Outline

---Patrick/109540036/0919

---Topic 1 What you need to know about Roe v. Wade

I. The case of Roe v. Wade

A、 The protagonist of the whole event (Jane Roe)

1. Seek legitimate abortion because of accidental pregnancy

2. Suggestions from her friend lying about rape

B、 The result of suing

1. Violations of the Ninth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution on privacy

2. Restriction of a woman's right to abortion violates the due process

II. Supreme Court decision

A、 majority opinion

1. Cycle often shorter than the appeal case trial cycle based on mootness

2. The right to privacy includes the right of a woman to have an abortion

B、 Criticism of the verdict

1. Incomplete starting point based on privacy

2. Judgment is too restrictive and exceeds the appropriate scale

C、 Controversies

1. Are women's abortion rights guaranteed by privacy rights?

2. Unborn child protected by the due process clause?

III. Reasons
A、 Scope of protection of privacy rights, including women's abortion rights

1. Court doesn't say what constitutional basis for right to privacy

2. Constitutional man should only apply after birth

3. Courts' protection adopts Strict Scrutiny standard

B、 Court proposes three-stage standard

1. Fetus not have viability pregnant women can decide for themselves

2. Government restrict abortion only if necessary to protect the health

3. Government bans abortion unless mother's life or health is in danger

Scripts

everybody today I'm going to give my informative speech on topic number one what

you need to know about Roe versus wade it's actually a surprising overthrown from

the Supreme Court in America so let's talk about the cases and of course in 1969 and

the woman in an I am Jane train accidentally found herself in the pregnancy situation

and she wants to go under the process of abortion however due to due to the

limitations of their taxes can actually do it she can actually do so so she found a

lawyer and represent the no wait the wait official Chris procedure and the resource

turn out to be disappointed to the protagonist because they say that the baby in the

mothers party is fire so yeah actually contract this with the rules of the that's nice

amendment but why is this surprising in my first introduction it's because that through

browse the oral debate by two sides of the lawyer the resource turned out holy so row

yeah spring sparkles a lot of issues and the first one is about turn woman have their

rights and go under abortions at their discretion because previous team I've talked

about that America especially they have strong enforcement moments just paying and

the last word you mean a mattress this was not it all of their rules because of these

events the Supreme Court of the America change at last

References

Curry, Lynne. "Beyond "Choice": Roe v. Wade as U. S. Constitutional History."

Journal of Women's History, vol. 22 no. 2, 2010, p. 166-170. Project MUSE,
doi:10.1353/jowh.0.0155.

Joans, Barbara. Review of The Girls Who Went Away: The Hidden History of Women
Who Surrendered Children for Adoption in the Decades Before Roe v. Wade. Oral
History Review, vol. 36 no. 2, 2009, p. 285-287. Project MUSE
muse.jhu.edu/article/365766.

Leon, Sharon M. Review of Defenders of the Unborn: The Pro-life Movement before
Roe v. Wade, by Daniel K. Williams. The Catholic Historical Review, vol. 103 no. 2,
2017, p. 376-377. Project MUSE, doi:10.1353/cat.2017.0096.

Regan, Donald H. “Rewriting Roe v. Wade.” Michigan Law Review, vol. 77, no. 7,
1979, pp. 1569–646. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/1288037. Accessed 18 Sep.
2022.

Reagan, Leslie J. Review of Doctors of Conscience: The Struggle to Provide Abortion

before and after "Roe v. Wade". Bulletin of the History of Medicine, vol. 71 no. 3,
1997, p. 559-560. Project MUSE, doi:10.1353/bhm.1997.0116.

REIDINGER, PAUL. “Will Roe v. Wade Be Overruled?” ABA Journal, vol. 74, no.
7, 1988, pp. 66–70. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20759999. Accessed 18 Sep.
2022.

Vincent, S. James. “UNWANTED PREGNANCY AND THE UNREMITTED ROW

OVER ‘ROE v. WADE.’” Journal of the Indian Law Institute, vol. 32, no. 2, 1990,
pp. 246–58. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43953183. Accessed 18 Sep. 2022.

Weisberg, D. Kelly, editor. “ROE v. WADE.” Applications Of Feminist Legal

Theory, Temple University Press, 1996, pp. 953–61. JSTOR,
http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt14bs8md.70. Accessed 18 Sep. 2022.
Speech Evaluation Sheet (Instructor’s copy) Date ___________

Speaker Name _____________________ Student ID. ________________

Speech Type _________________________________________________

Speech Topic _________________________________________________

Evaluation:

1) Logos (logical reasoning) _________________ (0-3)

2) Ethos (ethical duties/credibility) & Pathos (emotional connection/

effectiveness/impact) ____________ (0-3)

3) Research and Structure (content substance/organization of arguments)

___________ (0-2)
4) Language use (fluency and accuracy) ___________ (0-2)

*** Total points earned __________

*** Comments & Feedbacks from the Instructor: