- Acceptable Non acceptable
Using children in 1. As long as the kids are fully
advertisements willing to do it then yes, by
their own full will. The
importance of consent is my
point. Always ask for consent.
2. If the advertisement is
harmless, decent and
appropriate for everyone of
course it’s acceptable.
Using actors who 1. It depends on the situation.
pretend to be experts If the product isn’t that much
meaningful then yes. For
example, it would be fine to
use an actor who only uses
soap to advertise body wash,
because he would just be
doing his job which is acting.
2. If the actor has a good
influence over people, it
would be a waste to not use
that potential / power on
advertising even if they aren’t
experts.
1. It’d be very wrong if their
parents are only using them to
fulfill the parent’s lost
opportunities when they were
themselves children for the
sake of money, fame and
business they could’ve have if
they were them.
2. You may think otherwise
but making children look like
teenagers isn’t appropriate in
my opinion, it’s just spreading
early bad influence on TV or
elsewhere. A child should look
like a child, no with heavy
makeups, no mini-skirts nor
crop tops. And it has nothing
to do with pedophilia or
grooming but just because
being a child is precious and
innocent, so breaking that
image isn’t the best move.
1. It would be very
unacceptable if the actor is
promoting himself while he’s
actually a terrible person. For
example, if he’s part of a
campaign to give water in
Africa while he actually really
doesn’t care or is racist just to
make himself look like a good
person, and that’s just wrong
bc people lives and futures are
on the line and those are no
jokes.
2. If whatever they promoted
is actually really lame, useless
or disgusting and yet people
already spent their money just
 bc they’ve been fooled by
great acting.

Using nudity 1. If the goal is to get much 1. It just wakes many

more attention than it
normally should, then mission
accomplished. I think that’s
one fast and clever way of
getting a larger audience.
(target)
insecurities on people. And I
believe in the bible it says “do
not compare yourself to
others”, so it’s basically a sin
for those who watch the ad
and compare themselves.

2. it’s a great opportunity for 2. (This isn’t a very serious

the model/actor to get argument but maybe) the
noticed more by other brands. product would get jealous
because he knows the
attention isn’t fully on him or
not on him at all even.

Promoting alcohol on TV 1. As a non-drinker, I literally 1. Very obvious for everyone,

know nothing about alcoholic
beverages and yet there are
times I want to know things
about them, but since there
aren’t many ads about those
on TV, I’m still clueless on
which are well known or the
best. So, I think using that
technique where you ask
whether it's ok or not to let
that ad run and then typing a
quick parental password
would be nice.
2. All alcoholic beverages have may also have bad
their alcohol level on them so experiences or bad memories
I think promoting those with
low alcohol level won’t cause
harm while always reminding
people to consume alcohol
moderately.
alcohol isn’t good for our
health (if not consumed
moderately) and body, so it
won’t be right to advertise
such bad thing on TV.
2. There are many people out
there who are very bad at
controlling themselves, they
are easily tempted so if they
are in a fight against alcohol, it
won’t be fair to see ads about
those on TV especially since
alcohol isn’t harmless. They
with it.

Comparing your 1. Very childish move but if 1. That’s immature and not a
products to your I’m 100% sure my products business-like, friendly move.
competitors’ products are better, then yes. But it’d
be only acceptable in my 2. Because we all put hard
company’s point of view not work in our products so
theirs. comparing them would be
very offensive.
2. If they give my company
permission to compare one of
their products to ours then
that be acceptable for both
sides. Even if I think that never
happened and will never also.

An image flashed onto a 1. Isn’t curiosity the start of 1.

screen very quickly so everything? Because why
that people are would people even care if
influenced without they aren’t curious, a bit
noticing it interested.

2. And if they really didn’t

notice it but somehow felt like
there was something then
again, that may or would
wake their curiosity.

Exploiting people’s fears 1. That’s very clever. Rising 1.

and worries. people’s anxiety will make
them act faster like what
happened during the start of
the pandemic.

2.