You are on page 1of 1

the object of an English raid on Norridgewock mis- to stay in business, and they got what they said they

sion in 1724. There were no winners, only losers, in needed. The Indians, in effect, were forced to pay
the four Abenaki-English wars during 1675-1 727. them a subsidy, not infrequently a subsidy in cash,
French policies are shown as sometimes unenlight- as happened when Indians paid for substitutes to es-
ened, but English policies almost always were. Jes- cape the labor draft, the dreaded mita of Potosi.
uits frequently succeeded in providing the Abenaki Bakewell reminds those who tend to think of Po-
with desired services, and so the Abenaki usually tosi only in terms of the mita that more than half the
supported French military efforts-whenever i t labor force worked voluntarily and was better paid
seemed advantageous to do so. Abenaki actions than the draft laborers. His study deals with both
maximized autonomy, given the alternatives avail- groups. There is a certain emphasis on the volunteer
able. The Embattled Northeast is highly recom- workers, however, which is reflected in the chapter
mended for its own alliance of interdisciplinary in- headings. Bakewell discusses wages and cost of liv-
puts. ing, working conditions and welfare as well as he
can, given the limitations of the documents he has
available. Very little of the kind of information that
ethnologists look for i s easily recoverable from
Spanish colonial documents.
Miners of the Red Mountain: Indian Labor in
Bakewell has written a pioneer synthesis i n
Potosi, 7545-1650. PETER BAKEWELL. Albu-
which he lays out the major changes in the labor
querque: The University of New Mexico Press, situation at Potosi with relation to changes in min-
1984. xvi + 213 pp., maps, figures, illustra- ing conditions (for example, as easily accessible de-
tions, appendixes, glossary, references, in- posits of high grade ore were worked out, extraction
dex. $19.95 (cloth). became both more difficult and more expensive).
The documents Bakewell uses reflect the point of
IOHN HOWLAND ROWE view of the mine owners, and their biases affect his
University of California, Berkeley study. Latin American historians tend to follow the
lead of their documents in this way and thus to be-
Miners of the Red Mountain is a book by a his- come apologists for the Spanish imperial regime
torian on Indian labor in the silver mines of Potosi, when writing about the colonial period.
in what is now Bolivia, between 1545 and 1650. In order to understand what happened to mine
Why should anyone but a specialist be interested in workers at Potosi, a broader perspective is neces-
that subject? sary. Bakewell wrote his dissertation on silver min-
Potosi was a mountain of silver, a fabulous trea- ing in colonial Mexico (Cambridge, 1971), and the
sure in the eyes of Europeans and one of the richest context he offers for Potosi is a comparison with the
jewels in the crown of imperial Spain. It was Amer- Mexican mines. Unfortunately, in making the com-
ican silver that financed the wars of Europe from the parison he misreads his own table, statingon p. 183
Protestant Reformation through the Thirty Years that mines in the Mexico City district employed
War. More of this silver came from Potosi than any- 58.8 percent forced labor, when the correct figure
where else; for part of the period, this location is 26.6 percent.
alone produced twice as much silver as all the Two major pieces of the context are missing. One
mines of Mexico combined. All the work in the is the context of the Spanish economy, and espe-
mines was performed by Indians, and the total work cially the ever more desperate state of Spanish gov-
force was nearly 10,000 men, about 45 percent of ernment finances. Successive crises, and particu-
whom worked under coercion and were paid less larly those of the 1590s and 16205, led to increases
than it cost them to live. A large part of what is now in the pressures on the American colonies to pro-
southern Peru and Bolivia was subject to the labor duce more treasure, at whatever sacrifice. Theother
draft lor Potosi. element missing from this account concerns the
The mines were owned by individual Spaniards pressures impinging on the Indian labor force from
who also controlled the refining process. These in- sources other than the Potosi mines. There were
dividuals were the chief beneficiaries of the mining other demands for forced labor, financial pressures
effort. Since the crown claimed one-fifth of all the resulting from the illegal commercial activities of
the corregidores (provincial governors), and prop-
silver produced, i t too had an important interest in
erty losses as the result of the sale to Spaniards of
maintaining production.
Indian land taken by the Spanish government as
Actual work in mines was not something Span-
baldio (idle).Changes in these factors increased the
iards did willingly. In Spain, Spaniards were con-
problems faced by Indians subject to the mita of Po-
demned to work in the mines as punishment for tosi during the period covered.
atrocious crimes, so there was severe stigma asso- Within its limitations, this is a useful study of an
ciated with this form of labor. With such anteced- important subject, and we can hope that it will in-
ents, the home government was naturally troubled terest others to look at the surviving documents and
by the tendency of Spanish colonists to insist that tell us more about Indian labor in the mines of co-
free Indians who had committed no crime be forced lonial Potosi.
to mine silver and gold. Officials in Spain could see
no alternative, however, and the forced labor of In-
dians was approved repeatedly as necessary in the Notable Family Networks in Latin America.
interests of the state. DIANA BALMORI, STUART F. VOSS, and
The alternative that received little or no consid- MILES WORTMAN. Chicago: University of Chl-
eration was that of paying the mine workers a wage cago Press, 1984. 290 p ~ . figures,
, photo-
that would make the job worth their while. The graphs, notes, references, Index. $27.00
mine owners insisted that they needed cheap labor (cloth).

400 american ethnologist

You might also like