‌‌   for‌‌ the‌‌ taxable‌‌ year‌‌  Charitable‌‌  a. Contribution‌  ‌or‌  ‌gift‌  ‌must‌  ‌actually‌  ‌be‌‌ 
for‌‌which‌‌the‌‌return‌‌is‌‌made.‌  ‌ i. Not‌  ‌incurred‌  ‌to‌  ‌finance‌  ‌petroleum‌‌  Contribution‌ paid;‌  ‌
operations;‌  ‌ s‌  ‌
6. A‌‌
  general‌‌ professional‌‌ partnership‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ partners‌‌ comprising‌  b. Given‌  ‌to‌  ‌organizations‌  ‌specified‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
j. Not‌‌treated‌‌as‌‌capital‌‌expenditure.‌  ‌ tax‌‌code;‌  ‌
  partnership‌‌ may‌‌ avail‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ OSD‌‌ only‌‌ ‌once‌, ‌‌either‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ 
such‌‌
GPP‌‌or‌‌the‌‌partners‌‌comprising‌‌the‌‌partnership.‌  ‌ Taxes‌  ‌ a. c. Net‌  ‌income‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌institution‌  ‌must‌‌
  not‌‌ 
Paid‌‌or‌‌incurred‌‌during‌‌taxable‌‌year;‌  ‌
inure‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌benefit‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌private‌‌ 
d.‌‌Requirements‌‌for‌‌deductible‌‌items‌  ‌ b. In‌  ‌connection‌  ‌with‌  ‌trade,‌  ‌business,‌‌ 
stockholder‌‌or‌‌individual;‌  ‌
Deduction‌  ‌ Requisites‌‌for‌‌Deductibility‌  ‌ profession.‌  ‌
d. Made‌‌within‌‌the‌‌taxable‌‌year;‌  ‌
Expenses‌  ‌ a. Ordinary‌‌and‌‌necessary;‌  ‌ Losses‌  ‌ a. Must‌‌  be‌‌
  incurred‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌ trade,‌‌ business,‌‌  e. Evidenced‌  ‌by‌  ‌adequate‌  ‌records‌  ‌or‌‌ 
or‌‌profession‌‌of‌‌the‌‌taxpayer;‌  ‌ receipts;‌  ‌
b. Paid‌‌or‌‌incurred‌‌during‌‌the‌‌taxable‌‌year;‌  ‌
b. Actually‌  ‌sustained‌  ‌and‌  ‌charged‌  ‌off‌‌  f. Not‌  ‌exceed‌  ‌10%‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌‌ 
c. Paid‌‌ or‌‌ incurred‌‌ in‌‌ carrying‌‌ on‌‌ or‌‌ which‌‌ 
within‌  ‌the‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌year‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌mere‌‌  individuals‌  ‌and‌  ‌5%‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌
are‌  ‌directly‌  ‌attributable‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
anticipated‌‌losses;‌  ‌ corporation,‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌taxpayer‘s‌  ‌taxable‌‌ 
development,‌  ‌management,‌  ‌operation‌‌ 
c. Evidenced‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌closed‌  ‌and‌  ‌completed‌  income‌  ‌(except‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌donation‌  ‌is‌‌ 
and/or‌‌   conduct‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ trade,‌‌ business‌‌ or‌‌ 
transaction;‌  ‌ deductible‌  ‌in‌  ‌full)‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌determined‌‌ 
exercise‌‌of‌‌profession;‌  ‌
without‌‌the‌‌benefit‌‌of‌‌the‌‌contribution.‌  ‌
d. Supported‌  ‌by‌  ‌adequate‌  ‌invoices‌  ‌or‌‌  d. Not‌  ‌be‌  ‌compensated‌  ‌by‌  ‌insurance‌  ‌or‌‌ 
receipts;‌  ‌ other‌‌forms‌‌of‌‌indemnity;‌  ‌
Research‌‌  a. Incurred‌‌during‌‌taxable‌‌year;‌  ‌
e. Not‌  ‌contrary‌  ‌to‌  ‌law,‌  ‌public‌  ‌policy‌  ‌or‌‌  e. If‌‌
  partly‌‌
  compensated,‌‌
  only‌‌
  the‌‌
  amount‌‌  and‌‌  b. In‌‌connection‌‌with‌‌trade‌‌or‌‌business.‌  ‌
not‌  ‌compensated‌  ‌by‌  ‌insurance‌  ‌is‌‌  Developme‌
moral;‌  ‌
deductible;‌  ‌ nt‌  ‌
f. Tax‌  ‌required‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌withheld‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌ 
expense‌  ‌paid‌  ‌or‌  ‌payable‌  ‌is‌  ‌shown‌  ‌to‌‌  f. In‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌casualty‌  ‌loss,‌  ‌taxpayer‌‌  Pension‌  ‌ a. Employer‌  ‌must‌  ‌have‌  ‌established‌  ‌a ‌‌
have‌‌been‌‌remitted‌‌to‌‌the‌‌BIR.‌  ‌ must‌  ‌file‌  ‌a ‌ ‌sworn‌  ‌declaration‌  ‌of‌  ‌loss‌‌  pension‌  ‌or‌  ‌retirement‌  ‌plan‌  ‌to‌  ‌provide‌‌ 
within‌  ‌45‌  ‌day‌s ‌ ‌after‌  ‌the‌  ‌date‌  ‌of‌‌  for‌  ‌the‌  ‌payments‌  ‌of‌  ‌reasonable‌‌ 
Interest‌  ‌ a. There‌‌must‌‌be‌‌an‌‌indebtedness;‌  ‌ discovery‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌casualty‌  ‌or‌  ‌robbery,‌‌  pensions‌‌to‌‌his‌‌employees;‌  ‌
b. Paid‌  ‌or‌  ‌incurred‌  ‌upon‌  ‌such‌‌  theft‌‌or‌‌embezzlement.‌  ‌
b. Pension‌  ‌plan‌  ‌is‌  ‌reasonable‌  ‌and‌‌ 
indebtedness;‌  ‌ actuarially‌‌sound;‌  ‌
Bad‌‌Debt‌  ‌ a. Arise‌  ‌from‌  ‌a ‌ ‌valid‌  ‌and‌  ‌subsisting‌‌ 
c. Must‌‌be‌‌that‌‌of‌‌the‌‌taxpayer;‌  ‌ obligation;‌  ‌ c. Contribution‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌made‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
d. Connected‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌trade,‌  ‌business‌  ‌or‌‌  b. Ascertained‌‌to‌‌be‌‌worthless;‌  ‌ employer‌‌to‌‌the‌‌pension‌‌fund;‌  ‌
profession;‌  ‌ d. Funded‌‌by‌‌the‌‌employer;‌  ‌
c. Charged‌‌  off‌‌
  and‌‌ uncollectible‌‌ within‌‌ the‌‌ 
e. Paid‌‌or‌‌incurred‌‌during‌‌taxable‌‌year;‌  ‌ taxable‌‌year;‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 74‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

2) Any‌  ‌amount‌  ‌paid‌  ‌out‌  ‌for‌  ‌new‌  ‌buildings‌  ‌or‌  ‌for‌  ‌permanent‌‌  6) Between‌  ‌a ‌ ‌fiduciary‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌trust‌  ‌and‌  ‌beneficiary‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌  ‌trust.‌‌ 
e. Amount‌  ‌contributed‌  ‌must‌  ‌no‌‌   longer‌‌
  be‌‌  improvements,‌‌   or‌‌
  betterments‌‌   ‌made‌‌
  to‌‌
  increase‌‌ the‌‌ value‌‌ ‌of‌‌  (‌Sec‌‌36‌) ‌ ‌
subject‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌ control‌‌ and‌‌ disposition‌‌ of‌‌  any‌‌property‌‌or‌‌estate;‌  ‌
the‌‌employer;‌  ‌ 5.‌‌Income‌‌Tax‌‌on‌‌Individuals‌  ‌
Does‌  ‌not‌  ‌apply‌  ‌to‌  ‌intangible‌  ‌drilling‌  ‌and‌  ‌development‌  ‌costs‌‌ 
f. Payment‌  ‌has‌  ‌not‌  ‌yet‌  ‌been‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌as‌‌  a.‌‌RC,‌‌NRC,‌‌RA‌ 
incurred‌  ‌in‌  ‌petroleum‌  ‌operations‌  ‌which‌‌   are‌‌  deductible‌‌
  under‌‌ 
deduction;‌  ‌
Sec‌‌34(g)(1).‌  ‌ i.‌‌Coverage‌  ‌
g. Deduction‌‌   is‌‌
  apportioned‌‌   in‌‌ equal‌‌ parts‌‌ 
3) Any‌  ‌amount‌  ‌expended‌  ‌in‌  ‌restoring‌  ‌property‌  ‌or‌  ‌in‌  ‌making‌‌  Individual‌  ‌ Source‌‌of‌‌Income‌  ‌ Tax‌‌Base‌  ‌
over‌  ‌a ‌ ‌period‌  ‌of‌  ‌10‌  ‌consecutive‌  ‌years‌‌ 
good‌  ‌the‌  ‌exhaustion‌  ‌thereof‌  ‌for‌  ‌which‌  ‌an‌‌
  allowance‌‌
  is‌‌
  or‌‌
  has‌‌ 
beginning‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌year‌  ‌in‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌‌ 
been‌‌made;‌‌or‌  ‌ RC‌  Within‌‌and‌‌without‌  ‌ Taxable‌‌income‌  ‌
transfer‌‌or‌‌payment‌‌is‌‌made.‌  ‌
4) Premiums‌  ‌paid‌  ‌on‌  ‌any‌‌   life‌‌
  insurance‌‌  policy‌‌  covering‌‌   the‌‌
  life‌‌ 
Depreciati‌ a. Property‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌used‌  ‌in‌  ‌trade,‌‌  NRC‌  ‌ within‌  ‌ Taxable‌‌income‌  ‌
of‌  ‌any‌  ‌officer‌  ‌or‌  ‌employee,‌  ‌or‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌person‌  ‌financially‌‌ 
on‌  ‌ business‌‌or‌‌profession‌‌of‌‌the‌‌taxpayer;‌  ‌ interested‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌‌
  trade‌‌
  or‌‌  business‌‌
  carried‌‌  on‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  taxpayer,‌‌  RA‌  ‌ within‌  ‌ Taxable‌‌income‌  ‌
b. There‌‌must‌‌be‌d
‌ epreciable‌p
‌ roperties;‌  ‌ individual‌  ‌or‌  ‌corporate,‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌taxpayer‌  ‌is‌  ‌directly‌  ‌or‌‌ 
c. Allowance‌  ‌for‌  ‌depreciation‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌‌  indirectly‌‌a‌‌beneficiary‌‌‌under‌‌such‌‌policy.‌  ‌ NRA-ETB‌  ‌ within‌  ‌ Taxable‌‌income‌  ‌
reasonable‌; ‌ ‌ Losses‌  ‌from‌  ‌Sales‌  ‌or‌  ‌Exchanges‌  ‌of‌  ‌Property.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌In‌  ‌computing‌  ‌net‌‌ 
NRA-NETB‌  ‌ within‌  ‌ Gross‌‌income‌  ‌
d. Depreciation‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ charged‌‌ off‌‌ during‌‌  income,‌  ‌no‌  ‌deductions‌  ‌shall‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌case‌  ‌be‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌in‌  ‌respect‌  ‌of‌‌ 
the‌‌taxable‌‌year;‌  ‌ losses‌‌from‌‌sales‌‌or‌‌exchanges‌‌of‌‌property‌‌directly‌‌or‌‌indirectly‌‌— ‌ ‌ ii.‌‌Taxation‌‌on‌‌compensation‌‌income‌  ‌
e. Statement‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌allowance‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌‌  1) Between‌  ‌members‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌family.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌brothers‌  ‌and‌  ‌sisters,‌‌ 
a)‌‌Inclusions‌  ‌
attached‌‌to‌‌the‌‌return;‌  ‌ spouse,‌‌ancestors,‌‌and‌‌lineal‌‌descendants;‌‌or‌  ‌
f. Method‌  ‌for‌  ‌computing‌  ‌the‌  ‌allowance‌‌  All‌  ‌remuneration‌  ‌for‌  ‌services‌  ‌rendered‌  ‌by‌  ‌an‌  ‌employee‌  ‌for‌  ‌his‌‌ 
2) Except‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌distributions‌  ‌in‌  ‌liquidation,‌  ‌between‌‌   an‌‌ 
for‌  ‌depreciation‌  ‌must‌‌
  be‌‌
  in‌‌
  accordance‌‌  employer‌‌unless‌‌specifically‌‌excluded.‌‌It‌‌includes‌‌   ‌
individual‌  ‌and‌  ‌corporation‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌  ‌fifty‌  ‌percent‌  ‌(50%)‌  ‌in‌‌ 
with‌  ‌the‌‌
  method‌‌  prescribed‌‌  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  SOF‌‌  value‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌outstanding‌  ‌stock‌  ‌of‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌‌  owned,‌‌   directly‌‌
  or‌‌  a) salaries,‌‌wages,‌‌emoluments,‌‌   ‌
upon‌‌the‌‌recommendation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌CIR.‌  ‌ indirectly,‌‌by‌‌or‌‌for‌‌such‌‌individual;‌‌or‌  ‌
b) honoraria,‌‌   ‌
Depletion‌  ‌ a. Depletible‌  ‌asset‌  ‌— ‌ ‌natural‌  ‌resources,‌‌  3) Except‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌   case‌‌
  of‌‌  distributions‌‌  in‌‌
  liquidation,‌‌   between‌‌
  two‌‌ 
c) bonuses,‌‌   ‌
i.e.‌‌mines,‌‌gas‌‌and‌‌oil‌‌wells;‌  ‌ corporations‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌  ‌fifty‌  ‌percent‌  ‌(50%)‌  ‌in‌  ‌value‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
outstanding‌‌   stock‌‌  of‌‌  which‌‌
  is‌‌
  owned,‌‌   directly‌‌  or‌‌
  indirectly,‌‌ by‌  d) allowances,‌‌   ‌
b. Charged‌‌off‌‌within‌‌taxable‌‌year;‌  ‌
or‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌individual‌  ‌if‌  ‌either‌  ‌one‌‌   of‌‌
  such‌‌  corporations,‌‌ 
c. Allowance‌‌  for‌‌
  depletion‌‌
  is‌‌
  computed‌‌ in‌‌  e) fringe‌‌benefits‌‌including‌‌director’s‌‌fee,‌‌   ‌
with‌‌ respect‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ taxable‌‌ year‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ corporation‌‌ preceding‌‌ the‌‌ 
accordance‌  ‌with‌  ‌cost‌  ‌depletion‌‌  date‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌sale‌  ‌of‌  ‌exchange‌  ‌was‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌applicable‌  ‌to‌‌  f) taxable‌‌pensions‌‌and‌‌retirement‌‌pay‌‌and‌‌   ‌
method‌. ‌ ‌ such‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌year,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌personal‌  ‌holding‌  ‌company‌  ‌or‌  ‌a ‌ ‌foreign‌‌  g) other‌  ‌income‌  ‌of‌  ‌similar‌  ‌nature‌  ‌including‌  ‌those‌  ‌paid‌  ‌in‌‌ 
personal‌‌holding‌‌company;‌  ‌ kind.‌  ‌
e.‌‌Items‌‌not‌‌deductible‌  ‌
4) Between‌‌the‌‌grantor‌‌and‌‌a‌‌fiduciary‌‌of‌‌any‌‌trust;‌‌or‌  ‌ i) COLA,‌  ‌PERA,‌  ‌housing‌  ‌allowance,‌  ‌OT‌  ‌pay,‌  ‌Emergency‌‌ 
In‌‌
  computing‌‌   net‌‌
  income,‌‌
  ‌no‌‌
  deduction‌‌
  shall‌‌
  in‌‌
  any‌‌ case‌‌ be‌‌ allowed‌‌ 
in‌‌respect‌‌to‌‌— ‌ ‌ 5) Between‌  ‌the‌  ‌fiduciary‌  ‌of‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌fiduciary‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌trust‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌  pay,‌‌
  Hazard‌‌
  pay,‌‌  Rice‌‌
  and‌‌
  clothing‌‌
  allowance,‌‌ Medical‌‌ 
fiduciary‌  ‌of‌  ‌another‌  ‌trust‌‌
  if‌‌
  the‌‌
  same‌‌   person‌‌  is‌‌  a ‌‌grantor‌‌   with‌‌  allowance,‌‌grocery‌‌allowance.‌  ‌
1) Personal,‌‌living‌‌or‌‌family‌‌expenses‌; ‌ ‌
respect‌‌to‌‌each‌‌trust;‌‌or‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 75‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

b)‌‌Exclusions‌  ‌ c) Taxpayer‌  ‌must‌  ‌signify‌  ‌intention‌  ‌to‌  ‌use‌  ‌this‌  ‌option‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌1st‌‌ 
Royalties,‌‌in‌‌general‌  ‌ 20%‌  ‌
quarter‌  ‌percentage‌  ‌or‌‌
  income‌‌   tax‌‌
  return.‌‌   Otherwise,‌‌   graduated‌‌ 
a) Compensation‌  ‌for‌  ‌services‌  ‌rendered‌  ‌by‌  ‌an‌  ‌independent‌‌ 
rates‌‌apply.‌  ‌ - Books,‌‌literary‌‌and‌‌musical‌‌compositions‌  ‌ 10%‌  ‌
contractor;‌  ‌
d) Mixed‌  ‌income‌  ‌earners‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Php250K‌‌ 
b) Amounts‌  ‌paid‌  ‌either‌  ‌as‌  ‌advances‌  ‌or‌  ‌reimbursement‌  ‌for‌‌  Prizes‌‌and‌‌Winnings‌‌-‌‌P10K‌‌or‌‌less‌  ‌ 0-35%‌  ‌
reduction.‌  ‌
transportation,‌  ‌representation,‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌bona‌  ‌fide‌‌ 
e) This‌‌option‌‌is‌‌NOT‌‌available‌t‌ o:‌  ‌ - >‌‌P10K‌  ‌ 20%‌  ‌
ordinary‌  ‌and‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌expenses‌  ‌incurred‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
performance‌‌   of‌‌
  duties‌‌
  ‌unless‌‌  there‌‌
  is‌‌ an‌‌ excess‌‌ over‌‌ actual‌‌  PCSO‌‌and‌‌Lotto‌ ‌winnings‌‌-‌‌P10K‌‌or‌‌less‌  ‌ EXEMPT‌  ‌
i) Purely‌‌compensation‌‌‌income‌‌earners;‌  ‌
expenses;‌  ‌
ii) VAT-registered‌  ‌taxpayers,‌  ‌regardless‌  ‌of‌  ‌gross‌  ‌sales‌  ‌or‌‌  - >‌‌P10K‌  ‌ 20%‌  ‌
c) Income‌‌derived‌‌by‌‌partner‌‌from‌‌professional‌‌partnership.‌  ‌
receipts;‌  ‌
d) Convenience‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ Employer‌‌ Rule.‌‌ — ‌‌benefits‌‌ which‌‌ are‌‌  Interest‌‌income‌‌from‌‌FCDU‌  ‌ 15%‌  ‌
iii) Non-VAT‌‌
  taxpayers‌‌
  whose‌‌
  gross‌‌
  sale‌‌
  or‌‌
  receipts‌‌
  and‌‌ other‌‌ 
given‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌exclusive‌  ‌benefit‌  ‌or‌  ‌convenience‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
non-operating‌‌income‌‌>‌P
‌ hp3M‌; ‌ ‌ Cash‌‌and‌‌Property‌‌Dividends‌‌-‌‌Individual‌‌to‌‌DC‌  ‌ 10%‌  ‌
employer.‌  ‌
iv) Taxpayers‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌OPT‌e‌ xcept‌‌‌those‌‌under‌‌Sec‌‌116.‌  ‌
e) De‌‌minimis‌‌‌benefits.‌  ‌ - DC‌‌to‌‌DC‌  ‌ 0%‌  ‌
v) Partners‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌GPP‌  ‌since‌‌
  their‌‌
  distributive‌‌
  share‌‌
  is‌‌
  already‌‌ 
iii.‌‌Taxation‌‌of‌‌business‌‌income/income‌‌from‌‌practice‌‌of‌‌
  Interest‌‌on‌‌long-term‌‌deposit‌‌or‌‌investment‌‌in‌‌banks‌‌ 
net‌‌of‌‌costs‌‌and‌‌expenses;‌‌and‌  ‌ EXEMPT‌  ‌
profession‌  ‌ (With‌‌maturity‌‌of‌‌at‌‌least‌‌5‌‌years)‌  ‌
vi) Individuals‌‌enjoying‌‌income‌‌tax‌‌exemption,‌‌i.e.‌‌BMBEs.‌  ‌
a)‌‌Schedular‌  ‌ Plus‌‌NRA-ETB‌  ‌
iv.‌‌Taxation‌‌of‌‌partners‌‌in‌‌a‌‌general‌‌professional‌‌partnership‌  ‌
1. RC‌–‌ ‌‌0-35%‌‌of‌‌net‌‌income‌‌within‌‌&‌‌without;‌  ‌ Interest‌‌from‌‌currency‌‌deposits,‌‌trust‌‌funds‌‌and‌‌  20%‌  ‌
1. A‌‌
  GPP‌‌  is‌‌ not‌‌ a ‌‌taxable‌‌ entity‌‌ for‌‌ income‌‌ tax‌‌ purposes‌‌ because‌‌ it‌‌  deposit‌‌substitutes‌  ‌
2. NRC‌–‌ ‌‌0-35%‌‌on‌‌net‌‌income‌‌within;‌  ‌
only‌  ‌acts‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌pass-through‌  ‌entity‌  ‌where‌  ‌its‌  ‌income‌  ‌is‌‌ 
3. RA‌‌–‌‌0-35%‌‌of‌‌net‌‌income‌‌within;‌  ‌ ultimately‌‌passed‌‌to‌‌the‌‌partners.‌  ‌ Interest‌‌Income‌‌from‌‌long-term‌‌deposit‌‌or‌‌investment‌‌   ‌ EXEMPT‌  ‌
4. NRA-ETB‌‌‌–‌‌0-35%‌‌of‌‌net‌‌income‌‌within;‌  ‌
2. The‌‌GPP‌‌may‌‌avail‌‌of‌‌itemized‌‌deductions‌‌or‌‌the‌‌40%‌‌OSD.‌  ‌ - Upon‌‌pre-termination‌‌with‌‌Holding‌‌period‌‌of‌‌  5%‌  ‌
5. NRA-NETB‌–‌ ‌‌25%‌‌of‌‌gross‌‌income‌‌within;‌  ‌ 4-5‌‌years‌  ‌  ‌
3. The‌  ‌GPP‌  ‌then‌  ‌distributes‌  ‌the‌  ‌net‌  ‌income‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌partners.‌‌
  The‌‌ 
6. Estates‌‌&‌‌Trusts‌‌‌–‌‌0-35%‌‌of‌‌net‌‌income;‌  ‌ share‌‌of‌‌the‌‌partner‌‌is‌‌taxable‌‌income‌‌of‌‌each‌‌partner.‌  ‌ - 3-4‌‌years‌  ‌ 12%‌  ‌
7. Special‌‌Employees‌‌‌–‌‌15%‌‌of‌‌gross‌‌compensation‌‌income.‌  ‌
4. The‌  ‌partners‌  ‌then‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌claim‌  ‌further‌  ‌deductions‌‌
  from‌‌
  their‌‌ 
- <‌‌3‌‌years‌  ‌ 20%‌  ‌
b)‌‌‌8%‌‌option‌  ‌ distributive‌‌share.‌  ‌

Self-employed‌  ‌individuals‌  ‌and/or‌  ‌professionals‌  ‌shall‌  ‌have‌  ‌the‌‌  5. The‌  ‌partners‌‌  cannot‌‌
  also‌‌
  avail‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  8%‌‌
  income‌‌
  tax‌‌
  rate‌‌
  with‌‌  ALL,‌‌including‌‌NRA-NETB‌  ‌
option‌  ‌to‌  ‌avail‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌eight‌  ‌percent‌  ‌(8%)‌  ‌tax‌  ‌on‌  ‌gross‌  ‌sales‌‌
  or‌‌  regard‌‌to‌‌his‌‌share‌‌from‌‌the‌‌GPP.‌  ‌
Capital‌‌gains‌  ‌ 6%‌  ‌
gross‌  ‌receipts‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌non-operating‌  ‌income‌  ‌in‌  ‌excess‌  ‌of‌‌  v.‌‌Taxation‌‌of‌‌passive‌‌income‌  ‌
Php250K‌  ‌in‌  ‌lieu‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌graduated‌  ‌income‌  ‌tax‌  ‌rates‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌  Capital‌‌gains‌‌for‌‌shares‌‌of‌‌stock‌‌not‌‌traded‌  ‌ 15%‌  ‌
percentage‌‌tax.‌R ‌ ules‌‌on‌‌availing‌‌the‌‌8%‌‌tax‌‌rate‌  ‌ Passive‌‌Income‌  ‌ Rate‌  ‌
Only‌‌NRA-NETB‌  ‌
a) The‌‌first‌‌Php250K‌‌is‌‌not‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌tax;‌  ‌ For‌‌RC,‌‌NRC,‌‌RA‌  ‌
b) This‌‌is‌‌in‌‌lieu‌‌of‌‌the‌‌3%‌‌percentage‌‌tax;‌  ‌ Gross‌‌amount‌‌of‌‌income‌‌within‌‌PH‌  ‌ 25%‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 76‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

BDO‌‌v.‌‌Republic‌‌‌2015‌‌Leonen‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ a. For‌‌
  ‌common‌‌  shares‌‌ of‌‌ stock‌, ‌‌the‌‌ book‌‌ value‌‌ based‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌  b. Change‌‌  of‌‌
  hands‌‌ to‌‌ recipient‌‌ not‌‌ engaged‌‌ in‌‌ real‌‌ estate‌‌ or‌‌ to‌‌ use‌‌ 
latest‌‌available‌‌financial‌‌statements.‌‌   ‌ in‌‌business:‌  ‌
From‌‌
  the‌‌
  point‌‌  of‌‌ view‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ financial‌‌ market,‌‌ the‌‌ phrase‌‌ “at‌‌ any‌‌ one‌‌ 
time”‌‌
  for‌‌
  purposes‌‌   of‌‌
  determining‌‌   the‌‌
  “‌20‌‌
  or‌‌
  more‌‌ lenders‌” ‌‌would‌‌  b. For‌  ‌preferred‌  ‌shares‌  ‌of‌  ‌stock‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌liquidation‌  ‌value,‌‌  i. Succession‌‌or‌‌donation‌‌‌-‌‌CAPITAL;‌  ‌
mean‌  ‌every‌  ‌transaction‌  ‌executed‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌primary‌‌   or‌‌
  secondary‌‌  which‌  ‌is‌  ‌equal‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌redemption‌  ‌price‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌preferred‌‌  ii. As‌‌dividend‌‌‌-‌‌CAPITAL;‌  ‌
market‌‌‌in‌‌connection‌‌with‌‌the‌‌purchase‌‌or‌‌sale‌‌of‌‌securities.‌  ‌
shares.‌‌   ‌
iii. Exchange‌‌‌-‌‌ORDINARY;‌  ‌
Where‌  ‌the‌  ‌financial‌  ‌assets‌  ‌involved‌  ‌are‌  ‌government‌  ‌securities‌  ‌like‌‌  c. The‌  ‌latest‌  ‌audited‌  ‌financial‌  ‌statements‌  ‌shall‌‌   be‌‌
  sufficient‌‌  iv. Involuntary‌‌Transfers‌‌‌-‌‌NO‌‌EFFECT.‌  ‌
bonds,‌  ‌the‌  ‌reckoning‌  ‌of‌  ‌“20‌  ‌or‌  ‌more‌  ‌lenders/investors”‌  ‌is‌  ‌made‌‌
  at‌‌ 
in‌‌
  determining‌‌   the‌‌
  fair‌‌  market‌‌   value‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  shares‌‌ of‌‌ stock‌‌ 
any‌  ‌transaction‌  ‌in‌  ‌connection‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌purchase‌  ‌or‌  ‌sale‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  CONDITIONALLY‌‌EXEMPT‌‌FROM‌‌CGT‌  ‌
subject‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌sale,‌  ‌barter,‌  ‌exchange,‌  ‌or‌‌
  other‌‌  disposition.‌‌ 
Government‌  ‌Bonds.‌  ‌Consequently,‌  ‌the‌  ‌seller‌  ‌is‌  ‌required‌  ‌to‌‌ 
(‌RR‌‌20-2020‌) ‌ ‌ a) Proceeds‌  o ‌ f‌  ‌sale‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌principal‌  ‌residence‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌fully‌‌ 
withhold‌  ‌the‌  ‌20%‌  ‌final‌  ‌withholding‌  ‌tax‌‌   ‌on‌‌
  the‌‌
  imputed‌‌
  interest‌‌ 
income‌‌from‌‌the‌‌bonds.‌  ‌ utilized‌‌   in‌‌
  acquiring‌‌   a ‌‌new‌‌ one‌‌ within‌‌ ‌18‌‌ months‌‌ from‌‌ date‌‌ of‌‌ 
b) Income‌  ‌from‌  ‌sale‌  ‌of‌  ‌real‌  ‌property‌  ‌situated‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  sale;‌  ‌
It‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌emphasized‌  ‌that‌  ‌debt‌  ‌instruments‌  ‌that‌‌   do‌‌
  not‌‌  qualify‌‌   as‌‌  Philippines;‌  ‌
b) The‌‌   historical‌‌   cost‌‌   or‌‌  adjusted‌‌   basis‌‌   of‌‌
  RP‌‌
  sold‌‌ will‌‌ be‌‌ carried‌‌ 
deposit‌  ‌substitutes‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌1997‌  ‌NIRC‌  ‌are‌‌   subject‌‌  to‌‌
  the‌‌  ‌regular‌‌  c) Income‌  ‌from‌  ‌sale,‌  ‌exchange,‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌disposition‌  ‌of‌  ‌other‌‌  over‌‌to‌‌the‌‌new‌‌PR;‌  ‌
income‌  ‌tax.‌  ‌For‌  ‌discounted‌  ‌instruments,‌  ‌like‌  ‌the‌  ‌zero-coupon‌‌ 
capital‌‌assets.‌
bonds,‌  ‌the‌  ‌trading‌  ‌gain‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌the‌  ‌excess‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  selling‌‌   price‌‌   over‌‌  c) CIR‌‌  has‌‌
  been‌‌   duly‌‌   notified,‌‌   through‌‌   a ‌‌prescribed‌‌ return,‌‌ within‌‌ 
 ‌

the‌  ‌book‌  ‌value‌  ‌or‌  ‌accreted‌  ‌value‌  ‌(original‌  ‌issue‌  ‌price‌  ‌plus‌‌  Type‌  ‌ Rate‌  ‌ Basis‌  ‌ 30‌  ‌days‌, ‌ ‌from‌  ‌date‌  ‌of‌  ‌sale‌  ‌of‌  ‌intention‌  ‌to‌  ‌avail‌  ‌of‌  ‌tax‌‌ 
accumulated‌  ‌discount‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌of‌  ‌purchase‌  ‌up‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌of‌‌  exemption.‌  ‌
sale)‌‌of‌‌the‌‌instruments.‌  ‌ Sale‌‌of‌‌shares‌‌of‌‌stocks‌‌not‌‌  15%‌  ‌ Net‌‌Capital‌‌Gains‌  ‌
traded‌  ‌ d) Net‌‌of‌‌proceeds‌‌not‌‌utilized‌‌will‌‌be‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌CGT.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌BIR’s‌  ‌interpretation‌  ‌of‌  ‌“at‌  ‌any‌  ‌one‌  ‌time”‌  ‌to‌  ‌mean‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌‌ 
e) Buyer‌  ‌of‌  ‌principal‌  ‌residence‌‌   shall‌‌  deduct‌‌   6%,‌‌  deposit‌‌   in‌‌
  cash‌‌ 
point‌‌of‌‌origination‌‌alone‌‌is‌‌unduly‌‌restrictive.‌  ‌ - Listed‌‌and‌‌Traded‌  ‌ 0.6%‌  ‌ Gross‌‌Selling‌‌Price‌  ‌ or‌  ‌manager’s‌  ‌check‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌  ‌interest-bearing‌  ‌account‌  ‌with‌  ‌an‌‌ 
Tax‌‌treatment‌‌of‌‌income‌‌derived‌  ‌ Authorized‌‌Agent‌‌Bank‌‌under‌‌an‌E ‌ scrow‌‌Agreement‌. ‌ ‌
Sale‌‌of‌‌real‌‌property‌‌located‌‌  6%‌  ‌ GSP,‌‌FMV,‌‌higher‌  ‌
from‌‌the‌‌PEACe‌‌Bonds‌  ‌ in‌‌PH‌  ‌ EXEMPT‌‌ENTITIES‌‌FROM‌‌CGT‌  ‌
Should‌  ‌there‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌a ‌ ‌simultaneous‌  ‌sale‌  ‌to‌  ‌20‌  ‌or‌  ‌more‌‌  1) Dealer‌‌in‌‌securities;‌  ‌
Sale‌‌of‌‌other‌‌capital‌‌assets‌  ‌
lenders/investors,‌  ‌the‌  ‌PEACe‌  ‌Bonds‌  ‌are‌  ‌deemed‌  ‌deposit‌‌  2) Exempt‌‌under‌‌special‌‌laws;‌ 
substitutes‌. ‌ ‌Under‌  ‌Section‌  ‌24‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌1997‌  ‌NIRC,‌  ‌interest‌  ‌income‌‌  - >‌‌12‌‌Months‌  ‌ 0-35%‌  ‌ 50%‌‌of‌‌CG‌  ‌
received‌‌   by‌‌  individuals‌‌   from‌‌   long-term‌‌   deposits‌‌
  or‌‌
  investments‌‌  with‌‌  3) Exchange‌‌
  of‌‌
  real‌‌ property‌‌ solely‌‌ for‌‌ shares‌‌ of‌‌ stock‌‌ resulting‌‌ in‌‌ 
a‌  ‌holding‌  ‌period‌  ‌of‌  ‌not‌  ‌less‌  ‌than‌  ‌five‌  ‌(5)‌‌
  years‌‌
  is‌‌
  ‌exempt‌‌
  ‌from‌‌
  the‌‌  - 12‌‌Months‌‌or‌‌less‌  ‌ 0-35%‌  ‌ 100%‌‌of‌‌CG‌  ‌ corporate‌‌control;‌  ‌
final‌‌tax‌. ‌ ‌
RULES‌  ‌ 4) GOCC‌‌selling‌‌real‌‌property;‌  ‌
Thus,‌‌   should‌‌   the‌‌
  PEACe‌‌  Bonds‌‌   be‌‌
  found‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  within‌‌ the‌‌ coverage‌‌ of‌‌  5) Disposition‌‌is‌‌gratuitous;‌  ‌
a. Real‌‌
  properties‌‌
  formerly‌‌   forming‌‌   part‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  stock‌‌ in‌‌ trade‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌
deposit‌  ‌substitutes,‌  ‌the‌  ‌proper‌  ‌procedure‌  ‌was‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌Bureau‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Treasury‌‌   to‌‌ pay‌‌ the‌‌ face‌‌ value‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ PEACe‌‌ Bonds‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ bondholders‌‌  taxpayer‌  ‌engaged‌  ‌in‌  ‌real‌  ‌estate‌  ‌or‌  ‌formerly‌  ‌used‌  ‌in‌  ‌trade‌  ‌or‌‌  6) Pursuant‌‌to‌‌CARP‌‌Law;‌  ‌
and‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌BIR‌  ‌to‌  ‌collect‌  ‌the‌  ‌unpaid‌  ‌final‌  ‌withholding‌  ‌tax‌‌  business‌‌  which‌‌
  were‌‌   later‌‌   on‌‌ abandoned‌‌ continue‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ treated‌‌ 
7) Requirements‌‌above‌‌have‌‌been‌‌met,‌‌reg.‌‌principal‌‌residence.‌  ‌
directly‌‌ from‌‌ RCBC‌‌ Capital/CODE-NGO,‌‌ or‌‌ any‌‌ lender‌‌ or‌‌ investor‌‌  as‌‌ORDINARY‌a‌ ssets.‌  ‌
if‌‌such‌‌be‌‌the‌‌case,‌‌as‌‌the‌‌withholding‌‌agents‌. ‌ ‌ Republic‌‌v.‌‌Sps‌‌Salvador‌‌2
‌ 017‌  ‌
Provided‌, ‌ ‌that‌  ‌such‌  ‌is‌  ‌automatically‌  ‌converted‌  ‌to‌  ‌CAPITAL‌‌ 
assets‌  ‌upon‌  ‌showing‌  ‌proof‌  ‌that‌  ‌they‌  ‌have‌  ‌not‌  ‌been‌  ‌used‌  ‌in‌‌  1. It‌  ‌is‌  ‌settled‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌transfer‌  ‌of‌  ‌property‌  ‌through‌‌ 
vi.‌‌Taxation‌‌of‌‌capital‌‌gains‌  ‌ expropriation‌  ‌proceedings‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌sale‌  ‌or‌  ‌exchange‌  ‌within‌‌ 
business‌‌   for‌‌
  ‌more‌‌
  than‌‌ 2 ‌‌years‌‌ prior‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ consummation‌‌ of‌‌ 
the‌‌taxable‌‌transaction.‌  ‌ the‌  ‌meaning‌  ‌of‌  ‌Sections‌  ‌24(D)‌  ‌and‌‌   56(A)(3)‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  NIRC‌, ‌‌
a) Income‌  ‌from‌  ‌sale‌  ‌of‌  ‌shares‌  ‌of‌  ‌stock‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Philippine‌‌ 
and‌  ‌profit‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌transaction‌  ‌constitutes‌  ‌capital‌  ‌gain.‌‌
  Since‌‌ 
corporation‌‌—‌t‌ he‌‌following‌‌rules‌‌shall‌‌apply:‌‌   ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 77‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

capital‌  ‌gains‌  ‌tax‌  ‌is‌‌


  a ‌‌tax‌‌
  on‌‌
  passive‌‌
  income,‌‌
  it‌‌
  is‌‌
  the‌‌
  seller,‌‌
  or‌‌  the‌  ‌MWEs‌  ‌will‌  ‌not‌  ‌lose‌  ‌their‌  ‌exemption‌  ‌as‌  ‌such.‌  ‌(‌Soriano‌  ‌v.‌‌  6.‌‌Income‌‌Tax‌‌on‌‌Corporations‌  ‌
respondents‌‌in‌‌this‌‌case,‌‌who‌‌are‌‌liable‌‌to‌‌shoulder‌‌the‌‌tax.‌  ‌ Secretary‌‌of‌‌Finance‌2 ‌ 017‌‌En‌‌Banc‌) ‌ ‌
a.‌‌Domestic‌‌corporations‌  ‌
2. As‌  ‌far‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌‌   government‌‌   is‌‌
  concerned,‌‌   ‌the‌‌   capital‌‌
  gains‌‌   tax‌‌  ii.‌‌Exemptions‌‌granted‌‌under‌‌international‌‌agreements‌  ‌
in‌  ‌expropriation‌  ‌proceedings‌  ‌remains‌  ‌a ‌ ‌liability‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  i.‌‌Taxation‌‌-‌‌in‌‌general‌  ‌
seller‌, ‌ ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌tax‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌seller's‌  ‌gain‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌sale‌‌   of‌‌
  real‌‌  1. Officers‌  ‌and‌  ‌staff‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌
  ADB‌‌  who‌‌   are‌‌
  NOT‌‌   PH‌‌   nationals‌‌   shall‌‌ 
a)‌‌Regular‌‌Corporate‌‌Income‌‌Tax‌‌(RCIT)‌  ‌
property.‌  ‌ be‌ e
‌ xempt‌ f
‌ rom‌ P
‌ H‌ i
‌ ncome‌ t
‌ ax.‌   ‌
Regular‌  ‌Corporate‌  ‌Income‌  ‌Tax‌‌   — ‌‌‌effective‌‌   January‌‌   1,‌‌
  2009,‌‌   the‌‌   rate‌‌ 
b.‌‌NRA-ETB‌  ‌ 2. Alien‌  ‌individual‌  ‌employees‌  ‌of‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌embassies‌  ‌or‌‌ 
of‌‌income‌‌tax‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌‌thirty‌‌percent‌‌(30%).‌  ‌
international‌  ‌organizations‌‌   in‌‌
  PH‌‌  are‌‌
  exempt‌‌   from‌‌  our‌‌  income‌‌ 
Please‌‌see‌T ‌ axation‌‌of‌‌Passive‌‌Income‌‌‌(5[a][v])‌  ‌
tax‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌international‌  ‌agreements‌  ‌entered‌  ‌into‌‌   by‌‌
  PH‌‌  b)‌‌Minimum‌‌Corporate‌‌Income‌‌Tax‌‌(MCIT)‌  ‌
c.‌‌NRA-NETB‌  ‌ with‌  ‌said‌  ‌international‌  ‌organizations‌  ‌or‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌Vienna‌‌ 
Under‌‌the‌‌MCIT‌‌scheme,‌‌a‌‌corporation,‌‌   ‌
Convention.‌  ‌
Please‌‌see‌T ‌ axation‌‌of‌‌Passive‌‌Income‌‌‌(5[a][v])‌  ‌ 1. beginning‌‌on‌‌its‌‌‌fourth‌‌year‌‌of‌‌operation‌,  ‌‌ ‌
Resume‌‌of‌‌Individual‌‌Income‌‌Taxation‌  ‌
a) 25%‌‌‌Gross‌‌Income‌‌Tax;‌  ‌ 2. is‌‌assessed‌‌an‌‌MCIT‌‌of‌‌2%‌‌of‌‌its‌‌gross‌‌income‌‌   ‌
Passive‌‌Income‌‌(FINAL‌‌TAX‌‌RATE)‌  ‌
b) CGT‌‌on‌‌sale‌‌of‌‌shares‌‌of‌‌stock‌‌not‌‌traded‌‌in‌‌the‌‌LSE;‌  ‌ Kind‌‌of‌‌  Ordinary‌‌  3. when‌  ‌such‌  ‌MCIT‌  ‌is‌  ‌greater‌‌   than‌‌   the‌‌   normal‌‌   corporate‌‌   income‌‌ 
Individual‌  ‌ Income‌  ‌ Prizes‌‌& ‌‌ tax‌‌imposed‌‌under‌‌Section‌‌27(A).‌‌   ‌
c) CGT‌‌on‌‌sale‌‌of‌‌real‌‌property‌‌located‌‌in‌‌PH.‌  ‌ Royalties‌  ‌ Interest‌  ‌ Dividend‌  ‌
Winning‌  ‌
If‌  ‌the‌  ‌regular‌‌   income‌‌   tax‌‌  is‌‌
  higher‌‌   than‌‌   the‌‌   MCIT,‌‌   the‌‌   corporation‌‌   does‌‌ 
d.‌‌Special‌‌Aliens‌  ‌
RC,‌‌NRC,‌‌RA‌  ‌ GR:‌‌20%‌  ‌ GR:‌‌20%‌  ‌ 20%‌‌‌if‌‌  From‌‌DC‌‌  not‌  ‌pay‌‌   the‌‌
  MCIT.‌‌   Any‌‌   excess‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌   MCIT‌‌   over‌‌   the‌‌  normal‌‌   tax‌‌   shall‌‌   be‌‌ 
1. Aliens‌  ‌employed‌  ‌by‌  ‌regional‌  ‌headquarters,‌  ‌regional‌‌   operating‌‌   ‌  ‌ >10K‌  ‌ is‌‌10%‌  ‌ carried‌   f
‌ orward‌   a
‌ nd‌   c
‌ redited‌   a
‌ gainst‌   t
‌ he‌   n
‌ ormal‌   i
‌ ncome‌   t
‌ ax‌   f
‌ or‌   ‌the‌‌ 
headquarters,‌  ‌offshore‌  ‌banking‌  ‌units,‌  ‌and‌  ‌petroleum‌  ‌service‌‌  Purely‌‌  Schedular‌  ‌ 10%‌‌‌for‌‌  15%‌‌‌for‌‌    ‌  ‌ three‌‌immediately‌‌succeeding‌‌taxable‌‌years‌. ‌ ‌
Compensation‌  ‌
contractors.‌  ‌ books,‌‌  EFCD;‌‌  Part‌‌of‌‌GI‌‌  From‌‌FC:‌  ‌
Carry‌  ‌Forward‌  ‌of‌  ‌Excess‌  ‌Minimum‌  ‌Tax.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Any‌  ‌excess‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌   MCIT‌‌ 
Business‌‌  Schedular‌‌  literary‌‌  exempt‌‌  if‌‌10K‌‌or‌‌    ‌
2. They‌  ‌are‌  ‌now‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌regular‌  ‌income‌  ‌tax‌  ‌rate‌  ‌without‌‌  or‌‌8%‌‌  works‌‌  for‌‌NRC‌  ‌ <‌  ‌ Part‌‌of‌‌GI‌‌  over‌  ‌the‌  ‌normal‌  ‌income‌  ‌tax‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌carried‌  ‌forward‌  ‌and‌  ‌credited‌‌ 
and‌‌ 
prejudice‌‌to‌‌preferential‌‌rates‌‌under‌‌existing‌‌tax‌‌treaties.‌  ‌ Professional‌  ‌ GIT‌  ‌ and‌‌   ‌  ‌ for‌‌RC‌  ‌ against‌‌   the‌‌ normal‌‌ income‌‌ tax‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ ‌three‌‌ (3)‌‌ immediately‌‌ succeeding‌‌ 
music‌  ‌ 5,‌‌12,‌‌  Lotto‌‌or‌‌   ‌ taxable‌y ‌ ears‌. ‌ ‌
e.‌‌Individual‌‌taxpayers‌e ‌ xempt‌f‌ rom‌‌income‌‌tax‌  ‌
Apply‌‌  20%‌‌‌for‌‌  PCSO‌‌is‌‌  Exempt‌‌ 
pre-‌‌  20%‌‌exc‌‌  for‌‌NRC‌‌   ‌ RCIT‌  ‌ MCIT‌  ‌
i.‌‌Minimum‌‌wage‌‌earner‌  ‌ Mixed‌  ‌ both‌‌ 
terminated‌‌  10K‌‌or‌‌< ‌ ‌ and‌‌RA‌  ‌
rules‌  ‌ long‌‌term‌  Applicable‌‌to‌  ‌ ALL‌‌corporate‌‌TPs‌  ‌ DC‌‌and‌‌RFC‌‌only‌  ‌
Statutory‌  ‌minimum‌  ‌wage‌  ‌shall‌  ‌refer‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌rate‌  ‌fixed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
RTWPB,‌  ‌as‌  ‌defined‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌Bureau‌  ‌of‌  ‌Labor‌  ‌and‌  ‌Employment‌‌  Tax‌‌rate‌  ‌ 30%‌  ‌ 2%‌‌   ‌
From‌‌DC‌‌ 
Statistics‌‌(BLES)‌‌of‌‌DOLE.‌  ‌ Same‌‌but‌‌  is‌‌20%‌  ‌
NRA-‌‌  Tax‌‌base‌  Taxable‌‌Income‌  ‌ Gross‌‌Income‌  ‌
Minimum‌‌ wage‌‌ earner‌‌ shall‌‌ refer‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌‌worker‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ private‌‌ sector‌‌  GITR‌  ‌ Same‌  ‌ exempt‌‌  Same‌  ‌  ‌
ETB‌  ‌
for‌‌EFCD‌  ‌ From‌‌FC‌‌ 
paid‌  ‌the‌  ‌statutory‌‌   minimum‌‌   wage‌‌   or‌‌
  to‌‌  an‌‌
  employee‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  public‌‌  When‌‌  Upon‌‌  Beginning‌‌on‌‌the‌‌4th‌‌taxable‌‌ 
is‌‌exempt‌ 
sector‌  ‌with‌  ‌compensation‌  ‌income‌  ‌of‌  ‌not‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌  ‌the‌  ‌statutory‌‌  imposable‌  ‌ commencement‌  ‌ year‌‌following‌‌commencement‌‌ 
minimum‌  ‌wage‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌non-agricultural‌  ‌sector‌  ‌where‌  ‌he/she‌  ‌is‌‌  NRA-‌‌  of‌‌business‌‌operation‌  ‌
25%‌‌‌GIT‌‌on‌‌all‌‌income‌‌from‌‌PH‌‌sources‌‌(FINAL‌‌TAX)‌  ‌
assigned.‌  ‌ NETB‌  ‌
If‌‌greater‌‌than‌‌MCIT‌  If‌‌greater‌‌than‌‌RCIT‌ 
The‌‌   proper‌‌   interpretation‌‌   of‌‌
  R.A.‌‌   9504‌‌   is‌‌
  that‌‌ it‌‌ imposes‌‌ taxes‌‌ only‌‌ 
on‌‌
  the‌‌  taxable‌‌  income‌‌   received‌‌ in‌‌ excess‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ minimum‌‌ wage,‌‌ but‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 78‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

Relief‌‌
  from‌‌  the‌‌
  Minimum‌‌ Corporate‌‌ Income‌‌ Tax‌‌ Under‌‌ Certain‌‌  1. Proprietary‌  ‌Educational‌  ‌Institutions‌‌
  ‌that‌‌
  are‌‌
  subject‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌ 
Conditions.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Imposition‌  ‌of‌  ‌MCIT‌  ‌is‌  ‌suspended‌  ‌on‌  ‌any‌‌  preferential‌‌10%‌‌rate;‌  ‌ The‌  ‌claimed‌  ‌deduction‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌ ‌direct‌  ‌cost‌  ‌or‌  ‌expense.‌‌
  A ‌‌
corporation‌‌   ‌ 2. Non-profit‌  ‌Hospitals‌  ‌that‌  ‌are‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌‌
  the‌‌
  preferential‌‌
  10%‌‌  cost‌  ‌or‌  ‌expense‌  ‌is‌‌
  deemed‌‌
  "direct"‌‌
  when‌‌  it‌‌
  is‌‌
  readily‌‌
  attributable‌‌
  to‌‌ 
1. which‌  ‌suffers‌  ‌losses‌  ‌on‌  ‌account‌  ‌of‌  ‌prolonged‌  ‌labor‌‌  rate;‌  ‌ the‌‌production‌‌of‌‌the‌‌goods‌‌or‌‌for‌‌the‌‌rendition‌‌of‌‌the‌‌service.‌  ‌
dispute‌,‌‌or‌‌   ‌ For‌  ‌(1)‌  ‌and‌  ‌(2),‌  ‌the‌  ‌income‌  ‌derived‌  ‌from‌  ‌unrelated‌  ‌trade,‌‌  Premium‌  ‌taxes‌, ‌ ‌though‌  ‌payable‌  ‌by‌  ‌MBLIC,‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌direct‌  ‌costs‌‌ 
2. because‌‌of‌f‌ orce‌‌majeure‌,‌‌or‌‌   ‌ business,‌  ‌or‌  ‌activity‌  ‌should‌  ‌not‌  ‌exceed‌  ‌50%‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌gross‌‌  within‌  ‌the‌  ‌contemplation‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌  phrase‌‌   "cost‌‌   of‌‌
  services,"‌‌
  incurred‌‌ 
income.‌  ‌ as‌  ‌they‌  ‌are‌  ‌AFTER‌  ‌the‌  ‌sale‌  ‌of‌  ‌service‌  ‌had‌‌   already‌‌  transpired.‌‌ 
3. because‌‌of‌l‌ egitimate‌‌business‌‌reverses.‌  ‌
This‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌therefore‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌equivalent‌  ‌of‌  ‌raw‌‌ 
"‌Substantial‌  ‌losses‌  ‌from‌  ‌a ‌ ‌prolonged‌  ‌labor‌  ‌dispute‌" ‌ ‌means‌‌  3. PEZA-registered‌  ‌entities‌  ‌for‌  ‌registered‌  ‌activities‌  ‌that‌  ‌are‌‌  materials,‌‌   labor,‌‌
  and‌‌
  manufacturing‌‌   cost‌‌
  of‌‌ deductible‌‌ "cost‌‌ of‌‌ sales"‌ 
losses‌  ‌arising‌  ‌from‌  ‌a ‌‌strike‌‌
  staged‌‌  by‌‌
  the‌‌   employees‌‌  which‌‌
  lasted‌‌  subject‌‌to‌‌5%‌‌preferential‌‌rate;‌  ‌ in‌‌the‌‌sale‌‌of‌‌goods.‌  ‌
for‌  ‌more‌‌
  than‌‌   six‌‌
  (6)‌‌  months‌‌   ‌within‌‌  a ‌‌taxable‌‌
  period‌‌
  and‌‌
  which‌‌  4. Offshore‌‌Banking‌‌Units;‌  ‌
Association‌‌of‌‌International‌‌Shipping‌‌Lines,‌‌Inc.et‌‌al.‌‌v.‌‌SOF‌‌‌2020‌  ‌
has‌‌caused‌‌the‌‌temporary‌‌shutdown‌‌‌of‌‌business‌‌operations.‌  ‌ 5. International‌  ‌Carriers‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌2.5%‌  ‌of‌  ‌Gross‌  ‌Philippine‌‌ 
Gross‌‌Income‌‌Defined‌  ‌ Billings.‌  ‌ WON‌‌   ‌demurrage‌‌   and‌‌
  detention‌‌ fees‌‌ are‌‌ subject‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ preferential‌‌ 
tax‌‌rate‌‌of‌‌2.5%‌‌of‌‌Gross‌‌PH‌‌Billings.‌  ‌
1. gross‌  ‌income‌  ‌= ‌ ‌gross‌  ‌sales‌‌  — ‌‌sales‌‌  returns,‌‌  discounts‌‌  and‌‌  Aegis‌‌PeopleSupport,‌‌Inc.‌‌v.‌‌CIR‌‌‌2019‌  ‌
allowances‌‌and‌‌cost‌‌of‌‌goods‌‌sold.‌‌   ‌ NO‌. ‌ ‌They‌‌  are‌‌  properly‌‌  ‌regular‌‌
  income‌‌
  ‌subject‌‌  to‌‌  regular‌‌  income‌‌ 
Section‌  ‌4 ‌ ‌of‌  ‌R.A.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌7916‌  ‌provides‌  ‌that‌‌   enterprises‌‌   located‌‌   within‌‌  tax‌‌
  rate.‌‌
  The‌‌  GPB‌‌  covers‌‌ gross‌‌ revenue‌‌ derived‌‌ from‌‌ ‌transportation‌ 
2. '‌Cost‌  ‌of‌  ‌goods‌  ‌sold‌' ‌ ‌shall‌  ‌include‌  ‌all‌  ‌business‌  ‌expenses‌‌  the‌  ‌recognized‌‌   economic‌‌   or‌‌
  trade‌‌   zones‌‌   "are‌‌
  granted‌‌  preferential‌‌   tax‌‌  of‌‌
  passengers,‌‌   cargo‌‌
  and/or‌‌  mail‌‌
  originating‌‌
  from‌‌ the‌‌ Philippines‌‌ up‌‌ 
directly‌  ‌incurred‌‌   to‌‌
  produce‌‌   the‌‌  merchandise‌‌   to‌‌
  bring‌‌
  them‌‌
  to‌‌  treatment."‌  ‌Any‌‌   income‌‌   earned‌‌   by‌‌  a ‌‌PEZA-registered‌‌   enterprise‌‌  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  final‌‌
  destination.‌‌   Any‌‌
  other‌‌  income,‌‌
  therefore,‌‌ is‌‌ subject‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ 
their‌‌present‌‌location‌‌and‌‌use.‌  ‌ which‌‌   is‌‌
  NOT‌‌   related‌‌   to‌‌  its‌‌  registered‌‌   activities‌‌
  is‌‌   NOT‌‌  covered‌‌  regular‌‌income‌‌tax‌‌rate.‌  ‌
by‌‌the‌‌incentives‌g‌ ranted‌‌under‌‌R.A.‌‌No.‌‌7916‌‌and‌‌EO‌‌No.‌‌226.‌  ‌
3. In‌‌the‌‌case‌‌of‌‌taxpayers‌‌engaged‌‌in‌‌the‌‌‌sale‌‌of‌‌service‌,  ‌‌ ‌
The‌  ‌exclusion‌‌   of‌‌
  demurrage‌‌   and‌‌
  detention‌‌   fees‌‌
  from‌‌
  the‌‌
  preferential‌‌ 
gross‌  ‌income‌  ‌= ‌‌gross‌‌  receipts‌‌  — ‌‌sales‌‌  returns,‌‌  allowances,‌‌  A‌  ‌hedge‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌investment‌  ‌undertaken‌  ‌to‌‌  reduce‌‌   the‌‌   risk‌‌
  of‌‌
  adverse‌‌  rate‌  ‌of‌  ‌2.5%‌  ‌is‌  ‌proper‌  ‌since‌  ‌they‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌considered‌  ‌income‌‌ 
price‌  ‌movements‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌  ‌asset.‌  ‌Simply‌  ‌put,‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌loose‌  ‌form‌  ‌of‌‌  derived‌  ‌from‌  ‌transportation‌  ‌of‌  ‌persons,‌  ‌goods‌  ‌and/or‌  ‌mail,‌  ‌in‌‌ 
discounts‌‌and‌‌cost‌‌of‌‌services.‌‌   ‌ insurance‌  ‌against‌  ‌value‌  ‌or‌  ‌price‌  ‌fluctuations‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌particular‌‌  accordance‌‌with‌‌the‌‌rule‌e‌ xpressio‌‌unios‌‌est‌‌exclusio‌‌alterius.‌  ‌
4. '‌Cost‌  ‌of‌  ‌services‌' ‌ ‌shall‌  ‌mean‌  ‌all‌  ‌direct‌  ‌costs‌  ‌and‌  ‌expenses‌‌  asset‌. ‌ ‌Any‌  ‌occurring‌  ‌fluctuation‌  ‌in‌  ‌local‌  ‌currency‌  ‌value‌  ‌before‌  ‌the‌‌ 
necessarily‌  ‌incurred‌  ‌to‌  ‌provide‌  ‌the‌  ‌services‌  ‌required‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  conversion‌‌ of‌‌ foreign‌‌ currency‌‌ does‌‌ not‌‌ result‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ realization‌‌ of‌‌  Demurrage‌‌   and‌‌  detention‌‌
  fees‌‌
  definitely‌‌ form‌‌ part‌‌ of‌‌ an‌‌ international‌‌ 
any‌‌gain‌‌or‌‌loss‌. ‌ ‌ sea‌  ‌carrier's‌  ‌gross‌  ‌income.‌  ‌For‌  ‌they‌  ‌are‌  ‌acquired‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌normal‌‌ 
customers‌‌and‌‌clients‌‌including‌  ‌
course‌‌of‌‌trade‌‌or‌‌business.‌  ‌
a. salaries‌  ‌and‌  ‌employee‌  ‌benefits‌  ‌of‌  ‌personnel,‌‌  In‌  ‌the‌  ‌instant‌  ‌case,‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌may‌  ‌validly‌  ‌enter‌  ‌into‌  ‌a ‌ ‌hedging‌‌ 
consultants‌  ‌and‌  ‌specialists‌  ‌directly‌  ‌rendering‌  ‌the‌‌  contract‌  ‌to‌  ‌manage‌  ‌its‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌currencies‌  ‌on-hand‌  ‌earned‌  ‌as‌  ‌gross‌‌  c)‌‌Taxation‌‌of‌‌passive‌‌income‌  ‌
service‌‌and‌  ‌ revenues.‌  ‌Consequently,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌considers‌  ‌hedging‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌very‌‌ 
much‌  ‌related‌  ‌to‌‌   its‌‌
  registered‌‌   activities‌‌
  and,‌‌  hence,‌‌  still‌‌  subject‌‌  Passive‌‌Income‌  ‌ Rate‌  ‌
b. cost‌  ‌of‌  ‌facilities‌  ‌directly‌  ‌utilized‌  ‌in‌  ‌providing‌  ‌the‌‌  to‌‌a‌‌preferential‌‌tax‌‌treatment‌‌‌under‌‌RA‌‌7916‌‌and‌‌EO‌‌226.‌  ‌
service‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌depreciation‌  ‌or‌  ‌rental‌  ‌of‌  ‌equipment‌‌  Interest‌‌under‌‌the‌‌expanded‌‌foreign‌‌currency‌‌deposit‌‌ 
15%‌  ‌
used‌‌and‌‌cost‌‌of‌‌supplies.‌  ‌ Manila‌‌Bankers'‌‌Life‌‌Insurance‌‌Corp.‌‌v.‌‌CIR‌‌‌2019‌  ‌ (EFCD)‌‌system‌  ‌
c. In‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌banks‌, ‌ ‌'cost‌  ‌of‌  ‌services'‌  ‌shall‌‌
  include‌‌  "‌Gross‌‌   income‌" ‌‌as‌‌
  used‌‌
  in‌‌
  determining‌‌
  MCIT‌‌   means‌‌ "gross‌‌ receipts‌‌  Royalty‌‌of‌‌all‌‌types‌‌within‌‌PH‌  ‌ 20%‌  ‌
interest‌‌expense.‌  ‌ less‌‌   sales‌‌
  returns,‌‌
  allowances,‌‌   discounts‌‌
  and‌‌
  cost‌‌ of‌‌ services."‌‌ "‌Cost‌‌ 
of‌  ‌services‌" ‌ ‌means‌  ‌all‌  ‌DIRECT‌  ‌costs‌  ‌and‌  ‌expenses‌  ‌necessarily‌‌  - From‌‌abroad‌  ‌ 30%‌  ‌
Exceptions‌‌to‌‌MCIT‌  ‌
incurred‌  ‌to‌  ‌provide‌  ‌the‌  ‌services‌  ‌required‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌customers‌  ‌and‌‌ 
Corporations‌‌subject‌‌to‌s‌ pecial‌‌tax‌‌rates‌a‌ re‌e
‌ xempt‌f‌ rom‌‌MCIT:‌  ‌ clients.‌  ‌ Interest‌‌on‌‌any‌‌current‌‌bank‌‌deposit,‌‌yield‌‌or‌‌other‌‌ 
20%‌  ‌
monetary‌‌benefits‌‌from‌‌deposit‌‌substitute,‌‌trust‌‌fund‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 79‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

corporation,‌  ‌by‌  ‌permitting‌  ‌earnings‌  ‌and‌  ‌profits‌  ‌to‌‌  e) Reasonable‌  ‌Needs‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Business.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌includes‌  ‌the‌‌ 
and‌‌similar‌‌arrangement‌  ‌
accumulate‌‌instead‌‌of‌‌being‌‌divided‌‌or‌‌distributed.‌  ‌ reasonably‌‌anticipated‌‌needs‌‌of‌‌the‌‌business.‌ 
Intercorporate‌‌dividend‌‌from‌‌other‌‌DCs‌  ‌ EXEMPT‌  ‌
2) Exceptions.‌‌‌-‌‌The‌‌IAET‌‌shall‌‌not‌‌apply‌‌to:‌  ‌ a. Allowance‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌increase‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌accumulation‌  ‌of‌‌ 
earnings‌‌up‌‌to‌1
‌ 00%‌‌of‌‌the‌‌paid-up‌‌capital‌; ‌ ‌
Tax‌‌Rate‌‌of‌‌Banks‌‌on‌‌income‌‌derived‌‌under‌‌the‌‌EFCD‌‌System‌  ‌ a. Publicly-held‌‌corporations;‌  ‌
b. For‌‌
  definite‌‌
  corporate‌‌
  expansion‌‌
  projects‌‌
  or‌‌ programs‌‌ 
Income‌‌derived‌‌by‌‌a‌‌depository‌‌bank‌‌from‌‌foreign‌‌  b. Banks‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌nonbank‌  ‌financial‌‌ 
EXEMPT‌  ‌ requiring‌‌considerable‌‌capital‌‌expenditure;‌  ‌
currency‌‌transactions‌‌with‌‌nonresidents,‌‌OBUs‌  ‌ intermediaries;‌‌and‌  ‌
c. For‌‌building,‌‌plants,‌‌or‌‌equipment‌‌acquisition;‌  ‌
c. Insurance‌‌companies;‌  ‌
Interest‌‌income‌‌from‌‌foreign‌‌currency‌‌loans‌‌granted‌‌ 
10%‌  ‌ d. For‌‌
  compliance‌‌
  with‌‌ any‌‌ loan‌‌ covenant‌‌ or‌‌ pre-existing‌‌ 
by‌‌a‌‌bank‌‌to‌‌residents‌‌other‌‌than‌‌OBUs‌  ‌ d. Taxable‌‌partnerships;‌  ‌
obligation;‌  ‌
e. Foreign‌‌corporations.‌  ‌
d)‌‌Taxation‌‌of‌‌capital‌‌gains‌  ‌ e. Earnings‌‌required‌‌by‌‌law‌‌or‌‌regulations‌‌to‌‌be‌‌retained;‌  ‌
c) Evidence‌‌of‌‌Purpose‌‌to‌‌Avoid‌‌Income‌‌Tax.‌—
‌  ‌ ‌
On‌‌sale‌‌of‌‌shares‌‌of‌‌stock‌‌of‌‌a‌‌DC‌‌NOT‌‌  15%‌‌of‌‌net‌‌capital‌‌  f. In‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  o
‌ f‌  ‌subsidiaries‌  ‌of‌  F
‌ Cs‌  ‌in‌  ‌PH,‌  ‌all‌‌ 
traded‌‌through‌‌a‌‌local‌‌stock‌‌exchange‌‌held‌‌  gains‌  ‌ 1) Prima‌‌   Facie‌‌   Evidence.‌‌  ‌- ‌‌the‌‌
  fact‌‌  that‌‌ any‌‌ corporation‌‌  undistributed‌  ‌earnings‌  ‌intended‌  ‌for‌  ‌investments‌‌ 
as‌‌a‌‌capital‌‌asset‌  ‌ is‌  ‌a ‌‌mere‌‌   ‌holding‌‌
  ‌company‌‌   or‌‌
  ‌investment‌‌   ‌company‌‌  within‌‌PH.‌  ‌
shall‌‌   be‌‌
  prima‌‌ facie‌‌ evidence‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌purpose‌‌ to‌‌ avoid‌‌ the‌‌ 
On‌‌sale‌‌of‌‌real‌‌property‌‌in‌‌PH‌‌held‌‌as‌‌a ‌‌ 6%‌‌of‌‌GSP‌‌or‌‌current‌‌  Cyanamid‌‌Philippines,‌‌Inc.‌‌v.‌‌CA‌‌‌on‌‌IAET‌  ‌
tax‌‌upon‌‌its‌‌shareholders‌‌or‌‌members.‌  ‌
capital‌‌asset‌  ‌ MV‌‌‌whichever‌‌is‌‌higher‌  ‌ In‌  ‌order‌  ‌to‌  ‌determine‌  ‌whether‌  ‌profits‌  ‌are‌  ‌accumulated‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌ 
2) Evidence‌  ‌Determinative‌‌   of‌‌
  Purpose.‌‌
  ‌- ‌‌The‌‌  fact‌‌
  that‌‌ 
reasonable‌  ‌needs‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌business‌  ‌to‌  ‌avoid‌  ‌the‌  ‌surtax‌  ‌upon‌‌ 
If‌‌shares‌‌of‌‌stock‌‌are‌‌listed‌‌and‌‌traded‌‌  6/10‌‌of‌‌1%‌‌of‌‌GSP‌‌or‌‌  the‌  ‌earnings‌  ‌or‌  ‌profits‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌corporation‌‌  are‌‌  permitted‌‌  shareholders,‌  ‌it‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌shown‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌controlling‌  ‌intention‌  ‌of‌‌ 
through‌‌LSE‌  ‌ gross‌‌value‌  ‌ to‌  ‌accumulate‌  ‌beyond‌  ‌the‌  ‌reasonable‌  ‌needs‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  the‌  ‌taxpayer‌  ‌is‌  ‌manifested‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌of‌  ‌accumulation‌, ‌ ‌not‌‌ 
business‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌determinative‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌to‌‌  intentions‌  ‌declared‌  ‌subsequently,‌  ‌which‌  ‌are‌  ‌mere‌  ‌afterthoughts.‌‌ 
If‌‌shares‌‌not‌‌traded‌‌through‌‌the‌‌LSE‌  ‌ 15%‌‌of‌‌net‌‌capital‌‌  Furthermore,‌  ‌the‌  ‌accumulated‌  ‌profits‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌used‌  ‌within‌  ‌a ‌‌
avoid‌‌   the‌‌ tax‌‌ upon‌‌ its‌‌ shareholders‌‌ or‌‌ members‌‌ ‌unless‌‌ 
gains‌  ‌ reasonable‌‌time‌a‌ fter‌‌the‌‌close‌‌of‌‌the‌‌taxable‌‌year.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌corporation,‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌clear‌  ‌preponderance‌  ‌of‌‌ 
e)‌‌Improperly‌‌accumulated‌‌earnings‌‌tax‌  ‌ evidence,‌‌shall‌‌prove‌‌to‌‌the‌‌contrary.‌  ‌
To‌  ‌determine‌  ‌the‌  ‌‘reasonable‌  ‌needs’‌‌   ‌of‌‌  the‌‌  business‌‌  in‌‌  order‌‌  to‌‌ 
d) Improperly‌‌   Accumulated‌‌   Taxable‌‌   Income.‌‌
  — ‌‌means‌‌ taxable‌‌  justify‌  ‌an‌  ‌accumulation‌  ‌of‌  ‌earnings,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Courts‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌United‌‌   States‌‌ 
a) In‌‌
  General.‌‌   — ‌‌In‌‌
  addition‌‌ to‌‌ other‌‌ taxes‌‌ imposed‌‌ by‌‌ this‌‌ Title,‌‌  income‌‌adjusted‌‌by:‌  ‌ have‌‌   invented‌‌   the‌‌ so-called‌‌ ‘I‌ mmediacy‌‌ Test’‌ ‌which‌‌ construed‌‌ the‌‌ 
there‌  ‌is‌  ‌hereby‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌for‌  ‌each‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌year‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌ 
a. Income‌‌exempt‌‌from‌‌tax;‌  ‌ words‌  ‌‘reasonable‌  ‌needs‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌business’‌  ‌to‌  ‌mean‌  ‌the‌  ‌immediate‌‌ 
improperly‌‌   accumulated‌‌   taxable‌‌ income‌‌ of‌‌ each‌‌ corporation‌‌ an‌‌  needs‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌business,‌  ‌and‌  ‌it‌  ‌was‌  ‌generally‌  ‌held‌  ‌that‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌‌ 
improperly‌  ‌accumulated‌  ‌earnings‌  ‌tax‌  ‌equal‌  ‌to‌  ‌ten‌  ‌percent‌‌  b. Income‌‌excluded‌‌from‌‌gross‌‌income;‌  ‌ corporation‌‌   did‌‌  not‌‌
  prove‌‌ an‌‌ immediate‌‌ need‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ accumulation‌‌ of‌‌ 
(10%)‌o‌ f‌‌the‌‌improperly‌‌accumulated‌‌taxable‌‌income.‌  ‌ the‌‌
  earnings‌‌   and‌‌   profits,‌‌ the‌‌ accumulation‌‌ was‌‌ not‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ reasonable‌‌ 
c. Income‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌final‌‌tax;‌‌and‌  ‌ needs‌‌of‌‌the‌‌business,‌‌and‌‌the‌‌penalty‌‌tax‌‌would‌‌apply.‌  ‌
b) Tax‌  ‌on‌  ‌Corporations‌  ‌Subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌Improperly‌  ‌Accumulated‌‌ 
d. The‌‌amount‌‌of‌‌net‌‌operating‌‌loss‌‌carry-over‌‌deducted;‌  ‌
Earnings‌‌Tax.‌— ‌  ‌ ‌ ii.‌‌Proprietary‌‌educational‌‌institutions‌‌and‌‌non-profit‌‌hospitals‌  ‌
And‌‌reduced‌‌by‌‌the‌‌sum‌‌of:‌  ‌
1) In‌  ‌General.‌  ‌- ‌‌The‌‌
  IAET‌‌
  imposed‌‌
  shall‌‌   apply‌‌
  to‌‌
  every‌‌  Proprietary‌  ‌educational‌  ‌institutions‌  ‌and‌  ‌hospitals‌  ‌which‌  ‌are‌‌ 
corporation‌  ‌formed‌  ‌or‌  ‌availed‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌‌  a. Dividends‌‌actually‌‌or‌‌constructively‌‌paid;‌‌and‌  ‌
nonprofit‌‌
  shall‌‌
  pay‌‌   of‌  ‌ten‌‌
  a ‌‌tax‌‌   percent‌‌
  (10%)‌  ‌on‌‌  their‌‌  taxable‌‌ 
avoiding‌  ‌the‌  ‌income‌  ‌tax‌  ‌with‌  ‌respect‌  ‌to‌  ‌its‌‌ 
b. Income‌‌tax‌‌paid‌‌for‌‌the‌‌taxable‌‌year.‌  ‌ income‌‌except‌t‌ hose‌‌covered‌‌by‌‌Subsection‌‌(D)‌‌hereof:‌‌   ‌
shareholders‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌shareholders‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌other‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 80‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

Provided‌, ‌ ‌that‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌gross‌  ‌income‌  ‌from‌  ‌'‌unrelated‌  ‌trade,‌‌  imposed‌  ‌by‌  ‌this‌  ‌Section‌  ‌upon‌  ‌corporations‌  ‌or‌  ‌associations‌‌ 
business‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌activity‌' ‌ ‌exceeds‌  ‌fifty‌  ‌percent‌  ‌(50%)‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  St.‌‌
  Luke’s‌‌   fails‌‌  to‌‌
  meet‌‌
  the‌‌
  requirements‌‌ under‌‌ Section‌‌ 30(E)‌‌ and‌‌ (G)‌‌  engaged‌‌in‌‌a‌‌similar‌‌business,‌‌industry,‌‌or‌‌activity‌‌   ‌
total‌  ‌gross‌  ‌income‌  ‌derived‌  ‌by‌  ‌such‌  ‌educational‌  ‌institutions‌  ‌or‌‌  of‌  ‌the‌  ‌NIRC‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌completely‌  ‌tax‌  ‌exempt‌  ‌from‌  ‌all‌  ‌its‌  ‌income.‌‌ 
except‌‌   ‌
hospitals‌  ‌from‌  ‌all‌  ‌sources,‌  ‌the‌  ‌tax‌  ‌prescribed‌  ‌in‌  ‌Subsection‌  ‌(A)‌‌  However,‌  ‌it‌  ‌remains‌  ‌a ‌ ‌proprietary‌‌   non-profit‌‌   hospital‌‌   under‌‌   Section‌‌ 
hereof‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌imposed‌‌on‌‌the‌e ‌ ntire‌t‌ axable‌‌income.‌   27(B)‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ NIRC‌‌ as‌‌ long‌‌ as‌‌ it‌‌ does‌‌ not‌‌ distribute‌‌ any‌‌ of‌‌ its‌‌ profits‌‌ to‌‌  a) the‌‌Government‌‌Service‌‌Insurance‌‌System‌‌(GSIS),‌‌   ‌
its‌‌
  members‌‌   and‌‌ such‌‌ profits‌‌ are‌‌ reinvested‌‌ pursuant‌‌ to‌‌ its‌‌ corporate‌‌ 
For‌‌   purposes‌‌   of‌‌
  this‌‌ Subsection,‌‌ the‌‌ term‌‌ '‌unrelated‌‌ trade,‌‌ business‌‌  purposes.‌  ‌St.‌  ‌Luke’s,‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌proprietary‌  ‌non-profit‌  ‌hospital,‌  ‌is‌‌  b) the‌‌Social‌‌Security‌‌System‌‌(SSS),‌‌   ‌
or‌  ‌other‌  ‌activity‌' ‌ ‌means‌  ‌any‌  ‌trade,‌  ‌business‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌activity,‌‌
  the‌‌  entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌preferential‌  ‌tax‌  ‌rate‌  ‌of‌  ‌10%‌  ‌on‌‌   its‌‌  net‌‌   income‌‌ 
c) the‌  ‌Philippine‌  ‌Health‌  ‌Insurance‌  ‌Corporation‌  ‌(PHIC),‌‌ 
conduct‌  ‌of‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌substantially‌  ‌related‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌or‌‌  from‌‌its‌‌for-profit‌‌activities.‌  ‌
and‌‌   ‌
performance‌  ‌by‌  ‌such‌  ‌educational‌  ‌institution‌  ‌or‌  ‌hospital‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌‌ 
primary‌‌purpose‌‌or‌‌function.‌‌   ‌ La‌‌Sallian‌‌Educational‌‌Innovators‌‌Foundation‌‌v.‌‌CIR‌‌‌2019‌  ‌ d) the‌‌local‌‌water‌‌districts.‌  ‌

A‌  ‌'‌proprietary‌  ‌educational‌  ‌institution‌' ‌ ‌is‌  ‌any‌  ‌private‌  ‌school‌‌  PAGCOR‌‌v.‌‌BIR‌,‌‌2014‌  ‌


No‌‌
  less‌‌  than‌‌
  the‌‌
  1987‌‌
  Constitution‌‌   expressly‌‌   ‌exempt‌‌ ALL‌‌ revenues‌‌ 
maintained‌‌   and‌‌
  administered‌‌   by‌‌
  private‌‌ individuals‌‌ or‌‌ groups‌‌ with‌‌  and‌  ‌assets‌  ‌of‌  ‌non-stock,‌  ‌non-profit‌  ‌educational‌  ‌institutions‌  ‌from‌‌  We‌  ‌uphold‌  ‌our‌  ‌earlier‌  ‌ruling‌  ‌that‌  ‌Section‌  ‌1 ‌ ‌of‌  ‌R.A.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌9337,‌‌ 
an‌‌
  issued‌‌
  permit‌‌   to‌‌
  operate‌‌
  from‌‌ the‌‌ DepEd,‌‌ or‌‌ CHED,‌‌ or‌‌ TESDA,‌‌ as‌‌  taxes‌‌  provided‌‌ that‌‌ they‌‌ are‌‌ actually,‌‌ directly‌‌ and‌‌ exclusively‌‌ used‌‌ for‌‌  amending‌  ‌Section‌  ‌27(c)‌  ‌of‌  ‌R.A.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌8424,‌  ‌by‌  ‌excluding‌  ‌petitioner‌‌ 
the‌‌case‌‌may‌‌be,‌‌in‌‌accordance‌‌with‌‌existing‌‌laws‌‌and‌‌regulations.‌  ‌ educational‌  ‌purposes.‌  ‌This‌  ‌constitutional‌‌   exemption‌‌   is‌‌
  reiterated‌‌
  in‌‌  from‌‌  the‌‌ enumeration‌‌ of‌‌ GOCCs‌‌ exempted‌‌ from‌‌ corporate‌‌ income‌‌ tax,‌‌ 
Section‌‌30‌‌(H)‌‌of‌‌the‌‌1997‌‌Tax‌‌Code,‌‌as‌‌amended.‌  ‌ is‌‌valid‌‌and‌‌constitutional.‌‌In‌‌addition,‌‌we‌‌hold‌‌that:‌  ‌
CIR‌‌v.‌‌St.‌‌Luke’s‌‌Medical‌‌Center‌‌2
‌ 012‌  ‌  ‌
Based‌  ‌on‌  ‌jurisprudence‌  ‌and‌  ‌tax‌  ‌rulings,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌taxpayer‌‌
  shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  granted‌‌  1. Petitioner’s‌  ‌tax‌  ‌privilege‌  ‌of‌  ‌paying‌  ‌five‌  ‌percent‌  ‌(5%)‌‌ 
The‌‌
  Constitution‌‌   exempts‌‌   charitable‌‌   institutions‌‌   only‌‌
  from‌‌ real‌‌  with‌‌this‌‌‌tax‌‌exemption‌‌‌after‌‌proving‌‌that:‌‌   ‌ franchise‌‌   tax‌‌ in‌‌ lieu‌‌ of‌‌ all‌‌ other‌‌ taxes‌‌ with‌‌ respect‌‌ to‌‌ its‌‌ 
property‌  ‌taxes‌. ‌ ‌In‌  ‌the‌  ‌NIRC,‌  ‌Congress‌  ‌decided‌  ‌to‌  ‌extend‌  ‌the‌‌  income‌‌  from‌‌ gaming‌‌ operations‌, ‌‌pursuant‌‌ to‌‌ P.D.‌‌ 1869,‌‌ as‌‌ 
1) it‌  ‌falls‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌classification‌  ‌of‌  ‌non-stock,‌  ‌non-profit‌‌ 
exemption‌‌  to‌‌
  income‌‌   taxes.‌‌
  Section‌‌
  30(E)‌‌  of‌‌ the‌‌ NIRC‌‌ provides‌‌ that‌‌ a ‌‌ amended,‌‌   is‌‌
  not‌‌
  repealed‌‌   or‌‌ amended‌‌ by‌‌ Section‌‌ 1(c)‌‌ of‌‌ R.A.‌‌ 
educational‌‌institution;‌‌and‌  ‌
charitable‌‌institution‌‌must‌‌be:‌  ‌ No.‌‌9337;‌  ‌
2) the‌  ‌income‌  ‌it‌  ‌seeks‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌exempted‌  ‌from‌  ‌taxation‌  ‌is‌  ‌used‌‌ 
2. Petitioner’s‌  ‌income‌  ‌from‌  ‌gaming‌  ‌operations‌  ‌is‌‌
  subject‌‌
  to‌‌ 
1) A‌‌‌non-stock‌‌‌corporation‌‌or‌‌association;‌  ‌ actually,‌  ‌directly‌  ‌and‌  ‌exclusively‌  ‌for‌  ‌educational‌‌ 
the‌‌five‌‌percent‌‌(5%)‌‌franchise‌‌tax‌‌only;‌‌‌and‌ 
2) Organized‌‌exclusively‌f‌ or‌‌charitable‌‌purposes;‌  ‌ purposes‌. ‌ ‌
3. Petitioner’s‌‌
  income‌‌
  from‌‌
  other‌‌   related‌‌
  services‌‌
  is‌‌
  subject‌‌ 
3) Operated‌‌exclusively‌‌‌for‌‌charitable‌‌purposes;‌‌and‌  ‌ Article‌  ‌XIV,‌  ‌Section‌  ‌4(3)‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌require‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌revenues‌  ‌and‌‌  to‌c‌ orporate‌‌income‌‌tax‌‌only‌. ‌ ‌
4) No‌‌
  part‌‌
  of‌‌
  its‌‌
  net‌‌
  income‌‌
  or‌‌  asset‌‌ shall‌‌ belong‌‌ to‌‌ or‌‌ inure‌‌ to‌‌  income‌  ‌must‌  ‌have‌  ‌also‌  ‌been‌  ‌earned‌  ‌from‌  ‌educational‌  ‌activities‌  ‌or‌‌ 
the‌‌
  benefit‌‌  of‌‌
  any‌‌
  member,‌‌
  organizer,‌‌   officer‌‌
  or‌‌
  any‌‌  specific‌‌  activities‌  ‌related‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌purposes‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌educational‌  ‌institution.‌‌   The‌‌  iv.‌‌Foreign‌‌currency‌‌deposit‌‌units‌  ‌
person.‌  ‌ phrase‌‌   "all‌‌
  revenues"‌‌   is‌‌
  unqualified‌‌  by‌‌  any‌‌ reference‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ source‌‌ of‌‌ 
revenues.‌  Thus,‌  ‌so‌  ‌long‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌revenues‌  ‌and‌  ‌income‌  ‌are‌‌   USED‌‌  Income‌‌  derived‌‌   by‌‌
  a ‌‌depository‌‌   bank‌‌ under‌‌ the‌‌ expanded‌‌ foreign‌‌ 
Thus,‌  ‌both‌  ‌the‌  ‌organization‌  ‌and‌  ‌operations‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌charitable‌‌  actually,‌‌   directly‌‌ and‌‌ exclusively‌‌ for‌‌ educational‌‌ purposes,‌‌ then‌‌  currency‌‌   deposit‌‌   system‌‌   from‌‌ foreign‌‌ currency‌‌ transactions‌‌ with‌‌ 
institution‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌devoted‌  ‌“exclusively”‌  ‌for‌  ‌charitable‌  ‌purposes.‌‌  said‌  ‌revenues‌  ‌and‌  ‌income‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌exempt‌  ‌from‌  ‌taxes‌  ‌and‌‌  non-residents,‌  ‌offshore‌  ‌banking‌  ‌units‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines,‌  ‌local‌‌ 
Likewise,‌‌   to‌‌
  be‌‌
  exempt‌‌
  from‌‌
  income‌‌   taxes,‌‌ Section‌‌ 30(G)‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ NIRC‌  duties.‌  ‌ commercial‌‌   banks‌‌   including‌‌   branches‌‌   of‌‌
  foreign‌‌ banks‌‌ that‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌ 
requires‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌institution‌  ‌be‌  ‌“operated‌  ‌exclusively”‌  ‌for‌  ‌social‌‌ 
authorized‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌BSP‌  ‌to‌  ‌transact‌  ‌business‌  ‌with‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌currency‌‌ 
welfare.‌  ‌However‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌last‌  ‌paragraph‌  ‌of‌  ‌Section‌  ‌30‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌NIRC‌‌  iii.‌‌GOCCs,‌‌agencies,‌‌instrumentalities‌  ‌
qualifies‌‌ the‌‌ words‌‌ “o ‌ rganized‌‌ and‌‌ operated‌‌ exclusively‌.”‌‌ In‌‌ short,‌‌  deposit‌‌
  system‌‌   shall‌‌   be‌‌
  ‌EXEMPT‌‌   ‌from‌‌
  all‌‌ taxes,‌‌ ‌except‌‌ ‌net‌‌ income‌‌ 
the‌  ‌last‌  ‌paragraph‌  ‌of‌  ‌Section‌  ‌30‌  ‌provides‌  ‌that‌  ‌if‌  ‌a ‌ ‌tax‌  ‌exempt‌‌  1) The‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌of‌  ‌existing‌  ‌special‌  ‌or‌  ‌general‌  ‌laws‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  from‌‌such‌‌transactions.‌  ‌
charitable‌  ‌institution‌  ‌conducts‌  ‌“any”‌  ‌activity‌  ‌for‌  ‌profit,‌  ‌such‌‌  contrary‌  ‌notwithstanding,‌  ‌all‌  ‌corporations,‌  ‌agencies,‌  ‌or‌‌  Interest‌  ‌income‌  ‌from‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌currency‌  ‌loans‌  ‌granted‌  ‌by‌  ‌such‌‌ 
activity‌  ‌is‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌tax‌  ‌exempt‌  ‌even‌  ‌as‌  ‌its‌  ‌not-for-profit‌  ‌activities‌‌  instrumentalities‌  ‌owned‌  ‌or‌  ‌controlled‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌Government,‌‌  depository‌  ‌banks‌  ‌under‌  ‌said‌  ‌expanded‌  ‌system‌  ‌to‌  ‌residents‌  ‌other‌‌ 
remain‌‌tax‌‌exempt.‌  ‌ SHALL‌  ‌PAY‌  ‌such‌  ‌rate‌  ‌of‌  ‌tax‌  ‌upon‌  ‌their‌  ‌taxable‌‌
  income‌‌
  as‌‌
  are‌‌  than‌  ‌offshore‌  ‌banking‌  ‌units‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  Philippines‌‌
  or‌‌
  other‌‌  depository‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 81‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

banks‌‌  under‌‌  the‌‌


  expanded‌‌
  system,‌‌
  shall‌‌
  be‌‌ subject‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌‌‌final‌‌ tax‌‌ at‌‌  income‌‌  tax‌‌
  rate.‌‌
  (‌Association‌‌
  of‌‌
  International‌‌ Shipping‌‌ Lines‌‌ v.‌‌ 
Interest‌‌on‌‌any‌‌current‌‌bank‌‌deposit,‌‌yield‌‌or‌‌other‌‌ 
the‌‌rate‌‌of‌‌ten‌‌percent‌‌(10%)‌. ‌ ‌ monetary‌‌benefits‌‌from‌‌deposit‌‌substitute,‌‌trust‌‌fund‌‌  20%‌  ‌ SOF‌‌‌2020‌‌case)‌  ‌
Any‌‌
  income‌‌  of‌‌
  ‌nonresidents‌, ‌‌whether‌‌ individuals‌‌ or‌‌ corporations,‌‌  and‌‌similar‌‌arrangement‌  ‌ b)‌‌Foreign‌‌currency‌‌deposit‌‌units‌‌and‌‌offshore‌‌banking‌‌units‌  ‌
from‌  ‌transactions‌  ‌with‌  ‌depository‌  ‌banks‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌expanded‌‌  EXEMPT‌  ‌
Intercorporate‌‌dividend‌‌from‌‌DCs‌  ‌ Income‌‌   derived‌‌   by‌‌
  offshore‌‌   banking‌‌   units‌‌  authorized‌‌   by‌‌ the‌‌ BSP,‌‌ 
system‌‌shall‌‌be‌E ‌ XEMPT‌‌from‌‌income‌‌tax.‌  ‌
from‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌currency‌  ‌transactions‌  ‌with‌  ‌non-residents,‌  ‌other‌‌ 
b.‌‌Resident‌‌foreign‌‌corporations‌  ‌ e)‌‌Taxation‌‌of‌‌capital‌‌gains‌  ‌ offshore‌‌ banking‌‌ units,‌‌ local‌‌ commercial‌‌ banks,‌‌ including‌‌ branches‌‌ 
of‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌banks‌  ‌that‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌authorized‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌BSP‌  ‌to‌  ‌transact‌‌ 
i.‌‌Taxation‌‌-‌‌in‌‌general‌  ‌
On‌‌sale‌‌of‌‌shares‌‌of‌‌stock‌‌of‌‌a‌‌DC‌‌NOT‌‌traded‌‌through‌‌a‌‌local‌‌stock‌‌  business‌  ‌with‌  ‌offshore‌  ‌banking‌  ‌units‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌EXEMPT‌  ‌from‌  ‌all‌‌ 
a)‌‌Regular‌‌Corporate‌‌Income‌‌Tax‌‌(RCIT)‌  ‌ exchange‌‌held‌‌as‌‌a‌‌capital‌‌asset‌  ‌ taxes‌e‌ xcept‌n ‌ et‌‌income‌‌from‌‌such‌‌transactions.‌  ‌

Same‌‌with‌‌DC‌  ‌ 5%‌‌of‌‌net‌‌capital‌‌  Any‌‌


  interest‌‌
  income‌‌   derived‌‌   from‌‌ foreign‌‌ currency‌‌ loans‌‌ granted‌‌ to‌‌ 
- Capital‌‌gains‌‌not‌‌over‌‌Php100K‌  ‌
gains‌  ‌ residents‌  ‌other‌  ‌than‌  ‌offshore‌  ‌banking‌  ‌units‌  ‌or‌  ‌local‌  ‌commercial‌‌ 
b)‌‌Minimum‌‌Corporate‌‌Income‌‌Tax‌‌(MCIT)‌  ‌
banks,‌  ‌including‌  ‌local‌  ‌branches‌  ‌of‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌banks‌  ‌that‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌‌ 
10%‌‌of‌‌net‌‌capital‌‌ 
Same‌‌with‌‌DC‌  ‌ - Capital‌‌gains‌‌>‌‌Php100K‌  ‌ authorized‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌BSP‌  ‌to‌  ‌transact‌  ‌business‌  ‌with‌‌
  offshore‌‌   banking‌‌ 
gains‌  ‌
units,‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌subject‌‌only‌‌to‌‌a‌‌final‌‌tax‌‌at‌‌the‌‌rate‌‌of‌1 ‌ 0%‌. ‌ ‌
c)‌‌Branch‌‌Profits‌‌Remittance‌‌Tax‌‌(BPRT)‌  ‌
On‌‌sale‌‌of‌‌real‌‌property‌‌in‌‌PH‌‌   ‌ 30%‌‌RCIT‌  ‌ Any‌  ‌income‌  ‌of‌  ‌nonresidents,‌‌
  whether‌‌
  individuals‌‌  or‌‌
  corporations,‌‌ 
Any‌‌  profit‌‌  remitted‌‌   by‌‌   a‌‌
  branch‌‌ to‌‌ its‌‌ head‌‌ office‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ subject‌‌ to‌‌ 
from‌  ‌transactions‌  ‌with‌  ‌said‌  ‌offshore‌  ‌banking‌  ‌units‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌ 
a‌‌
  tax‌‌  1
  of‌‌‌ 5%‌  ‌which‌‌   shall‌‌   be‌‌ based‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ ‌total‌‌ profits‌‌ applied‌‌ or‌‌  ii.‌‌Resident‌‌foreign‌‌corporations‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌preferential‌‌tax‌‌rates‌  ‌
EXEMPT‌‌from‌‌income‌‌tax.‌  ‌
earmarked‌  ‌for‌  ‌remittance‌  ‌without‌  ‌any‌  ‌deduction‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌tax‌‌ 
a)‌‌International‌‌carriers‌  ‌
component‌‌   thereof‌‌  ‌except‌‌ ‌those‌‌ activities‌‌ which‌‌ are‌‌ registered‌‌ with‌‌  c)‌‌Regional‌‌or‌‌area‌‌headquarters‌‌and‌‌regional‌‌operating‌‌ 
the‌‌PEZA.‌‌   ‌ An‌‌  international‌‌   carrier‌‌
  doing‌‌   business‌‌   in‌‌ the‌‌ Philippines‌‌ shall‌‌ pay‌‌  headquarters‌  ‌
a‌‌tax‌‌of‌‌2.5%‌‌‌on‌‌its‌‌'‌Gross‌‌Philippine‌‌Billings‌.'‌  ‌ 1) RAHQ‌‌‌is‌‌a‌‌branch‌‌established‌‌by‌‌multinationals‌‌which‌  ‌
Interests,‌  ‌dividends,‌  ‌rents,‌  ‌royalties,‌  ‌including‌  ‌remuneration‌  ‌for‌‌ 
technical‌  ‌services,‌  ‌salaries,‌  ‌wages‌  ‌premiums,‌  ‌annuities,‌‌  1. Under‌  ‌RA‌  ‌10378,‌  ‌international‌  ‌carriers‌  ‌doing‌  ‌business‌  ‌in‌  ‌PH‌‌  a) Do‌‌not‌‌earn‌‌or‌‌derive‌‌income‌‌from‌‌PH;‌‌and‌  ‌
emoluments‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌fixed‌  ‌or‌  ‌determinable‌  ‌annual,‌  ‌periodic‌  ‌or‌‌  may‌‌avail‌‌of‌‌a‌‌preferential‌‌rate‌‌or‌‌exemption‌‌from‌‌tax‌‌based‌‌on‌  ‌
casual‌‌   gains,‌‌  profits,‌‌  income‌‌   and‌‌ capital‌‌ gains‌‌ received‌‌ by‌‌ a ‌‌foreign‌‌  b) Acts‌  ‌as‌  ‌supervisory,‌  ‌communications‌  ‌and‌‌ 
a) A‌‌treaty‌‌or‌‌international‌‌agreement;‌‌or‌  ‌ coordinating‌‌   center‌‌
  for‌‌
  their‌‌
  affiliates,‌‌
  subsidiaries‌‌
  or‌‌ 
corporation‌  ‌during‌  ‌each‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌year‌  ‌from‌  ‌all‌  ‌sources‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Philippines‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌treated‌  ‌as‌  ‌branch‌  ‌profits‌  ‌unless‌  ‌the‌‌  b) The‌‌basis‌‌of‌‌reciprocity.‌  ‌ branches‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Asia-Pacific.‌  ‌
same‌‌   are‌‌
  effectively‌‌   connected‌‌   with‌‌   the‌‌ conduct‌‌ of‌‌ its‌‌ trade‌‌ or‌‌  RAHQs‌‌are‌E
‌ XEMPT‌‌from‌‌income‌‌tax.‌  ‌
2. GPB‌‌refers‌‌to‌  ‌
business‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Philippines‌. ‌ ‌
a) Gross‌  ‌revenue‌  ‌derived‌  ‌from‌  ‌carriage‌  ‌of‌  ‌persons,‌‌  2) ROHQ‌‌‌is‌‌a‌‌branch‌‌engaged‌‌in‌‌any‌‌of‌‌the‌‌following‌‌services:‌  ‌
d)‌‌Taxation‌‌of‌‌passive‌‌income‌  ‌
excess‌‌baggage,‌‌cargo‌‌and‌‌mail;‌  ‌ a) general‌‌administration‌‌and‌‌planning;‌‌   ‌
Passive‌‌Income‌  ‌ Rate‌  ‌
b) Originating‌‌ from‌‌ PH‌‌ in‌‌ a ‌‌continuous‌‌ and‌‌ uninterrupted‌‌  b) business‌‌planning‌‌and‌‌coordination;‌‌   ‌
Interest‌‌under‌‌the‌‌expanded‌‌foreign‌‌currency‌‌deposit‌‌  flight;‌  ‌
7.5%‌  ‌ c) sourcing‌  ‌and‌  ‌procurement‌  ‌of‌  ‌raw‌  ‌materials‌  ‌and‌‌ 
(EFCD)‌‌system‌  ‌ c) Irrespective‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌  place‌‌
  of‌‌
  sale‌‌  or‌‌
  issue‌‌
  and‌‌ the‌‌ place‌‌  components;‌‌   ‌
Royalty‌‌of‌‌all‌‌types‌‌within‌‌PH‌  ‌ 20%‌  ‌ of‌ p
‌ ayment‌ o
‌ f‌ t
‌ he‌ t
‌ icket.‌
  ‌
d) corporate‌‌finance‌‌advisory‌‌services;‌‌   ‌
3. Note‌  ‌that‌  ‌for‌  ‌international‌  ‌shippers,‌  ‌demurrage‌‌   and‌‌   detention‌‌ 
- From‌‌abroad‌  ‌ EXEMPT‌  ‌ e) marketing‌‌control‌‌and‌‌sales‌‌promotion;‌‌   ‌
fees‌  ‌are‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌GPB‌  ‌as‌  ‌they‌  ‌are‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌regular‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 82‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

f) training‌‌and‌‌personnel‌‌management;‌‌   ‌ CIR‌‌v.‌‌Interpublic‌‌Group‌‌of‌‌Companies‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌ c) Beneficiary‌  ‌society,‌  ‌order‌  ‌or‌  ‌association‌, ‌ ‌operating‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌ 
exclusive‌  ‌benefit‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌members‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌fraternal‌‌ 
g) logistic‌‌services;‌‌   ‌ Can‌  ‌an‌‌
  NRFC‌‌  which‌‌
  collects‌‌
  dividends‌‌
  from‌‌
  the‌‌
  Philippines‌‌
  sue‌‌
  here‌‌ 
to‌‌claim‌‌tax‌‌refund?‌  ‌ organization‌  ‌operating‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌lodge‌  ‌system,‌  ‌or‌‌   mutual‌‌   aid‌‌ 
h) research‌  ‌and‌  ‌development‌  ‌services‌  ‌and‌  ‌product‌‌  association‌‌   or‌‌
  a ‌‌nonstock‌‌  corporation‌‌ organized‌‌ by‌‌ employees‌‌ 
development;‌‌   ‌ YES‌. ‌ ‌Mere‌  ‌investment‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌shareholder‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌foreign‌‌  providing‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌payment‌  ‌of‌  ‌life,‌‌
  sickness,‌‌  accident,‌‌  or‌‌
  other‌‌ 
corporation‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌duly‌  ‌registered‌  ‌domestic‌  ‌corporation‌  ‌shall‌‌  benefits‌  ‌exclusively‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌members‌‌   of‌‌
  such‌‌
  society,‌‌
  order,‌‌  or‌‌ 
i) technical‌‌support‌‌and‌‌maintenance;‌‌   ‌
NOT‌  ‌be‌  ‌deemed‌  ‌"doing‌  ‌business"‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌   Philippines‌. ‌‌It‌‌   is‌‌  clear‌‌  association,‌‌or‌‌nonstock‌‌corporation‌‌or‌‌their‌‌dependents;‌  ‌
j) data‌‌processing‌‌and‌‌communications;‌‌and‌‌   ‌ then‌‌  that‌‌
  the‌‌  IGC's‌‌
  act‌‌
  of‌‌
  subscribing‌‌   shares‌‌
  of‌‌
  stocks‌‌   from‌‌ McCann,‌‌ 
maintaining‌  ‌investments‌  ‌therein,‌  ‌and‌  ‌deriving‌  ‌dividend‌  ‌income‌‌  d) Cemetery‌  ‌company‌  ‌owned‌  ‌and‌  ‌operated‌  ‌exclusively‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌ 
k) business‌‌development.‌  ‌ therefrom,‌‌   ‌does‌‌
  not‌‌
  qualify‌‌   as‌‌
  "doing‌‌   business"‌‌   contemplated‌‌   under‌‌  benefit‌‌of‌‌its‌‌members;‌  ‌
R.A.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌7042.‌  ‌Hence,‌  ‌the‌‌   IGC‌‌  is‌‌
  ‌not‌‌
  required‌‌   to‌‌
  secure‌‌  a ‌‌license‌‌  e) Nonstock‌‌  corporation‌‌
  or‌‌
  association‌‌ organized‌‌ and‌‌ operated‌‌ 
ROHQs‌a‌ re‌‌taxed‌1
‌ 0%‌‌‌on‌‌taxable‌‌income.‌  ‌
before‌‌it‌‌can‌‌file‌‌a‌‌claim‌‌for‌‌tax‌‌refund.‌  ‌ exclusively‌‌   ‌
c.‌‌Non-resident‌‌foreign‌‌corporations‌‌(NRFC)‌  ‌
The‌  ‌general‌  ‌rule‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌foreign‌  ‌corporation‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌juridical‌‌  i) for‌‌
  religious,‌‌
  charitable,‌‌
  scientific,‌‌
  athletic,‌‌ or‌‌ cultural‌‌ 
i.‌‌Taxation‌‌of‌‌NRFC‌‌in‌‌general‌  ‌ entity‌‌  as‌‌
  its‌‌
  branch‌‌
  office‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ Philippines‌‌ ‌cannot‌‌ apply‌‌ here‌. ‌‌When‌  purposes,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
the‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌corporation‌  ‌transacts‌  ‌business‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌‌ 
NRFCs‌‌
  are‌‌
  subject‌‌   ‌30%‌  ‌income‌‌
  to‌‌   tax‌‌   ‌gross‌‌
  on‌‌   income‌ ‌derived‌‌  independently‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌branch,‌  ‌the‌  ‌principal-agent‌‌   relationship‌‌   is‌‌
  set‌‌  ii) for‌‌the‌‌rehabilitation‌‌of‌‌veterans,‌‌   ‌
during‌‌each‌‌taxable‌‌year‌‌from‌‌all‌‌sources‌‌within‌‌PH.‌  ‌ aside.‌‌   ‌ no‌‌
  part‌‌
  of‌‌
  its‌‌
  net‌‌ income‌‌ or‌‌ asset‌‌ shall‌‌ belong‌‌ to‌‌ or‌‌ inure‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ 
benefit‌‌of‌‌any‌‌member,‌‌organizer,‌‌officer‌‌or‌‌any‌‌specific‌‌person;‌  ‌
Passive‌‌Income‌  ‌ Rate‌  ‌ The‌‌   RP-US‌‌   Tax‌‌   Treaty‌‌  created‌‌   a ‌‌treaty‌‌ obligation‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ part‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ US‌‌ 
that‌  ‌it‌  ‌"shall‌  ‌allow"‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌US‌  ‌parent‌  ‌corporation‌  ‌receiving‌‌   dividends‌‌  f) Business‌‌   league‌‌   chamber‌‌   of‌‌  commerce,‌‌   or‌‌ board‌‌ of‌‌ trade‌, ‌‌
Interest‌‌on‌‌foreign‌‌loans,‌‌i.e.‌‌lending‌‌to‌‌DC‌  ‌ 20%‌  ‌ from‌  ‌its‌  ‌Philippine‌  ‌subsidiary‌  ‌"a‌  ‌tax‌  ‌credit‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌appropriate‌‌  not‌  ‌organized‌  ‌for‌  ‌profit‌  ‌and‌  ‌no‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌net‌  ‌income‌  ‌of‌‌ 
amount‌  ‌of‌  ‌taxes‌  ‌paid‌  ‌or‌  ‌accrued‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌said‌‌  which‌  ‌inures‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌benefit‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌private‌  ‌stock-holder,‌  ‌or‌‌ 
Intercorporate‌‌dividend‌‌from‌‌DC‌  ‌ Philippine‌  ‌subsidiary.‌  ‌The‌  ‌IGC,‌  ‌being‌‌   a ‌‌non-resident‌‌   US‌‌
  corporation‌‌  individual;‌  ‌
- Subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌condition‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌country‌  ‌of‌‌  is‌  ‌qualified‌  ‌to‌  ‌avail‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌   aforesaid‌‌   ‌15%‌‌   preferential‌‌   tax‌‌  rate‌‌   on‌‌ 
domicile‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌NRFC‌  ‌allows‌‌   a ‌‌credit‌‌
  against‌‌  15%‌  ‌ the‌  ‌dividends‌  ‌it‌  ‌earned‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌   Philippines.‌‌   It‌‌
  was‌‌
  proven‌‌   that‌‌  the‌‌  g) Civic‌  ‌league‌  ‌or‌  ‌organization‌  ‌not‌  ‌organized‌  ‌for‌  ‌profit‌  ‌but‌‌ 
the‌  ‌tax‌  ‌due‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌NRFC‌  ‌taxes‌  ‌deemed‌  ‌to‌‌  country‌  ‌which‌  ‌it‌  ‌was‌  ‌domiciled‌  ‌shall‌‌   grant‌‌  similar‌‌   tax‌‌
  relief/credit‌‌  operated‌‌exclusively‌‌for‌‌the‌‌promotion‌‌of‌‌social‌‌welfare;‌  ‌
have‌‌been‌‌paid‌‌in‌‌PH‌‌equivalent‌‌to‌‌15%.‌  ‌ against‌  ‌the‌  ‌tax‌  ‌due‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌dividends‌  ‌earned‌‌   from‌‌   sources‌‌   within‌‌ 
h) A‌‌nonstock‌‌and‌‌nonprofit‌‌educational‌‌institution‌; ‌ ‌
the‌  ‌Philippines.‌  ‌Clearly,‌  ‌the‌  ‌IGC‌  ‌has‌‌   made‌‌   an‌‌   overpayment‌‌   of‌‌
  its‌‌ 
- Otherwise‌  ‌ 30%‌  ‌ tax‌‌due‌‌of‌‌FWT‌‌by‌‌using‌‌the‌‌35%‌‌tax‌‌rate.‌  ‌ i) Government‌‌educational‌‌institution‌; ‌ ‌

Since‌  ‌the‌  ‌RP-US‌  ‌Tax‌  ‌Treaty‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌provide‌  ‌for‌  ‌any‌  ‌other‌‌  j) Farmers'‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌mutual‌  ‌typhoon‌  ‌or‌  ‌fire‌  ‌insurance‌‌ 
ii.‌‌NRFCs‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌preferential‌‌tax‌‌rates‌  ‌
prerequisite‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌
  availment‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  benefits‌‌ under‌‌ the‌‌ said‌‌ treaty,‌‌ to‌‌  company‌, ‌ ‌mutual‌  ‌ditch‌  ‌or‌  ‌irrigation‌  ‌company,‌  ‌mutual‌  ‌or‌‌ 
1) Cinematographic‌  ‌Film‌  ‌Owner,‌  ‌Lessor‌  ‌or‌  ‌Distributor.‌  ‌— ‌‌ impose‌  ‌additional‌  ‌requirements‌  ‌would‌  ‌negate‌  ‌the‌  ‌availment‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  cooperative‌‌ telephone‌‌ company,‌‌ or‌‌ like‌‌ organization‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌purely‌‌ 
25%‌; ‌ ‌ reliefs‌‌provided‌‌for‌‌under‌‌international‌‌agreements.‌  ‌ local‌  ‌character,‌  ‌the‌  ‌income‌  ‌of‌  ‌which‌  ‌consists‌  ‌solely‌  ‌of‌‌ 
assessments,‌  ‌dues,‌  ‌and‌  ‌fees‌  ‌collected‌  ‌from‌  ‌members‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌ 
2) Owner‌  ‌or‌  ‌Lessor‌  ‌of‌  ‌Vessels‌  ‌Chartered‌  ‌by‌  ‌Philippine‌‌  d.‌‌Corporations‌e
‌ xempt‌f‌ rom‌‌income‌‌tax‌  sole‌‌purpose‌‌of‌‌meeting‌‌its‌‌expenses;‌‌‌and‌  ‌
Nationals‌. ‌ ‌—‌  ‌4%‌  ‌of‌‌
  gross‌‌  rentals,‌‌
  lease‌‌
  or‌‌
  charter‌‌
  fees‌‌
  from‌‌ 
a) Labor,‌‌
  agricultural‌‌
  or‌‌
  horticultural‌‌ organization‌‌ ‌not‌‌ organized‌‌  k) Farmers',‌  ‌fruit‌  ‌growers',‌  ‌or‌  ‌like‌  ‌association‌  ‌organized‌‌   and‌‌ 
leases‌  ‌or‌  ‌charters‌  ‌to‌  ‌Filipino‌  ‌citizens‌  ‌or‌  ‌corporations,‌  ‌as‌‌ 
principally‌‌for‌‌profit‌; ‌ ‌ operated‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌sales‌  ‌agent‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌marketing‌  ‌the‌‌ 
approved‌‌by‌‌MARINA;‌  ‌
products‌‌   of‌‌ its‌‌ members‌‌ and‌‌ turning‌‌ back‌‌ to‌‌ them‌‌ the‌‌ proceeds‌‌ 
b) Mutual‌‌  savings‌‌   bank‌‌
  not‌‌
  having‌‌  a ‌‌capital‌‌
  stock‌‌  represented‌‌ by‌‌ 
3) Owner‌  ‌or‌  ‌Lessor‌  ‌of‌  ‌Aircraft,‌  ‌Machineries‌  ‌and‌  ‌Other‌‌  of‌‌
  sales,‌‌
  less‌‌   the‌‌
  necessary‌‌  selling‌‌ expenses‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ basis‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
shares,‌  ‌and‌  ‌cooperative‌  ‌bank‌  ‌without‌  ‌capital‌  ‌stock‌  ‌organized‌‌ 
Equipment‌.‌‌—‌‌7.5%‌‌‌of‌‌gross‌‌rental‌‌or‌‌fees.‌  ‌ quantity‌‌of‌‌produce‌‌finished‌‌by‌‌them;‌  ‌
and‌‌operated‌‌for‌‌mutual‌‌purposes‌‌and‌w ‌ ithout‌‌profit‌; ‌ ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 83‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

The‌  ‌income‌  ‌of‌  ‌whatever‌  ‌kind‌  ‌and‌  ‌character‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌foregoing‌‌  c. Provision‌‌   of‌‌
  welfare‌‌
  aid‌‌
  and‌‌
  financial‌‌ assistance‌‌ to‌‌ its‌‌  2) Those‌‌   subject‌‌ to‌‌ tax‌‌ — ‌‌those‌‌ that‌‌ derive‌‌ income‌‌ from‌‌ trade‌‌ 
organizations‌‌   from‌‌
  any‌‌
  of‌‌ their‌‌ properties,‌‌ real‌‌ or‌‌ personal,‌‌ or‌‌ from‌‌ any‌‌  members;‌  ‌except‌  ‌life,‌  ‌sickness,‌  ‌accident‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌‌  or‌  ‌business‌  ‌and‌‌  are‌‌   considered‌‌   as‌‌
  corporations‌‌   under‌‌
  the‌‌ 
of‌  ‌their‌  ‌activities‌  ‌conducted‌  ‌for‌  ‌profit‌  ‌regardless‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌disposition‌‌  benefits.‌  ‌ Tax‌‌Code.‌  ‌
made‌‌of‌‌such‌‌income,‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌tax.‌  ‌
d. Donation‌‌to‌‌any‌‌person‌‌or‌‌entity;‌  ‌ With‌‌regard‌‌to‌  ‌ Nontaxable‌  ‌ Taxable‌  ‌
GR‌:‌‌  These‌  ‌entities‌  ‌are‌  ‌exempt‌  ‌from‌  ‌income‌  ‌tax‌  ‌because‌  ‌they‌‌ 
e. Purchase‌  ‌of‌  ‌goods‌  ‌or‌  ‌services‌  ‌in‌  ‌excess‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌FMV‌‌  Partner’s‌‌distributive‌‌ 
are‌  n
‌ ot‌  ‌intended‌  ‌for‌  ‌profit‌. ‌ ‌They‌  ‌earn‌  ‌income‌  ‌to‌‌  Will‌‌form‌‌part‌‌of‌‌ 
from‌‌   an‌‌
  entity‌‌
  in‌‌
  which‌‌   one‌‌
  or‌‌
  more‌‌ trustees,‌‌ officers‌‌  share‌‌in‌‌the‌‌net‌‌income‌‌ 
realize‌‌their‌‌purpose.‌  ‌ partner’s‌‌gross‌‌income‌‌ 
or‌‌fiduciaries‌‌have‌‌an‌‌interest;‌‌and‌  ‌ Distributive‌‌  is‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌a‌1
‌ 0%‌‌ 
EXC‌:‌‌  ‌ hey‌  ‌can‌  ‌still‌  ‌be‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌tax‌  ‌regardless‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
T in‌‌the‌‌ITR‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌ 
share‌  ‌ final‌‌tax‌,‌‌except‌f‌ or‌‌ 
f. When‌  ‌upon‌  ‌dissolution‌  ‌and‌  ‌satisfaction‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌‌  graduated‌‌income‌‌tax‌‌ 
disposition‌‌of‌‌income‌  ‌ NRA-ETB‌‌which‌‌is‌‌ 
liabilities,‌  ‌its‌  ‌remaining‌  ‌assets‌  ‌are‌  ‌distributed‌  ‌to‌  ‌its‌‌  rates‌  ‌
subject‌‌to‌2 ‌ 0%‌  ‌
1. Earned‌  ‌income‌  ‌of‌  ‌whatever‌  ‌kind‌  ‌and‌  ‌character‌  ‌by‌  ‌using‌‌ 
trustees,‌‌organizers,‌‌officers‌‌or‌‌members.‌  ‌
their‌‌property,‌‌real‌‌or‌‌personal.‌  ‌ May‌‌be‌‌claimed‌‌as‌‌a ‌‌
2. Income‌‌from‌‌activities‌‌conducted‌‌for‌‌profit.‌  ‌ Requisites‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌Tax‌  ‌Exemption‌  ‌under‌  ‌Sec‌  ‌30‌  ‌exc‌  ‌Non-Stock,‌‌  Partner’s‌  ‌share‌‌  NOT‌‌deductible‌‌since‌‌ 
deductible‌‌expense‌‌in‌‌ 
Non-Profit‌‌Educational‌‌Institution‌(‌ RMO‌‌38-2019)‌  ‌ in‌‌net‌‌loss‌  ‌ subject‌‌to‌‌final‌‌tax.‌  ‌
EXC‌‌to‌‌EXC‌:  ‌‌ ‌ his‌‌personal‌‌ITR‌  ‌

Article‌  ‌XIV,‌  ‌Section‌  ‌4 ‌ ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌


  Constitution‌‌
  provides‌‌
  that:‌‌
  ― ‌‌ a) It‌‌is‌‌a‌‌non-stock,‌‌non-profit‌‌corporation;‌  ‌
Still‌‌required‌‌to‌‌file‌‌an‌‌ 
All‌  ‌revenues‌  ‌and‌  ‌assets‌  ‌of‌  ‌non-stock,‌  ‌non-profit‌‌  b) No‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌corporation‌  ‌or‌  ‌association’s‌  ‌net‌  ‌income‌  ‌shall‌‌  annual‌‌information‌‌ 
Deemed‌‌and‌‌treated‌‌as‌‌ 
educational‌  ‌institutions‌  ‌used‌  ‌actually,‌  ‌directly,‌  ‌and‌‌  inure‌‌to‌‌the‌‌benefit‌‌of‌‌any‌‌private‌‌individual;‌‌and‌  ‌ How‌‌  return‌‌on‌‌their‌‌incomes‌‌ 
corporations‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌ 
exclusively‌‌   for‌‌  educational‌‌ purposes‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ ‌exempt‌‌ ‌from‌‌  partnership‌‌is‌‌  and‌‌expenses‌‌for‌‌the‌‌ 
the‌‌corporate‌‌income‌‌ 
taxes‌‌and‌‌duties.‌  ‌ c) The‌‌trustees‌‌do‌‌not‌‌receive‌‌any‌‌compensation‌‌or‌‌remuneration.‌  ‌ taxed‌  ‌ purpose‌‌of‌‌ascertaining‌‌ 
tax‌‌rate.‌  ‌
the‌‌partners’‌‌taxable‌‌ 
In‌‌short,‌‌to‌‌be‌‌exempt‌  ‌ d) In‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌dissolution,‌  ‌assets‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌transferred‌  ‌to‌  ‌similar‌‌  shares.‌  ‌
institutions‌‌or‌‌to‌‌the‌‌government.‌  ‌
1. The‌‌corporation‌‌passed‌‌the‌  ‌
Requisites‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Joint‌  ‌Venture‌  ‌not‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌a ‌ ‌taxable‌‌ 
e.‌‌Tax‌‌on‌‌other‌‌business‌‌entities:‌‌general‌‌partnerships,‌‌  
a. Organizational‌‌   Test‌‌
  — ‌‌constitutive‌‌ documents‌‌ must‌‌  corporation‌  ‌
general‌‌professional‌‌partnerships,‌‌co-ownerships,‌‌joint‌‌  
show‌  ‌that‌  ‌its‌  ‌primary‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌incorporation‌  ‌fall‌‌ 
ventures,‌a ‌ nd‌‌consortia‌  ‌ 1) The‌  ‌JV‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌undertaking‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌construction‌‌ 
under‌‌Sec‌‌30‌‌of‌‌the‌‌NIRC;‌‌and‌  ‌
project;‌  ‌
There‌‌are‌‌two‌‌kinds‌‌of‌‌partnerships‌‌for‌‌income‌‌tax‌‌purposes:‌  ‌
b. Operational‌  ‌Test‌  ‌— ‌ ‌the‌  ‌regular‌  ‌activities‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌‌ 
2) Should‌‌  involve‌‌
  joining‌‌
  or‌‌
  pooling‌‌
  of‌‌ resources‌‌ by‌‌ licensed‌‌ 
exclusively‌  ‌devoted‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌accomplishment‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌‌  1) Those‌‌NOT‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌income‌‌tax‌  ‌
local‌‌contracts;‌  ‌
purpose.‌  ‌
a) GPPs;‌  ‌
3) The‌  ‌contractors‌  ‌are‌‌
  engaged‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  construction‌‌
  business;‌‌ 
2. Must‌  ‌be‌  ‌non-profit‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Non-inurement‌  ‌Rule.‌  ‌What‌  ‌are‌‌ 
b) Joint‌‌   venture‌‌
  or‌‌
  consortium‌‌   agreement‌‌   formed‌‌
  for‌‌ the‌‌  and‌  ‌
considered‌‌as‌‌inurements:‌  ‌
purpose‌‌of‌  ‌
4) The‌‌JV‌‌itself‌‌must‌‌be‌‌licensed‌‌under‌‌PCAB.‌  ‌
a. Payment‌  ‌of‌  ‌compensation,‌‌   salaries,‌‌
  or‌‌
  honorarium‌‌   to‌‌ 
i) Undertaking‌‌construction‌‌projects;‌‌or‌  ‌
its‌‌trustees‌‌or‌‌organizers;‌  ‌ Determination‌‌of‌‌OSD‌‌by‌‌the‌‌GPP‌‌and‌‌its‌‌Partners‌  ‌
ii) Engaging‌  ‌in‌  ‌petroleum,‌  ‌coal,‌  ‌geothermal‌  ‌and‌‌ 
b. Payment‌  ‌of‌  ‌exorbitant‌  ‌or‌‌   unreasonable‌‌   compensation‌‌  1. GPP‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌professional‌  ‌partners‌  ‌may‌  ‌avail‌  ‌of‌  ‌OSD‌  ‌only‌‌ 
other‌  ‌energy‌  ‌operations‌  ‌pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌an‌‌ 
to‌‌its‌‌employees;‌  ‌ ONCE‌; ‌ ‌
operating‌  ‌or‌  ‌consortium‌  ‌agreement‌  ‌under‌  ‌a ‌‌
service‌‌contract‌‌with‌‌the‌‌government.‌  ‌ 2. Distributable‌‌ net‌‌ income‌‌ of‌‌ GPP‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌ determined‌‌ using‌‌ ID‌‌ or‌‌ 
OSD;‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 84‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

3. Share‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  net‌‌
  income‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  GPP‌‌
  shall‌‌
  be‌‌ reported‌‌ as‌‌ taxable‌‌  4. A‌  ‌minimum‌  ‌wage‌  ‌earner‌  ‌or‌  ‌an‌  ‌individual‌  ‌who‌  ‌is‌  ‌exempt‌‌  consolidated‌‌   return‌‌
  on‌‌
  or‌‌
  before‌‌
  April‌‌  15‌‌ of‌‌ each‌‌ year‌‌ 
income‌‌of‌‌each‌‌partner;‌  ‌ from‌‌income‌‌tax.‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌51‌) ‌ ‌ covering‌‌ all‌‌ stock‌‌ transactions‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ preceding‌‌ taxable‌‌ 
year;‌‌and‌  ‌
4. The‌  ‌professional‌  ‌partners‌  ‌can‌  ‌no‌  ‌longer‌  ‌claim‌  ‌further‌‌  ii.‌‌Substituted‌‌filing‌  ‌
deduction‌  ‌from‌  ‌their‌  ‌distributive‌  ‌share‌  ‌regardless‌  ‌of‌  ‌method‌‌  b. From‌‌   the‌‌
  sale‌‌
  or‌‌
  disposition‌‌   of‌‌ real‌‌ property‌‌ shall‌‌ file‌‌ 
used‌‌in‌‌claiming‌‌deduction;‌  ‌ Who‌‌shall‌‌not‌‌be‌‌required‌‌to‌‌file‌‌an‌‌annual‌‌income‌‌tax‌‌return?‌  ‌ a‌  ‌return‌  ‌within‌  ‌thirty‌  ‌(30)‌  ‌days‌‌   following‌‌  each‌‌
  sale‌‌ 
1. Individual‌‌taxpayers‌‌   ‌ or‌‌other‌‌disposition.‌‌(‌Sec‌‌50[c]‌) ‌ ‌
5. However,‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌partner‌  ‌also‌  ‌derives‌‌
  other‌‌
  income‌‌
  outside‌‌  the‌‌ 
GPP,‌‌
  then‌‌
  the‌‌   deduction‌‌   from‌‌   the‌‌
  other‌‌ income‌‌ would‌‌ either‌‌ be‌‌  2. receiving‌‌purely‌‌compensation‌‌income,‌‌regardless‌‌of‌‌amount,‌‌   ‌ Return‌  ‌of‌  ‌Parent‌  ‌to‌  ‌Include‌  ‌Income‌  ‌of‌  ‌Children.‌  ‌— ‌‌The‌‌   income‌‌  of‌‌ 
ID‌‌or‌‌OSD.‌  ‌ unmarried‌  ‌minors‌  ‌derived‌  ‌from‌  ‌properly‌  ‌received‌  ‌from‌  ‌a ‌ ‌living‌‌ 
3. from‌  ‌only‌  ‌one‌  ‌employer‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌calendar‌‌ 
parent‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌included‌‌in‌‌the‌‌return‌‌of‌‌the‌‌parent,‌e‌ xcept‌‌   ‌
7.‌‌Filing‌‌of‌‌Returns‌‌and‌‌Payment‌  ‌ year,‌‌   ‌
1. when‌‌the‌‌donor's‌‌tax‌‌has‌‌been‌‌paid‌‌on‌‌such‌‌property,‌‌or‌  ‌
a.‌‌Individual‌‌return‌  ‌ 4. the‌  ‌income‌  ‌tax‌  ‌of‌  ‌which‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌withheld‌  ‌correctly‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
said‌‌employer‌‌(tax‌‌due‌‌equals‌‌tax‌‌withheld).‌  ‌ 2. when‌‌   the‌‌
  transfer‌‌   of‌‌
  such‌‌
  property‌‌   is‌‌
  exempt‌‌ from‌‌ donor's‌‌ tax.‌  ‌
i.‌‌W ho‌‌are‌‌required‌‌to‌‌file;‌‌exceptions‌  ‌ (‌Sec‌‌50[e]‌) ‌ ‌
The‌‌
  ‌certificate‌‌   of‌‌
  withholding‌‌   filed‌‌
  by‌‌ the‌‌ respective‌‌ employers,‌‌ duly‌‌ 
1. Every‌‌Filipino‌‌citizen‌‌residing‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Philippines;‌  ‌ stamped‌‌   'received'‌‌   the‌‌ BIR,‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ tantamount‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ substituted‌‌  b.‌‌Corporate‌‌returns‌  ‌
  by‌‌
2. Every‌  ‌Filipino‌  ‌citizen‌  ‌residing‌  ‌outside‌‌
  the‌‌
  Philippines,‌‌
  on‌‌
  his‌‌  filing‌‌‌of‌‌income‌‌tax‌‌returns‌‌by‌‌said‌‌employees.‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌51-A‌) ‌ ‌
Every‌  ‌corporation‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌tax‌  ‌herein‌  ‌imposed,‌  ‌except‌  ‌foreign‌‌ 
income‌‌from‌‌sources‌‌within‌‌the‌‌Philippines;‌  ‌ iii.‌‌W hen‌‌and‌‌where‌‌to‌‌file‌  ‌ corporations‌‌   not‌‌
  engaged‌‌   in‌‌
  trade‌‌
  or‌‌  business‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  Philippines,‌‌   shall‌‌ 
3. Every‌‌
  alien‌‌ residing‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ Philippines,‌‌ on‌‌ income‌‌ derived‌‌ from‌‌  render,‌‌in‌‌duplicate,‌‌a‌‌true‌‌and‌‌accurate‌‌   ‌
Where‌‌to‌‌File.‌—
‌ ‌‌The‌‌return‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌filed‌‌with‌‌   ‌
sources‌‌within‌‌the‌‌Philippines;‌‌and‌  ‌ 1. quarterly‌  ‌income‌  ‌tax‌  ‌return,‌  ‌on‌  ‌a ‌ ‌cumulative‌  ‌basis‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌ 
1. An‌‌authorized‌‌agent‌‌bank,‌‌   ‌ preceding‌‌quarters,‌‌and‌‌   ‌
4. Every‌  ‌nonresident‌‌
  alien‌‌
  engaged‌‌   in‌‌
  trade‌‌
  or‌‌
  business‌‌
  or‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌ 
exercise‌‌of‌‌profession‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Philippines.‌  ‌ 2. Revenue‌‌District‌‌Officer,‌‌   ‌ 2. final‌‌or‌‌adjustment‌‌return,‌‌on‌‌or‌‌before‌‌April‌‌15.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌following‌‌
  individuals‌‌
  shall‌‌
  ‌not‌‌
  be‌‌
  required‌‌
  to‌‌
  file‌‌
  an‌‌
  income‌‌
  tax‌‌  3. Collection‌‌Agent‌‌or‌‌   ‌ i.‌‌Quarterly‌‌income‌‌tax‌  ‌
return:‌  ‌ 4. Duly‌‌
  authorized‌‌   Treasurer‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  city‌‌
  or‌‌ municipality‌‌ in‌‌ which‌‌ 
1. Every‌  ‌corporation‌  ‌shall‌  ‌file‌  ‌in‌‌
  duplicate‌‌
  a ‌‌quarterly‌‌
  summary‌‌ 
1. An‌‌individual‌‌whose‌‌taxable‌‌income‌d
‌ oes‌‌not‌‌exceed‌‌P250K‌.  ‌‌ ‌ such‌  ‌person‌  ‌has‌  ‌his‌  ‌legal‌  ‌residence‌  ‌or‌  ‌principal‌  ‌place‌  ‌of‌‌ 
declaration‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌gross‌  ‌income‌  ‌and‌  ‌deductions‌  ‌on‌  ‌a ‌‌
business‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Philippines,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
Those‌  ‌individuals‌  ‌engaged‌  ‌in‌  ‌business‌  ‌or‌  ‌practice‌  ‌of‌‌  cumulative‌‌basis‌f‌ or‌‌the‌‌preceding‌‌quarter‌‌or‌‌quarters.‌  ‌
profession‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌shall‌  ‌file‌  ‌an‌  ‌income‌  ‌tax‌‌  5. If‌  ‌there‌  ‌be‌  ‌no‌  ‌legal‌  ‌residence‌  ‌or‌  ‌place‌  ‌of‌  ‌business‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
2. The‌  ‌tax‌  ‌so‌  ‌computed‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌   decreased‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌   amount‌‌   of‌‌
  tax‌‌ 
return,‌‌regardless‌‌of‌‌the‌‌amount‌‌of‌‌gross‌‌income;‌  ‌ Philippines,‌‌with‌‌the‌‌Office‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Commissioner‌.‌‌(‌Sec‌‌50[b]‌) ‌ ‌
previously‌‌   paid‌‌   or‌‌
  assessed‌‌   during‌‌   the‌‌  preceding‌‌   quarters‌‌ and‌‌ 
2. Purely‌‌compensation‌‌income‌‌earners.‌  ‌ When‌‌to‌‌File.‌‌‌— ‌ ‌ shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌paid‌  ‌not‌  ‌later‌  ‌than‌‌
  ‌sixty‌‌
  (60)‌‌   days‌‌   ‌from‌‌   the‌‌
  close‌‌  of‌‌ 
each‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌   first‌‌
  three‌‌  (3)‌‌  quarters‌‌   ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌ taxable‌‌ year,‌‌ whether‌‌ 
However‌, ‌ ‌an‌  ‌individual‌  ‌deriving‌  ‌compensation‌  ‌concurrently‌‌  1. On‌  ‌or‌  ‌before‌  ‌April‌  ‌15‌  ‌of‌  ‌each‌  ‌year‌  ‌covering‌  ‌income‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌ 
calendar‌‌or‌‌fiscal‌‌year.‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌75‌) ‌ ‌
from‌  ‌two‌  ‌or‌  ‌more‌  ‌employers‌  ‌at‌  ‌any‌  ‌time‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌  ‌taxable‌‌  preceding‌‌taxable‌‌year.‌  ‌
year‌‌shall‌‌file‌‌an‌‌income‌‌tax‌‌return.‌‌   ‌ ii.‌‌F inal‌‌adjustment‌‌return‌  ‌
2. ‌Individuals‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌tax‌‌on‌‌capital‌‌gains;‌  ‌
3. An‌‌
  individual‌‌
  whose‌‌
  ‌sole‌‌
  income‌‌
  has‌‌
  been‌‌
  subjected‌‌
  to‌‌ ‌FWT‌; ‌‌ a. From‌‌ the‌‌ sale‌‌ or‌‌ exchange‌‌ of‌‌ shares‌‌ of‌‌ stock‌‌ not‌‌ traded‌‌  1. Every‌  ‌corporation‌  ‌shall‌‌   file‌‌
  a ‌‌final‌‌  adjustment‌‌  return‌‌
  covering‌‌ 
and‌  ‌ thru‌  ‌a ‌ ‌local‌  ‌stock‌  ‌exchange‌  ‌shall‌  ‌file‌  ‌a ‌ ‌return‌‌
  within‌‌  the‌  ‌total‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌income‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌preceding‌  ‌calendar‌  ‌or‌  ‌fiscal‌‌ 
thirty‌  ‌(30)‌  ‌days‌  ‌after‌  ‌each‌  ‌transaction‌  ‌and‌  ‌a ‌ ‌final‌‌  year.‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 85‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

2. If‌  ‌the‌‌
  sum‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  quarterly‌‌  tax‌‌  payments‌‌   made‌‌   during‌‌   the‌‌  said‌‌  2. The‌  ‌dissolving‌  ‌or‌  ‌reorganizing‌  ‌corporation‌  ‌shall,‌  ‌prior‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌  withheld‌‌by‌‌the‌‌withholding‌‌  income‌‌payments‌‌are‌‌intended‌‌to‌‌ 
taxable‌  ‌year‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌equal‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌total‌  ‌tax‌  ‌due‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌entire‌‌  issuance‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌SEC‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Certificate‌  ‌of‌  ‌Dissolution‌  ‌or‌‌  agent‌‌is‌‌constituted‌‌as‌‌a‌‌full‌‌and‌‌  equal‌‌or‌‌at‌‌least‌‌approximate‌‌the‌‌ 
taxable‌‌income‌‌of‌‌that‌‌year,‌‌the‌‌corporation‌‌shall‌‌either:‌  ‌ Reorganization,‌  ‌secure‌  ‌a ‌ ‌certificate‌  ‌of‌  ‌tax‌  ‌clearance‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌  final‌‌payment‌‌of‌‌the‌‌income‌‌tax‌‌  tax‌‌due‌‌of‌‌the‌‌payee‌‌on‌‌said‌‌ 
BIR‌‌which‌‌certificate‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌submitted‌‌to‌‌the‌‌SEC.‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌52[c]‌) ‌ ‌ due‌‌from‌‌the‌‌payee‌‌on‌‌the‌‌said‌‌  income.‌  ‌
a. Pay‌‌the‌‌balance‌‌of‌‌tax‌‌still‌‌due;‌‌or‌  ‌
c.‌‌Return‌‌on‌‌capital‌‌gains‌‌realized‌‌f rom‌‌sale‌‌of‌‌shares‌‌of‌‌
  income.‌  ‌
b. Carry-over‌‌the‌‌excess‌‌credit;‌‌or‌  ‌
stock‌‌and‌‌real‌‌estate‌  ‌
b)‌‌The‌‌liability‌‌for‌‌payment‌‌of‌‌  b)‌‌Payee‌‌of‌‌income‌‌is‌‌required‌‌to‌‌ 
c. Be‌  ‌credited‌  ‌or‌‌
  refunded‌‌
  with‌‌
  the‌‌
  excess‌‌
  amount‌‌
  paid,‌‌ 
the‌‌tax‌‌rests‌‌primarily‌‌on‌‌the‌‌  report‌‌the‌‌income‌‌and/or‌‌pay‌‌the‌‌ 
as‌‌the‌‌case‌‌may‌‌be.‌  ‌
Sale‌‌or‌‌exchange‌‌of‌‌stock‌‌NOT‌‌  Within‌‌30‌‌days‌‌after‌‌each‌‌  payor‌‌as‌‌a‌‌withholding‌‌agent.‌  ‌ difference‌‌between‌‌the‌‌tax‌‌ 
3. Option‌  ‌shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  considered‌‌
  irrevocable‌‌
  for‌‌
  that‌‌
  taxable‌‌
  period.‌  ‌ traded‌‌through‌‌LSE‌  ‌ transaction‌‌and‌‌final‌‌  withheld‌‌and‌‌the‌‌tax‌‌due‌‌on‌‌the‌‌ 
(‌Sec‌‌76‌) ‌ ‌ consolidated‌‌return‌‌on‌‌or‌‌before‌‌ 
income.‌‌The‌‌payee‌‌also‌‌has‌‌the‌‌ 
April‌‌15‌  ‌
right‌‌to‌‌ask‌‌for‌‌a‌‌refund‌‌if‌‌the‌‌tax‌‌ 
iii.‌‌W hen‌‌and‌‌where‌‌to‌‌file‌  ‌
Sale‌‌or‌‌disposition‌‌of‌‌real‌‌  Within‌‌30‌‌days‌‌following‌‌each‌‌  withheld‌‌is‌‌more‌‌than‌‌the‌‌tax‌‌due.‌  ‌
Where‌‌to‌‌file.‌—
‌ ‌‌same‌‌as‌‌Individual.‌  ‌ property‌  ‌ sale‌‌or‌‌other‌‌disposition‌  ‌
c)‌‌The‌‌payee‌‌is‌‌not‌‌required‌‌to‌‌  c)‌‌The‌‌income‌‌recipient‌‌is‌‌still‌‌ 
When‌‌to‌‌File.‌‌‌— ‌  ‌ ‌ Gains‌‌received‌‌by‌‌installment‌  ‌ Within‌‌30‌‌days‌‌from‌‌receipt‌‌of‌‌  file‌‌an‌‌income‌‌tax‌‌return‌‌for‌‌the‌‌  required‌‌to‌‌file‌‌an‌‌income‌‌tax‌‌ 
each‌‌installment.‌  ‌ particular‌‌income.‌  ‌ return,‌‌as‌‌prescribed‌‌in‌‌Sec.‌‌51‌‌ 
1. The‌‌   corporate‌‌   ‌quarterly‌‌   ‌declaration‌‌   shall‌‌ be‌‌ filed‌‌ within‌‌ sixty‌‌ 
and‌‌Sec.‌‌52‌‌of‌‌the‌‌NIRC,‌‌as‌‌ 
(60)‌  ‌days‌  ‌following‌  ‌the‌  ‌close‌  ‌of‌  ‌each‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌first‌  ‌three‌  ‌(3)‌‌ 
8.‌‌Withholding‌‌Tax‌  ‌ amended.‌  ‌
quarters‌‌of‌‌the‌‌taxable‌‌year.‌‌   ‌
a.‌‌Concept‌  ‌ b.‌‌Final‌‌withholding‌‌tax‌  ‌
2. The‌  ‌final‌  ‌adjustment‌  ‌return‌‌   shall‌‌
  be‌‌  filed‌‌
  on‌‌   or‌‌
  before‌‌
  April‌‌ 
15,‌  ‌or‌  ‌on‌  ‌or‌‌
  before‌‌  the‌‌
  fifteenth‌‌  (15th)‌‌   day‌‌
  of‌‌  the‌‌
  fourth‌‌
  (4th)‌‌  The‌  ‌types‌  ‌of‌  ‌income‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌withholding‌  ‌tax‌  ‌are‌‌
  divided‌‌
  into‌‌
  three‌‌  1. Income‌‌   subject‌‌   to‌‌
  final‌‌
  tax‌‌
  refers‌‌
  to‌‌
  income‌‌   wherein‌‌
  tax‌‌ due‌‌ is‌‌ 
month‌‌following‌‌the‌‌close‌‌of‌‌the‌‌fiscal‌‌year,‌‌as‌‌the‌‌case‌‌may‌‌be.‌  ‌ categories:‌‌   ‌ fully‌‌
  collected‌‌   through‌‌ the‌‌ withholding‌‌ tax‌‌ system,‌‌ wherein‌‌ the‌‌ 
iv.‌‌Return‌‌of‌‌corporations‌‌contemplating‌‌dissolution‌‌or‌‌
  a) withholding‌‌of‌‌final‌‌tax‌‌on‌‌certain‌‌incomes;‌‌   ‌ payor‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  income‌‌   withholds‌‌   the‌‌
  tax‌‌
  and‌‌ then‌‌ remits‌‌ it‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ 
reorganization‌  ‌ government.‌  ‌
b) withholding‌‌of‌‌creditable‌‌tax‌‌at‌‌source‌‌and‌‌   ‌
2. Some‌‌principles‌‌of‌‌FWT‌  ‌
1. Every‌  ‌corporation‌  ‌shall,‌  ‌within‌  ‌thirty‌  ‌(30)‌  ‌days‌  ‌after‌  ‌the‌‌  c) tax-free‌‌covenant‌‌bonds.‌  ‌
adoption‌‌by‌‌the‌‌corporation‌‌of‌‌a‌‌resolution‌‌or‌‌plan‌‌   ‌ a) The‌‌amount‌‌of‌‌tax‌‌withheld‌‌is‌‌full‌‌and‌‌final.‌  ‌
The‌‌withholding‌‌tax‌‌system‌‌was‌‌devised‌‌for‌‌three‌‌primary‌‌reasons:‌‌   ‌
a. for‌‌its‌‌dissolution,‌‌or‌‌   ‌ b) The‌  ‌liability‌  ‌for‌  ‌payment‌  ‌rests‌  ‌primarily‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌ 
1. to‌  ‌provide‌  ‌the‌  ‌taxpayer‌  ‌a ‌ ‌convenient‌  ‌manner‌  ‌to‌  ‌meet‌  ‌his‌‌  withholding‌‌agent.‌  ‌
b. for‌  ‌the‌  ‌liquidation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌whole‌  ‌or‌  ‌any‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌‌  probable‌‌income‌‌tax‌‌liability;‌‌   ‌
capital‌  ‌stock,‌‌  including‌‌   a ‌‌corporation‌‌  which‌‌   has‌‌  been‌‌  2. to‌‌
  ensure‌‌   the‌‌
  collection‌‌
  of‌‌
  income‌‌  tax‌‌
  which‌‌
  can‌‌
  otherwise‌‌   be‌‌  c) In‌‌
  case‌‌
  of‌‌ failure‌‌ to‌‌ withhold,‌‌ the‌‌ agent‌‌ is‌‌ liable‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ 
notified‌  ‌of‌  ‌possible‌  ‌involuntary‌  ‌dissolution‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌  lost‌  ‌or‌  ‌substantially‌  ‌reduced‌  ‌through‌  ‌failure‌  ‌to‌  ‌file‌  ‌the‌‌  deficiency.‌  ‌
SEC,‌‌or‌‌   ‌ corresponding‌‌returns‌‌and‌‌   ‌ d) The‌  ‌payee‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌required‌  ‌to‌  ‌file‌  ‌any‌  ‌ITR‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌ 
c. for‌‌its‌‌reorganization,‌‌   ‌ 3. to‌‌improve‌‌the‌‌government's‌‌cash‌‌flow.‌  ‌ particular‌‌income.‌  ‌

render‌  ‌a ‌ ‌correct‌  ‌return‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Commissioner,‌  ‌verified‌  ‌under‌‌  e) The‌  ‌finality‌  ‌of‌  ‌withheld‌  ‌tax‌  ‌is‌  ‌limited‌  ‌on‌  ‌that‌‌ 
FWT‌  ‌ CWT‌  ‌
oath,‌‌setting‌‌forth‌‌the‌‌terms‌‌of‌‌such‌‌resolution‌‌or‌‌plan.‌  ‌ particular‌  ‌income‌  ‌and‌  ‌will‌  ‌not‌  ‌extend‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌payee’s‌‌ 
a)‌‌The‌‌amount‌‌of‌‌income‌‌tax‌‌  a)‌‌Taxes‌‌withheld‌‌on‌‌certain‌‌  other‌‌tax‌‌liability‌‌on‌‌said‌‌income.‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 86‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

c.‌‌Creditable‌‌withholding‌‌tax‌  ‌
Individual‌‌payee‌  ‌ 1%‌‌ 
The‌  ‌Secretary‌  ‌of‌  ‌Finance‌  ‌may‌  ‌require‌  ‌the‌  ‌withholding‌  ‌of‌‌   a ‌‌tax‌‌
  on‌‌  Payments‌‌by‌‌the‌‌government‌‌to‌‌local‌‌suppliers‌e‌ xcept‌‌  (goods)‌  ‌
the‌‌   items‌‌ of‌‌ income‌‌ payable‌‌ to‌‌ natural‌‌ or‌‌ juridical‌‌ persons,‌‌ residing‌‌  - If‌‌gross‌‌income‌‌>‌‌P3M‌‌or‌‌VAT-registered‌  ‌ 10%‌  ‌ if‌‌below‌‌P10K‌  ‌ 2%‌‌ 
(services)‌  ‌
in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines,‌  ‌by‌  ‌payor-corporation/persons‌  ‌as‌  ‌provided‌  ‌for‌‌  - If‌‌gross‌‌income‌‌did‌‌not‌‌exceed‌‌P3M‌  ‌ 5%‌  ‌
by‌  ‌law,‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌rate‌‌
  of‌‌
  not‌‌
  less‌‌
  than‌‌
  one‌‌
  percent‌‌
  (1%)‌‌   but‌‌
  not‌‌   more‌‌  Income‌‌payments‌‌to‌‌partners‌‌of‌‌GPP‌  ‌
than‌‌ fifteen‌‌ percent‌‌ (15%)‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ income‌‌ payment,‌‌ which‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌  Non-individual‌‌payee‌  ‌
credited‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌  ‌income‌  ‌tax‌  ‌liability‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌taxpayer‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌  - If‌‌gross‌‌income‌‌>‌‌P720K‌  ‌ 15%‌  ‌
taxable‌‌year.‌  ‌ - If‌‌gross‌‌income‌‌>‌‌P720K‌  ‌ 15%‌  ‌
- If‌‌it‌‌does‌‌not‌‌exceed‌‌P720K‌  ‌ 10%‌  ‌
1. Creditable‌  ‌tax‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌withheld‌  ‌at‌  ‌source,‌‌
  but‌‌
  should‌‌
  still‌‌
  be‌‌  - If‌‌gross‌‌income‌‌did‌‌not‌‌exceed‌‌P720K‌  ‌ 10%‌  ‌
included‌‌in‌‌the‌‌tax‌‌return‌‌of‌‌recipient.‌  ‌ Income‌‌payments‌‌made‌‌by‌‌political‌‌parties‌‌and‌‌ 
Rentals‌‌for‌‌continued‌‌use‌‌or‌‌possession‌‌of‌‌real‌‌  candidates‌‌for‌‌all‌‌purchases‌‌of‌‌goods‌‌and‌‌services‌‌as‌‌ 
2. There‌‌are‌‌three‌‌types:‌  properties‌‌used‌‌in‌‌business,‌‌which‌‌the‌‌payor‌‌has‌‌not‌‌  5%‌  ‌ campaign‌‌expenditures,‌‌as‌‌well‌‌as‌‌income‌‌payments‌‌ 
5%‌  ‌
taken‌‌title‌  ‌ made‌‌by‌‌individuals‌‌and‌‌juridical‌‌entities‌‌for‌‌all‌‌ 
a) Expanded‌‌ withholding‌‌ tax‌‌ on‌‌ certain‌‌ income‌‌ payments‌‌ 
purchases‌‌intended‌‌to‌‌be‌‌given‌‌as‌‌campaign‌‌ 
made‌‌by‌‌private‌‌persons‌‌to‌‌resident‌‌taxpayers;‌  ‌ Cinematographic‌‌film‌‌rentals‌‌and‌‌other‌‌payments‌  ‌ 5%‌  ‌ contribution‌  ‌
b) Withholding‌‌tax‌‌on‌‌compensation‌‌income‌‌in‌‌PH;‌  ‌
Income‌‌payments‌‌to‌‌certain‌‌contractors,‌‌general‌‌  Interest‌‌income‌‌from‌‌other‌‌instruments,‌‌i.e.‌‌not‌‌ 
2%‌  ‌ 15%‌  ‌
c) Withholding‌  ‌tax‌  ‌on‌  ‌money‌  ‌payments‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  engineering,‌‌general‌‌building,‌‌specialty‌‌and‌‌other‌‌  deposit‌‌substitutes‌  ‌
government.‌  ‌ contractors‌  ‌
CIR‌‌v.‌‌Solidbank‌‌‌reiterated‌‌in‌C
‌ IR‌‌v.‌‌Citytrust‌‌Investment‌‌Phils.‌  ‌
i.‌‌Expanded‌‌withholding‌‌tax‌  ‌ Income‌‌distributed‌‌to‌‌the‌‌beneficiaries‌‌of‌‌estates‌‌and‌‌ 
15%‌  ‌
trusts‌  ‌
When‌‌EWT‌‌will‌‌apply‌  Whether‌‌the‌‌20%‌‌FWT‌‌Forms‌‌Part‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Taxable‌‌Gross‌‌Receipts‌  ‌
Income‌‌payments‌‌to‌‌certain‌‌brokers‌‌and‌‌agents‌  ‌ 10%‌  ‌
1. Expense‌  ‌is‌  ‌paid‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌taxpayer,‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌income‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  YES‌. ‌ ‌Although‌  ‌the‌  ‌20%‌‌  FWT‌‌  on‌‌  respondent's‌‌  interest‌‌  income‌‌  was‌‌ 
recipient‌‌thereof‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌income‌‌tax;‌  ‌ not‌‌   actually‌‌
  received‌‌  by‌‌   respondent‌‌   because‌‌   it‌‌
  was‌‌
  remitted‌‌ directly‌‌ 
Real‌‌property‌‌which‌‌are‌‌NOT‌‌capital‌‌assets‌‌sold‌‌by‌‌a ‌‌ 1.5%‌‌or‌‌ 
to‌  ‌the‌‌  government,‌‌   the‌‌  fact‌‌  that‌‌  the‌‌
  amount‌‌   redounded‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  bank's‌‌ 
2. Income‌‌is‌‌fixed‌‌or‌‌determinable‌‌at‌‌the‌‌time‌‌of‌‌payment;‌  ‌ person‌‌engaged‌‌in‌‌the‌‌real‌‌estate‌‌business‌  ‌ 3%‌‌or‌‌5%‌  ‌
benefit‌  ‌makes‌  ‌it‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌taxable‌‌   gross‌‌
  receipts‌‌   in‌‌
  computing‌‌   the‌‌ 
- If‌‌NOT‌‌engaged‌‌in‌‌real‌‌estate‌‌business‌  ‌ 6%‌  ‌ 5%‌‌GRT.‌  ‌
3. Income‌‌  is‌‌ one‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ income‌‌ payments‌‌ listed‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ regulations;‌ 
and‌  ‌ In‌  ‌a ‌ ‌withholding‌  ‌tax‌  ‌system‌, ‌‌the‌‌   payee‌‌   is‌‌   the‌‌  taxpayer,‌‌   the‌‌  person‌‌ 
On‌‌additional‌‌payments‌‌by‌‌importers,‌‌shipping‌‌and‌‌ 
4. Income‌‌recipient‌‌is‌‌a‌‌RESIDENT‌‌of‌‌the‌‌PH‌‌liable‌‌to‌‌income‌‌tax.‌  ‌ on‌  ‌whom‌  ‌the‌  ‌tax‌‌   is‌‌
  imposed;‌‌   the‌‌
  payor,‌‌   a ‌‌separate‌‌   entity,‌‌  acts‌‌   as‌‌
  no‌‌ 
airline‌‌companies‌‌to‌‌government‌‌personnel‌‌for‌‌OT‌‌  15%‌  ‌
more‌‌   than‌‌
  an‌‌
  agent‌‌
  of‌‌  the‌‌   government‌‌   for‌‌   the‌‌   collection‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌ tax‌‌ in‌‌ 
services‌  ‌
If‌  ‌the‌  ‌recipient‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌nonresident‌, ‌ ‌then‌  ‌income‌  ‌payment‌  ‌is‌‌  order‌  ‌to‌  ‌ensure‌  ‌its‌  ‌payment.‌  ‌In‌  ‌our‌  ‌withholding‌  ‌tax‌  ‌system,‌‌ 
subject‌‌to‌F ‌ WT‌,‌‌not‌‌CWT.‌  ‌ possession‌  ‌is‌  ‌acquired‌‌   by‌‌   the‌‌
  payor‌‌   as‌‌  the‌‌   withholding‌‌   agent‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
On‌‌the‌‌amount‌‌paid‌‌by‌‌any‌‌credit‌‌card‌‌company‌‌to‌‌any‌‌  1%‌‌of‌‌½‌‌of‌‌ 
government,‌‌   because‌‌   the‌‌   taxpayer‌‌   ratifies‌‌   the‌‌   very‌‌  act‌‌
  of‌‌
  possession‌‌ 
ii.‌‌W ithholding‌‌tax‌‌on‌‌compensation‌  ‌ business‌‌entity‌‌representing‌‌the‌‌sale‌‌of‌‌goods,‌‌  gross‌‌ 
for‌  ‌the‌  ‌government.‌  ‌There‌  ‌is‌  ‌thus‌  ‌constructive‌  ‌receipt.‌  ‌The‌‌ 
services‌‌made‌‌by‌‌them‌‌to‌‌cardholders‌  ‌ amounts‌  ‌
processes‌  ‌of‌  ‌bookkeeping‌  ‌and‌  ‌accounting‌  ‌for‌  ‌interest‌  ‌on‌  ‌deposits‌‌ 
Income‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌CWT‌  ‌ Rate‌  ‌ and‌‌   yield‌‌  on‌‌
  deposit‌‌ substitutes‌‌ that‌‌ are‌‌ subjected‌‌ to‌‌ FWT‌‌ are‌‌ indeed‌‌ 
1%‌‌ 
Payments‌‌made‌‌by‌‌any‌‌of‌‌the‌‌top‌‌withholding‌‌agents‌  ‌ (goods)‌  ‌ --‌‌for‌‌legal‌‌purposes‌‌--‌‌tantamount‌‌to‌‌delivery,‌‌receipt‌‌or‌‌remittance.‌  ‌
Professional‌‌fees,‌‌promotional‌‌and‌‌talent‌‌fees,‌‌referred‌‌by‌‌ 
individuals,‌‌entertainers,‌‌and‌‌athletes‌  ‌ to‌‌their‌‌local‌‌suppliers‌  ‌ 2%‌‌ 
(services)‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 87‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

d.‌‌Fringe‌‌benefits‌‌tax‌  ‌ Value‌  ‌added‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌difference‌  ‌between‌  ‌total‌  ‌sales‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌ 
profit,‌  ‌for‌  ‌purposes‌  ‌of‌  ‌determining‌  ‌liability‌  ‌for‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌on‌  ‌services‌‌ 
taxpayer‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌quarter‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌and‌  ‌his‌  ‌total‌‌  rendered.‌  ‌As‌  ‌long‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌entity‌  ‌provides‌  ‌service‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌fee,‌‌ 
A‌‌
  final‌‌
  tax‌‌   ‌35%‌  ‌is‌‌
  of‌‌   hereby‌‌
  imposed‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ grossed-up‌‌ monetary‌‌ 
purchases‌‌for‌‌the‌‌same‌‌period‌‌subject‌‌also‌‌to‌‌VAT.‌  ‌ remuneration‌  ‌or‌  ‌consideration,‌  ‌then‌  ‌the‌  ‌service‌  ‌rendered‌  ‌is‌‌ 
value‌‌of‌‌fringe‌‌benefit.‌2 ‌ 5%‌‌for‌‌NRA-NETB‌  ‌
subject‌‌to‌‌VAT.‌  ‌
Output‌  ‌tax‌  ‌means‌‌
  the‌‌
  VAT‌‌
  due‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  sale‌‌
  or‌‌
  lease‌‌
  of‌‌
  taxable‌‌ 
goods,‌  ‌properties‌  ‌or‌  ‌services‌  ‌by‌  ‌any‌  ‌person‌  ‌registered‌  ‌or‌‌ 
MV
GU M V = 65%   F BT = GU M V x 35%   ‌ required‌‌to‌‌register.‌  ‌
c. Tax‌  ‌on‌  ‌consumption.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌VAT‌  ‌is‌  ‌broad-based‌  ‌because‌  ‌every‌‌ 
sale‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌levels‌  ‌of‌  ‌manufacturers‌  ‌or‌  ‌producers‌  ‌and‌‌ 
 ‌ Input‌‌
  tax‌‌  means‌‌   the‌‌
  VAT‌‌  due‌‌   from‌‌
  or‌‌ paid‌‌ by‌‌ a ‌‌VAT-registered‌‌  distributors‌  ‌is‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌VAT.‌  ‌The‌  ‌tax‌  ‌burden‌  ‌rests‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌‌ 
person‌‌  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  course‌‌   of‌‌
  his‌‌ trade‌‌ or‌‌ business‌‌ on‌‌ importation‌‌ of‌‌  final‌  ‌consumer‌  ‌who‌  ‌consumes‌  ‌the‌  ‌goods,‌  ‌properties‌  ‌or‌‌ 
e.‌‌Duties‌‌of‌‌a‌‌withholding‌‌agent‌  ‌ goods‌  ‌or‌  ‌local‌  ‌purchase‌  ‌of‌  ‌goods,‌  ‌properties,‌  ‌or‌  ‌services,‌‌  services.‌  ‌
1. A‌‌ withholding‌‌ agent‌‌ is‌‌ one‌‌ required‌‌ to‌‌ deduct‌‌ and‌‌ withhold‌‌ any‌‌  including‌  ‌lease‌  ‌or‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌property,‌  ‌from‌  ‌a ‌ ‌VAT-registered‌‌ 
tax.‌  ‌ person.‌  ‌ d. Indirect‌‌
  tax:‌‌
  impact‌‌   and‌‌ incidence.‌‌ — ‌‌‌An‌‌ indirect‌‌ tax‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌tax‌‌ 
demanded‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌first‌  ‌instance‌  ‌from‌  ‌one‌  ‌person‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
2. He‌‌also‌‌has‌‌the‌‌legal‌‌interest‌‌to‌‌file‌‌a‌‌claim‌‌for‌‌tax‌‌refund.‌  ‌ b. Sales‌‌ tax.‌‌ — ‌‌‌VAT‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌tax‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ taxable‌‌ sale,‌‌ barter‌‌ or‌‌ exchange‌‌ 
expectation‌  ‌and‌  ‌intention‌  ‌that‌  ‌he‌  ‌can‌  ‌shift‌  ‌the‌  ‌burden‌  ‌to‌‌ 
of‌  ‌goods,‌  ‌properties‌  ‌or‌  ‌services.‌  ‌A ‌ ‌sale‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌an‌  ‌actual‌  ‌or‌‌ 
a. Considered‌  ‌a ‌ ‌taxpayer‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌NIRC‌  ‌as‌  ‌he‌  ‌is‌‌  someone‌‌else.‌  ‌
deemed‌‌sale,‌‌or‌‌an‌‌export‌‌or‌‌a‌‌local‌‌sale.‌  ‌
personally‌‌liable‌‌for‌‌the‌‌withholding‌‌tax;‌‌and‌  ‌
GR‌:‌‌  ‌ here‌  ‌must‌‌
T   be‌‌
  an‌‌
  actual‌‌
  sale‌‌
  in‌‌
  PH‌‌
  in‌‌
  order‌‌
  that‌‌
  VAT‌‌
  may‌‌  The‌‌
  ‌impact‌‌
  of‌‌
  taxation‌‌
  is‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  seller‌‌
  upon‌‌ whom‌‌ the‌‌ tax‌‌ has‌‌ 
b. As‌  ‌agent‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌
  taxpayer,‌‌   he‌‌
  has‌‌
  the‌‌   implied‌‌   authority‌‌  be‌‌imposed.‌  ‌ been‌  ‌imposed,‌  ‌while‌  ‌the‌  ‌incidence‌  ‌of‌  ‌tax‌  ‌is‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌final‌‌ 
to‌  ‌file‌  ‌a ‌ ‌claim‌  ‌for‌  ‌refund‌  ‌and‌  ‌to‌  ‌bring‌  ‌an‌  ‌action‌  ‌for‌‌  consumer,‌‌the‌‌place‌‌at‌‌which‌‌the‌‌tax‌‌comes‌‌to‌‌rest.‌  ‌
recovery‌‌of‌‌such‌‌claim.‌  ‌ EXC‌: ‌ ‌
e. Tax‌‌credit‌‌method‌‌   ‌
ING‌‌Bank‌‌v.‌‌CIR‌‌‌2016‌‌Resolution‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌ 1. Importation‌‌of‌‌goods;‌  ‌
i. Cost‌  ‌deduction‌  ‌method‌  ‌— ‌ ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌manner‌  ‌of‌‌ 
The‌‌
  liability‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  withholding‌‌
  agent‌‌
  is‌‌ independent‌‌ from‌‌ that‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  2. Erroneous‌  ‌issuance‌  ‌of‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌invoice‌  ‌or‌  ‌receipt‌  ‌for‌‌  computing‌  ‌the‌  ‌taxpayer’s‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌liability‌  ‌by‌  ‌deducting‌‌ 
taxpayer.‌  ‌ VAT-exempt‌‌sales;‌  ‌ his‌‌
  costs‌‌
  and‌‌
  expenses‌‌ subject‌‌ to‌‌ VAT‌‌ from‌‌ his‌‌ taxable‌‌ 
3. Deemed‌‌sales‌‌of‌‌goods‌‌or‌‌properties.‌  ‌ sales‌  ‌and‌  ‌multiplying‌  ‌the‌  ‌resulting‌  ‌value‌  ‌added‌  ‌by‌‌ 
The‌‌   withholding‌‌   agent‌‌  cannot‌‌  be‌‌
  made‌‌   liable‌‌   for‌‌  the‌‌ tax‌‌ due‌‌ because‌‌ 
it‌  ‌is‌‌
  the‌‌
  taxpayer‌‌   who‌‌  earned‌‌  the‌‌
  income‌‌   subject‌‌   to‌‌
  withholding‌‌   tax.‌‌  12%.‌  ‌
CIR‌‌v.‌‌CA‌‌and‌‌COMASERCO‌  ‌
The‌  ‌withholding‌  ‌agent‌  ‌is‌  ‌liable‌‌   only‌‌  insofar‌‌   as‌‌  he‌‌
  failed‌‌   to‌‌
  perform‌‌  ii. Tax‌  ‌credit‌  ‌method‌  ‌or‌‌   invoice‌‌   method‌‌   — ‌‌the‌‌   input‌‌ 
his‌  ‌duty‌  ‌to‌  ‌withhold‌  ‌the‌  ‌tax‌‌
  and‌‌   remit‌‌  the‌‌  same‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  government.‌‌  WON‌  ‌COMASERCO‌  ‌was‌  ‌engaged‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌sale‌  ‌of‌  ‌services,‌  ‌and‌  ‌thus‌‌  taxes‌  ‌shifted‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌sellers‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌buyer‌  ‌are‌  ‌credited‌‌ 
The‌‌   liability‌‌  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  tax,‌‌  however,‌‌   remains‌‌   with‌‌   the‌‌ taxpayer‌‌ because‌‌  liable‌‌to‌‌pay‌‌VAT‌‌thereon.‌  ‌ against‌  ‌the‌  ‌buyer’s‌‌   output‌‌   taxes‌‌   when‌‌  he‌‌
  in‌‌
  turn‌‌   sells‌‌ 
the‌‌gain‌‌was‌‌realized‌‌and‌‌received‌‌by‌‌him.‌  ‌
YES‌. ‌‌‌Sec‌‌  105‌‌  of‌‌  the‌‌  NIRC‌‌  clarifies‌‌  that‌‌  even‌‌  a ‌‌non-stock,‌‌  non-profit,‌‌  the‌‌taxable‌‌goods,‌‌properties,‌‌or‌‌services.‌  ‌
3. VAT‌  ‌ organization‌‌  or‌‌
  government‌‌
  entity,‌‌
  is‌‌
  liable‌‌
  to‌‌
  pay‌‌ VAT‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ sale‌‌ of‌‌  f. Destination‌  ‌principle‌  ‌and‌  ‌cross‌  ‌border‌  ‌doctrine.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌The‌‌ 
 ‌ goods‌‌or‌‌services.‌  ‌ destination‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌goods‌  ‌determines‌  ‌taxation‌  ‌or‌  ‌exemption‌‌ 
from‌‌  tax.‌‌
  ‌Export‌‌ ‌sales‌‌ of‌‌ goods‌‌ are‌‌ zero-rated‌, ‌‌while‌‌ ‌imports‌‌ 
1.‌‌Nature‌‌and‌‌characteristics‌‌of‌‌VAT‌  ‌ Section‌  ‌108‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  NIRC‌‌
  defines‌‌
  the‌‌
  phrase‌‌
  "‌sale‌‌
  of‌‌
  services‌" ‌‌as‌‌
  the‌‌ 
"performance‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌  ‌kinds‌  ‌of‌  ‌services‌  ‌for‌  ‌others‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌fee,‌‌  of‌‌
  goods‌‌  are‌‌
  subject‌‌  to‌‌
  ‌12%‌‌   VAT‌. ‌‌Thus,‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌situs‌‌
  ‌of‌‌ taxation‌‌ is‌‌ 
a. Tax‌  ‌on‌  ‌value‌  ‌added.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌VAT‌  ‌is‌‌
  a ‌‌tax‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  value‌‌
  added‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌ remuneration‌‌or‌‌consideration."‌  ‌ where‌‌ the‌‌ goods‌‌ are‌‌ c
‌ onsumed‌. ‌‌As‌‌ for‌‌ services,‌‌ consumption‌‌ 
taxpayer‌  ‌arising‌  ‌from‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌sales‌  ‌of‌  ‌goods,‌  ‌properties,‌  ‌or‌‌  takes‌‌place‌‌where‌‌the‌‌service‌‌is‌‌performed.‌  ‌
Hence,‌‌  it‌‌
  is‌‌ immaterial‌‌ whether‌‌ the‌‌ primary‌‌ purpose‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌corporation‌‌ 
services‌‌during‌‌the‌‌quarter‌‌at‌‌the‌‌rate‌‌of‌‌0‌‌or‌‌12%.‌  ‌
indicates‌  ‌that‌  ‌it‌  ‌receives‌  ‌payments‌  ‌for‌  ‌services‌  ‌rendered‌  ‌to‌  ‌its‌‌ 
affiliates‌  ‌on‌  ‌a ‌ ‌reimbursement-on-cost‌  ‌basis‌  ‌only,‌  ‌without‌  ‌realizing‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 88‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

Cross‌‌ border‌‌ doctrine‌‌ mandates‌‌ that‌‌ no‌‌ VAT‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ imposed‌‌  a) He‌  ‌undertakes‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌transactions‌  ‌in‌  ‌goods,‌  ‌properties,‌  ‌or‌‌  Government‌‌   — ‌‌liable‌‌ to‌‌ VAT‌‌ if‌‌ engaged‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ sale‌‌ of‌‌ goods,‌‌ properties,‌‌ 
to‌‌
  form‌‌
  part‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  cost‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  goods‌‌ destined‌‌ for‌‌ consumption‌‌  services‌‌consumed‌‌or‌‌destined‌‌for‌‌consumption‌‌within‌‌PH;‌  ‌ or‌‌services‌‌in‌‌its‌‌proprietary‌‌capacity.‌  ‌
outside‌‌the‌‌territorial‌‌border‌‌of‌‌the‌‌taxing‌‌authority.‌  ‌ b) Such‌  ‌transactions‌  ‌are‌  ‌entered‌‌
  into‌‌
  ‌in‌‌
  the‌‌
  course‌‌
  of‌‌
  his‌‌
  trade‌‌  Non-stock,‌  ‌non-profit‌  ‌association‌  ‌or‌  ‌organization‌  ‌— ‌ ‌if‌  ‌not‌‌ 
CIR‌‌v.‌‌Burmeister‌‌and‌‌Wain‌‌Scandinavian‌‌Contractor‌‌Mindanao‌  ‌ or‌‌business‌;‌‌AND‌  ‌ organized‌‌   for‌‌  profit,‌‌   relies‌‌
  solely‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  mandatory‌‌ contributions‌‌ of‌‌ its‌‌ 

The‌  ‌Consortium’s‌‌   operation‌‌   and‌‌


  maintenance‌‌   of‌  ‌NAPOCOR’s‌‌   power‌‌  c) The‌‌  amount‌‌   of‌‌
  his‌‌
  gross‌‌
  sales‌‌   receipts‌‌ is‌‌ over‌‌ the‌‌ threshold‌‌  members‌‌
  or‌‌   for‌‌ its‌‌ operating‌‌ expenses,‌‌ and‌‌ performs‌‌ functions‌‌ exclusively‌‌ 
fixed‌‌by‌‌law‌‌or‌‌regulations.‌  ‌ for‌ t
‌ he‌ b
‌ enefit‌ ‌of‌‌its‌‌members,‌‌NOT‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌VAT.‌  ‌
barges‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌classified‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌single‌  ‌or‌  ‌isolated‌  ‌transaction.‌  ‌
As‌‌   the‌‌
  Court‌‌   held‌‌  in‌‌
  ‌CIR‌‌  v.‌‌
  American‌‌   Express‌, ‌‌the‌‌ ‌place‌‌ of‌‌ payment‌‌  An‌  ‌importer‌  ‌of‌  ‌goods‌, ‌ ‌whether‌  ‌or‌‌
  not‌‌
  made‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  course‌‌   of‌‌   or‌‌  BIR‌‌v.‌‌First‌‌E-Bank‌‌Tower‌‌Condo‌‌‌2020‌‌ 
  trade‌‌
is‌‌
  immaterial,‌‌   much‌‌   less‌‌   is‌‌
  the‌‌
  place‌‌
  where‌‌   the‌‌ output‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ service‌‌  re‌‌Condominium‌‌corporation‌  ‌
business,‌‌is‌‌also‌‌a‌‌taxable‌‌person.‌  ‌
is‌‌
  ultimately‌‌   used.‌  ‌An‌‌   essential‌‌ condition‌‌ for‌‌ entitlement‌‌ to‌‌ 0%‌‌ VAT‌ 
is‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌recipient‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌services‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person‌  ‌doing‌‌  Registration‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌VAT‌  ‌person‌  ‌is‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌a ‌ ‌requirement‌  ‌to‌  ‌make‌‌
  a ‌‌person‌‌  Certiorari‌  ‌or‌  ‌prohibition‌, ‌ ‌not‌  ‌declaratory‌  ‌relief‌, ‌ ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌proper‌‌ 
business‌‌   outside‌‌   the‌‌   Philippines.‌  ‌In‌‌  this‌‌  case,‌‌  the‌‌ recipient‌‌ of‌‌  liable‌  ‌to‌  ‌VAT.‌  ‌An‌  ‌existing‌  ‌VAT-registered‌  ‌person‌  ‌whose‌  ‌gross‌‌  remedy‌  ‌to‌  ‌assail‌  ‌the‌  ‌validity‌  ‌or‌  ‌constitutionality‌  ‌of‌  ‌executive‌‌ 
the‌‌   services‌‌   is‌‌
  the‌‌
  Consortium,‌‌   which‌‌  is‌‌
  doing‌‌  business‌‌ not‌‌ outside,‌‌  issuances.‌  ‌In‌  ‌Diaz‌  ‌v.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Secretary‌  ‌of‌  ‌Finance,‌  ‌et‌  ‌al.‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌Court,‌‌ 
sales/receipts‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌preceding‌  ‌year‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌  ‌exceed‌  ‌the‌  ‌VAT-exempt‌‌ 
nonetheless,‌  ‌held‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌petition‌  ‌for‌  ‌declaratory‌  ‌relief‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌‌ 
but‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌because‌  ‌it‌  ‌has‌  ‌a ‌ ‌15-year‌  ‌contract‌  ‌to‌‌  threshold‌‌of‌‌P3M‌,‌‌may‌‌opt‌‌to:‌  ‌ treated‌  ‌as‌  ‌one‌  ‌for‌  ‌prohibition‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌has‌  ‌far-reaching‌‌ 
operate‌  ‌and‌  ‌maintain‌  ‌NAPOCOR’s‌  ‌two‌  ‌100-MW‌  ‌power‌  ‌barges‌  ‌in‌‌ 
Mindanao.‌  ‌ a) Register‌‌as‌‌a‌‌Non-VAT;‌‌or‌  ‌ implications‌  ‌and‌  ‌raises‌  ‌questions‌  ‌that‌  ‌need‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌resolved‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌ 
public‌  ‌good;‌  ‌or‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌assailed‌  ‌act‌  ‌or‌  ‌acts‌  ‌of‌  ‌executive‌  ‌officials‌  ‌are‌‌ 
b) Avail‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌ ‌Optional‌‌ Registration‌‌ for‌‌ VAT‌‌ of‌‌ Exempt‌‌ Person‌‌  alleged‌‌to‌‌have‌‌usurped‌‌legislative‌‌authority.‌  ‌
Nevertheless,‌‌   in‌‌
  seeking‌‌   a ‌‌refund‌‌
  of‌‌ its‌‌ excess‌‌ output‌‌ tax,‌‌ respondent‌‌ 
relied‌‌
  on‌‌
  VAT‌‌
  Ruling‌‌
  No.‌‌   003-99,‌‌   which‌‌   reconfirmed‌‌  BIR‌‌  Ruling‌‌
  No.‌‌  under‌‌ Sec‌‌ 236(H)‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ NIRC,‌‌ subject‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ condition‌‌ that‌‌ once‌‌ 
availed‌  ‌of,‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌‌
  cancel‌‌
  the‌‌
  VAT‌‌
  registration‌‌  RMC‌‌No.‌‌65-2012‌‌is‌‌Invalid‌  ‌
023-95‌  ‌“insofar‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌held‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌services‌  ‌being‌  ‌rendered‌  ‌by‌‌ 
BWSCMI‌  ‌is‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌at‌  ‌zero‌  ‌percent‌  ‌(0%).”‌  ‌Respondent’s‌‌  for‌‌the‌‌next‌3 ‌ ‌‌years‌. ‌ ‌ A‌  ‌condominium‌  ‌corporation‌  ‌is‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌engaged‌  ‌in‌  ‌trade‌  ‌or‌‌ 
reliance‌‌on‌‌these‌‌BIR‌‌rulings‌‌binds‌‌petitioner.‌  ‌ business‌. ‌‌The‌‌  collection‌‌
  of‌‌
  association‌‌   dues,‌‌
  membership‌‌   fees,‌‌
  and‌‌ 
A‌‌taxable‌‌person‌‌may‌‌conduct‌‌business‌‌as‌  ‌
other‌  ‌assessments/charges‌  ‌is‌  ‌purely‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌benefit‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
CIR‌‌v.‌‌American‌‌Express‌  ‌ a) An‌‌individual;‌  ‌
condominium‌  ‌owners.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌necessary‌  ‌incident‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌to‌‌ 
As‌  ‌a ‌ ‌general‌  ‌rule,‌  ‌the‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌system‌  ‌uses‌  ‌the‌  ‌destination‌  ‌principle.‌  ‌ b) Estate‌‌or‌‌trust;‌  ‌ effectively‌  ‌oversee,‌‌
  maintain,‌‌   or‌‌  even‌‌
  improve‌‌   the‌‌
  common‌‌   areas‌‌  of‌‌ 
However,‌  ‌our‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌law‌  ‌itself‌  ‌provides‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌clear‌  exception‌, ‌ ‌under‌‌  the‌‌condominium‌‌as‌‌well‌‌as‌‌its‌‌governance.‌  ‌
c) Partnership;‌  ‌
which‌‌   the‌‌
  supply‌‌
  of‌‌
  service‌‌   shall‌‌  be‌‌
  ‌zero-rated‌‌   ‌when‌‌
  the‌‌
  following‌‌ 
requirements‌‌are‌‌met:‌   d) Joint‌‌venture;‌  ‌ As‌  ‌established‌  ‌in‌  ‌Yamane‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌expenditures‌  ‌incurred‌  ‌by‌‌ 
condominium‌  ‌corporations‌  ‌on‌  ‌behalf‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌condominium‌  ‌owners‌‌ 
1) the‌‌service‌‌is‌‌performed‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Philippines;‌  ‌ e) Corporation;‌  ‌ are‌  ‌not‌  ‌intended‌  ‌to‌  ‌generate‌  ‌revenue‌  ‌nor‌  ‌equate‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌cost‌  ‌of‌‌ 
2) the‌  ‌service‌  ‌falls‌  ‌under‌  ‌any‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌categories‌  ‌provided‌  ‌in‌‌  f) Cooperative;‌‌or‌  ‌ doing‌  ‌business.‌  ‌Association‌  ‌dues,‌  ‌membership‌  ‌fees,‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌‌ 
Section‌‌102(b)‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Tax‌‌Code;‌‌and‌  ‌ assessments/charges‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌arise‌  ‌from‌  ‌transactions‌  ‌involving‌  ‌the‌‌ 
g) Association.‌  ‌ sale,‌‌  barter,‌‌
  or‌‌
  exchange‌‌  of‌‌
  goods‌‌
  or‌‌
  property.‌‌ Nor‌‌ are‌‌ they‌‌ generated‌‌ 
3) it‌  ‌is‌  ‌paid‌  ‌for‌  ‌in‌  ‌acceptable‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌currency‌  ‌that‌  ‌is‌‌ 
Husband‌  ‌and‌  ‌Wife‌  ‌— ‌ ‌treated‌  ‌as‌  ‌separate‌  ‌taxpayers.‌  ‌However,‌  ‌the‌‌  by‌‌the‌‌performance‌‌of‌‌services.‌‌As‌‌such,‌‌they‌‌are‌n ‌ ot‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌VAT‌. ‌ ‌
accounted‌  ‌for‌  ‌in‌  ‌accordance‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌regulations‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Bangko‌‌Sentral‌‌ng‌‌Pilipinas.‌   ‌ ‌ aggregation‌  ‌rule‌  ‌for‌  ‌each‌  ‌spouse‌  ‌shall‌  ‌apply,‌  ‌which‌  ‌means‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Section‌  ‌57‌  ‌of‌  ‌RA‌  ‌8424‌  ‌directs‌  ‌that‌  ‌only‌  ‌income,‌  ‌be‌  ‌it‌  ‌active‌  ‌or‌‌ 
Since‌  ‌respondent’s‌  ‌services‌  ‌meet‌  ‌these‌  ‌requirements,‌  ‌they‌  ‌are‌‌  taxable‌  ‌sales‌  ‌by‌  ‌each‌  ‌spouse‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌added‌  ‌together‌  ‌to‌  ‌determine‌‌ 
passive,‌  ‌earned‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌payor-corporation‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌‌ 
zero-rated.‌  ‌ whether‌‌   he/she‌‌   has‌‌  exceeded‌‌ the‌‌ general‌‌ threshold‌‌ prescribed‌‌ by‌‌ law.‌‌ If‌  withholding‌‌tax‌. ‌ ‌
he/she‌  ‌does,‌  ‌then‌  ‌register‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌VAT‌  ‌person;‌  ‌otherwise,‌‌
  subject‌‌   ‌3%‌‌ 
  to‌‌
2.‌‌Persons‌‌liable‌‌to‌‌VAT‌  ‌ percentage‌‌tax‌‌‌under‌‌Sec‌‌116‌. ‌ ‌ Subdivisions‌‌
  or‌‌
  Villages‌‌
  Homeowners‌‌   — ‌‌Sec‌‌ 18‌‌ of‌‌ ‌RA‌‌ 
  Associations‌‌
A‌‌person‌‌may‌‌be‌‌characterized‌‌as‌‌a‌‌taxable‌‌person,‌‌if‌  ‌ Joint‌‌   Venture‌‌
  — ‌‌An‌‌ unincorporated‌‌ JV‌‌ engaged‌‌ in‌‌ construction‌‌ activity‌‌  9904‌  ‌provides‌‌  that‌‌  ‌association‌‌  dues‌‌  and‌‌  income‌‌  derived‌‌  from‌‌  rentals‌‌ 
or‌‌ in‌‌ energy-related‌‌ projects,‌‌ ‌although‌‌ exempt‌‌ from‌‌ income‌‌ tax‌, ‌‌is‌‌ liable‌‌  of‌‌
  property‌‌
  may‌‌ be‌‌ ‌exempted‌‌ ‌from‌‌ income‌‌ tax,‌‌ VAT,‌‌ and‌‌ percentage‌‌ tax,‌‌ 
to‌‌VAT.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 89‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

provided‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌association‌  ‌complements,‌  ‌supports,‌‌


  and‌‌
  strengthens‌‌  2. Transactions‌‌Deemed‌‌Sale‌‌subject‌‌to‌1
‌ 2%‌‌VAT‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌107[B]‌);‌  ‌ The‌‌  ‌excise‌‌
  tax‌, ‌‌if‌‌ any,‌‌ on‌‌ such‌‌ goods‌‌ or‌‌ properties‌‌ shall‌‌ form‌‌ part‌‌ 
the‌‌LGU‌‌in‌‌providing‌‌vital‌‌services‌‌to‌‌their‌‌members.‌  ‌ of‌‌the‌‌gross‌‌selling‌‌price‌  ‌
3. Sale‌  ‌or‌  ‌Exchange‌  ‌of‌  ‌Services‌  ‌and‌  ‌Use‌  ‌or‌  ‌Lease‌  ‌of‌  ‌properties‌‌ 
1) The‌‌
  association‌‌  must‌‌
  be‌‌
  duly-constituted‌‌ as‌‌ defined‌‌ under‌‌ SEC‌  subject‌‌to‌1 ‌ 2%‌‌‌VAT‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌108[A]‌);‌  ‌ ii.‌‌Transactions‌‌deemed‌‌sale‌  ‌
3(b)‌‌of‌‌RA‌‌9904;‌  ‌
4. Sale‌‌of‌‌goods‌‌or‌‌properties‌‌subject‌‌to‌0
‌ %‌‌‌VAT‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌106[A][2]‌);‌  ‌ 1) Transfer,‌  ‌use‌  ‌or‌  ‌consumption‌‌
  not‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  course‌‌  of‌‌  business‌‌   of‌‌ 
2) Certification‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌LGU‌  ‌identifying‌  ‌the‌  ‌basic‌  ‌services‌‌ 
5. Sale‌  ‌or‌  ‌Exchange‌  ‌of‌  ‌Services‌  ‌and‌  ‌Use‌  ‌or‌  ‌Lease‌  ‌of‌  ‌properties‌‌  goods‌  ‌or‌  ‌properties‌  ‌originally‌  ‌intended‌  ‌for‌  ‌sale‌  ‌or‌  ‌for‌  ‌use‌‌
  in‌‌ 
rendered‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌association‌  ‌and‌  ‌therein‌  ‌stating‌  ‌its‌  ‌lack‌  ‌of‌‌ 
subject‌‌to‌0 ‌ %‌‌‌VAT‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌108[B]‌);‌  ‌ the‌‌course‌‌of‌‌business;‌  ‌
resources‌‌to‌‌render‌‌such‌‌services‌. ‌ ‌
2) Distribution‌‌or‌‌transfer‌‌to:‌  ‌
Recreational‌‌   or‌‌ sports‌‌ club‌‌ — ‌‌‌Membership‌‌ fees,‌‌ assessment‌‌ dues,‌‌  6. Importation‌‌of‌‌goods‌‌(‌Sec‌‌107‌).‌  ‌
and‌‌
  other‌‌
  fees‌‌
  of‌‌  similar‌‌   nature‌‌
  only‌‌ constitute‌‌ contributions‌‌ to‌‌ and/or‌‌  a) Shareholders‌  ‌or‌  ‌investors‌  ‌as‌  ‌share‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌profits‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
a.‌‌On‌‌sale‌‌of‌‌goods‌‌or‌‌properties‌  ‌
replenishment‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌funds‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌maintenance‌  ‌and‌  ‌operations‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  VAT-registered‌‌persons;‌‌or‌  ‌
facilities‌‌
  offered‌‌   by‌‌
  recreational‌‌ clubs‌‌ to‌‌ their‌‌ exclusive‌‌ members.‌‌ They‌‌  To‌‌be‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌VAT,‌‌the‌‌sale‌‌of‌g
‌ oods‌‌‌must‌‌be‌  ‌ b) Creditors‌‌in‌‌payment‌‌of‌‌debt;‌  ‌
represent‌‌   funds‌‌   "‌held‌‌   in‌‌
  trust‌" ‌‌by‌‌
  these‌‌ clubs‌‌ to‌‌ defray‌‌ their‌‌ operating‌‌  a) An‌‌actual‌‌or‌‌deemed‌‌sale‌‌for‌‌a‌‌valuable‌‌consideration;‌  ‌ 3) Consignment‌‌   ‌of‌‌
  goods‌‌
  if‌‌
  actual‌‌
  sale‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  made‌‌
  within‌‌
  sixty‌‌ 
and‌‌general‌‌costs‌‌and‌‌hence,‌o ‌ nly‌‌constitute‌‌infusion‌‌of‌‌capital‌. ‌ ‌ b) Undertaken‌‌in‌‌the‌‌course‌‌of‌‌trade‌‌or‌‌business;‌  ‌ (60)‌‌days‌‌‌following‌‌the‌‌date‌‌such‌‌goods‌‌were‌‌consigned;‌‌and‌  ‌
Association‌‌of‌‌Non-Profit‌‌Clubs,‌‌Inc.‌‌v.‌‌BIR‌‌‌2019‌  ‌ c) For‌‌the‌‌use‌‌or‌‌consumption‌‌in‌‌PH;‌‌AND‌  ‌ 4) Retirement‌  ‌from‌  ‌or‌  ‌cessation‌  ‌of‌  ‌business,‌  ‌with‌  ‌respect‌  ‌to‌‌ 
In‌  ‌fine,‌  ‌for‌‌
  as‌‌
  long‌‌
  as‌‌
  these‌‌
  membership‌‌
  fees,‌‌
  assessment‌‌
  dues,‌‌
  and‌‌  d) Not‌  ‌exempt‌  ‌from‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌under‌  ‌Sec‌  ‌109‌  ‌of‌  ‌NIRC,‌  ‌special‌  ‌law,‌‌
  or‌‌  inventories‌  ‌of‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌goods‌  ‌existing‌  ‌as‌  ‌of‌‌
  such‌‌
  retirement‌‌
  or‌‌ 
the‌‌like‌‌are‌‌   ‌ international‌‌agreement.‌  ‌ cessation.‌  ‌

1. treated‌  ‌as‌  ‌collections‌  ‌by‌  ‌recreational‌  ‌clubs‌  ‌from‌  ‌their‌‌  With‌‌respect‌‌to‌‌sale‌‌or‌‌exchange‌‌of‌r‌ eal‌‌property‌  ‌ Here,‌  ‌the‌  ‌seller‌  ‌is‌  ‌also‌‌
  the‌‌  buyer‌‌  and‌‌
  no‌‌
  valuable‌‌   consideration‌‌   is‌‌ 
members‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌‌   inherent‌‌
  consequence‌‌   of‌‌
  their‌‌
  membership,‌‌  thus‌‌
  paid.‌‌   The‌‌
  rationale‌‌   is‌‌
  to‌‌ recapture‌‌ the‌‌ VAT‌‌ that‌‌ was‌‌ claimed‌‌ as‌‌ 
a) The‌  ‌seller‌  ‌executes‌  ‌a ‌ ‌deed‌  ‌of‌  ‌sale,‌  ‌barter,‌  ‌or‌  ‌exchange,‌‌ 
and‌‌   ‌ input‌‌tax‌‌at‌‌the‌‌time‌‌of‌‌purchase.‌  ‌
assignment‌‌or‌‌conveyance,‌‌or‌‌contract‌‌to‌‌sell,‌‌of‌‌real‌‌property;‌  ‌
2. are,‌  ‌by‌  ‌nature,‌  ‌intended‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌maintenance,‌  ‌preservation,‌‌ 
b) The‌‌real‌‌property‌‌is‌‌located‌‌in‌‌PH;‌  ‌ In‌‌
  the‌‌
  course‌‌   of‌‌  trade‌‌   or‌‌
  business‌‌   — ‌‌means‌‌  the‌‌
  regular‌‌
  conduct‌‌ 
and‌‌upkeep‌‌of‌‌the‌‌clubs'‌‌general‌‌operations‌‌and‌‌facilities,‌‌   ‌
or‌  ‌pursuit‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌commercial‌  ‌or‌  ‌an‌  ‌economic‌  ‌activity,‌  ‌including‌‌ 
c) The‌‌  seller‌‌ or‌‌ transferor‌‌ is‌‌ engaged‌‌ in‌‌ real‌‌ estate‌‌ business‌‌ either‌‌ 
then‌  ‌these‌  ‌fees‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌classified‌  ‌as‌  ‌"the‌  ‌income‌  ‌of‌  ‌recreational‌‌  transactions‌  i‌ ncidental‌  ‌thereto‌, ‌ ‌by‌  ‌any‌  ‌person‌  ‌regardless‌  ‌of‌‌ 
clubs‌‌   from‌‌   whatever‌‌  source"‌‌ that‌‌ are‌‌ "subject‌‌ to‌‌ income‌‌ tax."‌‌ Instead,‌‌  as‌‌a‌‌real‌‌estate‌‌dealer,‌‌developer,‌‌or‌‌lessor;‌  ‌
whether‌‌   or‌‌
  not‌‌  the‌‌  person‌‌ engaged‌‌ therein‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌non-stock,‌‌ nonprofit‌‌ 
they‌  ‌only‌  ‌form‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌capital‌  ‌from‌  ‌which‌  ‌no‌  ‌income‌‌   tax‌‌
  may‌‌
  be‌‌  d) The‌‌  real‌‌
  property‌‌   is‌‌
  held‌‌
  primarily‌‌   for‌‌
  sale‌‌
  or‌‌
  for‌‌
  lease‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌  private‌  ‌organization‌  ‌(irrespective‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌disposition‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌net‌‌ 
collected‌‌or‌‌imposed.‌  ‌
ordinary‌  ‌course‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌trade‌  ‌or‌  ‌business‌, ‌ ‌or‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌an‌‌  income‌‌   and‌‌   whether‌‌   or‌‌
  not‌‌
  it‌‌
  sells‌‌
  exclusively‌‌ to‌‌ members‌‌ or‌‌ their‌‌ 
In‌‌
  the‌‌
  same‌‌  way,‌‌   membership‌‌   fees,‌‌ assessment‌‌ dues,‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ like‌‌ are‌‌  ordinary‌‌   asset‌‌ used‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ trade‌‌ or‌‌ business‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ VAT‌‌ taxpayer‌‌  guests),‌‌or‌‌government‌‌entity.‌  ‌
not‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌because‌  ‌in‌  ‌collecting‌  ‌such‌  ‌fees,‌  ‌the‌  ‌club‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌‌  as‌‌an‌‌incident‌‌to‌‌his‌‌VAT-taxable‌‌activity;‌‌AND‌  ‌
selling‌‌its‌‌service‌‌‌to‌‌the‌‌members.‌  ‌ The‌‌  ‌rule‌‌
  of‌‌  regularity,‌ ‌to‌‌ the‌‌ contrary‌‌ notwithstanding,‌‌ services‌‌ 
e) Not‌  ‌exempt‌  ‌from‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌under‌  ‌Sec‌  ‌109‌  ‌of‌  ‌NIRC,‌  ‌special‌  ‌law,‌‌
  or‌‌ 
rendered‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  Philippines‌‌
  by‌nonresident‌‌
   foreign‌‌ persons‌‌ ‌shall‌‌ 
international‌‌agreement.‌  ‌
Importer‌  ‌— ‌ ‌VAT‌  ‌is‌  ‌properly‌  ‌and‌‌  legally‌‌
  due‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  local‌‌  buyers‌‌
  who‌‌  be‌‌considered‌‌as‌‌being‌‌rendered‌‌in‌‌the‌‌course‌‌of‌‌trade‌‌or‌‌business‌. ‌ ‌
are‌‌
  the‌‌
  importers‌‌  and‌‌   should‌‌
  no‌‌ longer‌‌ be‌‌ imposed‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ PH‌‌ branch‌‌ of‌‌  i.‌‌Tax‌‌base:‌‌gross‌‌selling‌‌price‌  ‌
iii.‌‌Change‌‌or‌‌cessation‌‌of‌‌status‌‌as‌‌VAT-registered‌‌person‌  ‌
the‌‌seller‌‌based‌‌outside‌‌PH.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌term‌  ‌"‌gross‌  ‌selling‌  ‌price‌" ‌‌means‌‌   the‌‌
  total‌‌
  amount‌‌   of‌‌
  money‌‌ 
A‌‌
  VAT-registered‌‌   person‌‌   whose‌‌   registration‌‌   has‌‌
  been‌‌  cancelled‌‌ due‌‌ 
3.‌‌Imposition‌‌of‌‌VAT‌  ‌ or‌‌
  its‌‌
  equivalent‌‌   which‌‌
  the‌‌
  purchaser‌‌   pays‌‌  or‌‌ is‌‌ obligated‌‌ to‌‌ pay‌‌ to‌‌ 
to‌‌
  retirement‌‌   from‌‌   or‌‌  cessation‌‌ of‌‌ business,‌‌ or‌‌ due‌‌ to‌‌ changes‌‌ in‌‌ or‌‌ 
the‌  ‌seller‌  ‌in‌  ‌consideration‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌sale,‌  ‌barter‌  ‌or‌  ‌exchange‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
What‌‌are‌‌the‌‌transactions‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌VAT?‌  ‌ cessation‌‌   of‌‌
  status‌‌   under‌‌   Sec.‌‌
  106‌‌  (C)‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Tax‌‌
  Code‌‌   may,‌‌ ‌within‌‌ 
goods‌‌or‌‌properties,‌‌excluding‌‌the‌‌VAT.‌‌   ‌
two‌‌   (2)‌‌
  years‌‌   from‌‌   the‌‌
  date‌‌
  of‌‌
  cancellation,‌‌   apply‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ issuance‌‌ 
1. Sale‌‌of‌‌goods‌‌or‌‌properties‌‌subject‌‌to‌1
‌ 2%‌‌‌VAT‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌106[A]‌);‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 90‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

of‌‌
  ‌tax‌‌ credit‌‌ certificate‌‌ for‌‌ any‌‌ unused‌‌ input‌‌ tax‌‌ which‌‌ he‌‌ may‌‌ use‌‌  4. warehousing‌‌services;‌‌   ‌
services‌  ‌rendered‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌fee‌  ‌even‌  ‌on‌  ‌reimbursement-on-cost‌‌ 
in‌‌payment‌‌of‌‌his‌‌other‌‌internal‌‌revenue‌‌taxes.‌  ‌ basis‌  ‌only‌  ‌and‌  ‌without‌  ‌realizing‌‌  profit‌‌
  are‌‌
  also‌‌
  subject‌‌
  to‌‌
  VAT‌. ‌ ‌
5. lessors‌‌or‌‌distributors‌‌of‌‌cinematographic‌‌films;‌‌   ‌
He‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌refund‌  ‌if‌  ‌he‌  ‌has‌‌
  no‌‌
  internal‌‌
  revenue‌‌
  tax‌‌  The‌‌case,‌‌however,‌‌is‌‌not‌‌applicable‌‌to‌‌the‌‌present‌‌case.‌  ‌
6. persons‌  ‌engaged‌  ‌in‌  ‌milling,‌  ‌processing,‌  ‌manufacturing‌  ‌or‌‌ 
liabilities‌‌against‌‌which‌‌the‌‌tax‌‌credit‌‌certificate‌‌may‌‌be‌‌utilized.‌‌   ‌ Here,‌  ‌Sony‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌  ‌render‌  ‌any‌  ‌service‌  ‌to‌  ‌SIS‌  ‌at‌  ‌all.‌  ‌The‌  ‌services‌‌ 
repacking‌‌goods‌‌for‌‌others;‌‌   ‌
The‌  ‌date‌‌
  of‌‌
  cancellation‌‌   is‌‌
  the‌‌
  date‌‌
  of‌‌
  issuance‌‌   of‌‌
  tax‌‌
  clearance‌‌
  by‌‌  rendered‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌advertising‌  ‌companies,‌  ‌paid‌  ‌for‌  ‌by‌  ‌Sony‌  ‌using‌  ‌SIS‌‌ 
7. proprietors,‌‌
  operators‌‌  or‌‌
  keepers‌‌ of‌‌ hotels,‌‌ motels,‌‌ resthouses,‌‌  dole-out,‌‌  ‌were‌‌   for‌‌
  Sony‌‌  and‌‌   not‌‌
  SIS.‌‌
  SIS‌‌
  just‌‌
  gave‌‌ assistance‌‌ to‌‌ Sony‌‌ 
the‌  ‌BIR,‌  ‌after‌  ‌full‌  ‌settlement‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌  ‌tax‌  ‌liabilities‌  ‌relative‌  ‌to‌‌ 
pension‌‌houses,‌‌inns,‌‌resorts;‌‌   ‌ in‌‌
  the‌‌
  amount‌‌   equivalent‌‌   to‌‌ the‌‌ latter's‌‌ advertising‌‌ expense‌‌ but‌‌ never‌‌ 
cessation‌‌   of‌‌
  business‌‌   or‌‌ change‌‌ of‌‌ status‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ concerned‌‌ taxpayer.‌‌ 
received‌‌any‌‌goods,‌‌properties‌‌or‌‌service‌‌from‌‌Sony.‌  ‌
(‌Sec.‌‌4.112-1.[b]‌‌RR‌‌13-18‌) ‌ ‌ 8. proprietors‌  ‌or‌  ‌operators‌  ‌of‌  ‌restaurants,‌  ‌refreshment‌  ‌parlors,‌‌ 
cafes‌‌and‌‌other‌‌eating‌‌places,‌‌including‌‌clubs‌‌and‌‌caterers;‌‌   ‌ Diaz,‌‌et‌‌al.‌‌v.‌‌Secretary‌‌of‌‌Finance,‌‌et‌‌al.‌‌2
‌ 011‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌re‌‌Toll‌‌Fees‌  ‌
b.‌‌On‌‌importation‌‌of‌‌goods‌  ‌
9. dealers‌‌in‌‌securities;‌‌   ‌ May‌‌‌toll‌‌fees‌‌‌collected‌‌by‌‌tollway‌‌operators‌‌be‌‌subjected‌‌to‌‌VAT?‌  ‌
There‌‌   shall‌‌   be‌‌
  levied,‌‌
  assessed‌‌   and‌‌
  collected‌‌  on‌‌ every‌‌ importation‌‌ 
of‌‌
  goods‌‌   a ‌‌VAT‌‌   equivalent‌‌   to‌twelve‌‌
    percent‌‌   (12%)‌‌   ‌based‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌  10. lending‌‌investors;‌‌   ‌
YES‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌law‌  ‌imposes‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌on‌  ‌"‌all‌  ‌kinds‌‌  of‌‌  services‌" ‌‌rendered‌‌  in‌‌ 
total‌  ‌value‌  ‌used‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌Bureau‌  ‌of‌  ‌Customs‌  ‌in‌  ‌determining‌  ‌tariff‌‌  11. transportation‌  ‌contractors‌  ‌on‌  ‌their‌  ‌transport‌  ‌of‌  ‌goods‌  ‌or‌‌  the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌fee,‌  ‌including‌  ‌those‌  ‌specified‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌list.‌  ‌The‌‌ 
and‌  ‌customs‌  ‌duties,‌  ‌plus‌  ‌customs‌  ‌duties,‌  ‌excise‌  ‌taxes,‌‌   if‌‌
  any,‌‌
  and‌‌  cargoes,‌‌   including‌‌   persons‌‌  who‌‌
  transport‌‌
  goods‌‌   or‌‌ cargoes‌‌ for‌‌  enumeration‌‌   of‌‌
  affected‌‌   services‌‌   is‌‌  ‌not‌‌
  exclusive‌. ‌‌‌Tollway‌‌   fees‌‌   are‌‌ 
other‌  ‌charges,‌  ‌such‌  ‌tax‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌paid‌  ‌by‌‌
  the‌‌
  importer‌‌   prior‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌  hire‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌domestic‌  ‌common‌  ‌carriers‌  ‌by‌  ‌land‌  ‌relative‌  ‌to‌‌  NOT‌  ‌taxes.‌  ‌Indeed,‌  ‌they‌  ‌are‌‌   not‌‌  assessed‌‌   and‌‌
  collected‌‌  by‌‌   the‌‌
  BIR‌‌ 
release‌‌of‌‌such‌‌goods‌‌from‌‌customs‌‌custody‌.  ‌‌ ‌ and‌‌do‌‌not‌‌go‌‌to‌‌the‌‌general‌‌coffers‌‌of‌‌the‌‌government.‌  ‌
their‌‌transport‌‌of‌‌goods‌‌or‌‌cargoes;‌‌   ‌
Transfer‌  ‌of‌  ‌Goods‌  ‌by‌  ‌Tax-exempt‌  ‌Persons.‌  ‌(‌Technical‌‌  12. common‌  ‌carriers‌  ‌by‌  ‌air‌  ‌and‌  ‌sea‌  ‌relative‌  ‌to‌  ‌their‌  ‌transport‌  ‌of‌‌  Consequently,‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌on‌  ‌tollway‌  ‌operations‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌really‌  ‌a ‌ ‌tax‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Importation‌) ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌In‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌‌
  tax-free‌‌
  importation‌‌   of‌‌
  goods‌‌
  into‌‌  passengers,‌‌   goods‌‌
  or‌‌
  cargoes‌‌   from‌‌ one‌‌ place‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ Philippines‌‌  tollway‌‌user,‌‌but‌‌on‌‌the‌‌tollway‌‌operator.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌by‌  ‌persons,‌  ‌entities‌  ‌or‌  ‌agencies‌  ‌exempt‌  ‌from‌  ‌tax‌‌  to‌‌another‌‌place‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Philippines;‌‌   ‌
where‌‌   such‌‌ goods‌‌ are‌‌ ‌subsequently‌‌ ‌sold,‌‌ transferred‌‌ or‌‌ exchanged‌‌  CIR‌‌v.‌‌SM‌‌Prime‌‌Holdings,‌‌Inc.‌‌2
‌ 010‌  ‌
in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌to‌  ‌non-exempt‌  ‌persons‌  ‌or‌  ‌entities,‌  ‌the‌‌  13. sales‌  ‌of‌  ‌electricity‌  ‌by‌  ‌generation‌‌
  companies,‌‌
  transmission‌‌
  by‌‌ 
WON‌  ‌the‌  ‌gross‌  ‌receipts‌  ‌derived‌  ‌by‌  ‌operators‌  ‌or‌  ‌proprietors‌  ‌of‌‌ 
purchasers,‌  ‌transferees‌  ‌or‌  ‌recipients‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌the‌‌  any‌  ‌entity,‌  ‌and‌  ‌distribution‌  ‌companies,‌  ‌including‌  ‌electric‌‌  cinema/theater‌‌houses‌‌from‌a ‌ dmission‌‌tickets‌‌‌are‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌VAT.‌  ‌
importers‌  ‌thereof,‌  ‌who‌  ‌shall‌‌  be‌‌  liable‌‌
  for‌‌
  any‌‌
  internal‌‌
  revenue‌‌   tax‌‌  cooperatives;‌‌   ‌
on‌‌such‌‌importation.‌‌   ‌ NO‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌legislative‌  ‌intent‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌to‌  ‌impose‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌on‌  ‌persons‌‌ 
14. services‌  ‌of‌  ‌franchise‌  ‌grantees‌  ‌of‌  ‌electric‌  ‌utilities,‌  ‌telephone‌‌ 
already‌‌covered‌‌by‌‌the‌‌amusement‌‌tax.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌tax‌  ‌due‌  ‌on‌  ‌such‌  ‌importation‌  ‌shall‌  ‌constitute‌  ‌a ‌ ‌lien‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌  and‌  ‌telegraph,‌  ‌radio‌  ‌and‌  ‌television‌  ‌broadcasting‌‌   and‌‌   all‌‌
  other‌‌ 
goods‌‌   superior‌‌   to‌‌
  all‌‌
  charges‌‌
  or‌‌
  liens‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  goods,‌‌
  irrespective‌‌ of‌‌  franchise‌‌   grantees‌‌  except‌‌   those‌‌
  under‌‌  Section‌‌  119‌‌  of‌‌
  this‌‌  Code‌‌  To‌  ‌hold‌  ‌otherwise‌  ‌would‌  ‌impose‌  ‌an‌  ‌unreasonable‌  ‌burden‌  ‌on‌‌ 
the‌‌possessor‌‌thereof.‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌107‌‌NIRC‌) ‌ ‌ and‌‌   ‌ cinema/theater‌  ‌houses‌  ‌operators‌  ‌or‌  ‌proprietors,‌  ‌who‌  ‌would‌  ‌be‌‌ 
paying‌  ‌an‌  ‌additional‌  ‌10%‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌on‌  ‌top‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌30%‌  ‌amusement‌  ‌tax‌‌ 
c.‌‌On‌‌sale‌‌of‌‌services‌‌and‌‌use‌‌or‌‌lease‌‌of‌‌properties‌  ‌ 15. non-life‌  ‌insurance‌  ‌companies‌  ‌(except‌  ‌their‌  ‌crop‌  ‌insurances),‌‌  imposed‌‌by‌‌Section‌‌140‌‌of‌‌the‌‌LGC‌‌of‌‌1991,‌‌or‌‌a‌‌total‌‌of‌‌40%‌‌tax.‌  ‌
including‌  ‌surety,‌  ‌fidelity,‌  ‌indemnity‌  ‌and‌  ‌bonding‌  ‌companies;‌‌ 
The‌  ‌phrase‌  ‌'‌sale‌  ‌or‌  ‌exchange‌  ‌of‌  ‌services‌' ‌‌means‌‌   the‌‌   performance‌‌  of‌‌  and‌‌   ‌ Tambunting‌‌Pawnshop,‌‌Inc.‌‌v.‌‌CIR‌‌2
‌ 010‌  ‌
all‌‌
  kinds‌‌ of‌‌ services‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ Philippines‌‌ for‌‌ others‌‌ for‌‌ a ‌‌fee,‌‌ remuneration‌‌ 
or‌‌consideration,‌‌including‌‌those‌‌performed‌‌or‌‌rendered‌‌by‌  ‌ 16. similar‌  ‌services‌‌   regardless‌‌   of‌‌
  whether‌‌   or‌‌  not‌‌
  the‌‌
  performance‌‌  WON‌  ‌pawnshops‌  ‌are‌  ‌liable‌  ‌to‌  ‌pay‌  ‌VAT.‌  ‌YES‌. ‌ ‌R.A.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌9238‌  ‌finally‌‌ 
thereof‌  ‌calls‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌or‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌  physical‌‌  or‌‌
  mental‌‌  classified‌‌pawnshops‌‌as‌‌Other‌‌Non-bank‌‌Financial‌‌Intermediaries.‌  ‌
1. construction‌‌and‌‌service‌‌contractors;‌‌   ‌ faculties.‌  ‌
Tax‌‌base:‌‌gross‌‌receipt‌  ‌
2. stock,‌  ‌real‌  ‌estate,‌  ‌commercial,‌  ‌customs‌  ‌and‌  ‌immigration‌‌  CIR‌‌v.‌‌Sony‌‌Phil.,‌‌Inc.‌‌2
‌ 010‌  ‌
brokers;‌‌   ‌ The‌‌   '‌gross‌‌
  term‌‌   receipts‌' ‌‌means‌‌ the‌‌ total‌‌ amount‌‌ of‌‌ money‌‌ or‌‌ its‌‌ 
In‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌CIR‌  ‌v.‌  ‌CA‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌had‌  ‌the‌  ‌occasion‌  ‌to‌  ‌rule‌  ‌that‌‌ 
3. lessors‌‌of‌‌property,‌‌whether‌‌personal‌‌or‌‌real;‌‌   ‌ equivalent‌  ‌representing‌  ‌the‌  ‌contract‌  ‌price,‌  ‌compensation,‌  ‌service‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 91‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

fee,‌  ‌rental‌  ‌or‌  ‌royalty,‌  ‌including‌  ‌the‌  ‌amount‌  ‌charged‌  ‌for‌  ‌materials‌‌  c) whose‌  ‌export‌  ‌sales‌  ‌exceed‌  ‌seventy‌  ‌percent‌  ‌(70%)‌  ‌of‌‌  xxxx‌  ‌
supplied‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌services‌  ‌and‌  ‌deposits‌  ‌and‌  ‌advanced‌  ‌payments‌‌  total‌‌annual‌‌production;‌  ‌
b. Effectively‌  ‌Zero-Rated‌  ‌Transaction.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Sales‌  ‌to‌  ‌persons‌  ‌or‌‌ 
actually‌‌   or‌‌  constructively‌‌   received‌‌   during‌‌ the‌‌ taxable‌‌ quarter‌‌ for‌‌  4) Those‌  ‌considered‌  ‌export‌  ‌sales‌  ‌under‌  ‌EO‌  ‌No.‌  ‌226,‌  ‌otherwise‌‌ 
entities‌  ‌whose‌  ‌exemption‌  ‌under‌  ‌special‌  ‌laws‌  ‌or‌  ‌international‌‌ 
the‌  ‌services‌  ‌performed‌  ‌or‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌performed‌  ‌for‌  ‌another‌  ‌person,‌‌  known‌‌  as‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌Omnibus‌‌
  Investment‌‌   Code‌‌   of‌‌ 1987‌, ‌‌and‌‌ other‌‌ 
agreements‌  ‌to‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌signatory‌  ‌effectively‌‌ 
excluding‌‌VAT.‌  ‌ special‌‌laws;‌  ‌
subjects‌‌such‌‌sales‌‌to‌‌‌zero‌‌rate‌. ‌ ‌
4.‌  ‌Zero-rated‌  ‌and‌  ‌effectively‌  ‌zero-rated‌  ‌sales‌  ‌of‌  ‌goods‌  ‌or‌‌  Without‌  ‌actual‌  ‌exportation‌  ‌the‌  ‌following‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌ 
The‌‌   ‌services‌‌ ‌performed‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ Philippines‌‌ by‌‌ VAT-registered‌‌ 
  following‌‌
properties,‌‌and‌‌services‌  ‌ constructively‌e ‌ xported‌‌‌for‌‌purposes‌‌of‌‌these‌‌provisions:‌‌   ‌
persons‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌subject‌‌to‌z
‌ ero‌‌percent‌‌(0%)‌‌rate‌: ‌ ‌
Zero-rated‌‌sale‌  ‌ 1. sales‌  ‌to‌  ‌bonded‌  ‌manufacturing‌  ‌warehouses‌  ‌of‌‌ 
1)   ‌
export-oriented‌‌manufacturers;‌  ‌
a. Export‌‌Sales.‌‌—‌T‌ he‌‌term‌‌'export‌‌sales'‌‌means:‌  ‌
a) Processing,‌‌manufacturing‌‌or‌‌repacking‌‌goods‌  ‌
1)   ‌ 2. sales‌‌to‌‌export‌‌processing‌‌zones;‌  ‌
b) for‌‌other‌‌persons‌‌doing‌‌business‌‌outside‌‌the‌‌Philippines‌‌   ‌
3. sales‌  ‌to‌  ‌registered‌  ‌export‌  ‌traders‌  ‌operating‌  ‌bonded‌‌ 
a) The‌  ‌sale‌  ‌and‌  ‌actual‌  ‌shipment‌  ‌of‌  ‌goods‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌ 
trading‌  ‌warehouses‌  ‌supplying‌  ‌raw‌  ‌materials‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  c) which‌‌goods‌‌are‌‌‌subsequently‌‌exported‌, ‌ ‌
Philippines‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌foreign‌  ‌country,‌  ‌irrespective‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌ 
manufacture‌‌   of‌‌
  export‌‌   products‌‌ under‌‌ guidelines‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ 
shipping‌‌  arrangement‌‌   that‌‌
  may‌‌   be‌‌
  agreed‌‌ upon‌‌ which‌‌ may‌‌  d) where‌  ‌the‌  ‌services‌  ‌are‌  ‌paid‌  ‌for‌  ‌in‌  ‌acceptable‌  ‌foreign‌‌ 
set‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌
  Board‌‌   in‌‌
  consultation‌‌   with‌‌
  the‌‌
  BIR‌‌
  and‌‌
  the‌‌ 
influence‌  ‌or‌  ‌determine‌  ‌the‌  ‌transfer‌  ‌of‌  ‌ownership‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  currency‌‌and‌‌   ‌
BOC;‌‌   ‌
goods‌‌so‌‌exported‌‌and‌  ‌ e) accounted‌‌   for‌‌
  in‌‌
  accordance‌‌
  with‌‌ the‌‌ rules‌‌ and‌‌ regulations‌‌ 
4. sales‌  ‌to‌  ‌diplomatic‌  ‌missions‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌agencies‌‌ 
b) paid‌‌
  for‌‌
  in‌‌
  acceptable‌‌
  foreign‌‌
  currency‌‌
  or‌‌
  its‌‌ equivalent‌‌ in‌‌  of‌‌the‌‌BSP;‌  ‌
and/or‌  ‌instrumentalities‌  ‌granted‌  ‌tax‌  ‌immunities,‌  ‌of‌‌ 
goods‌‌or‌‌services,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ 2)   ‌
locally‌‌ manufactured,‌‌ assembled‌‌ or‌‌ repacked‌‌ products‌‌ 
c) accounted‌‌   for‌‌
  in‌‌
  accordance‌‌
  with‌‌ the‌‌ rules‌‌ and‌‌ regulations‌‌  whether‌‌paid‌‌for‌‌in‌‌foreign‌‌currency‌‌or‌‌not.‌  ‌ a) Services‌‌other‌‌than‌‌PMR,‌‌   ‌
of‌‌the‌‌BSP;‌  ‌ b) rendered‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person‌  ‌engaged‌  ‌in‌  ‌business‌  ‌conducted‌‌ 
2)   ‌ 5) The‌  ‌sale‌  ‌of‌  ‌goods,‌  ‌supplies,‌  ‌equipment‌  ‌and‌  ‌fuel‌  ‌to‌  ‌persons‌‌ 
outside‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌or‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌nonresident‌  ‌person‌  ‌not‌‌ 
engaged‌  ‌in‌  ‌international‌  ‌shipping‌  ‌or‌  ‌international‌  ‌air‌‌ 
engaged‌  ‌in‌  ‌business‌  ‌who‌  ‌is‌‌
  outside‌‌   the‌‌
  Philippines‌‌
  when‌‌ 
a) Sale‌‌of‌‌raw‌‌materials‌‌or‌‌packaging‌‌materials‌  ‌ transport‌  ‌operations‌: ‌ ‌Provided‌, ‌ ‌That‌  ‌the‌  ‌goods,‌  ‌supplies,‌‌ 
the‌‌services‌‌are‌‌performed,‌‌   ‌
equipment‌‌ and‌‌ fuel‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ used‌‌ for‌‌ ‌international‌‌ ‌shipping‌‌ or‌‌ 
b) to‌‌a‌‌nonresident‌‌buyer‌  ‌
air‌‌transport‌‌operations.‌  ‌ c) the‌  ‌consideration‌  ‌for‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌paid‌  ‌for‌  ‌in‌  ‌acceptable‌‌ 
c) for‌‌delivery‌‌to‌‌a‌‌resident‌‌local‌‌export-oriented‌‌enterprise‌‌   ‌ foreign‌‌currency‌‌and‌  ‌
Provided‌, ‌‌That‌‌ subparagraphs‌‌ (3),‌‌ (4),‌‌ and‌‌ (5)‌‌ hereof‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ subject‌‌ to‌‌ 
d) to‌  ‌be‌  ‌used‌  ‌in‌  ‌manufacturing,‌  ‌processing,‌  ‌packing‌  ‌or‌‌  the‌  ‌12%‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌and‌  ‌no‌  ‌longer‌  ‌be‌‌
  considered‌‌
  export‌‌
  sales‌‌
  subject‌‌   to‌‌
  0%‌‌  d) accounted‌‌   for‌‌  in‌‌
  accordance‌‌  with‌‌ the‌‌ rules‌‌ and‌‌ regulations‌‌ 
repacking‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Philippines‌‌of‌‌the‌‌said‌‌buyer's‌‌goods‌‌and‌‌   ‌ VAT‌‌rate‌‌upon‌‌satisfaction‌‌of‌‌the‌‌following‌‌conditions:‌  ‌ of‌‌the‌‌BSP;‌  ‌
e) paid‌‌for‌‌in‌‌acceptable‌‌foreign‌‌currency‌‌and‌  ‌ 3) Services‌  ‌rendered‌  ‌to‌  ‌persons‌  ‌or‌  ‌entities‌  ‌whose‌  ‌exemption‌‌ 
1) The‌  ‌successful‌  ‌establishment‌  ‌and‌  ‌implementation‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌‌ 
under‌  ‌special‌  ‌laws‌  ‌or‌  ‌international‌  ‌agreements‌  ‌to‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌‌ 
f) accounted‌‌   for‌‌
  in‌‌
  accordance‌‌
  with‌‌ the‌‌ rules‌‌ and‌‌ regulations‌‌  enhanced‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌refund‌  ‌system‌  ‌that‌  ‌grants‌  ‌refunds‌  ‌of‌‌  Philippines‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌signatory‌  ‌effectively‌  ‌subjects‌  ‌the‌  ‌supply‌  ‌of‌‌ 
of‌‌the‌‌BSP;‌  ‌ creditable‌  ‌input‌  ‌tax‌  ‌within‌  ‌ninety‌‌
  (90)‌‌
  days‌‌
  from‌‌
  the‌‌
  filing‌‌
  of‌‌  such‌‌services‌‌to‌‌zero‌‌percent‌‌(0%)‌‌rate;‌  ‌
3)   ‌ the‌‌VAT‌‌refund‌‌application‌‌with‌‌the‌‌BIR;‌‌and‌  ‌
4) Services‌  ‌rendered‌  ‌to‌  ‌persons‌  ‌exclusively‌  ‌engaged‌  ‌in‌‌ 
a) Sale‌‌of‌‌raw‌‌materials‌‌or‌‌packaging‌‌materials‌  ‌ 2) All‌  ‌pending‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌refund‌‌
  claims‌‌
  as‌‌
  of‌‌
  December‌‌
  31,‌‌
  2017‌‌
  shall‌‌  international‌‌
  shipping‌‌ or‌‌ international‌‌ air‌‌ transport‌‌ operations,‌‌ 
be‌‌fully‌‌paid‌‌in‌‌cash‌‌by‌‌December‌‌31,‌‌2019.‌  ‌ including‌‌leases‌‌of‌‌property‌‌for‌‌use‌‌thereof;‌  ‌
b) to‌e‌ xport-oriented‌e‌ nterprise‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 92‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

5) Services‌  ‌performed‌  ‌by‌  ‌subcontractors‌  ‌and/or‌  ‌contractors‌  ‌in‌‌  3. breeding‌‌stock‌‌and‌‌genetic‌‌materials‌‌therefor.‌  ‌


processing,‌  ‌converting,‌  ‌or‌  ‌manufacturing‌  ‌goods‌  ‌for‌  ‌an‌‌  1) the‌‌buyer‌‌is‌‌a‌‌BOI-registered‌‌manufacturer/producer;‌  B. Sale‌‌or‌‌importation‌‌‌of‌‌   ‌
enterprise‌‌   whose‌‌
  export‌‌
  sales‌‌
  exceed‌‌ seventy‌‌ percent‌‌ (70%)‌‌  2) the‌‌buyer's‌‌products‌‌are‌‌100%‌‌exported;‌‌and‌  ‌ 1. fertilizers;‌‌   ‌
of‌‌total‌‌annual‌‌production;‌  ‌
3) the‌  ‌BOI‌  ‌certified‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌buyer‌  ‌exported‌  ‌100%‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌‌  2. seeds,‌‌seedlings‌‌and‌‌fingerlings‌;  ‌‌ ‌
6) Transport‌  ‌of‌  ‌passengers‌  ‌and‌  ‌cargo‌  ‌by‌  ‌domestic‌  ‌air‌  ‌or‌  ‌sea‌‌  products.‌‌   ‌
vessels‌‌from‌‌the‌‌Philippines‌‌to‌‌a‌‌foreign‌‌country;‌‌and‌  ‌ 3. fish,‌  ‌prawn,‌  ‌livestock‌  ‌and‌  ‌poultry‌  ‌feeds‌, ‌ ‌including‌‌ 
For‌‌   this‌‌
  purpose,‌‌ the‌‌ ‌BOI‌‌ Certification‌‌ is‌‌ vital‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ seller-taxpayer‌‌  ingredients,‌‌
  whether‌‌ locally‌‌ produced‌‌ or‌‌ imported,‌‌ used‌‌ in‌‌ 
★ If‌  ‌international‌, ‌ ‌VAT-exempt‌  ‌if‌  ‌passenger‌; ‌ ‌and‌‌  to‌  ‌avail‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌benefits‌  ‌of‌  ‌zero-rating.‌  ‌To‌  ‌ensure‌  ‌compliance‌  ‌with‌‌  the‌‌manufacture‌‌of‌‌finished‌‌feeds‌‌   ‌
subject‌‌to‌o
‌ ther‌‌percentage‌‌tax‌o
‌ f‌‌3%‌‌if‌‌cargo‌. ‌ ‌ invoicing‌  ‌requirements,‌  ‌Section‌  ‌3 ‌ ‌of‌  ‌RMO‌  ‌No.‌  ‌09-00‌  ‌requires‌  ‌the‌‌ 
7) Sale‌‌
  of‌‌
  power‌‌
  or‌‌
  fuel‌‌  generated‌‌   through‌‌ ‌renewable‌‌ sources‌‌ of‌‌  BOI-registered‌  ‌buyer‌  ‌to‌  ‌furnish‌‌   its‌‌
  suppliers‌‌   with‌‌
  a ‌‌copy‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  BOI‌‌  except‌  ‌specialty‌  ‌feeds‌  ‌for‌  ‌race‌  ‌horses,‌  ‌fighting‌  ‌cocks,‌‌ 
Certification‌‌attesting‌‌that‌‌it‌‌exported‌‌100%‌‌of‌‌its‌‌products.‌  aquarium‌  ‌fish,‌  ‌zoo‌  ‌animals‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌animals‌  ‌generally‌‌ 
energy‌  ‌such‌  ‌as,‌  ‌but‌  ‌not‌  ‌limited‌  ‌to,‌  ‌biomass,‌  ‌solar,‌  ‌wind,‌‌ 
hydropower,‌  ‌geothermal,‌  ‌ocean‌  ‌energy,‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌emerging‌‌  considered‌‌as‌‌pets;‌  ‌
CIR‌‌v.‌‌Cebu‌‌Toyo‌‌Corporation‌  ‌
energy‌  ‌sources‌  ‌using‌  ‌technologies‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌fuel‌  ‌cells‌  ‌and‌‌  C. Importation‌‌ ‌of‌‌ ‌personal‌‌ and‌‌ household‌‌ effects‌‌ ‌belonging‌‌ to‌‌ 
hydrogen‌‌fuels.‌  ‌ Under‌  ‌RA‌  ‌7916,‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌had‌  ‌two‌  ‌options‌  ‌with‌‌
  respect‌‌
  to‌‌
  its‌‌
  tax‌‌ 
the‌  ‌residents‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌returning‌  ‌from‌  ‌abroad‌  ‌and‌‌ 
burden.‌   ‌ ‌
Atlas‌‌Consolidated‌‌Mining‌‌v.‌‌CIR‌  ‌ nonresident‌  ‌citizens‌  ‌coming‌  ‌to‌  ‌resettle‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines:‌‌ 
1. It‌  ‌could‌  ‌avail‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌income‌  ‌tax‌  ‌holiday‌  ‌pursuant‌  ‌to‌‌  Provided‌,‌‌That‌‌such‌‌goods‌‌are‌e‌ xempt‌‌from‌‌customs‌‌duties‌;  ‌‌ ‌
WON‌  ‌the‌  ‌totality‌  ‌of‌  ‌sales‌  ‌to‌  ‌EPZA-registered‌  ‌enterprises‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌‌  provisions‌‌   of‌‌ E.O.‌‌ No.‌‌ 226,‌‌ thus‌‌ exempt‌‌ it‌‌ from‌‌ income‌‌ taxes‌‌  D. Importation‌‌   ‌of‌‌ ‌professional‌‌ instruments‌‌ and‌‌ implements‌, ‌‌
zero-rated,‌  ‌not‌  ‌merely‌  ‌the‌  ‌proportion‌  ‌which‌  ‌such‌  ‌sales‌‌
  have‌‌  to‌‌
  the‌‌  for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌number‌  ‌of‌  ‌years‌  ‌but‌  ‌not‌  ‌from‌‌
  other‌‌  internal‌‌
  revenue‌‌  tools‌  ‌of‌  ‌trade,‌  ‌occupation‌  ‌or‌  ‌employment,‌  ‌wearing‌  ‌apparel,‌‌ 
actual‌‌exports‌‌of‌‌the‌‌enterprise.‌  ‌ taxes‌‌such‌‌as‌‌VAT‌;‌‌or‌‌   ‌ domestic‌  ‌animals,‌  ‌and‌  ‌personal‌  ‌and‌  ‌household‌  ‌effects‌‌ 
YES‌. ‌‌‌Section‌‌  4.100.2‌‌  of‌‌  RR‌‌  7-95‌‌  in‌‌  relation‌‌  to‌‌  Section‌‌  102‌‌  (b)‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  2. It‌‌
  could‌‌
  avail‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ tax‌‌ exemptions‌‌ on‌‌ all‌‌ taxes‌, ‌‌including‌‌  belonging‌  ‌to‌  ‌persons‌  ‌coming‌  ‌to‌  ‌settle‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌or‌‌ 
Tax‌  ‌Code‌  ‌shows‌  ‌that‌  ‌sales‌  ‌to‌  ‌an‌  ‌export-oriented‌  ‌enterprise‌‌  VAT‌  ‌under‌‌  P.D.‌‌
  No.‌‌
  66‌‌  and‌‌
  pay‌‌
  only‌‌
  the‌‌
  preferential‌‌   tax‌‌
  rate‌‌  Filipinos‌  ‌or‌  ‌their‌  ‌families‌  ‌and‌  ‌descendants‌  ‌who‌  ‌are‌  ‌now‌‌ 
whose‌‌   export‌‌   sales‌‌  exceed‌‌
  70‌‌  percent‌‌   of‌‌
  its‌‌
  annual‌‌ production‌  of‌‌5%‌‌‌under‌‌Rep.‌‌Act‌‌No.‌‌7916.‌  ‌
residents‌‌or‌‌citizens‌‌of‌‌other‌‌countries.‌  ‌
are‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌zero-rated‌, ‌ ‌provided‌  ‌the‌  ‌seller‌  ‌complies‌  ‌with‌  ‌other‌‌ 
Respondent‌  ‌availed‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌income‌  ‌tax‌  ‌holiday‌  ‌for‌  ‌four‌  ‌(4)‌  ‌years.‌‌  Vehicles,‌  ‌vessels,‌  ‌aircrafts,‌  ‌machineries‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌similar‌‌ 
requirements,‌  ‌like‌‌   registration‌‌  with‌‌
  the‌‌
  BOI‌‌  and‌‌  the‌‌
  EPZA.‌‌
  ‌The‌‌
  said‌‌ 
Hence,‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌is‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌exempt‌  ‌from‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌and‌  ‌it‌  ‌correctly‌‌ 
Regulation‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌even‌  ‌hint,‌  ‌much‌  ‌less‌  ‌expressly‌  ‌mention,‌‌  goods‌  ‌for‌  ‌use‌  ‌in‌  ‌manufacture‌, ‌ ‌shall‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌fall‌  ‌within‌  ‌this‌‌ 
registered‌‌  itself‌‌
  as‌‌
  a ‌‌VAT‌‌
  taxpayer.‌  ‌In‌‌
  fine,‌‌
  it‌‌
  is‌‌
  ‌engaged‌‌ in‌‌ taxable‌‌ 
that‌‌only‌‌a‌‌percentage‌‌of‌‌the‌‌sales‌‌would‌‌be‌‌zero-rated.‌  ‌ classification‌  ‌and‌  ‌shall‌  ‌therefore‌  ‌be‌  ‌subject‌‌
  to‌‌
  duties,‌‌  taxes‌‌ 
rather‌‌than‌‌exempt‌t‌ ransactions‌. ‌ ‌
and‌‌other‌‌charges‌; ‌ ‌
CIR‌‌v.‌‌Filminera‌‌Resources‌‌Corporation‌‌‌2020‌  ‌ Here,‌  ‌respondent‌‌   is‌‌
  engaged‌‌   in‌‌  the‌‌  export‌‌
  business‌‌   and‌‌  is‌‌
  registered‌‌ 
E. Services‌s‌ ubject‌‌to‌p
‌ ercentage‌‌tax‌‌‌under‌‌Title‌‌V;‌  ‌
Proof‌  ‌of‌‌
  actual‌‌
  exportation‌‌
  of‌‌
  goods‌‌  sold‌‌   by‌‌
  a ‌‌Value‌‌
  Added‌‌  Tax‌‌  as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌VAT‌  ‌taxpayer.‌  ‌Further,‌  ‌the‌  ‌records‌  ‌show‌  ‌that‌‌  the‌‌
  respondent‌‌   is‌‌ 
(VAT)-registered‌  ‌taxpayer‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Board‌  ‌of‌  ‌Investments‌‌  subject‌‌   to‌‌
  VAT‌‌
  as‌‌
  it‌‌
  availed‌‌
  of‌‌  the‌‌  income‌‌   tax‌‌
  holiday‌‌  under‌‌   E.O.‌‌ No.‌‌  1) Sale‌‌
  or‌‌
  lease‌‌  of‌‌
  goods‌‌  or‌‌
  properties‌‌   or‌‌  the‌‌
  performance‌‌   of‌‌ 
(BOI)-registered‌  ‌enterprise‌  ‌is‌  ‌vital‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌transaction‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌‌  226.‌  ‌Perforce,‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌is‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌at‌  ‌0%‌  ‌rate‌  ‌and‌  ‌is‌‌  services‌  ‌of‌  ‌non-VAT-registered‌  ‌persons,‌  ‌other‌  ‌than‌  ‌the‌‌ 
considered‌‌as‌‌zero-rated‌‌export‌‌sales.‌  ‌ entitled‌‌to‌‌a‌‌refund‌‌or‌‌credit‌‌of‌‌the‌‌unutilized‌‌input‌‌taxes‌. ‌ ‌ transactions‌  ‌mentioned‌  ‌in‌  ‌paragraphs‌  ‌(A)‌  ‌to‌  ‌(AA)‌  ‌of‌‌   Sec.‌‌ 
109(1)‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Tax‌  ‌Code,‌  ‌the‌  ‌gross‌  ‌annual‌  ‌sales‌  ‌and/or‌‌ 
WON‌  ‌the‌  ‌sales‌  ‌made‌  ‌to‌  ‌PGPRC‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  third‌‌
  and‌‌
  fourth‌‌  quarters‌‌   of‌‌  5.‌‌VAT-exempt‌‌transactions‌  ‌
receipts‌‌of‌‌which‌‌‌does‌‌not‌‌exceed‌‌the‌‌amount‌‌of‌‌Php3M‌. ‌ ‌
the‌‌
  FY‌‌
  ending‌‌  June‌‌
  30,‌‌ 2010‌‌ are‌‌ zero-rated‌‌ export‌‌ sales‌‌ based‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ 
certification‌‌issued‌‌by‌‌the‌‌BOI‌‌on‌‌January‌‌27,‌‌2010.‌  ‌ A. Sale‌‌or‌‌importation‌‌‌of‌‌   ‌ 2) Services‌  ‌rendered‌  ‌by‌  ‌domestic‌  ‌common‌‌   carriers‌‌
  by‌‌  land,‌‌ 
1. agricultural‌  ‌and‌  ‌marine‌  ‌food‌  ‌products‌  ‌in‌  ‌their‌  ‌original‌‌  for‌  ‌the‌  ‌transport‌  ‌of‌  ‌passengers‌‌
  and‌‌
  keepers‌‌  of‌‌
  garages‌‌ 
Section‌  ‌4.106-5(a)(5)‌  ‌of‌  ‌RR‌  ‌No.‌  ‌16-2005‌  ‌classified‌  ‌sales‌  ‌to‌‌ 
state,‌‌   ‌ (Sec.‌‌117);‌   ‌ ‌
BOI-registered‌‌ entities‌‌ as‌‌ zero-rated‌‌ export‌‌ sales‌‌ if‌‌ the‌‌ following‌‌ 
conditions‌‌are‌‌met:‌‌   ‌ 2. livestock‌  ‌and‌  ‌poultry‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌kind‌  ‌generally‌  ‌used‌  ‌as,‌  ‌or‌‌  3) Services‌  ‌rendered‌  ‌by‌  international‌  ‌air/shipping‌‌ 
yielding‌‌or‌‌producing‌‌foods‌‌for‌‌human‌‌consumption;‌‌and‌‌   ‌ carriers‌‌‌(Sec.‌‌118);‌   ‌ ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 93‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

4) Services‌  ‌rendered‌  ‌by‌  ‌franchise‌  ‌grantees‌  ‌of‌  ‌radio‌‌


  and/or‌‌  K. Transactions‌  ‌which‌  ‌are‌  ‌exempt‌  ‌under‌  ‌international‌‌  M. Gross‌  ‌receipts‌  ‌from‌  ‌lending‌  ‌activities‌  ‌by‌  ‌credit‌  ‌or‌‌ 
television‌  ‌broadcasting‌  ‌whose‌‌   annual‌‌
  gross‌‌   receipts‌‌
  of‌‌  agreements‌  ‌to‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌‌
  is‌‌
  a ‌‌signatory‌‌
  or‌‌
  under‌  multi-purpose‌‌cooperatives‌‌‌duly‌‌registered‌‌‌with‌‌the‌‌CDA;‌  ‌
the‌  ‌preceding‌  ‌year‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌exceed‌  ‌Php10M‌, ‌ ‌and‌  ‌by‌‌  special‌‌laws,‌e‌ xcept‌t‌ hose‌‌under‌‌PD‌‌No.‌‌529;‌  ‌ N. Sales‌  ‌by‌  ‌non-agricultural,‌  ‌non-electric‌  ‌and‌  ‌non-credit‌‌ 
franchise‌‌grantees‌‌of‌g ‌ as‌‌and‌‌water‌‌utilities‌‌‌(Sec.‌‌119);‌   ‌ ‌ L.  ‌ cooperatives‌d ‌ uly‌‌registered‌‌‌with‌‌the‌‌CDA.‌  ‌
5) Service‌  ‌rendered‌  ‌for‌  ‌overseas‌  ‌dispatch‌, ‌ ‌message‌  ‌or‌‌  The‌  ‌share‌  ‌capital‌  ‌contribution‌  ‌of‌  ‌each‌  ‌member‌‌   does‌‌  not‌‌ 
a) Sales‌‌
  by‌‌
  ‌agricultural‌‌
  cooperatives‌‌
  ‌duly‌‌ registered‌‌ with‌‌ 
conversation‌‌originating‌‌from‌ ‌the‌‌Philippines‌‌(Sec.‌‌120);‌   ‌ ‌ exceed‌‌   Php15K‌‌   and‌‌ regardless‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ aggregate‌‌ capital‌‌ and‌‌ net‌‌ 
the‌‌CDA‌‌to‌‌their‌‌members‌  ‌
6) Services‌‌  rendered‌‌
  by‌‌
  any‌‌  person,‌‌
  company‌‌
  or‌‌  corporation‌‌  surplus‌‌ratably‌‌distributed‌‌among‌‌the‌‌members;‌  ‌
b) as‌  ‌well‌  ‌as‌  ‌sale‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌  ‌produce,‌  ‌whether‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌  ‌original‌‌ 
(except‌  ‌purely‌  ‌cooperative‌  ‌companies‌  ‌or‌  ‌associations)‌‌  Importation‌  ‌by‌  ‌non-agricultural,‌  ‌non-electric‌  ‌and‌  ‌non-credit‌‌ 
state‌‌or‌‌processed‌‌form,‌‌to‌‌non-members;‌  
doing‌  ‌life‌  ‌insurance‌  ‌business‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌sort‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌ cooperatives‌  ‌of‌  ‌machineries‌  ‌and‌  ‌equipment,‌  ‌including‌  ‌spare‌‌ 
Philippines‌‌(Sec.‌‌123);‌   ‌ ‌ c) their‌  ‌importation‌  ‌of‌  ‌direct‌  ‌farm‌  ‌inputs,‌  ‌machineries‌  ‌and‌‌  parts‌‌thereof,‌‌to‌‌be‌‌used‌‌by‌‌them‌‌are‌s‌ ubject‌‌to‌ ‌VAT‌. ‌ ‌
7) Services‌  ‌rendered‌  ‌by‌  fire,‌  ‌marine‌  ‌or‌  ‌miscellaneous‌‌  equipment,‌  ‌including‌  ‌spare‌  ‌parts‌  ‌thereof,‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌used‌‌ 
O. Export‌‌sales‌‌‌by‌‌persons‌‌who‌‌are‌‌not‌‌VAT-registered;‌  ‌
insurance‌  ‌agents‌  ‌of‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌insurance‌  ‌companies‌  ‌(Sec.‌‌  directly‌  ‌and‌  ‌exclusively‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌production‌  ‌and/or‌‌ 
processing‌‌of‌‌their‌‌produce;‌  ‌ If‌‌VAT-registered,‌z‌ ero-rated.‌  ‌
124);‌   ‌ ‌
8) Services‌  ‌of‌  ‌proprietors,‌  ‌lessees‌  ‌or‌  ‌operators‌  ‌of‌  ‌cockpits,‌‌  CIR‌‌v.‌‌United‌‌Cadiz‌‌Sugar‌‌Farmers‌‌Association‌‌MPC‌‌2
‌ 016‌  ‌ P. The‌  ‌following‌  ‌sales‌  ‌of‌  ‌real‌  ‌properties‌  ‌are‌  ‌exempt‌  ‌from‌‌ 
cabarets,‌  ‌night‌  ‌or‌  ‌day‌  ‌clubs,‌  ‌boxing‌  ‌exhibitions,‌‌  VAT,‌‌namely:‌‌   ‌
Although‌  ‌the‌  ‌sale‌  ‌of‌  ‌refined‌  ‌sugar‌  ‌is‌  ‌generally‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌VAT‌, ‌‌
professional‌  ‌basketball‌  ‌games,‌  ‌Jai-Alai‌  ‌and‌  ‌race‌  ‌tracks‌‌  such‌  ‌transaction‌  ‌may‌  ‌nevertheless‌  ‌qualify‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌VAT-exempt‌‌  1) Sale‌  ‌of‌  ‌real‌  ‌properties‌  ‌not‌  ‌primarily‌  ‌held‌  ‌for‌  ‌sale‌  ‌to‌‌ 
(Sec.‌‌125);‌ ‌and‌   ‌ ‌ transaction‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌sale‌  ‌is‌  ‌made‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌cooperative‌. ‌ ‌Under‌‌
  Section‌‌  customers‌  ‌or‌  ‌held‌‌   for‌‌  lease‌‌   in‌‌  the‌‌  ordinary‌‌   course‌‌   of‌‌ 
9) Receipts‌  ‌on‌  ‌sale,‌  ‌barter‌  ‌or‌  ‌exchange‌  ‌of‌  ‌shares‌  ‌of‌  ‌stock‌‌  109(L)‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌NIRC,‌  ‌sales‌  ‌by‌  ‌agricultural‌  ‌cooperatives‌  ‌are‌  ‌exempt‌‌  trade‌  ‌or‌  ‌business‌. ‌ ‌However,‌  ‌even‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌‌   real‌‌  property‌‌   is‌‌ 
from‌‌VAT‌‌provided‌‌the‌‌following‌‌conditions‌‌concur,‌‌viz:‌  ‌ not‌  ‌primarily‌  ‌held‌  ‌for‌‌   sale‌‌   to‌‌
  customers‌‌   or‌‌  held‌‌  for‌‌
  lease‌‌ 
listed‌  ‌and‌  ‌traded‌  ‌through‌  ‌the‌  ‌local‌  ‌stock‌  ‌exchange‌  ‌or‌‌ 
through‌‌initial‌‌public‌‌offering‌‌(Sec.‌‌127).‌  ‌ First‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌seller‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌an‌‌
  agricultural‌‌
  cooperative‌‌
  duly‌‌
  registered‌‌  in‌‌
  the‌‌   ordinary‌‌   course‌‌   of‌‌
  trade‌‌ or‌‌ business‌‌ but‌‌ the‌‌ same‌‌ is‌‌ 
with‌‌the‌‌CDA.‌‌   ‌ used‌‌   in‌‌  the‌‌
  trade‌‌  or‌‌
  business‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌  seller,‌‌
  the‌‌
  sale‌‌ thereof‌‌ 
F. Services‌  ‌by‌  ‌agricultural‌  ‌contract‌  ‌growers‌  ‌and‌  ‌milling‌  ‌for‌‌ 
Second‌,‌‌the‌‌cooperative‌‌must‌‌sell‌‌either:‌  ‌ shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌being‌  ‌a ‌ ‌transaction‌  ‌incidental‌‌   ‌to‌‌ 
others‌‌  of‌‌
  palay‌‌ into‌‌ rice,‌‌ corn‌‌ into‌‌ grits‌‌ and‌‌ sugar‌‌ cane‌‌ into‌‌ raw‌‌ 
1) exclusively‌‌to‌‌its‌‌members;‌‌or‌  ‌ the‌‌taxpayer's‌‌main‌‌business.‌‌   ‌
sugar;‌  ‌
2) to‌  ‌both‌  ‌members‌  ‌and‌  ‌non-members,‌  ‌its‌  ‌produce‌, ‌‌whether‌‌  2) Sale‌‌of‌‌real‌‌properties‌‌utilized‌‌for‌l‌ ow-cost‌‌housing‌. ‌  ‌ ‌
G. Medical,‌  ‌dental,‌  ‌hospital‌  ‌and‌  ‌veterinary‌‌
  services‌‌
  ‌except‌‌
  ‌those‌‌ 
in‌‌its‌‌original‌‌state‌‌or‌‌processed‌‌form.‌  ‌ 3) Sale‌  ‌of‌  ‌real‌  ‌properties‌  ‌utilized‌  ‌for‌  ‌socialized‌  ‌housing‌‌ 
rendered‌‌by‌‌professionals;‌  ‌
A‌‌ cooperative‌‌ is‌‌ the‌‌ producer‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ sugar‌‌ if‌‌ it‌‌ owns‌‌ or‌‌ leases‌‌ the‌‌ land‌‌  wherein‌  ‌the‌  ‌price‌  ‌ceiling‌  ‌per‌  ‌unit‌  ‌is‌  ‌P450K‌  ‌or‌  ‌as‌  ‌may‌‌ 
H. Educational‌  ‌services‌  ‌rendered‌  ‌by‌  ‌private‌  ‌educational‌‌  tilled,‌  ‌incurs‌  ‌the‌  ‌cost‌  ‌of‌  ‌agricultural‌  ‌production‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌sugar,‌  ‌and‌‌ 
from‌  ‌time‌  ‌to‌  ‌time‌  ‌be‌  ‌determined‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌HUDCC‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌ 
institutions,‌  ‌duly‌  ‌accredited‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌DepEd,‌  ‌CHED,‌‌
  TESDA‌‌
  and‌  produces‌  ‌the‌  ‌sugar‌  ‌cane‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌refined.‌  ‌It‌  ‌should‌  ‌not‌  ‌have‌  ‌merely‌‌ 
purchased‌‌the‌‌sugar‌‌cane‌‌from‌‌its‌‌planters-members.‌  ‌ NEDA‌‌and‌‌other‌‌related‌‌laws.‌‌   ‌
those‌‌rendered‌‌by‌‌government‌‌educational‌‌institutions;‌  ‌
4) Sale‌  ‌of‌  ‌residential‌  ‌lots‌  ‌valued‌  ‌at‌  ‌Php1,919,500‌  ‌and‌‌ 
“‌Educational‌  ‌services‌” ‌ ‌shall‌  ‌refer‌  ‌to‌  ‌academic,‌  ‌technical‌  ‌or‌‌  CIR‌‌v.‌‌Negros‌‌Consolidated‌‌Farmers‌‌MPC‌‌2
‌ 018‌  ‌ below,‌  ‌or‌  ‌house‌  ‌& ‌‌lot‌‌
  and‌‌
  other‌‌
  residential‌‌
  dwellings‌‌ 
vocational‌‌education.‌  ‌
For‌  ‌an‌  ‌agricultural‌  ‌cooperative‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  exempted‌‌
  from‌‌
  the‌‌
  payment‌‌
  of‌‌  valued‌‌at‌P ‌ hp3,199,200‌‌‌and‌‌below.‌‌   ‌
I. Services‌  ‌rendered‌  ‌by‌  ‌individuals‌  ‌pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌an‌‌  advance‌‌VAT‌‌on‌‌refined‌‌sugar,‌‌it‌‌must‌‌be‌‌   ‌ If‌‌
  ‌two‌‌ or‌‌ more‌‌ adjacent‌‌ residential‌‌ lots‌‌ are‌‌ sold‌‌ or‌‌ disposed‌‌ 
employer-employee‌‌‌relationship;‌  ‌
a) a‌  ‌cooperative‌  ‌in‌  ‌good‌  ‌standing‌  ‌duly‌  ‌accredited‌  ‌and‌‌  of‌‌
  in‌‌ favor‌‌ of‌‌ one‌‌ buyer,‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ purpose‌‌ of‌‌ utilizing‌‌ the‌‌ lots‌‌ 
J. Services‌  ‌rendered‌  ‌by‌  RAHQ‌  ‌that‌  do‌  ‌not‌  ‌earn‌  ‌or‌  ‌derive‌‌  registered‌‌with‌‌the‌‌CDA;‌‌and‌  ‌ as‌  ‌one‌  ‌residential‌  ‌lot,‌  ‌the‌  ‌sale‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌exempt‌‌
  from‌‌
  VAT‌‌ 
income‌‌from‌‌the‌‌Philippines‌; ‌ ‌ b) the‌‌producer‌‌of‌‌the‌‌sugar.‌  ‌ only‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌aggregate‌  ‌value‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌lots‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌exceed‌‌ 
Php1,919,500M‌.  ‌‌ ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 94‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

Adjacent‌  ‌residential‌  ‌lots,‌  ‌although‌  ‌covered‌  ‌by‌  ‌separate‌  ‌titles‌‌  the‌  ‌3%‌  ‌tax‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌under‌  ‌Section‌  ‌116‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Tax‌‌  Tax-free‌‌
  exchange‌‌
  of‌‌  property‌‌ in‌‌ pursuance‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌plan‌‌ of‌‌ ‌merger‌‌ 
and/or‌‌   separate‌‌  tax‌‌
  declarations,‌‌ when‌‌ sold‌‌ or‌‌ disposed‌‌ to‌‌  Code.‌‌   ‌ or‌‌consolidation‌. ‌ ‌
one‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌buyer‌, ‌ ‌whether‌  ‌covered‌  ‌by‌  ‌one‌  ‌or‌‌  R. Sale,‌‌
  importation,‌‌   printing‌‌   or‌‌
  publication‌‌ ‌of‌‌ books‌‌ and‌‌ any‌‌  Y. Association‌  ‌dues,‌  ‌membership‌  ‌fees,‌  a ‌ nd‌  ‌other‌‌ 
separate‌  ‌Deed‌‌  of‌‌   Conveyance,‌‌  shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  presumed‌‌   as‌‌
  a ‌‌sale‌‌  newspaper,‌  ‌magazine,‌  ‌review‌  ‌or‌  ‌bulletin‌  ‌which‌  ‌appears‌  ‌at‌‌  assessments‌  ‌and‌  ‌charges‌  ‌collected‌  ‌by‌  ‌homeowners‌‌ 
of‌‌one‌‌residential‌‌lot.‌‌   ‌ regular‌‌
  intervals‌‌   with‌‌
  fixed‌‌
  prices‌‌ or‌‌ subscription‌‌ and‌‌ sale‌‌ and‌‌  associations‌‌and‌‌condominium‌‌corporations;‌  ‌
Provided‌, ‌ ‌That‌  ‌beginning‌  ‌January‌  ‌1,‌  ‌2021‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌VAT‌‌  which‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌devoted‌  ‌principally‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌publication‌  ‌of‌  ‌paid‌‌  Z. Sale‌‌of‌‌gold‌‌‌to‌‌the‌‌BSP;‌  ‌
exemption‌‌shall‌‌only‌‌apply‌‌to‌‌   ‌ advertisements;‌  ‌
AA. Sale‌  ‌of‌  ‌drugs‌  ‌and‌  ‌medicines‌  ‌prescribed‌  ‌for‌  ‌diabetes,‌  ‌high‌‌ 
1. sale‌  ‌of‌‌
  real‌‌
  properties‌‌
  not‌‌
  primarily‌‌   held‌‌   for‌‌
  sale‌‌  S. Transport‌‌of‌p
‌ assengers‌‌by‌i‌ nternational‌c‌ arriers;‌  ‌ cholesterol,‌  ‌and‌  ‌hypertension‌  ‌beginning‌  ‌January‌  ‌1,‌  ‌2019;‌‌ 
to‌  ‌customers‌  ‌or‌  ‌held‌  ‌for‌  ‌lease‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌ordinary‌‌  If‌‌cargo‌,‌‌3%‌‌OPT.‌  and‌  ‌
course‌‌of‌‌trade‌‌or‌‌business,‌‌   ‌
T. Sale,‌‌
  importation‌‌   or‌‌
  lease‌‌   ‌of‌‌
  passenger‌‌
  or‌‌
  cargo‌‌  vessels‌‌ and‌‌  BB. Sale‌  ‌or‌  ‌lease‌  ‌of‌  ‌goods‌  ‌or‌  ‌properties‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌performance‌  ‌of‌‌ 
2. sale‌  ‌of‌  ‌real‌  ‌property‌  ‌utilized‌  ‌for‌  ‌socialized‌‌  aircraft,‌  ‌including‌  ‌engine,‌  ‌equipment‌  ‌and‌  ‌spare‌  ‌parts‌  ‌thereof‌‌  services‌‌ other‌‌ than‌‌ the‌‌ transactions‌‌ mentioned‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ preceding‌‌ 
housing‌,  ‌‌ ‌ for‌‌domestic‌‌or‌‌international‌‌transport‌‌operations;‌  ‌ paragraphs,‌  ‌the‌  ‌gross‌  ‌annual‌  ‌sales‌  ‌and/or‌  ‌receipts‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌‌ 
3. sale‌  ‌of‌  ‌house‌  ‌and‌  ‌lot,‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  r‌ esidential‌‌  U. Importation‌‌ ‌of‌‌ fuel,‌‌ goods‌‌ and‌‌ supplies‌‌ by‌‌ persons‌‌ engaged‌‌ in‌‌  exceed‌‌the‌‌amount‌‌of‌P ‌ 3M‌. ‌ ‌
dwellings‌  ‌with‌  ‌selling‌  ‌price‌  ‌of‌  ‌not‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌‌  international‌‌shipping‌‌or‌‌air‌‌transport‌‌operations:‌‌   ‌ Contex‌‌Corp.‌‌v.‌‌CIR‌  ‌
Php3,199,200.‌  ‌
Provided‌, ‌ ‌That‌  ‌the‌  ‌fuel,‌  ‌goods,‌  ‌and‌  ‌supplies‌‌
  shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  used‌‌
  for‌‌  Petitioner‌  ‌is‌  ‌registered‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌NON-VAT‌  ‌taxpayer‌  ‌per‌  ‌Certificate‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Q. Lease‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌residential‌  ‌unit‌  ‌with‌  ‌a ‌ ‌monthly‌  ‌rental‌  ‌not‌‌  international‌s‌ hipping‌‌or‌‌air‌‌transport‌‌operations;‌  ‌ Registration‌  ‌issued‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌
  BIR.‌  ‌As‌‌
  such,‌‌  it‌‌
  is‌‌
  exempt‌‌
  from‌‌  VAT‌‌
  on‌‌ 
exceeding‌P ‌ 15K‌; ‌ ‌ all‌‌its‌‌sales‌‌and‌‌importations‌‌of‌‌goods‌‌and‌‌services‌. ‌ ‌
Thus,‌‌   said‌‌ fuel,‌‌ goods‌‌ and‌‌ supplies‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ used‌‌ exclusively‌‌ or‌‌ 
The‌‌  foregoing‌‌   notwithstanding,‌‌ lease‌‌ of‌‌ residential‌‌ units‌‌ where‌‌  shall‌‌
  pertain‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  transport‌‌ of‌‌ goods‌‌ and/or‌‌ passenger‌‌ from‌‌ a ‌‌ Petitioner’s‌  ‌claim,‌  ‌however,‌  ‌for‌  ‌exemption‌  ‌from‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌for‌  ‌its‌‌ 
the‌‌
  monthly‌‌   rental‌‌   per‌‌
  unit‌‌
  exceeds‌‌
  ‌P15K‌, ‌‌but‌‌   the‌‌ aggregate‌‌ of‌‌  port‌‌
  in‌‌   the‌‌
  Philippines‌‌   directly‌‌  to‌‌
  a ‌‌foreign‌‌
  port,‌‌
  or‌‌ vice‌‌ versa,‌‌  purchases‌‌   of‌‌   supplies‌‌  and‌‌
  raw‌‌ materials‌‌ is‌‌ incongruous‌‌ with‌‌ its‌‌ 
such‌  ‌rentals‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌lessor‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌‌   year‌‌
  do‌‌
  not‌‌
  exceed‌‌  ‌P3M‌‌  without‌  ‌docking‌  ‌or‌  ‌stopping‌  ‌at‌  ‌any‌  ‌other‌  ‌port‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  claim‌  ‌that‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌VAT-Exempt,‌  ‌for‌  ‌only‌  ‌VAT-Registered‌  ‌entities‌  ‌can‌‌ 
shall‌‌   likewise‌‌   be‌‌
  exempt‌‌   from‌‌  VAT;‌‌ ‌however‌, ‌‌the‌‌ same‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌  Philippines‌  ‌unless‌  ‌the‌  ‌docking‌  ‌or‌  ‌stopping‌  ‌at‌  ‌any‌  ‌other‌‌  claim‌‌Input‌‌VAT‌‌Credit/Refund‌. ‌ ‌
subject‌‌   to‌‌
  ‌three‌‌   percent‌‌   (3%)‌‌   percentage‌‌ tax‌‌ under‌‌ Section‌‌  Philippine‌  ‌port‌  ‌is‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌unloading‌  ‌passengers‌‌ 
116‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Tax‌‌Code.‌‌   ‌ While‌‌   it‌‌
  is‌‌
  true‌‌   that‌‌  the‌‌  petitioner‌‌ should‌‌ not‌‌ have‌‌ been‌‌ liable‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ 
and/or‌  ‌cargoes‌  ‌that‌  ‌originated‌  ‌from‌  ‌abroad,‌  ‌or‌  ‌to‌  ‌load‌‌ 
VAT‌  ‌inadvertently‌  ‌passed‌  ‌on‌  ‌to‌  ‌it‌  ‌by‌  ‌its‌  ‌supplier‌  ‌since‌  ‌such‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌‌
In‌  ‌cases‌  ‌where‌‌
  a ‌‌lessor‌‌
  has‌‌  several‌‌
  residential‌‌   units‌‌
  for‌‌
  lease,‌‌  passengers‌‌and/or‌‌cargoes‌‌bound‌‌for‌‌abroad.‌  ‌ zero-rated‌‌   sale‌‌   on‌‌   the‌‌
  part‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  supplier,‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌petitioner‌‌   is‌‌
  not‌‌ the‌‌ 
some‌  ‌are‌  ‌leased‌  ‌out‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌monthly‌  ‌rental‌  ‌per‌  ‌unit‌  ‌of‌  ‌not‌‌  V. Services‌  ‌of‌  ‌bank,‌  ‌non-bank‌  ‌financial‌  i‌ ntermediaries‌‌  proper‌‌   party‌‌   ‌to‌‌  claim‌‌   such‌‌  VAT‌‌  refund.‌‌
  Rather,‌‌  it‌‌
  is‌‌ the‌‌ petitioner’s‌‌ 
exceeding‌  ‌P15K‌  ‌while‌  ‌others‌  ‌are‌  ‌leased‌  ‌out‌  ‌for‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌‌  performing‌  ‌quasi-banking‌  ‌functions,‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌non-bank‌‌  suppliers‌‌   who‌‌   are‌‌ the‌‌ proper‌‌ parties‌‌ to‌‌ claim‌‌ the‌‌ tax‌‌ credit‌‌ ‌and‌‌ 
P15K‌‌‌per‌‌unit,‌‌his‌‌tax‌‌liability‌‌will‌‌be‌‌as‌‌follows:‌‌   ‌ accordingly‌‌   refund‌‌ the‌‌ petitioner‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ VAT‌‌ erroneously‌‌ passed‌‌ on‌‌ to‌‌ 
financial‌‌intermediaries;‌  ‌
the‌‌latter.‌  ‌
1. The‌  ‌gross‌  ‌receipts‌  ‌from‌  ‌rentals‌  ‌not‌  ‌exceeding‌  ‌P15K‌‌  Such‌  ‌as‌  ‌money‌  ‌changers‌  ‌and‌  ‌pawnshops‌, ‌ ‌subject‌  ‌to‌‌ 
per‌  ‌month‌  ‌per‌  ‌unit‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌exempt‌  ‌from‌  ‌VAT‌‌  percentage‌‌   tax‌‌
  under‌‌
  Secs.‌‌
  121‌‌ and‌‌ 122,‌‌ respectively,‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Tax‌‌  PSALM‌‌v.‌‌CIR‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌
regardless‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  aggregate‌‌   annual‌‌   gross‌‌  receipts.‌‌
  It‌‌
  is‌‌  Code;‌  ‌
also‌‌exempt‌‌from‌‌the‌3 ‌ %‌‌percentage‌‌tax‌. ‌ ‌ WON‌‌PSALM’s‌‌privatization‌‌activities‌‌are‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌VAT.‌  ‌
W. Sale‌  ‌or‌  ‌lease‌  ‌of‌  ‌goods‌  ‌and‌  ‌services‌  ‌to‌  ‌senior‌  ‌citizens‌  ‌and‌‌ 
2. The‌  ‌gross‌  ‌receipts‌  ‌from‌  ‌rentals‌  ‌exceeding‌  ‌P15K‌  ‌per‌‌  persons‌‌   with‌‌
  disability‌, ‌‌as‌‌  provided‌‌ under‌‌ RA‌‌ Nos.‌‌ 9994‌‌ and‌‌  NO‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌sale‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌plants‌  ‌in‌‌  this‌‌  case‌‌  is‌‌  not‌‌  subject‌‌  to‌‌  VAT‌‌ 
month‌‌   per‌‌
  unit‌‌
  shall‌‌  be‌‌
  subject‌‌
  to‌‌
  VAT‌‌ if‌‌ the‌‌ aggregate‌‌  10754,‌‌respectively;‌  ‌ since‌  ‌the‌  ‌sale‌  ‌was‌  ‌made‌  ‌pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌PSALM's‌  ‌mandate‌‌
  to‌‌  privatize‌‌ 
annual‌  ‌gross‌  ‌receipts‌  ‌from‌  ‌said‌  ‌units‌  ‌only‌  ‌exceeds‌‌  NPC's‌  ‌assets,‌  ‌and‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌  ‌undertaken‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌course‌  ‌of‌  ‌trade‌  ‌or‌‌ 
X. Transfer‌  ‌of‌  ‌property‌  ‌pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌Section‌  ‌40(C)(2)‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  business‌. ‌‌In‌‌  selling‌‌  the‌‌
  power‌‌  plants,‌‌ PSALM‌‌ was‌‌ merely‌‌ exercising‌‌ a ‌‌
P3M‌. ‌ ‌Otherwise‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌gross‌  ‌receipts‌‌   will‌‌
  be‌‌
  subject‌‌
  to‌‌ 
NIRC,‌‌as‌‌amended;‌  ‌ governmental‌‌function‌‌for‌‌which‌‌it‌‌was‌‌created‌‌under‌‌the‌‌EPIRA‌‌law.‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 95‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

2. On‌  ‌importation‌  ‌— ‌ ‌upon‌  ‌payment‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌prior‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  d) Input‌  ‌tax‌  ‌from‌  ‌payments‌  ‌made‌  ‌to‌  ‌non-residents‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌ 
During‌  ‌its‌  ‌corporate‌  ‌life,‌  ‌PSALM‌  ‌has‌  ‌powers‌  ‌relating‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  release‌‌of‌‌the‌‌goods‌‌from‌‌customs‌‌custody.‌  ‌ supported‌‌   by‌‌
  a ‌‌copy‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Monthly‌‌
  Remittance‌‌
  Return‌‌
  of‌‌
  VAT‌  ‌
management‌‌   of‌‌
  its‌‌
  personnel‌‌  and‌‌
  leasing‌‌
  of‌‌
  its‌‌
  properties‌‌
  as‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌  Withheld.‌   ‌ ‌
3. On‌  ‌purchase‌  ‌of‌  ‌services‌  ‌— ‌ ‌when‌  ‌paid‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌buyer‌  ‌and‌‌ 
necessary‌‌to‌‌discharge‌‌its‌‌mandate.‌  ‌ e) Advance‌‌ VAT‌‌ on‌‌ sugar‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ supported‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ Payment‌‌ Order‌‌ 
evidenced‌‌by‌‌the‌‌seller’s‌‌official‌‌receipt.‌  ‌
showing‌‌payment‌ ‌of‌‌the‌‌advance‌‌VAT.‌‌   ‌
6.‌‌Input‌‌and‌‌output‌‌tax‌  ‌ Substantiation‌‌of‌‌Input‌‌Tax‌‌Credits‌‌   ‌
Transitional‌‌Input‌‌Tax‌‌Credits‌  ‌
Categories‌‌of‌‌Input‌‌taxes‌  ‌ a) Input‌  ‌taxes‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌importation‌  ‌of‌  ‌goods‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌domestic‌‌ 
purchase‌  ‌of‌  ‌goods,‌  ‌properties‌  ‌or‌  ‌services‌  ‌is‌  ‌made‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  A‌  ‌person‌  ‌who‌‌   becomes‌‌   liable‌‌
  to‌‌
  VAT‌‌
  or‌‌
  any‌‌   person‌‌   who‌‌   elects‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  a ‌‌
1. Input‌  ‌tax‌  ‌credit‌  ‌on‌  ‌importation‌  ‌of‌  ‌goods‌  ‌and‌  ‌current‌  ‌local‌‌ 
course‌‌   of‌‌
  trade‌‌
  or‌‌  business,‌‌   whether‌‌  such‌‌
  input‌‌
  taxes‌‌ shall‌  ‌be‌‌  VAT-registered‌  ‌person‌  ‌shall,‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌filing‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌inventory‌  ‌be‌‌ 
purchases‌‌of‌‌goods,‌‌properties,‌‌and‌‌services‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌110‌);‌  ‌
credited‌  ‌against‌  ‌zero-rated‌  ‌sale,‌  ‌non-zero-rated‌  ‌sales,‌  ‌or‌‌  allowed‌‌input‌‌tax‌‌   ‌
2. Transitional‌‌input‌‌tax‌‌credit‌‌—‌‌2%;‌  ‌ subjected‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌5%‌  ‌Final‌  ‌Withholding‌  ‌VAT‌, ‌ ‌must‌  ‌be‌‌ 
1. on‌  ‌his‌  ‌beginning‌  ‌inventory‌  ‌of‌  ‌goods,‌  ‌materials‌  ‌and‌  ‌supplies‌‌ 
3. Presumptive‌‌input‌‌tax‌‌credit‌‌—‌‌4%;‌  ‌ substantiated‌  ‌and‌  ‌supported‌  ‌by‌‌   the‌‌
  following‌‌  documents,‌‌   and‌‌ 
equivalent‌‌   to‌‌
  two‌‌  percent‌‌ (2%)‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ value‌‌ of‌‌ such‌‌ inventory‌‌ 
must‌  ‌be‌  ‌reported‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌information‌  ‌returns‌  ‌required‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌‌ 
4. Final‌‌withholding‌‌tax‌‌credit;‌‌and‌  ‌ or‌‌   ‌
submitted‌‌to‌‌the‌‌Bureau:‌   ‌ ‌
5. Excess‌‌input‌‌tax‌‌credit.‌  ‌ 2. the‌‌actual‌‌VAT‌‌paid‌‌on‌‌such‌‌goods,‌‌materials‌‌and‌‌supplies,‌‌   ‌
1) For‌  ‌the‌  ‌importation‌  ‌of‌  ‌goods‌  ‌- ‌ ‌import‌  ‌entry‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌‌ 
Sources‌‌of‌‌input‌‌tax‌‌credits‌  ‌ equivalent‌  ‌document‌  ‌showing‌  ‌actual‌  ‌payment‌‌   of‌‌   on‌‌  whichever‌‌is‌h
  VAT‌‌ ‌ igher‌,‌‌which‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌creditable‌‌against‌‌the‌‌output‌‌tax.‌  ‌
1. Purchase‌‌or‌‌importation‌‌of‌‌goods:‌  ‌ the‌‌imported‌‌goods.‌   ‌ ‌ When‌‌may‌‌one‌‌claim‌‌transitional‌‌input‌‌tax‌  ‌
2) For‌  ‌the‌  ‌domestic‌  ‌purchase‌‌   of‌‌
  goods‌‌
  and‌‌  properties‌‌   ‌– ‌‌
a. For‌‌sale;‌‌or‌  ‌ 1. He‌  ‌becomes‌  ‌liable‌  ‌to‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌first-time‌  ‌either‌  ‌through‌  ‌a ‌‌
invoice‌‌  showing‌‌   the‌  ‌information‌‌ required‌‌ under‌‌ Secs.‌‌ 113‌‌ 
new‌  ‌law‌  ‌or‌  ‌when‌  ‌his‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌transactions‌  ‌exceed‌  ‌the‌  ‌P3M‌‌ 
b. For‌  ‌conversion‌  ‌into‌  ‌or‌  i‌ ntended‌  ‌to‌  ‌form‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌ and‌‌237‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Tax‌‌Code.‌‌   ‌
threshold;‌  ‌
finished‌  ‌product‌  ‌for‌  s‌ ale‌  ‌including‌  ‌packaging‌‌  3) For‌  ‌the‌  ‌purchase‌  ‌of‌  ‌real‌  ‌property‌  ‌– ‌‌public‌‌  instrument‌‌ 
materials;‌‌or‌  ‌ i.e.,‌  ‌deed‌  ‌of‌  ‌absolute‌  ‌sale,‌  ‌deed‌  ‌of‌  ‌conditional‌  ‌sale,‌‌  2. He‌‌elects‌‌to‌‌register‌‌as‌‌a‌‌VAT-registered‌‌person;‌‌and‌  ‌
c. For‌‌use‌‌as‌‌supplies‌‌in‌‌the‌‌course‌‌of‌‌business;‌‌or‌  ‌ contract/agreement‌  ‌to‌‌   sell,‌‌
  etc.,‌‌
  together‌‌
  with‌‌
  VAT‌‌  invoice‌‌  3. He‌  ‌is‌  ‌already‌  ‌VAT-registered‌  ‌and‌  ‌also‌  ‌deals‌  ‌in‌  ‌goods‌  ‌or‌‌ 
issued‌‌by‌ ‌the‌‌seller.‌   ‌ ‌ properties,‌  ‌the‌  ‌sale‌  ‌of‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌exempt,‌  ‌but‌  ‌later‌  ‌becomes‌  ‌a ‌‌
d. For‌‌use‌‌as‌‌materials‌‌supplied‌‌in‌‌the‌‌sale‌‌of‌‌service;‌‌or‌  ‌
4) For‌  ‌the‌  ‌purchase‌  ‌of‌  ‌services‌  ‌– ‌ ‌official‌  ‌receipt‌‌   showing‌‌  taxable‌‌transaction‌‌through‌‌legislation.‌  ‌
e. For‌  ‌use‌  ‌in‌  ‌trade‌  ‌or‌  ‌business‌  ‌for‌  ‌which‌‌
  deduction‌‌
  for‌‌  the‌  ‌information‌  ‌required‌  ‌under‌  ‌Secs.‌  ‌113‌‌   and‌‌  237‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  Presumptive‌‌Input‌‌Tax‌‌Credits‌  ‌
depreciation‌  ‌or‌  ‌amortization‌  ‌is‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌under‌  ‌this‌‌  Tax‌‌Code.‌   ‌ ‌
Code.‌  ‌ Persons‌‌or‌‌firms‌‌engaged‌‌   ‌
A‌‌
  cash‌‌
  register‌‌   machine‌‌   tape‌‌
  issued‌‌  to‌‌
  a ‌‌registered‌‌ buyer‌‌ shall‌‌ 
2. Purchase‌‌of‌‌services‌‌on‌‌which‌‌a‌‌VAT‌‌has‌‌been‌‌actually‌‌paid.‌  ‌ constitute‌  ‌valid‌  ‌proof‌  ‌of‌  ‌substantiation‌‌   of‌‌
  tax‌‌
  credit‌‌   only‌‌  if‌‌
  it‌‌  1. in‌‌the‌‌‌processing‌‌of‌‌sardines,‌‌mackerel‌‌and‌‌milk,‌‌and‌‌   ‌

3. Transactions‌‌deemed‌‌sale;‌  ‌ shows‌‌  the‌‌ information‌‌ required‌‌ under‌‌ Secs.‌‌ 113‌‌ and‌‌ 237‌  ‌of‌‌ the‌‌  2. in‌‌manufacturing‌‌refined‌‌sugar‌‌and‌‌cooking‌‌oil,‌‌   ‌


Tax‌‌Code.‌   ‌ ‌
4. Transitional‌‌input‌‌tax.‌  ‌ shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌a ‌‌presumptive‌‌   input‌‌
  tax,‌‌
  creditable‌‌  against‌‌
  the‌‌
  output‌‌ 
b) Transitional‌‌   input‌‌
  tax‌‌  ‌shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  supported‌‌   by‌‌
  an‌‌
  inventory‌‌   of‌‌  tax,‌‌
  equivalent‌‌   to‌‌
  ‌four‌‌
  percent‌‌  (4%)‌  ‌of‌‌  the‌‌ gross‌‌ value‌‌ in‌‌ money‌‌ of‌‌ 
When‌‌creditable‌  ‌ goods‌‌as‌‌shown‌‌in‌‌a‌ ‌detailed‌‌list‌‌to‌‌be‌‌submitted‌‌to‌‌the‌‌BIR.‌  ‌ their‌  ‌purchases‌  ‌of‌  ‌primary‌  ‌agricultural‌  ‌products‌  ‌which‌  ‌are‌  ‌used‌  ‌as‌‌ 
1. On‌‌   purchase‌‌   of‌‌
  goods‌‌   or‌‌  properties‌‌ — ‌‌upon‌‌ consummation‌‌  c) Input‌  ‌tax‌  ‌on‌  ‌“deemed‌  ‌sale”‌  ‌transactions‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌  inputs‌‌to‌‌their‌‌production.‌  ‌
of‌  ‌sale,‌  ‌or‌  ‌issue‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌sales‌  ‌invoice,‌  ‌although‌  ‌no‌  ‌payment‌‌  substantiated‌‌with‌‌the‌‌invoice‌ ‌required‌‌under‌‌Sec.‌‌4.113-2.‌   ‌ ‌
The‌‌
  term‌‌   ‌'processing'‌‌ ‌shall‌‌ mean‌‌ pasteurization,‌‌ canning‌‌ and‌‌ activities‌‌ 
thereof‌‌was‌‌made‌‌by‌‌the‌‌buyer.‌  ‌
which‌‌   through‌‌   physical‌‌   or‌‌
  chemical‌‌ process‌‌ alter‌‌ the‌‌ exterior‌‌ texture‌‌ or‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 96‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

form‌‌
  or‌‌
  inner‌‌   substance‌‌   of‌‌ a‌‌ product‌‌ in‌‌ such‌‌ manner‌‌ as‌‌ to‌‌ prepare‌‌ it‌‌ for‌‌  1. Zero-rated‌  ‌or‌  ‌effectively‌  ‌zero-rated‌  ‌sales‌  ‌of‌  ‌goods.‌‌  clearance/s‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌appropriate‌  ‌BIR‌  ‌Office‌  ‌which‌  ‌has‌‌ 
special‌  ‌use‌  ‌to‌  ‌which‌  ‌it‌‌
  could‌‌   not‌‌
  have‌‌
  been‌‌
  put‌‌
  in‌‌
  its‌‌
  original‌‌  form‌‌   or‌‌  Petitioner‌‌must‌‌prove‌‌or‌‌comply‌‌the‌‌following:‌  ‌ jurisdiction‌‌over‌‌the‌‌taxpayer‌. ‌ ‌
condition.‌  ‌ a. He‌‌is‌‌a‌‌VAT-registered‌‌person;‌  ‌ CIR‌‌v.‌‌Central‌‌Luzon‌‌Drug‌‌Corporation‌  ‌
7.‌‌Refund‌‌or‌‌tax‌‌credit‌‌of‌‌excess‌‌input‌‌tax;‌‌procedure‌  ‌ b. Filed‌‌
  with‌‌  the‌‌
  BIR‌‌
  or‌‌ DOF‌‌ Center‌‌ within‌‌ ‌2 ‌‌years‌‌ after‌‌ the‌‌  Tax‌‌liability‌‌required‌‌for‌‌Tax‌‌credit‌  ‌
1. Any‌‌VAT-registered‌‌person,‌‌   ‌ close‌‌of‌‌taxable‌‌quarter‌‌when‌‌the‌‌sales‌‌were‌‌made‌  ‌
Since‌‌
  a ‌‌tax‌‌  credit‌‌   is‌‌
  used‌‌
  to‌‌
  directly‌‌
  reduce‌‌  the‌‌
  tax‌‌
  that‌‌ is‌‌ due,‌‌ there‌‌ 
2. whose‌‌sales‌‌are‌‌zero-rated‌‌or‌‌effectively‌‌zero-rated‌‌may,‌‌   ‌ With‌  ‌the‌  ‌CTA‌  ‌within‌  ‌30‌  ‌days‌  ‌from‌‌
  date‌‌
  of‌‌
  receipt‌‌
  of‌‌ 
ought‌‌  to‌‌  be‌‌  a ‌‌tax‌‌  liability‌‌
  before‌‌  the‌‌  tax‌‌
  credit‌‌  can‌‌   be‌‌  applied‌. ‌‌
denial‌‌from‌‌CIR;‌  ‌ While‌‌  the‌‌   grant‌‌   is‌‌
  mandatory,‌‌ the‌‌ availment‌‌ or‌‌ use‌‌ is‌‌ not‌. ‌‌By‌‌ its‌‌ 
3. within‌‌
  ‌two‌‌
  (2)‌‌
  years‌‌
  after‌‌
  the‌‌
  close‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  taxable‌‌ quarter‌‌ 
c. The‌  ‌claimed‌  ‌input‌  ‌tax‌  ‌payments‌‌   were‌‌
  not‌‌
  applied‌‌   against‌‌  nature,‌  ‌the‌  ‌tax‌  ‌credit‌  ‌may‌  ‌still‌  ‌be‌  ‌deducted‌  ‌from‌  ‌a ‌ ‌future,‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌‌
when‌‌the‌‌sales‌‌were‌‌made‌,  ‌‌ ‌ present,‌‌tax‌‌liability,‌‌without‌‌which‌‌it‌‌does‌‌not‌‌have‌‌any‌‌use.‌  ‌
any‌‌   output‌‌
  tax‌‌
  during‌‌
  the‌‌  period‌‌
  covered‌‌
  by‌‌  the‌‌
  claim‌‌ and‌‌ 
4. apply‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌ issuance‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌tax‌‌ credit‌‌ certificate‌‌ or‌‌ refund‌‌ of‌‌ 
in‌  ‌the‌  ‌succeeding‌  ‌periods,‌  ‌unless‌  ‌there‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌ ‌separate‌‌  Prior‌‌tax‌‌payments‌‌NOT‌‌required‌‌for‌‌Tax‌‌credit‌  ‌
creditable‌  ‌input‌  ‌tax‌  ‌due‌  ‌or‌  ‌paid‌  ‌attributable‌  ‌to‌  ‌such‌  ‌sales,‌‌  claim‌; ‌ ‌
except‌  ‌transitional‌  ‌input‌  ‌tax,‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌extent‌‌
  that‌‌
  such‌‌
  input‌‌  tax‌‌  While‌  ‌a ‌ ‌tax‌  ‌liability‌  ‌is‌  ‌essential‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌availment‌  ‌or‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌‌
  any‌‌
  tax‌‌ 
d. Deduct‌  ‌from‌  ‌its‌  ‌quarterly‌  ‌return‌  ‌the‌  ‌input‌  ‌tax‌  ‌being‌‌ 
has‌‌not‌‌been‌‌applied‌‌against‌‌output‌‌tax.‌  ‌ credit,‌‌ prior‌‌ tax‌‌ payments‌‌ are‌‌ not.‌  ‌On‌‌ the‌‌ contrary,‌‌ ‌for‌‌ the‌‌ existence‌‌ 
claimed‌‌as‌‌refund‌‌or‌‌credit;‌  ‌ or‌‌
  grant‌‌   solely‌‌   of‌‌
  such‌‌   credit,‌‌
  neither‌‌   a ‌‌tax‌‌
  liability‌‌
  nor‌‌ a ‌‌prior‌‌ 
Cancellation‌‌   of‌‌  VAT‌‌   Registration.‌‌   — ‌‌A ‌‌person‌‌   whose‌‌ registration‌‌ has‌‌ 
e. Directly‌‌attributable‌‌to‌‌the‌‌sale;‌  tax‌  ‌payment‌  ‌is‌  ‌needed‌. ‌ ‌Regarding‌  ‌this‌  ‌matter,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌private‌‌ 
been‌‌   cancelled‌‌   due‌‌   to‌‌
  retirement‌‌  from‌‌   or‌‌   cessation‌‌   of‌‌
  business,‌‌   or‌‌
  due‌‌ 
establishment‌  ‌reporting‌  ‌a ‌ ‌net‌  ‌loss‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌  ‌financial‌  ‌statements‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌‌ 
to‌  ‌changes‌  ‌in‌  ‌or‌  ‌cessation‌  ‌of‌  ‌status‌‌  under‌‌   Section‌‌   106(C)‌‌  of‌‌
  this‌‌
  Code‌‌  f. The‌  ‌acceptable‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌currency‌  ‌exchange‌  ‌proceeds‌  ‌had‌‌ 
different‌‌ from‌‌ another‌‌ that‌‌ presents‌‌ a ‌‌net‌‌ income.‌  ‌Both‌‌ are‌‌ entitled‌‌ to‌‌ 
may,‌  ‌within‌  ‌two‌  ‌(2)‌  ‌years‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌   date‌‌   of‌‌
  cancellation‌, ‌‌apply‌‌   for‌‌  been‌‌duly‌‌accounted‌‌for,‌‌if‌‌applicable;‌  ‌ the‌‌ tax‌‌ credit‌‌ provided‌‌ for‌‌ under‌‌ RA‌‌ 7432,‌‌ since‌‌ the‌‌ law‌‌ itself‌‌ accords‌‌ 
the‌‌   issuance‌‌  of‌‌  a ‌‌tax‌‌
  credit‌‌  certificate‌‌   ‌for‌‌  any‌‌ unused‌‌ input‌‌ tax‌‌ which‌‌  g. Duly‌‌supported‌‌by‌‌VAT‌i‌ nvoices‌o
‌ r‌‌official‌‌receipts‌; ‌ ‌ that‌‌unconditional‌‌benefit.‌‌   ‌
may‌‌be‌‌used‌‌in‌‌payment‌‌of‌‌his‌‌other‌‌internal‌‌revenue‌‌taxes.‌  ‌
Imprinting‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  word‌‌
  “zero-rated”‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌ invoices‌‌ or‌‌  CIR‌‌v.‌‌Aichi‌‌Forging‌‌‌October‌‌6,‌‌2010‌  ‌
Period‌  ‌within‌  ‌which‌  ‌Refund‌  ‌or‌  ‌Tax‌‌   Credit‌‌
  of‌‌
  Input‌‌   Taxes‌‌   shall‌‌
  be‌‌  receipts‌‌is‌r‌ equired.‌ 
Made.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌In‌  ‌proper‌  ‌cases,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Commissioner‌  ‌shall‌  ‌grant‌  ‌a ‌ ‌refund‌  ‌for‌‌  1. Thus,‌  ‌in‌  ‌claims‌  ‌for‌  ‌tax‌  ‌refund‌  ‌or‌  ‌credit‌‌
  of‌‌
  unutilized‌‌
  input‌‌ 
h. The‌‌
  VAT‌‌
  return‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  succeeding‌‌
  quarters‌‌
  covered‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌  VAT,‌‌
  only‌‌ the‌‌ administrative‌‌ claim‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ within‌‌ the‌‌ 2-year‌‌ 
creditable‌  ‌input‌  ‌taxes‌  ‌within‌  ‌ninety‌  ‌(90)‌  ‌days‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌date‌  ‌of‌‌ 
claim‌‌must‌‌be‌‌submitted‌‌with‌‌the‌‌CTA.‌  ‌ prescriptive‌  ‌period‌  ‌reckoned‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌close‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌taxable‌‌ 
submission‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌official‌  ‌receipts‌  ‌or‌  ‌invoices‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌‌ 
2. Cancellation‌‌  of‌‌
  VAT‌‌  registration‌‌ ‌due‌‌ to‌‌ cessation‌‌ of‌‌ business‌‌  quarter‌‌when‌‌the‌‌sale‌‌was‌‌made.‌  ‌
documents‌‌‌in‌‌support‌‌of‌‌the‌‌application‌‌filed:‌  ‌
or‌‌dissolution‌‌of‌‌the‌‌corporation.‌  ‌ 2. The‌‌claimant‌‌may‌‌then‌‌file‌‌his‌‌judicial‌‌claim‌  ‌
Provided‌, ‌‌That‌‌
  should‌‌  the‌‌
  CIR‌‌
  find‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ grant‌‌ of‌‌ refund‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ proper,‌‌ 
a. Within‌  ‌two‌  ‌(2)‌  ‌years‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌date‌  ‌of‌  ‌cancellation‌, ‌‌ a. Within‌‌
  30‌‌ days‌‌ from‌‌ receipt‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ denial‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ CIR;‌‌ 
the‌‌CIR‌‌must‌‌state‌‌in‌‌writing‌‌the‌‌legal‌‌and‌‌factual‌‌basis‌‌for‌‌the‌‌denial.‌  ‌
OR‌  ‌
apply‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌issuance‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌tax‌  ‌credit‌  ‌certificate‌  ‌for‌  ‌any‌‌ 
In‌‌
  case‌‌
  of‌‌
  full‌‌
  or‌‌
  partial‌‌
  denial‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  claim‌‌
  for‌‌
  tax‌‌
  refund,‌‌
  the‌‌
  taxpayer‌‌  b. Within‌‌ 30‌‌ days‌‌ after‌‌ the‌‌ lapse‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ ‌90-day‌‌ period‌‌ 
unused‌  ‌input‌  ‌tax‌  ‌which‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌used‌  ‌in‌  ‌payment‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌‌ 
affected‌  ‌may,‌  ‌within‌  ‌thirty‌  ‌(30)‌  ‌days‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌receipt‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  given‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  CIR‌‌
  to‌‌
  decide‌‌   that‌‌
  is‌‌ reckoned‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌ 
other‌‌internal‌‌revenue‌‌taxes.‌  ‌
decision‌‌denying‌‌the‌‌claim,‌‌‌appeal‌‌the‌‌decision‌‌with‌‌the‌‌CTA:‌‌   ‌ date‌‌when‌‌documents‌‌are‌‌deemed‌‌submitted.‌  ‌
b. The‌  ‌date‌  ‌of‌  ‌cancellation‌  ‌being‌  ‌referred‌‌  herein‌‌   is‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌date‌‌ 
Provided,‌  ‌however‌, ‌ ‌That‌  ‌failure‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌official,‌  ‌agent,‌  ‌or‌‌  This‌‌is‌‌considered‌‌a‌d
‌ enial‌‌‌on‌‌the‌‌part‌‌of‌‌the‌‌CIR.‌  ‌
of‌  ‌issuance‌  ‌of‌  ‌tax‌  ‌clearance‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌BIR‌, ‌ ‌after‌  ‌full‌‌ 
employee‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  BIR‌‌ to‌‌ act‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ application‌‌ within‌‌ the‌‌ ninety‌‌ (90)-day‌‌  3. If‌‌
  the‌‌
  claimant‌‌
  files‌‌
  his‌‌ judicial‌‌ claim‌‌ without‌‌ respecting‌‌ the‌‌ 
settlement‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌  ‌tax‌  ‌liabilities‌  ‌relative‌  ‌to‌  ‌cessation‌  ‌of‌‌ 
period‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌punishable‌‌under‌‌Section‌‌269‌o ‌ f‌‌this‌‌Code.‌  ‌ 90-day‌‌period,‌‌such‌‌will‌‌be‌‌dismissed‌‌as‌‌being‌p ‌ remature‌. ‌ ‌
business‌‌or‌‌change‌‌of‌‌status.‌  ‌
When‌  ‌based‌‌
  on‌‌
  statute,‌‌
  a ‌‌claim‌‌
  for‌‌
  tax‌‌
  refund‌‌
  partakes‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  nature‌‌
  of‌‌  4. The‌  ‌rule‌  ‌that‌  ‌both‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌and‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌claims‌  ‌fall‌‌ 
c. The‌‌   filing‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ claim‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ made‌‌ only‌‌ after‌‌ completion‌‌  within‌  ‌the‌  ‌2-year‌  ‌period‌  ‌applies‌  ‌to‌  ‌erroneously‌  ‌or‌‌ 
an‌‌exemption.‌  ‌
of‌  ‌the‌  ‌mandatory‌  ‌audit‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌  ‌internal‌  ‌revenue‌  ‌tax‌‌  excessively‌  ‌paid‌  ‌taxes,‌  ‌and‌  ‌is‌  ‌reckoned‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌date‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Categories‌‌of‌‌refunds‌‌or‌‌credits‌  ‌ liabilities‌‌   covering‌‌   the‌‌ immediately‌‌ preceding‌‌ year‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌  payment.‌‌Input‌‌VAT‌‌is‌N ‌ OT‌e‌ rroneously‌‌or‌‌excessively‌‌paid.‌  ‌
short‌  ‌period‌  ‌return‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌   issuance‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  applicable‌‌
  tax‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 97‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

Philippine‌‌Phosphate‌‌Fertilizer‌‌v.‌‌CIR‌  ‌ Silicon‌‌Philippines‌‌v.‌‌CIR‌‌‌2016‌  ‌
the‌‌120-day‌‌period‌‌if‌‌the‌‌CIR‌‌does‌‌not‌‌act‌‌within‌‌that‌‌period.‌  ‌
WON‌‌ the‌‌ CTA‌‌ should‌‌ have‌‌ granted‌‌ petitioner’s‌‌ claim‌‌ for‌‌ refund.‌‌ ‌YES‌. ‌‌ The‌‌   general‌‌   interpretative‌‌   rule‌‌  allowed‌‌   the‌‌ premature‌‌ filing‌‌ of‌‌ 
Nowhere‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Circular‌  ‌is‌  ‌it‌  ‌stated‌‌
  that‌‌
  invoices‌‌
  are‌‌
  required‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌  Panay‌‌Power‌‌Corp.‌‌v.‌‌CIR‌‌2
‌ 015‌  ‌ judicial‌  ‌claims‌  ‌by‌  ‌providing‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌"taxpayer-claimant‌  ‌need‌  ‌not‌‌ 
presented‌‌in‌‌claiming‌‌refunds.‌  ‌ wait‌‌  for‌‌  the‌‌  lapse‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  120-day‌‌   period‌‌   before‌‌
  it‌‌
  could‌‌
  seek‌‌ judicial‌‌ 
In‌  ‌this‌  ‌case,‌  ‌records‌  ‌disclose‌  ‌that‌‌  petitioner‌‌   filed‌‌  its‌‌
  administrative‌‌ 
relief‌‌  with‌‌   the‌‌   CTA‌‌  by‌‌  way‌‌   of‌‌
  Petition‌‌  for‌‌ Review."‌‌ ‌The‌‌ rule‌‌ certainly‌‌ 
and‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌claims‌  ‌for‌  ‌refund/credit‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌input‌  ‌VAT‌‌   on‌‌  December‌‌ 
‌CIR‌‌v.‌‌San‌‌Roque‌‌Power‌‌2
‌ 013‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ did‌‌
  not‌‌  allow‌‌   the‌‌
  filing‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌judicial‌‌ claim‌‌ long‌‌ after‌‌ the‌‌ expiration‌‌ of‌‌ 
29,‌  ‌2005‌  ‌and‌  ‌January‌  ‌20,‌  ‌2006,‌‌   respectively,‌‌   or‌‌
  ‌during‌‌   the‌‌  period‌‌ 
the‌‌120+30‌‌day‌‌period‌. ‌ ‌
Application‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  120+30‌‌   Day‌‌
  Periods‌‌
  ‌(please‌‌
  note‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌ 120‌‌  when‌‌BIR‌‌Ruling‌‌No.‌‌DA-489-03‌‌was‌‌in‌‌place.‌  ‌
days‌‌is‌‌now‌9
‌ 0‌d ‌ ays‌‌‌under‌‌the‌‌TRAIN‌‌law)‌  ‌ 8.‌‌Compliance‌‌requirements‌  ‌
As‌  ‌such,‌  ‌it‌  ‌need‌  ‌not‌  ‌wait‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌expiration‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌120-day‌‌ 
GR‌: ‌ ‌Taxpayer‌‌  must‌‌
  wait‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  lapse‌‌ of‌‌ 120‌‌ days‌‌ before‌‌ it‌‌ could‌‌  period‌‌   before‌‌   filing‌‌
  its‌‌
  judicial‌‌ claim‌‌ before‌‌ the‌‌ CTA,‌‌ and‌‌ hence,‌‌ is‌‌ 
A‌  ‌person‌  ‌subject‌‌
  to‌‌
  pay‌‌
  internal‌‌
  revenue‌‌
  tax‌‌
  must‌‌
  comply‌‌
  with‌‌
  certain‌‌ 
seek‌‌relief‌‌with‌‌the‌‌CTA.‌  ‌ deemed‌‌   timely‌‌   filed.‌‌
  In‌‌
  view‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  foregoing,‌‌
  the‌‌
  CTA‌‌ En‌‌ Banc‌‌ erred‌‌ 
in‌  ‌dismissing‌  ‌outright‌  ‌petitioner’s‌  ‌claim‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌ground‌  ‌of‌‌  administrative‌‌requirements:‌  ‌
EXC‌:‌ T
‌ hose‌‌who‌‌filed‌‌their‌‌judicial‌‌claim‌‌between‌‌   ‌ prematurity.‌  ‌ 1. Registration‌‌as‌‌a‌‌VAT‌‌taxpayer;‌  ‌

10‌‌Dec‌‌2003‌‌—‌‌6‌‌Oct‌‌2010‌. ‌ ‌ Cargill‌‌Phils.,‌‌Inc.‌‌v.‌‌CIR‌‌2
‌ 015‌  ‌ 2. Keeping‌‌   and‌‌ stamping‌‌ of‌‌ books‌‌ of‌‌ accounts,‌‌ sales‌‌ invoices,‌‌ and‌‌ 
official‌‌receipts‌‌and‌‌other‌‌accounting‌‌records;‌ 
“Excess”‌‌Input‌‌VAT‌‌and‌‌“Excessively”‌‌Collected‌‌Tax‌  ‌ Anent‌  ‌Cargill’s‌  ‌first‌  ‌refund‌  ‌claim‌, ‌ ‌it‌  ‌filed‌  ‌its‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌claim‌‌ 
with‌  ‌the‌  ‌BIR‌‌
  on‌‌
  June‌‌   27,‌‌
  2003,‌‌
  and‌‌   its‌‌
  judicial‌‌
  claim‌‌
  before‌‌
  the‌‌
  CTA‌‌  3. Issuance‌‌of‌‌invoices‌‌and‌‌receipts;‌  ‌
The‌  ‌input‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌is‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌“excessively”‌  ‌collected‌  ‌as‌  ‌understood‌‌   under‌‌  on‌  ‌June‌  ‌30,‌  ‌2003,‌  ‌or‌  ‌before‌  ‌the‌  ‌period‌  ‌when‌  ‌BIR‌  ‌Ruling‌  ‌No.‌‌ 
Section‌‌   229‌‌  because‌‌ at‌‌ the‌‌ time‌‌ the‌‌ input‌‌ VAT‌‌ is‌‌ collected‌‌ the‌‌ amount‌‌  DA-489-03‌‌   was‌‌ in‌‌ effect.‌‌ As‌‌ such,‌‌ it‌‌ was‌‌ incumbent‌‌ upon‌‌ Cargill‌‌ to‌‌  4. Filing‌‌of‌‌tax‌‌returns‌‌and‌‌payment‌‌of‌‌taxes;‌‌and‌  ‌
paid‌‌is‌‌correct‌‌and‌‌proper.‌  ‌ wait‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌  lapse‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ 120-day‌‌ period‌‌ before‌‌ seeking‌‌ relief‌‌ with‌‌ 
5. Withholding‌‌of‌‌tax‌‌on‌‌certain‌‌payments‌‌made‌‌to‌‌other‌‌persons.‌  ‌
the‌‌CTA.‌‌It‌‌was‌‌thus‌p ‌ rematurely‌‌filed‌. ‌ ‌
CIR‌‌v.‌‌Dash‌‌Engineering‌‌‌2013‌‌cf.‌‌‌San‌‌Roque‌  ‌ KEPCO‌‌Phils.‌‌v.‌‌CIR‌‌‌2011‌‌supra‌  ‌
In‌  ‌contrast,‌‌   Cargill’s‌‌
  ‌second‌‌   refund‌‌   claims‌‌  were‌‌
  both‌‌
  filed‌‌  on‌‌
  May‌‌ 
WON‌  ‌respondent’s‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌claim‌  ‌for‌  ‌refund‌  ‌was‌  ‌filed‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌‌  31,‌‌   2005,‌‌
  falling‌‌
  within‌‌  the‌‌
  exemption‌‌   window‌‌  period‌‌
  contemplated‌‌  Failure‌  ‌to‌  ‌print‌  ‌the‌  ‌word‌  ‌"zero-rated"‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌
  invoices‌‌
  or‌‌
  receipts‌‌
  is‌‌ 
prescriptive‌‌period.‌  ‌ in‌  ‌San‌  ‌Roque‌. ‌ ‌Verily,‌  ‌the‌  ‌CTA‌  ‌En‌  ‌Banc‌  ‌erred‌  ‌when‌  ‌it‌  ‌outrightly‌‌  fatal‌‌to‌‌a‌‌claim‌‌for‌‌refund‌‌or‌‌credit‌‌of‌‌input‌‌VAT‌‌on‌‌zero-rated‌‌sales.‌  ‌
dismissed‌‌CTA‌‌Case‌‌No.‌‌7262‌‌on‌‌the‌‌ground‌‌of‌‌prematurity.‌  ‌
NO‌. ‌ ‌In‌  ‌accordance‌  ‌with‌  ‌San‌‌  Roque,‌‌  respondent’s‌‌  judicial‌‌  claim‌‌  for‌‌ 
Silicon‌‌Phil.,‌‌Inc.‌‌v.‌‌CIR‌‌‌2011‌‌on‌‌printing‌‌of‌‌“zero-rated”‌  ‌
refund‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌denied‌  ‌for‌  ‌having‌  ‌been‌  ‌filed‌  ‌late.‌  ‌Although‌‌  Pilipinas‌‌Total‌‌Gas‌‌v.‌‌CIR‌‌2
‌ 015‌‌En‌‌Banc‌‌ 
respondent‌  ‌filed‌  ‌its‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌claim‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌‌   BIR‌‌
  on‌‌  August‌‌  9,‌‌  See‌‌also‌‌‌Western‌‌Mindanao‌‌Power‌‌Corp.‌‌v.‌‌CIR‌,‌‌Panasonic‌‌ 
re‌‌Submission‌‌of‌‌Documents‌  ‌
2004‌‌ before‌‌ the‌‌ expiration‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ two-year‌‌ period‌‌ in‌‌ Section‌‌ 112(A),‌‌ it‌‌  Communications‌‌Imaging‌‌v.‌‌CIR‌  ‌
undoubtedly‌‌   failed‌‌
  to‌‌
  comply‌‌   with‌‌  the‌‌  120+30-day‌‌   period‌‌ in‌‌ Section‌‌  Under‌  ‌the‌  ‌current‌  ‌rule‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌reckoning‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌120-day‌  ‌period‌  ‌has‌‌ 
Printing‌‌the‌‌ATP‌‌on‌‌the‌‌invoices‌‌or‌‌receipts‌‌is‌‌NOT‌‌required‌  ‌
112(D)‌‌   (now‌‌   subparagraph‌‌   C)‌‌
  which‌‌   requires‌‌   that‌‌
  upon‌‌   the‌‌
  inaction‌‌  been‌  ‌withdrawn‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌taxpayer‌  ‌by‌  ‌RMC‌  ‌54-2014‌, ‌ ‌since‌  ‌it‌‌ 
of‌  ‌the‌  ‌CIR‌  ‌for‌  ‌120‌  ‌days‌  ‌after‌  ‌the‌  ‌submission‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌documents‌  ‌in‌‌  requires‌‌   him‌‌
  at‌‌ the‌‌ time‌‌ he‌‌ files‌‌ his‌‌ claim‌‌ to‌‌ complete‌‌ his‌‌ supporting‌‌  It‌‌
  has‌‌
  been‌‌
  settled‌‌
  in‌‌
  Intel‌‌
  Technology‌‌   Philippines,‌‌   Inc.‌‌
  v.‌‌
  CIR‌‌ that‌‌ 
support‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  claim,‌‌  the‌‌
  taxpayer‌‌   has‌‌  to‌‌ file‌‌ its‌‌ judicial‌‌ claim‌‌ within‌‌  documents‌  ‌and‌  ‌attest‌  ‌that‌  ‌he‌  ‌will‌  ‌no‌  ‌longer‌  ‌submit‌  ‌any‌  ‌other‌‌  the‌‌  ATP‌‌
  need‌‌
  not‌‌
  be‌‌
  reflected‌‌  or‌‌
  indicated‌‌
  in‌‌ the‌‌ invoices‌‌ or‌‌ receipts‌‌ 
30‌‌days‌‌after‌‌the‌‌lapse‌‌of‌‌the‌‌said‌‌period.‌  ‌ document‌  ‌to‌  ‌prove‌  ‌his‌  ‌claim.‌  ‌Further,‌  ‌the‌  ‌taxpayer‌  ‌is‌  ‌barred‌  ‌from‌‌  because‌‌there‌‌is‌‌no‌‌law‌‌or‌‌regulation‌‌requiring‌‌it.‌  ‌
submitting‌‌ additional‌‌ documents‌‌ after‌‌ he‌‌ has‌‌ filed‌‌ his‌‌ administrative‌‌ 
ROHM‌‌Apollo‌‌v.‌‌CIR‌‌‌2015‌  ‌ claim.‌  ‌ But‌  ‌while‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌law‌  ‌requiring‌  ‌the‌  ‌ATP‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌printed‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌ 
invoices‌  ‌or‌  ‌receipts,‌  ‌Section‌  ‌238‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌NIRC‌  ‌expressly‌  ‌requires‌‌ 
The‌‌taxpayer‌‌can‌‌file‌‌an‌‌appeal‌‌in‌‌one‌‌of‌‌two‌‌ways:‌‌   ‌ Hedcor,‌‌Inc.‌‌v.‌‌CIR‌‌2
‌ 015‌‌also‌‌on‌‌Submission‌‌of‌‌Documents‌  ‌ persons‌  ‌engaged‌‌   in‌‌  business‌‌   to‌‌
  secure‌‌
  an‌‌
  ATP‌‌
  from‌‌   the‌‌  BIR‌‌
  prior‌‌   to‌‌ 
1) file‌‌
  the‌‌ judicial‌‌ claim‌‌ within‌‌ 30‌‌ days‌‌ after‌‌ the‌‌ Commissioner‌‌  printing‌‌  invoices‌‌ or‌‌ receipts.‌‌ Failure‌‌ to‌‌ do‌‌ so‌‌ makes‌‌ the‌‌ person‌‌ liable‌‌ 
denies‌‌the‌‌claim‌‌within‌‌the‌‌120-day‌‌waiting‌‌period,‌‌or‌  ‌ The‌  ‌Transmittal‌  ‌Letter‌  ‌submitted‌  ‌by‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌is‌‌
  not‌‌
  a ‌‌substantial‌‌ 
under‌‌Section‌‌264‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌NIRC.‌  ‌
submission‌‌  ‌that‌‌
  would‌‌
  warrant‌‌  a ‌‌change‌‌  in‌‌
  the‌‌ reckoning‌‌ date‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ 
2) file‌‌
  the‌‌
  judicial‌‌
  claim‌‌
  within‌‌
  30‌‌
  days‌‌
  from‌‌
  the‌‌
  expiration‌‌
  of‌‌  120-day‌‌period‌‌for‌‌the‌‌BIR‌‌to‌‌act‌‌on‌‌the‌‌claim‌‌for‌‌refund.‌‌   ‌ WON‌  ‌a ‌ ‌claimant‌  ‌for‌  ‌unutilized‌  ‌input‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌on‌  ‌zero-rated‌  ‌sales‌  ‌is‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 98‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

a.‌‌Registration‌  ‌ b) Information‌  ‌contained‌  ‌in‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌invoice‌  ‌or‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌official‌‌ 


required‌  ‌to‌  ‌present‌  ‌proof‌  ‌that‌  ‌it‌  ‌has‌  ‌secured‌  ‌an‌  ‌ATP‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌
  BIR‌‌ 
prior‌‌to‌‌the‌‌printing‌‌of‌‌its‌‌invoices‌‌or‌‌receipts‌.‌‌YES‌. ‌ ‌ receipt.‌‌
  – ‌‌The‌‌ following‌  ‌information‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ indicated‌‌ in‌‌ VAT‌‌ 
Persons‌‌Required‌‌to‌‌Register‌‌for‌‌VAT.‌—
‌  ‌ ‌
invoice‌‌or‌‌VAT‌‌official‌‌receipt:‌   ‌ ‌
The‌‌   non-presentation‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  ATP‌‌
  and‌‌   the‌‌ failure‌‌ to‌‌ indicate‌‌ the‌‌  1) Any‌  ‌person‌  ‌who,‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌course‌  ‌of‌  ‌trade‌  ‌or‌  ‌business,‌  ‌sells,‌‌ 
1) A‌  ‌statement‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌seller‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌VAT-registered‌  ‌person,‌‌ 
word‌‌   "zero-rated"‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌  invoices‌‌
  or‌‌ receipts‌‌ are‌‌ ‌fatal‌‌ ‌to‌‌ a ‌‌claim‌‌  barters‌‌  or‌‌
  exchanges‌‌ goods‌‌ or‌‌ properties,‌‌ or‌‌ engages‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ sale‌‌ 
followed‌‌by‌‌his‌‌TIN;‌   
for‌‌credit/refund‌‌of‌‌input‌‌VAT‌‌on‌‌zero-rated‌‌sales.‌‌   ‌ or‌‌exchange‌‌of‌‌services,‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌liable‌‌to‌‌register‌‌for‌‌VAT‌‌if:‌  ‌
2) The‌‌   total‌‌
  amount‌‌   which‌‌
  the‌‌  purchaser‌‌   pays‌‌ or‌‌ is‌‌ obligated‌‌ 
To‌‌
  claim‌‌
  a ‌‌refund‌‌
  of‌‌
  ‌input‌‌
  VAT‌‌ on‌‌ capital‌‌ goods‌, ‌‌Section‌‌ 112‌‌ (B)‌‌ of‌‌  a) His‌  ‌gross‌  ‌sales‌  ‌or‌  ‌receipts‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌past‌  ‌twelve‌  ‌(12)‌‌ 
to‌  ‌pay‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌seller‌‌
  with‌  ‌the‌‌  indication‌‌  that‌‌
  such‌‌   amount‌‌ 
the‌‌NIRC‌‌requires‌‌that:‌  ‌ months,‌  ‌other‌  ‌than‌  ‌those‌  ‌that‌  ‌are‌  ‌exempt‌  ‌under‌‌ 
includes‌‌the‌‌VAT.‌‌   ‌
Section‌‌109(A)‌‌to‌‌(BB),‌‌have‌e‌ xceeded‌‌Php3M‌;‌‌OR‌  ‌
1) the‌‌claimant‌‌must‌‌be‌‌a‌‌VAT‌‌registered‌‌person;‌  ‌ Consequence‌  ‌of‌  ‌Issuing‌  ‌Erroneous‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌Invoice‌  ‌or‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌Official‌‌ 
b) There‌‌   are‌‌   reasonable‌‌   grounds‌‌   to‌‌
  believe‌‌ that‌‌ his‌‌ gross‌‌ 
2) the‌  ‌input‌  ‌taxes‌  ‌claimed‌  ‌must‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌paid‌  ‌on‌  ‌capital‌‌  Receipt.‌‌‌— ‌ ‌
sales‌  ‌or‌‌   receipts‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  next‌‌
  twelve‌‌   (12)‌‌  months‌‌   will‌‌ 
goods;‌  ‌ 1) If‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person‌  ‌who‌  ‌is‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌a ‌ ‌VAT-registered‌  ‌person‌  ‌issues‌  ‌an‌‌ 
exceed‌P ‌ hp3M‌.‌‌OR‌  ‌
3) the‌  ‌input‌  ‌taxes‌  ‌must‌  ‌not‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌applied‌  ‌against‌  ‌any‌‌  invoice‌‌   or‌‌
  receipt‌‌
  showing‌‌   his‌‌  Taxpayer‌‌ Identification‌‌ Number‌‌ 
output‌‌tax‌‌liability;‌‌and‌  ‌ 2) Every‌‌   person‌‌ who‌‌ becomes‌‌ liable‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ registered‌‌ shall‌‌ register‌‌ 
(TIN),‌‌followed‌‌by‌‌the‌‌word‌‌"VAT";‌  ‌
with‌‌ the‌‌ Revenue‌‌ District‌‌ Office‌‌ which‌‌ has‌‌ jurisdiction‌‌ over‌‌ the‌‌ 
4) the‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌claim‌  ‌for‌  ‌refund‌  ‌must‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌filed‌‌ 
head‌  ‌office‌  ‌or‌  ‌branch‌  ‌of‌‌
  that‌‌
  person,‌‌  and‌‌   shall‌‌
  pay‌‌  the‌‌
  annual‌‌  a) The‌  ‌issuer‌  ‌shall,‌  ‌in‌  ‌addition‌  ‌to‌  ‌any‌  ‌liability‌  ‌to‌  ‌other‌‌ 
within‌  ‌two‌  ‌(2)‌  ‌years‌  ‌after‌  ‌the‌  ‌close‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌quarter‌‌ 
when‌‌the‌‌importation‌‌or‌‌purchase‌‌was‌‌made.‌  ‌ registration‌‌fee.‌   percentage‌‌taxes‌,‌‌be‌‌liable‌‌to:‌  ‌
If‌‌
  he‌‌
  fails‌‌
  to‌‌
  register,‌‌
  he‌‌
  shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  liable‌‌  to‌‌ pay‌‌ the‌‌ tax‌‌ under‌‌ Title‌‌ IV‌‌ as‌‌ if‌‌  1. The‌  ‌tax‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌in‌  ‌Section‌  ‌106‌  ‌or‌  ‌108‌  ‌without‌  ‌the‌‌ 
"‌Capital‌‌goods‌‌or‌‌properties‌"‌‌refer‌‌to‌‌goods‌‌or‌‌properties‌‌   ‌
he‌‌  were‌‌  a ‌‌VAT-registered‌‌   person,‌‌  but‌‌
  ‌without‌‌   the‌‌ benefit‌‌ of‌‌ input‌‌ tax‌‌  benefit‌‌of‌‌any‌‌input‌‌tax‌‌credit‌;‌‌and‌  ‌
a. with‌‌estimated‌‌useful‌‌life‌‌greater‌‌than‌‌one‌‌year‌‌‌and‌‌   ‌ credits‌f‌ or‌‌the‌‌period‌‌in‌‌which‌‌he‌‌was‌‌not‌‌properly‌‌registered.‌  ‌ 2. A‌‌50%‌‌surcharge‌u
‌ nder‌‌Section‌‌248(B)‌‌of‌‌this‌‌Code;‌  ‌
b. which‌  ‌are‌  ‌treated‌  ‌as‌  ‌depreciable‌  ‌assets‌  ‌under‌  ‌Section‌‌  Optional‌‌Registration‌‌for‌‌VAT‌‌of‌‌Exempt‌‌Person.‌—
‌  ‌ ‌ b) The‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌shall,‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌‌
  other‌‌
  requisite‌‌
  information‌‌   required‌‌ 
29(f),‌‌   ‌ under‌  ‌Subsection‌  ‌(B)‌  ‌hereof‌  ‌is‌  ‌shown‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌invoice‌  ‌or‌‌ 
1) Any‌‌
  person‌‌   who‌‌
  is‌‌ not‌‌ required‌‌ to‌‌ register‌‌ for‌‌ VAT‌‌ may‌‌ elect‌‌ to‌‌ 
c. used‌  ‌directly‌  ‌or‌  ‌indirectly‌  ‌in‌‌
  the‌‌
  production‌‌
  or‌‌
  sale‌‌
  of‌‌  register‌  ‌for‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌by‌  ‌registering‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌RDO,‌  ‌and‌  ‌paying‌  ‌the‌‌  receipt,‌  ‌be‌  ‌recognized‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌  ‌input‌  ‌tax‌  ‌credit‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
taxable‌‌goods‌‌or‌‌services.‌  ‌ purchaser‌u ‌ nder‌‌Section‌‌110‌‌of‌‌this‌‌Code.‌  ‌
annual‌‌registration‌‌fee.‌ 
Training‌‌   materials,‌‌  office‌‌  supplies,‌‌
  posters,‌‌   banners,‌‌ T-shirts,‌‌ books,‌‌  2) Any‌  ‌person‌  ‌who‌  ‌elects‌  ‌to‌  ‌register‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌‌  2) If‌  ‌a ‌ ‌VAT-registered‌  ‌person‌  ‌issues‌  ‌a ‌ ‌VAT‌  ‌invoice‌  ‌or‌  ‌VAT‌‌ 
and‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌similar‌  ‌items‌  ‌reflected‌  ‌in‌  ‌petitioner's‌  ‌Summary‌  ‌of‌‌  cancel‌‌his‌‌registration‌‌‌for‌‌the‌n ‌ ext‌‌three‌‌(3)‌‌years‌. ‌ ‌ official‌‌ receipt‌‌ for‌‌ a ‌‌VAT-exempt‌‌ transaction,‌‌ but‌‌ fails‌‌ to‌‌ display‌‌ 
Importation‌‌of‌‌Goods‌‌are‌N ‌ OT‌c‌ apital‌‌goods.‌  ‌ prominently‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌invoice‌  ‌or‌  ‌receipt‌  ‌the‌  ‌term‌  ‌'‌VAT‌  ‌exempt‌‌ 
Any‌  ‌person‌  ‌who‌  ‌elected‌  ‌to‌  ‌pay‌  ‌the‌  ‌eight‌  ‌percent‌  ‌(8%)‌  ‌tax‌  ‌on‌‌
  gross‌‌ 
sale‌',‌  ‌the‌  ‌issuer‌‌
  shall‌‌  be‌‌
  liable‌‌
  to‌‌
  account‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌  tax‌‌
  imposed‌‌ 
Northern‌‌Mindanao‌‌Power‌‌v.‌‌CIR‌‌2
‌ 015‌‌on‌‌Invoice‌‌vs‌‌Receipt‌  ‌ sales‌‌or‌‌receipts‌s‌ hall‌‌not‌‌be‌‌allowed‌‌to‌‌avail‌‌of‌‌this‌‌option‌. ‌ ‌
in‌‌section‌‌106‌‌or‌‌108‌‌as‌‌if‌‌Section‌‌109‌‌did‌‌not‌‌apply.‌  ‌
Invoice‌‌vs‌‌Receipt‌  ‌ b.‌‌Invoicing‌‌requirements‌  ‌
CIR‌‌v.‌‌Euro-Philippines‌‌Airline‌‌Services‌‌‌2018‌  ‌
As‌‌  regards‌‌  the‌‌ ‌sufficiency‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌company‌‌ invoice‌‌ to‌‌ prove‌‌ the‌‌ sales‌‌  a) A‌‌VAT-registered‌‌person‌‌shall‌‌issue:‌—
‌  ‌  ‌ ‌
of‌  ‌services‌  ‌to‌  ‌NPC,‌  ‌we‌  ‌find‌  ‌this‌  ‌claim‌  ‌is‌  ‌without‌‌   sufficient‌‌   legal‌‌  Nowhere‌  ‌in‌  ‌Sec‌  ‌113‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌presumption‌  ‌created‌  ‌by‌  ‌law‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌ 
basis‌. ‌‌Section‌‌   113‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  NIRC‌‌   of‌‌
  1997‌‌  provides‌‌   a ‌‌VAT‌‌ ‌invoice‌‌ 
  that‌‌ 1) A‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌invoice‌‌
  ‌for‌‌
  every‌‌
  sale,‌‌
  barter‌‌
  or‌‌
  exchange‌‌
  of‌‌
  goods‌‌  non-imprintment‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌word‌  ‌"zero‌  ‌rated"‌  ‌deems‌  ‌the‌  ‌transaction‌‌ 
is‌‌
  necessary‌‌   for‌‌ every‌‌ sale,‌‌ barter‌‌ or‌‌ exchange‌‌ of‌‌ goods‌‌ or‌‌ properties,‌‌  or‌‌properties;‌‌and‌   ‌ ‌ subject‌‌to‌‌12‌‌%‌‌VAT.‌  ‌
while‌  ‌a ‌ ‌VAT‌  ‌official‌  ‌receipt‌  ‌properly‌  ‌pertains‌  ‌to‌  ‌every‌  ‌lease‌  ‌of‌‌  2) A‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌official‌  r‌ eceipt‌  ‌for‌  ‌every‌  ‌lease‌  ‌of‌  ‌goods‌  ‌or‌‌  Thus,‌  ‌in‌‌
  this‌‌
  case,‌‌
  failure‌‌
  to‌‌
  comply‌‌
  with‌‌
  invoicing‌‌
  requirements‌‌
  as‌‌ 
goods‌  ‌or‌  ‌properties;‌  ‌as‌  ‌well‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌every‌  ‌sale,‌  ‌barter‌‌   or‌‌  exchange‌‌  of‌‌  properties,‌  ‌and‌  ‌for‌  ‌every‌  ‌sale,‌  ‌barter‌  ‌or‌  ‌exchange‌  ‌of‌‌  mandated‌‌by‌‌law‌‌does‌‌not‌‌deem‌‌the‌‌transaction‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌12%‌‌VAT.‌  ‌
services.‌  ‌Certainly,‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌intend‌  ‌the‌  ‌two‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌used‌‌ 
services.‌   ‌ ‌
alternatively‌. ‌ ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 99‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

c.‌‌Filing‌‌of‌‌returns‌‌and‌‌payment‌  ‌ e.‌‌Administrative‌‌and‌‌penal‌‌sanctions‌  ‌ excess‌  ‌of‌  ‌P250,000‌  ‌exempt‌  ‌gift‌  ‌made‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌  ‌calendar‌‌ 
year.‌  ‌
Every‌‌
  person‌‌   liable‌‌
  to‌‌
  pay‌‌  VAT‌‌ shall‌‌ ‌file‌‌ a ‌‌quarterly‌‌ return‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  The‌‌
  CIR‌‌
  or‌‌
  his‌‌
  authorized‌‌ representative‌‌ is‌‌ empowered‌‌ to‌‌ ‌suspend‌‌ the‌‌ 
amount‌‌   of‌‌
  his‌‌
  gross‌‌ sales‌‌ or‌‌ receipts‌‌ within‌‌ ‌twenty-five‌‌ (25)‌‌ days‌‌  business‌  ‌operations‌  ‌and‌  ‌temporarily‌  ‌close‌  ‌the‌  ‌business‌‌  6. "‌NET‌  ‌GIFT‌" ‌ ‌shall‌  ‌mean‌  ‌the‌  ‌net‌  ‌economic‌  ‌benefit‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌ 
following‌  ‌the‌  ‌close‌  ‌of‌  ‌each‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌quarter‌  ‌prescribed‌  ‌for‌  ‌each‌‌  establishment‌‌‌of‌‌any‌‌person‌‌for‌‌any‌‌of‌‌the‌‌following‌‌violations:‌  ‌ transfer‌‌that‌‌accrues‌‌to‌‌the‌‌donee.‌  ‌
taxpayer:‌‌   ‌ 7. Any‌  ‌contribution‌  ‌in‌  ‌cash‌  ‌or‌  ‌in‌  ‌kind‌  ‌to‌  ‌any‌  ‌candidate‌  ‌or‌‌ 
a) In‌‌the‌‌case‌‌of‌‌a‌‌VAT-registered‌‌Person.‌‌— ‌ ‌
Provided,‌  ‌however,‌‌
  That‌‌  VAT-registered‌‌
  persons‌‌
  shall‌‌
  pay‌‌
  the‌‌
  VAT‌‌  political‌  ‌party‌  ‌or‌  ‌coalition‌  ‌of‌  ‌parties‌  ‌for‌  ‌campaign‌  ‌purposes,‌‌ 
1) Failure‌‌to‌‌issue‌‌receipts‌‌or‌‌invoices;‌  ‌
on‌‌a‌‌monthly‌‌basis:‌‌   ‌ duly‌  ‌reported‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Comelec‌  ‌shall‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌be‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
2) Failure‌  ‌to‌‌
  file‌‌
  a ‌‌VAT‌‌
  return‌‌
  as‌‌
  required‌‌
  under‌‌
  Section‌‌
  114;‌‌  payment‌‌of‌‌any‌‌gift‌‌tax.‌‌(S‌ ec‌‌13,‌‌RA‌‌7166‌) ‌ ‌
Provided,‌  ‌finally‌, ‌ ‌That‌  ‌beginning‌  ‌January‌  ‌1,‌  ‌2023,‌  ‌the‌  ‌filing‌  ‌and‌‌  or‌  ‌ 8. The‌  ‌donor's‌  ‌tax‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌apply‌  ‌unless‌  ‌and‌  ‌until‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌‌
payment‌  ‌required‌  ‌under‌  ‌this‌  ‌Subsection‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌done‌  ‌within‌‌ 
3) Understatement‌  ‌of‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌sales‌  ‌or‌  ‌receipts‌  ‌by‌  ‌thirty‌‌  completed‌  ‌gift‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌transfer‌  ‌of‌  ‌property‌  ‌by‌  ‌gift‌  ‌is‌  ‌perfected‌‌ 
twenty-five‌‌(25)‌‌days‌‌following‌‌the‌‌close‌‌of‌‌each‌‌taxable‌q ‌ uarter‌. ‌ ‌
percent‌  ‌(30%)‌  ‌or‌  ‌more‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌correct‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌sales‌  ‌or‌‌  from‌  ‌the‌  ‌moment‌  ‌the‌  ‌donor‌  ‌knows‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌acceptance‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌ 
d.‌‌Withholding‌‌of‌‌final‌‌VAT‌‌on‌‌sales‌‌to‌‌government‌  ‌ receipts‌‌for‌‌the‌‌taxable‌‌quarter.‌  ‌ donee;‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌completed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌delivery,‌  ‌either‌  ‌actually‌  ‌or‌‌ 
The‌  ‌Government‌  ‌shall,‌‌   before‌‌   making‌‌   payment‌‌   on‌‌
  account‌‌
  of‌‌
  each‌‌  b) Failure‌‌of‌‌any‌‌Person‌‌to‌‌Register‌‌as‌‌Required‌‌under‌‌Sec‌‌236.‌  ‌ constructively,‌‌of‌‌the‌‌donated‌‌property‌‌to‌‌the‌‌donee.‌‌   ‌
purchase‌  ‌of‌  ‌goods‌  ‌and‌  ‌services‌  ‌which‌  ‌are‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌VAT‌‌  9. Thus,‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌in‌  ‌force‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
The‌‌
  temporary‌‌   closure‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌
  establishment‌‌   shall‌‌   be‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ duration‌‌ of‌‌ 
imposed‌‌   in‌‌  Sections‌‌   106‌‌   and‌‌ 108‌‌ of‌‌ this‌‌ Code,‌‌ deduct‌‌ and‌‌ withhold‌‌  perfection/completion‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌donation‌  ‌shall‌  ‌govern‌  ‌the‌‌ 
not‌  ‌less‌  ‌than‌  ‌five‌  ‌(5)‌  ‌days‌‌   and‌‌  shall‌‌  be‌‌   lifted‌‌   only‌‌   upon‌‌   compliance‌‌ 
a‌‌
  final‌‌
  VAT‌‌   at‌‌
  the‌‌
  rate‌‌  of‌‌ ‌five‌‌ percent‌‌ (5%)‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ gross‌‌ payment‌‌  imposition‌‌of‌‌the‌‌donor's‌‌tax.‌  ‌
with‌  ‌whatever‌  ‌requirements‌  ‌prescribed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌Commissioner‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
thereof:‌‌   ‌
closure‌‌order.‌  ‌ 2.‌‌Requisites‌‌of‌‌a‌‌Valid‌‌Donation‌  ‌
Provided‌, ‌ ‌That‌  ‌beginning‌  ‌January‌  ‌1,‌  ‌2021,‌  ‌the‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌withholding‌‌ 
system‌  ‌under‌  ‌this‌  ‌Subsection‌  ‌shall‌  ‌shift‌  ‌from‌  ‌final‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌‌ 4. Donor’s‌‌Tax‌  ‌ 1. Capacity‌‌of‌‌donor;‌  ‌
creditable‌‌system‌:  ‌‌ ‌   ‌
2. Donative‌‌intent;‌  ‌
Provided,‌‌   further,‌‌   That‌‌ the‌‌ payment‌‌ for‌‌ lease‌‌ or‌‌ use‌‌ of‌‌ properties‌‌ or‌‌  1.‌‌Basic‌‌Principles,‌‌Concept,‌‌and‌‌Definition‌  ‌
3. Delivery‌,‌‌whether‌‌actual‌‌or‌‌constructive,‌‌of‌‌the‌‌subject‌‌matter;‌  ‌
property‌  ‌rights‌  ‌to‌  ‌nonresident‌  ‌owners‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌‌ 
1. Donation‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌liberality‌  ‌whereby‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person‌‌   disposes‌‌ 
twelve‌‌percent‌‌(12%)‌‌withholding‌‌tax‌‌‌at‌‌the‌‌time‌‌of‌‌payment.‌  ‌ 4. Acceptance‌o ‌ f‌‌the‌‌gift‌‌by‌‌the‌‌donee.‌  ‌
gratuitously‌‌   of‌‌  a ‌‌thing‌‌  or‌‌
  right‌‌  in‌‌  favor‌‌   of‌‌
  another‌‌ who‌‌ accepts‌‌ 
1. The‌  ‌payor‌  ‌or‌  ‌person‌  ‌in‌  ‌control‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌payment‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌  it.‌  ‌ Manuel‌‌G.‌‌Abello,‌‌et‌‌al.‌‌v.‌‌CIR‌  ‌
considered‌‌as‌‌the‌‌withholding‌‌agent.‌  ‌
2. In‌‌   taxation,‌‌   donation‌‌   extends‌‌   to‌‌  sales‌‌   or‌‌ exchanges‌‌ of‌‌ property,‌‌  Donative‌  ‌intent‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌negated‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌presence‌  ‌of‌  ‌other‌  ‌intentions,‌‌ 
2. The‌  ‌5%‌  ‌final‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌shall‌  ‌represent‌  ‌the‌  ‌net‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌payable‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌  other‌  ‌than‌  ‌real‌  ‌property‌  ‌classified‌  ‌as‌  ‌capital‌  ‌asset‌  ‌located‌  ‌in‌‌  motives‌‌or‌‌purposes‌‌which‌‌do‌‌not‌‌contradict‌‌donative‌‌intent.‌  ‌
seller.‌‌   ‌ PH,‌  ‌for‌  ‌less‌  ‌than‌‌   adequate‌‌   and‌‌  full‌‌   consideration‌‌   in‌‌
  money‌‌   or‌‌ 
Subsequent‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ donations‌‌ involved‌‌ in‌‌ this‌‌ case,‌‌ Congress‌‌ approved‌‌ 
3. The‌  ‌remaining‌  ‌7%‌  ‌effectively‌‌   accounts‌‌   for‌‌  the‌‌
  standard‌‌
  input‌‌  money’s‌‌worth.‌  ‌ RA‌  ‌7166,‌  ‌providing‌  ‌in‌  ‌Section‌  ‌13‌  ‌thereof‌  ‌that‌  ‌political/electoral‌‌ 
VAT,‌  ‌in‌  ‌lieu‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌actual‌  ‌input‌  ‌VAT‌  ‌directly‌  ‌attributable‌  ‌or‌‌  3. Gift‌  ‌tax‌  ‌is‌  ‌also‌  ‌an‌  ‌excise‌  ‌tax‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌privilege‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  contributions,‌  ‌duly‌  ‌reported‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Comelec,‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
ratably‌‌apportioned‌‌to‌‌such‌‌sales.‌  ‌ payment‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌gift‌  ‌tax.‌  ‌This‌  ‌all‌  ‌the‌  ‌more‌  ‌shows‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌political‌‌ 
owner‌‌to‌‌give.‌  ‌
contributions‌  ‌herein‌  ‌made‌  ‌are‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌payment‌  ‌of‌  ‌gift‌  ‌taxes,‌‌ 
4. Should‌‌   actual‌‌   input‌‌   VAT‌‌ attributable‌‌ to‌‌ sales‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ government‌‌  4. Gifts‌  ‌in‌  ‌favor‌  ‌of‌  ‌religious‌  ‌institutions‌  ‌are‌  ‌now‌  ‌exempt‌  ‌from‌‌  since‌‌  the‌‌
  same‌‌
  were‌‌   made‌‌   prior‌‌  to‌‌  the‌‌ exempting‌‌ legislation,‌‌ and‌‌ RA‌‌ 
exceed‌  ‌7%‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌gross‌  ‌payments‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌excess‌  ‌may‌  ‌form‌‌  donor’s‌‌tax.‌  ‌ No.‌‌7166‌‌provides‌‌no‌‌retroactive‌‌effect‌‌on‌‌this‌‌point.‌  ‌
part‌‌of‌‌the‌‌sellers’‌‌expense‌‌or‌‌cost‌.  ‌‌ ‌
5. Rate‌  ‌of‌  ‌Donor’s‌  ‌Tax‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌tax‌  ‌for‌  ‌each‌‌   calendar‌‌   year‌‌   shall‌‌  be‌‌ 
5. On‌‌   the‌‌   other‌‌  hand,‌‌ if‌‌ actual‌‌ input‌‌ VAT‌‌ is‌‌ less‌‌ than‌‌ 7%‌‌ of‌‌ gross‌‌  six‌‌   percent‌‌   (6%)‌  ‌computed‌‌  on‌‌  the‌‌  basis‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ total‌‌ gifts‌‌ in‌‌ 
payment,‌‌the‌‌difference‌‌must‌‌be‌c‌ losed‌‌to‌‌expense‌‌or‌‌cost‌. ‌ ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 100‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

3.‌‌Transfers‌‌which‌‌may‌‌be‌‌considered‌‌as‌‌donation‌  ‌ Whereas‌‌ ‌general‌‌ renunciation‌‌ by‌‌ an‌‌ heir,‌‌ including‌‌ the‌‌ surviving‌‌  a) Unlisted‌‌common‌‌shares‌‌=‌ ‌Book‌‌value;‌  ‌


spouse,‌‌   of‌‌ his/her‌‌ share‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ hereditary‌‌ estate‌‌ left‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ decedent‌‌ 
a.‌‌Sale,‌‌exchange,‌‌or‌‌transfer‌‌of‌‌property‌‌for‌‌less‌‌than‌‌
  b) Unlisted‌‌preferred‌‌shares‌‌=‌‌Par‌‌value.‌  ‌
is‌‌
  ‌NOT‌‌
  ‌subject‌‌  to‌‌  donor's‌‌
  tax,‌‌
  ‌unless‌specifically‌‌
   and‌‌ categorically‌‌ 
adequate‌‌and‌‌full‌‌consideration;‌‌exception‌  ‌ done‌‌ in‌‌ favor‌‌ of‌‌ identified‌‌ heir/s‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ exclusion‌‌ or‌‌ disadvantage‌‌ of‌‌  In‌‌
  determining‌‌ the‌‌ book‌‌ value‌‌ of‌‌ common‌‌ shares,‌‌ appraisal‌‌ surplus‌‌ 
Where‌  ‌property‌  ‌is‌  ‌transferred‌  ‌for‌  ‌less‌  ‌than‌  ‌an‌  ‌adequate‌  ‌and‌  ‌full‌‌  the‌‌other‌‌co-heirs‌‌in‌‌the‌‌hereditary‌‌estate.‌‌   ‌ shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌as‌  ‌well‌  ‌as‌‌
  the‌‌
  value‌‌
  assigned‌‌
  to‌‌
  preferred‌‌ 
consideration‌  ‌in‌  ‌money‌  ‌or‌  ‌money's‌  ‌worth,‌  ‌then‌  ‌the‌  ‌amount‌  ‌by‌‌  4.‌‌Classification‌‌of‌‌Donor‌  ‌ shares,‌‌if‌‌there‌‌are‌‌any.‌  ‌
which‌  ‌the‌  ‌fair‌  ‌market‌  ‌value‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌‌
  exceeded‌‌   the‌‌
  value‌‌
  of‌‌  c) Listed‌  ‌in‌  ‌stock‌  ‌exchange‌  ‌= ‌ ‌FMV‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌the‌  ‌arithmetic‌‌ 
the‌  ‌consideration‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌deemed‌  ‌a ‌ ‌gift,‌  ‌and‌‌  shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  included‌‌
  in‌‌  1. Resident‌  ‌or‌  ‌citizen‌  ‌and‌  ‌DC.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌donation‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌  ‌types‌  ‌of‌‌  mean‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌  ‌highest‌  ‌and‌  ‌lowest‌  ‌quotation‌  ‌at‌‌   a ‌‌date‌‌ 
computing‌‌the‌‌amount‌‌of‌‌gifts‌‌made‌‌during‌‌the‌‌calendar‌‌year:‌‌   ‌ properties‌‌wherever‌‌situated;‌  ‌ nearest‌‌  the‌‌   date‌‌
  of‌‌
  death,‌‌
  if‌‌ none‌‌ is‌‌ available‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ date‌‌ of‌‌ 
Provided,‌  ‌however‌, ‌ ‌That‌  ‌a ‌ ‌sale,‌  ‌exchange,‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌transfer‌  ‌of‌‌  2. Nonresident‌  ‌alien‌  ‌and‌  ‌FC.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌donation‌  ‌of‌  ‌real‌‌
  property‌‌
  and‌‌  death‌‌itself.‌  ‌
property‌‌
  ‌made‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  ordinary‌‌ course‌‌ of‌‌ business‌, ‌‌a ‌‌transaction‌‌  tangible‌‌personal‌‌property‌‌situated‌‌in‌‌PH;‌  ‌ Units‌  ‌of‌  ‌participation‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌association,‌  ‌recreation‌  ‌or‌‌ 
which‌‌is‌‌   ‌ Donation‌  ‌of‌  ‌intangible‌  ‌PP‌‌
  with‌‌
  a ‌‌situs‌‌
  in‌‌
  PH,‌‌
  ‌unless‌‌
  exempted‌‌  amusement‌  ‌club‌  ‌— ‌ ‌the‌  ‌bid‌  ‌price‌  ‌nearest‌  ‌the‌  ‌date‌  ‌of‌  ‌death‌‌ 
1) a‌‌bona‌‌fide,‌‌   ‌ on‌‌the‌‌basis‌‌of‌‌reciprocity.‌  ‌ published‌‌in‌‌any‌‌newspaper‌‌or‌‌publication‌‌of‌‌general‌‌circulation.‌  ‌

2) at‌‌arm's‌‌length,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ 5.‌‌Determination‌‌of‌‌Gross‌‌Gift‌  ‌ Right‌‌   to‌‌


  usufruct,‌‌   use‌‌
  or‌‌
  habitation,‌‌   as‌‌
  well‌‌ as‌‌ that‌‌ of‌‌ annuity‌‌ 
—‌  ‌there‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌taken‌  ‌into‌  ‌account‌  ‌the‌  ‌probable‌  ‌life‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
3) free‌‌from‌‌any‌‌donative‌‌intent,‌‌   ‌ a.‌‌Composition‌‌of‌‌gross‌‌gift‌  ‌ beneficiary‌  ‌in‌  ‌accordance‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌latest‌‌
  basic‌‌
  standard‌‌   mortality‌‌ 
will‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌‌
  as‌‌
  made‌‌
  for‌‌
  an‌‌
  adequate‌‌
  and‌‌
  full‌‌
  consideration‌‌  Gross‌‌   gifts‌‌  ‌include‌‌   real‌‌
  and‌‌
  personal‌‌   property,‌‌ whether‌‌ tangible‌‌ or‌‌  table,‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌approved‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌Secretary‌  ‌of‌  ‌Finance,‌  ‌upon‌‌ 
in‌‌money‌‌or‌‌money's‌‌worth.‌  ‌ intangible,‌  ‌or‌  ‌mixed,‌  ‌wherever‌  ‌situated:‌  ‌Provided,‌  ‌however,‌  ‌That‌‌  recommendation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Insurance‌‌Commissioner.‌  ‌

CIR‌‌v.‌‌B.F.‌‌Goodrich‌‌Phils.,‌‌Inc.‌  ‌ where‌‌ the‌‌ donor‌‌ was‌‌ a ‌‌nonresident‌‌ alien‌‌ at‌‌ the‌‌ time‌‌ of‌‌ donation,‌‌ his‌‌  c.‌‌Exemption‌‌of‌‌certain‌‌gifts‌  ‌


real‌  ‌and‌  ‌personal‌  ‌property‌  ‌so‌  ‌transferred‌  ‌but‌  ‌which‌  ‌are‌  ‌situated‌‌ 
Petitioner‌‌   insists‌‌   that‌‌
  private‌‌ respondent‌‌ committed‌‌ "falsity"‌‌ when‌‌ it‌‌  outside‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌‌   included‌‌   as‌‌
  part‌‌
  of‌‌
  his‌‌
  '‌gross‌‌  Made‌‌by‌‌a‌‌Resident‌  ‌
sold‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌price‌  ‌lesser‌  ‌than‌  ‌its‌  ‌declared‌  ‌fair‌  ‌market‌‌ 
gift.‌’ ‌ ‌ 1) Gifts‌‌   made‌‌   to‌‌
  or‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌   use‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ National‌‌ Government‌‌ or‌‌ 
value.‌‌  This‌‌   fact‌‌
  alone‌‌ did‌‌ not‌‌ constitute‌‌ a ‌‌false‌‌ return‌‌ which‌‌ contains‌‌ 
wrong‌  ‌information‌  ‌due‌  ‌to‌  ‌mistake,‌  ‌carelessness‌  ‌or‌  ‌ignorance.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌‌  any‌  ‌entity‌  ‌created‌  ‌by‌  ‌any‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌agencies‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌‌ 
The‌  ‌computation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌donor's‌  ‌tax‌  ‌is‌  ‌on‌  ‌a ‌ c ‌ umulative‌  ‌basis‌ ‌
possible‌‌   that‌‌   real‌‌   property‌‌   may‌‌  be‌‌
  sold‌‌   for‌‌
  less‌‌ than‌‌ adequate‌‌  conducted‌‌   for‌‌
  profit,‌‌  or‌‌  to‌‌
  any‌‌
  political‌‌   subdivision‌‌
  of‌‌ the‌‌ 
over‌‌a‌‌period‌‌of‌‌one‌‌calendar‌‌year.‌  ‌
consideration‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌‌bona‌‌   fide‌‌  business‌‌   purpose;‌‌   in‌‌
  such‌‌
  event,‌‌  said‌‌Government;‌‌and‌  ‌
the‌‌sale‌‌remains‌‌an‌‌"arm's‌‌length"‌‌transaction.‌‌   ‌ b.‌‌Valuation‌‌of‌‌gifts‌‌made‌‌in‌‌property‌  ‌
2) Gifts‌  ‌in‌  ‌favor‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌educational‌  ‌and/or‌  ‌charitable,‌‌ 
b.‌‌Condonation‌‌or‌‌remission‌‌of‌‌debt‌  ‌ Valuation‌. ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌The‌  ‌amount‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌charitable‌  ‌contribution‌  ‌of‌‌  religious,‌  ‌cultural‌  ‌or‌  ‌social‌  ‌welfare‌  ‌corporation,‌‌ 
property‌‌   other‌‌   than‌‌
  money‌‌   shall‌‌
  be‌‌  based‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌acquisition‌‌   cost‌‌  institution,‌  ‌accredited‌  ‌non-government‌  ‌organization‌, ‌‌
If‌  ‌a ‌ ‌creditor‌  ‌desires‌  ‌to‌  ‌benefit‌  ‌a ‌ ‌debtor,‌  ‌and‌  ‌without‌  ‌any‌‌  of‌‌said‌‌property.‌‌(Sec‌‌34[H][3])‌  ‌ trust‌  ‌or‌  ‌philanthropic‌‌   organization‌‌   or‌‌
  research‌‌
  institution‌‌ 
consideration‌‌   therefore,‌‌
  cancels‌‌  the‌‌
  debt,‌‌
  the‌‌
  amount‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌ debt‌‌ is‌‌  or‌  ‌organization:‌  ‌Provided,‌  ‌however‌, ‌ ‌That‌  ‌not‌  ‌more‌‌   than‌‌ 
a‌‌donation‌‌by‌‌the‌‌creditor‌‌to‌‌the‌‌debtor.‌  ‌ If‌‌
  real‌‌   property‌‌   — ‌‌the‌‌
  appraised‌‌   value‌‌   as‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  time‌‌
  of‌‌ donation‌‌ 
thirty‌  ‌percent‌  ‌(30%)‌  ‌of‌  ‌said‌  ‌gifts‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌used‌  ‌by‌‌ 
shall‌‌be‌‌whichever‌‌is‌‌higher‌‌of‌‌the‌‌FMV‌‌as:‌  ‌
c.‌‌Renunciation‌‌of‌‌inheritance;‌‌exception‌  ‌ such‌‌donee‌‌for‌‌administration‌‌purposes‌. ‌ ‌
a) Determined‌‌by‌‌the‌‌CIR;‌‌or‌  ‌ The‌‌donee-entity‌‌must‌‌be:‌  ‌
Renunciation‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌surviving‌  ‌spouse‌  ‌of‌  ‌his/her‌  ‌share‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
conjugal‌‌ partnership‌‌ or‌‌ absolute‌‌ community‌‌ after‌‌ the‌‌ dissolution‌‌ of‌‌  b) Shown‌‌in‌‌the‌‌schedule‌‌of‌‌values‌‌fixed‌‌by‌‌local‌‌assessors.‌  ‌ a) Non-stock;‌  ‌
the‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌in‌  ‌favor‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌heirs‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌deceased‌  ‌spouse‌  ‌or‌  ‌any‌‌  If‌‌
  shares‌‌   of‌‌
  stocks‌‌
  ‌— ‌‌the‌‌
  FMV‌‌
  depends‌‌
  on‌‌ whether‌‌ the‌‌ shares‌‌ are‌‌  b) Paying‌‌no‌‌dividends;‌  ‌
other‌‌person/s‌‌is‌s‌ ubject‌‌to‌‌donor's‌‌tax.‌  ‌ listed‌‌or‌‌unlisted.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 101‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

c) Governed‌  ‌by‌  ‌trustees‌  ‌who‌  ‌receive‌  ‌no‌‌  a) The‌  ‌amount‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌credit‌‌
  in‌‌
  respect‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  tax‌‌
  paid‌‌  to‌‌
  any‌‌  a) Decisions‌  ‌or‌  ‌resolutions‌  ‌on‌  ‌motions‌  ‌for‌  ‌reconsideration‌  ‌or‌‌ 
compensation;‌‌and‌  ‌ country‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌exceed‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌proportion‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌tax‌‌  new‌  ‌trial‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌in‌  ‌Divisions‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌‌ 
against‌  ‌which‌  ‌such‌  ‌credit‌  ‌is‌  ‌taken,‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌net‌  ‌gifts‌‌  exclusive‌a ‌ ppellate‌j‌urisdiction‌‌over:‌  ‌
d) Devotes‌  ‌all‌  ‌its‌  ‌income‌  ‌to‌‌
  the‌‌
  accomplishment‌‌
  of‌‌ 
situated‌‌   within‌‌
  such‌‌   country‌‌  taxable‌‌ under‌‌ this‌‌ Title‌‌ bears‌‌ 
its‌‌purpose‌‌as‌‌enumerated‌‌in‌‌its‌‌AOI.‌  ‌ 1) Cases‌  ‌arising‌  ‌from‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌agencies‌  ‌– ‌ ‌BIR,‌‌ 
to‌‌his‌‌entire‌‌net‌‌gifts;‌‌and‌  ‌
BOC,‌‌DOF,‌‌DTI,‌‌DA;‌  ‌
Made‌‌by‌‌a‌‌Non-resident‌‌Alien‌  ‌
b) The‌  ‌total‌  ‌amount‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌credit‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌exceed‌  ‌the‌‌
  same‌‌ 
1) -‌‌same‌‌- ‌ ‌ 2) Local‌‌  tax‌‌
  cases‌‌
  decided‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ RTCs‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ exercise‌‌ of‌‌ 
proportion‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌tax‌  ‌against‌  ‌which‌  ‌such‌  ‌credit‌  ‌is‌  ‌taken,‌‌ 
their‌‌original‌‌jurisdiction;‌‌and‌  ‌
2) -‌‌same‌‌-‌‌but‌‌change‌‌‘accredited‌‌non-government‌‌  which‌‌   the‌‌
  donor's‌‌ net‌‌ gifts‌‌ situated‌‌ outside‌‌ the‌‌ Philippines‌‌ 
organization’‌‌to‌‘‌foundation’‌. ‌ ‌ taxable‌‌under‌‌this‌‌title‌‌bears‌‌to‌‌his‌‌entire‌‌net‌‌gifts.‌  ‌ 3) Tax‌  ‌collection‌  ‌cases‌  ‌decided‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌RTCs‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌  ‌original‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌involving‌  ‌final‌‌ 
Deductions‌‌under‌‌RR‌‌12-2018‌  ‌ 7.‌‌Filing‌‌of‌‌return‌‌and‌‌payment‌  ‌
and‌‌
  executory‌‌   assessments‌‌   for‌‌ taxes,‌‌ fees,‌‌ charges‌‌ and‌‌ 
1) Encumbrance‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌  ‌donated,‌  ‌if‌  ‌assumed‌  ‌by‌‌  Requirements‌. ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌Any‌  ‌person‌  ‌making‌‌   a ‌‌donation‌‌
  (whether‌‌  direct‌‌  penalties,‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌principal‌  ‌amount‌  ‌of‌  ‌taxes‌  ‌and‌‌ 
donee;‌  ‌ or‌  ‌indirect),‌  ‌unless‌  ‌the‌  ‌donation‌  ‌is‌  ‌specifically‌  ‌exempt‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌‌  penalties‌‌claimed‌‌is‌‌less‌‌than‌‌one‌‌million‌‌pesos;‌  ‌

2) Those‌  ‌specifically‌‌
  provided‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  donor‌‌
  as‌‌
  a ‌‌diminution‌‌  NIRC‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌special‌  ‌laws,‌  ‌is‌  ‌required,‌  ‌for‌  ‌every‌  ‌donation,‌  ‌to‌‌  b) Decisions,‌‌  resolutions‌‌  or‌‌
  orders‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌ ‌RTCs‌‌ ‌in‌‌ ‌local‌‌ tax‌‌ cases‌‌ 
of‌‌the‌‌property‌‌donated.‌  ‌ accomplish‌‌   under‌‌  oath‌‌  a ‌‌donor's‌‌
  tax‌‌ return‌‌ in‌‌ duplicate.‌‌ The‌‌ return‌‌  decided‌‌
  or‌‌
  resolved‌‌
  by‌‌
  them‌‌  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  exercise‌‌  of‌‌ their‌appellate‌‌
   
shall‌‌set‌‌forth:‌‌   ‌ jurisdiction;‌  ‌
Exemptions‌‌under‌‌Special‌‌Laws‌  ‌
1. Each‌  ‌gift‌  ‌made‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌  ‌calendar‌  ‌year‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌‌  c) Decisions,‌  ‌resolutions‌  ‌or‌‌
  orders‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌RTCs‌‌   ‌in‌‌
  tax‌‌
  ‌collection‌‌ 
1) Donations‌  ‌to‌  ‌PH‌  ‌government‌  ‌for‌  ‌scientific,‌  ‌engineering,‌‌  included‌‌in‌‌gifts;‌  ‌ cases‌  ‌decided‌  ‌or‌  ‌resolved‌  ‌by‌  ‌them‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌ 
and‌‌technological‌‌research,‌‌invention‌‌and‌‌development;‌  ‌
2. The‌‌deductions‌‌claimed‌‌and‌‌allowable;‌  ‌ appellate‌j‌urisdiction;‌  ‌
2) To‌‌social‌‌welfare,‌‌cultural,‌‌and‌‌charitable‌‌organizations;‌  ‌
3. Any‌‌previous‌‌net‌‌gifts‌‌made‌‌during‌‌the‌‌same‌‌calendar‌‌year;‌  ‌ d) Decisions,‌  ‌resolutions‌  ‌or‌  ‌orders‌  ‌on‌  ‌motions‌  ‌for‌‌ 
3) To‌‌IRRI;‌  ‌ reconsideration‌  ‌or‌  ‌new‌  ‌trial‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌in‌  ‌Division‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
4. The‌‌name‌‌of‌‌the‌‌donee;‌‌and‌  ‌
exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌exclusive‌  ‌original‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌over‌  ‌tax‌‌ 
4) To‌‌Ramon‌‌Magsaysay‌‌Award‌‌Foundation;‌  ‌
5. Such‌  ‌further‌  ‌information‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌Commissioner‌  ‌may‌‌  collection‌c‌ ases;‌  ‌
5) To‌  ‌the‌  ‌National‌  ‌Museum,‌  ‌National‌  ‌Library,‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌  require.‌  ‌
e) Decisions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Central‌  ‌Board‌  ‌of‌  ‌Assessment‌  ‌Appeals‌‌ 
archives‌‌of‌‌the‌‌NHI;‌  ‌
Time‌‌   and‌‌   place‌‌  of‌‌
  filing‌‌   and‌‌  payment.‌‌  ‌— ‌‌The‌‌ donor's‌‌ tax‌‌ return‌‌  (CBAA)‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  exercise‌‌  of‌‌
  its‌‌
  ‌appellate‌‌
  ‌jurisdiction‌‌
  over‌‌ cases‌‌ 
6) To‌‌the‌‌Southern‌‌Philippines‌‌Development‌‌Administration;‌  ‌ shall‌‌  be‌‌ filed‌‌ ‌within‌‌ thirty‌‌ (30)‌‌ days‌‌ after‌‌ the‌‌ date‌‌ the‌‌ gift‌‌ is‌‌ made‌‌  involving‌  ‌the‌  ‌assessment‌  ‌and‌  ‌taxation‌  ‌of‌  ‌real‌  ‌property‌‌ 
7) To‌‌the‌‌Intramuros‌‌Foundation.‌  ‌ or‌‌
  completed‌‌   and‌‌
  the‌‌  tax‌‌ due‌‌ thereon‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ paid‌‌ at‌‌ the‌‌ same‌‌ time‌‌  originally‌  ‌decided‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌provincial‌  ‌or‌  ‌city‌  ‌board‌  ‌of‌‌ 
that‌‌the‌‌return‌‌is‌‌filed.‌  ‌ assessment‌‌appeals;‌  ‌
6.‌‌Tax‌‌credit‌‌for‌‌donor's‌‌taxes‌‌paid‌‌to‌‌a‌‌foreign‌‌country‌  ‌
f) Decisions,‌  ‌resolutions‌  ‌or‌  ‌orders‌  ‌on‌  ‌motions‌  ‌for‌‌ 
The‌‌
  tax‌‌
  imposed‌‌   by‌‌   this‌‌
  Title‌‌
  upon‌‌
  a ‌‌donor‌‌
  who‌‌
  was‌‌  a ‌‌citizen‌‌ or‌‌ a ‌ 5. Remedies‌  ‌ reconsideration‌  ‌or‌  ‌new‌  ‌trial‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌in‌  ‌Division‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
resident‌‌ at‌‌ the‌‌ time‌‌ of‌‌ donation‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ credited‌‌ with‌‌ the‌‌ amount‌‌ of‌‌  a. Jurisdiction‌‌of‌‌Courts‌  ‌ exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌exclusive‌  ‌original‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌over‌  ‌cases‌‌ 
any‌  ‌donor's‌  ‌tax‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌character‌  ‌and‌  ‌description‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌  involving‌  ‌criminal‌  ‌offenses‌  ‌arising‌  ‌from‌  ‌violations‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
authority‌‌of‌‌a‌‌foreign‌‌country.‌  ‌ En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ NIRC‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌TCC‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌laws‌  ‌administered‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌BIR‌  ‌or‌‌ 
Limitations‌  ‌on‌  ‌Credit.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌The‌  ‌amount‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌credit‌  ‌taken‌  ‌under‌‌  BOC;‌  ‌
The‌  ‌Court‌  ‌en‌  ‌banc‌  ‌shall‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌exclusive‌  ‌appellate‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌to‌‌ 
this‌‌Section‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌each‌‌of‌‌the‌‌following‌‌limitations:‌  ‌ review‌‌by‌‌appeal‌‌the‌‌following:‌  ‌ g) Decisions,‌  ‌resolutions‌  ‌or‌  ‌orders‌  ‌on‌  ‌motions‌  ‌for‌‌ 
reconsideration‌  ‌or‌  ‌new‌  ‌trial‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌in‌  ‌Division‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 102‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌exclusive‌  ‌appellate‌‌


  ‌jurisdiction‌‌
  over‌‌
  ‌criminal‌‌  Provided,‌  ‌still‌  ‌further,‌  ‌that‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌claims‌  ‌for‌‌  2) Appellate‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌over‌  ‌appeals‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌ 
offenses‌‌mentioned‌‌in‌‌the‌‌preceding‌‌subparagraph;‌‌and‌  ‌ refund‌  ‌of‌  ‌taxes‌  ‌erroneously‌  ‌or‌  ‌illegally‌  ‌collected‌, ‌‌ judgments,‌  ‌resolutions‌  ‌or‌  ‌orders‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌
  RTCs‌‌   in‌‌
  their‌‌ 
the‌  ‌taxpayer‌  ‌must‌  ‌file‌  ‌a ‌ ‌petition‌  ‌for‌  ‌review‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌‌  original‌  ‌jurisdiction‌‌  in‌‌
  criminal‌‌  offenses‌‌   arising‌‌  from‌‌ 
h) Decisions,‌‌   resolutions‌‌  or‌‌
  orders‌‌
  of‌‌   the‌‌
  ‌RTCs‌‌
  ‌in‌‌
  the‌‌
  exercise‌‌ of‌‌ 
Court‌  ‌prior‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌expiration‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌two-year‌  ‌period‌‌  violations‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌NIRC‌  ‌or‌  ‌TCC‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌laws‌‌ 
their‌‌
  ‌appellate‌‌
  ‌jurisdiction‌‌  over‌‌ ‌criminal‌‌ ‌offenses‌‌ mentioned‌‌ 
under‌‌Section‌‌229‌‌of‌‌the‌‌NIRC;‌  ‌ administered‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌BIR‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌BOC,‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌‌ 
in‌‌subparagraph‌‌(f).‌  ‌
principal‌  ‌amount‌  ‌of‌  ‌taxes‌  ‌and‌  ‌fees,‌  ‌exclusive‌  ‌of‌‌ 
3) Decisions,‌  ‌resolutions‌  ‌or‌  ‌orders‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  RTCs‌‌   in‌‌
  local‌‌ 
In‌‌Division‌  ‌ charges‌  ‌and‌  ‌penalties,‌  ‌claimed‌  ‌is‌  ‌less‌  ‌than‌  ‌P1M‌  ‌or‌‌ 
tax‌  ‌cases‌  ‌decided‌‌
  or‌‌
  resolved‌‌
  by‌‌
  them‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  exercise‌ 
where‌‌there‌‌is‌n ‌ o‌‌specified‌‌amount‌‌claimed;‌  ‌
The‌‌Court‌‌in‌‌Divisions‌‌shall‌‌exercise:‌  ‌ of‌‌their‌‌original‌‌jurisdiction;‌  ‌
c) Exclusive‌j‌urisdiction‌‌over‌t‌ ax‌‌collection‌‌‌cases,‌‌to‌‌wit:‌  ‌
a) Exclusive‌  ‌original‌  ‌or‌  ‌appellate‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌to‌  ‌review‌  ‌by‌‌  4) Decisions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Commissioner‌  ‌of‌  ‌Customs‌  ‌in‌  ‌cases‌‌ 
appeal‌‌the‌‌following:‌  ‌ involving‌  ‌liability‌  ‌for‌  ‌customs‌  ‌duties,‌  ‌fees‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌‌  1) Original‌‌   ‌jurisdiction‌‌  in‌‌
  tax‌‌
  collection‌‌ cases‌‌ involving‌‌ 
money‌  ‌charges,‌  ‌seizure,‌  ‌detention‌  ‌or‌  ‌release‌  ‌of‌‌  final‌  ‌and‌  ‌executory‌  ‌assessments‌  ‌for‌  ‌taxes,‌  ‌fees,‌‌ 
1) Decisions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌CIR‌  ‌in‌  ‌cases‌  ‌involving‌  ‌disputed‌‌  property‌  ‌affected,‌  ‌fines,‌  ‌forfeitures‌  ‌of‌  ‌other‌‌
  penalties‌‌  charges‌  ‌and‌  ‌penalties,‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌‌  principal‌‌
  amount‌‌   of‌‌ 
assessments,‌‌   refunds‌‌   of‌‌
  internal‌‌ revenue‌‌ taxes,‌‌ fees‌‌ or‌‌  in‌  ‌relation‌  ‌thereto,‌  ‌or‌‌
  other‌‌
  matters‌‌  arising‌‌
  under‌‌   the‌‌  taxes‌  ‌and‌  ‌fees,‌  ‌exclusive‌  ‌of‌  ‌charges‌  ‌and‌  ‌penalties,‌‌ 
other‌  ‌charges,‌  ‌penalties‌  ‌in‌  ‌relation‌  ‌thereto,‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌‌  Customs‌‌Law‌‌or‌‌other‌‌laws‌‌administered‌‌by‌‌the‌‌BOC;‌  ‌ claimed‌‌is‌‌P1M‌‌or‌‌more‌;‌‌and‌  ‌
matters‌  ‌arising‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌NIRC‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌laws‌‌ 
administered‌‌by‌‌the‌‌BIR;‌  ‌ 5) Decisions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Secretary‌  ‌of‌  ‌Finance‌  ‌on‌  ‌customs‌‌  2) Appellate‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌over‌  ‌appeals‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌ 
cases‌  ‌elevated‌  ‌to‌  ‌him‌  ‌automatically‌  ‌for‌  ‌review‌  ‌from‌‌  judgments,‌  ‌resolutions‌  ‌or‌  ‌orders‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌RTCs‌  ‌in‌  ‌tax‌‌ 
2) Inaction‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌CIR‌  ‌in‌  ‌cases‌  ‌involving‌  ‌disputed‌‌  decisions‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  Commissioner‌‌   of‌‌
  Customs‌‌ ‌adverse‌‌ to‌‌  collection‌  ‌cases‌  ‌originally‌  ‌decided‌  ‌by‌  ‌them‌  ‌within‌‌ 
assessments,‌‌   refunds‌‌  of‌‌
  internal‌‌ revenue‌‌ taxes,‌‌ fees‌‌ or‌‌  the‌  ‌Government‌  ‌under‌  ‌Section‌  ‌2315‌  ‌of‌‌  the‌‌  Tariff‌‌
  and‌‌  their‌‌respective‌‌territorial‌‌jurisdiction.‌  ‌
other‌  ‌charges,‌  ‌penalties‌  ‌in‌  ‌relation‌  ‌thereto,‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌‌  Customs‌‌Code;‌‌and‌  ‌
matters‌  ‌arising‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌NIRC‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌laws‌‌  Lucas‌‌G.‌‌Adamson,‌‌et‌‌al.‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
administered‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌BIR,‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌NaIRC‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌‌  6) Decisions‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Secretary‌‌ of‌‌ Trade‌‌ and‌‌ Industry,‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ 
case‌  ‌of‌  ‌non-agricultural‌  ‌product,‌  ‌commodity‌  ‌or‌‌  Whether‌  ‌the‌  ‌CTA‌  ‌has‌‌
  no‌‌
  jurisdiction‌‌   to‌‌
  take‌‌
  cognizance‌‌
  of‌‌
  both‌‌
  the‌‌ 
applicable‌‌law‌‌provides‌‌a‌‌specific‌‌period‌‌for‌‌action:‌‌   ‌ criminal‌‌and‌‌civil‌‌cases‌‌here‌‌at‌‌bar‌. ‌ ‌
article,‌‌   and‌‌  the‌‌   Secretary‌‌   of‌‌
  Agriculture,‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  case‌‌   of‌‌ 
Provided‌, ‌ ‌that‌  ‌in‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌disputed‌  ‌assessments,‌  ‌the‌‌  agricultural‌  ‌product,‌  ‌commodity‌  ‌or‌  ‌article,‌  ‌involving‌‌  NO‌. ‌ ‌Under‌  ‌Republic‌  ‌Act‌  ‌No.‌  ‌1125‌  ‌as‌  ‌amended,‌  ‌the‌  ‌rulings‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
inaction‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌CIR‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌one‌  ‌hundred‌  ‌eighty‌‌  dumping‌  ‌and‌‌   countervailing‌‌   duties‌‌  under‌‌  Section‌‌   301‌‌  Commissioner‌  ‌are‌  ‌appealable‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌CTA.‌  ‌The‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌decide‌‌ 
day-period‌  ‌under‌  ‌Section‌  ‌228‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌NIRC‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌  and‌‌  302,‌‌   respectively,‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  Tariff‌‌
  and‌‌
  Customs‌‌   Code,‌‌  disputed‌‌  assessments,‌‌ refunds‌‌ of‌‌ internal‌‌ revenue‌‌ taxes,‌‌ fees‌‌ or‌‌ other‌‌ 
deemed‌‌   a ‌‌denial‌‌  for‌‌ purposes‌‌ of‌‌ allowing‌‌ the‌‌ taxpayer‌‌  and‌‌  safeguard‌‌   measures‌‌   under‌‌   Republic‌‌   Act‌‌ No.‌‌ 8800,‌‌  charges,‌  ‌penalties‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌in‌  ‌relation‌  ‌thereto,‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌matters‌‌ 
to‌  ‌appeal‌  ‌his‌  ‌case‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌and‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌‌  where‌‌   either‌‌   party‌‌   may‌‌  appeal‌‌   the‌‌
  decision‌‌ to‌‌ impose‌‌  arising‌  ‌under‌  ‌this‌  ‌Code‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌laws‌  ‌or‌  ‌portions‌  ‌thereof‌‌ 
necessarily‌‌   constitute‌‌   a ‌‌formal‌‌
  decision‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  CIR‌‌
  on‌‌  administered‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌ BIR‌‌ is‌‌ vested‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ Commissioner,‌‌ subject‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ 
or‌‌not‌‌to‌‌impose‌‌said‌‌duties;‌  ‌
the‌‌tax‌‌case;‌‌   ‌ exclusive‌‌appellate‌‌jurisdiction‌‌of‌‌the‌‌CTA.‌  ‌
b) Exclusive‌‌   ‌jurisdiction‌‌
  over‌‌
  cases‌‌
  involving‌‌ ‌criminal‌‌ ‌offenses,‌‌ 
Provided,‌‌   further,‌‌
  that‌‌ should‌‌ the‌‌ taxpayer‌‌ opt‌‌ to‌‌ await‌‌  to‌‌wit:‌  ‌ CIR‌‌v.‌‌Hambrecht‌‌&‌‌Quist‌‌Philippines‌‌2
‌ 010‌  ‌
the‌  ‌final‌  ‌decision‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌CIR‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌disputed‌‌ 
1) Original‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌over‌  ‌all‌  ‌criminal‌  ‌offenses‌‌  The‌  ‌issue‌  ‌of‌  ‌prescription‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌BIR's‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌collect‌  ‌taxes‌‌  may‌‌
  be‌‌ 
assessments‌  ‌beyond‌  ‌the‌  ‌one‌  ‌hundred‌  ‌eighty‌‌ 
arising‌  ‌from‌  ‌violations‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌NIRC‌‌  or‌‌  TCC‌‌
  and‌‌
  other‌‌  considered‌   a
‌ s‌   c
‌ overed‌  b
‌ y‌‌
  the‌‌
  term‌‌   "o
‌ ther‌‌
  m atters"‌‌   over‌‌   which‌‌
  t he‌‌ 
day-period‌  ‌abovementioned,‌  ‌the‌  ‌taxpayer‌‌   may‌‌
  appeal‌‌  CTA‌‌has‌‌appellate‌‌jurisdiction.‌  ‌
such‌  ‌final‌  ‌decision‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌under‌  ‌Section‌  ‌3(a),‌‌  laws‌  ‌administered‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌BIR‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌BOC,‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Rule‌‌8‌‌of‌‌these‌‌Rules;‌‌and‌‌   ‌ principal‌  ‌amount‌  ‌of‌  ‌taxes‌  ‌and‌  ‌fees,‌  ‌exclusive‌  ‌of‌‌ 
NPC‌‌v.‌‌Municipal‌‌Govt.‌‌of‌‌Navotas,‌‌et‌‌al.‌‌‌2014‌  ‌
charges‌‌and‌‌penalties,‌‌claimed‌‌is‌P ‌ 1M‌‌‌or‌‌more‌;‌‌and‌  ‌
WON‌‌   the‌‌
  CTA‌‌   Second‌‌  Division‌‌   has‌‌
  jurisdiction‌‌   to‌‌ review‌‌ the‌‌ decision‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 103‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

In‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌false‌‌  or‌‌   fraudulent‌‌  return‌‌   with‌‌


  intent‌‌
  to‌‌
  evade‌‌ 
of‌‌
  the‌‌
  RTC‌‌
  which‌‌
  concerns‌‌
  a ‌‌petition‌‌
  for‌‌
  declaratory‌‌
  relief‌‌ involving‌‌  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  CA‌‌
  petition‌‌ not‌‌ only‌‌ contested‌‌ the‌‌ applicability‌‌ of‌‌ Sec.‌‌ 100‌‌ of‌‌ 
real‌‌property‌‌taxes.‌  ‌ the‌  ‌NIRC‌  ‌over‌  ‌the‌  ‌sales‌  ‌transaction‌  ‌but‌  ‌likewise‌  ‌questioned‌  ‌the‌‌  tax‌‌   or‌‌
  of‌‌
  failure‌‌   to‌‌ file‌‌ a ‌‌return‌‌ — ‌‌within‌‌ t‌ en‌‌ (10)‌‌ years‌ ‌after‌‌ 
validity‌  ‌of‌‌
  Sec.‌‌
  7(c.2.2)‌‌   of‌‌
  RR‌‌
  06-08‌‌
  and‌‌
  RMC‌‌   25-11‌‌
  does‌‌   not‌‌
  divest‌‌  the‌‌discovery‌‌of‌‌the‌‌falsity,‌‌fraud‌‌or‌‌omission.‌  ‌
YES‌. ‌ ‌When‌‌  the‌‌  legality‌‌  or‌‌  validity‌‌  of‌‌  the‌‌  assessment‌‌  is‌‌  in‌‌  question,‌‌  the‌‌CTA‌‌of‌‌its‌‌jurisdiction‌‌over‌‌the‌‌controversy.‌  ‌
and‌  ‌not‌  ‌its‌‌
  reasonableness‌‌   or‌‌
  correctness,‌‌   appeals‌‌   to‌‌  the‌‌  LBAA,‌‌
  and‌‌  If‌  ‌the‌  ‌return‌  ‌is‌  ‌amended‌  ‌substantially‌, ‌ ‌then‌  ‌the‌  ‌period‌  ‌to‌‌ 
subsequently‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌CBAA,‌  ‌pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌Sections‌‌   226‌‌   and‌‌   229‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  CIR‌‌v.‌‌V.Y.‌‌Domingo‌‌Jewellers,‌‌Inc.‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌ assess‌‌will‌‌be‌‌reckoned‌‌from‌‌the‌‌filing‌‌of‌‌the‌‌amended‌‌return.‌  ‌
LGC,‌  ‌are‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌necessary.‌  ‌Stated‌  ‌differently,‌  in‌  ‌the‌  ‌event‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌ 
WON‌  ‌the‌  ‌First‌  ‌Division‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌CTA‌  ‌has‌  ‌jurisdiction‌‌
  to‌‌
  entertain‌‌
  V.Y.‌‌  The‌  ‌taxpayer‌  ‌is‌  ‌given‌  ‌three‌  ‌(3)‌  ‌years‌  ‌from‌  ‌date‌  ‌of‌  ‌filing‌  ‌of‌‌ 
taxpayer‌  ‌questions‌  ‌the‌‌   authority‌‌   and‌‌   power‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌   assessor‌‌   to‌‌ 
impose‌‌   the‌‌   assessment,‌‌  and‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  treasurer‌‌   to‌‌
  collect‌‌ the‌‌ real‌‌  Domingo's‌‌petition‌‌for‌‌review.‌  ‌ original‌  ‌return‌  ‌to‌‌  ‌amend‌, ‌‌‌provided‌‌   ‌that‌‌
  no‌‌
  notice‌‌
  for‌‌   audit‌‌  or‌‌ 
property‌‌tax,‌‌resort‌‌to‌‌judicial‌‌action‌‌may‌‌prosper‌. ‌ ‌ investigation‌‌   of‌‌
  such‌‌ return,‌‌ statement‌‌ or‌‌ declaration‌‌ has‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ 
NO‌. ‌ ‌V.Y.‌  ‌Domingo‌  ‌received‌  ‌the‌  ‌PCL‌  ‌issued‌  ‌by‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌CIR‌‌  meantime‌‌been‌‌actually‌‌served‌‌upon‌‌the‌‌taxpayer.‌  ‌
In‌‌
  fine‌, ‌‌if‌‌   a ‌‌taxpayer‌‌   is‌‌
  not‌‌ satisfied‌‌ with‌‌ the‌‌ decision‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ CBAA‌‌ or‌‌  informing‌  ‌it‌  ‌of‌  ‌Assessment‌  ‌Notices‌  ‌dated‌  ‌November‌  ‌18,‌  ‌2010.‌  ‌On‌‌ 
the‌‌   RTC,‌‌   as‌‌  the‌‌  case‌‌   may‌‌   be,‌‌
  the‌‌
  taxpayer‌‌ may‌‌ file,‌‌ within‌‌ thirty‌‌ (30)‌‌  September‌  ‌12,‌  ‌2011,‌  ‌the‌  ‌former‌  ‌sent‌  ‌a ‌ ‌letter‌  ‌request‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌BIR‌‌  2) Collection.‌‌—  ‌‌ ‌
days‌‌   from‌‌   receipt‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  assailed‌‌   decision,‌‌   a ‌‌petition‌‌ for‌‌ review‌‌ with‌‌  requesting‌‌for‌‌certified‌‌true‌‌copies‌‌of‌‌the‌‌said‌‌Assessment‌‌Notices.‌  ‌
a) When‌‌   the‌‌
  CIR‌‌
  validly‌‌
  issues‌‌   an‌‌ assessment‌‌ within‌‌ the‌‌ 
the‌  ‌CTA‌  ‌pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌Section‌  ‌7(a)‌  ‌of‌  ‌R.A.‌  ‌9282.‌  ‌In‌  ‌cases‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌‌ 
question‌  ‌involves‌  ‌the‌  ‌amount‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌tax‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌correctness‌‌  However,‌  ‌instead‌  ‌of‌  ‌filing‌  ‌an‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌protest‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌‌  three‌‌  (3)-year‌‌   period,‌‌ it‌‌ has‌‌ another‌‌ ‌three‌‌ (3)‌‌ years‌ ‌
thereof,‌  ‌the‌  ‌appeal‌  ‌will‌  ‌be‌‌   pursuant‌‌   to‌‌  Section‌‌   7(a)(5)‌‌
  of‌‌  R.A.‌‌
  9282.‌‌  assessment‌  ‌notice‌  ‌within‌  ‌thirty‌  ‌(30)‌  ‌days‌  ‌from‌  ‌its‌  ‌receipt,‌  ‌V.Y.‌‌  within‌  ‌which‌  ‌to‌  ‌collect‌  ‌the‌‌   tax‌‌
  due‌‌  by‌‌
  distraint,‌‌
  levy,‌‌ 
When‌‌   the‌‌
  appeal‌‌ comes‌‌ from‌‌ a ‌‌judicial‌‌ remedy‌‌ which‌‌ questions‌‌ the‌‌  Domingo‌  ‌elected‌  ‌to‌  ‌file‌  ‌its‌  ‌petition‌  ‌for‌  ‌review‌  ‌before‌  ‌the‌‌
  CTA‌‌
  First‌‌  or‌  ‌court‌  ‌proceeding.‌  ‌(‌CIR‌  ‌v.‌  ‌United‌  ‌Salvage‌  ‌and‌‌ 
authority‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌
  local‌‌   government‌‌   to‌‌
  impose‌‌ the‌‌ tax,‌‌ Section‌‌ 7(a)(3)‌  Division‌‌ on‌‌ September‌‌ 16,‌‌ 2011,‌‌ ratiocinating‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ issuance‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
Towage‌2 ‌ 014‌) ‌ ‌
of‌  ‌R.A.‌  ‌9282‌  ‌applies.‌  ‌Thereafter,‌  ‌such‌‌   decision,‌‌   ruling‌‌
  or‌‌  resolution‌‌  PCL‌‌
  and‌‌ the‌‌ alleged‌‌ finality‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ terms‌‌ used‌‌ for‌‌ demanding‌‌ payment‌‌ 
may‌  ‌be‌  ‌further‌  ‌reviewed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌   CTA‌‌   En‌‌   Banc‌‌   pursuant‌‌   to‌‌  Section‌‌
  2,‌‌  therein‌  ‌proved‌  ‌that‌  ‌its‌  ‌Request‌  ‌for‌  ‌Re-evaluation/‌  ‌Re-investigation‌‌  b) In‌‌
  the‌‌
  case‌‌  of‌‌
  an‌‌
  omission‌‌
  to‌‌
  file‌‌
  or‌‌
  if‌‌
  the‌‌
  return‌‌
  filed‌‌ 
Rule‌‌4‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Revised‌‌Rules‌‌of‌‌the‌‌CTA.‌  ‌ and‌‌Reconsideration‌‌had‌‌been‌‌denied‌‌by‌‌the‌‌CIR.‌  ‌ is‌‌false‌‌or‌‌fraudulent,‌‌the‌‌period‌‌to‌‌collect‌‌is‌‌   ‌

Thus,‌‌   the‌‌  CTA‌‌ En‌‌ Banc‌‌ ‌erred‌‌ ‌in‌‌ dismissing‌‌ the‌‌ petition‌‌ for‌‌ review‌‌ en‌‌  The‌  ‌word‌  ‌"decisions"‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌aforementioned‌  ‌provision‌  ‌of‌  ‌R.A.‌‌  i) within‌  ‌ten‌  ‌(10)‌  ‌years‌  ‌from‌  ‌discovery‌‌ 
banc,‌  ‌and‌‌   affirming‌‌   the‌‌
  CTA‌‌
  Second‌‌   Division’s‌‌   position‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌
  RTC‌‌  No.‌‌
  9282‌‌  has‌‌ been‌‌ interpreted‌‌ to‌‌ mean‌‌ the‌‌ decisions‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ CIR‌‌  without‌‌need‌‌of‌‌assessment;‌‌or‌  ‌
has‌  ‌no‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌over‌  ‌the‌  ‌instant‌  ‌case‌  ‌for‌  ‌failure‌  ‌of‌  ‌petitioner‌‌   to‌‌  on‌  ‌the‌  ‌protest‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌taxpayer‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌  ‌assessments.‌‌ 
exhaust‌‌   administrative‌‌   remedies‌‌   which‌‌
  resulted‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  finality‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  Definitely,‌‌said‌‌word‌‌does‌‌not‌‌signify‌‌the‌‌assessment‌‌itself.‌  ‌ ii) Within‌  ‌five‌  ‌(5)‌  ‌years‌  ‌from‌  ‌date‌  ‌of‌‌ 
assessment.‌  ‌ assessment‌.‌‌(‌Sec‌‌222,‌‌NIRC‌) ‌ ‌
Evidently,‌  ‌V.Y.‌  ‌Domingo's‌  ‌immediate‌  ‌recourse‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌CTA‌  ‌First‌‌ 
Division‌  ‌was‌  ‌in‌  ‌violation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌exhaustion‌  ‌of‌‌  3) Period‌  ‌to‌  ‌File‌  ‌Criminal‌  ‌Action‌  ‌— ‌ ‌All‌  ‌violations‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌‌ 
Philamlife‌‌v.‌‌Sec.‌‌of‌‌Finance‌‌and‌‌CIR‌‌2
‌ 014‌  ‌
administrative‌‌remedies.‌  ‌ provision‌‌of‌‌this‌‌Code‌‌shall‌‌prescribe‌‌after‌‌‌five‌‌(5)‌‌years.‌  ‌
Where‌‌   does‌‌
  one‌‌
  seek‌‌
  immediate‌‌   recourse‌‌  from‌‌   the‌‌
  adverse‌‌   ruling‌‌ of‌‌ 
the‌  ‌Secretary‌  ‌of‌‌
  Finance‌‌
  in‌‌
  its‌‌
  exercise‌‌
  of‌‌
  its‌‌
  power‌‌   of‌‌
  review‌‌  under‌‌  b. Prescription‌  ‌ Prescription‌  ‌shall‌  ‌begin‌  ‌to‌  ‌run‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌day‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Sec.‌‌4?‌  ‌ 1) Period‌  ‌of‌  ‌Limitation‌  ‌Upon‌  ‌Assessment.‌‌
  — ‌‌Internal‌‌
  revenue‌‌  commission‌‌   ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  violation‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  law,‌‌
  and‌‌
  if‌‌ the‌‌ same‌‌ be‌‌ not‌‌ 
taxes‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌assessed‌‌within‌t‌ hree‌‌(3)‌‌years‌  ‌ ‌ known‌‌at‌‌the‌‌time,‌‌from‌‌the‌d‌ iscovery‌t‌ hereof.‌  ‌
Sec.‌  ‌7(a)(1)‌  ‌of‌  ‌RA‌  ‌1125,‌  ‌as‌  ‌amended,‌‌   addresses‌‌   the‌‌
  seeming‌‌
  gap‌‌  in‌‌ 
the‌‌
  law‌‌ as‌‌ it‌‌ vests‌‌ the‌‌ CTA,‌‌ albeit‌‌ impliedly,‌‌ with‌‌ jurisdiction‌‌ over‌‌ the‌‌  a) after‌‌
  the‌‌
  last‌‌
  day‌‌
  prescribed‌‌ by‌‌ law‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ filing‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  The‌  ‌prescription‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌interrupted‌  ‌when‌  ‌proceedings‌  ‌are‌‌ 
CA‌  ‌petition‌  ‌as‌  ‌“other‌  ‌matters”‌  ‌arising‌  ‌under‌‌   the‌‌
  NIRC‌‌
  or‌‌
  other‌‌  instituted‌  ‌and‌  ‌shall‌  ‌begin‌  ‌to‌‌
  ‌run‌‌
  again‌‌
  if‌‌
  the‌‌
  proceedings‌‌
  are‌‌ 
return,‌‌OR‌  ‌
laws‌‌administered‌‌by‌‌the‌‌BIR‌. ‌ ‌ dismissed‌‌for‌‌reasons‌‌not‌‌constituting‌‌jeopardy.‌  ‌
b) where‌  ‌a ‌ ‌return‌  ‌is‌  ‌filed‌  ‌beyond‌  ‌the‌  ‌period‌  ‌prescribed‌‌ 
In‌  ‌the‌  ‌recent‌  ‌case‌‌
  of‌‌
  ‌City‌‌
  of‌‌
  Manila‌‌   v.‌‌
  Grecia-Cuerdo‌, ‌‌the‌‌   Court‌‌
  en‌‌  The‌  ‌term‌  ‌of‌  ‌prescription‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌run‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌offender‌  ‌is‌‌ 
by‌‌law,‌ ‌from‌‌the‌‌day‌‌the‌‌return‌‌was‌‌filed.‌  ‌
banc‌  ‌has‌  ‌ruled‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌CTA‌  ‌now‌  ‌has‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌certiorari‌  ‌in‌‌  absent‌‌from‌‌the‌‌Philippines.‌  ‌
cases‌‌within‌‌its‌‌appellate‌‌jurisdiction.‌  ‌
Imelda‌‌Sze,‌‌et‌‌al.‌‌v.‌‌BIR‌‌‌2020‌  ‌
Guided‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  doctrinal‌‌
  teaching‌‌
  in‌‌
  resolving‌‌
  the‌‌
  case‌‌
  at‌‌
  bar,‌‌ the‌‌ fact‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 104‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

How‌  ‌to‌  ‌determine‌  ‌the‌  ‌reckoning‌  ‌point‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌5-year‌  ‌prescriptive‌‌  WON‌‌   CIR's‌‌ right‌‌ to‌‌ collect‌‌ respondent's‌‌ alleged‌‌ deficiency‌‌ income‌‌ tax‌‌  respondent‌  ‌filed‌  ‌its‌  ‌final‌  ‌adjusted‌  ‌return.‌‌
  Hence,‌‌
  it‌‌
  was‌‌
  filed‌‌
  within‌‌ 
period‌‌for‌‌violations‌‌of‌‌the‌‌NIRC?‌  ‌ is‌‌barred‌‌by‌‌prescription.‌  ‌ the‌‌reglementary‌‌period.‌  ‌

The‌  ‌CTA‌  ‌explained‌  ‌that‌  ‌RMC‌  ‌101-90‌‌


  provides‌‌   that‌‌
  an‌‌  offense‌‌  under‌‌  YES‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌assessment,‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌  ‌case,‌  ‌was‌  ‌presumably‌  ‌issued‌  ‌on‌  ‌14‌‌  CIR‌‌v.‌‌Univation‌‌Motor‌‌Philippines,‌‌Inc.‌‌‌2019‌  ‌
the‌  ‌tax‌  ‌code‌  ‌is‌  ‌considered‌  ‌discovered‌  ‌only‌  ‌after‌‌   the‌‌
  manner‌‌   of‌‌  April‌  ‌1994‌  ‌since‌  ‌the‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌  ‌dispute‌  ‌the‌  ‌CIR's‌  ‌claim.‌‌ 
commission‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌nature‌  ‌and‌  ‌extent‌  ‌of‌  ‌fraud‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌‌  Therefore,‌‌   the‌‌
  BIR‌‌
  had‌‌   until‌‌
  13‌‌
  April‌‌ 1997.‌‌ However,‌‌ as‌‌ there‌‌ was‌‌ no‌‌  WON‌‌   the‌‌
  CTA‌‌
  has‌‌
  prematurely‌‌   assumed‌‌   jurisdiction‌‌ on‌‌ respondent's‌‌ 
definitely‌  ‌ascertained‌. ‌ ‌This‌  ‌occurs‌  ‌when‌‌   the‌‌
  BIR‌‌  renders‌‌  its‌‌
  final‌‌  Warrant‌‌   of‌‌
  Distraint‌‌   and/or‌‌   Levy‌‌  served‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌
  respondents‌‌ nor‌‌ any‌‌  judicial‌  ‌claim‌  ‌for‌  ‌tax‌  ‌refund‌  ‌or‌  ‌credit‌  ‌without‌  ‌waiting‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌ 
decision‌‌and‌‌requires‌‌the‌‌taxpayer‌‌to‌‌pay‌‌the‌‌deficiency‌‌tax‌. ‌ ‌ judicial‌  ‌proceedings‌  ‌initiated‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌BIR,‌  ‌the‌‌   earliest‌‌
  attempt‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  decision‌‌of‌‌petitioner.‌  ‌
BIR‌‌   to‌‌
  collect‌‌  the‌‌
  tax‌‌  due‌‌  based‌‌ on‌‌ this‌‌ assessment‌‌ was‌‌ when‌‌ it‌‌ filed‌‌ 
Here,‌‌
  counting‌‌   30‌‌
  days‌‌
  from‌‌
  the‌‌
  service‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌ FLD‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ FAN,‌‌ ‌the‌‌  its‌  ‌Answer‌  ‌in‌  ‌CTA‌  ‌Case‌  ‌No.‌  ‌6568‌  ‌on‌  ‌9 ‌ ‌January‌  ‌2003,‌  ‌which‌  ‌was‌‌  NO‌. ‌‌In‌‌  the‌‌  instant‌‌  case,‌‌  the‌‌  two-year‌‌  period‌‌ to‌‌ file‌‌ a ‌‌claim‌‌ for‌‌ refund‌‌ 
violations‌  ‌were‌  ‌considered‌  ‌discovered‌  ‌on‌  ‌March‌  ‌9,‌  ‌2005‌. ‌ ‌The‌‌  several‌  ‌years‌  ‌beyond‌  ‌the‌  ‌three-year‌  ‌prescriptive‌  ‌period.‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌the‌‌  is‌  ‌reckoned‌  ‌from‌  ‌April‌  ‌15,‌  ‌2011,‌‌   the‌‌   date‌‌   respondent‌‌   filed‌‌   its‌‌  Final‌‌ 
BIR's‌  ‌revenue‌  ‌officers‌  ‌filed‌  ‌their‌  ‌joint‌  ‌affidavit‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌DOJ‌  ‌for‌‌  CIR‌‌is‌‌now‌‌prescribed‌‌‌from‌‌collecting‌‌the‌‌assessed‌‌tax.‌  ‌ Adjustment‌‌ Return.‌‌ Since‌‌ respondent‌‌ filed‌‌ its‌‌ administrative‌‌ claim‌‌ on‌‌ 
preliminary‌  ‌investigation‌  ‌on‌  ‌May‌  ‌26,‌  ‌2005.‌  ‌However,‌  ‌the‌  ‌original‌‌  March‌  ‌12,‌  ‌2012‌  ‌and‌  ‌its‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌claim‌  ‌on‌  ‌April‌  ‌12,‌‌   2013,‌‌   therefore,‌‌ 
Information‌  ‌was‌  ‌only‌  ‌filed‌  ‌in‌  ‌court‌  ‌on‌  ‌April‌  ‌23,‌  ‌2014‌, ‌ ‌which‌‌  Fishwealth‌‌Canning‌‌Corp.‌‌v.‌‌CIR‌‌2
‌ 010‌  ‌ both‌  ‌of‌  ‌respondent's‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌and‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌claim‌  ‌for‌  ‌refund‌‌ 
exceeded‌‌   the‌‌
  five-year‌‌  prescriptive‌‌   period.‌‌ Therefore,‌‌ the‌‌ action‌‌ had‌‌  were‌  ‌filed‌  ‌on‌  ‌time‌  ‌or‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌two-year‌  ‌prescriptive‌  ‌period‌‌ 
prescribed.‌  ‌ Since‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌received‌  ‌the‌  ‌denial‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌administrative‌‌   protest‌‌
  on‌‌  provided‌  ‌by‌  ‌law.‌  ‌Under‌  ‌the‌  ‌circumstances,‌  ‌if‌‌   respondent‌‌   awaited‌‌ 
August‌  ‌4,‌  ‌2005,‌  ‌it‌  ‌had‌  ‌until‌  ‌September‌  ‌3,‌‌  2005‌‌
  to‌‌
  file‌‌
  a ‌‌petition‌‌
  for‌‌  for‌  ‌the‌  ‌commissioner‌‌   to‌‌
  act‌‌   on‌‌   its‌‌  administrative‌‌   claim‌‌   (before‌‌ 
4) No‌  ‌credit‌  ‌or‌  ‌refund‌  ‌of‌  ‌taxes‌  ‌or‌  ‌penalties‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌allowed‌‌  review‌‌   before‌‌
  the‌‌  CTA‌‌   Division.‌‌   It‌‌
  filed‌‌
  one,‌‌ however,‌‌ on‌‌ October‌‌ 20,‌‌  resort‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌  Court),‌‌
  chances‌‌   are,‌‌  ‌the‌‌   two-year‌‌ prescriptive‌‌ period‌‌ 
unless‌  ‌the‌  ‌taxpayer‌  ‌files‌  ‌in‌  ‌writing‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌Commissioner‌  ‌a ‌‌ 2005,‌  ‌hence,‌  ‌it‌  ‌was‌  ‌filed‌  ‌out‌  ‌of‌  ‌time.‌  ‌For‌  ‌a ‌ ‌motion‌  ‌for‌‌  will‌  ‌lapse‌‌   effectively‌‌   resulting‌‌   to‌‌  the‌‌   loss‌‌   of‌‌
  respondent's‌‌   right‌‌ 
reconsideration‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ denial‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ administrative‌‌ protest‌‌ ‌does‌‌  to‌‌  seek‌‌  judicial‌‌   recourse‌‌   ‌and‌‌   worse,‌‌   its‌‌ right‌‌ to‌‌ recover‌‌ the‌‌ taxes‌‌ it‌‌ 
claim‌  ‌for‌  ‌credit‌  ‌or‌  ‌refund‌  ‌within‌  ‌two‌  ‌(2)‌  ‌years‌  ‌after‌  ‌the‌‌ 
not‌‌toll‌t‌ he‌‌30-day‌‌period‌‌to‌‌appeal‌‌to‌‌the‌‌CTA‌. ‌ ‌ erroneously‌‌   paid‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  government.‌‌   Hence,‌‌   respondent's‌‌   immediate‌‌ 
payment‌‌of‌‌the‌‌tax‌‌or‌‌penalty.‌  ‌ resort‌‌to‌‌the‌‌Court‌‌is‌‌justified.‌  ‌
5) Local‌‌   taxes,‌‌   fees,‌‌
  or‌‌   charges‌‌   shall‌‌
  be‌‌   within‌  ‌five‌‌ (5)‌‌  Lascona‌‌Land‌‌Co.,‌‌Inc.‌‌v.‌‌CIR‌‌2
  assessed‌‌ ‌ 012‌  ‌
waited‌‌for‌‌CIR‌‌Decision‌‌even‌‌after‌‌lapse‌‌of‌‌180‌‌days‌  ‌ c. Against‌‌Assessment‌‌Notices‌  ‌
years‌f‌ rom‌‌the‌‌date‌‌they‌‌became‌‌due.‌  ‌
Considering‌‌   that‌‌   Lascona‌‌   opted‌‌   to‌‌   await‌‌  the‌‌  final‌‌  decision‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ CIR‌‌  i.‌‌Period‌‌to‌‌file‌‌protest‌  ‌
In‌‌
  case‌‌   of‌‌
  fraud‌‌  or‌‌  intent‌‌ to‌‌ evade‌‌ the‌‌ payment‌‌ of‌‌ taxes,‌‌ fees,‌‌ or‌‌ 
on‌‌
  the‌‌  protested‌‌   assessment,‌‌   it‌‌ then‌‌ has‌‌ the‌‌ right‌‌ to‌‌ appeal‌‌ such‌‌ final‌‌ 
charges,‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌assessed‌  ‌within‌  t‌ en‌  ‌(10)‌  ‌years‌ ‌ decision‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌   Court‌‌ by‌‌ filing‌‌ a ‌‌petition‌‌ for‌‌ review‌‌ within‌‌ thirty‌‌ days‌‌  Within‌‌30‌‌days‌‌‌from‌‌receipt‌‌of‌‌the‌‌assessment.‌  ‌
from‌‌discovery‌‌of‌‌the‌‌fraud‌‌or‌‌intent‌‌to‌‌evade‌‌payment.‌  ‌ after‌  ‌receipt‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌copy‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌  ‌decision‌  ‌or‌  ‌ruling,‌  ‌even‌  ‌after‌  ‌the‌‌ 
expiration‌‌   of‌‌   the‌‌   180-day‌‌   period‌‌   fixed‌‌  by‌‌ law‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ CIR‌‌ to‌‌ act‌‌ on‌‌  ii.‌K
‌ inds‌‌of‌‌protest‌  ‌
Local‌  ‌taxes,‌‌   fees,‌‌
  or‌‌  charges‌‌   may‌‌
  be‌‌
  collected‌‌
  within‌‌   f‌ ive‌‌
  (5)‌‌  the‌‌disputed‌‌assessments.‌  ‌
years‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌date‌  ‌of‌  ‌assessment‌  ‌by‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌or‌‌  There‌‌are‌‌basically‌‌two‌‌types:‌  ‌
judicial‌‌action.‌  ‌ CIR‌‌v.‌‌Primetown‌‌Property‌‌Group,‌‌Inc.‌  ‌ 1) Request‌‌   for‌‌   Reconsideration‌  ‌— ‌‌anchored‌‌ on‌‌ documents,‌‌ 
6) Under‌  ‌the‌  ‌Tax‌  ‌Code,‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌provide‌  ‌for‌  ‌any‌‌  The‌  ‌rule‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌‌   the‌‌   two-year‌‌   prescriptive‌‌   period‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌
  filing‌‌   of‌‌
  tax‌‌  arguments,‌ a
‌ nd‌ ‌legal‌‌authorities‌‌already‌‌submitted‌‌to‌‌the‌‌BIR.‌  ‌
particular‌‌ prescriptive‌‌ period‌‌ of‌‌ assessment,‌‌ the‌‌ rule‌‌ is‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌  refunds‌  ‌and‌  ‌tax‌  ‌credits‌  ‌is‌  ‌reckoned‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌filing‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌final‌‌ 
This‌‌may‌‌involve‌‌a‌‌question‌‌of‌‌fact,‌‌or‌‌law,‌‌or‌‌both.‌  ‌
tax‌‌sought‌‌to‌‌be‌‌assessed‌‌becomes‌I‌ MPRESCRIPTIBLE‌. ‌ ‌ adjusted‌  ‌return.‌‌   ‌But‌‌  how‌‌  should‌‌   the‌‌  two-year‌‌   prescriptive‌‌   period‌‌   be‌‌ 
computed?‌  ‌ 2) Request‌  ‌for‌  ‌Reinvestigation‌  ‌— ‌ ‌grounded‌  ‌on‌  ‌new‌  ‌or‌‌ 
7) The‌‌   issue‌‌   of‌‌ prescription‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ raised‌‌ at‌‌ the‌‌ ‌administrative‌‌ 
Section‌  ‌31,‌  ‌Chapter‌  ‌VIII,‌  ‌Book‌  ‌I ‌ ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Administrative‌  ‌Code‌  ‌of‌‌  additional‌‌   documents,‌‌   arguments,‌‌  and‌‌
  legal‌‌
  authorities‌‌
  not‌‌ yet‌‌ 
level‌‌ and‌‌ evidence‌‌ to‌‌ prove‌‌ prescription‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ introduced‌‌ by‌‌ 
1987,‌  ‌being‌  ‌the‌  ‌more‌  ‌recent‌  ‌law,‌  ‌governs‌  ‌the‌  ‌computation‌  ‌of‌‌  submitted.‌   ‌
the‌‌taxpayer.‌  ‌
legal‌‌periods.‌‌‌Lex‌‌posteriori‌‌derogat‌‌priori‌. ‌ ‌
The‌‌taxpayer‌‌shall‌‌state‌‌in‌‌his‌‌protest:‌  ‌
CIR‌‌v.‌‌Phil.‌‌Global‌‌Communication,‌‌Inc.‌  ‌
We‌‌  therefore‌‌   hold‌‌   that‌‌ respondent's‌‌ petition‌‌ (filed‌‌ on‌‌ April‌‌ 14,‌‌ 2000)‌‌  1) The‌‌nature‌‌of‌‌the‌‌protest;‌  ‌
was‌  ‌filed‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌last‌  ‌day‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌24th‌  ‌calendar‌  ‌month‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌   day‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 105‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

2) Date‌‌of‌‌the‌‌assessment‌‌notice;‌‌and‌  ‌ b) Await‌  ‌the‌  ‌final‌  ‌decision‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌CIR’s‌  ‌duly‌  ‌authorized‌‌ 
representative‌‌of‌‌the‌‌disputed‌‌assessment.‌  ‌ DAY1‌‌|‌‌PM‌‌Criminal‌‌Law‌  ‌
3) The‌‌
  applicable‌‌   law,‌‌
  rules,‌‌  and‌‌
  regulations,‌‌  or‌‌
  jurisprudence‌‌ on‌‌ 
which‌  ‌the‌  ‌protest‌  ‌is‌  ‌based;‌  ‌otherwise,‌  ‌the‌  ‌protest‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌  3) If‌  ‌the‌  ‌protest‌  ‌or‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌appeal‌  ‌is‌  ‌denied‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌  Basic‌‌Principles‌  ‌
deemed‌‌void.‌  ‌ CIR‌  ‌
1.‌‌Mala‌‌in‌‌se‌‌and‌‌mala‌‌prohibita‌  ‌
iii.‌‌Submission‌‌of‌‌supporting‌‌documents‌  ‌ a) Appeal‌‌to‌‌the‌‌CTA‌‌within‌‌30‌‌days‌‌from‌‌receipt.‌  ‌
2.‌‌Scope‌‌and‌‌characteristics‌  ‌
Submit‌  ‌additional‌  ‌relevant‌  ‌supporting‌  ‌documents‌  ‌within‌  ‌60‌‌  An‌  ‌MR‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  CIR’s‌‌
  denial‌‌
  shall‌‌
  NOT‌‌
  toll‌‌
  the‌‌
  30-day‌‌
  period‌‌
  to‌‌ 
appeal‌‌to‌‌the‌‌CTA.‌  ‌ 3.‌‌Pro‌‌reo‌‌principle‌  ‌
days‌  ‌from‌  ‌filing‌  ‌of‌  ‌protest.‌  ‌The‌  ‌180‌  ‌day‌  ‌period‌  ‌will‌‌
  be‌‌
  reckoned‌‌ 
from‌‌the‌‌day‌‌the‌‌taxpayer‌‌submitted‌‌such‌‌documents.‌  ‌ 4) If‌  ‌the‌  ‌protest‌  ‌is‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌acted‌  ‌upon‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌CIR‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌‌  4.‌‌Interpretation‌‌of‌‌penal‌‌laws‌  ‌
iv.‌‌Effect‌‌of‌‌failure‌‌to‌‌file‌‌protest‌  ‌ 180-day‌‌period‌  ‌
5.‌‌Retroactive‌‌effect‌‌of‌‌penal‌‌laws‌  ‌
a) Appeal‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  CTA‌‌ within‌‌ 30‌‌ days‌‌ after‌‌ the‌‌ expiration‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
The‌‌
  assessment‌‌   shall‌‌
  become‌‌
  final,‌‌
  executory‌‌
  and‌‌ demandable.‌‌ No‌‌  Attenuating‌‌Circumstances‌  ‌
180-day‌‌period;‌‌OR‌  ‌
requests‌‌for‌‌reconsideration‌‌or‌‌reinvestigation‌‌may‌‌then‌‌be‌‌granted.‌  ‌
Justifying‌  ‌
b) Await‌  ‌the‌  ‌final‌  ‌decision‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌CIR‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌disputed‌‌ 
v.‌‌Action‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Commissioner‌‌on‌‌the‌‌protest‌‌filed‌  ‌
assessment‌  ‌and‌  ‌appeal‌  ‌such‌  ‌final‌  ‌decision‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌CTA‌‌  Exempting‌  ‌
a)‌‌Period‌‌to‌‌act‌‌upon‌‌or‌‌decide‌‌on‌‌protest‌‌filed‌  ‌ within‌‌30‌‌days‌‌after‌‌receipt‌‌of‌‌the‌‌decision.‌  ‌
Mitigating‌  ‌
180‌‌days.‌  ‌ NB:‌‌‌These‌‌options‌‌are‌‌MUTUALLY‌‌EXCLUSIVE.‌  ‌
Aggravating‌  ‌
b)‌‌Remedies‌‌of‌‌the‌‌taxpayer‌‌in‌‌case‌‌of‌‌denial‌‌or‌‌inaction‌‌of‌‌the‌‌  Denial‌‌of‌‌Protest‌  ‌
Commissioner‌  ‌ Alternative‌  ‌
A. DIRECT‌  ‌— ‌ ‌The‌  ‌decision‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌CIR‌  ‌or‌  ‌his‌  ‌duly‌  ‌authorized‌‌ 
How‌‌to‌‌Appeal‌  ‌ representative‌‌shall‌  ‌ Application‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Indeterminate‌‌Sentence‌‌Law‌  ‌

1) If‌  ‌the‌  ‌protest‌  ‌is‌  ‌denied‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌CIR’s‌  ‌duly‌  ‌authorized‌‌  a. State‌  ‌the‌  ‌facts,‌  ‌applicable‌  ‌law,‌  ‌rules‌  ‌and‌  ‌regulations,‌  ‌or‌‌  Service‌‌of‌‌Sentence‌  ‌
representative‌  ‌ jurisprudence‌‌on‌‌which‌‌such‌‌decision‌‌is‌‌based;‌‌and‌  ‌
Effect‌‌of‌‌Death‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Accused‌  ‌
a) Appeal‌‌to‌‌the‌‌CTA;‌‌OR‌  ‌ b. That‌‌the‌‌same‌‌is‌‌his‌‌final‌‌decision.‌  ‌
Crimes‌‌Against‌‌Persons‌  ‌
b) Elevate‌‌   the‌‌
  protest‌‌
  through‌‌
  a ‌‌request‌‌
  for‌‌
  ‌reconsideration‌‌  B. INDIRECT‌‌‌—  ‌‌ ‌
Crimes‌‌Against‌‌Property‌  ‌
to‌‌the‌‌CIR.‌  ‌ a. CIR‌‌did‌‌not‌‌rule‌‌on‌‌the‌‌motion‌‌for‌‌reconsideration;‌ 
Crimes‌‌Against‌‌Liberty‌  ‌
Both‌‌within‌‌30‌‌days‌‌from‌‌receipt‌‌of‌‌decision.‌  ‌ b. Referral‌‌by‌‌the‌‌CIR‌‌of‌‌request‌‌for‌‌reinvestigation‌‌to‌‌OSG;‌  ‌
Crimes‌‌Againt‌‌Public‌‌Interest‌  ‌
NO‌  ‌request‌  ‌for‌  ‌reinvestigation‌  ‌is‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌in‌  ‌administrative‌‌  c. Reiterating‌  ‌the‌  ‌demand‌  ‌for‌  ‌immediate‌  ‌payment‌  o ‌ f‌‌ 
appeal.‌  ‌ deficiency‌  ‌tax‌  ‌due‌  ‌to‌  ‌taxpayer’s‌  ‌continued‌  ‌refusal‌  ‌to‌‌  RA‌‌9262‌  ‌
2) If‌  ‌the‌  ‌protest‌  ‌is‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌acted‌  ‌upon‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌CIR’s‌  ‌duly‌‌  execute‌‌waiver;‌  ‌
RA‌‌7610‌  ‌
authorized‌‌representative‌‌within‌‌the‌‌180-day‌‌period‌  ‌ d. Preliminary‌  ‌collection‌  ‌letter‌  ‌may‌  ‌serve‌  ‌as‌  ‌assessment‌‌ 
Safe‌‌Spaces‌‌Act‌  ‌
a) Appeal‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  CTA‌‌ within‌‌ 30‌‌ days‌‌ after‌‌ the‌‌ expiration‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  notice.‌  ‌
180-day‌‌period;‌‌OR‌  ‌ c)‌‌Effect‌‌of‌‌failure‌‌to‌‌appeal‌  ‌ Data‌‌Privacy‌‌Act‌  ‌

The‌‌assessment‌‌shall‌‌become‌‌final,‌‌executory‌‌and‌‌demandable.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 106‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

1. Basic‌‌Principles‌  ‌ People‌‌v.‌‌Comia‌  ‌
vessel‌‌ and‌‌ its‌‌ cargo‌‌ is‌‌ still‌‌ deemed‌‌ part‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ act‌‌ of‌‌ piracy,‌‌ hence,‌‌ the‌‌ 
The‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌transporting‌  ‌a ‌ ‌prohibited‌  ‌drug‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌"‌malum‌‌  same‌‌need‌‌not‌‌be‌‌committed‌‌in‌‌Philippine‌‌waters‌. ‌ ‌
1.‌‌Mala‌‌in‌‌se‌‌and‌‌mala‌‌prohibita‌  ‌ prohibitum‌" ‌‌because‌‌   it‌‌
  is‌‌
  punished‌‌ as‌‌ an‌‌ offense‌‌ under‌‌ a ‌‌special‌‌ law.‌‌   ‌
It‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌wrong‌  ‌because‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌prohibited‌  ‌by‌  ‌law.‌  ‌Without‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌‌  Moreover,‌  ‌piracy‌  ‌falls‌  ‌under‌  ‌Title‌  ‌One‌  ‌of‌  ‌Book‌  ‌Two‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌
  Revised‌‌ 
Crimes‌  ‌mala‌  ‌in‌  ‌se‌  ‌are‌  ‌inherently‌  ‌immoral‌  ‌and‌  ‌involve‌  ‌intent‌  ‌to‌‌  Penal‌‌  Code.‌‌  As‌‌   such,‌‌   it‌‌ is‌‌ an‌‌ exception‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ rule‌‌ on‌‌ territoriality‌‌ 
punishing‌‌   the‌‌
  act,‌‌
  it‌‌
  cannot‌‌ be‌‌ considered‌‌ a ‌‌wrong.‌‌ As‌‌ such,‌‌ the‌‌ mere‌‌ 
commit‌‌   a ‌‌crime.‌‌
  Good‌‌
  faith‌‌
  is‌‌ a ‌‌defense‌‌ in‌‌ ‌mala‌‌ in‌‌ se‌‌ crimes,‌‌ but‌‌ is‌‌  commission‌‌   of‌‌
  said‌‌  act‌‌  is‌‌
  what‌‌
  constitutes‌‌   the‌‌ offense‌‌ punished‌‌ and‌‌  in‌‌
  criminal‌‌   law.‌‌   It‌‌ is‌‌ likewise,‌‌ well-settled‌‌ that‌‌ regardless‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ law‌‌ 
not‌  ‌a ‌ ‌defense‌  ‌in‌  ‌mala‌‌
  prohibita‌‌   crimes,‌‌
  where‌‌   what‌‌   is‌‌
  required‌‌
  is‌‌  suffices‌  ‌to‌  ‌validly‌  ‌charge‌  ‌and‌  ‌convict‌  ‌an‌  ‌individual‌  ‌caught‌‌  penalizing‌‌  the‌‌   same,‌‌   ‌piracy‌‌   is‌‌
  a ‌‌reprehensible‌‌   crime‌‌   against‌‌   the‌‌ 
merely‌  ‌the‌  ‌intent‌  ‌to‌  ‌perpetrate‌  ‌the‌  ‌act‌. ‌ ‌Although‌  ‌most‌  ‌crimes‌‌  committing‌‌the‌‌act‌‌so‌‌punished,‌‌regardless‌‌of‌‌criminal‌‌intent‌. ‌ ‌ whole‌‌world‌‌‌(‌People‌‌v.‌‌Lol-lo‌).‌  ‌
punished‌  ‌under‌  ‌special‌  ‌penal‌  ‌laws‌  ‌are‌  ‌mala‌  ‌prohibita‌, ‌ ‌there‌  ‌are‌‌ 
also‌‌those‌‌that‌‌are‌‌‌mala‌‌in‌‌se‌. ‌ ‌ 2.‌‌Scope‌‌and‌‌characteristics‌  ‌ c.‌‌Prospectivity‌  ‌

Matalam‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌‌2016‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌ a.‌‌Generality‌  ‌ Penal‌‌laws‌‌do‌‌not‌‌have‌‌retroactive‌‌effect‌  ‌

The‌‌
  general‌‌
  rule‌‌
  is‌‌
  that‌‌
  acts‌‌
  punished‌‌ under‌‌ a ‌‌special‌‌ law‌‌ are‌‌ ‌malum‌‌  Penal‌  ‌laws‌  ‌apply‌  ‌to‌  ‌ALL‌‌
  PERSONS‌‌
  who‌‌
  commit‌‌
  crimes‌‌
  within‌‌
  the‌‌  exc‌i‌ f‌‌the‌‌provisions‌‌are‌‌favorable‌‌to‌‌the‌‌accused‌‌who‌‌is‌‌not‌‌a ‌‌
prohibitum‌. ‌‌"An‌‌
  act‌‌
  which‌‌  is‌‌
  declared‌‌
  malum‌‌ prohibitum‌, ‌‌‌malice‌‌ or‌‌  territory.‌e‌ xc‌‌   ‌ habitual‌‌offender‌  ‌
criminal‌‌intent‌‌is‌‌completely‌‌immaterial.‌" ‌ ‌ 1. Under‌‌Vienna‌‌Convention‌‌on‌‌diplomatic‌‌relations;‌  ‌ exc‌‌to‌‌the‌‌exc‌t‌ he‌‌law‌‌itself‌‌provides‌‌against‌‌such‌‌retroactive‌‌effect.‌  ‌
Hence,‌  ‌"‌intent‌  ‌to‌  ‌commit‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌‌   and‌‌   intent‌‌   to‌‌
  perpetrate‌‌   the‌‌  2. In‌  ‌certain‌  ‌exempting‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌RPC‌  ‌and‌‌ 
Hernan‌‌v.‌‌Sandiganbayan‌‌‌2017‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
act‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌distinguished.‌  ‌A ‌ ‌person‌  ‌may‌  ‌not‌  ‌have‌  ‌consciously‌‌  special‌‌laws;‌  ‌
intended‌  ‌to‌  ‌commit‌  ‌a ‌ ‌crime;‌  ‌but‌  ‌he‌‌   did‌‌   intend‌‌   to‌‌  commit‌‌   an‌‌  act‌, ‌ For‌‌  as‌‌
  long‌‌   as‌‌
  the‌‌  penal‌‌   law‌‌
  is‌‌
  favorable‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  accused,‌‌   it‌‌
  shall‌‌ find‌‌ 
and‌  ‌that‌  ‌act‌‌   is,‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  very‌‌  nature‌‌   of‌‌
  things,‌‌   the‌‌
  crime‌‌   itself‌."‌‌
  When‌‌  3. Legal‌  ‌pluralism‌  ‌in‌  ‌certain‌  ‌areas/culture,‌  ‌i.e.‌  ‌the‌  ‌Muslim‌‌ 
application‌‌   regardless‌‌   of‌‌  whether‌‌   its‌‌
  effectivity‌‌   comes‌‌   after‌‌   the‌‌ time‌‌ 
an‌  ‌act‌  ‌is‌  ‌prohibited‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌special‌  ‌law,‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌considered‌  ‌injurious‌  ‌to‌‌  Code‌‌and‌‌IPRA.‌  ‌
when‌  ‌the‌  ‌judgment‌  ‌of‌  ‌conviction‌  ‌is‌  ‌rendered‌  ‌and‌‌   even‌‌
  if‌‌
  service‌‌   of‌‌ 
public‌‌   welfare,‌‌   and‌‌ the‌‌ performance‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ prohibited‌‌ act‌‌ is‌‌ the‌‌ crime‌‌  b.‌‌Territoriality‌  ‌ sentence‌  ‌has‌  ‌already‌  ‌begun.‌  ‌The‌  ‌accused‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
itself.‌  ‌ benefits‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  new‌‌   law‌‌  warranting‌‌   him‌‌   to‌‌ serve‌‌ a ‌‌lesser‌‌ sentence,‌‌ or‌‌ 
Penal‌‌   laws‌‌
  apply‌‌
  to‌‌
  all‌‌
  offenses‌‌
  committed‌‌
  within‌‌
  the‌‌ PH‌‌ territory.‌  to‌‌
  his‌‌  release,‌‌   if‌‌
  he‌‌
  has‌‌  already‌‌   begun‌‌   serving‌‌ his‌‌ previous‌‌ sentence,‌‌ 
Volition‌, ‌‌or‌‌ intent‌‌ to‌‌ commit‌‌ the‌‌ act,‌‌ is‌‌ different‌‌ from‌‌ criminal‌‌ intent.‌‌  exc‌‌   and‌  ‌said‌  ‌service‌  ‌already‌  ‌accomplishes‌  ‌the‌  ‌term‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌modified‌ 
Volition‌  ‌or‌  ‌voluntariness‌  ‌refers‌‌   to‌‌
  knowledge‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  act‌‌
  being‌‌
  done.‌‌ 
1. Extraterritoriality‌‌under‌‌the‌‌RPC‌‌and‌‌SPLs‌  ‌ sentence.‌  ‌
On‌‌ the‌‌ other‌‌ hand,‌‌ ‌criminal‌‌ intent‌‌ refers‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ state‌‌ of‌‌ mind‌‌ beyond‌‌ 
voluntariness.‌‌   It‌‌
  is‌‌
  this‌‌
  intent‌‌
  that‌‌  is‌‌
  being‌‌ punished‌‌ by‌‌ crimes‌mala‌‌
    2. Transnational‌‌crimes‌‌under‌‌UNTOC‌‌and‌‌domestic‌‌law,‌‌   ‌
in‌‌se‌. ‌ ‌ 3.‌P
‌ ro‌‌reo‌‌‌principle‌  ‌
3. Universal‌  ‌jurisdiction‌  ‌in‌  ‌jus‌  ‌cogens‌  ‌crimes‌  ‌and‌  ‌under‌‌ 
UNCLOS,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ ⭐‌Intestate‌‌Estate‌‌of‌‌Gonzales‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌‌2010‌  ‌
Garcia‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
4. Erga‌  ‌omnes‌  ‌crimes‌  ‌under‌  ‌international‌  ‌criminal‌  ‌tribunal‌‌  The‌  ‌fundamental‌  ‌principle‌  ‌in‌  ‌applying‌  ‌and‌  ‌in‌  ‌interpreting‌  ‌criminal‌ 
The‌  ‌acts‌  ‌prohibited‌  ‌in‌  ‌Section‌  ‌27(b)‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Omnibus‌‌   Election‌‌
  Code‌‌  laws‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌resolve‌  ‌all‌  ‌doubts‌  ‌in‌  ‌favor‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  accused.‌‌
  ‌In‌‌
  dubio‌‌
  pro‌‌ 
jurisdiction.‌  ‌
are‌  ‌mala‌  ‌in‌  ‌se‌. ‌ ‌Given‌  ‌the‌  ‌volume‌  ‌of‌  ‌votes‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌counted‌  ‌and‌‌  reo‌.‌‌When‌‌in‌‌doubt,‌‌rule‌‌for‌‌the‌‌accused.‌  ‌
canvassed‌  ‌within‌  ‌a ‌ ‌limited‌  ‌amount‌  ‌of‌  ‌time,‌  ‌errors‌  ‌and‌‌  People‌‌v.‌‌Tulin‌‌‌re‌‌extraterritoriality‌‌and‌‌universal‌‌jurisdiction‌  ‌
miscalculations‌‌ are‌‌ bound‌‌ to‌‌ happen.‌‌ And‌‌ it‌‌ could‌‌ not‌‌ be‌‌ the‌‌ intent‌‌ of‌‌  Intimately‌  ‌related‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌in‌  ‌dubio‌  ‌pro‌  ‌reo‌  ‌principle‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌rule‌  ‌of‌‌ 
the‌‌law‌‌to‌‌punish‌‌unintentional‌‌election‌‌canvass‌‌errors.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌attack‌  ‌on‌  ‌and‌  ‌seizure‌  ‌of‌  ‌"M/T‌  ‌Tabangao''‌  ‌and‌  ‌its‌  ‌cargo‌  ‌were‌‌  lenity.‌  ‌The‌  ‌rule‌  ‌applies‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌court‌‌  is‌‌  faced‌‌  with‌‌  two‌‌  possible‌‌ 
committed‌‌   in‌‌ Philippine‌‌ waters,‌‌ although‌‌ the‌‌ captive‌‌ vessel‌‌ was‌‌ later‌‌  interpretations‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌penal‌  ‌statute,‌  ‌one‌  ‌that‌  ‌is‌  ‌prejudicial‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Criminal‌  ‌intent‌  ‌is‌‌  ‌presumed‌‌   ‌to‌‌
  exist‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  part‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  person‌‌
  who‌‌  brought‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌pirates‌  ‌to‌  ‌Singapore‌  ‌where‌  ‌its‌‌   cargo‌‌   was‌‌  off-loaded,‌‌  accused‌  ‌and‌  ‌another‌  ‌that‌  ‌is‌  ‌favorable‌  ‌to‌  ‌him.‌  ‌The‌‌   rule‌‌  calls‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌ 
executes‌  ‌an‌  ‌act‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌punishes,‌  ‌unless‌  ‌the‌  ‌contrary‌  ‌shall‌‌  transferred,‌  ‌and‌  ‌sold.‌  ‌And‌  ‌such‌  ‌transfer‌  ‌was‌  ‌done‌  ‌under‌‌  adoption‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌interpretation‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌more‌  ‌lenient‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
appear.‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌whoever‌  ‌invokes‌  ‌good‌  ‌faith‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌defense‌  ‌has‌  ‌the‌  accused-appellant‌  ‌Hiong's‌  ‌direct‌  ‌supervision.‌  ‌Although‌  ‌PD‌  ‌No.‌‌   532‌‌  accused‌. ‌ ‌
burden‌‌of‌‌proving‌‌its‌‌existence.‌  ‌ requires‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌attack‌  ‌and‌  ‌seizure‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌vessel‌  ‌and‌  ‌its‌  ‌cargo‌  ‌be‌‌ 
committed‌‌   in‌‌
  Philippine‌‌   waters,‌‌   the‌‌
  disposition‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌
  pirates‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  Lenity‌  ‌becomes‌  ‌all‌  ‌the‌  ‌more‌  ‌appropriate‌  ‌when‌  ‌this‌  ‌case‌  ‌is‌‌
  viewed‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 107‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

1. There‌‌   is‌‌
  ‌unlawful‌‌
  aggression‌‌
  when‌‌   the‌‌
  peril‌‌
  to‌‌ one’s‌‌ life,‌‌ limb‌‌ or‌‌  a. The‌  ‌nature‌  ‌and‌  ‌quality‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌weapon‌  ‌used‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌aggressor;‌‌ 
through‌  ‌the‌  ‌lens‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌basic‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌Article‌  ‌332‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌RPC‌  ‌to‌‌ 
preserve‌‌family‌‌harmony‌‌by‌‌providing‌‌an‌‌absolutory‌‌cause‌. ‌ ‌ right‌‌is‌‌either‌a‌ ctual‌‌or‌‌imminent‌. ‌ ‌ What‌‌the‌‌law‌‌requires‌‌is‌r‌ ational‌‌equivalence.‌  ‌

2. A‌‌slap‌‌on‌‌the‌‌face‌‌is‌‌unlawful‌‌aggression.‌  ‌ b. His‌‌ physical‌‌ condition,‌‌ character,‌‌ size‌‌ and‌‌ other‌‌ circumstances,‌‌ 
4.‌‌Interpretation‌‌of‌‌penal‌‌laws‌  ‌ and‌‌those‌‌of‌‌the‌‌person‌‌defending‌‌himself;‌  ‌
3. A‌  ‌strong‌  ‌retaliation‌  ‌for‌  ‌an‌  ‌injury‌  ‌or‌  ‌threat‌  ‌may‌  ‌amount‌  ‌to‌  ‌an‌‌ 
a. Penal‌‌
  laws‌‌
  are‌‌
  ‌strictly‌‌  construed‌‌   against‌‌
  the‌‌
  Government‌‌ and‌‌  c. And‌‌also‌‌the‌‌place‌‌and‌‌occasion‌‌of‌‌the‌‌assault.‌  ‌
liberally‌‌in‌‌favor‌o ‌ f‌‌the‌‌accused;‌  ‌ unlawful‌‌aggression.‌  ‌
12. If‌‌
  the‌‌ provocation‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ person‌‌ defending‌‌ himself‌‌ is‌‌ ‌not‌‌ ‌proximate‌‌ 
b. The‌‌Spanish‌‌text‌‌is‌‌controlling.‌  ‌ 4. The‌  ‌killing‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  deceased‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  defendant‌‌
  be‌‌
  ‌simultaneous‌‌
  with‌‌ 
and‌‌immediate‌‌to‌‌the‌‌aggression,‌‌there‌‌is‌‌self-defense.‌  ‌
the‌‌
  attack‌‌  made‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  former,‌‌  or‌‌
  at‌‌
  least‌‌
  both‌‌ acts‌‌ succeeded‌‌ each‌‌ 
5.‌‌Retroactive‌‌effect‌‌of‌‌penal‌‌laws‌  ‌ other‌‌  ‌without‌‌
  appreciable‌‌   interval‌‌   of‌‌
  time.‌‌
  The‌‌
  accused‌‌ must‌‌ have‌‌  People‌‌v.‌‌Antonio‌  ‌
The‌  ‌general‌  ‌rule‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌  ‌penal‌  ‌laws‌  ‌shall‌  ‌have‌  ‌a ‌ ‌retroactive‌  ‌effect‌‌  no‌‌time‌‌nor‌‌occasion‌‌for‌‌deliberation‌‌and‌‌cool‌‌thinking‌. ‌ ‌
As‌‌
  testified‌‌   by‌‌ accused-appellant‌‌ himself,‌‌ ‌the‌‌ deceased‌‌ who‌‌ was‌‌ at‌‌ 
insofar‌‌as‌‌they‌‌favor‌‌the‌‌person‌‌guilty‌‌of‌‌a‌‌felony‌‌‌except‌  ‌ 5. A‌  ‌public‌  ‌officer‌  ‌exceeding‌  ‌his‌  ‌authority‌  ‌may‌  ‌become‌‌
  an‌‌
  unlawful‌‌  that‌‌   time‌‌ very‌‌ drunk‌‌ tried‌‌ to‌‌ hit‌‌ him‌‌ but‌‌ missed‌‌ and‌‌ fell‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ 
a. If‌‌the‌‌offender‌‌is‌‌a‌‌habitual‌‌delinquent;‌  ‌ aggressor.‌  ‌ ground.‌‌   At‌‌
  that‌‌  point,‌‌
  unlawful‌‌  aggression‌‌   ceased‌‌   and‌‌  it‌‌
  was‌‌
  no‌‌ 
longer‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌for‌  ‌him‌  ‌to‌  ‌stab‌  ‌the‌  ‌deceased.‌  ‌It‌  ‌was‌‌ 
b. The‌‌new‌‌or‌‌amendatory‌‌law‌‌is‌‌not‌‌favorable‌‌to‌‌him;‌‌or‌  ‌ 6. When‌  ‌the‌  ‌aggressor‌  ‌flees,‌  ‌unlawful‌  ‌aggression‌  ‌no‌  ‌longer‌  ‌exists.‌‌  accused-appellant,‌  ‌therefore,‌  ‌who‌  ‌became‌  ‌the‌  ‌aggressor‌  ‌when‌  ‌he,‌‌ 
c. Retrospective‌‌application‌‌is‌‌expressly‌‌proscribed.‌  ‌ despite‌‌   the‌‌
  condition‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  deceased,‌‌
  proceeded‌‌   to‌‌
  stab‌‌
  the‌‌  latter‌‌
  at‌‌ 
However‌, ‌‌if‌‌  the‌‌
  purpose‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ retreat‌‌ was‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ aggressor‌‌ to‌‌ ‌take‌‌ 
the‌  ‌back.‌  ‌His‌  ‌act‌  ‌can‌  ‌no‌  ‌longer‌  ‌be‌  ‌interpreted‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌‌ 
a‌  ‌more‌  ‌advantageous‌  ‌position‌  ‌to‌  ‌insure‌  ‌the‌  ‌success‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌
  attack‌‌  self-preservation‌  ‌but‌  ‌a ‌ ‌perverse‌  ‌desire‌  ‌to‌  ‌kill.‌  ‌Hence,‌  ‌he‌  ‌cannot‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Sarcia‌  ‌
already‌  ‌begun‌  ‌by‌  ‌him,‌‌
  the‌‌  unlawful‌‌   aggression‌‌   is‌‌
  considered‌still‌‌
    successfully‌‌claim‌‌the‌‌benefit‌‌of‌‌self-defense.‌‌   ‌
Sec‌‌   68‌‌  of‌‌
  RA‌‌  9344‌‌   allows‌‌ the‌‌ retroactive‌‌ application‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Act‌‌ to‌‌  continuing‌, ‌‌and‌‌ the‌‌ one‌‌ making‌‌ a ‌‌defense‌‌ has‌‌ a ‌‌right‌‌ to‌‌ pursue‌‌ him‌ 
those‌  ‌who‌‌   have‌‌
  been‌‌   convicted‌‌   and‌‌  are‌‌
  serving‌‌
  sentence‌‌  at‌‌
  the‌‌
  time‌‌  in‌‌his‌‌retreat‌‌and‌‌to‌‌disable‌‌him.‌  ‌ People‌‌v.‌‌Rubiso‌  ‌
of‌  ‌the‌‌
  effectivity‌‌   of‌‌
  this‌‌  said‌‌
  Act,‌‌  and‌‌  who‌‌  were‌‌
  below‌‌
  the‌‌  age‌‌
  of‌‌  18‌‌ 
years‌‌at‌‌the‌‌time‌‌of‌‌the‌‌commission‌‌of‌‌the‌‌offense.‌‌   ‌ 7. No‌  ‌unlawful‌  ‌aggression‌  ‌when‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌agreement‌  ‌to‌  ‌fight.‌  ‌The‌‌  Unlawful‌  ‌aggression‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌condition‌  ‌sine‌  ‌qua‌  ‌non‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌ 
challenge‌  ‌to‌  ‌fight‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌accepted.‌  ‌However‌, ‌ ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌aggression‌‌  justifying‌  ‌circumstance‌  ‌of‌  ‌self-defense.‌  ‌It‌  ‌contemplates‌  ‌an‌  ‌actual,‌‌ 
2. Attenuating‌‌Circumstances‌  ‌ occurred‌  ‌ahead‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌agreed‌  ‌time‌  ‌and‌  ‌place‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌fight,‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌‌ 
sudden‌  ‌and‌  ‌unexpected‌  ‌attack,‌‌  or‌‌
  imminent‌‌   danger‌‌
  thereof,‌‌  and‌‌
  ‌not‌‌ 
merely‌  ‌a ‌ ‌threatening‌  ‌or‌  ‌intimidating‌  ‌attitude‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌person‌‌ 
a. Justifying‌  ‌ unlawful.‌  ‌
defending‌‌   himself‌‌
  ‌must‌‌
  have‌‌   been‌‌   attacked‌‌   with‌‌ actual‌‌ physical‌‌ 
force‌‌or‌‌with‌‌actual‌‌use‌‌of‌‌weapon‌. ‌ ‌
Self-defense‌  ‌ 8. A‌  ‌mere‌  ‌threatening‌  ‌or‌  ‌intimidating‌  ‌attitude,‌  ‌not‌  ‌preceded‌  ‌by‌  ‌an‌‌ 
outward‌  ‌and‌  ‌material‌  ‌aggression,‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌unlawful‌  ‌aggression‌, ‌‌ It‌  ‌is‌  ‌axiomatic‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌mere‌  ‌thrusting‌  ‌of‌  ‌one’s‌  ‌hand‌  ‌into‌  ‌his‌‌ 
Anyone‌‌
  who‌‌  acts‌‌
  in‌‌
  defense‌‌
  of‌‌ his‌‌ person‌‌ or‌‌ rights,‌‌ provided‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌  because‌‌   it‌‌
  is‌‌
  required‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ act‌‌ be‌‌ ‌offensive‌‌ and‌‌ positively‌‌ strong‌, ‌‌ pocket‌  ‌as‌  ‌if‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌drawing‌  ‌a ‌ ‌weapon‌  ‌is‌  ‌NOT‌‌ 
following‌‌circumstances‌‌concur;‌  ‌ showing‌‌the‌‌wrongful‌‌intent‌‌of‌‌the‌‌aggressor‌‌to‌‌cause‌‌injury.‌  ‌ unlawful‌‌   aggression.‌‌   Even‌‌
  the‌‌
  cocking‌‌  of‌‌ a ‌‌rifle‌‌ without‌‌ aiming‌‌ the‌‌ 
firearm‌  ‌at‌  ‌any‌  ‌particular‌  ‌target‌  ‌is‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌sufficient‌  ‌to‌  ‌conclude‌  ‌that‌‌ 
First‌.‌‌Unlawful‌‌aggression‌.‌‌⭐ ‌ ‌ 9. The‌  ‌person‌  ‌defending‌  ‌himself‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌expected‌‌
  to‌‌
  think‌‌
  clearly‌‌  one’s‌‌life‌‌was‌‌in‌‌imminent‌‌danger.‌‌   ‌
so‌‌as‌‌‌to‌‌control‌‌his‌‌blow.‌  ‌
Second‌. ‌ ‌Reasonable‌  ‌necessity‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌means‌  ‌employed‌  ‌to‌‌  The‌  ‌location‌  ‌and‌  ‌presence‌  ‌of‌  ‌gunshot‌  ‌wounds‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌body‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
prevent‌‌or‌‌repel‌‌it.‌  10. The‌  ‌measure‌  ‌of‌  ‌rational‌‌   necessity‌‌  is‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌   found‌‌  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  situation‌‌  victim‌‌   eloquently‌‌   refute‌‌   appellant’s‌‌ allegation‌‌ of‌‌ self-defense.‌‌ It‌‌ is‌‌ an‌‌ 
oft‌‌
  repeated‌‌   rule‌‌
  that‌‌   ‌the‌‌
  presence‌‌
  of‌‌  a ‌‌large‌‌
  number‌‌   of‌‌ wounds,‌‌ 
as‌  ‌it‌  ‌appeared‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌person‌  ‌defending‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌‌  time‌‌
  when‌‌  the‌‌
  blow‌‌ 
Third‌. ‌‌‌Lack‌‌
  of‌‌
  sufficient‌‌
  provocation‌  ‌on‌‌  the‌‌  part‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ person‌‌  their‌‌   location‌‌   and‌‌   their‌‌   seriousness‌‌   would‌‌  ‌negate‌‌ ‌self-defense‌. ‌‌
defending‌‌himself.‌  ‌ was‌‌struck.‌  ‌ Instead,‌‌they‌‌indicate‌‌a‌‌determined‌‌effort‌‌to‌‌kill.‌  ‌
11. Whether‌‌the‌‌means‌‌employed‌‌is‌‌reasonable,‌‌will‌‌depend‌‌upon‌  ‌
People‌‌v.‌‌Lansang‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 108‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

Cabanlig‌‌v.‌‌Sandiganbayan‌  ‌
The‌  ‌justifying‌  ‌circumstance‌  ‌of‌  ‌defense‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌relative‌  ‌can‌  ‌only‌  ‌be‌‌  virtue‌‌of‌‌his‌‌relationship‌‌to‌‌the‌‌offended‌‌party.‌ 
raised‌  ‌where‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌concurrence‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌requisites‌  ‌of‌  ‌unlawful‌‌  Self-defense‌  ‌and‌  ‌fulfillment‌  ‌of‌  ‌duty‌  ‌operate‌  ‌on‌  ‌different‌  ‌principles.‌‌ 
aggression,‌‌   reasonable‌‌   necessity‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  means‌‌   employed‌‌   to‌‌ repel‌‌ the‌‌  The‌  ‌continuing‌  ‌affinity‌  ‌view‌  ‌maintains‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌relationship‌  ‌by‌‌  Self-defense‌‌   is‌‌
  based‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌
  principle‌‌   of‌‌
  self-preservation‌‌   from‌ 
aggression‌‌   and‌‌
  that‌‌ ‌the‌‌ person‌‌ making‌‌ the‌‌ defense‌‌ had‌‌ no‌‌ part‌‌ in‌‌  affinity‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌  ‌surviving‌  ‌spouse‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌kindred‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  mortal‌  ‌harm,‌  ‌while‌  ‌fulfillment‌  ‌of‌  ‌duty‌  ‌is‌  ‌premised‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌due‌‌ 
the‌‌provocation‌. ‌ ‌ deceased‌  ‌spouse‌  c ‌ ontinues‌  ‌even‌  ‌after‌  ‌the‌  ‌death‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌deceased‌‌  performance‌‌of‌‌duty‌. ‌ ‌
spouse,‌‌   regardless‌‌   of‌‌
  whether‌‌ the‌‌ marriage‌‌ produced‌‌ children‌‌ or‌‌ not.‌‌ 
Defense‌‌of‌‌relatives‌  ‌ This‌‌  is‌‌
  more‌‌ consistent‌‌ with‌‌ the‌‌ language‌‌ and‌‌ spirit‌‌ of‌‌ Article‌‌ 332(1)‌‌  A‌  ‌policeman‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌performance‌  ‌of‌  ‌duty‌  ‌is‌  ‌justified‌  ‌in‌  ‌using‌  ‌such‌‌ 
of‌‌
  the‌‌  RPC.‌‌  The‌‌
  fundamental‌‌ principle‌‌ in‌‌ applying‌‌ and‌‌ in‌‌ interpreting‌  force‌  ‌as‌  ‌is‌  ‌reasonably‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌to‌  ‌secure‌  ‌and‌  ‌detain‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Any‌  ‌one‌  ‌who‌  ‌acts‌  ‌in‌  ‌defense‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌person‌  ‌or‌‌
  rights‌‌
  of‌‌
  his‌‌
  spouse,‌‌  criminal‌  ‌laws‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌resolve‌  ‌all‌  ‌doubts‌  ‌in‌  ‌favor‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused.‌  ‌In‌‌  offender,‌  ‌overcome‌  ‌his‌  ‌resistance,‌  ‌prevent‌  ‌his‌  ‌escape,‌‌ 
ascendants,‌  ‌descendants,‌  ‌or‌  ‌legitimate,‌  ‌natural‌  ‌or‌  ‌adopted‌  ‌brothers‌‌  dubio‌‌pro‌‌reo‌.‌‌When‌‌in‌‌doubt,‌‌rule‌‌for‌‌the‌‌accused.‌  ‌ recapture‌  ‌him‌  ‌if‌  ‌he‌  ‌escapes,‌  ‌and‌  ‌protect‌  ‌himself‌  ‌from‌  ‌bodily‌‌ 
or‌  ‌sisters,‌  ‌or‌  ‌his‌‌
  relatives‌‌
  by‌‌
  affinity‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  same‌‌  degrees‌‌   and‌‌  those‌‌  harm‌. ‌ ‌Unlike‌  ‌in‌  ‌self-defense‌  ‌where‌  ‌unlawful‌  ‌aggression‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌‌ 
consanguinity‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  f‌ ourth‌  ‌civil‌  ‌degree‌, ‌ ‌provided‌‌   that‌‌  the‌‌  Defense‌‌of‌‌strangers‌  ‌ element,‌  ‌in‌  ‌performance‌  ‌of‌  ‌duty,‌  ‌unlawful‌‌   aggression‌‌   from‌‌   the‌‌ 
first‌  ‌and‌  ‌second‌  ‌requisites‌  ‌prescribed‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌next‌  ‌preceding‌‌  victim‌‌is‌‌NOT‌‌a‌‌requisite‌. ‌ ‌
circumstance‌  ‌are‌  ‌present,‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌further‌  ‌requisite,‌  ‌in‌  ‌case‌  ‌the‌‌  Anyone‌  ‌who‌  ‌acts‌  ‌in‌  ‌defense‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌person‌  ‌or‌  ‌rights‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌stranger,‌‌ 
provided‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌first‌  ‌and‌  ‌second‌  ‌requisites‌  ‌mentioned‌‌   in‌‌   the‌‌
  first‌‌  Fulfillment‌‌of‌‌Duty‌‌was‌‌Complete,‌‌Killing‌‌was‌‌Justified‌ 
revocation‌  ‌was‌  ‌given‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌person‌  ‌attacked,‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌one‌  ‌making‌‌ 
defense‌‌had‌‌no‌‌part‌‌therein.‌  ‌ circumstance‌  ‌of‌  ‌this‌  ‌Article‌  ‌are‌  ‌present‌  ‌and‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌person‌‌ 
In‌‌
  this‌‌
  case,‌‌
  Valino‌‌  was‌‌  committing‌‌   an‌‌
  offense‌‌   in‌‌ the‌‌ presence‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
defending‌  ‌be‌‌   not‌‌   induced‌‌   by‌‌
  revenge,‌‌  resentment,‌‌   or‌‌   other‌‌   evil‌‌ 
Requisites:‌  ‌ policemen‌  ‌when‌  ‌Valino‌  ‌grabbed‌  ‌the‌  ‌M16‌  ‌Armalite‌  ‌from‌  ‌Mercado‌‌ 
motive‌. ‌ ‌
and‌‌  jumped‌‌   from‌‌  the‌‌
  jeep‌‌
  to‌‌ escape.‌‌ The‌‌ policemen‌‌ would‌‌ have‌‌ been‌‌ 
1) Unlawful‌‌aggression;‌  ‌ justified‌  ‌in‌  ‌shooting‌  ‌Valino‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌force‌  ‌was‌  ‌absolutely‌‌ 
Requisites:‌  ‌ necessary‌‌ to‌‌ prevent‌‌ his‌‌ escape.‌‌ The‌‌ policemen‌‌ had‌‌ the‌‌ duty‌‌ not‌‌ only‌‌ 
2) Reasonable‌  ‌necessity‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌means‌  ‌employed‌  ‌to‌  ‌prevent‌  ‌or‌‌ 
1) Unlawful‌‌aggression;‌  ‌ to‌‌recapture‌‌Valino‌‌but‌‌also‌‌to‌‌recover‌‌the‌‌loose‌‌firearm.‌‌   ‌
repel‌‌it;‌  ‌
3) In‌  ‌case‌  ‌the‌  ‌provocation‌  ‌was‌‌
  given‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  person‌‌
  attacked,‌‌
  the‌‌  2) Reasonable‌  ‌necessity‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌means‌  ‌employed‌  ‌to‌  ‌prevent‌  ‌or‌‌  The‌  ‌duty‌  ‌to‌  ‌issue‌  ‌a ‌ ‌warning‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌‌   absolutely‌‌   mandated‌‌   at‌‌
  all‌‌ 
repel‌‌it;‌  ‌ times‌  ‌and‌  ‌at‌  ‌all‌  ‌cost‌, ‌ ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌
  detriment‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  life‌‌
  of‌‌
  law‌‌  enforcers.‌‌ 
one‌‌making‌‌the‌‌defense‌‌had‌‌no‌‌part‌‌therein.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌directive‌  ‌to‌  ‌issue‌  ‌a ‌ ‌warning‌  ‌contemplates‌  ‌a ‌ ‌situation‌‌ 
3) Accused‌  ‌must‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌induced‌  ‌by‌  ‌revenge,‌  ‌resentment‌  ‌or‌‌  where‌‌   several‌‌   options‌‌   are‌‌  still‌‌
  available‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ law‌‌ enforcers‌. ‌‌In‌‌ 
13. Relatives‌‌that‌‌can‌‌be‌‌defended:‌(‌ SADS4C)‌  ‌
other‌‌evil‌‌motive‌. ‌ ‌ exceptional‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌‌   this‌‌
  case,‌‌  where‌‌   the‌‌
  threat‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌ 
a. S‌pouse;‌  ‌ life‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌law‌  ‌enforcer‌  ‌is‌  ‌already‌  ‌imminent,‌  ‌and‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌other‌‌ 
15. Any‌‌
  person‌‌ ‌not‌‌ included‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ enumeration‌‌ of‌‌ relatives‌‌ that‌‌ can‌‌ be‌‌  option‌  ‌but‌  ‌to‌  ‌use‌  ‌force‌  ‌to‌  ‌subdue‌  ‌the‌  ‌offender,‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌enforcer's‌‌ 
b. A‌scendants;‌  ‌
defended‌‌‌is‌‌considered‌‌a‌s‌ tranger.‌  ‌ failure‌‌to‌‌issue‌‌a‌‌warning‌‌is‌‌excusable‌. ‌ ‌
c. D‌escendants;‌  ‌
Fulfillment‌‌of‌‌duty‌  ‌
d. Legitimate,‌‌
  natural‌‌
  or‌‌ adopted‌‌ ‌Siblings‌, ‌‌or‌‌ relatives‌‌ by‌‌ ‌affinity‌‌  Avoidance‌‌of‌‌a‌‌greater‌‌evil‌  ‌
in‌‌the‌‌same‌‌degrees;‌  ‌ Any‌  ‌person‌  ‌who‌  ‌acts‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌fulfillment‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌duty‌  ‌or‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌lawful‌ 
exercise‌‌of‌‌a‌‌right‌‌or‌‌office.‌  ‌ Any‌  ‌person‌  ‌who,‌  ‌in‌  ‌order‌  ‌to‌  ‌avoid‌  ‌an‌  ‌evil‌  ‌or‌  ‌injury,‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌act‌‌ 
e. Relatives‌‌by‌C
‌ onsanguinity‌‌‌within‌‌the‌4
‌ th‌‌civil‌‌degree.‌(‌ 4C)‌  ‌ which‌  ‌causes‌  ‌damage‌  ‌to‌  ‌another,‌  ‌provided‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌following‌‌ 
requisites‌‌are‌‌present;‌  ‌
14. The‌‌fact‌‌that‌‌the‌‌relative‌‌defended‌‌gave‌‌provocation‌‌is‌i‌ mmaterial.‌  ‌ Requisites:‌  ‌
1. The‌  ‌accused‌  ‌acted‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌performance‌  ‌of‌‌
  a ‌‌duty‌‌   ‌OR‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌  First‌.‌‌That‌‌the‌‌evil‌‌sought‌‌to‌‌be‌‌avoided‌a
‌ ctually‌‌exists‌; ‌ ‌
⭐‌Carungcong‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌‌2010‌  ‌
lawful‌‌exercise‌‌of‌‌a‌‌right‌‌or‌‌office‌; ‌ ‌ Second‌.‌‌That‌‌the‌‌injury‌‌feared‌b
‌ e‌‌greater‌‌‌than‌‌that‌‌done‌‌to‌‌avoid‌‌it;‌  ‌
Article‌  ‌332‌  ‌provides‌  ‌for‌  ‌an‌  a
‌ bsolutory‌  ‌cause‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌crimes‌  ‌of‌‌ 
2. The‌‌
  injury‌‌
  caused‌‌  or‌‌  the‌‌ offense‌‌ committed‌‌ be‌‌ the‌‌ n
‌ ecessary‌‌ 
theft,‌‌
  estafa‌‌
  and‌‌ malicious‌‌ mischief.‌‌ It‌‌ limits‌‌ the‌‌ responsibility‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  Third‌. ‌‌That‌‌ there‌‌ be‌‌ ‌no‌‌ other‌‌ practical‌‌ and‌‌ less‌‌ harmful‌‌ means‌‌ of‌‌ 
offender‌  ‌to‌  ‌civil‌  ‌liability‌  ‌and‌  ‌frees‌  ‌him‌  ‌from‌  ‌criminal‌  ‌liability‌  ‌by‌‌  consequence‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌due‌  ‌performance‌  ‌of‌  ‌duty‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌‌  lawful‌‌  preventing‌‌it.‌  ‌
exercise‌‌of‌‌such‌‌right‌‌or‌‌office.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 109‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

16. The‌  ‌greater‌  ‌evil‌  ‌should‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌‌


  brought‌‌
  about‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  negligence‌‌
  or‌‌  2. To‌  ‌constitute‌  ‌insanity‌, ‌ ‌there‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌complete‌  ‌deprivation‌  ‌of‌‌ 
pointing‌‌his‌‌service‌‌firearm‌‌at‌‌Bautista.‌‌   ‌
imprudence‌‌of‌‌the‌‌actor;‌‌nor‌‌must‌‌it‌‌result‌‌from‌‌a‌‌violation‌‌of‌‌law.‌  ‌ intelligence‌‌   ‌or‌‌
  that‌‌
  there‌‌
  be‌‌
  ‌total‌‌
  deprivation‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ freedom‌‌ of‌‌ 
Aggression‌  ‌presupposes‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌person‌  ‌attacked‌‌   must‌‌   face‌‌
  a ‌‌ the‌  ‌will‌. ‌ ‌During‌  ‌the‌  ‌lucid‌  ‌interval‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌insane‌  ‌acts‌  ‌with‌‌ 
17. Only‌‌criminal‌‌liability‌‌is‌‌excused,‌n
‌ ot‌‌civil‌‌liability‌. ‌ ‌ real‌  ‌threat‌  ‌to‌  ‌his‌  ‌life‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌peril‌  ‌sought‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌avoided‌  ‌is‌‌  intelligence.‌  ‌
Obedience‌‌to‌‌a‌‌lawful‌‌order‌  ‌ imminent‌‌and‌‌actual,‌‌not‌‌imaginary‌.  ‌‌ ‌
3. Thus,‌  ‌epilepsy,‌  ‌somnambulism,‌  ‌and‌  ‌malignant‌  ‌malaria‌  ‌are‌  ‌valid‌‌ 
Any‌  ‌person‌  ‌who‌  ‌acts‌  ‌in‌‌
  obedience‌‌
  to‌‌
  an‌‌
  order‌‌
  issued‌‌
  by‌‌
  a ‌‌superior‌‌  Masipequiña‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ defenses.‌‌
  Feeblemindedness‌‌ and‌‌ pedophilia,‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ other‌‌ hand,‌‌ are‌‌ 
for‌‌some‌‌lawful‌‌purpose.‌  ‌ NOT.‌  ‌
The‌‌   rule‌‌
  is‌‌
  that‌‌
  ‌the‌‌ reasonable‌‌ necessity‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ means‌‌ employed‌‌ 
Requisites:‌  ‌ to‌  ‌repel‌  ‌or‌  ‌prevent‌  ‌the‌  ‌attack‌  ‌depends‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌imminent‌‌  People‌‌v.‌‌Rafanan‌‌‌on‌‌insanity‌  ‌
danger‌  ‌of‌  ‌injury‌, ‌ ‌NOT‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌harm‌  ‌actually‌  ‌done‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
1) That‌‌an‌‌order‌‌has‌‌been‌‌issued‌‌‌by‌‌a‌‌superior;‌  ‌ accused‌. ‌ ‌ In‌‌
  order‌‌  that‌‌
  the‌‌   exempting‌‌  circumstance‌‌   of‌‌ ‌INSANITY‌‌ ‌may‌‌ be‌‌ taken‌‌ 
into‌  ‌account,‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌‌
  necessary‌‌  that‌‌
  there‌‌
  be‌‌
  a ‌‌complete‌‌
  deprivation‌‌   of‌‌ 
2) Such‌‌order‌‌must‌‌be‌f‌ or‌‌some‌‌lawful‌‌purpose‌; ‌ ‌ Thus,‌‌
  that‌‌ Masipequiñ a‌‌ escaped‌‌ serious‌‌ injuries‌‌ does‌‌ not‌‌ necessarily‌‌ 
intelligence‌‌in‌‌committing‌‌the‌‌act,‌‌that‌‌is,‌‌   ‌
imply‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌means‌‌
  he‌‌
  used‌‌
  to‌‌
  repel‌‌
  the‌‌
  attack‌‌
  were‌‌
  unreasonable‌‌ 
3) The‌‌
  ‌means‌‌
  used‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  subordinate‌‌
  to‌‌
  carry‌‌
  out‌‌ said‌‌ order‌‌ is‌‌  1. that‌‌the‌‌accused‌‌be‌‌deprived‌‌of‌‌reason;‌‌   ‌
and‌‌excessive.‌  ‌
lawful‌. ‌ ‌ 2. that‌‌there‌‌be‌‌no‌‌responsibi­lity‌‌for‌‌his‌‌own‌‌acts;‌‌   ‌
b. Exempting‌  ‌ 3. that‌‌he‌‌acts‌‌without‌‌the‌‌least‌‌discernment;‌‌   ‌
18. The‌‌
  subordinate‌‌ is‌‌ ‌not‌‌ liable‌‌ ‌for‌‌ carrying‌‌ out‌‌ an‌‌ illegal‌‌ order‌‌ of‌‌ his‌‌ 
superior,‌  ‌if‌  ‌he‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌‌
  aware‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  illegality‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  order‌‌
  ‌and‌‌
  ‌he‌‌
  is‌‌  the‌‌following‌‌are‌e
‌ xempt‌f‌ rom‌‌criminal‌‌liability:‌  ‌ 4. that‌‌
  there‌‌
  be‌‌
  a ‌‌complete‌‌  absence‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  power‌‌ to‌‌ discern,‌‌ or‌‌ 
not‌‌negligent‌. ‌ ‌ that‌‌there‌‌be‌‌a‌‌total‌‌deprivation‌‌of‌‌freedom‌‌of‌‌the‌‌will.‌  ‌
1. An‌  ‌imbecile‌‌  or‌‌
  an‌‌
  insane‌  ‌person,‌‌  unless‌‌ the‌‌ latter‌‌ has‌‌ acted‌‌ 
during‌‌a‌‌lucid‌‌interval.‌  ‌ Where‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌failed‌  ‌to‌  ‌show‌  ‌complete‌  ‌impairment‌  ‌or‌  ‌loss‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Balunueco‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ intelligence,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌has‌  ‌recognized‌  ‌at‌  ‌most‌  ‌a ‌‌‌mitigating‌, ‌‌not‌‌
  an‌‌ 
2. A‌‌person‌‌under‌‌15‌‌years‌‌‌of‌‌age.‌  ‌ exempting,‌‌circumstance‌‌in‌‌accord‌‌with‌‌Article‌‌13(9)‌‌of‌‌the‌‌RPC.‌  ‌
In‌‌
  the‌‌  case‌‌
  at‌‌
  bar,‌‌
  Ricardo‌‌
  utterly‌‌
  failed‌‌  to‌‌
  adduce‌‌
  sufficient‌‌
  proof‌‌ of‌‌ 
3.   person‌‌ ‌over‌‌ 15‌‌ years‌‌ of‌‌ age‌‌ and‌‌ under‌‌ 18‌, ‌‌unless‌‌ he‌‌ has‌‌ 
A‌‌ In‌  ‌previous‌  ‌cases‌  ‌where‌  ‌schizophrenia‌  ‌was‌  ‌interposed‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌‌ 
the‌‌  existence‌‌  of‌‌
  a ‌‌positively‌‌
  strong‌‌
  act‌‌
  of‌‌
  real‌‌
  aggression‌‌  on‌‌
  the‌‌ part‌‌ 
acted‌  ‌with‌  ‌discernment,‌  ‌in‌  ‌which‌  ‌case,‌  ‌such‌  ‌minor‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌  exempting‌‌   circumstance,‌‌   it‌‌ has‌‌ mostly‌‌ been‌‌ ‌rejected‌‌ ‌by‌‌ the‌‌ Court.‌‌ In‌‌ 
of‌‌the‌‌deceased‌‌Senando.‌  ‌
proceeded‌‌   against‌‌ in‌‌ accordance‌‌ with‌‌ the‌‌ provisions‌‌ of‌‌ Art.‌‌ 80‌‌ of‌‌  each‌  ‌of‌  ‌these‌  ‌cases,‌  ‌the‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌presented‌  ‌tended‌  ‌to‌  ‌show‌  ‌that‌  ‌if‌‌ 
First‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌fact‌  ‌that‌  ‌three‌  ‌(3)‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌assailants‌  ‌suffered‌  ‌non-fatal‌‌  this‌‌Code.‌  ‌ there‌  ‌was‌  ‌impairment‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  mental‌‌
  faculties,‌‌   such‌‌
  impairment‌‌   was‌‌ 
injuries‌  ‌bolsters‌  ‌the‌  ‌fact‌  ‌that‌  ‌Senando‌  ‌tried‌  ‌vainly‌  ‌to‌  ‌ward‌  ‌off‌  ‌the‌‌  4. Any‌  ‌person‌  ‌who,‌  ‌while‌  ‌performing‌  ‌a ‌ ‌lawful‌  ‌act‌  ‌with‌  ‌due‌  ‌care,‌‌  not‌  ‌so‌  ‌complete‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌deprive‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌of‌  ‌intelligence‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌‌ 
assaults‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌‌  assailants.‌‌   ‌Second‌, ‌‌Ricardo‌‌   failed‌‌
  to‌‌
  present‌‌  himself‌‌  causes‌‌  an‌‌
  injury‌‌
  by‌‌  mere‌‌  ‌accident‌‌ ‌without‌‌ fault‌‌ or‌‌ intention‌‌ of‌‌  consciousness‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌acts.‌  ‌Accordingly,‌  ‌we‌  ‌must‌  ‌reject‌  ‌the‌‌   insanity‌‌ 
to‌‌
  the‌‌
  authorities.‌‌   The‌‌  natural‌‌  impulse‌‌   of‌‌
  any‌‌  person‌‌   who‌‌ has‌‌ killed‌‌  causing‌‌it.‌  ‌ defense‌‌of‌‌Rafanan.‌  ‌
someone‌‌   in‌‌ defense‌‌ of‌‌ his‌‌ person‌‌ or‌‌ relative‌‌ is‌‌ to‌‌ bring‌‌ himself‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ 
5. Any‌  ‌person‌  ‌who‌  ‌act‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌compulsion‌  ‌of‌  ‌irresistible‌‌ 
authorities‌‌ and‌‌ try‌‌ to‌‌ dispel‌‌ any‌‌ suspicion‌‌ of‌‌ guilt‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ authorities‌‌  Minority‌  ‌
might‌  ‌have‌  ‌against‌  ‌him.‌  ‌Third‌, ‌ ‌petitioner‌  ‌had‌  ‌a ‌ ‌rather‌  ‌erratic‌‌  force‌. ‌ ‌
RA‌‌9344‌‌as‌‌amended‌‌by‌‌RA‌‌10360‌  ‌
recollection‌‌of‌‌people‌‌and‌‌events.‌  6. Any‌‌
  person‌‌   who‌‌
  acts‌‌
  under‌‌
  the‌‌   of‌‌ an‌‌ ‌uncontrollable‌‌ 
  impulse‌‌
4. A‌  ‌child‌  ‌above‌  ‌15,‌  ‌but‌  ‌below‌  ‌18,‌  ‌must‌  ‌have‌  ‌acted‌  ‌without‌‌ 
fear‌‌‌of‌‌an‌‌equal‌‌or‌‌greater‌‌injury.‌  ‌
discernment‌‌‌to‌‌be‌‌exempt.‌  ‌
Manaban‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ 7. Any‌  ‌person‌  ‌who‌  ‌fails‌  ‌to‌  ‌perform‌  ‌an‌  ‌act‌  ‌required‌  ‌by‌‌
  law,‌‌
  when‌‌ 
prevented‌‌by‌‌some‌l‌ awful‌‌insuperable‌‌cause‌. ‌ ‌ 5. Periods‌‌of‌c‌ riminal‌‌responsibility‌  ‌
In‌  ‌this‌  ‌case,‌  ‌there‌  ‌was‌  ‌no‌  ‌unlawful‌‌   aggression‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌  part‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
victim.‌‌   ‌First‌, ‌‌Bautista‌‌  was‌‌
  shot‌‌ at‌‌ the‌‌ back‌‌ as‌‌ evidenced‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ point‌  a) Absolute‌‌irresponsibility‌‌‌15‌‌years‌‌and‌‌below;‌  ‌
of‌  ‌entry‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  bullet.‌‌
  ‌Second‌, ‌‌when‌‌   Bautista‌‌   was‌‌  shot,‌‌
  his‌‌
  gun‌‌  was‌‌  Imbecility‌‌or‌‌Insanity‌  ‌ b) Conditional‌‌responsibility‌‌‌15‌‌years‌‌and‌‌1‌‌day‌‌-‌‌18‌‌years;‌  ‌
still‌  ‌inside‌  ‌a ‌ ‌locked‌  ‌holster‌  ‌and‌  ‌tucked‌  ‌in‌  ‌his‌  ‌right‌  ‌waist.‌  ‌Third‌, ‌‌ 1. An‌  ‌imbecile‌  ‌is‌  ‌one‌  ‌who,‌  ‌while‌  ‌advanced‌  ‌in‌  ‌age,‌  ‌has‌  ‌a ‌ ‌mental‌‌ 
when‌  ‌Bautista‌  ‌turned‌  ‌his‌  ‌back‌  ‌at‌  ‌Manaban,‌  ‌Manaban‌  ‌was‌  ‌already‌‌  c) Full‌‌responsibility‌‌‌18‌‌years‌‌-‌‌70‌‌years;‌  ‌
development‌‌comparable‌‌to‌‌that‌‌of‌‌children‌‌2-7‌‌years‌‌of‌‌age.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 110‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

d) Mitigated‌  ‌responsibility‌  ‌15‌  ‌years‌  ‌and‌  ‌1 ‌ ‌day‌  ‌to‌‌


  18‌‌
  years,‌‌
  with‌‌  15. The‌  ‌compulsion‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌  ‌a ‌ ‌character‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌leave‌  ‌no‌‌ 
no‌‌part‌‌therein.‌  ‌
discernment;‌‌over‌‌70‌‌years‌‌or‌s‌ enility.‌  ‌ opportunity‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌for‌  ‌escape‌  ‌or‌  ‌self-defense‌  ‌in‌  ‌equal‌‌ 
6. A‌‌
  ‌child‌‌
  in‌‌ conflict‌‌ with‌‌ the‌‌ law‌‌ ‌(CCL)‌‌ is‌‌ one‌‌ who‌‌ at‌‌ the‌‌ time‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  combat.‌  ‌ 1. Unlawful‌‌aggression;‌  ‌
commission‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  offense‌‌
  is‌‌
  below‌‌
  18‌‌
  years‌‌
  old‌‌
  but‌‌
  not‌‌
  less‌‌
  than‌‌  Insuperable‌‌cause‌  2. Reasonable‌‌necessity‌‌of‌‌the‌‌ 
15‌‌years‌‌and‌‌1‌‌day‌‌old.‌  ‌ means‌‌employed‌‌to‌‌prevent‌‌or‌‌ 
16. Confessant‌  ‌reveals‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌priest‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌plan‌  ‌to‌  ‌rebel‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌‌  Defense‌‌of‌‌  repel‌‌it;‌  ‌
7. Discernment‌  ‌means‌  ‌the‌  ‌capacity‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌child‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  government.‌‌ Under‌‌ Art‌‌ 116,‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌ required‌‌ that‌‌ anyone‌‌ who‌‌ knows‌‌ of‌‌  ✘‌  ‌ M‌  ‌
strangers‌  ‌ 3. The‌‌person‌‌defending‌‌be‌n ‌ ot‌‌ 
commission‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌offense‌  ‌to‌  ‌understand‌  ‌the‌  ‌differences‌‌   between‌‌  such‌  ‌conspiracy‌  ‌must‌  ‌report‌  ‌the‌  ‌same.‌  ‌However,‌  ‌due‌  ‌to‌‌ 
right‌‌and‌‌wrong‌‌and‌‌the‌‌consequences‌‌of‌‌the‌‌wrongful‌‌act.‌  ‌ induced‌‌by‌‌revenge,‌‌ 
penitent-priest‌  ‌privileged‌  ‌communication,‌  ‌the‌  ‌priest‌  ‌can‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌‌ 
resentment‌‌or‌‌other‌‌evil‌‌ 
8. Intent‌  ‌refers‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌desired‌‌
  act‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  person‌‌
  while‌‌
  ‌discernment‌‌  compelled‌‌to‌‌report‌‌such‌‌information.‌  ‌
motive.‌  ‌
relates‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌moral‌‌
  significance‌‌
  that‌‌
  a ‌‌person‌‌
  ascribes‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  said‌‌  a. The‌‌act‌‌of‌‌reporting‌‌is‌‌required‌‌under‌‌law;‌  ‌
act.‌  ‌ 1. The‌‌evil‌‌sought‌‌to‌‌be‌‌avoided‌‌ 
b. The‌‌priest‌‌fails‌‌to‌‌do‌‌so;‌  ‌
Accident‌  ‌ actually‌‌exists;‌  ‌
c. His‌  ‌failure‌  ‌was‌  ‌due‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌lawful‌  ‌cause,‌  ‌privileged‌‌  Avoidance‌‌of‌ 
2. The‌‌injury‌‌feared‌‌be‌‌greater‌‌ 
9. An‌  ‌accident‌  ‌is‌  ‌something‌  ‌that‌  ‌happens‌  ‌outside‌  ‌the‌  ‌sway‌  ‌of‌  ‌our‌‌  communication‌‌between‌‌him‌‌and‌‌a‌‌penitent.‌  ‌ greater‌‌evil‌  ‌
✔‌  ‌ M‌  ‌ than‌‌that‌‌done‌‌to‌‌avoid‌‌it;‌  ‌
will,‌‌  and‌‌
  although‌‌   it‌‌
  comes‌‌
  about‌‌ through‌‌ some‌‌ act‌‌ of‌‌ our‌‌ will,‌‌ lies‌‌  or‌‌State‌‌of‌‌ 
Review‌‌of‌‌Justifying‌‌and‌‌Exempting‌‌Circumstances‌  3. There‌‌be‌‌no‌‌other‌‌practical‌‌and‌‌ 
beyond‌‌the‌‌bounds‌‌of‌‌humanly‌‌foreseeable‌‌consequences.‌  ‌ necessity‌  ‌
M‌‌=‌‌Mitigating‌  ‌ less‌‌harmful‌‌means‌‌of‌‌ 
10. It‌‌is‌‌intrinsically‌‌contradictory‌‌‌to‌‌negligence.‌  ‌ Civil‌‌  If‌‌not‌‌  preventing‌‌it.‌  ‌
 ‌ Requisites‌  ‌
11. The‌‌following‌r‌ equisites‌m
‌ ust‌‌concur:‌  ‌ Liability‌  complete‌ 
1. The‌‌accused‌‌acted‌‌in‌‌the‌‌ 
a) that‌‌the‌‌accused‌‌was‌‌performing‌‌a‌l‌ awful‌‌act‌‌with‌‌due‌‌care‌; ‌ ‌ Justifying‌  ‌ performance‌‌of‌‌a‌‌duty‌‌or‌‌in‌‌the‌‌ 
b) that‌‌the‌‌injury‌‌is‌‌caused‌‌by‌‌mere‌‌accident‌;‌‌and‌  ‌ lawful‌‌exercise‌‌of‌‌such‌‌right‌‌or‌‌ 
c) that‌  ‌there‌  ‌was‌  ‌no‌  ‌fault‌  ‌or‌  ‌intent‌  ‌on‌  ‌his‌  ‌part‌  ‌to‌  ‌cause‌  ‌the‌‌  1. Unlawful‌‌aggression‌; ‌ ‌ office;‌  ‌
injury.‌  ‌ 2. Reasonable‌‌necessity‌‌of‌‌the‌‌  Fulfillment‌‌ 
✘‌  ‌ M‌  ‌ 2. The‌‌injury‌‌caused‌‌or‌‌the‌‌ 
means‌‌employed‌‌to‌‌prevent‌‌or‌‌  of‌‌duty‌  ‌ offense‌‌committed‌‌be‌‌the‌‌ 
Irresistible‌‌force‌  ‌
Self-defense‌  ‌ ✘‌  ‌ M‌  ‌ repel‌‌it;‌  ‌ necessary‌‌consequence‌‌of‌‌the‌‌ 
12. The‌  ‌force‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌irresistible‌  ‌to‌  ‌reduce‌  ‌the‌  ‌actor‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌mere‌‌  3. Lack‌‌of‌‌sufficient‌‌provocation‌‌  due‌‌‌performance‌‌of‌‌duty‌‌or‌‌ 
instrument‌‌‌who‌‌acts‌‌not‌‌only‌‌without‌‌will‌‌but‌‌against‌‌his‌‌will.‌  ‌ on‌‌the‌‌part‌‌of‌‌the‌‌person‌‌  lawful‌‌exercise‌‌of‌‌such‌‌right‌‌or‌‌ 
Uncontrollable‌‌fear‌  ‌ defending‌‌himself;‌  ‌ office.‌  ‌

13. This‌‌
  presupposes‌‌   that‌‌
  a ‌‌person‌‌  is‌‌
  compelled‌‌ to‌‌ commit‌‌ a ‌‌crime‌‌ by‌‌  1. Unlawful‌‌aggression;‌  ‌ 1. An‌‌order‌‌has‌‌been‌‌issued‌‌by‌‌a ‌‌
another,‌  ‌but‌  ‌the‌  ‌compulsion‌  ‌is‌  ‌by‌  ‌means‌  ‌of‌  ‌intimidation‌  ‌or‌‌  2. Reasonable‌‌necessity‌‌of‌‌the‌‌  superior;‌  ‌
threat‌, ‌‌‌not‌‌
  force‌‌
  or‌‌  violence.‌‌  If‌‌
  force‌‌
  or‌‌
  violence‌‌  is‌‌
  employed,‌‌
  the‌‌  means‌‌employed‌‌to‌‌prevent‌‌or‌‌  Obedience‌‌  2. Such‌‌order‌‌must‌‌be‌‌for‌‌a‌l‌ awful‌‌ 
Defense‌‌of‌‌ 
applicable‌‌defense‌‌is‌i‌ rresistible‌‌force‌. ‌ ‌ ✘‌  ‌ M‌  ‌ repel‌‌it;‌  ‌ to‌‌a‌‌lawful‌‌  ✘‌  ‌ M‌  ‌ purpose;‌  ‌
relatives‌  ‌ order‌  ‌
14. Duress‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌valid‌  ‌defense‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌real,‌‌
  imminent,‌‌
  or‌‌  3. In‌‌case‌‌the‌‌provocation‌‌was‌‌  3. The‌‌means‌‌used‌‌by‌‌the‌‌ 
reasonable‌  ‌fear‌  ‌for‌  ‌one’s‌  ‌life‌  ‌or‌  ‌limb‌  ‌and‌  ‌should‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌be‌‌  given‌‌by‌‌the‌‌person‌‌attacked,‌‌  subordinate‌‌to‌‌carry‌‌out‌‌said‌‌ 
speculative,‌‌fanciful,‌o
‌ r‌‌remote‌‌fear.‌  ‌ the‌‌one‌‌making‌‌a‌‌defense‌‌had‌‌  order‌‌is‌l‌ awful.‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 111‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

Exempting‌  ‌ a) existence‌‌of‌‌an‌‌  6. Passion‌  ‌or‌  ‌obfuscation.‌  ‌That‌  ‌of‌  ‌having‌  ‌acted‌  ‌upon‌  ‌an‌‌ 
uncontrollable‌‌fear;‌  ‌ impulse‌  ‌so‌  ‌powerful‌  ‌as‌  ‌naturally‌  ‌to‌  ‌have‌  ‌produced‌  ‌passion‌  ‌or‌ 
1. Imbecile‌‌is‌e‌ xempt‌‌in‌A
‌ LL‌‌  b) the‌‌fear‌‌must‌‌be‌‌real‌‌and‌‌  obfuscation.‌  ‌
cases;‌  ‌ imminent;‌  ‌ 7. Voluntary‌  ‌surrender.‌  ‌That‌  ‌the‌  ‌offender‌  ‌had‌  ‌voluntarily‌‌ 
Imbecility‌‌ 
or‌‌insanity‌  ‌
✔‌  ‌ ‌ M‌  ‌ 2. Insane‌‌‌is‌‌only‌‌exempt‌‌‌if‌‌he‌‌  c) the‌‌fear‌‌of‌‌an‌‌injury‌‌is‌‌  surrendered‌‌himself‌‌to‌‌a‌‌person‌‌in‌‌authority‌‌or‌‌his‌‌agents,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
acted‌‌not‌‌during‌‌a‌‌lucid‌‌  greater‌‌than‌‌or‌‌at‌‌least‌‌  Plea‌  ‌of‌  ‌guilty.‌  ‌That‌  ‌he‌  ‌had‌  ‌voluntarily‌  ‌confessed‌  ‌his‌  ‌guilt‌‌ 
interval.‌  ‌ equal‌‌to‌‌that‌‌done.‌  ‌ before‌‌
  the‌‌
  court‌‌
  prior‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  presentation‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  evidence‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ 
prosecution.‌  ‌
2. That‌‌it‌‌promises‌‌an‌e‌ vil‌‌‌of‌‌ 
1. If‌‌15‌‌and‌‌below,‌a
‌ bsolutely‌‌  such‌‌gravity‌‌‌and‌‌imminence‌‌  8. Deaf‌  ‌and‌  ‌Dumb,‌  ‌Blind.‌  ‌That‌‌  the‌‌  offender‌‌  is‌‌  deaf‌‌  and‌‌  dumb,‌‌ 
exempt;‌  ‌ that‌‌the‌‌ordinary‌‌man‌‌would‌‌  blind‌  ‌or‌  ‌otherwise‌  ‌suffering‌  ‌some‌  ‌physical‌  ‌defect‌  ‌which‌  ‌thus‌‌ 
2. If‌‌above‌‌15‌‌but‌‌below‌‌18,‌‌  have‌‌succumbed‌‌to‌‌it.‌  ‌ restricts‌  ‌his‌  ‌means‌  ‌of‌  ‌action,‌‌
  defense,‌‌
  or‌‌
  communications‌‌   with‌‌ 
his‌‌fellow‌‌beings.‌  ‌
Minority‌  ‌ ✔‌  ‌ ‌ M‌  ‌ conditionally‌‌exempt‌. ‌ ‌
An‌‌act‌‌is‌‌required‌‌by‌‌law‌‌to‌‌be‌‌  9. Illness.‌  ‌Such‌  ‌illness‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌offender‌  ‌as‌  ‌would‌  ‌diminish‌  ‌the‌‌ 
3. Exemption‌‌applies‌‌only‌‌if‌‌it‌‌be‌‌ 
done;‌  ‌ exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌will-power‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌offender‌  ‌without‌  ‌however‌‌ 
shown‌‌that‌‌the‌‌minor‌‌acted‌‌  depriving‌‌him‌‌of‌‌the‌‌consciousness‌‌of‌‌his‌‌acts.‌  ‌
Insuperable‌‌ 
without‌‌discernment.‌  ‌
cause‌  ‌
✘‌  ‌ ✘‌  ‌ A‌‌person‌‌fails‌‌to‌‌perform‌‌such‌‌act;‌  ‌ 10. Analogous‌. ‌ ‌And,‌  ‌finally,‌  ‌any‌  ‌other‌  ‌circumstances‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌similar‌‌ 
His‌‌failure‌‌to‌‌perform‌‌such‌‌act‌‌was‌‌ 
nature‌‌and‌‌analogous‌‌to‌‌those‌‌above‌‌mentioned.‌  ‌
1. A‌‌person‌‌is‌‌performing‌‌a ‌‌ due‌‌to‌‌some‌‌lawful‌‌or‌‌ 
lawful‌‌act;‌  ‌ insuperable‌‌cause.‌  ‌
Privileged‌‌and‌‌ordinary‌  ‌
2. With‌‌due‌‌care;‌  ‌
c. Mitigating‌  ‌ 1. Ordinary‌  ‌or‌  ‌Generic‌  ‌mitigating‌‌
  are‌‌
  those‌‌
  enumerated‌‌   in‌‌
  Art‌‌
  13.‌‌ 
Accident‌  ‌ ✘‌  ‌ M‌  ‌ 3. He‌‌causes‌‌an‌‌accident‌‌to‌‌ 
For‌  ‌incomplete‌  ‌defense‌  ‌however,‌  ‌in‌  ‌Subsection‌  ‌1,‌  ‌it‌  ‌becomes‌‌ 
another‌‌by‌‌mere‌‌accident;‌  ‌  ‌ privileged‌‌‌when‌‌majority‌‌of‌‌the‌‌requisites‌‌are‌‌present.‌‌‌(Art‌‌69)‌  ‌
4. Without‌‌fault‌‌or‌‌intention‌‌of‌‌ 
1. Incomplete‌  ‌Defense‌. ‌ ‌Those‌  ‌mentioned‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌preceding‌‌  a. It‌  ‌is‌  ‌susceptible‌  ‌to‌  ‌being‌  ‌offset‌  ‌by‌  ‌any‌  ‌aggravating‌‌ 
causing‌‌it.‌  ‌
chapter,‌‌
  when‌‌
  all‌‌
  the‌‌
  requisites‌‌  necessary‌‌
  to‌‌ justify‌‌ or‌‌ to‌‌ exempt‌‌  circumstance.‌  ‌
from‌‌criminal‌‌liability‌‌in‌‌the‌‌respective‌‌cases‌‌are‌‌not‌‌attendant.‌  ‌
1. The‌‌compulsion‌‌is‌‌by‌m‌ eans‌‌  b. If‌  ‌not‌  ‌offset,‌  ‌produces‌  ‌only‌  ‌the‌  ‌effect‌  ‌of‌  ‌applying‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Compulsion‌‌  2. Mitigating‌  ‌responsibility.‌  ‌That‌  ‌the‌  ‌offender‌  ‌is‌  ‌under‌‌ 
of‌‌physical‌‌force;‌  ‌ penalty‌  ‌provided‌  ‌by‌  ‌law‌  ‌in‌‌
  its‌‌
  ‌minimum‌‌   period,‌‌  in‌‌
  case‌‌ 
of‌‌an‌‌  eighteen‌‌year‌‌of‌‌age‌‌or‌‌over‌‌seventy‌‌years.‌‌   ‌
✔‌  ‌ ✘‌  ‌ 2. Such‌‌force‌‌must‌‌be‌i‌ rresistible‌; ‌ ‌ of‌‌divisible‌‌penalty.‌  ‌
irresistible‌‌  3. Praeter‌  ‌intentionem.‌  ‌That‌  ‌the‌  ‌offender‌  ‌had‌  ‌no‌  ‌intention‌  ‌to‌‌ 
force‌  ‌ 3. Such‌‌force‌m
‌ ust‌‌come‌‌from‌‌a ‌‌ 2. Privileged‌  ‌mitigating‌  ‌are‌  ‌those‌  ‌that‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌offset‌  ‌by‌  ‌any‌‌ 
commit‌‌so‌‌grave‌‌a‌‌wrong‌‌as‌‌that‌‌committed.‌  ‌
third‌‌person.‌  ‌ aggravating‌  ‌circumstance.‌  ‌It‌  ‌has‌  ‌the‌  ‌effect‌  ‌of‌  ‌imposing‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌‌ 
4. Provocation.‌  ‌That‌  ‌sufficient‌‌  provocation‌‌  or‌‌  threat‌‌  on‌‌  the‌‌  part‌‌  offender‌  ‌the‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌lower‌  ‌by‌  ‌one‌  ‌or‌  ‌two‌  ‌degrees‌  ‌than‌  ‌that‌‌ 
of‌‌the‌‌offended‌‌party‌‌immediately‌‌preceded‌‌the‌‌act.‌  ‌
Impulse‌‌of‌‌  1. The‌‌threat‌‌which‌‌causes‌‌the‌‌  provided‌‌by‌‌law.‌  ‌
an‌‌  fear‌‌is‌‌‌of‌‌an‌‌evil‌g
‌ reater‌‌than‌‌  5. Immediate‌  ‌vindication‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌grave‌  ‌offense.‌  ‌That‌  ‌the‌  ‌act‌‌ 
uncontrollable‌ ‌
✔‌  ‌ M‌  ‌
was‌  ‌committed‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌immediate‌‌   vindication‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌grave‌‌
  offense‌‌ 
a. Art‌  ‌68.‌  ‌When‌  ‌the‌  ‌offender‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌minor‌  ‌and‌  ‌his‌  ‌case‌  ‌falls‌‌ 
or‌‌at‌‌least‌‌equal‌‌to‌,‌‌that‌‌which‌‌  under‌‌  the‌‌
  JJWA,‌‌
  particularly‌‌
  those‌‌
  above‌‌
  15‌‌
  but‌‌
  below‌‌ 18,‌‌ 
fear‌  ‌ to‌  ‌the‌  ‌one‌  ‌committing‌  ‌the‌  ‌felony,‌  ‌his‌  ‌spouse,‌  ‌ascendants,‌  ‌or‌‌ 
he‌‌is‌‌required‌‌to‌‌commit;‌  ‌ and‌‌acts‌‌WITH‌‌discernment.‌  ‌
relatives‌‌by‌‌affinity‌‌within‌‌the‌‌same‌‌degrees.‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 112‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

b. Art‌‌ 69‌. ‌‌Not‌‌ all,‌‌ but‌‌ a ‌‌majority‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ requisites‌‌ of‌‌ justifying‌‌  9. It‌‌
  must‌‌ be‌‌ ‌immediate‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ commission‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ crime‌‌ such‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌  17. It‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌proven‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌act‌  ‌which‌  ‌produced‌  ‌passion‌  ‌or‌‌ 
or‌‌exempting‌‌circumstances‌‌are‌‌present.‌  ‌ accused‌  ‌had‌  ‌no‌  ‌time‌  ‌to‌  ‌regain‌  ‌his‌  ‌reason‌  ‌and‌  ‌to‌  ‌exercise‌‌  obfuscation‌  ‌took‌  ‌place‌  ‌at‌  ‌a ‌ ‌time‌  ‌not‌  ‌far‌  ‌removed‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌ 
c. Art‌  ‌64(5).‌  ‌When‌  ‌there‌  ‌are‌  ‌2 ‌ ‌or‌  ‌more‌  ‌mitigating‌‌  self-control.‌  ‌ commission‌‌of‌‌the‌‌crime.‌  ‌
circumstances‌‌and‌‌no‌‌aggravating.‌  ‌ 10. It‌  ‌should‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌offensive‌  ‌and‌  ‌positively‌‌
  strong‌‌
  as‌‌
  it‌‌
  may‌‌
  then‌‌
  be‌‌  18. The‌  ‌crime‌  ‌committed‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌the‌  ‌result‌  ‌of‌‌
  a ‌‌‌sudden‌‌
  impulse‌‌
  of‌ 
d. Art‌‌
  268(3).‌‌
  Voluntary‌‌
  release‌‌
  of‌‌
  person‌‌
  illegally‌‌ detained‌‌  considered‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌  ‌unlawful‌  ‌aggression‌  ‌that‌  ‌may‌  ‌give‌  ‌rise‌  ‌to‌‌  natural‌‌and‌‌uncontrollable‌‌fury.‌  ‌
within‌‌3‌‌days;‌  ‌ self-defense.‌  ‌ 19. It‌‌
  may‌‌
  be‌‌
  built‌‌ up‌‌ and‌‌ strengthen‌‌ over‌‌ time‌‌ until‌‌ it‌‌ can‌‌ no‌‌ longer‌‌ be‌‌ 
e.
Art‌  ‌333(3).‌  ‌Abandonment‌  ‌without‌  ‌justification‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  Immediate‌‌vindication‌‌of‌‌a‌‌grave‌‌offense‌  ‌ repressed‌  ‌and‌  ‌will‌  ‌ultimately‌  ‌motivate‌  ‌the‌  ‌commission‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
spouse‌‌who‌‌committed‌‌adultery.‌  ‌ crime.‌‌(P‌ eople‌‌v.‌‌Oloverio‌‌2 ‌ 015‌L
‌ eonen,‌‌J)‌ 
11. A‌  ‌lapse‌  ‌of‌  ‌time‌  ‌is‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌  ‌grave‌  ‌offense‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌ 
20. Considered‌  ‌as‌  ‌ONE‌  ‌mitigating‌  ‌circumstance‌  ‌with‌  ‌provocation‌  ‌if‌‌ 
Incomplete‌‌defense‌  ‌ vindication.‌  ‌
both‌‌arose‌‌from‌‌one‌‌and‌‌the‌‌same‌‌cause.‌  ‌
3. When‌  ‌all‌  ‌the‌  ‌requisites‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌to‌  ‌justify‌  ‌the‌  ‌act‌  ‌or‌  ‌to‌  ‌exempt‌‌  12. Whether‌‌
  the‌‌
  personal‌‌
  offense‌‌
  is‌‌
  grave‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ decided‌‌ considering‌‌ 
21. INCOMPATIBLE‌w
‌ ith‌‌the‌‌following:‌  ‌
from‌‌criminal‌‌liability‌‌are‌‌not‌‌attendant.‌  ‌ the‌‌ ‌social‌‌ standing‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ person,‌‌ the‌‌ ‌place‌, ‌‌the‌‌ ‌time‌‌ when‌‌ the‌‌ insult‌‌ 
4. The‌  ‌only‌  ‌instance‌  ‌it‌  ‌becomes‌  ‌privileged‌  ‌mitigating‌  ‌is‌  ‌when‌  ‌a ‌‌ was‌‌made.‌  ‌ a. Praeter‌‌intentionem‌; ‌ ‌
majority‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌requisites‌  ‌in‌  ‌self-defense,‌  ‌defense‌  ‌of‌  ‌relatives‌  ‌or‌‌  13. It‌  ‌is‌  ‌incompatible‌  ‌with‌  ‌passion‌  ‌or‌  ‌obfuscation‌. ‌ ‌They‌  ‌cannot‌‌  b. Treachery;‌  ‌
strangers‌‌is‌‌present.‌  ‌ co-exist,‌  ‌except‌  ‌when‌  ‌there‌  ‌are‌  ‌other‌  ‌facts,‌  ‌although‌  ‌closely‌‌  c. Evident‌‌premeditation;‌  ‌
connected.‌  ‌In‌  ‌other‌  ‌words,‌  ‌the‌‌
  cause‌‌
  for‌‌
  each‌‌
  arose‌‌  from‌‌
  different‌‌ 
Praeter‌‌intentionem‌  ‌
sets‌‌of‌‌facts.‌  ‌
5. It‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌intention‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌offender‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌moment‌  ‌when‌  ‌he‌  ‌is‌‌   ‌ Provocation‌  ‌ Passion‌‌or‌‌Obfuscation‌  ‌
committing‌‌the‌‌crime‌‌which‌‌is‌‌considered.‌  ‌
 ‌ Provocation‌  ‌ Vindication‌  ‌ Source‌  ‌ Offended‌‌party‌  ‌ Caused‌‌by‌‌provocation‌  ‌
People‌‌v.‌‌Enriquez‌  ‌
Also‌‌against‌‌offender’s‌‌  Time‌‌  Immediately‌  ‌preceded‌ 
Made‌‌towards‌  ‌ offender‌  ‌ Need‌‌not‌‌be‌‌immediate‌  ‌
The‌  ‌trial‌  ‌court‌  ‌gave‌  ‌all‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌the‌  ‌benefit‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  mitigating‌‌  relatives‌  ‌ lapse‌  ‌ the‌‌act‌  ‌
circumstance‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌offenders‌  ‌had‌  ‌no‌  ‌intention‌  ‌to‌  ‌commit‌  ‌so‌‌ 
grave‌‌   a ‌‌wrong‌. ‌‌‌The‌‌ estimation‌‌ of‌‌ this‌‌ circumstance‌‌ was‌‌ proper,‌‌  Offender‌  ‌must‌‌  An‌  ‌offense‌  ‌need‌  ‌not‌‌  Effect‌  ‌ Loss‌‌of‌‌reason‌‌and‌‌self-control‌‌of‌‌offender‌  ‌
A‌‌grave‌‌offense‌  ‌
and‌‌  its‌‌  allowance‌‌   was‌‌ not‌‌ inconsistent‌‌ with‌‌ the‌‌ finding‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌  have‌‌done‌  ‌ be‌‌grave‌  ‌  ‌
crime‌‌was‌‌murder.‌  ‌
Immediately‌‌   ‌ Irresistible‌‌Force‌  ‌ Passion‌‌or‌‌Obfuscation‌  ‌
Time‌‌lapse‌  ‌ Proximate‌  ‌
preceded‌‌the‌‌act‌  ‌
Provocation‌  ‌
Kind‌  ‌ Exempting‌  ‌ Mitigating‌  ‌
6. Any‌  ‌unjust‌  ‌or‌  ‌improper‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌or‌  ‌act‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌offended‌  ‌party,‌‌  Passion‌‌or‌‌obfuscation‌  ‌
capable‌‌of‌‌exciting,‌‌inciting,‌‌or‌‌irritating‌‌anyone.‌  ‌ Force‌  ‌ Physical‌  ‌ Not‌‌physical‌  ‌
14. Mitigating‌  ‌only‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌arose‌  ‌from‌‌
  ‌lawful‌‌
  sentiments‌, ‌‌and‌‌ 
7. As‌  ‌to‌  ‌whether‌  ‌a ‌ ‌provocation‌  ‌is‌  ‌sufficient‌  ‌depends‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌act‌‌  NOT‌‌in‌‌a‌‌spirit‌‌of‌‌lawlessness‌‌or‌‌revenge.‌  ‌ Source‌  ‌ 3rd‌‌person‌  ‌ Offender‌‌himself‌  ‌
constituting‌  ‌the‌  ‌provocation,‌  ‌the‌  ‌social‌  ‌standing‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌person‌‌ 
15. The‌  ‌crime‌  ‌committed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌provoked‌  ‌by‌  ‌prior‌‌ 
provoked,‌‌the‌‌place‌‌and‌‌time‌‌when‌‌the‌‌provocation‌‌is‌‌made.‌  ‌ Lawful?‌  ‌ NO‌  ‌ Arise‌‌from‌‌lawful‌‌sentiments‌ 
unjust‌‌or‌‌improper‌‌acts‌‌of‌‌the‌‌injured‌‌party.‌  ‌
8. As‌‌  an‌‌
  element‌‌
  of‌‌  self-defense,‌‌   it‌‌
  pertains‌‌ to‌‌ its‌‌ ‌absence‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ part‌‌ 
16. Exercise‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌right‌‌
  or‌‌
  fulfillment‌‌
  of‌‌
  duty‌‌
  is‌NOT‌‌
    a ‌‌proper‌‌
  source‌‌ of‌‌  Romera‌‌v.‌‌People‌  ‌
of‌  ‌the‌  ‌person‌  ‌defending‌  ‌himself;‌  ‌whereas‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌mitigating‌‌ 
passion‌‌or‌‌obfuscation.‌  ‌
circumstance,‌‌   it‌‌ pertains‌‌ to‌‌ its‌‌ ‌presence‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ part‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ offended‌‌  Thrusting‌‌
  his‌‌
  bolo‌‌
  at‌‌
  petitioner,‌‌  threatening‌‌   to‌‌
  kill‌‌
  him,‌‌
  and‌‌  hacking‌‌ 
party.‌  ‌ the‌  ‌bamboo‌  ‌walls‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌house‌  ‌are,‌  ‌in‌  ‌our‌  ‌view,‌  ‌sufficient‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 113‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

c. Esprit‌  ‌de‌  ‌corps‌  ‌or‌  ‌mass‌  ‌psychology‌‌


  is‌‌
  similar‌‌
  to‌‌
  passion‌‌
  or‌‌ 
provocation‌  ‌to‌  ‌enrage‌  ‌any‌  ‌man,‌  ‌or‌  ‌stir‌  ‌his‌  ‌rage‌  ‌and‌  ‌obfuscate‌  ‌his‌‌  incurred‌‌in‌‌his‌‌search‌‌and‌‌capture.‌  
thinking,‌  ‌more‌  ‌so‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌lives‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌wife‌  ‌and‌  ‌children‌  ‌are‌  ‌in‌‌  obfuscation;‌  ‌
If‌  ‌none‌  ‌of‌  ‌these‌  ‌two‌  ‌(2)‌‌
  reasons‌‌  impelled‌‌  the‌‌
  accused‌‌   to‌‌
  surrender,‌‌ 
danger.‌  ‌Petitioner‌  ‌stabbed‌  ‌the‌  ‌victim‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌result‌  ‌of‌  ‌those‌‌  because‌‌   his‌‌   surrender‌‌ was‌‌ obviously‌‌ motivated‌‌ more‌‌ by‌‌ an‌‌ intention‌‌  d. Voluntary‌  ‌restitution‌  ‌of‌  ‌property‌  ‌similar‌  ‌to‌  ‌voluntary‌‌ 
provocations,‌  ‌and‌  ‌while‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌was‌  ‌still‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌fit‌  ‌of‌  ‌rage.‌  ‌In‌  ‌our‌‌  to‌  ‌insure‌  ‌his‌  ‌safety,‌  ‌his‌  ‌arrest‌‌
  being‌‌
  inevitable,‌‌  the‌‌
  surrender‌‌   is‌‌
  not‌‌  surrender;‌  ‌
view,‌  ‌there‌  ‌was‌  ‌sufficient‌‌  provocation‌‌   and‌‌   the‌‌  circumstance‌‌   of‌‌  spontaneous.‌  ‌Here,‌  ‌accused-appellant‌  ‌willingly‌  ‌went‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌police‌‌ 
passion‌‌or‌‌obfuscation‌‌attended‌‌the‌‌commission‌‌of‌‌the‌‌offense‌. ‌ ‌ e. Extreme‌  ‌poverty‌  ‌similar‌  ‌to‌  ‌incomplete‌  ‌justification‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌‌ 
authorities‌  ‌with‌  ‌Gilbert‌  ‌Sacla‌  ‌only‌  ‌to‌  ‌escape‌  ‌the‌  ‌wrath‌  ‌of‌  ‌private‌‌ 
complainant's‌‌   relatives‌‌  who‌‌  were‌‌ pursuing‌‌ him‌‌ and‌‌ who‌‌ appeared‌‌ to‌‌  state‌‌of‌‌necessity;‌  ‌
But,‌  ‌we‌  ‌must‌‌   stress‌‌
  that‌‌
  provocation‌‌
  and‌‌  passion‌‌   or‌‌
  obfuscation‌‌ 
be‌‌thirsting‌‌for‌‌his‌‌blood.‌  ‌ f. Testifying‌‌for‌‌the‌‌prosecution‌‌similar‌‌to‌p
‌ lea‌‌of‌‌guilty;‌  ‌
are‌  ‌not‌  ‌two‌  ‌separate‌  ‌mitigating‌  ‌circumstances.‌  ‌Well-settled‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌‌ 
rule‌‌  that‌‌  if‌‌
  these‌‌ two‌‌ circumstances‌‌ are‌‌ based‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ same‌‌ facts,‌‌ they‌‌ 
should‌‌be‌‌treated‌‌together‌‌as‌‌one‌‌‌mitigating‌‌circumstance‌.  ‌‌ ‌ Manaban‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ People‌‌v.‌‌Tampus‌‌and‌‌Montesclaros‌  ‌

Nonetheless,‌  ‌since‌  ‌the‌  ‌mitigating‌  ‌circumstance‌  ‌of‌  ‌voluntary‌‌  Voluntary‌‌Surrender‌‌and‌‌Obfuscation‌  ‌ We‌‌   agree‌‌  with‌‌ both‌‌ the‌‌ trial‌‌ and‌‌ appellate‌‌ courts‌‌ in‌‌ their‌‌ appreciation‌‌ 
surrender‌  ‌is‌  ‌also‌  ‌present,‌  ‌Article‌  ‌64‌  ‌(5)‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌RPC‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌‌  of‌  ‌the‌  ‌mitigating‌  ‌circumstance‌  ‌of‌  ‌illness‌  ‌as‌  ‌would‌  ‌diminish‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Manaban‌  ‌called‌‌  the‌‌
  police‌‌
  to‌‌
  report‌‌
  the‌‌
  shooting‌‌  incident.‌‌
  When‌‌   the‌‌  exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌willpower‌  ‌of‌  ‌Ida‌  ‌without‌  ‌depriving‌  ‌her‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
applied.‌  ‌The‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌for‌  ‌frustrated‌‌
  homicide,‌‌   pursuant‌‌   to‌‌
  Article‌‌
  50‌‌ 
police‌  ‌arrived,‌  ‌Manaban‌  ‌surrendered‌  ‌his‌  ‌service‌  ‌firearm‌  ‌and‌‌  consciousness‌‌of‌‌her‌‌acts,‌‌pursuant‌‌to‌‌Article‌‌13(9).‌  ‌
of‌  ‌the‌  ‌RPC,‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌next‌  ‌lower‌  ‌in‌  d ‌ egree‌  ‌than‌  ‌that‌‌ 
voluntarily‌  ‌went‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌police‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌police‌  ‌station‌  ‌for‌‌ 
prescribed‌‌by‌‌law‌‌for‌‌consummated‌‌homicide.‌  ‌
investigation.‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌Manaban‌  ‌is‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌benefit‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  Dr.‌  ‌Costas‌  ‌testified‌  ‌that‌  ‌Ida‌  ‌was‌  ‌provisionally‌  ‌treated‌  ‌for‌‌ 
mitigating‌‌circumstance‌‌of‌v ‌ oluntary‌‌surrender‌. ‌ ‌ schizophrenia‌  ‌a ‌ ‌few‌  ‌months‌  ‌before‌  ‌the‌  ‌incident.‌  ‌Ida‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌‌ 
Voluntary‌‌Surrender‌  ‌ totally‌  ‌deprived‌  ‌of‌  ‌intelligence‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌incident;‌  ‌but,‌‌
  she‌‌ 
On‌  ‌obfuscation‌, ‌ ‌we‌  ‌find‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌facts‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌entitle‌‌  may‌‌have‌‌‌poor‌‌judgment.‌‌   ‌
22. The‌‌  following‌‌
  elements‌‌
  must‌‌
  be‌‌
  present‌‌
  for‌‌ voluntary‌‌ surrender‌‌ to‌‌ 
Manaban‌  ‌to‌  ‌such‌  ‌mitigating‌  ‌circumstance.‌  ‌Manaban‌  ‌admitted‌‌ 
be‌‌appreciated:‌‌   ‌ shooting‌  ‌Bautista‌‌   because‌‌   Bautista‌‌   turned‌‌   around‌‌   and‌‌  was‌‌
  allegedly‌‌  Mitigating‌‌circumstances‌‌which‌‌are‌‌personal‌‌to‌‌offenders‌  ‌
a) the‌‌offender‌‌has‌‌not‌‌been‌‌actually‌‌arrested;‌  ‌ about‌  ‌to‌  ‌draw‌  ‌his‌  ‌gun‌  ‌to‌  ‌shoot‌  ‌Manaban.‌  ‌The‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌Bautista‌  ‌in‌‌ 
turning‌  ‌around‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌unlawful‌‌   and‌‌   sufficient‌‌  cause‌‌   for‌‌
  Manaban‌‌   to‌‌  Mitigating‌‌circumstances‌‌which‌‌arise‌  ‌
b) the‌  ‌offender‌  ‌surrendered‌  ‌himself‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person‌  ‌in‌  ‌authority‌, ‌‌ lose‌‌  his‌‌
  reason‌‌
  and‌‌   shoot‌‌   Bautista.‌‌ ‌The‌‌ defense‌‌ failed‌‌ to‌‌ establish‌‌  1) From‌‌the‌‌moral‌‌attributes‌‌of‌‌the‌‌offender;‌‌or‌  ‌
and,‌  ‌ by‌  ‌clear‌  ‌and‌  ‌convincing‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌the‌  ‌cause‌  ‌that‌  ‌allegedly‌‌ 
produced‌‌obfuscation.‌  ‌ 2) From‌‌his‌‌private‌‌relations‌‌with‌‌the‌‌offended‌‌party;‌‌or‌  ‌
c) the‌‌surrender‌‌must‌‌be‌‌voluntary,‌s‌ pontaneous‌. ‌ ‌
3) From‌‌any‌‌other‌‌personal‌‌cause,‌  ‌
Lumauig‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌‌2014‌  ‌ Plea‌‌of‌‌guilty‌  ‌
Shall‌‌
  only‌‌
  serve‌‌
  to‌‌
  mitigate‌‌
  the‌‌
  liability‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  principals,‌‌ accomplices,‌‌ 
23. Not‌‌mitigating‌‌if‌‌made‌‌on‌‌appeal.‌  ‌ and‌‌accessories‌‌to‌‌whom‌‌such‌‌circumstances‌‌are‌‌attendant.‌‌(Art‌‌62[3])‌  ‌
In‌  ‌sentencing‌  ‌petitioner,‌‌   the‌‌
  Sandiganbayan‌‌
  correctly‌‌   considered‌‌   the‌‌ 
mitigating‌  ‌circumstance‌  ‌of‌  ‌voluntary‌  ‌surrender‌. ‌ ‌However,‌  ‌it‌‌  24. Plea‌  ‌of‌  ‌guilty‌‌
  to‌‌
  lesser‌‌
  offense‌‌
  than‌‌
  that‌‌
  charged‌‌
  is‌‌
  ‌not‌‌
  ‌mitigating.‌‌  Circumstances‌‌which‌‌are‌‌neither‌‌exempting‌‌nor‌‌mitigating‌  ‌
failed‌  ‌to‌  ‌consider‌  ‌the‌  ‌mitigating‌  ‌circumstance‌  ‌of‌  ‌return‌  ‌or‌  ‌full‌‌  However‌, ‌‌if‌‌ the‌‌ ‌information‌‌ is‌‌ amended‌‌ to‌‌ change‌‌ the‌‌ charge‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌‌
restitution‌‌of‌‌the‌‌funds‌‌that‌‌were‌‌previously‌‌unliquidated‌. ‌ ‌ 1. Aberratio‌‌ictus‌; ‌ ‌
lesser‌‌offense‌‌and‌‌the‌‌accused‌‌pleads‌‌guilty‌‌thereto,‌‌it‌‌is‌‌mitigating.‌ 
2. Mistake‌‌in‌‌the‌‌identity;‌  ‌
25. The‌‌plea‌‌of‌‌guilty‌‌must‌‌be‌‌unconditional.‌  ‌
People‌‌v.‌‌Basite‌  ‌
3. Entrapment;‌  ‌
26. NOT‌‌mitigating‌‌in‌‌culpable‌‌felonies‌‌and‌‌in‌‌crimes‌‌under‌‌SPLs.‌  ‌
A‌  ‌surrender‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌voluntary‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  spontaneous‌, ‌ ‌showing‌  ‌the‌‌  4. Age‌‌of‌‌criminal‌‌responsibility;‌  ‌
intent‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌to‌  ‌submit‌  ‌himself‌  ‌unconditionally‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  Analogous‌‌circumstances‌  ‌
authorities,‌‌either‌‌because‌‌   ‌ 5. Performance‌‌of‌‌righteous‌‌action.‌  ‌

a. Over‌‌60‌‌years‌‌with‌‌failing‌‌sight,‌‌similar‌‌to‌s‌ enility‌; ‌ ‌
1. he‌‌acknowledges‌‌his‌‌guilt,‌‌or‌  ‌ Review‌‌of‌‌Mitigating‌‌Circumstances‌  ‌
b. Outraged‌  ‌feeling‌  ‌of‌  ‌owner‌  ‌of‌‌
  animal‌‌
  taken‌‌
  for‌‌
  ransom‌‌
  similar‌‌ 
2. he‌‌
  wishes‌‌
  to‌‌
  save‌‌
  them‌‌
  the‌‌
  trouble‌‌
  and‌‌
  expense‌‌ necessarily‌‌ 
to‌v‌ indication‌; ‌ ‌ Circumstance‌  Requisites‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 114‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

Not‌‌all‌‌requisites‌‌necessary‌‌to‌‌justify‌‌the‌‌act‌‌or‌‌to‌‌  2. He‌‌surrendered‌‌himself‌‌to‌‌a‌p ‌ erson‌‌in‌‌authority‌‌  5. That‌‌ the‌‌ crime‌‌ be‌‌ committed‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ palace‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Chief‌‌ Executive‌‌ 


Incomplete‌‌  exempt‌‌from‌‌criminal‌‌liability‌‌are‌‌attendant.‌  ‌ or‌‌to‌‌the‌‌latter's‌‌agent;‌  ‌ or‌  ‌in‌  ‌his‌  ‌presence,‌  ‌or‌  ‌where‌  ‌public‌  ‌authorities‌‌   are‌‌
  engaged‌‌   in‌‌ 
defense‌  ‌ If‌‌majority‌‌of‌‌the‌‌requisites‌‌are‌‌present,‌p
‌ rivileged‌,‌‌  the‌‌   discharge‌‌   of‌‌
  their‌‌
  duties,‌‌ or‌‌ in‌‌ a ‌‌place‌‌ dedicated‌‌ to‌‌ religious‌‌ 
3. The‌‌surrender‌‌was‌‌voluntary.‌  ‌
otherwise,‌o ‌ rdinary.‌  ‌ worship.‌(‌ ‌Palace‌‌of‌‌Chief‌‌Executive‌) ‌ ‌
1. Offender‌s‌ pontaneously‌‌confessed‌‌his‌‌guilt;‌  ‌ 6. That‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌  ‌be‌  ‌committed‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌night‌  ‌time,‌  ‌or‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌‌ 
Minor‌  ‌ uninhabited‌  ‌place,‌‌   or‌‌
  by‌‌
  a‌‌
  band,‌‌
  whenever‌‌   such‌‌  circumstances‌‌ 
Above‌‌15‌‌but‌‌below‌‌18‌‌years‌‌old.‌  ‌ 2. Such‌‌was‌‌made‌i‌ n‌‌open‌‌court‌,‌‌before‌‌the‌‌ 
(Privileged)‌‌   ‌ Plea‌‌of‌‌  may‌  ‌facilitate‌  ‌the‌  ‌commission‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌offense.‌  ‌(‌Nighttime,‌‌ 
competent‌‌court‌‌‌that‌‌is‌‌to‌‌try‌‌the‌‌case;‌‌and‌  ‌ Uninhabited‌‌place,‌) ‌ ‌
guilty‌  ‌
Senility‌  ‌ Offender‌‌is‌‌over‌‌70‌‌years‌‌old‌  ‌
3. Such‌‌was‌‌made‌p ‌ rior‌‌‌to‌‌the‌‌presentation‌‌of‌‌  Whenever‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌‌
  three‌‌
  armed‌‌   malefactors‌‌   shall‌‌  have‌‌
  acted‌‌ 
evidence‌‌for‌‌the‌‌prosecution.‌  ‌ together‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  commission‌‌   of‌‌
  an‌‌
  offense,‌‌
  it‌‌
  shall‌‌ be‌‌ deemed‌‌ to‌‌ 
There‌‌is‌‌a‌‌notable‌‌and‌‌evident‌‌disproportion‌‌between‌‌ 
Praeter‌‌  have‌‌been‌‌committed‌‌by‌‌a‌‌band.‌(‌ ‌Band‌) ‌ ‌
the‌‌means‌‌employed‌‌to‌‌execute‌‌the‌‌criminal‌‌act‌‌and‌‌ 
intentionem‌  ‌ 1. The‌‌offender‌‌is‌‌deaf‌‌and‌‌dumb,‌‌blind‌‌or‌‌  7. That‌‌
  the‌‌
  crime‌‌ be‌‌ committed‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ occasion‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌conflagration,‌‌ 
its‌‌consequences.‌  ‌
otherwise‌‌suffering‌‌some‌‌physical‌‌defect‌  ‌ shipwreck,‌  ‌earthquake,‌  ‌epidemic‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌calamity‌  ‌or‌‌ 
Deaf‌‌and‌‌  misfortune.‌(‌ ‌Calamity‌)‌ 
1. Must‌‌be‌‌sufficient;‌  ‌ Dumb,‌‌Blind‌  ‌ 2. Which‌‌thus‌‌restricts‌‌his‌‌means‌‌of‌‌action,‌‌ 
defense,‌‌or‌‌communications‌‌with‌‌his‌‌fellow‌‌  8. That‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌  ‌be‌  ‌committed‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌aid‌  ‌of‌  ‌armed‌  ‌men‌  ‌or‌‌ 
2. Must‌‌originate‌‌from‌‌offended‌‌party;‌‌‌and‌  ‌
persons‌‌who‌‌insure‌‌or‌‌afford‌‌impunity.‌(‌ ‌Aid‌‌of‌‌armed‌‌men‌) ‌ ‌
Provocation‌  ‌ 3. beings.‌  ‌
Must‌‌be‌‌immediate‌‌‌to‌‌the‌‌act,‌‌i.e.,‌‌to‌‌the‌‌  9. That‌‌the‌‌accused‌‌is‌‌a‌‌recidivist.‌(‌ ‌Recidivist‌) ‌ ‌
commission‌‌of‌‌the‌‌crime‌‌by‌‌the‌‌person‌‌who‌‌is‌‌  1. The‌‌illness‌‌of‌‌offender‌‌must‌‌diminish‌‌the‌‌  A‌  ‌recidivist‌  ‌is‌  ‌one‌  ‌who,‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌of‌‌
  his‌‌
  trial‌‌
  for‌‌
  one‌‌
  crime,‌‌ 
provoked.‌  ‌ exercise‌‌of‌‌his‌‌will-power;‌  ‌ shall‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌previously‌  ‌convicted‌  ‌by‌  ‌final‌  ‌judgment‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Illness‌  ‌ another‌‌crime‌‌embraced‌‌in‌‌the‌‌same‌‌title‌‌of‌‌this‌‌Code.‌  ‌
2. Such‌‌illness‌‌should‌‌not‌‌deprive‌‌the‌‌offender‌‌of‌‌ 
1. There‌‌be‌‌a‌g
‌ rave‌‌offense‌‌‌done‌‌to‌‌the‌‌one‌‌ 
consciousness‌‌of‌‌his‌‌acts.‌  ‌ 10. That‌‌
  the‌‌ offender‌‌ has‌‌ been‌‌ previously‌‌ punished‌‌ by‌‌ an‌‌ offense‌‌ to‌‌ 
committing‌‌the‌‌felony,‌‌his‌‌spouse,‌‌ascendants,‌‌ 
which‌‌   the‌‌
  law‌‌
  attaches‌‌  an‌‌
  equal‌‌ or‌‌ greater‌‌ penalty‌‌ or‌‌ for‌‌ two‌‌ or‌‌ 
Immediate‌‌  descendants,‌‌legitimate,‌‌natural‌‌or‌‌adopted‌‌  more‌  ‌crimes‌  ‌to‌  ‌which‌  ‌it‌  ‌attaches‌  ‌a ‌ ‌lighter‌  ‌penalty.‌‌ 
Analogous‌‌   ‌ Similar‌‌to‌‌any‌‌of‌‌the‌‌mitigating‌‌circumstances.‌  ‌
vindication‌‌  brothers‌‌or‌‌sisters,‌‌or‌‌relatives‌‌by‌‌affinity‌‌within‌‌  (‌Reiteracion‌) ‌ ‌
of‌‌a‌‌grave‌‌  the‌‌same‌‌degrees;‌  ‌ d. Aggravating‌  ‌ 11. That‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌  ‌be‌  ‌committed‌  ‌in‌  ‌consideration‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌price,‌‌ 
offense‌  ‌ 2. The‌‌felony‌‌is‌‌committed‌‌in‌‌vindication‌‌of‌‌such‌‌  reward,‌‌or‌‌promise.‌(‌ ‌Price,‌‌reward,‌‌or‌‌promise‌) ‌ ‌
1. That‌  ‌advantage‌‌
  be‌‌
  taken‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  offender‌‌
  of‌‌
  his‌‌
  public‌‌
  position.‌‌ 
grave‌‌offense.‌‌A‌l‌ apse‌‌of‌‌time‌‌‌is‌‌allowed‌‌‌between‌‌  (‌Abuse‌‌of‌‌public‌‌position‌) ‌ ‌ 12. That‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌  ‌be‌  ‌committed‌  ‌by‌  ‌means‌  ‌of‌  ‌inundation,‌  ‌fire,‌‌ 
the‌‌vindication‌‌and‌‌doing‌‌of‌‌the‌‌grave‌‌offense.‌  ‌ poison,‌‌   explosion,‌‌ stranding‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌vessel‌‌ or‌‌ international‌‌ damage‌‌ 
2. That‌  ‌the‌‌
  crime‌‌
  be‌‌
  committed‌‌
  in‌‌
  contempt‌‌   or‌‌
  with‌‌
  insult‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌  thereto,‌  ‌derailment‌  ‌of‌‌   a ‌‌locomotive,‌‌
  or‌‌
  by‌‌   the‌‌
  use‌‌
  of‌‌
  any‌‌
  other‌‌ 
1. There‌‌be‌‌an‌‌act,‌‌both‌u
‌ nlawful‌‌and‌‌sufficient‌,‌‌to‌‌  public‌  ‌authorities.‌  ‌(‌Contempt‌  ‌of‌  ‌or‌  ‌insult‌  ‌to‌  ‌public‌‌  artifice‌‌involving‌‌great‌‌waste‌‌and‌‌ruin.‌(‌ ‌Great‌‌waste‌‌and‌‌ruin‌) ‌ ‌
authorities‌) ‌ ‌
produce‌‌such‌‌a‌‌condition‌‌of‌‌mind;‌‌and‌  ‌ 13. That‌‌ the‌‌ act‌‌ be‌‌ committed‌‌ with‌‌ evident‌‌ premeditation.‌‌ ‌(‌Evident‌‌ 
3. That‌  ‌the‌  ‌act‌  ‌be‌  ‌committed‌  ‌with‌  ‌insult‌  ‌or‌  ‌in‌  ‌disregard‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  premeditation‌) ‌ ‌
2. Said‌‌act‌‌which‌‌produced‌‌the‌‌obfuscation‌w ‌ as‌‌not‌‌  respect‌  ‌due‌  ‌the‌  ‌offended‌  ‌party‌  ‌on‌  ‌account‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌‌  rank,‌‌
  age,‌‌   or‌‌ 
Passion‌‌or‌‌ 
far‌‌removed‌‌from‌‌the‌‌commission‌‌of‌‌the‌‌  sex,‌(‌ ‌Insult‌‌to‌‌offended‌‌party‌) ‌ ‌ 14. That‌‌
  the‌‌
  craft,‌‌
  fraud‌‌
  or‌‌
  disguise‌‌
  be‌‌
  employed.‌‌ ‌(‌Craft,‌‌ fraud,‌‌ or‌‌ 
obfuscation‌  ‌
crime‌‌‌by‌‌a‌‌considerable‌‌length‌‌of‌‌time,‌‌during‌‌  disguise‌)‌ 
or‌‌
  that‌‌
  is‌‌
  committed‌‌  in‌‌
  the‌‌ dwelling‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ offended‌‌ party,‌‌ if‌‌ the‌‌ 
which‌‌the‌‌perpetrator‌‌might‌‌recover‌‌his‌‌normal‌‌  latter‌‌has‌‌not‌‌given‌‌provocation.‌(‌ ‌Dwelling‌) ‌ ‌ 15. That‌  ‌advantage‌  ‌be‌  ‌taken‌  ‌of‌  s‌ uperior‌  s‌ trength,‌  o
‌ r‌  ‌means‌  ‌be‌‌ 
equanimity.‌  ‌ employed‌  ‌to‌  ‌weaken‌  ‌the‌  ‌defense.‌  ‌(‌Abuse‌  ‌of‌  ‌superior‌‌ 
4. That‌‌
  the‌‌
  act‌‌
  be‌‌
  committed‌‌
  with‌‌
  abuse‌‌ of‌‌ confidence‌‌ or‌‌ obvious‌‌  strength‌) ‌ ‌
ungratefulness.‌  ‌(‌Abuse‌  ‌of‌  ‌confidence‌  ‌or‌  ‌obvious‌‌ 
Voluntary‌‌  16. That‌‌the‌‌act‌‌be‌‌committed‌‌with‌‌treachery.‌(‌ ‌Alevosia‌) ‌ ‌
1. Offender‌‌had‌n
‌ ot‌‌been‌‌actually‌‌arrested.‌  ‌ ungratefulness‌) ‌ ‌
surrender‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 115‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

2. What‌‌  is‌‌
  decisive‌‌
  is‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  execution‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ attack,‌‌ without‌‌ the‌‌ 
There‌‌ is‌‌ treachery‌‌ when‌‌ the‌‌ offender‌‌ commits‌‌ any‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ crimes‌‌  slightest‌  ‌provocation‌  ‌from‌  ‌an‌  ‌unarmed‌  ‌victim,‌  ‌made‌  ‌it‌‌ 
Lastly,‌‌  ‌disregard‌‌   of‌‌
  old‌‌  age‌  ‌should‌‌  not‌‌  be‌‌  taken‌‌ into‌‌ account‌‌ for,‌‌ 
against‌‌  the‌‌   person,‌‌
  employing‌‌   means,‌‌  methods,‌‌  or‌‌ forms‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ 
as‌‌
  stated‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌  case‌‌
  of‌‌
  ‌People‌‌
  v.‌‌
  Pagal‌, ‌‌it‌‌
  is‌‌ not‌‌ proper‌‌ to‌‌ consider‌‌  impossible‌‌for‌‌the‌‌victim‌‌to‌‌defend‌‌himself‌‌or‌‌to‌‌retaliate.‌  ‌
execution‌‌   thereof‌‌
  which‌‌
  tend‌‌ directly‌‌ and‌‌ specially‌‌ to‌‌ insure‌‌ its‌‌ 
execution,‌  ‌without‌  ‌risk‌  ‌to‌  ‌himself‌  ‌arising‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌defense‌‌  this‌  ‌aggravating‌  ‌circumstance‌  ‌in‌  ‌crimes‌  ‌against‌  ‌property‌. ‌‌
3. There‌  ‌is‌  ‌treachery‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌offender‌  ‌commits‌  ‌any‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
which‌‌the‌‌offended‌‌party‌‌might‌‌make.‌  ‌ Robbery‌‌   with‌‌   homicide‌‌ is‌‌ primarily‌‌ a ‌‌crime‌‌ against‌‌ property‌‌ and‌‌ not‌‌ 
against‌‌persons.‌‌   ‌ crimes‌‌   against‌‌ persons,‌‌ employing‌‌ means,‌‌ methods‌‌ or‌‌ forms‌‌ 
17. That‌‌ means‌‌ be‌‌ employed‌‌ or‌‌ circumstances‌‌ brought‌‌ about‌‌ which‌‌  in‌  ‌the‌  ‌execution‌  ‌thereof,‌  ‌which‌  ‌tend‌  ‌directly‌  ‌and‌  ‌specially‌  ‌to‌‌ 
add‌‌ignominy‌‌to‌‌the‌‌natural‌‌effects‌‌of‌‌the‌‌act.‌(‌ ‌Ignominy‌) ‌ ‌ ensure‌  ‌its‌  ‌execution‌  ‌without‌  ‌risk‌  ‌to‌  ‌himself‌  ‌arising‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Recidivism‌‌vs‌‌Reiteracion‌  ‌
18. That‌‌
  the‌‌ crime‌‌ be‌‌ committed‌‌ after‌‌ an‌‌ unlawful‌‌ entry.‌‌ ‌(‌Unlawful‌‌  defense‌‌that‌‌the‌‌offended‌‌party‌‌might‌‌make.‌‌   ‌
entry‌) ‌ ‌  ‌ Recidivism‌  Reiteracion‌  ‌
4. There‌‌
  are‌‌
  two‌‌
  (2)‌‌
  conditions‌‌
  that‌‌
  must‌‌
  concur‌‌ for‌‌ treachery‌‌ to‌‌ 
There‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌unlawful‌  ‌entry‌  ‌when‌  ‌an‌  ‌entrance‌  ‌is‌  ‌effected‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌‌
way‌‌not‌‌intended‌‌for‌‌the‌‌purpose.‌  ‌ As‌‌to‌‌1st‌‌offense,‌‌  Been‌‌adjudged‌‌with‌‌  exist,‌‌to‌‌wit:‌  ‌
Served‌‌out‌‌the‌‌sentence‌  ‌
offender‌‌shall‌‌have‌  ‌ finality‌  ‌ a) the‌‌ employment‌‌ of‌‌ means‌‌ of‌‌ execution‌‌ gave‌‌ the‌‌ person‌‌ 
19. That‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌means‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ commission‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌crime‌‌ a ‌‌wall,‌‌ roof,‌‌ floor,‌‌ 
door,‌‌  or‌‌
  window‌‌   be‌‌  broken.‌‌
  ‌(‌Breaking‌‌   wall,‌‌
  roof,‌‌  floor,‌‌ door,‌‌  attacked‌  ‌no‌  ‌opportunity‌  ‌to‌  ‌defend‌  ‌himself‌  ‌or‌  ‌to‌‌ 
Previous‌‌and‌‌  Included‌‌in‌‌SAME‌‌  Must‌‌NOT‌‌be‌‌embraced‌‌ 
or‌‌window‌) ‌ ‌ retaliate;‌‌and‌  ‌
subsequent‌‌offenses‌  ‌ title‌  ‌ in‌‌same‌‌title‌  ‌
20. That‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌  ‌be‌  ‌committed‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌aid‌  ‌of‌  ‌persons‌  ‌under‌‌  b) the‌  ‌means‌  ‌or‌  ‌method‌  ‌of‌  ‌execution‌  ‌was‌  ‌deliberately‌‌ 
fifteen‌  ‌years‌  ‌of‌  ‌age‌  ‌or‌  ‌by‌  ‌means‌‌
  of‌‌
  motor‌‌
  vehicles,‌‌  motorized‌‌  Always‌‌aggravating‌  ‌ ✔‌  ‌ ✘‌  ‌ and‌‌consciously‌‌adopted‌.  ‌‌ ‌
watercraft,‌  ‌airships,‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌similar‌  ‌means.‌  ‌(‌aab‌  ‌RA‌  ‌5438‌).‌‌ 
(‌Aid‌‌of‌‌person‌‌under‌‌15,‌‌Motor‌‌vehicle‌) ‌ ‌ The‌‌four‌‌forms‌‌of‌‌REPETITION‌  ‌ 5. The‌  ‌essence‌  ‌of‌  ‌treachery‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌‌
  the‌‌
  attack‌‌
  is‌‌
  ‌deliberate‌‌
  and‌‌ 
21. That‌  ‌the‌  ‌wrong‌  ‌done‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌commission‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌  ‌be‌‌  1. Recidivism‌  without‌  ‌warning‌, ‌ ‌done‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌swift‌  ‌and‌  ‌unexpected‌  ‌manner,‌‌ 
deliberately‌‌   augmented‌‌  by‌‌  causing‌‌   other‌‌
  wrongs‌‌
  not‌‌
  necessary‌‌  affording‌  ‌the‌  ‌hapless,‌  ‌unarmed‌  ‌and‌  ‌unsuspecting‌  ‌victim‌  ‌no‌‌ 
for‌‌its‌‌commission.‌(‌ ‌Cruelty‌) ‌ ‌ 2. Reiteracion‌‌‌or‌‌habituality‌  ‌
chance‌‌to‌‌resist‌‌or‌‌escape.‌  ‌
3. Multi-recidivism‌  ‌or‌  ‌habitual‌  ‌delinquency‌  ‌Art‌  ‌62[5]‌‌ 
Kinds‌  ‌
(Extraordinary‌  ‌aggravating)‌  ‌— ‌ ‌if‌  ‌within‌  ‌a ‌ ‌period‌  ‌of‌  ‌ten‌‌   years‌‌  People‌‌v.‌‌Bermudo‌‌2 ‌ 018‌  ‌
1. Generic‌‌‌—‌T
‌ hose‌‌that‌‌can‌‌be‌‌applied‌‌to‌‌all‌‌crimes.‌  ‌ from‌‌   the‌‌
  date‌‌
  of‌‌
  his‌‌
  release‌‌   or‌‌
  last‌‌
  conviction‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  crimes‌‌ of‌‌ 
Gilberto‌‌   was‌‌  completely‌‌ defenseless‌‌ at‌‌ the‌‌ time‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ attack‌‌ because‌‌ 
2. Specific‌—
‌ ‌A
‌ pplies‌‌only‌‌to‌‌particular‌‌crimes.‌  serious‌‌ or‌‌ less‌‌ serious‌‌ physical‌‌ injuries,‌‌ ‌robo‌, ‌‌‌hurto‌, ‌‌‌estafa‌‌  he‌‌
  was‌‌   surprised‌‌   by‌‌  Rommel‌‌   with‌‌   a ‌‌blow‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ head‌‌ causing‌‌ him‌‌ to‌‌ 
or‌‌
  ‌falsification‌, ‌‌he‌‌
  is‌‌
  found‌‌ guilty‌‌ of‌‌ any‌‌ of‌‌ said‌‌ crimes‌‌ a ‌‌third‌‌  fall‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌ground.‌  R ‌ ommel‌  ‌and‌‌   co-accused‌‌   continued‌‌   to‌‌
  attack‌‌
  him‌‌ 
3. Qualifying‌—
‌ ‌C
‌ hanges‌‌the‌‌nature‌‌of‌‌the‌‌crime.‌  ‌ causing‌  ‌him‌‌   multiple‌‌   injuries,‌‌
  including‌‌   the‌‌
  fatal‌‌  ones.‌‌   Gilberto‌‌
  was‌‌ 
time‌‌or‌‌oftener.‌  ‌
4. Inherent‌—
‌ ‌M
‌ ust‌‌accompany‌‌the‌‌commission‌‌of‌‌the‌‌crime.‌  ‌ never‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌position‌  ‌to‌  ‌defend‌  ‌himself.‌  ‌Further,‌  ‌Rommel‌  ‌and‌  ‌his‌‌ 
4. Quasi-recidivism‌  ‌Art‌‌   160‌‌
  ‌(Special‌‌   aggravating)‌‌   — ‌‌commits‌‌   a ‌‌ co-accused‌  ‌consciously‌  ‌adopted‌  ‌the‌  ‌means‌  ‌of‌  ‌attack‌  ‌because,‌  ‌as‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Nabaluna‌  ‌ felony‌  ‌after‌  ‌having‌  ‌been‌  ‌convicted‌  ‌by‌  ‌final‌  ‌judgment,‌  ‌before‌  noted‌‌   by‌‌ the‌‌ CA,‌‌ they‌‌ were‌‌ already‌‌ armed‌‌ when‌‌ they‌‌ proceeded‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ 
beginning‌  ‌to‌  ‌serve‌  ‌such‌  ‌sentence,‌  ‌or‌  ‌while‌  ‌serving‌  ‌the‌‌   same,‌‌  crime‌  ‌scene.‌  ‌In‌  ‌addition,‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌noteworthy‌  ‌that‌  ‌Rommel‌  ‌suddenly,‌‌ 
The‌  ‌element‌‌   ‌treachery‌‌
  of‌‌   ‌cannot‌‌  simply‌‌  be‌‌  presumed.‌‌  It‌‌  ‌must‌‌  be‌‌  shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌punished‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌maximum‌  ‌period‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌penalty‌‌  without‌‌warning‌‌or‌‌provocation,‌‌attacked‌‌Gilberto‌‌‌from‌‌behind‌. ‌ ‌
clearly‌‌proven‌‌as‌‌the‌‌crime‌‌itself‌. ‌ ‌ prescribed‌‌by‌‌law‌‌for‌‌the‌‌new‌‌felony.‌  ‌
People‌‌v.‌‌Bagabay‌‌2
‌ 018‌  ‌
The‌‌
  mere‌‌   fact‌‌
  that‌‌
  two‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  accused,‌‌
  with‌‌ one‌‌ of‌‌ them‌‌ being‌‌ armed‌‌  Treachery‌‌or‌‌alevosia‌  ‌
with‌  ‌a ‌ ‌bolo,‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌necessarily‌  ‌constitute‌  ‌abuse‌  ‌of‌  ‌superior‌‌  It‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌enough‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌attack‌  ‌was‌  ‌"sudden,"‌  ‌"unexpected,"‌  ‌and‌‌ 
strength‌  ‌on‌‌  their‌‌  part.‌‌  To‌‌  take‌‌  advantage‌‌  of‌‌  superior‌‌  strength,‌‌  it‌‌  is‌‌  1. The‌‌  settled‌‌   rule‌‌
  is‌‌
  that‌‌
  treachery‌‌   can‌‌
  exist‌‌
  even‌‌
  if‌‌
  the‌‌
  attack‌‌ is‌‌  "without‌  ‌any‌  ‌warning‌  ‌or‌  ‌provocation."‌  ‌There‌  ‌must‌  ‌also‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌‌
imperative‌  ‌that‌  ‌there‌  ‌be‌‌   a ‌‌showing‌‌   of‌‌
  purposely‌‌   using‌‌
  excessive‌‌  frontal,‌  ‌as‌  ‌long‌‌  as‌‌
  the‌‌
  attack‌‌
  is‌‌
  sudden‌‌   and‌‌
  unexpected,‌‌   giving‌‌  showing‌‌   that‌‌  the‌‌
  offender‌‌ ‌consciously‌‌ and‌‌ deliberately‌‌ adopted‌‌ 
force‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌out‌  ‌of‌  ‌proportion‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌means‌  ‌of‌  ‌defense‌‌  the‌‌victim‌‌no‌‌opportunity‌‌to‌‌repel‌‌it‌‌or‌‌to‌‌defend‌‌himself.‌   the‌‌   particular‌‌   means,‌‌   methods‌‌   and‌‌  forms‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  execution‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
available‌t‌ o‌‌the‌‌person‌‌attacked.‌  ‌ crime‌‌   which‌‌  tended‌‌   directly‌‌ to‌‌ insure‌‌ such‌‌ execution,‌‌ without‌‌ risk‌‌ to‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 116‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

Nighttime‌‌or‌‌nocturnidad‌  ‌
himself.‌  ‌ The‌‌   trial‌‌
  court‌‌
  is‌‌
  correct‌‌   appreciating‌‌ ‌dwelling‌‌ ‌as‌‌ an‌‌ aggravating‌‌ 
  in‌‌
a) particularly‌  ‌sought‌  ‌or‌  ‌darkness‌  ‌is‌  ‌taken‌‌
  advantage‌‌
  to‌‌
  commit‌‌  circumstance.‌  ‌Generally,‌  ‌dwelling‌  ‌is‌  ‌considered‌  ‌inherent‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Jaurigue‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌ the‌‌offense,‌‌or‌  ‌ crimes‌‌   which‌‌  can‌‌   only‌‌ be‌‌ committed‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ abode‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ victim,‌‌ such‌‌ 
as‌  ‌trespass‌  ‌to‌‌  dwelling‌‌   and‌‌   robbery‌‌
  in‌‌
  an‌‌
  inhabited‌‌
  place.‌‌   However,‌‌ 
b) facilitated‌‌the‌‌commission‌‌of‌‌the‌‌crime.‌  ‌
There‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌no‌  ‌treachery‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌victim‌  ‌was‌‌   "forewarned‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  in‌  ‌robbery‌  ‌with‌  ‌homicide‌  ‌the‌  ‌authors‌  ‌thereof‌  ‌can‌  ‌commit‌  ‌the‌‌ 
danger‌  ‌he‌  ‌was‌  ‌in,"‌  ‌"put‌  ‌on‌  ‌guard,"‌  ‌or‌  ‌otherwise‌  ‌"could‌  ‌anticipate‌‌  Nighttime‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌if‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌shown‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌place‌  ‌was‌‌  heinous‌  ‌crime‌  ‌without‌  ‌transgressing‌  ‌the‌  ‌sanctity‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌victim's‌‌ 
aggression‌‌   from‌‌   the‌‌   assailant"‌‌ as‌‌ when‌‌ "the‌‌ assault‌‌ is‌‌ preceded‌‌ by‌‌ a ‌‌ adequately‌‌lighted.‌  ‌ domicile.‌  ‌
heated‌  ‌exchange‌  ‌of‌  ‌words‌  ‌between‌‌   the‌‌  accused‌‌   and‌‌
  the‌‌
  victim;‌‌   or‌‌ 
when‌‌
  the‌‌
  victim‌‌   is‌‌  aware‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  hostility‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ assailant‌‌ towards‌‌ the‌‌  Abuse‌‌of‌‌superior‌‌strength‌  ‌ But‌  ‌treachery‌  ‌was‌  ‌incorrectly‌  ‌considered‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌trial‌  ‌court.‌  ‌The‌‌ 
former."‌  ‌ accused‌  ‌stand‌  ‌charged‌  ‌with,‌  ‌tried‌  ‌and‌  ‌convicted‌  ‌of‌  ‌robbery‌  ‌with‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Maron‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌ homicide‌  ‌which‌‌   is‌‌
  primarily‌‌
  classified‌‌   as‌‌
  a ‌‌crime‌‌  against‌‌
  property.‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Angeles‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌ As‌‌
  such,‌‌
  treachery‌‌   cannot‌‌
  be‌‌
  validly‌‌   appreciated‌‌   as‌‌
  an‌‌
  aggravating‌‌ 
Employment‌  ‌of‌  ‌means‌  ‌to‌  ‌weaken‌  ‌the‌  ‌defense‌  ‌is,‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌very‌  ‌least,‌‌ 
circumstance‌. ‌ ‌
subsumed‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌qualifying‌  ‌circumstance‌  ‌of‌  ‌abuse‌  ‌of‌‌   superior‌‌ 
Treachery‌  ‌may‌  ‌still‌  ‌be‌  ‌appreciated‌  ‌even‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌victim‌  ‌was‌‌  strength.‌  ‌
forewarned‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌   danger‌‌  to‌‌
  his‌‌
  person.‌‌
  What‌‌   is‌‌
  ‌decisive‌‌  ‌is‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌  While‌  ‌it‌  ‌appears‌  ‌that‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌five‌  ‌(5)‌  ‌malefactors‌  ‌took‌  ‌part‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
execution‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌attack‌  ‌made‌  ‌it‌  ‌impossible‌  ‌for‌‌
  the‌‌  victim‌‌  to‌‌
  defend‌‌  In‌  ‌determining‌  ‌whether‌  ‌the‌  ‌qualifying‌  ‌circumstance‌  ‌of‌  ‌employing‌‌  commission‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime,‌  ‌the‌‌   evidence‌‌   on‌‌
  record‌‌  does‌‌
  not‌‌
  disclose‌‌ 
himself‌‌or‌‌to‌‌retaliate.‌  ‌ means‌‌   to‌‌
  weaken‌‌   the‌‌
  defense‌‌  is‌‌
  present,‌‌ the‌‌ Court‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ guided‌‌ by‌‌  that‌‌
  "more‌‌   than‌‌
  three"‌‌
  persons‌‌   were‌‌   ‌armed‌, ‌‌and‌‌  robbery‌‌ in‌‌ "b
‌ and‌" ‌‌
the‌  ‌same‌  ‌standard‌  ‌in‌‌   determining‌‌   the‌‌
  presence‌‌  of‌‌
  abuse‌‌   of‌‌
  superior‌‌  means‌  ‌"‌more‌  ‌than‌  ‌three‌  ‌armed‌  ‌malefactors‌  ‌united‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
strength,‌  ‌i.e.,‌  ‌"‌notorious‌  ‌inequality‌  ‌of‌  ‌forces‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌  ‌victim‌‌  commission‌‌of‌‌robbery."‌  ‌
Evident‌‌premeditation‌  ‌ and‌‌   the‌‌
  aggressor/s‌‌ that‌‌ is‌‌ plainly‌‌ and‌‌ obviously‌‌ advantageous‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ 
To‌‌
  prove‌‌
  this‌‌
  aggravating‌‌
  circumstance,‌‌
  the‌‌
  prosecution‌‌ must‌‌ show‌‌ the‌‌  aggressor's‌‌   and‌‌
  purposely‌‌   selected‌‌   or‌‌
  taken‌‌
  advantage‌‌ of‌‌ to‌‌ facilitate‌‌  Nighttime‌‌
  ‌did‌‌ not‌‌ attend‌‌ the‌‌ commission‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ crime.‌‌ The‌‌ fact‌‌ that‌‌ 
following:‌  ‌ the‌‌commission‌‌of‌‌the‌‌crime.”‌  ‌ the‌‌
  offense‌‌
  was‌‌
  committed‌‌   at‌‌
  9:30‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  evening‌‌
  does‌‌
  not‌‌ suffice‌‌ to‌‌ 
sustain‌  ‌nocturnidad.‌  ‌It‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌shown‌  ‌that‌  ‌nocturnidad‌  ‌was‌‌ 
1) the‌‌time‌‌when‌‌the‌‌offender‌d
‌ etermined‌‌to‌‌commit‌t‌ he‌‌crime;‌  ‌ deliberately‌‌and‌‌intentionally‌‌sought‌. ‌ ‌
People‌‌v.‌‌Pagapulaan‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌
2) an‌  ‌act‌  ‌manifestly‌  ‌indicating‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌offender‌  ‌clung‌  ‌to‌  ‌his‌‌ 
To‌  ‌take‌  ‌advantage‌  ‌of‌  ‌superior‌  ‌strength‌  ‌means‌  ‌to‌  ‌purposely‌  ‌use‌‌  People‌‌v.‌‌Nasayao‌‌r‌ e‌‌Treachery‌  ‌
determination;‌‌and‌  ‌
excessive‌‌   force‌‌
  out‌‌
  of‌‌ proportion‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ means‌‌ of‌‌ defense‌‌ available‌‌ to‌‌ 
3) a‌  ‌lapse‌  ‌of‌  ‌time‌, ‌ ‌between‌  ‌the‌  ‌determination‌  ‌to‌  ‌commit‌  ‌the‌‌  the‌‌person‌‌attacked.‌‌   ‌ The‌  ‌victim,‌  ‌while‌  ‌squatting‌  ‌on‌  ‌top‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌bench‌  ‌and‌  ‌eating‌  ‌his‌  ‌meal‌‌ 
crime‌‌   and‌‌ the‌‌ execution‌‌ thereof,‌‌ sufficient‌‌ to‌‌ allow‌‌ the‌‌ offender‌‌  Unlike‌  ‌in‌  ‌treachery,‌‌
  where‌‌   the‌‌  victim‌‌  was‌‌
  not‌‌
  given‌‌
  the‌‌
  opportunity‌‌  with‌  ‌a ‌ ‌plate‌  ‌in‌  ‌one‌  ‌hand,‌  ‌was‌  ‌certainly‌  ‌in‌  ‌no‌  ‌position‌  ‌to‌  ‌defend‌‌ 
to‌‌reflect‌‌upon‌‌the‌‌consequences‌‌of‌‌his‌‌act.‌  ‌ to‌  ‌defend‌  ‌himself‌  ‌or‌  ‌repel‌  ‌the‌  ‌aggression,‌  ‌taking‌  ‌advantage‌  ‌of‌‌  himself‌  ‌or‌  ‌to‌  ‌retaliate.‌  ‌Accused‌  ‌may‌  ‌have‌  ‌forewarned‌  ‌Joves‌  ‌about‌‌ 
superior‌  ‌strength‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌mean‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌victim‌  ‌was‌‌  what‌  ‌he‌  ‌was‌  ‌about‌  ‌to‌  ‌do‌  ‌by‌  ‌telling‌  ‌him‌  ‌to‌  ‌finish‌  ‌his‌  ‌meal.‌‌ 
Mari‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ completely‌‌defenseless.‌  ‌ Nevertheless,‌‌   accused‌‌   did‌‌ not‌‌ wait‌‌ for‌‌ Joves‌‌ to‌‌ finish.‌‌ He‌‌ did‌‌ not‌‌ give‌‌ 
Joves‌  ‌the‌  ‌opportunity‌  ‌to‌  ‌stand‌  ‌up.‌  ‌Joves‌  ‌not‌  ‌only‌  ‌failed‌  ‌to‌‌   reply‌‌   to‌‌ 
The‌  ‌mere‌  ‌fact‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌victim‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌woman‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌per‌  ‌se‌  ‌an‌‌  accused’s‌‌ order‌‌ for‌‌ him‌‌ to‌‌ finish‌‌ his‌‌ meal,‌‌ but‌‌ also‌‌ failed‌‌ to‌‌ make‌‌ any‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Enojo‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌
aggravating‌  ‌circumstance‌. ‌‌There‌‌   was‌‌
  no‌‌
  finding‌‌  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  evidence‌‌  instinctive‌  ‌reaction‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌perceived‌  ‌threat‌  ‌posed‌  ‌by‌  ‌accused‌  ‌who‌‌ 
proved‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌in‌  ‌fact‌  ‌deliberately‌  ‌intended‌  ‌to‌  ‌offend‌  ‌or‌‌  It‌‌
  has‌‌
  been‌‌  consistently‌‌
  held‌‌  that‌‌
  an‌‌  attack‌  ‌made‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌man‌  ‌with‌  ‌a ‌ was‌‌
  holding‌‌ two‌‌ knives.‌‌ From‌‌ all‌‌ indications,‌‌ the‌‌ attack‌‌ on‌‌ Joves‌‌ was‌‌ 
insult‌  ‌the‌  ‌sex‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌victim,‌  ‌or‌  ‌showed‌  ‌manifest‌  ‌disrespect‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  deadly‌  ‌weapon‌  ‌upon‌  ‌an‌  ‌unarmed‌  ‌and‌  ‌defenseless‌  ‌woman‌‌  sudden‌‌and‌‌unexpected.‌  ‌
offended‌  ‌woman‌  ‌or‌  ‌displayed‌  ‌some‌  ‌specific‌  ‌insult‌  ‌or‌‌   disrespect‌‌   to‌‌  constitutes‌  ‌the‌  ‌circumstance‌  ‌of‌  ‌abuse‌  ‌of‌  ‌that‌‌  superiority‌‌   which‌‌  his‌‌ 
her‌‌  womanhood.‌‌   There‌‌ was‌‌ no‌‌ proof‌‌ of‌‌ specific‌‌ fact‌‌ or‌‌ circumstance,‌‌  sex‌‌  and‌‌
  the‌‌
  weapon‌‌
  used‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌ act‌‌ afforded‌‌ him,‌‌ and‌‌ from‌‌ which‌‌ the‌‌  People‌‌v.‌‌de‌‌la‌‌Torre‌‌r‌ e‌‌Dwelling‌  ‌
other‌‌   than‌‌
  the‌‌
  victim‌‌   is‌‌
  a ‌‌woman,‌‌   showing‌‌  insult‌‌ or‌‌ disregard‌‌ of‌‌ sex‌‌  woman‌‌was‌‌unable‌‌to‌‌defend‌‌herself.‌  ‌
in‌‌order‌‌that‌‌it‌‌may‌‌be‌‌considered‌‌as‌‌aggravating‌‌circumstance.‌  ‌ In‌‌
  ‌People‌‌   v.‌‌
  Parazo‌, ‌‌the‌‌
  “dwelling”‌‌   contemplated‌‌   in‌‌ Article‌‌ 14(3)‌‌ of‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Arizobal‌‌‌re‌‌Dwelling,‌‌Treachery,‌‌Band,‌‌Nighttime‌  ‌ the‌  ‌RPC‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌necessarily‌  ‌mean‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌victim‌  ‌owns‌  ‌the‌‌ 
place‌  ‌where‌  ‌he‌  ‌lives‌  ‌or‌  ‌dwells‌. ‌ ‌Be‌  ‌he‌  ‌a ‌ ‌lessee,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌boarder,‌  ‌or‌  ‌a ‌‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 117‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

People‌‌v.‌‌Aspili‌  ‌
bedspacer,‌‌  the‌‌
  place‌‌
  is‌‌   home,‌  ‌the‌‌
  his‌‌   sanctity‌‌   of‌‌ which‌‌ the‌‌ law‌‌  (204-245)‌  ‌
seeks‌‌  to‌‌
  protect‌. ‌‌The‌‌  fact‌‌  that‌‌  the‌‌ crime‌‌ was‌‌ consummated‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌  We‌  ‌find‌  ‌no‌  ‌merit‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌appellants'‌  ‌contention‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌
  lower‌‌   court‌‌ 
nearby‌  ‌house‌  ‌is‌  ‌also‌  ‌immaterial.‌  ‌Marita‌  ‌was‌  ‌forcibly‌  ‌taken‌  ‌by‌‌  erred‌‌   in‌‌ considering‌‌ ‌recidivism‌‌ ‌as‌‌ an‌‌ aggravating‌‌ circumstance.‌‌ All‌‌  a) public‌‌authority‌‌is‌‌ 
appellant‌  ‌from‌  ‌her‌  ‌dwelling‌  ‌house‌  ‌(kitchen)‌  ‌and‌  ‌then‌  ‌raped‌  ‌her.‌‌  the‌  ‌appellants‌  ‌are‌  ‌recidivists.‌‌   They‌‌
  were‌‌   serving‌‌
  sentence‌‌   by‌‌
  virtue‌‌  engaged‌‌in‌‌the‌‌exercise‌‌of‌‌ 
Dwelling‌  ‌is‌‌
  aggravating‌‌   if‌‌
  the‌‌
  victim‌‌   was‌‌
  taken‌‌   from‌‌
  his‌‌
  house‌‌  of‌‌
  a ‌‌final‌‌   judgment‌‌   of‌‌
  conviction‌‌   when‌‌   they‌‌  committed‌‌   the‌‌ offenses.‌‌  his‌‌functions;‌  ‌
although‌‌the‌‌offense‌‌was‌‌not‌‌completed‌‌therein.‌  ‌ Aspili,‌  ‌Magbanua,‌  ‌Mendoza‌  ‌and‌  ‌Rebutido‌  ‌have‌  ‌previously‌  ‌been‌‌  b) authority‌‌is‌‌not‌‌the‌‌ 
convicted‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌crimes‌  ‌of‌  ‌frustrated‌  ‌homicide,‌  ‌serious‌  ‌physical‌‌  Contempt‌‌or‌‌ 
person‌‌against‌‌whom‌‌the‌‌  Becomes‌‌Direct‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Matibag‌‌‌2015‌  ‌ injuries,‌  ‌theft,‌  ‌and‌  ‌murder‌  ‌and‌  ‌trespass‌  ‌to‌  ‌dwelling,‌  ‌respectively.‌‌  insult‌‌to‌‌the‌‌ 
crime‌‌is‌‌committed;‌  ‌ Assault‌‌if‌d‌ one‌‌ 
Both‌‌   Sales‌‌   and‌‌
  Aguirre‌‌   have‌‌
  previously‌‌   been‌‌ convicted‌‌ of‌‌ robbery‌‌ in‌‌  public‌‌ 
c) offender‌‌knows‌‌him‌‌to‌‌be‌‌  against‌ a
‌ uthority‌  ‌
The‌  ‌special‌  ‌aggravating‌  ‌circumstance‌  ‌of‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌unlicensed‌‌  band.‌  ‌ authorities‌  ‌
firearm‌, ‌ ‌which‌  ‌was‌  ‌duly‌  ‌alleged‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Information,‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌‌  a‌‌public‌‌authority;‌  ‌
appreciated‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  imposition‌‌   of‌‌ penalty.‌‌ When‌‌ Matibag‌‌ killed‌‌ Duhan‌‌  We‌  ‌likewise‌  ‌uphold‌  ‌the‌  ‌trial‌  ‌court's‌  ‌finding‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌  ‌was‌‌  d) presence‌‌has‌‌not‌‌ 
with‌‌   his‌‌ firearm,‌‌ the‌‌ use‌‌ thereof‌‌ was‌‌ unauthorized‌‌ under‌‌ the‌‌ purview‌‌  aggravated‌  ‌because‌  ‌it‌  ‌was‌  ‌committed‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌band‌. ‌ ‌All‌  ‌the‌  ‌six‌‌  prevented‌‌the‌‌ 
of‌  ‌RA‌  ‌8294‌  ‌and‌  ‌is‌  ‌equally‌  ‌appreciated‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌special‌  ‌aggravating‌‌  appellants‌‌   were‌‌  armed‌‌   when‌‌ they‌‌ boarded‌‌ the‌‌ vessel‌‌ and‌‌ perpetrated‌‌  commission‌‌of‌‌the‌‌crime.‌  ‌
circumstance.‌‌   As‌‌
  a ‌‌result,‌‌
  the‌‌
  imposition‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ maximum‌‌ penalty‌‌ of‌‌  their‌  ‌dastardly‌  ‌acts.‌  ‌There‌  ‌is‌  ‌also‌  ‌abuse‌‌
  of‌‌
  superior‌‌   strength‌, ‌‌
death,‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌reduced‌  ‌to‌  ‌reclusion‌  ‌perpetua‌  ‌in‌  ‌light‌  ‌of‌  ‌RA‌  ‌9346,‌‌  since‌‌ most‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ victims‌‌ were‌‌ women‌‌ and‌‌ children‌‌ ranging‌‌ from‌‌ 2 ‌‌to‌‌  a) Deliberate‌‌intent‌‌to‌‌offend‌‌ 
stands‌‌   proper.‌‌   To‌‌
  this,‌‌ the‌‌ Court‌‌ adds‌‌ that‌‌ Matibag‌‌ is‌not‌‌
   eligible‌‌ for‌  9‌‌years‌‌old.‌  ‌ or‌‌insult‌‌(‌sine‌‌qua‌‌non‌) ‌ ‌
parole.‌  ‌ Rank‌:‌‌there‌‌should‌‌be‌‌a ‌‌
However,‌  ‌the‌  ‌aggravating‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌of‌  ‌nocturnity‌  ‌and‌  ‌craft‌‌ 
Insult‌‌or‌‌  difference‌‌in‌‌the‌‌social‌‌  Disregard‌‌of‌‌sex‌‌ 
should‌‌ not‌‌ have‌‌ been‌‌ considered‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ lower‌‌ court.‌‌ There‌‌ was‌‌ no‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Perreras‌‌r‌ e‌‌Dwelling‌  ‌ disregard‌‌of‌‌  condition‌‌of‌‌the‌‌offender‌‌and‌‌  absorbed‌i‌ n‌‌ 
showing‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌appellants‌  ‌purposely‌  ‌sought‌  ‌the‌  ‌cover‌  ‌of‌  ‌night‌‌ 
Dwelling‌‌
  ‌aggravates‌‌  a ‌‌felony‌‌ where‌‌ the‌‌ crime‌‌ was‌‌ committed‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌  when‌  ‌they‌  ‌committed‌  ‌the‌  ‌special‌  ‌complex‌  ‌crime‌  ‌of‌  ‌robbery‌  ‌with‌‌  offended‌‌party‌  ‌ offended;‌  ‌ treachery;‌  ‌
dwelling‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  offended‌‌   party‌‌  if‌‌
  the‌‌  latter‌‌
  has‌‌  not‌‌ given‌‌ provocation‌‌  homicide.‌  ‌Neither‌  ‌did‌  ‌the‌  ‌appellants‌  ‌employ‌  ‌craft,‌  ‌since‌  ‌they‌  ‌had‌‌  Age‌:‌‌there‌‌is‌‌a‌‌considerable‌‌ 
or‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌victim‌‌   was‌‌
  killed‌‌  inside‌‌   his‌‌  house.‌‌
  Although‌‌   ‌accused‌‌
  was‌‌  already‌‌   boarded‌‌   the‌‌ vessel‌‌ when‌‌ they‌‌ pretended‌‌ to‌‌ buy‌‌ Tanduay‌‌ Rum‌‌  gap;‌  ‌
outside‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ house‌‌ ‌when‌‌ he‌‌ fired,‌‌ the‌‌ victim‌‌ was‌‌ inside‌‌ his‌‌ house.‌  in‌  ‌exchange‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌dried‌  ‌fish‌‌  and‌‌
  chicken‌‌
  they‌‌
  were‌‌  carrying.‌‌
  Even‌‌  Sex‌:‌‌Female.‌  ‌
For‌‌   the‌‌   circumstance‌‌ of‌‌ dwelling‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ considered,‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ necessary‌‌  without‌‌   such‌‌  pretense,‌‌   they‌‌   could‌‌  nonetheless‌‌  have‌‌ carried‌‌ out‌‌ their‌‌ 
that‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌should‌  ‌have‌  ‌actually‌  ‌entered‌  ‌the‌  ‌dwelling‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  unlawful‌‌scheme.‌  ‌ it‌‌is‌‌enough‌‌that‌‌ 
a) offended‌‌party‌‌must‌‌not‌‌ 
victim‌  ‌to‌  ‌commit‌  ‌the‌  ‌offense;‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌enough‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌victim‌  ‌was‌‌  the‌‌victim‌‌was‌‌ 
attacked‌‌inside‌‌his‌‌own‌‌house‌. ‌ ‌ Review‌‌of‌‌Aggravating‌‌Circumstances‌  ‌ Dwelling‌  ‌ give‌‌provocation‌‌(s‌ ine‌‌ 
attacked‌‌inside‌‌ 
qua‌‌non‌) ‌ ‌
Circumstance‌  ‌ Requisites‌  ‌ Notes‌  ‌ his‌‌own‌‌house‌  ‌
People‌‌v.‌‌Taño‌  ‌
Inherent‌i‌ n‌‌  ★ Betrayal‌‌of‌‌ 
The‌  ‌Court‌  ‌finds‌  ‌that‌  ‌dwelling‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌appreciated‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌‌  a) offended‌‌party‌‌had‌‌trusted‌‌ 
Malversation‌‌  confidence‌‌ 
aggravating‌‌   circumstance.‌‌   The‌‌  building‌‌   where‌‌   the‌‌
  two‌‌
  offenses‌‌ were‌‌  the‌‌offender;‌  ‌
(217);‌‌  NOT‌‌ 
committed‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌  ‌entirely‌  ‌for‌  ‌dwelling‌‌   purposes‌. ‌‌The‌‌   evidence‌‌  b) offender‌‌abused‌‌such‌‌ 
shows‌  ‌that‌  ‌it‌  ‌consisted‌  ‌of‌  ‌two‌  ‌floors:‌  ‌the‌  ‌ground‌  ‌floor,‌  ‌which‌  ‌was‌‌  Falsification‌‌of‌‌  aggravating‌  ‌
a) Done‌‌by‌‌a‌‌public‌‌officer;‌  ‌ trust‌‌by‌‌committing‌‌a ‌‌
being‌‌  operated‌‌   as‌‌
  a ‌‌video‌‌ rental‌‌ shop,‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ upper‌‌ floor,‌‌ which‌‌ was‌‌  Abuse‌‌of‌‌public‌‌  document‌‌by‌‌  Abuse‌‌of‌‌  ★ Confidence‌‌ 
b) Took‌‌advantage‌o ‌ f‌‌  crime‌‌against‌‌the‌‌offended‌‌ 
used‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌residence.‌  ‌It‌  ‌was‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌video‌‌
  rental‌‌   shop‌‌
  where‌‌   the‌‌
  rape‌‌  position‌  ‌ public‌‌  confidence‌  ‌ must‌‌be‌‌ 
position‌  ‌ party;‌  ‌
was‌‌ committed.‌‌ True,‌‌ the‌‌ victim‌‌ was‌‌ dragged‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ kitchen‌‌ and‌‌ toilet‌‌  officers(171);‌‌  immediate‌‌ 
but‌‌
  these‌‌   two‌‌   sections‌‌ were‌‌ adjacent‌‌ to‌‌ and‌‌ formed‌‌ parts‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ store.‌‌  c) abuse‌‌of‌‌confidence‌‌ 
Art‌‌19‌‌par‌‌3;‌‌  and‌‌personal‌ 
Being‌  ‌a ‌ ‌commercial‌  ‌shop‌  ‌that‌  ‌caters‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌public‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌video‌‌  facilitated‌‌the‌‌ 
Crimes‌‌by‌‌public‌‌  ★ Stealing‌‌the‌‌ 
rental‌‌ outlet‌‌ was‌‌ open‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ public.‌‌ As‌‌ such,‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ attributed‌‌ the‌‌  commission‌‌of‌‌the‌‌crime‌  ‌
officers‌‌  property‌‌of‌‌ 
sanctity‌‌of‌‌privacy‌‌‌that‌‌jurisprudence‌‌accords‌‌to‌‌residential‌‌abodes.‌‌  
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 118‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

host‌‌is‌‌with‌‌  together,‌‌taking‌d ‌ irect‌‌  inducement.‌  ‌ ★ If‌‌offender‌‌ 


abuse‌‌of‌‌  part‌‌in‌‌the‌‌execution‌‌of‌‌  a) Accused‌‌on‌‌trial‌‌for‌‌an‌‌  has‌‌not‌‌been‌‌ 
confidence‌  ‌ the‌‌act;‌  ‌ offense;‌  ‌ previously‌ 
b) previously‌s‌ erved‌‌  punished‌‌or‌‌ 
Obvious‌‌  ungratefulness‌‌must‌‌be‌‌obvious,‌‌i.e.‌‌manifest‌‌and‌‌  COMMON‌‌ELEMENTS‌‌FOR‌‌PAR‌‌6 ‌ ‌ sentence‌‌‌for‌‌another‌‌  served‌‌ 
ungratefulness‌  ‌ clear.‌  ‌ a) facilitated‌‌the‌‌commission‌‌of‌‌the‌‌crime;‌‌OR‌  ‌ offense‌‌of‌‌an‌‌equal‌‌or‌‌  sentence,‌‌ 
b) especially‌‌sought‌‌by‌‌the‌‌offender‌‌to‌‌insure‌‌the‌‌commission‌‌  Reiteracion‌‌or‌‌ 
greater‌‌penalty,‌‌or‌‌for‌‌two‌‌  reiteracion‌‌ 
Chief‌‌Executive‌:‌‌  of‌‌the‌‌crime‌‌or‌‌for‌‌the‌‌purpose‌‌of‌‌impunity;‌‌OR‌  ‌ habituality‌  ‌
or‌‌more‌‌crimes‌‌of‌‌a ‌‌ is‌‌NOT‌‌ 
a) Public‌‌authority‌‌must‌‌be‌‌  Need‌‌not‌‌be‌‌in‌‌  c) offender‌‌took‌‌advantage‌‌for‌‌the‌‌purpose‌‌of‌‌impunity;‌  ‌ lighter‌‌penalty‌‌than‌‌that‌‌  attendant;‌  ‌
in‌‌their‌‌office‌‌while‌‌  the‌‌palace;‌‌His‌‌  for‌‌the‌‌new‌‌offense;‌  ‌ ★ Reiteracion‌ 
Palace‌‌of‌‌the‌‌  Calamity‌‌ 
performing‌‌his‌‌duty;‌  ‌ mere‌‌presence‌‌  c) be‌‌convicted‌‌of‌‌the‌‌new‌‌  NOT‌‌ 
Chief‌‌Executive‌  ‌ includes‌‌ 
b) He‌‌may‌‌be‌‌the‌‌offended‌‌  aggravates;‌‌He‌‌  offense.‌  ‌ ALWAYS‌‌ 
party‌  ‌ need‌‌not‌‌perform‌‌  Calamity‌‌or‌‌  a) Offender‌‌must‌‌take‌‌  conflagration,‌‌ 
aggravating‌  ‌
his‌‌duties;‌  ‌ misfortune‌  ‌ advantage‌‌of‌‌calamity;‌  ‌ shipwreck,‌‌ 
earthquake,‌‌  a) there‌‌must‌‌be‌‌at‌‌least‌‌two‌‌ 
a) crime‌‌occurred‌‌in‌‌that‌‌  Two‌‌alternative‌  ‌ epidemic‌  ‌ If‌‌not‌‌alleged‌‌to‌‌ 
Consideration‌  ‌ (2)‌‌principals,‌‌one‌‌by‌‌ 
period‌‌of‌‌darkness‌‌  tests‌‌for‌‌  qualify‌‌the‌‌crime‌‌ 
of‌‌price,‌‌reward‌‌  inducement‌‌and‌‌the‌‌ 
beginning‌‌at‌‌end‌‌of‌‌dusk‌‌  nocturnity:‌  ‌ a) armed‌‌persons‌‌took‌‌part‌‌  to‌‌murder,‌‌ 
Not‌‌considered‌‌  or‌‌promise‌  ‌ other/s‌‌by‌‌direct‌‌ 
and‌‌ending‌‌at‌‌dawn;‌  ‌ a) Objective‌:‌‌  in‌‌the‌‌commission‌‌of‌‌the‌‌  GENERIC‌‌only‌  ‌
Nocturnidad‌‌or‌‌  when‌‌both‌‌  participation;‌  ‌
b) place‌‌must‌‌not‌‌be‌‌  facilitates‌‌  crime‌‌either‌‌directly‌‌or‌‌ 
Nighttime‌  ‌ parties‌‌are‌‌ 
illuminated;‌  ‌ crime;‌  ‌ Aid‌‌of‌‌armed‌‌  indirectly;‌  ‌ When‌‌the‌‌crime‌‌committed‌‌is‌‌ 
EQUALLY‌‌armed;‌  ‌ Great‌‌waste‌‌ 
c) crime‌‌must‌‌begin‌‌and‌‌be‌‌  b) Subjective‌:‌‌  men‌  ‌ b) accused‌‌availed‌‌himself‌‌  parricide,‌‌there‌‌is‌‌only‌‌ 
Not‌‌considered‌‌if‌‌  and‌‌ruin‌  ‌
accomplished‌‌in‌‌the‌‌  purposely‌‌  of‌‌their‌‌aid,‌‌or‌‌relied‌‌upon‌‌  GENERIC‌‌aggravating‌  ‌
conspiracy‌‌is‌‌ 
nighttime;‌  ‌ sought‌  ‌ them‌‌during‌‌the‌‌ 
present‌  ‌ Means‌‌are‌‌ 
commission‌‌of‌‌the‌‌crime‌  ‌ Explosion‌  ‌ If‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌intent‌  ‌to‌‌
  kill,‌‌
  using‌‌ 
purposely‌‌used‌‌ 
a) The‌‌place‌‌provides‌‌no‌‌  explosion,‌‌crime‌‌is‌‌MURDER‌  ‌
"‌For‌‌the‌‌  a) Offender‌‌is‌‌on‌‌trial‌‌for‌‌an‌‌offense;‌  ‌ to‌‌accomplish‌‌a ‌‌
reasonable‌‌possibility‌‌of‌‌ 
purpose‌‌of‌‌  b) previously‌c‌ onvicted‌‌by‌‌final‌‌judgment‌‌of‌‌  If‌  ‌person‌  ‌dies‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌result‌‌  criminal‌‌ 
the‌‌victim‌‌receiving‌‌some‌‌  without‌  ‌intent,‌  ‌COMPLEX‌‌  purpose.‌  ‌
impunity‌"‌‌  another‌‌crime;‌  ‌
help;‌  ‌ Derailment‌‌of‌  CRIME‌  ‌of‌‌   damage‌‌   to‌‌
  means‌‌   of‌‌ 
In‌‌an‌‌  means‌‌to‌‌prevent‌‌  c) both‌‌offenses‌‌embraced‌‌in‌‌same‌‌title‌‌of‌‌Code;‌  ‌
b) accused‌‌sought‌‌the‌‌  Locomotive‌  ‌ communication‌  ‌with‌‌ 
uninhabited‌‌  offender's‌‌  d) offender‌‌be‌‌convicted‌‌of‌‌new‌‌offense‌  ‌
solitude‌‌for‌‌an‌‌easy‌‌and‌‌  homicide‌‌   (Arts‌‌ 330‌‌ and‌‌ 249‌‌ in‌‌ 
place‌  ‌ recognition,‌‌or‌‌  ★ Also‌‌applies‌‌if‌‌both‌‌offenses‌‌violate‌‌the‌‌  rel‌‌to‌‌Art‌‌4‌‌and‌‌48);‌  ‌
uninterrupted‌‌  Recidivist‌  ‌
secure‌‌himself‌‌  same‌‌Ordinance/SPL‌  ‌
accomplishment‌‌of‌‌the‌‌ 
from‌‌detection‌‌  ★ Controlling‌‌is‌‌time‌‌of‌‌TRIAL,‌‌not‌‌the‌‌  a) time‌‌when‌‌offender‌‌ 
crime,‌‌and‌‌to‌‌insure‌‌  After‌‌offender‌‌ 
and‌‌punishment.‌  ‌ commission‌‌of‌‌crime;‌  ‌ determined‌‌to‌‌commit‌‌ 
concealment‌‌of‌‌offense;‌  ‌ had‌‌determined‌‌ 
Evident‌‌  crime;‌  ‌
★ The‌‌commission‌‌of‌‌crime‌‌and‌‌rendering‌‌  to‌‌commit‌‌the‌‌ 
Premeditation‌  ‌ b) act‌‌indicating‌‌culprit‌‌ 
a) at‌‌least‌‌four‌; ‌ ‌ One‌‌of‌‌the‌‌four‌‌  of‌‌judgment‌‌must‌‌be‌‌successive:‌‌e.g.‌  ‌ crime,‌‌2nd‌‌req.‌‌ 
By‌‌a‌‌band‌  ‌ b) all‌f‌ our‌‌are‌a
‌ rmed‌; ‌ ‌ should‌‌not‌‌be‌‌a‌‌  Crime‌‌1‌‌→‌‌Judgment‌‌1‌‌→‌‌Crime‌‌2‌‌→‌‌Judgment‌‌2 ‌ ‌ clung‌‌to‌‌this‌‌ 
exists.‌  ‌
c) all‌‌shall‌‌have‌‌acted‌‌  principal‌‌by‌‌  determination;‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 119‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

c) sufficient‌‌lapse‌‌of‌‌time‌‌  disgrace‌‌and‌‌  The‌  ‌intoxication‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌


  offender‌‌
  shall‌‌   be‌‌
  taken‌‌
  into‌‌
  consideration‌‌ 
between‌‌determination‌‌  obloquy‌‌to‌‌the‌‌  as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌mitigating‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌offender‌  ‌has‌‌   committed‌‌   a ‌‌
and‌‌execution,‌‌allowing‌‌  material‌‌injury‌‌  felony‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌state‌  ‌of‌  ‌intoxication,‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌habitual‌  ‌or‌‌ 
REFLECTION‌‌and‌‌COOL‌‌  caused‌‌by‌‌the‌‌  subsequent‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌plan‌  ‌to‌  ‌commit‌  ‌said‌  ‌felony‌  ‌but‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌‌ 
intoxication‌  ‌is‌  ‌habitual‌  ‌or‌  ‌intentional,‌  ‌it‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌‌ 
THOUGHT‌  ‌ crime.‌  ‌
aggravating‌c‌ ircumstance.‌  ‌
Act‌‌done‌‌in‌‌order‌‌  There‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌unlawful‌  ‌entry‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Orilla‌‌‌re‌‌relationship‌  ‌
Craft‌  ‌ involves‌  ‌intellectual‌  ‌trickery‌‌  not‌‌to‌‌arouse‌‌  Unlawful‌‌Entry‌  ‌ when‌  ‌an‌  ‌entrance‌  ‌is‌  ‌effected‌‌  NOT‌‌for‌‌escape‌  ‌
and‌‌cunning‌  ‌ suspicion‌‌of‌‌the‌‌  by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌way‌  ‌not‌‌
  intended‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌  The‌  ‌Amended‌  ‌Information‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌  ‌allege‌  ‌Remilyn’s‌‌
  minor‌‌
  age.‌‌
  ‌The‌‌ 
purpose.‌‌   ‌ prosecution’s‌  ‌failure‌  ‌to‌‌
  allege‌‌   specifically‌‌   Remilyn’s‌‌
  minor‌‌   age‌‌ 
victim;‌  ‌
prevents‌‌the‌‌transformation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌crime‌‌to‌‌its‌‌qualified‌‌form‌. ‌ ‌
Breaking‌w ‌ all,‌‌ 
Differs‌‌from‌‌  Offender‌  ‌need‌  ‌not‌  ‌enter‌  ‌the‌  ‌building‌  ‌for‌‌ 
involves‌‌insidious‌‌words‌‌or‌‌  roof,‌‌floor,‌‌door,‌‌  Based‌  ‌on‌  ‌a ‌ ‌strict‌  ‌interpretation,‌  ‌alternative‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌are‌  ‌thus‌‌ 
Craft‌‌in‌‌that‌‌  FORCIBLE‌E ‌ NTRY‌‌to‌‌be‌‌aggravating.‌  ‌
machinations‌‌used‌‌to‌‌induce‌‌  or‌‌window‌  ‌ not‌  ‌aggravating‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌per‌  ‌se.‌  ‌Jurisprudence‌  ‌considers‌‌ 
Fraud‌‌involves‌‌ 
Fraud‌  ‌ the‌‌victim‌‌in‌‌a‌‌manner‌‌which‌‌  relationship‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌  ‌aggravating‌‌   circumstance‌‌   in‌‌
  crimes‌‌
  against‌‌ 
direct‌‌  Aid‌‌of‌‌person‌‌  chastity‌. ‌‌However,‌‌   ‌rape‌‌
  is‌‌
  no‌‌
  longer‌‌  a ‌‌crime‌‌
  against‌‌ chastity‌‌ for‌‌ 
would‌‌enable‌‌the‌‌offender‌‌to‌‌  1. Two‌‌different‌‌aggravating:‌‌aid‌‌of‌‌minors‌‌ 
carry‌‌out‌‌his‌‌criminal‌‌design.‌  ‌ inducement‌‌by‌‌  under‌‌15‌  ‌ under‌‌15,‌‌means‌‌of‌‌motor‌‌vehicle;‌  ‌
it‌‌is‌‌now‌‌classified‌‌as‌‌a‌c‌ rime‌‌against‌‌persons‌. ‌ ‌
insidious‌‌words‌  ‌
2. Estafa‌‌cannot‌‌be‌‌committed‌‌by‌‌means‌‌of‌‌ 
Means‌‌of‌‌motor‌‌  People‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Bondoc‌  ‌lack‌  ‌of‌  ‌instruction‌  ‌generally‌  ‌mitigating‌‌ 
involves‌  ‌resorting‌  ‌to‌  ‌any‌  ‌device‌  ‌to‌  ‌conceal‌‌  motor‌‌vehicle‌  ‌
Disguise‌  ‌ vehicle‌  ‌ except‌i‌ n‌‌Crimes‌‌against‌‌property‌‌and‌‌chastity‌  ‌
identity‌  ‌
a) Injury‌‌caused‌‌be‌‌  A‌  ‌close‌  ‌examination‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌record‌  ‌is‌  ‌indicative‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌lack‌  ‌of‌‌ 
a) There‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌‌  The‌‌culprit‌‌  instruction‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌offender.‌  ‌There‌  ‌is‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌  ‌sufficient‌‌ 
deliberately‌‌increased‌‌ 
Abuse‌‌of‌‌  notorious‌  ‌inequality‌  ‌of‌‌  enjoys‌‌and‌‌  justification‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌finding‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌mitigating‌  ‌circumstance‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Incompatible‌‌  by‌‌causing‌o
‌ ther‌‌wrong‌; ‌ ‌
superior‌‌  forces‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌  ‌two‌‌  Cruelty‌  ‌ delights‌‌in‌‌  above‌  ‌character‌  ‌that‌  ‌would‌  ‌lessen‌  ‌the‌  ‌rigor‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Anti-Subversion‌‌ 
with‌  ‌Passion‌  o
‌ r‌‌  b) Other‌‌wrong‌‌is‌‌ 
parties;‌  ‌ making‌‌his‌‌  law.‌  ‌
strength‌  ‌ obfuscation‌  ‌
b) Offender‌  ‌takes‌  ‌advantage‌‌  unnecessary‌i‌ n‌‌ 
victim‌‌suffer.‌  ‌
of‌‌this‌‌inequality.‌  ‌ accomplishing‌‌the‌‌crime;‌  ‌
People‌‌v.‌‌Fontillas‌‌2
‌ 010‌‌‌re‌‌intoxication‌  ‌
a) At‌‌the‌‌time‌‌of‌‌the‌‌attack,‌‌  a) Applies‌‌to‌‌  e. Alternative‌  ‌ The‌  ‌Court‌  ‌of‌  ‌Appeals‌  ‌correctly‌  ‌rejected‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused-appellant's‌‌ 
victim‌‌was‌‌not‌‌in‌‌a ‌‌ crimes‌‌  assertion‌‌ that‌‌ his‌‌ extreme‌‌ i‌ ntoxication‌‌ ‌from‌‌ alcohol‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ night‌‌ of‌‌ 
position‌‌to‌‌defend‌‌himself‌‌  against‌‌  Alternative‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌are‌  ‌those‌  ‌which‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌taken‌  ‌into‌‌  the‌‌
  rape‌‌
  should‌‌ be‌‌ appreciated‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌mitigating‌‌ circumstance.‌‌ Accused‌‌ 
Alevosia‌‌or‌‌  or‌‌retaliate;‌‌AND‌  ‌ persons;‌  ‌ consideration‌‌ as‌‌ aggravating‌‌ or‌‌ mitigating‌‌ according‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ nature‌‌ and‌‌  did‌‌
  not‌‌
  present‌‌  any‌‌  evidence‌‌   that‌‌
  his‌‌
  intoxication‌‌  was‌‌
  ‌not‌‌
  habitual‌‌ 
Treachery‌  ‌ b) offender‌‌consciously‌‌  b) mode‌‌of‌‌  effects‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌conditions‌  ‌attending‌  ‌its‌‌  or‌‌subsequent‌‌to‌‌the‌‌plan‌‌to‌‌commit‌‌the‌‌rape‌. ‌ ‌
commission.‌‌   They‌‌ are‌‌ the‌‌ relationship,‌‌ intoxication‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ degree‌‌ of‌‌ 
adopted‌‌the‌‌particular‌‌  attack‌‌ 
instruction‌‌and‌‌education‌‌of‌‌the‌‌offender.‌  ‌
means,‌‌methods,‌‌or‌‌  consciously‌‌  People‌‌v.‌‌Dawaton‌  ‌
forms.‌  ‌ adopted.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌alternative‌  ‌circumstance‌  ‌of‌  ‌relationship‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌taken‌  ‌into‌‌ 
The‌  ‌trial‌  ‌court‌  ‌erred‌  ‌in‌  ‌not‌  ‌appreciating‌  ‌the‌  ‌alternative‌‌ 
consideration‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌offended‌  ‌party‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌spouse,‌  ‌ascendant,‌‌ 
A‌‌circumstance‌‌  circumstance‌  ‌of‌  ‌intoxication‌  ‌in‌  ‌favor‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌. ‌ ‌There‌‌ 
descendant,‌  ‌legitimate,‌  ‌natural,‌  ‌or‌  ‌adopted‌  ‌brother‌  ‌or‌  ‌sister,‌  ‌or‌‌ 
must‌  ‌tend‌  ‌to‌  ‌make‌‌
  the‌‌
  effects‌‌  pertaining‌‌to‌‌the‌‌  being‌‌  no‌‌
  indication‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌
  accused‌‌   was‌‌
  a ‌‌habitual‌‌
  drunkard‌‌   or‌‌ that‌‌ 
relative‌‌by‌‌affinity‌‌in‌‌the‌‌same‌‌degrees‌‌of‌‌the‌‌offender.‌  ‌
Ignominy‌  ‌ of‌‌
  the‌‌ crime‌‌ more‌‌ humiliating,‌‌  his‌‌
  alcoholic‌‌   intake‌‌
  was‌‌ intended‌‌ to‌‌ fortify‌‌ his‌‌ resolve‌‌ to‌‌ commit‌‌ the‌‌ 
moral‌‌order,‌‌  crime,‌  ‌the‌  ‌circumstance‌  ‌of‌  ‌intoxication‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌credited‌  ‌in‌  ‌his‌‌ 
putting‌‌the‌‌victim‌‌to‌‌shame;‌  ‌
which‌‌adds‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 120‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

7. those‌‌
  who‌‌
  having‌‌
  been‌‌  granted‌‌ conditional‌‌ pardon‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ Chief‌‌ 
favor.‌  ‌
Executive‌‌shall‌‌have‌v‌ iolated‌‌the‌‌terms‌t‌ hereof;‌‌   ‌ 2. The‌‌ Code‌‌ provides‌‌ for‌‌ attending‌‌ or‌‌ modifying‌‌ circumstances‌‌ 
which‌  ‌when‌  ‌present‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌commission‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌felony‌  ‌affects‌‌ 
3. Application‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Indeterminate‌‌Sentence‌‌Law‌  ‌ 8. whose‌‌
  maximum‌‌
  term‌‌
  of‌‌
  imprisonment‌‌
  ‌does‌‌ not‌‌ exceed‌‌ one‌‌  the‌  ‌computation‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  penalty‌‌   to‌‌
  be‌‌
  imposed‌‌   on‌‌
  a ‌‌convict.‌‌ 
year.‌  ‌ This‌  ‌penalty,‌  ‌as‌  ‌thus‌  ‌modified,‌  ‌is‌  ‌referred‌  ‌to‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Procedure‌  ‌
"‌imposable‌‌penalty‌."‌  ‌
1. Getting‌‌the‌‌MAXIMUM‌‌range‌  ‌ In‌‌summary‌  ‌
3. From‌  ‌this‌  ‌imposable‌  ‌penalty,‌  ‌the‌  ‌court‌  ‌chooses‌  ‌a ‌ ‌single‌‌ 
a. Start‌‌with‌‌the‌‌imposable‌‌penalty‌‌of‌‌the‌‌RPC;‌  ‌ 1. Determine‌‌first‌‌the‌d
‌ egree‌b
‌ efore‌‌fixing‌‌the‌‌periods;‌  ‌ fixed‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌(also‌  ‌called‌  ‌a ‌ ‌straight‌  ‌penalty)‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌‌ 
b. If‌  ‌there‌  ‌are‌  ‌privileged‌  ‌mitigating‌  ‌(Art‌  ‌68-69),‌  ‌or‌  ‌special‌‌  a. Take‌  ‌the‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌principal‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌consummated‌‌  "‌penalty‌‌   actually‌‌ imposed‌" ‌‌on‌‌ a ‌‌convict,‌‌ i.e.,‌‌ the‌‌ prison‌‌ 
stage‌‌as‌‌the‌‌starting‌‌point;‌  ‌ term‌‌he‌‌has‌‌to‌‌serve.‌  ‌
mitigating‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌(Art‌  ‌64[5]),‌  ‌lower‌  ‌the‌  ‌penalty‌‌ 
first‌‌by‌‌1‌‌degree‌‌or‌‌more,‌‌then‌‌start‌‌from‌‌there.‌  ‌ b. Disregard‌‌the‌‌attendant‌‌circumstances;‌  ‌ 4. With‌  ‌the‌  ‌passage‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌ISL,‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌created‌  ‌a ‌ ‌prison‌‌
  term‌‌ 
which‌‌   consists‌‌  of‌‌
  a ‌‌minimum‌‌ and‌‌ maximum‌‌ term‌‌ called‌‌ the‌‌ 
2. Getting‌‌the‌‌MINIMUM‌‌range‌; ‌ ‌ c. Consider‌‌the‌‌factors‌‌in‌‌graduating‌‌by‌‌degree.‌  ‌ indeterminate‌  ‌sentence‌. ‌ ‌Thus,‌  ‌the‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌actually‌‌ 
a. The‌  ‌degree‌  ‌next‌  ‌lower‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌maximum‌  ‌range‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌‌  2. Determine‌  ‌the‌‌
  ‌proper‌‌
  period‌‌
  in‌‌
  accordance‌‌
  with‌‌
  Arts‌‌
  62‌‌
  and‌‌  imposed‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌pre-ISL‌  ‌regime‌  ‌became‌  ‌the‌  ‌maximum‌‌ 
term‌‌under‌‌the‌‌ISL‌‌regime.‌  ‌
minimum‌‌range‌‌of‌‌the‌‌indeterminate‌‌sentence.‌  64‌‌by‌‌considering‌‌the‌‌following:‌  ‌
3. Getting‌‌the‌‌MAXIMUM‌T
‌ ERM‌  ‌ a. Ordinary‌‌mitigating‌‌—‌‌minimum‌‌period;‌  ‌ People‌‌v.‌‌Simon‌  ‌
a. Consider‌‌  the‌‌
  presence‌‌
  of‌‌
  attendant‌‌
  circumstances‌‌
  in‌‌ order‌‌  b. Generic‌‌aggravating‌‌—‌‌maximum‌‌period;‌  ‌
to‌‌determine‌‌the‌‌period‌‌of‌‌the‌‌penalty;‌  ‌ c. Alternative‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌— ‌ ‌depends‌  ‌on‌  ‌whether‌  ‌it‌‌  1. If‌  ‌the‌  ‌judgment‌  ‌which‌  ‌could‌  ‌be‌  ‌affected‌  ‌and‌  ‌modified‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
b. Said‌  ‌period‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌the‌  ‌actual‌  ‌maximum‌  ‌term‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  mitigates‌‌or‌‌aggravates;‌  ‌ reduced‌  ‌penalties‌  ‌provided‌  ‌in‌  ‌Republic‌  ‌Act‌  ‌No.‌  ‌7659‌  ‌has‌‌ 
already‌  ‌become‌  ‌final‌  ‌and‌  ‌executory‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌is‌‌ 
indeterminate‌‌sentence;‌  ‌ d. Complex‌‌crimes‌‌—‌‌always‌‌maximum;‌  ‌ serving‌  ‌sentence‌  ‌thereunder,‌  ‌then‌  ‌practice,‌  ‌procedure‌  ‌and‌‌ 
4. Getting‌‌the‌‌MINIMUM‌T
‌ ERM‌  ‌ e. Crimes‌  ‌due‌  ‌to‌  ‌error‌  ‌in‌  ‌personae‌  ‌(Art‌‌
  49),‌‌
  the‌‌
  penalty‌‌
  for‌‌  pragmatic‌  ‌considerations‌  ‌would‌  ‌warrant‌  ‌and‌  ‌necessitate‌  ‌the‌‌ 
matter‌‌   being‌‌
  brought‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  judicial‌‌   authorities‌‌   for‌‌ relief‌‌ under‌‌ a ‌‌
a. Shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌taken‌  ‌from‌  ‌any‌  ‌period‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌minimum‌  ‌range,‌‌  the‌  ‌lesser‌  ‌offense,‌  ‌as‌  ‌between‌  ‌that‌  ‌committed‌  ‌and‌‌  writ‌‌of‌‌habeas‌‌corpus‌. ‌ ‌
taking‌  ‌into‌  ‌consideration‌  ‌the‌  ‌factors‌  ‌stated‌  ‌in‌  ‌People‌  ‌v.‌‌  intended,‌‌is‌‌imposed‌‌in‌‌the‌m ‌ aximum‌‌period;‌  ‌
2. Mitigating‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌and‌  ‌applied‌‌ 
Ducosin‌  ‌ f. Abuse‌  ‌of‌  ‌public‌  ‌position‌  ‌or‌  ‌membership‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌‌
  organized‌‌  only‌  ‌if‌  ‌they‌  ‌affect‌  ‌the‌  ‌periods‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌degrees‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  penalties‌‌ 
syndicate‌‌(Art‌‌62‌‌par‌‌1[a])‌‌—‌‌maximum‌‌period.‌  ‌ within‌‌rational‌‌limits‌. ‌ ‌
Inapplicability‌  ‌
3. The‌‌
  final‌‌ query‌‌ is‌‌ ‌whether‌‌ or‌‌ not‌‌ the‌‌ Indeterminate‌‌ Sentence‌‌ 
1. persons‌‌ convicted‌‌ of‌‌ offenses‌‌ punished‌‌ with‌‌ death‌‌ penalty‌‌ or‌‌  g. Quasi-recidivism‌‌(Art‌‌160)‌‌—‌‌maximum‌‌period;‌  ‌
Law‌‌   is‌‌
  applicable‌‌   to‌‌ the‌‌ case‌‌ now‌‌ before‌‌ us.‌‌ Apparently‌‌ it‌‌ does,‌‌ 
life-imprisonment‌;  ‌‌ ‌ h. Ordinary‌‌attendant‌‌circumstances‌‌may‌‌offset‌‌each‌‌other.‌  ‌ since‌  ‌drug‌  ‌offenses‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌included‌  ‌in‌  ‌nor‌  ‌has‌  ‌appellant‌‌ 
2. convicted‌  ‌of‌  ‌treason‌, ‌ ‌conspiracy‌  ‌or‌  ‌proposal‌  ‌to‌  ‌commit‌‌  committed‌‌   any‌‌ act‌‌ which‌‌ would‌‌ put‌‌ him‌‌ within‌‌ the‌‌ exceptions‌‌ to‌‌ 
3. Apply‌‌the‌i‌ ndeterminate‌‌sentence‌l‌ aw,‌‌when‌‌applicable.‌  ‌
said‌  ‌law‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌involve‌‌ 
treason;‌‌   ‌ People‌‌v.‌‌Temporada‌  ‌ reclusion‌‌perpetua‌‌or‌‌death.‌  ‌
3. convicted‌  ‌of‌  ‌misprision‌  ‌of‌  ‌treason,‌  ‌rebellion,‌  ‌sedition‌  ‌or‌‌  4. It‌‌
  is‌‌
  held‌‌
  that‌‌
  Sec‌‌
  1 ‌‌of‌‌
  ISLaw‌‌
  refers‌‌
  to‌‌
  an‌‌
  offense‌‌ under‌‌ a ‌‌special‌‌ 
Discussion‌‌on‌‌relevant‌‌terminologies‌  ‌
espionage;‌‌   ‌ law‌  ‌wherein‌  ‌the‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌  ‌taken‌  ‌from‌  ‌and‌  ‌is‌‌ 
1. The‌  ‌RPC‌  ‌provides‌  ‌for‌  ‌an‌  ‌initial‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌general‌‌  without‌‌reference‌‌to‌‌the‌‌RPC.‌  ‌
4. convicted‌‌of‌p
‌ iracy‌;  ‌‌ ‌
prescription‌  ‌for‌‌   the‌‌
  felonies‌‌   defined‌‌   therein‌‌   which‌‌
  consists‌‌ 
5. habitual‌‌delinquents‌;  ‌‌ ‌ of‌‌
  a ‌‌range‌‌
  of‌‌
  period‌‌ of‌‌ time.‌‌ This‌‌ is‌‌ what‌‌ is‌‌ referred‌‌ to‌‌ as‌‌ the‌‌  ⭐‌People‌‌v.‌‌Cesar‌  ‌
"‌prescribed‌‌penalty‌."‌  ‌
6. have‌e
‌ scaped‌‌from‌‌confinement‌‌or‌‌evaded‌‌sentence;‌‌   ‌
Accused-appellant‌  ‌pleaded‌  ‌guilty‌  ‌to‌‌
  and‌‌
  was‌‌
  convicted‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  crime‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 121‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

of‌‌
  ‌direct‌‌   assault‌‌ upon‌‌ a ‌‌person‌‌ in‌‌ authority‌‌ with‌‌ homicide‌. ‌‌This‌‌  The‌  ‌ISLaw,‌  ‌under‌  ‌Section‌  ‌2,‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌applicable‌  ‌to‌, ‌ ‌among‌  ‌others,‌‌  medium‌‌and‌‌maximum‌‌periods‌. ‌ ‌
being‌‌   a ‌‌c
‌ omplex‌‌   crime‌, ‌‌the‌‌  ‌penalty‌‌  for‌‌  the‌‌  more‌‌  serious‌‌ crime‌‌  cases‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌maximum‌  ‌term‌  ‌of‌  ‌imprisonment‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌‌ 
should‌  ‌be‌  ‌imposed,‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌applied‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌  ‌maximum‌‌  exceed‌  ‌one‌  ‌year‌. ‌ ‌In‌  ‌determining‌  ‌“whether‌  ‌an‌  ‌indeterminate‌  Reynaldo‌‌Mariano‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌‌2014‌  ‌
period‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌more‌  ‌serious‌  ‌crime‌  ‌is‌  ‌homicide‌  ‌punishable‌  ‌by‌‌  sentence‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌ ‌straight‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌is‌  ‌proper,‌‌
  what‌‌
  is‌‌
  considered‌‌
  is‌‌ 
reclusion‌‌temporal‌(‌ the‌‌prescribed‌p ‌ enalty).‌  ‌ the‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌actually‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌trial‌  ‌court,‌  ‌after‌‌  Death‌‌ stands‌‌ alone‌‌ as‌‌ the‌‌ capital‌‌ punishment‌. ‌‌The‌‌ RPC‌‌ classifies‌‌ 
considering‌  ‌the‌  ‌attendant‌  ‌circumstances,‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌the‌  ‌imposable‌‌  the‌‌  felony‌‌
  of‌‌
  serious‌‌ physical‌‌ injuries‌‌ in‌‌ Art‌‌ 263‌‌ based‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ gravity‌‌ 
Accused‌‌   has‌‌
  to‌‌
  his‌‌
  credit‌‌ ‌two‌‌ mitigating‌‌ circumstan­ces:‌‌ the‌‌ ‌special‌‌  penalty‌.”‌‌   ‌ of‌‌the‌‌physical‌‌injuries.‌‌   ‌
or‌  ‌privileged‌  ‌mitigating‌  ‌circumstance‌  ‌of‌  ‌minority‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌ 
With‌  ‌Ferdinand‌  ‌not‌  ‌becoming‌  ‌insane,‌  ‌imbecile,‌  ‌impotent,‌  ‌or‌  ‌blind,‌‌ 
ordinary‌‌mitigating‌‌‌circumstance‌‌of‌p ‌ lea‌‌of‌‌guilty‌.  ‌‌ ‌ In‌‌
  the‌‌
  case‌‌   at‌‌  bar,‌‌
  since‌‌   the‌‌ maximum‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ imposable‌‌ penalty‌‌ is‌‌ six‌‌ 
his‌‌
  physical‌‌   injuries‌‌
  did‌‌  not‌‌
  fall‌‌
  under‌‌  Article‌‌   263[1].‌‌ Consequently,‌‌ 
months,‌‌   the‌‌  ‌ISLaw‌‌   is‌‌
  not‌‌  applicable‌. ‌‌Thus,‌‌   it‌‌
  is‌‌ proper‌‌ to‌‌ impose‌‌ a ‌‌
1. Therefore,‌‌
  under‌‌   64,‌‌ par.‌‌ 5,‌‌ the‌‌ ‌penalty‌‌ imposable‌ ‌is‌‌ 
  Art.‌‌ the‌  ‌CA‌  ‌incorrectly‌  ‌considered‌  ‌the‌  ‌petitioner’s‌  ‌act‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌grave‌  ‌felony‌‌ 
straight‌‌   penalty‌  ‌of‌‌  four‌‌  months‌‌ and‌‌ one‌‌ day‌‌ of‌‌ arresto‌‌ mayor‌‌ and‌‌  had‌  ‌it‌  ‌been‌  ‌intentional,‌‌
  and‌‌  should‌‌   not‌‌  have‌‌  imposed‌‌   the‌‌  penalty‌‌   at‌‌ 
the‌‌penalty‌‌next‌‌lower‌‌to‌‌that‌‌prescribed‌‌‌by‌‌law.‌‌   ‌
delete‌‌the‌‌imposition‌‌of‌‌fine.‌  ‌ arresto‌  ‌mayor‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌  ‌maximum‌  ‌period‌  ‌to‌‌   prision‌‌   correccional‌‌   in‌‌
  its‌‌ 
2. Under‌‌  Art.‌‌
  71,‌‌ the‌‌ penalty‌‌ next‌‌ lower‌‌ to‌‌ ‌reclusion‌‌ tem­poral‌‌ 
medium‌  ‌period.‌  ‌Instead,‌  ‌the‌  ‌petitioner’s‌  ‌act‌‌   that‌‌
  caused‌‌   the‌‌  serious‌‌ 
is‌‌prision‌‌mayor.‌‌   ‌
Cajigas‌‌v.‌‌People‌  ‌ physical‌  ‌injuries,‌  ‌had‌  ‌it‌  ‌been‌  ‌intentional,‌  ‌would‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌ ‌less‌  ‌grave‌‌ 
3. Because‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌complex‌‌   ‌nature‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  crime‌‌
  committed,‌‌ the‌‌  felony‌  ‌under‌‌  Article‌‌  25,‌‌  because‌‌  Ferdinand’s‌‌  physical‌‌ injuries‌‌ were‌‌ 
penalty‌  ‌of‌  ‌prision‌  ‌mayor‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌applied‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌‌  Applying‌‌the‌I‌ SLaw‌,  ‌‌ ‌
those‌  ‌under‌  ‌Article‌  ‌263[3],‌  ‌for‌  ‌having‌  ‌incapacitated‌  ‌him‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌ 
maximum‌p ‌ eriod‌.  ‌‌ ‌ 1. the‌  ‌minimum‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌indeterminate‌  ‌sentence‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌‌  performance‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌work‌  ‌in‌  ‌which‌‌   he‌‌
  was‌‌   habitually‌‌   engaged‌‌   in‌‌
  for‌‌ 
4. How­ever,‌  ‌having‌  ‌in‌  ‌his‌  ‌favor‌  ‌the‌  ‌ordinary‌  ‌mitigating‌‌  anywhere‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌range‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌next‌  ‌lower‌  ‌in‌‌  more‌‌than‌‌90‌‌days.‌  ‌
circums­tance‌  ‌of‌  ‌plea‌  ‌of‌  ‌guilty‌  ‌without‌  ‌any‌  ‌offsetting‌‌  degree‌‌to‌‌the‌‌penalty‌‌prescribed‌‌by‌‌the‌‌RPC‌‌for‌‌the‌‌crime.‌‌   ‌
Conformably‌  ‌with‌  ‌Article‌  ‌365,‌  ‌the‌  ‌proper‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌is‌  ‌arresto‌‌ 
aggravating‌  ‌circumstance,‌  ‌applying‌  ‌Art.‌  ‌64,‌  ‌par.‌  ‌2,‌  ‌the‌‌  2. The‌  ‌determination‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌minimum‌  ‌term‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  mayor‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌  ‌minimum‌  ‌and‌  ‌medium‌‌   periods‌, ‌‌which‌‌
  ranges‌‌   from‌ ‌
penalty‌  ‌of‌  ‌prision‌  ‌mayor‌  ‌maximum‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌imposed‌‌  indeterminate‌  ‌sentence‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌done‌  ‌without‌‌  one‌  ‌to‌  ‌four‌  ‌months‌. ‌ ‌As‌  ‌earlier‌‌  mentioned,‌‌  the‌‌  rules‌‌  in‌‌  Article‌‌ 
in‌‌its‌m
‌ inimum‌‌range‌. ‌ ‌ considering‌‌   any‌‌
  modifying‌‌ circumstance‌‌ attendant‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌  64‌  ‌are‌‌
  NOT‌‌   applicable‌‌  in‌‌
  reckless‌‌   imprudence‌, ‌‌and‌‌   considering‌‌ 
commission‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌  ‌and‌  ‌without‌  ‌reference‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  further‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌maximum‌  ‌term‌  ‌of‌  ‌imprisonment‌  ‌would‌  ‌not‌‌ 
The‌‌proper‌‌method,‌‌thus,‌‌is‌‌   ‌ periods‌‌into‌‌which‌‌it‌‌may‌‌be‌‌subdivided.‌  ‌ exceed‌  ‌one‌  ‌year,‌  ‌rendering‌  ‌the‌  ‌Indeterminate‌  ‌Sentence‌  ‌Law‌‌ 
1. to‌  ‌start‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌RPC,‌  ‌i.e.,‌‌  3. The‌‌  penalty‌‌  prescribed‌‌
  under‌‌
  Article‌‌
  315,‌‌
  paragraph‌‌ 2(d)‌‌ of‌‌  inapplicable‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌holds‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  s
‌ traight‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌of‌  ‌two‌‌ 
reclusion‌‌temporal‌;  ‌‌ ‌ the‌‌RPC,‌‌as‌‌amended‌‌by‌‌PD‌‌818,‌‌is‌r‌ eclusion‌‌temporal.‌‌   ‌ months‌‌of‌‌arresto‌‌mayor‌‌was‌‌the‌‌correct‌‌penalty‌‌for‌‌the‌‌petitioner.‌  ‌
2. then‌  ‌apply‌  ‌the‌  ‌privileged‌  ‌mitigating‌  ‌circumstance‌  ‌of‌‌  4. The‌‌penalty‌‌next‌‌lower‌‌in‌‌degree‌‌is‌‌‌prision‌‌mayor.‌‌   ‌
minority‌‌   and‌‌  determine‌‌
  the‌‌
  penalty‌‌
  immediately‌‌
  inferior‌‌
  in‌‌  People‌‌v.‌‌Medroso‌  ‌
5. The‌‌
  ‌minimum‌‌   term‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ indeterminate‌‌ penalty‌‌ should‌‌ be‌‌ 
degree,‌‌i.e.,‌‌‌prision‌‌mayor‌;‌‌and‌‌   ‌
anywhere‌‌   within‌‌ six‌‌ years‌‌ and‌‌ one‌‌ day‌‌ to‌‌ 12‌‌ years‌‌ of‌‌ ‌prision‌‌  Paragraph‌  ‌5 ‌ ‌of‌‌
  Article‌‌
  365‌‌
  expressly‌‌   states‌‌
  that‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  imposition‌‌   of‌‌ 
3. finally,‌‌
  ‌apply‌‌  the‌‌ same‌‌ in‌‌ its‌‌ maximum‌‌ degree‌‌ due‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌  mayor.‌  ‌ the‌  ‌penalties‌  ‌provided‌  ‌for‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Article,‌  ‌the‌  ‌courts‌  ‌shall‌  ‌exercise‌‌ 
complex‌n ‌ ature‌‌of‌‌the‌‌crime‌  ‌ their‌  ‌sound‌  ‌discretion‌  ‌without‌  ‌regard‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌rules‌  ‌prescribed‌  ‌in‌‌ 
4. but‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌minimum‌  ‌range‌  ‌there­of‌  ‌because‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  Gelig‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌2
‌ 010‌‌supra‌  ‌ Article‌‌64‌. ‌ ‌
ordinary‌‌mitigating‌‌circumstance‌‌of‌‌plea‌‌of‌‌guilty.‌‌   ‌
The‌‌   penalty‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  crime‌‌   of‌‌
  ‌direct‌‌
  assault‌‌  ‌is‌‌ prision‌‌ correccional‌‌  The‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌for‌  ‌homicide‌  ‌thru‌  ‌reckless‌  ‌imprudence‌  ‌with‌‌ 
Prision‌‌
  mayor‌‌   being‌‌
  the‌‌  maximum‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ inde­terminate‌‌ sentence,‌‌ the‌‌  in‌‌
  its‌‌  medium‌‌   and‌‌   maximum‌‌   periods‌. ‌‌The‌‌ penalty‌‌ should‌‌ be‌‌ fixed‌‌  violation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Automobile‌  ‌Law‌  ‌is‌  ‌prision‌  ‌correccional‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌‌ 
minimum‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌indeterminate‌  ‌pe­nalty‌  ‌is‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌range‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  in‌  ‌its‌  ‌medium‌  ‌period‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌absence‌  ‌of‌  ‌mitigating‌  ‌or‌  ‌aggravating‌‌  medium‌  ‌and‌  ‌maximum‌  ‌periods‌  ‌with‌  ‌a ‌ ‌duration‌  ‌from‌  ‌two‌  ‌years,‌‌ 
penalty‌  ‌next‌  ‌lower‌  ‌to‌  ‌it‌  ‌as‌  ‌prescribed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌RPC,‌  ‌i.e.,‌  ‌prision‌‌  circumstances.‌  ‌Applying‌  ‌the‌  ‌ISLaw,‌  ‌the‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌‌  four‌  ‌months,‌  ‌and‌‌  one‌‌
  day‌‌
  to‌‌
  six‌‌
  years.‌‌
  Applying‌‌   the‌‌
  ISLaw‌‌
  to‌‌
  which‌‌ 
correccional‌. ‌ ‌ sentenced‌  ‌to‌  ‌an‌  ‌indeterminate‌  ‌term,‌  ‌the‌  ‌minimum‌  ‌of‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌‌  appellant‌‌is‌‌entitled‌‌the‌‌imposable‌‌penalty‌‌covers‌‌   ‌
within‌  ‌the‌  ‌range‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌next‌  ‌lower‌  ‌in‌  ‌degree,‌  ‌i.e.,‌  ‌arresto‌‌ 
a) a‌  ‌minimum‌‌   ‌to‌‌
  be‌‌
  taken‌‌
  from‌‌
  the‌‌
  penalty‌‌
  one‌‌
  degree‌‌  lower‌‌ 
Lumauig‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌‌2014‌s‌ upra‌  ‌ mayor‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌  ‌maximum‌  ‌period‌  ‌to‌  ‌prision‌  ‌correccional‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌‌ 
than‌  ‌that‌  ‌prescribed‌  ‌by‌  ‌law‌  ‌or‌  arresto‌  ‌mayor‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌‌ 
minimum‌  ‌period‌, ‌ ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌maximum‌  ‌of‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌  ‌properly‌‌ 
maximum‌  ‌period‌  ‌to‌  ‌prision‌  ‌correccional‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌  ‌minimum‌‌ 
imposable‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌RPC‌, ‌ ‌i.e.,‌  ‌prision‌  ‌correccional‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 122‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

e. Corollarily,‌  ‌the‌  ‌claim‌  ‌for‌  ‌civil‌  ‌liability‌  ‌survives‌‌ 


period‌, ‌ ‌i.e.‌  ‌four‌  ‌months‌  ‌and‌  ‌one‌  ‌day‌‌
  to‌‌
  two‌‌
  years‌‌
  and‌‌
  four‌‌  This‌  ‌period‌  ‌of‌  ‌thirty‌  ‌(30)‌  ‌years‌  ‌vis-a-vis‌  ‌reclusion‌  ‌perpetua‌  ‌is‌‌ 
months,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ reiterated‌  ‌in‌  ‌Article‌  ‌70‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  code.‌‌   Said‌‌
  article‌‌   pertinently‌‌   provides‌‌  notwithstanding‌  ‌the‌  ‌death‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused,‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌may‌‌ 
that‌‌
  in‌‌
  applying‌‌   the‌‌  so‌‌
  called‌‌   “‌ three-fold‌‌   rule”‌‌   ‌— ‌‌i.e.,‌‌  that‌‌ “when‌‌  also‌  ‌be‌  ‌predicated‌  ‌on‌  ‌a ‌ ‌source‌  ‌of‌  ‌obligation‌  ‌other‌  ‌than‌‌ 
b) a‌‌
  ‌maximum‌‌   ‌to‌‌  be‌‌
  taken‌‌ in‌‌ turn‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌ penalty‌‌ prescribed‌‌ 
the‌  ‌culprit‌  ‌has‌  ‌to‌  ‌serve‌  ‌two‌  ‌or‌  ‌more‌  ‌penalties,‌  ‌the‌  ‌maximum‌‌  delict.‌  ‌
for‌‌
  the‌‌
  offense‌‌   the‌‌  duration‌‌   of‌‌
  which‌‌ is‌‌ from‌‌ two‌‌ years,‌‌ four‌‌ 
duration‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌convict's‌‌   sentence‌‌   shall‌‌
  not‌‌   be‌‌  more‌‌   than‌‌   three-fold‌‌  f. Where‌  ‌the‌  ‌civil‌  ‌liability‌  ‌survives,‌  ‌an‌  ‌action‌  ‌for‌  ‌recovery‌‌ 
months‌‌and‌‌one‌‌day‌‌to‌‌six‌‌years.‌‌   ‌
the‌‌
  length‌‌  of‌‌
  time‌‌  corresponding‌‌   to‌‌  the‌‌
  most‌‌   severe‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌   penalties‌‌ 
therefore‌‌   may‌‌   be‌‌
  pursued‌‌   but‌‌
  only‌‌  by‌‌
  way‌‌ of‌‌ filing‌‌ a ‌‌‌separate‌‌ 
The‌  ‌determination‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌minimum‌  ‌and‌  ‌maximum‌  ‌terms‌  ‌is‌  ‌left‌‌  imposed‌  ‌upon‌  ‌him”‌  ‌— ‌ ‌“‌the‌  ‌duration‌  ‌of‌  ‌perpetual‌  ‌penalties‌  ‌(pena‌‌ 
perpetua)‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌computed‌‌at‌‌thirty‌‌years‌.”‌  ‌ civil‌  ‌action.‌  ‌This‌‌   separate‌‌  civil‌‌
  action‌‌   may‌‌  be‌‌
  enforced‌‌   either‌‌ 
entirely‌‌  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  discretion‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  trial‌‌
  court,‌‌
  the‌‌ exercise‌‌ of‌‌ which‌‌ will‌‌ 
against‌‌   the‌‌
  executor/administrator‌‌   or‌‌
  the‌‌  estate‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ accused,‌‌ 
not‌‌be‌‌disturbed‌‌on‌‌appeal‌‌unless‌‌there‌‌is‌‌a‌‌clear‌‌abuse.‌  ‌
It‌  ‌was‌  ‌thus‌  ‌incorrect‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌Trial‌  ‌Court‌  ‌to‌  ‌specify‌  ‌the‌  ‌duration‌  ‌of‌‌  depending‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌
  source‌‌  of‌‌
  obligation‌‌   upon‌‌   which‌‌   the‌‌  same‌‌ is‌‌ 
thirty‌  ‌(30)‌  ‌years‌  ‌in‌  ‌relation‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌of‌  reclusion‌  ‌perpetua‌‌  based.‌‌(‌Asilo,‌‌Jr.‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌‌2011‌‌‌also‌P ‌ eople‌‌v.‌‌Lipata‌‌‌2016‌) ‌ ‌
4. Service‌‌of‌‌Sentence‌  ‌ imposed‌‌by‌‌it‌‌on‌‌the‌‌accused‌‌in‌‌this‌‌case.‌  ‌
Material‌‌accumulation‌‌system‌  ‌ 6. Crimes‌‌Against‌‌Persons‌  ‌
Thus,‌  ‌the‌  ‌imputation‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌thirty-year‌  ‌duration‌  ‌to‌  ‌reclusion‌‌ 
When‌  ‌the‌  ‌culprit‌  ‌has‌  ‌to‌  ‌serve‌  ‌two‌  ‌or‌  ‌more‌  ‌penalties,‌  ‌he‌  ‌shall‌  ‌serve‌‌  perpetua‌‌‌in‌‌Articles‌‌27‌‌and‌‌70‌‌only‌‌serves:‌  ‌ Destruction‌‌of‌‌Life‌  ‌
them‌  s
‌ imultaneously‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌nature‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌penalties‌  ‌will‌  ‌so‌  ‌permit‌‌  1. as‌  ‌the‌  ‌basis‌  ‌for‌  ‌determining‌  ‌the‌  ‌convict's‌  ‌eligibility‌  ‌for‌‌ 
 ‌

otherwise,‌‌the‌‌following‌‌rules‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌observed:‌  ‌ 246‌  ‌ Parricide‌  ‌


pardon‌;‌‌or‌‌   ‌
★ In‌  ‌the‌  ‌imposition‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌penalties,‌  ‌the‌  ‌order‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌  ‌respective‌‌  1) A‌‌person‌‌is‌‌killed;‌  ‌
2. for‌  ‌the‌  ‌application‌‌
  of‌‌   ‌three-­fold‌‌
  the‌‌   rule‌‌
  ‌in‌‌  the‌‌  service‌‌  of‌‌ 
severity‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌followed‌  ‌so‌  ‌that‌  ‌they‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌executed‌‌  2) Deceased‌‌is‌‌killed‌‌by‌‌the‌‌accused;‌  ‌
multiple‌‌penalties.‌  ‌
successively‌‌   ‌or‌‌ as‌‌ nearly‌‌ as‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌ possible,‌‌ should‌‌ a ‌‌pardon‌‌ have‌ 
AND‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌as‌  ‌basis‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌duration‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌‌  3) Deceased‌‌is:‌  ‌
been‌‌   granted‌‌
  as‌‌  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  penalty‌‌   or‌‌ penalties‌‌ first‌‌ imposed,‌‌ or‌‌ should‌‌ 
they‌‌have‌‌been‌‌served‌‌out.‌  ‌ intended‌‌to‌‌be‌p
‌ erpetual‌. ‌ ‌ a) the‌‌father‌‌mother,‌‌or‌‌child,‌‌regardless‌‌of‌‌legitimacy;‌‌or‌‌   ‌
b) a‌‌legitimate‌‌other‌‌ascendant,‌‌descendant‌‌or‌‌spouse‌‌of‌‌ 
Juridical‌‌accumulation‌‌system‌  ‌ 5. Effect‌‌of‌‌Death‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Accused‌  ‌ accused.‌  ‌
1. Notwithstanding‌  ‌the‌‌
  provisions‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  rule‌‌
  next‌‌
  preceding,‌‌
  the‌‌  a. The‌‌
  death‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ accused‌‌ AFTER‌‌ arraignment‌‌ and‌‌ during‌‌ the‌‌  The‌‌law‌‌does‌‌not‌‌require‌‌knowledge‌‌of‌‌relationship.‌  ‌
maximum‌  ‌duration‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌convict's‌  ‌sentence‌  ‌shall‌‌  NOT‌‌  be‌‌  pendency‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌criminal‌  ‌action‌  ‌shall‌  ‌extinguish‌  ‌the‌  ‌civil‌‌ 
more‌‌ than‌‌ ‌three-fold‌ ‌the‌‌ length‌‌ of‌‌ time‌‌ corresponding‌‌ to‌‌  liability‌‌arising‌‌from‌‌the‌‌delict‌.  ‌‌ ‌ 247‌  ‌ Death‌‌or‌‌physical‌‌injuries‌‌under‌‌exceptional‌‌ 
circumstances‌  ‌
the‌  ‌most‌  ‌severe‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌penalties‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌upon‌  ‌him.‌  ‌No‌‌  b. However‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌independent‌  ‌civil‌  ‌action‌  ‌instituted‌  ‌to‌  ‌enforce‌‌ 
other‌‌   penalty‌‌
  to‌‌
  which‌‌   he‌‌  may‌‌
  be‌‌
  liable‌‌
  shall‌‌
  be‌‌ inflicted‌‌ after‌‌  liability‌  ‌arising‌  ‌from‌  ‌other‌  ‌sources‌  ‌of‌  ‌obligation‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌‌  1) A‌‌legally‌‌married‌‌person‌‌‌or‌‌a‌‌parent‌s‌ urprises‌‌‌his‌‌spouse‌‌ 
the‌  ‌sum‌  ‌total‌  ‌of‌  ‌those‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌equals‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌maximum‌‌  continued‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌  ‌estate‌  ‌or‌  ‌legal‌  ‌representative‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  or‌‌his‌‌daughter,‌‌the‌‌latter‌u
‌ nder‌‌18‌‌‌years‌‌of‌‌age‌‌and‌l‌ iving‌‌ 
period.‌  ‌ accused‌  ‌after‌  ‌proper‌‌
  substitution‌‌   or‌‌
  against‌‌
  said‌‌
  estate,‌‌
  as‌‌
  the‌‌  with‌‌him‌,‌‌in‌‌the‌‌act‌‌of‌‌committing‌‌sexual‌‌intercourse‌‌ 
case‌‌may‌‌be.‌‌   ‌ with‌‌another.‌  ‌
2.   ‌maximum‌‌ ‌period‌‌ shall‌ ‌in‌‌ no‌‌ case‌‌ exceed‌‌ forty‌‌ (40)‌‌ 
Such‌‌
c. If‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌dies‌  ‌BEFORE‌  ‌arraignment‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌  2) He‌‌or‌‌she‌‌kills,‌‌or‌‌inflicts‌‌any‌s‌ erious‌‌physical‌‌injuries‌‌upon‌‌ 
years‌. ‌ ‌
dismissed‌  ‌without‌  ‌prejudice‌  ‌to‌  ‌any‌  ‌civil‌  ‌action‌  ‌the‌  ‌offended‌‌  any‌‌or‌‌both‌,‌‌in‌‌the‌‌act‌‌or‌‌immediately‌‌thereafter‌. ‌ ‌
3. In‌‌
  applying‌‌
  the‌‌ provisions‌‌ of‌‌ this‌‌ rule‌‌ the‌‌ duration‌‌ of‌‌ perpetual‌‌ 
party‌‌may‌‌file‌‌against‌‌the‌e‌ state‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌deceased.‌  ‌ 3) He‌‌has‌‌not‌‌promoted‌‌or‌‌facilitated‌‌the‌‌prostitution‌‌of‌‌his‌‌ 
penalties‌  ‌(‌pena‌  ‌perpetua‌) ‌ ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌computed‌  ‌at‌‌
  ‌thirty‌‌
  (30)‌‌  wife‌‌or‌‌daughter,‌‌nor‌‌has‌‌consented‌‌to‌‌the‌‌infidelity‌‌of‌‌the‌‌ 
d. Death‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌pending‌  ‌appeal‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌conviction‌‌ 
years‌. ‌ ‌ spouse.‌  ‌
extinguishes‌  ‌his‌  ‌criminal‌  ‌liability‌  ‌as‌  ‌well‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌civil‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Tena‌  ‌ liability‌‌based‌‌solely‌‌thereon.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 123‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

248‌  ‌ Murder‌  ‌   1) By‌‌assisting‌‌another‌‌to‌‌commit‌‌suicide,‌‌whether‌‌it‌‌is‌‌ 


NOTES‌  ‌ consummated‌‌(P ‌ M)‌‌‌or‌‌not‌‌(‌AMay‌‌med-max);‌  ‌
Any‌‌of‌‌the‌‌following‌‌aggravating‌‌circumstances‌‌are‌‌present‌  ‌
1. When‌‌victim‌‌is‌‌under‌‌12‌‌years‌‌of‌‌age:‌R
‌ P‌‌‌(Sec‌‌10‌‌RA‌‌7610);‌  ‌ 2) By‌‌lending‌‌his‌‌assistance‌‌to‌‌another‌‌to‌‌commit‌‌suicide‌‌to‌‌the‌‌ 
1) Treachery‌  ‌(16),‌  ‌taking‌  ‌advantage‌  ‌of‌  ‌superior‌  ‌strength‌  ‌(15),‌‌  extent‌‌of‌‌doing‌‌the‌‌killing‌‌himself‌‌(R
‌ T).‌  ‌
2. Intent‌‌
  to‌‌ kill‌‌ is‌‌ conclusively‌‌ presumed‌‌ when‌‌ death‌‌ resulted.‌‌ (‌US‌‌ v ‌‌
with‌  ‌the‌  ‌aid‌  ‌of‌  ‌armed‌  ‌men‌  ‌(8),‌  ‌or‌  ‌employing‌  ‌means‌  ‌to‌‌ 
Gloria)‌  ‌
weaken‌‌   the‌‌
  defense‌‌   (15),‌‌
  or‌‌ of‌‌ means‌‌ or‌‌ persons‌‌ to‌‌ insure‌‌ or‌‌  254‌  ‌ Discharge‌‌of‌‌firearms‌  ‌
afford‌‌immunity‌‌(8);‌  ‌ 251‌  ‌ Death‌‌caused‌‌in‌‌a‌‌tumultuous‌‌affray‌  ‌
1) Discharges‌‌a‌‌firearm‌‌against‌‌or‌‌at‌‌another;‌  ‌
2) In‌‌consideration‌‌of‌‌a‌‌price,‌‌reward,‌‌or‌‌promise‌‌(11);‌  ‌
1) There‌‌be‌s‌ everal‌p
‌ ersons;‌  ‌ 2) No‌‌intention‌‌to‌‌kill.‌  ‌
3) By‌  ‌means‌  ‌of‌  ‌inundation,‌  ‌fire,‌‌   poison,‌‌  explosion,‌‌
  shipwreck,‌‌ 
stranding‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌vessel,‌  ‌derailment‌‌   or‌‌
  assault‌‌  upon‌‌
  a ‌‌railroad,‌‌  2) Did‌‌not‌‌compose‌‌‌groups‌‌organized‌‌for‌‌the‌‌common‌‌purpose‌‌ 
255‌  ‌ Infanticide‌  ‌
fall‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌airship‌  ‌(12),‌  ‌by‌‌
  means‌‌
  of‌‌
  motor‌‌  vehicles,‌‌   or‌‌
  with‌‌  of‌‌assaulting‌‌and‌‌attacking‌‌each‌‌other‌‌reciprocally;‌  ‌
the‌‌use‌‌of‌‌great‌‌waste‌‌and‌‌ruin‌‌(20);‌  ‌ 3) Quarreled‌a‌ nd‌‌assaulted‌o
‌ ne‌‌another‌‌in‌‌a‌‌confused‌a‌ nd‌‌  1) Child‌‌was‌‌killed;‌  ‌
4) On‌  ‌occasion‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌preceding,‌  ‌or‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌earthquake,‌‌  tumultuous‌‌manner;‌  ‌ 2) Less‌‌than‌‌72‌‌hours‌‌of‌‌age;‌  ‌
eruption‌‌  of‌‌
  a ‌‌volcano,‌‌   destructive‌‌ cyclone,‌‌ epidemic‌‌ or‌‌ other‌‌  4) Someone‌‌was‌k
‌ illed‌; ‌ ‌ 3) Accused‌‌killed‌‌the‌‌child.‌  ‌
public‌‌calamity‌‌(7);‌  ‌
5) It‌‌cannot‌‌be‌‌ascertained‌‌‌who‌‌actually‌‌killed‌‌the‌‌deceased;‌  ‌  
5) Evident‌‌premeditation‌‌(13);‌  ‌ NOTES‌  ‌
6) Those‌‌who‌‌inflicted‌s‌ erious‌‌physical‌‌injuries‌‌‌or‌‌who‌‌used‌‌ 
6) With‌‌   cruelty‌‌ (21),‌‌ by‌‌ deliberately‌‌ and‌‌ inhumanly‌‌ augmenting‌‌  violence:‌  ‌ 1. Penalty‌‌is‌‌same‌‌as‌‌that‌‌for‌‌parricide‌‌or‌‌murder.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌suffering‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌victim,‌  ‌or‌  ‌outraging‌  ‌or‌  ‌scoffing‌  ‌at‌  ‌his‌‌ 
a) can‌‌be‌‌identified‌.‌‌-‌‌PM;‌  ‌ 2. Concealing‌  ‌dishonor‌  ‌mitigates‌  ‌liability‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌mother‌  ‌(PM‌‌ 
person‌‌or‌‌corpse‌‌(not‌‌in‌‌Art‌‌14).‌  ‌
b) cannot‌‌be‌‌determined‌‌-‌P
‌ C‌‌med-max.‌  ‌ med-max)‌‌and‌‌maternal‌‌grandparents‌‌(RT).‌  ‌
 
 
Rules‌‌for‌‌the‌‌application‌‌of‌‌circumstances‌‌to‌‌qualify‌‌murder‌  ‌ Abortion‌  ‌
NOTES‌  ‌
a) Only‌‌
  one‌‌
  of‌‌ the‌‌ circumstances‌‌ required;‌‌ others‌‌ considered‌‌ as‌‌ 
1. Tumultuous‌a‌ ffray‌‌exists‌‌when‌a
‌ t‌‌least‌‌four‌‌persons‌‌‌took‌‌part;‌  ‌
generic‌‌aggravating;‌  ‌ 256‌  ‌ Intentional‌‌abortion‌  ‌
2. The‌‌  person‌‌
  ‌killed‌‌
  ‌in‌‌
  the‌‌
  course‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  affray‌‌ ‌need‌‌ not‌‌ be‌‌ one‌‌ of‌‌ 
b) When‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌are‌  ‌absorbed‌  ‌or‌  ‌included‌  ‌in‌‌ 
the‌‌participants‌‌in‌‌said‌‌affray.‌  ‌ Acts‌‌punished‌  ‌
the‌  ‌one‌  ‌that‌  ‌qualifies,‌  ‌they‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌‌
  considered‌‌
  as‌‌
  generic‌‌ 
aggravating;‌  ‌ 252‌  ‌ Physical‌‌injuries‌‌inflicted‌‌in‌‌a‌‌tumultuous‌‌affray‌  ‌ 1) Using‌‌violence‌‌against‌‌a‌‌pregnant‌‌woman‌‌(R
‌ T).‌  ‌
c) Any‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌qualifying‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌alleged‌. ‌‌ 2) Without‌‌violence‌‌and‌‌without‌‌consent‌‌of‌‌the‌‌woman‌‌(P
‌ M).‌  ‌
Otherwise,‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌  ‌is‌  ‌only‌  ‌homicide‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌qualifying‌‌  1) There‌‌is‌‌a‌t‌ umultuous‌‌affray;‌  ‌
3) With‌‌consent‌‌(‌PC‌‌med-max).‌  ‌
only‌‌considered‌‌as‌‌generic‌‌aggravating.‌  ‌ 2) There‌‌are‌‌those‌‌who‌‌suffered‌s‌ erious‌‌or‌‌less‌‌serious‌‌ 
Elements‌  ‌
physical‌‌injuries‌o‌ nly‌; ‌ ‌
249‌  ‌ Homicide‌  ‌ 1) There‌‌is‌‌a‌p
‌ regnant‌w
‌ oman;‌  ‌
3) Those‌‌responsible‌c‌ an‌‌not‌‌be‌‌identified‌; ‌ ‌
2) Violence‌e‌ xerted,‌‌or‌d
‌ rugs‌‌or‌‌beverages‌a‌ dministered,‌‌or‌‌ 
1) A‌‌person‌‌was‌‌killed;‌  ‌ 4) Those‌‌that‌‌have‌‌used‌v
‌ iolence‌u
‌ pon‌‌the‌‌offended‌‌party‌‌are‌‌ 
acts‌‌upon‌‌the‌‌woman;‌  ‌
2) Without‌‌any‌‌justifying‌‌circumstance;‌  ‌ known‌. ‌ ‌
3) As‌‌a‌‌result,‌f‌ etus‌‌dies‌; ‌ ‌
3) With‌‌intention‌‌to‌‌kill,‌‌which‌‌is‌‌presumed;‌  ‌ 253‌  ‌ Giving‌‌assistance‌‌to‌‌suicide‌  ‌
4) Abortion‌‌is‌i‌ ntended‌. ‌ ‌
4) Not‌‌murder,‌‌parricide,‌‌nor‌‌infanticide.‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 124‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

257‌  ‌ Unintentional‌‌abortion‌  ‌ 3) have‌‌   become‌‌   ‌deformed‌, ‌‌or‌‌   have‌‌  ‌lost‌‌


  any‌‌   other‌‌ body‌‌ part‌, ‌‌ 2) Had‌‌carnal‌‌knowledge‌w
‌ ith‌‌a‌‌woman‌; ‌ ‌
or‌  ‌the‌  ‌use‌  ‌thereof‌, ‌ ‌or‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌ill‌  ‌or‌  ‌incapacitated‌  ‌to‌‌  3) Accomplished‌  ‌
1) There‌‌is‌‌a‌‌pregnant‌‌woman;‌  ‌
perform‌  ‌the‌  ‌work‌  ‌he‌  ‌was‌  ‌habitually‌  ‌engaged‌  ‌in‌  ‌for‌‌ 
2) Violence‌‌is‌‌used‌‌without‌‌intending‌‌an‌‌abortion;‌  ‌ a) using‌‌force‌o
‌ r‌‌intimidation‌; ‌ ‌
more‌‌than‌‌90‌‌days‌. ‌ ‌
3) Violence‌‌intentionally‌‌exerted;‌  ‌ 4) have‌‌
  become‌‌
  ill‌‌
  or‌‌
  incapacitated‌‌
  for‌‌
  labor‌‌
  for‌‌
  more‌‌
  than‌‌  b) when‌‌the‌‌woman‌‌is‌‌‌deprived‌‌of‌‌reason,‌o
‌ r‌‌ 
30‌‌days.‌  ‌ unconscious‌; ‌ ‌
4) Fetus‌‌dies.‌  ‌
c) through‌f‌ raudulent‌‌machination‌o
‌ r‌‌grave‌‌abuse‌‌of‌‌ 
260‌  ‌ Duel‌  ‌ 264‌  ‌ Administering‌‌injurious‌‌substances‌‌or‌‌beverages‌  ‌ authority‌;‌‌OR‌  ‌
d) when‌‌woman‌‌is‌u ‌ nder‌‌12‌‌years‌‌of‌‌age‌‌(s‌ tatutory‌‌rape‌)‌‌ 
1) Killing‌‌one's‌‌adversary‌‌in‌‌a‌‌duel;‌(‌ RT)‌  ‌ 1) Offender‌‌inflicted‌‌upon‌‌another‌a
‌ ny‌‌serious‌‌physical‌‌ 
or‌‌demented‌.  ‌‌ ‌
injury;‌  ‌
2) Inflicting‌‌physical‌‌injuries‌‌upon‌‌such‌‌adversary;‌(‌ Penalty‌‌ 
Penalty‌‌is‌R
‌ P‌‌to‌‌Death‌w
‌ hen:‌  ‌
according‌‌to‌‌the‌‌nature)‌  ‌ 2) By‌k
‌ nowingly‌‌administering‌a‌ ny‌‌injurious‌‌substances‌‌or‌‌ 
beverages‌‌or‌‌by‌‌taking‌‌advantage‌‌of‌‌his‌‌weakness‌‌of‌‌mind‌‌or‌‌  1) with‌‌the‌‌use‌‌of‌‌a‌‌deadly‌‌weapon‌‌or‌‌by‌‌at‌‌least‌‌2‌‌persons;‌‌   ‌
3) Making‌‌combat‌‌although‌‌no‌‌physical‌‌injuries‌‌have‌‌been‌‌ 
credulity.‌  ‌ 2) the‌‌victim‌‌has‌‌become‌‌insane;‌  ‌
inflicted.‌(‌ AMay)‌  ‌
3) No‌‌intent‌‌to‌‌kill.‌‌   ‌ 3) special‌‌complex‌‌crime‌o
‌ f‌‌attempted‌‌rape‌‌with‌‌homicide;‌  ‌

Physical‌‌Injuries‌  ‌ 265‌  ‌ Less‌‌serious‌‌physical‌‌injuries‌  ‌ Penalty‌‌is‌D


‌ eath‌w
‌ hen:‌  ‌
1) special‌‌complex‌‌crime‌o
‌ f‌‌rape‌‌with‌‌homicide.‌ 
262‌  ‌ Mutilation‌  ‌ 1) Incapacitated‌‌for‌‌labor‌‌for‌1
‌ 0-30‌‌days;‌‌‌or‌‌needs‌‌medical‌‌ 
2) with‌‌any‌‌of‌‌the‌‌following:‌  ‌
attendance‌‌for‌‌same‌‌period.‌  ‌
Acts‌‌punished‌  ‌ a) victim‌‌is‌‌minor‌‌and‌‌the‌‌offender‌‌is‌‌a‌‌parent,‌‌ascendant,‌‌ 
2) Injuries‌‌not‌‌those‌‌described‌‌in‌‌Art‌‌263-264.‌  ‌
1) Castration‌-‌ ‌‌depriving‌‌another,‌‌either‌‌totally‌‌or‌‌partially,‌‌of‌‌  step-parent,‌‌guardian,‌‌relative‌‌within‌‌the‌‌3rd‌‌civil‌‌degree,‌‌ 
266‌  ‌ Slight‌‌physical‌‌injuries‌‌and‌‌maltreatment‌  ‌ or‌‌the‌‌common‌‌law‌‌spouse‌‌of‌‌the‌‌parent.‌  ‌
some‌‌essential‌‌organ‌‌for‌‌reproduction.‌  ‌
b) under‌‌the‌‌custody‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌police,‌‌military‌‌or‌‌any‌‌law‌‌ 
a) There‌‌is‌‌mutilation‌‌of‌‌penis‌‌or‌‌ovarium.‌  ‌
1) Incapacitated‌‌offended‌‌party‌‌for‌‌labor‌‌from‌1
‌ -9‌‌days‌,‌‌or‌‌  enforcement‌‌agency‌‌or‌‌penal‌‌institution.‌  ‌
b) It‌‌was‌p
‌ urposeful‌‌and‌‌deliberate‌,‌‌to‌‌deprive‌‌the‌‌  required‌‌medical‌‌attendance‌‌during‌‌same‌‌period;‌‌(AMen)‌  ‌
c) ‌in‌‌full‌‌view‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌spouse,‌‌parent,‌‌child,‌‌or‌‌other‌‌ 
offended‌‌party‌‌of‌‌reproducing.‌  ‌
2) Did‌‌not‌‌prevent‌‌offended‌‌party‌‌from‌‌his‌‌habitual‌‌work‌‌or‌‌did‌‌  relatives‌‌within‌‌the‌‌3rd‌‌degree‌‌of‌‌consanguinity.‌  ‌
2) Mayhem‌-‌ ‌‌lopping‌‌or‌‌clipping‌‌off‌‌any‌‌other‌‌part‌‌of‌‌the‌‌body.‌  ‌ not‌‌require‌‌medical‌‌attendance.‌‌(AMen‌‌or‌‌Fine‌‌<=200‌‌and‌‌ 
d) offender‌‌knows‌‌victim‌‌as‌r‌ eligious;‌  ‌
Censure);‌  ‌
263‌  ‌ Serious‌‌physical‌‌injuries‌  ‌ e) victim‌‌is‌‌below‌‌7‌‌years‌‌old;‌  ‌
3) Ill-treatment‌‌of‌‌another‌‌by‌‌deed‌‌without‌‌causing‌‌any‌‌injury.‌‌ 
(AMen‌‌min‌‌or‌‌Fine‌‌<=50)‌  ‌ f) offender‌‌knows‌‌he‌‌has‌H ‌ IV/AIDS‌‌or‌‌other‌‌STD‌‌‌and‌‌ 
If‌‌in‌‌consequence‌‌of‌‌the‌‌physical‌‌injuries‌‌inflicted,‌‌injured‌‌ 
transmits‌‌to‌‌victim;‌  ‌
person‌‌shall:‌  ‌
Rape‌  ‌ g) offender‌‌belongs‌‌to‌‌AFP,‌‌PNP,‌‌para-military,‌‌other‌‌law‌‌ 
1) become‌‌insane,‌‌imbecile,‌‌impotent‌‌or‌‌blind‌  ‌
enforcement‌‌agency‌‌or‌‌penal‌‌institution‌‌and‌‌takes‌ 
2) have‌  ‌lost‌  ‌the‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌speech‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌hear‌  ‌or‌  ‌to‌‌  266-A‌‌Rape‌‌by‌‌sexual‌‌intercourse‌(‌ Ordinary)‌  ‌ advantage‌‌of‌‌position.‌  ‌
smell‌, ‌‌‌an‌‌
  eye,‌‌
  a ‌‌hand,‌‌   a ‌‌foot,‌‌
  an‌‌
  arm,‌‌ or‌‌ a ‌‌leg,‌‌ or‌‌ lost‌‌ the‌‌ 
Penalty‌‌is‌R
‌ P‌w
‌ hen:‌  ‌ h) permanent‌‌mutilation/disability‌; ‌ ‌
use‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌such‌  ‌principal‌  ‌member‌, ‌ ‌or‌  ‌have‌  ‌become‌‌ 
incapacitated‌‌‌for‌‌the‌‌work‌‌he‌‌was‌h ‌ abitually‌‌engaged.‌  ‌ 1) Offender‌‌is‌‌a‌m
‌ an‌; ‌ ‌ i) offender‌‌knows‌‌victim‌‌is‌p
‌ regnant‌; ‌ ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 125‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

People‌‌v.‌‌Dalisay‌  ‌
j) offender‌‌knows‌‌victim‌‌has‌m
‌ ental‌‌disability‌,‌‌ 
In‌‌ ‌People‌‌ v.‌‌ Soria‌, ‌‌the‌‌ court‌‌ discussed‌‌ that‌‌ a ‌‌victim‌‌ need‌‌ not‌‌ identify‌  The‌‌   presence‌‌   of‌‌  either‌‌  hymenal‌‌ laceration‌‌ or‌‌ spermatozoa‌‌ on‌‌ Lanie's‌‌ 
emotional‌‌disorder‌a‌ nd/or‌‌physical‌‌handicap‌. ‌ ‌
what‌‌   was‌‌
  inserted‌‌   into‌‌   his‌‌
  or‌‌
  her‌‌
  genital‌‌
  or‌‌
  anal‌‌  orifice‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ court‌‌  private‌‌   part‌‌
  is‌‌  not‌‌
  an‌‌
  essential‌‌   element‌‌
  of‌‌
  rape.‌‌   In‌‌
  ‌People‌‌   v.‌‌
  Parcia‌, ‌‌
to‌‌find‌‌that‌‌rape‌‌through‌‌sexual‌‌assault‌‌was‌‌committed.‌  ‌ we‌  ‌held‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌absence‌  ‌of‌  ‌sperm‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌disprove‌‌   the‌‌
  charge‌‌  of‌‌ 
266-A‌‌Rape‌‌through‌‌sexual‌‌assault‌(‌ Object)‌  ‌
rape.‌  ‌Likewise,‌  ‌in‌  ‌People‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Regala‌, ‌ ‌we‌‌  ruled‌‌   that‌‌   an‌‌
  intact‌‌   hymen‌‌ 
Penalty‌‌is‌P
‌ M‌  ‌ Baleros‌‌v.‌‌People‌  ‌ does‌‌not‌‌necessarily‌‌prove‌‌absence‌‌of‌‌sexual‌‌intercourse.‌ 
1) Offender‌‌commits‌‌sexual‌‌assault;‌  ‌ Whether‌  ‌or‌  ‌not‌  ‌the‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌petitioner,‌  ‌i.e.,‌  ‌the‌  ‌pressing‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌
People‌‌v.‌‌Lining‌  ‌
2) Committed‌‌by‌‌inserting‌‌   ‌ chemical-soaked‌‌   cloth‌‌ while‌‌ on‌‌ top‌‌ of‌‌ Malou,‌‌ constitutes‌‌ an‌‌ overt‌‌ act‌‌ 
of‌‌rape.‌  ‌ RTC‌‌   found‌‌
  Gerry‌‌ Lining‌‌ guilty‌‌ beyond‌‌ reasonable‌‌ doubt‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ crime‌‌ 
a) his‌‌penis‌‌into‌‌another's‌‌mouth‌‌or‌‌anus;‌‌or‌‌   ‌
of‌‌‌forcible‌‌abduction‌‌with‌‌rape,‌‌and‌‌for‌‌another‌‌count‌‌of‌‌rape.‌  ‌
b) any‌‌instrument‌‌or‌‌object‌‌into‌‌the‌‌genital‌‌or‌‌anal‌‌  NO‌. ‌‌‌It‌‌
  would‌‌   be‌‌
  too‌‌ strained‌‌ to‌‌ construe‌‌ petitioner's‌‌ act‌‌ of‌‌ pressing‌‌ a ‌‌
chemical-soaked‌  ‌cloth‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌mouth‌  ‌of‌  ‌Malou‌  ‌which‌  ‌would‌  ‌induce‌‌  The‌‌  medical‌‌   finding‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌
  victim‌‌ was‌‌ already‌‌ a ‌‌non-virgin,‌‌ nor‌‌ the‌‌ 
orifice.‌  ‌
her‌  ‌to‌  ‌sleep‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌‌
  overt‌‌  act‌‌
  that‌‌
  will‌‌   logically‌‌   and‌‌
  necessarily‌‌   ripen‌‌  fact‌  ‌that‌  ‌she‌  ‌had‌  ‌sexual‌  ‌relations‌  ‌before,‌  ‌would‌  ‌not‌  ‌matter.‌  ‌Even‌‌  a ‌‌
3) Accomplished‌  ‌ into‌  ‌rape.‌  ‌As‌  ‌it‌  ‌were,‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌  ‌commence‌  ‌at‌  ‌all‌  ‌the‌‌  woman‌  ‌of‌  ‌loose‌  ‌morals‌  ‌could‌  ‌still‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌ ‌victim‌  ‌of‌  ‌rape‌, ‌ ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌ 
a) using‌f‌ orce‌o
‌ r‌‌intimidation‌; ‌ ‌ performance‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌act‌  ‌indicative‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌intent‌  ‌or‌  ‌attempt‌  ‌to‌  ‌rape‌‌  essence‌‌   of‌‌  rape‌‌  is‌‌
  the‌‌  carnal‌‌
  knowledge‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌woman‌‌   against‌‌ her‌‌ will‌‌ 
Malou.‌‌   It‌‌
  cannot‌‌   be‌‌
  overemphasized‌‌   that‌‌ petitioner‌‌ was‌‌ fully‌‌ clothed‌‌  and‌‌without‌‌her‌‌consent.‌  ‌
b) when‌‌the‌‌woman‌‌is‌d
‌ eprived‌‌of‌‌reason‌,‌‌or‌‌  and‌‌  that‌‌   there‌‌  was‌‌  no‌‌
  attempt‌‌   on‌‌ his‌‌ part‌‌ to‌‌ undress‌‌ Malou,‌‌ let‌‌ alone‌‌ 
unconscious‌; ‌ ‌ touch‌  ‌her‌  ‌private‌  ‌part.‌  ‌For‌  ‌what‌  ‌reason‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌wanted‌  ‌the‌‌  Nevertheless,‌  ‌accused-appellant‌  ‌could‌  ‌only‌  ‌be‌  ‌convicted‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌ 
c) through‌f‌ raudulent‌‌machination‌o ‌ r‌‌grave‌‌abuse‌‌  complainant‌‌   unconscious,‌‌   if‌‌
  that‌‌
  was‌‌ really‌‌ his‌‌ immediate‌‌ intention,‌‌  crime‌  ‌of‌  ‌rape‌, ‌ ‌instead‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌complex‌  ‌crime‌  ‌of‌  ‌forcible‌  ‌abduction‌‌ 
is‌‌anybody's‌‌guess.‌  ‌ with‌  ‌rape.‌  ‌Indeed,‌  ‌it‌  ‌would‌  ‌appear‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌records‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌main‌‌ 
of‌‌authority‌;‌‌or‌‌when‌‌woman‌‌is‌u
‌ nder‌‌12‌‌years‌‌of‌‌ 
age‌‌or‌d
‌ emented‌.  ‌‌ ‌ objective‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌victim‌‌   was‌‌
  taken‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  house‌‌
  of‌‌ 
Perez‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ Mila‌  ‌Salvacion‌  ‌was‌  ‌to‌  ‌rape‌  ‌her.‌  ‌Hence,‌  ‌forcible‌  ‌abduction‌  ‌is‌‌ 
Qualified‌  ‌ absorbed‌‌‌in‌‌the‌‌crime‌‌of‌‌rape.‌  ‌
a) with‌‌the‌‌use‌‌of‌‌a‌‌deadly‌‌weapon‌‌or‌‌by‌‌at‌‌least‌‌2‌‌persons;‌P
‌ M‌‌  Perez‌  ‌was‌  ‌found‌  ‌guilty‌  ‌of‌  ‌attempted‌  ‌rape.‌  ‌However,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌careful‌‌ 
review‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  records‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  case‌‌
  shows‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ crime‌‌ committed‌‌ by‌‌  People‌‌v.‌‌Monticalvo‌‌‌2013‌  ‌
to‌‌RT‌  ‌
petitioner‌‌was‌a ‌ cts‌‌of‌‌lasciviousness‌‌‌not‌‌attempted‌‌rape.‌‌   ‌
b) the‌‌victim‌‌has‌‌become‌‌insane;‌‌RT‌  ‌ A‌  ‌mental‌  ‌retardate‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌classified‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person‌  ‌“‌deprived‌  ‌of‌‌ 
There‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌showing‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌  ‌case‌  ‌that‌  ‌petitioner’s‌  ‌sexual‌‌
  organ‌‌
  had‌‌  reason‌,”‌  ‌not‌  ‌one‌  ‌who‌  ‌is‌  ‌“demented”‌  ‌and‌  ‌carnal‌  ‌knowledge‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌
c) special‌‌complex‌‌crime‌‌of‌‌attempted‌‌rape‌‌with‌‌homicide;‌R
‌ T‌‌ 
even‌  ‌touched‌  ‌complainant’s‌  ‌vagina‌  ‌nor‌  ‌any‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌her‌  ‌body.‌‌  mental‌  ‌retardate‌  ‌is‌  ‌considered‌  ‌rape‌  ‌under‌  ‌subparagraph‌  ‌(b),‌  ‌not‌‌ 
to‌‌RP‌  ‌ Although‌  ‌the‌  ‌information‌  ‌filed‌  ‌against‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌was‌  ‌for‌‌  subparagraph‌‌(d)‌‌of‌‌Article‌‌266-A(1)‌‌of‌‌the‌‌RPC.‌  ‌
d) special‌‌complex‌‌crime‌‌of‌‌rape‌‌with‌‌homicide.‌R
‌ P‌  ‌ attempted‌  ‌rape,‌  ‌he‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌convicted‌  ‌of‌  ‌acts‌  ‌of‌  ‌lasciviousness‌‌ 
because‌‌the‌‌crime‌‌of‌‌acts‌‌of‌‌lasciviousness‌‌is‌‌included‌‌in‌‌rape.‌  ‌ Nonetheless,‌‌the‌‌mistake‌‌would‌‌not‌‌exonerate‌‌appellant.‌  ‌
e) any‌‌of‌‌the‌‌10‌‌qualifying‌‌of‌‌par‌‌1.‌R
‌ T‌  ‌

People‌‌v.‌‌Aca-ac‌  ‌ In‌  ‌People‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Dalandas‌, ‌ ‌citing‌  ‌People‌‌


  v.‌‌
  Dumanon‌, ‌‌this‌‌  Court‌‌
  held‌‌ 
Ricalde‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌‌2015‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌ that‌  ‌mental‌  ‌retardation‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌proven‌  ‌by‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌other‌  ‌than‌‌ 
Necessarily,‌  ‌rape‌  ‌is‌  ‌attempted‌  ‌if‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌penetration‌‌   ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌  medical/clinical‌  ‌evidence,‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌testimony‌  ‌of‌  ‌witnesses‌  ‌and‌‌ 
Rape‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌second‌  ‌paragraph‌‌  of‌‌
  Article‌‌
  266-A‌‌
  is‌‌
  also‌‌
  known‌‌   as‌‌ 
female‌  ‌organ‌  ‌because‌  ‌not‌  ‌all‌‌   acts‌‌   of‌‌
  execution‌‌   were‌‌   performed.‌‌   The‌‌  even‌‌the‌‌observation‌‌by‌‌the‌‌trial‌‌court.‌  ‌
“‌instrument‌  ‌or‌  ‌object‌  ‌rape‌,”‌  ‌“gender-free‌  ‌rape,”‌  ‌or‌  ‌“homosexual‌‌ 
offender‌‌   merely‌‌   commenced‌‌   the‌‌   commission‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌felony‌‌   directly‌‌   by‌‌ 
rape.”‌  ‌The‌  ‌gravamen‌  ‌of‌  ‌rape‌  ‌through‌  ‌sexual‌  ‌assault‌  ‌is‌  ‌“the‌‌ 
overt‌  ‌acts.‌  ‌Taking‌  ‌into‌  ‌account‌  ‌the‌‌   nature,‌‌
  elements,‌‌   and‌‌
  manner‌‌   of‌‌  People‌‌v.‌‌YYY‌‌2
‌ 018‌‌re‌‌Rape‌  ‌
insertion‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  penis‌‌
  into‌‌
  another‌‌
  person’s‌‌  mouth‌‌
  or‌‌ anal‌‌ orifice,‌‌ or‌‌ 
execution‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌  ‌of‌‌
  rape‌‌   and‌‌   jurisprudence‌‌   on‌‌   the‌‌
  matter,‌‌  it‌‌
  is‌‌ 
any‌  ‌instrument‌  ‌or‌  ‌object,‌  ‌into‌  ‌another‌  ‌person’s‌  ‌genital‌  ‌or‌  ‌anal‌ 
hardly‌  ‌conceivable‌  ‌how‌  ‌the‌  ‌frustrated‌  ‌stage‌  ‌in‌  ‌rape‌  ‌can‌  ‌ever‌  ‌be‌‌  A‌‌
  medico-legal‌‌   report‌‌
  is‌‌ NOT‌‌ indispensable‌‌ in‌‌ rape‌‌ cases‌‌ as‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌ 
orifice.”‌  ‌
committed.‌  ‌ merely‌‌   corroborative‌‌   in‌‌  nature.‌‌   Thus,‌‌  even‌‌   without‌‌   it,‌‌ an‌‌ accused‌‌ 
may‌  ‌still‌  ‌be‌  ‌convicted‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌sole‌  ‌basis‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌testimony‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 126‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

victim.‌  ‌As‌  ‌such,‌  ‌the‌  ‌credibility‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌witness‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌assessed‌‌  4. Robbery‌‌at‌‌a‌‌glance‌  ‌ Pars‌‌2-3.‌‌Robbery‌‌with‌‌serious‌‌physical‌‌injuries‌  ‌
independently‌  ‌regardless‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌presence‌  ‌or‌  ‌absence‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌
medico-legal‌  ‌report.‌  ‌Trial‌  ‌courts‌  ‌are‌  ‌expected‌  ‌to‌  ‌scrutinize‌  ‌the‌‌  a) If‌  ‌there‌‌
  is‌‌
  ‌violence‌‌
  against‌‌
  or‌‌
  intimidation‌‌
  ‌of‌‌
  any‌‌
  person,‌‌  1) The‌‌injuries‌‌were‌‌inflicted‌‌in‌‌the‌‌course‌‌of‌‌the‌‌robbery;‌‌and‌  ‌
victim's‌‌  testimony‌‌   with‌‌ great‌‌ caution,‌‌ with‌‌ or‌‌ without‌‌ a ‌‌medico-legal‌‌  always‌‌robbery.‌  ‌ 2) Inflicted‌‌upon‌‌those‌‌not‌‌responsible‌‌for‌‌the‌‌crime.‌  ‌
report‌‌to‌‌corroborate‌‌the‌‌same.‌  ‌ b) In‌  ‌the‌  ‌first‌  ‌type‌  ‌of‌  ‌robbery,‌  ‌the‌  ‌value‌‌
  of‌‌
  robbed‌‌   property‌‌  is‌‌  Par‌‌4.‌‌Robbery‌‌with‌‌unnecessary‌‌violence‌‌and‌‌intimidation‌  ‌
immaterial.‌‌   Penalty‌‌   depends‌‌   on‌‌
  (1)‌‌
  the‌‌ result‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ violence‌‌ 
7. Crimes‌‌Against‌‌Property‌  ‌ used,‌‌and‌‌(2)‌‌on‌‌the‌‌existence‌‌of‌‌intimidation.‌  ‌
1) If‌‌the‌‌violence‌‌or‌‌intimidation‌‌employed‌‌in‌‌the‌‌commission‌‌ 
of‌‌the‌‌robbery‌‌   ‌
Robbery‌  ‌ c) On‌  ‌the‌  ‌second‌  ‌type,‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌is‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌(1)‌  ‌value,‌  ‌(2)‌‌ 
carrying‌‌of‌‌arms,‌‌if‌‌carried‌‌out‌‌in‌‌inhabited‌‌buildings.‌‌   ‌ 2) shall‌‌have‌‌been‌‌carried‌‌to‌‌a‌‌degree‌‌clearly‌‌unnecessary‌‌for‌‌ 
293‌  ‌ Robbery,‌‌in‌‌general‌  ‌ the‌‌commission‌‌of‌‌the‌‌crime,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
d) Penalty‌  ‌based‌  ‌solely‌  ‌on‌  ‌value‌  ‌if‌  ‌carried‌‌
  out‌‌
  in‌‌
  uninhabited‌‌ 
3) when‌‌in‌‌the‌‌course‌‌of‌‌its‌‌execution,‌‌the‌‌offender‌‌shall‌‌have‌‌ 
buildings.‌  ‌
1) Elements‌‌of‌‌robbery‌‌in‌‌general‌  ‌ inflicted‌‌upon‌‌any‌‌person‌‌not‌‌responsible‌‌for‌‌its‌‌commission‌‌ 
a) there‌‌be‌‌(1)‌p
‌ ersonal‌‌property‌,‌(‌ 2)‌‌belonging‌‌to‌‌  5. If‌  ‌robbery‌  ‌was‌  ‌effected‌  ‌by‌  ‌employing‌  ‌both‌  ‌violence‌  ‌against‌  ‌or‌‌  any‌‌of‌‌the‌‌physical‌‌injuries‌‌covered‌‌by‌‌subdivisions‌‌3‌‌and‌‌4 ‌‌
another‌; ‌ ‌ intimidation‌‌   of‌‌
  persons‌‌  ‌and‌‌  force‌‌
  upon‌‌  the‌‌
  things,‌‌ the‌‌ latter‌‌ will‌‌  of‌‌Article‌‌263.‌  ‌
be‌‌   absorbed‌‌  by‌‌  the‌‌
  former.‌‌
  Thus,‌‌  the‌‌
  proper‌‌  crime‌‌
  to‌‌  be‌‌  charged‌‌ 
b) there‌‌is‌‌(3)‌u
‌ nlawful‌‌taking‌‌‌of‌‌that‌‌property;‌  ‌ is‌‌under‌‌Art‌‌294,‌‌‌not‌‌Art‌‌299.‌  ‌ Par‌‌5.‌‌Robbery‌‌with‌‌the‌‌use‌‌of‌‌violence‌‌and‌‌intimidation‌  ‌
c) such‌‌must‌‌be‌‌(4)‌w
‌ ith‌‌intent‌‌to‌‌gain‌;‌‌and‌  ★ Simple‌‌robbery.‌  ‌
6. RA‌  ‌10883‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌New‌  ‌Anti-Carnapping‌  ‌Act‌‌   of‌‌
  2016,‌‌
  which‌‌  lapsed‌‌ 
d) there‌‌is‌‌(5)‌v‌ iolence‌‌against‌‌‌or‌‌intimidation‌‌of‌‌  into‌  ‌law‌  ‌on‌  ‌July‌  ‌17,‌  ‌2016,‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌applicable‌  ‌when‌  ‌property‌‌  ‌ ,‌‌4,‌‌5‌‌of‌‌Art‌‌294‌‌‌qualified‌i‌ f‌‌ 
Robbery‌‌under‌‌subdivisions‌3
any‌‌person‌,‌‌or‌‌force‌‌upon‌‌anything‌. ‌ ‌ taken‌‌in‌‌robbery‌‌is‌‌a‌‌motor‌‌vehicle.‌  ‌ committed‌‌in:‌  ‌
2) Classification‌‌of‌‌robbery‌  ‌ a) an‌‌uninhabited‌‌place,‌‌or‌  ‌
294‌  ‌ Robbery‌‌with‌‌violence‌‌against‌‌or‌‌intimidation‌‌of‌‌persons‌  ‌
a) With‌‌violence‌‌against,‌‌or‌‌intimidation‌‌of‌‌persons‌‌  b) by‌‌a‌‌band,‌‌or‌  ‌
(Arts‌‌294,‌‌297,‌‌298);‌  ‌ Par‌‌1.‌‌Robbery‌‌with‌‌homicide‌  ‌ c) by‌‌attacking‌‌a‌‌moving‌‌train,‌‌street‌‌car,‌‌motor‌‌vehicle,‌‌or‌‌ 
b) By‌‌the‌‌use‌‌of‌‌force‌‌upon‌‌things‌‌(Arts‌‌299,‌‌302)‌  ‌ 1) Robbery‌  ‌with‌  ‌homicide‌  ‌is‌  ‌taken‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌  ‌generic‌  ‌sense‌  ‌and‌‌  airship,‌‌or‌  ‌
  absorbs‌  ‌all‌  ‌other‌  ‌crimes,‌  ‌i.e.‌  ‌serious‌  ‌physical‌  ‌injuries,‌‌  d) by‌‌entering‌‌the‌‌passengers'‌‌compartments‌‌in‌‌a‌‌train,‌‌or‌  ‌
NOTES‌  ‌ contemporaneous‌  ‌thereto.‌  ‌If‌  ‌committed‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌band,‌  ‌such‌‌ 
e) on‌‌a‌‌street,‌‌road,‌‌highway,‌‌or‌‌alley,‌‌and‌‌with‌‌the‌‌use‌‌of‌‌ 
1. Where‌‌   the‌‌
  ‌taking‌‌
  was‌‌  lawful‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ unlawful‌‌ misappropriation‌‌  becomes‌‌only‌‌a‌‌generic‌‌aggravating‌‌circumstance.‌  ‌
firearms.‌  ‌
was‌  ‌subsequent‌  ‌thereto,‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌  ‌is‌  ‌estafa‌  ‌or‌  ‌malversation.‌‌  2) One‌‌of‌‌the‌‌following‌‌must‌‌be‌‌proven‌‌that‌‌the‌‌homicide‌‌ 
But‌  ‌if‌  ‌intent‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌very‌  ‌beginning‌  ‌was‌  ‌to‌  ‌gain‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌  was‌‌committed:‌  ‌ 296‌  ‌ Robbery‌‌by‌‌a‌‌band‌  ‌
prohibited‌‌material,‌‌even‌‌with‌‌lawful‌‌taking,‌‌then‌‌it‌‌is‌r‌ obbery.‌  ‌ a) to‌‌facilitate‌‌the‌‌robbery‌‌or‌‌escape‌‌of‌‌culprits;‌ 
2. Unlawful‌  ‌taking‌  ‌complete‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌moment‌  ‌the‌‌   offender‌‌  gains‌‌  1) At‌‌least‌‌four‌‌armed‌‌‌malefactors‌‌take‌‌part‌‌in‌‌committing‌‌ 
b) to‌‌preserve‌‌the‌‌possession‌‌of‌‌the‌‌loot;‌  ‌ robbery.‌  ‌
possession‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌thing‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌robbery‌  ‌with‌  ‌violence‌  ‌against‌  ‌or‌‌ 
intimidation‌  ‌of‌  ‌persons.‌  ‌The‌  ‌thing‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌taken‌  ‌out‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  c) to‌‌prevent‌‌discovery;‌‌or‌  ‌
2) When‌‌any‌‌of‌‌the‌‌arms‌‌used‌‌is‌u‌ nlicensed‌,‌‌the‌‌penalty‌‌upon‌‌ 
building‌‌‌as‌‌to‌‌robbery‌‌with‌‌force‌‌upon‌‌things.‌  ‌ d) to‌‌eliminate‌‌witnesses‌‌or‌‌suppress‌‌evidence.‌‌   ‌ all‌‌robbers‌‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌the‌‌maximum‌‌corresponding‌‌‌penalty,‌‌ 
3. In‌  ‌order‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌element‌  ‌of‌  ‌violence‌  ‌or‌  ‌intimidation‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  Par‌‌1.‌‌Robbery‌‌with‌‌rape‌  ‌ without‌‌prejudice‌‌to‌‌the‌‌criminal‌‌liability‌‌of‌‌illegal‌‌ 
appreciated,‌  ‌it‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌present‌  ‌before‌  ‌the‌  ‌taking‌  ‌of‌  ‌personal‌‌  possession‌‌of‌‌such‌‌firearms.‌  ‌
1) The‌‌intent‌‌to‌‌gain‌‌must‌‌precede‌‌the‌‌rape.‌  ‌
property‌  ‌is‌  ‌complete.‌  ‌Except‌, ‌ ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌violence‌  ‌results‌  ‌in‌  ‌(a)‌‌  3) Any‌‌member‌‌present‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌punished‌‌as‌‌principal‌‌of‌‌any‌‌of‌‌ 
2) Committed‌‌when‌‌the‌‌robbery‌‌is‌‌accompanied‌‌by‌‌rape.‌  ‌
homicide,‌  ‌(b)‌  ‌rape,‌  ‌(c)‌  ‌intentional‌  ‌mutilation,‌  ‌(d)‌  ‌or‌  ‌serious‌‌  the‌‌assaults,‌‌unless‌‌it‌‌be‌‌shown‌‌that‌‌he‌‌attempted‌‌to‌‌prevent‌‌ 
physical‌‌injuries‌‌under‌‌pars‌‌1‌‌and‌‌2.‌  ‌ 3) The‌‌rape‌‌must‌‌be‌‌consummated.‌‌   ‌ the‌‌same.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 127‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

4) A‌‌band‌‌member‌‌is‌‌liable‌‌for‌‌any‌‌assaults‌‌committed‌w
‌ hen‌‌  a) breaking‌‌of‌‌doors,‌‌wardrobes,‌‌chests,‌‌or‌‌any‌‌other‌‌  3) Personal‌‌property‌‌of‌‌another‌‌was‌‌taken‌‌with‌‌intent‌‌to‌‌gain.‌‌   ‌
the‌‌following‌‌concur‌: ‌ ‌ kind‌‌of‌‌locked‌‌or‌‌sealed‌‌furniture‌‌or‌‌receptacle;‌O
‌ R‌  ‌
304‌  ‌ Possession‌‌of‌‌picklocks‌‌or‌‌similar‌‌tools‌  ‌
a) He‌‌was‌‌a‌‌member;‌  ‌ b) by‌‌taking‌‌such‌‌away‌‌to‌‌be‌‌broken‌‌or‌‌forced‌‌open‌‌ 
b) Present‌‌at‌‌the‌‌commission‌‌of‌‌robbery;‌  ‌ outside.‌  ‌ 1) Offender‌‌has‌p
‌ ossession‌;  ‌‌ ‌
c) Others‌‌committed‌‌the‌‌assault;‌  ‌ 300‌  ‌ Robbery‌‌in‌‌an‌‌uninhabited‌‌place‌‌and‌‌by‌‌a‌‌band‌  ‌ 2) Such‌‌are‌‌specially‌‌adapted‌‌to‌‌commit‌‌robbery;‌‌and‌‌   ‌
d) Did‌‌not‌‌attempt‌‌to‌‌prevent‌‌assault.‌  ‌ 3) Possession‌‌was‌u
‌ nlawful.‌  ‌
1. Qualifies‌‌Art‌‌299.‌‌Punished‌‌by‌‌the‌m
‌ aximum‌‌period‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌   
298‌  ‌ Robbery‌‌by‌‌execution‌‌of‌‌deeds‌‌⭐ ‌ ‌ penalty‌‌therefor.‌  ‌ False‌‌keys‌  ‌
2. That‌‌the‌‌place‌‌be‌‌uninhabited,‌‌and‌‌committed‌‌by‌‌a‌‌band‌‌  1)‌‌(a)‌‌Art‌‌304;‌‌(b)‌‌Genuine‌‌keys‌‌stolen‌‌from‌‌owner;‌‌(c)‌‌Any‌‌keys.‌  ‌
1) Offender‌i‌ ntends‌‌to‌‌defraud‌‌‌another;‌  ‌ must‌‌concur‌. ‌ ‌
2) Compels‌‌him‌‌to‌‌sign,‌‌execute,‌‌or‌‌deliver‌a
‌ ny‌‌public‌‌  Brigandage‌  ‌
3. The‌‌inhabited‌‌house,‌‌public‌‌building,‌‌edifice‌‌for‌‌religions‌‌ 
instrument‌‌or‌‌document;‌  ‌ worship‌‌must‌‌be‌l‌ ocated‌‌in‌‌an‌‌uninhabited‌‌place.‌  ‌
306‌  ‌ Brigandage‌  ‌
3) By‌‌means‌‌of‌‌violence‌‌or‌‌intimidation.‌  ‌ 4. Art‌‌299‌‌is‌‌qualified‌‌when‌b
‌ oth‌‌‌circumstances‌‌concur.‌‌In‌‌ 
Robbery‌‌with‌‌violence‌‌against‌‌or‌‌intimidation‌‌of‌‌persons,‌‌  Exists‌‌when‌  ‌
299‌  ‌ Robbery‌‌in‌‌an‌‌inhabited‌‌house,‌‌public‌‌building,‌‌or‌‌  either‌‌‌may‌‌qualify‌‌(Art‌‌295).‌  ‌ 1) There‌‌are‌‌at‌‌least‌‌four‌‌armed‌‌men.‌  ‌
edifice‌‌devoted‌‌to‌‌public‌‌worship‌  ‌
What‌‌is‌‌an‌‌inhabited‌‌house‌‌and‌‌their‌‌dependencies‌  ‌ 2) Forming‌‌a‌‌band‌‌of‌‌robbers;‌  ‌
Elements‌‌of‌‌subdivision‌‌A ‌ ‌
1) Dependencies‌‌‌must‌‌be‌‌   ‌ 3) Purpose‌‌is‌‌to‌‌   ‌
1) Offender‌e‌ ntered‌‌   ‌
a) Contiguous,‌  ‌ a) commit‌‌robbery‌‌in‌‌the‌‌highway,‌  ‌
a) an‌‌inhabited‌‌place,‌‌or‌  ‌
b) have‌‌an‌‌interior‌‌entrance‌‌connected‌‌therewith,‌‌and‌‌   ‌ b) kidnap‌‌for‌‌ransom,‌‌or‌  ‌
b) public‌‌building,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
c) form‌‌part‌‌of‌‌the‌‌whole.‌  ‌ c) attain‌‌by‌‌means‌‌of‌‌force‌‌and‌‌violence‌‌any‌‌other‌‌ 
c) edifice‌‌devoted‌‌to‌‌religious‌‌worship.‌  ‌
2) Orchards‌‌and‌‌lands‌‌used‌‌for‌‌cultivation,‌n
‌ ot‌‌dependencies.‌  ‌ purpose.‌  ‌
2) The‌‌entrance‌‌‌effected‌‌by:‌  ‌
302‌  ‌ Robbery‌‌in‌‌an‌‌uninhabited‌‌place‌‌or‌‌in‌‌a‌‌private‌‌building‌  ‌ 307‌  ‌ Aiding‌‌and‌‌abetting‌‌brigands‌  ‌
a) ‌an‌‌opening‌‌not‌‌intended‌‌for‌‌entrance‌‌or‌‌egress;‌  ‌
b) breaking‌‌‌any‌‌wall,‌‌roof,‌‌or‌‌floor‌‌or‌‌breaking‌‌any‌‌  1) Offender‌‌enters‌‌an‌‌uninhabited‌‌or‌‌a‌‌private‌‌building.‌  ‌ 1) There‌‌is‌‌a‌‌band‌‌of‌‌brigands;‌  ‌
door‌‌or‌‌window;‌  ‌
2) Any‌‌was‌‌present:‌  ‌ 2) Offender‌‌knows;‌  ‌
c) using‌f‌ alse‌‌keys‌,‌‌picklocks‌‌or‌‌similar‌‌tools;‌  ‌
a) entrance‌‌was‌‌effected‌‌through‌‌an‌‌opening‌‌not‌‌  3) Does‌‌any:‌  ‌
d) using‌‌any‌f‌ ictitious‌‌name‌‌‌or‌‌pretending‌‌the‌‌exercise‌‌  intended‌‌for‌‌egress;‌  ‌ a) aids,‌‌abets,‌‌protects‌  ‌
of‌‌public‌‌authority.‌‌   ‌
b) a‌‌wall,‌‌roof,‌‌floor,‌‌or‌‌outside‌‌door‌‌or‌‌window‌‌was‌‌  b) gives‌‌info‌‌on‌‌police‌‌movement;‌  ‌
3) Once‌‌inside,‌‌takes‌‌personal‌‌property‌‌of‌‌another‌‌with‌‌intent‌‌to‌‌  broken;‌  ‌
gain.‌  ‌ c) acquires‌‌or‌‌receives‌‌property‌‌taken‌‌by‌‌such‌‌ 
c) false‌‌keys,‌‌picklocks,‌‌were‌‌used‌‌to‌‌effect‌‌entrance;‌  ‌ brigands.‌  ‌
Elements‌‌of‌‌subdivision‌‌B ‌ ‌
d) a‌‌door,‌‌wardrobe,‌‌chest,‌‌was‌‌broken;‌  ‌
1) Offender‌‌is‌‌inside‌‌regardless‌‌of‌‌how‌‌he‌‌entered;‌  ‌ Theft‌  ‌
e) a‌‌closed‌‌or‌‌sealed‌‌receptacle‌‌was‌‌removed,‌‌and‌‌be‌‌ 
2) The‌‌unlawful‌‌taking‌‌done‌‌by‌  ‌ broken‌‌open‌‌elsewhere.‌  ‌ 308‌  ‌ Theft‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 128‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

Who‌‌are‌‌liable‌‌for‌‌theft‌  ‌ 2. Grave‌  ‌abuse‌  ‌of‌  ‌confidence‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌mere‌  ‌circumstance‌  ‌which‌‌ 
Swindling‌‌and‌‌Other‌‌Deceits‌  ‌
1) With‌‌intent‌‌to‌‌gain,‌‌but‌‌without‌‌violence‌‌against‌‌or‌‌  aggravates‌  ‌and‌  ‌qualifies‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌for‌  ‌said‌‌ 
intimidation‌‌of‌‌persons‌‌nor‌‌force‌‌upon‌‌things,‌‌take,‌‌personal‌  circumstance‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌premeditated‌  ‌in‌  ‌order‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌taken‌  ‌into‌‌ 
315‌  ‌ Swindling‌‌or‌E
‌ stafa‌  ‌
property,‌‌of‌‌another,‌‌without‌‌the‌‌latter's‌‌consent.‌  ‌ consideration.‌  ‌Its‌  ‌presence‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌commission‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌  ‌is‌‌ 
2) Having‌‌found‌‌lost‌‌property,‌‌fail‌‌to‌‌deliver‌‌same‌‌to‌‌the‌‌local‌‌  sufficient.‌  ‌ Fraud‌‌committed‌‌by‌‌these‌‌means:‌  ‌
authorities‌‌or‌‌its‌‌owner.‌  ‌ 3. Theft‌  ‌by‌  ‌domestic‌  ‌servant‌  ‌always‌  ‌qualified‌. ‌ ‌Not‌  ‌so‌  ‌for‌‌  (par‌‌1)‌‌WITH‌‌UNFAITHFULNESS‌‌OR‌‌ABUSE‌‌OF‌‌CONFIDENCE‌  ‌
3) After‌‌having‌‌maliciously‌‌damaged‌‌the‌‌property‌‌of‌‌another,‌‌  housemate.‌‌Not‌‌for‌‌laborer.‌  ‌
a) altering‌t‌ he‌‌substance,‌‌quantity,‌‌or‌‌quality‌‌‌of‌‌anything‌‌of‌‌ 
remove‌‌or‌‌make‌‌use‌‌of‌‌the‌‌fruits‌‌or‌‌object‌‌of‌‌the‌‌damage‌‌  4. Theft‌‌  by‌‌
  truck‌‌
  driver‌‌
  or‌‌ by‌‌ shepherd‌‌ or‌‌ by‌‌ one‌‌ who‌‌ had‌‌ access‌‌ to‌‌  value;‌  ‌
caused‌‌by‌‌them.‌  ‌ the‌‌place‌‌where‌‌the‌‌stolen‌‌property‌‌is‌‌kept‌‌is‌‌qualified‌‌theft.‌  ‌
b) misappropriating‌‌‌or‌‌converting‌‌‌any‌‌personal‌‌property‌‌ 
4) Enter‌‌an‌‌enclosed‌‌estate‌‌or‌‌a‌‌field‌‌where‌‌trespass‌‌is‌‌  received‌‌in‌t‌ rust,‌o
‌ r‌‌denying‌t‌ o‌‌having‌‌received‌‌same.‌; ‌ ‌
Usurpation‌  ‌
forbidden‌‌and‌‌without‌‌consent,‌‌hunt‌‌or‌‌fish‌‌upon‌‌the‌‌same‌‌or‌‌ 
c) taking‌‌undue‌‌advantage‌‌of‌‌the‌‌signature‌‌in‌‌blank,‌‌and‌‌by‌‌ 
gather‌‌fruits,‌‌cereals‌‌or‌‌other‌‌forest‌‌or‌‌farm‌‌products.‌  ‌
312‌  ‌ Occupation‌‌of‌‌real‌‌property‌  ‌ writing‌‌any‌‌document‌‌above‌‌such.‌  ‌
Elements‌  ‌
Acts‌‌punished‌  ‌ (par‌‌2)‌‌BY‌‌FALSE‌‌PRETENSES‌  ‌
1) Taking‌‌of‌‌personal‌‌property;‌  ‌
1) taking‌‌possession‌‌of‌‌any‌‌real‌‌property‌‌of‌‌another‌‌by‌‌means‌‌  a) using‌‌fictitious‌‌names,‌‌or‌‌falsely‌p
‌ retending‌t‌ o‌‌possess‌‌ 
2) belonging‌‌to‌‌another;‌  ‌ power,‌‌influence,‌‌qualifications,‌‌property,‌‌credit,‌‌agency,‌‌ 
of‌‌violence‌‌against‌‌or‌‌intimidation‌‌of‌‌persons.‌  ‌
3) done‌‌with‌‌intent‌‌to‌‌gain;‌  ‌ business‌‌or‌‌imaginary‌‌transactions‌,‌‌or‌‌by‌‌means‌‌of‌‌other‌‌ 
2) usurping‌‌any‌‌real‌‌rights‌‌in‌‌property‌‌belonging‌‌to‌‌another‌‌by‌‌  similar‌‌deceits.‌  ‌
4) without‌‌consent‌‌of‌‌owner;‌  ‌ means‌‌of‌‌VAIP.‌  ‌
5) be‌‌accomplished‌w ‌ ithout‌‌violence‌‌against‌‌or,‌‌intimidation‌‌of‌‌  b) altering‌‌‌the‌‌quality,‌‌fineness‌‌or‌‌weight‌‌‌of‌‌anything‌‌ 
Elements‌  ‌ pertaining‌‌to‌‌his‌‌art‌‌or‌‌business.‌  ‌
persons,‌‌or‌‌force‌‌upon‌‌things.‌  ‌
1) takes‌‌possession‌‌of‌‌any‌‌real‌‌property‌‌or‌‌usurps‌‌any‌‌real‌‌  c) pretending‌‌to‌‌have‌b
‌ ribed‌‌‌any‌‌Government‌‌employee.‌‌ 
310.‌‌Qualified‌‌Theft‌i‌ f‌  ‌ rights‌‌thereof;‌  ‌
(‌maximum‌‌penalty)‌  ‌
1) theft‌‌committed‌‌by‌‌a‌d
‌ omestic‌‌servant;‌  ‌ 2) belongs‌‌to‌‌another;‌  ‌ d) postdating‌‌‌or‌‌issuing‌‌a‌‌bouncing‌‌check.‌  ‌
2) with‌‌grave‌‌abuse‌‌of‌‌confidence;‌  ‌ 3) violence‌‌against‌‌or‌‌intimidation‌‌of‌‌persons‌‌is‌‌used;‌  ‌ e) obtaining‌‌any‌‌food‌‌or‌‌accommodation,‌‌or‌‌credit‌‌of‌‌such.‌  ‌
3) property‌‌stolen‌‌is‌‌a  ‌‌ ‌ 4) with‌‌intent‌‌to‌‌gain.‌  ‌ (par‌‌3)‌‌BY‌‌ANY‌‌OF‌‌THE‌‌FOLLOWING‌‌FRAUDULENT‌‌MEANS‌  ‌
a) motor‌‌vehicle‌, ‌ ‌
313‌  ‌ Altering‌‌boundaries‌‌or‌‌landmarks‌  ‌ a) inducing‌‌another,‌‌by‌‌means‌‌of‌‌deceit,‌‌to‌‌sign‌‌a‌‌document;‌  ‌
b) mail‌‌matter‌, ‌ ‌
b) resorting‌‌to‌‌some‌‌fraudulent‌‌practice‌‌to‌‌insure‌‌success‌‌in‌‌a ‌‌
c) large‌‌cattle;‌  ‌ 1) There‌‌be‌‌boundary‌‌marks‌‌or‌‌monuments,‌‌or‌‌estates;‌  ‌ gambling‌‌game;‌  ‌
4) consists‌‌of‌‌coconuts‌‌taken‌‌from‌‌plantation;‌  ‌ 2) Offender‌‌alters‌‌same.‌  ‌ c) removing,‌‌concealing,‌‌or‌‌destroying,‌‌in‌‌whole‌‌or‌‌in‌‌part,‌‌any‌‌ 
5) fish‌‌taken‌‌from‌‌fishpond‌‌or‌‌fishery;‌  ‌ court‌‌record,‌‌office‌‌files,‌‌document,‌‌or‌‌any‌‌other‌‌papers.‌  ‌
314‌  ‌ Fraudulent‌‌insolvency‌  ‌
6) on‌‌the‌‌occasion‌‌of‌‌fire,‌‌earthquake,‌‌typhoon,‌‌volcanic‌‌  Elements‌‌in‌‌general‌  ‌
eruption,‌‌or‌‌any‌‌other‌‌calamity,‌‌vehicular‌‌accident,‌‌civil‌‌  1) Offender‌‌is‌‌a‌d
‌ ebtor‌‌‌with‌‌due‌‌and‌‌demandable‌‌obligation;‌  ‌ 1) Accused‌d
‌ efrauded‌‌‌another‌‌by‌  ‌
disturbance.‌  ‌ 2) He‌‌absconds‌‌with‌‌his‌‌property;‌  ‌ a) abuse‌‌of‌‌confidence‌,‌‌or‌  ‌
QUALIFIED‌‌THEFT‌  ‌ 3) To‌‌the‌p
‌ rejudice‌o
‌ f‌‌his‌‌creditors.‌  ‌ b) means‌‌of‌‌deceit‌;‌‌and‌  ‌
1. Penalty‌‌is‌t‌ wo‌‌degrees‌‌higher.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 129‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

2) Damage‌‌‌or‌‌prejudice‌‌‌capable‌‌of‌‌pecuniary‌‌estimation‌‌caused‌‌  4. Demand‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌legally‌  r‌ equired,‌  ‌but‌  ‌is‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌to‌  ‌show‌‌  1) Offender‌‌postdated‌‌a‌‌check,‌‌or‌‌issued‌‌a‌‌check‌‌in‌‌payment‌‌of‌‌ 
upon‌‌injured‌‌party.‌  ‌ circumstantial‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌of‌  ‌misappropriation‌  ‌after‌  ‌failing‌  ‌to‌‌  an‌‌obligation;‌  ‌
Elements‌‌of‌‌estafa‌‌with‌‌unfaithfulness‌‌(sub‌‌1[a])‌  ‌ account‌‌upon‌‌demand.‌  ‌ 2) Done‌‌when‌‌the‌‌offender‌‌had‌‌no‌‌funds‌‌in‌‌the‌‌bank,‌‌or‌‌his‌‌ 
1) Offender‌‌has‌‌an‌‌onerous‌‌obligation‌‌to‌‌deliver‌‌something‌‌of‌‌  5. There‌‌is‌‌no‌‌estafa‌‌through‌‌negligence.‌  ‌ funds‌‌deposited‌‌therein‌‌were‌‌not‌‌sufficient‌‌to‌‌cover‌‌the‌‌ 
value;‌  ‌ 6. Estafa‌  ‌through‌  ‌falsification‌  ‌of‌  ‌public‌  ‌documents‌  ‌(FPD)‌  ‌is‌‌  amount.‌  ‌
necessarily‌i‌ ncluded‌‌‌in‌‌a‌‌charge‌‌of‌‌malversation‌‌through‌‌FPD.‌  ‌  
2) He‌‌alters‌‌its‌‌substance,‌‌quality‌‌or‌‌quantity;‌  ‌ Elements‌‌of‌‌estafa‌‌by‌‌inducing‌‌another‌‌to‌‌sign‌‌any‌‌document.‌‌ 
3) Damage‌‌or‌‌prejudice‌‌is‌‌caused.‌  ‌ 7. Misappropriation‌  ‌of‌  ‌policeman‌  ‌of‌  ‌firearms‌  ‌received‌  ‌is:‌  ‌estafa‌, ‌‌
(No‌‌3[a])‌  ‌
  when‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌involved‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌commission‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌crime,‌  ‌and‌‌ 
malversation‌,‌‌if‌‌it‌‌is‌‌involved.‌  ‌ 1) Offender‌‌induced‌‌offended‌‌party‌‌to‌‌sign‌‌a‌‌document;‌  ‌
Elements‌‌of‌‌estafa‌‌with‌‌abuse‌‌of‌‌confidence‌‌(sub‌‌1[b])‌  ‌
  2) Deceit‌‌be‌‌employed;‌  ‌
1) Money,‌  ‌goods,‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌personal‌  ‌property‌  ‌be‌  ‌received‌  ‌in‌‌  Elements‌‌of‌‌estafa‌‌by‌‌taking‌‌undue‌‌advantage‌‌of‌‌the‌‌signature‌‌  3) Offended‌‌party‌‌personally‌‌signed;‌  ‌
trust,‌‌
  or‌‌
  on‌‌
  commission,‌‌   or‌‌  for‌‌
  administration,‌‌   or‌‌
  under‌‌ any‌‌  in‌‌blank‌‌(sub‌‌1[c])‌  ‌
other‌‌
  obligation‌‌  involving‌‌   the‌‌
  duty‌‌
  to‌‌ ‌make‌‌ delivery‌‌ of,‌‌ or‌‌ to‌‌  4) Prejudice‌‌be‌‌caused.‌  ‌
1) The‌‌paper‌‌with‌‌the‌‌signature‌‌of‌‌the‌‌offended‌‌party‌‌be‌‌in‌‌ 
return.‌  ‌ There‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌proof‌  ‌that‌  ‌defendant‌  ‌made‌  ‌statements‌  ‌tending‌  ‌to‌‌ 
blank;‌  ‌
2) Such‌‌has‌‌been‌m
‌ isappropriated‌‌or‌‌converted;‌  ‌ mislead‌‌   the‌‌
  complainant‌‌   as‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌ character‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ document‌‌ executed‌‌ 
2) Offended‌‌party‌‌should‌‌have‌‌delivered‌‌it‌‌to‌‌the‌‌offender;‌  ‌ by‌‌him.‌  ‌
3) To‌‌the‌‌prejudice‌‌of‌‌another;‌  ‌
3) A‌‌document‌‌is‌‌written‌‌above‌‌the‌‌signature‌‌without‌‌authority;‌  ‌ Elements‌‌of‌‌estafa‌‌by‌‌removing,‌‌concealing,‌‌or‌‌destroying‌‌ 
4) There‌  ‌is‌  ‌demand‌  ‌from‌  ‌offended‌  ‌party‌  ‌(‌not‌  ‌required‌  ‌when‌‌  4) Liability‌‌or‌‌damage‌‌is‌‌caused‌‌to‌‌another.‌  ‌ documents‌‌(No‌‌3[c])‌  ‌
there‌‌is‌‌evidence‌‌of‌‌misappropriation)‌  ‌
  1) There‌‌be‌‌court‌‌record,‌‌office‌‌files,‌‌documents‌‌or‌‌any‌‌other‌‌ 
★ Three‌‌(3)‌‌ways‌‌of‌‌committing‌  ‌ Elements‌‌of‌‌estafa‌‌by‌‌means‌‌of‌‌DECEIT‌‌(subs‌‌2,‌‌3)‌  ‌ papers;‌  ‌
1) misappropriating‌‌‌or‌  ‌ 1) There‌‌must‌‌be‌‌a‌f‌ alse‌‌pretense,‌‌fraudulent‌‌act,‌o
‌ r‌‌fraudulent‌‌  2) Offender‌‌removed,‌‌concealed‌‌or‌‌destroyed‌‌any‌‌of‌‌them;‌  ‌
2) converting‌‌‌the‌‌thing‌‌received;‌‌or‌  ‌ means;‌  ‌
3) With‌‌intent‌‌to‌‌defraud‌‌another.‌  ‌
3) denying‌‌‌that‌‌the‌‌thing‌‌was‌‌received.‌  ‌ 2) Must‌‌be‌‌made‌‌prior‌‌to‌‌‌or‌‌simultaneously‌‌with‌‌the‌‌ 
commission‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌fraud;‌  ‌ Element‌‌of‌‌damage‌‌or‌‌prejudice‌‌may‌‌consist‌‌in:‌  ‌
1. Estafa‌‌   by‌‌
  conversion.‌‌
  Pledging‌‌   a ‌‌thing‌‌
  which‌‌
  was‌‌ received‌‌ only‌‌  1) Offended‌‌party‌‌being‌‌deprived‌‌of‌‌his‌‌money‌‌or‌‌property,‌‌as‌‌ 
to‌‌
  be‌‌
  sold‌‌
  on‌‌
  commission.‌‌  It‌‌
  presupposes‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ thing‌‌ has‌‌ been‌‌  3) Offended‌‌party‌r‌ elied‌‌‌on‌‌it,‌‌or‌‌was‌‌induced‌‌by‌‌it‌‌to‌‌part‌‌with‌‌ 
result‌‌of‌‌the‌‌defraudation;‌  ‌
devoted‌‌to‌‌a‌‌purpose‌‌or‌‌use‌‌different‌‌from‌‌that‌‌agreed‌‌upon.‌  ‌ his‌‌property.‌  ‌
4) There‌‌is‌‌damage.‌  ‌ 2) Disturbance‌‌in‌‌property‌‌right;‌‌or‌  ‌
2. Estafa‌  ‌by‌  ‌misappropriation‌. ‌ ‌Appellant‌  ‌took‌  ‌the‌  ‌sum‌‌   of‌‌
  P8.3K‌‌ 
out‌‌
  of‌‌ the‌‌ funds‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Manila‌‌ Railroad‌‌ Company,‌‌ replacing‌‌ it‌‌ with‌‌  3) Temporary‌‌prejudice.‌  ‌
Three‌‌(3)‌‌ways‌‌of‌‌committing‌‌Art‌‌315‌‌No.‌‌2[a]‌  ‌
his‌‌
  personal‌‌ check.‌‌ He‌‌ directed‌‌ the‌‌ cashier‌‌ to‌‌ hold‌‌ the‌‌ check‌‌ until‌‌   
1) using‌‌fictitious‌‌name;‌  ‌ NOTES‌‌RE‌‌ESTAFA‌  ‌
end‌  ‌of‌  ‌month.‌  ‌He‌  ‌used‌  ‌the‌  ‌amount‌  ‌for‌  ‌his‌  ‌personal‌  ‌use.‌  ‌It‌‌  was‌‌ 
found‌  ‌out‌  ‌he‌  ‌had‌  ‌insufficient‌  ‌funds‌  ‌to‌  ‌cover‌  ‌the‌  ‌check,‌  ‌though‌‌  2) falsely‌‌pretending‌‌to‌‌possess‌:‌‌power,‌‌influence,‌‌qualifications,‌‌  1. Disturbance‌  ‌in‌  ‌property‌  ‌rights.‌  ‌Though‌  ‌the‌  ‌typewriter‌  ‌was‌‌ 
later,‌  ‌he‌  ‌was‌  ‌able‌  ‌to‌  ‌replenish‌  ‌said‌  ‌account.‌  ‌He‌  ‌is‌  ‌still‌  ‌guilty‌‌  property,‌‌credit,‌‌agency,‌‌business‌‌or‌‌imaginary‌‌transactions;‌‌  later‌  ‌recovered‌  ‌after‌  ‌it‌  ‌was‌  ‌sold‌  ‌to‌  ‌another‌  ‌by‌  ‌accused,‌‌ 
because‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌distinguish‌  ‌between‌  ‌permanent‌  ‌and‌‌  or‌  ‌ complainant‌  ‌suffered‌  ‌disturbance‌‌   of‌‌
  his‌‌
  property‌‌
  right‌‌  over‌‌
  said‌‌ 
temporary‌‌misappropriations.‌  ‌ 3) ‌through‌s‌ imilar‌‌deceits.‌  ‌ typewriter.‌  ‌
3. In‌  ‌estafa,‌  ‌damage‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌offended‌  ‌party‌, ‌ ‌not‌  ‌the‌  ‌gain‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  Elements‌‌of‌‌estafa‌‌by‌‌postdating‌‌a‌‌check‌‌or‌‌issuing‌‌a‌‌check‌‌in‌‌  2. The‌‌
  basis‌‌
  of‌‌
  penalty‌‌   is‌‌
  the‌‌
  amount‌‌  or‌‌ value‌‌ misappropriated‌‌ and‌‌ 
offender,‌‌is‌‌the‌‌important‌‌consideration.‌  ‌ payment‌‌of‌‌an‌‌obligation.‌‌(No‌‌2[d])‌  ‌ not‌‌
  delivered‌‌   or‌‌ returned‌‌ before‌‌ the‌‌ institution‌‌ of‌‌ criminal‌‌ action.‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 130‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

Payment‌  ‌subsequent‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌commission‌  ‌of‌  ‌estafa‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌‌  another‌  ‌ by‌‌taking‌‌advantage‌‌of‌‌the‌‌credulity‌‌of‌‌the‌‌public‌‌in‌‌any‌‌other‌‌ 
distinguish‌‌the‌‌criminal‌‌liability.‌  ‌ Par‌‌5.‌‌By‌‌accepting‌‌any‌‌compensation‌‌for‌‌services‌‌not‌‌rendered‌‌  similar‌‌manner,‌f‌ or‌‌profit‌‌or‌‌gain.‌  ‌
3. Temporary‌‌   prejudice.‌‌   Complainant‌‌ bought‌‌ a ‌‌filter‌‌ from‌‌ an‌‌ agent‌‌  or‌‌for‌‌labor‌‌not‌‌performed.‌  ‌
 ‌

through‌‌
  a ‌‌check.‌‌   The‌‌  filter‌‌
  was‌‌
  not‌‌
  delivered,‌‌
  and‌‌  found‌‌   agent‌‌
  to‌‌  Arson‌  ‌
Par‌‌6.‌‌By‌‌selling,‌‌mortgaging‌‌or‌‌encumbering‌‌real‌‌property‌‌or‌‌ 
be‌‌
  bogus.‌‌  He‌‌   called‌‌
  bank‌‌ to‌‌ suspend‌‌ payment.‌‌ Thus,‌‌ he‌‌ could‌‌ not‌‌  properties‌‌with‌‌which‌‌the‌‌offender‌‌guaranteed‌‌the‌‌ 
dispose‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌amount‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌check‌  ‌possessed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌‌  320‌  ‌ Destructive‌‌Arson‌  ‌
fulfillment‌‌of‌‌his‌‌obligation‌‌as‌‌surety.‌  ‌
bogus‌‌agent.‌  ‌
1) Offender‌‌is‌‌a‌s‌ urety‌‌‌in‌‌a‌‌bond;‌  ‌ Penalty‌‌of‌R
‌ P‌‌to‌‌Death‌‌‌to‌‌any‌‌person‌‌who‌‌burns‌‌the‌‌following‌  ‌
4. If‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person‌  ‌procures‌  ‌a ‌‌loan‌‌
  through‌‌
  a ‌‌falsified‌‌
  public‌‌   document,‌‌ 
2) He‌‌guaranteed‌‌with‌‌his‌‌real‌‌property/ies;‌  ‌ 1) One‌‌or‌‌more‌‌buildings,‌‌consequent‌‌to‌‌1‌‌single‌‌act‌‌of‌‌burning,‌‌ 
but‌  ‌settles‌  ‌said‌  ‌loan‌  ‌in‌  ‌due‌  ‌time,‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌estafa,‌  ‌only‌‌ 
3) He‌‌encumbers‌‌said‌‌guaranty;‌  ‌ or‌‌as‌‌a‌‌result‌‌of‌‌simultaneous‌‌burnings‌‌or‌‌committed‌‌on‌‌ 
falsification.‌  ‌
several‌‌or‌‌different‌‌occasions.‌  ‌
5. There‌‌is‌‌a‌‌complex‌‌crime‌‌of‌‌theft‌‌and‌‌estafa.‌  ‌ 4) Such‌‌encumbrance‌‌is‌  ‌
2) Any‌‌building‌‌of‌‌public‌‌or‌‌private‌‌ownership‌‌where‌‌people‌‌ 
a) without‌‌express‌‌authority‌‌from‌‌court,‌‌   ‌ usually‌‌congregate,‌‌regardless‌‌of‌‌whether‌‌offender‌‌knows‌‌ 
316‌  ‌ Other‌‌forms‌‌of‌‌swindling‌  ‌
b) made‌‌before‌‌the‌‌cancellation‌‌of‌‌his‌‌bond,‌O
‌ R‌‌   ‌ that‌‌there‌‌are‌‌persons‌‌in‌‌said‌‌building‌‌at‌‌the‌‌time‌‌it‌‌is‌‌set‌‌on‌‌ 
Par‌‌1.‌‌By‌‌conveying,‌‌selling,‌‌encumbering,‌‌or‌‌mortgaging‌‌any‌‌  c) before‌‌being‌‌relieved‌‌from‌‌the‌‌bond.‌  ‌ fire,‌‌and‌‌whether‌‌it‌‌is‌‌inhabited‌‌or‌‌not.‌  ‌
real‌‌property,‌‌pretending‌‌to‌‌be‌‌the‌‌owner‌‌of‌‌the‌‌same.‌  ‌ 3) Train,‌‌ship,‌‌vessel,‌‌airship,‌‌plane;‌  ‌
There‌‌must‌‌be‌‌damage‌‌caused‌‌under‌‌Art‌‌316.‌  ‌
1) Thing‌‌be‌‌immovable;‌  ‌ 4) Building,‌‌factory,‌‌warehouses,‌‌devoted‌‌to‌‌the‌‌service‌‌of‌‌ 
2) Offender‌‌falsely‌‌represents‌‌to‌‌be‌‌the‌‌owner;‌  ‌ 317‌  ‌ Swindling‌‌a‌‌minor‌  ‌ public‌‌utilities;‌  ‌
3) Executed‌‌an‌‌act‌‌of‌‌ownership;‌  ‌ 1) Offender‌‌takes‌‌advantage‌‌of‌‌the‌‌inexperience,‌‌emotions,‌‌or‌‌  5) Any‌‌building‌‌burnt‌‌to‌‌‌conceal‌‌evidence‌‌‌of‌‌another‌‌violation‌‌ 
feelings‌‌of‌‌a‌‌minor;‌  ‌ of‌‌law,‌‌to‌‌conceal‌‌bankruptcy‌‌or‌‌defrauding‌‌creditors‌‌or‌‌to‌‌ 
4) To‌‌the‌‌prejudice‌‌of‌‌owner‌‌or‌‌a‌‌third‌‌person.‌  ‌
collect‌‌from‌‌insurance.‌  ‌
Par‌‌2.‌‌By‌‌disposing‌‌of‌‌real‌‌property‌‌as‌‌free‌‌from‌‌encumbrance,‌‌  2) Induces‌‌such‌‌minor‌  ‌
6) Arsenal,‌‌shipyard,‌‌storehouse,‌‌military‌‌power‌‌or‌‌fireworks‌‌ 
although‌‌such‌‌be‌‌not‌‌recorded.‌  ‌ a) to‌‌assume‌‌an‌‌obligation,‌‌   ‌ factory,‌‌ordinance,‌‌storehouse,‌‌archives,‌‌general‌‌museum‌‌of‌‌ 
1) Thing‌‌disposed‌‌is‌‌real‌‌property;‌  ‌ b) to‌‌give‌‌release,‌O
‌ R‌  ‌ the‌‌Government;‌  ‌
2) Offender‌‌knew‌‌of‌‌the‌‌encumbrance,‌‌recorded‌‌or‌‌not.‌  c) to‌‌execute‌‌a‌‌transfer‌‌of‌‌any‌‌property‌‌right;‌  ‌ 7) In‌‌an‌‌inhabited‌‌place,‌‌any‌‌storehouse‌‌or‌‌factory‌‌of‌‌ 
3) There‌‌is‌‌express‌‌representation‌‌that‌‌the‌‌property‌‌is‌f‌ ree‌‌‌from‌‌  3) Consideration‌‌be‌  ‌ inflammable‌‌or‌‌explosive‌‌materials.‌  ‌
any‌‌encumbrance;‌  ‌
a) some‌‌loan‌‌of‌‌money,‌‌   ‌ PD‌‌1613.‌‌Simple‌‌Arson‌‌🔗 ‌ ‌
4) There‌‌is‌‌damage‌‌to‌‌another.‌  ‌
b) credit,‌O
‌ R‌  ‌
Par‌‌3.‌‌By‌‌wrongfully‌‌taking‌‌by‌‌the‌‌owner‌‌his‌‌personal‌‌property‌‌  ★ Arson‌i‌ s‌‌the‌‌malicious‌‌destruction‌‌of‌‌property‌‌by‌‌fire.‌  ‌
c) other‌‌personal‌‌property;‌  ‌
from‌‌its‌‌lawful‌‌possessor‌  ‌ ★ Kinds‌‌of‌‌arson:‌  ‌
4) To‌‌the‌‌detriment‌‌of‌‌the‌‌minor.‌  ‌
1) Offender‌‌is‌‌the‌‌owner‌‌of‌‌personal‌‌property;‌  ‌
1) Simple‌‌arson;‌  ‌
2) It‌‌is‌‌in‌‌the‌‌lawful‌‌possession‌‌of‌‌another;‌  ‌ 318‌  ‌ Other‌‌deceits‌  ‌ 2) Destructive‌‌arson;‌  ‌
3) Offender‌‌wrongfully‌‌takes‌‌it‌‌from‌‌its‌‌lawful‌‌possessor;‌  ‌
1) Defrauding‌‌or‌‌damaging‌‌another‌‌by‌‌any‌‌other‌‌deceit‌‌not‌‌  3) Other‌‌cases‌‌of‌‌arson.‌  ‌
4) Prejudice‌‌is‌‌caused‌‌upon‌‌the‌‌possessor‌‌or‌‌a‌‌third‌‌person.‌  ‌ mentioned‌‌in‌‌the‌‌preceding‌‌articles.‌  ‌ ★ Simple‌‌arson‌.‌‌Burning‌‌or‌‌setting‌‌fire‌‌to‌‌the‌‌property‌‌of‌‌ 
Par‌‌4.‌‌By‌‌executing‌‌any‌‌fictitious‌‌contract‌‌to‌‌the‌‌prejudice‌‌of‌‌  2) Interpreting‌‌dreams,‌‌by‌‌making‌‌forecasts,‌‌telling‌‌fortunes,‌‌or‌‌  another,‌‌or‌‌his‌‌own‌‌under‌‌circumstances‌‌which‌‌expose‌‌to‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 131‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

danger‌‌the‌‌life‌‌or‌‌property‌‌of‌‌another.‌P
‌ M.‌  ‌ 2) Such‌‌act‌‌does‌‌not‌‌constitute‌‌arson;‌  ‌ government‌  ‌or‌  ‌commercial‌  ‌establishments‌. ‌‌If‌‌   as‌‌
  a ‌‌consequence‌‌ 
★ Other‌‌cases‌‌of‌‌arson.‌P
‌ unished‌‌by‌R
‌ T-RP‌  ‌ of‌‌
  the‌‌
  commission‌‌   of‌‌
  any‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ acts‌‌ penalized‌‌ under‌‌ Art.‌‌ 320,‌‌ ‌death‌‌ 
3) Be‌‌done‌‌merely‌‌for‌‌the‌‌sake‌‌of‌‌damaging‌‌it.‌  ‌ should‌‌result‌,‌‌the‌‌mandatory‌‌penalty‌‌of‌‌death‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌imposed.‌  ‌
1) Any‌‌government‌‌building;‌  ‌ 328‌.‌‌Special‌‌cases‌‌or‌‌Qualified‌‌malicious‌‌mischief‌  ‌
2) Inhabited‌‌house‌‌or‌‌dwelling;‌  ‌ On‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌‌  hand,‌‌  ‌PD‌‌
  1613‌‌
  remains‌‌
  the‌‌
  governing‌‌   law‌‌
  for‌‌
  ‌Simple‌‌ 
1) To‌‌obstruct‌‌performance‌‌of‌‌public‌‌function.‌  ‌ Arson‌. ‌ ‌If‌  ‌special‌  ‌aggravating‌  ‌circumstances‌‌   are‌‌
  present,‌‌
  the‌‌
  penalty‌‌ 
3) Industrial‌‌establishment,‌‌shipyard,‌‌oil‌‌well,‌‌mine‌‌  2) Using‌‌any‌‌poisonous‌‌or‌‌corrosive‌‌substance;‌  ‌ under‌‌Sec.‌‌3‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌imposed‌‌in‌‌its‌‌‌maximum‌‌period‌:  ‌‌ ‌
shaft,‌‌platform‌‌or‌‌tunnel;‌  ‌ a) If‌‌committed‌‌with‌‌intent‌‌to‌‌gain;‌  ‌
3) Spreading‌‌any‌‌infection‌‌or‌‌contagion‌‌among‌‌cattle.‌  ‌
4) Plantation,‌‌farm,‌‌pasture‌‌land,‌‌growing‌‌crop,‌‌grain‌‌  b) If‌‌committed‌‌for‌‌the‌‌benefit‌‌of‌‌another;‌  ‌
4) Causing‌‌damage‌‌to‌‌property‌‌of‌‌the‌‌National‌‌Museum,‌‌Library,‌‌ 
field,‌‌orchard,‌‌bamboo‌‌grove‌‌or‌‌forest;‌  ‌
or‌‌to‌‌any‌‌archive‌‌or‌‌registry,‌‌waterworks,‌‌road,‌‌promenade,‌‌  c) If‌  ‌the‌  ‌offender‌  ‌is‌  ‌motivated‌  ‌by‌  ‌spite‌  ‌or‌  ‌hatred‌‌
  towards‌‌
  the‌‌ 
5) Rice,‌‌sugar,‌‌cane‌‌mills,‌‌or‌‌mill‌‌central;‌  ‌ or‌‌any‌‌other‌‌thing‌‌used‌‌in‌‌common‌‌by‌‌the‌‌public.‌  ‌ owner‌‌or‌‌occupant‌‌of‌‌the‌‌property‌‌burned;‌‌and,‌  ‌
6) Railway‌‌or‌‌bus‌‌station,‌‌airport,‌‌wharf‌‌or‌‌warehouse.‌  ‌ d) If‌  ‌committed‌‌
  by‌‌
  a ‌‌‌syndicate‌, ‌‌or‌‌
  group‌‌
  of‌‌
  three‌‌
  (3)‌‌
  or‌‌
  more‌‌ 
332‌  ‌ Persons‌‌exempt‌‌from‌‌criminal‌‌liability‌  ‌ persons.‌‌   ‌
★ Special‌‌aggravating‌‌circumstances.‌‌MAX‌  ‌
1) Intent‌‌to‌‌gain;‌  ‌ Crimes‌‌involved‌  ‌ If‌  ‌by‌  ‌reason,‌  ‌or‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌occasion‌  ‌of‌  ‌Simple‌  ‌Arson‌  ‌death‌‌
  results,‌‌
  the‌‌ 
penalty‌‌of‌‌reclusion‌‌perpetua‌‌to‌‌death‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌imposed.‌  ‌
2) For‌‌the‌‌benefit‌‌of‌‌another;‌  ‌ a) Theft;‌  ‌
3) Motivated‌‌by‌‌spite‌‌or‌‌hate‌‌towards‌‌owner‌‌or‌‌  b) Estafa;‌  ‌ Here,‌‌   the‌‌  applicable‌‌   provision‌‌   of‌‌
  law‌‌  should‌‌
  be‌‌  ‌Sec.‌‌ 3,‌‌ par.‌‌ 2,‌‌ of‌‌ PD‌‌ 
occupant;‌  ‌ 1613‌, ‌ ‌which‌  ‌imposes‌  ‌a ‌ ‌penalty‌  ‌of‌  ‌reclusion‌  ‌temporal‌‌   to‌‌
  reclusion‌‌ 
c) Malicious‌‌mischief.‌  ‌
perpetua‌  ‌for‌  o ‌ ther‌  ‌cases‌  ‌of‌  ‌arson‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌properties‌  ‌burned‌  ‌by‌‌ 
4) By‌‌a‌‌syndicate‌‌(at‌‌least‌‌3‌‌persons).‌  ‌ Persons‌‌exempted‌  ‌ accused‌  ‌are‌  ‌specifically‌  ‌described‌  ‌as‌  ‌houses‌, ‌ ‌contemplating‌‌ 
  inhabited‌  ‌houses‌  ‌or‌  ‌dwellings‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌aforesaid‌  ‌law.‌  ‌The‌  ‌3rd‌‌ 
NOTES‌‌RE‌‌ARSON‌  ‌ a) Spouses,‌  ‌ascendants,‌  ‌descendants,‌‌
  or‌‌
  relatives‌‌
  by‌‌
  affinity‌‌
  in‌‌ 
special‌‌ aggravating‌‌ circumstance‌‌ cannot‌‌ be‌‌ appreciated‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ present‌‌ 
the‌‌same‌‌line;‌  ‌
1. Attempted‌‌
  arson.‌‌   Placing‌‌
  the‌‌
  rags‌‌
  soaked‌‌  in‌‌ gasoline‌‌ beside‌‌ the‌‌  case‌‌  where‌‌   it‌‌
  appears‌‌  that‌‌
  he‌‌
  was‌‌   ‌acting‌‌
  more‌‌ on‌‌ impulse,‌‌ heat‌‌ of‌‌ 
wooden‌‌wall‌‌of‌‌the‌‌building‌‌and‌‌lighting‌‌a‌‌match.‌  ‌ b) Widowed‌  ‌spouse‌  ‌with‌  ‌respect‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌  ‌which‌‌  anger‌‌   or‌‌
  risen‌‌ temper‌. ‌‌Thus,‌‌ accused-appellant‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ held‌‌ guilty‌‌ 
belonged‌‌  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  deceased‌‌ spouse‌‌ before‌‌ the‌‌ same‌‌ passed‌‌ into‌‌  of‌‌Simple‌‌Arson.‌  ‌
2. Frustrated‌  ‌arson.‌  ‌The‌  ‌rags‌  ‌were‌  ‌set‌  ‌on‌  ‌fire,‌  ‌but‌  ‌were‌  ‌put‌  ‌out‌‌ 
the‌‌possession‌‌of‌‌another.‌  ‌
before‌‌any‌‌part‌‌of‌‌the‌‌building‌‌was‌‌burned.‌  ‌
c) Brothers‌‌ and‌‌ sisters‌‌ and‌‌ brothers-in-law‌‌ and‌‌ sisters-in-law,‌‌ if‌‌  People‌‌v.‌‌Buebos‌  ‌
3. If‌‌main‌‌objective‌‌is‌‌burning,‌‌but‌‌death‌‌results,‌a
‌ rson.‌  ‌ living‌‌together.‌  ‌
The‌‌
  legal‌‌
  basis‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  trial‌‌
  court‌‌
  in‌‌
  convicting‌‌
  petitioners‌‌ of‌‌ arson‌‌ is‌‌ 
4. If‌‌
  purpose‌‌
  is‌‌
  to‌‌
  kill‌‌
  a ‌‌person‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌ building,‌‌ and‌‌ setting‌‌ it‌‌ on‌‌ fire‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Soriano‌‌‌re‌‌Arson‌  ‌ Section‌‌3[2]‌‌of‌‌P.D.‌‌No.‌‌1613.‌‌The‌‌elements‌‌of‌‌this‌‌form‌‌of‌‌arson‌‌are:‌‌   ‌
was‌‌the‌‌means‌‌resorted,‌m ‌ urder.‌  ‌
a) there‌‌is‌‌intentional‌‌burning‌‌   ‌
5. If‌‌
  killing‌‌
  has‌‌
  been‌‌
  committed,‌‌
  then‌‌
  the‌‌
  building‌‌
  is‌‌ burnt‌‌ to‌‌ cover‌‌  Arson‌‌is‌‌the‌‌malicious‌‌burning‌‌of‌‌property‌. ‌ ‌
b) of‌‌an‌‌inhabited‌h
‌ ouse‌‌or‌‌dwelling.‌ 
it‌‌up,‌‌murder/homicide‌‌AND‌‌arson.‌  ‌ 1) Destructive‌‌Arson‌‌(Art.‌‌320)‌‌and‌  ‌
2) other‌‌cases‌‌of‌‌arson‌‌(PD‌‌1613).‌‌   ‌ Admittedly,‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌confluence‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌foregoing‌  ‌elements‌  ‌here.‌‌ 
Malicious‌‌Mischief‌  ‌ However,‌  ‌the‌  ‌information‌  ‌failed‌  ‌to‌  ‌allege‌  ‌that‌  ‌what‌  ‌was‌‌ 
This‌‌  classification‌‌
  is‌‌
  based‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  kind,‌‌
  character‌‌   and‌‌
  location‌‌ of‌‌  intentionally‌  ‌burned‌  ‌was‌‌   an‌‌
  inhabited‌‌   house‌‌   or‌‌
  dwelling‌. ‌‌That‌‌ 
327‌  ‌ Malicious‌‌mischief‌  ‌ the‌‌property‌‌burned,‌r‌ egardless‌‌of‌‌the‌‌value‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌damage‌‌caused.‌  ‌ is‌  ‌fatal‌. ‌ ‌In‌  ‌fine,‌‌
  petitioners‌‌
  can‌‌
  be‌‌
  convicted‌‌  only‌‌
  of‌‌
  ‌simple‌‌
  arson‌, ‌‌
under‌‌Section‌‌1[1]‌‌of‌‌P.D.‌‌No.‌‌1613,‌‌punishable‌‌by‌‌‌prision‌‌mayor.‌  ‌
1) Offender‌‌deliberately‌‌caused‌‌damage‌‌to‌‌the‌‌property‌‌of‌‌  Article‌  ‌320‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌RPC,‌  ‌aab‌  ‌RA‌  ‌7659,‌  ‌contemplates‌  ‌the‌  ‌malicious‌‌ 
another;‌  ‌ burning‌  ‌of‌  ‌structures,‌  ‌both‌  ‌public‌  ‌and‌  ‌private,‌  ‌hotels,‌  ‌buildings,‌‌ 
edifices,‌  ‌trains,‌  ‌vessels,‌  ‌aircraft,‌  ‌factories‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌  ‌military,‌‌  People‌‌v.‌‌Macabando‌‌‌2013‌  ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 132‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

The‌‌
  Information‌‌   alleged‌‌  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  appellant‌‌
  set‌‌
  fire‌‌
  to‌‌
  his‌‌
  own‌‌
  house,‌‌  1) the‌  ‌offender‌  ‌has‌‌
  postdated‌‌
  or‌‌   issued‌‌
  a ‌‌check‌‌   in‌‌
  payment‌‌  of‌‌  5. That‌  ‌it‌  ‌be‌  ‌accomplished‌  ‌without‌  ‌the‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌violence‌  ‌or‌‌ 
and‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌fire‌  ‌spread‌  ‌to‌  ‌other‌  ‌inhabited‌  ‌houses.‌  ‌That‌  ‌the‌‌  an‌  ‌obligation‌  ‌contracted‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌postdating‌  ‌or‌‌  intimidation‌‌against‌‌persons,‌‌nor‌‌of‌‌force‌‌upon‌‌things;‌  ‌
appellant’s‌‌   act‌‌  affected‌‌
  many‌‌ families‌‌ ‌will‌‌ not‌‌ convert‌‌ the‌‌ crime‌‌ to‌‌  issuance;‌  ‌
destructive‌‌   arson‌, ‌‌since‌‌   the‌‌
  appellant’s‌‌
  act‌‌
  ‌does‌‌ not‌‌ appear‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌  6. That‌‌it‌‌be‌‌done‌‌with‌‌grave‌‌abuse‌‌of‌‌confidence.‌  ‌
heinous‌  ‌or‌  ‌represents‌  ‌a ‌ ‌greater‌  ‌degree‌  ‌of‌  ‌perversity‌  ‌and‌‌  2) at‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌of‌  ‌postdating‌  ‌or‌  ‌issuance‌  ‌of‌  ‌said‌  ‌check,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
offender‌‌has‌‌no‌‌funds‌‌in‌‌the‌‌bank‌‌or‌‌insufficient;‌‌and‌  ‌ Cahilig‌  ‌took‌  ‌money‌  ‌from‌  ‌WPESLAI‌  ‌and‌  ‌its‌  ‌depositors‌  ‌by‌  ‌taking‌‌ 
viciousness‌  ‌when‌  ‌compared‌  ‌to‌  ‌those‌  ‌acts‌  ‌punished‌  ‌under‌  ‌Article‌‌ 
advantage‌‌   of‌‌
  her‌‌
  position‌‌
  as‌‌
  cashier.‌‌
  Her‌‌
  intent‌‌
  to‌‌
  gain‌‌ is‌‌ clear‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ 
320‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌RPC.‌  ‌The‌  ‌established‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌only‌  ‌showed‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌  3) the‌‌payee‌‌has‌‌been‌d
‌ efrauded‌. ‌ ‌
use‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌carefully‌  ‌planned‌  ‌and‌  ‌deliberately‌  ‌executed‌  ‌scheme‌  ‌to‌‌ 
appellant‌  ‌intended‌  ‌to‌  ‌burn‌  ‌his‌  ‌own‌  ‌house,‌  ‌but‌  ‌the‌  ‌conflagration‌‌ 
In‌  ‌People‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Reyes‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌ruled‌  ‌that‌  ‌for‌  ‌estafa‌  ‌under‌‌   the‌‌
  above‌‌  commit‌‌the‌‌theft.‌  ‌
spread‌‌to‌‌the‌‌neighboring‌‌houses‌. ‌ ‌
provision‌  ‌to‌  ‌prosper,‌  ‌the‌  ‌issuance‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌   check‌‌  must‌‌   have‌‌   been‌‌ 
Grave‌‌   abuse‌‌   of‌‌
  confidence‌, ‌‌as‌‌   an‌‌
  element‌‌   of‌‌ Qualified‌‌ Theft,‌‌ “must‌‌ 
the‌  ‌inducement‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌party‌‌   to‌‌
  part‌‌  with‌‌   his‌‌
  money‌‌   or‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Abayon‌‌2
‌ 016‌  ‌ be‌  ‌the‌  ‌result‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  relation‌‌   by‌‌
  reason‌‌   of‌‌
  dependence,‌‌   guardianship,‌‌ 
property‌. ‌ ‌
or‌‌
  vigilance,‌‌   between‌‌   the‌‌  appellant‌‌   and‌‌  the‌‌ offended‌‌ party‌‌ that‌‌ might‌‌ 
There‌‌is‌‌no‌‌complex‌‌crime‌‌of‌‌arson‌‌with‌‌(multiple)‌‌homicide.‌  ‌ create‌‌   a ‌‌high‌‌
  degree‌‌   of‌‌  confidence‌‌   between‌‌ them‌‌ which‌‌ the‌‌ appellant‌‌ 
The‌  ‌prosecution‌  ‌sufficiently‌  ‌demonstrated‌  ‌Batac's‌  ‌deceit‌  ‌when‌  ‌it‌‌ 
established‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌latter‌  ‌induced‌  ‌Frias‌‌
  into‌‌
  buying‌‌  the‌‌
  checks‌‌
  at‌‌
  a ‌‌ abused.”‌  ‌
In‌  ‌cases‌  ‌where‌  ‌both‌  ‌burning‌  ‌and‌  ‌death‌  ‌occur,‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌de‌  ‌rigueur‌  ‌to‌‌ 
ascertain‌‌the‌‌main‌‌objective‌‌of‌‌the‌‌malefactor:‌‌   ‌ rediscounted‌  ‌rate‌  ‌by‌  ‌representing‌‌   to‌‌  him‌‌  that‌‌
  she‌‌
  had‌‌  enough‌‌
  funds‌‌ 
in‌‌her‌‌account‌‌to‌‌cover‌‌them.‌  ‌ Brokmann‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌‌2012‌  ‌
a) if‌‌
  the‌‌
  main‌‌ objective‌‌ is‌‌ the‌‌ burning‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ building‌‌ or‌‌ edifice,‌‌ 
but‌‌  death‌‌
  results‌‌
  by‌‌
  reason‌‌   or‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  occasion‌‌   of‌‌
  arson,‌‌ the‌‌  Deceit‌‌  and‌‌ damage‌‌ are‌‌ essential‌‌ elements‌‌ in‌‌ Article‌‌ 315‌‌ (2-d),‌‌ but‌‌ are‌‌  Brokmann‌‌   was‌‌
  convicted‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  crime‌‌   ‌estafa‌, ‌‌under‌‌ Art‌‌ 315,‌‌ ‌par‌‌ 
  of‌‌
crime‌  ‌is‌  ‌simply‌  a‌ rson‌, ‌ ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌resulting‌  ‌homicide‌  ‌is‌‌  not‌‌
  required‌‌   in‌‌ BP‌‌ 22.‌‌ Other‌‌ differences‌‌ between‌‌ the‌‌ two‌‌ also‌‌ include‌‌  1(b).‌‌The‌‌offense‌‌of‌‌estafa,‌‌in‌‌general,‌‌is‌‌committed‌‌either‌‌by‌‌   ‌
absorbed;‌  ‌ the‌‌following:‌‌   ‌ a) abuse‌‌of‌‌confidence‌‌‌(Par‌‌1)‌‌or‌  ‌
b) if,‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌ other‌‌ hand,‌‌ the‌‌ main‌‌ objective‌‌ is‌‌ to‌‌ kill‌‌ a ‌‌particular‌‌  1) a‌‌
  drawer‌‌
  of‌‌  a ‌‌dishonored‌‌   check‌‌  may‌‌  be‌‌
  convicted‌‌   under‌‌
  BP‌‌  b) means‌‌of‌‌deceit‌(‌ Par‌‌2).‌  ‌
person‌  ‌who‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌building‌  ‌or‌  ‌edifice,‌  ‌when‌  ‌fire‌  ‌is‌‌  22‌  ‌even‌  ‌if‌  ‌he‌  ‌had‌  ‌issued‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌preexisting‌‌ 
resorted‌‌   to‌‌
  as‌‌
  the‌‌
  means‌‌   to‌‌
  accomplish‌‌   such‌‌
  goal‌‌   the‌‌ crime‌‌  obligation,‌‌   while‌‌   under‌‌ Article‌‌ 315‌‌ (2-d),‌‌ such‌‌ circumstance‌‌  Deceit‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌an‌  ‌essential‌  ‌requisite‌  ‌of‌  ‌estafa‌  ‌by‌  ‌abuse‌  ‌of‌‌ 
committed‌‌is‌‌m ‌ urder‌o ‌ nly‌;‌‌lastly,‌  ‌ negates‌‌criminal‌‌liability;‌  ‌ confidence‌; ‌ ‌the‌  ‌breach‌  ‌of‌  ‌confidence‌  ‌takes‌  ‌the‌  ‌place‌  ‌of‌  ‌fraud‌  ‌or‌‌ 
c) if‌‌
  the‌‌ objective‌‌ is,‌‌ likewise,‌‌ to‌‌ kill‌‌ a ‌‌particular‌‌ person,‌‌ and‌‌ in‌‌  2) specific‌  ‌and‌  ‌different‌  ‌penalties‌  ‌are‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌in‌  ‌each‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  deceit,‌‌  which‌‌
  is‌‌
  a ‌‌usual‌‌   element‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌   other‌‌
  estafas.‌‌ In‌‌ this‌‌ case,‌‌ the‌‌ 
fact‌  ‌the‌‌
  offender‌‌  has‌‌  already‌‌  done‌‌   so,‌‌
  but‌‌
  fire‌‌
  is‌‌
  resorted‌‌  to‌‌  two‌‌offenses;‌  ‌ charge‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌‌   petitioner‌‌   and‌‌   her‌‌
  subsequent‌‌   conviction‌‌   was‌‌
  for‌‌ 
as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌means‌  ‌to‌  ‌cover‌  ‌up‌  ‌the‌  ‌killing,‌  ‌then‌  ‌there‌  ‌are‌  ‌two‌‌  estafa‌‌
  committed‌‌   by‌‌   abuse‌‌   of‌‌
  confidence.‌‌   Thus,‌‌ it‌‌ was‌‌ not‌‌ necessary‌‌ 
3) estafa‌  ‌is‌  ‌essentially‌  ‌a ‌ ‌crime‌  ‌against‌  ‌property‌, ‌ ‌while‌‌ 
separate‌  ‌and‌  ‌distinct‌  ‌crimes‌  ‌committed‌  ‌— ‌‌ for‌‌
  the‌‌
  prosecution‌‌   to‌‌  prove‌‌   deceit‌‌   as‌‌
  this‌‌  was‌‌
  not‌‌   an‌‌
  element‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
violation‌  ‌of‌  ‌BP‌  ‌22‌  ‌is‌  ‌principally‌  ‌a ‌ ‌crime‌  ‌against‌  ‌public‌‌ 
homicide/murder‌‌‌and‌‌arson‌. ‌ ‌ estafa‌‌that‌‌the‌‌petitioner‌‌was‌‌charged‌‌with.‌  ‌
interest‌a‌ s‌‌it‌‌does‌‌injury‌‌to‌‌the‌‌entire‌‌banking‌‌system;‌  ‌
Abayon‌  ‌is‌  ‌charged‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌  ‌of‌  ‌arson‌  ‌because‌  ‌his‌  ‌intent‌  ‌was‌‌  4) violations‌  ‌of‌  ‌Article‌  ‌315‌‌
  are‌‌
  ‌mala‌‌
  in‌‌
  se‌, ‌‌while‌‌
  those‌‌
  of‌‌
  BP‌‌ 
Espino‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌‌2013‌  ‌
merely‌‌   to‌‌
  destroy‌‌  his‌‌
  family's‌‌  apartment‌‌   through‌‌  the‌‌ use‌‌ of‌‌ fire.‌‌ The‌‌  22‌‌are‌m
‌ ala‌‌prohibita‌. ‌ ‌
resulting‌  ‌deaths‌  ‌that‌  ‌occurred,‌  ‌therefore,‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌absorbed‌‌   ‌by‌‌  The‌‌
  crime‌‌  charged‌‌ was‌‌ estafa‌‌ under‌‌ Art‌‌ 315,‌‌ par‌‌ 1(b)‌. ‌‌However,‌‌ the‌‌ 
the‌  ‌crime‌  ‌of‌  ‌arson‌  ‌and‌  ‌only‌  ‌increases‌  ‌the‌  ‌imposable‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌to‌‌  People‌‌v.‌‌Cahilig‌‌‌2014‌‌re‌‌Qualified‌‌Theft‌  ‌ crime‌‌the‌‌accused‌‌was‌c‌ onvicted‌o ‌ f‌‌was‌‌estafa‌‌under‌‌par‌‌‌2(a)‌.  ‌‌ ‌
reclusion‌‌perpetua‌‌to‌‌death‌. ‌ ‌
Estafa‌  ‌under‌  ‌paragraph‌  ‌2(a)‌  ‌is‌  ‌swindling‌  ‌by‌  ‌means‌  ‌of‌  ‌false‌‌ 
The‌  ‌elements‌  ‌of‌  ‌Qualified‌  ‌Theft,‌  ‌committed‌  ‌with‌  ‌grave‌  ‌abuse‌  ‌of‌‌ 
confidence,‌‌are‌‌as‌‌follows:‌  ‌ pretense‌. ‌ ‌In‌  ‌this‌  ‌case,‌  ‌there‌  ‌was‌‌  ‌no‌‌  use‌‌  of‌‌  a ‌‌fictitious‌‌  name,‌‌  or‌‌  a ‌‌
Batac‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌‌2018‌r‌ e‌‌Estafa‌‌through‌‌false‌‌checks‌‌vis-a-vis‌‌BP‌‌22‌  ‌
false‌  ‌pretense‌  ‌of‌  ‌power,‌  ‌influence,‌  ‌qualifications,‌  ‌property,‌  ‌credit,‌‌ 
1. Taking‌‌of‌‌personal‌‌property;‌  ‌ agency,‌‌   or‌‌
  business.‌‌   The‌‌
  Court‌‌   deems‌‌   it‌‌
  wiser‌‌   to‌‌  give‌‌
  the‌‌
  offense‌‌ its‌‌ 
The‌‌
  CA‌‌
  affirmed‌‌
  the‌‌
  decision‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  RTC‌‌
  finding‌‌
  Batac‌‌ guilty‌‌ beyond‌‌ 
reasonable‌‌   doubt‌‌
  of‌‌ ‌Estafa‌‌ ‌defined‌‌ under‌‌ Article‌‌ 315,‌‌ paragraph‌‌ 2(d)‌‌  2. That‌‌the‌‌said‌‌property‌‌belongs‌‌to‌‌another;‌  ‌ true,‌  ‌formal‌  ‌name‌  ‌– ‌ ‌that‌  ‌of‌  ‌estafa‌  ‌through‌  ‌abuse‌  ‌of‌‌ 
committed‌  ‌against‌  ‌Frias.‌  ‌Jurisprudence‌  ‌has‌  ‌consistently‌  ‌held‌  ‌that‌‌  3. That‌‌the‌‌said‌‌taking‌‌be‌‌done‌‌with‌‌intent‌‌to‌‌gain;‌  ‌ confidence‌u ‌ nder‌‌paragraph‌‌‌1(b)‌. ‌ ‌
such‌‌estafa‌‌consists‌‌of‌‌the‌‌following‌‌elements:‌‌   ‌ 4. That‌‌it‌‌be‌‌done‌‌without‌‌the‌‌owner’s‌‌consent;‌  ‌ First‌, ‌ ‌personal‌  ‌property‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  form‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  checks‌‌
  was‌‌
  received‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 133‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

by‌  ‌the‌  ‌offender‌  ‌in‌  ‌trust‌  ‌or‌  ‌on‌  ‌commission,‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌duty‌  ‌to‌‌  theft‌, ‌ ‌because‌  ‌his‌  ‌employer‌  ‌had‌‌  never‌‌
  given‌‌   him‌‌  the‌‌  posses­sion‌‌   of‌‌ 
deliver‌‌it‌‌to‌‌Mr.‌‌Banaag.‌‌   ‌ the‌  ‌machines‌  ‌involved‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌present‌  ‌case‌  ‌or‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌him‌  ‌to‌  ‌take‌‌  The‌  ‌appellant’s‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌falsely‌  ‌pretending‌  ‌to‌  ‌possess‌  ‌power‌  ‌and‌‌ 
hold‌‌   of‌‌
  them,‌‌
  and‌‌
  it‌‌  does‌‌
  not‌‌
  appear‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  former‌‌   had‌‌  any‌‌ special‌‌  qualifications‌‌   to‌‌ deploy‌‌ the‌‌ complainants‌‌ to‌‌ Hongkong,‌‌ even‌‌ if‌‌ he‌‌ did‌‌ 
Second‌,‌‌the‌‌accused‌‌rediscounted‌‌the‌‌checks‌‌to‌‌his‌‌aunt-in-law.‌‌   ‌
confidence‌‌in‌‌him.‌  ‌ not‌  ‌have‌  ‌the‌  ‌authority‌  ‌or‌  ‌license‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose,‌  ‌undoubtedly‌‌ 
Third‌, ‌‌this‌‌ rediscounting‌‌ resulted‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ wrongful‌‌ encashment‌‌ of‌‌  constitutes‌  ‌estafa‌  ‌under‌  ‌Article‌  ‌315(2)(a)‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌elements‌  ‌of‌  ‌deceit‌‌ 
the‌‌
  checks‌‌   by‌‌
  someone‌‌
  who‌‌  was‌‌
  not‌‌ the‌‌ payee‌‌ and‌‌ therefore‌‌ not‌‌  and‌  ‌damage‌  ‌are‌  ‌clearly‌‌   present;‌‌
  the‌‌  appellant’s‌‌   false‌‌
  pretenses‌‌
  were‌ 
lawfully‌‌authorized‌‌to‌‌do‌‌so.‌‌   ‌ People‌‌v.‌‌Nery‌  ‌
the‌  ‌very‌  ‌cause‌  ‌that‌  ‌induced‌  ‌the‌  ‌complainants‌  ‌to‌  ‌part‌  ‌with‌  ‌their‌‌ 
Finally‌, ‌‌this‌‌ wrongful‌‌ encashment‌‌ prejudiced‌‌ KN‌‌ Inc.,‌‌ which‌‌ lost‌‌  The‌‌  accused‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  present‌‌ case‌‌ insists‌‌ that‌‌ there‌‌ is‌‌ no‌‌ prohibition‌‌ in‌‌  money.‌  ‌
the‌‌proceeds‌‌of‌‌the‌‌check.‌‌   ‌ our‌  ‌law‌  ‌to‌  ‌prevent‌  ‌the‌  ‌parties‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌contract‌  ‌to‌‌  novate‌‌   it‌‌
  so‌‌
  that‌‌
  any‌‌ 
Thus,‌‌
  the‌‌
  Information‌‌   in‌‌
  this‌‌
  case‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌ interpreted‌‌ as‌‌ charging‌‌ the‌‌  incipient‌  ‌criminal‌  ‌liability‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌first‌  ‌is‌  ‌thereby‌  ‌avoided.‌‌  Ablaza‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌2
‌ 018‌‌re‌‌Robbery‌  ‌
accused‌  ‌with‌  ‌both‌  ‌estafa‌  ‌under‌  ‌paragraph‌  ‌1(b)‌  ‌and‌  ‌estafa‌  ‌under‌‌  The‌  ‌novation‌  ‌theory‌  ‌may‌  ‌perhaps‌  ‌apply‌  p ‌ rior‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌   filing‌‌   of‌‌ 
the‌  ‌criminal‌  ‌information‌  ‌in‌  ‌court‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌state‌  ‌prosecutors.‌  ‌But‌‌  Paragraphs‌‌   one‌‌  to‌‌  four‌‌
  of‌‌
  Article‌‌  294‌‌   indisputably‌‌   involve‌‌ the‌‌ use‌‌ of‌‌ 
paragraph‌‌2(a).‌  ‌
after‌  ‌the‌  ‌justice‌  ‌authorities‌  ‌have‌  ‌taken‌  ‌cognizance‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌   crime‌‌   and‌‌  violence‌  ‌against‌  ‌persons.‌  ‌The‌  ‌actual‌  ‌physical‌‌   force‌‌  inflicted‌‌   results‌‌ 
instituted‌‌   action‌‌ in‌‌ court,‌‌ the‌‌ offended‌‌ party‌‌ may‌‌ no‌‌ longer‌‌ divest‌‌ the‌‌  in‌‌
  death,‌‌   rape,‌‌ mutilation‌‌ or‌‌ the‌‌ physical‌‌ injuries‌‌ therein‌‌ enumerated.‌‌ 
Guzman‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ The‌‌   simple‌‌   robbery‌‌ under‌‌ paragraph‌‌ five‌‌ may‌‌ cover‌‌ physical‌‌ injuries‌‌ 
prosecution‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌exact‌  ‌the‌  ‌criminal‌  ‌liability,‌  ‌as‌‌ 
distinguished‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌civil.‌‌   The‌‌  crime‌‌   being‌‌   an‌‌  offense‌‌   against‌‌   the‌‌  not‌  ‌included‌  ‌in‌  ‌paragraphs‌  ‌two‌‌   to‌‌  four.‌‌  Thus,‌‌
  ‌when‌‌   ‌less‌‌  serious‌‌   or‌‌ 
As‌  ‌appellant‌  ‌converted‌  ‌to‌  ‌his‌  ‌own‌  ‌use‌  ‌proceeds‌  ‌of‌  ‌sales‌  ‌of‌‌ 
state,‌‌only‌‌the‌‌latter‌‌can‌‌renounce‌‌it.‌  ‌ slight‌‌   physical‌‌   injuries‌‌   are‌‌ inflicted‌‌ upon‌‌ the‌‌ offended‌‌ party‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ 
merchandise‌‌   delivered‌‌   to‌‌
  him‌‌ as‌‌ agent,‌‌ which‌‌ he‌‌ received‌‌ in‌‌ trust‌‌ for‌‌ 
occasion‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌robbery,‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌prosecuted‌  ‌for‌  ‌and‌‌ 
and‌  ‌under‌  ‌obligation‌  ‌to‌  ‌deliver‌  ‌and‌‌   turn‌‌  over‌‌
  to‌‌
  his‌‌
  principal,‌‌  he‌‌  is‌‌ 
convicted‌  ‌of‌  ‌robbery‌  ‌under‌  ‌paragraph‌  ‌five‌. ‌ ‌It‌  ‌seems‌  ‌obvious‌  ‌that‌‌ 
guilty‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌ crime‌‌ of‌‌ estafa‌‌ as‌‌ defined‌‌ by‌‌ Article‌‌ 315,‌‌ paragraph‌‌ 1,‌‌  Lito‌‌Corpuz‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌‌2014‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ intimidation‌‌   is‌‌
  not‌‌   encompassed‌‌   under‌‌   paragraphs‌‌   one‌‌   to‌‌ four‌‌ since‌‌ 
subparagraph‌  ‌(e).‌  ‌The‌  ‌next‌  ‌question‌  ‌is‌  ‌whether‌  ‌the‌  ‌present‌‌ 
No‌  ‌specific‌  ‌type‌  ‌of‌  ‌proof‌  ‌is‌  ‌required‌  ‌to‌  ‌show‌  ‌that‌  ‌there‌  ‌was‌‌  no‌‌
  actual‌‌ physical‌‌ violence‌‌ is‌‌ inflicted;‌‌ evidently‌‌ then,‌‌ it‌‌ can‌‌ only‌‌ fall‌‌ 
information‌  ‌for‌  ‌qualified‌  ‌theft‌  ‌alleges‌  ‌sufficient‌  ‌facts‌  ‌to‌  ‌sustain‌  ‌a ‌‌
under‌‌paragraph‌‌five.‌  ‌
conviction‌‌for‌‌estafa‌. ‌ ‌ demand‌. ‌ ‌Demand‌  ‌need‌  ‌not‌  ‌even‌  ‌be‌  ‌formal;‌  ‌it‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌verbal.‌  ‌The‌‌ 
specific‌  ‌word‌  ‌“demand”‌  ‌need‌  ‌not‌  ‌even‌  ‌be‌  ‌used‌  ‌to‌  ‌show‌  ‌that‌‌
  it‌‌
  has‌‌ 
An‌‌
  essential‌‌ element‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ crime‌‌ of‌‌ estafa‌‌ is‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ money‌‌ or‌‌ goods‌‌  indeed‌  ‌been‌  ‌made‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌person‌  ‌charged,‌  ‌since‌  ‌even‌  ‌a ‌ ‌mere‌‌  People‌‌v.‌‌Domasig‌‌2
‌ 018‌‌re‌‌Robbery‌‌with‌‌homicide‌  ‌
misappropriated‌  ‌or‌  ‌converted‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌prejudice‌  ‌of‌‌  query‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌whereabouts‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌money‌  ‌[in‌  ‌this‌  ‌case,‌‌ 
another‌  ‌was‌  ‌received‌  ‌by‌  ‌him‌  ‌"in‌  ‌trust‌  ‌or‌  ‌on‌  ‌commission,‌  ‌or‌  ‌for‌‌  property],‌‌would‌‌be‌‌tantamount‌‌to‌‌a‌‌demand.‌  ‌ A‌  ‌conviction‌  ‌of‌  ‌robbery‌  ‌with‌  ‌homicide‌  ‌requires‌  ‌certitude‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌ 
administration,‌  ‌or‌  ‌under‌  ‌any‌  ‌other‌  ‌obligation‌  ‌involving‌  ‌the‌‌   duty‌‌
  to‌‌  robbery‌‌   is‌‌  the‌‌
  main‌‌   purpose,‌‌  and‌‌  the‌‌   objective‌‌  of‌‌ the‌‌ malefactor‌‌ and‌‌ 
make‌  ‌delivery‌  ‌of,‌  ‌or‌  ‌to‌  ‌retain‌  ‌the‌  ‌same".‌  ‌No‌  ‌such‌  ‌allegation‌‌  The‌‌   prosecution‌‌ was‌‌ able‌‌ to‌‌ prove‌‌ the‌‌ existence‌‌ of‌‌ all‌‌ the‌‌ elements‌‌ of‌‌  the‌‌   killing‌‌   is‌‌
  merely‌‌   incidental‌‌  to‌‌ the‌‌ robbery.‌‌ The‌‌ intent‌‌ to‌‌ rob‌‌ must‌‌ 
appears‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌above‌  ‌information‌. ‌ ‌Consequently,‌  ‌we‌  ‌agree‌  ‌with‌‌  the‌  ‌Estafa‌  ‌under‌  ‌Article‌  ‌315‌  ‌par(1)(b)‌. ‌ ‌Private‌  ‌complainant‌  ‌gave‌‌  precede‌  ‌the‌  ‌taking‌  ‌of‌  ‌human‌  ‌life‌  ‌but‌  ‌the‌  ‌killing‌  ‌may‌  ‌occur‌  ‌before,‌‌ 
appellant‌‌   that‌‌
  he‌‌
  ‌can‌‌ not‌‌ be‌‌ convicted‌‌ thereunder‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ crime‌‌ of‌‌  petitioner‌‌   the‌‌ pieces‌‌ of‌‌ jewelry‌‌ in‌‌ trust,‌‌ or‌‌ on‌‌ commission‌‌ basis‌‌ with‌‌  during‌‌   or‌‌  after‌‌   the‌‌ robbery.‌‌ ‌What‌‌ is‌‌ crucial‌‌ for‌‌ a ‌‌conviction‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ 
estafa‌. ‌ ‌ an‌  ‌obligation‌  ‌to‌  ‌sell‌  ‌or‌  ‌return‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌within‌  ‌sixty‌  ‌(60)‌  ‌days,‌  ‌if‌‌  crime‌  ‌of‌‌   robbery‌‌   with‌‌   homicide‌‌   is‌‌  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  prosecution‌‌   to‌‌
  firmly‌‌ 
unsold.‌  ‌There‌  ‌was‌  ‌misappropriation‌‌   when‌‌   petitioner‌‌   failed‌‌   to‌‌
  remit‌‌  establish‌  ‌the‌  ‌offender's‌  ‌intent‌‌   to‌‌   take‌‌   personal‌‌   property‌‌   before‌‌ 
the‌‌  proceeds‌‌   of‌‌   those‌‌  pieces‌‌
  of‌‌
  jewelry‌‌   sold,‌‌   or‌‌ if‌‌ no‌‌ sale‌‌ took‌‌ place,‌‌  the‌  ‌killing,‌  ‌regardless‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌homicide‌  ‌is‌  ‌actually‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Maglaya‌  ‌ carried‌‌out.‌  ‌
failed‌‌   to‌‌
  return‌‌   the‌‌
  same‌‌  pieces‌‌  of‌‌
  jewelry‌‌   within‌‌   or‌‌
  after‌‌   the‌‌ agreed‌‌ 
Under‌‌   the‌‌
  facts‌‌  proven,‌‌
  ‌appellant‌‌   is‌‌
  guilty‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ crime‌‌ of‌‌ theft.‌‌ It‌‌  period‌‌   despite‌‌   demand‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌ private‌‌ complainant,‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ prejudice‌‌ 
is‌‌
  true‌‌  that‌‌  the‌‌
  machines‌‌   specified‌‌  in‌‌
  the‌‌ information‌‌ were‌‌ delivered‌‌  of‌‌the‌‌latter.‌  ‌ People‌‌v.‌‌Layug‌‌2
‌ 017‌‌re‌‌Robbery‌‌with‌‌homicide‌  ‌
to‌  ‌him‌  ‌by‌  ‌his‌  ‌prospective‌  ‌customers,‌  ‌but‌  ‌the‌  ‌physical‌  ‌possession‌ 
thus‌  ‌secured‌  ‌by‌  ‌him‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌  ‌vest‌  ‌in‌  ‌him‌  ‌the‌  ‌juridical‌  ‌possession‌‌  People‌‌v.‌‌Fernandez‌‌2
‌ 014‌  ‌ It‌‌
  is‌‌
  immaterial‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌
  death‌‌
  would‌‌   supervene‌‌ by‌‌ mere‌‌ accident;‌‌ or‌‌ 
necessary‌‌for‌‌the‌‌crime‌‌of‌‌estafa.‌‌   ‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ victim‌‌ of‌‌ homicide‌‌ is‌‌ other‌‌ than‌‌ the‌‌ victim‌‌ of‌‌ robbery,‌‌ or‌‌ that‌‌ 
We‌  ‌point‌  ‌out‌  ‌that‌  ‌conviction‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌Labor‌  ‌Code‌  ‌for‌  ‌illegal‌‌  two‌‌   or‌‌
  more‌‌   persons‌‌ are‌‌ killed‌‌ or‌‌ that‌‌ aside‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌ homicide,‌‌ rape,‌‌ 
Although‌‌ appellant‌‌ had‌‌ taken‌‌ advantage‌‌ of‌‌ his‌‌ position‌‌ in‌‌ committing‌‌  recruitment‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌‌   preclude‌‌   punishment‌‌   under‌‌  the‌‌  RPC‌‌   for‌‌  intentional‌  ‌mutilation,‌  ‌or‌  ‌usurpation‌  ‌of‌  ‌authority,‌  ‌is‌  ‌committed‌  ‌by‌‌ 
the‌  ‌crime‌  ‌aforementioned,‌  ‌We‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌believe‌  ‌he‌  ‌had‌‌
  acted‌‌
  with‌‌  the‌‌crime‌‌of‌‌estafa‌. ‌ ‌ reason‌  ‌or‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌occasion‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime.‌  ‌Likewise‌‌   immaterial‌‌   is‌‌
  the‌‌ 
grave‌  ‌abuse‌  ‌of‌  ‌confidence‌  ‌and‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌convicted‌  ‌of‌  ‌qua­lified‌‌  fact‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌victim‌  ‌of‌  ‌homicide‌  ‌is‌  ‌one‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌robbers;‌  ‌the‌  ‌felony‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 134‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

would‌‌   still‌‌  be‌‌ robbery‌‌ with‌‌ homicide.‌‌ Once‌‌ a ‌‌homicide‌‌ is‌‌ committed‌‌  Clearly,‌  ‌all‌  ‌the‌  ‌elements‌  ‌of‌  ‌Syndicated‌  ‌Estafa‌  ‌obtain‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌  ‌case,‌‌  3) Act‌‌is‌‌illegal;‌  ‌
by‌‌
  or‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ occasion‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ robbery,‌‌ the‌‌ felony‌‌ committed‌‌ is‌‌ robbery‌‌  considering‌‌that:‌‌   ‌
with‌‌   homicide.‌‌   ‌All‌‌
  the‌‌
  felonies‌‌   committed‌‌ by‌‌ reason‌‌ of‌‌ or‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌  4) Any‌‌of‌‌the‌‌following‌‌circumstance‌‌is‌‌present:‌  ‌
a) more‌  ‌than‌  ‌five‌  ‌(5)‌  ‌persons‌‌   are‌‌
  involved‌‌
  in‌‌  Multitel's‌‌
  grand‌‌ 
occasion‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌   robbery‌‌   are‌‌
  integrated‌‌  into‌‌
  one‌‌
  and‌‌ indivisible‌‌  fraudulent‌  ‌scheme,‌  ‌including‌‌   Baladjay‌‌
  and‌‌  her‌‌
  co-accused‌‌  - ‌‌ a) lasts‌‌for‌‌more‌‌than‌‌3‌‌days;‌  ‌
felony‌  ‌of‌‌   robbery‌‌   with‌‌  homicide‌. ‌‌The‌‌
  word‌‌  "homicide"‌‌   is‌‌
  used‌‌   in‌‌  who‌‌   employed‌‌   deceit,‌‌   false‌‌ pretenses‌‌ and‌‌ representations‌‌ to‌‌ 
its‌  ‌generic‌  ‌sense.‌  ‌Homicide,‌  ‌thus,‌  ‌includes‌  ‌murder,‌  ‌parricide,‌  ‌and‌‌  b) simulating‌‌public‌‌authority;‌  ‌
the‌  ‌private‌  ‌complainants‌  ‌regarding‌  ‌a ‌ ‌supposed‌  ‌lucrative‌‌ 
infanticide.‌  ‌ investment‌  ‌opportunity‌  ‌with‌  ‌Multitel‌  ‌in‌  ‌order‌  ‌to‌  ‌solicit‌‌  c) any‌‌serious‌‌physical‌‌injuries‌‌are‌‌inflicted‌‌or‌‌threats‌‌ 
money‌‌from‌‌them;‌‌   ‌ to‌‌kill‌‌detainee‌‌are‌‌made;‌‌   ‌
People‌‌v.‌‌Mejares‌‌2
‌ 018‌‌Leonen,‌‌J‌‌re‌‌Theft‌  ‌ b) the‌‌
  said‌‌ false‌‌ pretenses‌‌ and‌‌ representations‌‌ were‌‌ made‌‌ prior‌‌  d) detainee‌‌is‌‌a‌‌minor,‌‌female,‌‌or‌‌a‌‌public‌‌officer;‌O
‌ R‌  ‌
to‌‌or‌‌simultaneous‌‌with‌‌the‌‌commission‌‌of‌‌fraud;‌‌   ‌ e) Person‌‌is‌‌kidnapped‌‌for‌r‌ ansom‌. ‌ ‌
The‌  ‌SC‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌consistent‌  ‌in‌‌   holding‌‌  that‌‌  intent‌‌  to‌‌
  gain‌‌
  or‌‌
  animus‌‌ 
lucrandi‌‌   is‌‌
  an‌‌
  internal‌‌  act‌‌  that‌‌
  is‌‌
  presumed‌‌   from‌‌ the‌‌ unlawful‌‌ taking‌‌  c) relying‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌false‌  ‌promises‌  ‌and‌  ‌misrepresentations‌  ‌thus‌‌ 
Maximum‌‌penalty‌‌of‌D
‌ eath‌  ‌
by‌  ‌the‌  ‌offender‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌thing‌  ‌subject‌  ‌of‌  ‌asportation.‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌actual‌‌  employed,‌  ‌private‌  ‌complainants‌  ‌invested‌  ‌their‌‌   hard-earned‌‌ 
gain‌  ‌is‌  ‌irrelevant‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌‌  important‌‌  consideration‌‌  is‌‌  the‌‌  intent‌‌  to‌‌  money‌‌in‌‌Multitel;‌‌and‌  ‌ 1) if‌‌the‌‌purpose‌‌is‌‌to‌e
‌ xtort‌m
‌ oney;‌  ‌
gain.‌  ‌ d) Baladjay‌  ‌and‌  ‌her‌  ‌co-accused‌  ‌defrauded‌  ‌the‌  ‌private‌‌  2) victim‌‌is‌‌killed‌‌or‌‌dies‌‌as‌‌a‌‌consequence;‌‌special‌‌complex‌‌ 
complainants,‌‌obviously‌‌to‌‌the‌‌latter's‌‌prejudice.‌  ‌ crime‌  ‌
The‌  ‌value‌  ‌of‌  ‌personal‌  ‌property‌  ‌in‌  ‌qualified‌  ‌theft‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌proven‌‌ 
during‌  ‌trial.‌  ‌Since‌  ‌the‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌in‌  ‌cases‌  ‌of‌  ‌theft‌  ‌is‌  ‌dependent‌‌  on‌‌
  the‌‌  3) victim‌‌is‌‌raped;‌s‌ pecial‌‌complex‌‌crime‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Aquino‌‌2
‌ 018‌‌re‌‌Civil‌‌Fraud‌  ‌
value‌  ‌of‌  ‌stolen‌  ‌personal‌  ‌properties,‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌critical‌  ‌to‌  ‌ensure‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌  4) victim‌‌is‌‌subjected‌‌to‌‌torture‌‌or‌‌dehumanizing‌‌acts.‌  ‌
penalty‌‌   is‌‌  based‌‌  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  value‌‌
  proven‌‌   during‌‌   trial,‌‌
  and‌‌  not‌‌
  merely‌‌ on‌‌  Not‌  ‌all‌  ‌proposals‌  ‌to‌  ‌invest‌  ‌in‌  ‌certain‌  ‌business‌  ‌ventures‌‌  are‌‌
  tainted‌‌ 
the‌  ‌Information‌  ‌or‌  ‌uncorroborated‌  ‌testimonies‌  ‌presented‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌  with‌  ‌fraud.‌  ‌To‌  ‌be‌  ‌sure,‌‌   an‌‌
  actionable‌‌
  fraud‌‌  arises‌‌
  when‌‌
  the‌‌  accused‌‌  268‌  ‌ Slight‌‌illegal‌‌detention‌  ‌
prosecution.‌  ‌ has‌‌  knowledge‌‌   that‌‌   the‌‌ venture‌‌ proposed‌‌ would‌‌ not‌‌ reasonably‌‌ yield‌‌ 
the‌  ‌promised‌  ‌results,‌  ‌and‌  ‌yet,‌  ‌despite‌‌   such‌‌  knowledge,‌‌
  deliberately‌‌  1) Offender‌‌is‌‌a‌‌private‌‌individual;‌  ‌
Cheng‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌2
‌ 016‌‌re‌‌Estafa‌‌by‌‌misappropriation‌‌or‌‌conversion‌  ‌ continues‌‌with‌‌the‌‌misrepresentation.‌‌   ‌ 2) Kidnaps‌‌or‌‌detains‌‌another,‌‌depriving‌‌the‌‌latter‌‌of‌‌his‌‌liberty;‌  ‌
Jewelries‌  ‌were‌  ‌delivered‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌  accused‌‌   by‌‌  the‌‌
  owner‌‌
  for‌‌
  her‌‌  to‌‌
  sell‌‌  As‌  ‌case‌  ‌law‌  ‌instructs,‌  ‌"the‌  ‌gravamen‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌  ‌of‌  ‌Estafa‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌‌  3) Act‌‌is‌‌illegal;‌  ‌
them‌‌   and‌‌
  remit‌‌
  the‌‌  proceeds‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌ latter.‌‌ The‌‌ accused‌‌ failed‌‌ to‌‌ remit‌‌  employment‌‌   of‌‌
  fraud‌‌  or‌‌
  deceit‌‌  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  damage‌‌ or‌‌ prejudice‌‌ of‌‌ another.‌‌  4) Without‌‌any‌‌of‌‌the‌‌circumstances‌‌in‌‌Art‌‌267.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌proceeds‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌owner.‌  ‌Instead‌‌   she‌‌  issued‌‌   her‌‌
  checks‌‌  to‌‌
  pay‌‌   for‌‌  When‌  ‌fraud‌  ‌pertains‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌means‌  ‌of‌  ‌committing‌  ‌a ‌ ‌crime‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌‌ 
the‌  ‌jewelries‌  ‌but‌  ‌the‌  ‌checks‌  ‌bounced‌  ‌upon‌  ‌being‌  ‌presented‌  ‌for‌‌  classes‌‌   of‌‌ crimes‌‌ under‌‌ Estafa;‌‌ otherwise,‌‌ if‌‌ fraud‌‌ merely‌‌ causes‌‌ loss‌‌  Penalty‌‌lowered‌‌to‌P
‌ M‌‌min-med‌‌‌when‌o
‌ ffender‌‌   ‌
payment‌‌in‌‌the‌‌bank.‌I‌ s‌‌the‌‌accused‌‌liable‌‌for‌‌estafa?‌‌   ‌ or‌‌
  injury‌‌   to‌‌
  another,‌‌   without‌‌   being‌‌ an‌‌ element‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌crime,‌‌ then‌‌ it‌‌ may‌‌  a) voluntarily‌‌releases‌‌captive‌‌within‌‌3‌‌days,‌‌when‌‌he‌‌was‌‌in‌‌ 
only‌‌   be‌‌
  classified‌‌   as‌‌
  ‌civil‌‌
  fraud‌‌ from‌‌ which‌‌ an‌‌ ‌action‌‌ for‌‌ damages‌‌  the‌‌position‌‌to‌‌prolong‌‌detention;‌  ‌
YES‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌essence‌  ‌of‌  ‌this‌  ‌kind‌  ‌of‌  ‌Estafa‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌appropriation‌  ‌or‌‌  may‌‌arise.‌  ‌
conversion‌  ‌of‌  ‌money‌  ‌or‌  ‌property‌  ‌received‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌prejudice‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  b) without‌‌having‌‌attained‌‌the‌‌purpose‌‌intended;‌a
‌ nd‌  ‌
entity‌‌   to‌‌  whom‌‌  a ‌‌return‌‌ should‌‌ be‌‌ made.‌‌ To‌‌ misappropriate‌‌ for‌‌ one's‌‌ 
own‌  ‌use‌  ‌includes‌  ‌not‌  ‌only‌  ‌conversion‌  ‌to‌‌   one's‌‌   personal‌‌   advantage,‌‌ 
8. Crimes‌‌Against‌‌Liberty‌  ‌ c) before‌‌the‌‌institution‌‌of‌‌criminal‌‌proceedings.‌  ‌
but‌‌
  also‌‌   every‌‌
  attempt‌‌   to‌‌
  dispose‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  property‌‌   of‌‌ another‌‌ without‌‌ 
267‌  ‌ Kidnapping‌‌and‌‌serious‌‌illegal‌‌detention‌  ‌ 269‌  ‌ Unlawful‌‌arrest‌  ‌
right.‌  ‌In‌  ‌proving‌  ‌the‌  ‌element‌  ‌of‌  ‌conversion‌  ‌or‌  ‌misappropriation,‌  ‌a ‌‌
legal‌  ‌presumption‌‌   of‌‌
  misappropriation‌‌   arises‌‌   when‌‌   the‌‌  accused‌‌ 
Penalty‌‌is‌R
‌ P‌‌to‌‌Death‌  ‌ 1) Offender‌‌arrests‌‌or‌‌detains‌‌another;‌  ‌
fails‌  ‌to‌  ‌deliver‌  ‌the‌  ‌proceeds‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌sale‌‌
  or‌‌  to‌‌
  return‌‌   the‌‌
  items‌‌   to‌‌
  be‌ 
sold‌‌and‌‌fails‌‌to‌‌give‌‌an‌‌account‌‌of‌‌their‌‌whereabouts.‌  ‌ 1) Offender‌‌is‌‌a‌p
‌ rivate‌‌individual;‌  ‌ 2) Purpose‌‌is‌‌to‌‌deliver‌‌him‌‌to‌‌the‌‌proper‌‌authorities;‌  ‌

2) Kidnaps‌‌or‌‌detains‌‌‌another,‌‌depriving‌‌the‌‌latter‌‌of‌‌his‌‌  3) Not‌‌authorized‌‌by‌‌law‌‌or‌‌there‌‌is‌‌no‌‌reasonable‌‌ground‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Baladjay‌‌2
‌ 017‌‌re‌‌Syndicated‌‌Estafa‌  ‌ therefor.‌  ‌
liberty;‌  ‌
 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 135‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

People‌‌v.‌‌Anticamara‌‌‌2011‌  ‌
NOTES‌‌RE‌‌ILLEGAL‌‌DETENTION‌  simulated‌  ‌public‌  ‌authority‌  ‌by‌  ‌misrepresenting‌  ‌themselves‌  ‌as‌‌ 
1. The‌‌essence‌‌of‌‌the‌‌crime‌‌of‌‌kidnapping‌‌is‌‌   ‌ The‌  ‌last‌  ‌paragraph‌  ‌of‌  ‌Article‌  ‌267‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌RPC‌  ‌provides‌  ‌that‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌‌  PDEA‌‌   agents‌‌  when‌‌   they‌‌
  forcibly‌‌  took‌‌
  the‌‌
  victims.‌‌  In‌‌
  kidnapping‌‌ and‌‌ 
victim‌‌   is‌‌  killed‌‌
  or‌‌
  dies‌‌
  as‌‌ a ‌‌consequence‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ detention,‌‌ or‌‌ is‌‌ raped‌‌  serious‌‌   illegal‌‌
  detention‌‌   for‌‌
  ransom,‌‌ the‌‌ purpose‌‌ of‌‌ extorting‌‌ ransom‌‌ 
a. the‌‌actual‌‌deprivation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌victim's‌‌liberty‌‌   ‌ or‌  ‌subjected‌  ‌to‌  ‌torture‌  ‌or‌‌   dehumanizing‌‌   acts,‌‌  the‌‌  maximum‌‌   penalty‌‌  is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌qualifying‌  ‌circumstance‌  ‌which‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌alleged‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
b. coupled‌‌   with‌‌
  an‌‌
  indubitable‌‌ proof‌‌ of‌‌ ‌intent‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ part‌‌  shall‌‌   be‌‌  imposed.‌‌   In‌‌
  People‌‌   v.‌‌
  Larrañaga‌, ‌‌this‌‌  provision‌‌
  gives‌‌ rise‌‌  Information‌  ‌and‌  ‌proved‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌prosecution‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌  ‌itself‌  ‌by‌‌ 
of‌  ‌the‌  ‌malefactor‌  ‌to‌  ‌effect‌  ‌such‌  ‌restraint‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌  to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌special‌  ‌complex‌  ‌crime.‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌We‌  ‌hold‌  ‌that‌  ‌appellant‌  ‌Lando‌  ‌is‌‌  words‌  ‌and‌  ‌overt‌  ‌acts‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌before,‌  ‌during‌  ‌and‌  ‌after‌  ‌the‌‌ 
guilty‌  ‌beyond‌  ‌reasonable‌  ‌doubt‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  special‌  ‌complex‌  ‌crime‌  ‌of‌‌  kidnapping‌  ‌and‌  ‌detention‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌victim.‌  ‌In‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌at‌  ‌bench,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
offended‌‌party's‌‌liberty‌. ‌ ‌
kidnapping‌‌and‌‌serious‌‌illegal‌‌detention‌‌with‌‌rape‌. ‌ ‌ Information‌‌   did‌‌
  not‌‌
  contain‌‌ an‌‌ allegation‌‌ that‌‌ Bandoquillo‌‌ and‌‌ 
2. A‌‌
  public‌‌
  officer‌‌
  must‌‌  have‌‌  duty‌‌  under‌‌  the‌‌
  law‌‌
  to‌‌
  detain‌‌ persons,‌‌  his‌  ‌cohorts‌  ‌intended‌  ‌to‌  ‌extort‌  ‌ransom‌  ‌to‌  ‌obtain‌  ‌the‌‌   release‌‌   of‌‌ 
otherwise‌  ‌he‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌liable‌  ‌for‌  ‌kidnapping‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌arbitrary‌‌  However,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌agree‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌CA‌  ‌and‌  ‌trial‌  ‌court's‌‌  the‌  ‌victims‌. ‌ ‌Accordingly,‌  ‌Bandoquillo‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌convicted‌  ‌only‌  ‌of‌‌ 
detention.‌  ‌ judgment‌‌   finding‌‌   appellant‌‌
  Al‌‌   liable‌‌  for‌‌
  Rape.‌‌
  In‌‌
  ‌People‌‌   v.‌‌
  Suyu‌, ‌‌We‌‌  simple‌‌kidnapping‌‌and‌‌serious‌‌illegal‌‌detention‌. ‌ ‌
ruled‌‌   that‌‌  once‌‌
  conspiracy‌‌   is‌‌ established‌‌ between‌‌ several‌‌ accused‌‌ in‌‌ 
3. When‌‌  the‌‌
  victim‌‌  is‌‌
  female,‌‌
  detention‌‌
  is‌‌
  under‌‌
  Art‌‌ 267.‌‌ Voluntary‌‌ 
the‌  ‌commission‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌  ‌of‌  ‌robbery,‌  ‌they‌  ‌would‌‌   all‌‌
  be‌‌  equally‌‌  People‌‌v.‌‌Borja‌‌‌2017‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌
release‌‌is‌‌not‌‌mitigating‌‌in‌‌that‌‌article.‌  ‌
culpable‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌   rape‌‌
  committed‌‌   by‌‌
  anyone‌‌   of‌‌
  them‌‌   on‌‌  the‌‌  occasion‌‌ 
of‌  ‌the‌  ‌robbery,‌  ‌unless‌  ‌anyone‌‌   of‌‌
  them‌‌  proves‌‌   that‌‌
  he‌‌
  endeavored‌‌   to‌‌  A‌  ‌public‌  ‌officer‌  ‌who‌  ‌detains‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Kidnapping‌‌of‌‌minors‌  ‌ prevent‌‌the‌‌others‌‌from‌‌committing‌‌rape.‌  ‌ extorting‌  ‌ransom‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌said‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌acting‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌  ‌official‌‌ 
capacity.‌  ‌In‌  ‌People‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Santiano‌, ‌ ‌this‌  ‌Court‌  ‌explained‌  ‌that‌  ‌public‌‌ 
There‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌to‌  ‌prove‌  ‌that‌  ‌appellant‌  ‌Al‌  ‌was‌  ‌aware‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  officials‌‌  may‌‌ be‌‌ prosecuted‌‌ under‌‌ Article‌‌ 267‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ RPC‌‌ if‌‌ they‌‌ act‌‌ in‌‌ 
270‌  ‌ Kidnapping‌‌and‌‌failure‌‌to‌‌return‌‌a‌‌minor‌  ‌ subsequent‌‌   events‌‌   that‌‌ transpired‌‌ after‌‌ the‌‌ killing‌‌ of‌‌ Sulpacio‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌  their‌‌
  private‌‌
  capacity.‌‌  The‌‌  burden‌‌   is‌‌
  on‌‌  the‌‌ accused‌‌ to‌‌ prove‌‌ that‌‌ 
kidnapping‌  ‌of‌‌   AAA.‌‌  Appellant‌‌
  Al‌‌
  could‌‌   not‌‌
  have‌‌
  prevented‌‌   appellant‌‌  he‌‌or‌‌she‌‌acted‌‌in‌‌furtherance‌‌of‌‌his‌‌or‌‌her‌‌official‌‌functions‌. ‌ ‌
1) Offender‌‌is‌‌entrusted‌‌with‌‌the‌‌custody‌‌of‌‌a‌‌minor;‌  ‌ Lando‌‌  from‌‌   raping‌‌ AAA,‌‌ because‌‌ at‌‌ the‌‌ time‌‌ of‌‌ rape,‌‌ he‌‌ was‌‌ no‌‌ longer‌‌ 
2) Deliberately‌‌fails‌‌to‌‌restore‌‌said‌‌minor‌‌to‌‌his‌‌parents‌‌or‌‌  associated‌‌with‌‌appellant‌‌Lando.‌  ‌ In‌  ‌this‌  ‌case,‌  ‌Ronalyn‌  ‌was‌  ‌clearly‌  ‌deprived‌  ‌of‌  ‌her‌  ‌liberty.‌  ‌She‌  ‌was‌‌ 
guardians.‌  ‌ forcibly‌  ‌taken‌‌   inside‌‌
  a ‌‌vehicle‌‌
  by‌‌
  accused-appellant‌‌   and‌‌
  his‌‌   cohorts‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Dionaldo‌‌‌2014‌  ‌ and‌‌was‌‌driven‌‌around‌‌Quezon‌‌City‌‌for‌‌at‌‌least‌‌five‌‌(5)‌‌hours.‌  ‌
271‌  ‌ Inducing‌‌a‌‌minor‌‌to‌‌abandon‌‌his‌‌home‌  ‌
The‌  ‌Court‌  ‌is,‌  ‌however,‌  ‌constrained‌  ‌to‌  ‌modify‌  ‌the‌  ‌ruling‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  RTC‌‌  People‌‌v.‌‌Concepcion‌‌2
‌ 018‌‌Leonen,‌‌J‌‌ 
1) The‌‌minor‌‌is‌‌living‌‌in‌‌the‌‌home‌‌of‌‌his‌‌parents‌‌or‌‌guardian‌‌or‌‌  and‌‌  the‌‌   CA,‌‌ as‌‌ the‌‌ crime‌‌ the‌‌ accused-appellants‌‌ have‌‌ committed‌‌ does‌‌ 
re‌‌kidnapping‌‌absorbed‌‌in‌‌rape‌  ‌
the‌‌person‌‌entrusted‌‌with‌‌is‌‌custody;‌  ‌ not‌  ‌merely‌  ‌constitute‌  ‌Kidnapping‌  ‌and‌  ‌Serious‌‌   Illegal‌‌
  Detention,‌‌   but‌‌ 
that‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ ‌special‌‌ complex‌‌ crime‌‌ of‌‌ Kidnapping‌‌ for‌‌ Ransom‌‌ with‌‌  Accused‌  ‌abducted‌  ‌the‌  ‌victim‌  ‌and‌  ‌then‌  ‌raped‌  ‌her.‌  ‌Thereafter,‌  ‌he‌‌ 
2) Induces‌‌said‌‌minor‌‌to‌‌abandon‌‌such‌‌home.‌  ‌ Homicide.‌‌   This‌‌   is‌‌
  in‌‌
  view‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ victim’s‌‌ (i.e.,‌‌ Edwin's)‌‌ death,‌‌ which‌‌  prevented‌‌   her‌‌
  from‌‌   leaving‌‌   by‌‌  placing‌‌   electric‌‌  wire‌‌ around‌‌ the‌‌ room‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Benedicto‌‌Ramos‌  ‌ was‌  ‌(a)‌  ‌specifically‌  ‌charged‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Information,‌  ‌and‌  ‌(b)‌  ‌clearly‌‌  where‌  ‌she‌‌  was‌‌  in‌‌
  to‌‌  prevent‌‌   anyone‌‌   who‌‌   might‌‌   come‌‌  to‌‌
  release‌‌   her.‌‌ 
established‌‌during‌‌the‌‌trial‌‌of‌‌this‌‌case.‌‌   ‌ The‌‌  abduction‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌   victim‌‌  by‌‌  the‌‌
  accused‌‌   is‌‌
  absorbed‌‌   in‌‌ the‌‌ crime‌‌ 
For‌‌   kidnapping‌‌ to‌‌ exist,‌‌ ‌it‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ necessary‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ offended‌‌ party‌‌  of‌‌rape‌‌since‌‌it‌‌was‌‌resorted‌‌to‌‌in‌‌order‌‌to‌‌commit‌‌the‌‌latter‌‌crime.‌  ‌
be‌‌   kept‌‌   within‌‌  an‌‌
  enclosure‌‌   ‌to‌‌
  restrict‌‌
  her‌‌ freedom‌‌ of‌‌ locomotion.‌‌  Further‌  ‌taking‌  ‌into‌  ‌account‌  ‌the‌  ‌fact‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌kidnapping‌  ‌was‌‌ 
It‌  ‌is‌  ‌enough‌  ‌that,‌  ‌as‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌instant‌  ‌case,‌  ‌she‌  ‌was‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌manner‌‌  committed‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌‌
  of‌‌
  extorting‌‌
  ransom,‌‌   accused-appellants’‌‌  The‌  ‌continued‌  ‌detention‌  ‌of‌  ‌AAA‌  ‌after‌  ‌the‌  ‌rape‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌deemed‌‌ 
deprived‌‌of‌‌her‌‌liberty,‌‌unable‌‌to‌‌move‌‌-‌‌and‌‌get‌‌out‌‌-‌‌as‌‌she‌‌pleased.‌  ‌ conviction‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌modified‌  ‌from‌  ‌Kidnapping‌  ‌and‌  ‌Serious‌  ‌Illegal‌  absorbed‌  ‌in‌  ‌it.‌  ‌The‌  ‌detention‌  ‌was‌  ‌illegal‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌attended‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Detention‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  special‌‌
  complex‌‌   crime‌‌
  of‌‌  ‌Kidnapping‌‌ for‌‌ Ransom‌‌  circumstances‌  ‌that‌  ‌would‌  ‌render‌  ‌it‌  ‌serious‌  ‌illegal‌  ‌detention.‌  ‌Thus,‌‌ 
The‌  ‌rule‌  ‌now‌  ‌is:‌  ‌Where‌  ‌the‌  ‌person‌  ‌kidnapped‌  ‌is‌  ‌killed‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  with‌‌Homicide‌,‌‌which‌‌carries‌‌the‌‌penalty‌‌of‌d ‌ eath‌.  ‌‌ ‌ this‌‌ Court‌‌ finds‌‌ accused-appellant‌‌ guilty‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ crime‌‌ of‌‌ ‌slight‌‌ illegal‌‌ 
course‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌detention,‌  ‌regardless‌  ‌of‌  ‌whether‌  ‌the‌  ‌killing‌  ‌was‌‌  detention.‌  ‌
purposely‌‌   sought‌‌   or‌‌
  was‌‌  merely‌‌ an‌‌ afterthought‌, ‌‌the‌‌ kidnapping‌‌ and‌‌  People‌‌v.‌‌Bandoquillo‌‌‌2016‌  ‌
murder‌  ‌or‌  ‌homicide‌  ‌can‌  ‌no‌‌   longer‌‌
  be‌‌  complexed‌‌   under‌‌  Art.‌‌   48,‌‌
  nor‌‌ 
9. Crimes‌‌Againt‌‌Public‌‌Interest‌  ‌
be‌  ‌treated‌  ‌as‌  ‌separate‌  ‌crimes,‌  ‌but‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌punished‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌special‌‌ 
Bandoquillo‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ p
‌ rivate‌  ‌individual‌  ‌who,‌  ‌along‌  ‌with‌  ‌his‌  ‌cohorts,‌‌   ‌

complex‌‌crime‌‌‌under‌‌the‌‌last‌‌paragraph‌‌of‌‌Art.‌‌267,‌‌as‌‌amended.‌  ‌
kidnapped‌  ‌Hung‌  ‌Yee‌  ‌Chua‌  ‌(Yee)‌  ‌and‌  ‌5 ‌ ‌minors.‌  ‌The‌  ‌abductors‌‌  161‌  ‌ Counterfeiting‌‌or‌‌forging‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 136‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

Forging‌‌the‌: ‌ ‌ b) Knowledge.‌  ‌ one-peso‌‌bill‌‌which‌‌accused‌‌gave‌‌as‌‌payment.‌‌(P


‌ P‌‌v ‌‌
1) Great‌‌Seal‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Government‌‌of‌‌the‌‌PH;‌  ‌ Galano)‌. ‌ ‌
False‌‌Treasury‌‌or‌‌Bank‌‌notes‌  ‌ 2) E‌rasing,‌S‌ bstituting,‌‌Co‌ unterfeiting,‌‌or‌A
‌u ‌ l‌ tering‌‌by‌‌any‌‌ 
2) signature‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌President;‌  ‌
means‌‌the‌‌figures,‌‌letters,‌‌words,‌‌or‌‌sign‌‌contained‌‌therein.‌  ‌
3) stamp‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌President.‌  ‌ Forging‌‌treasury‌‌or‌‌bank‌‌notes‌‌or‌‌other‌‌documents‌‌ 
166‌  ‌ payable‌‌to‌‌bearer,‌‌importing,‌‌and‌‌uttering‌‌of‌‌such‌‌false‌‌  e.g.‌‌‌A‌‌wrote‌‌B's‌‌name‌‌on‌‌the‌‌back‌‌of‌‌said‌‌treasury‌‌ 
162‌  ‌ Using‌‌forged‌‌signature‌‌or‌‌counterfeit‌‌seal‌‌or‌‌stamp‌  ‌ or‌‌forged‌‌notes‌‌and‌‌documents‌  ‌ warrant‌‌as‌‌if‌‌B‌‌had‌‌indorsed‌‌it,‌‌and‌‌then‌‌presented‌‌it‌‌for‌‌ 
payment.‌‌(U ‌ S‌‌v.‌‌Solito‌)‌  ‌
1) Great‌‌Seal‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Republic‌‌was‌‌counterfeited‌‌or‌‌the‌‌signature‌‌  1) Forging‌o
‌ r‌‌falsification‌‌of‌‌treasury‌‌or‌‌bank‌‌notes‌‌or‌‌other‌‌ 
or‌‌stamp‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Chief‌‌Executive‌‌was‌‌forged‌‌by‌‌another‌‌person;‌  documents‌‌payable‌‌to‌‌bearer;‌  ‌
Falsification‌  ‌
2) Offender‌‌knew‌‌of‌‌the‌‌counterfeiting‌‌or‌‌forgery;‌  ‌ 2) Importation;‌  ‌
170‌  ‌ Falsification‌‌of‌‌legislative‌‌documents‌  ‌
3) He‌‌used‌‌the‌‌counterfeit‌‌seal‌‌or‌‌forged‌‌signature‌‌or‌‌stamp.‌  ‌ 3) Uttering‌i‌ n‌‌connivance‌‌with‌‌the‌‌forgers‌‌or‌‌importers.‌  ‌
1) There‌‌be‌‌a‌‌bill,‌‌resolution,‌‌or‌‌ordinance‌‌‌of‌‌any‌‌stage‌‌and‌‌of‌‌ 
Counterfeiting‌‌or‌‌Mutilating‌‌coins‌  ‌ Counterfeiting,‌‌importing‌‌and‌‌uttering‌‌instruments‌‌not‌‌  any‌‌legislative‌‌body;‌  ‌
167‌  ‌
payable‌‌to‌‌bearer‌  ‌
163‌  ‌ Making,‌‌importing‌‌and‌‌uttering‌‌false‌‌coins.‌  ‌ 2) Offender‌a
‌ lters‌; ‌ ‌
1) There‌‌be‌‌an‌‌instrument‌‌payable‌‌to‌‌order‌‌or‌‌other‌‌document‌‌  3) He‌‌has‌‌no‌‌proper‌‌authority;‌  ‌
1) There‌‌be‌f‌ alse‌‌‌or‌‌counterfeited‌c‌ oins;‌  ‌ not‌‌payable‌‌‌to‌‌bearer;‌  ‌
4) Alteration‌h
‌ as‌‌changed‌‌the‌‌meaning.‌  ‌
2) Offender‌‌either‌m
‌ ade,‌‌imported,‌‌or‌‌uttered‌‌‌such‌‌coins;‌  ‌ 2) Offender‌‌either‌f‌ orged,‌‌imported‌‌or‌‌uttered‌‌‌such‌‌instrument;‌  ‌
3) In‌‌case‌‌of‌‌uttering‌,‌‌he‌‌connived‌‌‌with‌‌the‌‌counterfeiters‌‌or‌‌  Falsification‌‌by‌‌public‌‌officer,‌‌employee‌‌or‌‌notary‌‌or‌‌ 
3) In‌‌case‌‌of‌‌uttering,‌‌he‌c‌ onnived‌‌‌with‌‌the‌‌forger‌‌or‌‌importer.‌  ‌ 171‌  ‌
importers.‌  ‌ ecclesiastical‌‌minister‌  ‌
Illegal‌‌possession‌‌and‌‌use‌‌of‌‌forged‌‌treasury‌‌or‌‌bank‌‌  Any‌‌public‌‌officer,‌‌employee,‌‌or‌‌notary,‌‌or‌‌ecclesiastical‌‌minister,‌‌ 
168‌  ‌
Mutilation‌‌of‌‌coins,‌‌importation‌‌and‌‌uttering‌‌of‌‌  notes‌‌and‌‌other‌‌instruments‌‌of‌‌credit‌  ‌
164‌  ‌ who‌‌takes‌‌advantage‌‌of‌‌his‌‌official‌‌position.‌  ‌
mutilated‌‌coins‌  ‌
1) Any‌‌treasury‌‌or‌‌bank‌‌note‌‌or‌‌certificate‌‌or‌‌other‌‌obligation‌‌  Acts‌‌punished‌‌with‌‌corresponding‌‌elements‌  ‌
1) Mutilating‌c‌ oins‌‌with‌‌intent‌‌to‌‌damage‌‌‌or‌‌defraud.‌  ‌ and‌‌security‌‌payable‌‌to‌‌bearer‌,‌‌or‌‌any‌‌instrument‌p ‌ ayable‌‌  1) Counterfeiting‌‌or‌‌imitating‌‌any‌h
‌ andwriting,‌‌signature‌‌or‌‌ 
2) Importing‌o ‌ r‌‌uttering‌s‌ uch‌‌mutilated‌‌coins‌‌with‌‌  to‌‌order‌‌‌or‌‌other‌‌document‌‌of‌‌credit‌n‌ ot‌‌payable‌‌to‌‌bearer‌‌  rubric‌. ‌ ‌
connivance‌‌‌with‌‌the‌‌mutilator‌‌or‌‌importer.‌  ‌ is‌‌forged‌‌or‌‌falsified‌‌by‌a
‌ nother‌‌person.‌  ‌
Two‌‌ways‌:  ‌‌ ‌
2) Knowledge‌; ‌ ‌
165‌  ‌ Selling‌‌of‌‌false‌‌or‌‌mutilated‌‌coins,‌‌without‌‌connivance‌  ‌ 1) Counterfeiting,‌‌requisites‌‌are:‌  
3) Performs‌a
‌ ny‌‌of‌‌these‌‌acts:‌  ‌
a) intent‌‌or‌‌attempt‌‌to‌‌imitate‌, ‌ ‌
Acts‌‌punished‌‌with‌‌corresponding‌‌elements‌  ‌ a) Using‌‌any‌‌such‌‌forged‌‌or‌‌falsified‌‌instruments;‌‌or‌  ‌
b) genuine‌‌and‌‌forged‌b
‌ ear‌‌some‌‌resemblance;‌‌ 
1) Possession‌‌of‌‌coin,‌‌counterfeited‌‌or‌‌mutilated‌‌by‌‌another‌  ‌ b) Possessing‌‌with‌‌intent‌‌to‌‌use.‌  ‌ and‌  ‌
a) Possession‌  ‌
169‌  ‌ How‌‌forgery‌‌is‌‌committed‌  ‌ 2) Feigning‌‌‌which‌‌is‌‌simulating‌‌something‌‌that‌‌does‌‌ 
b) With‌‌intent‌‌to‌‌utter‌  ‌ not‌‌exist.‌  ‌
c) Knowledge.‌  ‌ 1) Giving‌‌to‌‌a‌‌treasury‌‌or‌‌bank‌‌note‌‌or‌‌any‌‌instrument‌‌payable‌‌  Making‌‌it‌‌appear‌‌that‌‌a‌‌person‌‌who‌‌does‌‌not‌‌know‌‌ 
to‌‌bearer‌‌or‌‌to‌‌order‌‌mentioned‌‌therein‌‌the‌‌appearance‌‌of‌‌a ‌‌ how‌‌to‌‌write‌‌has‌‌signed‌‌the‌‌document‌‌is‌‌feigning.‌  ‌
2) Actually‌‌uttering‌  ‌
true‌‌and‌‌genuine‌‌document.‌  ‌
a) Actually‌‌uttering‌  ‌ 2) Causing‌‌it‌‌to‌‌appear‌‌‌that‌‌persons‌‌have‌‌participated‌‌in‌‌any‌‌ 
e.g.‌‌‌Writing‌‌the‌‌word‌‌"Victory"‌‌in‌‌ink‌‌at‌‌the‌‌back‌‌of‌‌the‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 137‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

act‌‌or‌‌proceeding.‌  ‌ Making‌‌a‌‌copy‌‌of‌‌a‌‌deed‌‌of‌‌sale‌‌which‌‌was‌‌never‌‌  service‌  ‌


a) Causing‌‌it‌‌to‌‌appear‌‌that‌‌a‌‌person‌‌participated‌‌in‌‌an‌‌  executed;‌  ‌
Punishable‌‌act‌‌committed‌‌by‌‌offender‌  ‌
act;‌‌and‌‌   ‌ 8) Intercalating‌‌any‌‌instrument‌‌or‌‌note‌‌relative‌‌to‌‌the‌‌issuance‌‌ 
thereof‌‌in‌‌a‌‌protocol,‌‌registry‌‌or‌‌official‌‌book.‌  ‌ 1) Physician‌f‌ alsifies‌m
‌ edical‌‌certificate‌, ‌ ‌
b) Such‌‌person‌‌did‌‌not‌‌in‌‌fact‌‌participate.‌  ‌
★ Including‌‌in‌‌a‌‌copy‌‌a‌‌statement‌‌contrary‌‌to,‌‌or‌‌  2) Public‌‌Officer‌‌‌falsifies‌c‌ ertificate‌‌of‌‌merit‌‌or‌‌service,‌‌ 
3) Attributing‌t‌ o‌‌persons‌‌who‌‌have‌‌participated‌‌in‌‌an‌‌act‌‌or‌‌ 
different‌‌from‌‌that‌‌of‌‌the‌‌genuine‌‌original‌‌‌-‌‌Civil‌‌  good‌‌conduct‌,‌‌etc,‌  ‌
proceeding‌‌statements‌‌other‌‌than‌‌those‌‌in‌‌fact‌‌made‌‌by‌‌them.‌  ‌
registrar‌‌stating‌‌that‌‌a‌‌person‌‌is‌‌legitimate‌‌contrary‌‌  3) Private‌‌person‌‌‌falsifies‌e
‌ ither‌. ‌ ‌
a) A‌‌person‌‌participated‌‌in‌‌an‌‌act;‌  ‌
to‌‌that‌‌stated‌‌in‌‌the‌‌original.‌  ‌
b) He‌‌made‌‌statements‌‌in‌‌that‌‌act;‌‌and‌  ‌ 175‌  ‌ Using‌‌false‌‌certificates‌  ‌
c) Statements‌‌other‌‌than‌‌those‌‌made‌‌by‌‌such‌‌person‌‌  Falsification‌‌by‌‌private‌‌individuals‌‌and‌‌use‌‌of‌‌falsified‌‌ 
172‌  ‌ 1) Art‌‌174‌‌has‌‌been‌‌committed;‌  ‌
documents‌  ‌
were‌‌attributed‌‌to‌‌him.‌  ‌
2) Offender‌‌knew‌‌of‌‌the‌‌falsity;‌  ‌
4) Making‌‌untruthful‌‌statements‌‌‌in‌‌a‌‌narration‌‌of‌‌facts.‌  ‌ Acts‌‌punished‌‌with‌‌corresponding‌‌elements‌  ‌
3) He‌‌used‌‌the‌‌same.‌  ‌
a) In‌‌a‌‌document,‌‌there‌‌be‌‌a‌‌narration‌‌of‌‌facts;‌  ‌ 1) Falsification‌‌of‌p
‌ ublic‌,‌o
‌ fficial‌o
‌ r‌c‌ ommercial‌‌‌documents.‌  ‌
b) Offender‌‌has‌‌legal‌‌obligation‌‌to‌‌disclose‌‌the‌‌truth;‌  ‌ a) Offender‌‌is‌‌private‌‌individual‌‌or‌‌public‌‌officer‌‌who‌‌  177‌  ‌ Usurpation‌  ‌
c) Facts‌‌are‌‌absolutely‌‌false;‌  ‌ did‌‌not‌‌take‌‌advantage‌‌of‌‌his‌‌official‌‌position;‌  ‌
1) Usurpation‌‌of‌‌authority‌  ‌
d) Wrongful‌‌intent‌‌of‌‌injuring‌‌a‌‌third‌‌person.‌  ‌ b) Committed‌‌any‌‌acts‌‌in‌‌Art‌‌171;‌  ‌
knowingly‌‌and‌‌falsely‌‌representing‌‌oneself‌‌to‌‌be‌‌an‌‌officer,‌‌ 
c) Falsification‌‌committed‌‌in‌‌public,‌‌official,‌‌or‌‌ 
★ Person‌‌making‌‌the‌‌narration‌‌of‌‌facts‌‌must‌‌have‌‌  agent,‌‌rep‌‌of‌‌the‌‌PH‌‌or‌‌any‌‌foreign‌‌gov't‌  ‌
commercial‌‌documents.‌  ‌
knowledge‌‌of‌‌its‌‌falsity.‌  ‌
2) Usurpation‌‌of‌‌official‌‌functions‌  ‌
5) Altering‌t‌ rue‌‌dates‌  ‌ 2) Falsification‌‌of‌p
‌ rivate‌‌‌documents.‌  ‌
performing‌‌any‌‌act‌‌pertaining‌‌to‌‌any‌‌person‌‌in‌‌authority,‌‌ 
a) Offender‌‌committed‌‌act‌‌in‌‌Art‌‌171‌‌except‌‌par‌‌7;‌  ‌
★ Date‌‌must‌‌be‌‌essential.‌  ‌ under‌‌pretense‌‌of‌‌official‌‌position,‌‌and‌‌without‌‌being‌‌ 
★ Must‌‌affect‌‌either‌‌the‌‌veracity‌‌or‌‌the‌‌effects‌‌of‌‌the‌‌  b) Committed‌‌in‌‌any‌‌private‌‌document;‌  ‌ lawfully‌‌entitled‌‌to.‌  ‌
document.‌  ‌ c) Caused‌‌or‌‌with‌‌intent‌‌‌to‌‌cause‌‌damage‌‌to‌‌a‌‌third‌‌ 
★ Altering‌‌dates‌‌in‌‌official‌‌receipts‌‌to‌‌prevent‌‌  party.‌  ‌ False‌‌testimony‌  ‌
discovery‌‌of‌‌malversation‌‌is‌‌falsification.‌  ‌ 3) Use‌‌‌of‌‌falsified‌‌documents.‌‌   ‌
6) Making‌‌any‌a
‌ lteration‌o
‌ r‌‌intercalation‌i‌ n‌‌a‌‌genuine‌‌  in‌‌a‌‌judicial‌‌proceeding‌  ‌ 180‌  ‌ False‌‌testimony‌‌against‌‌a‌‌defendant‌  ‌
document‌‌which‌‌changes‌‌its‌‌meaning.‌  ‌ a) Knowledge;‌  ‌ 1) There‌‌be‌‌a‌c‌ riminal‌‌‌proceeding;‌  ‌
a) There‌‌be‌‌an‌‌alteration‌‌or‌‌intercalation;‌  ‌ b) False‌‌document‌‌embraced‌‌in‌‌Art‌‌171‌‌or‌‌172‌‌pars‌‌  2) Offender‌‌testifies‌‌falsely‌‌under‌‌oath‌a
‌ gainst‌d
‌ efendant;‌  ‌
b) Made‌‌on‌‌a‌‌genuine‌‌document;‌  ‌ 1-2;‌  ‌
3) Knows‌‌of‌‌falsity;‌  ‌
c) Meaning‌‌of‌‌document‌‌has‌‌changed;‌‌and‌  ‌ c) Introduced‌‌in‌‌evidence‌‌in‌‌any‌‌judicial‌‌proceeding.‌‌   ‌
4) Defendant‌‌is‌‌either‌‌acquitted‌‌or‌‌convicted‌‌by‌‌final‌‌judgment.‌  ‌
d) Change‌‌made‌‌the‌‌document‌‌speak‌‌something‌‌false.‌  ‌ in‌‌any‌‌other‌‌transaction‌  ‌
7) Issuing‌‌in‌‌authenticated‌‌form‌‌a‌‌document‌‌purporting‌‌to‌‌be‌‌a ‌‌ d) Used‌‌such‌‌document;‌  ‌ 181‌  ‌ False‌‌testimony‌‌favorable‌‌to‌‌the‌‌defendant‌  ‌
copy‌‌of‌‌an‌‌inexistent‌‌document.‌  ‌ e) Caused‌‌or‌‌with‌‌intent‌‌to‌‌cause‌‌damage.‌  ‌ 1) There‌‌be‌‌a‌c‌ riminal‌‌‌proceeding;‌  ‌
★ Purporting‌‌to‌‌be‌‌a‌‌copy‌‌of‌‌an‌‌inexistent‌‌document‌-‌ ‌‌ 
174‌  ‌ False‌‌medical‌‌certificates,‌‌false‌‌certificates‌‌of‌‌merit‌‌or‌‌  2) Offender‌‌testifies‌‌falsely‌‌under‌‌oath‌w
‌ ith‌‌intent‌‌to‌‌favor‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 138‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌  ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

defendant;‌  ‌ 2. Subornation‌  ‌of‌  ‌perjury‌  ‌is‌  ‌committed‌  ‌by‌  ‌procuring‌  ‌another‌‌


  to‌‌  Competition‌‌Act‌  ‌
3) Knows‌‌of‌‌falsity;‌  ‌ swear‌‌falsely.‌  ‌
Layug‌‌v.‌‌Sandiganbayan‌  ‌
3. Offer‌  ‌of‌‌
  testimonial‌‌  evidence‌, ‌‌begins‌‌
  the‌‌
  moment‌‌
  a ‌‌witness‌‌
  is‌‌ 
182‌  ‌ False‌‌testimony‌‌in‌‌civil‌‌cases‌  ‌
called‌‌to‌‌the‌‌witness‌‌stand‌‌and‌‌interrogated‌‌by‌‌counsel.‌  ‌ There‌‌   is‌‌
  authority‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  effect‌‌
  that‌‌ a ‌‌fourth‌‌ requisite,‌‌ i.e.,‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ act‌‌ 
4. If‌‌
  the‌‌
  false‌‌
  witness‌‌
  desists,‌‌
  he‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  liable.‌‌ The‌‌ ‌offeror‌‌ however‌‌  of‌‌
  falsification‌‌ was‌‌ committed‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ ‌damage‌‌ ‌of‌‌ a ‌‌third‌‌ party‌‌ or‌‌ with‌‌ 
1) Civil‌c‌ ase;‌  ‌
intent‌  ‌to‌  ‌cause‌  ‌such‌  ‌damage,‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌dispensed‌  ‌with‌  ‌as‌  ‌regards‌‌ 
2) Testimony‌‌is‌‌relevant,‌‌and‌  ‌ is‌‌liable‌‌for‌a‌ ttempted‌o ‌ ffering‌‌false‌‌testimony‌‌in‌‌evidence.‌  ‌
falsification‌  ‌of‌  ‌public‌  ‌or‌  ‌official‌  ‌documents.‌  ‌In‌  ‌the‌  ‌prosecution‌  ‌of‌‌ 
3) False;‌  ‌ cases‌  ‌involving‌  ‌falsification‌  ‌of‌‌   ‌daily‌‌   time‌‌
  records,‌‌  it‌‌
  is‌‌
  imperative‌‌ 
185‌  ‌ Machinations‌‌in‌‌public‌‌auctions‌  ‌
that‌‌
  there‌‌ be‌‌ proof‌‌ of‌‌ damag‌e ‌‌to‌‌ the‌‌ government.‌‌ Such‌‌ damage‌‌ may‌‌ 
4) Knows‌‌of‌‌falsity;‌  ‌ take‌‌the‌‌form‌‌of‌‌salary‌‌paid‌‌to‌‌the‌‌accused‌‌for‌‌services‌‌not‌‌rendered.‌  ‌
Common‌‌elements‌  ‌
5) Malicious‌‌with‌‌intent‌‌to‌‌affect‌‌the‌‌issues‌‌presented.‌  ‌
1) There‌‌be‌‌public‌‌auction;‌‌   ‌ Tepoco‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌2
‌ 017‌‌re‌‌Falsification‌‌of‌‌public‌‌documents‌  ‌
183‌  ‌ False‌‌testimony‌‌in‌‌other‌‌cases‌‌and‌‌perjury‌  ‌ 2) Intent‌‌to‌‌cause‌‌reduction‌‌of‌‌price‌  ‌
Wrongful‌  ‌intent‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌to‌  ‌injure‌  ‌a ‌ ‌third‌‌ 
Acts‌‌punished‌  ‌ Acts‌‌punished‌‌with‌‌additional‌‌elements‌  ‌ person‌‌  is‌‌
  NOT‌‌
  an‌‌
  essential‌‌   element‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌
  crime‌‌ of‌‌ falsification‌‌ 
1) Soliciting‌‌any‌‌gift‌‌or‌‌promise‌  ‌ of‌‌public‌‌document‌. ‌ ‌
1) Falsely‌‌testifying‌u
‌ nder‌‌oath‌;‌‌and‌  ‌
2) Making‌‌a‌‌false‌‌affidavit.‌  ‌ a) Solicited‌‌gift‌‌or‌‌promise;‌  ‌
Malabanan‌‌v.‌‌Sandiganbayan‌‌2
‌ 017‌‌   ‌
Elements‌  ‌ b) To‌‌refrain‌‌bidders‌‌from‌‌taking‌‌part.‌  ‌
Offenders‌  ‌are‌  ‌considered‌  ‌to‌  ‌have‌  ‌taken‌  ‌advantage‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌  ‌official‌‌ 
1) Made‌‌statement‌‌under‌‌oath,‌‌or‌‌executed‌‌an‌‌affidavit‌‌upon‌‌a ‌‌ 2) Attempting‌‌bidders‌‌to‌‌stay‌‌away‌  ‌
position‌‌in‌‌falsifying‌‌a‌‌document‌‌if‌‌   ‌
material‌‌matter;‌‌   ‌ a) Attempted‌‌to‌‌cause‌‌bidders‌‌to‌‌stay‌‌away;‌  ‌
1) they‌‌  had‌‌
  the‌‌
  duty‌‌
  to‌‌
  make‌‌ or‌‌ prepare‌‌ or‌‌ otherwise‌‌ intervene‌‌ 
2) Such‌‌was‌‌made‌‌before‌‌a‌c‌ ompetent‌‌officer‌,‌‌authorized‌‌to‌‌  b) By‌‌threats,‌‌gifts,‌‌promises‌‌or‌‌other‌‌artifice.‌  ‌
in‌‌the‌‌preparation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌document;‌‌or‌  ‌
receive‌‌and‌‌administer‌‌oath;‌‌   ‌  
2) they‌‌had‌‌official‌‌custody‌‌of‌‌the‌‌falsified‌‌document‌  ‌
3) Willful‌‌and‌‌deliberate‌‌assertion‌‌of‌‌falsehood;‌‌   ‌ Common‌‌bid‌‌manipulation‌‌practices:‌  ‌
In‌  ‌cases‌  ‌of‌‌
  falsification,‌‌
  we‌‌
  have‌‌
  interpreted‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌  criminal‌‌
  intent‌‌ 
4) Statement‌‌or‌‌affidavit‌r‌ equired‌‌by‌‌law‌. ‌ ‌ 1. Bid‌  ‌cover‌  ‌happens‌‌
  when‌‌
  a ‌‌competitor‌‌
  submits‌‌
  a ‌‌bid‌‌
  that‌‌
  is‌‌  to‌‌pervert‌‌the‌‌truth‌‌is‌‌lacking‌‌in‌‌cases‌‌showing‌‌that‌‌   ‌
either‌‌   ‌
the‌‌accused‌‌did‌‌not‌‌benefit‌‌from‌‌the‌‌falsification;‌‌and‌  ‌
184‌  ‌ Offering‌‌false‌‌testimony‌‌in‌‌evidence‌  ‌
a) higher‌‌than‌‌that‌‌of‌‌the‌‌designated‌‌winner,‌  ‌ no‌  ‌damage‌  ‌was‌  ‌caused‌  ‌either‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌government‌  ‌or‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌third‌‌ 
1) Offered‌‌in‌‌evidence‌‌a‌‌false‌‌witness‌‌or‌‌testimony;‌  ‌ b) too‌‌high‌‌to‌‌be‌‌accepted,‌‌or‌  ‌ person.‌  ‌
2) Knows‌‌of‌‌falsity;‌  ‌ c) contains‌‌ special‌‌ terms‌‌ that‌‌ are‌‌ known‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ unacceptable‌‌ 
by‌‌the‌‌purchaser.‌  ‌ 10. RA‌‌9262‌  ‌
3) Made‌‌in‌‌a‌‌judicial‌‌or‌‌official‌‌proceeding.‌  ‌
  2. Bid‌‌  suppression‌‌   happens‌‌
  when‌‌
  a ‌‌company‌‌ does‌‌ not‌‌ submit‌‌  Who‌‌can‌‌be‌‌victims‌‌of‌‌VAWC‌  ‌
NOTES‌‌RE‌‌FALSE‌‌TESTIMONY‌  ‌ a‌‌bid‌‌for‌‌final‌‌consideration.‌  ‌
1. woman‌‌who‌‌is‌‌   ‌
1. Material‌  ‌matter‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌main‌  ‌fact‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌subject‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  3. Bid‌‌rotation,‌t‌ akes‌‌turns‌‌winning‌‌bids.‌  ‌
a. offender’s‌‌wife,‌‌   ‌
inquiry‌‌ or‌‌ any‌‌ circumstance‌‌ which‌‌ tends‌‌ to‌‌ prove‌‌ that‌‌ fact,‌‌ or‌‌ any‌‌  4. Market‌  ‌allocation‌, ‌ ‌agree‌  ‌not‌  ‌to‌  ‌compete‌  ‌for‌  ‌certain‌‌ 
fact‌‌
  or‌‌
  circumstance‌‌   which‌‌ tends‌‌ to‌‌ corroborate‌‌ or‌‌ strengthen‌‌ the‌‌  b. former‌‌wife,‌‌or‌‌a ‌ ‌
customers‌‌or‌‌in‌‌certain‌‌areas.‌  ‌
testimony,‌‌   or‌‌
  which‌‌
  legitimately‌‌   affects‌‌
  the‌‌
  credit‌‌   of‌‌ any‌‌ witness‌‌  2. woman‌‌with‌‌whom‌‌the‌‌offender‌‌   ‌
who‌‌testifies.‌  ‌ 186‌  ‌ Has‌‌been‌‌repealed‌‌by‌R
‌ A‌‌10667‌‌or‌‌the‌‌Philippine‌‌ 
a. has‌‌or‌‌had‌‌a‌‌sexual‌‌or‌‌dating‌‌relationship,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 139‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

b. has‌‌a‌‌common‌‌child‌‌with,‌‌or‌‌against‌‌   ‌ 4. "‌Economic‌  ‌abuse‌" ‌ ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌acts‌  ‌that‌  ‌make‌  ‌or‌  ‌attempt‌  ‌to‌‌  fear‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌imminent‌  ‌harm‌  ‌from‌  ‌her‌  ‌batterer‌  ‌and‌  ‌an‌  ‌honest‌‌ 
3. The‌‌ woman’s‌‌ child‌‌ whether‌‌ legitimate‌‌ or‌‌ illegitimate,‌‌ within‌‌ or‌‌  make‌  ‌a ‌ ‌woman‌  ‌financially‌  ‌dependent‌  ‌which‌  ‌includes,‌  ‌but‌  ‌is‌‌  belief‌‌that‌‌she‌‌needed‌‌to‌‌use‌‌force‌‌to‌‌save‌‌her‌‌life.‌  ‌
without‌‌the‌‌family‌‌abode.‌  ‌ not‌‌limited‌‌to‌‌the‌‌following:‌  ‌ 3. At‌‌ the‌‌ time‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ killing,‌‌ the‌‌ batterer‌‌ must‌‌ have‌‌ posed‌‌ probable‌‌ 
a. withdrawal‌‌   of‌‌ financial‌‌ support‌‌ or‌‌ preventing‌‌ the‌‌ victim‌‌  —‌  ‌not‌  ‌necessarily‌  ‌immediate‌  ‌and‌‌   actual‌‌
  — ‌‌grave‌‌   harm‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌ 
Who‌‌can‌‌commit‌‌VAWC‌  ‌ woman,‌   b
‌ ased‌
  o
‌ n‌
  t
‌ he‌
  h
‌ istory‌
  o
‌ f‌
  v
‌ iolence.‌   (
‌ P
‌ P‌
  v
‌ .‌‌
  G enosa‌ , ‌‌GR‌‌ 
from‌  ‌engaging‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌legitimate‌  ‌profession,‌  ‌occupation,‌‌ 
business‌  ‌or‌  ‌activity,‌  ‌except‌  ‌in‌  ‌cases‌  ‌wherein‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌‌  135981,‌‌Jan.‌‌15,‌‌2004‌) ‌ ‌
1. VAWC‌  ‌may‌  ‌likewise‌  ‌be‌  ‌committed‌  ‌“against‌  ‌a ‌ ‌woman‌  ‌with‌‌ 
whom‌‌the‌‌person‌‌has‌‌or‌‌had‌‌a‌‌sexual‌‌or‌‌dating‌‌relationship.”‌‌   ‌ spouse/partner‌  ‌objects‌  ‌on‌  ‌valid,‌  ‌serious‌  ‌and‌  ‌moral‌‌ 
Extraterritoriality‌  ‌
grounds‌‌as‌‌defined‌‌in‌‌Article‌‌73‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Family‌‌Code;‌  ‌
2. The‌‌
  use‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  gender-neutral‌‌
  word‌‌
  “person”‌‌
  who‌‌
  has‌‌
  or‌‌
  had‌‌
  a ‌‌
sexual‌  ‌or‌  ‌dating‌  ‌relationship‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌woman‌  ‌encompasses‌‌  b. deprivation‌  ‌or‌  ‌threat‌‌   of‌‌
  deprivation‌‌   of‌‌
  financial‌‌  resources‌‌  AAA‌‌v.‌‌BBB‌‌2
‌ 018‌  ‌
even‌‌lesbian‌‌relationships‌.  ‌‌ ‌ and‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌use‌  ‌and‌  ‌enjoyment‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌conjugal,‌‌  YES‌. ‌ ‌In‌  ‌Dinamling‌  ‌v.‌  ‌People‌, ‌ ‌this‌  ‌Court‌  ‌already‌  ‌had‌  ‌occasion‌  ‌to‌ 
3. It‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌preclude‌  ‌the‌  ‌application‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌principle‌  ‌of‌‌  community‌‌or‌‌property‌‌owned‌‌in‌‌common;‌  ‌ enumerate‌  ‌the‌  ‌elements‌  ‌of‌  ‌psychological‌  ‌violence‌  ‌under‌  ‌Section‌‌ 
conspiracy‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌RPC.‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌Go-Tan‌  ‌v.‌‌  c. destroying‌‌household‌‌property;‌  5(i)‌‌of‌‌R.A.‌‌No.‌‌9262:‌  ‌
Spouses‌‌  Tan‌, ‌‌the‌‌
  parents-in-law‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌  victim,‌‌  were‌‌ held‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌  1) The‌‌offended‌‌party‌‌is‌‌a‌‌woman‌‌and/or‌‌her‌‌child‌‌or‌‌children;‌  ‌
d. controlling‌‌
  the‌‌ victims'‌‌ own‌‌ money‌‌ or‌‌ properties‌‌ or‌‌ solely‌‌ 
proper‌‌respondents‌‌in‌‌the‌‌case.‌  ‌
controlling‌‌the‌‌conjugal‌‌money‌‌or‌‌properties.‌  ‌ 2) The‌‌   woman‌‌   is‌‌
  either‌‌
  the‌‌
  wife‌‌
  or‌‌
  former‌‌ wife‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ offender,‌‌ 
Kinds‌‌of‌‌abuses‌‌against‌‌women‌  or‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌‌woman‌‌   with‌‌
  whom‌‌   the‌‌
  offender‌‌
  has‌‌
  or‌‌
  had‌‌  a ‌‌sexual‌‌ 
Battered‌‌Woman‌‌Syndrome‌  or‌  ‌dating‌  ‌relationship,‌  ‌or‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌woman‌  ‌with‌  ‌whom‌  ‌such‌‌ 
1. "‌Physical‌  ‌Violence‌" ‌ ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌acts‌  ‌that‌  ‌include‌  ‌bodily‌  ‌or‌‌  offender‌‌has‌‌a‌‌common‌‌child;‌  ‌
"‌Battered‌‌Woman‌‌Syndrome‌"‌‌has‌‌three‌‌phases‌  ‌
physical‌‌harm;‌  ‌ 3) The‌  ‌offender‌  ‌causes‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌woman‌  ‌and/or‌‌
  child‌‌
  mental‌‌
  or‌‌ 
1. The‌  ‌tension-building‌  ‌phase‌  ‌— ‌ ‌minor‌  ‌batterings,‌  ‌verbal‌  ‌or‌‌ 
2. "‌Sexual‌‌
  violence‌"‌‌  refers‌‌  to‌‌  an‌‌  act‌‌  which‌‌  is‌‌  sexual‌‌  in‌‌ nature,‌‌  emotional‌‌anguish;‌‌and‌  ‌
slight‌  ‌physical‌  ‌abuse‌  ‌occurs.‌  ‌The‌  ‌victim‌  ‌either‌  ‌pacifies‌  ‌the‌‌ 
committed‌‌   against‌‌
  a ‌‌woman‌‌
  or‌‌
  her‌‌ child.‌‌ It‌‌ includes,‌‌ but‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌  batterer‌‌or‌‌stays‌‌out‌‌of‌‌his‌‌way;‌‌   ‌ 4) The‌  ‌anguish‌  ‌is‌  ‌caused‌  ‌through‌  ‌acts‌  ‌of‌  ‌public‌  ‌ridicule‌  ‌or‌‌ 
limited‌‌to:‌  ‌ humiliation,‌‌   repeated‌‌  verbal‌‌
  and‌‌  emotional‌‌  abuse,‌‌  denial‌‌
  of‌‌ 
2. Acute‌  ‌battering‌  ‌phase‌  ‌— ‌ ‌characterized‌  ‌by‌  ‌brutality,‌‌ 
a. rape,‌‌sexual‌‌harassment,‌‌acts‌‌of‌‌lasciviousness‌‌xxx;‌  ‌ financial‌  ‌support‌‌
  or‌‌
  custody‌‌  of‌‌
  minor‌‌
  children‌‌  or‌‌
  access‌‌
  to‌‌ 
destructiveness‌  ‌or‌  ‌death.‌  ‌The‌  ‌victim‌  ‌realizes‌  ‌that‌  ‌she‌  ‌cannot‌‌ 
the‌‌children‌‌or‌‌similar‌‌such‌‌acts‌‌or‌‌omissions.‌  ‌
b. acts‌‌
  causing‌‌   or‌‌
  attempting‌‌   to‌‌
  cause‌‌  the‌‌ victim‌‌ to‌‌ engage‌‌ in‌‌  reason‌  ‌with‌  ‌him‌  ‌and‌  ‌resistance‌  ‌would‌  ‌only‌  ‌exacerbate‌  ‌her‌‌ 
any‌  ‌sexual‌  ‌activity‌  ‌by‌  ‌force,‌  ‌threat‌  ‌of‌  ‌force,‌  ‌physical‌  ‌or‌‌  condition;‌  ‌ What‌‌
  R.A.‌‌
  No.‌‌
  9262‌‌ criminalizes‌‌ is‌‌ ‌not‌‌ the‌‌ marital‌‌ infidelity‌‌ ‌per‌‌ se‌‌ 
other‌‌harm‌‌or‌‌threat‌‌of‌‌physical‌‌or‌‌other‌‌harm‌‌or‌‌coercion;‌  ‌ 3. Tranquil‌‌
  period‌‌
  — ‌‌batterer‌‌
  may‌‌
  show‌‌
  a ‌‌tender‌‌
  and‌‌ nurturing‌‌  but‌‌  the‌‌
  psychological‌‌ violence‌‌ causing‌‌ mental‌‌ or‌‌ emotional‌‌ suffering‌‌ 
behavior.‌  ‌ on‌  ‌the‌  ‌wife.‌  ‌Marital‌  ‌infidelity‌  ‌as‌  ‌cited‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌‌
  is‌‌
  only‌‌  one‌‌
  of‌‌ 
c. Prostituting‌‌the‌‌woman‌‌or‌‌child.‌  ‌
Requisites‌‌for‌‌BWS‌‌as‌‌a‌‌Defense‌  ‌ the‌  ‌various‌  ‌acts‌  ‌by‌  ‌which‌  ‌psychological‌  ‌violence‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌‌ 
3. "‌Psychological‌  ‌violence‌" ‌ ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌acts‌  ‌or‌  ‌omissions‌‌  committed‌. ‌‌Thus,‌‌   ‌the‌‌
  mental‌‌
  or‌‌
  emotional‌‌   suffering‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ victim‌‌ is‌‌ 
causing‌‌   or‌‌
  likely‌‌   to‌‌
  cause‌‌   mental‌‌
  or‌‌
  emotional‌‌   suffering‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
1. Cycle‌  ‌of‌  ‌violence‌  ‌— ‌ ‌“each‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌phases‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌cycle‌  ‌of‌‌  an‌‌essential‌‌and‌‌distinct‌‌element‌‌‌in‌‌the‌‌commission‌‌of‌‌the‌‌offense.‌  ‌
victim‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌‌  but‌‌  not‌‌
  limited‌‌
  to‌‌
  ‌intimidation,‌‌   harassment,‌‌  violence‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌proven‌  ‌to‌  ‌have‌  ‌characterized‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌two‌‌ 
stalking,‌  ‌damage‌  ‌to‌  ‌property,‌  ‌public‌  ‌ridicule‌  ‌or‌‌  battering‌‌episodes”‌  ‌ What‌‌
  may‌‌
  be‌‌
  gleaned‌‌
  from‌‌
  Section‌‌
  7 ‌‌of‌‌
  R.A.‌‌
  No.‌‌
  9262‌‌ is‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ law‌‌ 
humiliation,‌‌   repeated‌‌   verbal‌‌
  abuse‌‌   ‌and‌‌
  ‌marital‌‌ infidelity‌. ‌‌ 2. The‌  ‌final‌  ‌acute‌  ‌episode‌  ‌preceding‌  ‌the‌  ‌killing‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌batterer‌‌  contemplates‌‌   that‌‌
  acts‌‌
  of‌‌
  violence‌‌  against‌‌   women‌‌
  and‌‌
  their‌‌ children‌‌ 
xxxx‌  ‌ must‌  ‌have‌  ‌produced‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌battered‌  ‌person’s‌  ‌mind‌  ‌an‌  ‌actual‌‌  may‌  ‌manifest‌  ‌as‌  ‌transitory‌  ‌or‌  ‌continuing‌  ‌crimes‌. ‌ ‌Even‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌‌ 
alleged‌  ‌extra­ ‌ ‌marital‌  ‌affair‌  ‌causing‌  ‌the‌  ‌offended‌  ‌wife‌  ‌mental‌  ‌and‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 140‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

The‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌of‌  ‌reclusion‌  ‌temporal‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌  ‌medium‌  ‌period‌  ‌to‌‌ 
emotional‌‌
  anguish‌‌
  is‌‌  committed‌‌  abroad,‌‌
  the‌‌
  same‌‌
  ‌does‌‌
  not‌‌
  place‌‌ a ‌‌ to‌‌
  this‌‌
  party."‌‌
  Thus,‌‌
  in‌‌
  cases‌‌ of‌‌ support,‌‌ it‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ first‌‌ shown‌‌ that‌‌ 
the‌‌ accused's‌‌ denial‌‌ thereof‌‌ — ‌‌which‌‌ is,‌‌ by‌‌ itself,‌‌ already‌‌ a ‌‌form‌‌ of‌‌  reclusion‌‌perpetua‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌imposed‌‌upon‌‌the‌‌following:‌  ‌
prosecution‌‌ under‌‌ R.A.‌‌ No.‌‌ 9262‌‌ absolutely‌‌ beyond‌‌ the‌‌ reach‌‌ of‌‌ 
economic‌  ‌abuse‌‌   — ‌‌‌further‌‌
  caused‌‌   mental‌‌   or‌‌
  emotional‌‌   anguish‌‌    who‌‌ ‌engage‌‌ in‌‌ or‌‌ promote,‌‌ facilitate‌‌ or‌‌ induce‌‌ ‌child‌‌ 
a) Those‌‌
Philippine‌‌courts‌. ‌ ‌
to‌‌the‌‌woman-victim‌‌and/or‌‌to‌‌their‌‌common‌‌child.‌  ‌
prostitution‌  ‌which‌  ‌include,‌  ‌but‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌limited‌  ‌to,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Dabalos‌‌v.‌‌RTC‌‌‌2013‌  ‌ 11. RA‌‌7610‌  ‌ following:‌  ‌

In‌‌
  ‌Ang‌‌ v.‌‌ Court‌‌ of‌‌ Appeals‌,‌‌ the‌‌ Court‌‌ enumerated‌‌ the‌‌ elements‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  1) Acting‌‌as‌‌a‌‌procurer‌‌of‌‌a‌‌child‌‌prostitute;‌  ‌
crime‌‌of‌‌violence‌‌against‌‌women‌‌through‌‌harassment‌,‌‌to‌‌wit:‌  ‌ Definition‌‌of‌‌Child‌  ‌
2) Inducing‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌ ‌client‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌child‌  ‌prostitute‌  ‌by‌‌ 
1. The‌‌  offender‌‌
  has‌‌
  or‌‌
  had‌‌
  a ‌‌sexual‌‌
  or‌‌ dating‌‌ relationship‌‌ with‌‌  "‌Children‌" ‌ ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌person‌  ‌below‌  ‌eighteen‌  ‌(18)‌  ‌years‌  ‌of‌  ‌age‌‌
  or‌‌  means‌  ‌of‌  ‌written‌  ‌or‌  ‌oral‌  ‌advertisements‌  ‌or‌‌
  other‌‌
  similar‌‌ 
the‌‌offended‌‌woman;‌  ‌ those‌‌
  over‌‌
  but‌‌
  are‌‌
  unable‌‌ to‌‌ fully‌‌ take‌‌ care‌‌ of‌‌ themselves‌‌ or‌‌ protect‌‌  means;‌  ‌
2. The‌‌  offender,‌‌
  by‌‌
  himself‌‌
  or‌‌
  through‌‌
  another,‌‌ commits‌‌ an‌‌ act‌‌  themselves‌  ‌from‌  ‌abuse,‌  ‌neglect,‌  ‌cruelty,‌  ‌exploitation‌  ‌or‌‌ 
3) Taking‌  ‌advantage‌‌
  of‌‌
  influence‌‌
  or‌‌
  relationship‌‌
  to‌‌
  procure‌‌
  a ‌‌
or‌‌series‌‌of‌‌acts‌‌of‌‌harassment‌‌against‌‌the‌‌woman;‌‌and‌  ‌ discrimination‌  ‌because‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌physical‌  ‌or‌  ‌mental‌  ‌disability‌  ‌or‌‌ 
child‌‌as‌‌prostitute;‌  ‌
3. The‌  ‌harassment‌  ‌alarms‌  ‌or‌  ‌causes‌  ‌substantial‌‌
  emotional‌‌
  or‌‌  condition.‌  ‌
psychological‌‌distress‌‌to‌‌her.‌  ‌ 4) Threatening‌  ‌or‌  ‌using‌  ‌violence‌  ‌towards‌  ‌a ‌ ‌child‌  ‌to‌  ‌engage‌‌ 
 ‌ Acts‌‌punished‌‌as‌‌child‌‌abuse‌  ‌ him‌‌as‌‌a‌‌prostitute;‌‌or‌  ‌
Notably,‌  ‌while‌‌   it‌‌
  is‌‌
  required‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  offender‌‌   has‌‌   or‌‌
  had‌‌  a ‌‌sexual‌‌  or‌‌ 
dating‌  ‌relationship‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌offended‌  ‌woman,‌  ‌for‌  ‌RA‌  ‌9262‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌‌    ‌"‌Child‌‌
  abuse‌" ‌‌refers‌‌  to‌‌  the‌‌  maltreatment,‌‌  whether‌‌  habitual‌‌ or‌‌ not,‌‌ of‌‌  5) Giving‌  ‌monetary‌  ‌consideration‌  ‌goods‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌pecuniary‌‌ 
applicable,‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌indispensable‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌‌   violence‌‌   be‌‌
  a ‌‌ the‌‌child‌‌which‌‌includes‌‌any‌‌of‌‌the‌‌following:‌  ‌ benefit‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌child‌  ‌with‌  ‌intent‌  ‌to‌  ‌engage‌  ‌such‌  ‌child‌  ‌in‌‌ 
consequence‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌  ‌relationship‌. ‌ ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌immaterial‌  ‌whether‌  ‌the‌‌  prostitution.‌  ‌
relationship‌  ‌had‌  ‌ceased‌  ‌for‌  ‌as‌  ‌long‌  ‌as‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌sufficient‌  ‌evidence‌‌  1) Psychological‌  ‌and‌  ‌physical‌‌
  abuse,‌‌
  neglect,‌‌
  cruelty,‌‌
  sexual‌‌ 
b) Those‌  ‌who‌  ‌commit‌  ‌the‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌sexual‌  ‌intercourse‌  ‌of‌‌ 
showing‌  ‌the‌  ‌past‌  ‌or‌  ‌present‌  ‌existence‌‌   of‌‌  such‌‌  relationship‌‌   between‌‌  abuse‌‌and‌‌emotional‌‌maltreatment;‌  ‌
the‌‌offender‌‌and‌‌the‌‌victim‌‌when‌‌the‌‌physical‌‌harm‌‌was‌‌committed.‌  ‌ lascivious‌‌ conduct‌‌ with‌‌ a ‌‌child‌‌ exploited‌‌ in‌‌ prostitution‌‌ or‌‌ 
2) Any‌  ‌act‌  ‌by‌  ‌deeds‌  ‌or‌  ‌words‌  ‌which‌  ‌debases,‌  ‌degrades‌  ‌or‌‌ 
subject‌‌to‌‌other‌‌sexual‌‌abuse‌;‌ ‌and‌  ‌
demeans‌‌   the‌‌
  intrinsic‌‌
  worth‌‌
  and‌‌ dignity‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌child‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌human‌‌ 
Araza‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌‌2020‌  ‌ c) Those‌‌
  who‌‌
  ‌derive‌‌
  profit‌‌
  or‌‌
  advantage‌‌ therefrom,‌‌ whether‌‌ as‌‌ 
being;‌  ‌
The‌  ‌law‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌require‌  ‌proof‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌victim‌  ‌became‌‌  manager‌‌   or‌‌
  owner‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  establishment‌‌   where‌‌  the‌‌  prostitution‌‌ 
3) Unreasonable‌  ‌deprivation‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌basic‌  ‌needs‌  ‌for‌  ‌survival,‌‌ 
psychologically‌  ‌ill‌  ‌due‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌psychological‌  ‌violence‌  ‌done‌  ‌by‌  ‌her‌‌  takes‌  ‌place,‌  ‌or‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌sauna,‌  ‌disco,‌  ‌bar,‌  ‌resort,‌  ‌place‌  ‌of‌‌ 
abuser.‌  ‌Rather,‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌only‌  ‌requires‌  ‌emotional‌  ‌anguish‌  ‌and‌‌  such‌‌as‌‌food‌‌and‌‌shelter;‌‌or‌  ‌
entertainment‌  ‌or‌  ‌establishment‌  ‌serving‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌cover‌  ‌or‌  ‌which‌‌ 
mental‌  ‌suffering‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌proven.‌  ‌To‌  ‌establish‌  ‌emotional‌  ‌anguish‌  ‌or‌‌  4) Failure‌  ‌to‌  ‌immediately‌  ‌give‌  ‌medical‌  ‌treatment‌  ‌to‌  ‌an‌‌  engages‌‌   in‌‌
  prostitution‌‌   in‌‌
  addition‌‌
  to‌‌ the‌‌ activity‌‌ for‌‌ which‌‌ the‌‌ 
mental‌  ‌suffering,‌  ‌jurisprudence‌  ‌only‌  ‌requires‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌testimony‌  ‌of‌‌  injured‌‌
  child‌‌
  resulting‌‌ in‌‌ serious‌‌ impairment‌‌ of‌‌ his‌‌ growth‌‌ and‌‌  license‌‌has‌‌been‌‌issued‌‌to‌‌said‌‌establishment.‌  ‌
the‌‌
  victim‌‌   be‌‌
  presented‌‌  in‌‌
  court,‌‌   as‌‌
  such‌‌ experiences‌‌ are‌‌ personal‌‌ to‌‌ 
this‌‌party.‌  ‌ development‌‌or‌‌in‌‌his‌‌permanent‌‌incapacity‌‌or‌‌death.‌  ‌ Attempt‌‌To‌‌Commit‌‌Child‌‌Prostitution‌  ‌
Child‌‌Prostitution‌‌and‌‌Other‌‌Sexual‌‌Abuse‌  ‌ 1. Under‌‌
  ‌Section‌‌
  5(a)‌‌
  when‌‌
  any‌‌
  person‌‌
  who,‌‌
  not‌‌ being‌‌ a ‌‌relative‌‌ 
Melgar‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌‌2018‌‌re‌‌Denial‌‌of‌‌financial‌‌support‌  ‌
of‌‌
  a ‌‌child,‌‌
  is‌‌
  found‌‌ alone‌‌ with‌‌ the‌‌ said‌‌ child‌‌ inside‌‌ the‌‌ room‌‌ or‌‌ 
Children,‌  ‌whether‌  ‌male‌  ‌or‌  ‌female,‌‌   who‌‌  for‌‌
  money,‌‌   profit,‌‌
  or‌‌  any‌‌  cubicle‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌house,‌  ‌an‌  ‌inn,‌  ‌hotel,‌  ‌motel,‌  ‌pension‌  ‌house,‌‌ 
Psychological‌  ‌violence‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌means‌  ‌employed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌perpetrator,‌‌ 
while‌  ‌mental‌  ‌or‌  ‌emotional‌  ‌anguish‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌effect‌  ‌caused‌  ‌to‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌‌  other‌‌   consideration‌‌   ‌or‌‌
  ‌due‌‌  to‌‌
  the‌‌  coercion‌‌  or‌‌
  influence‌‌   ‌of‌‌
  any‌‌  apartelle‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌similar‌  ‌establishments,‌  ‌vessel,‌  ‌vehicle‌  ‌or‌‌ 
damage‌  ‌sustained‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌offended‌‌   party.‌‌   To‌‌  establish‌‌   psychological‌‌  adult,‌  ‌syndicate‌  ‌or‌  ‌group,‌  ‌indulge‌  ‌in‌  ‌sexual‌  ‌intercourse‌  ‌or‌‌  any‌‌  other‌‌
  hidden‌‌   or‌‌
  secluded‌‌   area‌‌  under‌‌  circumstances‌‌   which‌‌ 
violence‌‌   as‌‌  an‌‌
  element‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌  crime,‌‌   it‌‌
  is‌‌
  necessary‌‌ to‌‌ show‌‌ proof‌‌ of‌‌  lascivious‌  ‌conduct,‌  ‌are‌  ‌deemed‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌children‌  ‌exploited‌  ‌in‌‌  would‌  ‌lead‌  ‌a ‌ ‌reasonable‌  ‌person‌  ‌to‌  ‌believe‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌child‌  ‌is‌‌ 
commission‌‌   of‌‌
  any‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌   acts‌‌   enumerated‌‌   in‌‌ Section‌‌ 5 ‌‌(i)‌‌ or‌‌ similar‌‌  prostitution‌‌and‌‌other‌‌sexual‌‌abuse.‌  ‌
acts.‌‌
  And‌‌   to‌‌
  establish‌‌   mental‌‌   or‌‌ emotional‌‌ anguish,‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌ necessary‌‌ to‌‌  about‌‌to‌‌be‌‌exploited‌‌in‌‌prostitution‌‌and‌‌other‌‌sexual‌‌abuse.‌  ‌
present‌‌  the‌‌   testimony‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  victim‌‌   as‌‌ such‌‌ experiences‌‌ are‌‌ personal‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 141‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

2. Under‌  ‌Section‌  ‌5(b)‌  ‌when‌  ‌any‌  ‌person‌  ‌is‌  ‌receiving‌  ‌services‌‌  the‌‌
  principals‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  attempt‌‌
  to‌‌
  commit‌‌
  child‌‌
  trafficking‌‌ under‌‌ this‌‌ 
abuse‌  ‌ temporal‌i‌ n‌‌its‌‌ 
from‌  ‌a ‌ ‌child‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌sauna‌  ‌parlor‌  ‌or‌‌
  bath,‌‌
  massage‌‌
  clinic,‌‌
  health‌‌  Act.‌  ‌ medium‌‌period‌  ‌
club‌‌and‌‌other‌‌similar‌‌establishments.‌‌   ‌ Rape‌‌under‌‌RPC‌‌from‌‌sexual‌‌child‌‌abuse‌  ‌
3. A‌‌
  ‌penalty‌‌
  lower‌‌
  by‌‌
  two‌‌
  (2)‌‌
  degrees‌‌
  than‌‌
  that‌‌
  prescribed‌‌ for‌‌  Rape‌‌under‌‌ 
1. Under‌  ‌12‌  ‌prosecute‌  ‌as‌  ‌Statutory‌‌
  Rape‌‌
  under‌‌
  RPC‌; ‌‌penalty‌  Sexual‌‌ 
Article‌‌266-A(1)‌‌  Sexual‌‌Abuse‌‌ 
the‌  ‌consummated‌  ‌felony‌  ‌under‌  ‌Section‌  ‌5 ‌ ‌hereof‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌  Intercourse‌‌ 
is‌‌RP‌‌   ‌ of‌‌the‌‌RPC:‌‌  under‌‌Section‌‌5(b)‌‌ 
imposed‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌principals‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌attempt‌  ‌to‌  ‌commit‌  ‌the‌‌  committed‌‌ 
reclusion‌‌  of‌‌R.A.‌‌No.‌‌7610:‌‌ 
prosecute‌  ‌as‌  ‌Acts‌  ‌of‌‌
  Lasciviousness‌‌
  under‌‌
  RPC‌, ‌‌but‌‌
  penalty‌‌  against‌‌ 
crime‌‌of‌‌child‌‌prostitution.‌  ‌ perpetua‌,‌‌except‌‌  reclusion‌‌ 
provided‌‌under‌‌Sec.‌‌5‌‌(b),‌‌RA‌‌7610‌‌which‌‌is‌‌RT‌‌med.‌  ‌ children‌‌  NA‌  ‌
when‌‌the‌‌victim‌‌is‌‌  tempora‌l‌‌in‌‌its‌‌ 
exploited‌‌in‌‌ 
Child‌‌Trafficking‌  ‌ 2. Over‌  ‌12‌  ‌but‌  ‌Under‌  ‌18‌  ‌either‌  ‌Rape‌  ‌under‌  ‌RPC‌  (if‌  ‌any‌  ‌of‌  ‌4 ‌‌ prostitution‌‌or‌‌ 
below‌‌7‌‌years‌‌old‌‌  medium‌‌period‌‌to‌‌ 
in‌‌which‌‌case‌‌  reclusion‌‌ 
circumstances‌‌occur)‌  ‌ other‌‌sexual‌‌ 
Any‌  ‌person‌  ‌who‌  ‌shall‌  ‌engage‌‌   in‌‌
  trading‌‌   and‌‌
  dealing‌‌  with‌‌  children‌‌  death‌‌penalty‌‌  perpetua‌  ‌
abuse‌  ‌
including,‌‌  but‌‌
  not‌‌  limited‌‌
  to,‌‌
  the‌‌ act‌‌ of‌‌ buying‌‌ and‌‌ selling‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌child‌‌  or‌  ‌RA‌  ‌7610‌  ‌if‌  ‌victim‌  ‌is‌  ‌“subjected‌  ‌to‌  ‌other‌  ‌sexual‌‌
  abuse”‌‌
  or‌‌  shall‌‌be‌‌imposed‌  ‌
for‌‌
  money,‌‌   or‌‌
  for‌‌
  any‌‌  other‌‌
  consideration,‌‌ or‌‌ barter,‌‌ shall‌‌ suffer‌‌ the‌‌  under‌  ‌persuasion,‌  ‌inducement,‌  ‌enticement,‌  ‌coercion‌  ‌or‌‌ 
influence‌‌(PIECI)‌‌where‌‌penalty‌‌is‌‌RT‌‌medium‌‌to‌‌RP.‌  ‌ Rape‌‌under‌‌ 
penalty‌‌of‌‌reclusion‌‌temporal‌t‌ o‌‌‌reclusion‌‌perpetua.‌‌   ‌ Article‌‌266-A(1)‌‌ 
3. Over‌‌18‌‌‌Rape‌‌under‌‌RPC;‌  ‌ Rape‌‌ 
The‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌  ‌maximum‌  ‌period‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌‌  in‌‌relation‌‌to‌‌Art.‌‌ 
Rape‌‌under‌‌  under‌‌ 
victim‌‌is‌‌‌under‌‌twelve‌‌(12)‌‌years‌o
‌ f‌‌age.‌  ‌ Acts‌‌of‌‌Lasciviousness‌‌under‌‌RPC‌‌(prision‌‌correccional).‌  ‌ 266-B‌‌of‌‌the‌‌RPC:‌‌ 
Article‌‌266-A(1)‌‌  Article‌‌ 
Rape‌‌by‌‌  reclusion‌‌ 
Attempt‌‌to‌‌Commit‌‌Child‌‌Trafficking‌  ‌ in‌‌relation‌‌to‌‌Art.‌‌  266-A(1)‌‌ 
Designation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Crime‌‌&‌‌Imposable‌‌Penalty‌‌  carnal‌‌  perpetua,‌‌except‌‌ 
266-B‌‌of‌‌the‌‌RPC:‌‌  of‌‌the‌‌ 
There‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌attempt‌‌
  to‌‌
  commit‌‌
  child‌‌
  trafficking‌‌
  under‌‌
  Section‌‌
  7 ‌‌of‌‌  from‌T
‌ ulagan‌‌v.‌‌People‌  ‌ knowledge‌  ‌ when‌‌the‌‌victim‌‌is‌‌ 
reclusion‌‌  RPC:‌‌ 
below‌‌7‌‌years‌‌old‌‌ 
this‌‌Act:‌  ‌ Age‌‌of‌‌Victim‌  ‌ 12‌‌years‌‌old‌‌or‌‌  perpetua‌  ‌ reclusion‌‌ 
18‌‌years‌‌  in‌‌which‌‌case‌‌ 
Under‌‌12‌‌years‌‌  below‌‌18,‌‌or‌‌18‌‌  perpetua‌  ‌
a) When‌  ‌a ‌ ‌child‌  ‌travels‌  ‌alone‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌‌foreign‌‌
  country‌‌
  without‌‌
  valid‌‌  old‌‌and‌‌  death‌‌penalty‌‌ 
Crime‌‌  old‌‌or‌‌demented‌  ‌ under‌‌special‌‌  shall‌‌be‌‌imposed‌  ‌
reason‌  ‌therefor‌  ‌and‌‌  without‌‌
  clearance‌‌  issued‌‌  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  DSWD‌‌   or‌‌  above‌  ‌
Committed‌  ‌ circumstances‌  ‌
written‌‌
  permit‌‌
  or‌‌  justification‌‌  from‌‌
  the‌‌
  child's‌‌
  parents‌‌ or‌‌ legal‌‌  Sexual‌‌Assault‌‌  Lascivious‌‌  Sexual‌‌ 
guardian;‌  ‌ Acts‌‌of‌‌  Acts‌‌of‌‌  under‌‌Article‌‌  Conduct‌‌‌under‌‌  Assault‌‌ 
Lasciviousness‌‌  Lasciviousness‌‌  266-A(2)‌‌of‌‌the‌‌  Section‌‌5(b)‌‌of‌‌  under‌‌ 
b) When‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person,‌  ‌agency,‌  ‌establishment‌  ‌or‌  ‌child-caring‌‌ 
committed‌‌  under‌‌Article‌‌336‌‌  RPC‌‌in‌‌relation‌‌to‌‌  R.A.‌‌No.‌‌7610:‌‌  Article‌‌ 
institution‌  ‌recruits‌  ‌women‌‌
  or‌‌
  couples‌‌
  to‌‌
  bear‌‌
  children‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌  Rape‌‌by‌‌ 
against‌‌  of‌‌the‌‌RPC‌‌in‌‌  Section‌‌5(b)‌‌of‌‌  reclusion‌‌  266-A(2)‌‌ 
purpose‌‌of‌‌child‌‌trafficking;‌‌or‌  ‌ Lascivious‌‌  NA‌  ‌ Sexual‌‌Assault‌  ‌
children‌‌  relation‌‌to‌‌Section‌‌  R.A.‌‌No.‌‌7610:‌‌  temporal‌‌‌in‌‌its‌‌  of‌‌the‌‌ 
c) When‌  ‌a ‌ ‌doctor,‌  ‌hospital‌  ‌or‌  ‌clinic‌  ‌official‌  ‌or‌‌
  employee,‌‌
  nurse,‌‌  exploited‌‌in‌‌  5(b)‌‌of‌‌R.A.‌‌No.‌‌  conduct‌‌‌under‌‌  reclusion‌‌  medium‌‌period‌‌to‌‌  RPC:‌‌ 
prostitution‌‌or‌‌  7610:‌‌reclusion‌‌  Section‌‌5(b)‌‌of‌‌  temporal‌‌‌in‌‌its‌‌  reclusion‌‌  prision‌‌ 
midwife,‌  ‌local‌  ‌civil‌  ‌registrar‌  ‌or‌  ‌any‌  ‌other‌  ‌person‌  ‌simulates‌‌  other‌‌sexual‌‌  temporal‌‌‌in‌‌its‌‌  R.A.‌‌No.‌‌7610:‌‌  medium‌‌period‌  ‌ perpetua‌  ‌ mayor‌  ‌
birth‌‌for‌‌the‌‌purpose‌‌of‌‌child‌‌trafficking;‌‌or‌  ‌ abuse‌  ‌ medium‌‌period‌  ‌ reclusion‌‌ 
d) When‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person‌  ‌engages‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌finding‌  ‌children‌  ‌among‌‌  temporal‌‌‌in‌‌its‌‌  Tulagan‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌2
‌ 019‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
Sexual‌‌Assault‌‌  Sexual‌‌Assault‌‌  medium‌‌period‌‌to‌‌ 
low-income‌  ‌families,‌  ‌hospitals,‌  ‌clinics,‌  ‌nurseries,‌  ‌day-care‌‌  committed‌‌  under‌‌Article‌‌  reclusion‌‌  If‌‌
  the‌‌
  acts‌‌  constituting‌‌   sexual‌‌  assault‌‌   are‌‌
  committed‌‌ against‌‌ a ‌‌victim‌‌ 
centers,‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌  ‌child-during‌  ‌institutions‌  ‌who‌  ‌can‌‌
  be‌‌
  offered‌‌  against‌‌  266-A(2)‌‌of‌‌the‌‌  perpetua‌  ‌ under‌  ‌12‌  ‌years‌  ‌of‌  ‌age‌  ‌or‌  ‌is‌  ‌demented,‌  ‌the‌  ‌nomenclature‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
for‌‌the‌‌purpose‌‌of‌‌child‌‌trafficking.‌  ‌ children‌‌  RPC‌‌in‌‌relation‌‌to‌‌  NA‌  ‌ offense‌  ‌should‌  ‌now‌  ‌be‌  ‌"‌Sexual‌‌   Assault‌” ‌‌under‌‌   paragraph‌‌   2,‌‌
  Article‌‌ 
exploited‌‌in‌‌  Section‌‌5(b)‌‌of‌‌  266-A‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌RPC‌  ‌in‌  ‌relation‌  ‌to‌  ‌Section‌  ‌5(b)‌  ‌of‌  ‌R.A.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌7610.‌  ‌The‌‌ 
A‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌lower‌  ‌two‌  ‌(2)‌  ‌degrees‌  ‌than‌  ‌that‌  ‌prescribed‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌ 
prostitution‌‌or‌‌  R.A.‌‌No.‌‌7610:‌‌  imposable‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌is‌  ‌still‌‌   ‌reclusion‌‌   temporal‌‌   in‌‌  its‌‌
  medium‌‌   period,‌‌ 
consummated‌‌
  felony‌‌
  under‌‌
  Section‌‌ 7 ‌‌hereof‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ imposed‌‌ upon‌‌  other‌‌sexual‌‌  reclusion‌‌  and‌‌not‌‌prision‌‌mayor‌. ‌ ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 142‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

a) for‌‌money,‌‌profit‌‌or‌‌any‌‌other‌‌consideration;‌‌or‌  ‌ prejudicial‌‌to‌‌the‌‌child's‌‌development.‌  ‌
Whereas‌  ‌if‌‌
  the‌‌
  victim‌‌   is‌‌
  ‌12‌‌
  years‌‌
  old‌‌
  and‌‌   under‌‌
  18‌‌
  years‌‌
  old,‌‌
  or‌‌ 
18‌  ‌years‌  ‌old‌  ‌and‌  ‌above‌  ‌under‌  ‌special‌  ‌circumstances‌, ‌ ‌the‌‌  b) under‌  ‌the‌  ‌coercion‌  ‌or‌‌
  any‌‌
  influence‌‌
  of‌‌
  any‌‌
  adult,‌‌
  syndicate‌‌  An‌‌ accused‌‌ can‌‌ be‌‌ prosecuted‌‌ and‌‌ be‌‌ convicted‌‌ under‌‌ Section‌‌ 10(a)‌‌ if‌‌ 
nomenclature‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌"‌Lascivious‌  ‌Conduct‌  ‌under‌‌  or‌‌group.‌‌   ‌ he‌  ‌commits‌  ‌any‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌four‌  ‌acts‌  ‌therein.‌  ‌The‌  ‌prosecution‌  ‌need‌‌
  not‌‌ 
Section‌  ‌5(b)‌  ‌of‌  ‌R.A.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌7610‌" ‌ ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌imposable‌  ‌penalty‌  ‌of‌‌  prove‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌ acts‌‌ of‌‌ child‌‌ abuse,‌‌ child‌‌ cruelty‌‌ and‌‌ child‌‌ exploitation‌‌ 
reclusion‌‌
  temporal‌‌   in‌‌
  its‌‌
  medium‌‌   period‌‌ to‌‌ reclusion‌‌ perpetua‌, ‌‌but‌‌ it‌‌  In‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌Olivarez‌  ‌v.‌  ‌CA‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌explained‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌phrase‌‌  have‌  ‌resulted‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  prejudice‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  child‌‌
  because‌‌   an‌‌
  act‌‌
  prejudicial‌‌ 
should‌‌not‌‌make‌‌any‌‌reference‌‌to‌‌the‌‌provisions‌‌of‌‌the‌‌RPC.‌‌   ‌ "other‌‌   sexual‌‌   abuse,"‌‌ covers‌‌ not‌‌ only‌‌ a ‌‌child‌‌ who‌‌ is‌‌ abused‌‌ for‌‌ profit,‌‌  to‌‌the‌‌development‌‌of‌‌the‌‌child‌‌is‌‌different‌‌from‌‌the‌‌former‌‌acts.‌  ‌
but‌  ‌also‌  ‌one‌  ‌who‌  ‌engages‌  ‌in‌  ‌lascivious‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌through‌  ‌the‌‌ 
It‌‌
  is‌‌
  only‌‌
  when‌‌  the‌‌
  victim‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  sexual‌‌
  assault‌‌
  is‌‌
  ‌18‌‌
  years‌‌ old‌‌ and‌‌  coercion‌‌   or‌‌
  intimidation‌‌   by‌‌
  an‌‌ adult‌. ‌‌In‌‌ the‌‌ latter‌‌ case,‌‌ there‌‌ must‌‌ 
be‌  ‌some‌  ‌form‌  ‌of‌  ‌compulsion‌  ‌equivalent‌  ‌to‌  ‌intimidation‌  ‌which‌‌  Bongalon‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌‌2013‌  ‌
above‌, ‌‌and‌‌  not‌‌
  demented,‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌ crime‌‌ should‌‌ be‌‌ called‌‌ as‌‌ "‌Sexual‌‌ 
Assault‌  ‌under‌  ‌paragraph‌  ‌2,‌  ‌Article‌  ‌266-A‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌RPC‌" ‌‌with‌‌   the‌‌  subdues‌‌the‌‌free‌‌exercise‌‌of‌‌the‌‌offended‌‌party's‌‌will.‌  ‌ Not‌  ‌every‌  ‌instance‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌laying‌‌   of‌‌
  hands‌‌  on‌‌  a ‌‌child‌‌
  constitutes‌‌  the‌‌ 
imposable‌‌penalty‌‌of‌p ‌ rision‌‌mayor‌. ‌ ‌ crime‌  ‌of‌‌
  child‌‌  abuse‌‌   under‌‌   Section‌‌   10‌‌
  (a)‌‌
  of‌‌
  Republic‌‌   Act‌‌
  No.‌‌
  7610.‌‌ 
Calaoagan‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌ Only‌‌   when‌‌  the‌‌
  laying‌‌  of‌‌
  hands‌‌   is‌‌
  shown‌‌ beyond‌‌ reasonable‌‌ doubt‌‌ to‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Tubillo‌‌2
‌ 017‌  ‌ be‌  ‌intended‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌to‌  ‌debase,‌  ‌degrade‌  ‌or‌  ‌demean‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Sec.‌  ‌10(a)‌  ‌of‌  ‌R.A.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌7610‌  ‌penalizes‌  ‌an‌  ‌act‌  ‌when‌  ‌it‌  ‌constitutes‌‌  as‌‌  intrinsic‌‌  worth‌‌   and‌‌
  dignity‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ child‌‌ as‌‌ a ‌‌human‌‌ being‌‌ should‌‌ it‌‌ be‌‌ 
Under‌  ‌Section‌  ‌5 ‌‌(b),‌‌
  Article‌‌  III‌‌
  of‌‌
  RA‌‌  7610‌‌  in‌‌
  relation‌‌   to‌‌
  RA‌‌   8353,‌‌
  if‌‌  child‌  ‌abuse.‌  ‌In‌  ‌relation‌  ‌thereto,‌  ‌Sec.‌  ‌3(b)‌  ‌highlights‌  ‌that‌  ‌in‌  ‌child‌‌  punished‌‌as‌‌child‌‌abuse.‌‌Otherwise,‌‌it‌‌is‌‌punished‌‌under‌‌the‌‌RPC.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌victim‌  ‌of‌  ‌sexual‌  ‌abuse‌  ‌is‌  ‌below‌  ‌12‌  ‌years‌  ‌of‌  ‌age,‌  ‌the‌  ‌offender‌‌  abuse,‌  ‌the‌  ‌act‌  ‌by‌  ‌deeds‌  ‌or‌  ‌words‌  ‌must‌  ‌debase,‌  ‌degrade,‌  ‌or‌‌ 
should‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌‌  prosecuted‌‌   for‌‌
  sexual‌‌   abuse‌‌   but‌‌   ‌statutory‌‌
  for‌‌   rape‌‌  demean‌  ‌the‌  ‌intrinsic‌  ‌worth‌  ‌and‌  ‌dignity‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌child‌‌   as‌‌
  a ‌‌human‌‌ 
being.‌‌   ‌ People‌‌v.‌‌Baraga‌‌‌2014‌  ‌
under‌  ‌Article‌  ‌266-A(1)(d)‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌RPC‌  ‌and‌  ‌penalized‌‌   with‌‌   ‌reclusion‌‌ 
perpetua.‌‌   ‌ Sexual‌  ‌abuse‌  ‌under‌  ‌Section‌  ‌5(b)‌, ‌‌Article‌‌
  III‌‌
  of‌‌
  R.A.‌‌
  No.‌‌
  7610‌‌
  has‌‌ 
When‌‌   the‌‌  infliction‌‌
  of‌‌ physical‌‌ injuries‌‌ against‌‌ a ‌‌minor‌‌ is‌‌ done‌‌ at‌‌ the‌‌ 
three‌‌elements:‌‌   ‌
On‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌hand,‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌victim‌  ‌is‌‌
  ‌12‌‌
  years‌‌  or‌‌
  older‌, ‌‌the‌‌
  offender‌‌  spur‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  moment,‌‌  it‌‌
  is‌‌
  ‌imperative‌‌
  for‌‌ the‌‌ prosecution‌‌ to‌‌ prove‌‌ 
should‌‌   be‌‌ charged‌‌ with‌‌ ‌either‌‌ ‌sexual‌‌ abuse‌‌ under‌‌ Section‌‌ 5 ‌‌(b)‌‌ of‌‌ RA‌‌  a‌  ‌specific‌  ‌intent‌  ‌to‌  ‌debase,‌  ‌degrade,‌  ‌or‌  ‌demean‌  ‌the‌  ‌intrinsic‌‌  1) the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌commits‌  ‌an‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌sexual‌  ‌intercourse‌  ‌or‌‌ 
7610‌  ‌or‌  ‌rape‌  ‌under‌  ‌Article‌  ‌266-A‌  ‌(except‌  ‌par‌  ‌1 ‌ ‌[d])‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌RPC.‌‌  worth‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌child‌; ‌ ‌otherwise,‌  ‌the‌  ‌accused‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌convicted‌‌  lascivious‌‌conduct;‌  ‌
However,‌‌   the‌‌  offender‌‌   cannot‌‌   be‌‌
  accused‌‌ of‌‌ both‌‌ crimes‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ same‌‌  under‌‌Sec.‌‌10(a)‌‌of‌‌R.A.‌‌No.‌‌7610.‌  ‌
2) the‌  ‌said‌  ‌act‌  ‌is‌  ‌performed‌  ‌with‌  ‌a ‌ ‌child‌  ‌exploited‌  ‌in‌‌ 
act‌  ‌because‌  ‌his‌  ‌right‌  ‌against‌  ‌double‌  ‌jeopardy‌  ‌will‌  ‌be‌  ‌prejudiced.‌  ‌A ‌‌ prostitution‌‌or‌‌subjected‌‌to‌‌other‌‌sexual‌‌abuse;‌‌and‌  ‌
person‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌subjected‌  ‌twice‌  ‌to‌  ‌criminal‌  ‌liability‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌single‌‌  Sanchez‌‌v.‌‌People‌  ‌
criminal‌‌   act.‌‌ Likewise,‌‌ ‌rape‌‌ cannot‌‌ be‌‌ complexed‌‌ with‌‌ a ‌‌violation‌‌  3) the‌‌child‌‌is‌‌below‌‌18‌‌years‌‌old.‌  ‌
of‌  ‌Section‌  ‌5 ‌ ‌(b)‌‌   of‌‌
  RA‌‌  7610‌. ‌‌Under‌‌   Section‌‌
  48‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  RPC,‌‌
  a ‌‌felony‌‌  Here,‌  ‌the‌  ‌applicable‌  ‌laws‌  ‌are‌  ‌Article‌  ‌59‌‌   of‌‌
  P.D.‌‌
  No.‌‌
  603‌‌  and‌‌   Section‌‌ 
under‌  ‌the‌  ‌RPC‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌rape‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌complexed‌  ‌with‌  ‌an‌  ‌offense‌‌  10(a)‌  ‌of‌  ‌R.A.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌7610.‌‌  The‌‌
  use‌‌   of‌‌
  "or"‌‌   in‌‌
  Section‌‌  10(a)‌‌   of‌‌
  RA‌‌   7610‌‌  The‌‌   penalty‌‌ for‌‌ sexual‌‌ abuse‌‌ performed‌‌ on‌‌ a ‌‌child‌‌ under‌‌ 18‌‌ years‌‌ old‌‌ 
penalized‌‌by‌‌a‌‌special‌‌law.‌  ‌ before‌  ‌the‌‌   phrase‌‌   "be‌‌
  responsible‌‌   for‌‌  other‌‌   conditions‌‌   prejudicial‌‌   to‌‌  but‌‌ over‌‌ 12‌‌ years‌‌ old‌‌ under‌‌ Section‌‌ 5(b)‌‌ of‌‌ R.A.‌‌ No.‌‌ 7610‌‌ is‌‌ reclusion‌‌ 
the‌  ‌child's‌  ‌development"‌  ‌supposes‌  ‌that‌  ‌there‌  ‌are‌  ‌four‌  ‌punishable‌‌  temporal‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌  ‌medium‌  ‌period‌  ‌to‌  ‌reclusion‌  ‌perpetua.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Court‌‌ 
acts‌  ‌therein.‌  ‌First‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌child‌  ‌abuse;‌  ‌second‌, ‌ ‌child‌  ‌cruelty;‌‌  likewise‌  ‌considers‌  ‌the‌  ‌alternative‌  ‌circumstance‌  ‌of‌‌   relationship‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Basa,‌‌Jr‌‌2
‌ 019‌  ‌ against‌  ‌Baraga‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌  ‌aggravating‌  ‌circumstance.‌  ‌Since‌  ‌there‌‌   is‌‌
  an‌‌ 
third‌, ‌ ‌child‌  ‌exploitation;‌  ‌and‌  ‌fourth‌, ‌ ‌being‌  ‌responsible‌  ‌for‌‌ 
conditions‌  ‌prejudicial‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌child's‌  ‌development.‌  ‌The‌  ‌fourth‌‌  aggravating‌‌ circumstance‌‌ and‌‌ no‌‌ mitigating‌‌ circumstance,‌‌ the‌‌ penalty‌‌ 
Before‌  ‌an‌  ‌accused‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌held‌  ‌criminally‌  ‌liable‌  ‌for‌  ‌lascivious‌‌ 
conduct‌‌   under‌‌   Section‌‌
  5(b)‌‌   R.A.‌‌
  No.‌‌ 7610,‌‌ the‌‌ Court‌‌ held‌‌ in‌‌ ‌Quimvel‌‌  penalized‌  ‌act‌  ‌cannot‌‌   be‌‌
  interpreted‌‌   as‌‌
  a ‌‌qualifying‌‌   condition‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌  shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌applied‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌  ‌maximum‌  ‌period,‌  ‌i.e.,‌  ‌reclusion‌  ‌perpetua.‌‌ 
three‌‌other‌‌acts.‌  ‌ Besides,‌  ‌Section‌  ‌31‌  ‌of‌  ‌R.A.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌7610‌  ‌expressly‌  ‌provides‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌ 
v.‌‌
  People‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  requisites‌‌   for‌‌
  Acts‌‌
  of‌‌
  Lasciviousness,‌‌   as‌‌  penalized‌‌ 
under‌  ‌Article‌  ‌336‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌RPC,‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌met‌  ‌in‌  ‌addition‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  penalty‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌  ‌maximum‌  ‌period‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌‌ 
requisites‌‌for‌‌sexual‌‌abuse‌‌under‌‌R.A.‌‌No.‌‌7610.‌  ‌ perpetrator‌‌is‌,‌‌inter‌‌alia,‌t‌ he‌‌parent‌‌of‌‌the‌‌victim‌. ‌ ‌
Araneta‌‌v.‌‌People‌  ‌

A‌‌
  child‌‌
  is‌‌
  ‌deemed‌‌
  exploited‌‌   in‌‌
  prostitution‌‌ or‌‌ subjected‌‌ to‌‌ other‌‌  The‌  ‌Rules‌  ‌and‌  ‌Regulations‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌questioned‌  ‌statute‌  ‌distinctly‌  ‌and‌‌  People‌‌v.‌‌Carlos‌‌Alhambra‌‌‌2014‌  ‌
sexual‌  ‌abuse‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌child‌  ‌indulges‌  ‌in‌  ‌sexual‌  ‌intercourse‌  ‌or‌‌  separately‌‌   defined‌‌   child‌‌
  abuse,‌‌
  cruelty‌‌
  and‌‌
  exploitation‌‌   just‌‌
  to‌‌ show‌‌ 
lascivious‌‌conduct‌‌   ‌ that‌  ‌these‌  ‌three‌‌
  acts‌‌
  are‌‌
  different‌‌  from‌‌
  one‌‌
  another‌‌  and‌‌  from‌‌   the‌‌
  act‌‌  The‌  ‌prosecution‌  ‌was‌  ‌able‌  ‌to‌‌
  establish‌‌   Alhambra’s‌‌   criminal‌‌  liability‌‌ 
under‌‌   Section‌‌
  5(b)‌‌
  of‌‌
  R.A.‌‌
  No.‌‌   7610.‌‌
  ‌First‌, ‌‌AAA‌‌
  testified‌‌
  that,‌‌
  whilst‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 143‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

public‌  ‌spaces‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌alleys,‌  ‌roads,‌  ‌sidewalks‌  ‌and‌‌  iv. If‌  ‌the‌  ‌perpetrator‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌member‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌uniformed‌‌ 
clad‌  ‌only‌  ‌in‌  ‌towel‌  ‌after‌  ‌having‌  ‌taken‌  ‌a ‌ ‌bath,‌  ‌her‌  ‌father‌  ‌forcibly‌‌ 
removed‌  ‌her‌  ‌towel‌  ‌covering‌  ‌her‌  ‌body,‌  ‌kissed‌  ‌her‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌neck,‌‌  parks.‌  ‌ services‌, ‌‌such‌‌   as‌‌
  the‌‌ PNP‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ AFP,‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ act‌‌ was‌‌ 
removed‌‌   her‌‌
  undergarments,‌‌   and‌‌
  kissed‌‌  her‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ other‌‌ parts‌‌ of‌‌ her‌‌  c. They‌  ‌are‌  ‌those‌  ‌performed‌  ‌in‌  ‌buildings,‌  ‌schools,‌  ‌churches,‌‌  perpetrated‌‌while‌‌the‌‌perpetrator‌‌was‌‌in‌‌uniform;‌‌and‌  ‌
body.‌  ‌Second‌, ‌ ‌Alhambra‌  ‌used‌  ‌his‌  ‌moral‌  ‌ascendancy‌  ‌and‌  ‌influence‌‌  restaurants,‌  ‌malls,‌  ‌public‌  ‌washrooms,‌  ‌bars,‌  ‌internet‌  ‌shops,‌‌  v. If‌  ‌the‌  ‌act‌  ‌takes‌  ‌place‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌premises‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌
over‌  ‌his‌‌
  daughter‌‌   AAA‌‌   to‌‌
  consummate‌‌   his‌‌  lascivious‌‌   design.‌‌   ‌Third‌, ‌‌
public‌  ‌markets,‌  ‌transportation‌  ‌terminals‌  ‌or‌  ‌public‌  ‌utility‌‌  government‌‌   agency‌‌  offering‌‌
  frontline‌‌ services‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ 
AAA‌‌was‌‌only‌‌17‌‌years‌‌old‌‌when‌‌the‌‌said‌‌incident‌‌happened.‌  ‌
vehicles.‌  ‌ public‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌perpetrator‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌government‌‌ 
Alhambra’s‌  ‌assertion‌  ‌that‌  ‌he‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌liable‌  ‌for‌  ‌sexual‌  ‌abuse‌  ‌under‌‌  d. Gender-based‌  ‌online‌  ‌sexual‌  ‌harassment‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌an‌‌  employee‌. ‌ ‌
Section‌  ‌5(b)‌  ‌since‌  ‌AAA‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌ ‌child‌  ‌engaged‌  ‌in‌  ‌prostitution‌  ‌or‌‌  g. The‌  ‌crime‌  ‌of‌  ‌gender-based‌  ‌sexual‌  ‌harassment‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌ 
online‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌targeted‌  ‌at‌  ‌a ‌ ‌particular‌  ‌person‌  ‌that‌  ‌causes‌  ‌or‌‌ 
subjected‌  ‌to‌  ‌other‌  ‌sexual‌  ‌abuse‌  ‌is‌  ‌plainly‌  ‌without‌  ‌merit.‌  ‌The‌  ‌law‌‌ 
covers‌‌  not‌‌
  only‌‌  a ‌‌situation‌‌   in‌‌
  which‌‌   a ‌‌child‌‌  is‌‌
  abused‌‌   for‌‌ profit‌‌  likely‌  ‌to‌  ‌cause‌  ‌another‌  ‌mental,‌  ‌emotional‌  ‌or‌  ‌psychological‌‌  workplace‌‌‌includes‌‌the‌‌following;‌  ‌
but‌  ‌also‌  ‌one‌  ‌in‌  ‌which‌  ‌a ‌ ‌child,‌  ‌through‌  ‌coercion‌  ‌or‌‌  distress,‌  ‌and‌  ‌fear‌  ‌of‌  ‌personal‌  ‌safety,‌  ‌sexual‌  ‌harassment‌  ‌acts‌‌  i. An‌  ‌act‌  ‌or‌  ‌series‌  ‌of‌  ‌acts‌  ‌involving‌  ‌any‌  ‌unwelcome‌‌ 
intimidation‌, ‌ ‌engages‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌lascivious‌  ‌conduct‌. ‌ ‌A ‌ ‌child‌  ‌is‌‌  including‌‌   ‌
sexual‌  ‌advances,‌  ‌requests‌  ‌or‌  ‌demand‌  ‌for‌  ‌sexual‌‌ 
deemed‌‌   subjected‌‌   to‌‌
  “other‌‌
  sexual‌‌   abuse”‌‌ when‌‌ he‌‌ or‌‌ she‌‌ indulges‌‌ in‌‌  i. unwanted‌‌sexual‌‌remarks‌‌and‌‌comments,‌‌threats,‌‌   ‌ favors‌  ‌or‌  ‌any‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌sexual‌  ‌nature,‌  ‌whether‌  ‌done‌‌ 
lascivious‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌coercion‌  ‌or‌‌   influence‌‌   of‌‌
  any‌‌
  adult.‌‌
  As‌‌ 
ii. uploading‌‌
  or‌‌
  sharing‌‌
  of‌‌
  one's‌‌
  photos‌‌ without‌‌ consent,‌‌  verbally,‌  ‌physically‌  ‌or‌  ‌through‌  ‌the‌  ‌use‌‌   of‌‌
  technology‌‌ 
established‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌prosecution,‌  ‌Alhambra‌  ‌was‌  ‌only‌  ‌able‌  ‌to‌‌ 
consummate‌  ‌his‌  ‌lascivious‌  ‌design‌  ‌towards‌  ‌AAA‌  ‌through‌  ‌coercion‌‌  video‌‌and‌‌audio‌‌recordings,‌‌   ‌ such‌  ‌as‌  ‌text‌  ‌messaging‌  ‌or‌  ‌electronic‌  ‌mail‌‌   or‌‌
  through‌‌ 
and‌‌with‌‌the‌‌use‌‌of‌‌his‌‌influence‌‌over‌‌the‌‌latter‌‌as‌‌her‌‌father.‌  ‌ any‌  ‌other‌  ‌forms‌  ‌of‌  ‌information‌  ‌and‌  ‌communication‌‌ 
iii. cyberstalking‌‌and‌‌   ‌
systems,‌‌   that‌‌  has‌‌
  or‌‌ could‌‌ have‌‌ a ‌‌detrimental‌‌ effect‌‌ on‌‌ 
iv. online‌‌identity‌‌theft.‌  ‌
12. Safe‌‌Spaces‌‌Act‌  ‌ the‌  ‌conditions‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌individual's‌  ‌employment‌  ‌or‌‌ 
e. Stalking‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌directed‌  ‌at‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person‌  ‌involving‌‌   the‌  education,‌‌job‌‌performance‌‌or‌‌opportunities;‌  ‌
a. The‌‌
  crimes‌‌   ‌gender-based‌‌
  of‌‌   streets‌‌
  and‌‌
  public‌‌ spaces‌‌ 
repeated‌  ‌visual‌  ‌or‌  ‌physical‌  ‌proximity,‌  ‌non-consensual‌‌  ii. A‌‌
  conduct‌‌ of‌‌ sexual‌‌ nature‌‌ and‌‌ other‌‌ conduct-based‌‌ on‌‌ 
sexual‌  ‌harassment‌  ‌are‌  ‌committed‌  ‌through‌  ‌any‌  ‌unwanted‌‌ 
communication,‌  ‌or‌  ‌a ‌ ‌combination‌  ‌thereof‌  ‌that‌  ‌cause‌  ‌or‌  ‌will‌‌  sex‌  ‌affecting‌  ‌the‌  ‌dignity‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person,‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌‌ 
and‌  ‌uninvited‌  ‌sexual‌  ‌actions‌  ‌or‌  ‌remarks‌  ‌against‌  ‌any‌  ‌person‌‌ 
likely‌‌
  cause‌‌
  a ‌‌person‌‌   to‌‌
  fear‌‌
  for‌‌
  one's‌‌
  own‌‌   safety‌‌
  or‌‌
  the‌‌ safety‌‌  unwelcome,‌  ‌unreasonable,‌  ‌and‌  ‌offensive‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
regardless‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌motive‌  ‌for‌  ‌committing‌  ‌such‌  ‌action‌  ‌or‌‌ 
of‌‌others,‌‌or‌‌to‌‌suffer‌‌emotional‌‌distress.‌  ‌ recipient,‌  ‌whether‌  ‌done‌  ‌verbally,‌  ‌physically‌  ‌or‌‌ 
remarks.‌  ‌
f. Qualified‌  ‌Gender-Based‌  ‌Streets,‌  ‌Public‌‌   Spaces‌‌  and‌‌  Online‌‌  through‌  ‌the‌  ‌use‌‌
  of‌‌
  technology‌‌  such‌‌   as‌‌
  text‌‌
  messaging‌‌ 
b. It‌‌includes‌‌   ‌
Sexual‌‌  Harassment.‌‌   — ‌‌The‌‌
  penalty‌‌
  next‌‌ higher‌‌ in‌‌ degree‌‌ will‌‌  or‌  ‌electronic‌  ‌mail‌  ‌or‌  ‌through‌  ‌any‌  ‌other‌  ‌forms‌  ‌of‌‌ 
i. catcalling‌, ‌ ‌wolf-whistling,‌  ‌unwanted‌  ‌invitations,‌‌  be‌‌applied‌‌in‌‌the‌‌following‌‌cases:‌  ‌ information‌‌and‌‌communication‌‌systems;‌  ‌
misogynistic,‌  ‌transphobic,‌  ‌homophobic‌  ‌and‌  ‌sexist‌‌  iii. A‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌that‌  ‌is‌  ‌unwelcome‌  ‌and‌  ‌pervasive‌  ‌and‌‌ 
i. If‌  ‌the‌  ‌act‌  ‌takes‌  ‌place‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌common‌  ‌carrier‌  ‌or‌  ‌PUV,‌‌ 
slurs,‌‌   ‌
including,‌‌   but‌‌
  not‌‌  limited‌‌   to,‌‌ jeepneys,‌‌ taxis,‌‌ tricycles,‌‌  creates‌  ‌an‌  ‌intimidating,‌  ‌hostile‌  ‌or‌  ‌humiliating‌‌ 
ii. persistent‌  ‌uninvited‌  ‌comments‌  ‌or‌  ‌gestures‌  ‌on‌  ‌a ‌‌ or‌  ‌app-based‌  ‌transport‌  ‌network‌  ‌vehicle‌  ‌services,‌‌  environment‌‌for‌‌the‌‌recipient.‌  ‌
person's‌‌appearance,‌‌   ‌ where‌  ‌the‌  ‌perpetrator‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌driver‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌vehicle‌‌  ⭐The‌‌ crime‌‌ of‌‌ gender-based‌‌ sexual‌  ‌harassment‌‌ may‌‌ 
iii. relentless‌‌requests‌‌for‌‌personal‌‌details,‌‌   ‌ and‌‌the‌‌offended‌‌party‌‌is‌‌a‌‌passenger;‌  ‌ also‌  ‌be‌  ‌committed‌  ‌between‌  ‌peers‌  ‌and‌  ‌those‌‌ 
iv. statement‌‌of‌‌sexual‌‌comments‌‌and‌‌suggestions,‌‌   ‌ ii. If‌‌
  the‌‌
  offended‌‌
  party‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌‌minor,‌‌ a ‌‌senior‌‌ citizen,‌‌ or‌‌ a ‌‌ committed‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌‌superior‌‌   officer‌‌
  by‌‌  a ‌‌subordinate,‌‌ 
PWD,‌‌or‌‌a‌‌breastfeeding‌‌mother‌n ‌ ursing‌‌her‌‌child;‌  ‌ or‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌teacher‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌student,‌  ‌or‌‌
  to‌‌
  a ‌‌trainer‌‌
  by‌‌
  a ‌‌
v. public‌‌masturbation‌‌or‌‌flashing‌‌of‌‌private‌‌parts,‌‌   ‌
iii. If‌  ‌the‌  ‌offended‌  ‌party‌  ‌is‌  ‌diagnosed‌  ‌with‌  ‌a ‌ ‌mental‌‌  trainee‌. ‌ ‌
vi. groping,‌  ‌or‌‌  any‌‌
  advances,‌‌   whether‌‌   verbal‌‌  or‌‌
  physical,‌‌ 
problem‌‌‌tending‌‌to‌‌impair‌‌consent;‌  ‌ h. Exemptions‌. ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌Acts‌  ‌that‌  ‌are‌  ‌legitimate‌  ‌expressions‌  ‌of‌‌ 
that‌  ‌is‌  ‌unwanted‌  ‌and‌  ‌has‌  ‌threatened‌  ‌one's‌  ‌sense‌  ‌of‌‌ 
indigenous‌‌   culture‌‌  and‌‌
  tradition‌, ‌‌as‌‌  well‌‌ as‌‌ ‌breastfeeding‌‌ 
personal‌  ‌space‌  ‌and‌  ‌physical‌‌   safety‌‌
  and‌‌
  committed‌‌   in‌‌ 
in‌‌public‌‌shall‌‌not‌‌be‌‌penalized‌.‌‌(‌Sec‌‌31‌) ‌ ‌

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 144‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌  ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

13. Data‌‌Privacy‌‌Act‌  ‌ any‌  ‌personal‌  ‌information‌  ‌or‌  ‌personal‌  ‌sensitive‌  ‌information‌‌  B.‌‌Nature‌‌and‌‌Effects‌‌of‌‌Obligations‌  ‌
obtained‌‌by‌‌him.‌‌   ‌
Punishable‌‌acts‌‌are‌‌as‌‌follows:‌  ‌ C.‌‌Kinds‌‌of‌‌Obligations‌  ‌
h. Unauthorized‌  ‌disclosure‌  ‌— ‌ ‌committed‌  ‌by‌  ‌any‌  ‌personal‌‌ 
a. Unauthorized‌  ‌processing‌  ‌of‌  ‌personal‌  ‌information‌  ‌or‌‌  D.‌‌Extinguishment‌‌of‌‌Obligations‌  ‌
information‌  ‌controller‌  ‌or‌  ‌personal‌  ‌information‌  ‌processor‌  ‌or‌‌ 
sensitive‌  ‌personal‌  ‌information‌  ‌— ‌ ‌processing‌  ‌personal‌‌ 
any‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌officials,‌  ‌employees‌  ‌or‌  ‌agents,‌  ‌who‌  ‌discloses‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌‌ Contracts‌  ‌
information‌  ‌or‌  ‌sensitive‌  ‌personal‌  ‌information,‌  ‌without‌  ‌the‌‌ 
third-party‌  ‌personal‌  ‌information‌  ‌or‌  ‌sensitive‌  ‌personal‌‌ 
consent‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  data‌‌
  subject,‌‌
  or‌‌
  without‌‌
  being‌‌
  authorized‌‌
  under‌‌  A.‌‌General‌‌Provisions‌  ‌
information,‌  ‌without‌  ‌the‌  ‌consent‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌data‌  ‌subject,‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌‌ 
any‌‌existing‌‌law.‌  ‌
constituting‌‌Malicious‌‌disclosure.‌‌   ‌ 1.‌‌Principles‌  ‌
b. Accessing‌  ‌personal‌  ‌information‌  ‌and‌  ‌sensitive‌  ‌personal‌‌ 
i. “‌Committed‌  ‌in‌  ‌Large-Scale‌” ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌personal‌‌ 
information‌  ‌due‌  ‌to‌  ‌negligence‌  ‌— ‌ ‌providing‌  ‌access‌  ‌to‌‌  2.‌‌Stages‌  ‌
information‌  ‌of‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌100‌  ‌persons‌  ‌is‌  ‌harmed,‌  ‌affected‌  ‌or‌‌ 
personal‌  ‌information‌  ‌or‌  ‌sensitive‌  ‌personal‌  ‌information,‌‌ 
involved‌‌as‌‌the‌‌result‌‌of‌‌the‌‌above-mentioned‌‌actions.‌  ‌ 3.‌‌Classification‌  ‌
without‌‌being‌‌authorized‌‌under‌‌any‌‌law,‌‌due‌‌to‌‌negligence.‌  ‌
c. Improper‌  ‌personal‌  ‌information‌  ‌or‌  ‌sensitive‌  ‌personal‌‌  4.‌‌Essential‌‌Requisites‌  ‌
information‌  ‌— ‌ ‌knowingly‌  ‌or‌  ‌negligently‌  ‌disposing,‌‌ 
DAY2‌‌|‌‌AM‌‌Civil‌‌Law‌  ‌
B.‌‌Form‌‌of‌‌Contracts‌  ‌
discarding‌‌   or‌‌ abandoning‌‌ the‌‌ personal‌‌ information‌‌ or‌‌ sensitive‌‌ 
Legal‌‌Presonality‌‌and‌‌Capacity‌‌to‌‌Act‌  ‌
personal‌  ‌information‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌‌
  individual‌‌   in‌‌
  an‌‌
  area‌‌
  accessible‌‌
  to‌‌  C.‌‌Reformation‌‌of‌‌Instruments‌  ‌
the‌‌
  public‌‌
  or‌‌
  has‌‌
  otherwise‌‌
  placed‌‌
  the‌‌ personal‌‌ information‌‌ of‌‌  Marital‌‌Relationships‌  ‌ D.‌‌Interpretation‌‌of‌‌Contracts‌  ‌
an‌‌individual‌‌in‌‌its‌‌container‌‌for‌‌trash‌‌collection.‌‌   ‌
Requisites‌  ‌ E.‌‌Defective‌‌Contracts‌  ‌
d. Processing‌  ‌of‌  ‌personal‌  ‌information‌  ‌or‌  ‌sensitive‌‌   personal‌‌ 
information‌  ‌for‌  ‌unauthorized‌  ‌purposes‌  ‌— ‌ ‌processing‌  ‌of‌‌  Marriages‌‌Celebrated‌‌Abroad‌  ‌
1.‌‌Rescissible‌‌Contracts‌  ‌
personal‌  ‌information‌  ‌or‌  ‌sensitive‌  ‌personal‌  ‌information‌  ‌for‌‌  Foreign‌‌Divorce‌  ‌
purposes‌  ‌not‌  ‌authorized‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌data‌  ‌subject,‌  ‌or‌  ‌otherwise‌‌  2.‌‌Voidable‌‌Contracts‌  ‌
authorized‌‌under‌‌existing‌‌laws.‌‌   ‌ Void‌‌Marriages‌  ‌
3.‌‌Unenforceable‌‌Contracts‌ 
e. Unauthorized‌  ‌access‌  ‌or‌  ‌Intentional‌  ‌breach‌  ‌— ‌ ‌knowingly‌‌  Voidable‌‌Marriages‌  ‌ 4.‌‌Void‌‌or‌‌Inexistent‌‌Contracts‌  ‌
and‌  ‌unlawfully,‌  ‌or‌  ‌violating‌  ‌data‌  ‌confidentiality‌  ‌and‌  ‌security‌‌ 
Property‌  ‌ 5.‌‌Distinguish:‌‌resolution‌‌and‌‌rescission‌‌of‌‌contracts‌  ‌
data‌  ‌systems,‌  ‌breaks‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌way‌  ‌into‌  ‌any‌  ‌system‌  ‌where‌‌ 
personal‌‌and‌‌sensitive‌‌personal‌‌information‌‌is‌‌stored.‌‌   ‌ Concept‌  ‌ F.‌‌Loans‌‌and‌‌Mortgages‌  ‌
f. Concealment‌  ‌of‌  ‌security‌  ‌breaches‌  ‌involving‌  ‌sensitive‌‌ 
Ownership‌  ‌ G.‌‌Interest‌  ‌
personal‌  ‌information‌  ‌— ‌ ‌concealing,‌  ‌intentionally‌  ‌or‌  ‌by‌‌ 
omission,‌  ‌security‌  ‌breaches‌  ‌involving‌  ‌sensitive‌  ‌personal‌‌  Co-ownership‌  ‌ Torts‌‌and‌‌Quasi-delicts‌  ‌
information,‌‌  after‌‌
  having‌‌
  knowledge‌‌   of‌‌
  such‌‌
  breach‌‌
  and‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
Right‌‌of‌‌Accession‌  ‌ A.‌‌PRINCIPLES‌  ‌
obligation‌‌to‌‌notify‌‌the‌‌Data‌‌Privacy‌‌Commission.‌‌   ‌
g. Malicious‌  ‌disclosure‌  ‌— ‌ ‌committed‌  ‌by‌  ‌any‌  ‌personal‌‌  Easement‌  ‌
B.‌‌CLASSIFICATION‌‌OF‌‌TORTS‌  ‌
information‌  ‌controller‌  ‌or‌  ‌personal‌  ‌information‌  ‌processor‌  ‌or‌‌  Nuisance‌  ‌ C.‌‌THE‌‌TORTFEASOR‌  ‌
any‌‌
  of‌‌ its‌‌ officials,‌‌ employees‌‌ or‌‌ agents,‌‌ who,‌‌ with‌‌ malice‌‌ or‌‌ in‌‌ 
bad‌‌ faith,‌‌ discloses‌‌ unwarranted‌‌ or‌‌ false‌‌ information‌‌ relative‌‌ to‌‌  Obligations‌  ‌
D.‌‌PROXIMATE‌‌CAUSE‌  ‌
A.‌‌General‌‌Provisions‌  ‌ E.‌‌LEGAL‌‌INJURY‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 145‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

F.‌‌INTENTIONAL‌‌TORTS‌  ‌ ART‌‌42‌.‌‌Civil‌‌personality‌‌is‌‌extinguished‌‌by‌‌death.‌  ‌ law‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌  s‌ ubject‌  ‌to‌  ‌stipulation,‌  ‌except‌  ‌that‌  ‌marriage‌‌ 
settlements‌  ‌may‌  ‌fix‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌  ‌relations‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌‌ 
G.‌‌NEGLIGENCE‌  ‌ The‌  ‌effect‌  ‌of‌  ‌death‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌rights‌  ‌and‌  ‌obligations‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
marriage‌‌within‌‌the‌‌limits‌‌provided‌‌by‌‌this‌‌Code.‌ 
deceased‌‌is‌‌determined‌‌by‌‌law,‌‌by‌‌contract‌‌and‌‌by‌‌will.‌  ‌
H.‌‌SPECIAL‌‌LIABILITY‌‌IN‌‌PARTICULAR‌‌ACTIVITIES‌  ‌ Law‌‌governing‌‌validity‌‌of‌‌marriage‌  ‌
Juridical‌‌Persons‌  ‌
I.‌‌STRICT‌‌LIABILITY‌  ‌ Castillo‌‌v.‌‌De‌‌Leon-Castillo‌‌2
‌ 016‌  ‌
Kinds‌‌of‌‌juridical‌‌persons‌  ‌
Damages‌  ‌ The‌  ‌validity‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌marriage‌  ‌and‌  ‌all‌  ‌its‌  ‌incidents‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌‌ 
ART‌‌44‌.‌‌The‌‌following‌‌are‌‌juridical‌‌persons:‌  ‌ determined‌  ‌in‌  ‌accordance‌  ‌with‌‌   the‌‌
  law‌‌   in‌‌
  effect‌‌
  at‌‌
  the‌‌
  time‌‌
  of‌‌ 
A.‌‌GENERAL‌‌CONSIDERATIONS‌  ‌ its‌‌celebration‌.  ‌‌ ‌
1) The‌‌State‌‌and‌‌its‌‌political‌‌subdivisions;‌  ‌
B.‌‌DAMAGES‌‌IN‌‌CASE‌‌OF‌‌DEATH‌  ‌ 2) Other‌‌
  corporations,‌‌ institutions‌‌ and‌‌ entities‌‌ for‌‌ public‌‌  Requisites‌  ‌
interest‌  ‌or‌  ‌purpose,‌  ‌created‌  ‌by‌‌
  law;‌‌
  their‌‌
  personality‌‌ 
C.‌‌GRADUATION‌‌OF‌‌DAMAGES‌  ‌ Essential‌‌Requisites‌  ‌
begins‌  ‌as‌  ‌soon‌  ‌as‌  ‌they‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌constituted‌‌ 
according‌‌to‌‌law;‌  ‌
1. Legal‌‌Presonality‌‌and‌‌Capacity‌‌to‌‌Act‌  ‌ ART‌  ‌2.‌ ‌ ‌No‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌valid,‌  ‌unless‌  ‌these‌  ‌essential‌‌ 
3) Corporations,‌  ‌partnerships‌  ‌and‌  ‌associations‌  ‌for‌‌  requisites‌‌are‌‌present:‌  ‌
Natural‌‌Persons‌  ‌ private‌  ‌interest‌  ‌or‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌to‌  ‌which‌‌
  the‌‌
  law‌‌
  grants‌‌  a ‌‌ 1) ⭐Legal‌  ‌capacity‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌contracting‌  ‌parties‌  ‌who‌‌ 
juridical‌‌   personality,‌‌ separate‌‌ and‌‌ distinct‌‌ from‌‌ that‌‌ of‌‌  must‌‌be‌‌a‌‌male‌‌and‌‌a‌‌female;‌‌and‌  ‌
ART‌  ‌40‌. ‌ ‌Birth‌‌  determines‌‌  personality;‌‌  but‌‌  the‌‌  conceived‌‌  child‌‌  each‌‌shareholder,‌‌partner‌‌or‌‌member.‌  ‌
shall‌  ‌be‌‌
  considered‌‌   born‌‌  for‌‌
  all‌‌
  purposes‌‌   that‌‌
  are‌‌
  favorable‌‌   to‌‌  2) Consent‌  ‌freely‌  ‌given‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌presence‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
it,‌‌
  provided‌‌  it‌‌
  be‌‌
  born‌‌ later‌‌ with‌‌ the‌‌ conditions‌‌ specified‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌  Capacity‌‌to‌‌Act‌  ‌ solemnizing‌‌officer.‌  ‌
following‌‌article.‌  ‌
Juridical‌‌Capacity‌‌distinguished‌‌from‌‌Capacity‌‌to‌‌Act‌  ‌ Formal‌‌Requisites‌  ‌
Commencement‌‌of‌‌civil‌‌personality‌  ‌
ART‌  ‌37‌. ‌ ‌Juridical‌  ‌capacity‌, ‌ ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌fitness‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌the‌‌  ART‌‌3.‌‌‌The‌‌formal‌‌requisites‌‌of‌‌marriage‌‌are:‌  ‌
ART‌‌  41‌. ‌‌For‌‌  civil‌‌  purposes,‌‌ the‌‌ foetus‌‌ is‌‌ considered‌‌ born‌‌ if‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌  subject‌  ‌of‌  ‌legal‌  ‌relations,‌  ‌is‌‌
  ‌inherent‌‌
  ‌in‌‌
  every‌‌
  natural‌‌
  person‌‌ 
alive‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌completely‌‌
  delivered‌‌
  from‌‌
  the‌‌
  mother's‌‌  1) ⭐‌Authority‌‌of‌‌the‌s
‌ olemnizing‌‌officer‌; ‌ ‌
and‌‌is‌‌lost‌‌only‌‌through‌‌death.‌‌   ‌
womb.‌‌   ‌ 2) ⭐‌A ‌ ‌valid‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌license‌  ‌except‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌cases‌‌ 
Capacity‌  ‌to‌  ‌act,‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌‌  the‌‌  ‌power‌‌  to‌‌  do‌‌  acts‌‌  with‌‌  legal‌‌ 
However‌, ‌ ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌foetus‌  ‌had‌  ‌an‌  ‌intrauterine‌  ‌life‌  ‌of‌  ‌less‌  ‌than‌‌  provided‌‌for‌‌in‌‌Chapter‌‌2‌‌of‌‌this‌‌Title;‌‌and‌  ‌
effect‌,‌‌is‌‌acquired‌‌and‌‌may‌‌be‌‌lost.‌  ‌
seven‌  ‌months‌, ‌ ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌deemed‌  ‌born‌  ‌if‌  ‌it‌  ‌dies‌  ‌within‌‌ 
Restrictions‌‌on‌‌the‌‌capacity‌‌to‌‌act‌  ‌ 3) A‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌ceremony‌  ‌which‌‌   takes‌‌
  place‌‌
  with‌‌   the‌‌ 
twenty-four‌‌ hours‌‌ after‌‌ its‌‌ complete‌‌ delivery‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌ maternal‌‌ 
appearance‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌contracting‌  ‌parties‌  ‌before‌  ‌the‌‌ 
womb.‌  ‌
ART‌  ‌38‌. ‌ ‌Minority,‌  ‌insanity‌  ‌or‌  ‌imbecility,‌  ‌the‌  ‌state‌  ‌of‌  ‌being‌  ‌a ‌‌ solemnizing‌‌   officer‌‌
  and‌‌ their‌‌ personal‌‌ declaration‌‌ that‌‌ 
Geluz‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ deaf-mute,‌  ‌prodigality‌  ‌and‌  ‌civil‌  ‌interdiction‌  ‌are‌  ‌mere‌‌  they‌  ‌take‌  ‌each‌  ‌other‌  ‌as‌  ‌husband‌  ‌and‌  ‌wife‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
restrictions‌  ‌on‌  ‌capacity‌  ‌to‌  ‌act,‌  ‌and‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌exempt‌  ‌the‌‌  presence‌‌of‌‌not‌‌less‌‌than‌‌two‌‌witnesses‌‌of‌‌legal‌‌age.‌  ‌
Whether‌  ‌the‌  ‌husband‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌woman,‌  ‌who‌  ‌voluntarily‌  ‌procured‌  ‌her‌‌ 
abortion,‌‌
  could‌‌  recover‌‌
  damages‌‌   from‌‌
  the‌‌
  physician‌‌
  who‌‌ caused‌‌ the‌‌  incapacitated‌  ‌person‌  ‌from‌  ‌certain‌  ‌obligations,‌  ‌as‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ⭐‌A
‌ bsence‌‌makes‌‌the‌‌marriage‌V
‌ OID‌. ‌ ‌
same.‌  ‌ latter‌  ‌arise‌  ‌from‌  ‌his‌  ‌acts‌  ‌or‌  ‌from‌  ‌property‌  ‌relations,‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌‌ 
easements.‌  ‌ Sevilla‌‌v.‌‌Cardenas‌  ‌
NO‌. ‌‌‌Even‌‌ if‌‌ a ‌‌cause‌‌ of‌‌ action‌‌ did‌‌ accrue‌‌ on‌‌ behalf‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ unborn‌‌ child,‌‌  A‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌license‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌essential‌  ‌requisite‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌validity‌  ‌of‌‌ 
the‌  ‌same‌  ‌was‌  ‌extinguished‌  ‌by‌  ‌its‌  ‌pre-natal‌  ‌death,‌  ‌since‌  ‌no‌‌  2. Marital‌‌Relationships‌  ‌
marriage.‌  ‌The‌  ‌certification‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌issued‌  ‌by‌‌
  the‌‌  Local‌‌
  Civil‌‌  Registrar‌‌ 
transmission‌  ‌to‌  ‌anyone‌  ‌can‌  ‌take‌  ‌place‌  ‌from‌  ‌one‌  ‌that‌  ‌lacked‌‌  ART‌  ‌1.‌ ‌ ‌Marriage‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌special‌  ‌contract‌  ‌of‌  ‌permanent‌  ‌union‌‌  must‌  ‌categorically‌  ‌state‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌document‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌exist‌  ‌in‌  ‌his‌‌ 
juridical‌‌personality.‌  ‌ between‌  ‌a ‌ ‌man‌  ‌and‌  ‌a ‌ ‌woman‌‌   entered‌‌
  into‌‌
  in‌‌
  accordance‌‌   with‌‌  office‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌particular‌  ‌entry‌  ‌could‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌found‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌register‌‌ 
law‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌establishment‌  ‌of‌  ‌conjugal‌  ‌and‌‌
  family‌‌
  life.‌‌
  It‌‌
  is‌‌
  the‌‌  despite‌‌diligent‌‌search.‌‌   ‌
Extinguishment‌‌of‌‌civil‌‌personality‌  ‌ foundation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌family‌  ‌and‌  ‌an‌  ‌inviolable‌  ‌social‌  ‌institution‌‌ 
whose‌  ‌nature,‌  ‌consequences,‌  ‌and‌  ‌incidents‌  ‌are‌  ‌governed‌  ‌by‌‌  Alcantara‌‌v.‌‌Alcantara‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 146‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

An‌‌
  irregularity‌‌   in‌‌
  any‌‌
  of‌‌ the‌‌ formal‌‌ requisites‌‌ of‌‌ marriage‌‌ does‌‌  The‌‌   Municipal‌‌   Civil‌‌
  Registrar‌‌ of‌‌ Carmona,‌‌ Cavite,‌‌ where‌‌ the‌‌ marriage‌‌ 
not‌  ‌affect‌  ‌its‌  ‌validity‌  ‌but‌  ‌the‌  ‌party‌  ‌or‌  ‌parties‌  ‌responsible‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌  NO‌. ‌ ‌Consent‌  ‌was‌‌
  not‌‌
  lacking‌‌  between‌‌   Albios‌‌  and‌‌
  Fringer.‌‌
  That‌‌
  their‌‌  license‌‌   of‌‌
  Gloria‌‌   and‌‌ Syed‌‌ was‌‌ allegedly‌‌ issued,‌‌ issued‌‌ a ‌‌certification‌‌ 
irregularity‌‌are‌‌civilly,‌‌criminally‌‌and‌‌administratively‌‌liable.‌‌   ‌ consent‌  ‌was‌  ‌freely‌  ‌given‌  ‌is‌  ‌best‌  ‌evidenced‌  ‌by‌  ‌their‌  ‌conscious‌  to‌  ‌the‌  ‌effect‌  ‌that‌  ‌no‌  ‌such‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌license‌  ‌for‌  ‌Gloria‌  ‌and‌‌
  Syed‌‌
  was‌‌ 
purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌acquiring‌  ‌American‌  ‌citizenship‌  ‌through‌  ‌marriage.‌  ‌Such‌‌  issued,‌  ‌and‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌   serial‌‌  number‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  marriage‌‌   license‌‌  pertained‌‌ 
Moreover,‌  ‌the‌  ‌solemnizing‌  ‌officer‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌duty-bound‌  ‌to‌‌  plainly‌  ‌demonstrates‌  ‌that‌  ‌they‌‌   willingly‌‌   and‌‌
  deliberately‌‌  contracted‌‌  to‌  ‌another‌  ‌couple.‌  ‌The‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌characterized‌  ‌as‌  ‌among‌‌ 
investigate‌  ‌whether‌  ‌or‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌ ‌marriage‌  ‌license‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌duly‌‌  the‌‌marriage.‌‌   ‌ the‌  ‌exemptions,‌  ‌and‌  ‌thus,‌  ‌having‌  ‌been‌  ‌solemnized‌  ‌without‌  ‌a ‌‌
and‌‌regularly‌‌issued‌‌‌by‌‌the‌‌local‌‌civil‌‌registrar.‌‌   ‌ marriage‌‌license,‌‌is‌‌void‌‌ab‌‌initio.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌respondent’s‌  m ‌ arriage‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌at‌  ‌all‌  ‌analogous‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌‌
Kho‌‌v.‌‌Republic‌‌‌2016‌  ‌ marriage‌  ‌in‌  ‌jest.‌  ‌Albios‌‌  and‌‌  Fringer‌‌  had‌‌  an‌‌  undeniable‌‌  intention‌‌  Go-Bangayan‌‌v.‌‌Bangayan‌‌Jr.‌‌‌2013‌  ‌
to‌  ‌be‌  ‌bound‌  ‌in‌‌
  order‌‌
  to‌‌
  create‌‌
  the‌‌
  very‌‌
  bond‌‌  necessary‌‌  to‌‌
  allow‌‌
  the‌‌ 
The‌  ‌Certification‌  ‌issued‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌   Civil‌‌   Registrar‌‌   is‌‌
  sufficient‌‌   evidence‌‌  The‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌between‌  ‌Benjamin‌  ‌and‌  ‌Sally‌  ‌“was‌  ‌made‌  ‌only‌  ‌in‌  ‌jest”‌‌ 
respondent‌‌to‌‌acquire‌‌American‌‌citizenship.‌‌   ‌
to‌  ‌prove‌  ‌the‌  ‌absence‌‌   ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  subject‌‌   ‌marriage‌‌   license‌. ‌‌By‌‌   virtue‌‌  of‌‌  and‌  ‌“a‌  ‌simulated‌  ‌marriage‌, ‌ ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌instance‌  ‌of‌  ‌Sally,‌  ‌intended‌  ‌to‌‌ 
such‌‌   certification,‌‌  it‌‌
  becomes‌‌   the‌‌   burden‌‌   of‌‌
  respondent‌‌ to‌‌ prove‌‌ that‌‌  cover‌‌   her‌‌ up‌‌ from‌‌ expected‌‌ social‌‌ humiliation‌‌ coming‌‌ from‌‌ relatives,‌‌ 
Aranes‌‌v.‌‌Occiano‌  ‌
their‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌is‌  ‌valid‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌she‌  ‌who‌  ‌alleges‌  ‌such‌  ‌validity.‌  ‌The‌‌  friends‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌society‌  ‌especially‌‌  from‌‌
  her‌‌
  parents‌‌   seen‌‌   as‌‌
  Chinese‌‌ 
Certificate‌‌   of‌‌
  Marriage‌‌   issued‌‌   by‌‌  the‌‌  officiating‌‌   priest‌‌  does‌‌   not‌‌  Respondent‌  ‌judge‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌faulted‌  ‌for‌  ‌solemnizing‌  ‌a ‌ ‌marriage‌‌  conservatives.”‌‌In‌‌short,‌‌it‌‌was‌‌a‌‌fictitious‌‌marriage.‌  ‌
contain‌  ‌any‌  ‌entry‌  ‌regarding‌  ‌the‌  ‌said‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌license‌. ‌‌ without‌  ‌the‌  ‌requisite‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌license.‌  ‌In‌‌  People‌‌  vs.‌‌
  Lara‌, ‌‌we‌‌   held‌‌ 
Respondent‌  ‌could‌  ‌have‌  ‌obtained‌  ‌a ‌ ‌copy‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌contract‌‌  that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌marriage‌  ‌which‌  ‌preceded‌  ‌the‌  ‌issuance‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌marriage‌‌  Defect‌‌in‌‌any‌‌of‌‌essential‌‌requisites‌‌—‌‌Voidable‌‌(Art.‌‌45‌‌FC)‌  ‌
from‌  ‌the‌  ‌National‌  ‌Archives‌‌   and‌‌   Records‌‌   Section,‌‌   where‌‌  information‌‌  license‌  ‌is‌  ‌void‌, ‌ ‌and‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌subsequent‌  ‌issuance‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌  ‌license‌‌ 
regarding‌  ‌the‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌license,‌  ‌i.e.,‌  ‌date‌  ‌of‌  ‌issuance‌  ‌and‌  ‌license‌‌  cannot‌‌render‌‌valid‌‌or‌‌even‌‌add‌‌an‌‌iota‌‌of‌‌validity‌‌to‌‌the‌‌marriage.‌‌   ‌ xxxx‌  ‌
number,‌‌could‌‌be‌‌obtained.‌‌However,‌‌she‌‌also‌‌failed‌‌to‌‌do‌‌so.‌‌   ‌ A‌‌
  ‌defect‌‌
  ‌in‌‌
  any‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  essential‌‌  requisites‌‌   shall‌‌  ‌not‌‌
  affect‌‌
  ‌the‌‌ 
Beso‌‌v.‌‌Daguman‌  ‌ validity‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌but‌  ‌the‌  ‌party‌  ‌or‌  ‌parties‌‌  responsible‌‌ 
In‌  ‌Republic‌  ‌v.‌  ‌CA‌, ‌ ‌this‌  ‌Court‌‌   considered‌‌   the‌‌
  certification‌‌   issued‌‌   by‌‌  for‌  ‌the‌  ‌irregularity‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌civilly,‌  ‌criminally‌  ‌and‌‌ 
the‌  ‌Local‌  ‌Civil‌  ‌Registrar‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌certification‌  ‌of‌  ‌due‌  ‌search‌  ‌and‌‌  A‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌held‌  ‌outside‌  ‌the‌  ‌judge’s‌  ‌chambers‌‌
  or‌‌
  courtroom‌‌ 
administratively‌‌liable.‌  ‌
inability‌‌   to‌‌
  find‌‌   the‌‌
  record‌‌   or‌‌
  entry‌‌
  sought‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌
  parties‌‌  despite‌‌  only‌‌in‌‌the‌‌following‌‌instances:‌‌   ‌
the‌‌   absence‌‌  of‌‌
  a ‌‌categorical‌‌   statement‌‌   that‌‌  "such‌‌   document‌‌   does‌‌ not‌‌  1. at‌‌the‌‌point‌‌of‌‌death;‌‌   ‌ Effect‌‌of‌‌irregularity‌‌in‌‌any‌‌of‌‌the‌‌formal‌‌requisites‌  ‌
exist‌‌in‌‌their‌‌records‌‌despite‌‌diligent‌‌search."‌  ‌ 2. in‌‌remote‌‌places‌‌in‌‌accordance‌‌with‌‌Article‌‌29,‌‌or‌  ‌ Navarro‌‌v.‌‌Domagtoy‌  ‌
Diaz-Salgado‌‌v.‌‌Anson‌‌2
‌ 016‌  ‌ 3. upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌request‌  ‌of‌  ‌both‌  ‌parties‌  ‌in‌  ‌writing‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌sworn‌‌  Even‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌spouse‌  ‌present‌‌   has‌‌
  a ‌‌well-founded‌‌   belief‌‌
  that‌‌   the‌‌
  absent‌‌ 
statement‌‌to‌‌this‌‌effect.‌  ‌ spouse‌  ‌was‌‌   already‌‌  dead,‌‌   a ‌‌summary‌‌   proceeding‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌  declaration‌‌ 
A‌‌
  cursory‌‌  examination‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌   marriage‌‌
  contract‌‌  of‌‌  Luis‌‌
  and‌‌ Severina‌‌  of‌  ‌presumptive‌‌   death‌‌  is‌‌
  necessary‌‌   in‌‌
  order‌‌
  to‌‌
  contract‌‌   a ‌‌subsequent‌‌ 
reveals‌  ‌that‌‌
  no‌‌
  marriage‌‌   license‌‌  number‌‌   ‌was‌‌  indicated‌‌   therein.‌‌   It‌‌  Morigo‌‌v.‌‌People‌  ‌ marriage.‌  ‌
also‌  ‌appears‌  ‌therein‌‌
  that‌‌  ‌no‌‌  marriage‌‌   license‌‌  ‌was‌‌   exhibited‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌ 
solemnizing‌‌officer.‌  ‌ In‌‌  the‌‌
  instant‌‌   case,‌‌  ‌no‌‌
  marriage‌‌  ceremony‌‌   at‌‌
  all‌‌ was‌‌ performed‌‌ by‌‌ 
Where‌‌   a ‌‌judge‌‌  solemnizes‌‌ a ‌‌marriage‌‌ outside‌‌ his‌‌ court's‌‌ jurisdiction,‌‌ 
a‌  ‌duly‌  ‌authorized‌  ‌solemnizing‌  ‌officer.‌  ‌Petitioner‌  ‌and‌  ‌Lucia‌  ‌Barrete‌‌ 
there‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌resultant‌  ‌irregularity‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌
  formal‌‌   requisite‌‌   laid‌‌
  down‌‌
  in‌‌ 
ART‌  ‌4.‌ ‌ ‌The‌  ‌absence‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌of‌  t‌ he‌  ‌essential‌  ‌or‌  ‌formal‌‌  merely‌‌   signed‌‌   a ‌‌marriage‌‌
  contract‌‌ on‌‌ their‌‌ own.‌‌ The‌‌ mere‌‌ private‌‌ act‌‌  Article‌‌   3,‌‌  which‌‌   while‌‌  it‌‌
  may‌‌
  not‌‌
  affect‌‌   the‌‌
  validity‌‌
  of‌‌ the‌‌ marriage‌, ‌‌
of‌‌  signing‌‌ a ‌‌marriage‌‌ contract‌‌ bears‌‌ no‌‌ semblance‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌‌valid‌‌ marriage‌‌ 
  ‌void‌‌
requisites‌  ‌shall‌  ‌render‌  ‌the‌  ‌marriage‌‌   a‌ b‌‌  initio,‌‌  ‌except‌‌  ‌as‌‌  may‌‌subject‌‌the‌‌officiating‌‌official‌‌to‌‌administrative‌‌liability‌. ‌ ‌
and‌  ‌thus,‌  n ‌ eeds‌  ‌no‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌declaration‌  ‌of‌  ‌nullity‌. ‌ ‌Such‌  ‌act‌‌ 
stated‌‌in‌‌Article‌‌35‌‌(2).‌‌   ‌
alone,‌  ‌without‌  ‌more,‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌deemed‌  ‌to‌  ‌constitute‌‌   an‌‌
  ostensibly‌‌ 
xxxx‌  ‌
ART‌  ‌5.‌  ‌Any‌  ‌male‌  ‌or‌  ‌female‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌age‌  ‌of‌  ‌eighteen‌  ‌years‌  ‌or‌‌ 
valid‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌for‌  ‌which‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌might‌‌   be‌‌  held‌‌   liable‌‌
  for‌‌
  bigamy‌‌ 
upwards‌  ‌not‌  ‌under‌  ‌any‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌impediments‌  ‌mentioned‌  ‌in‌‌ 
unless‌  ‌he‌  ‌first‌  ‌secures‌  ‌a ‌ ‌judicial‌  ‌declaration‌  ‌of‌  ‌nullity‌  ‌before‌  ‌he‌‌ 
Republic‌‌v.‌‌Albios‌‌2
‌ 013‌  ‌ Articles‌‌37‌‌and‌‌38,‌‌may‌‌contract‌‌marriage.‌  ‌
contracts‌‌a‌‌subsequent‌‌marriage.‌  ‌
Is‌‌
  a ‌‌marriage,‌‌   contracted‌‌
  for‌‌ the‌‌ sole‌‌ purpose‌‌ of‌‌ acquiring‌‌ American‌‌  ART‌  ‌6.‌ ‌ ‌No‌  ‌prescribed‌  ‌form‌  ‌or‌  ‌religious‌  ‌rite‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌ 
citizenship‌‌ in‌‌ consideration‌‌ of‌‌ $2,000.00,‌‌ void‌‌ ab‌‌ initio‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ ground‌‌  Abbas‌‌v.‌‌Gloria‌‌Goo‌‌Abbas‌‌‌2013‌  ‌ solemnization‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌is‌  ‌required‌. ‌ ‌It‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌ 
of‌‌lack‌‌of‌‌consent?‌  ‌ necessary,‌  ‌however,‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌contracting‌  ‌parties‌  ‌to‌  ‌appear‌‌ 
personally‌  ‌before‌  ‌the‌  ‌solemnizing‌  ‌officer‌  ‌and‌  ‌declare‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 147‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

presence‌  ‌of‌  ‌not‌  ‌less‌  ‌than‌  ‌two‌‌


  witnesses‌‌
  of‌‌
  legal‌‌
  age‌‌
  that‌‌
  they‌‌  solemnized‌‌   at‌‌
  a ‌‌house‌‌
  or‌‌
  place‌‌
  designated‌‌
  by‌‌ them‌‌ in‌‌ 
Testimony‌  ‌by‌  ‌one‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌parties‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌marriage,‌  ‌or‌‌   by‌‌
  one‌‌   of‌‌ 
take‌‌each‌‌other‌‌as‌‌husband‌‌and‌‌wife.‌‌xxxx‌  ‌ a‌‌sworn‌‌statement‌‌to‌‌that‌‌effect.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌witnesses‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌  marriage,‌‌
  has‌‌  been‌‌   held‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  admissible‌‌ 
Persons‌‌authorized‌‌to‌‌solemnize‌‌marriage‌  ‌ Marriage‌‌License‌‌—‌W
‌ here‌‌issued‌  ‌ to‌  ‌prove‌  ‌the‌  ‌fact‌  ‌of‌  ‌marriage.‌  ‌The‌  ‌person‌  ‌who‌  ‌officiated‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌‌ 
solemnization‌  ‌is‌  ‌also‌  ‌competent‌  ‌to‌  ‌testify‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌  ‌eyewitness‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
ART‌‌7.‌‌‌Marriage‌‌may‌‌be‌‌solemnized‌‌by:‌  ‌ ART‌  ‌9.‌ ‌ ‌A ‌ ‌marriage‌  ‌license‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌issued‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌local‌  ‌civil‌‌  fact‌‌of‌‌marriage.‌  ‌
1) Any‌  ‌incumbent‌  ‌member‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  ‌judiciary‌‌
  ‌within‌‌
  the‌‌  registrar‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌city‌  ‌or‌  ‌municipality‌  ‌where‌  ‌either‌  ‌contracting‌‌ 
court's‌‌jurisdiction;‌  ‌ party‌  ‌habitually‌‌   resides,‌‌   ‌except‌‌
  ‌in‌‌
  marriages‌‌
  where‌‌   no‌‌
  license‌‌  Sy‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
is‌‌required‌‌xxxx.‌  ‌
2) Any‌‌   ‌priest,‌‌
  rabbi,‌‌  imam,‌‌   or‌‌
  minister‌‌   of‌‌
  any‌‌   church‌‌  On‌  ‌the‌  ‌day‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌ceremony,‌  ‌there‌  ‌was‌  ‌no‌  ‌marriage‌‌ 
or‌  ‌religious‌  ‌sect‌  ‌duly‌  ‌authorized‌  ‌by‌  ‌his‌  ‌church‌  ‌or‌‌  Who‌‌will‌‌issue‌  ‌ license‌. ‌ ‌A ‌ ‌marriage‌  ‌license‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌formal‌  ‌requirement;‌  ‌its‌  ‌absence‌‌ 
religious‌  ‌sect‌  ‌and‌  ‌registered‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌civil‌  ‌registrar‌‌  renders‌  ‌the‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌void‌  ‌ab‌  ‌initio‌. ‌ ‌In‌  ‌addition,‌  ‌the‌  ‌marriage‌ 
ART‌  ‌10‌. ‌ ‌Marriages‌  ‌between‌  ‌Filipino‌  ‌citizens‌  ‌abroad‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌‌ 
general‌‌xxx;‌  ‌ contract‌  ‌shows‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌license‌  ‌was‌  ‌issued‌  ‌in‌  ‌Carmona,‌‌ 
solemnized‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌consul-general,‌  ‌consul‌  ‌or‌  ‌vice-consul‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
3) Any‌  ‌ship‌  ‌captain‌  ‌or‌  ‌airplane‌  ‌chief‌  ‌only‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌‌  Republic‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines.‌‌xxxx.‌  ‌ Cavite,‌  ‌yet,‌‌
  neither‌‌   petitioner‌‌
  nor‌‌
  private‌‌
  respondent‌‌
  ever‌‌   resided‌‌  in‌‌ 
mentioned‌‌in‌‌Article‌‌31;‌  ‌ Carmona.‌  ‌
If‌‌previously‌‌married‌  ‌
4) Any‌  ‌military‌  ‌commander‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌unit‌  ‌to‌  ‌which‌  ‌a ‌‌
ART‌  ‌13‌. ‌ ‌In‌  ‌case‌  ‌either‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌contracting‌  ‌parties‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌‌  Villanueva‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
chaplain‌  ‌is‌  ‌assigned,‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌absence‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌latter,‌‌ 
during‌‌
  a ‌‌military‌‌
  operation,‌‌   likewise‌‌ only‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ cases‌‌  previously‌  ‌married‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌applicant‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌required‌  ‌to‌‌  The‌  ‌best‌  ‌documentary‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌of‌‌   a ‌‌marriage‌‌   is‌‌
  the‌‌
  marriage‌‌ 
mentioned‌‌in‌‌Article‌‌32;‌  ‌ furnish,‌‌   instead‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  birth‌‌ or‌‌ baptismal‌‌ certificate‌‌ required‌‌ in‌‌  contract‌  ‌itself.‌  ‌A ‌ ‌Torrens‌  ‌certificate‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌best‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌of‌‌ 
5) Any‌‌
  ‌consul-general‌, ‌‌consul‌‌ or‌‌ vice-consul‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ case‌‌  the‌‌last‌‌preceding‌‌article,‌‌   ‌ ownership‌‌of‌‌registered‌‌land,‌n ‌ ot‌‌of‌‌the‌‌civil‌‌status‌o ‌ f‌‌the‌‌owner.‌  ‌
provided‌‌in‌‌Article‌‌10.‌  ‌ 1. the‌‌death‌‌certificate‌‌of‌‌the‌‌deceased‌‌spouse‌‌‌or‌‌   ‌
SSS‌‌v.‌‌Enobiso‌‌‌2013‌  ‌
Enumeration‌‌not‌‌exclusive.‌‌Mayor‌‌may‌‌also‌‌solemnize.‌  ‌ 2. the‌‌judicial‌‌decree‌‌of‌‌the‌‌absolute‌‌divorce,‌‌or‌‌   ‌
In‌  ‌Trinidad‌  ‌v.‌  ‌CA,‌  ‌et‌  ‌al.,‌‌
  this‌‌
  Court‌‌
  ruled‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  following‌‌
  may‌‌
  be‌‌ 
People‌‌v.‌‌Bustamante‌  ‌ 3. the‌‌judicial‌‌decree‌‌of‌‌annulment‌‌or‌‌   ‌
presented‌‌as‌‌proof‌‌of‌‌marriage:‌‌   ‌
4. declaration‌‌of‌‌nullity‌‌of‌‌his‌‌or‌‌her‌‌previous‌‌marriage.‌‌   ‌
When‌‌   the‌‌   issue‌‌   involves‌‌   the‌‌  assumption‌‌   of‌‌
  powers‌‌   and‌‌ duties‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  a) testimony‌‌of‌‌a‌‌witness‌‌to‌‌the‌‌matrimony;‌  ‌
office‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌   mayor‌‌   by‌‌  the‌‌   vice-mayor,‌‌   when‌‌   proper,‌‌
  it‌‌
  is‌‌
  immaterial‌‌  In‌  ‌case‌  ‌the‌  ‌death‌‌
  certificate‌‌
  cannot‌‌   be‌‌
  secured,‌‌  the‌‌
  party‌‌  shall‌‌  b) the‌  ‌couple's‌  ‌public‌  ‌and‌  ‌open‌  ‌cohabitation‌  ‌as‌  ‌husband‌  ‌and‌‌ 
whether‌‌   it‌‌  is‌‌
  because‌‌   the‌‌   latter‌‌  is‌‌
  the‌‌
  Acting‌‌   Mayor‌‌  or‌‌  merely‌‌
  acting‌‌  make‌‌ an‌‌ ‌affidavit‌‌ ‌setting‌‌ forth‌‌ this‌‌ circumstance‌‌ and‌‌ his‌‌ or‌‌ her‌‌  wife‌‌after‌‌the‌‌alleged‌‌wedlock;‌  ‌
as‌  ‌Mayor,‌  ‌for‌  ‌in‌  ‌both‌  ‌instances,‌  ‌he‌  ‌discharges‌  ‌all‌  ‌the‌  ‌duties‌  ‌and‌‌  actual‌  ‌civil‌  ‌status‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌name‌  ‌and‌  ‌date‌  ‌of‌  ‌death‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
wields‌‌the‌‌powers‌‌appurtenant‌‌to‌‌said‌‌office.‌  ‌ deceased‌‌spouse.‌  ‌ c) the‌  ‌birth‌  ‌and‌  ‌baptismal‌  ‌certificate‌  ‌of‌  ‌children‌  ‌born‌  ‌during‌‌ 
such‌‌union;‌‌and‌  ‌
Proof‌‌to‌‌attack‌‌the‌‌validity‌‌of‌‌marriage‌  ‌
Venue‌‌of‌‌Marriage‌‌—‌E‌ xceptions:‌‌  d) the‌‌mention‌‌of‌‌such‌‌nuptial‌‌in‌‌subsequent‌‌documents.‌  ‌
Articulo‌‌Mortis‌‌and‌‌Written‌‌request‌  ‌ Lim‌‌Tanhu‌‌v.‌‌Ramolete‌  ‌
Here,‌  ‌the‌  ‌lack‌  ‌of‌  ‌prompt‌  ‌recording‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌OCR‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌amply‌‌ 
ART‌  ‌8.‌ ‌ ‌The‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌solemnized‌  ‌publicly‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  The‌‌   primary‌‌  evidence‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌marriage‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ an‌‌ authentic‌‌ copy‌‌  rebut‌‌   the‌‌  presumption‌‌   that‌‌ Lourdes‌‌ was‌‌ Petronilo's‌‌ wife.‌‌ As‌‌ declared‌‌ 
chambers‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ judge‌‌ or‌‌ in‌‌ open‌‌ court,‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ church,‌‌ chapel‌‌ or‌‌  of‌  ‌the‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌contract‌. ‌‌‌While‌‌   a ‌‌marriage‌‌   may‌‌   also‌‌
  be‌‌
  proved‌‌  in‌  ‌Vda.‌  ‌de‌  ‌Jacob‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌"‌failure‌  ‌to‌  ‌send‌  ‌a ‌ ‌copy‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌marriage‌ 
temple,‌  ‌or‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌office‌  ‌the‌  ‌consul-general,‌  ‌consul‌  ‌or‌‌  by‌  ‌other‌  ‌competent‌  ‌evidence,‌  ‌the‌‌   absence‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  contract‌‌  must‌‌   first‌‌  contract‌‌   for‌‌
  record‌‌   purposes‌‌ does‌‌ not‌‌ invalidate‌‌ the‌‌ marriage.‌" ‌‌
vice-consul,‌‌as‌‌the‌‌case‌‌may‌‌be,‌‌and‌‌not‌‌elsewhere,‌e‌ xcept‌‌   ‌ be‌  ‌satisfactorily‌  ‌explained.‌  ‌The‌  ‌certification‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌person‌  ‌who‌‌  It‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌ the‌‌ duty‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ couple‌‌ to‌‌ send‌‌ a ‌‌copy‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ marriage‌‌ contract‌‌ 
allegedly‌  ‌solemnized‌  ‌a ‌‌marriage‌‌   is‌‌  not‌‌   admissible‌‌   evidence‌‌   of‌‌
  such‌‌  to‌‌the‌‌civil‌‌registrar.‌  ‌
1. in‌‌
  cases‌‌
  of‌‌
  marriages‌‌
  contracted‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  point‌‌ of‌‌ death‌‌ 
marriage‌  ‌unless‌  ‌proof‌  ‌of‌  ‌loss‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌contract‌  ‌or‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌other‌‌ 
or‌‌   ‌
satisfactory‌  ‌reason‌  ‌for‌  ‌its‌  ‌non-production‌  ‌is‌  ‌first‌  ‌presented‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  Avenido‌‌v.‌‌Avenido‌‌‌2014‌  ‌
2. in‌‌remote‌‌places‌‌in‌‌accordance‌‌with‌‌Article‌‌29‌‌or‌‌   ‌ court.‌  ‌
While‌‌
  ‌a ‌‌marriage‌‌   certificate‌‌
  is‌‌
  considered‌‌   the‌‌ primary‌‌ evidence‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌
3. where‌  ‌both‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌parties‌  ‌request‌  ‌the‌  ‌solemnizing‌‌  marital‌‌
  union,‌‌
  it‌‌
  ‌is‌‌
  not‌‌
  regarded‌‌   as‌‌ the‌‌ sole‌‌ and‌‌ exclusive‌‌ evidence‌‌ of‌‌ 
Pugeda‌‌v.‌‌Trias‌  ‌
officer‌  ‌in‌  ‌writing‌  ‌in‌  ‌which‌  ‌case‌‌
  the‌‌
  marriage‌‌
  may‌‌
  be‌‌  marriage‌. ‌ ‌Jurisprudence‌  ‌teaches‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌fact‌  ‌of‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌‌ 

 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 148‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

proven‌  ‌by‌  ‌relevant‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌other‌  ‌than‌  ‌the‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌certificate.‌‌  In‌  ‌Van‌  ‌Dorn‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Romillo,‌  ‌Jr.‌  we‌  ‌held‌  ‌that‌  ‌owing‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌nationality‌‌ 
Hence,‌  ‌even‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person’s‌  ‌birth‌  ‌certificate‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌recognized‌  ‌as‌‌  principle‌  ‌embodied‌  ‌in‌  ‌Article‌  ‌15‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Civil‌  ‌Code,‌  ‌only‌‌   Philippine‌‌  Moreover,‌‌   in‌‌
  Juliano-Llave‌‌   v.‌‌
  Republic‌, ‌‌this‌‌
  Court‌‌
  held‌‌   that‌‌ the‌‌ rule‌‌ 
competent‌‌evidence‌‌of‌‌the‌‌marriage‌‌between‌‌his‌‌parents.‌  ‌ nationals‌  ‌are‌  ‌covered‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌policy‌  ‌against‌  ‌absolute‌  ‌divorces,‌  ‌the‌‌  in‌  ‌A.M.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌02-11-10-SC‌  ‌that‌  ‌only‌  ‌the‌  ‌husband‌  ‌or‌  ‌wife‌  ‌can‌  ‌file‌  ‌a ‌‌
same‌  ‌being‌‌   considered‌‌   contrary‌‌   to‌‌  our‌‌
  concept‌‌   of‌‌
  public‌‌   policy‌‌
  and‌‌  declaration‌  ‌of‌  ‌nullity‌  ‌or‌  ‌annulment‌  ‌of‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌“‌does‌‌  ‌NOT‌‌   ‌apply‌‌   if‌ 
Here,‌‌  the‌‌
  establishment‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  fact‌‌
  of‌‌
  marriage‌‌ was‌‌ completed‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌  morality.‌‌   ‌ the‌‌reason‌‌behind‌‌the‌‌petition‌‌is‌b ‌ igamy‌.”‌  ‌ ‌
testimonies‌‌   of‌‌
  Adelina,‌‌  Climaco‌‌   and‌‌  Tecla;‌‌
  the‌‌
  unrebutted‌‌  fact‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
birth‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌cohabitation‌  ‌of‌  ‌Tecla‌  ‌and‌  ‌Eustaquio‌  ‌of‌  ‌four‌  ‌(4)‌‌  Citing‌  ‌this‌  ‌landmark‌  ‌case,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌held‌  ‌in‌  ‌Quita‌  ‌v.‌  ‌CA‌, ‌ ‌that‌‌  once‌‌  Fujiki‌  ‌has‌  ‌the‌  ‌personality‌  ‌to‌  ‌file‌  ‌a ‌ ‌petition‌  ‌to‌  ‌recognize‌  ‌the‌‌ 
children‌  ‌coupled‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌certificates‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌children’s‌  ‌birth‌  ‌and‌‌  proven‌  ‌that‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌was‌  ‌no‌  ‌longer‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Filipino‌  ‌citizen‌  ‌when‌  ‌he‌‌  Japanese‌  ‌Family‌  ‌Court‌‌   judgment‌‌   nullifying‌‌   the‌‌   marriage‌‌   between‌‌ 
baptism;‌‌   and‌‌ the‌‌ certifications‌‌ of‌‌ marriage‌‌ issued‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ parish‌‌ priest‌‌  obtained‌  ‌the‌  ‌divorce‌  ‌from‌  ‌petitioner,‌‌   the‌‌
  ruling‌‌   in‌‌
  ‌Van‌‌  Dorn‌‌   would‌‌  Marinay‌‌   and‌‌  Maekara‌‌   on‌‌   the‌‌  ground‌‌   of‌‌ bigamy‌‌ because‌‌ the‌‌ judgment‌‌ 
of‌‌the‌‌Most‌‌Holy‌‌Trinity‌‌Cathedral‌‌of‌‌Talibon,‌‌Bohol.‌  ‌ become‌  ‌applicable‌  ‌and‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌could‌  ‌"very‌‌   well‌‌   lose‌‌
  her‌‌  right‌‌  to‌‌  concerns‌‌   his‌‌
  civil‌‌
  status‌‌   as‌‌  married‌‌   to‌‌
  Marinay.‌‌   For‌‌ the‌‌ same‌‌ reason‌‌ 
inherit"‌‌from‌‌him.‌  ‌ he‌‌
  has‌‌
  the‌‌   personality‌‌   to‌‌
  file‌‌  a ‌‌petition‌‌ under‌‌ ‌Rule‌‌ 108‌‌ to‌‌ cancel‌‌ the‌‌ 
In‌‌the‌‌matter‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Intestate‌‌Estates‌‌of‌‌Delgado‌‌and‌‌Rustia‌  ‌ entry‌‌
  of‌‌
  marriage‌‌   between‌‌   Marinay‌‌   and‌‌   Maekara‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  civil‌‌ registry‌‌ 
In‌‌
  ‌Pilapil‌‌
  v.‌‌
  Ibay-Somera,‌‌   we‌‌ stated‌‌ that‌‌ divorce‌‌ and‌‌ its‌‌ legal‌‌ effects‌‌  on‌‌the‌‌basis‌‌of‌‌the‌‌decree‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Japanese‌‌Family‌‌Court.‌‌   ‌
In‌  ‌this‌  ‌jurisdiction,‌  ‌every‌  ‌intendment‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌leans‌  ‌toward‌‌  may‌  ‌be‌  ‌recognized‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines‌  ‌insofar‌  ‌as‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌is‌‌ 
legitimizing‌  ‌matrimony.‌  ‌Persons‌  ‌dwelling‌  ‌together‌  ‌apparently‌  ‌in‌‌  concerned‌‌   in‌‌
  view‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  nationality‌‌   principle‌‌   in‌‌ our‌‌ civil‌‌ law‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌  A‌  ‌recognition‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌foreign‌  ‌judgment‌‌   is‌‌
  NOT‌‌
  an‌‌
  action‌‌   to‌‌ 
marriage‌  ‌are‌  ‌presumed‌‌   to‌‌
  be‌‌
  in‌‌
  fact‌‌
  married.‌‌
  ‌Semper‌‌   praesumitur‌‌  status‌‌of‌‌persons.‌  ‌ nullify‌  ‌a ‌ ‌marriage.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌action‌  ‌for‌  ‌Philippine‌  ‌courts‌  ‌to‌‌ 
pro‌‌matrimonio‌.‌‌Always‌‌presume‌‌marriage.‌  ‌ recognize‌  ‌the‌‌
  effectivity‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌foreign‌‌
  judgment,‌‌
  which‌‌
  presupposes‌‌
  a ‌‌
Bayot‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ case‌‌which‌‌was‌‌already‌‌tried‌‌and‌‌decided‌‌under‌‌foreign‌‌law.‌  ‌
Marriages‌‌Celebrated‌‌Abroad‌  ‌
The‌  ‌fact‌  ‌that‌  ‌Rebecca‌  ‌was‌  ‌clearly‌  ‌an‌  ‌American‌  ‌citizen‌  ‌when‌  ‌she‌‌ 
⭐‌Republic‌‌v.‌‌Manalo‌‌2
‌ 018‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
ART‌  ‌26‌. ‌ ‌All‌  ‌marriages‌  ‌solemnized‌  ‌outside‌  ‌the‌‌  Philippines,‌‌  in‌‌  secured‌‌   the‌‌ divorce‌‌ and‌‌ that‌‌ divorce‌‌ is‌‌ recognized‌‌ and‌‌ allowed‌‌ in‌‌ any‌‌ 
accordance‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌laws‌  ‌in‌  ‌force‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌country‌  ‌where‌  ‌they‌‌  of‌  ‌the‌  ‌States‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Union,‌  ‌the‌  ‌presentation‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌copy‌  ‌of‌  ‌foreign‌‌  In‌‌this‌‌jurisdiction,‌‌the‌‌following‌‌rules‌‌exist:‌  ‌
were‌‌   solemnized,‌‌   and‌‌  valid‌‌
  there‌‌ as‌‌ such,‌‌ shall‌‌ also‌‌ be‌‌ valid‌‌ in‌‌  divorce‌  ‌decree‌  ‌duly‌  ‌authenticated‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌court‌  ‌issuing‌‌   said‌‌  1. Philippine‌‌
  law‌‌
  does‌‌
  not‌‌
  provide‌‌ for‌‌ absolute‌‌ divorce;‌‌ hence,‌‌ 
this‌‌
  country,‌‌  except‌‌
  those‌‌  prohibited‌‌ under‌‌ Articles‌‌ 35‌‌ (1),‌‌ (4),‌‌  decree‌‌is,‌‌as‌‌here,‌‌sufficient.‌  ‌ our‌‌courts‌‌cannot‌‌grant‌‌it.‌  ‌
(5)‌‌and‌‌(6),‌‌36,‌‌37‌‌and‌‌38.‌  ‌
Garcia‌‌v.‌‌Recio‌  ‌ 2. Consistent‌  ‌with‌  ‌Articles‌  ‌15‌  ‌and‌  ‌17,‌  ‌the‌  ‌marital‌  ‌bond‌‌ 
Where‌‌   a ‌‌marriage‌‌   between‌‌  a ‌‌Filipino‌‌  citizen‌‌
  and‌‌   a ‌‌foreigner‌‌ is‌‌  between‌  ‌two‌  ‌Filipinos‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌dissolved‌  ‌even‌  ‌by‌  ‌an‌‌ 
validly‌  ‌celebrated‌  ‌and‌  ‌a‌  ‌divorce‌  ‌is‌‌
  thereafter‌‌   validly‌‌   obtained‌‌  The‌  ‌divorce‌  ‌decree‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌governing‌  ‌personal‌  ‌law‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌alien‌  absolute‌‌divorce‌‌obtained‌‌abroad.‌  ‌
abroad‌‌   by‌‌  the‌‌
  alien‌‌  spouse‌‌
  capacitating‌‌   him‌‌
  or‌‌  her‌‌ to‌‌ remarry,‌‌  spouse‌‌   who‌‌  obtained‌‌   the‌‌  divorce‌‌  must‌‌  be‌‌  proven.‌‌  Our‌‌  courts‌‌ do‌‌ not‌‌ 
3. An‌  ‌absolute‌  ‌divorce‌  ‌obtained‌  ‌abroad‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌couple,‌  ‌who‌‌
  are‌‌ 
the‌  ‌Filipino‌  ‌spouse‌  ‌shall‌  ‌have‌  ‌capacity‌  ‌to‌  ‌remarry‌  ‌under‌‌  take‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌notice‌  ‌of‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌laws‌  ‌and‌  ‌judgments;‌  ‌hence,‌  ‌like‌  ‌any‌‌ 
both‌‌   aliens,‌‌
  may‌‌
  be‌‌
  recognized‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  Philippines,‌‌   provided‌‌ 
Philippine‌‌law.‌‌(A ‌ s‌‌amended‌‌by‌‌Executive‌‌Order‌‌227‌) ‌ ‌ other‌‌   facts,‌‌
  both‌‌
  the‌‌
  divorce‌‌   decree‌‌  and‌‌  the‌‌  national‌‌
  law‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  alien‌‌ 
it‌‌is‌‌consistent‌‌with‌‌their‌‌respective‌‌national‌‌laws.‌  ‌
must‌‌be‌‌alleged‌‌and‌‌proven‌‌according‌‌to‌‌our‌‌law‌‌on‌‌evidence.‌  ‌
Foreign‌‌Divorce‌  ‌ 4. In‌  ‌mixed‌‌   marriages‌‌   involving‌‌   a ‌‌Filipino‌‌
  and‌‌
  a ‌‌foreigner,‌‌   the‌‌ 
Ando‌‌v.‌‌DFA‌‌‌2014‌  ‌ former‌‌   is‌‌
  allowed‌‌   to‌‌
  contract‌‌  a ‌‌subsequent‌‌ marriage‌‌ in‌‌ case‌‌ 
Lavadia‌‌v.‌‌Heirs‌‌of‌‌Luna‌‌2
‌ 014‌  ‌ the‌‌   absolute‌‌   divorce‌‌   is‌‌
  validly‌‌  obtained‌‌  abroad‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌
  alien‌‌ 
With‌‌   respect‌‌   to‌‌
  her‌‌
  prayer‌‌
  for‌‌ the‌‌ recognition‌‌ of‌‌ her‌‌ second‌‌ marriage‌‌  spouse‌‌capacitating‌‌him‌‌or‌‌her‌‌to‌‌remarry.‌  ‌
Divorce‌  ‌between‌  ‌Filipinos‌  ‌is‌  ‌void‌  ‌and‌  ‌ineffectual‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌‌ 
as‌  ‌valid,‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌should‌  ‌have‌  ‌filed,‌  ‌instead,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌petition‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌ 
nationality‌‌rule‌‌adopted‌‌by‌‌Philippine‌‌law.‌‌   ‌
judicial‌‌recognition‌‌of‌‌her‌‌foreign‌‌divorce‌f‌ rom‌‌her‌‌first‌‌husband.‌  ‌ Based‌‌   on‌‌
  a ‌‌clear‌‌  and‌‌  plain‌‌
  reading‌‌   of‌‌
  ‌Paragraph‌‌   2 ‌‌of‌‌
  Article‌‌  26‌, ‌‌‌it‌‌ 
Republic‌‌v.‌‌Orbecido‌‌III‌  ‌ only‌  ‌requires‌  ‌that‌  ‌there‌  ‌be‌‌   a ‌‌divorce‌‌   validly‌‌
  obtained‌‌   abroad‌. ‌‌
Fujiki‌‌v.‌‌Marinay‌‌‌2013‌  ‌ The‌  ‌letter‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌demand‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌alien‌  ‌spouse‌‌ 
The‌‌   ‌reckoning‌‌   point‌‌   is‌‌
  not‌‌
  the‌‌
  citizenship‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ parties‌‌ at‌‌ the‌‌ time‌‌  should‌  ‌be‌  ‌the‌  ‌one‌  ‌who‌  ‌initiated‌  ‌the‌  ‌proceeding‌  ‌wherein‌  ‌the‌‌ 
The‌  ‌Rule‌  ‌on‌  ‌Declaration‌  ‌of‌  ‌Absolute‌  ‌Nullity‌  ‌of‌  ‌Void‌‌
  Marriages‌‌  and‌‌ 
of‌‌
  the‌‌  celebration‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  marriage,‌‌   but‌‌
  their‌‌
  ‌citizenship‌‌   at‌‌ the‌‌ time‌‌  divorce‌  ‌decree‌  ‌was‌  ‌granted.‌  ‌It‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌distinguish‌  ‌whether‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Annulment‌  ‌of‌  ‌Voidable‌  ‌Marriages‌  ‌(A.M.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌02-11-10-SC)‌‌   ‌does‌‌
  not‌‌ 
a‌‌
  valid‌‌ divorce‌‌ is‌‌ obtained‌‌ abroad‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ alien‌‌ spouse‌‌ capacitating‌‌  Filipino‌  ‌spouse‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌foreign‌‌ 
apply‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌petition‌‌
  to‌‌
  recognize‌‌   a ‌‌foreign‌‌
  judgment‌‌   relating‌‌   to‌‌ 
the‌‌latter‌‌to‌‌remarry.‌  ‌ divorce‌‌proceeding.‌  ‌
the‌‌ status‌‌ of‌‌ a‌‌ marriage‌‌ where‌‌ one‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ parties‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌citizen‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌
foreign‌‌country.‌‌   ‌
Llorente‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 149‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

Morisono‌‌v.‌‌Morisono‌‌‌2018‌‌‌reiterating‌M
‌ analo‌  ‌ Void‌‌Marriages‌  ‌ Psychological‌‌incapacity‌‌must‌‌be‌‌characterized‌‌by‌‌   ‌
Pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌Manalo‌, ‌ ‌foreign‌  ‌divorce‌  ‌decrees‌  ‌obtained‌  ‌to‌  ‌nullify‌‌  a) Gravity,‌  ‌the‌  ‌incapacity‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌grave‌‌   or‌‌
  serious‌‌   such‌‌  that‌‌ 
marriages‌  ‌between‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Filipino‌  ‌and‌  ‌an‌  ‌alien‌  ‌citizen‌  ‌may‌  ‌already‌  ‌be‌‌  1) Marriages‌‌that‌‌are‌‌Void‌a
‌ b‌‌initio‌  ‌ the‌  ‌party‌  ‌would‌  ‌be‌  ‌incapable‌  ‌of‌  ‌carrying‌  ‌out‌  ‌the‌‌
  ordinary‌‌ 
recognized‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌  ‌jurisdiction,‌  ‌regardless‌  ‌of‌  ‌who‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌‌  duties‌‌required‌‌in‌‌marriage;‌  ‌
spouses‌  ‌initiated‌  ‌the‌  ‌divorce;‌  ‌provided,‌  ‌of‌  ‌course,‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌party‌‌ 
ART‌  ‌35‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌following‌  ‌marriages‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌VOID‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌ 
petitioning‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌recognition‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌  ‌foreign‌  ‌divorce‌  ‌decree‌  ‌– ‌‌ beginning:‌  ‌ b) Juridical‌  ‌antecedence,‌‌   ‌it‌‌
  must‌‌
  be‌‌
  rooted‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  history‌‌
  of‌‌ 
presumably‌  ‌the‌  ‌Filipino‌  ‌citizen‌  ‌– ‌ ‌must‌  ‌prove‌  ‌the‌  ‌divorce‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌fact‌‌  1) Those‌  ‌contracted‌  ‌by‌  ‌any‌  ‌party‌  ‌below‌  ‌eighteen‌‌  the‌  ‌party‌  ‌antedating‌  ‌the‌  ‌marriage,‌  ‌although‌  ‌the‌  ‌overt‌‌ 
and‌‌demonstrate‌‌its‌‌conformity‌‌to‌‌the‌‌foreign‌‌law‌‌allowing‌‌it.‌  ‌ manifestations‌‌may‌‌emerge‌‌only‌‌after‌‌the‌‌marriage;‌‌and‌  ‌
years‌  ‌of‌  ‌age‌  ‌even‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌consent‌  ‌of‌  ‌parents‌  ‌or‌‌ 
guardians;‌  ‌ c) Incurability,‌  ‌it‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌incurable‌  ‌or,‌  ‌even‌  ‌if‌  ‌it‌  ‌were‌‌ 
Republic‌‌v.‌‌Cote‌‌‌2018‌  ‌
2) Those‌  ‌solemnized‌  ‌by‌  ‌any‌  ‌person‌  ‌not‌  ‌legally‌‌  otherwise,‌‌  the‌‌
  cure‌‌
  would‌‌ be‌‌ beyond‌‌ the‌‌ means‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ party‌‌ 
WON‌  ‌the‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌of‌  ‌A.M.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌02-11-10-SC‌  ‌applies‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌case‌‌  authorized‌  ‌to‌  ‌perform‌  ‌marriages‌  ‌unless‌  ‌such‌‌  involved.‌‌(S‌ antos‌‌v.‌‌CA‌) ‌ ‌
involving‌‌recognition‌‌of‌‌a‌‌foreign‌‌decree‌‌of‌‌divorce.‌  ‌ marriages‌  ‌were‌‌   contracted‌‌   with‌‌  either‌‌  or‌‌
  both‌‌
  parties‌‌  Macam‌‌v.‌‌Macam‌‌‌2014‌  ‌
believing‌  ‌in‌  ‌good‌  ‌faith‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌solemnizing‌  ‌officer‌‌ 
A.M.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌02-11-10-SC‌  ‌only‌  ‌covers‌  ‌void‌  ‌and‌‌
  voidable‌‌
  marriages‌‌  Any‌  ‌party‌  ‌may‌  ‌attack‌  ‌a ‌ ‌VOID‌  ‌marriage‌. ‌ ‌It‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌questioned‌  ‌even‌‌ 
had‌‌the‌‌legal‌‌authority‌‌to‌‌do‌‌so;‌  ‌
that‌‌are‌‌specifically‌‌cited‌‌and‌‌enumerated‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Family‌‌Code‌. ‌ ‌ beyond‌  ‌the‌‌   lifetime‌‌  of‌‌   the‌‌
  parties‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌   marriage.‌‌   Indeed,‌‌
  a ‌‌void‌‌ 
3) Those‌  ‌solemnized‌  ‌without‌  ‌license‌, ‌ ‌except‌  ‌those‌‌  marriage‌‌may‌‌be‌‌impugned‌‌either:‌‌   ‌
It‌  ‌was‌  ‌error‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌RTC‌  ‌to‌  ‌use‌  ‌as‌  ‌basis‌  ‌for‌  ‌denial‌  ‌of‌  ‌petitioner's‌‌  covered‌‌the‌‌preceding‌‌Chapter;‌  ‌
appeal‌‌   Section‌‌   20‌‌  of‌‌
  A.M.‌‌  No.‌‌  02-11-10-SC.‌‌   Since‌‌   Florie‌‌   followed‌‌ the‌‌  1) directly‌,‌‌by‌‌filing‌‌an‌‌action‌‌attacking‌‌the‌‌validity‌‌thereof;‌‌or‌‌   ‌
procedure‌  ‌for‌  ‌cancellation‌  ‌of‌  ‌entry‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌civil‌  ‌registry,‌  ‌an‌  ‌appeal‌‌  4) Those‌  ‌bigamous‌  ‌or‌  ‌polygamous‌  ‌marriages‌  ‌not‌‌ 
2) collaterally‌, ‌‌in‌‌   a ‌‌suit‌‌
  instituted‌‌  not‌‌
  to‌‌
  specifically‌‌  question‌‌ 
from‌‌   the‌‌
  RTC‌‌  decision‌‌   should‌‌   be‌‌
  governed‌‌   by‌‌  ‌Section‌‌   3 ‌‌of‌‌ Rule‌‌ 41‌‌  failing‌‌under‌‌Article‌‌41;‌  ‌
the‌  ‌same,‌  ‌but‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌  ‌determination‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌issue‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌‌ 
of‌‌the‌‌Rules‌‌of‌‌Court‌‌and‌n ‌ ot‌‌A.M.‌‌No.‌‌02-11-10-SC‌. ‌ ‌ 5) Those‌  ‌contracted‌‌   through‌‌
  ‌mistake‌‌  ‌of‌‌
  one‌‌
  contracting‌‌  validity‌  ‌is‌  ‌essential‌  ‌to‌‌   the‌‌
  resolution‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  controversy,‌‌   as‌‌ 
party‌‌as‌‌to‌‌the‌i‌ dentity‌‌of‌‌the‌‌other;‌‌and‌  ‌ in‌‌the‌‌case‌‌at‌‌bar.‌  ‌
Noveras‌‌v.‌‌Noveras‌‌‌2014‌  ‌
6) Those‌  ‌subsequent‌  ‌marriages‌  ‌that‌  ‌are‌  ‌void‌  ‌under‌‌ 
The‌‌  trial‌‌
  court‌‌   erred‌‌
  in‌‌ recognizing‌‌ the‌‌ divorce‌‌ decree‌‌ which‌‌ severed‌‌  Mallion‌‌v.‌‌Alcantara‌  ‌
Article‌‌53‌.  ‌‌ ‌
the‌  ‌bond‌  ‌of‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌  ‌parties.‌  ‌Only‌  ‌the‌  ‌divorce‌  ‌decree‌‌  A‌‌ previous‌‌ final‌‌ judgment‌‌ denying‌‌ a ‌‌petition‌‌ for‌‌ declaration‌‌ of‌‌ nullity‌‌ 
was‌  ‌presented‌  ‌in‌  ‌evidence.‌  ‌The‌  ‌required‌  ‌certificates‌  ‌to‌  ‌prove‌  ‌its‌‌  2) Psychological‌‌Incapacity‌  ‌ on‌  ‌the‌  ‌ground‌  ‌of‌  ‌psychological‌  ‌incapacity‌  ‌BARS‌  ‌a ‌ ‌subsequent‌‌ 
authenticity,‌  ‌as‌  ‌well‌  ‌as‌‌   the‌‌
  pertinent‌‌   California‌‌
  law‌‌  on‌‌  divorce‌‌  were‌‌  petition‌  ‌for‌  ‌declaration‌  ‌of‌  ‌nullity‌  ‌on‌‌
  the‌‌
  ground‌‌
  of‌‌
  lack‌‌
  of‌‌
  marriage‌‌ 
not‌  ‌presented.‌  ‌Absent‌  ‌a ‌ ‌valid‌  ‌recognition‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌divorce‌  ‌decree,‌  ‌it‌‌  ART‌‌  36‌. ‌‌A ‌‌marriage‌‌  contracted‌‌  by‌‌ any‌‌ party‌‌ who,‌‌ at‌‌ the‌‌ time‌‌ of‌‌  license.‌  ‌
follows‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌parties‌  ‌are‌  ‌still‌  ‌legally‌  ‌married‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌Philippines.‌‌  the‌  ‌celebration,‌  ‌was‌  ‌psychologically‌  ‌incapacitated‌  ‌to‌  ‌comply‌‌ 
The‌‌trial‌‌court‌‌thus‌‌erred‌‌in‌‌proceeding‌‌directly‌‌to‌‌liquidation.‌  ‌ with‌  ‌the‌  ‌essential‌  ‌marital‌  ‌obligations‌  ‌of‌  ‌marriage,‌  ‌shall‌‌  Chi‌‌Ming‌‌Tsoi‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
likewise‌  ‌be‌  ‌VOID‌  ‌even‌  ‌if‌  ‌such‌  ‌incapacity‌  ‌becomes‌  ‌manifest‌‌ 
Nullada‌‌v.‌‌the‌‌Civil‌‌Registrar‌‌of‌‌Manila‌‌‌2019‌  ‌ only‌‌after‌‌its‌‌solemnization.‌  ‌ One‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  essential‌‌  marital‌‌ obligations‌‌ under‌‌ the‌‌ Family‌‌ Code‌‌ is‌‌ "To‌‌ 
procreate‌  ‌children‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌‌   the‌‌
  universal‌‌  principle‌‌   that‌‌
  procreation‌‌ 
Applying‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌legal‌  ‌considerations‌‌   and‌‌
  considering‌‌   the‌‌
  similar‌‌  Meaning‌  ‌ of‌‌
  children‌‌   through‌‌
  sexual‌‌
  cooperation‌‌   is‌‌
  the‌‌
  basic‌‌
  end‌‌ of‌‌ marriage."‌‌ 
factual‌  ‌milieu‌  ‌that‌  ‌attended‌  ‌in‌  ‌Manalo‌, ‌‌the‌‌  present‌‌   case‌‌
  warrants‌‌   a ‌‌ Constant‌  ‌non-fulfillment‌  ‌of‌  ‌this‌  ‌obligation‌  ‌will‌  ‌finally‌  ‌destroy‌  ‌the‌‌ 
reversal‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌RTC's‌  ‌decision‌  ‌that‌  ‌refused‌  ‌to‌‌
  recognize‌‌   the‌‌
  divorce‌‌  "‌Psychological‌  ‌incapacity‌" ‌ ‌should‌  ‌refer‌  ‌to‌  ‌no‌  ‌less‌‌   than‌‌   a ‌‌mental‌‌ 
integrity‌‌or‌‌wholeness‌‌of‌‌the‌‌marriage.‌‌   ‌
decree‌  ‌that‌  ‌was‌  ‌mutually‌  ‌obtained‌  ‌by‌  ‌Marlyn‌  ‌and‌  ‌her‌  ‌foreigner‌‌  (not‌‌   physical)‌‌   incapacity‌‌  that‌‌   causes‌‌
  a ‌‌party‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ truly‌‌ incognitive‌‌ 
of‌‌
  the‌‌  basic‌‌ marital‌‌ covenants‌‌ that‌‌ concomitantly‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ assumed‌‌  In‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌‌
  at‌‌  bar,‌‌  ‌the‌‌
  senseless‌‌   and‌‌
  protracted‌‌  refusal‌‌   of‌‌
  one‌‌
  of‌‌ 
spouse‌  ‌in‌  ‌Japan‌  ‌solely‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌ground‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌divorce‌  ‌was‌  ‌jointly‌‌ 
and‌  ‌discharged‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌parties‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌which,‌  ‌as‌  ‌so‌‌  the‌   p
‌ arties‌   t
‌ o‌  f
‌ ulfill‌‌
  t he‌‌
  above‌‌   m arital‌‌
  obligation‌‌  is‌‌
  equivalent‌‌  
initiated‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ spouses.‌‌ The‌‌ Court‌‌ finds‌‌ no‌‌ reason‌‌ to‌‌ deviate‌‌ from‌‌ its‌‌ 
expressed‌  ‌by‌  ‌Article‌  ‌68‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Family‌  ‌Code,‌  ‌include‌  ‌their‌  ‌mutual‌‌  to‌ p
‌ sychological‌ i
‌ ncapacity‌ . ‌
  ‌
recent‌‌disposition‌‌on‌‌the‌‌issue,‌‌as‌‌made‌‌in‌M ‌ analo‌. ‌ ‌
obligations‌  ‌to‌  ‌live‌  ‌together,‌  ‌observe‌  ‌love,‌  ‌respect‌  ‌and‌‌   fidelity‌‌  and‌‌ 
render‌‌help‌‌and‌‌support.‌  ‌ Republic‌‌v.‌‌Molina‌  ‌

Requisites‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 150‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

must‌  ‌make‌  ‌it‌  ‌impossible‌  ‌for‌  ‌him‌  ‌or‌  ‌her‌  ‌to‌  ‌understand‌  ‌and,‌‌ 
Far‌‌
  from‌‌
  abandoning‌‌   ‌Molina‌, ‌‌the‌‌
  Court‌‌
  in‌‌
  ‌Te‌‌
  v.‌‌ Te‌‌ simply‌‌ suggested‌‌ 
1. The‌  ‌burden‌  ‌of‌  ‌proof‌  ‌to‌  ‌show‌  ‌the‌  ‌nullity‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌marriage‌‌  more‌  ‌important,‌  ‌to‌  ‌comply‌  ‌with‌  ‌his‌  ‌or‌  ‌her‌  ‌essential‌  ‌marital‌‌ 
the‌‌relaxation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌stringent‌‌requirements‌‌set‌‌forth‌‌therein.‌  ‌
belongs‌‌to‌‌the‌‌plaintiff.‌  ‌ obligations.‌  ‌

2. The‌‌root‌‌cause‌‌of‌‌the‌‌psychological‌‌incapacity‌‌must‌‌be‌  ‌ 3. A‌  ‌party‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌nullity‌  ‌case‌  ‌is‌  ‌still‌  ‌required‌  ‌to‌  ‌prove‌  ‌juridical‌‌  ⭐‌Tenebro‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
antecedence‌‌‌because‌‌it‌ ‌is‌‌an‌‌explicit‌‌requirement‌‌of‌‌the‌‌law.‌  ‌
a) medically‌‌or‌‌clinically‌‌identified,‌  ‌ The‌  ‌subsequent‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌declaration‌  ‌of‌  ‌nullity‌  ‌of‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌on‌‌ 
Proof‌  ‌of‌  ‌juridically‌  ‌antecedent‌  ‌psychological‌  ‌incapacity‌  ‌may‌‌  the‌‌  ground‌‌   of‌‌
  psychological‌‌   incapacity‌‌   does‌‌
  not‌‌   retroact‌‌  to‌‌
  the‌‌ 
b) alleged‌‌in‌‌the‌‌complaint,‌  ‌ consist‌  ‌of‌  ‌testimonies‌  ‌describing‌  ‌the‌  ‌environment‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌‌  date‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  celebration‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ marriage‌‌ insofar‌‌ as‌‌ the‌‌ Philippines’‌‌ 
supposedly‌  ‌incapacitated‌  ‌spouse‌  ‌lived‌  ‌that‌  ‌may‌‌  have‌‌
  led‌‌
  to‌‌
  a ‌ ‌ penal‌  ‌laws‌  ‌are‌  ‌concerned.‌  ‌As‌  ‌such,‌  ‌an‌  ‌individual‌  ‌who‌  ‌contracts‌  ‌a ‌‌
c) sufficiently‌‌proven‌‌by‌‌experts‌‌and‌  ‌
particular‌‌behavior.‌  ‌ second‌  ‌or‌  ‌subsequent‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌  ‌subsistence‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌valid‌‌ 
d) clearly‌‌explained‌‌in‌‌the‌‌decision.‌  ‌ marriage‌  ‌is‌  ‌criminally‌  ‌liable‌  ‌for‌  ‌bigamy,‌  ‌notwithstanding‌  ‌the‌‌ 
4. The‌  ‌third‌  ‌Molina‌  ‌guideline‌  ‌is‌  ‌amended.‌  ‌Psychological‌‌ 
3. The‌‌  incapacity‌‌
  must‌‌  be‌‌
  proven‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  existing‌‌
  at‌‌ “the‌‌ time‌‌ of‌‌  subsequent‌‌   declaration‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌   second‌‌
  marriage‌‌   is‌‌
  void‌‌
  ab‌‌
  initio‌‌ on‌‌ 
incapacity‌  ‌is‌  ‌incurable,‌  ‌not‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌medical,‌  ‌but‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌legal‌‌ 
the‌‌celebration”‌‌of‌‌the‌‌marriage.‌  ‌ the‌‌ground‌‌of‌‌psychological‌‌incapacity.‌  ‌
sense.‌‌   ‌
4. Such‌  ‌incapacity‌  ‌must‌  ‌also‌  ‌be‌  ‌shown‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌medically‌  ‌or‌‌  This‌  ‌means‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌incapacity‌  ‌is‌  ‌so‌  ‌enduring‌  ‌and‌  ‌persistent‌‌  Antonio‌‌v.‌‌Reyes‌‌‌✔ ‌ ‌
clinically‌‌permanent‌‌or‌‌incurable.‌‌   ‌ with‌‌ respect‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌ ‌specific‌‌ partner,‌‌ and‌‌ contemplates‌‌ a ‌ ‌situation‌‌ 
The‌  ‌Court‌  ‌had‌  ‌already‌  ‌held‌  ‌in‌  ‌Marcos‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Marcos‌  ‌that‌  ‌personal‌‌ 
5. Such‌  ‌illness‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌grave‌  ‌enough‌  ‌to‌  ‌bring‌  ‌about‌  ‌the‌‌  where‌  ‌the‌  ‌couple's‌  ‌respective‌  ‌personality‌  ‌structures‌  ‌are‌  ‌so‌‌ 
examination‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌   subject‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ physician‌‌ is‌‌ NOT‌‌ required‌‌ for‌‌ 
incompatible‌‌   and‌‌   antagonistic‌‌   that‌‌   the‌‌   only‌‌  result‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ union‌‌ 
disability‌‌   of‌‌   the‌‌   party‌‌   to‌‌   assume‌‌ the‌‌ essential‌‌ obligations‌‌ of‌‌  the‌‌spouse‌‌to‌‌be‌‌declared‌‌psychologically‌‌incapacitated‌. ‌ ‌
would‌  ‌be‌  ‌the‌  ‌inevitable‌  ‌and‌  ‌irreparable‌  ‌breakdown‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
marriage.‌  ‌
marriage.‌  ‌
6. The‌  ‌essential‌  ‌marital‌  ‌obligations‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌those‌  ‌embraced‌‌  Buenaventura‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
5. With‌  ‌respect‌  ‌to‌  ‌gravity‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌requirement‌  ‌is‌  ‌retained.‌  ‌The‌‌ 
by‌  ‌Articles‌  ‌68‌  ‌up‌  ‌to‌  ‌71‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Family‌  ‌Code‌  ‌as‌  ‌regards‌  ‌the‌‌  By‌  ‌declaring‌  ‌the‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌as‌  ‌psychologically‌  ‌incapacitated,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
husband‌‌   and‌‌   wife‌‌ as‌‌ well‌‌ as‌‌ Articles‌‌ 220,‌‌ 221‌‌ and‌‌ 225‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  psychological‌  ‌incapacity‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌mere‌  ‌"refusal,‌  ‌neglect,‌  ‌or‌‌ 
possibility‌‌   of‌‌   awarding‌‌   moral‌‌   damages‌‌   on‌‌  the‌‌
  same‌‌   set‌‌
  of‌‌
  facts‌‌   was‌‌ 
same‌‌Code‌‌in‌‌regard‌‌to‌‌parents‌‌and‌‌their‌‌children.‌  ‌ difficulty,‌‌   much‌‌   less‌‌   ill‌‌  will."‌‌   In‌‌ other‌‌ words,‌‌ it‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ shown‌‌ 
negated‌. ‌ ‌Since‌‌   psychological‌‌   incapacity‌‌   means‌‌   that‌‌
  one‌‌   is‌‌
  truly‌‌ 
that‌  ‌the‌  ‌incapacity‌‌   is‌‌  caused‌‌   by‌‌   a ‌‌‌genuinely‌‌   serious‌‌   psychic‌‌ 
7. Interpretations‌‌   given‌‌   by‌‌   the‌‌   National‌‌   Appellate‌‌   Matrimonial‌‌  incognitive‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌basic‌  ‌marital‌  ‌covenants‌  ‌that‌  ‌one‌  ‌must‌‌ 
cause‌. ‌ ‌
Tribunal‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌   Catholic‌‌   Church‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ Philippines,‌‌ while‌‌ not‌‌  assume‌  ‌and‌  ‌discharge‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌consequence‌  ‌of‌  ‌marriage,‌  ‌it‌‌ 
controlling‌‌   or‌‌   decisive,‌‌   should‌‌   be‌‌
  given‌‌ great‌‌ respect‌‌ by‌‌ our‌‌  6. The‌‌  p ersuasive‌‌   e ffect‌‌   o f‌‌
  the‌‌  d ecisions‌‌   o f‌‌
  the‌‌
  N ational‌‌   A ppellate‌‌  removes‌  ‌the‌  ‌basis‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌contention‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌petitioner‌‌ 
Matrimonial‌‌   Tribunal‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌   Catholic‌‌   Church‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Philippines‌‌  purposely‌  ‌deceived‌  ‌the‌  ‌private‌  ‌respondent.‌  ‌If‌  ‌the‌  ‌private‌‌ 
courts.‌  ‌
on‌‌nullity‌‌cases‌‌pending‌‌before‌‌secular‌‌courts‌‌is‌r‌ etained‌. ‌ ‌ respondent‌‌   was‌‌   deceived,‌‌   it‌‌ was‌‌ not‌‌ due‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌‌willful‌‌ act‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ part‌‌ of‌‌ 
8. The‌‌   trial‌‌
  court‌‌   must‌‌   order‌‌   the‌‌
  prosecuting‌‌ attorney‌‌ or‌‌ fiscal‌‌  the‌  ‌petitioner.‌  ‌Therefore,‌  ‌the‌  ‌award‌  ‌of‌  ‌moral‌  ‌damages‌  ‌was‌‌ 
While‌  ‌Article‌  ‌36‌‌   is‌‌   similarly‌‌   worded‌‌   to‌‌  the‌‌
  third‌‌  paragraph‌‌   of‌‌ 
and‌‌the‌‌Solicitor‌‌General‌‌to‌‌appear‌‌as‌‌counsel‌‌for‌‌the‌‌state.‌  ‌ without‌‌basis‌‌in‌‌law‌‌and‌‌in‌‌fact.‌  ‌
Canon‌  ‌1095,‌  ‌canonical‌  ‌decisions‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌second‌‌ 
paragraph‌‌   should‌‌   likewise‌‌   have‌‌   a ‌ ‌persuasive‌‌   effect‌‌  in‌‌ secular‌‌ 
NB:‌‌  Please‌  ‌note‌  ‌the‌  ‌2021‌  ‌En‌  ‌Banc‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌Tan-Andal‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Andal‌, ‌‌ Rumbaua‌‌v.‌‌Rumbaua‌  ‌
decisions‌‌on‌‌psychological‌‌incapacity.‌  ‌
penned‌‌by‌L ‌ eonen,‌‌J.‌‌‌Some‌‌notable‌‌pronouncements:‌  ‌
A.M.‌  ‌No.‌  ‌02-11-10-SC,‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌remedial‌  ‌measure,‌  ‌removed‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Ngo‌‌  Te‌‌
  v.‌‌
  Te‌‌
  as‌‌
  reiterated‌‌   in‌‌   ‌Azcueta‌‌   v.‌‌
  Republic‌‌ and‌‌ CA‌‌ and‌‌ ‌Halili‌‌ 
1. The‌‌
  plaintiff-spouse‌‌   must‌‌ prove‌‌ his‌‌ or‌‌ her‌‌ case‌‌ with‌‌ ‌clear‌‌ and‌‌  mandatory‌  ‌nature‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌OSG‌  ‌certification‌  ‌and‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌applied‌‌ 
convincing‌e‌ vidence.‌  ‌ v.‌‌Halili‌‌and‌‌Republic‌✔ ‌ ‌
retroactively‌  ‌to‌  ‌pending‌  ‌matters.‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌what‌  ‌is‌  ‌important‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Petitioner's‌  ‌behavioral‌  ‌pattern‌  ‌falls‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌classification‌  ‌of‌‌  presence‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌   prosecutor‌‌   in‌‌   the‌‌   case,‌‌  not‌‌   the‌‌
  remedial‌‌ requirement‌‌ 
2. The‌  ‌second‌  ‌Molina‌  ‌guideline‌  ‌is‌‌   abandoned.‌‌   Psychological‌‌ 
dependent‌  ‌personality‌  ‌disorder,‌  ‌and‌  ‌respondent's,‌  ‌that‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  that‌ h
‌ e‌ b
‌ e‌ c
‌ ertified‌ t
‌ o‌ b
‌ e‌ p
‌ resent.‌‌    ‌
incapacity‌‌   is‌‌  neither‌‌ a ‌‌mental‌‌ incapacity‌‌ nor‌‌ a ‌ ‌personality‌‌ 
narcissistic‌  ‌and‌  ‌antisocial‌  ‌personality‌  ‌disorder‌. ‌ ‌Both‌  ‌parties‌‌ 
disorder‌‌‌that‌‌must‌‌be‌‌proven‌‌through‌‌expert‌‌opinion.‌‌   ‌
being‌  ‌afflicted‌  ‌with‌  ‌grave,‌  ‌severe‌  ‌and‌  ‌incurable‌  ‌psychological‌‌  Kalaw‌‌v.‌‌Fernandez‌‌‌2015‌‌✔ ‌ ‌
There‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌proof,‌  ‌however,‌  ‌of‌  t‌ he‌  ‌durable‌  ‌or‌  ‌enduring‌‌  incapacity,‌‌the‌‌precipitous‌‌marriage‌‌is‌‌thus‌‌declared‌n ‌ ull‌‌and‌‌void.‌  ‌
aspects‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌person's‌‌ personality,‌‌ called‌‌ "personality‌‌ structure,"‌‌  In‌‌
  her‌‌
  Psychological‌‌   Evaluation‌‌   Report,‌‌   Dr.‌‌ Dayan‌‌ impressed‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ 
which‌  ‌manifests‌  ‌itself‌  ‌through‌  ‌clear‌  ‌acts‌  ‌of‌  ‌dysfunctionality‌‌  Ting‌‌v.‌‌Velez-Ting‌  ‌ respondent‌   h
‌ ad‌   “
‌ c
‌ ompulsive‌   a
‌ nd‌   d
‌ ependent‌   ‌tendencies‌” ‌ ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
that‌‌
  undermines‌‌   the‌‌
  family.‌‌   The‌‌   spouse's‌‌ personality‌‌ structure‌‌  extent‌ o
‌ f‌ b
‌ eing‌ “
‌ relationship‌ d
‌ ependent.”‌   ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 151‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

7) Between‌‌   an‌‌
  adopted‌‌
  child‌‌ and‌‌ a ‌‌‌legitimate‌‌ ‌child‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
necessary‌  ‌before‌  ‌a ‌ ‌subsequent‌  ‌one‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌legally‌  ‌contracted‌. ‌‌
The‌  ‌frequency‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  respondent’s‌‌
  mahjong‌‌   playing‌‌   should‌‌  not‌‌
  have‌‌  adopter;‌  ‌
One‌  ‌who‌  ‌enters‌  ‌into‌  ‌a ‌ ‌subsequent‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌without‌  ‌first‌‌
  obtaining‌‌ 
delimited‌  ‌our‌  ‌determination‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌presence‌  ‌or‌  ‌absence‌  ‌of‌‌  8) Between‌‌adopted‌‌children‌‌of‌‌the‌‌same‌‌adopter;‌‌and‌  ‌ such‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌declaration‌  ‌is‌  ‌guilty‌  ‌of‌  ‌bigamy.‌‌
  This‌‌
  principle‌‌
  applies‌‌ 
psychological‌  ‌incapacity.‌  ‌Instead,‌  ‌the‌  ‌determinant‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌her‌‌  even‌‌if‌‌the‌‌earlier‌‌union‌‌is‌‌characterized‌‌by‌‌statute‌‌as‌‌“void.”‌  ‌
obvious‌  ‌failure‌  ‌to‌  ‌fully‌  ‌appreciate‌  ‌the‌  ‌duties‌  ‌and‌‌  9) Between‌  ‌parties‌  ‌where‌  ‌one,‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌intention‌  ‌to‌‌ 
responsibilities‌  ‌of‌  ‌parenthood‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌she‌  ‌made‌  ‌her‌  ‌marital‌‌  marry‌  ‌the‌  ‌other,‌  ‌killed‌  ‌that‌‌
  other‌‌
  person's‌‌
  spouse,‌‌
  or‌‌ 
Nicdao‌‌Cariño‌‌v.‌‌Cariño‌  ‌
vows.‌  ‌ his‌‌or‌‌her‌‌own‌‌spouse.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌between‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌Susan‌  ‌Nicdao‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌deceased,‌‌ 
Vinas‌‌v.‌‌Parel-Vinas‌‌2
‌ 015‌  ‌ 5) Imprescriptibility‌‌of‌‌Action‌‌to‌  having‌‌   been‌‌  solemnized‌‌   without‌‌
  the‌‌
  necessary‌‌ marriage‌‌ license,‌‌ and‌‌ 
Declare‌‌Nullity‌‌of‌‌Marriage‌  ‌ not‌  ‌being‌  ‌one‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌marriages‌  ‌exempt‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌license‌‌ 
The‌  ‌lack‌  ‌of‌  ‌personal‌  ‌examination‌  ‌or‌  ‌assessment‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  requirement,‌‌is‌‌undoubtedly‌v ‌ oid‌‌ab‌‌initio.‌  ‌
respondent‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌‌psychologist‌‌   or‌‌
  psychiatrist‌‌   is‌‌
  ‌not‌‌
  necessarily‌‌  ART‌  ‌39‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌action‌  ‌or‌  ‌defense‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌  declaration‌‌  of‌‌  absolute‌‌ 
fatal‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌petition‌‌  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  declaration‌‌   of‌‌
  nullity‌‌   of‌‌
  marriage.‌‌   “If‌‌  nullity‌‌of‌‌a‌‌marriage‌‌shall‌‌not‌‌prescribe‌. ‌ ‌ Accordingly,‌  ‌the‌  ‌declaration‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌instant‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌nullity‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
the‌  ‌totality‌  ‌of‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌presented‌  ‌is‌  ‌enough‌  ‌to‌  ‌sustain‌  ‌a ‌ ‌finding‌‌
  of‌‌  previous‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌deceased‌  ‌and‌  ‌Susan‌  ‌Nicdao‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌‌ 
psychological‌  ‌incapacity,‌  ‌then‌  ‌actual‌  ‌medical‌  ‌examination‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  Niñal‌‌v.‌‌Bayadog‌,‌‌supra‌  ‌ validate‌‌  the‌‌  second‌‌   marriage‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ deceased‌‌ with‌‌ Susan‌‌ Yee.‌‌ The‌‌ fact‌‌ 
person‌‌concerned‌‌need‌‌not‌‌be‌‌resorted‌‌to.”‌  ‌ The‌  ‌law‌  ‌makes‌  ‌either‌  ‌the‌  ‌action‌  ‌or‌  ‌defense‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌declaration‌  ‌of‌‌  remains‌‌   that‌‌   their‌‌
  marriage‌‌   was‌‌ solemnized‌‌ without‌‌ first‌‌ obtaining‌‌ a ‌‌
absolute‌‌   nullity‌‌
  of‌‌
  marriage‌‌   imprescriptible.‌‌   Corollarily,‌‌   if‌‌
  the‌‌
  death‌‌  judicial‌  ‌decree‌  ‌declaring‌  ‌the‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌of‌  ‌Susan‌  ‌Nicdao‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌ 
deceased‌‌   void.‌‌   Hence,‌‌
  the‌‌
  marriage‌‌   of‌‌
  Susan‌‌
  Yee‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ deceased‌‌ is,‌‌ 
3) Incestuous‌‌Marriage‌  ‌ of‌‌
  either‌‌
  party‌‌
  would‌‌  extinguish‌‌   the‌‌ cause‌‌ of‌‌ action‌‌ or‌‌ the‌‌ ground‌‌ for‌‌ 
defense,‌‌then‌‌the‌‌same‌‌cannot‌‌be‌‌considered‌‌imprescriptible.‌  ‌ likewise‌,‌‌void‌‌ab‌‌initio‌. ‌ ‌
ART‌  ‌37‌. ‌ ‌Marriages‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌  ‌following‌  ‌are‌  ‌incestuous‌  ‌and‌‌ 
void‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌beginning,‌  ‌whether‌  ‌relationship‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌‌  Montañez‌‌v.‌‌Cipriano‌‌‌2012‌  ‌
6) Bigamous‌‌Marriage‌‌Under‌‌Art‌‌40‌  ‌
parties‌‌be‌‌legitimate‌‌or‌‌illegitimate:‌  ‌ Whether‌  ‌or‌  ‌not‌  ‌the‌  ‌RTC‌  ‌erred‌  ‌in‌  ‌quashing‌  ‌the‌  ‌Information‌  ‌for‌‌ 
1) Between‌  ‌ascendants‌  ‌and‌  ‌descendants‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌degree;‌‌  ART‌  ‌40‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌absolute‌  ‌nullity‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌previous‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌‌  bigamy‌‌filed‌‌against‌‌respondent.‌  ‌
and‌  ‌ invoked‌  ‌for‌  ‌purposes‌  ‌of‌  ‌remarriage‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌basis‌  ‌solely‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌
final‌‌judgment‌‌‌declaring‌‌such‌‌previous‌‌marriage‌‌void.‌  ‌ YES‌. ‌‌‌Here,‌‌ at‌‌ the‌‌ time‌‌ respondent‌‌ contracted‌‌ the‌‌ second‌‌ marriage,‌‌ the‌‌ 
2) Between‌  ‌brothers‌  ‌and‌  ‌sisters,‌  ‌whether‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌full‌  ‌or‌‌  first‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌was‌  ‌still‌  ‌subsisting‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌had‌  ‌not‌  ‌yet‌  ‌been‌  ‌legally‌‌ 
half‌‌blood.‌  ‌ Article‌‌40‌‌and‌‌the‌‌crime‌‌of‌‌Bigamy‌  ‌ dissolved.‌  ‌In‌  ‌Atienza‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Brillantes,‌  ‌Jr.‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌Court‌  ‌already‌‌  made‌‌   the‌‌ 
For‌‌ a ‌‌person‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ convicted‌‌ of‌‌ ‌bigamy‌, ‌‌the‌‌ following‌‌ elements‌‌  declaration‌‌   that‌‌
  Article‌‌   40,‌‌
  which‌‌   a ‌‌rule‌‌ of‌‌ procedure,‌ ‌should‌‌ be‌‌ 
  is‌‌
4) Void‌‌Marriage‌‌for‌‌Reason‌‌of‌‌Public‌‌Policy‌  ‌ applied‌‌retroactively‌. ‌ ‌
must‌‌concur:‌‌   ‌
ART‌  ‌38‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌following‌  ‌marriages‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌void‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌  1) that‌‌the‌‌offender‌‌has‌‌been‌‌legally‌‌married;‌  ‌ Capili‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌2
‌ 013‌  ‌
beginning‌‌for‌‌reasons‌‌of‌‌public‌‌policy:‌  ‌
2) that‌  ‌the‌  ‌first‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌has‌  ‌not‌‌  been‌‌   legally‌‌
  dissolved‌‌  Whether‌  ‌or‌  ‌not‌  ‌the‌  ‌subsequent‌  ‌declaration‌  ‌of‌  ‌nullity‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  second‌‌ 
1) Between‌  ‌collateral‌  ‌blood‌  ‌relatives‌‌
  whether‌‌
  legitimate‌‌  or,‌  ‌in‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌absentee‌  ‌spouse,‌  ‌the‌  ‌absent‌  ‌spouse‌‌  marriage‌‌is‌‌a‌‌ground‌‌for‌‌dismissal‌‌of‌‌the‌‌criminal‌‌case‌‌for‌‌bigamy.‌  ‌
or‌‌illegitimate,‌‌up‌‌to‌‌the‌‌‌fourth‌c‌ ivil‌‌degree;‌  ‌ could‌  ‌not‌  ‌yet‌  ‌be‌  ‌presumed‌  ‌dead‌  ‌according‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
provisions‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Civil‌‌Code;‌‌   ‌ NO‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌subsequent‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌declaration‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  second‌‌
  marriage‌‌   for‌‌ 
2) Between‌‌step-parents‌‌and‌‌step-children;‌  ‌
3) that‌  ‌the‌  ‌offender‌  ‌contracts‌  ‌a ‌ ‌second‌  ‌or‌  ‌subsequent‌‌  being‌  ‌bigamous‌  ‌in‌‌
  nature‌‌
  does‌‌   not‌‌
  bar‌‌
  the‌‌
  prosecution‌‌   of‌‌
  petitioner‌‌ 
3) Between‌‌parents-in-law‌‌and‌‌children-in-law;‌  ‌ for‌‌the‌‌crime‌‌of‌‌bigamy.‌  ‌
marriage;‌‌and‌  ‌
4) Between‌‌the‌‌adopting‌‌parent‌‌and‌‌the‌‌adopted‌‌child;‌  ‌
4) that‌  ‌the‌  ‌second‌  ‌or‌  ‌subsequent‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌has‌  ‌all‌  ‌the‌‌  People‌‌v.‌‌Odtuhan‌‌‌2013‌  ‌
5) Between‌  ‌the‌  ‌surviving‌  ‌spouse‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌adopting‌‌
  parent‌‌  essential‌‌requisites‌‌for‌‌validity.‌  ‌
and‌‌the‌‌adopted‌‌child;‌  ‌ Settled‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌rule‌  ‌that‌  ‌criminal‌  ‌culpability‌  ‌attaches‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌
  offender‌‌ 
Mercado‌‌v.‌‌Tan‌‌‌and‌I‌ wasawa‌‌v.‌‌Custodio‌‌Gangan‌‌2
‌ 013‌  ‌ upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌commission‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌offense‌  ‌and‌  ‌from‌‌   that‌‌
  instant,‌‌  liability‌‌ 
6) Between‌‌  the‌‌ surviving‌‌ spouse‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ adopted‌‌ child‌‌ and‌‌  appends‌  ‌to‌  ‌him‌  ‌until‌  ‌extinguished‌  ‌as‌  ‌provided‌  ‌by‌  ‌law‌  ‌and‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌ 
A‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌declaration‌  ‌of‌  ‌nullity‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌previous‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌is‌‌ 
the‌‌adopter;‌  ‌ time‌  ‌of‌  ‌filing‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌criminal‌  ‌complaint‌  ‌or‌  ‌information‌  ‌is‌  ‌material‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 152‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

There‌‌
  are‌‌
  four‌‌
  (4)‌‌
  requisites‌‌  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  declaration‌‌
  of‌‌ presumptive‌‌ death‌‌  Judicial‌‌
  Declaration‌‌   of‌‌
  Presumptive‌‌ Death‌‌ NOT‌‌ 
only‌‌for‌‌determining‌‌prescription.‌  ‌
under‌‌Article‌‌41‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Family‌‌Code:‌  ‌ required‌‌prior‌‌to‌‌effectivity‌‌of‌‌Family‌‌Code‌  ‌
Sarto‌‌y‌‌Misalucha‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌‌2018‌  ‌ 1. That‌  ‌the‌‌
  absent‌‌   spouse‌‌
  ‌has‌‌   been‌‌   missing‌‌   for‌‌
  4 ‌‌consecutive‌‌  Valdez‌‌v.‌‌Republic‌  ‌
years,‌  ‌or‌  ‌2 ‌ ‌consecutive‌‌   years‌‌   ‌if‌‌
  the‌‌
  disappearance‌‌   occurred‌‌ 
Redante‌‌   admitted‌‌   that‌‌
  he‌‌
  had‌‌ contracted‌‌ two‌‌ marriages.‌‌ He,‌‌ however,‌‌  For‌‌  the‌‌
  purposes‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌
  civil‌‌ marriage‌‌ law,‌‌ it‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ necessary‌‌ to‌‌ have‌‌ 
where‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌danger‌  ‌of‌  ‌death‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌laid‌‌ 
put‌  ‌forth‌  ‌the‌  ‌defense‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌termination‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌first‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌‌ the‌‌  former‌‌   spouse‌‌   judicially‌‌ declared‌‌ an‌‌ absentee‌. ‌‌The‌‌ declaration‌‌ of‌‌ 
down‌‌in‌‌Article‌‌391,‌‌Civil‌‌Code;‌  ‌
result‌‌of‌‌the‌d ‌ ivorce‌o ‌ btained‌‌abroad‌‌by‌‌his‌‌alien‌‌spouse.‌  ‌ absence‌‌ made‌‌ in‌‌ accordance‌‌ with‌‌ the‌‌ provisions‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Civil‌‌ Code‌‌ has‌‌ 
2. That‌‌the‌‌present‌‌spouse‌‌wishes‌‌to‌r‌ emarry‌; ‌ ‌ for‌  ‌its‌  ‌sole‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌to‌  ‌enable‌  ‌the‌  ‌taking‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌necessary‌‌ 
Since‌  ‌neither‌  ‌the‌  ‌divorce‌  ‌decree‌  ‌nor‌  ‌the‌  ‌alleged‌  ‌Canadian‌  ‌law‌  ‌was‌‌  precautions‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌   administration‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  estate‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  absentee‌. ‌‌For‌‌ 
3. That‌  ‌the‌  ‌present‌  ‌spouse‌  ‌has‌  ‌a ‌ ‌well-founded‌  ‌belief‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌ 
satisfactorily‌  ‌demonstrated,‌  ‌the‌  ‌type‌‌   of‌‌
  divorce‌‌   supposedly‌‌   secured‌‌  the‌‌celebration‌‌of‌‌civil‌‌marriage,‌‌however,‌‌the‌‌law‌‌only‌‌requires‌  ‌
absentee‌‌is‌‌dead;‌‌and‌  ‌
could‌‌  not‌‌  be‌‌ ascertained.‌‌ As‌‌ such,‌‌ Redante‌‌ failed‌‌ to‌‌ prove‌‌ his‌‌ defense‌‌  1. that‌  ‌the‌  ‌former‌  ‌spouse‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌absent‌  ‌for‌  ‌seven‌‌ 
that‌‌
  he‌‌
  had‌‌   the‌‌
  capacity‌‌  to‌‌
  remarry‌‌ when‌‌ he‌‌ contracted‌‌ a ‌‌subsequent‌‌  4. That‌‌
  the‌‌
  present‌‌
  spouse‌‌
  ‌files‌‌
  a ‌‌summary‌‌
  proceeding‌‌
  for‌‌ the‌‌  consecutive‌‌years‌‌‌at‌‌the‌‌time‌‌of‌‌the‌‌second‌‌marriage,‌‌   ‌
marriage‌‌   to‌‌  Fe.‌‌
  ‌His‌‌
  liability‌‌  for‌‌
  bigamy‌‌   is,‌‌ therefore,‌‌ now‌‌ beyond‌‌  declaration‌‌of‌‌presumptive‌‌death‌‌of‌‌the‌‌absentee.‌  ‌
question‌. ‌ ‌ 2. that‌  ‌the‌  ‌spouse‌  ‌present‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌know‌  ‌his‌  ‌or‌  ‌her‌  ‌former‌‌ 
Republic‌‌v.‌‌Nolasco‌  ‌ spouse‌‌to‌‌be‌‌living,‌‌   ‌
No‌‌retroactive‌‌effect‌‌for‌‌Article‌‌40‌  ‌ Nolasco‌‌ ‌failed‌‌ ‌to‌‌ conduct‌‌ a ‌‌search‌‌ for‌‌ his‌‌ missing‌‌ wife‌‌ with‌‌ such‌‌  3. that‌‌such‌‌former‌‌spouse‌‌is‌‌generally‌‌reputed‌‌to‌‌be‌‌dead‌‌and‌‌   ‌
diligence‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌give‌  ‌rise‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌"well-founded‌  ‌belief"‌  ‌that‌  ‌she‌  ‌is‌‌  4. the‌‌  spouse‌‌
  present‌‌
  so‌‌
  believes‌‌
  at‌‌
  the‌‌ time‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ celebration‌‌ 
Castillo‌‌v.‌‌De‌‌Leon-Castillo‌,‌‌supra‌‌2
‌ 016‌  ‌
dead‌. ‌ ‌ of‌‌the‌‌marriage.‌  ‌
We‌  ‌find‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Family‌  ‌Code‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌‌ 
retroactively‌‌   applied‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌ present‌‌ case,‌‌ for‌‌ to‌‌ do‌‌ so‌‌ would‌‌ prejudice‌‌  When‌  ‌he‌  ‌arrived‌  ‌in‌  ‌San‌  ‌Jose,‌  ‌Antique‌  ‌after‌  ‌learning‌  ‌of‌  ‌Janet's‌‌  Under‌‌   the‌‌
  Civil‌‌
  Code,‌‌
  ‌the‌‌
  presumption‌‌   of‌‌ death‌‌ is‌‌ established‌‌ by‌‌ 
the‌‌vested‌‌rights‌‌‌of‌‌petitioner‌‌and‌‌of‌‌her‌‌children.‌‌   ‌ departure,‌  ‌instead‌  ‌of‌  ‌seeking‌  ‌the‌  ‌help‌  ‌of‌  ‌local‌  ‌authorities‌  ‌or‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌  law‌‌
  and‌‌   no‌‌
  court‌‌
  declaration‌‌  is‌‌
  needed‌‌  for‌‌
  the‌‌  presumption‌‌   to‌‌ 
British‌  ‌Embassy,‌  ‌he‌  ‌secured‌  ‌another‌  ‌seaman's‌‌   contract‌‌   and‌‌
  went‌‌   to‌‌  arise‌. ‌ ‌
The‌  ‌subsequent‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌of‌  ‌Lea‌  ‌to‌  ‌Renato‌  ‌is‌  ‌valid‌  ‌in‌  ‌view‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
London,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌vast‌  ‌city‌  ‌of‌‌
  many‌‌   millions‌‌  of‌‌
  inhabitants,‌‌   to‌‌  look‌‌
  for‌‌  her‌‌ 
invalidity‌‌   of‌‌
  her‌‌ first‌‌ marriage‌‌ to‌‌ Bautista‌‌ because‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ absence‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌
there.‌  ‌We‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌consider‌  ‌that‌  ‌walking‌  ‌into‌  ‌a ‌ ‌major‌  ‌city‌  ‌like‌  Matias‌‌v.‌‌Republic‌‌‌2018‌  ‌
marriage‌‌   license.‌‌   That‌‌  there‌‌  was‌‌  no‌‌  judicial‌‌   declaration‌‌  that‌‌ the‌‌ first‌‌ 
Liverpool‌  ‌or‌  ‌London‌‌   with‌‌
  a ‌‌simple‌‌
  hope‌‌   of‌‌  somehow‌‌   bumping‌‌   into‌‌ 
marriage‌  ‌was‌  ‌void‌  ‌ab‌  ‌initio‌  ‌before‌  ‌the‌  ‌second‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌was‌‌  The‌‌   ‌petition‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ declaration‌‌ of‌‌ presumptive‌‌ death‌‌ filed‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ 
one‌  ‌particular‌  ‌person‌  ‌there‌‌   — ‌‌which‌‌  is‌‌
  in‌‌  effect‌‌
  what‌‌
  Nolasco‌‌   says‌‌ 
contracted‌‌   is‌‌
  immaterial‌‌   as‌‌
  this‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌  a ‌‌requirement‌‌   under‌‌  the‌‌
  Civil‌‌  petitioner‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌an‌  ‌authorized‌  ‌suit‌  ‌and‌  ‌should‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌‌ 
he‌‌did‌‌—‌‌can‌‌be‌‌regarded‌‌as‌‌a‌‌reasonably‌‌diligent‌‌search.‌  ‌
Code.‌‌   ‌ dismissed‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌
  RTC‌‌  because‌‌ petitioner‌‌ was‌‌ not‌‌ seeking‌‌ to‌‌ remarry.‌‌ 
Republic‌‌v.‌‌Espinosa‌‌Cantor‌‌‌2013‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌ A‌  ‌reading‌  ‌of‌  ‌Article‌  ‌41‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌FC‌  ‌shows‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌presumption‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Vitangcol‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌‌2016‌‌Leonen,‌‌J ‌ ‌ death‌‌   established‌‌   therein‌‌ is‌‌ ONLY‌‌ applicable‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ purpose‌‌ of‌‌ 
The‌  ‌Family‌  ‌Code‌‌
  was‌‌
  explicit‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌
  court’s‌‌
  judgment‌‌
  in‌‌
  summary‌‌  contracting‌‌a‌‌valid‌‌subsequent‌‌marriage‌‌‌under‌‌the‌‌said‌‌law.‌  ‌
Persons‌  ‌intending‌  ‌to‌  ‌contract‌‌  a ‌‌second‌‌   marriage‌‌   must‌‌   first‌‌
  secure‌‌   a ‌‌
proceedings,‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌declaration‌  ‌of‌  ‌presumptive‌  ‌death‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌‌ 
judicial‌  ‌declaration‌  ‌of‌  ‌nullity‌‌
  of‌‌  their‌‌
  first‌‌
  marriage.‌‌   If‌‌
  they‌‌
  proceed‌‌ 
absent‌  ‌spouse‌  ‌under‌  ‌Article‌  ‌41‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Family‌  ‌Code,‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌  Republic‌‌v.‌‌Catubag‌‌‌2018‌  ‌
with‌  ‌the‌  ‌second‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌without‌  ‌the‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌declaration,‌  ‌they‌  ‌are‌‌ 
immediately‌  ‌final‌  ‌and‌  ‌executory‌. ‌ ‌Modification‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌court’s‌‌ 
guilty‌  ‌of‌  ‌bigamy‌  ‌regardless‌  ‌of‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌nullity‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌first‌‌  Since‌‌
  what‌‌
  is‌‌
  involved‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌ instant‌‌ case‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌petition‌‌ for‌‌ declaration‌‌ 
ruling,‌‌  no‌‌
  matter‌‌
  how‌‌  erroneous,‌‌   is‌‌  no‌‌
  longer‌‌
  permissible.‌‌  The‌‌ final‌‌ 
marriage.‌‌   ‌ of‌‌
  presumptive‌‌   death,‌‌
  the‌‌  relevant‌‌  provisions‌‌ of‌‌ law‌‌ are‌‌ ‌Articles‌‌ 41,‌‌ 
and‌‌
  executory‌‌ nature‌‌ of‌‌ this‌‌ summary‌‌ proceeding‌‌ thus‌‌ ‌prohibits‌‌ the‌‌ 
resort‌‌to‌‌appeal.‌(‌ ‌Republic‌‌v.‌‌Bermudez-Lorino‌,‌‌Republic‌‌v.‌‌Tango‌) ‌ ‌ 238,‌  ‌and‌  ‌253‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Family‌  ‌Code.‌  ‌These‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌explicitly‌‌ 
Mere‌  ‌presentation‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌certification‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌civil‌  ‌registrar‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌ 
provide‌‌that‌‌actions‌‌for‌‌presumptive‌‌death‌‌are‌s ‌ ummary‌i‌ n‌‌nature.‌  ‌
marriage‌  ‌license‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌found‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌enough‌  ‌to‌  ‌discharge‌  ‌the‌‌ 
The‌  ‌law‌  ‌did‌  ‌not‌  ‌define‌  ‌what‌‌   is‌‌
  meant‌‌   by‌‌  “‌well-founded‌‌   belief.‌” ‌‌
burden‌‌of‌‌proving‌‌that‌‌no‌‌such‌‌marriage‌‌license‌‌was‌‌issued.‌  ‌
To‌‌
  be‌‌
  able‌‌  to‌‌  comply‌‌ with‌‌ this‌‌ requirement,‌‌ the‌‌ present‌‌ spouse‌‌ must‌‌  Parties‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌seek‌  ‌reconsideration,‌  ‌nor‌  ‌appeal‌  ‌decisions‌  ‌in‌‌ 
prove‌‌   that‌‌
  his/her‌‌   belief‌‌
  was‌‌  the‌‌  result‌‌  of‌‌
  ‌diligent‌‌
  and‌‌ reasonable‌‌  summary‌‌   judicial‌‌
  proceedings‌‌   under‌‌   the‌‌ Family‌‌ Code.‌‌ Petitioner's‌‌ 
7) Judicial‌‌Declaration‌‌of‌‌Presumptive‌‌Death‌  ‌ efforts‌‌   and‌‌   inquiries‌‌   to‌‌
  locate‌‌
  the‌‌  absent‌‌   spouse‌‌
  and‌‌
  that‌‌ based‌‌ on‌‌  resort‌‌
  to‌‌
  certiorari‌‌
  under‌‌
  ‌Rule‌‌
  65‌‌
  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌  Rules‌‌
  of‌‌
  Court‌‌
  to‌‌
  challenge‌‌ 
these‌  ‌efforts‌  ‌and‌  ‌inquiries,‌  ‌he/she‌  ‌believes‌  ‌that‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌‌  the‌‌RTC's‌‌Order‌‌declaring‌‌Shanaviv‌‌presumptively‌‌dead‌‌was‌p ‌ roper‌. ‌ ‌
Requisites‌  ‌
circumstances,‌  ‌the‌  ‌absent‌  ‌spouse‌  ‌is‌  ‌already‌  ‌dead.‌  ‌It‌  ‌requires‌‌ 
exertion‌‌of‌‌active‌‌effort‌‌(not‌‌a‌‌mere‌‌passive‌‌one)‌. ‌ ‌ Santos‌‌v.‌‌Santos‌‌‌2014‌‌Leonen,‌‌J‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 153‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

2) The‌  ‌property‌  ‌relations‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌dissolved‌  ‌and‌‌  Elmer‌‌Bermudo‌‌v.‌‌CA‌‌‌2013‌  ‌


The‌  ‌proper‌  ‌remedy‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌judicial‌  ‌declaration‌  ‌of‌  ‌presumptive‌  ‌death‌‌ 
liquidated,‌  ‌but‌  ‌if‌  ‌either‌  ‌spouse‌  ‌contracted‌  ‌said‌‌ 
obtained‌‌   by‌‌
  extrinsic‌‌   fraud‌‌   an‌ action‌‌ to‌‌ annul‌‌ the‌‌ judgment‌. ‌‌
  is‌‌   ‌vitiated‌‌
Petitioner’s‌  ‌claim‌  ‌of‌‌   consent‌  ‌as‌‌  a ‌‌result‌‌  of‌‌  the‌‌  force‌‌  and‌‌ 
marriage‌  ‌in‌  ‌bad‌  ‌faith‌, ‌ ‌his‌  ‌or‌  ‌her‌  ‌share‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌net‌‌ 
An‌  ‌affidavit‌  ‌of‌  ‌reappearance‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌the‌  ‌proper‌  ‌remedy‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌‌  profits‌‌shall‌‌be‌f‌ orfeited‌i‌ n‌‌favor‌‌of‌‌   ‌ intimidation‌  ‌employed‌  ‌by‌  ‌respondent’s‌  ‌friends‌  ‌in‌  ‌obtaining‌  ‌his‌‌ 
person‌‌declared‌‌presumptively‌‌dead‌‌has‌‌never‌‌been‌‌absent.‌  ‌ agreement‌‌to‌‌his‌‌marriage‌‌with‌‌respondent‌‌has‌‌no‌‌merit.‌  ‌
a) the‌‌common‌‌children‌‌or,‌‌   ‌
Here,‌  ‌no‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌was‌  ‌presented‌  ‌to‌  ‌reveal‌  ‌force,‌  ‌intimidation‌  ‌or‌‌ 
8) Voidable‌‌Bigamous‌‌Marriage‌  ‌ b) if‌  ‌there‌  ‌are‌  ‌none,‌  ‌the‌  ‌children‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌guilty‌‌ 
undue‌  ‌influence.‌  ‌There‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌proof‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌facts‌  ‌or‌  ‌circumstances‌‌ 
spouse‌‌by‌‌a‌‌previous‌‌marriage‌‌or‌‌   ‌
SSS‌‌v.‌‌Vda.‌‌De‌‌Bailon‌  ‌ constituting‌‌ force,‌‌ intimidation‌‌ or‌‌ undue‌‌ influence‌‌ that‌‌ respondent‌‌ or‌‌ 
c) in‌‌default‌‌of‌‌children,‌‌the‌‌innocent‌‌spouse;‌  ‌ her‌‌   friends‌‌
  have‌‌  improperly‌‌   taken‌‌
  advantage‌‌   of,‌‌
  or‌‌
  used‌‌ their‌‌ power,‌‌ 
If‌  ‌the‌  ‌subsequent‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌terminated‌  ‌by‌  ‌registration‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌‌  if‌  ‌any,‌  ‌over‌  ‌the‌  ‌will‌  ‌of‌  ‌petitioner,‌  ‌depriving‌  ‌him‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌reasonable‌‌ 
affidavit‌  ‌of‌  ‌reappearance‌  ‌or‌  ‌by‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌declaration‌  ‌but‌  ‌by‌  ‌death‌  ‌of‌‌  3) Donations‌  ‌by‌  ‌reason‌  ‌of‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌shall‌  ‌remain‌  ‌valid,‌‌ 
freedom‌  ‌of‌  ‌choice.‌  ‌Petitioner‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌healthy‌  ‌male‌  ‌with‌  ‌sufficient‌‌ 
either‌‌   spouse‌‌  as‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  case‌‌
  at‌‌
  bar,‌‌
  the‌‌
  effects‌‌
  of‌‌
  dissolution‌‌   of‌‌ valid‌‌  except‌‌   ‌that‌‌ if‌‌ the‌‌ donee‌‌ contracted‌‌ the‌‌ marriage‌‌ in‌‌ ‌bad‌‌  intellectual‌‌capacity‌‌to‌‌resist‌‌any‌‌untoward‌‌intimidation‌‌against‌‌him.‌  ‌
marriages‌‌shall‌‌arise.‌  ‌ faith‌, ‌‌such‌‌ donations‌‌ made‌‌ to‌‌ said‌‌ donee‌‌ are‌‌ ‌revoked‌‌ 
by‌‌operation‌‌of‌‌law;‌  ‌
Kinds‌‌of‌‌Fraud‌‌that‌‌could‌‌invalidate‌‌the‌‌marriage‌  ‌
It‌  ‌bears‌  ‌reiterating‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌voidable‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌assailed‌‌ 
4) The‌  ‌innocent‌  ‌spouse‌  ‌may‌  ‌revoke‌  ‌the‌  ‌designation‌  ‌of‌‌ 
collaterally‌‌   ‌except‌‌
  in‌‌
  a ‌‌direct‌‌  proceeding‌. ‌‌In‌‌
  the‌‌
  case‌‌ at‌‌ bar,‌‌ as‌‌ no‌‌  the‌  ‌other‌  ‌spouse‌  ‌who‌  ‌acted‌  ‌in‌  ‌bad‌  ‌faith‌  ‌as‌‌  ART‌  ‌46‌. ‌ ‌Any‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌following‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌shall‌  ‌constitute‌‌ 
step‌  ‌was‌  ‌taken‌  ‌to‌  ‌nullify,‌  ‌in‌  ‌accordance‌  ‌with‌  ‌law,‌  ‌Bailon's‌  ‌and‌  fraud‌r‌ eferred‌‌to‌‌in‌‌Number‌‌3‌‌of‌‌the‌‌preceding‌‌Article:‌  ‌
beneficiary‌  ‌in‌  ‌any‌  ‌insurance‌  ‌policy,‌  ‌even‌  ‌if‌  ‌such‌‌ 
respondent's‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌prior‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌former's‌  ‌death‌  ‌in‌  ‌1998,‌‌  designation‌‌be‌‌stipulated‌‌as‌‌irrevocable‌;‌‌and‌  ‌ 1) Non-disclosure‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌previous‌  ‌conviction‌  ‌by‌  ‌final‌‌ 
respondent‌‌is‌‌rightfully‌‌the‌‌dependent‌‌beneficiary‌‌of‌‌Bailon.‌  ‌
5) The‌  ‌spouse‌  ‌who‌  ‌contracted‌  ‌the‌  ‌subsequent‌‌   marriage‌‌  judgment‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌  ‌party‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌crime‌  ‌involving‌‌ 
moral‌‌turpitude‌; ‌ ‌
Effects‌‌of‌‌Reappearance‌  ‌ in‌‌
  ‌bad‌‌ faith‌‌ ‌shall‌‌ be‌‌ disqualified‌‌ to‌‌ inherit‌‌ from‌‌ the‌‌ 
innocent‌‌spouse‌‌by‌‌testate‌‌and‌‌intestate‌‌succession.‌  ‌ 2) Concealment‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌
  wife‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  fact‌‌  that‌‌  at‌‌
  the‌‌ time‌‌ of‌‌ 
ART‌  ‌42‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌subsequent‌  ‌marriage‌‌  referred‌‌  to‌‌  in‌‌  the‌‌  preceding‌‌  the‌  ‌marriage,‌‌
  she‌‌  was‌‌
  ‌pregnant‌‌   ‌by‌‌
  a ‌‌man‌‌   other‌‌  than‌‌ 
Article‌‌  shall‌‌  be‌‌
  ‌automatically‌‌
  terminated‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌ recording‌‌  Effects‌‌if‌‌both‌‌parties‌‌to‌‌the‌‌subsequent‌‌marriage‌‌are‌‌in‌‌bad‌‌faith‌  ‌
her‌‌husband;‌  ‌
of‌‌
  the‌‌
  affidavit‌‌   of‌‌
  reappearance‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌ absent‌‌ spouse,‌‌ ‌unless‌‌ 
ART‌  ‌44‌. ‌ ‌If‌  ‌both‌  ‌spouses‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌subsequent‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌acted‌  ‌in‌‌  3) Concealment‌‌   of‌‌
  ‌STD‌, ‌‌regardless‌‌
  of‌‌
  its‌‌
  nature,‌‌
  existing‌‌ 
there‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌judgment‌  ‌annulling‌  ‌the‌  ‌previous‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌or‌‌ 
bad‌  ‌faith,‌  ‌said‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌void‌  ‌ab‌  ‌initio‌  ‌and‌  ‌all‌‌  at‌‌the‌‌time‌‌of‌‌the‌‌marriage;‌‌or‌  ‌
declaring‌‌it‌‌void‌‌ab‌‌initio.‌‌   ‌ donations‌‌   by‌‌ reason‌‌ of‌‌ marriage‌‌ and‌‌ testamentary‌‌ dispositions‌‌ 
A‌  ‌sworn‌  ‌statement‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌fact‌  ‌and‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌of‌‌  made‌‌   by‌‌
  one‌‌  in‌‌
  favor‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  other‌‌
  are‌‌
  ‌revoked‌‌ ‌by‌‌ operation‌‌ of‌‌  4) Concealment‌  ‌of‌  ‌drug‌  ‌addiction,‌  ‌habitual‌‌ 
reappearance‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌recorded‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌civil‌  ‌registry‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  law.‌  ‌ alcoholism‌  ‌or‌  ‌homosexuality‌  ‌or‌  ‌lesbianism‌‌ 
residence‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌parties‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌subsequent‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌‌  existing‌‌at‌‌the‌‌time‌‌of‌‌the‌‌marriage.‌‌   ‌
Voidable‌‌Marriages‌  ‌
instance‌  ‌of‌  ‌ANY‌  ‌interested‌  ‌person‌, ‌ ‌with‌  ‌due‌  ‌notice‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  No‌  ‌other‌  ‌misrepresentation‌  ‌or‌  ‌deceit‌  ‌as‌  ‌to‌  ‌character,‌  ‌health,‌‌ 
spouses‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌subsequent‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌and‌  ‌without‌  ‌prejudice‌‌   to‌‌  Grounds‌‌for‌‌Annulment‌‌of‌‌Marriage‌  ‌ rank,‌‌  fortune‌‌
  or‌‌ chastity‌‌ shall‌‌ constitute‌‌ such‌‌ fraud‌‌ as‌‌ will‌‌ give‌‌ 
the‌  ‌fact‌  ‌of‌  ‌reappearance‌  ‌being‌  ‌judicially‌  ‌determined‌  ‌in‌  ‌case‌‌  grounds‌‌for‌‌action‌‌for‌‌the‌‌annulment‌‌of‌‌marriage.‌  ‌
such‌‌fact‌‌is‌‌disputed.‌  ‌ ART‌‌45‌.‌‌Simply‌  ‌
Aquino‌‌v.‌‌Delizo‌‌‌the‌‌‘plump’‌‌case‌  ‌
Effects‌‌of‌‌termination‌‌of‌‌subsequent‌‌marriage‌‌  a. Lack‌‌of‌‌Parental‌‌Consent;‌  ‌
by‌‌reappearance‌‌of‌‌the‌‌absent‌‌spouse‌  ‌ Concealment‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌wife‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  fact‌‌
  that‌‌
  at‌‌
  the‌‌
  time‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  marriage,‌‌ 
b. Unsoundness‌‌of‌‌mind;‌  ‌ she‌‌
  was‌‌   pregnant‌‌
  by‌‌
  a ‌‌man‌‌
  other‌‌  than‌‌  her‌‌ husband‌‌ constitutes‌‌ fraud‌‌ 
ART‌‌  43‌. ‌‌The‌‌ termination‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ subsequent‌‌ marriage‌‌ referred‌‌ to‌‌  and‌‌is‌‌ground‌‌for‌‌annulment‌‌of‌‌marriage.‌  ‌
c. Consent‌‌obtained‌‌by‌‌Fraud;‌  ‌
in‌‌the‌‌preceding‌‌Article‌‌shall‌‌produce‌‌the‌‌following‌‌effects:‌  ‌
1) The‌  ‌children‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌subsequent‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌conceived‌‌  d. Consent‌‌obtained‌‌by‌‌force,‌‌intimidation,‌‌or‌‌undue‌‌ 
influence;‌  ‌
Prescriptive‌‌period‌‌for‌‌Annulment‌‌of‌‌Marriage‌  ‌
prior‌  ‌to‌  ‌its‌  ‌termination‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌‌ 
legitimate‌; ‌ ‌ e. Physical‌‌incapacity‌‌of‌‌consummating‌‌the‌‌marriage;‌  ‌ ART‌‌  47‌. ‌‌The‌‌  action‌‌  for‌‌  annulment‌‌  of‌‌  marriage‌‌  must‌‌ be‌‌ filed‌‌ by‌‌ 
the‌‌following‌‌persons‌‌and‌‌within‌‌the‌‌periods‌‌indicated‌‌herein:‌  ‌
f. Afflicted‌‌with‌‌STD‌‌that‌‌is‌‌serious‌‌and‌‌incurable.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 154‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

1) For‌‌
  causes‌‌  mentioned‌‌ in‌‌ number‌‌ 1 ‌‌of‌‌ Article‌‌ 45‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ 
of‌  ‌the‌‌
  respondent.‌‌
  The‌‌
  trial‌‌
  court‌‌
  forthwith‌‌
  received‌‌  the‌‌
  evidence‌‌  of‌‌ 
Effects‌‌of‌‌Annulment‌‌of‌‌Marriage‌  ‌
party‌‌
  whose‌‌   parent‌‌   or‌‌
  guardian‌‌  did‌‌   not‌‌ give‌‌ his‌‌ or‌‌ her‌‌ 
the‌‌   respondent‌‌
  ex-parte‌‌
  and‌‌
  rendered‌‌  judgment‌‌  against‌‌ the‌‌ petitioner‌‌  ART‌‌  50‌. ‌‌The‌‌ effects‌‌ provided‌‌ for‌‌ by‌‌ paragraphs‌‌ (2),‌‌ (3),‌‌ (4)‌‌ and‌‌ 
consent,‌  ‌within‌  5 ‌  ‌ ‌years‌  ‌after‌  ‌attaining‌  ‌the‌‌   age‌‌   of‌‌ 
without‌‌a‌‌whimper‌‌of‌‌protest‌‌from‌‌the‌‌public‌‌prosecutor.‌‌   ‌
twenty-one‌, ‌ ‌or‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌parent‌  ‌or‌  ‌guardian‌  ‌or‌  ‌person‌‌  (5)‌‌ of‌‌ Article‌‌ 43‌‌ and‌‌ by‌‌ Article‌‌ 44‌‌ shall‌‌ also‌‌ apply‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ proper‌‌ 
having‌  ‌legal‌  ‌charge‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  minor,‌‌   ‌at‌‌
  any‌‌   time‌‌  before‌‌  The‌  ‌actuations‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌trial‌  ‌court‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌public‌  ‌prosecutor‌  ‌are‌  ‌in‌‌  cases‌‌   to‌‌
  marriages‌‌   which‌‌   are‌‌
  declared‌‌   ab‌‌
  initio‌‌
  or‌‌ annulled‌‌ by‌‌ 
such‌‌party‌‌has‌‌reached‌‌the‌‌age‌‌of‌‌twenty-one‌; ‌ ‌ defiance‌‌of‌‌Article‌‌48‌o ‌ f‌‌the‌‌Family‌‌Code.‌  ‌ final‌‌judgment‌‌under‌‌Articles‌‌40‌‌and‌‌45.‌‌   ‌
2) For‌  ‌causes‌  ‌mentioned‌  ‌in‌  ‌number‌  ‌2 ‌ ‌of‌  ‌Article‌  ‌45,‌  ‌by‌‌  The‌‌final‌‌judgment‌‌in‌‌such‌‌cases‌‌shall‌‌provide‌‌for‌‌   ‌
Republic‌‌v.‌‌Iyoy‌  ‌
the‌‌
  same‌‌   spouse,‌‌ who‌‌ had‌‌ no‌‌ knowledge‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ other's‌‌  1. the‌  ‌liquidation,‌  ‌partition‌  ‌and‌  ‌distribution‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
insanity;‌  ‌or‌  ‌by‌  ‌any‌  ‌relative‌  ‌or‌  ‌guardian‌  ‌or‌  ‌person‌‌  The‌  ‌general‌  ‌rule‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌  ‌only‌  ‌the‌  ‌Solicitor‌  ‌General‌  ‌is‌  ‌authorized‌  ‌to‌‌  properties‌‌of‌‌the‌‌spouses,‌‌   ‌
having‌‌   charge‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ insane,‌‌ ‌at‌‌ any‌‌ time‌‌ ‌before‌‌ 
  legal‌‌ bring‌‌  or‌‌
  defend‌‌   actions‌‌   on‌‌   behalf‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  People‌‌   or‌‌
  the‌‌  Republic‌‌ once‌‌ 
the‌‌
  case‌‌  is‌‌
  brought‌‌   before‌‌   this‌‌  Court‌‌   or‌‌
  the‌‌  Court‌‌ of‌‌ Appeals.‌‌ Since‌‌ it‌‌  2. the‌  ‌custody‌  ‌and‌  ‌support‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌common‌  ‌children,‌‌ 
the‌  ‌death‌  ‌of‌  ‌either‌  ‌party,‌  ‌or‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌insane‌  ‌spouse‌‌  and‌‌   ‌
shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌eventually‌  ‌responsible‌  ‌for‌  ‌taking‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌appellate‌‌ 
during‌‌a‌‌lucid‌‌interval‌‌or‌‌after‌‌regaining‌‌sanity;‌  ‌
courts‌  ‌when‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌demand,‌  ‌then‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌only‌‌   reasonable‌‌   and‌‌  3. the‌‌delivery‌‌of‌‌third‌‌presumptive‌l‌ egitimes‌. ‌ ‌
3) For‌  ‌causes‌  ‌mentioned‌  ‌in‌  ‌number‌‌   3 ‌‌of‌‌
  Articles‌‌   45,‌‌
  by‌‌  practical‌‌   that‌‌
  even‌‌
  while‌‌   the‌‌   proceeding‌‌   is‌‌
  still‌‌
  being‌‌ held‌‌ before‌‌ the‌‌ 
the‌  ‌injured‌  ‌party,‌‌   ‌5 ‌‌‌years‌‌
  ‌within‌‌   ‌after‌‌  the‌‌
  ‌discovery‌‌  RTC,‌  ‌the‌  ‌OSG‌  ‌can‌  ‌already‌  ‌exercise‌‌   supervision‌‌   and‌‌  control‌‌
  over‌‌  the‌‌  Valdes‌‌v.‌‌RTC‌  ‌
of‌‌the‌‌fraud;‌  ‌ conduct‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌prosecuting‌  ‌attorney‌  ‌or‌  ‌fiscal‌  ‌therein‌  ‌to‌  ‌better‌‌  In‌  ‌a ‌ ‌void‌  ‌marriage,‌  ‌regardless‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌cause‌  ‌thereof,‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌‌ 
guarantee‌‌the‌‌protection‌‌of‌‌the‌‌interests‌‌of‌‌the‌‌State.‌  ‌ relations‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  parties‌‌
  during‌‌  the‌‌
  period‌‌   of‌‌ cohabitation‌‌ is‌‌ governed‌‌ 
4) For‌  ‌causes‌  ‌mentioned‌  ‌in‌  ‌number‌  ‌4 ‌ ‌of‌  ‌Article‌  ‌45,‌  ‌by‌‌ 
by‌  ‌the‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌of‌  Article‌  ‌147‌  ‌or‌  ‌Article‌  ‌148,‌  ‌such‌‌  as‌‌
  the‌‌
  case‌ 
the‌  ‌injured‌  ‌party,‌  ‌within‌  ‌5 ‌ ‌years‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Custody‌‌and‌‌support‌‌of‌‌children‌‌during‌‌
  may‌‌be.‌  ‌
force,‌  ‌intimidation‌‌   or‌‌
  undue‌‌  influence‌‌   disappeared‌‌   or‌‌ 
ceased‌; ‌ ‌ pendency‌‌of‌‌the‌‌case‌  ‌ A‌‌
  court‌‌
  which‌‌
  has‌‌
  jurisdiction‌‌
  to‌‌
  declare‌‌
  the‌‌ marriage‌‌ a ‌‌nullity‌‌ must‌‌ 
5) For‌‌
  causes‌‌   mentioned‌‌   in‌‌ number‌‌ 5 ‌‌and‌‌ 6 ‌‌of‌‌ Article‌‌ 45,‌‌  be‌‌
  ‌deemed‌‌ likewise‌‌ clothed‌‌ with‌‌ authority‌‌ to‌‌ resolve‌‌ incidental‌‌ 
Visitorial‌‌rights‌‌of‌‌parent‌  ‌
by‌  ‌the‌  ‌injured‌  ‌party,‌  ‌within‌  ‌5 ‌ ‌years‌  ‌after‌  ‌the‌‌  and‌‌consequential‌‌matters.‌‌   ‌
marriage‌. ‌ ‌ ART‌‌  49‌. ‌‌During‌‌  the‌‌  ‌pendency‌‌  ‌of‌‌  the‌‌  action‌‌  and‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ absence‌‌ 
of‌  ‌adequate‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌written‌  ‌agreement‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌‌  Yu‌‌v.‌‌Reyes-Carpio‌‌‌2011‌  ‌
No‌‌declaration‌‌of‌‌default‌‌in‌‌annulment‌‌cases‌  ‌ spouses,‌‌ the‌‌ Court‌‌ shall‌‌ provide‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ ‌support‌‌ ‌of‌‌ the‌‌ spouses‌‌ 
The‌  ‌family‌  ‌court‌  ‌shall‌  ‌proceed‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌liquidation,‌  ‌partition‌  ‌and‌‌ 
and‌  ‌the‌  ‌custody‌  ‌and‌  ‌support‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌  ‌common‌  ‌children.‌  ‌The‌  distribution,‌  ‌custody,‌  ‌support‌  ‌of‌  ‌common‌  ‌children,‌  ‌and‌  ‌delivery‌‌   of‌‌ 
Tuason‌‌v.‌‌CA‌,‌‌supra‌  ‌ Court‌  ‌shall‌  ‌give‌  ‌paramount‌  ‌consideration‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌moral‌  ‌and‌‌  their‌  ‌presumptive‌  ‌legitimes‌  ‌upon‌  ‌entry‌  ‌of‌  ‌judgment‌  ‌granting‌  ‌the‌‌ 
The‌  ‌role‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌prosecuting‌  ‌attorney‌  ‌or‌  ‌fiscal‌  ‌in‌  ‌annulment‌  ‌of‌‌  material‌‌   welfare‌‌  of‌‌
  said‌‌
  children‌‌  and‌‌  their‌‌
  choice‌‌
  of‌‌ the‌‌ parent‌‌ 
petition.‌  ‌And‌  ‌following‌  ‌the‌  ‌pertinent‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌of‌  ‌A.M.‌  ‌No.‌‌ 
marriage‌  ‌and‌  ‌legal‌  ‌separation‌  ‌proceedings‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌determine‌  ‌whether‌‌  with‌  ‌whom‌  ‌they‌  ‌wish‌  ‌to‌  ‌remain.‌  ‌It‌  ‌shall‌  ‌also‌  ‌provide‌  ‌for‌‌  02-11-10-SC‌, ‌‌this‌‌   act‌‌ is‌‌ undoubtedly‌‌ consistent‌‌ with‌‌ Articles‌‌ 50‌‌ and‌‌ 
collusion‌‌ exists‌‌ between‌‌ the‌‌ parties‌‌ and‌‌ to‌‌ take‌‌ care‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ evidence‌‌  appropriate‌v ‌ isitation‌‌rights‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌other‌‌parent.‌  ‌
51‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Family‌‌Code,‌‌contrary‌‌to‌‌what‌‌petitioner‌‌asserts.‌  ‌
is‌  ‌not‌  ‌suppressed‌‌   or‌‌
  fabricated.‌‌   Petitioner’s‌‌   vehement‌‌   opposition‌‌
  to‌‌  Silva‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
the‌  ‌annulment‌  ‌proceedings‌  ‌negates‌  ‌the‌  ‌conclusion‌  ‌that‌  ‌collusion‌‌  The‌  ‌trial‌‌
  court‌‌
  may‌‌
  receive‌‌  evidence‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌
  subject‌‌
  incidents‌‌   after‌‌
  a ‌‌
existed‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌  ‌parties.‌  ‌Here,‌  ‌the‌  ‌non-intervention‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌ The‌  ‌case‌  ‌merely‌  ‌concerns‌  ‌the‌  ‌visitation‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌parent‌  ‌over‌  ‌his‌‌  judgment‌  ‌granting‌  ‌the‌  ‌petition‌  ‌but‌  ‌before‌  ‌the‌  ‌decree‌  ‌of‌  ‌nullity‌  ‌or‌‌ 
prosecuting‌  ‌attorney‌  ‌to‌  ‌assure‌  ‌lack‌  ‌of‌  ‌collusion‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌‌  children‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌trial‌‌  court‌‌  has‌‌
  adjudged‌‌   in‌‌
  favor‌‌
  of‌‌  petitioner‌‌
  by‌‌  annulment‌‌of‌‌marriage‌‌is‌‌issued.‌‌   ‌
contending‌‌   parties‌‌   is‌‌
  ‌not‌‌ fatal‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ validity‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ proceedings‌‌ in‌‌  holding‌  ‌that‌  ‌he‌  ‌shall‌  ‌have‌  ‌“visitorial‌  ‌rights‌  ‌to‌  ‌his‌  ‌children‌  ‌during‌‌ 
the‌‌trial‌‌court.‌  ‌ Saturdays‌  ‌and/or‌  ‌Sundays,‌  ‌but‌  ‌in‌  ‌no‌  ‌case‌  ‌(could)‌  ‌he‌  ‌take‌  ‌out‌  ‌the‌‌  Diño‌‌v.‌‌Diño‌‌‌2011‌  ‌
children‌  ‌without‌  ‌the‌  ‌written‌  ‌consent‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌mother‌  ‌x ‌ ‌x ‌ ‌x."‌  ‌The‌‌ 
visitation‌  ‌right‌  ‌referred‌  ‌to‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌‌
  access‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌noncustodial‌‌  Whether‌  ‌the‌  ‌trial‌  ‌court‌  ‌erred‌  ‌when‌  ‌it‌  ‌ordered‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌decree‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Ancheta‌‌v.‌‌Ancheta‌  ‌
parent‌‌to‌‌his‌‌or‌‌her‌‌child‌‌or‌‌children.‌  ‌ absolute‌  ‌nullity‌  ‌of‌  ‌marriage‌  ‌shall‌  ‌only‌  ‌be‌  ‌issued‌  ‌after‌  ‌liquidation,‌‌ 
The‌‌   records‌‌   show‌‌   that‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌  petitioner’s‌‌   failure‌‌  to‌‌ file‌‌ an‌‌ answer‌‌ to‌‌  partition,‌  ‌and‌  ‌distribution‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌parties'‌  ‌properties‌  ‌under‌  ‌Article‌‌ 
the‌  ‌complaint,‌  ‌the‌  ‌trial‌  ‌court‌  ‌granted‌  ‌the‌  ‌motion‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌   respondent‌‌  147‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Family‌‌Code.‌  ‌
herein‌‌   to‌‌
  declare‌‌   her‌‌
  in‌‌
  default.‌‌   The‌‌
  public‌‌   prosecutor‌‌   condoned‌‌ the‌‌ 
acts‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  trial‌‌
  court‌‌   when‌‌   he‌‌
  interposed‌‌   no‌‌   objection‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ motion‌‌  YES‌. ‌‌The‌‌
  ruling‌‌
  has‌‌
  no‌‌
  basis‌‌
  because‌‌
  Section‌‌
  19(1)‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ Rule‌‌ does‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 155‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

not‌‌   apply‌‌
  to‌‌ cases‌‌ governed‌‌ under‌‌ Articles‌‌ 147‌‌ and‌‌ 148‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ Family‌‌ 
⭐‌ART‌‌  53‌. ‌‌Either‌‌  of‌‌ the‌‌ former‌‌ spouses‌‌ may‌‌ marry‌‌ again‌‌ after‌‌  chattel‌  ‌mortgages‌  ‌are‌  ‌of‌‌  a ‌‌purely‌‌
  ministerial‌‌   character‌; ‌‌and‌‌
  no‌‌ 
Code.‌  ‌Article‌  ‌50‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Family‌  ‌Code‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌‌  apply‌‌  to‌‌  marriages‌‌  compliance‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌requirements‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌immediately‌‌  provision‌‌   of‌‌
  law‌‌
  can‌‌
  be‌‌
  cited‌‌  which‌‌
  confers‌‌ upon‌‌ him‌‌ any‌‌ judicial‌‌ or‌‌ 
which‌‌   are‌‌  declared‌‌   void‌‌ ab‌‌ initio‌‌ under‌‌ Article‌‌ 36‌, ‌‌which‌‌ should‌‌  preceding‌‌  Article;‌‌
  ‌otherwise‌, ‌‌the‌‌
  subsequent‌‌
  marriage‌‌
  shall‌‌
  be‌‌  quasi-judicial‌  ‌power‌  ‌to‌  ‌determine‌  ‌the‌  ‌nature‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌document‌  ‌of‌‌ 
be‌‌  declared‌‌   void‌‌
  without‌‌   waiting‌‌
  for‌‌ the‌‌ liquidation‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ properties‌‌  null‌‌and‌‌void‌. ‌ ‌ which‌‌registration‌‌is‌‌sought‌‌as‌‌a‌‌chattel‌‌mortgage.‌  ‌
of‌  ‌the‌  ‌parties.‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌what‌  ‌governs‌  ‌the‌  ‌liquidation‌  ‌of‌  ‌properties‌‌  Status‌‌of‌‌children‌‌of‌‌dissolved‌‌marriages‌  ‌
owned‌  ‌in‌  ‌common‌  ‌by‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌and‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌are‌  ‌the‌  ‌rules‌‌   on‌‌  Davao‌‌Sawmill‌‌Co.‌‌v.‌‌Castillo‌‌   ‌
co-ownership‌. ‌ ‌ ART‌  ‌54‌. ‌ ‌Children‌  ‌conceived‌  ‌or‌  ‌born‌  ‌before‌  ‌the‌  ‌judgment‌  ‌of‌‌ 
annulment‌‌  or‌‌
  absolute‌‌
  nullity‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  marriage‌‌   under‌‌ Article‌‌ 36‌‌  While‌  ‌not‌  ‌conclusive,‌  ‌the‌  ‌characterization‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌machineries‌  ‌as‌‌ 
has‌  ‌become‌  ‌final‌  ‌and‌  ‌executory‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌‌  chattels‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌appellant‌  ‌is‌  ‌indicative‌  ‌of‌  ‌intention‌  ‌and‌  ‌impresses‌‌ 
Under‌  ‌Article‌  ‌496‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Civil‌  ‌Code,‌  ‌"partition‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌made‌  ‌by‌‌ 
legitimate‌. ‌ ‌Children‌  ‌conceived‌  ‌or‌  ‌born‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌subsequent‌‌  upon‌‌the‌‌property‌‌the‌‌character‌‌determined‌‌by‌‌the‌‌parties.‌  ‌
agreement‌‌   between‌‌   the‌‌
  parties‌‌   or‌‌
  by‌‌
  judicial‌‌ proceedings.‌‌ x ‌‌x ‌‌x."‌‌ ‌It‌‌ is‌‌ 
NOT‌‌
  necessary‌‌   to‌‌
  liquidate‌‌   the‌‌ properties‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ spouses‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌  marriage‌‌under‌‌Article‌‌53‌‌shall‌‌likewise‌‌be‌l‌ egitimate‌. ‌ ‌
Makati‌‌Leasing‌‌v.‌‌Wearever‌‌Textile‌‌Mills‌  ‌
same‌‌proceeding‌‌for‌‌declaration‌‌of‌‌nullity‌‌of‌‌marriage‌. ‌ ‌
3. Property‌  ‌ As‌  ‌stated‌  ‌in‌  ‌Standard‌  ‌Oil‌  ‌Co.‌  ‌of‌  ‌New‌  ‌York‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Jaramillo‌, ‌ ‌it‌  ‌is‌‌ 
Salas‌‌Jr.‌‌v.‌‌Aguila‌‌‌2013‌  ‌ a. Concept‌  ‌ undeniable‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌parties‌  ‌to‌  ‌a‌  ‌contract‌  ‌may‌  ‌by‌  ‌agreement‌  ‌treat‌‌
  as‌‌ 
personal‌  ‌property‌  ‌that‌  ‌which‌  ‌by‌  ‌nature‌  ‌would‌  ‌be‌  ‌real‌  ‌property,‌  ‌as‌‌ 
Under‌  ‌Art‌  ‌147‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Family‌  ‌Code,‌  ‌property‌  ‌acquired‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Immovables‌  ‌ long‌  ‌as‌  n
‌ o‌  ‌interest‌  ‌of‌  ‌third‌  ‌parties‌  ‌would‌  ‌be‌  ‌prejudiced‌ ‌
marriage‌‌  is‌‌
  ‌prima‌‌
  facie‌‌   ‌presumed‌‌  to‌‌
  have‌‌
  been‌‌
  obtained‌‌ through‌‌ the‌‌ 
couple’s‌‌joint‌‌efforts‌‌and‌‌governed‌‌by‌‌the‌‌rules‌‌on‌‌co-ownership.‌‌   ‌ thereby‌. ‌ ‌
What‌‌is‌‌immovable‌‌property?‌  ‌
In‌  ‌the‌‌  present‌‌  case,‌‌
  Salas‌‌
  did‌‌  not‌‌
  rebut‌‌  this‌‌
  presumption.‌‌   Where‌‌   the‌‌  Mindanao‌‌Bus‌‌Company‌‌v.‌‌City‌‌Assessor‌  ‌
ART‌‌415‌.‌‌The‌‌following‌‌are‌i‌ mmovable‌p
‌ roperty:‌‌xxxx‌  ‌
ground‌‌   for‌‌
  nullity‌‌
  of‌‌
  marriage‌‌   was‌‌  psychological‌‌ incapacity,‌‌ we‌‌ held‌‌  So‌  ‌that‌  ‌movable‌  ‌equipment‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌immobilized‌  ‌in‌  ‌contemplation‌  ‌of‌‌ 
that‌‌   the‌‌  properties‌‌  acquired‌‌   during‌‌   the‌‌
  union‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ parties,‌‌ as‌‌ found‌‌  Classification‌‌of‌‌Real‌‌properties:‌  ‌ the‌  ‌law‌  ‌must‌  ‌first‌  ‌be‌  ‌"‌essential‌  ‌and‌  ‌principal‌  ‌elements‌" ‌ ‌of‌  ‌an‌‌ 
by‌‌both‌‌the‌‌RTC‌‌and‌‌the‌‌CA,‌‌would‌‌be‌‌governed‌‌by‌c‌ o-ownership‌. ‌ ‌ industry‌  ‌or‌  ‌works‌  ‌without‌  ‌which‌  ‌such‌‌   industry‌‌  or‌‌
  works‌‌
  would‌‌  be‌‌ 
1. Real‌‌property‌‌by‌‌‌nature‌‌‌(trees‌‌and‌‌plants);‌  ‌
"unable‌  ‌to‌  ‌function‌  ‌or‌  ‌carry‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌industrial‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌for‌  ‌which‌  ‌it‌‌ 
2. By‌i‌ ncorporation‌‌‌(building);‌  ‌ was‌‌established."‌  ‌
Partition‌‌and‌‌Presumptive‌‌Legitime‌  ‌
3. By‌d
‌ estination‌o
‌ r‌‌purpose‌(‌ machinery);‌  ‌
ART‌‌  51‌. ‌‌In‌‌ said‌‌ partition,‌‌ the‌‌ value‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ presumptive‌‌ legitimes‌‌  Aside‌‌   from‌‌   the‌‌   element‌‌   of‌‌
  ‌essentiality,‌‌
  ‌Art‌‌
  415(5)‌‌ also‌‌ requires‌‌ that‌‌ 
of‌  ‌all‌  ‌common‌  ‌children,‌  ‌computed‌  ‌as‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌date‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌final‌‌  4. By‌a
‌ nalogy‌‌‌(right‌‌of‌‌usufruct).‌  ‌ the‌‌ industry‌‌ or‌‌ works‌‌ be‌‌ carried‌‌ on‌‌ in‌‌ a ‌‌building‌‌ or‌‌ on‌‌ a ‌‌piece‌‌ of‌‌ land.‌‌ 
judgment‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  trial‌‌
  court,‌‌
  shall‌‌
  be‌‌ delivered‌‌ in‌‌ cash,‌‌ property‌‌  Leung‌‌Yee‌‌v.‌‌Strong‌‌Machinery‌  ‌ In‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌at‌  ‌bar,‌  ‌the‌  ‌equipments‌  ‌in‌  ‌question‌  ‌are‌  ‌destined‌  ‌only‌  ‌to‌‌ 
or‌  ‌sound‌  ‌securities,‌  ‌unless‌  ‌the‌  ‌parties,‌  ‌by‌  ‌mutual‌  ‌agreement‌‌  repair‌‌   or‌‌  service‌‌ the‌‌ transportation‌‌ business.‌‌ ‌Said‌‌ equipments‌‌ may‌‌ 
judicially‌‌approved,‌‌had‌‌already‌‌provided‌‌for‌‌such‌‌matters.‌‌   ‌ The‌  ‌building‌  ‌of‌  ‌strong‌  ‌materials‌  ‌in‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌rice-cleaning‌‌  not,‌‌therefore,‌‌be‌‌deemed‌‌real‌‌property‌. ‌ ‌
machinery‌  ‌was‌  ‌installed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌"Compania‌  ‌Agricola‌  ‌Filipina"‌  ‌was‌‌ 
The‌  ‌children‌  ‌or‌  ‌their‌  ‌guardian‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌trustee‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌  real‌  ‌property,‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌mere‌  ‌fact‌  ‌that‌‌  the‌‌  parties‌‌  seem‌‌  to‌‌  have‌‌  dealt‌‌  Caltex‌‌Philippines‌‌Inc.‌‌v.‌‌CBAA‌  ‌
property‌‌may‌‌ask‌‌for‌‌the‌‌enforcement‌‌of‌‌the‌‌judgment.‌‌xxxx‌  ‌ with‌‌
  it‌‌
  separate‌‌  and‌‌
  apart‌‌  from‌‌   the‌‌  land‌‌  on‌‌  which‌‌ it‌‌ stood‌‌ in‌‌ no‌‌ wise‌‌ 
This‌  ‌case‌  ‌is‌  ‌about‌  ‌the‌  ‌realty‌  ‌tax‌  ‌on‌  ‌machinery‌  ‌and‌  ‌equipment‌‌ 
Requirement‌‌   of‌‌
  registration‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  decree‌‌
  of‌‌
  annulment‌‌
  or‌‌
  nullity‌‌  changed‌‌its‌‌character‌‌as‌‌real‌‌property.‌  ‌
installed‌  ‌by‌  ‌Caltex‌  ‌in‌  ‌its‌  ‌gas‌  ‌stations‌  ‌located‌  ‌on‌  ‌leased‌  ‌land‌. ‌ ‌Said‌‌ 
of‌‌marriage‌‌—‌‌Effects‌‌of‌‌non-compliance‌  ‌ equipment‌  ‌and‌  ‌machinery,‌  ‌as‌  ‌appurtenances‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌gas‌  ‌station‌‌ 
Punsalan,‌‌Jr.‌‌v.‌‌Lacsamana‌  ‌
ART‌  ‌52‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌judgment‌  ‌of‌  ‌annulment‌  ‌or‌  ‌of‌  ‌absolute‌  ‌nullity‌‌  of‌‌  building‌‌  or‌‌
  shed‌‌   owned‌‌   by‌‌  Caltex‌‌ and‌‌ which‌‌ fixtures‌‌ are‌‌ necessary‌‌ to‌‌ 
the‌‌
  marriage,‌‌  the‌‌
  partition‌‌  and‌‌
  distribution‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ properties‌‌ of‌‌  The‌‌   ‌warehouse‌‌   ‌claimed‌‌  to‌‌
  be‌‌ owned‌‌ by‌‌ petitioner‌‌ is‌‌ an‌‌ ‌immovable‌‌  the‌  ‌operation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌gas‌  ‌station‌  ‌are‌  ‌taxable‌  ‌improvements‌  ‌and‌‌ 
the‌  ‌spouses‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌delivery‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌children's‌  ‌presumptive‌‌  or‌  ‌real‌‌  ‌property‌‌
  as‌‌
  provided‌‌   in‌‌
  Article‌‌
  415(1).‌‌
  Buildings‌‌   are‌‌
  always‌‌  machinery‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌meaning‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Assessment‌  ‌Law‌‌   and‌‌  the‌‌
  Real‌‌ 
legitimes‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  r
‌ ecorded‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌   appropriate‌‌   civil‌‌
  registry‌‌  immovable‌‌under‌‌the‌‌Code.‌‌   ‌ Property‌‌Tax‌‌Code.‌  ‌
and‌‌  registries‌‌
  of‌‌
  property;‌‌  ‌otherwise‌, ‌‌the‌‌   same‌‌   shall‌‌
  not‌‌  affect‌‌ 
Standard‌‌Oil‌‌Co.‌‌v.‌‌Jaramillo‌  ‌ Serg’s‌‌Products‌‌v.‌‌PCI‌‌Leasing‌ 
third‌‌persons.‌  ‌
The‌‌
  duties‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌register‌‌ of‌‌ deeds‌‌ in‌‌ respect‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ registration‌‌ of‌‌  After‌‌ agreeing‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌‌contract‌‌ stipulating‌‌ that‌‌ a ‌‌real‌‌ or‌‌ immovable‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 156‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

property‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌as‌  ‌personal‌  ‌or‌  ‌movable,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌party‌  ‌is‌‌ 
Movables‌  ‌
estopped‌  ‌from‌  ‌subsequently‌  ‌claiming‌  ‌otherwise.‌  ‌Hence,‌  ‌such‌‌  The‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌‌
  conducting‌‌   ISR‌‌  operations‌‌   by‌‌
  illegally‌‌   connecting‌‌   various‌‌ 
property‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌proper‌  ‌subject‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌writ‌  ‌of‌  ‌replevin‌  ‌obtained‌‌
  by‌‌  ART‌  ‌416‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌following‌  ‌things‌  ‌are‌  ‌deemed‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌personal‌‌  equipment‌  ‌or‌  ‌apparatus‌  ‌to‌‌   PLDT's‌‌
  telephone‌‌   system,‌‌   through‌‌   which‌‌ 
the‌‌other‌‌contracting‌‌party.‌  ‌ property:‌  ‌ petitioner‌‌   is‌‌
  able‌‌ to‌‌ resell‌‌ or‌‌ re-route‌‌ international‌‌ long‌‌ distance‌‌ calls‌‌ 
using‌  ‌PLDT's‌  ‌facilities‌  ‌constitutes‌  ‌all‌  ‌three‌‌   acts‌‌
  of‌‌
  subtraction.‌‌   ‌The‌‌ 
Tumalad‌‌v.‌‌Vicencio‌  ‌ 1) Those‌  ‌movables‌  ‌susceptible‌  ‌of‌  ‌appropriation‌‌  business‌  ‌of‌  ‌providing‌  ‌telecommunication‌‌   or‌‌
  telephone‌‌   service‌‌ 
which‌‌are‌‌not‌‌included‌‌in‌‌the‌‌preceding‌‌article;‌  ‌ is‌‌ likewise‌‌ personal‌‌ property‌‌ ‌which‌‌ can‌‌ be‌‌ the‌‌ object‌‌ of‌‌ theft‌‌ under‌‌ 
Although‌‌   there‌‌  is‌‌
  no‌‌
  specific‌‌   statement‌‌   referring‌‌   to‌‌ the‌‌ subject‌‌ house‌‌  Article‌‌308‌‌of‌‌the‌‌RPC.‌  ‌
as‌‌
  personal‌‌   property,‌‌   yet‌‌
  by‌‌
  ceding,‌‌  selling‌‌   or‌‌ transferring‌‌ a ‌‌property‌‌  2) Real‌‌ property‌‌ which‌‌ by‌‌ any‌‌ special‌‌ provision‌‌ of‌‌ law‌‌ is‌‌ 
by‌  ‌way‌  ‌of‌  ‌chattel‌  ‌mortgage‌  ‌defendants-appellants‌  ‌could‌  ‌only‌  ‌have‌‌  considered‌‌as‌‌personality;‌  ‌
HPS‌‌Software‌‌and‌‌Communication‌‌v.‌‌PLDT‌‌‌2012‌  ‌
meant‌‌   to‌‌
  convey‌‌   the‌‌
  house‌‌   as‌‌  chattel,‌‌
  or‌‌ at‌‌ least,‌‌ intended‌‌ to‌‌ treat‌‌ the‌‌ 
3) Forces‌‌
  of‌‌
  nature‌‌
  which‌‌
  are‌‌
  brought‌‌
  under‌‌
  control‌‌ by‌‌  The‌  ‌business‌  ‌of‌  ‌providing‌  ‌telecommunication‌‌   or‌‌  telephone‌‌   service‌‌ 
same‌  ‌as‌  ‌such,‌  ‌so‌  ‌that‌  ‌they‌  ‌should‌  ‌not‌  ‌now‌  ‌be‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌to‌  ‌make‌  ‌an‌‌  science;‌‌and‌  ‌
inconsistent‌‌stand‌‌by‌‌claiming‌‌otherwise.‌  ‌ is‌  ‌personal‌  ‌property‌‌   which‌‌
  can‌‌
  be‌‌
  the‌‌
  object‌‌
  of‌‌
  theft‌‌  under‌‌  Article‌‌ 
4) In‌‌
  general,‌‌   all‌‌
  things‌‌
  which‌‌ ‌can‌‌ be‌‌ transported‌‌ from‌‌  308‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌RPC.‌  ‌Business‌‌
  ‌may‌‌  be‌‌
  appropriated‌‌   ‌under‌‌   Section‌‌  2 ‌‌of‌‌ 
Ago‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ place‌‌
  to‌‌ place‌‌ ‌without‌‌ impairment‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ real‌‌ property‌‌  the‌‌Bulk‌‌Sales‌‌Law,‌‌hence,‌‌could‌‌be‌‌the‌‌object‌‌of‌‌theft.‌  ‌
to‌‌which‌‌they‌‌are‌‌fixed.‌  ‌
By‌  ‌the‌  ‌installation‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  sawmill‌‌   machineries‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌  building‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  Chiang‌‌v.‌‌PLDT‌‌‌2017‌  ‌
Golden‌‌   Pacific‌‌ Sawmill,‌‌ Inc.‌‌ for‌‌ use‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ sawing‌‌ of‌‌ logs‌‌ carried‌‌ on‌‌ in‌‌  ART‌  ‌417‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌following‌  ‌are‌  ‌also‌  ‌considered‌  ‌as‌  ‌personal‌‌ 
said‌‌   building,‌‌ the‌‌ same‌‌ became‌‌ a ‌‌necessary‌‌ and‌‌ permanent‌‌ part‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  property:‌  ‌ Toll‌  ‌bypass‌  ‌operations‌  ‌could‌‌   not‌‌
  have‌‌
  been‌‌
  accomplished‌‌   without‌‌ 
building‌  ‌or‌  ‌real‌  ‌estate‌  ‌on‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌was‌  ‌constructed,‌‌  the‌  ‌installation‌  ‌of‌  ‌telecommunications‌  ‌equipment‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌PLDT‌‌ 
1) Obligations‌  ‌and‌  ‌actions‌  ‌which‌  ‌have‌  ‌for‌‌
  their‌‌
  object‌‌  telephone‌  ‌lines.‌  ‌Thus,‌  ‌petitioners‌  ‌may‌  ‌also‌  ‌be‌  ‌held‌  ‌liable‌  ‌for‌‌ 
converting‌  ‌the‌  ‌said‌  ‌machineries‌  ‌and‌  ‌equipment‌  ‌into‌  ‌real‌‌ 
movables‌‌or‌‌demandable‌‌sums;‌‌and‌  ‌ violation‌  ‌of‌  ‌PD‌  ‌No.‌  ‌401,‌  ‌which‌  ‌penalizes‌  ‌the‌  ‌unauthorized‌‌ 
estate.‌  ‌
2) Shares‌  ‌of‌  ‌stock‌  ‌of‌  ‌agricultural,‌  ‌commercial‌  ‌and‌‌  installation‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌telephone‌  ‌connection‌‌   without‌‌  previous‌‌
  authority‌‌ 
Benguet‌‌Corp.‌‌v.‌‌CBAA‌  ‌ industrial‌‌entities,‌‌although‌‌they‌‌may‌‌have‌‌real‌‌estate.‌  ‌ from‌‌PLDT.‌  ‌
Here,‌  ‌the‌  ‌subject‌  ‌dam‌  ‌falls‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌definition‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌‌  a. General‌‌Test‌‌of‌‌Movable‌‌Character‌‌   ‌ Fort‌‌Bonifacio‌‌Development‌‌Corp.‌‌v.‌‌Fong‌‌‌2015‌  ‌
"‌improvement‌" ‌ ‌because‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌permanent‌  ‌in‌  ‌character‌  ‌and‌  ‌it‌‌  1. If‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌  ‌is‌  ‌capable‌  ‌of‌  ‌being‌  ‌carried‌  ‌from‌  ‌place‌  ‌to‌‌ 
enhances‌‌   both‌‌
  the‌‌ value‌‌ and‌‌ utility‌‌ ‌of‌‌ petitioner's‌‌ mine.‌‌ Moreover,‌‌  An‌  ‌assignment‌  ‌of‌  c‌ redit‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌consideration‌  ‌and‌  ‌covering‌  ‌a ‌‌
place‌‌(‌test‌‌by‌‌description‌);‌  ‌
the‌  ‌immovable‌  ‌nature‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌dam‌  ‌defines‌  ‌its‌  ‌character‌  ‌as‌  ‌real‌‌  demandable‌  ‌sum‌  ‌of‌  ‌money‌  ‌is‌  ‌considered‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌sale‌  ‌of‌  ‌personal‌‌ 
property‌  ‌under‌  ‌Article‌  ‌415‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Civil‌  ‌Code‌  ‌and‌  ‌thus‌  ‌makes‌  ‌it‌‌  2. If‌‌
  such‌‌   change‌‌   in‌‌
  location‌‌ can‌‌ be‌‌ made‌‌ without‌‌ injuring‌‌ the‌‌  property.‌  ‌
taxable‌u ‌ nder‌‌Section‌‌38‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Real‌‌Property‌‌Tax‌‌Code.‌  ‌ real‌‌   property‌‌   to‌‌  which‌‌  it‌‌
  may‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  meantime‌‌   be‌‌ attached‌‌ 
(‌test‌‌by‌‌description‌);‌‌and‌  ‌ Laud‌‌v.‌‌People‌‌‌2014‌  ‌
Star‌‌Two,‌‌Inc.‌‌v.‌‌Paper‌‌City‌‌Corp.‌‌‌2013‌  ‌ 3. If‌‌
  the‌‌  object‌‌
  is‌‌ not‌‌ one‌‌ of‌‌ those‌‌ enumerated‌‌ in‌‌ Art‌‌ 415‌‌ (‌test‌‌  “‌Personal‌  ‌property‌” ‌ ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌thing’s‌  ‌mobility,‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌to‌  ‌its‌‌ 
by‌‌exclusion‌) ‌ ‌ capacity‌‌  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  owned‌‌ or‌‌ alienated‌‌ by‌‌ a ‌‌particular‌‌ person.‌‌ Considering‌‌ 
The‌  ‌real‌  ‌estate‌  ‌mortgages‌  ‌which‌  ‌specifically‌  ‌included‌  ‌the‌‌ 
machineries‌  ‌and‌  ‌equipments‌  ‌were‌  ‌subsequent‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌chattel‌‌  b. Consumables‌  ‌and‌  ‌Non-Consumables.‌  ‌—A
‌ ccording‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  that‌  ‌human‌  ‌remains‌  ‌can‌  ‌generally‌  ‌be‌  ‌transported‌  ‌from‌  ‌place‌  ‌to‌‌ 
mortgages‌  ‌dated‌  ‌26‌  ‌August‌  ‌1992,‌  ‌20‌  ‌November‌  ‌1992,‌  ‌7 ‌ ‌June‌  ‌1994‌‌  nature‌‌‌of‌‌the‌‌movable‌‌property.‌  ‌ place,‌  ‌and‌  ‌considering‌  ‌further‌  ‌that‌  ‌they‌  ‌qualify‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌phrase‌‌ 
and‌  ‌24‌  ‌January‌  ‌1995.‌  ‌Without‌  ‌doubt,‌  ‌the‌  ‌real‌  ‌estate‌  ‌mortgages‌‌  c. Fungible‌‌   and‌‌   Non-Fungible.‌‌
  — ‌‌‌According‌‌
  to‌‌ the‌‌ ‌intention‌‌ of‌‌  “subject‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌offense”‌  ‌given‌  ‌that‌  ‌they‌  ‌prove‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime’s‌  ‌corpus‌‌ 
superseded‌t‌ he‌‌earlier‌‌chattel‌‌mortgages‌. ‌ ‌ the‌‌parties.‌‌   ‌ delicti,‌‌it‌‌follows‌‌that‌‌they‌‌may‌‌be‌‌valid‌‌subjects‌‌of‌‌a‌‌search‌‌warrant.‌  ‌

The‌  ‌real‌  ‌estate‌  ‌mortgage‌  ‌over‌  ‌the‌  ‌machineries‌  ‌and‌  ‌equipments‌  ‌is‌‌  ⭐‌Laurel‌‌v.‌‌Abrogar‌  ‌ b. Ownership‌  ‌
even‌  ‌in‌  ‌full‌  ‌accord‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌classification‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌  ‌properties‌  ‌as‌‌  This‌  ‌Court,‌  ‌in‌  ‌US‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Genato,‌  ‌US‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Carlos,‌  ‌and‌  ‌US‌‌
  v.‌‌
  Tambunting‌, ‌‌
immovable‌p ‌ roperty.‌  ‌ consistently‌  ‌ruled‌  ‌that‌‌   any‌‌
  personal‌‌   property,‌‌
  tangible‌‌   or‌‌
  intangible,‌‌  ART‌‌427‌.‌‌Ownership‌‌may‌‌be‌‌exercised‌‌over‌‌things‌‌or‌‌rights.‌  ‌
corporeal‌  ‌or‌  ‌incorporeal,‌  c ‌ apable‌  ‌of‌  ‌appropriation‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌the‌‌  Definition‌‌of‌‌Ownership‌  ‌
object‌‌of‌‌theft.‌  ‌
Ownership‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌independent‌  ‌and‌  ‌general‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person‌  ‌to‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 157‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

control‌  ‌a ‌ ‌thing‌  ‌particularly‌  ‌in‌  ‌his‌  ‌possession,‌  ‌enjoyment,‌‌ 


case,‌  ‌Sheriff‌  ‌Alvarez‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌  ‌an‌  ‌aggressor,‌  ‌as‌  ‌indeed‌  ‌he‌  ‌could‌  ‌not‌‌  The‌  ‌Complaint‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌allege‌  ‌facts‌  ‌showing‌  ‌compliance‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌‌ 
disposition,‌  ‌and‌  ‌recovery,‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌no‌  ‌restrictions‌  ‌except‌  ‌those‌‌ 
have‌  ‌been‌  ‌one,‌  ‌because‌  ‌as‌  ‌an‌  ‌officer‌  ‌or‌  ‌agent‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌court,‌  ‌he‌  ‌was‌  prescribed‌  ‌one‌  ‌year‌  ‌period‌  ‌to‌  ‌file‌  ‌an‌‌  action‌‌  for‌‌
  unlawful‌‌   detainer.‌‌
  It‌‌ 
imposed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌state‌  ‌or‌  ‌private‌  ‌persons,‌  ‌without‌  ‌prejudice‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
simply‌  ‌carrying‌  ‌out‌  ‌his‌  ‌official‌  ‌duty‌  ‌to‌  ‌implement‌  ‌the‌  ‌writ‌  ‌of‌‌  does‌‌   not‌‌
  state‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌material‌‌   dates‌‌  that‌‌ would‌‌ have‌‌ established‌‌ that‌‌ it‌‌ 
provisions‌‌of‌‌the‌‌law.‌  ‌
execution.‌  ‌ was‌  ‌filed‌  ‌within‌  ‌one‌  ‌year‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌date‌  ‌of‌  ‌Manantan's‌  ‌last‌‌ 
1.‌‌Bundle‌‌of‌‌rights‌  ‌ demand‌  ‌upon‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌to‌  ‌vacate‌  ‌the‌  ‌disputed‌  ‌portion‌  ‌of‌  ‌land.‌‌ 
Acts‌‌in‌‌a‌‌State‌‌of‌‌Necessity‌‌   ‌ Such‌  ‌allegations‌  ‌are‌  ‌jurisdictional‌  ‌and‌  ‌crucial,‌  ‌because‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌‌ 
a) Right‌‌to‌e‌ njoy;‌  ‌ complaint‌  ‌was‌  ‌filed‌  ‌beyond‌  ‌the‌  ‌prescribed‌  ‌one‌  ‌year‌  ‌period,‌  ‌then‌  ‌it‌‌ 
ART‌  ‌432‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌owner‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌thing‌  ‌has‌  ‌no‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌prohibit‌  ‌the‌‌  cannot‌‌   properly‌‌   qualify‌‌
  as‌‌ an‌‌ action‌‌ for‌‌ unlawful‌‌ detainer‌‌ over‌‌ which‌‌ 
i) To‌‌Possess;‌j‌ us‌‌possidendi‌  ‌ the‌  ‌MTCC‌  ‌can‌  ‌exercise‌‌  jurisdiction.‌‌   It‌‌
  may‌‌  be‌‌  an‌‌
  ‌accion‌‌
  publiciana‌‌ 
interference‌‌of‌‌another‌‌with‌‌the‌‌same,‌‌if‌‌   ‌
ii) To‌‌Use;‌j‌ us‌‌utendi‌  ‌ or‌‌accion‌‌reivindicatoria‌. ‌ ‌
1. the‌  ‌interference‌  ‌is‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌to‌  ‌avert‌  ‌an‌  ‌imminent‌‌ 
iii) To‌‌the‌‌Fruits.‌j‌ us‌‌fruendi‌  ‌ danger‌‌and‌‌   ‌ Here,‌  ‌the‌  ‌respondent‌  ‌was‌  ‌already‌  ‌in‌  ‌possession‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌disputed‌‌ 
b) Right‌‌to‌d
‌ ispose‌;‌‌jus‌‌disponendi‌  ‌ 2. the‌  ‌threatened‌  ‌damage,‌  ‌compared‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌damage‌‌  portion‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌Manantan‌  ‌bought‌  ‌the‌  ‌subject‌  ‌property‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌ 
arising‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌owner‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌interference,‌  ‌is‌  ‌much‌‌  Bayot‌  ‌family,‌  ‌and‌  ‌it‌  ‌was‌  ‌only‌  ‌after‌  ‌the‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌relocation‌‌ 
i) To‌‌consume‌‌or‌‌destroy‌‌or‌‌abuse;‌j‌ us‌‌abutendi‌  ‌ greater.‌‌   ‌ survey‌, ‌‌which‌‌   supposedly‌‌   showed‌‌   that‌‌  respondent‌‌   was‌‌   encroaching‌‌ 
ii) To‌‌encumber‌‌or‌‌alienate.‌  ‌ on‌  ‌the‌  ‌subject‌  ‌property,‌  ‌did‌  ‌Manantan‌  ‌begin‌  ‌asserting‌  ‌her‌  ‌claim‌  ‌of‌‌ 
The‌‌   owner‌‌
  may‌‌
  demand‌‌   from‌‌ the‌‌ person‌‌ benefited‌‌ ‌indemnity‌‌  ownership‌‌ over‌‌ the‌‌ portion‌‌ occupied‌‌ and‌‌ used‌‌ by‌‌ respondent.‌‌ Clearly,‌‌ 
c) Right‌‌to‌r‌ ecover‌o
‌ r‌‌vindicate‌;‌‌jus‌‌vindicandi‌  ‌ for‌‌the‌‌damage‌‌to‌‌him.‌  ‌ respondent's‌  ‌possession‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌disputed‌  ‌portion‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌‌ 
pursuant‌  ‌to‌  ‌any‌  ‌contract,‌  ‌express‌  ‌or‌  ‌implied,‌  ‌with‌  ‌Manantan‌, ‌‌
ART‌  ‌430‌. ‌ ‌Every‌  ‌owner‌  ‌may‌  ‌enclose‌  ‌or‌  ‌fence‌  ‌his‌  ‌land‌  ‌or‌‌  2.‌‌Actions‌‌to‌‌Recover‌‌
   ‌ and,‌  ‌resultantly,‌  ‌respondent's‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌possession‌  ‌over‌  ‌the‌  ‌disputed‌‌ 
tenements‌  ‌by‌  ‌means‌  ‌of‌‌
  walls,‌‌
  ditches,‌‌
  live‌‌
  or‌‌
  dead‌‌
  hedges,‌‌
  or‌‌ 
portion‌‌is‌‌not‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌expiration‌‌or‌‌termination.‌  ‌
by‌  ‌any‌  ‌other‌  ‌means‌  ‌without‌  ‌detriment‌  ‌to‌  ‌servitudes‌  ART‌  ‌433‌. ‌ ‌Actual‌  ‌possession‌  ‌under‌  ‌claim‌‌  of‌‌  ownership‌‌  raises‌‌ 
constituted‌‌thereon.‌  ‌ disputable‌  ‌presumption‌  ‌of‌  ‌ownership.‌  ‌The‌  ‌true‌  ‌owner‌‌   ‌must‌‌  Casilang‌‌v.‌‌Casilang-Dizon‌‌‌2013‌  ‌
Principle‌‌of‌‌“Self-Help”‌‌   ‌ resort‌‌to‌‌judicial‌‌process‌‌‌for‌‌the‌‌recovery‌‌of‌‌the‌‌property.‌  ‌
Inferior‌  ‌courts‌  ‌are‌  ‌empowered‌‌   to‌‌
  rule‌‌
  on‌‌   the‌‌
  question‌‌  of‌‌
  ownership‌‌ 
ART‌  ‌429‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌owner‌  ‌or‌  ‌lawful‌  ‌possessor‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌thing‌  ‌has‌  ‌the‌‌  of‌‌Personal‌‌Property‌  ‌ raised‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌defendant‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌‌
  ejectment‌‌   suit,‌‌  but‌‌
  only‌‌
  to‌‌
  resolve‌‌   the‌‌ 
right‌  ‌to‌  ‌exclude‌  ‌any‌  ‌person‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌enjoyment‌‌
  and‌‌
  disposal‌‌  issue‌‌
  of‌‌
  possession;‌‌   its‌‌
  determination‌‌   is‌‌
  not‌‌
  conclusive‌‌   on‌‌  the‌‌ issue‌‌ 
a. Replevin‌  ‌— ‌ ‌An‌  ‌action‌  ‌or‌  ‌provisional‌  ‌remedy‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌‌ 
thereof.‌‌   ‌ of‌‌ownership.‌  ‌
complainant‌  ‌prays‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌recovery‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌possession‌  ‌of‌‌ 
For‌‌
  this‌‌
  purpose,‌‌   he‌‌
  may‌‌  use‌‌
  such‌‌  force‌‌  as‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌ reasonably‌‌  personal‌‌property.‌  ‌
Quijano‌‌v.‌‌Amante‌‌‌2014‌  ‌
necessary‌‌   to‌‌
  repel‌‌
  or‌‌
  prevent‌‌
  an‌‌
  actual‌‌  or‌‌  threatened‌‌   unlawful‌‌  of‌‌Real‌‌Property‌  ‌
physical‌‌invasion‌‌or‌‌usurpation‌‌of‌‌his‌‌property.‌  ‌ Where‌  ‌the‌  ‌plaintiff‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌prove‌  ‌her‌  ‌alleged‌  ‌tolerance‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
b. Forcible‌  ‌Entry‌  ‌and‌  ‌Unlawful‌  ‌Detainer‌. ‌ ‌— ‌ ‌Accion‌‌  defendant's‌  ‌occupation,‌  ‌the‌  ‌possession‌  ‌is‌  ‌deemed‌  ‌illegal‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌ 
German‌‌Management‌‌&‌‌Services,‌‌Inc.‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ beginning.‌‌   Hence,‌‌   ‌the‌‌ action‌‌ for‌‌ unlawful‌‌ detainer‌‌ is‌‌ an‌‌ improper‌‌ 
interdictal‌  ‌comprises‌  ‌two‌  ‌distinct‌  ‌causes‌  ‌of‌  ‌action,‌  ‌namely,‌‌ 
The‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌self-help‌  ‌can‌  ‌only‌  ‌be‌  ‌exercised‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌of‌‌  forcible‌  ‌entry‌  ‌(‌detentacion‌) ‌ ‌and‌  ‌unlawful‌  ‌detainer‌‌  remedy‌. ‌‌‌But‌‌  the‌‌ action‌‌ cannot‌‌ be‌‌ considered‌‌ as‌‌ one‌‌ for‌‌ forcible‌‌ entry‌‌ 
actual‌‌or‌‌threatened‌‌dispossession‌‌‌which‌‌is‌‌absent‌‌herein.‌‌   ‌ (‌desahuico‌).‌‌   ‌ without‌‌  any‌‌ allegation‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ complaint‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ entry‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ defendant‌‌ 
was‌‌by‌‌means‌‌of‌‌force,‌‌intimidation,‌‌threats,‌‌strategy‌‌or‌‌stealth.‌  ‌
When‌‌   possession‌‌
  has‌‌
  already‌‌  been‌‌
  lost,‌‌
  the‌‌
  owner‌‌ must‌‌ resort‌‌    ‌forcible‌‌
In‌‌   entry‌, ‌‌one‌‌  is‌‌  deprived‌‌  of‌‌  physical‌‌  possession‌‌  of‌‌ 
to‌‌judicial‌‌process‌‌for‌‌the‌‌recovery‌‌of‌‌property.‌  ‌ real‌‌  property‌‌   by‌‌
  means‌‌   of‌‌
  force,‌‌ intimidation,‌‌ strategy,‌‌ threats,‌‌ 
or‌  ‌stealth‌  ‌whereas‌  ‌in‌  u ‌ nlawful‌  ‌detainer‌, ‌ ‌one‌  ‌illegally‌‌  c. Accion‌  ‌Publiciana.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌plenary‌  ‌action‌  ‌to‌  ‌recover‌  ‌the‌‌ 
withholds‌‌   possession‌‌   after‌‌   the‌‌ expiration‌‌ or‌‌ termination‌‌ of‌‌ his‌‌  right‌  ‌of‌  ‌possession‌  ‌when‌  ‌dispossession‌  ‌has‌  ‌lasted‌  ‌for‌‌   more‌‌ 
Tan-Yap‌‌v.‌‌Patrick‌‌‌2019‌  ‌ than‌‌ one‌‌ year.‌‌ It‌‌ is‌‌ an‌‌ ordinary‌‌ civil‌‌ proceeding‌‌ to‌‌ determine‌‌ the‌‌ 
right‌  ‌to‌  ‌hold‌  ‌possession‌  ‌under‌  ‌any‌  ‌contract,‌  ‌express‌  ‌or‌‌ 
The‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌of‌  ‌"self-help"‌  ‌applies‌  ‌only‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌person‌  ‌against‌‌  better‌‌right‌‌of‌‌possession‌‌of‌‌realty‌‌independently‌‌of‌‌title.‌  ‌
implied.‌‌   ‌
whom‌  ‌the‌  ‌owner‌  ‌has‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌use‌  ‌force‌‌
  (in‌‌
  order‌‌
  to‌‌
  exclude‌‌   the‌‌ 
former‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌latter's‌  ‌property)‌  ‌is‌  ‌really‌  ‌an‌  ‌"‌aggressor‌."‌  ‌In‌  ‌this‌‌  Estate‌‌of‌‌Manantan‌‌v.‌‌Somera‌  ‌ d. Accion‌  ‌Reivindicatoria.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌action‌  ‌to‌  ‌recover‌‌ 
ownership‌, ‌ ‌as‌  ‌well‌  ‌as‌  ‌possession‌  ‌in‌  ‌an‌  ‌ordinary‌  ‌civil‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 158‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

proceeding.‌  ‌
Baguio‌‌Townsite‌‌Reservation.‌‌It‌‌is‌‌the‌‌SolGen‌‌who‌‌is‌‌the‌‌proper‌‌party.‌  An‌  ‌ordinance‌  ‌that‌  ‌provides‌  ‌that‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌6%‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌total‌  ‌area‌  ‌of‌‌  the‌‌ 
Iglesia‌‌ni‌‌Cristo‌‌v.‌‌Ponferrada‌  ‌ memorial‌  ‌park‌  ‌cemetery‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌set‌  ‌aside‌  ‌for‌  ‌charity‌  ‌burial‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Javelosa‌‌v.‌‌Tapus‌‌‌2018‌  ‌ deceased‌‌   persons‌‌   who‌‌   are‌‌
  paupers‌‌   is‌‌  being‌‌  challenged.‌‌   This‌‌  is‌‌
  not‌‌   a ‌‌
Since‌  ‌respondents‌  ‌were‌  ‌in‌  ‌actual‌  ‌or‌  ‌physical‌‌   possession‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
mere‌  ‌police‌  ‌regulation‌  ‌but‌  ‌an‌  ‌outright‌  ‌confiscation.‌  ‌It‌  ‌deprives‌  ‌a ‌‌
property‌  ‌when‌  ‌they‌  ‌filed‌  ‌their‌  ‌complaint‌  ‌against‌  ‌petitioner,‌  ‌the‌‌  The‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌failed‌  ‌to‌  ‌adduce‌  ‌evidence‌  ‌to‌  ‌establish‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌‌ 
person‌  ‌of‌‌
  his‌‌
  private‌‌  property‌‌   without‌‌   due‌‌
  process‌‌   of‌‌  law,‌‌  nay,‌‌  even‌‌ 
prescriptive‌  ‌period‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌reinvindicatory‌  ‌action‌  ‌had‌  ‌not‌  ‌even‌‌  respondents'‌‌   occupation‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  subject‌‌
  property‌‌ was‌‌ actually‌‌ effected‌‌ 
without‌‌compensation.‌  ‌
commenced‌‌   to‌‌
  run‌, ‌‌even‌‌  if‌‌ petitioner‌‌ was‌‌ able‌‌ to‌‌ secure‌‌ TCT‌‌ over‌‌ the‌‌  through‌  ‌her‌  ‌tolerance‌  ‌or‌  ‌permission.‌  ‌Unfortunately,‌  ‌the‌  ‌petitioner‌‌ 
property‌  ‌in‌  ‌1984.‌  ‌The‌  ‌reason‌  ‌for‌  ‌this‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌  ‌one‌  ‌who‌‌   is‌‌
  in‌‌  actual‌‌  failed‌‌
  to‌‌
  prove‌‌   how‌‌
  and‌‌ when‌‌ the‌‌ respondents‌‌ entered‌‌ the‌‌ subject‌‌ lot,‌‌ 
OSG‌‌v.‌‌Ayala‌‌Land‌  ‌
possession‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌piece‌  ‌of‌  ‌land‌  ‌claiming‌‌   to‌‌  be‌‌  the‌‌
  owner‌‌   thereof‌‌  as‌‌
  well‌‌
  as‌‌
  how‌‌   and‌‌
  when‌‌   the‌‌  permission‌‌   to‌‌
  occupy‌‌  was‌‌
  purportedly‌‌ 
may‌  ‌wait‌  ‌until‌  ‌his‌  ‌possession‌  ‌is‌  ‌disturbed‌  ‌or‌  ‌his‌  ‌title‌  ‌is‌‌  given.‌  ‌The‌  ‌absence‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌  ‌essential‌  ‌details‌  ‌is‌  ‌especially‌  ‌troubling‌‌  The‌  ‌total‌  ‌prohibition‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌  ‌collection‌  ‌of‌  ‌parking‌  ‌fees‌  ‌from‌‌ 
attacked‌‌   before‌‌   taking‌‌   steps‌‌ to‌‌ vindicate‌‌ his‌‌ right‌, ‌‌the‌‌ reason‌‌ for‌‌  considering‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌respondents‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌occupying‌  ‌the‌  ‌subject‌‌  persons‌  ‌who‌  ‌use‌  ‌the‌  ‌mall‌  ‌parking‌  ‌facilities‌  ‌has‌  ‌no‌  ‌basis‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
the‌  ‌rule‌  ‌being,‌  ‌that‌  ‌his‌  ‌undisturbed‌  ‌possession‌  ‌gives‌  ‌him‌  ‌a ‌‌ property‌‌for‌‌more‌‌than‌‌70‌‌years.‌  ‌ National‌  ‌Building‌  ‌Code‌  ‌or‌  ‌its‌  ‌IRR.‌‌
  The‌‌
  State‌‌
  also‌‌
  cannot‌‌  impose‌‌   the‌‌ 
continuing‌‌   right‌‌   to‌‌
  seek‌‌  the‌‌  aid‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌court‌‌ of‌‌ equity‌‌ to‌‌ ascertain‌‌ and‌‌  same‌  ‌prohibition‌  ‌by‌  ‌generally‌  ‌invoking‌  ‌police‌  ‌power,‌  ‌since‌  ‌said‌‌ 
determine‌  ‌the‌  ‌nature‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌adverse‌  ‌claim‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌third‌  ‌party‌  ‌and‌  ‌its‌‌  e. Injunction‌. ‌‌— ‌‌A ‌‌person‌‌ deprived‌‌ of‌‌ his‌‌ possession‌‌ of‌‌ property‌‌  prohibition‌  ‌amounts‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌taking‌  ‌of‌  ‌respondents'‌  ‌property‌  ‌without‌‌ 
effect‌‌  on‌‌
  his‌‌  own‌‌  title,‌‌ which‌‌ right‌‌ can‌‌ be‌‌ claimed‌‌ only‌‌ by‌‌ one‌‌ who‌‌ is‌‌  is‌  ‌ordinarily‌  ‌not‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌to‌  ‌avail‌  ‌himself‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌remedy‌  ‌of‌‌  payment‌‌of‌‌just‌‌compensation.‌  ‌
in‌‌possession.‌  ‌ injunction.‌  ‌
MMDA‌‌v.‌‌Trackworks‌  ‌
Suarez‌‌v.‌‌Emboy‌‌‌2014‌  ‌ In‌  ‌civil‌  ‌cases,‌  ‌however,‌  ‌the‌  ‌remedy‌  ‌of‌  ‌writ‌  ‌of‌  ‌preliminary‌‌  MMDA's‌  ‌powers‌  ‌were‌  ‌limited‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌formulation,‌  ‌coordination,‌‌ 
As‌‌
  a ‌‌‌general‌‌
  rule‌, ‌‌a ‌‌pending‌‌
  civil‌‌
  action‌‌  involving‌‌   ownership‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  mandatory‌  ‌injunction‌‌   may‌‌   be‌‌
  availed‌‌
  of‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  original‌‌   case‌‌
  of‌‌  regulation,‌  ‌implementation,‌  ‌preparation,‌  ‌management,‌  ‌monitoring,‌‌ 
same‌  ‌property‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌justify‌  ‌the‌  ‌suspension‌  ‌of‌  ‌ejectment‌‌  forcible‌  ‌entry;‌  ‌and‌  ‌during‌  ‌appeal,‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌unlawful‌‌  setting‌‌
  of‌‌ policies,‌‌ installing‌‌ a ‌‌system,‌‌ and‌‌ administration.‌‌ Nothing‌‌ in‌ 
proceedings.‌  ‌Only‌  ‌in‌  ‌rare‌  ‌instances‌  ‌is‌  ‌suspension‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌to‌  ‌await‌‌  detainer.‌  ‌ RA‌‌7924‌‌granted‌‌MMDA‌‌police‌‌power,‌‌let‌‌alone‌‌legislative‌‌power.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌outcome‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌pending‌  ‌civil‌  ‌action.‌  ‌As‌  ‌an‌  ‌exception‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  f. Writ‌  ‌of‌  ‌Possession.‌  ‌— ‌ ‌Used‌  ‌in‌  ‌connection‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌Land‌‌ 
general‌  ‌rule,‌  ‌the‌  ‌respondents’‌  ‌petition‌  ‌for‌  ‌nullification‌  ‌of‌  ‌partition‌‌  Registration‌  ‌Law,‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌order‌  ‌directing‌  ‌the‌  ‌sheriff‌  ‌to‌  ‌place‌  ‌a ‌‌ Eminent‌‌Domain‌  ‌
can‌‌abate‌‌Carmencita’s‌‌suit‌‌for‌‌unlawful‌‌detainer.‌  ‌ successful‌‌   registrant‌‌ under‌‌ the‌‌ Torrens‌‌ system‌‌ in‌‌ possession‌‌ of‌‌ 
the‌‌property‌‌covered‌‌by‌‌a‌‌decree‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Court.‌  ‌ ART‌‌ 435‌. ‌‌No‌‌ person‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ deprived‌‌ of‌‌ his‌‌ property‌‌ except‌‌ by‌‌ 
Indisputably,‌‌ the‌‌ execution‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ MCTC‌‌ Decision‌‌ would‌‌ have‌‌ resulted‌‌ 
Requisites‌‌in‌‌an‌‌Action‌‌to‌‌Recover‌‌   ‌ competent‌  ‌authority‌  ‌and‌  ‌for‌  ‌public‌  ‌use‌  ‌and‌  ‌always‌  ‌upon‌‌ 
in‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌demolition‌‌   ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  house‌‌   subject‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ ejectment‌‌ suit;‌‌ thus,‌‌ by‌‌ 
payment‌‌of‌‌just‌‌compensation.‌  ‌
parity‌  ‌of‌  ‌reasoning,‌  ‌considerations‌‌   of‌‌
  equity‌‌   require‌‌  the‌‌  suspension‌‌ 
of‌  ‌the‌  ‌ejectment‌  ‌proceedings.‌‌   Needlessly,‌‌   the‌‌  litigants‌‌  as‌‌
  well‌‌   as‌‌
  the‌‌ 
ART‌  ‌434‌. ‌ ‌In‌  ‌an‌  ‌action‌  ‌to‌  ‌recover,‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌‌ 
MCIAA‌‌v.‌‌Lozada,‌s‌ upra‌‌‌2010‌‌En‌‌Banc‌  ‌
identified‌, ‌ ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌plaintiff‌‌
  must‌‌
  rely‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  ‌strength‌‌
  of‌‌
  his‌‌ 
courts‌‌   will‌‌
  be‌‌
  wasting‌‌   much‌‌  time‌‌   and‌‌  effort‌‌  by‌‌   proceeding‌‌   at‌‌ a ‌‌stage‌‌ 
title‌‌‌and‌‌not‌‌on‌‌the‌‌weakness‌‌of‌‌the‌‌defendant's‌‌claim.‌  ‌ We‌  ‌now‌  ‌expressly‌  ‌hold‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌taking‌  ‌of‌  ‌private‌  ‌property,‌‌ 
wherein‌  ‌the‌  ‌outcome‌  ‌is‌  ‌at‌  ‌best‌  ‌temporary,‌  ‌but‌  ‌the‌  ‌result‌  ‌of‌‌ 
consequent‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌Government's‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌power‌  ‌of‌  ‌eminent‌‌ 
enforcement‌‌is‌‌permanent,‌‌unjust‌‌and‌‌probably‌‌irreparable‌. ‌ ‌ 3.‌‌Limitations‌‌of‌‌ownership‌  ‌ domain,‌‌   is‌‌
  ALWAYS‌‌   subject‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ condition‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ property‌‌ be‌‌ 
devoted‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌specific‌  ‌public‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌for‌‌   which‌‌   it‌‌
  was‌‌
  taken‌. ‌‌
Gabriel‌‌v.‌‌Crisologo‌‌‌2014‌  ‌ Imposed‌‌by‌‌the‌‌State‌  ‌ Corollarily,‌‌   if‌‌
  this‌‌
  particular‌‌   purpose‌‌  or‌‌  intent‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  initiated‌‌   or‌‌
  not‌‌ 
The‌  ‌objective‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌plaintiffs‌  ‌in‌  ‌accion‌  ‌publiciana‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌recover‌‌  Police‌‌Power‌  ‌ at‌  ‌all‌  ‌pursued,‌  ‌and‌  ‌is‌  ‌peremptorily‌  ‌abandoned,‌  ‌then‌  ‌the‌  ‌former‌‌ 
possession‌‌   ONLY‌, ‌‌not‌‌ ownership.‌‌ When‌‌ parties,‌‌ however,‌‌ raise‌‌ the‌‌  owners,‌  ‌if‌  ‌they‌  ‌so‌  ‌desire,‌  ‌may‌  ‌seek‌  ‌the‌  ‌reversion‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌property,‌ 
issue‌  ‌of‌  ‌ownership,‌‌   the‌‌  court‌‌
  may‌‌   pass‌‌  upon‌‌  the‌‌
  issue‌‌   to‌‌
  determine‌ 
ART‌  ‌436‌. ‌ ‌When‌  ‌any‌  ‌property‌  ‌is‌  ‌condemned‌  ‌or‌  ‌seized‌  ‌by‌‌  subject‌‌   to‌‌  the‌‌  return‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  amount‌‌  of‌‌  just‌‌  compensation‌‌ received.‌‌ In‌‌ 
who‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌  ‌parties‌  ‌has‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌‌   to‌‌  possess‌‌   the‌‌
  property.‌‌   This‌‌  competent‌  ‌authority‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌interest‌  ‌of‌  ‌health,‌  ‌safety‌  ‌or‌‌  such‌‌   a ‌‌case,‌‌ the‌‌ exercise‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ power‌‌ of‌‌ eminent‌‌ domain‌‌ has‌‌ become‌‌ 
adjudication,‌  ‌nonetheless,‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌ ‌final‌  ‌and‌  ‌binding‌‌  security‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌owner‌  ‌thereof‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌‌  improper‌‌for‌‌lack‌‌of‌‌the‌‌required‌‌factual‌‌justification.‌  ‌
compensation,‌‌   unless‌‌
  he‌‌
  can‌‌
  show‌‌
  that‌‌
  such‌‌  condemnation‌‌ or‌‌ 
determination‌‌of‌‌the‌‌issue‌‌of‌‌ownership‌. ‌ ‌
seizure‌‌is‌‌unjustified.‌  ‌ Republic‌‌v.‌‌Heirs‌‌of‌‌Borbon‌‌‌2015‌  ‌
Petitioners,‌  ‌as‌  ‌private‌  ‌individuals,‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌the‌  ‌proper‌  ‌parties‌  ‌to‌‌  City‌‌Government‌‌of‌‌Quezon‌‌City‌‌v.‌‌Ericta‌  ‌ The‌‌
  expropriator‌‌ who‌‌ has‌‌ taken‌‌ possession‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ property‌‌ subject‌‌ of‌‌ 
question‌  ‌the‌  ‌status‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌respondent’s‌  ‌registered‌  ‌titles‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 159‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

Imposed‌‌By‌‌The‌‌Owner‌  ‌ d) Testamentary‌‌disposition,‌‌or‌‌donation‌‌inter‌‌vivos;‌  ‌
expropriation‌  ‌is‌  ‌obliged‌  ‌to‌  ‌pay‌  ‌reasonable‌  ‌compensation‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
landowner‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌period‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌  ‌possession‌  ‌although‌  ‌the‌‌  E.g.‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌owner‌  ‌leases‌  ‌his‌‌
  property‌‌
  to‌‌
  another,‌‌
  said‌‌
  owner‌‌
  in‌‌  e) Fortuitous‌‌event‌‌or‌‌chance‌‌—‌‌commixtion‌‌or‌‌confusion;‌  ‌
proceedings‌  ‌had‌  ‌been‌  ‌discontinued‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌ground‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌public‌‌  the‌‌meantime‌‌cannot‌‌physically‌‌occupy‌‌the‌‌premises.‌  ‌ f) Occupancy.‌‌   ‌
purpose‌‌for‌‌the‌‌expropriation‌‌had‌‌meanwhile‌‌ceased.‌  ‌
c. Co-ownership‌  ‌ Gapacan‌‌v.‌‌Omipet‌  ‌
Imposed‌‌by‌‌law‌  ‌ A‌  ‌property‌  ‌owner‌  ‌whose‌  ‌property‌  ‌rights‌  ‌were‌‌   being‌‌  disturbed‌‌   may‌‌ 
ART‌‌  484‌. ‌‌There‌‌ is‌‌ co-ownership‌‌ whenever‌‌ the‌‌ ownership‌‌ of‌‌ an‌‌ 
undivided‌‌thing‌‌or‌‌right‌‌belongs‌‌to‌‌different‌‌persons.‌  ‌ ask‌  ‌a ‌ ‌competent‌  ‌court‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌proper‌  ‌determination‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  respective‌‌ 
ART‌‌  431‌. ‌‌The‌‌  owner‌‌  of‌‌ a ‌‌thing‌‌ cannot‌‌ make‌‌ use‌‌ thereof‌‌ in‌‌ such‌‌  rights‌‌of‌‌the‌‌party-claimants.‌‌   ‌
manner‌‌as‌‌to‌‌injure‌‌the‌‌rights‌‌of‌‌a‌‌third‌‌person.‌‌   ‌ Exists‌  ‌whenever‌  ‌an‌  ‌undivided‌  ‌thing‌  ‌or‌  ‌right‌  ‌belongs‌  ‌to‌‌ 
different‌‌persons.‌  ‌ As‌  ‌the‌  ‌two‌  ‌(2)‌  ‌surviving‌  ‌heirs‌‌   of‌‌
  Paicat‌‌   Gapacan,‌‌   neither‌‌   Maria‌‌
  nor‌‌ 
Ermino‌‌v.‌‌Golden‌‌Village‌‌Homeowners‌,‌‌2018‌ 
Antonio‌‌   can‌‌
  claim‌‌   absolute‌‌ ownership‌‌ over‌‌ the‌‌ entire‌‌ property‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ 
Requisites‌  ‌
The‌  ‌bulldozing‌  ‌and‌  ‌construction‌  ‌works‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌Hilltop‌  ‌City‌‌  prejudice‌  ‌of‌‌   the‌‌  other,‌‌  for‌‌  each,‌‌
  in‌‌
  legal‌‌
  contemplation,‌‌   is‌‌
  entitled‌‌  to‌‌ 
Subdivision,‌  ‌made‌  ‌Alco‌  ‌Homes‌  ‌and‌  ‌Golden‌  ‌Village's‌  ‌obligation,‌  ‌as‌‌  a. Plurality‌‌of‌‌owners;‌  ‌ only‌  ‌one-half‌  ‌(1/2)‌  ‌pro-indiviso‌  ‌share‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌or‌  ‌her‌  ‌father's‌  ‌estate.‌‌ 
lower‌  ‌estates,‌  ‌more‌  ‌burdensome‌  ‌than‌  ‌what‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌contemplated.‌‌  Prior‌‌   to‌‌
  partition,‌‌   Maria‌‌   and‌‌  Antonio,‌‌   and‌‌   upon‌‌ the‌‌ latter's‌‌ death,‌‌ the‌‌ 
b. Object‌‌is‌‌undivided;‌  ‌
Lower‌  ‌estates‌  ‌are‌  ‌only‌  ‌obliged‌  ‌to‌  ‌receive‌  ‌water‌  ‌naturally‌‌  petitioners,‌  ‌hold‌  ‌the‌  ‌disputed‌  ‌property‌  ‌in‌  ‌their‌  ‌capacity‌  ‌as‌‌ 
flowing‌  ‌from‌  ‌higher‌  ‌estates‌  ‌and‌  ‌such‌‌   should‌‌   be‌‌
  free‌‌   from‌‌   any‌‌  c. Each‌  ‌co-owner’s‌  ‌right‌  ‌is‌  ‌limited‌‌
  only‌‌
  to‌‌
  his‌‌
  ideal‌‌
  share‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  co-owners‌. ‌ ‌
human‌  ‌intervention‌. ‌‌In‌‌   the‌‌
  instant‌‌   case,‌‌   what‌‌  flowed‌‌   from‌‌   Hilltop‌‌  physical‌‌value.‌  ‌
City‌  ‌Subdivision‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌  ‌water‌  ‌that‌  ‌naturally‌  ‌flowed‌‌   from‌‌   a ‌‌higher‌‌  3.‌‌Rights‌‌of‌‌co-owners‌  ‌
estate.‌‌  Alco‌‌
  Homes‌‌  and‌‌  Golden‌‌   Village‌‌   are‌‌
  not‌‌
  anymore‌‌ obligated‌‌ to‌‌  1.‌‌Characteristics‌  ‌
receive‌‌such‌‌waters‌‌‌and‌‌earth‌‌coming‌‌from‌‌Hilltop‌‌City‌‌Subdivision.‌  ‌ Share‌‌of‌‌Co-Owners‌‌in‌‌Benefits‌‌and‌‌Charges‌  ‌
a) There‌‌are‌‌at‌‌least‌‌two‌‌co-owners;‌  ‌
Therefore,‌  ‌E.B.‌  ‌Villarosa‌  ‌is‌  ‌responsible‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌damage‌  ‌suffered‌  ‌by‌‌  b) Co-owner‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  whole‌‌
  and‌‌  at‌‌
  the‌‌
  same‌‌ time‌‌ absolute‌‌ owner‌‌ of‌‌  ART‌‌  485‌. ‌‌The‌‌  share‌‌  of‌‌ the‌‌ co-owners,‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ benefits‌‌ as‌‌ well‌‌ as‌‌ 
Spouses‌  ‌Ermino.‌  ‌E.B.‌  ‌Villarosa‌  ‌should‌  ‌have‌  ‌provided‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌  his‌  ‌own‌  ‌ideal‌  ‌(abstract,‌  ‌pro‌  ‌indiviso‌, ‌ ‌fractional,‌  ‌aliquot‌) ‌ ‌but‌‌  in‌  ‌the‌  ‌charges,‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌proportional‌  ‌to‌  ‌their‌  ‌respective‌‌ 
necessary‌‌   measures‌‌   such‌‌  as‌‌
  retaining‌‌
  walls‌‌   and‌‌  drainage‌‌  so‌‌
  that‌‌ the‌‌  definite‌‌share.‌  ‌ interests.‌‌   Any‌‌
  stipulation‌‌   in‌‌ a ‌‌contract‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ contrary‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ 
large‌  ‌volume‌  ‌of‌  ‌water‌  ‌emanating‌  ‌from‌  ‌it‌  ‌would‌  ‌not‌  ‌unduly‌  ‌cause‌‌  void‌. ‌ ‌
inconvenience,‌‌if‌‌not‌‌injury,‌‌to‌‌the‌‌lower‌‌estates.‌  ‌ c) There‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌single‌  ‌object‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌materially‌  ‌divided‌  ‌and‌‌ 
over‌  ‌which‌  ‌and‌  ‌his‌  ‌ideal‌  ‌share‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌whole,‌  ‌each‌  ‌co-owner‌‌  The‌  ‌portions‌  ‌belonging‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌
  co-owners‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  co-ownership‌‌ 
exercises‌‌ownership,‌‌together‌‌with‌‌the‌‌other‌‌co-owners;‌  ‌ shall‌‌be‌‌‌presumed‌‌equal,‌‌‌unless‌‌the‌‌contrary‌‌is‌‌proved.‌  ‌
Imposed‌‌By‌‌The‌‌Grantor‌  ‌
d) There‌‌is‌‌no‌‌mutual‌‌representation‌‌by‌‌the‌‌co-owners;‌  ‌ Renunciation‌‌by‌‌a‌‌Co-owner‌‌of‌‌his‌‌Share‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Co-ownership‌  ‌
E.g.‌  ‌the‌  ‌donor‌  ‌may‌  ‌prohibit‌  ‌the‌  ‌donees‌  ‌from‌  ‌partitioning‌  ‌the‌‌ 
property‌‌for‌‌a‌‌period‌‌not‌‌exceeding‌‌20‌‌years.‌  ‌ e) It‌‌exists‌‌for‌‌the‌‌common‌‌enjoyment‌‌of‌‌the‌‌co-owners;‌  Is‌‌
  in‌‌
  reality‌‌
  a ‌‌case‌‌ of‌‌ ‌dacion‌‌ en‌‌ pago‌. ‌‌It‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ a ‌‌unilateral‌‌ act‌‌ which‌‌ 
f) It‌‌has‌‌no‌‌distinct‌‌legal‌‌personality;‌‌and‌  ‌ will‌  ‌extinguish‌  ‌an‌  ‌existing‌  ‌liability‌  ‌of‌  ‌co-owner‌  ‌without‌  ‌formal‌‌ 
Roman‌‌Catholic‌‌Archbishop‌‌of‌‌Manila‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
acceptance‌‌by‌‌the‌‌others.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌deed‌  ‌of‌  ‌donation‌  ‌involved‌  ‌herein‌  ‌expressly‌  ‌provides‌  ‌for‌‌  g) It‌  ‌is‌  ‌governed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌contract‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌parties,‌  ‌otherwise,‌  ‌by‌‌ 
automatic‌  ‌reversion‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌  ‌donated‌  ‌in‌  ‌case‌‌   of‌‌
  violation‌‌   of‌‌  special‌  ‌legal‌  ‌provisions,‌  ‌and‌  ‌in‌  ‌default,‌  ‌by‌  ‌Title‌  ‌III‌  ‌on‌‌  It‌‌
  must‌‌
  be‌‌
  a ‌‌free‌‌
  act.‌‌
  He‌‌
  who‌‌
  has‌‌
  not‌‌
  renounced‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌ compelled‌‌ 
the‌‌   condition‌‌  therein,‌‌
  hence‌‌   a ‌‌judicial‌‌   declaration‌‌   revoking‌‌ the‌‌ same‌‌  Co-ownership.‌  ‌ by‌‌an‌‌action‌‌in‌‌court‌‌to‌‌pay‌‌his‌‌share‌‌in‌‌the‌‌necessary‌‌expenses.‌  ‌
is‌  ‌not‌  ‌necessary.‌  ‌The‌  ‌cause‌  ‌of‌‌  action‌‌  herein‌‌  is‌‌
  based‌‌   on‌‌
  the‌‌
  alleged‌‌  2.‌‌Sources‌  ‌ Right‌‌of‌‌any‌‌Co-Owner‌‌to‌‌Recover,‌‌Limitation‌‌of‌‌Right‌‌of‌‌Co-Owner‌  ‌
breach‌  ‌by‌  ‌petitioners‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌resolutory‌  ‌condition‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌deed‌  ‌of‌‌ 
donation‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌  ‌donated‌  ‌should‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌sold‌  ‌within‌  ‌a ‌‌ a) Contract;‌  ‌ ART‌‌  486‌. ‌‌Each‌‌  co-owner‌‌  may‌‌  use‌‌  the‌‌  thing‌‌ owned‌‌ in‌‌ common‌‌ 
period‌  ‌of‌  ‌one‌‌
  hundred‌‌   (100)‌‌
  years‌‌   from‌‌  the‌‌
  date‌‌  of‌‌
  execution‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  xxxx‌  ‌
deed‌  ‌of‌  ‌donation.‌  ‌Said‌  ‌condition,‌  ‌in‌  ‌our‌  ‌opinion,‌‌   constitutes‌‌   an‌‌  b) Law‌  ‌— ‌ ‌easement‌  ‌of‌  ‌party‌  ‌walls,‌  ‌absolute‌  ‌community‌  ‌of‌‌ 
undue‌  ‌restriction‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌rights‌  ‌arising‌  ‌from‌  ‌ownership‌  ‌of‌‌  property‌‌between‌‌spouses;‌  ‌ ART‌  ‌487‌. ‌ ‌Any‌  ‌one‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌co-owners‌  ‌may‌  ‌bring‌  ‌an‌  ‌action‌  ‌in‌‌ 
petitioners‌‌and‌‌is,‌‌therefore,‌c‌ ontrary‌‌to‌‌public‌‌policy‌. ‌ ‌ c) Succession;‌  ‌ ejectment.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 160‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

Torres,‌‌Jr.‌‌v.‌‌Lapinid‌‌‌2014‌  ‌ Definition‌‌of‌‌Alteration‌  ‌
In‌‌
  this‌‌
  case,‌‌ Jesus‌‌ can‌‌ validly‌‌ alienate‌‌ his‌‌ co-owned‌‌ property‌‌ in‌‌ favor‌‌  Milagros‌‌  de‌‌ Guzman‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ an‌‌ indispensable‌‌ party‌‌ ‌in‌‌ the‌‌ action‌‌ for‌‌  1. Involves‌‌  change‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  thing‌‌
  from‌‌ the‌‌ state‌‌ or‌‌ essence‌‌ in‌‌ which‌‌ 
of‌  ‌Lapinid,‌  ‌free‌  ‌from‌  ‌any‌  ‌opposition‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌
  co-owners.‌‌   From‌‌  the‌‌  the‌‌recovery‌‌of‌‌the‌‌allegedly‌‌loaned‌‌money‌‌to‌‌the‌‌spouses‌‌Carandang.‌  ‌ the‌‌others‌‌believe‌‌it‌‌should‌‌remain;‌‌or‌ 
perfection‌  ‌of‌  ‌contract,‌  ‌Lapinid‌‌   eventually‌‌   became‌‌  a ‌‌co-owner‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
2. Withdrawal‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌thing‌‌
  from‌‌
  the‌‌
  use‌‌
  to‌‌
  which‌‌
  they‌‌
  wish‌‌
  it‌‌
  to‌‌ 
property.‌  ‌ Expenses‌‌for‌‌Preservation,‌‌Useful‌‌Expenses‌  ‌
be‌‌intended;‌‌or‌  ‌
No‌‌  individual‌‌   can‌‌
  claim‌‌  title‌‌
  to‌‌  a ‌‌definite‌‌  or‌‌
  concrete‌‌   portion‌‌   before‌‌  ART‌‌  488‌. ‌‌Each‌‌  co-owner‌‌  shall‌‌  have‌‌  a ‌‌right‌‌ to‌‌ compel‌‌ the‌‌ other‌‌  3. Any‌  ‌other‌  ‌transformation‌  ‌which‌  ‌prejudices‌  ‌the‌  ‌condition‌  ‌or‌‌ 
partition‌‌   of‌‌ co-owned‌‌ property.‌‌ Each‌‌ co-owner‌‌ only‌‌ possesses‌‌ a ‌‌right‌‌  co-owners‌  ‌to‌  ‌contribute‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌expenses‌  ‌of‌  ‌preservation‌‌
  of‌‌  substance‌‌of‌‌the‌‌thing‌‌or‌‌its‌‌enjoyment‌‌by‌‌others.‌  ‌
to‌‌
  sell‌‌
  or‌‌  alienate‌‌   his‌‌
  ideal‌‌  share‌‌   after‌‌
  partition.‌‌  However,‌‌   in‌‌
  case‌‌ he‌‌  the‌‌thing‌‌or‌‌right‌‌owned‌‌in‌‌common‌‌‌and‌‌to‌‌the‌‌taxes.‌‌xxxx‌  ‌
disposes‌  ‌his‌‌   share‌‌   before‌‌  partition,‌‌   such‌‌  disposition‌‌   does‌‌  not‌‌  make‌‌  4. Any‌  ‌act‌‌
  of‌‌
  ownership‌‌
  — ‌‌alienation,‌‌
  donation,‌‌
  lease,‌‌
  mortgage,‌‌ 
the‌‌  sale‌‌
  or‌‌  alienation‌‌   null‌‌
  and‌‌   void.‌‌   What‌‌ will‌‌ be‌‌ affected‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ sale‌‌  ART‌‌  489‌. ‌‌‌Repairs‌‌ ‌for‌‌ preservation‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌ made‌‌ at‌‌ the‌‌ will‌‌ of‌‌  pledge.‌  ‌
is‌‌only‌‌his‌‌proportionate‌‌share,‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌the‌‌results‌‌of‌‌the‌‌partition.‌‌   ‌ one‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌co-owners,‌  ‌but‌  ‌he‌  ‌must,‌  ‌if‌‌
  practicable,‌‌
  first‌‌
  ‌notify‌‌  Necessity‌‌of‌‌Consent,‌‌Form‌  ‌
his‌  ‌co-owners‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌necessity‌  ‌for‌  ‌such‌  ‌repairs.‌  ‌Expenses‌  ‌to‌‌ 
Adlawan‌‌v.‌‌Adlawan‌  ‌ improve‌  ‌or‌  ‌embellish‌  ‌the‌  ‌thing‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌decided‌  ‌upon‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌‌ 1. Unanimous‌‌consent;‌  ‌
Where‌  ‌the‌  ‌suit‌  ‌is‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌benefit‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌plaintiff‌  ‌alone‌  ‌who‌‌  majority‌‌as‌‌determined‌‌in‌‌article‌‌492.‌  ‌ 2. May‌‌be‌‌expressly‌‌or‌‌impliedly‌‌given.‌  ‌
claims‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌the‌  ‌sole‌  ‌owner‌  ‌and‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌possession‌  ‌of‌‌  Renunciation‌‌by‌‌a‌‌Co-Owner‌‌of‌‌his‌‌share‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Co-Ownership‌  ‌ Liability.‌‌
  — ‌‌‌If‌‌ the‌‌ co-owner‌‌ makes‌‌ the‌‌ alteration‌‌ without‌‌ the‌‌ consent‌‌ of‌‌ 
the‌‌litigated‌‌property,‌‌the‌‌action‌‌should‌‌be‌d ‌ ismissed‌. ‌ ‌
ART‌  ‌488‌. ‌‌xxxx‌‌  Any‌‌  one‌‌  of‌‌  the‌‌  latter‌‌  may‌‌  exempt‌‌  himself‌‌  from‌‌  others,‌‌he‌‌acts‌‌in‌‌bad‌‌faith‌‌and‌‌must:‌  ‌
Here,‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌brought‌  ‌the‌  ‌suit‌  ‌for‌  ‌unlawful‌  ‌detainer‌  ‌in‌  ‌his‌  ‌name‌‌  this‌  ‌obligation‌  ‌by‌  ‌renouncing‌  ‌so‌  ‌much‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌undivided‌‌  1. Lose‌‌what‌‌he‌‌has‌‌spent;‌  ‌
alone‌‌   and‌‌
  for‌‌ his‌‌ own‌‌ benefit‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ exclusion‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ heirs‌‌ of‌‌ Graciana‌‌  interest‌‌   as‌‌
  may‌‌
  be‌‌
  equivalent‌‌   to‌‌
  his‌‌
  share‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌  expenses‌‌
  and‌‌ 
as‌‌
  he‌‌  even‌‌ executed‌‌ an‌‌ affidavit‌‌ of‌‌ self-adjudication‌‌ over‌‌ the‌‌ disputed‌‌  2. Be‌‌obliged‌‌to‌‌demolish‌‌the‌‌improvements‌‌done,‌‌and‌  ‌
taxes.‌  ‌No‌  ‌such‌  ‌waiver‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌made‌‌  if‌‌
  it‌‌
  is‌‌
  prejudicial‌‌   to‌‌ 
property.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌‌
  clear‌‌
  therefore‌‌
  that‌‌   petitioner‌‌
  cannot‌‌   validly‌‌   maintain‌‌  the‌‌co-ownership‌. ‌ ‌ 3. Be‌  ‌liable‌  ‌to‌  ‌pay‌  ‌for‌  ‌losses‌  ‌and‌  ‌damages‌  ‌that‌  ‌may‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌‌ 
the‌  ‌instant‌  ‌action‌  ‌considering‌  ‌that‌  ‌he‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌  ‌recognize‌  ‌the‌‌  suffered.‌  ‌
co-ownership‌. ‌ ‌ Alteration‌‌of‌‌a‌‌Property‌‌under‌‌Co-Ownership‌  ‌
Acts‌‌of‌‌Administration‌‌and‌‌Better‌‌Enjoyment‌  ‌
ART‌  ‌491‌. ‌ ‌None‌  ‌of‌‌  the‌‌  co-owners‌‌  shall,‌‌  without‌‌  the‌‌  consent‌‌  of‌‌ 
Resuena‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ the‌  ‌others,‌  ‌make‌  ‌alterations‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌
  thing‌‌
  owned‌‌
  in‌‌
  common,‌‌  1. Contemplates‌‌
  of‌‌ acts‌‌ or‌‌ decisions‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ common‌‌ benefit‌‌ of‌‌ all‌‌ 
A‌‌  co-owner‌‌  may‌‌  bring‌‌  an‌‌
  action‌‌
  to‌‌
  exercise‌‌
  and‌‌  protect‌‌  the‌‌
  rights‌‌  of‌‌  even‌‌though‌‌benefits‌‌for‌‌all‌‌would‌‌result‌‌therefrom.‌‌   ‌ the‌‌co-owners‌‌and‌‌not‌‌for‌‌the‌‌benefit‌‌of‌‌only‌‌one‌‌or‌‌some.‌‌   ‌
all.‌‌  When‌‌
  the‌‌
  action‌‌
  is‌‌
  brought‌‌ by‌‌ one‌‌ co-owner‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ benefit‌‌ of‌‌ all,‌‌  However‌, ‌ ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌withholding‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  consent‌‌   by‌‌
  one‌‌
  or‌‌
  more‌‌
  of‌  2. Merely‌‌transitory,‌‌while‌‌alteration‌‌is‌‌more‌‌or‌‌less‌‌permanent.‌  ‌
a‌  ‌favorable‌  ‌decision‌  ‌will‌  ‌benefit‌  ‌them;‌  ‌but‌  ‌an‌  ‌adverse‌  ‌decision‌‌  the‌‌ co-owners‌‌ is‌‌ clearly‌‌ prejudicial‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ common‌‌ interest,‌‌ the‌‌ 
cannot‌‌prejudice‌‌their‌‌rights.‌  ‌ Examples‌  ‌
courts‌‌may‌‌afford‌a ‌ dequate‌‌relief‌. ‌ ‌
1. Unregistered‌‌lease‌‌of‌‌one‌‌year‌‌or‌‌less;‌  ‌
Carandang‌‌v.‌‌De‌‌Guzman‌  ‌ ART‌  ‌492‌. ‌ ‌For‌  ‌the‌  ‌administration‌  ‌and‌  ‌better‌  ‌enjoyment‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
thing‌  ‌owned‌  ‌in‌  ‌common,‌  ‌the‌  ‌resolutions‌  ‌of‌‌   ‌majority‌‌
  the‌‌   o‌ f‌‌  2. Legal‌‌fees‌‌to‌‌preserve‌‌ownership‌‌and‌‌possession‌‌of‌‌property;‌  ‌
Milagros‌‌   de‌‌
  Guzman,‌‌   being‌‌  presumed‌‌   to‌‌
  be‌‌ a ‌‌co-owner‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ credits‌‌ 
allegedly‌  ‌extended‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌spouses‌  ‌Carandang,‌  ‌seems‌‌   to‌‌
  be‌‌  either‌‌
  an‌‌  the‌‌co-owners‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌binding.‌  ‌ 3. Payment‌‌made‌‌in‌‌the‌‌ordinary‌‌course‌‌of‌‌management.‌  ‌
indispensable‌  ‌or‌  ‌a ‌ ‌necessary‌  ‌party.‌  ‌Taken‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌presumption‌‌   of‌  There‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ no‌‌ majority‌‌ unless‌‌ the‌‌ resolution‌‌ is‌‌ approved‌‌ by‌‌  Majority‌‌Rule‌  ‌
the‌‌
  conjugal‌‌   nature‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  funds‌‌  used‌‌
  to‌‌
  finance‌‌ the‌‌ four‌‌ checks‌‌ used‌‌  the‌‌
  ‌co-owners‌‌   who‌‌
  represent‌‌ the‌‌ controlling‌‌ interest‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ 
to‌‌
  pay‌‌   for‌‌  petitioners'‌‌ stock‌‌ subscriptions,‌‌ and‌‌ with‌‌ the‌‌ presumption‌‌  object‌‌of‌‌the‌‌co-ownership.‌  ‌ 1. For‌‌   the‌‌
  administration‌‌ and‌‌ better‌‌ enjoyment‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ thing‌‌ owned‌‌ 
that‌  ‌the‌  ‌credits‌  ‌themselves‌  ‌are‌  ‌part‌  ‌of‌  ‌conjugal‌  ‌funds,‌  ‌Article‌‌   1811‌‌  in‌  ‌common,‌  ‌the‌  ‌resolutions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌majority‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌co-owners‌‌ 
makes‌  ‌Quirino‌  ‌and‌  ‌Milagros‌  ‌de‌  ‌Guzman‌  ‌co-owners‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌alleged‌‌  Should‌  ‌there‌  ‌be‌  ‌no‌  ‌majority,‌  ‌or‌  ‌should‌  ‌the‌  ‌resolution‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  shall‌‌be‌‌binding.‌  ‌
credit.‌‌   Being‌‌ co-owners‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ alleged‌‌ credit,‌‌ Quirino‌‌ and‌‌ Milagros‌‌ de‌‌  majority‌  ‌be‌  ‌seriously‌  ‌prejudicial‌  ‌to‌  ‌those‌  ‌interested‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
property‌  ‌owned‌  ‌in‌  ‌common,‌  ‌the‌  ‌court,‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌instance‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌‌  2. There‌‌   shall‌‌ be‌‌ no‌‌ majority‌‌ unless‌‌ the‌‌ resolution‌‌ is‌‌ approved‌‌ by‌‌ 
Guzman‌‌may‌‌separately‌‌bring‌‌an‌‌action‌‌for‌‌the‌‌recovery‌‌thereof.‌‌   ‌
interested‌  ‌party,‌  ‌shall‌  ‌order‌  ‌such‌  ‌measures‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌may‌  ‌deem‌‌  the‌  ‌co-owners‌  ‌who‌  ‌represent‌  ‌the‌  ‌controlling‌  ‌interest‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
proper,‌‌including‌‌the‌a ‌ ppointment‌‌of‌‌an‌‌administrator.‌  ‌ object‌‌of‌‌the‌‌co-ownership.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 161‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

⭐‌Cruz‌‌v.‌‌Catapang‌‌‌on‌‌entry‌‌by‌‌strategy‌  ‌ Sanchez‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
lapse‌  ‌of‌  ‌one‌  ‌year‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌date‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌decree‌  ‌of‌  ‌registration,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
A‌‌
  co-owner‌‌   cannot‌‌   give‌‌
  valid‌‌
  consent‌‌   to‌‌
  another‌‌
  to‌‌
  build‌‌   a ‌‌house‌‌ on‌‌  In‌  ‌co-ownership,‌  ‌the‌  ‌relationship‌  ‌of‌  ‌such‌  ‌co-owner‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌other‌‌  attendance‌  ‌of‌  ‌fraud‌‌   in‌‌
  its‌‌
  issuance‌‌   created‌‌   an‌‌
  implied‌‌   trust‌‌   ‌in‌‌ 
the‌  ‌co-owned‌  ‌property,‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌act‌  ‌tantamount‌  ‌to‌  ‌devoting‌‌   the‌‌  co-owners‌‌is‌f‌ iduciary‌‌‌in‌‌character‌‌and‌‌attribute.‌‌   ‌ favor‌  ‌of‌‌
  petitioners‌‌   and‌‌
  gave‌‌   them‌‌  the‌‌  right‌‌
  to‌‌
  seek‌‌   reconveyance‌‌   of‌‌ 
property‌‌   to‌‌
  his‌‌  or‌‌
  her‌‌
  exclusive‌‌   use.‌‌ ‌Giving‌‌ consent‌‌ to‌‌ a ‌‌third‌‌ person‌‌  the‌‌parcel‌‌wrongfully‌‌obtained‌‌by‌‌the‌‌former.‌‌   ‌
to‌  ‌construct‌  ‌a ‌ ‌house‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌co-owned‌  ‌property‌  ‌will‌  ‌injure‌  ‌the‌‌  Thus,‌  ‌the‌  ‌legal‌  ‌effect‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌agreement‌  ‌to‌  ‌preserve‌  ‌the‌  ‌properties‌‌
  in‌‌ 
interest‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌  co-ownership‌‌   and‌‌ prevent‌‌ other‌‌ co-owners‌‌ from‌‌ using‌‌  co-ownership‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌create‌  ‌an‌  ‌express‌  ‌trust‌  ‌among‌  ‌the‌  ‌heirs‌  ‌as‌‌  Effect‌‌of‌‌Redemption‌‌of‌‌Co-Owned‌‌Property‌‌by‌‌one‌‌Co-Owner‌‌   ‌
the‌‌property‌‌in‌‌accordance‌‌with‌‌their‌‌rights.‌  ‌ co-owners‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌properties.‌  ‌Co-ownership‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌form‌  ‌of‌  ‌trust‌  ‌and‌‌ 
every‌‌co-owner‌‌is‌‌a‌‌trustee‌‌for‌‌the‌‌others.‌  ‌ Adille‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
The‌‌   construction‌‌   of‌‌
  a ‌‌house‌‌   on‌‌  the‌‌
  co-owned‌‌ property‌‌ is‌‌ an‌‌ act‌‌ 
May‌  ‌a ‌‌co-owner‌‌
  acquire‌‌
  exclusive‌‌
  ownership‌‌
  over‌‌
  the‌‌
  property‌‌
  held‌‌ 
of‌  ‌dominion.‌  ‌Therefore,‌‌   it‌‌
  is‌‌
  an‌‌
  alteration‌‌   falling‌‌
  under‌‌  Article‌‌   491.‌‌  Nufable‌‌v.‌‌Nufable‌  ‌ in‌‌common?‌  ‌
The‌‌   consent‌‌   given‌‌  by‌‌
  Norma‌‌   Maligaya‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌  absence‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  consent‌‌ 
of‌‌
  petitioner‌‌   and‌‌
  Luz‌‌  Cruz‌‌   did‌‌   not‌‌  vest‌‌  upon‌‌   respondent‌‌   any‌‌ right‌‌ to‌‌  Well-entrenched‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌rule‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌co-owner‌‌
  can‌‌
  only‌‌
  alienate‌‌
  his‌‌ 
pro‌‌indiviso‌‌share‌‌in‌‌the‌‌co-owned‌‌property‌. ‌ ‌ NO‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌repurchase‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌exercised‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌co-owner‌  ‌with‌‌ 
enter‌‌   into‌‌
  the‌‌
  co-owned‌‌   property.‌‌   ‌Her‌‌ entry‌‌ into‌‌ the‌‌ property‌‌ still‌‌  respect‌  ‌to‌  ‌his‌  ‌share‌  ‌alone.‌  ‌Necessary‌  ‌expenses‌  ‌may‌‌   be‌‌
  incurred‌‌   by‌‌ 
falls‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌classification‌  ‌“through‌  ‌strategy‌  ‌or‌  ‌stealth.‌” ‌ ‌As‌‌  one‌‌
  co-owner,‌‌   subject‌‌   to‌‌
  his‌‌
  right‌‌
  to‌‌
  collect‌‌
  reimbursement‌‌   from‌‌ the‌‌ 
Therefore,‌  ‌as‌  ‌regards‌  ‌the‌  ‌remaining‌  ‌¾ ‌‌pro‌‌   indiviso‌‌  share,‌‌
  the‌‌
  same‌‌ 
such,‌‌respondent’s‌‌acts‌‌constitute‌‌‌forcible‌‌entry‌. ‌ ‌ remaining‌  ‌co-owners.‌  ‌There‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌doubt‌  ‌that‌  ‌redemption‌  ‌of‌‌ 
was‌‌ ‌held‌‌ in‌‌ trust‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ party‌‌ rightfully‌‌ entitled‌‌ thereto,‌‌ who‌‌ are‌‌ the‌‌ 
private‌‌respondents‌‌herein.‌  ‌ property‌‌entails‌‌a‌‌necessary‌‌expense‌.  ‌‌ ‌
⭐‌Arambulo‌‌v.‌‌Nolasco‌‌‌2014‌‌on‌‌adequate‌‌relief‌‌of‌‌Art‌‌491‌  ‌
Corollary‌  ‌to‌  ‌Article‌  ‌494‌, ‌ ‌Article‌  ‌498‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Civil‌  ‌Code‌  ‌states‌‌
  that‌‌  Prescription,‌‌
  as‌‌ a ‌‌mode‌‌ of‌‌ terminating‌‌ co-ownership,‌‌ must‌‌ have‌‌ been‌‌ 
Sale‌‌or‌‌Mortgage‌‌of‌‌Common‌‌Property‌  ‌
whenever‌  ‌the‌  ‌thing‌  ‌is‌  ‌essentially‌  ‌indivisible‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌co-owners‌‌  preceded‌  ‌by‌  ‌repudiation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌co-ownership.‌  ‌The‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌‌ 
cannot‌  ‌agree‌  ‌that‌  ‌it‌  ‌be‌  ‌allotted‌  ‌to‌‌
  one‌‌
  of‌‌
  them‌‌  who‌‌  shall‌‌
  indemnify‌  Pamplona‌‌v.‌‌Moreto‌  ‌ repudiation‌,‌‌in‌‌turn,‌‌is‌‌subject‌‌to‌‌certain‌‌conditions:‌‌   ‌
the‌  ‌others,‌  ‌it‌‌
  shall‌‌
  be‌‌  sold‌‌  and‌‌
  its‌‌
  proceeds‌‌   accordingly‌‌   distributed.‌‌ 
The‌  ‌title‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌pro-indiviso‌  ‌or‌  ‌inchoate‌  ‌but‌  ‌the‌  ‌moment‌  ‌the‌‌  1) a‌‌co-owner‌‌repudiates‌‌the‌‌co-ownership;‌‌   ‌
This‌‌is‌‌resorted‌‌to‌‌   ‌
co-owner‌‌   as‌‌
  vendor‌‌   pointed‌‌   out‌‌   its‌‌
  location‌‌ and‌‌ even‌‌ indicated‌‌ 
a) when‌‌   the‌‌
  right‌‌
  to‌‌
  partition‌‌
  the‌‌ property‌‌ is‌‌ invoked‌‌ by‌‌ any‌‌ of‌‌  2) such‌  ‌an‌  ‌act‌  ‌of‌  ‌repudiation‌  ‌is‌  ‌clearly‌  ‌made‌  ‌known‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
the‌  ‌boundaries‌  ‌over‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌fences‌  ‌were‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌erected‌‌ 
the‌  ‌co-owners‌  ‌but‌  ‌because‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌nature‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  property,‌‌
  it‌  other‌‌co-owners;‌‌   ‌
with­out‌‌   objection,‌‌   protest‌‌   or‌‌ complaint‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ other‌‌ co-owners,‌‌ 
cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌subdivided‌  ‌or‌  ‌its‌  ‌subdivision‌  ‌would‌‌  on‌‌
  the‌‌  contrary‌‌   they‌‌   acquiesced‌‌   and‌‌   tolerated‌‌   such‌‌ alienation,‌‌  3) the‌‌evidence‌‌thereon‌‌is‌c‌ lear‌‌and‌‌conclu­sive‌;‌‌and‌  ‌
prejudice‌‌‌the‌‌interests‌‌of‌‌the‌‌co-owners,‌‌and‌  ‌ occupation‌  ‌and‌  ‌possession,‌  ‌We‌  ‌rule‌  ‌that‌‌   a ‌‌factual‌‌   partition‌‌   or‌‌ 
termination‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌   co-ownership,‌‌   although‌‌ partial,‌‌ was‌‌ created‌, ‌‌ 4) he‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌in‌  ‌open,‌  c‌ ontinuous,‌  ‌exclusive,‌  ‌and‌‌ 
b) the‌‌
  co-owners‌‌   are‌‌ ‌not‌‌ in‌‌ agreement‌‌ as‌‌ to‌‌ who‌‌ among‌‌ them‌‌  notorious‌  ‌possession‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌period‌‌ 
shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  allotted‌‌
  or‌‌ assigned‌‌ the‌‌ entire‌‌ property‌‌ upon‌‌ proper‌‌  and‌  ‌barred‌  ‌not‌‌   only‌‌   the‌‌  vendor,‌‌   Flaviano‌‌   Moreto,‌‌   but‌‌
  also‌‌
  his‌‌
  heirs,‌‌ 
the‌  ‌private‌  ‌respondents‌  ‌herein‌  ‌from‌  ‌asserting‌  ‌as‌  ‌against‌  ‌the‌‌  required‌‌by‌‌law.‌  ‌
reimbursement‌‌of‌‌the‌‌co-owners.‌  ‌
vendees-petitioners‌‌   any‌‌   right‌‌
  or‌‌ title‌‌ in‌‌ derogation‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ deed‌‌ of‌‌ sale‌‌ 
Here,‌‌
  the‌‌
  right‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  respondents‌‌
  ‌commenced‌‌
  from‌‌
  the‌‌ time‌‌ they‌‌ 
This‌‌
  is‌‌
  the‌‌
  result‌‌
  obviously‌‌
  aimed‌‌
  at‌‌
  by‌‌
  petitioners‌‌
  at‌‌
  the‌‌ outset.‌‌ As‌‌  executed‌‌by‌‌said‌‌vendor‌‌Flaviano‌‌Moreto.‌  ‌
actually‌‌discovered‌‌the‌‌petitioner's‌‌act‌‌of‌‌defraudation‌. ‌ ‌
already‌‌shown,‌‌this‌c‌ annot‌‌be‌‌done‌‌while‌‌the‌‌co-ownership‌‌exists.‌  ‌
Sps‌‌Del‌‌Campo‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
Aguilar‌‌v.‌‌Aguilar‌  ‌
Extent‌‌of‌‌Co-Owner’s‌‌Right‌  ‌ Where‌  ‌the‌  ‌transferees‌‌   of‌‌
  an‌‌
  undivided‌‌   portion‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  land‌‌  allowed‌‌   a ‌‌
The‌  ‌following‌  ‌are‌  ‌the‌  ‌requisites‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌exercise‌  ‌of‌  ‌legal‌‌ 
co-owner‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ property‌‌ to‌‌ occupy‌‌ a ‌‌definite‌‌ portion‌‌ thereof‌‌ and‌‌ had‌‌ 
Paulmitan‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ redemption‌:  ‌‌ ‌
not‌  ‌disturbed‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌period‌  ‌too‌  ‌long‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌ignored,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Although‌‌   petitioner‌‌   Fanesa‌‌   did‌‌
  not‌‌ acquire‌‌ ownership‌‌ over‌‌ the‌‌ entire‌‌  possessor‌‌   is‌‌
  in‌‌
  a ‌‌better‌‌ condition‌‌ or‌‌ right‌‌ than‌‌ said‌‌ transferees.‌‌ ‌Such‌‌  1) There‌‌must‌‌be‌‌a‌‌co-ownership;‌‌   ‌
lot‌  ‌by‌  ‌virtue‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌redemption‌  ‌she‌  ‌made,‌  ‌nevertheless,‌  ‌she‌  ‌did‌‌  undisturbed‌  ‌possession‌  ‌had‌  ‌the‌  ‌effect‌  ‌of‌‌   a ‌‌partial‌‌   partition‌‌   of‌‌ 
2) one‌‌of‌‌the‌‌co-owners‌‌sold‌‌his‌‌right‌‌to‌‌a‌s‌ tranger‌; ‌ ‌
acquire‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌reimbursed‌  ‌for‌  ‌half‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  redemption‌‌
  price‌‌  the‌  ‌co-owned‌  ‌property‌  ‌which‌  ‌entitles‌  ‌the‌  ‌possessor‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌definite‌‌ 
she‌‌ paid‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ Provincial‌‌ Government‌‌ of‌‌ Negros‌‌ Occidental‌‌ on‌‌ behalf‌‌  portion‌‌which‌‌he‌‌occupies.‌  ‌ 3) the‌  ‌sale‌  ‌was‌  ‌made‌  ‌before‌  ‌the‌  ‌partition‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌co-owned‌‌ 
of‌  ‌her‌  ‌co-owners.‌  ‌Until‌  ‌reimbursed,‌  ‌Fanesa‌  ‌holds‌  ‌a ‌ ‌lien‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌‌  property;‌  ‌
subject‌‌property‌‌for‌‌the‌‌amount‌‌due‌‌her.‌  ‌ Although‌  ‌Regalado's‌  ‌certificate‌  ‌of‌‌
  title‌‌
  became‌‌
  indefeasible‌‌
  after‌‌
  the‌‌ 
4) the‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌redemption‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌exercised‌  ‌by‌  ‌one‌  ‌or‌‌
  more‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 162‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

Neither‌  ‌shall‌  ‌there‌  ‌be‌  ‌any‌  ‌partition‌  ‌when‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌prohibited‌  ‌by‌‌  2. Extrajudicial‌‌partition;‌  ‌
co-owners‌‌ within‌‌ a‌‌ period‌‌ of‌‌ ‌thirty‌‌ days‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ counted‌‌ from‌‌ 
law.‌  ‌
the‌  ‌time‌  ‌that‌  ‌he‌  ‌or‌  ‌they‌  ‌were‌  ‌notified‌  ‌in‌  ‌writing‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌  3. When‌‌by‌‌prescription,‌‌one‌‌co-owner‌‌has‌‌acquired‌‌the‌‌whole‌‌ 
vendee‌‌or‌‌by‌‌the‌‌co-owner‌‌vendor;‌‌and‌  ‌ No‌  ‌prescription‌  ‌shall‌  ‌run‌  ‌in‌  ‌favor‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌co-owner‌  ‌or‌  ‌co-heir‌‌  property‌‌by‌‌adverse‌‌possession;‌  ‌
against‌  ‌his‌  ‌co-owners‌  ‌or‌  ‌co-heirs‌  ‌so‌  ‌long‌  ‌as‌  ‌he‌  ‌expressly‌  ‌or‌‌ 
5) the‌‌vendee‌‌must‌‌be‌‌reimbursed‌‌for‌‌the‌‌price‌‌of‌‌the‌‌sale.‌  ‌ 4. When‌‌a‌‌stranger‌‌acquires‌‌by‌‌prescription‌‌the‌‌thing‌‌owned‌‌in‌‌ 
impliedly‌‌recognizes‌‌the‌‌co-ownership.‌  ‌
common;‌  ‌
We‌  ‌have‌  ‌held‌  ‌that‌  ‌after‌  ‌a ‌ ‌property‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌subdivided‌  ‌and‌‌  Exceptions‌  ‌
distributed‌  ‌among‌  ‌the‌  ‌co-owners,‌  ‌the‌  ‌community‌  ‌has‌‌  5. Merger‌‌in‌‌one‌‌co-owner;‌  ‌
1. When‌‌  co-owners‌‌   have‌‌
  agreed‌‌
  to‌‌
  keep‌‌
  the‌‌
  thing‌‌ undivided‌‌ for‌‌ a ‌‌
terminated‌  ‌and‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌reason‌  ‌to‌  ‌sustain‌  ‌any‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌‌  6. Loss‌‌or‌‌destruction;‌  ‌
certain‌‌period‌‌of‌‌time‌‌not‌‌exceeding‌t‌ en‌‌years‌; ‌ ‌
pre-emption‌‌or‌‌redemption‌. ‌ ‌
2. Prohibited‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌donor‌  ‌or‌  ‌testator‌  ‌for‌  ‌a ‌ ‌certain‌  ‌period‌  ‌not‌‌  7. Expropriation.‌  ‌
Sps‌‌Pascual‌‌v.‌‌Sps‌‌Ballesteros‌‌‌2012‌  ‌ exceeding‌t‌ wenty‌‌years‌; ‌ ‌ Aguilar‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
The‌‌  30-day‌‌   period‌‌
  given‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌
  respondents‌‌ within‌‌ which‌‌ to‌‌ exercise‌‌  3. Prohibited‌‌by‌‌law;‌  ‌
When‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌filed‌  ‌an‌  ‌action‌  ‌to‌  ‌compel‌  ‌the‌  ‌sale‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
their‌‌  right‌‌
  of‌‌
  redemption‌‌   ‌has‌‌ not‌‌ commenced‌‌ in‌‌ view‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ ‌absence‌‌  4. Partition‌‌would‌‌render‌‌the‌‌thing‌‌unserviceable‌‌(Art‌‌495);‌‌and‌  ‌ property‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌trial‌  ‌court‌‌
  granted‌‌
  the‌‌
  petition‌‌
  and‌‌  ordered‌‌ 
of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌written‌  ‌notice.‌  ‌Verily,‌  ‌despite‌  ‌the‌  ‌respondents’‌  ‌actual‌‌  5. Co-owner‌  ‌has‌  ‌possessed‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌‌   as‌‌
  exclusive‌‌
  owner‌‌
  and‌‌  the‌  ‌ejectment‌  ‌of‌  ‌respondent,‌  ‌the‌  ‌co-ownership‌  ‌was‌  ‌deemed‌‌ 
knowledge‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌sale‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌respondents,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌written‌  ‌notice‌  ‌is‌  ‌still‌‌  for‌‌a‌‌period‌‌sufficient‌‌to‌‌acquire‌‌it‌‌by‌‌prescription‌  ‌ terminated‌a‌ nd‌‌the‌‌right‌‌to‌‌enjoy‌‌the‌‌possession‌‌jointly‌‌also‌‌ceased.‌‌  
mandatory‌‌and‌‌indispensable.‌  ‌
Prescription‌  ‌
‌Quintos‌‌v.‌‌Nicolas‌‌‌2014‌  ‌
Reyes‌‌v.‌‌Concepcion‌  ‌ Generally,‌‌
  imprescriptible‌‌ unless‌‌ properly‌‌ repudiated.‌‌ In‌‌ such‌‌ case,‌‌ 
action‌‌prescribes‌t‌ en‌‌(10)‌‌years‌‌after‌‌repudiation‌. ‌ ‌ There‌‌   can‌‌
  still‌‌
  be‌‌   ‌res‌‌  judicata‌‌ in‌‌ partition‌‌ cases‌‌ concerning‌‌ the‌‌ same‌‌ 
In‌  ‌this‌  ‌jurisdiction,‌  ‌the‌  ‌legal‌‌
  provisions‌‌   on‌‌
  co-ownership‌‌   ‌do‌‌
  not‌‌ 
parties‌‌   and‌‌  the‌‌
  same‌‌   subject‌‌   matter‌‌  once‌‌  the‌‌ respective‌‌ shares‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
grant‌  ‌to‌  ‌any‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌owners‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌property‌  ‌held‌  ‌in‌  ‌common‌  ‌a ‌‌ When‌‌Right‌‌to‌‌Demand‌‌Partition‌‌Not‌‌Available‌  ‌ co-owners‌  ‌have‌‌   been‌‌   determined‌‌   with‌‌
  finality‌‌   by‌‌
  a ‌‌competent‌‌
  court‌‌ 
pre-emptive‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌purchase‌  ‌the‌  ‌pro-indiviso‌  ‌shares‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌‌ 
⭐‌ART‌‌  498‌. ‌‌Whenever‌‌ the‌‌ ‌thing‌‌ is‌‌ ‌essentially‌‌ indivisible‌ ‌ with‌‌  jurisdiction‌‌   or‌‌  if‌‌
  the‌‌ court‌‌ determines‌‌ that‌‌ partition‌‌ is‌‌ improper‌‌ 
co-owners‌. ‌ ‌
for‌‌co-ownership‌‌does‌‌not‌‌or‌‌no‌‌longer‌‌exists.‌  ‌
and‌  ‌the‌  ‌co-owners‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌agree‌  ‌that‌  ‌it‌  ‌be‌  ‌allotted‌  ‌to‌  ‌one‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Here,‌  ‌no‌  ‌sale‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌latter's‌  ‌pro-indiviso‌‌   shares‌‌   to‌‌
  a ‌‌third‌‌  party‌‌  had‌‌  them‌  ‌who‌  ‌shall‌  ‌indemnify‌  ‌the‌  ‌others,‌  ‌it‌  ‌shall‌‌   be‌‌
  sold‌‌
  and‌‌  its‌‌ 
yet‌‌  been‌‌  made.‌‌   Thus,‌‌   Article‌‌  1620‌‌   finds‌‌
  no‌‌  application‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ case‌‌ at‌‌  ⭐‌Figuracion‌‌v.‌‌Figuracion-Gerilla‌‌‌2013‌  ‌
proceeds‌‌distributed.‌  ‌
bar.‌‌  Neither‌‌  do‌‌  petitioners‌‌   have‌‌   the‌‌
  legal‌‌
  right‌‌   to‌‌
  enjoin‌‌   respondents‌‌  The‌‌
  first‌‌   stage‌‌
  in‌‌
  an‌‌ action‌‌ for‌‌ partition‌‌ is‌‌ the‌‌ settlement‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
from‌  ‌alienating‌  ‌their‌  ‌pro-indiviso‌‌   shares‌‌  to‌‌
  a ‌‌third‌‌  party.‌‌  The‌‌  rights‌‌  Effects‌‌of‌‌Partition‌  ‌
issue‌‌  of‌‌ ownership.‌‌ Such‌‌ an‌‌ action‌‌ will‌‌ not‌‌ lie‌‌ if‌‌ the‌‌ claimant‌‌ has‌‌ no‌‌ 
of‌‌
  a‌‌  co-owner‌‌   of‌‌  a ‌‌property‌‌   are‌‌ clearly‌‌ specified‌‌ in‌‌ Article‌‌ 493.‌‌ None‌‌  1. Mutual‌‌accounting‌‌for‌‌benefits‌‌received;‌  ‌ rightful‌‌interest‌‌in‌‌the‌‌subject‌‌property.‌‌   ‌
of‌‌the‌‌legal‌‌exceptions‌‌under‌‌Article‌‌494‌‌applies‌‌to‌‌the‌‌case‌‌at‌‌bar.‌  ‌ 2. Mutual‌‌reimbursement‌‌for‌‌expenses;‌  ‌
When‌  ‌Hilaria‌  ‌and‌  ‌Felipa‌  ‌registered‌  ‌the‌  ‌lot‌  ‌in‌  ‌their‌  ‌names‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
3. Indemnity‌‌for‌‌damages‌‌in‌‌case‌‌of‌‌negligence‌‌or‌‌fraud;‌  ‌   ‌an‌  ‌implied‌‌  trust‌‌ ‌was‌‌ created‌‌ ‌by‌‌ force‌‌ of‌‌ law‌‌ 
4.‌‌Termination‌  ‌ exclusion‌‌   of‌‌
  Emilia,‌‌
4. Reciprocal‌‌warranty‌‌for‌  ‌ and‌  ‌the‌  ‌two‌  ‌of‌  ‌them‌  ‌were‌  ‌considered‌  ‌a ‌ ‌trustee‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌respondent’s‌‌ 
ART‌  ‌494‌. ‌ ‌No‌  ‌co-owner‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌obliged‌  ‌to‌  ‌remain‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  a. Defects‌‌of‌‌title‌‌or‌‌eviction;‌  ‌ undivided‌  ‌share.‌  ‌As‌  ‌trustees,‌  ‌they‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌‌   permitted‌‌   to‌‌
  repudiate‌‌ 
co-ownership.‌  ‌Each‌  ‌co-owner‌  ‌may‌  ‌demand‌  ‌at‌  ‌any‌  ‌time‌  ‌the‌‌  the‌‌trust‌‌by‌‌relying‌‌on‌‌the‌‌registration.‌  ‌
b. Quality‌‌or‌‌hidden‌‌defects.‌  ‌
partition‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  thing‌‌ owned‌‌ in‌‌ common,‌‌ insofar‌‌ as‌‌ his‌‌ share‌‌ is‌‌ 
concerned.‌  ‌ 5. Each‌  ‌former‌  ‌co-owner‌  ‌is‌  ‌deemed‌  ‌to‌  ‌have‌  ‌had‌  ‌exclusive‌‌  ⭐‌Delima‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
possession‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌part‌  ‌allotted‌  ‌to‌  ‌him‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌entire‌  ‌period‌‌ 
Nevertheless,‌  ‌an‌  ‌agreement‌  ‌to‌  ‌keep‌  ‌the‌  ‌thing‌  ‌undivided‌  ‌for‌‌
  a ‌‌ during‌‌which‌‌the‌‌co-possession‌‌lasted.‌  ‌ When‌  ‌a ‌ ‌co-owner‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌  ‌in‌  ‌question‌  ‌executed‌  ‌a ‌ ‌deed‌  ‌of‌‌ 
certain‌‌  period‌‌
  of‌‌
  time,‌‌ ‌not‌‌ exceeding‌‌ ten‌‌ (10)‌‌ years‌, ‌‌shall‌‌ be‌‌  partition‌  ‌and‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌strength‌  ‌thereof‌  ‌obtained‌  ‌the‌  ‌cancellation‌‌   of‌‌ 
6. Confers‌‌upon‌‌each,‌‌the‌‌exclusive‌‌title‌‌over‌‌his‌‌respective‌‌share.‌  ‌ the‌‌  title‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌  name‌‌
  of‌‌
  their‌‌   predecessor‌‌   and‌‌   the‌‌  issuance‌‌   of‌‌ a ‌‌new‌‌ 
valid.‌‌This‌‌term‌‌may‌‌be‌‌extended‌‌by‌‌a‌‌new‌‌agreement.‌  ‌
one‌‌  wherein‌‌   he‌‌
  appears‌‌  as‌‌
  the‌‌   new‌‌ owner‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ property,‌‌ the‌‌ statute‌‌ 
A‌‌
  ‌donor‌‌
  or‌‌
  testator‌‌
  may‌‌
  prohibit‌‌ partition‌‌ for‌‌ a ‌‌period‌‌ which‌‌  Termination‌‌of‌‌Co-Ownership‌  ‌
of‌‌
  limitations‌‌   started‌‌
  to‌‌
  run‌‌  for‌‌  the‌‌
  purposes‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  action‌‌
  seeking‌‌   a ‌‌
shall‌‌not‌‌exceed‌t‌ wenty‌‌(20)‌‌years‌. ‌ ‌
1. Judicial‌‌partition;‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 163‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

declaration‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌existence‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌co-ownership‌  ‌and‌  ‌of‌‌   their‌‌
  rights‌‌  ART‌  ‌445‌. ‌ ‌Whatever‌  ‌is‌  ‌built,‌  ‌planted‌  ‌or‌  ‌sown‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌land‌  ‌of‌‌  b) to‌‌
  oblige‌‌  the‌‌
  one‌‌
  who‌‌ built‌‌ or‌‌ planted‌‌ to‌‌ ‌pay‌‌ ‌the‌‌ price‌‌ 
another‌‌   and‌‌
  the‌‌ improvements‌‌ or‌‌ repairs‌‌ made‌‌ thereon,‌‌ belong‌‌  of‌‌the‌‌land,‌‌and‌‌the‌‌one‌‌who‌‌sowed,‌‌the‌‌proper‌‌rent.‌‌   ‌
thereunder.‌  ‌Since‌  ‌an‌  ‌action‌  ‌for‌  ‌reconveyance‌  ‌of‌  ‌land‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌‌ 
implied‌  ‌or‌  ‌constructive‌  ‌trust‌  ‌prescribes‌  ‌after‌  ‌ten‌  ‌(10)‌  ‌years‌, ‌ ‌it‌  ‌is‌‌  to‌‌the‌‌owner‌‌of‌‌the‌‌land,‌‌xxxx‌  ‌ However,‌‌   the‌‌
  ‌builder‌‌   ‌or‌‌  ‌planter‌‌  ‌cannot‌‌   be‌‌
  obliged‌‌   to‌‌ buy‌‌ the‌‌ 
from‌‌  the‌‌
  date‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  issuance‌‌  of‌‌  such‌‌  title‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ effective‌‌ assertion‌‌  Basic‌‌principles‌‌of‌‌Accession‌‌Continua‌  ‌ land‌‌   if‌‌
  its‌‌
  value‌‌
  is‌‌
  considerably‌‌   more‌‌   than‌‌  that‌‌
  of‌‌ the‌‌ building‌‌ 
of‌‌adverse‌‌title‌‌for‌‌purposes‌‌of‌‌the‌‌statute‌‌of‌‌limitations‌‌is‌‌counted.‌  ‌ or‌  ‌trees.‌  ‌In‌  ‌such‌  ‌case,‌  ‌he‌  ‌shall‌  ‌pay‌  ‌reasonable‌  ‌rent‌, ‌ ‌if‌  ‌the‌‌ 
a. Accessory‌  ‌follows‌  ‌the‌  ‌principal.‌  ‌To‌  ‌the‌  ‌owner‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
owner‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌
  land‌‌  does‌‌   not‌‌  choose‌‌   to‌‌
  appropriate‌‌   the‌‌   building‌‌ 
As‌  ‌the‌  ‌certificate‌  ‌of‌  ‌title‌  ‌was‌  ‌notice‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌whole‌  ‌world‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌‌  principal‌‌must‌‌belong‌‌also‌‌the‌‌accessions;‌  ‌
or‌  ‌trees‌  ‌after‌  ‌proper‌  ‌indemnity.‌  ‌The‌  ‌parties‌  ‌shall‌  ‌agree‌  ‌upon‌‌ 
exclusive‌  ‌title‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌land,‌  ‌such‌  ‌rejection‌  ‌was‌  ‌binding‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌  b. The‌‌  union‌‌  or‌‌ incorporation‌‌ must,‌‌ within‌‌ ‌certain‌‌ exceptions‌, ‌‌be‌‌  the‌  ‌terms‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌lease‌  ‌and‌  ‌in‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌disagreement,‌  ‌the‌‌   court‌‌ 
other‌  ‌heirs‌  ‌and‌  ‌started‌  ‌as‌  ‌against‌  ‌them‌  ‌the‌  ‌period‌  ‌of‌‌  effected‌  ‌in‌  ‌such‌  ‌a ‌ ‌manner‌  ‌that‌  ‌to‌  ‌separate‌  ‌the‌‌
  principal‌‌
  from‌‌  shall‌‌fix‌‌the‌‌terms‌‌thereof.‌  ‌
prescription‌. ‌ ‌Hence,‌  ‌when‌  ‌petitioners‌  ‌filed‌  ‌their‌  ‌action‌  ‌for‌‌  the‌‌accessory‌‌would‌‌result‌‌in‌s‌ ubstantial‌‌injury‌t‌ o‌‌either;‌  ‌
reconveyance‌‌   and/or‌‌   to‌‌
  compel‌‌   partition‌‌ on‌‌ February‌‌ 29,‌‌ 1968,‌‌ such‌‌   ‌
c. He‌‌
  who‌‌   is‌‌
  in‌‌
  good‌‌
  faith‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌ held‌‌ responsible‌‌ but‌‌ he‌‌ should‌‌ 
action‌‌was‌a ‌ lready‌‌barred‌‌by‌‌prescription‌.  ‌‌ ‌ not‌‌be‌‌penalized;‌  ‌ 1. Refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌land‌  ‌whose‌  ‌ownership‌  ‌is‌  ‌claimed‌  ‌by‌  ‌at‌  ‌least‌  ‌two‌‌ 
parties‌,‌‌one‌‌of‌‌whom‌‌has‌‌built‌‌some‌‌works‌‌thereon.‌  ‌
⭐‌Mariategui‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ d. He‌‌who‌‌is‌‌in‌‌bad‌‌faith‌‌may‌‌be‌‌penalized;‌  ‌
2. Applies‌‌‌when‌‌builder‌‌   ‌
e. No‌  ‌one‌  ‌should‌  ‌enrich‌  ‌himself‌  ‌unjustly‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌expense‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Inasmuch‌  ‌as‌  ‌petitioners‌  ‌registered‌  ‌the‌  ‌properties‌  ‌in‌  ‌their‌‌
  names‌‌   in‌‌ 
another;‌  ‌ a) acts‌  ‌in‌  ‌good‌  ‌faith‌  ‌believing‌  ‌himself‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌the‌  ‌owner‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
fraud‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌‌
  co-heirs,‌‌
  ‌prescription‌‌  can‌‌  only‌‌
  be‌‌
  deemed‌‌   to‌‌
  have‌‌ 
commenced‌‌   from‌‌
  the‌‌
  time‌‌
  private‌‌
  respondents‌‌   dis­covered‌‌   the‌‌  f. Bad‌‌
  faith‌‌
  of‌‌
  one‌‌
  party‌‌
  ‌neutralizes‌‌
  ‌the‌‌
  bad‌‌
  faith‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  other‌‌
  so‌‌  land,‌‌or‌‌at‌‌least,‌‌to‌‌have‌‌a‌‌claim‌‌of‌‌title;‌‌or‌  ‌
petitioners’‌‌act‌‌of‌‌defraudation‌. ‌ ‌ both‌‌should‌‌be‌‌considered‌‌in‌‌good‌‌faith.‌  ‌ b) proceeded‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌knowledge,‌  ‌tolerance,‌  ‌consent,‌  ‌or‌‌ 
 ‌ LO‌  ‌ OM‌  ‌ permission‌‌of‌‌owner.‌  ‌
d. Right‌‌of‌‌Accession‌  ‌
Rights‌  ‌ Liabilities‌  ‌ Rights‌  ‌ Liabilities‌  ‌ c) or‌‌in‌‌‌special‌‌cases‌‌where‌‌builder:‌  ‌
1.‌‌Right‌‌to‌‌hidden‌‌treasure‌  ‌ i) Built‌  ‌his‌  ‌house‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌he‌  ‌was‌  ‌still‌  ‌co-owner‌  ‌that‌‌ 
Payment‌‌or‌‌  overlapped‌‌the‌‌land‌‌of‌‌another‌‌(D ‌ el‌‌Campo‌);‌  ‌
ART‌  ‌438‌. ‌ ‌Hidden‌  ‌treasure‌  ‌belongs‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌owner‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌land,‌‌  Both‌‌in‌‌GF‌‌  removal‌‌if‌‌ 
 ‌ ii) Built‌‌with‌‌consent‌‌of‌‌owner‌‌(B
‌ oyer-Roxas‌);‌  ‌
building,‌‌or‌‌other‌‌property‌‌on‌‌which‌‌it‌‌is‌‌found.‌  ‌ or‌‌BF‌  ‌ Pays‌‌value‌‌  not‌‌ 
of‌‌material‌  ‌ injurious‌  ‌ iii) Relied‌  ‌on‌  ‌consent‌  ‌of‌  ‌another‌  ‌they‌  ‌believed‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Nevertheless,‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌discovery‌  ‌is‌  ‌made‌  ‌on‌‌   the‌‌  property‌‌   of‌‌ 
Becomes‌‌   ‌ landowner‌‌(S‌ armiento‌‌v.‌‌Agana‌);‌  ‌
another,‌  ‌or‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌State‌  ‌or‌  ‌any‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌subdivisions,‌  ‌and‌  ‌by‌‌  owner‌‌of‌‌ 
LO‌‌in‌‌GF;‌‌  No‌‌right‌‌of‌‌ 
chance‌, ‌‌o ‌ ne-half‌  ‌thereof‌‌   shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  allowed‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌ finder.‌‌ If‌‌ the‌‌  Damages‌  ‌ iv) As‌  ‌son,‌  ‌built‌  ‌with‌  ‌knowledge‌  ‌and‌  ‌consent‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌father‌‌ 
OM‌‌in‌‌BF‌  ‌ material‌  ‌ removal‌  ‌
finder‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌trespasser‌, ‌ ‌he‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌‌
  be‌‌
  entitled‌‌   to‌‌
  any‌‌  share‌‌   of‌‌   ‌ (‌Javier‌);‌  ‌
the‌‌treasure.‌  ‌ Absolute‌‌ 
v) As‌  ‌children,‌  ‌built‌  ‌to‌  ‌lots‌  ‌owned‌  ‌by‌  ‌their‌  ‌parents‌  ‌who‌‌ 
If‌  ‌the‌  ‌things‌  ‌found‌  ‌be‌  ‌of‌  ‌interest‌  ‌to‌  ‌science‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌arts‌, ‌‌the‌‌  LO‌‌in‌‌BF;‌‌  Pays‌‌value‌‌  right‌‌of‌‌ 
 ‌ invited‌  ‌them‌  ‌and‌  ‌fully‌  ‌consented‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌improvements‌‌ 
State‌  ‌may‌  ‌acquire‌  ‌them‌  ‌at‌  ‌their‌  ‌just‌  ‌price‌, ‌ ‌which‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌  OM‌‌in‌‌GF‌  ‌ +‌‌Damages‌  ‌ removal‌‌+ ‌‌
Damages‌  ‌ introduced‌‌(M‌ acasaet‌‌v.‌‌Sps‌‌Macasaet‌) ‌ ‌
divided‌‌in‌‌conformity‌‌with‌‌the‌‌rule‌‌stated.‌  ‌
3. Inapplicable‌‌‌where‌‌one’s‌‌interest‌‌in‌‌the‌‌land‌‌is‌‌merely‌‌that‌‌of:‌  ‌
ART‌  ‌439‌. ‌ ‌By‌  ‌treasure‌  ‌is‌  ‌understood,‌  ‌for‌‌  legal‌‌  purposes,‌‌  any‌‌  Legend‌:‌LO‌‌  = ‌‌Landowner;‌‌
  OM‌‌
  = ‌‌Owner‌‌ of‌‌ Material;‌‌ GF‌‌ = ‌‌Good‌‌ Faith;‌‌ BF‌‌ 
hidden‌  ‌and‌  ‌unknown‌  ‌deposit‌  ‌of‌  ‌money,‌  ‌jewelry,‌  ‌or‌  ‌other‌‌  a) A‌‌holder‌‌such‌‌as‌‌a‌‌tenant‌‌or‌‌lessee‌‌(Q
‌ uevada,‌‌Mores‌);‌  ‌
precious‌  ‌objects,‌  ‌the‌  ‌lawful‌  ‌ownership‌  ‌of‌  ‌which‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌‌  =‌‌Bad‌‌Faith‌  ‌
b) An‌‌agent;‌‌or‌  ‌
appear.‌  ‌ ⭐ART‌  ‌448‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌owner‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌land‌  ‌on‌  ‌which‌  ‌anything‌‌  has‌‌  c) A‌‌usufructuary‌‌(‌Macasaet)‌  ‌
2.‌‌Rules‌‌of‌‌Accession‌  ‌ been‌‌built,‌‌sown‌‌or‌‌planted‌‌in‌‌good‌‌faith,‌‌shall‌‌have‌‌the‌‌right‌‌   ‌
Option‌‌Given‌‌to‌‌Landowner‌  ‌
a) to‌  ‌appropriate‌  ‌as‌  ‌his‌  ‌own‌  ‌the‌  ‌works,‌  ‌sowing‌  ‌or‌‌ 
1) Right‌‌of‌‌Accession‌‌with‌‌respect‌‌to‌‌Immovable‌‌Property‌  ‌ planting,‌‌  after‌‌
  payment‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  indemnity‌‌  provided‌‌  for‌‌  a. To‌  ‌appropriate‌  ‌improvement‌  ‌upon‌  ‌payment‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌required‌‌ 
in‌‌articles‌‌546‌‌and‌‌548,‌‌or‌‌   ‌ indemnity‌‌(Art.‌‌546,‌‌548,‌‌448)‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 164‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

1. Article‌  ‌546.‌  ‌Necessary‌  ‌expenses‌  ‌shall‌‌  be‌‌  refunded‌‌   to‌‌


  every‌‌  actual‌‌ possessor‌‌ to‌‌ remain‌‌ in‌‌ possession‌‌ while‌‌ he‌‌ has‌‌ not‌‌ been‌‌  ART‌‌  452‌. ‌‌The‌‌  builder,‌‌  planter‌‌  or‌‌  sower‌‌ in‌‌ ‌bad‌‌ faith‌‌ is‌‌ entitled‌‌ 
possessor;‌‌   but‌‌  only‌‌
  the‌‌
  possessor‌‌
  in‌‌
  good‌‌  faith‌‌
  may‌‌ retain‌‌ the‌‌  reimbursed‌‌for‌‌the‌‌necessary‌‌improvements.‌  ‌ to‌‌ ‌reimbursement‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ necessary‌‌ expenses‌‌ of‌‌ preservation‌‌ of‌‌ 
thing‌‌until‌‌he‌‌has‌‌been‌‌reimbursed‌‌therefor.‌  ‌ the‌‌land‌.  ‌‌ ‌
2. A‌‌
  builder‌‌
  in‌‌
  GF‌‌
  cannot‌‌
  be‌‌
  compelled‌‌
  to‌‌
  pay‌‌ rentals‌‌ during‌‌ this‌ 
2. Useful‌‌ expenses‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ refunded‌‌ only‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ possessor‌‌ in‌‌ ‌good‌‌  period‌‌nor‌‌be‌‌disturbed‌‌of‌‌his‌‌possession.‌  ‌  ‌
faith‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌retention‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌person‌  ‌who‌  ‌has‌‌  1. Consequences‌‌of‌‌Bad‌‌Faith‌‌(Art.‌‌449‌‌and‌‌450)‌  ‌
3. Offsetting‌  ‌of‌  ‌expenses‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌fruits‌  ‌of‌  ‌builder‌  ‌in‌  ‌GF‌‌ 
defeated‌  ‌him‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  possession‌‌   having‌‌
  the‌‌  option‌‌
  of‌‌
  refunding‌‌  prohibited‌. ‌ ‌ a. Article‌  ‌450‌  ‌applies‌  ‌when‌  ‌landowner‌  ‌chooses‌  ‌not‌  ‌to‌‌ 
the‌  ‌amount‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌expenses‌‌   or‌‌  of‌‌
  paying‌‌  the‌‌
  increase‌‌   in‌‌
  value‌‌  appropriate‌  ‌the‌  ‌improvements‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌builder‌  ‌in‌  ‌BF.‌  ‌He‌‌
  may‌‌ 
4. Applies‌‌only‌‌to‌‌private‌‌land.‌  ‌
which‌‌the‌‌thing‌‌may‌‌have‌‌acquired‌‌by‌‌reason‌‌thereof.‌  ‌ elect‌‌to‌‌require‌‌builder‌‌to:‌  ‌
Effect‌‌of‌‌Alienation‌‌by‌‌Owner‌‌of‌‌Land‌‌with‌‌Improvements‌  ‌
3. Article‌‌  548.‌Expense‌‌
    for‌‌
  pure‌‌  luxury‌‌   or‌‌ mere‌‌ pleasure‌‌ shall‌‌  i. Remove‌‌at‌‌builder’s‌‌expense;‌‌or‌  ‌
not‌  ‌be‌  ‌refunded‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌possessor‌  ‌in‌  ‌good‌  ‌faith;‌  ‌but‌‌
  he‌‌
  ‌may‌‌  1. A‌  ‌purchaser‌  ‌who‌  ‌buys‌  ‌land‌  ‌with‌  ‌improvements‌  ‌belonging‌  ‌to‌‌ 
ii. Pay‌‌the‌‌price‌‌of‌‌land‌‌or‌‌proper‌‌rent‌‌in‌‌case‌‌of‌‌a‌‌sower.‌  ‌
remove‌  ‌the‌  ‌ornaments‌  ‌with‌  ‌which‌  ‌he‌  ‌has‌  ‌embellished‌  ‌the‌‌  another‌  ‌knowing‌  ‌such‌‌  fact,‌‌
  places‌‌   himself‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  position‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌
principal‌  ‌thing‌  ‌if‌  ‌it‌  ‌suffers‌  ‌no‌  ‌injury‌  ‌thereby,‌  ‌and‌  ‌if‌  ‌his‌‌  landowner‌‌in‌‌BF‌‌and‌‌must‌‌therefore‌‌pay‌‌for‌‌the‌‌indemnity.‌  ‌ b. In‌‌both‌‌instances,‌‌landowner‌‌is‌‌entitled‌‌to‌d
‌ amages‌. ‌ ‌
successors‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌possession‌  ‌do‌  ‌not‌  ‌prefer‌  ‌to‌  ‌refund‌  ‌the‌‌  2. If‌‌ new‌‌ owner‌‌ paid‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ improvements,‌‌ the‌‌ action‌‌ may‌‌ still‌‌ be‌‌  2. Rights‌‌of‌‌Builder/Planter/Sower‌‌in‌‌Bad‌‌Faith‌‌(Art.‌‌452)‌  ‌
amount‌‌expended.‌  ‌ brought‌  ‌against‌  ‌him‌  ‌without‌  ‌prejudice‌  ‌to‌  ‌his‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌recover‌‌  a. Examples‌‌of‌n ‌ ecessary‌e‌ xpenses‌‌for‌‌preservation‌‌of‌‌land‌  ‌
i. Liability‌‌of‌‌Builder‌‌to‌‌Account‌‌for‌‌Fruits‌‌Received‌  ‌ from‌‌the‌‌former‌‌owner.‌  ‌
i. Defense‌‌work‌‌to‌‌prevent‌‌erosion;‌  ‌
a) Whatever‌‌   fruits‌‌
  he‌‌
  receives‌‌
  during‌‌
  period‌‌
  of‌‌ retention‌‌  3. Option‌  ‌transferred‌  ‌to‌  ‌purchaser‌  ‌if‌  ‌former‌  ‌owner‌  ‌fails‌‌   to‌‌  elect‌‌ 
ii. Litigation‌  ‌expenses‌  ‌in‌  ‌defense‌  ‌of‌  ‌land‌  ‌against‌‌ 
must‌‌be‌‌deducted‌‌from‌‌indemnity‌‌due‌‌to‌‌him;‌  ‌ either‌‌options‌. ‌ ‌
usurpers.‌  ‌
b) If‌  ‌Fruits‌  ‌> ‌ ‌Indemnity,‌  ‌the‌  ‌excess‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌returned‌‌
  to‌‌   ‌
iii. Real‌‌property‌‌taxes.‌  ‌
the‌‌landowner.‌  ‌ ART‌  ‌449‌. ‌ ‌He‌  ‌who‌  ‌builds,‌  ‌plants‌  ‌or‌  ‌sows‌  ‌in‌‌  ‌bad‌‌  faith‌‌  on‌‌  the‌‌ 
b. Right‌‌of‌‌Retention‌‌(Art.‌‌546),‌‌Right‌‌to‌‌expenses‌‌of‌‌production‌  ‌
c) If‌‌
  building‌‌
  is‌‌ occupied‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ builder‌‌ in‌‌ GF,‌‌ landowner‌‌  land‌  ‌of‌  ‌another,‌  ‌loses‌  ‌what‌‌  is‌‌
  built,‌‌
  planted‌‌   or‌‌
  sown‌‌   ‌without‌‌ 
has‌‌no‌‌right‌‌to‌‌collect‌‌rent‌‌during‌‌period‌‌of‌‌retention.‌  ‌ right‌‌to‌‌indemnity.‌  ‌ i. Only‌  ‌possessor‌  ‌in‌  ‌GF‌  ‌is‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌retain‌  ‌the‌  ‌thing‌‌ 
until‌‌he‌‌is‌‌fully‌‌reimbursed.‌  ‌
b. To‌  ‌oblige‌  ‌the‌  ‌builder‌  ‌or‌  ‌planter‌  ‌to‌  ‌pay‌  ‌the‌  ‌price‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  land‌‌  ART‌  ‌450‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌owner‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌land‌  ‌on‌‌  which‌‌  anything‌‌  has‌‌  been‌‌ 
and‌‌the‌‌sower,‌‌to‌‌pay‌‌the‌‌proper‌‌rent‌  ‌ built,‌‌planted‌‌or‌‌sown‌‌in‌b ‌ ad‌‌faith‌‌   ‌ 3. Rights‌‌of‌‌Owner‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Land‌‌(Art.‌‌450-451)‌  ‌

i. When‌‌this‌‌right‌‌cannot‌‌be‌‌exercised‌  ‌ 1. may‌‌demand‌‌   ‌ a. To‌  ‌appropriate‌  ‌what‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌built‌  ‌without‌  ‌obligation‌‌
  to‌‌
  pay‌‌ 
a. the‌‌demolition‌‌of‌‌the‌‌work,‌‌or‌‌   ‌ any‌  ‌indemnity‌  ‌therefor‌  ‌except‌  ‌for‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌expenses‌  ‌for‌‌  the‌‌ 
If‌‌value‌‌of‌‌LAND‌‌>>‌‌BUILDING.‌  ‌
b. that‌  ‌the‌  ‌planting‌  ‌or‌‌
  sowing‌‌
  be‌‌
  removed,‌‌
  in‌‌
  order‌‌  preservation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌land‌‌+‌‌damages;‌‌or‌  ‌
ii. Fixing‌  ‌of‌  ‌Price;‌  ‌Remedies‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Landowner‌  ‌if‌‌  to‌‌replace‌‌things‌‌in‌‌their‌‌former‌‌condition‌‌   ‌ b. To‌‌ask‌‌the‌‌removal‌‌or‌‌demolition‌‌+‌‌damages;‌‌or‌  ‌
Builder/Planter‌‌Refuses‌‌to‌‌Pay‌  ‌
at‌  ‌the‌  ‌expense‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌person‌  ‌who‌  ‌built,‌  ‌planted‌  ‌or‌‌  c. To‌  ‌compel‌  ‌the‌  ‌builder‌  ‌or‌  ‌planter‌  ‌to‌  ‌pay‌  ‌the‌  ‌price‌  ‌of‌  ‌land‌‌ 
a) Forced‌  ‌lease‌  ‌is‌  ‌created‌  ‌wherein‌  ‌the‌  ‌court‌  ‌fixes‌  ‌the‌‌  sowed;‌‌OR‌‌   ‌ regardless‌  ‌if‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌considerably‌  ‌higher‌  ‌than‌  ‌that‌  ‌of‌  ‌what‌  ‌was‌‌ 
terms‌‌of‌‌lease.‌(‌ Depra‌‌v.‌‌Dumlao‌) ‌ ‌ 2. he‌‌may‌‌compel‌‌   ‌ built,‌‌and‌‌the‌‌sower,‌‌to‌‌pay‌‌rent‌‌+‌‌damages.‌  ‌
b) Sell‌‌
  the‌‌
  property‌‌  at‌‌
  ‌public‌‌
  auction‌‌
  wherein‌‌
  proceeds‌‌  a. the‌‌
  builder‌‌
  or‌‌
  planter‌‌
  to‌‌
  pay‌‌
  the‌‌
  price‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ land,‌‌ 
Balucanag‌‌v.‌‌Francisco‌  ‌
are‌‌applied‌‌first‌‌to‌‌the‌‌land,‌‌then‌‌improvements.‌  ‌ and‌‌   ‌
b. the‌‌sower‌‌the‌‌proper‌‌rent.‌‌   ‌ Stohner‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌considered‌  ‌a ‌ ‌builder‌  ‌in‌  ‌good‌  ‌faith.‌  ‌There‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌‌ 
c) Have‌‌improvements‌r‌ emoved‌‌‌at‌‌builder’s‌‌expense.‌  ‌
dispute‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌relation‌  ‌between‌  ‌Balucanag‌  ‌and‌  ‌Stohner‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Builder's/Sower's/Planter's‌‌Right‌‌to‌‌Retain‌‌Improvement‌  ‌ ART‌  ‌451‌. ‌ ‌In‌  ‌the‌  ‌cases‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌two‌  ‌preceding‌  ‌articles,‌  ‌the‌‌  lessor‌‌and‌‌lessee‌. ‌ ‌
1. Right‌  ‌of‌  ‌Retention‌  ‌protects‌  ‌builders‌  ‌in‌  ‌good‌  ‌faith.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌‌  landowner‌‌  is‌‌
  entitled‌‌
  to‌‌
  ‌damages‌‌
  ‌from‌‌
  the‌‌
  builder,‌‌
  planter‌‌ or‌‌ 
sower.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌law‌  ‌applicable‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌case‌  ‌at‌  ‌bar‌  ‌is‌  ‌Article‌  ‌1678‌. ‌ ‌This‌‌
  article‌‌ 
guarantee‌  ‌full‌  ‌and‌  ‌prompt‌  ‌reimbursement‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌allows‌  ‌the‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 165‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

gives‌  ‌the‌  ‌lessor‌  ‌the‌  ‌option‌  ‌to‌  ‌appropriate‌  ‌the‌‌   useful‌‌   improvements‌‌  them‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌  ‌encroachment‌  ‌on‌  ‌her‌  ‌property.‌  ‌Article‌  ‌448‌‌
  has‌‌
  been‌‌  Neither‌  ‌did‌  ‌the‌  ‌promise‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  Padas‌‌   that‌‌
  they‌‌   were‌‌
  going‌‌   to‌‌
  donate‌‌ 
by‌‌
  paying‌‌  o‌ ne-half‌‌   ‌of‌‌  their‌‌  value;‌‌  and‌‌ the‌‌ lessee‌‌ cannot‌‌ compel‌‌ the‌‌  applied‌  ‌to‌  ‌improvements‌  ‌or‌  ‌portions‌  ‌of‌  ‌improvements‌  ‌built‌  ‌by‌‌  the‌  ‌premises‌  ‌to‌  ‌petitioners‌‌   convert‌‌   them‌‌  into‌‌   builders‌‌   in‌‌
  good‌‌   faith‌‌ 
lessor‌  ‌to‌  ‌appropriate‌  ‌the‌  ‌improvements‌  ‌and‌  ‌make‌  ‌reimbursement.‌‌  mistaken‌‌belief‌‌on‌‌land‌‌belonging‌‌to‌‌the‌‌adjoining‌‌owner‌. ‌ ‌ for‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌the‌  ‌improvements‌  ‌were‌  ‌built‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌   premises,‌‌   such‌‌ 
But‌  ‌he‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌  ‌cause‌  ‌any‌  ‌more‌  ‌damage‌  ‌upon‌‌   the‌‌
  property‌‌
  than‌‌
  is‌‌  promise‌  ‌was‌  ‌not‌  ‌yet‌  ‌fulfilled,‌  ‌i.e.,‌  ‌it‌  ‌was‌  ‌a ‌ ‌mere‌  ‌expectancy‌  ‌of‌‌ 
necessary.‌  ‌ In‌‌ the‌‌ event‌‌ that‌‌ petitioners‌‌ elect‌‌ to‌‌ sell‌‌ to‌‌ respondents‌‌ Go‌‌ the‌‌ subject‌‌  ownership‌  ‌that‌  ‌may‌  ‌or‌  ‌may‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌  ‌realized.‌  ‌As‌  ‌such,‌  ‌petitioners‌‌ 
portion‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌  ‌lot,‌  ‌the‌  ‌price‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌fixed‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌prevailing‌‌  cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌said‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌‌   entitled‌‌  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  value‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌   improvements‌‌   that‌‌ 
⭐‌Floreza‌‌v.‌‌Evangelista‌  ‌ market‌‌value‌a ‌ t‌‌the‌‌time‌‌of‌‌payment‌. ‌ ‌ they‌‌built‌‌on‌‌the‌‌said‌‌lot‌. ‌ ‌
Since‌‌   petitioner‌‌   cannot‌‌
  be‌‌
  classified‌‌   as‌‌
  a ‌‌builder‌‌ in‌‌ good‌‌ faith‌‌ within‌‌  Communities‌‌Cagayan,‌‌Inc.‌‌v.‌‌Sps‌‌Nanol‌‌‌2012‌  ‌ e. Easement‌  ‌
the‌‌
  purview‌‌   of‌‌
  Article‌‌
  448,‌‌  nor‌‌
  as‌‌
  a ‌‌vendee‌‌ a ‌‌retro,‌‌ who‌‌ made‌‌ useful‌‌ 
improvements‌  ‌during‌  ‌the‌  ‌lifetime‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌pacto‌  ‌de‌  ‌retro,‌‌   petitioner‌‌  As‌  ‌a ‌ ‌general‌‌
  rule,‌‌   ‌Article‌‌  448‌‌  on‌‌  builders‌‌   in‌‌
  good‌‌  faith‌‌
  does‌‌
  not‌‌ 
ART‌  ‌613‌. ‌‌‌An‌‌  ‌EASEMENT‌‌
  ‌or‌‌  servitude‌‌  is‌‌  an‌‌  encumbrance‌‌ 
has‌‌   no‌‌  right‌‌
  to‌‌  reimbursement‌‌   of‌‌  the‌‌   value‌‌
  of‌‌ the‌‌ house‌‌ which‌‌  apply‌  ‌where‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌contractual‌  ‌relation‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌‌ 
imposed‌  ‌upon‌  ‌an‌  ‌immovable‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌benefit‌  ‌of‌  ‌another‌‌ 
he‌  ‌had‌  ‌erected‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌residential‌  ‌lot‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌EVANGELISTAS‌, ‌‌ parties‌, ‌ ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌instant‌  ‌case.‌  ‌However,‌  ‌the‌  ‌parties‌  ‌failed‌  ‌to‌‌ 
immovable‌‌belonging‌‌to‌‌a‌‌different‌‌owner.‌  ‌
much‌‌less‌‌to‌‌retention‌‌of‌‌the‌‌premises‌‌until‌‌he‌‌is‌‌reimbursed.‌‌   ‌ attach‌  ‌a ‌ ‌copy‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Contract‌‌
  to‌‌  Sell.‌‌
  As‌‌
  such,‌‌  we‌‌
  are‌‌
  constrained‌‌   to‌‌ 
apply‌‌Article‌‌448.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌immovable‌  ‌in‌‌   favor‌‌
  of‌‌
  which‌‌   the‌‌  easement‌‌   is‌‌
  established‌‌ 
The‌  ‌rights‌  ‌of‌‌
  petitioner‌‌
  are‌‌
  ‌more‌‌
  akin‌‌  to‌‌
  those‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌usufructuary‌‌  is‌  ‌called‌  ‌the‌  ‌dominant‌  ‌estate‌; ‌ ‌that‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌‌
  subject‌‌   thereto,‌‌ 
who,‌  ‌under‌  ‌Article‌  ‌579,‌  ‌may‌  ‌make‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌  ‌useful‌  Vda.‌‌de‌‌Roxas‌‌v.‌‌Our‌‌Lady’s‌‌Foundation‌‌‌2013‌  ‌ the‌‌servient‌‌estate‌.  ‌‌ ‌
improvements‌‌but‌‌with‌n ‌ o‌‌right‌‌to‌‌be‌‌indemnified‌‌‌therefor.‌‌   ‌
Ballatan‌‌ v.‌‌ CA‌‌ already‌‌ specifies‌‌ that‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ event‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ seller‌‌ elects‌‌  1.‌‌Characteristics‌  ‌
to‌  ‌sell‌  ‌the‌  ‌lot,‌  ‌“the‌  ‌price‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌fixed‌  ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌prevailing‌  ‌market‌‌ 
PNB‌‌v.‌‌De‌‌Jesus‌  ‌
value‌‌   at‌‌  the‌‌  time‌‌   of‌‌
  payment.‌” ‌‌More‌‌   recently,‌‌   ‌Tuatis‌‌  v.‌‌
  Sps‌‌ Escol‌‌  a) A‌‌real‌‌right;‌  ‌
Article‌  ‌448‌‌   refers‌‌   to‌‌
  a ‌‌‌piece‌‌
  of‌‌
  land‌‌   whose‌‌   ownership‌‌   is‌‌
  claimed‌‌  illustrates‌‌   that‌‌
  ‌the‌‌  present‌‌   or‌‌
  current‌‌   fair‌‌  value‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  land‌‌ is‌‌ to‌‌ 
b) Imposable‌‌only‌‌on‌‌ANOTHER’s‌‌property;‌  ‌
by‌  ‌two‌  ‌or‌  ‌more‌  ‌parties‌, ‌ ‌one‌  ‌of‌  ‌whom‌  ‌has‌  ‌built‌  ‌some‌  ‌works‌  ‌(or‌‌  be‌‌  reckoned‌‌   at‌‌  the‌‌  time‌‌  that‌‌ the‌‌ landowner‌‌ elected‌‌ the‌‌ choice‌, ‌‌
sown‌‌   or‌‌
  planted‌‌   something)‌‌   and‌‌   ‌not‌‌
  to‌‌
  a ‌‌case‌‌ where‌‌ the‌‌ owner‌‌ of‌‌  and‌‌not‌‌at‌‌the‌‌time‌‌that‌‌the‌‌property‌‌was‌‌purchased.‌  ‌ c) A‌‌real‌‌right‌‌that‌‌may‌‌be‌‌alienated;‌  ‌
the‌  ‌land‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌builder,‌  ‌sower,‌  ‌or‌  ‌planter‌‌   who‌‌
  then‌‌   later‌‌   loses‌‌  d) It‌‌
  is‌‌
  a ‌‌limitation‌‌
  or‌‌
  encumbrance‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ servient‌‌ estate‌‌ for‌‌ 
ownership‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌land‌  ‌by‌‌   sale‌. ‌‌In‌‌
  fine,‌‌
  petitioner‌‌  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  in‌‌
  a ‌‌valid‌‌  In‌‌
  ‌Sarmiento‌‌   v.‌‌
  Agana‌, ‌‌we‌‌ reckoned‌‌ the‌‌ valuation‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ property‌‌ at‌‌ 
position‌‌to‌‌invoke‌‌the‌‌provisions‌‌of‌‌Article‌‌448.‌  ‌ the‌‌ time‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ real‌‌ owner‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ land‌‌ asked‌‌ the‌‌ builder‌‌ to‌‌ vacate‌‌ the‌‌  another’s‌‌benefit,‌‌the‌‌dominant‌‌estate‌  ‌
property‌  ‌encroached‌  ‌upon.‌  ‌Depra‌  ‌v.‌  ‌Dumlao‌  ‌likewise‌  ‌ordered‌  ‌the‌‌  i) It‌‌is‌‌essential‌‌that‌‌there‌‌be‌‌a‌‌BENEFIT;‌  ‌
Heirs‌‌of‌‌Sarili‌‌v.‌‌Lagrosa‌‌‌2014‌  ‌ courts‌‌   of‌‌
  origin‌‌  to‌‌
  compute‌‌   the‌‌
  current‌‌   fair‌‌
  price‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ land‌‌ in‌‌ cases‌‌ 
of‌‌encroachment‌‌on‌‌real‌‌properties.‌  ii) It‌‌is‌‌not‌‌essential‌‌that‌‌the‌‌benefit‌‌be‌‌exercised;‌  ‌
As‌‌ for‌‌ Sps.‌‌ Sarili,‌‌ they‌‌ knew‌‌ – ‌‌or‌‌ at‌‌ the‌‌ very‌‌ least,‌‌ should‌‌ have‌‌ known‌‌ 
iii) Not‌‌presumed.‌  ‌
–‌‌
  from‌‌   the‌‌
  very‌‌  beginning‌‌   that‌‌  they‌‌  were‌‌
  dealing‌‌   with‌‌
  a ‌‌person‌‌   who‌‌  Parilla‌‌v.‌‌Pilar‌  ‌
possibly‌‌   had‌‌  no‌‌ authority‌‌ to‌‌ sell‌‌ the‌‌ subject‌‌ property‌‌ considering‌‌ the‌‌  e) There‌  ‌is‌  ‌INHERENCE‌  ‌or‌  ‌INSEPARABILITY‌  ‌from‌‌
  the‌‌
  estate‌‌ 
palpable‌  ‌irregularity‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌   subject‌‌   SPA’s‌‌
  acknowledgment.‌‌   It‌‌
  cannot‌‌  Petitioners,‌  ‌being‌  ‌dealers‌  ‌of‌  ‌Pilipinas‌  ‌Shell's‌  ‌petroleum‌  ‌products,‌‌  to‌‌which‌‌it‌‌belongs‌‌(Art‌‌617);‌  ‌
be‌‌  seriously‌‌   doubted‌‌   that‌‌
  Sps.‌‌  Sarili‌‌  were‌‌
  actually‌‌   aware‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌flaw‌‌ or‌‌  were‌‌  allowed‌‌   to‌‌
  occupy‌‌   the‌‌
  property.‌‌ Petitioners‌‌ are‌‌ thus‌‌ considered‌‌ 
defect‌  ‌in‌  ‌their‌  ‌title‌  ‌or‌  ‌mode‌  ‌of‌  ‌acquisition‌  ‌and‌  ‌have‌  ‌consequently‌‌  agents‌  ‌of‌  ‌Pilipinas‌  ‌Shell.‌  ‌As‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌on‌  ‌lease‌  ‌has‌  ‌specific‌  ‌rules‌‌  f) It‌‌is‌‌INDIVISIBLE‌‌(Art‌‌618);‌  ‌
built‌  ‌the‌  ‌house‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌subject‌  ‌property‌  i‌ n‌  ‌bad‌  ‌faith‌  ‌under‌  ‌legal‌‌  concerning‌  ‌useful‌  ‌improvements‌  ‌introduced‌  ‌by‌  ‌a ‌ ‌lessee‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌  g) It‌‌is‌‌INTRANSMISSIBLE;‌  ‌
contemplation.‌  ‌ property‌‌   leased,‌‌   ‌it‌‌
  is‌‌ erroneous‌‌ on‌‌ the‌‌ part‌‌ of‌‌ petitioners‌‌ to‌‌ urge‌‌ 
this‌‌Court‌‌to‌‌apply‌‌Article‌‌448,‌‌‌in‌‌relation‌‌to‌‌Article‌‌546.‌  ‌ h) It‌‌is‌‌PERPETUAL.‌  ‌
Ballatan,‌‌et.al.‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
It‌‌
  does‌‌
  not‌‌
  apply‌‌  where‌‌
  one's‌‌  only‌‌
  interest‌‌
  is‌‌ that‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌lessee‌‌ under‌‌ a ‌ Dichoso,‌‌Jr.‌‌v.‌‌Marcos‌‌‌2011‌  ‌
Go‌  ‌built‌  ‌his‌  ‌house‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌belief‌  ‌that‌  ‌it‌  ‌was‌  ‌entirely‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌‌  rental‌‌
  contract;‌‌
  ‌otherwise‌, ‌‌it‌‌
  would‌‌   always‌‌ be‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ power‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ 
An‌‌  easement‌‌   involves‌‌   an‌‌
  abnormal‌‌   restriction‌‌
  on‌‌  the‌‌ property‌‌ 
parameters‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌father's‌  ‌land.‌  ‌In‌  ‌short,‌  ‌respondents‌  ‌Go‌  ‌had‌  ‌no‌‌  tenant‌‌to‌‌"improve"‌‌his‌‌landlord‌‌out‌‌of‌‌his‌‌property‌. ‌ ‌
rights‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌servient‌  ‌owner‌  ‌and‌  ‌is‌  ‌regarded‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌charge‌  ‌or‌‌ 
knowledge‌‌   that‌‌
  they‌‌
  encroached‌‌   on‌‌ petitioners'‌‌ lot.‌‌ They‌‌ are‌‌ deemed‌‌ 
encumbrance‌‌   on‌‌  the‌‌
  servient‌‌  estate.‌‌
  It‌‌
  is‌‌
  incumbent‌‌
  upon‌‌  the‌‌
  owner‌‌ 
builders‌  ‌in‌  ‌good‌  ‌faith‌  ‌until‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌Ballatan‌‌   informed‌‌  Kilario‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
of‌  ‌the‌  ‌dominant‌  ‌estate‌  ‌to‌  ‌establish‌  ‌by‌  ‌clear‌  ‌and‌  ‌convincing‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 166‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

the‌  ‌owner‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌


  servient‌‌
  estate‌‌
  the‌‌
  obligation‌‌  of‌‌ 
evidence‌  ‌the‌  ‌presence‌  ‌of‌  ‌all‌  ‌the‌  ‌preconditions‌‌
  before‌‌
  his‌‌
  claim‌‌
  for‌‌ 
easement‌‌of‌‌right‌‌of‌‌way‌‌may‌‌be‌‌granted.‌  ‌ allowing‌  ‌something‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌done‌  ‌or‌  ‌of‌  ‌doing‌  ‌it‌‌  What‌‌   stamps‌‌   a ‌‌public‌‌ character‌‌ on‌‌ a ‌‌private‌‌ property,‌‌ like‌‌ the‌‌ road‌‌ in‌‌ 
himself.‌  ‌ question,‌  ‌is‌‌  not‌‌   the‌‌
  number‌‌   of‌‌
  persons‌‌  who‌‌  may‌‌
  have‌‌   an‌‌  interest‌‌
  in‌‌ 
Mere‌  ‌convenience‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌dominant‌  ‌estate‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌what‌  ‌is‌‌  ii) A‌  ‌negative‌  ‌easement‌  ‌is‌  ‌one‌  ‌that‌  ‌prohibits‌  ‌the‌‌  its‌‌
  use,‌‌
  but‌‌
  the‌‌   fact‌‌
  that‌‌
  all‌‌
  those‌‌   who‌‌ may‌‌ desire‌‌ to‌‌ use‌‌ it‌‌ may‌‌ do‌‌ so‌‌ 
required‌  ‌by‌  ‌law‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌  ‌basis‌  ‌of‌  ‌setting‌  ‌up‌  ‌a ‌ ‌compulsory‌‌  upon‌‌payment‌‌of‌‌the‌‌required‌‌indemnity.‌‌   ‌
easement.‌  ‌To‌  ‌be‌  ‌sure,‌  ‌the‌  ‌true‌  ‌standard‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌grant‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌legal‌‌  owner‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌servient‌  ‌estate‌  ‌from‌  ‌doing‌‌ 
right‌‌is‌‌"a
‌ dequacy‌."‌  ‌ something‌  ‌which‌  ‌he‌  ‌could‌  ‌lawfully‌  ‌do‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌ 
Continuous‌‌and‌‌Discontinuous‌‌Easements‌‌   ‌
easement‌‌did‌‌not‌‌exist.‌  ‌
Borbajo‌‌v.‌‌Hidden‌‌View‌‌Homeowners‌  ‌ Liwag‌‌v.‌‌Happy‌‌Glen‌‌Loop‌‌Homeowners‌‌‌2012‌  ‌
e) Right‌‌given‌  ‌
The‌‌
  dominant‌‌   estate‌‌
  cannot‌‌
  be‌‌
  the‌‌   servient‌‌ estate‌‌ at‌‌ the‌‌ same‌‌  In‌  ‌this‌  ‌case,‌  ‌the‌  ‌water‌  ‌facility‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌encumbrance‌‌   on‌‌
  Lot‌‌
  11‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌ 
i) Partial‌‌use;‌  ‌
time.‌  ‌One‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌characteristics‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌easement‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌  ‌it‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌‌  benefit‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ community.‌‌ It‌‌ is‌‌ continuous‌‌ and‌‌ apparent‌, ‌‌because‌‌ it‌‌ 
imposed‌  ‌only‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌  ‌of‌  ‌another,‌  ‌never‌  ‌on‌  ‌one’s‌  ‌own‌‌  ii) Getting‌‌of‌‌specific‌‌material.‌  ‌ is‌  ‌used‌  ‌incessantly‌  ‌without‌  ‌human‌  ‌intervention,‌  ‌and‌  ‌because‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌‌ 
property.‌  ‌An‌  ‌easement‌  ‌can‌  ‌exist‌  ‌only‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌servient‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌  continually‌  ‌kept‌  ‌in‌  ‌view‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌   overhead‌‌   water‌‌
  tank,‌‌
  which‌‌  reveals‌‌ 
f) Source‌‌or‌‌origin‌  ‌
dominant‌‌estates‌‌belong‌‌to‌‌different‌‌owners.‌  ‌ its‌‌use‌‌to‌‌the‌‌public.‌  ‌
i) Voluntary;‌  ‌
2.‌‌Classification‌  ‌ The‌‌  ‌easement‌‌ of‌‌ water‌‌ facility‌‌ has‌‌ been‌‌ voluntarily‌‌ established‌. ‌‌
ii) Legal;‌  ‌
For‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌  ‌30‌  ‌years,‌  ‌the‌  ‌facility‌  ‌was‌  ‌continuously‌  ‌used‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Resume‌‌of‌‌Classification‌A
‌ ccording‌‌to‌  ‌ iii) Mixed.‌  ‌ residents’‌  ‌sole‌  ‌source‌  ‌of‌  ‌water.‌  ‌Continuous‌  ‌and‌  ‌apparent‌‌ 
easements‌  ‌are‌  ‌acquired‌  ‌either‌  ‌by‌  ‌virtue‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌title‌  ‌or‌  ‌by‌‌ 
a) Party‌‌given‌b
‌ enefit‌  ‌ Real‌‌and‌‌Personal‌‌Servitudes‌‌   ‌ prescription‌  ‌of‌  ‌10‌  ‌years‌. ‌ ‌Thus,‌  ‌an‌  ‌easement‌  ‌of‌  ‌water‌  ‌facility‌‌  has‌‌ 
i) Real‌‌or‌‌predial‌  ‌ ART‌‌ 614‌. ‌‌Servitudes‌‌ may‌‌ also‌‌ be‌‌ established‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ benefit‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌ already‌‌been‌‌acquired‌‌through‌‌prescription.‌  ‌

ii) Personal‌  ‌ community,‌  ‌or‌  ‌of‌  ‌one‌  ‌or‌  ‌more‌  ‌persons‌  ‌to‌  ‌whom‌  ‌the‌‌ 
encumbered‌‌estate‌‌does‌‌not‌‌belong.‌  ‌ Positive‌‌and‌‌Negative‌‌Easements‌‌   ‌
b) Manner‌‌of‌‌exercise‌  ‌
Jabonete‌‌v.‌‌Monteverde‌  ⭐‌Sps‌‌Garcia‌‌v.‌‌Santos‌‌‌2019‌  ‌
i) Continuous‌‌   ‌easements‌‌ are‌‌ those‌‌ the‌‌ use‌‌ of‌‌ which‌‌ 
The‌  ‌servitude‌  ‌established‌  ‌was‌  ‌clearly‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌benefit‌  ‌alone‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  According‌  ‌to‌  ‌Article‌  ‌621‌, ‌ ‌in‌  ‌order‌  ‌to‌  ‌acquire‌  ‌easements‌  ‌by‌‌ 
is‌  ‌or‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌incessant,‌‌
  ‌without‌‌
  the‌‌
  intervention‌‌ 
plaintiffs.‌‌  In‌‌
  other‌‌
  words,‌‌   the‌‌
  right‌‌
  acquired‌‌   by‌‌ the‌‌ original‌‌ plaintiffs‌‌  prescription‌  ‌in‌  ‌positive‌  ‌easements,‌  ‌the‌  ‌prescriptive‌  ‌period‌  ‌shall‌‌ 
of‌‌any‌‌act‌‌of‌‌man‌. ‌ ‌ was‌  ‌a ‌ ‌personal‌  ‌servitude‌  ‌under‌  ‌Article‌  ‌614,‌  ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌a ‌ ‌predial‌‌  commence‌‌   from‌‌  the‌‌
  day‌‌
  on‌‌
  which‌‌  the‌‌
  owner‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ dominant‌‌ estate,‌‌ 
ii) Discontinuous‌  ‌easements‌  ‌are‌  ‌those‌  ‌which‌  ‌are‌‌  servitude‌  ‌that‌  ‌inures‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌benefit‌  ‌of‌  ‌whoever‌  ‌owns‌  ‌the‌‌
  dominant‌‌  or‌‌
  the‌‌
  person‌‌  who‌‌ may‌‌ have‌‌ made‌‌ use‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ easement,‌‌ ‌commenced‌‌ 
used‌  ‌at‌  ‌intervals‌  ‌and‌  ‌depend‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌acts‌  ‌of‌‌  estate.‌  ‌ to‌‌exercise‌‌‌it‌‌upon‌‌the‌‌servient‌‌estate.‌  ‌
man‌. ‌ ‌
Alcantara‌‌v.‌‌Reta,‌‌Jr.‌  ‌ With‌  ‌respect‌  ‌to‌  ‌negative‌  ‌easements‌  ‌— ‌ ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌day‌  ‌on‌‌
  which‌‌
  the‌‌ 
c) Whether‌‌or‌‌not‌‌existence‌‌is‌‌indicated‌  ‌ owner‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌dominant‌  ‌estate‌  ‌forbade,‌  ‌by‌  ‌an‌  ‌instrument‌‌ 
Roble‌  ‌was‌  ‌allowed‌  ‌to‌  ‌construct‌  ‌his‌  ‌house‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌land‌  ‌because‌  ‌it‌‌  acknowledged‌  ‌before‌  ‌a ‌ ‌notary‌  ‌public‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌owner‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌servient‌ 
i) Apparent‌  ‌easements‌  ‌are‌  ‌those‌  ‌which‌  ‌are‌  ‌made‌‌  would‌‌  facilitate‌‌ his‌‌ gathering‌‌ of‌‌ tuba.‌‌ This‌‌ would‌‌ be‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ nature‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌ estate,‌  ‌from‌  ‌executing‌  ‌an‌  ‌act‌  ‌which‌  ‌would‌  ‌be‌  ‌lawful‌  ‌without‌  ‌the‌‌ 
known‌  ‌and‌  ‌are‌  ‌continually‌  ‌kept‌  ‌in‌  ‌view‌  ‌by‌‌  personal‌‌easement‌‌under‌‌Article‌‌614.‌  ‌ easement.‌  ‌
external‌‌ signs‌‌ that‌‌ reveal‌‌ the‌‌ use‌‌ and‌‌ enjoyment‌‌ of‌‌ 
the‌‌same.‌  ‌ Public‌‌and‌‌Private‌‌Easements‌‌   How‌‌then‌‌is‌‌an‌‌easement‌‌of‌‌light‌‌and‌‌view‌‌classified?‌  ‌
ii) Nonapparent‌  ‌easements‌  ‌are‌  ‌those‌  ‌which‌  ‌show‌‌  North‌‌Negros‌‌Sugar‌‌v.‌‌Hidalgo‌  ‌ As‌‌ a ‌‌general‌‌ rule‌, ‌‌an‌‌ easement‌‌ of‌‌ light‌‌ and‌‌ view‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌‌positive‌‌ ‌one‌‌ if‌‌ 
no‌‌external‌‌indication‌‌of‌‌their‌‌existence.‌  ‌ the‌  ‌window‌  ‌or‌  ‌opening‌  ‌is‌  ‌situated‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌party‌  ‌wall‌, ‌ ‌while‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌‌
An‌  ‌easement‌  ‌of‌  ‌way‌  ‌voluntarily‌  ‌constituted‌  ‌in‌  ‌favor‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌
d) Purpose‌‌or‌‌nature‌‌of‌‌limitation‌  ‌ community‌. ‌ ‌Consequently,‌  ‌the‌  ‌plaintiff‌  ‌may‌  ‌not‌  ‌establish‌‌  negative‌  ‌one‌‌   if‌‌
  the‌‌
  window‌‌  or‌‌
  opening‌‌  is‌‌
  thru‌‌
  ‌one's‌‌   own‌‌
  wall‌, ‌‌i.e.,‌‌ 
discriminatory‌‌exceptions‌‌against‌‌any‌‌private‌‌person‌. ‌ ‌ thru‌‌   a ‌‌wall‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ dominant‌‌ estate.‌‌ ‌However‌, ‌‌even‌‌ if‌‌ the‌‌ window‌‌ is‌‌ on‌‌ 
i) A‌  ‌positive‌‌
  ‌easement‌‌
  is‌‌
  one‌‌
  which‌‌
  imposes‌‌
  upon‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 167‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

one's‌‌  own‌‌
  wall,‌‌
  still‌‌ the‌‌ easement‌‌ would‌‌ be‌‌ positive‌‌ if‌‌ the‌‌ window‌‌ is‌‌ 
3.‌‌Modes‌‌of‌‌acquiring‌‌easements‌  ‌ persons‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  one‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  grounds‌‌   for‌‌
  the‌‌  extinguishment‌‌ of‌‌ an‌‌ 
on‌‌a‌‌balcony‌‌or‌‌projection‌‌extending‌‌over‌‌into‌‌the‌‌adjoining‌‌land.‌  ‌ easement.‌  ‌On‌  ‌the‌  ‌contrary,‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌easement‌  ‌is‌  ‌continued‌  ‌by‌‌ 
a) TITLE‌‌or‌‌PRESCRIPTION‌‌of‌‌10‌‌YEARS‌‌if‌  ‌ operation‌‌of‌‌law,‌‌specifically,‌A ‌ rt‌‌624‌. ‌ ‌
Aside‌  ‌from‌  ‌prescription,‌  ‌easements‌  ‌may‌  ‌likewise‌  ‌be‌  ‌acquired‌‌  i) Continuous‌‌AND‌‌Apparent.‌  ‌
through‌  ‌title‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌term‌  ‌"‌title‌" ‌ ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌juridical‌  ‌act‌  ‌or‌  ‌law‌‌  4.‌‌Rights‌‌and‌‌obligations‌‌of‌‌the‌‌
 
sufficient‌‌to‌‌create‌‌the‌‌encumbrance.‌  ‌ b) TITLE‌‌ONLY‌‌if‌  ‌
i) Discontinuous‌‌and‌‌Apparent;‌  ‌
owners‌  ‌
The‌  ‌mode‌  ‌of‌  ‌acquiring‌  ‌an‌  ‌easement‌  ‌under‌  ‌Article‌  ‌624‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌"legal‌‌ 
presumption‌  ‌or‌  ‌apparent‌  ‌sign‌."‌  ‌Article‌  ‌624‌  ‌finds‌  ‌application‌  ‌in‌‌  ii) Continuous‌‌and‌‌Non-apparent;‌  ‌ Dominant‌‌Estate‌  ‌ Servient‌‌Estate‌  ‌
situations‌‌   wherein‌‌ two‌‌ or‌‌ more‌‌ estates‌‌ were‌‌ previously‌‌ owned‌‌ by‌‌ a ‌‌ iii) Discontinuous‌‌and‌‌Non-apparent.‌  ‌
singular‌  ‌owner‌, ‌ ‌or‌  ‌even‌  ‌a ‌ ‌single‌  ‌estate‌  ‌but‌  ‌with‌  ‌two‌  ‌or‌  ‌more‌‌  Rights‌  ‌
portions‌‌   being‌‌   owned‌‌   by‌‌
  a ‌‌singular‌‌
  owner.‌‌
  According‌‌   to‌‌
  Article‌‌ 624,‌‌  ⭐‌Bogo-Medellin‌‌Milling,‌‌Co.‌‌v.‌‌CA‌,‌‌supra‌  ‌
there‌‌   arises‌‌   a ‌‌title‌‌
  to‌‌ an‌‌ easement‌‌ of‌‌ light‌‌ and‌‌ view,‌‌ even‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌  1. Exercise‌‌the‌‌easement‌‌and‌‌all‌‌  1. Retain‌‌ownership‌‌and‌‌ 
The‌  ‌easement‌  ‌of‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌way‌  ‌is‌  ‌considered‌  ‌discontinuous‌‌ 
absence‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌formal‌  ‌act‌  ‌undertaken‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌owner‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌  necessary‌‌rights;‌‌(Art‌‌625)‌  ‌ possession;‌‌(Art‌‌630)‌  ‌
because‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌exercised‌  ‌only‌  ‌if‌  ‌a ‌ ‌person‌  ‌passes‌  ‌or‌  ‌sets‌  ‌foot‌  ‌on‌‌ 
dominant‌  ‌estate,‌  ‌if‌  ‌this‌  ‌apparent‌  ‌visible‌  ‌sign,‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌the‌‌  2. To‌‌make‌‌on‌‌the‌‌servient‌‌estate‌‌all‌‌  2. To‌‌make‌‌use‌‌of‌‌the‌‌ 
somebody‌  ‌else's‌  ‌land.‌  ‌Like‌  ‌a ‌ ‌road‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌passage‌  ‌of‌  ‌vehicles‌  ‌or‌‌ 
existence‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌door‌  ‌and‌  ‌windows,‌  ‌continues‌  ‌to‌  ‌remain‌  ‌and‌‌  necessary‌‌works‌‌for‌‌its‌‌use‌‌and‌‌  easement‌‌unless‌‌ 
persons,‌  ‌an‌  ‌easement‌  ‌of‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌way‌  ‌of‌  ‌railroad‌  ‌tracks‌  ‌is‌‌ 
subsist‌, ‌ ‌unless‌, ‌ ‌at‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌the‌  ‌ownership‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌two‌  ‌estates‌  ‌is‌‌  preservation,‌‌BUT‌  ‌ deprived‌‌by‌‌stipulation‌‌ 
discontinuous‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌presence‌  ‌of‌  ‌physical‌  ‌or‌  ‌visual‌  ‌signs‌  ‌only‌‌ 
divided,‌‌   ‌ provided‌‌that‌‌the‌‌ 
classifies‌‌an‌‌easement‌‌into‌‌apparent‌‌or‌‌non-apparent‌.  ‌‌ ‌ a. Must‌‌be‌‌at‌‌his‌‌own‌‌expense;‌  ‌
exercise‌‌of‌‌easement‌‌is‌‌ 
1) the‌‌
  contrary‌‌  should‌‌   be‌‌ provided‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ title‌‌ of‌‌ conveyance‌‌ of‌‌  b. Must‌‌notify‌‌the‌‌servient‌‌  not‌‌adversely‌‌affected‌‌ 
In‌  ‌this‌  ‌case,‌  ‌the‌  ‌presence‌  ‌of‌  ‌railroad‌  ‌tracks‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌passage‌  ‌of‌‌ 
either‌‌of‌‌them,‌‌or‌  ‌ owner;‌  ‌ and‌‌that‌‌he‌‌contributes‌‌ 
petitioner's‌  ‌trains‌  ‌denotes‌  ‌the‌  ‌existence‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌apparent‌  ‌but‌‌ 
2) the‌‌
  sign‌‌ aforesaid‌‌ should‌‌ be‌‌ removed‌‌ before‌‌ the‌‌ execution‌‌ of‌‌  discontinuous‌‌‌easement‌‌of‌‌right‌‌of‌‌way.‌‌   ‌ c. Select‌‌convenient‌‌time‌‌and‌‌  to‌‌the‌‌expenses;‌  ‌
the‌‌deed.‌  ‌ manner;‌  ‌ 3. To‌‌change‌‌the‌‌location‌‌ 
When‌‌   is‌‌
  a ‌‌party‌‌
  deemed‌‌
  to‌‌
  acquire‌‌ title‌‌ over‌‌ the‌‌ use‌‌ of‌‌ such‌‌ land?‌‌ In‌‌  d. Must‌‌not‌‌alter‌‌the‌‌easement‌‌  of‌‌a‌‌very‌‌inconvenient‌‌ 
The‌‌
  existence‌‌
  of‌‌
  an‌‌
  easement‌‌
  of‌‌
  light‌‌
  and‌‌
  view‌‌
  under‌‌ ‌Article‌‌ 624‌‌ is‌‌  at‌‌least‌‌two‌‌cases,‌‌we‌‌held‌‌that‌‌if:‌‌   ‌ or‌‌make‌‌it‌‌more‌‌  easement‌‌provided‌‌that‌‌ 
established‌‌as‌‌long‌‌as‌‌   ‌
a) it‌  ‌had‌  ‌subsequently‌  ‌entered‌  ‌into‌  ‌a ‌ ‌contractual‌‌   right‌‌
  of‌‌
  way‌‌  burdensome.‌‌(Art‌‌627)‌  ‌ an‌‌equally‌‌convenient‌‌ 
1) there‌  ‌exists‌  ‌an‌  ‌apparent‌  ‌sign‌  ‌of‌  ‌servitude‌  ‌between‌  ‌two‌‌  with‌  ‌the‌  ‌heirs‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌continued‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌land‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌‌  substitute‌‌is‌‌made,‌‌ 
3. Ask‌‌for‌‌a‌‌mandatory‌‌injunction‌‌to‌‌ 
estates;‌‌   ‌ principles‌‌of‌‌voluntary‌‌easements‌‌‌or‌‌   ‌ without‌‌injury‌‌to‌‌the‌‌ 
prevent‌‌impairment‌‌or‌ 
2) the‌‌ sign‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ easement‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ ‌established‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ owner‌‌  b) it‌‌
  had‌‌
  filed‌‌
  a ‌‌case‌‌
  against‌‌
  the‌‌
  heirs‌‌
  for‌‌
  conferment‌‌   on‌‌ it‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌ obstruction;‌  ‌ dominant‌‌estate.‌‌(Art‌‌ 
of‌‌both‌‌tenements;‌‌   ‌ legal‌‌easement‌‌of‌‌right‌‌of‌‌way‌‌under‌A ‌ rticle‌‌629‌,  ‌‌ ‌ 629)‌  ‌
4. Renounce‌‌totally‌‌the‌‌easement‌‌if‌‌ 
3) either‌‌or‌‌both‌‌of‌‌the‌‌estates‌‌are‌a
‌ lienated‌b
‌ y‌‌the‌‌owner;‌‌and‌‌   ‌ he‌‌desires‌‌exemption‌‌from‌‌ 
then‌‌title‌‌over‌‌the‌‌use‌‌of‌‌the‌‌land‌‌is‌‌deemed‌‌to‌‌exist.‌  ‌
4) at‌  ‌the‌  ‌time‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌alienation‌  ‌nothing‌  ‌is‌  ‌stated‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  contribution‌‌to‌‌expenses‌‌(Art‌‌ 
document‌  ‌of‌  ‌alienation‌  ‌contrary‌  ‌to‌‌   the‌‌
  easement‌‌   nor‌‌
  is‌‌
  the‌‌  628)‌  ‌
Abellana,‌‌Sr.‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
sign‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌easement‌  ‌removed‌  ‌before‌  ‌the‌  ‌execution‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
document.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌a‌  ‌footpath‌  ‌or‌  ‌road‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌apparent‌  ‌but‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌‌ Duties‌  ‌
discontinuous‌‌   ‌easement‌‌   because‌‌   its‌‌
  use‌‌
  is‌‌
  at‌‌ intervals‌‌ and‌‌ depends‌‌ 
Article‌  ‌673‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌exception‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌general‌  ‌rule.‌  ‌Therefore‌, ‌‌ upon‌‌   the‌‌  acts‌‌
  of‌‌  man.‌‌ It‌‌ can‌‌ be‌‌ exercised‌‌ only‌‌ if‌‌ a ‌‌man‌‌ passes‌‌ or‌‌ puts‌‌  1. Cannot‌‌use‌‌the‌‌easement‌‌except‌‌  1. Cannot‌‌impair‌‌the‌‌use‌‌of‌‌ 
considering‌‌   that‌‌
  the‌‌  Sps.‌‌
  Garcia‌‌ have‌‌ acquired‌‌ by‌‌ title‌‌ an‌‌ easement‌‌ of‌‌  his‌  ‌feet‌  ‌over‌  ‌somebody‌  ‌else's‌  ‌land.‌  ‌Hence,‌  ‌a ‌ ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌way‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌‌  for‌‌the‌‌benefit‌‌of‌‌the‌‌immovable‌‌  the‌‌easement;‌‌(Art‌‌629)‌  ‌
light‌  ‌and‌  ‌view‌  ‌in‌  ‌accordance‌  ‌with‌  ‌Article‌  ‌624,‌  ‌the‌  ‌Sps.‌  ‌Santos‌‌  acquirable‌‌by‌‌prescription‌. ‌ ‌ originally‌‌contemplated.‌‌   ‌ 2. Must‌‌contribute‌‌to‌‌the‌‌ 
should‌  ‌necessarily‌  ‌demolish‌  ‌or‌  ‌renovate‌  ‌portions‌  ‌of‌  ‌their‌‌  2. Cannot‌‌exercise‌‌the‌‌easement‌‌in‌‌  expenses‌‌in‌‌case‌‌he‌‌also‌‌ 
residential‌  ‌building‌  ‌so‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌three-meter‌  ‌distance‌  ‌rule‌  ‌as‌‌  Tañedo‌‌v.‌‌Bernad‌‌   ‌ any‌‌other‌‌manner‌‌than‌‌that‌‌  uses‌‌the‌‌easement;‌‌(Art‌‌ 
mandated‌‌under‌‌Article‌‌673‌‌is‌‌observed‌. ‌ ‌ previously‌‌established.‌‌(Art‌‌626)‌  628)‌  ‌
The‌‌ alien­ation‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ dominant‌‌ and‌‌ servient‌‌ estates‌‌ to‌‌ different‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 168‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

Villanueva‌‌v.‌‌Velasco‌  ‌
3. Cannot‌‌alter‌‌the‌‌easement;‌  ‌ 3. In‌‌case‌‌of‌‌impairment,‌‌  Merger‌  ‌presupposes‌  ‌the‌  ‌existence‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌prior‌  ‌servient-dominant‌‌ 
to‌‌restore‌‌conditions‌‌to‌‌  owner‌  ‌relationship,‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌termination‌  ‌of‌  ‌that‌  ‌relation‌  ‌leaves‌  ‌the‌‌  ‌ asement‌t‌ o‌‌be‌c
The‌‌essential‌‌requisites‌‌for‌‌an‌e ‌ ompulsory‌a‌ re:‌‌   ‌
4. Cannot‌‌make‌‌it‌‌more‌‌  easement‌‌   of‌‌
  no‌‌
  use.‌‌
  Unless‌‌   the‌‌
  owner‌‌
  conveys‌‌
  the‌‌  property‌‌   in‌‌
  favor‌‌ 
burdensome;‌  ‌ the‌‌status‌‌quo‌‌at‌‌his‌‌  1) the‌‌
  dominant‌‌
  estate‌‌ is‌‌ surrounded‌‌ by‌‌ other‌‌ immovables‌‌ and‌‌ 
expense‌‌plus‌‌damages;‌  ‌ of‌  ‌the‌  ‌public—if‌  ‌that‌  ‌is‌  ‌possible—‌no‌  ‌genuine‌  ‌merger‌  ‌can‌  ‌take‌‌ 
has‌‌no‌‌adequate‌‌outlet‌t‌ o‌‌a‌‌public‌‌highway;‌‌   ‌
5. For‌‌several‌‌dominant‌‌estates,‌‌  place‌‌that‌‌would‌‌terminate‌‌a‌‌personal‌‌easement‌. ‌ ‌
each‌‌must‌‌contribute‌‌to‌‌  4. To‌‌pay‌‌for‌‌the‌‌expenses‌‌  2) proper‌‌indemnity‌h
‌ as‌‌been‌‌paid;‌  ‌
incurred‌‌for‌‌the‌‌change‌‌ 
necessary‌‌repairs‌‌and‌‌expenses‌‌  6.‌‌Legal‌‌Easements‌  ‌ 3) the‌‌
  isolation‌‌
  was‌‌  ‌not‌‌
  due‌‌
  to‌‌
  acts‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  proprietor‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
in‌‌proportion‌‌to‌‌the‌‌BENEFIT‌‌  of‌‌location‌‌or‌‌form‌‌of‌‌ 
dominant‌‌estate;‌‌   ‌
received.‌‌(Art‌‌628)‌  ‌ the‌‌easement.‌‌(Art‌‌629)‌  ‌ Legal‌  ‌easements‌  ‌are‌  ‌ones‌  ‌imposed‌  ‌by‌  ‌law,‌  ‌and‌  ‌which‌  ‌have,‌  ‌for‌‌ 
4) the‌‌ right‌‌ of‌‌ way‌‌ claimed‌‌ is‌‌ at‌‌ a ‌‌point‌‌ ‌least‌‌ prejudicial‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ 
their‌  ‌object,‌  ‌either‌  ‌public‌  ‌use‌  ‌or‌  ‌interest‌  ‌of‌  ‌private‌  ‌persons,‌  ‌as‌‌ 
servient‌‌estate;‌‌and‌‌   ‌
5.‌‌Modes‌‌of‌‌extinguishment‌  ‌ opposed‌  ‌to‌  ‌voluntary‌  ‌easements‌  ‌that‌  ‌are‌  ‌established‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌‌ 
agreements‌‌of‌‌the‌‌parties.‌T ‌ he‌‌different‌‌legal‌‌easements‌‌are:‌‌   ‌ 5) to‌  ‌the‌  ‌extent‌  ‌consistent‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌foregoing‌  ‌rule,‌  ‌where‌  ‌the‌‌ 
ART‌‌631‌.‌‌Easements‌‌are‌‌extinguished:‌  ‌ distance‌  ‌from‌‌   the‌‌
  dominant‌‌  estate‌‌   to‌‌
  a ‌‌public‌‌
  highway‌‌
  may‌‌ 
a) easement‌‌relating‌‌to‌‌waters;‌‌   ‌ be‌‌the‌‌shortest.‌  ‌
1) By‌  ‌merger‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌person‌  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  ownership‌‌
  of‌‌  b) right‌‌of‌‌way;‌‌   ‌
the‌‌dominant‌‌and‌‌servient‌‌estates;‌  ‌ Ramos,‌‌Sr.‌‌v.‌‌Gatchalian‌‌Realty,‌‌Inc.‌  ‌
c) party‌‌wall;‌  ‌
2) By‌n
‌ onuse‌‌for‌‌ten‌‌years‌;  ‌‌ ‌ Mere‌  ‌convenience‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌dominant‌  ‌estate‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌enough‌  ‌to‌‌ 
d) light‌‌and‌‌view;‌‌   ‌ serve‌‌
  as‌‌
  its‌‌
  basis‌. ‌‌To‌‌
  justify‌‌
  the‌‌
  imposition‌‌ of‌‌ this‌‌ servitude,‌‌ ‌there‌‌ 
a) with‌  ‌respect‌  ‌to‌  ‌discontinuous‌  ‌easements,‌  ‌this‌‌  must‌‌be‌‌a‌‌real,‌‌not‌‌a‌‌fictitious‌‌or‌‌artificial,‌‌necessity‌‌‌for‌‌it.‌  ‌
e) drainage;‌‌   ‌
period‌  ‌shall‌‌
  be‌‌
  computed‌‌   from‌‌   the‌‌
  day‌‌
  on‌‌
  which‌‌ 
they‌c‌ eased‌‌to‌‌be‌‌used‌;‌‌and,‌‌   ‌ f) intermediate‌‌distances;‌‌   ‌ Quimen‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
b) with‌  ‌respect‌  ‌to‌  ‌continuous‌  ‌easements,‌‌   from‌‌
  the‌‌  g) easement‌‌against‌‌nuisance;‌‌and‌‌   ‌ If‌‌
  the‌‌
  two‌‌
  circumstances‌‌   do‌‌   not‌‌
  concur‌‌ in‌‌ a ‌‌single‌‌ tenement,‌‌ the‌‌ way‌‌ 
day‌‌
  on‌‌  which‌‌   an‌‌  ‌act‌‌
  contrary‌‌
  to‌‌
  the‌‌
  same‌‌ took‌‌  where‌‌ damage‌‌ will‌‌ be‌‌ least‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ used‌‌ even‌‌ if‌‌ not‌‌ the‌‌ shortest‌‌ 
h) lateral‌‌and‌‌subjacent‌‌support.‌  ‌
place‌; ‌ ‌ route.‌  ‌This‌  ‌is‌  ‌so‌  ‌because‌  ‌least‌  ‌prejudice‌  ‌prevails‌‌   over‌‌
  shortest‌‌ 
3) When‌  ‌either‌  ‌or‌  ‌both‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌estates‌  ‌fall‌  ‌into‌  ‌such‌‌  Requisites‌‌to‌‌Acquire‌‌Easement‌‌of‌‌AQUEDUCT‌  ‌ distance‌.  ‌‌ ‌
condition‌‌that‌‌the‌‌easement‌‌cannot‌‌be‌‌used;‌‌xxxx‌  ‌
a) Indemnity‌‌must‌‌be‌‌paid;‌  ‌
Floro‌‌v.‌‌Llenado‌  ‌
4) By‌  ‌the‌  ‌expiration‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌term‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌fulfillment‌  ‌of‌‌ 
b) If‌‌
  for‌‌
  private‌‌
  interests,‌‌ the‌‌ easement‌‌ cannot‌‌ be‌‌ imposed‌‌ on‌‌ 
the‌  ‌condition,‌  ‌if‌  ‌the‌  ‌easement‌  ‌is‌  ‌temporary‌  ‌or‌‌  The‌  ‌use‌  ‌of‌  ‌Road‌  ‌Lots‌  ‌4 ‌ ‌and‌  ‌5 ‌ ‌by‌‌  the‌‌
  Llenados‌‌   during‌‌  the‌‌
  month‌‌   of‌‌ 
EXISTING‌  ‌buildings,‌  ‌courtyards,‌  ‌annexes,‌  ‌out-houses,‌‌ 
conditional;‌  ‌ March‌  ‌was‌  ‌by‌  ‌mere‌  ‌tolerance‌  ‌of‌  ‌Floro‌  ‌pending‌  ‌the‌  ‌negotiation‌‌   of‌‌ 
orchards‌‌or‌‌gardens;‌  ‌
the‌‌  terms‌‌  and‌‌  conditions‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  right‌‌  of‌‌
  way.‌‌
  Although‌‌   such‌‌  use‌‌
  was‌‌ 
5) By‌  ‌the‌  ‌renunciation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌owner‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌dominant‌‌  in‌  ‌anticipation‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌voluntary‌  ‌easement‌  ‌of‌  ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌way,‌  ‌no‌  ‌such‌‌ 
c) There‌‌must‌‌be‌‌PROOF:‌  ‌
estate;‌  ‌ contract‌  ‌was‌  ‌validly‌  ‌entered‌  ‌into‌  ‌by‌  ‌reason‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌failure‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
i) That‌‌he‌‌can‌‌dispose‌‌of‌‌the‌‌water;‌  ‌
6) By‌‌  the‌‌
  ‌redemption‌‌
  ‌agreed‌‌
  upon‌‌
  between‌‌
  the‌‌
  owners‌‌  parties‌  ‌to‌  ‌agree‌  ‌on‌  ‌its‌‌
  terms‌‌   and‌‌  conditions.‌‌   Thus,‌‌
  Llenados‌‌   cannot‌‌ 
of‌‌the‌‌dominant‌‌and‌‌servient‌‌estates.‌  ‌ ii) That‌  ‌the‌  ‌water‌  ‌is‌  ‌SUFFICIENT‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌use‌  ‌for‌‌  claim‌  ‌entitlement‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌right‌  ‌of‌  ‌way‌  ‌through‌  ‌the‌  ‌Floro‌  ‌Park‌‌ 
which‌‌it‌‌is‌‌intended;‌  ‌ Subdivision‌‌on‌‌the‌‌basis‌‌of‌‌a‌‌voluntary‌‌easement.‌  ‌
Salimbangon‌‌v.‌‌Tan‌‌‌2010‌  ‌
iii) That‌  ‌the‌‌
  proposed‌‌   course‌‌   is‌‌
  the‌‌
  most‌‌
  convenient‌‌ 
When‌‌   the‌‌   owner‌‌   of‌‌
  Lots‌‌
  D ‌‌and‌‌ E ‌‌also‌‌ became‌‌ the‌‌ owner‌‌ of‌‌ Lot‌‌ B,‌‌ ‌the‌‌  Valdez‌‌v.‌‌Tabisula‌  ‌
and‌  ‌the‌  ‌least‌  ‌onerous‌  ‌to‌  ‌third‌  ‌persons‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌‌ 
easement‌‌   of‌‌
  right‌‌  of‌‌
  way‌‌   on‌‌
  Lot‌‌   B ‌‌became‌‌  ‌extinct‌‌
  ‌by‌‌ operation‌‌  servient‌‌estate;‌  ‌ A‌‌ document‌‌ stipulating‌‌ a ‌‌voluntary‌‌ easement‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ recorded‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ 
of‌‌law‌.  ‌‌ ‌ Registry‌‌of‌‌Property‌‌in‌‌order‌‌not‌‌to‌‌prejudice‌‌third‌‌parties.‌‌   ‌
iv) That‌  ‌proper‌  ‌administrative‌  ‌permission‌  ‌be‌‌ 
Solid‌‌Manila‌‌v.‌‌Bio‌‌Hong‌‌Trading‌  ‌ obtained.‌  ‌ Here,‌  ‌petitioners‌  ‌and‌  ‌their‌  ‌family‌  ‌are‌  ‌also‌  ‌the‌  ‌owners‌  ‌of‌  ‌two‌‌ 
Easement‌‌of‌‌Right‌‌of‌‌Way,‌‌Requisites‌‌of‌  ‌ properties‌  ‌adjoining‌  ‌the‌  ‌subject‌  ‌property‌  ‌which‌  ‌have‌  ‌access‌‌
  to‌‌
  two‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 169‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

public‌  ‌roads‌  ‌or‌  ‌highways.‌  ‌Since‌  ‌petitioners‌  ‌then‌  ‌have‌  ‌more‌  ‌than‌‌  the‌‌
  land‌‌
  occupied‌‌ plus‌‌ the‌‌ amount‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ damage‌‌ caused‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌  neighborhood‌  ‌or‌  ‌any‌  ‌considerable‌  ‌number‌  ‌of‌  ‌persons,‌‌ 
adequate‌  ‌passage‌  ‌to‌  ‌two‌  ‌public‌  ‌roads,‌  ‌they‌  ‌have‌  ‌no‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌‌  servient‌‌estate‌. ‌ ‌ although‌‌ the‌‌ extent‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ annoyance,‌‌ danger‌‌ or‌‌ damage‌‌ upon‌‌ 
demand‌‌an‌‌easement‌‌on‌‌the‌‌"western‌‌side‌‌of‌‌respondents'‌‌lot."‌  ‌ individuals‌‌may‌‌be‌‌unequal";‌‌or‌  ‌
Lateral‌‌and‌‌Subjacent‌‌Support‌  ‌ b) a‌  ‌private‌  ‌nuisance‌, ‌ ‌or‌  ‌one‌  ‌"that‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌included‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌ 
1) Right‌‌to‌‌Compensation‌‌of‌‌owner‌‌of‌‌servient‌‌estate‌  ‌ foregoing‌  ‌definition",‌  ‌or,‌  ‌as‌  ‌case‌  ‌law‌  ‌puts‌  ‌it,‌  ‌one‌  ‌which‌‌ 
Castro‌‌v.‌‌Monsod‌‌‌2011‌  ‌
"violates‌  ‌only‌  ‌private‌  ‌rights‌  ‌and‌  ‌produces‌  ‌damages‌  ‌to‌  ‌but‌‌ 
a) If‌‌permanent‌‌=‌‌Value‌‌of‌‌land‌‌+‌‌Damages;‌  ‌
An‌  ‌easement‌  ‌is‌  ‌established‌  ‌either‌  ‌by‌  ‌law‌  ‌or‌‌
  by‌‌
  ‌will‌‌
  ‌of‌‌
  the‌‌
  owners.‌‌  one‌‌or‌‌a‌‌few‌‌persons".‌  ‌
Upon‌‌extinction,‌‌return‌‌the‌‌indemnity‌‌without‌‌interest.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌courts‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌impose‌  ‌or‌  ‌constitute‌  ‌any‌  ‌servitude‌  ‌where‌  ‌none‌‌ 
existed.‌‌‌There‌‌are‌‌therefore‌‌no‌‌judicial‌‌easements‌. ‌ ‌ Nuisance‌‌per‌‌se‌‌and‌‌per‌‌accidens‌  ‌
b) If‌‌temporary‌‌=‌‌Damages‌‌only.‌  ‌
2) Width‌‌of‌‌an‌‌Easement‌‌of‌‌Right‌‌of‌‌Way‌  ‌ Article‌‌   684‌‌   provides‌‌   that‌‌ no‌‌ proprietor‌‌ shall‌‌ make‌‌ such‌‌ excavations‌‌  Jurisprudence‌  ‌further‌  ‌classifies‌  ‌nuisances‌  ‌in‌  ‌relation‌  ‌to‌  ‌their‌  ‌legal‌‌ 
upon‌‌  his‌‌  land‌‌ as‌‌ to‌‌ deprive‌‌ any‌‌ adjacent‌‌ land‌‌ or‌‌ building‌‌ of‌‌ sufficient‌‌  susceptibility‌‌to‌‌summary‌‌abatement‌.  ‌‌ ‌
Encarnacion‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ lateral‌‌ or‌‌ subjacent‌‌ support.‌‌ An‌‌ owner,‌‌ by‌‌ virtue‌‌ of‌‌ his‌‌ ‌surface‌‌ right‌, ‌‌
Whether‌  ‌or‌  ‌not‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌is‌  ‌entitled‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌widening‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌already‌‌  may‌  ‌make‌  ‌excavations‌  ‌on‌  ‌his‌  ‌land,‌  ‌but‌  ‌his‌  ‌right‌  ‌is‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌  a) a‌  ‌nuisance‌  ‌per‌  ‌se‌, ‌ ‌or‌  ‌one‌  ‌which‌  ‌"affects‌  ‌the‌  ‌immediate‌‌ 
existing‌‌easement‌‌of‌‌right-of-way.‌  ‌ limitation‌  ‌that‌  ‌he‌  ‌shall‌  ‌not‌‌   deprive‌‌
  any‌‌
  adjacent‌‌   land‌‌
  or‌‌
  building‌‌   of‌‌  safety‌  ‌of‌  ‌persons‌  ‌and‌  ‌property‌  ‌and‌  ‌may‌  ‌be‌  ‌summarily‌‌ 
sufficient‌‌lateral‌‌or‌‌subjacent‌‌support.‌‌   ‌ abated‌‌‌under‌‌the‌‌undefined‌‌‌law‌‌of‌‌necessity‌";‌‌or‌  ‌
While‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌dried‌  ‌river‌  ‌bed‌  ‌less‌  ‌than‌  ‌100‌  ‌meters‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌‌  b) a‌  ‌nuisance‌  ‌per‌  ‌accidens‌, ‌ ‌or‌  ‌that‌  ‌which‌  ‌"depends‌‌   upon‌‌ 
dominant‌  ‌tenement,‌‌   that‌‌
  access‌‌   is‌‌
  grossly‌‌   inadequate.‌‌   Generally,‌‌  the‌‌  In‌  ‌the‌  ‌instant‌  ‌case,‌  ‌an‌  ‌easement‌  ‌of‌  ‌subjacent‌  ‌and‌  ‌lateral‌‌  certain‌  ‌conditions‌  ‌and‌  ‌circumstances,‌  ‌and‌  ‌its‌  ‌existence‌‌ 
right‌‌of‌‌way‌‌may‌‌be‌‌demanded:‌‌   ‌ support‌  ‌exists‌‌  in‌‌ favor‌‌ of‌‌ respondent.‌‌ A ‌‌‌permanent‌‌ injunction‌‌ on‌‌  being‌  ‌a ‌ ‌question‌  ‌of‌  ‌fact,‌  ‌it‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌  ‌abated‌  ‌without‌  ‌due‌‌ 
the‌‌   part‌‌  of‌‌
  petitioner‌‌   from‌‌ making‌‌ injurious‌‌ excavations‌‌ is‌‌ necessary‌‌  hearing‌  ‌thereon‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌tribunal‌  ‌authorized‌  ‌to‌  ‌decide‌‌   whether‌‌ 
1) when‌‌there‌‌absolutely‌‌no‌‌access‌‌to‌‌a‌‌public‌‌highway,‌‌and‌  ‌ in‌  ‌order‌  ‌to‌  ‌protect‌  ‌the‌  ‌interest‌  ‌of‌  ‌respondent.‌  ‌However,‌  ‌an‌‌  such‌‌a‌‌thing‌‌does‌‌in‌‌law‌‌constitute‌‌a‌‌nuisance."‌‌   ‌
2) when,‌  ‌even‌  ‌if‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌one,‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌difficult‌  ‌or‌  ‌dangerous‌‌
  ‌to‌‌  annotation‌‌   of‌‌ the‌‌ existence‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ subjacent‌‌ and‌‌ lateral‌‌ support‌‌ 
There‌‌
  is‌‌ a ‌‌need‌‌ for‌‌ ‌judicial‌‌ intervention‌‌ when‌‌ the‌‌ nuisance‌‌ 
use‌‌or‌‌is‌‌grossly‌‌insufficient‌.  ‌‌ ‌ is‌  ‌no‌  ‌longer‌  ‌necessary.‌  ‌It‌  ‌exists‌  ‌whether‌  ‌or‌  ‌not‌  ‌it‌‌
  is‌‌
  annotated‌‌
  or‌‌ 
registered‌‌in‌‌the‌‌registry‌‌of‌‌property.‌‌   ‌ is‌‌NOT‌‌a‌‌nuisance‌p ‌ er‌‌se‌. ‌ ‌
Here,‌‌   during‌‌  the‌‌
  rainy‌‌
  season,‌‌  the‌‌
  river‌‌  bed‌‌
  is‌‌
  impassable‌‌   due‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ 
Aside‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌remedy‌  ‌of‌  ‌summary‌  ‌abatement‌, ‌ ‌a ‌ ‌private‌  ‌person‌‌ 
flood.‌‌   Thus,‌‌
  it‌‌
  can‌‌  only‌‌
  be‌‌ used‌‌ at‌‌ certain‌‌ times‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ year.‌‌ With‌‌  f. Nuisance‌  ‌ whose‌‌   property‌‌ right‌‌ was‌‌ invaded‌‌ or‌‌ unreasonably‌‌ interfered‌‌ with‌‌ by‌‌ 
the‌  ‌inherent‌  ‌disadvantages‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌river‌  ‌bed‌  ‌which‌  ‌make‌  ‌passage‌‌  the‌  ‌act,‌  ‌omission,‌  ‌establishment,‌  ‌business‌  ‌or‌  ‌condition‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
difficult,‌‌if‌‌not‌‌impossible,‌‌it‌‌is‌a ‌ s‌‌if‌‌there‌‌were‌‌no‌‌outlet‌‌at‌‌all‌. ‌ ‌ ART‌  ‌694‌. ‌ ‌A ‌ ‌nuisance‌  ‌is‌  ‌any‌  ‌act,‌  ‌omission,‌  ‌establishment,‌‌  property‌  ‌of‌  ‌another‌  ‌may‌  ‌file‌  ‌a ‌ ‌civil‌  ‌action‌  ‌to‌  ‌recover‌  ‌personal‌‌ 
business,‌‌condition‌‌of‌‌property,‌‌or‌‌anything‌‌else‌‌which:‌  ‌ damages‌. ‌‌To‌‌   note,‌‌
  ‌the‌‌
  remedies‌‌   of‌‌
  abatement‌‌ and‌‌ damages‌‌ are‌‌ 
The‌  ‌law‌  ‌decrees‌  ‌that‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌must‌  ‌indemnify‌  ‌the‌  ‌owners‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
1) Injures‌‌or‌‌endangers‌‌the‌h
‌ ealth‌‌or‌‌safety‌‌‌of‌‌others;‌‌or‌  ‌ cumulative‌;‌‌hence,‌‌BOTH‌‌may‌‌be‌‌demanded.‌  ‌
servient‌  ‌estate.‌  ‌Since‌  ‌the‌  ‌easement‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌established‌  ‌in‌  ‌favor‌  ‌of‌‌ 
petitioner‌  ‌is‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌continuous‌  ‌and‌  ‌permanent‌  ‌nature,‌  ‌the‌  ‌indemnity‌‌  2) Annoys‌‌or‌‌offends‌‌the‌s‌ enses‌;‌‌or‌  ‌
shall‌‌  consist‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌   ‌value‌‌
  of‌‌ the‌‌ land‌‌ occupied‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ amount‌‌ of‌‌  1.‌‌Liabilities‌  ‌
the‌‌damage‌‌‌caused‌‌to‌‌the‌‌servient‌‌estate‌‌pursuant‌‌to‌A ‌ rticle‌‌649.‌  ‌ 3) Shocks,‌‌defies‌‌or‌‌disregards‌d
‌ ecency‌‌or‌‌morality‌;‌‌or‌  ‌
4) Obstructs‌  ‌or‌  ‌interferes‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌‌
  ‌free‌‌
  passage‌‌
  of‌‌
  any‌‌  ART‌  ‌696‌. ‌ ‌Every‌  ‌successive‌  ‌owner‌  ‌or‌  ‌possessor‌  ‌of‌  ‌property‌‌ 
3) Payment‌‌of‌‌Indemnity‌  ‌ public‌‌highway‌‌or‌‌street,‌‌or‌‌any‌‌body‌‌of‌‌water;‌‌or‌  ‌ who‌‌   fails‌‌
  or‌‌ refuses‌‌ to‌‌ abate‌‌ a ‌‌nuisance‌‌ in‌‌ that‌‌ property‌‌ started‌‌ 
by‌  ‌a ‌‌former‌‌  owner‌‌  or‌‌  possessor‌‌   is‌‌
  liable‌‌
  therefor‌‌  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  same‌‌ 
Woodridge‌‌School‌‌v.‌‌ARB‌‌Construction‌‌‌reiterated‌‌in‌D
‌ e‌‌Guzman‌‌v.‌‌  5) Hinders‌‌or‌‌impairs‌‌the‌‌use‌‌of‌‌property.‌  ‌
manner‌‌as‌‌the‌‌one‌‌who‌‌created‌‌it.‌  ‌
Filinvest‌‌Development‌‌‌2015‌  ‌ Rana‌‌v.‌‌Wong‌‌‌2014‌ 
2.‌‌Attractive‌‌Nuisance‌  ‌
Since‌  ‌the‌  ‌intention‌  ‌of‌  ‌petitioners‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌establish‌  ‌a ‌ ‌permanent‌‌  Article‌  ‌695‌  ‌classifies‌  ‌nuisances‌  ‌with‌  ‌respect‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌object‌  ‌or‌‌ 
passage,‌  ‌the‌  ‌second‌  ‌paragraph‌  ‌of‌  ‌Article‌  ‌649‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Civil‌  ‌Code‌‌  objects‌‌that‌‌they‌‌affect‌.‌‌In‌‌this‌‌regard,‌‌a‌‌nuisance‌‌may‌‌either‌‌be:‌‌   ‌ Hidalgo‌‌Enterprises‌‌v.‌‌Balandan‌  ‌
particularly‌  ‌applies.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Civil‌  ‌Code‌  ‌categorically‌  ‌provides‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌ 
measure‌‌   by‌‌  which‌‌
  the‌‌
  proper‌‌  indemnity‌‌   may‌‌   be‌‌
  computed:‌‌ ‌value‌‌ of‌‌    ‌public‌‌
a) a‌‌   nuisance‌, ‌‌or‌‌  one‌‌  which‌‌  "affects‌‌ a ‌‌community‌‌ or‌‌  The‌‌
  ‌Doctrine‌‌
  of‌‌
  Attractive‌‌
  Nuisance‌‌
  ‌states‌‌ that‌‌ one‌‌ who‌‌ maintains‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 170‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

on‌  ‌his‌  ‌premises‌  ‌dangerous‌  ‌instrumentalities‌  ‌or‌  ‌appliances‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌‌ said‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  injurious‌‌
  to‌‌ the‌‌ rights‌‌ of‌‌ property,‌‌ health,‌‌ or‌‌ comfort‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌  permits.‌  ‌
character‌  ‌likely‌  ‌to‌  ‌attract‌  ‌children‌‌   in‌‌
  play,‌‌
  and‌‌
  who‌‌   fails‌‌
  to‌‌
  exercise‌‌  community.‌  ‌
ordinary‌‌   care‌‌
  to‌‌
  prevent‌‌   children‌‌ from‌‌ playing‌‌ therewith‌‌ or‌‌ resorting‌‌  5.‌‌Special‌‌injury‌‌to‌‌individual‌  ‌
thereto,‌  ‌is‌  ‌liable‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌child‌  ‌of‌  ‌tender‌  ‌years‌  ‌who‌  ‌is‌  ‌injured‌  ‌thereby,‌‌  Perez‌‌v.‌‌Sps‌‌Madrona‌‌and‌‌Pante‌‌‌2012‌  ‌
even‌‌if‌‌the‌‌child‌‌is‌‌technically‌‌a‌‌trespasser‌‌in‌‌the‌‌premises.‌  ‌ ART‌  ‌703‌. ‌ ‌A ‌ ‌private‌  ‌person‌  ‌may‌  ‌file‌‌  an‌‌  action‌‌  on‌‌  account‌‌  of‌‌  a ‌‌
For‌‌ ‌injunction‌‌ ‌to‌‌ issue,‌‌ two‌‌ requisites‌‌ must‌‌ concur:‌‌ ‌first‌, ‌‌there‌‌ must‌‌ 
be‌  ‌a ‌ ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌protected‌  ‌and‌  ‌second‌, ‌ ‌the‌  ‌acts‌  ‌against‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌‌  public‌‌nuisance,‌‌if‌‌it‌‌is‌‌specially‌‌injurious‌t‌ o‌‌himself.‌  ‌
The‌  ‌attractive‌  ‌nuisance‌  ‌doctrine‌  ‌generally‌  ‌is‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌applicable‌  ‌to‌‌ 
bodies‌  ‌of‌  ‌water,‌  ‌artificial‌  ‌as‌  ‌well‌  ‌as‌  ‌natural‌, ‌ ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌absence‌  ‌of‌‌  injunction‌‌   is‌‌  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  directed‌‌
  are‌‌
  violative‌‌
  of‌‌ said‌‌ right.‌‌ Here,‌‌ there‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌ ART‌  ‌704‌. ‌ ‌Any‌  ‌private‌  ‌person‌  ‌may‌  abate‌  ‌a ‌ ‌public‌  ‌nuisance‌‌ 
some‌  ‌unusual‌  ‌condition‌  ‌or‌  ‌artificial‌  ‌feature‌  ‌other‌  ‌than‌  ‌the‌  ‌mere‌‌  right‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌protected,‌  ‌that‌‌  is,‌‌
  respondents’‌‌   right‌‌  over‌‌
  their‌‌  ‌concrete‌‌  which‌  ‌is‌  ‌specially‌  ‌injurious‌  ‌to‌  ‌him‌  ‌by‌  ‌removing,‌  ‌or‌  ‌if‌‌ 
water‌‌and‌‌its‌‌location.‌  ‌ fence‌‌   which‌‌   cannot‌‌ be‌‌ removed‌‌ without‌‌ due‌‌ process;‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ act,‌‌ the‌‌ 
necessary,‌‌   by‌‌
  destroying‌‌  the‌‌
  thing‌‌
  which‌‌ constitutes‌‌ the‌‌ same,‌‌ 
summary‌  ‌demolition‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌concrete‌  ‌fence,‌  ‌against‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌‌  without‌  ‌committing‌  ‌a ‌ ‌breach‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌peace,‌  ‌or‌  ‌doing‌‌ 
3.‌‌No‌‌prescription‌  ‌ injunction‌‌is‌‌directed,‌‌would‌‌violate‌‌said‌‌right.‌  ‌ unnecessary‌‌injury.‌‌But‌‌it‌‌is‌‌necessary:‌  ‌
Telmo‌‌v.‌‌Bustamante‌  ‌ 1) That‌  ‌demand‌  ‌be‌  ‌first‌  ‌made‌  ‌upon‌  ‌the‌  ‌owner‌  ‌or‌‌ 
ART‌‌  698‌. ‌‌Lapse‌‌  of‌‌  time‌‌  cannot‌‌  legalize‌‌  any‌‌  nuisance,‌‌  whether‌‌  possessor‌‌of‌‌the‌‌property‌‌to‌‌abate‌‌the‌‌nuisance;‌  ‌
public‌‌or‌‌private.‌  ‌ Nowhere‌‌   was‌‌  it‌‌
  shown‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ ‌concrete‌‌ posts‌‌ put‌‌ up‌‌ by‌‌ respondent‌ 
in‌  ‌what‌  ‌he‌  ‌believed‌  ‌was‌  ‌his‌‌
  and‌‌   his‌‌
  co-owners'‌‌
  property‌‌   were‌‌
  ever‌‌  2) That‌‌such‌‌demand‌‌has‌‌been‌‌rejected‌; ‌ ‌
4.‌‌Extrajudicial‌‌abatement‌  ‌ declared‌  ‌dangerous‌  ‌or‌  ‌ruinous,‌  ‌such‌  ‌that‌  ‌they‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌  ‌summarily‌‌  3) That‌‌
  the‌‌  abatement‌‌ be‌‌ ‌approved‌‌ ‌by‌‌ the‌‌ district‌‌ health‌‌ 
demolished‌  ‌by‌  ‌petitioner.‌  ‌The‌  ‌concrete‌  ‌posts‌  ‌put‌‌   up‌‌  by‌‌
  respondent‌‌  officer‌  ‌and‌  ‌executed‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌assistance‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌local‌‌ 
ART‌  ‌702‌. ‌‌The‌‌  ‌district‌‌  health‌‌  officer‌‌  ‌shall‌‌  determine‌‌  whether‌‌  on‌‌ the‌‌ property‌‌ are‌‌ not‌‌ properly‌‌ covered‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ definition‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ word‌‌ 
police;‌‌and‌  ‌
or‌  ‌not‌  ‌abatement,‌  ‌without‌  ‌judicial‌  ‌proceedings,‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌best‌‌  "building"‌  ‌nor‌  ‌is‌  ‌it‌  ‌embraced‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  corresponding‌‌   interpretation‌‌   of‌‌ 
remedy‌‌against‌‌a‌p ‌ ublic‌‌nuisance.‌  ‌ the‌‌word‌‌"structure."‌  ‌ 4) That‌‌the‌‌value‌‌of‌‌the‌‌destruction‌‌does‌‌not‌‌exceed‌P
‌ 3K‌. ‌ ‌

Estate‌‌of‌‌Francisco‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ 6.‌‌Right‌‌of‌‌individual‌‌to‌‌abate‌‌a‌‌public‌‌nuisance‌  ‌
Cruz‌‌v.‌‌Pandacan‌‌Hiker’s‌‌Club‌‌‌2016‌  ‌
Violation‌  ‌of‌‌
  a ‌‌municipal‌‌   ordinance‌‌   neither‌‌
  empowers‌‌   the‌‌
  Municipal‌‌  A‌‌
  ‌basketball‌‌   ring‌, ‌‌by‌‌  itself,‌‌
  poses‌‌   no‌‌
  immediate‌‌  harm‌‌   or‌‌  danger‌‌ to‌‌ 
Mayor‌  ‌to‌  ‌avail‌  ‌of‌  ‌extra-judicial‌  ‌remedies.‌  ‌On‌  ‌the‌  ‌contrary,‌  ‌the‌  ‌LGC‌‌  ART‌‌699.‌‌‌The‌‌remedies‌‌against‌‌a‌‌public‌‌nuisance‌‌are:‌  ‌
anyone‌‌   but‌‌
  is‌‌
  merely‌‌   an‌‌ object‌‌ of‌‌ recreation.‌‌ Also,‌‌ the‌‌ chief‌‌ executive‌‌ 
imposes‌  ‌upon‌  ‌him‌  ‌the‌  ‌duty‌  ‌"to‌  ‌cause‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌instituted‌  ‌judicial‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  local‌‌  government,‌‌   like‌‌
  the‌‌
  Punong‌‌   Barangay,‌‌   is‌‌
  not‌‌
  authorized‌‌  1) A‌  ‌prosecution‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌Penal‌  ‌Code‌  ‌or‌  ‌any‌  ‌local‌‌ 
proceedings‌‌in‌‌connection‌‌with‌‌the‌‌violation‌‌of‌‌ordinances."‌  ‌ as‌  ‌the‌  ‌official‌  ‌who‌  ‌can‌  ‌determine‌  ‌the‌  ‌propriety‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌summary‌‌  ordinance:‌‌or‌  ‌
abatement.‌  ‌ 2) A‌‌civil‌‌action;‌‌or‌  ‌
Respondents‌  ‌can‌  ‌not‌  ‌seek‌  ‌cover‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌general‌  ‌welfare‌  ‌clause‌‌ 
authorizing‌‌   the‌‌
  abatement‌‌   of‌‌
  nuisances‌‌ without‌‌ judicial‌‌ proceedings.‌‌  3) Abatement,‌‌without‌‌judicial‌‌proceedings.‌  ‌
Aquino‌‌v.‌‌Municipality‌‌of‌‌Malay‌‌‌2014‌  ‌
That‌  ‌tenet‌‌
  applies‌‌   to‌‌
  a ‌‌‌nuisance‌‌   per‌‌
  se‌. ‌‌The‌‌
  storage‌‌   of‌‌
  copra‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌ 
quonset‌‌   building‌‌   is‌‌ a ‌‌legitimate‌‌ business.‌‌ ‌It‌‌ is‌‌ ‌not‌‌ per‌‌ se‌‌ a ‌‌nuisance‌‌  In‌  ‌establishing‌  ‌a ‌ ‌no‌  ‌build‌  ‌zone‌  ‌through‌  ‌local‌  ‌legislation,‌  ‌the‌  ‌LGU‌‌  ART‌  ‌700‌. ‌‌The‌‌  district‌‌  health‌‌  officer‌‌  shall‌‌  take‌‌  care‌‌  that‌‌  one‌‌  or‌‌ 
warranting‌‌its‌‌summary‌‌abatement‌‌without‌‌judicial‌‌intervention‌. ‌ ‌ effectively‌  ‌made‌‌   a ‌‌determination‌‌   that‌‌
  constructions‌‌   therein,‌‌
  without‌‌  all‌‌of‌‌the‌‌remedies‌‌against‌‌a‌‌public‌‌nuisance‌‌are‌‌availed‌‌of.‌  ‌
first‌  ‌securing‌  ‌exemptions‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌local‌  ‌council,‌  ‌qualify‌  ‌as‌‌ 
Parayno‌‌v.‌‌Jovellanos‌  ‌ nuisances‌f‌ or‌‌they‌‌pose‌‌a‌‌threat‌‌to‌‌public‌‌safety.‌‌   ‌ ART‌  ‌701‌. ‌ ‌If‌  ‌a ‌ ‌civil‌  ‌action‌  ‌is‌  ‌brought‌  ‌by‌  ‌reason‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
maintenance‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌public‌  ‌nuisance,‌  ‌such‌  ‌action‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌ 
A‌  ‌gas‌  ‌station‌  ‌is‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌a ‌ ‌nuisance‌  ‌per‌  ‌se‌  ‌or‌  ‌one‌  ‌affecting‌  ‌the‌‌  Had‌‌   it‌‌
  not‌‌
  been‌‌
  constructed‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌  no‌‌  build‌‌ zone,‌‌ Boracay‌‌ West‌‌ Cove‌‌  commenced‌‌by‌‌the‌‌city‌‌or‌‌municipal‌m ‌ ayor‌. ‌ ‌
immediate‌‌   safety‌‌
  of‌‌
  persons‌‌   and‌‌
  property,‌‌
  hence,‌‌ it‌‌ cannot‌‌ be‌‌ closed‌‌  could‌  ‌have‌  ‌secured‌  ‌the‌  ‌necessary‌  ‌permits‌  ‌without‌  ‌issue.‌  ‌As‌  ‌such,‌‌ 
down‌‌or‌‌transferred‌‌summarily‌‌to‌‌another‌‌location.‌  ‌ petitioner‌‌   is‌‌
  correct‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  hotel‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ a ‌‌nuisance‌‌ ‌per‌‌ se‌, ‌‌but‌‌ is‌‌ still‌‌  7.‌‌Right‌‌to‌‌damages‌  ‌
a‌‌‌nuisance‌‌per‌‌accidens‌. ‌ ‌
Lucena‌‌Grand‌‌Central‌‌Terminal‌‌v.‌‌Jac‌‌Liner‌  ‌
ART‌  ‌697‌. ‌ ‌The‌  ‌abatement‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌nuisance‌  ‌does‌  ‌not‌‌  preclude‌‌  the‌‌ 
Neither‌  ‌are‌  ‌terminals‌  ‌public‌  ‌nuisances‌  ‌as‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌argues.‌  ‌For‌‌  Pertinent‌‌
  herein‌‌  is‌‌
  Sec.‌‌
  444‌‌
  (b)(3)(vi)‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌  LGC,‌‌
  which‌‌ empowered‌‌ 
right‌  ‌of‌  ‌any‌  ‌person‌  ‌injured‌  ‌to‌  ‌recover‌  ‌damages‌  ‌for‌  ‌its‌  ‌past‌‌ 
their‌  ‌operation‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌legitimate‌  ‌business‌  ‌which,‌  ‌by‌  ‌itself,‌  ‌cannot‌  ‌be‌‌  the‌  ‌mayor‌  ‌to‌  ‌order‌  ‌the‌  ‌closure‌  ‌and‌  ‌removal‌  ‌of‌  ‌illegally‌‌ 
existence.‌  ‌
constructed‌  ‌establishments‌  ‌for‌‌   failing‌‌   to‌‌
  secure‌‌
  the‌‌  necessary‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 171‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

8.‌‌W ho‌‌may‌‌sue‌‌on‌‌private‌‌nuisance‌  ‌ Quasi-‌‌  Arise‌‌from‌‌lawful,‌‌  Return‌‌money‌‌paid‌‌by‌‌  Every‌‌  contract‌‌


  contains‌‌
  not‌‌
  only‌‌
  what‌‌
  has‌‌
  been‌‌
  explicitly‌‌
  stipulated,‌‌ 
contracts‌  ‌ voluntary‌‌and‌‌unilateral‌‌  mistake‌‌(Art‌‌2154)‌  ‌ but‌‌the‌‌statutory‌‌provisions‌‌that‌‌have‌‌any‌‌bearing‌‌on‌‌the‌‌matter.‌  ‌
ART‌‌705‌.‌‌The‌‌remedies‌‌against‌‌a‌‌private‌‌nuisance‌‌are:‌  ‌ acts‌‌and‌‌which‌‌are‌‌ 
1) A‌‌civil‌‌action;‌‌or‌  ‌ enforceable‌‌to‌‌the‌‌end‌‌  The‌  ‌rule‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌forms‌  ‌part‌  ‌of,‌  ‌and‌  ‌is‌  ‌read‌  ‌into,‌  ‌every‌‌ 
that‌‌no‌‌one‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌  contract‌, ‌ ‌unless‌  ‌clearly‌  ‌excluded‌  ‌therefrom‌  ‌in‌  ‌those‌  ‌cases‌  ‌where‌‌ 
2) Abatement,‌‌without‌‌judicial‌‌proceedings.‌  ‌ unjustly‌‌enriched‌‌(Art‌‌  such‌‌exclusion‌‌is‌‌allowed.‌  ‌
ART‌  ‌707‌. ‌ ‌A ‌ ‌private‌  ‌person‌  ‌or‌  ‌a ‌ ‌public‌  ‌official‌  ‌extrajudicially‌‌  2142).‌  ‌
3) Quasi-Contracts‌  ‌
abating‌‌a‌‌nuisance‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌liable‌‌for‌‌damages‌: ‌ ‌
Acts‌‌or‌‌  Arise‌‌from‌‌civil‌‌liability‌‌  Restitution,‌‌ 
1) If‌‌he‌‌causes‌‌unnecessary‌‌injury;‌‌or‌  ‌ omissions‌‌  which‌‌is‌‌the‌‌consequence‌‌  indemnification,‌‌  ART‌  ‌1160‌. ‌ ‌Obligations‌  ‌derived‌  ‌from‌  ‌quasi-contracts‌  ‌shall‌‌ 
punished‌‌  of‌‌a‌‌criminal‌‌offense‌‌(Art‌‌  reparation.‌  ‌ be‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌of‌  ‌Chapter‌  ‌1,‌  ‌Title‌  ‌XVII,‌  ‌of‌  ‌this‌‌ 
2) If‌‌
  an‌‌
  alleged‌‌ nuisance‌‌ is‌‌ later‌‌ declared‌‌ by‌‌ the‌‌ courts‌‌ to‌‌ 
by‌‌law‌  ‌ 1161)‌  ‌ Book.‌  ‌
be‌‌not‌‌a‌‌real‌‌nuisance.‌  ‌
A‌  ‌quasi-contract‌  ‌is‌  ‌that‌  ‌juridical‌  ‌relation‌  ‌resulting‌  ‌from‌  ‌a ‌ ‌lawful,‌‌ 
4. Obligations‌  ‌ Quasi-‌‌  Torts;‌‌Arise‌‌from‌‌damage‌‌  Art‌‌2193‌‌-‌‌head‌‌of‌‌the‌‌ 
voluntary,‌‌
  and‌‌
  unilateral‌‌   act,‌‌
  and‌‌ which‌‌ has‌‌ for‌‌ its‌‌ purpose‌‌ the‌‌ payment‌‌ 
 ‌ delicts‌  ‌ caused‌‌to‌‌another‌‌through‌‌  family‌‌liable‌‌for‌‌damage‌ 
of‌  ‌indemnity‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌end‌  ‌that‌  ‌no‌  ‌one‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌unjustly‌  ‌enriched‌  ‌or‌‌ 
an‌‌act‌‌or‌‌omission,‌‌there‌‌  caused‌‌by‌‌things‌‌thrown‌‌ 
benefited‌‌at‌‌the‌‌expense‌‌of‌‌another.‌‌It‌‌could‌‌either‌‌be:‌  ‌
A.‌‌General‌‌Provisions‌  ‌ being‌‌fault‌‌or‌‌negligence,‌‌  or‌‌falling‌‌from‌‌building‌‌in‌‌ 
but‌‌no‌‌contractual‌‌  which‌‌he‌‌resides;‌  ‌ a) Negotiorum‌  ‌gestio‌  ‌— ‌ ‌the‌  ‌voluntary‌  ‌management‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
ART‌‌  1156‌. ‌‌An‌‌ obligation‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌juridical‌‌ necessity‌‌ to‌‌ give,‌‌ to‌‌ do‌‌ or‌‌  relation‌‌exists‌‌between‌‌  Art‌‌2183‌‌-‌‌Possessor‌‌of‌‌an‌‌  property‌  ‌or‌  ‌affairs‌  ‌of‌  ‌another‌  ‌without‌  ‌the‌  ‌knowledge‌  ‌or‌‌ 
not‌‌to‌‌do.‌  ‌ the‌‌parties.‌‌‌(Art‌‌2176)‌  ‌ animal‌‌to‌‌pay‌‌for‌‌damages‌‌  consent‌‌of‌‌the‌‌latter‌‌(A
‌ rt‌‌2144‌).‌‌This‌‌does‌‌not‌‌apply‌‌‌when‌  ‌
which‌‌it‌‌may‌‌cause.‌  ‌
Obligation‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌legal‌  ‌relation‌  ‌established‌  ‌between‌  ‌one‌  ‌party‌  ‌and‌‌  i) property‌  ‌or‌  ‌business‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌neglected‌, ‌ ‌in‌  ‌which‌  ‌case‌‌ 
another,‌  ‌whereby‌  ‌the‌  ‌latter‌  ‌is‌  ‌bound‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌fulfillment‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌prestation‌‌  ART‌‌1157‌.‌‌Obligations‌‌arise‌‌from:‌  ‌ provisions‌  ‌on‌  ‌unauthorized‌  ‌contracts‌  ‌shall‌  ‌govern,‌‌ 
which‌‌the‌‌former‌‌may‌‌demand‌‌of‌‌him.‌  ‌ and‌‌   ‌
Elements‌  ‌ 1) Law‌‌
   ‌
ii) the‌‌
  manager‌‌
  has‌‌
  been‌‌
  tacitly‌‌
  authorized‌‌   by‌‌ the‌‌ owner,‌‌ 
a) An‌‌active‌s‌ ubject‌‌—‌‌the‌‌obligee‌‌or‌‌creditor‌; ‌ ‌ ART‌  ‌1158‌. ‌ ‌Obligations‌  ‌derived‌  ‌from‌  ‌law‌  ‌are‌  ‌not‌  ‌presumed.‌‌  in‌‌which‌‌case‌‌the‌‌rules‌‌on‌a
‌ gency‌‌‌shall‌‌govern.‌  ‌
Only‌  ‌those‌  ‌expressly‌  ‌determined‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌  ‌Code‌  ‌or‌  ‌in‌  ‌special‌‌  b) Solutio‌  ‌indebiti‌  ‌— ‌‌created‌‌   when‌‌   something‌‌   is‌‌
  received‌‌  when‌‌ 
b) A‌‌passive‌s‌ ubject‌‌—‌‌the‌‌obligor‌‌or‌‌debtor‌; ‌ ‌ laws‌‌are‌‌demandable‌‌xxxx.‌  ‌
there‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌demand‌  ‌it‌  ‌and‌  ‌it‌  ‌was‌  ‌unduly‌  ‌delivered‌‌ 
c) The‌‌object‌o
‌ r‌‌prestation;‌  ‌ Bautista‌‌v.‌‌F.O.‌‌Borromeo,‌‌Inc.‌  ‌ through‌  ‌mistake‌  ‌(‌Art‌  ‌2154‌).‌  ‌Whether‌  ‌the‌  ‌payment‌  ‌was‌  ‌made‌‌ 
The‌  ‌subject‌  ‌matter‌  ‌of‌  ‌an‌  ‌obligation‌  ‌— ‌ ‌and‌  ‌may‌  ‌consist‌  ‌of‌‌  Borromeo‌  ‌paid‌  ‌the‌  ‌widow‌  ‌of‌  ‌its‌  ‌employee,‌  ‌Quintin‌  ‌Delgado,‌‌  by‌  ‌mistake‌  ‌is‌‌   a ‌‌‌judicial‌‌
  matter‌. ‌‌General‌‌   presumption:‌‌   “money‌‌ 
giving‌‌a‌‌thing,‌‌doing‌‌or‌‌not‌‌doing‌‌a‌‌certain‌‌act.‌  ‌ compensation‌  ‌(death‌  ‌benefit)‌  ‌and‌  ‌funeral‌  ‌expenses‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌latter's‌‌  paid‌‌by‌‌one‌‌to‌‌another‌‌was‌‌due‌‌to‌‌the‌‌latter”.‌  ‌
death‌  ‌while‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌course‌  ‌of‌  ‌employment.‌  ‌This‌  ‌obligation‌  ‌arises‌‌ 
d) The‌‌efficient‌c
‌ ause‌—
‌ ‌‌the‌‌vinculum‌‌or‌‌juridical‌‌tie.‌  ‌ c) Other‌‌   cases‌‌   — ‌‌‌Arts‌‌
  2164‌‌  - ‌‌2175‌. ‌‌Recovery‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌ allowed‌‌ in‌‌ 
from‌‌law‌‌‌-‌‌Section‌‌2‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Workmen's‌‌Compensation‌‌Act.‌‌   ‌
view‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌peculiar‌  ‌circumstances‌  ‌or‌  ‌factual‌‌   environment‌‌   to‌‌ 
Sources‌  ‌
the‌  ‌end‌  ‌that‌  ‌a ‌ ‌recipient‌  ‌of‌  ‌benefits‌  ‌or‌  ‌favors‌  ‌resulting‌  ‌from‌‌ 
2) Contracts‌  ‌
Source‌  ‌ Definition‌  ‌ Examples‌  ‌ lawful,‌  ‌voluntary‌  ‌and‌  ‌unilateral‌  ‌acts‌  ‌of‌  ‌another‌  ‌may‌  ‌not‌  ‌be‌‌ 
ART‌  ‌1159‌. ‌ ‌Obligations‌‌  arising‌‌  from‌‌  ‌contracts‌‌
  ‌have‌‌  the‌‌  force‌‌  unjustly‌‌enriched‌‌at‌‌the‌‌expense‌‌of‌‌the‌‌latter.‌  ‌
Law‌(‌ Art‌‌  Imposed‌‌by‌‌the‌‌law‌‌itself‌‌   ‌ Art‌‌195‌‌Civil‌‌Code‌‌- ‌‌ of‌‌
  law‌‌
  between‌‌   the‌‌
  contracting‌‌ parties‌‌ and‌‌ should‌‌ be‌‌ complied‌ 
1158)‌  ‌ support‌  ‌ Cruz‌‌v.‌‌J.M.‌‌Tuason‌‌&‌‌Co.,‌‌Inc.‌  ‌
with‌‌in‌‌good‌‌faith.‌  ‌
A‌‌
  presumed‌‌   quasi-contract‌‌   cannot‌‌   emerge‌‌
  as‌‌
  against‌‌  one‌‌
  party‌‌ when‌‌ 
Contracts‌‌  Arise‌‌from‌‌stipulation‌‌of‌‌  Obligation‌‌to‌‌repay‌‌a‌‌loan‌‌  Maritime‌‌Company‌‌of‌‌the‌‌Philippines‌‌v.‌‌Reparations‌‌Commission‌  ‌ the‌  ‌subject‌  ‌matter‌  ‌thereof‌  ‌is‌‌
  already‌‌
  covered‌‌  by‌‌
  an‌‌
  existing‌‌
  contract‌‌ 
(Art‌‌1159)‌  ‌ parties‌(‌ Art‌‌1306);‌‌   ‌ by‌‌virtue‌‌of‌‌an‌‌agreement‌  ‌ with‌‌another‌‌party.‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 172‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

National‌‌Commercial‌‌Bank‌‌of‌‌Saudi‌‌Arabia‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ 5) Quasi-delict‌  ‌
a‌‌bar‌‌to‌‌the‌‌instant‌‌action‌‌against‌‌him.‌  ‌
Solutio‌‌indebiti‌‌‌applies‌‌where:‌‌   ‌ ART‌  ‌1162‌. ‌ ‌Obligations‌  ‌derived‌  ‌from‌  ‌quasi-delicts‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌‌ 
1) a‌  ‌payment‌  ‌is‌  ‌made‌  ‌when‌  ‌there‌  ‌exists‌  ‌no‌  ‌binding‌  ‌relation‌‌  governed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌of‌  ‌Chapter‌  ‌2,‌  ‌Title‌  ‌XVII‌  ‌of‌  ‌this‌‌  Virata‌‌v.‌‌Ochoa‌  ‌
between‌  ‌the‌  ‌payor,‌  ‌who‌  ‌has‌  ‌no‌  ‌duty‌‌
  to‌‌
  pay,‌‌
  and‌‌
  the‌‌
  person‌‌  Book,‌‌and‌‌by‌‌special‌‌laws.‌‌   ‌ It‌  ‌is‌  ‌settled‌  ‌that‌  ‌in‌  ‌negligence‌  ‌cases,‌  ‌the‌  ‌aggrieved‌‌
  parties‌‌
  may‌‌ 
who‌‌received‌‌the‌‌payment,‌‌and‌  ‌   ‌quasi-delict‌  ‌is‌‌
A‌‌   a ‌‌fault‌‌ or‌‌ act‌‌ of‌‌ negligence‌‌ or‌‌ omission‌‌ of‌‌ care‌‌ which‌‌  choose‌  ‌between‌  ‌an‌  ‌action‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌RPC‌  ‌or‌  ‌for‌  ‌quasi-delict‌‌ 
2) the‌  ‌payment‌  ‌is‌  ‌made‌  ‌through‌  ‌mistake‌, ‌ ‌and‌  ‌not‌  ‌through‌‌  causes‌  ‌damage‌  ‌to‌  ‌another,‌  ‌there‌  ‌being‌  ‌no‌  ‌pre-existing‌  ‌contractual‌‌  under‌  ‌Article‌  ‌2176.‌  ‌What‌  ‌is‌  ‌prohibited‌  ‌by‌  ‌Article‌  ‌2177‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌‌ 
liberality‌‌or‌‌some‌‌other‌‌cause.‌  ‌ relations‌‌between‌‌the‌‌parties.‌‌There‌‌must‌‌be:‌  ‌ recover‌‌twice‌‌for‌‌the‌‌same‌‌negligent‌‌act.‌  ‌
1) An‌‌‌act‌‌or‌‌omission‌‌‌by‌‌the‌‌defendant;‌  ‌
Here,‌  ‌PBC‌  ‌and‌  ‌NCBSA‌  ‌were‌  ‌bound‌  ‌by‌  ‌their‌  ‌contract,‌  ‌the‌  ‌letter‌  ‌of‌‌  Neplum,‌‌Inc.‌‌v.‌‌Orbeso‌  ‌
credit.‌  ‌As‌  ‌such,‌‌
  the‌‌
  cause‌‌
  of‌‌
  action‌‌
  was‌‌
  based‌‌   on‌‌
  a ‌‌contract,‌‌  and‌‌
  the‌‌  2) Fault‌‌or‌‌negligence‌‌‌by‌‌the‌‌defendant;‌  ‌
Deemed‌  ‌instituted‌  ‌in‌  ‌every‌  ‌criminal‌  ‌prosecution‌  ‌is‌  ‌the‌  ‌civil‌‌ 
prescriptive‌‌period‌‌is‌‌ten‌,‌‌not‌‌six‌‌years‌. ‌ ‌
3) Damage‌‌caused‌‌to‌‌the‌‌plaintiff;‌  ‌ liability‌  ‌arising‌  ‌from‌  ‌the‌  ‌crime‌  ‌or‌  ‌delict‌  ‌per‌  ‌se‌  ‌(‌civil‌  ‌liability‌  ‌ex‌‌ 
delicto‌),‌  ‌but‌  ‌NOT‌  ‌those‌  ‌liabilities‌  ‌from‌  ‌quasi-delicts,‌  ‌contracts‌  ‌or‌‌ 
Siga-an‌‌v.‌‌Villanueva‌  ‌ 4) Direct‌  ‌relation‌  ‌or‌  ‌connection‌  ‌of‌  ‌cause‌  ‌and‌  ‌effect‌  ‌between‌  ‌1 ‌‌
quasi-contracts.‌‌   ‌
Under‌  ‌Article‌  ‌1960,‌‌  if‌‌
  the‌‌
  borrower‌‌   of‌‌
  loan‌‌
  pays‌‌
  interest‌‌   when‌‌   there‌‌  and‌‌3;‌‌and‌  ‌
has‌  ‌been‌  ‌no‌  ‌stipulation‌  ‌therefor,‌  ‌the‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌Civil‌  ‌Code‌‌  5) No‌‌pre-existing‌‌contractual‌‌relations‌‌‌between‌‌the‌‌parties.‌  ‌ B.‌‌Nature‌‌and‌‌Effects‌‌of‌‌Obligations‌  ‌
concerning‌‌solutio‌‌indebiti‌‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌applied.‌‌   ‌
Lasam‌‌v.‌‌Smith‌  ‌ 1.‌‌Compliance‌‌with‌‌Obligations‌  ‌
4) Delict‌‌
   ‌ In‌‌
  a ‌‌legal‌‌ sense‌‌ and,‌‌ consequently,‌‌ also‌‌ in‌‌ relation‌‌ to‌‌ contracts,‌‌ a ‌‌‌caso‌‌ 
fortuito‌‌‌presents‌‌the‌‌following‌‌essential‌‌characteristics:‌‌   ‌ 1) In‌‌Obligations‌‌to‌‌Give‌  ‌
ART‌‌  1161‌. ‌‌Civil‌‌ obligations‌‌ arising‌‌ from‌‌ criminal‌‌ offenses‌‌ shall‌‌ 
be‌  ‌governed‌  ‌by‌  ‌the‌  ‌penal‌  ‌laws,‌  ‌subject‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌of‌‌  1) The‌  ‌cause‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌unforeseen‌  ‌and‌‌   unexpected‌‌   occurrence,‌‌   or‌‌  ART‌  ‌1163‌. ‌ ‌Every‌  ‌person‌  ‌obliged‌  ‌to‌  ‌give‌  ‌something‌  ‌is‌  ‌also‌‌ 
of‌  ‌the‌  ‌failure‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌debtor‌  ‌to‌  ‌comply‌  ‌with‌  ‌his‌  ‌obligation,‌‌  obliged‌  ‌to‌  ‌take‌‌  care‌‌
  of‌‌
  it‌‌
  with‌‌
  the‌‌  proper‌‌   ‌diligence‌‌  of‌‌
  a ‌‌good‌‌ 
Article‌  ‌2177,‌  ‌and‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌pertinent‌  ‌provisions‌  ‌on‌  ‌Human‌‌ 
must‌‌be‌‌‌independent‌‌of‌‌the‌‌human‌‌will‌. ‌ ‌ father‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌family‌, ‌ ‌unless‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌or‌  ‌the‌  ‌stipulation‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Relations,‌‌and‌‌of‌‌Title‌‌XVIII,‌‌regulating‌‌damages.‌  ‌
parties‌‌requires‌‌another‌‌standard‌‌of‌‌care.‌  ‌
DMPI‌‌Employees‌‌Credit‌‌Cooperative,‌‌Inc.‌‌v.‌‌Velez‌  ‌ 2) It‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌impossible‌  ‌to‌  ‌foresee‌  ‌the‌  ‌event‌  ‌which‌‌ 
constitutes‌‌   the‌‌
  caso‌‌
  fortuito,‌‌
  or‌‌
  if‌‌
  it‌‌
  can‌‌
  be‌‌
  foreseen,‌‌ it‌‌ must‌‌  ART‌  ‌1165‌. ‌ ‌When‌  ‌what‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌be‌  ‌delivered‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌determinate‌‌ 
Every‌‌  person‌‌  criminally‌‌  liable‌‌
  for‌‌
  a ‌‌felony‌‌
  is‌‌
  also‌‌ civilly‌‌ liable.‌‌ Civil‌‌  be‌‌‌impossible‌‌to‌‌avoid.‌  ‌ thing,‌  ‌the‌  ‌creditor,‌  ‌in‌  ‌addition‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌granted‌  ‌him‌  ‌by‌‌ 
liability‌  ‌includes‌  ‌restitution,‌  ‌reparation‌  ‌for‌  ‌damage‌  ‌caused,‌  ‌and‌‌  article‌‌1170,‌‌may‌‌compel‌‌the‌‌debtor‌‌to‌‌make‌‌the‌‌delivery.‌  ‌
indemnification‌‌of‌‌consequential‌‌damages.‌  ‌ 3) The‌‌
  occurrence‌‌   must‌‌
  be‌‌
  such‌‌
  as‌‌
  to‌‌
  render‌‌ it‌‌ impossible‌‌ for‌‌ 
the‌‌debtor‌‌to‌‌fulfill‌h
‌ is‌‌obligation‌‌in‌‌a‌‌normal‌‌manner.‌‌and‌‌   ‌ If‌‌
  the‌‌
  thing‌‌
  is‌‌
  ‌indeterminate‌‌
  ‌or‌‌
  ‌generic‌, ‌‌he‌‌
  may‌‌
  ask‌‌
  that‌‌ the‌‌ 
The‌  ‌case‌  ‌herein,‌  ‌an‌  ‌independent‌  ‌civil‌  ‌action‌  ‌for‌  ‌damages‌  ‌on‌‌  obligation‌‌be‌‌complied‌‌with‌‌at‌‌the‌‌expense‌‌of‌‌the‌‌debtor.‌  ‌
4) The‌  ‌obligor‌  ‌(debtor)‌‌
  must‌‌
  be‌‌
  ‌free‌‌
  from‌‌
  any‌‌
  participation‌‌ 
account‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌fraud‌  ‌committed‌  ‌against‌  ‌Villegas‌  ‌under‌  ‌Article‌  ‌33,‌‌  in‌‌the‌‌aggravation‌‌of‌‌the‌‌injury‌‌resulting‌‌to‌‌the‌‌creditor.‌  ‌ If‌‌
  the‌‌ obligor‌‌ ‌delays‌, ‌‌or‌‌ has‌‌ promised‌‌ to‌‌ deliver‌‌ the‌‌ same‌‌ thing‌‌ 
may‌‌proceed‌‌independently‌‌even‌‌if‌‌there‌‌was‌‌no‌‌reservation.‌  ‌ to‌‌
  two‌‌   or‌‌
  more‌‌
  persons‌‌   who‌‌   do‌‌
  not‌‌
  have‌‌
  the‌‌
  same‌‌ interest,‌‌ he‌‌ 
Elcano‌‌v.‌‌Hill‌  ‌ shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌responsible‌  ‌for‌  ‌any‌  ‌fortuitous‌  ‌event‌  ‌until‌  ‌he‌  ‌has‌‌ 
Hun‌‌Hyung‌‌Park‌‌v.‌‌Eung‌‌Won‌‌Choi‌  ‌ effected‌‌the‌‌delivery.‌  ‌
In‌  ‌this‌  ‌jurisdiction,‌  ‌the‌  ‌separate‌  ‌individuality‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌cuasi-delito‌  ‌or‌‌ 
The‌  ‌civil‌  ‌action‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌delict‌  ‌may,‌  ‌however,‌  ‌be‌  ‌deemed‌  culpa‌  ‌aquiliana‌  ‌under‌  ‌the‌  ‌Civil‌  ‌Code‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌fully‌  ‌and‌  ‌clearly‌‌  Duties‌‌of‌‌debtor‌‌in‌‌obligation‌‌to‌‌give‌‌a‌‌determinate‌‌thing‌  ‌
extinguished‌  ‌if‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌finding‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌final‌  ‌judgment‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  recognized,‌  ‌even‌  ‌with‌  ‌regard‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌negligent‌  ‌act‌  ‌for‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌‌ 
criminal‌  ‌action‌  ‌that‌  ‌the‌  ‌act‌  ‌or‌  ‌omission‌  ‌from‌  ‌which‌  ‌the‌  ‌civil‌‌  1. Preserve‌‌or‌‌take‌‌care‌‌of‌‌the‌‌thing‌‌due;‌  ‌
wrongdoer‌  ‌could‌  ‌have‌  ‌been‌  ‌prosecuted‌  ‌and‌  ‌convicted‌  ‌in‌‌   a ‌‌criminal‌‌ 
liability‌‌may‌‌arise‌‌did‌‌not‌‌exist‌. ‌ ‌ case‌‌   and‌‌   for‌‌
  which,‌‌
  after‌‌
  such‌‌
  a ‌‌conviction,‌‌
  he‌‌
  could‌‌   have‌‌
  been‌‌ sued‌‌  2. Deliver‌‌the‌‌fruits‌‌of‌‌the‌‌thing‌‌(Art‌‌1164);‌  ‌
for‌‌this‌‌civil‌‌liability‌‌arising‌‌from‌‌his‌‌crime.‌  ‌
3. Deliver‌‌its‌‌accessions‌‌and‌‌accessories‌‌(Art‌‌1166);‌  ‌
The‌  ‌acquittal‌  ‌of‌  ‌Reginald‌  ‌Hill‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌criminal‌  ‌case‌  ‌has‌  ‌not‌‌  4. Deliver‌‌the‌‌thing‌‌itself;‌‌and‌  ‌
extinguished‌‌  his‌‌
  liability‌‌
  for‌‌
  ‌quasi-delict‌, ‌‌hence‌‌  that‌‌
  acquittal‌‌ is‌‌ not‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 173‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

5. Answer‌  ‌for‌  ‌damages‌  ‌in‌  ‌case‌  ‌of‌  ‌non-fulfillment‌‌


  or‌‌
  breach‌‌
  (Art‌‌  legally,‌‌ or‌‌ because‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ rights‌‌ acquired‌‌ by‌‌ third‌‌ persons‌‌ who‌‌ acted‌‌ 
shambles."‌  ‌He‌‌   is‌‌
  liable‌‌
  under‌‌
  ‌Article‌‌   1167‌‌  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  cost‌‌  of‌‌
  executing‌‌ 
1170).‌  ‌ in‌‌
  good‌‌   faith,‌‌
  the‌‌
  remedy‌‌   is‌‌
  an‌‌
  ‌action‌‌
  for‌‌
  damages‌‌   caused‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌ 
the‌  ‌obligation‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌proper‌  ‌manner.‌‌   In‌‌
  addition,‌‌  he‌‌
  is‌‌
  likewise‌‌   liable,‌‌ 
Duties‌‌of‌‌debtor‌‌in‌‌obligation‌‌to‌‌deliver‌‌a‌‌generic‌‌thing‌  ‌ under‌  ‌Article‌  ‌1170‌, ‌ ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌cost‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌missing‌  ‌parts‌  ‌for‌  ‌in‌  ‌his‌‌  violation.‌  ‌
obligation‌‌   to‌‌
  repair‌‌   the‌‌
  typewriter‌‌   he‌‌  was‌‌
  bound,‌‌ but‌‌ failed,‌‌ to‌‌ return‌‌ 
1. Deliver‌  ‌a ‌‌thing‌‌
  which‌‌
  is‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  quality‌‌
  intended‌‌
  by‌‌
  the‌‌
  parties‌‌  2.‌‌Breach‌‌of‌‌Obligations‌‌and‌‌Grounds‌‌for‌‌Liability‌  ‌
it‌‌in‌‌the‌‌same‌‌condition‌‌it‌‌was‌‌when‌‌he‌‌received‌‌it.‌  ‌
considering‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌obligation‌  ‌and‌  ‌other‌‌ 
circumstances‌‌(Art‌‌1246);‌‌and‌  ‌ ART‌  ‌1170‌. ‌ ‌Those‌  ‌who‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌performance‌  ‌of‌‌  their‌‌  obligations‌‌ 
Tanguilig‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
2. Be‌  ‌liable‌‌
  for‌‌
  damages‌‌   in‌‌
  case‌‌
  of‌‌
  fraud,‌‌  negligence,‌‌
  or‌‌
  delay,‌‌  in‌‌  are‌‌
  guilty‌‌
  of‌‌  ‌fraud‌, ‌‌‌negligence‌, ‌‌or‌‌   ‌delay‌, ‌‌and‌‌ those‌‌ who‌‌ in‌‌ 
the‌‌
  performance‌‌   of‌‌ his‌‌ obligation,‌‌ or‌‌ contravention‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ tenor‌‌  Whether‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌is‌  ‌under‌  ‌obligation‌  ‌to‌  ‌reconstruct‌  ‌the‌  ‌windmill‌‌  any‌  ‌manner‌  ‌contravene‌  ‌the‌  ‌tenor‌  ‌thereof,‌  ‌are‌  ‌liable‌  ‌for‌‌ 
thereof‌‌(Art‌‌1170).‌  ‌ after‌‌it‌‌collapsed.‌  ‌ damages‌. ‌ ‌
Remedies‌‌of‌‌creditor‌‌when‌‌debtor‌‌fails‌‌to‌‌comply.‌D
‌ emand‌  ‌ YES‌. ‌ ‌When‌  ‌the‌  ‌windmill‌  ‌failed‌  ‌to‌  ‌function‌  ‌properly‌  ‌it‌  ‌became‌‌  Areola‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
a) Specific‌‌performance;‌  ‌ incumbent‌  ‌upon‌  ‌petitioner‌  ‌to‌  ‌institute‌  ‌the‌  ‌proper‌  ‌repairs‌  ‌in‌‌ 
Respondent‌‌ insurance‌‌ company‌‌ is‌‌ ‌liable‌‌ by‌‌ way‌‌ of‌‌ damages‌‌ for‌‌ the‌‌ 
accordance‌‌   with‌‌
  the‌‌
  guaranty‌‌ stated‌‌ in‌‌ the‌‌ contract.‌‌ Thus,‌‌ respondent‌‌ 
b) Rescission‌‌or‌‌cancellation;‌‌or‌  ‌ fraudulent‌  ‌acts‌  ‌committed‌  ‌by‌  ‌Malapit‌  ‌that‌  ‌gave‌  ‌occasion‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌‌ 
cannot‌‌   be‌‌
  said‌‌
  to‌‌
  have‌‌  incurred‌‌   in‌‌
  delay;‌‌
  instead,‌‌   it‌‌ is‌‌ petitioner‌‌ who‌‌ 
erroneous‌  ‌cancellation‌  ‌of‌  ‌subject‌  ‌insurance‌  ‌policy.‌  ‌Its‌  ‌earlier‌‌
  act‌‌
  of‌‌ 
c) Damages.‌  ‌ should‌  ‌bear‌  ‌the‌  ‌expenses‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌reconstruction‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌windmill.‌‌ 
reinstating‌‌
  the‌‌
  insurance‌‌  policy‌‌  can‌‌  not‌‌
  obliterate‌‌ the‌‌ injury‌‌ inflicted‌‌ 
Article‌  ‌1167‌  ‌is‌  ‌explicit‌  ‌on‌  ‌this‌  ‌point‌‌
  that‌‌
  if‌‌
  a ‌‌person‌‌   obliged‌‌
  to‌‌
  do‌‌ 
ART‌‌  1166‌. ‌‌The‌‌ obligation‌‌ to‌‌ give‌‌ a ‌‌‌determinate‌‌ ‌thing‌‌ includes‌‌  something‌‌fails‌‌to‌‌do‌‌it,‌‌the‌‌same‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌executed‌‌at‌‌his‌‌cost.‌  ‌
on‌‌petitioner-insured.‌‌   ‌
that‌  ‌of‌  ‌delivering‌  ‌all‌  ‌its‌  ‌accessions‌  ‌and‌  ‌accessories‌, ‌ ‌even‌‌ 
though‌‌they‌‌may‌‌not‌‌have‌‌been‌‌mentioned.‌  ‌ Vil-Rey‌‌Planners‌‌and‌‌Builders‌‌v.‌‌Lexber,‌‌Inc.‌‌2
‌ 016‌  ‌ 1) Fraud‌  ‌
Fidelity‌‌&‌‌Deposit‌‌Co.‌‌v.‌‌Wilson‌  ‌ Breach‌‌ of‌‌ contract‌ ‌is‌‌ the‌‌ failure‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌party,‌‌ without‌‌ legal‌‌ reason,‌‌ to‌‌  ART‌  ‌1171‌. ‌ ‌Responsibility‌  ‌arising‌  ‌from‌  ‌fraud‌  ‌is‌‌  demandable‌‌  in‌‌ 
The‌  ‌delivery‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌thing‌  ‌constitutes‌  ‌a ‌ ‌necessary‌  ‌and‌‌
  indispensable‌‌  comply‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌terms‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌contract‌  ‌or‌  ‌perform‌  ‌any‌  ‌promise‌  ‌that‌‌  all‌  ‌obligations.‌  ‌Any‌  ‌waiver‌‌
  of‌‌
  an‌‌
  action‌‌
  for‌‌
  future‌‌
  fraud‌‌
  is‌‌ 
requisite‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌purpose‌‌   of‌‌
  acquiring‌‌
  the‌‌  ownership‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  same‌‌
  by‌‌  forms‌‌either‌‌a‌‌part‌‌or‌‌the‌‌whole‌‌of‌‌it.‌  ‌ void‌. ‌ ‌
virtue‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌contract.‌  ‌The‌  ‌ownership,‌  ‌the‌  ‌property‌  ‌right,‌  ‌is‌  ‌only‌‌  Fraud‌  ‌(deceit‌  ‌or‌  ‌dolo)‌  ‌— ‌ ‌deliberate‌  ‌or‌  ‌intentional‌  ‌evasion‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌ 
derived‌‌from‌‌the‌‌delivery‌‌of‌‌a‌‌thing.‌  ‌ The‌  ‌reciprocal‌  ‌obligation‌  ‌in‌  ‌this‌  ‌case‌  ‌was‌  ‌Lexber's‌‌   payment‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ 
normal‌‌fulfillment‌‌of‌‌an‌‌obligation.‌  ‌
50%‌  ‌balance‌  ‌upon‌  ‌Vil-Rey's‌  ‌completion‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌works.‌  ‌However,‌‌ 
despite‌  ‌the‌  ‌grant‌  ‌of‌  ‌extension,‌  ‌and‌  ‌even‌  ‌after‌  ‌the‌  ‌lapse‌  ‌of‌  ‌another‌‌  a) Includes‌  ‌any‌  ‌act,‌  ‌omission‌  ‌or‌  ‌concealment‌  ‌involving‌  ‌some‌‌ 
2) In‌‌Obligations‌‌to‌‌Do‌  ‌
five-day‌‌grace‌‌period,‌‌Vil-Rey‌‌failed‌‌to‌‌finish‌‌the‌‌works.‌  ‌ kind‌  ‌of‌  ‌malice‌  ‌or‌  ‌dishonesty.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌synonymous‌  ‌to‌  ‌bad‌  ‌faith.‌‌ 
ART‌‌  1167‌. ‌‌If‌‌  a ‌‌person‌‌  obliged‌‌  to‌‌ do‌‌ something‌‌ fails‌‌ to‌‌ do‌‌ it,‌‌ the‌‌  Moral‌‌damages‌m ‌ ay‌‌be‌‌recovered.‌  ‌
same‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌executed‌‌at‌‌his‌‌cost.‌  ‌ The‌‌  law‌‌  provides‌‌ that‌‌ the‌‌ obligation‌‌ of‌‌ a ‌‌person‌‌ who‌‌ fails‌‌ to‌‌ fulfill‌‌ 
it‌‌
  shall‌‌  be‌‌
  executed‌‌   at‌‌
  that‌‌   person's‌‌ cost‌. ‌‌Thus,‌‌ Vil-Rey‌‌ should‌‌ be‌‌  b) Art‌  ‌1170‌  ‌refers‌  ‌to‌  ‌incidental‌  ‌fraud‌  ‌(‌dolo‌  ‌incidente‌) ‌‌
This‌‌   same‌‌  rule‌‌   shall‌‌  be‌‌
  observed‌‌ if‌‌ he‌‌ does‌‌ it‌‌ in‌‌ contravention‌‌  held‌  ‌liable‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌amount‌  ‌paid‌  ‌by‌  ‌Lexber‌  ‌to‌  ‌another‌  ‌contractor‌  ‌to‌‌  committed‌‌   in‌‌
  the‌‌
  performance‌‌ of‌‌ an‌‌ obligation‌‌ already‌‌ existing‌‌ 
of‌  ‌the‌  ‌tenor‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌‌
  obligation.‌‌
  Furthermore,‌‌   it‌‌
  may‌‌  be‌‌
  decreed‌‌  complete‌  ‌the‌  ‌works.‌  ‌Article‌  ‌1169‌  ‌provides‌  ‌that‌  ‌in‌  ‌reciprocal‌‌  because‌  ‌of‌  ‌contract.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is‌  ‌different‌  ‌from‌  ‌causal‌  ‌fraud‌  ‌(‌dolo‌‌ 
that‌‌what‌‌has‌‌been‌‌poorly‌‌done‌‌be‌‌undone.‌  ‌ obligations,‌‌   ‌delay‌‌
  ‌by‌‌
  one‌‌  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  parties‌‌
  begins‌‌   from‌‌
  the‌‌
  moment‌‌ the‌‌ 
causante‌) ‌ ‌or‌  ‌fraud‌  ‌employed‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌execution‌  ‌of‌  ‌a ‌ ‌contract‌‌ 
Remedies‌‌of‌‌creditor‌‌if‌‌debtor‌‌fails‌‌to‌‌do‌  ‌ other‌‌fulfills‌‌the‌‌obligation.‌‌   ‌
under‌‌  Art‌‌
  1338,‌‌   which‌‌  vitiates‌‌   consent‌‌   and‌‌ makes‌‌ the‌‌ contract‌‌ 
a) To‌‌  have‌‌
  the‌‌
  obligation‌‌ performed‌‌ by‌‌ himself‌‌ or‌‌ by‌‌ another‌‌  voidable‌. ‌ ‌
3) In‌‌Obligations‌‌Not‌‌to‌‌Do‌  ‌
at‌‌debtor’s‌‌expense.‌  ‌ 2) Negligence‌‌   ‌
b) Plus‌‌damages‌. ‌ ‌ ART‌  ‌1168‌. ‌ ‌When‌  ‌the‌  ‌obligation‌  ‌consists‌‌  in‌‌  not‌‌  doing,‌‌  and‌‌  the‌‌ 
obligor‌  ‌does‌  ‌what‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌forbidden‌  ‌him,‌  ‌it‌  ‌shall‌  ‌also‌  ‌be‌‌  ART‌  ‌1172‌. ‌ ‌Responsibility‌  ‌arising‌  ‌from‌  ‌negligence‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌ 
Chavez‌‌v.‌‌Gonzales‌  ‌ undone‌‌at‌‌his‌‌expense.‌  ‌ performance‌  ‌of‌  ‌every‌  ‌kind‌  ‌of‌  ‌obligation‌  ‌is‌  ‌also‌  ‌demandable,‌‌ 
The‌  ‌defendant-appellee‌  ‌contravened‌  ‌the‌  ‌tenor‌  ‌of‌  ‌his‌  ‌obligation‌‌  but‌‌
  such‌‌
  liability‌‌
  may‌‌
  be‌‌  regulated‌‌   by‌‌
  the‌‌
  courts‌, ‌‌according‌‌ to‌‌ 
As‌‌
  a ‌‌rule,‌‌
  the‌‌ remedy‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ obligee‌‌ is‌‌ the‌‌ ‌undoing‌‌ ‌of‌‌ the‌‌ forbidden‌‌  the‌‌circumstances.‌  ‌
because‌  ‌he‌  ‌not‌  ‌only‌‌
  did‌‌
  not‌‌
  repair‌‌
  the‌‌
  typewriter‌‌
  but‌‌
  returned‌‌
  it‌‌
  "in‌‌ 
thing‌‌   ‌plus‌‌
  damages‌‌   (Art‌‌   1170).‌‌  If‌‌
  it‌‌
  is‌‌
  not‌‌
  possible,‌‌
  physically‌‌ or‌‌ 
Picart‌‌v.‌‌Smith‌  ‌
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 174‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

Prudential‌‌Bank‌‌v.‌‌Rapanot,‌‌et‌‌al.‌‌2
‌ 017‌  ‌
The‌  ‌test‌  ‌by‌  ‌which‌  ‌to‌  ‌determine‌  ‌the‌  ‌existence‌  ‌of‌  ‌negligence‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌‌ selection‌‌ and‌‌ supervision‌‌ ‌of‌‌ employees‌‌ through‌‌ oral‌‌ evidence‌‌ must‌‌ 
particular‌‌ case‌‌ may‌‌ be‌‌ stated‌‌ as‌‌ follows:‌‌ ‌Did‌‌ the‌‌ defendant‌‌ in‌‌ doing‌‌  If‌‌
  only‌‌  the‌‌
  Bank‌‌  exercised‌‌   the‌‌   highest‌‌   degree‌‌   of‌‌ diligence‌‌ required‌‌  fail‌  ‌as‌  ‌it‌  ‌was‌  ‌unable‌  ‌to‌  ‌buttress‌  ‌the‌  ‌same‌  ‌with‌  ‌any‌  ‌other‌  ‌evidence,‌‌ 
the‌  ‌alleged‌  ‌negligent‌  ‌act‌‌   use‌‌
  that‌‌
  reasonable‌‌   care‌‌  and‌‌
  caution‌‌  by‌  ‌the‌‌
  nature‌‌
  of‌‌
  its‌‌
  business‌‌   as‌‌
  a ‌‌financial‌‌   institution,‌‌   it‌‌
  would‌‌   have‌‌  object‌  ‌or‌  ‌documentary,‌  ‌which‌  ‌might‌  ‌obviate‌  ‌the‌  ‌apparent‌  ‌biased‌‌ 
which‌  ‌an‌  ‌ordinarily‌  ‌prudent‌  ‌person‌  ‌would‌  ‌have‌  ‌used‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  discovered‌  ‌that‌‌   (i)‌‌
  Golden‌‌   Dragon‌‌   did‌‌
  not‌‌
  comply‌‌   with‌‌   the‌‌  approval‌‌  nature‌‌of‌‌the‌‌testimony.‌  ‌
same‌‌situation?‌‌‌If‌‌not,‌‌then‌‌he‌‌is‌‌guilty‌‌of‌‌negligence.‌  ‌ requirement‌  ‌imposed‌‌   by‌‌
  Section‌‌   18‌‌   of‌‌
  PD‌‌
  957,‌‌  and‌‌   (ii)‌‌
  that‌‌   Rapanot‌‌ 
already‌  ‌paid‌  ‌a ‌ ‌reservation‌  ‌fee‌  ‌and‌  ‌had‌  ‌made‌  ‌several‌  ‌installment‌‌  Calalas‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
The‌  ‌proper‌  ‌criterion‌  ‌for‌  ‌determining‌  ‌the‌  ‌existence‌  ‌of‌‌  payments‌  ‌in‌  ‌favor‌  ‌of‌  ‌Golden‌  ‌Dragon.‌  ‌The‌  ‌Bank's‌  ‌failure‌  ‌to‌‌   exercise‌‌ 
The‌‌   doctrine‌‌ of‌‌ proximate‌‌ cause‌‌ is‌‌ applicable‌‌ only‌‌ in‌‌ actions‌‌ for‌‌ 
negligence‌‌   in‌‌  a ‌‌given‌‌  case‌‌
  is‌‌
  this‌‌
  — ‌‌Conduct‌‌  is‌‌
  said‌‌
  to‌‌
  be‌‌
  negligent‌‌  the‌  ‌diligence‌  ‌required‌  ‌of‌  ‌it‌  ‌constitutes‌  ‌negligence‌, ‌‌and‌‌   negates‌‌   its‌‌ 
when‌  ‌a ‌ ‌prudent‌  ‌man‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌position‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌tortfeasor‌  ‌would‌  ‌have‌‌  quasi-delict‌, ‌ ‌not‌  ‌in‌  ‌actions‌  ‌involving‌  ‌breach‌  ‌of‌  ‌contract‌. ‌ ‌The‌‌ 
assertion‌‌that‌‌it‌‌is‌‌a‌‌mortgagee‌‌in‌‌good‌‌faith.‌  ‌
doctrine‌  ‌is‌‌
  a ‌‌device‌‌  for‌‌
  imputing‌‌   liability‌‌   to‌‌  a ‌‌person‌‌   where‌‌   there‌‌
  is‌‌ 
foreseen‌‌   that‌‌  an‌‌ effect‌‌ harmful‌‌ to‌‌ another‌‌ was‌‌ sufficiently‌‌ probable‌‌ to‌‌ 
no‌  ‌relation‌  ‌between‌  ‌him‌  ‌and‌  ‌another‌  ‌party.‌  ‌In‌  ‌such‌  ‌a ‌ ‌case,‌  ‌the‌‌ 
warrant‌  ‌his‌  ‌foregoing‌  ‌the‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌or‌  ‌guarding‌  ‌against‌  ‌its‌‌  Kinds‌‌of‌‌Negligence‌‌as‌‌Ground‌‌for‌‌Liability‌  ‌
consequences.‌  ‌ obligation‌  ‌is‌  ‌created‌  ‌by‌  ‌law‌  ‌itself.‌‌
  But,‌‌
  where‌‌   there‌‌
  is‌‌
  a ‌‌pre-existing‌‌ 
contractual‌  ‌relation‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌  ‌parties,‌‌   it‌‌
  is‌‌
  the‌‌
  parties‌‌   themselves‌‌ 
Contractual‌  ‌ Aquiliana‌  ‌ Criminal‌  ‌
who‌  ‌create‌  ‌the‌  ‌obligation,‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌function‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌law‌  ‌is‌  ‌merely‌  ‌to‌‌ 
PNB‌‌v.‌‌CA‌‌   ‌
regulate‌‌the‌‌relation‌‌thus‌‌created.‌  ‌
Negligence‌‌is‌‌merely‌‌  Direct,‌‌substantive‌‌and‌‌independent‌‌of‌‌a ‌‌
Damages‌‌
  ‌are‌‌  not‌‌  intended‌‌  to‌‌  enrich‌‌  the‌‌  complainant‌‌ at‌‌ the‌‌ expense‌‌ 
incidental‌  ‌ contract‌  ‌
of‌  ‌the‌  ‌defendant,‌  ‌and‌  ‌there‌  ‌is‌  ‌no‌  ‌hard-and-fast‌  ‌rule‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌‌  Air‌‌France‌‌v.‌‌Carrascoso‌  ‌
determination‌  ‌of‌  ‌what‌  ‌would‌  ‌be‌  ‌a ‌ ‌fair‌  ‌amount‌  ‌of‌  ‌moral‌  ‌damages‌‌  There’s‌‌a‌‌pre-existing‌‌  No‌‌pre-existing‌‌obligation,‌e‌ xcept‌t‌ he‌‌duty‌‌to‌‌  Although‌‌   the‌‌
  relation‌‌  of‌‌
  passenger‌‌  and‌‌  carrier‌‌
  is‌‌
  "contractual‌‌ both‌‌ in‌‌ 
since‌  ‌each‌  ‌case‌  ‌must‌  ‌be‌  ‌governed‌  ‌by‌  ‌its‌  ‌own‌  ‌peculiar‌  ‌facts.‌  ‌The‌‌  obligation‌  ‌ do‌‌no‌‌harm.‌  ‌ origin‌  ‌and‌  ‌nature"‌  ‌nevertheless‌  ‌"‌the‌  ‌act‌  ‌that‌‌
  breaks‌‌  the‌‌
  contract‌‌ 
yardstick‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌that‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌not‌  ‌palpably‌  ‌and‌  ‌scandalously‌‌ 
may‌‌be‌‌also‌‌a‌‌tort‌".‌  ‌
excessive.‌  ‌ Preponderance‌‌of‌‌evidence‌‌required‌  ‌ Proof‌‌beyond‌ 
reasonable‌‌doubt‌  ‌ Barredo‌‌v.‌‌Garcia‌  ‌
Samson‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
Defense‌‌of‌‌a‌‌good‌‌  Defense‌‌of‌‌a‌‌good‌‌  The‌‌employee’s‌‌guilt‌‌  A‌‌
  quasi-delict‌‌  or‌‌ "culpa‌‌ aquiliana"‌‌ is‌‌ a ‌‌separate‌‌ legal‌‌ institution‌‌ 
Bad‌‌
  faith‌‌
  ‌is‌‌  essentially‌‌  a ‌‌state‌‌  of‌‌ mind‌‌ affirmatively‌‌ operating‌‌ with‌‌  under‌  ‌the‌  ‌Civil‌  ‌Code‌, ‌ ‌with‌  ‌a ‌ ‌substantivity‌  ‌all‌  ‌its‌  ‌own,‌  ‌and‌‌ 
furtive‌  ‌design‌  ‌or‌  ‌with‌  ‌some‌  ‌motive‌  ‌of‌  ‌ill-will.‌  ‌Bad‌  ‌faith‌  ‌is‌  ‌thus‌‌  father‌‌of‌‌a‌‌family‌  father‌‌of‌‌a‌‌family‌‌is‌‌a ‌ is‌‌automatically‌‌the‌‌ 
inapplicable.‌‌  proper‌‌and‌‌complete‌‌  employer's‌c‌ ivil‌‌‌guilt‌‌  individuality‌  ‌that‌  ‌is‌  ‌entirely‌  ‌apart‌  ‌and‌  ‌independent‌‌
  from‌‌
  a ‌‌delict‌‌
  or‌‌ 
synonymous‌  ‌with‌  ‌fraud‌  ‌and‌  ‌involves‌  ‌a ‌ ‌design‌  ‌to‌  ‌mislead‌  ‌or‌‌  crime.‌  ‌
Respondeat‌‌  defense.‌  ‌ if‌‌the‌‌former‌‌is‌‌ 
deceive‌‌   another,‌‌  not‌‌
  prompted‌‌ by‌‌ an‌‌ honest‌‌ mistake‌‌ as‌‌ to‌‌ one's‌‌ rights‌‌ 
superior‌a‌ pplies.‌  ‌ insolvent.‌  ‌
or‌‌duties,‌‌but‌‌by‌‌some‌‌interested‌‌or‌‌sinister‌‌motive.‌  ‌ Macalinao‌‌v.‌‌Ong‌  ‌
In‌  ‌contracts,‌  ‌the‌  ‌kind‌  ‌of‌  ‌fraud‌  ‌that‌  ‌will‌  ‌vitiate‌‌
  consent‌‌
  is‌‌
  known‌‌
  as‌‌  Presumption‌‌arises‌‌  Ordinarily,‌‌  Prosecution‌‌has‌‌  Under‌  ‌local‌  ‌jurisprudence,‌  ‌the‌  ‌following‌  ‌are‌  ‌the‌  ‌requisites‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌‌ 
dolo‌  ‌causante‌  ‌or‌  ‌causal‌  ‌fraud‌  ‌which‌  ‌is‌  ‌basically‌  ‌a ‌ ‌deception‌‌  upon‌‌proof‌‌that‌‌there‌‌  complainant‌‌must‌‌  burden‌‌to‌‌prove‌‌the‌‌  application‌‌of‌‌‌res‌‌ipsa‌‌loquitur‌: ‌ ‌
was‌‌a‌‌contract‌‌and‌‌  prove‌‌the‌‌negligence‌‌  negligence‌‌of‌‌ 
employed‌  ‌by‌  ‌one‌  ‌party‌  ‌prior‌  ‌to‌  ‌or‌  ‌simultaneous‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌contract‌  ‌in‌‌  1) The‌‌  accident‌‌
  is‌‌
  of‌‌
  a ‌‌kind‌‌
  which‌‌
  ordinarily‌‌
  does‌‌ not‌‌ occur‌‌ in‌‌ 
that‌‌it‌‌was‌‌not‌‌  of‌‌defendant.‌  ‌ accused.‌  ‌
order‌‌to‌‌secure‌‌the‌‌consent‌‌of‌‌the‌‌other.‌  ‌ the‌‌absence‌‌of‌‌someone's‌‌negligence;‌  ‌
carried‌‌out.‌  ‌
PNCC‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ 2) It‌  ‌is‌  ‌caused‌  ‌by‌  ‌an‌  ‌instrumentality‌  ‌within‌  ‌the‌  ‌exclusive‌‌ 
Vinluan‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ control‌‌of‌‌the‌‌defendant‌‌or‌‌defendants;‌‌and‌  ‌
The‌‌   petitioner‌‌  failed‌‌   to‌‌ exercise‌‌ the‌‌ requisite‌‌ diligence‌‌ in‌‌ maintaining‌‌ 
In‌‌
  case‌‌  of‌‌
  injury‌‌  to‌‌  a ‌‌passenger‌‌   due‌‌   to‌‌
  the‌‌  negligence‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌ driver‌‌ of‌‌  3) The‌  ‌possibility‌  ‌of‌  ‌contributing‌  ‌conduct‌  ‌which‌‌
  would‌‌
  make‌‌ 
the‌  ‌NLEX‌  ‌safe‌  ‌for‌  ‌motorists.‌  ‌PASUDECO's‌‌   negligence‌‌  in‌‌  transporting‌‌ 
the‌  ‌bus‌  ‌on‌‌  which‌‌   he‌‌  was‌‌   riding‌‌
  and‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌  driver‌‌
  of‌‌
  another‌‌   vehicle,‌‌  the‌‌plaintiff‌‌responsible‌‌is‌‌eliminated.‌  ‌
sugarcanes‌  ‌without‌  ‌proper‌  ‌harness/straps,‌  ‌and‌  ‌that‌  ‌of‌  ‌PNCC‌  ‌in‌‌ 
the‌‌
  drivers‌‌   as‌‌
  well‌‌  as‌‌   the‌‌
  owners‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌   two‌‌ vehicles‌‌ are‌‌ ‌jointly‌‌ and‌‌ 
removing‌  ‌the‌  ‌emergency‌  ‌warning‌  ‌devices,‌  ‌were‌  ‌two‌  ‌successive‌‌ 
severally‌l‌ iable‌‌for‌‌damages.‌  ‌ There‌  ‌exists‌  ‌a ‌‌‌fourth‌‌  requisite‌, ‌‌that‌‌
  the‌‌
  defendant‌‌  fails‌‌
  to‌‌
  offer‌‌
  any‌‌ 
negligent‌  ‌acts‌  ‌which‌  ‌were‌  ‌the‌  ‌direct‌  ‌and‌  ‌proximate‌  ‌cause‌  ‌of‌‌ 
Latagan's‌  ‌injuries.‌  ‌As‌  ‌such,‌  ‌PASUDECO‌  ‌and‌  ‌PNCC‌  ‌are‌  ‌jointly‌  ‌and‌‌  explanation‌‌   tending‌‌   to‌‌
  show‌‌
  that‌‌
  the‌‌
  injury‌‌  was‌‌
  caused‌‌   by‌‌
  his‌‌ or‌‌ her‌‌ 
Metro‌‌Manila‌‌Transit‌‌Corp.‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌ want‌‌of‌‌due‌‌care.‌  ‌
severally‌‌liable‌. ‌ ‌
Petitioner's‌  ‌attempt‌  ‌to‌  ‌prove‌  ‌its‌  ‌diligentissimi‌  ‌patris‌  ‌familias‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌ 
 ‌

Based‌‌on‌‌the‌‌Pre-Week‌‌Notes‌  ‌ By‌R
‌ GL‌  ‌ 175‌o
‌ f‌‌‌387‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

POL‌LAB‌TAX‌‌‌|‌C
‌ RM‌|‌‌C ‌ EM‌ETH‌  ‌
‌ IV‌COM‌|‌‌R #BestBarOutlineReviewerEver‌  ‌ For‌‌the‌‌2020/21‌‌#BestBarEver‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

Sps‌‌Santos‌‌v.‌‌Pizarro‌  ‌ 4) When‌  ‌demand‌  ‌would‌  ‌be‌  ‌useless,‌  ‌as‌  ‌when‌  ‌the‌  ‌debtor‌  ‌has‌‌  Binalbagan‌‌Tech,‌‌Inc.‌‌v.‌‌CA‌  ‌
rendered‌‌it‌‌beyond‌‌his‌‌power‌‌to‌‌perform;‌  ‌
An‌  ‌act‌  ‌or‌  ‌omission‌  ‌causing‌  ‌damage‌‌
  to‌‌
  another‌‌
  may‌‌  give‌‌   rise‌‌
  to‌‌
  two‌‌  A‌  ‌party‌‌
  to‌‌
  a ‌‌contract‌‌   cannot‌‌   demand‌‌   performance‌‌   of‌‌
  the‌‌   other‌ 
separate‌‌civil‌‌liabilities‌‌on‌‌the‌‌part‌‌of‌‌the‌‌offender,‌‌i.e.,‌‌   ‌ 5) When‌  ‌debtor‌  ‌has‌  ‌expressly‌  ‌acknowledged‌  ‌that‌  ‌he‌  ‌really‌‌
  is‌‌
  in‌‌  party’s‌‌  obligations‌‌   unless‌‌   he‌‌
  is‌‌
  in‌‌  a ‌‌position‌‌
  to‌‌
  comply‌‌ with‌‌ his‌‌ 
default.‌  ‌ own‌  ‌obligations.‌  ‌Similarly,‌  ‌the‌  ‌right‌  ‌to‌  ‌rescind‌  ‌a ‌ ‌contract‌  ‌can‌  ‌be‌‌ 
1) Civil‌‌liability‌‌ex‌‌delicto‌,‌‌under‌‌Article‌‌100‌‌of‌‌the‌‌RPC;‌‌and‌  ‌
Kinds‌‌of‌‌Mora‌  ‌ demanded‌‌   only‌‌   if‌‌
  a ‌‌party‌‌  thereto‌‌   is‌‌
  ready,‌‌ willing‌‌ and‌‌ able‌‌ to‌‌ comply‌‌ 
2) Independent‌‌civil‌‌liabilities‌,‌‌such‌‌as‌‌those‌‌   ‌ with‌‌his‌‌own‌‌obligations‌‌thereunder‌‌(Art‌‌1191).‌  ‌

You might also like