Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/319987855
CITATIONS READS
4 2,159
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Rana P.B. Singh on 22 September 2017.
[493.17]. Kumar, Sarvesh and Singh, Rana P.B. 2017. Ayodhya (India): a study of Ritual
Landscapes. Practising Geographer (ISSN: 0975-3850; Foundation of Practising
Geographers, Kolkata, India), vol. 21 (no. 2), Winter: pp. 171 - 180.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1. INTRODUCTION
Rituals, is one of the unique features of every religious activities and associated with the
landscape and sites that converges into ‘ritual landscapes’, and their cognates like
‘ceremonial landscape’, ‘sacred landscape’, ‘faithscapes’ and ‘symbolic and archetypal
landscape’ (Robb, 1998: 170-171). The ritual landscapes are important ritual spaces in all
important religions of India, as they ‘literally incorporated the sacrality of the landscape
in their own bodies to live a wholly meaningful existence by maintaining its continuity
and re-interpreting its meanings in varying contexts of the belief systems’. They not only
connect the local people to divine and sublime but also help to maintain social values,
cultural identities, power relationship, and place ballets. Virtually all landscapes have
cultural associations because all landscapes have been affected in some way by human
action or perception, and thus ritual landscapes emerges as a result of various religious
activities. The landscapes and associated attributes that emphasize the interaction
between human being and nature over time-maintaining existence-continuity-
transformation and transferability – that makes the cultural landscapes (Singh, 2013: 92).
The cultural landscapes are reflective of human and natural (physical) transformation to
landscapes. They hold different meanings to diverse groups of people, each of which hold
within their relative culture, varying attitudes towards landscapes (cf. Duncan, Johnson
and Schein, 2004). Cultural beliefs in the form of rituals within different groups of people
(religious group) depend on as to how these distinctive beliefs come to dominate
transformation to the landscape. Following the Saurian frame, the ritual landscape is, thus
fashioned from a natural landscape by a religious group, where religious rituals serve as
the agent, the natural area is the medium, and the ritual landscape is the result (Fig. 1).
The ritual landscape is the impartial part and product of cultural landscape. It includes the
Kumar & Singh (2017), Ayodhya (India): a study of Ritual Landscapes. Practising Geographer, 21 (2), Winter. 172
present tangible and intangible cultural practices in the sphere of religion and festivities
and also includes all kind of religious heritage.
today. Muslims have never performed prayer (namaz) there. As it has been centre of
Hindu-Muslim riots, the main site was opened for devout Hindus till 23rd of February
1857 when the East India Company (Britain) made a separating wall and stop the entry of
Hindus through the mosque since 5th of January 1950 under the law, and only restricted
entry was permitted (Singh and Rana 2002: 301).
Table 1. Ayodhya: Religious Properties – Temples and Shrines
Se. Sacred Shrines ca. No. Notable Temple/ Shrine
1. Hindu Deities (1161)
a. Vishnu 7 Chandrahari, Dharmahari, Chakrahari
b. Rama 1035 Kanak Bhavan, Ramajamabhumi,
Lakshman Kila, Treta ke Thakur
c. Krishna 3 Radhe Kishna, Radhe Krishna
d. Shiva (& family) 18 Nageshvarnath, Kshireshvarnath
e. Devis (goddess) 11 Badi Devkali, Annapurna Devi, Chhoti
Devkali, Pateshvari, Jalpa Devi, Shitala
f. Auxiliary deities 5 Hanumangarhi, Hanuman, Shani Dev
g. Chhavani (a sect 3 Mani Ramadas (Chhoti) Chhavani,
monastery) Raghunath ji ki Chhavani, Badi Chhavani
h. Akhada (Dashnami 10 Digambar, Juna, Nirmohi, Udasin,
monastery) Mahanirvani, Niranjani, Santoshi
i. Caste-temple 62 Nishad Temple, Kori Temple
j. Folk deities 7 Bramha Baba, Sati Mata, Mari Mata
2. Jain temple 5 Adinatha, Ajitnath, Abhinandannath,
Sumatinath, Anantanath.
3. Buddhist Vihar 2 Vishakha Buddha, Panchashil Buddha
4. Christians (Church) 3 Saint Mary, Saint Andrew, Central
Methodist.
5. Sikhs (Gurudvaras) 7 Nishan Sahib, Thara Sahib, Brahmakunda,
Dukhanivaran
6 Muslims (186)
a. Mosque (masjid) 103 Jama Tatshah, Washika, Khajur, Sunahari,
Hasan Raza Khan, Terhi Bazar, Alamganj,
Saiyyedwada
b. Mazar (dargah) 80 Hazrat Noah, Hazrat Shish, Badi Bua
c. Karbala 3 Haqbari Sharif Karbala, Shia Karbala
Source: Field survey by the authors, 2015-2017.
Ayodhya has more than thousands of small and big temples and every temple followed
verity of rituals in existence of ritual landscapes of Ayodhya. Every temple of Ayodhya is
performing the following sequential eleven steps of ritual activities:
1. Meditation (dhyana)
2. Invocation (avahana)
3. Welcome ceremony (arghya, padya)
4. Bath (snana)
5. Dressing (vastra)
6. Worship of the various parts of god body (ang puja)
7. Offering incense and a lamp (dhupa, dipa)
8. Offering food to god (naivedya)
9. Hymn of praise (stuti)
10. Worship of the attendant deities (sah-deva puja)
11. Dismissal, conclusion (asana, prathana)
Jaganatha Puri and shared some religious discourses with Brahmins in the shadow of
wood apple tree on the Brhamakunda Ghat and also cleaning his teeth near to
Dukhabhanjana well, now which is protected by Gurudvara authority (Bakker, 1986:
274). According to mythology Brahmakund was place of austerity for Hindu god
Brahma in the Treta era. The ninth Guru Shri Teg Bahadur (CE 1670) and tenth Guru
Shri Guru Govind Singh also visited on this place several times and performed bathing
and meditation rituals, and conveyed Guru’s messages to Brahmin society of Ayodhya.
Another historical Gurudvara of Nazar Bag is situated near to Hanumangarhi temple;
Nazar Bag means Gifted Garden which was gifted by Man Singh, the king of Ayodhya to
Guru Nanak Dev in his honour. Presently a big Gurudvara has been constructed by Sikh
devotees and religious Sikh saints.
Sikh religion follows simple code of conduct based on precise and practical
guidelines laid out by the founder Guru (religious master) Nanak Deva for the practice of
the “Sikh way of life”. The Guru emphasised that a Sikh should lead a disciplined life
engaged in two important rituals, i.e. first meditation (simran), and second selfless
service (sewa). Gurudvara (the temple) is the main ceremonial place for performing
worship and other rituals. The ceremony of initiation into the Sikh religion is called the
Amrit ceremony. Every ritualistic ceremony is conducts in the presence of five baptized
Sikhs, called Panch Pyare, who wear the five Sikh symbols or Five ‘K’ of Sikh:
1. Kesha (long hair, which is never cut). This term is used to refer to the turban that
is used to cover the hair.
2. Kangha (comb)
3. Kachha (short pants)
4. Kada (metal bracelet)
5. Kirpan (a ceremonial dagger)
7. CONCLUDING REMARKS
Rituals play a very important role in every sphere of humankind. In Hindu religion rituals
starts from the birth (janma) and completed on death (mrityu). According to historical
proof in Hindu religion every people performs sixteen types of rituals on some
appropriate place – these places are called Ritual Landscape/ Ritualscapes. The Indian
Kumar & Singh (2017), Ayodhya (India): a study of Ritual Landscapes. Practising Geographer, 21 (2), Winter. 179
ritualistic city Ayodhya represents an aesthetic and unique type of cultural landscape that
include historical religious monuments, artefacts, ghats, water pools, traditional
performances, mythology and faiths, custom, folklore, festivities, pilgrimage route and
multi-cultural religious sites in the form of ritual landscapes. Ayodhya may certainly be
developed as a sacred place where divinity meets humanity and thus emerges the
landscapes of global understanding and harmony where Hindus, Jains, Sikhs, Buddhists,
Muslims, Sufis, and several other small congregations together develop a series and
variety of sacredscapes and ritualscapes characterised by mosaicness and religio-cultural
pluralities. This is warned that religious buildings (temples and shrines) form a large part
of the cultural heritage in South Asia, but little consciousness of historical value (Feilden,
1993: 1). In addition “with lack of understanding the universal importance of
heritagescapes and their resource value in promoting heritage tourism, increasing pace of
individualism and consumerism, the situation turned to be horrifying by constant threat
and destruction to such sites” (Singh, 2008: 96).
With the growing sense of tourism and wish to see culture in the mirror of history
and tradition, heritage resource management becomes a focal issue in both the ways:
protection and maintenance of sacred sites, and survival and continuity of pilgrimage
ceremonies; Ayodhya to be taken as a model example. Fostering a “rediscovery of
forgotten (or, about so) common cultural heritage and practices at sacred places that
centred on reverence to and harmony with the Earth as source and sustainer of life, the
conservation and preservation of such holy sites would put a strong step in this direction”
(Singh, 2006: 234).
8. REFERENCES
Bakker, Hans T. 1986. Ayodhya: The History of Ayodhya from the 17th Century BC to
the Middle of the 18th Century. Egbert Forsten, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Chakrabarti, Dilip K. 2000. Mahajanapadas States on ancient India; in, Hansen, Morgens
Herman (ed.) A Comparative Study of Thirty City-State Cultures. Danske
Videnskabernes Selskab, Copenhagen: pp. 375-391
der Veer, Peter Van 1988. Gods on Earth: Religious Experience and Identity in Ayodhya.
Oxford University Press, Delhi (reprinted 1997).
Duncan, James S., Johnson, Nuala C. and Schein, Richard H. (eds.), 2004. A Companion
to Cultural Geography. John Wiley & Sons.
Feilden, Bernard M. 1993. Is conservation of cultural heritage relevant to South Asia.
South Asian Studies, 9 (2): 1-10.
Führer, Alois A. 1891. The Monumental Antiquities and Inscription, in the North-
Western Provinces and Oudh. (Archaeological Survey of India). Govt. Press,
Allahabad.
Kumar, Sarvesh and Singh, Rana P.B. 2013. Waterfront Cultural Landscape of Ayodhya
(India), an Ancient Sacred Abode of Gods. South Asian Affairs (ISSN 1349-8851;
CSAS, Gifu Women’s University, Gifu, Japan), vol. 9: pp. 6-17.
Kumar, Sarvesh and Singh, Rana P.B. 2015 a. Cultural-Heritage Tourism in Ayodhya-
Faizabad: Scenario and Prospects. The Geographer (Geogr. Society, AMU
Aligarh), vol. 62 (2), July: pp. 66-74.
Kumar, Sarvesh and Singh, Rana P.B. 2015 b. Interfaces of Hindu Pilgrimage routes and
Agricultural Landscape: A Study of Ayodhya, India; in, Kohdrata, Naniek (ed.)
Proceedings, 4th ACLA International Symposium on Agricultural Landscape of
Asia: Learning, Preserving, and Redefining: 11~13 Sept. 2015. [Udayana
University, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia]: pp. 38-49.
Kumar, Sarvesh and Singh, Rana P.B. 2016-17. Ayodhyā, the holy city of India:
Riverfront and a Place of Indo-Korean interfacing symbolic Landscapes.
Kumar & Singh (2017), Ayodhya (India): a study of Ritual Landscapes. Practising Geographer, 21 (2), Winter. 180
Prof. Rana P.B. Singh, MA, PhD, FJF, FIFS, FAAI, FACLA, ‘Ganga-Ratna’, is Vice-
President, ACLA: Asian Cultural Landscape Association (SNU Seoul, Korea), and
Vice-President: BHAI, Big History Association of India, and was Professor of
Geography (spel. Cultural Geography & Heritage Studies), & Head (2013-2015),
Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, UP 221005, India.
Mob. (+091)-9838119474. Email: ranapbs@gmail.com
https://banaras.academia.edu/RanaPBSINGH/Papers/