Professional Documents
Culture Documents
METHOD
The researcher applied the classroom action research and took a part as a teacher in 12
IPS 4 Class of MAN 2 Model Medan which consists of 30 students. The research procedure
was conducted in two cycles, cycle I and cycle II. It conducted in five meetings starting from
July. The first meeting was for pre-test in which the researcher tried to find out the students’
speaking achievement before they got treatment. The second meeting was for cycle one
treatment, the third meeting was for the cycle one test, the fourth meeting was for cycle two
treatment, and the last meeting was for post-test and administrating the questionnaire. Each
cycle consisted of four stages which were planning, action, observation and reflection. There
was pre-test before conducting the cycles and post-test in the end of each cycle.
The research was conducted in 12 IPS 4 Class of MAN 2 Model Medan which consists of 30
students. The first competence test was given in the first meeting and the other tests were
given in the end of each cycle. Based on the preliminary of study, the researcher found there
were some problems. Some of students got difficulties to speak up when the speaking time
started. Therefore, the researcher implemented the Inside-Outside Circle technique as a
problem solving. The students were very enthusiastic when the learning process was
continuing. Although there were some obstacles, such as: the class situation was very noisy
when the teacher managed the students to make some group, and also most of students felt
uncomfortable when the teacher organized the members of group. The circle was too large
so that the class became so noisy and the technique could not work well. Since the members
of the group were made by the researcher, the students were unable to express their ideas
freely. After applying inside-outside circle technique in the class, the students’ score
improved continuously. The students’ improvement can be seen in table 4.1 below.
After analyzing the data, it was concluded that students’ speaking achievement had
improved from the first test to the last test through inside-outside circle technique. In the
first cycle, groups were made by the researcher so the students still did the learning-teaching
by speaking hesitatntly. In the second cycle, the way groups made was changed and students
could choose their group members as they wanted leading them into the more fun and
enjoyable learning. They spoke with less hesitance. It could be concluded that the use of
inside-outside circle technique improved the students’ speaking achievement.
Suggestion
The result of this study shows that the use of Inside-Outside Circle Technique
improved the students’ speaking achievement. These following suggestions are directed
to:
1. For the teacher
As a teacher we have to find and develop any kind of learning model and
technique as the source of building the human resource’s quality. Therefore what we
can do are:
REFERENCES
Hughes, Arthur. 1989. Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press
Kagan, Spencer. 1992. Cooperative Learning. San Juan Capistrano: Kagan Cooperative
Learning.
Sudrajad, M and Armeria W. ”The effectivenes of Inside Outside Circle By Using Cue
Card for Students’ Speaking Skill at seventh Graders”, Journal of English
Educators Society. Vol,1. (2016). 59-70.
Thornbury, Scott. 2005. How to Teach Speaking. Malaysia: Pearson Education Limited.
Wahyuni, Dewi Sri . Mukhayar and Kusni, ”Improving Students’ Speaking Skill by Using
Inside-Outside Circle Technique”. Journal English Language Teaching. Vol. 1
No. 2. (2013). 18-29.