ORIGINAL PEAC TEMPLATE

SCHOOL:______________________ REGION: _______________________

PEAC STANDARDS-BASED SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (SSIP)

B. CURRICULUM, ASSESSMENT ANDINSTRUCTION

IMPROVEMEN SMART OUTPUT ACTION STEPS TIME MONITORING PERSON IN BUDGET AND
T PLAN ITEM GOALS PERIOD SYSTEM CHARGE BUDGET
SOURCE

PHOENIX KAAGAPAY PROGRAM_STAGE 2_MODULE 3_STRATEGIC PLANNING 1

THREE-YEAR RESULTS-& STANDARDS BASED SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (“Kaagapay” PROGRAM TEMPLATE)

STRATEGIC PLANS
A. THREE-YEAR RESULTS & STANDARDS-BASED SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (3Y-RSSIP)

KEY RESULT AREA/DOMAIN: B. CURRICULUM, ASSESSMENT AND INSTRUCTION

R E S U L T S
TARGET GOALS STANDARD (Intended Outcomes)

2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024

TARGET GOAL 1 B.1 A CURRICULUM MAP in

ON CURRICULUM MAP
By the end of SY 2023-2024, all
subject area curriculum maps
are coherent and seamless to
ensure continuity, alignment to
MELC and school’s vision-
mission, reinforcement,
progression, and enhancement
of teaching-learning
experiences from K to Grade
12 learning, leading to
improved students’
performance.
each subject area that: What is the outcome of the
B1.5 articulates vertical compliance?
learning progression Intended Outcome A
across the different  Curriculum maps for each
grade levels (PEAC Final subject area are well-
Report; NE) formulated, coherent, and
seamless, ensuring
continuity, alignment,
reinforcement, learning
progression from K to 12,
and guiding cost-effective
instruction delivery.
Intended Outcome B
 Teachers are better able to
B1.3 shows unpacked K to 12 plan curriculum maps,
standards in different learning progression, and
PHOENIX KAAGAPAY PROGRAM_STAGE 2_MODULE 3_STRATEGIC PLANNING
What is the outcome of the
compliance?
Intended Outcome A
 Enhanced Curriculum Maps
for each subject area that
are responsive to the
changing times and
supported by appropriate
ICT tools or technology that
make learning dynamic and
engaging.
Intended Outcome B
 Teachers across subject
areas work collaboratively
in exploring possibilities of
What is the outcome of the
compliance?
Intended Outcome A
 Powerful Curriculum Maps
which are guideposts to
quality learning across the
subject areas.
Intended Outcome B
 Teachers in teams are
better able to conduct
action researches that
2
 ways in all subjects interdisciplinary integration enhancing the curriculum enhance the curriculum
(PEAC Final Report; PE) collaboratively. maps. maps.
B1.4 shows horizontal
alignment between
assessment, instruction,
and resources in all the EVIDENCES: EVIDENCES: EVIDENCES:
learning units (PEAC 1. CURRICULUM MAP 1. RESULTS OF REGULAR 1. UTILIZATION OF
Final Report; PE) 2. LEARNING MONITORING AND ACTION RESEARCH
B2. The implementation and PROGRESSION EVALUATION OF CURR OUTCOMES ON CURR
continuous improvement 3. HORIZONTAL MAPS MAP ENHANCEMENT
of the Curriculum Maps ARTICULATION 2. MINUTES OF a. Teaching strategies
by: 4. INTERDISCIPLINARY HORIZONTAL AND b. Formative and
1. checking that the INTEGRATION VERTICAL summative
PVMGO in the 5. LESSON PLANS ARTICULATIONS Assessment
curriculum maps are 3. UPGRADED CURR MAP c. Realignment of
reflected in the unit 4. UPGRADED LESSON standards and
learning plans PLANS competencies when
2. conducting a periodic necessary
review and updating of 2. Development of
the Curriculum Learning Materials
Maps
(PEAC Final Report; PE)

PHOENIX KAAGAPAY PROGRAM_STAGE 2_MODULE 3_STRATEGIC PLANNING 3

ANNUAL RESULTS-& STANDARDS BASED SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (“Kaagapay” PROGRAM TEMPLATE)

STRATEGIC PLANS
B. ANNUAL RESULTS & STANDARDS-BASED SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (A-RSSIP)

ANNUAL OPERATIONAL PLAN SY 2021-2022

KEY RESULT AREA/DOMAIN: CURRICULUM, ASSESSMENT AND INSTRUCTION

AREA OF STANDARDS IMPLEMENTATION RESULTS

IMPROVEMENT (BASELINE) PLAN OF ACTION
INPUT ► ACTIVITIES ► OUTPUT ► OUTCOME ► SMART GOAL for
SY 2021-2022
CURRICULUM B.1 A CURRICULUM  MELC and other A. Subject Teacher(s) A. Subject Curriculum Intended Outcome A  At the end of
MAP MAP in each subject benchmark Review and Map (initial),  Curriculum maps school year 2021-
standards such as 21st Revision of Subject developed by the
area that: Century Skills, school Curriculum Map subject teacher(s),
for each subject 2022, at least 85%
B1.5 articulates Vision-Mission, Time Frame: June – that is aligned to area are well- of the school’s
vertical learning  Textbook and other July 15, 2021 DepEd MELC, formulated, curriculum maps
progression across reference materials school vision- coherent, and are well-
the different grade (print and non-print) mission, and with seamless, formulated,
 Curriculum Maps SY integration of 21st
levels (PEAC Final Century Skills
ensuring coherent, and
2019-2020
Report; NE)  Data or information continuity, seamless,
on issues, themes or B. Horizontal alignment, ensuring
societal concerns B. Horizontal Articulation Map reinforcement, continuity,
that students need Articulation per that reinforced learning alignment,
to become aware of grade level teaching of skills or
Time Frame: 3rd progression from reinforcement,
 Collaborative subject integrated themes
area team teachers Week of July, 2021 that cut across K to 12, and learning
 Collaborative grade subjects in a grade guiding cost- progression from
level teachers level created by effective K to 12, and
 Budget the grade level instruction guiding cost-
subject teachers

PHOENIX KAAGAPAY PROGRAM_STAGE 2_MODULE 3_STRATEGIC PLANNING 4

 delivery. effective
C. Subject Area instruction
Learning delivery.
C. Vertical Articulation Progression Map
of subject area from K to 12 that
aligned standards Intended Outcome B
teachers across
grade levels and learning  Teachers are
(mapping of competencies better able to plan
learning formulated by the curriculum maps,
progression subject area
teachers learning
Time Frame: 4th progression, and
week of July, 2021
A. Subject Teacher(s) A. Subject Curriculum
interdisciplinary
B2. shows unpacked  MELC and other
benchmark Review and Map, developed by integration
K to 12 standards in
standards such as 21st Revision of Subject the subject collaboratively.
different ways in all Century Skills, school Curriculum Map teacher(s), that is
subjects (PEAC Final Vision-Mission, Time Frame: June – aligned to DepEd
Report; PE)  Textbook and other July 15, 2021 MELC, school
reference materials vision-mission, with
(print and non-print) integration of 21st
 Curriculum Maps SY Century Skills and
2019-2020 inclusion of
 Data or information unpacked learning
on issues, themes or competencies
societal concerns
that students need B. Shared and
to become aware of B. Collaborative common
 Subject teacher(s) subject area team understanding of
 Subject area team sharing and the unpacked K to
teachers validation of 12 standards and
 Budget unpacked K to 12 learning
standards competencies in
Time Frame: 2nd each subject by the
week of July, 2021 subject area
teachers

B1.4 shows  MELC and other A. Subject Teacher(s) A. Subject

benchmark Review and Curriculum Map,

PHOENIX KAAGAPAY PROGRAM_STAGE 2_MODULE 3_STRATEGIC PLANNING 5

horizontal alignment standards such as 21st Revision of Subject developed by the
between Century Skills, school Curriculum Map subject
Vision-Mission, Time Frame: June – teacher(s), that is
assessment,  Textbook and other July 15, 2021 aligned to DepEd
instruction, and reference materials MELC, school
resources in all the (print and non-print) vision-mission,
learning units (PEAC  Curriculum Maps SY B. Collaborative with integration
Final Report; PE) 2019-2020 subject area team of 21st Century
 Data or information sharing and Skills and
on issues, themes or validation of the inclusion of
societal concerns alignment of unpacked learning
that students need assessment, competencies
to become aware of instruction and
 Subject teacher(s) resources used in all B. Shared and
 Subject area team learning units. common
teachers Time Frame: 2nd understanding of
 Budget week of July, 2021 the unpacked K to
12 standards and
learning
competencies in
each subject by the
subject area
teachers

B2. The  MELC and other A. Subject Teacher(s) A. Subject

implementation and benchmark Review and Curriculum Map,
standards such as 21st Revision of Subject developed by the
continuous Century Skills, school Curriculum Map subject
improvement of the Vision-Mission, Time Frame: June – teacher(s), that is
Curriculum Maps by:  Textbook and other July 15, 2021 aligned to DepEd
1. checking that the reference materials MELC, school
PVMGO in the (print and non-print) vision-mission,
 Curriculum Maps SY with integration
curriculum maps of 21st Century
2019-2020
are reflected in  Data or information Skills and
the unit learning on issues, themes or inclusion of
plans societal concerns unpacked learning
2. conducting a that students need competencies

PHOENIX KAAGAPAY PROGRAM_STAGE 2_MODULE 3_STRATEGIC PLANNING 6

periodic review to become aware of
and updating of  Subject teacher(s) B. Shared and
 Subject area team B. Collaborative common
the Curriculum
teachers subject area team understanding of
Maps (PEAC Final  Budget the integration of
sharing and
Report; PE) validation of the the school’s vision-
integration of the mission in each
school’s vision- subject by the
mission in the subject area
subject area teachers
curriculum maps
Time Frame: 2nd
week of July, 2021
C. Defined System for
C. Establishing a Curriculum Review
system for the and Upgrading
regular conduct of
Curriculum map
review and
upgrading which
will be included in
the Faculty Manual
– Duties and
Responsibilities of a
Subject Teacher
Time Frame: 1st
week of August,
2021

PHOENIX KAAGAPAY PROGRAM_STAGE 2_MODULE 3_STRATEGIC PLANNING 7

PHOENIX KAAGAPAY PROGRAM_STAGE 2_MODULE 3_STRATEGIC PLANNING 8