Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By
Md. Amin-Uzz-Zaman Madani
WMES ID# 200840
Registration No: WMES 00355
Session: 2020 - 2021
I understand the University’s policy on plagiarism and declare that no part of this project has
been
copied from other sources or been previously submitted elsewhere for the award of any degree or
diploma.
Counter Signed by
Supervisor
Page | i
Certificate
This thesis/report has been compiled according to the regulation of the Masters in
Environmental Sciences and Management under Weekend Program in the Department of
Environmental Sciences, Jahangirnagar University and approved in its style and content.
Coordinator
Page | ii
Acknowledgements
First, thanks to ALLAH for keeping me alive in this pandemic situation and gave me the
opportunity to finish my study. It is a great pleasure to convey my heartfelt gratitude to my
supervisor, for her compassionate supervision of this study.
Last but not least, I would want to thank my family members who have been so supportive
throughout this process, especially my late grandfather, mother, father, and brother.
Page | iii
ABSTRACT
When the air quality in Bangladesh deteriorates, the majority of the population in the city and
suburbs wear masks. During the lockdown, due to less vehicle movement in the road, as well
as closing of the office, schools might have an impact on the air quality of the mega cities of
Bangladesh. In order to assess the real scenario, Six months (1 st June to 30th November, 2021)
of air quality and meteorological data were collected for the Dhaka and Chittagong city.
Statistical analyses were used to arrive at the conclusion. The data was analyzed in Excel and
SPSS. Pollutant and precipitation data for six months are shown in a time series graph, which
shows that all pollutants are strongly interconnected with precipitation. A graph of pollutants
vs lockdown phase was created. During lockdown periods, the concentration of contaminants
was minimal and considered acceptable by the public. In order to determine if all pollutants
are indeed dependent on precipitation or not, regression analysis has been performed on
precipitation and pollutants. With the exception of O 3, all other pollutants are found to have a
positive and statistically significant link with precipitation. The association between covid19
cases and other variables is identified using correlation analysis among covid19 cases,
environmental condition, and air quality index (AQI). As a result, it can be concluded that the
covid19 instance has a negative association with air quality despite having a positive
correlation with humidity, precipitation, and wind speed. In other words, these independent
verifiable have an effect on the covid19 infectious rate. Despite the fact that air quality has no
influence on covid 19, it does have an impact on other lung conditions. As a result, finding a
feasible solution to minimize the concentration of air pollutants during the dry season is a
major concern for the people of Bangladesh. Although significant effort has been done in this
study, additional analysis using yearly primary data is required in order to obtain an accurate
picture of the situation. Therefore, it is possible to implement actions that will lessen or
eliminate the problems.
Page | iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES.....................................................................................................................9
LIST OF FIGURES..................................................................................................................10
1. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................12
1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY....................................................................................12
1.2 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY....................................................................................12
1.3 HYPOTHESIS...............................................................................................................13
1.4 AIMS AND OBJECTIVE...............................................................................................13
2 METHODOLOGY................................................................................................................14
2.1 PRESENT SITUATION..................................................................................................14
2.2 BANGLADESH'S CLIMATOLOGICAL SITUATION..........................................................15
2.3 SELECTION OF THE STUDY AREA..............................................................................15
2.3.1 POPULATION.......................................................................................................16
2.3.2 INDUSTRIAL REVALUATION................................................................................17
2.3.3 TRAFFIC CONGESTION........................................................................................18
2.3.4 MEGA PROJECTS.................................................................................................18
2.3.5 BRICK KILNS......................................................................................................18
2.4 METHOD OF DATA COLLECTION................................................................................18
2.4.1 ACCUWEATHER.............................................................................................19
2.4.2 RR NETWORK.....................................................................................................20
2.4.3 COVID19 DASH BOARD FOR BANGLADESH......................................................20
2.5 WHY COVID19?.......................................................................................................20
2.6 AIR POLLUTANTS TO BE CONSIDERED......................................................................21
2.7 DOE AIR QUALITY STANDARDS...............................................................................21
2.8 ACCUWEATHER AIR QUALITY SCALE..................................................................21
2.9 DATA ANALYSIS........................................................................................................23
2.9.1 CORRELATION.....................................................................................................23
2.9.2 REGRESSION ANALYSIS......................................................................................23
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION...........................................................................................24
3.1 ANALYSIS FOR DHAKA CITY.....................................................................................24
3.1.1 POLLUTANTS CONCENTRATION VS PRECIPITATION RATE, A TIME SERIES
GRAPH (6 MONTHS).........................................................................................................24
3.1.2 POLLUTANT CONCENTRATION VS LOCKDOWN PHASE......................................27
3.1.3 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POLLUTANTS AND PRECIPITATION.............................30
Page | v
3.1.4 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AIR QUALITY, METEOROLOGICAL DATA AND COVID 19
CASES 33
3.2 ANALYSIS FOR CHITTAGONG CITY............................................................................34
3.2.1 POLLUTANTS CONCENTRATION VS PRECIPITATION RATE A TIME SERIES GRAPH
OF (6 MONTHS).................................................................................................................34
Page | vi
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 2.1: POPULATION DISTRIBUTION IN UPAZILAS OF DHAKA DISTRICT (POPULATION
CENSUS, 2011)..................................................................................................................17
TABLE 2.2: POPULATION DISTRIBUTION IN DISTRICTS OF CHITTAGONG (POPULATION
CENSUS, 2011)..................................................................................................................18
TABLE 2.3: DOE AIR QUALITY RANGE, CATEGORY, AND COLOUR..........................................22
TABLE 2.4: ACCUWEATHER AIR QUALITY SCALE/ CATEGORY, RAGE, AND DESCRIPTION. .22
TABLE 3.1: PEARSON CORRELATION BETWEEN AIR QUALITY, COVID19 CASES AND
METEOROLOGY.................................................................................................................34
TABLE 3.2: PEARSON CORRELATION BETWEEN AIR QUALITY, COVID19 CASES AND
METEOROLOGY.................................................................................................................44
Page | vii
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 2.1: BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER LOCKDOWN SITUATION IN DHAKA CITY (SOURCE:
SELF CAPTURE).................................................................................................................13
FIGURE 2.2: STUDY AREA MAP.................................................................................................15
FIGURE 2.3: POPULATION DENSITY AND GROWTH RATE FROM (1950-2021) (SOURCE:
MACROTRENDS, 2022)......................................................................................................15
FIGURE 2.4: AIR QUALITY AND METEOROLOGICAL DATA COLLECTION PICTURE (SOURCE:
ACCUWEATHER)..........................................................................................................19
FIGURE 2.5: RAINFALL DATA COLLECTION PICTURE FROM RR NETWORK (SOURCE: RR
NETWORK)........................................................................................................................19
FIGURE 2.6: TROPOSPHERIC NO2 COLUMN, 2020 AVG. AND 2017-2019 AVG. (NASA, 2020)
..........................................................................................................................................20
FIGURE 3.1: PM10 VS PRECIPITATION......................................................................................24
FIGURE 3.2: PM2.5 VS PRECIPITATION......................................................................................24
FIGURE 3.3: O3 VS PRECIPITATION...........................................................................................25
FIGURE 3.4: NO2 VS PRECIPITATION.......................................................................................25
FIGURE 3.5: SO2 (ΜG/M3) VS PRECIPITATION (MM) FOR DHAKA CITY...................................26
FIGURE 3.6: CO (ΜG/M3) VS PRECIPITATION (MM) FOR DHAKA CITY....................................26
FIGURE 3.7: PM10 VS LOCKDOWN PHASE FOR DHAKA CITY..................................................27
FIGURE 3.8: PM2.5 VS LOCKDOWN PHASE FOR DHAKA CITY..................................................27
FIGURE 3.9: SO2 VS LOCKDOWN PHASE FOR DHAKA CITY....................................................28
FIGURE 3.10: O3 VS LOCKDOWN PHASE FOR DHAKA CITY....................................................28
FIGURE 3.11: NO2 VS LOCKDOWN PHASE FOR DHAKA CITY.................................................29
FIGURE 3.12: CO VS LOCKDOWN PHASE FOR DHAKA CITY...................................................29
FIGURE 3.13: PM10 (ΜG/M3) VS PRECIPITATION (MM) FOR DHAKA CITY...............................30
FIGURE 3.14: O3 (ΜG/M3) VS PRECIPITATION (MM) FOR DHAKA CITY....................................30
FIGURE 3.15: NO2 (ΜG/M3) VS PRECIPITATION (MM) FOR DHAKA CITY.................................31
FIGURE 3.16: PM2.5 (ΜG/M3) VS PRECIPITATION (MM) FOR DHAKA CITY...............................31
FIGURE 3.17: SO2 (ΜG/M3) VS PRECIPITATION (MM) FOR DHAKA CITY.................................32
FIGURE 3.18: CO (ΜG/M3) VS PRECIPITATION (MM) FOR DHAKA CITY.................................32
FIGURE 3.19: PM10 VS PRECIPITATION....................................................................................34
FIGURE 3.20: PM2.5 VS PRECIPITATION....................................................................................35
FIGURE 3.21: O3 VS PRECIPITATION.........................................................................................35
FIGURE 3.22: NO2 VS PRECIPITATION.....................................................................................36
FIGURE 3.23: SO2 VS PRECIPITATION......................................................................................36
FIGURE 3.24: CO VS PRECIPITATION.......................................................................................37
FIGURE 3.25: PM10 VS LOCKDOWN PHASE FOR CHITTAGONG CITY......................................37
FIGURE 3.26: O3 VS LOCKDOWN PHASE FOR CHITTAGONG CITY...........................................38
FIGURE 3.27: NO2 VS LOCKDOWN PHASE FOR CHITTAGONG CITY........................................38
FIGURE 3.28: PM2.5 VS LOCKDOWN PHASE FOR CHITTAGONG CITY.....................................39
FIGURE 3.29: SO2 (ΜG/M3) VS LOCKDOWN PHASE FOR CHITTAGONG CITY..........................39
FIGURE 3.30: CO (ΜG/M3) VS LOCKDOWN PHASE FOR CHITTAGONG CITY..........................40
FIGURE 3.31: O3 (ΜG/M3) VS PRECIPITATION (MM) FOR CHITTAGONG CITY.........................40
FIGURE 3.32: NO2 (ΜG/M3) VS PRECIPITATION (MM) FOR CHITTAGONG CITY......................41
FIGURE 3.33: PM2.5 (ΜG/M3) VS PRECIPITATION (MM) FOR CHITTAGONG CITY.....................41
FIGURE 3.34: PM10 (ΜG/M3) VS PRECIPITATION (MM) FOR CHITTAGONG CITY.....................42
Page | viii
FIGURE 3.35: CO (ΜG/M3) VS PRECIPITATION (MM) FOR CHITTAGONG CITY .......................42
Page | ix
FIGURE 3.36: CO (ΜG/M3) VS PRECIPITATION (MM) FOR CHITTAGONG CITY .......................43
1. INTRODUCTION
Page | 1
attributed to air pollution in rational environments. According to previous research, viruses
may flourish under certain climatic conditions. For Example, temperature and relative
humidity have an adverse effect on influenza infection rates in Japan. (Iha et al., 2016).
Lockdown, COVID19 Cases and pollution are linked in a way that can be explained by this
study, which will show that whether or not there is a correlation between them.
1.3 Hypothesis
It is hypothesized that all pollutants, including PM10, PM2.5, O3, SO2, NOx, and CO, are
not directly correlated with precipitation.
Page | 2
Page | 3
2 METHODOLOGY
Figure 2.1: Before, during and after lockdown situation in dhaka city (source: self
capture)
Page | 4
Figure 2 .1 despites the three stages of lockdown: before, during and after. There was no
change in the flow of traffic or the pace of development prior to the lockdown. Low traffic
and restricted movement were observed during the lockdown. After lockdown, traffic
congestion and the movement of people returned to normal and reached their previous peaks.
Page | 5
N
Dhaka W E
Legend
Chittagong
City
Division
Boundary
2.3.1 Population
Bangladesh is one of the world's densest nations. Overall population density per square
kilometer has increased steadily since 1950, although the pace of expansion has tapered down
in recent years. Figure 2 .3 shows that, despite the fact that the growth rate was slowing, the
density was increasing year after year.
1,200 3.50%
1,000 3.00%
2.50%
Population Density
800
Growth rate
2.00%
600
1.50%
400
1.00%
200 0.50%
0 0.00%
09
97
85
57
21
17
13
05
01
93
89
81
77
73
69
65
61
53
20
20
20
20
20
20
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
Year
Population Density Growth Rate
Figure 2.3: Population density and growth rate from (1950-2021) (source: Macrotrends,
2022)
Page | 6
In this study Dhaka and Chittagong was selected as people move to Dhaka and Chittagong
city for better opportunities and life style.
1.
2.
2.1.
2.2.
2.3.
2.3.1.
2.3.1.1 Dhaka
Dhaka is the most populated city in Bangladesh. The population density of Dhaka district is
around 8229 per square kilometer (BBS, 2011). The population is distributed in Dhaka's
upazila, as shown in Table 2 .1.
From Table 2 .1 it is known that the Dhaka metropolitan's population density per square
kilometer is 30551. Which indicated that due to the large population in this area, city
administration is very important. Therefore, waste management, traffic control, and the
management of land and water bodies in this area are all troublesome. As a result,
Page | 7
environmental contamination is common. With numerous environmental issues to contend
with, Dhaka is plagued by three major problems: air pollution, water pollution, and noise
pollution.
2.3.1.2 Chittagong
In Bangladesh one of the most important sea ports is in the city of Chittagong located on the
Bay of Bengal. Because of this port, the economy between Dhaka and Chittagong and
neighboring regions is thriving. Billion dollars pass through Chittagong every day on their
way to Dhaka and the rest of Bangladesh. Table 2 .2 demonstrates the population density in
this district is around 1,702 per square kilometer (BBS, 2011). The primary sources of
pollution in this mountainous region have inadequate waste management policy, sewerage
policy, water management policy, traffic management and haphazard urban expansion.
Table 2.2: Population Distribution in Districts of Chittagong (Population Census, 2011)
Page | 8
1. Dhaka Metro Rail,
2. Dhaka Airport Terminal 3,
3. Chittagong Metro Rail,
4. Kornafuli Tunnel,
5. Dhaka Mass Rapid Transit, and
6. high-rise buildings
are among the city's major infrastructure projects. They are the most significant source of
particulate matter pollution in the environment. Every day, hundreds of tons of construction
waste were disposed of frequently here and there, contributing to atmospheric pollution with
PM10 and PM2.5. Which is the consequence of air pollution.
2.4.1 ACCUWEATHER
Despite the difficulty in selecting secondary sources, ACCUWEATHER was the only
secondary source with three stations in Bangladesh (Dhaka, Chittagong, and Rajshahi).
Pollutant data, air quality index, wind speed, humidity, and temperature were collected from
Page | 9
this portal. Overall, AQI data and meteorological data were collected from
ACCUWEATHER.
Figure 2.4: Air quality and meteorological data collection picture (Source:
ACCUWEATHER)
depicts the specific data that were obtained by using the secondary source
ACCUWEATHER. The selected meteorological data was displayed in the orange boxes
above the picture, and this was taken into consideration.
Page | 10
2.4.2 RR Network
Precipitation data were collected from the Bangladeshi Meteorological Department website
named "RR NETWORK a primary source. They have 13 stations all over Bangladesh.
Figure 2.5: Rainfall data collection picture from RR network (Source: RR Network)
Page | 11
Figure 2.6: Tropospheric NO2 column, 2020 Avg. and 2017-2019 Avg. (NASA, 2020)
The air quality was improved during lockdown periods, the concentration of the pollutant had
dropped. Consequently, the concentration of NO2 fell to its lowest possible level, as
demonstrated in Figure 2 .6. As a result, three air quality statuses were observed: before
lockdown, during lockdown, and after. The air quality has been established in this study for
three separate periods.
Category
Air quality index
Colour
(AQI) Range In English In Bangla
Page | 12
151-200 Unhealthy Ashasthykar Orange
According to Table 2 .3, it is evident which range is detrimental to the health of the
Bangladeshi people. While Individuals with red or purple air quality can survive, there is a
high probability of long-term injury in the near future. These standards were followed by the
industries and other organizations for emission activities, research work, and other purposes.
Table 2.4: ACCUWEATHER air quality scale/ category, rage, and description
Air quality
Category index Description
(AQI) Range
Excellent 0 - 19 The air quality is ideal for most individuals;
enjoy your normal outdoor activities.
Page | 13
sensitive groups and should avoid outdoor
activity. Healthy individuals are likely to
experience difficulty breathing and throat
irritation; consider staying indoors and
rescheduling outdoor activities.
Dangerous 250+ Any exposure to the air, even for a few
minutes, can lead to serious health effects on
everybody. Avoid outdoor activities.
Table 2 .4 lists the air quality scales and their associated ranges, which can be used to assess
if the air is safe or not.
2.4.
2.4.1.
2.4.2.
2.9.1 Correlation
Correlation is a statistical term that quantifies how closely two variables are connected
linearly. It is a commonly used term for expressing superficial correlations without making a
causal declaration (Investopedia, 2021).
r xy =
∑ ( xi −x)( y i− y)
√∑ ( x i−x )2 ∑ ( y i− y )2
Where:
a) rxy – the correlation coefficient of the linear relationship between the variables x and y
b) xi – the values of the x-variable in a sample
c) x̅ – the mean of the values of the x-variable
d) yi – the values of the y-variable in a sample
e) ȳ – the mean of the values of the y-variable
Page | 14
2.9.2 Regression Analysis
The term "regression analysis" refers to a compilation of statistical techniques for estimating
relationships between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables (CFI,
2021).
Y =a+bX +∈
Where:
a) Y – Dependent variable
b) X – Independent (explanatory) variable
c) a – Intercept
d) b – Slope
e) ϵ – Residual (error)
Page | 15
Page | 16
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
400 160
350 140
300 120
Precipitation (mm)
PM10 µg/m3
250 100
200 80
150 60
100 40
50 20
0 0
24 ug
ug
20 ov
ov
19 ct
27 ct
4- t
25 p
ep
21 n
29 n
un
23 l
31 l
8- l
16 ug
12 v
11 ct
13 n
17 p
15 l
c
u
u
Ju
e
u
o
Se
Se
Ju
-O
-O
-O
O
-J
-J
-J
-S
-S
-A
-A
-N
-N
-J
-J
-J
N
7-
5-
3-
1-
9-
Date
PM10 µg/m³ Pricipitation (mm)
300 160
140
250
120
Precipitation (mm)
200
100
PM2.5 µg/m³
150 80
60
100
40
50
20
0 0
24 ug
ug
20 ov
ov
19 ct
27 ct
4- t
25 p
ep
23 l
21 n
29 n
un
31 l
8- l
16 ug
12 ov
11 ct
p
17 p
13 n
15 l
c
u
u
Ju
e
u
Se
Se
Ju
-O
-O
-O
O
-J
-J
-J
-S
-S
-A
-A
-N
-N
-J
-J
-J
N
7-
3-
5-
1-
9-
Date
PM2.5 µg/m³ Pricipitation (mm)
Page | 17
Figure 3.8: PM2.5 VS Precipitation
Figure 3 .8 is showing the relationship between PM2.5 and Precipitation. From June, 2021 to
September, 2021 average concentration of PM2.5 was 13 µg/m3 and precipitation rate was
23.98 mm. From October, 2021 to November 2021 average concentration of PM2.5 was 129
µg/m3 and precipitation rate was 4.72 mm. From which it can be initially determined that
because of precipitation, the concentration of PM2.5 decreased.
140 160
120 140
120
Precipitation (mm)
100
100
80
O3 µg/m³
80
60
60
40
40
20 20
0 0
24 ug
ug
ov
20 ov
4- t
19 ct
27 ct
21 n
29 n
un
25 p
ep
16 ug
12 v
23 l
31 l
8- l
11 ct
13 n
17 p
15 l
c
u
u
Ju
e
u
o
Se
Se
Ju
-O
-O
-O
O
-J
-J
-J
-S
-S
-A
-A
-N
-N
-J
-J
-J
N
7-
5-
3-
1-
9-
Date
O3 µg/m³ Pricipitation (mm)
60 160
140
50
120
Precipitation (mm)
40
100
NO2 µg/m³
30 80
60
20
40
10
20
0 0
24 ug
ug
19 ct
27 ct
4- t
20 ov
ov
29 n
23 l
8- l
25 p
ep
21 n
un
31 l
16 g
11 ct
12 ov
17 p
13 n
p
15 l
c
u
u
u
Ju
e
u
Se
u
Se
u
Ju
-O
-O
-O
O
-J
-J
-J
-S
-S
-A
-A
-N
-N
-J
N
-J
-J
7-
5-
3-
1-
9-
Date
NO2 µg/m³ Pricipitation (mm)
Page | 18
Figure 3.10: NO2 VS Precipitation
Figure 3 .10 is showing the relationship between NO2 and Precipitation. From June, 2021 to
September, 2021 average concentration of NO2 was 14 µg/m3 and precipitation rate was 23.98
mm. From October, 2021 to November 2021 average concentration of NO2 was 25 µg/m3 and
precipitation rate was 4.72 mm. From which it can be initially determined that because of
precipitation, the concentration of NO2 decreased.
30 160
140
25
Precipitation (mm)
120
20
100
SO2 µg/m³
15 80
60
10
40
5
20
0 0
24 ug
ug
20 ov
ov
19 ct
27 ct
4- t
25 p
ep
un
21 n
29 n
31 l
16 ug
12 v
23 l
8- l
11 ct
13 n
ep
17 p
15 l
c
u
u
Ju
e
u
o
e
Ju
-O
-O
-O
O
-J
-J
-J
-S
-S
-A
-A
-N
-N
S
S
-J
-J
-J
N
7-
5-
3-
1-
9-
Date
SO2 µg/m³ Pricipitation (mm)
1000 160
900 140
800
120
Precipitation (mm)
700
600 100
CO µg/m³
500 80
400 60
300
40
200
100 20
0 0
24 ug
ug
20 ov
ov
25 p
ep
19 ct
27 ct
4- t
21 n
29 n
un
23 l
31 l
8- l
16 ug
12 ov
11 ct
13 n
17 p
15 l
c
u
u
Ju
e
u
Se
Se
Ju
-O
-O
-O
O
-J
-J
-J
-S
-S
-A
-A
-N
-N
-J
-J
-J
N
7-
5-
3-
1-
9-
Date
CO µg/m³ Pricipitation (mm)
Page | 19
Figure 3.12: CO (µg/m3) VS Precipitation (mm) For Dhaka City
Figure 3 .12 is showing the relationship between CO and Precipitation. From June, 2021 to
September, 2021 average concentration of CO was 203 µg/m 3 and precipitation rate was
23.98 mm. From October, 2021 to November 2021 average concentration of CO was 419
µg/m3 and precipitation rate was 4.72 mm. From which it can be initially determined that
because of precipitation, the concentration of CO decreased.
50
40
PM10 µg/m³
30
20
10
0
23-Jun 28-Jun 3-Jul 8-Jul 13-Jul 18-Jul 23-Jul 28-Jul 2-Aug 7-Aug 12-Aug
Date
25
20
15
PM2.5 µg/m³
10
0
23-Jun 28-Jun 3-Jul 8-Jul 13-Jul 18-Jul 23-Jul 28-Jul 2-Aug 7-Aug 12-Aug
Date
Page | 20
Figure 3.14: PM2.5 VS Lockdown Phase For Dhaka City
Figure 3 .14, the partial lockdown lasted from June 23, 2022 to July 13,2022 and July 22,
2022 to August 09,2022. During these times concentration of PM 2.5 was on average of 8
µg/m3. Which was a tolerable limit for the people of Bangladesh.
14
12
10
8
SO2 µg/m³
0
23-Jun 28-Jun 3-Jul 8-Jul 13-Jul 18-Jul 23-Jul 28-Jul 2-Aug 7-Aug 12-Aug
Date
70
60
50
40
O3 µg/m³
30
20
10
0
23-Jun 28-Jun 3-Jul 8-Jul 13-Jul 18-Jul 23-Jul 28-Jul 2-Aug 7-Aug 12-Aug
Date
Page | 21
Figure 3 .16 the partial lockdown lasted from June 23, 2022 to July 13,2022 and July 22,
2022 to August 09,2022. During these times concentration of O3 was on average of 29 µg/m3.
Which was a tolerable limit for the people of Bangladesh.
25
20
15
NO2 µg/m³
10
0
23-Jun 28-Jun 3-Jul 8-Jul 13-Jul 18-Jul 23-Jul 28-Jul 2-Aug 7-Aug 12-Aug
Date
400
350
300
250
CO µg/m³
200
150
100
50
0
23-Jun 28-Jun 3-Jul 8-Jul 13-Jul 18-Jul 23-Jul 28-Jul 2-Aug 7-Aug 12-Aug
Date
Page | 22
3.1.3 Relationship between pollutants and Precipitation
Relationship between O3 and precipitation was analyzed in Figure 3 .20. linear R2 value of
O3 Vs precipitation is 9.456E-5 µg/m3. From the R2 value it is understandable that they have
no significant relationship between them. As a result because of precipitation it has no change
in its concentration and linear graph is a straight line parallal to the X axis.
Page | 23
Figure 3.21: NO2 (µg/m3) VS Precipitation (mm) For Dhaka City
The relationship between NO2 and precipitation is demonstrated in figure 3.15. The R2 value
of NO2 and precipitation is 0.014 µg/m3 which indicates a positive relationship between the
pollutant and precipitation. Though the signifance is really low. From the linear graph it is
understandable that when the precipitation is high NO2 was low and when the precipitation is
low NO2 was high.
Page | 24
Figure 3.23: SO2 (µg/m3) VS Precipitation (mm) For Dhaka City
The linear relationship between SO2 and precipitation is demonstrated in figure 3.16. The r
square value of SO2 and precipitation is 0.027 which is positive but not significant. Though
the linear graphn is showing that because of precipitation rate SO2 changes. High
precipitation low concentration and low precipitation high concentration of SO2.
3.1.4 Relationship between air quality, meteorological data and covid 19 cases
Significant relationship between COVID19 cases, meterological data and air qulity data is
demonstrated in Table 3 .5. Pearson correlation for COVID19 with Precipitation, Humidity,
Temperature, Windspeed and AQI is 0.03, 0.175*, 0.01, 0.176*, and -0.335** respectively.
Page | 25
COVID19 instances were found to be substantially associated to humidity, windspeed, and
AQI. The rate of Covid19 cases is inversely proportional to humidity and wind speed. On the
other hand, it has a negative relationship with the air quality index, which implies that as air
quality improves, COVID19 decreases and vice versa.
Table 3.5: Pearson Correlation between air quality, covid19 cases and meteorology
Temperatur
Precipitatio
Windspeed
COVID19
Humidity
AQI
n
e
Pearson
1.00 0.03 .175* 0.01 .176* -.335**
Covid19 Correlation
Sig. (2-
0.71 0.02 0.94 0.02 0.00
tailed)
Pearson
0.03 1.00 .261** 0.01 .171* -.193*
Precipitation Correlation
Sig. (2-
0.71 0.00 0.86 0.03 0.01
tailed)
Pearson
.175* .261** 1.00 0.05 0.14 -.603**
Humidity Correlation
Sig. (2-
0.02 0.00 0.48 0.06 0.00
tailed)
Pearson
0.01 0.01 0.05 1.00 -0.10 -.228**
Temperature Correlation
Sig. (2-
0.94 0.86 0.48 0.21 0.00
tailed)
Pearson
.176* .171* 0.14 -0.10 1.00 -.394**
Windspeed Correlation
Sig. (2-
0.02 0.03 0.06 0.21 0.00
tailed)
AQI Pearson
-.335** -.193* -.603** -.228** -.394** 1.00
Correlation
Sig. (2- 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
tailed)
Page | 26
N 170 170 170 170 170 170
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
250 250
200 200
150 150
Precipitation (mm)
PM10 µg/m3
100 100
50 50
0 0
ul
11 ct
13 n
9- p
17 p
23 l
31 l
8-A ul
19 ct
27 ct
4-N ct
16 ug
12 ov
21 n
29 n
n
25 ep
ep
24 ug
1-S g
20 ov
ov
-Ju
-J u
e
Se
u
-Ju
-Ju
-Ju
3-O
7-J
-O
-O
-O
-J
5-J
-S
-S
-A
-A
-N
-N
15
Date
PM10 µg/m³ Pricipitation (mm)
Page | 27
200 250
180
160 200
140
Precipitation (mm)
120 150
PM2.5 µg/m3
100
80 100
60
40 50
20
0 0
11 ct
27 ct
4- ct
15 l
31 l
19 ct
13 n
21 n
16 ug
24 ug
1- g
9- p
17 ep
25 ep
ep
12 ov
23 l
8- ul
29 n
un
20 ov
ov
Ju
u
u
Se
Ju
u
u
-O
-O
-O
-J
-J
-J
S
-S
-S
-J
A
-A
-A
-N
-J
-J
-N
7-
5-
3-
Date
100 250
90
80 200
70
Precipitation (mm)
60 150
O3 µg/m3
50
40 100
30
20 50
10
0 0
24 ug
ug
20 ov
ov
27 ct
4- ct
25 ep
ep
19 ct
21 n
31 l
29 n
un
16 ug
12 ov
23 l
8- l
11 ct
13 n
17 p
15 l
u
u
u
Ju
u
Se
Se
Ju
-O
-O
-O
O
-J
-J
-J
-S
-S
-A
-A
-N
-N
-J
-J
-J
N
7-
5-
3-
1-
9-
Date
Page | 28
precipitation rate was 8 mm. As a result it can be determined that because of precipitation the
concentration of O3 decreased.
40 250
35
200
Precipitation (mm)
30
NO2 µg/m3
25 150
20
15 100
10
50
5
0 0
ug
20 ov
ov
24 ug
25 ep
ep
27 ct
4- ct
29 n
19 ct
21 n
un
12 ov
23 l
31 l
8- l
16 ug
11 ct
13 n
17 p
15 l
u
u
Ju
u
Se
Se
Ju
-O
-O
-O
O
-J
-J
-J
-S
-S
-N
-A
-A
-N
-J
-J
-J
N
A
7-
5-
3-
1-
9-
Date
16 250
14
200
12
Precipitation (mm)
10
SO2 µg/m3
150
8
6 100
4
50
2
0 0
ov
21 ug
28 ug
4- g
20 ov
18 ep
25 ep
2- p
30 ct
6- ct
19 un
26 un
un
23 ct
13 ov
17 ul
24 ul
31 ul
7- ul
14 ug
9- t
16 ct
11 p
12 un
10 l
c
Ju
e
Se
-O
-O
-O
O
O
-J
-J
-J
-J
-S
-S
-S
-A
-A
-A
-N
-N
N
-J
-J
-J
A
J
3-
5-
Date
Page | 29
mm. From October, 2021 to November 2021 average concentration of SO2 was 6 µg/m3 and
precipitation rate was 8 mm. As a result it can be determined that because of precipitation the
concentration of SO2 decreased.
450 250
400
350 200
Precipitation (mm)
300
150
CO µg/m3
250
200
100
150
100 50
50
0 0
24 ug
ug
20 ov
ov
19 ct
27 ct
4- t
21 n
29 n
un
25 p
ep
23 l
31 l
8- l
12 ov
16 ug
11 ct
15 l
13 n
17 p
c
u
u
Ju
e
u
Se
Se
Ju
-O
-O
-O
O
-J
-J
-J
-S
-S
-A
-A
-N
-N
-J
-J
-J
N
7-
5-
3-
1-
9-
Date
PM10 µg/m³
35
30
25
20
Axis Title
15
10
0
23-Jun 3-Jul 13-Jul 23-Jul 2-Aug 12-Aug 22-Aug
Axis Title
Page | 30
Figure 3 .18 From June 23, 2022 to July 13,2022 and July 22, 2022 to August 09,2022 was
the partial lockdown phase. During these times concentration of PM10 was on average of 13
µg/m3. Which indicates tolerable limit.
O3 µg/m³
60
50
40
Axis Title
30
20
10
0
23-Jun 3-Jul 13-Jul 23-Jul 2-Aug 12-Aug 22-Aug
Axis Title
NO2 µg/m³
18
16
14
12
10
Axis Title
0
23-Jun 3-Jul 13-Jul 23-Jul 2-Aug 12-Aug 22-Aug
Axis Title
Page | 31
PM2.5 µg/m³
12
10
8
Axis Title
0
23-Jun 3-Jul 13-Jul 23-Jul 2-Aug 12-Aug 22-Aug
Axis Title
SO2 µg/m³
3
2
Axis Title
0
23-Jun 3-Jul 13-Jul 23-Jul 2-Aug 12-Aug 22-Aug
Axis Title
Page | 32
CO µg/m³
180
160
140
120
100
Axis Title
80
60
40
20
0
23-Jun 3-Jul 13-Jul 23-Jul 2-Aug 12-Aug 22-Aug
Axis Title
Page | 33
Figure 3.38: NO2 (µg/m3) VS Precipitation (mm) For Chittagong City
The relationship between NO2 and precipitation is demonstrated in figure 3.15. The R 2 value
of NO2 and precipitation is 0.014 µg/m3 which indicates a positive relationship between the
pollutant and precipitation. Though the signifance is really low. From the linear graph it is
understandable that when the precipitation is high NO 2 was low and when the precipitation is
low NO2 was high.
Page | 34
Figure 3.40: PM10 (µg/m3) VS Precipitation (mm) For Chittagong City
Relationship between PM10 and precipitation was analyzed in Figure 3 .19. linear R2 value
of PM10 Vs precipitation is 0.038 µg/m3. Though the R2 value of PM10 and Precipitaiton is
positive but the linear graph showed that if precipitation is low PM 10 is High and if the
precipitation is high PM10 is low.
Page | 35
Figure 3.42: CO (µg/m3) VS Precipitation (mm) For Chittagong City
The relationship between CO and precipitation is demonstrated in figure 3.15. The R2 value
of CO and precipitation is 0.016 µg/m3 which indicates a positive relationship between the
pollutant and precipitation. Though the signifance is really low. From the linear graph it is
understandable that when the precipitation is high CO was low and when the precipitation is
low CO was high.
3.2.4 Relationship between COVID19 cases, meteorological data and Air Quality
Significant relationship between COVID19 cases, meterological data and air qulity data is
demonstrated in Table 3.1. Pearson correlation for COVID19 with Precipitation, Humidity,
Temperature, Windspeed and AQI is 0.03, 0.175*, 0.01, 0.176*, and -0.335** respectively.
Where COVID19 cases was significantly correlated with humidity, windspeed and AQI.
Covid19 cases rate has positive relation with humidity and wind speed. It has a negative
relationship with the air quality index, meaning that as air quality improved, COVID19
declined, and conversely, as air quality deteriorated, COVID19 increased.
Table 3.6: Pearson Correlation between air quality, covid19 cases and meteorology
Temperatur
Precipitatio
Windspeed
Humidity
Covid19
AQI
n
Pearson
1.00 .178* .271** 0.14 .208** -.366**
Correlation
Covid19
Sig. (2-
0.02 0.00 0.08 0.01 0.00
tailed)
Precipitation Pearson .178* 1.00 .279** -0.05 .229** -.214**
Page | 36
Correlation
Sig. (2-
0.02 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00
tailed)
Pearson
.271** .279** 1.00 0.04 0.05 -.521**
Correlation
Humidity
Sig. (2-
0.00 0.00 0.58 0.49 0.00
tailed)
Pearson
0.14 -0.05 0.04 1.00 -0.11 -.307**
Correlation
Temperature
Sig. (2-
0.08 0.50 0.58 0.16 0.00
tailed)
Pearson
.208** .229** 0.05 -0.11 1.00 -0.07
Correlation
Windspeed
Sig. (2-
0.01 0.00 0.49 0.16 0.36
tailed)
Pearson
-.366** -.214** -.521** -.307** -0.07 1.00
Correlation
AQI Sig. (2-
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36
tailed)
N 170 170 170 170 170 170
*Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
.
Page | 37
4. CONCLUSION
The analysis for the pre-, during-, and post-lockdown phases yielded some significant results.
During the lockdown phase, the air quality was really pleasant, as illustrated in the diagram.
PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NO2, O3, and CO levels were all within acceptable limits. Despite the fact
that the air quality was heavily contaminated with CO and O3, Prior to the lockdown, air
quality was satisfactory due to precipitation. During Eid-ul-Azha, however, the government
lifts the lockdown. Even though there was moderate precipitation, pollution concentrations
rose during this time. This indicates that there was a lot of movement and was a lot of traffic.
After August 09, 2021, when the lockdown phase was fully lifted the industrial, construction,
and social work sectors were able to resume normal operations. From the end of September
and the beginning of the November air quality decreased as it was before during nomal phase
before covid 19 lockdown. According to data from DOE and ACCUWEATHER, the average
air quality was unhealthy. That is, it has a long-lasting influence on people's bodies. To
determine the association between precipitation and pollutants, regression analysis was used.
Except for O3, all pollutants in this study, PM10, PM2.5, NO2, SO2, and CO, have a
relationship with precipitation. Their concentration changes as a result of the presipitation. It
was determined from the air quality, meteorological, and covid 19 case data table that covid
19 has a negative connection with AQI, implying that air quality has no effect on covid 19
infaction rate. Although covid 19 correlates positively with precipitation, humidity, and wind
speed. Which suggests that these meteorological factors have an effect on the rate of covid19
infection. Overall, this study requires additional examination, based on primary data, because
it cannot be easily concluded whether or not there is an effect of air quality on covid19
instances and lung disorders.
Page | 38
LIST OF REFERENCES
Muhammad, S., Long, X. and Salman, M. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic and environmental
pollution: A blessing in disguise? Science of The Total Environment, 728, p.138820.
Hashim, B.M., Al-Naseri, S.K., Al Maliki, A., Sa’adi, Z., Malik, A. and Yaseen, Z.M. (2021).
On the investigation of COVID-19 lockdown influence on air pollution concentration:
regional investigation over eighteen provinces in Iraq. Environmental Science and Pollution
Research International, pp.1–19.
Kerimray, A., Baimatova, N., Ibragimova, O.P., Bukenov, B., Kenessov, B., Plotitsyn, P. and
Karaca, F. (2020). Assessing air quality changes in large cities during COVID-19 lockdowns:
The impacts of traffic-free urban conditions in Almaty, Kazakhstan. Science of The Total
Environment, 730, p.139179.
Baldasano, J.M. (2020). COVID-19 lockdown effects on air quality by NO2 in the cities of
Barcelona and Madrid (Spain). Science of The Total Environment, 741, p.140353.
van Doremalen, N., Bushmaker, T., Morris, D.H., Holbrook, M.G., Gamble, A., Williamson,
B.N., Tamin, A., Harcourt, J.L., Thornburg, N.J., Gerber, S.I., Lloyd-Smith, J.O., de Wit, E.
and Munster, V.J. (2020). Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with
SARS-CoV-1. New England Journal of Medicine, 382(16), pp.1564–1567.
Iha, Y., Kinjo, T., Parrott, G., Higa, F., Mori, H. and Fujita, J. (2016). Comparative
epidemiology of influenza A and B viral infection in a subtropical region: a 7-year
surveillance in Okinawa, Japan. BMC Infectious Diseases, 16(1).
District Statistics 2011 Dhaka BANGLADESH BUREAU OF STATISTICS (BBS)
STATISTICS AND INFORMATICS DIVISION (SID) MINISTRY OF PLANNING
GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF BANGLADESH. (2013).
http://203.112.218.65:8008/WebTestApplication/userfiles/Image/District%20Statistics/
Dhaka.pdf
District Statistics 2011 CHITTAGONG BANGLADESH BUREAU OF STATISTICS (BBS)
STATISTICS AND INFORMATICS DIVISION (SID) MINISTRY OF PLANNING
GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF BANGLADESH. (2013).
http://203.112.218.65:8008/WebTestApplication/userfiles/Image/PopCen2011/
Com_Chittagong.pdf
Dhaka.gov.bd. (2022).
http://www.dhaka.gov.bd/bn/site/page/ByAG%E0%A6%8F
%E0%A6%95%E0%A6%A8%E0%A6%9C
%E0%A6%B0%E0%A7%87%E0%A6%A2%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%95%E0%A6%BE
Page | 39
Chittagong.gov.bd. (2022).
http://www.chittagong.gov.bd/bn/site/page/jQWu%E0%A6%8F
%E0%A6%95%E0%A6%A8%E0%A6%9C%E0%A6%B0%E0%A7%87%E0%A6%9A
%E0%A6%9F%E0%A7%8D%E0%A%9F%E0%A6%97%E0%A7%8D
%E0%A6%B0%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%AE
AccuWeather. (2010). Local Weather from AccuWeather.com - Superior AccuracyTM.
https://www.accuweather.com/.
live3.bmd.gov.bd. (n.d.). Bangladesh Meteorological Department.
http://live3.bmd.gov.bd/.
SVS, Nasa. (2020). SVS: Reductions in Pollution Associated with Decreased Fossil Fuel Use
Resulting from COVID-19 Mitigation. svs.gsfc.nasa.gov.
https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/4810
case.doe.gov.bd. (n.d.). Air Quality Index (AQI). http://case.doe.gov.bd/index.php?
option=com_content&view=article&id=29&Itemid=7
Corporate Finance Institute (2015). Regression Analysis - Formulas, Explanation, Examples
and Definitions. Corporate Finance Institute.
https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/knowledge/finance/regression-analysis/.
Investopedia. (n.d.). What Is Correlation in Finance?
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/correlation.asp#:~:text=Correlation%20is%20a
%20statistical%20term
Page | 40