You are on page 1of 18

MODULE 7

FERLYN MARIE F. ALDAYA BSBA FM3-3

INDIVIDUAL OUTPUT (I HAVE NO GROUP)

CREATE A PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SAMPLES


1. Based from the 9 Different Performance Appraisal Methods, choose at least 4 (make sure
that 3 members will work on one method).

2. There are many ways to create a Performance Method. Conduct research. Be Resourceful.

I’ve chosen the following:


1. Ranking Method
2. Critical Incident Method
3. Graphic Rating Scale
4. Multi- rater assessment or The 360- degree performance feedback
5.
1. RANKING METHOD

RANKING METHOD

TRAIT: RELIABILITY

HIGHEST- RANKING EMPLOYEE


1. MARIA G. 6. MAAN S.

2. CHRISTIAN G. 7. LAZY S.

3. JESSA A. 8. GEGE Q.

4. LYZA C. 9. BEBE MO

5. ROBERT T. 10. GINA C.


LOWEST- RANKING EMPLOYEE
RANKING METHOD

TRAIT: PROBLEM SOLVING SKILL

HIGHEST- RANKING EMPLOYEE


1. JESSA A. 6. ROBERT T.

2. MARIA G. 7. GINA C.

3. CHRISTIAN G. 8. BEBE MO

4. MAAN S. 9. GEGE Q.

5. LYZA C. 10. LAZY S.


LOWEST- RANKING EMPLOYEE

RANKING METHOD

TRAIT: WORK KNOWLEDGE

HIGHEST- RANKING EMPLOYEE


1. MARIA G. 6. MAAN S.

2. JESSA A. 7. BEBE MO

3. LYZA C. 8. GEGE Q.

4. CHRISTIAN G. 9. LAZY S.

5. ROBERT T. 10. GINA C.


LOWEST- RANKING EMPLOYEE
RANKING METHOD

TRAIT: QUALITY

HIGHEST- RANKING EMPLOYEE


1. MARIA G. 6. BEBE MO

2. LYZA C. 7. MAAN S.

3. JESSA A. 8. GEGE Q.

4. CHRISTIAN C. 9. LAZY S.

5. ROBRT T. 10. GINA C.


LOWEST- RANKING EMPLOYEE

RANKING METHOD

TRAIT: COMMUNICATION SKILL

HIGHEST- RANKING EMPLOYEE


1. LYZA C. 6. ROBERT T.

2. CHRISTIAN G. 7. GINA C.

3. MARIA G. 8. BEBE MO

4. JESSA A. 9. GEGE Q.

5. MAAN S. 10. LAZY S.


LOWEST- RANKING EMPLOYEE
EMPLOYEE RELIABILIY PROBLEM WORK QUALITY COMMUNICATION DIVIDE OVERALL
KNOWLEDGE SKILL BY 5
SOLVING RANKING
(5
TRAITS)

1. A, JESSA 3 1 2 3 4 5 2

2. C, GINA 10 7 10 10 7 5 8

3. C, LYZA 4 5 3 2 1 5 3

4. G, CHRISTIAN 2 3 4 4 2 5 3

5. G, MARIA 1 2 1 1 3 5 1

6. MO, BEBE 9 8 7 6 8 5 6

7. S, LAZY 7 10 9 9 10 5 9

8. S, MAAN 6 4 6 7 5 5 5

9. T, ROBERT 5 6 5 5 6 5 4

10. Q, GEGE 8 9 8 8 9 5 7
2. CRITICAL INCIDENT METHOD

CRITICAL INCIDENT METHOD


Score Indication
1- Strongly Agree
2- Agree
3- Fairly Agree
4- Disagree
5- Strongly Disagree

Incident: Exhibiting general rudeness or arrogance of co- employee

EMPLOYEE REACTION SCALE

A, JESSA Informs the supervisor 2


immediately

C, LYZA Ignore and just focus in 4


her own work

G, CHRISTIAN He doesn’t care about 5


other employees

G, MARIA Talk and tackle the issue 1


of her/ his rudeness
privately

S, MAAN Ignore the rudeness 3


CRITICAL INCIDENT METHOD
Score Indication
1- Strongly Agree
2- Agree
3- Fairly Agree
4- Disagree
5- Strongly Disagree

Incident: Exhibiting insubordination of co- employee

EMPLOYEE REACTION SCALE

A, JESSA Suspension and 2


Improvement Plan

C, LYZA Written or verbal warning 1

G, CHRISTIAN Ignore the attitude 5

G, MARIA Oral reprimand 3

S, MAAN Terminate the employee 4


CRITICAL INCIDENT METHOD

Score Indication
1- Strongly Agree
2- Agree
3- Fairly Agree
4- Disagree
5- Strongly Disagree

Incident: Workplace Conflict of Employees

EMPLOYEE REACTION SCALE

A, JESSA Listen to all parties 2


Involved
C, LYZA Encourage staff to resolve 3
conflicts on their own

G, CHRISTIAN Dismiss all parties involved 4

G, MARIA Encourage open dialogue 1


and conflict resolution
among the involved staff.

S, MAAN Ignore issues that are not 5


part of your work

EMPLOYEE OVERALL RANK


A, JESSA 2
C, LYZA 3
G, CHRISTIAN 5
G, MARIA 1
S, MAAN 4
3. Graphic Rating Scale

GRAPHIC RATING SCALE

Employee Name: MARIA GUTIERREZ

Department: FINANCE
Job Title: SALES DEPARTMENT HEAD

Performance Poor Fairly Poor Fairly Good Good Excellent


Level

A subordinate's
behavior 
Professionalism

Creative
concepts 
Responsibility

Aptitude for
solving issues 
Genuineness and
morality 
Attendance/
Punctuality 
Passion

GRAPHIC RATING SCALE

Employee Name: JESSA A.

Department: FINANCE
Job Title: ASSISTANT MANAGER

Performance Poor Fairly Poor Fairly Good Good Excellent


Level

A subordinate's
behavior 
Professionalism

Creative
concepts 
Responsibility

Aptitude for
solving issues 
Genuineness and
morality 
Attendance/
Punctuality 
Passion

GRAPHIC RATING SCALE

Employee Name: LYZA C.


Department: FINANCE

Job Title: PURCHASE DEPARTMENT HEAD

Performance Poor Fairly Poor Fairly Good Good Excellent


Level

A subordinate's
behavior 
Professionalism

Creative
concepts 
Responsibility

Aptitude for
solving issues 
Genuineness and
morality 
Attendance/
Punctuality 
Passion

EMPLOYEE OVERALL RANK

A, JESSA 3

C, LYZA 2

G, MARIA 1
4. Multi- rater assessment or The 360- degree performance feedback

360-Degree Performance Evaluation Form


The below-listed person's performance review will be prepared by management with the help of
this form. Your evaluation of his or her performance as someone who frequently collaborates with this
person will be helpful to the entire review procedure. Adding your name to this form is optional.

Employee Name: A, JESSA________________________________________

Relation to Employee: CO-WORKER____________________________________

Your Name (Optional): MARIA G._______________________________________

A few
A few times times a Every few NA
Time Spent Every Day a week month months (Never)

Your interaction with employee


Strongly Strongly Not


Quality of Work Agree Agree Disagree Disagree Applicable
Sets high standards for quality 
of work output
Ensures work is error-free 
before submitting
Helps others improve the 
quality of their work

Strongly Strongly Not


Communication Agree Agree Disagree Disagree Applicable
Communicates well orally and 
in written-form

Displays good listening skills 


Shares information freely with 
others
Strongly Strongly Not
Teamwork Agree Agree Disagree Disagree Applicable

Contributes positively to team 


Helps define team roles to 
maximize output

Can be counted on to complete 


tasks correctly

Strongly Strongly Not


Personal Qualifications and Agree Agree Disagree Disagree Applicable
Leadership

Presents a positive image to 


outsiders

Is friendly and easy to work with 


Adapts well to change 
Has high professional and 
ethical standards

Please provide additional comments in the space below

Despite the fact that it can be challenging to obtain information about a new program, I am
aware that Ma'am has many positive traits that enable this organization become well-known and its
employees to be productive.
360-Degree Performance Evaluation Form
The below-listed person's performance review will be prepared by management with the help of
this form. Your evaluation of his or her performance as someone who frequently collaborates with this
person will be helpful to the entire review procedure. Adding your name to this form is optional.

Employee Name: _A, JESSA________________________________________

Relation to Employee: _CO-WORKER____________________________________

Your Name (Optional): ANONYMOUS____________________________________

A few
A few times times a Every few NA
Time Spent Every Day a week month months (Never)

Your interaction with employee

Strongly Strongly Not


Agree Agree Disagree Disagree Applicable
Quality of Work
Sets high standards for quality 
of work output

Ensures work is error-free 


before submitting

Helps others improve the 


quality of their work

Strongly Strongly Not


Communication Agree Agree Disagree Disagree Applicable
Communicates well orally and 
in written-form

Displays good listening skills 


Shares information freely with 
others
Strongly Strongly Not
Teamwork Agree Agree Disagree Disagree Applicable

Contributes positively to team 


Helps define team roles to 
maximize output

Can be counted on to 
complete tasks correctly

Strongly Strongly Not


Personal Qualifications and Agree Agree Disagree Disagree Applicable
Leadership

Presents a positive image to 


outsiders
Is friendly and easy to work 
with
Adapts well to change 
Has high professional and 
ethical standards

Please provide additional comments in the space below

She's in a foul temper always. She's unjust since she continually strives for perfection and disregards
our feelings.
360-Degree Performance Evaluation Form
The below-listed person's performance review will be prepared by management with the help of
this form. Your evaluation of his or her performance as someone who frequently collaborates with this
person will be helpful to the entire review procedure. Adding your name to this form is optional.

Employee Name: _A, JESSA________________________________________

Relation to Employee: _CO-WORKER____________________________________

Your Name (Optional): ALOHA__________________________________________

A few
A few times times a Every few NA
Time Spent Every Day a week month months (Never)

Your interaction with employee


Strongly Strongly Not


Quality of Work Agree Agree Disagree Disagree Applicable
Sets high standards for quality 
of work output
Ensures work is error-free 
before submitting
Helps others improve the 
quality of their work

Strongly Strongly Not


Communication Agree Agree Disagree Disagree Applicable
Communicates well orally and 
in written-form

Displays good listening skills 

Shares information freely with 


others
Strongly Strongly Not
Teamwork Agree Agree Disagree Disagree Applicable
Contributes positively to team 
Helps define team roles to 
maximize output
Can be counted on to complete 
tasks correctly

Strongly Strongly Not


Personal Qualifications and Agree Agree Disagree Disagree Applicable
Leadership

Presents a positive image to 


outsiders

Is friendly and easy to work 


with

Adapts well to change 


Has high professional and 
ethical standards

Please provide additional comments in the space below

I admire her dedication to her career. She has the typical employee drive in her work. She
supports our company's mission and vision and despises those who are lazy or disrespectful.

You might also like