Professional Documents
Culture Documents
6.002 ELECTRONICS
.
Nature as observed in experiments
V 3 6 9 12 …
I 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 …
?
Suppose we wish to answer this question:
What is the current through the bulb?
We could do it the Hard Way…
Apply Maxwell’s
∂B ∂φ B
Faraday’s ∇× E = − ∫ E ⋅ dl = − ∂t
∂t
∂ρ ∂q
Continuity ∇ ⋅ J = − ∫ J ⋅ dS = −
∂t ∂t
ρ ⋅ =
q
Others ∇⋅E = ∫ E dS
ε0
ε0
Instead, there is an Easy Way…
First, let us build some insight:
Analogy
F
a?
Analogy
F
a?
Point-mass discretization
The Easy Way…
B
In EE, we do things
the easy way…
A
I
+ and I=
V
V R
– R
B
In EE, we do things
the easy way…
V
I= called element v-i relationship
R
R is a lumped element abstraction
for the bulb.
R is a lumped element abstraction
for the bulb.
V
SB
B –
black box
Although we will take the easy way
using lumped abstractions for the rest
of this course, we must make sure (at
least the first time) that our
abstraction is reasonable. In this case,
ensuring that V I
are defined
for the element
I
A + SA
V I
V
SB must be defined
B – for the element
black box
I must be defined. True when
I into S A = I out of S B
∂q
True only when = 0 in the filament!
∂t
∫ J ⋅ dS
SA
∫ J ⋅ dS
SB
∂q
∫ J ⋅ dS − ∫ J ⋅ dS = ∂t
SA SB
IA IB
from ell
a x w ∂q
M I A = I B only if =0
∂t
So let’s assume this
V Must also be defined.
see
A&L
∂φ B
VAB defined when =0
∂t
So VAB = ∫AB E ⋅ dl outside elements
Lumped Matter Discipline (LMD)
Or self imposed constraints:
∂φ B
= 0 outside
∂t
∂q
More in = 0 inside elements
Chapter 1 ∂t bulb, wire, battery
of A & L
Demo
Exploding resistor demo
can’t predict that!
Pickle demo
can’t predict light, smell
So, what does this buy us?
Replace the differential equations
with simple algebra using lumped
circuit abstraction (LCA).
For example —
a
R1 R4
R3
V + b d
–
R2 R5
c
What can we say about voltages in a loop
under the lumped matter discipline?
What can we say about voltages in a loop
under LMD?
R1 R4
R3
V + b d
–
R2 R5
∂φ B
∫ E ⋅ dl = − ∂t under DMD
0
∫ E ⋅ dl + ∫ E ⋅ dl + ∫ E ⋅ dl = 0
ca ab bc
+ Vca + Vab + Vbc = 0
Kirchhoff’s Voltage Law (KVL):
The sum of the voltages in a loop is 0.
What can we say about currents?
Consider
S
I ca I da
a
I ba
What can we say about currents?
S
I ca I da
a
I ba
∂q
∫S J ⋅ dS = − ∂t under LMD
0
I ca + I da + I ba = 0
KVL:
∑ jν j = 0
loop
KCL:
∑jij = 0
node