Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 2 (Print Version)
Chapter 2 (Print Version)
MATH 1821
Mathematical Methods for Actuarial Science I
Chapter 2
Limits and Continuity
1
MATH 1821: Mathematical Methods for Actuarial Science I Chapter 2: Limits and Continuity
x2 − 4
lim =
x→2 x − 2
the value of f (x) gets closer and closer to L as x gets closer and closer to c.
lim e 5x =
x→−∞
the value of f (x) gets closer and closer to L as x gets larger and larger
the value of f (x) gets closer and closer to L as x gets smaller and smaller.
Not all limits exist. In other words, sometimes f (x) does not get ‘closer and closer’
to a real number L as x gets ‘closer and closer’ to c (or gets ‘larger and larger’ /
‘smaller and smaller’ in case the limit is taken at ±∞).
1
We may write lim 2 = ∞ in this x
x→0 x
case.
Similarly, we have
1 − 2x − 3x 2
lim = .
x→∞ 4 − 5x
1
lim sin .
x→0 x x
In the previous example, although the limit does not exist, the function does get
‘closer and closer’ to a certain number if we let approach 0 either from the left or
from the right.
In this case we say that the left-hand limit and the right-hand limit both exist, and
we denote this by
x x
lim− x + = and lim+ x + =
x→0 |x| x→0 |x|
respectively.
More generally, we say that the left-hand limit of f (x) as x tends to c is equal to
L, denoted by
lim f (x) = L,
x→c −
if f (x) gets ‘closer and closer’ to L as x gets ‘closer and closer’ to c from the left.
if f (x) gets ‘closer and closer’ to L as x gets ‘closer and closer’ to c from the right.
The limit lim f (x) exists and is equal to L if and only if both
x→c
Remark. We can replace L by ±∞ although in that case we do not say the limit
‘exists’.
In each of the following cases, find f (0), lim f (x), lim− f (x) and lim+ f (x).
x→0 x→0 x→0
x2
(a) f (x) =
x y
x2
y=
x
x
In each of the following cases, find f (0), lim f (x), lim− f (x) and lim+ f (x).
x→0 x→0 x→0
y y = bxc
In each of the following cases, find f (0), lim f (x), lim− f (x) and lim+ f (x).
x→0 x→0 x→0
1
(c) f (x) =
x
y
1
y=
x
Sandwich theorem
Suppose that I is an interval with c ∈ I , and that
1 1
Using ≤ x sin ≤ , we can now conclude that lim x sin =
x x→0 x
The sandwich theorem also applies to one-sided limits and limits at infinity. For
example, can you find the following limits?
√ sin x
(a) lim+ x sin x 2 (b) lim
x→0 x→∞ x
Remarks:
We can phrase a similar result if ∞ is changed to −∞.
The same is true if we change the limits to one-sided limits.
We also have a similar result for limits at infinity instead of limit at c.
Can you find the following limits using the result on the previous page?
ex ln x
(c) lim (d) lim+
x→∞ x x→0 x
It turns out that this is very useful for computing the derivatives of trigonometric
functions. It should be noted that x must be in radians for the result to hold.
Can you find the following limits using the result on the previous page?
sin 5x 1 − cos x
(e) lim (f) lim
x→0 x x→0 x
Intuitively, we can understand a continuous function as one in which the graph can
be drawn in one single pen stroke.
y y = x3 − x y y = bxc
x x
Let f be a function and c be an interior point of dom f (i.e. there exists an open
interval I containing c such that I ⊆ dom f ). We say that f is continuous at c if
Intuitively, it means f (x) gets closer and closer to f (c) as x gets closer and closer
to c.
What can you say about the continuity of the following functions?
(a) (b)
y y
y = |x|
y = f (x)
2
1
x 1 2 3 4 x
The domain X of a function f may contain points that are not interior points.
We call c ∈ R a boundary point of X if any open interval I containing c
intersects both X and R \ X .
We call c ∈ X an isolated point of X if there exists an open interval I
containing c such that I ∩ X = {c}.
For example, let X = [1, 2) ∪ {3}. What are the interior, boundary and isolated
points of X ?
y y = f (x)
(
1 if x = 0
f (x) =
x otherwise
y
y = f (x)
(
1 if x < 0
f (x) =
2 if x ≥ 0
x
1
y=
x2
y 1
y = sin
x
Suppose f and g are two functions, both of which are continuous at c, and k be a
constant. Then the following functions are also continuous at c:
f ±g
kf
fg
f
(provided that )
g
f k (provided that it is defined on an interval containing c)
It follows from the statement on the previous page that all polynomials are
continuous. Rational functions (quotient of two polynomials) are also continuous
wherever they are defined.
We also state without proof that exponential, logarithmic and trigonometric
functions are continuous wherever they are defined.
Can you evaluate the following limits? What property have you implicitly used in
the process?
Now suppose f is a function such that f (1) = 3. Can you find lim f (ln x)?
x→e
If f is also continuous at c, then f (c) = L and the above result can be rephrased as
If f is continuous at c, then as x gets closer and closer to c, the value of f (x) gets
closer and closer to f (c). In particular, if the sequence {xn } converges to c, then
{f (xn )} would converge to f (c).
The contrapositive of the above statement gives us a way of showing that a
function is not continuous at a point c. It suffices to find a sequence {xn } that
converges to c for which the corresponding sequence {f (xn )} does not converge to
f (c). This is particularly useful for functions that are complicated but whose
values at certain points are easy to find.
We can make use of the intermediate value theorem to prove the existence of roots
to equations. Two examples are given below.
1
(a) The equation x 2 = x + 1 + has a root between 1 and 2.
x +1
We can make use of the intermediate value theorem to prove the existence of roots
to equations. Two examples are given below.
(b) Every cubic equation with real coefficients has at least one real root.