Professional Documents
Culture Documents
the-medical-dictionary.com/apraxia_article_2.htm 3/6
2/18/2021 Apraxia: Diagnostic criteria of developmental apraxia of speech used by clinical speech-language pathologists at The Medical Dictionary
M from the inventory had different patterns of phonological learning as a result of
N treatment compared to children who used a consistent substitute for an
O omitted sound. Children who used variable substitutes did not learn treatment
P targets nor show any generalization of knowledge to untreated sounds even
Q though the techniques used had been proven effective with children with more
R consistent phonological error patterns (Elbert, Dinnsen, & Powell, 1984; Gierut,
S 1985). Although it is not clear that these children have DAS, their substitution
T and learning patterns suggest that they are distinct from children with more
U consistent sound usage. Further, Davis et al. (1998) identified these patterns
V as markers of DAS.
W
X Inconsistency in speech production also has been cited as a hallmark feature of
Y DAS by Dodd and her associates (Dodd & McCormack, 1995; Dodd & Iacono,
Z 1989). Children with this diagnosis were found to have inconsistent
Medicines phonological errors and demonstrated the use of deviant phonological
processes (i.e., processes that are not seen in the typical acquisition of
The root word of Apraxia is praxis which phonology). Further, these children showed deficits in language performance as
is Greek for an act, work, or deed. well as motor planning of speech and nonspeech activities.
Types The presence of groping behavior and general oral-motor difficulties also were
frequently associated with DAS. Again, this characteristic has been cited
There are several types of apraxia
including: frequently in the literature (e.g., Crary, 1984, 1993; Hall, Jordan, & Robin,
1993; Ozanne, 1995; Stackhouse & Snowling, 1992). Ozanne (1995) noted
limb-kinetic (inability to make groping and oral-motor problems in children with developmental verbal
fine, precise movements with a dyspraxia and concluded that clusters of symptoms are needed for accurate
limb), diagnosis of the disorder. She suggests that these clusters represent deficits in
ideomotor (inability to carry out a
phonological planning, phonetic programming, and general oromotor control.
motor command),
ideational (inability to create a The current investigation cannot confirm or refute this hypothesis, in part
plan for or idea of a specific because of the methodology employed. That is, participants in this
movement), investigation were asked to supply "up to three" criteria that they use to
buccofacial or facial-oral (inability diagnose DAS. It is possible that in an attempt to comply with the instructions,
to carry out facial movements on some participants included additional characteristics that they don't normally
command, i.e., lick lips, whistle,
associate with this disorder. Other participants may have limited their
cough, or wink) - which is
perhaps the most common form, responses to include only three features even though additional characteristics
verbal (difficulty coordinating typically are used in their diagnosis of DAS.
mouth and speech movements),
constructional (inability to draw Despite restrictions placed on the number of DAS features that participants
or construct simple should list, the results from the current investigation provide some insight into
configurations), the concept of DAS. Review of Table 1 indicates that across clinicians there is
and oculomotor (difficulty moving great divergence in the characteristics of DAS, as noted by the 50 different
the eyes).
features that the SLPs cited. Not only were there a large number of different
Apraxia may be accompanied by a features suggested as diagnostic of the disorder, but some of the criteria were
language disorder called aphasia. contradictory. For example, some respondents viewed difficulty in speech
without concomitant problems in movement of the articulators for nonspeech
Developmental Apraxia of Speech (DAS)
activities as a marker of DAS (e.g., motor problems for speech with normal
presents in children who have no
evidence of difficulty with strength or movement for feeding, difficulty in voluntary speech movement), whereas
range of motion of the articulators, but other SLPs noted that general oral-motor deficits served as an important
are unable to execute speech characteristic of DAS. Similarly, respondents stated that normal auditory
movements because of motor planning perception should be evident in children with DAS and other clinicians indicated
and coordination problems. This is not to that auditory perception and processing impairments were markers of the
be confused with phonological disorder. This variation across individuals in the understanding of DAS may
impairments in children wtih normal
lead to errors in the diagnosis of the disorder, as noted by Davis et al. (1998).
coordination of the articulators during
speech. Experience in our university clinic is consistent with this claim. In our ongoing
research, we have found that many children referred for evaluation and
Symptoms of Acquired Apraxia of Speech treatment of DAS show signs of dysarthria. For example, in a recent group of
(AOS) and Developmental Apraxia of 10 children who had received diagnoses of DAS from area SLPs, 2 children had
Speech (DAS) include inconsistent
abnormally high velar air flow and 2 other children demonstrated excessive
articulatory errors, groping oral
movements to locate the correct laryngeal resistance. These physical deviations may account for much of the
articulatory position, and increasing treatment failure that was noted by the referring clinician.
errors with increasing word and phrase
length. AOS often co-occurs with Oral Clearly, additional research on DAS criteria is needed. The present study is
Apraxia (during both speech and non- limited in that the instructions to the participants (i.e., provide three criteria for
speech movements) and Limb Apraxia. diagnosing DAS) may have forced the clinicians to provide extraneous features.
Therefore, a replication of this study with less restrictive directions is
Treatment warranted. Further, the participants' level of experience in working with
Generally, treatment for individuals with
children with articulation disorders is unknown. Although most people who
apraxia includes physical therapy, attended this workshop were working as SLPs, and presumably these
occupational therapy or speech therapy. individuals were interested in the topic of DAS, precise information about the
If apraxia is a symptom of another participants was not obtained. Finally, the participants in this study were
disorder, the underlying disorder should obtained from a sample of convenience rather than by more controlled
be treated. procedures. Therefore, the results of this study remain purely descriptive.
Despite these limitations, the present investigation provides insight into the
Prognosis
features that SLPs use to diagnose DAS. Although a large number of features
The prognosis for individuals with emerged from this analysis, the category of "inconsistent errors" was most
apraxia varies, With therapy, some frequently cited as a diagnostic marker for DAS. However, it does not appear
the-medical-dictionary.com/apraxia_article_2.htm 4/6
2/18/2021 Apraxia: Diagnostic criteria of developmental apraxia of speech used by clinical speech-language pathologists at The Medical Dictionary
patients improve significantly, while that there is good consensus among working clinicians regarding the
others may show very little characteristics that define DAS.
improvement.
Acknowledgments
Read more at Wikipedia.org
This research was supported by National Institute on Communication Disorders
Grant DC04575.
• [List your site here Free!]
References
Forrest, K., Dinnsen, D. A., & Elbert, M. (1997). The impact of substitution
patterns on phonological learning by misarticulating children. Clinical
Linguistics and Phonetics, 11, 63-76.
Forrest, K., Elbert, M., & Dinnsen, D. A. (2000). The effect of substitution
patterns on phonological treatment outcomes. Clinical Linguistics and
Phonetics, 14, 519-531.
Munson, B., Bjorum, E. M., & Windsor, J. (2003). Acoustic and perceptual
correlates of stress in nonwords produced by children with suspected
developmental apraxia of speech and children with phonological disorder.
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 189-202.
the-medical-dictionary.com/apraxia_article_2.htm 5/6
2/18/2021 Apraxia: Diagnostic criteria of developmental apraxia of speech used by clinical speech-language pathologists at The Medical Dictionary
Ozanne, A. (1995). The search for developmental verbal dyspraxia. In B. Dodd
(Ed.), Differential diagnosis of children with speech disorders (pp. 91-109).
London: Whurr.
Skinder, A., Strand, E. A., & Mignerey, M. (1999). Perceptual and acoustic
analysis of lexical and sentential stress in children with developmental apraxia
of speech. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 7, 133-144.
Thoonen, G., Maassen, B., Gabreels, F., Schreuder, R., & de Swart, B. (1997).
Towards a standardised assessment procedure for developmental apraxia of
speech. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 32, 37-60.
DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2003/083)
Karen Forrest
E-mail: kforrest@indiana.edu
Return to Apraxia
the-medical-dictionary.com/apraxia_article_2.htm 6/6