Assessment on the Implementation of Special Program for Sports

(SPS) and Student Performance at Juan R. Liwag

Memorial High School in the Division of Gapan City

A Masteral Thesis (if you are Master’s student)or A Dissertation

(if you are PhD Student) Presented to the
Faculty of the Graduate School,
College of the Immaculate Concepcion
Cabanatuan City, Nueva Ecija

In Partial Fulfilment
of the Requirements for the Degree
state your degree
Major in (state your major)

JUANDELA CRUZ

December 2018
 INDEPENDENT VARIABLES DEPENDENT VARIABLES

Socio-demographic Profile:
 Age
 Sex
 Educational Attainment
 Position
 Years of Teaching
 Sports being Coached
 Area of Sport
Specialization
 No. of Years as Coach
 Awards Received
 Seminars Attended

SCHOOL PERFORMANCE
OUTPUT
In terms of:
 Individual/Dual
Sport Events,
and
 Team Sport Events

Implementation of Special
Program for Sports (SPS)
 Planned Curriculum for
dual, Individual,
team sports
 Admission Policy to SPS
 Retention Policy to SPS
 Student Support
 Sports facilities
 Manpower Resources
 Instructional Resources

Figure 1. Research paradigm on the relationship of

independent and dependent variables.
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

This study will be conducted to assess the level on the

implementation of Special Program for Sports (SPS) and student

performance at Juan R. Liwag Memorial High School in Gapan City.

Specifically, the researcher seeks to answer the following:

1. How may the Socio-Demographic Characteristic of the

respondents be described in terms of:

1.1 Age

1.2 Sex

1.3 Educational Attainment

1.4 Position

1.4 Years of Teaching

1.5 Sports being coached

1.6. Sports being coached

1.7. Area of Sport Specialization

1.8. Awards received in Sports

1.9. Seminars attended

2. How may the implementation of special program for sports as

perceived by respondents be described in terms of:

2.1 Planned Curriculum for individual and team sports

2.2 Admission Policy to the SPS program

2.3 Retention Policy to SPS program

2.4 Student support

2.5 Sports facilities

 2.6 Manpower resources

2.7 Instructional resources

3. How may the student performance in sports be described in

terms of:

3.1 Individual/dual sports

3.2 Team sports

4. Is there a significant correlation between socio-demographic

characteristics of the respondents and student performance

in sports?

5. Is there a significant relationship between adequate

implementation of special program of sports and student

performance in sports as perceived by the respondents?

6. What specific recommendation/suggestion may be drawn to

improve the implementation of special program for sports?

HYPOTHESIS OF THE STUDY

The following hypotheses will be tested:

1. There is no significant correlation between socio-

demographic characteristics of the respondents and student

performance in sports.

2. There is no significant relationship between the

implementation of special program of sports and student

performance in sports as perceived by the respondents.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Ball, S. (2011). Evaluating Educational Programs. Educational

Testing Service.
Bernard, R. H. (2006). Research Method in Anthropology. New
York, NY: Altamira Press.

Cash, C. S. (1993). Building condition and student achievement

and behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia
Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.

Chiu, L. K., Mahat, N. I., Hua, K. P., Radzuwan, R.(2013).

Student-Athletes' Perceptions of Coaches' Coaching
Competency at the Malaysian Public Institution of Higher
Learning. World Journal of Education, 3 (1) pp.13-22.

Corpuz, B. B., and Lucas, M. R. (2006). Facilitating

Learning: A meta-cognitive process.
Quezon City: Vibal Publishing Company.

Department of Education Memorandum No. 25, series of 2015,

Guidelines on the Implementation of Special Program for
Sports.

Earthman, G. I., Cash, C. S., & Van Berkum, D. (1996). Student

achievement and behavior and school building condition. The
Journal of School Business Management, 8(3), 26-27

Georgakis, S., Evans, J. R., Warwick, L. (2015). The Academic

Achievement of Elite Athletes at Australian Schools. Journal
of Education and Training Studies, 3 (1) pp.84-97.

Javier, F.V. (2012). Assessing an Asian University’s

Organizational Effectiveness Using the Malcolm Baldridge
Model. Asian Journal of Business and Governance, 2(1), 37-
55.

Kolb, D.A. 1984. Experiential

learning: experience as the
source of learning and
development.
Englewood Cliffs, New
Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Kolb, D.A. 1984. Experiential
learning: experience as the
source of learning and
development.
Englewood Cliffs, New
Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Kolb, D.A. 1984. Experiential
learning: experience as the
source of learning and
development.
Englewood Cliffs, New
Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Kolb, D.A. 1984. Experiential
learning: experience as the
source of learning and
development.
Englewood Cliffs, New
Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the
source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, New
Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Lyons, J. B. (2002). The learning environment: Do school

facilities really affect a child’s
education? Learning By Design, 11, 10-13.
Sternberg, R.J. and Zhang, L.F. (2000) (Eds.), Perspectives on
cognitive, learning, and thinking styles. NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum.

Taylor, F. & Francis, T. (2015) Predicting teacher job

satisfaction based on principals’ instructional supervision
behaviours: A study of Turkish teachers. Irish Educational
Studies, 34 (1), pp.34-47.

Wiersma, W., &Jurs, S. (2005). Research Method in Education: An

introduction. Boston, MA. Chestnuts Hills Enterprises, Inc.
Wlodkowsky, R. J. (2011). Enhancing adult motivation to learn: A
comprehensive guide to teaching all adults. San Francisco,
CA: John Wiley and Sons.