ATTACHMENT 2 (g)

Course Report

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

The National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment

COURSE REPORT
(CR)

A separate Course Report (CR) should be submitted for every course and for each section or campus
location where the course is taught, even if the course is taught by the same person. Each CR is to be
completed by the course instructor at the end of each course and given to the program coordinator

A combined, comprehensive CR should be prepared by the course coordinator and the separate location
reports are to be attached.
 ‫المملكــة العربيــة السعوديــة‬
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
National Commission for
‫الهيئــــة الوطنيــــة للتقـويــم‬
Academic Accreditation & Assessment ‫واالعـــتــمـــاد األكــاديــمــــي‬

Course Report

For guidance on the completion of this template refer to the NCAAA handbooks or the NCAAA
Accreditation System help buttons.

Institution Date of Course Report

College/ Department

A. Course Identification and General Information

1. Course title Computer programming I Code # CSC102 Section # 11

2. Name of course instructor Location

Hiba Al-Senawi

3. Year and semester to which this report applies.

Fall 2014-2015

4. Number of students starting the course? 19 Students completing the course? 18

5. Course components (actual total contact hours and credits per semester):

Lecture Tutorial Laboratory Practical Other: Total

Contact
Hours 3

Credit
3 0 0 0 0 3

B. - Course Delivery

1. Coverage of Planned Program

Planned Actual Reason for Variations if there is a
Topics Covered Contact Contact difference of more than 25% of the
Hours Hours hours planned
Overview of programming languages 6 6
A quick tour of C++ 6 6
data types 6 6
Control statements 9 9
loop statements 9 12
Operators, and Expressions 6 6
Arrays 9 9
Pointers 6 9
Objects and Classes 6 6
Constructors and Methods 6 6

Form 5b_ Course Report _SSRP_1 JULY 2013 Page 2

 ‫المملكــة العربيــة السعوديــة‬
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
National Commission for
‫الهيئــــة الوطنيــــة للتقـويــم‬
Academic Accreditation & Assessment ‫واالعـــتــمـــاد األكــاديــمــــي‬

2. Consequences of Non Coverage of Topics

For any topics where the topic was not taught or practically delivered, comment on how significant you
believe the lack of coverage is for the course learning outcomes or for later courses in the program. Suggest
possible compensating action.

Topics (if any) not Fully Effected Learning Outcomes Possible Compensating Action
Covered

3. Course learning outcome assessment.

List course learning outcomes List methods of assessment Summary analysis of

assessment results
1 Knowledge  Lecture Very effective
 Group discussion
 Students will able to recognize the  Homework and assignment
fundamentals of Object-Oriented  E-Material
 Team Project
Design  Group discussion
 Describe the basics of  Quizzes
 Presentation
programming and how to write and  First and second exam
implement basic C++ code.  Interactive lecture
 Describe the program control
statements including if else, while,
for and the switch as well as
debugging techniques and
recursion.
 Define the scope, complexity and
other important issues in error
debugging and the program
organization using methods and
passing variables.
 Define how to write and
implement use of classes and
objects (Object Oriented
Programming OOP) will also be
introduced
 Describe different type of array
and how to define array and
retrieve data.

Form 5b_ Course Report _SSRP_1 JULY 2013 Page 3

 ‫المملكــة العربيــة السعوديــة‬
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
National Commission for
‫الهيئــــة الوطنيــــة للتقـويــم‬
Academic Accreditation & Assessment ‫واالعـــتــمـــاد األكــاديــمــــي‬

2 Cognitive Skills  Use the latest tools Very effective

 Lab and project assignments
 Problem solving instruction
 Distinguish the different  Group discussion
techniques of solving problems.

 Distinguish the imagination and

thinking in solving programming
problems
 Ability to analyze problems, and
design and evaluate suitable
solution to them.
 Distinguish the key program
development concepts and how
apply them to practical problems.
 Demonstrate awareness of the
construct objects and classes, and
understand how to use them in a
program and problem-solving.

3 Interpersonal Skills & Responsibility  Utilizing student’s abilities Very effective

as individuals and as a team.
 Class lecture.
 Discuss and work in a group in  Assignments
order to analyse and solve c++  Presentation
programs
 Able to evaluate the various
approaches for solving problem
through Individual tasks in the lab
in order to develop writing code
skills
 Survey and search to improve
thinking and writing codes.
 Self study on the tools that
might be used in doing analysis
C++ code and find the best
solution.
4 Communication, Information  Role playing Very effective
 Work individually and in
Technology, Numerical groups.
 Presentations
 Develop students' abilities in  Inform students with the
most important websites of
communications through working learning about databases.
on shared reports, projects and
presentations.

 Empower students in IS and IT

through Survey and search the net
for different topics in web
information system.

Form 5b_ Course Report _SSRP_1 JULY 2013 Page 4

 ‫المملكــة العربيــة السعوديــة‬
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
National Commission for
‫الهيئــــة الوطنيــــة للتقـويــم‬
Academic Accreditation & Assessment ‫واالعـــتــمـــاد األكــاديــمــــي‬

 Enhance students' utilization of IT

through writing the home and
reports using different computers
applications.

5 Psychomotor (Not Applicable)

Summarize any actions you recommend for improving teaching strategies as a result of evaluations in table
3 above.

4. Effectiveness of Planned Teaching Strategies for Intended Learning Outcomes set out in the Course
Specification. (Refer to planned teaching strategies in Course Specification and description of Domains of
Learning Outcomes in the National Qualifications Framework)

Were these Difficulties Experienced (if any) in Using

List Teaching Methods set out in Course Effective? the Strategy and Suggested Action to Deal
Specification No Yes with Those Difficulties.

 Lectures None

 Group work 

 First Exam and Second Exam

 Quizzes 

 End Term Exam 
 Homework
 Discussions during classes  None

 Case study

 Role playing
 Assignments  None

 Presentations

 Role plays

Form 5b_ Course Report _SSRP_1 JULY 2013 Page 5

 ‫المملكــة العربيــة السعوديــة‬
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
National Commission for
‫الهيئــــة الوطنيــــة للتقـويــم‬
Academic Accreditation & Assessment ‫واالعـــتــمـــاد األكــاديــمــــي‬

 Role playing  None


 Work individually and in groups

 Presentations 
 Inform students with the most
important websites of learning about
databases.

Note: In order to analyze the assessment of student achievement for each course learning outcome,
student performance results can be measured and assessed using a KPI, a rubric, or some grading system
that aligns student work, exam scores, or other demonstration of successful learning.
C. Results

1. Distribution of Grades

Letter Number of Student Explanation of Distribution of Grades

Grade Students Percentage
A+ 0 0 95 – 100 :(A+)
A 2 10.53 90 – 94 : (A)
B+ 2 10.53 85 – 89 :(B+)
B 1 5.26 80 – 84 :(B)
C+ 1 5.26 70 – 74 :(C+)
C 1 5.26 75 – 79 :(C)
D+ 3 15.79 60 – 64 :(D+)
D 4 21.05 65 – 69 :(D)
F
3 15.79 <60 :(F)
Denied
0 0
Entry
In Progress 0 0
Incomplete 1 5.26
Pass 14 73.68
Fail 3 15.79
Withdrawn 1 5.26
2. Analyze special factors (if any) affecting the results

Form 5b_ Course Report _SSRP_1 JULY 2013 Page 6

 ‫المملكــة العربيــة السعوديــة‬
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
National Commission for
‫الهيئــــة الوطنيــــة للتقـويــم‬
Academic Accreditation & Assessment ‫واالعـــتــمـــاد األكــاديــمــــي‬

3. Variations from planned student assessment processes (if any) (see Course Specifications).

a. Variations (if any) from planned assessment schedule (see Course Specification)
Variation Reason

None

Form 5b_ Course Report _SSRP_1 JULY 2013 Page 7

 ‫المملكــة العربيــة السعوديــة‬
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
National Commission for
‫الهيئــــة الوطنيــــة للتقـويــم‬
Academic Accreditation & Assessment ‫واالعـــتــمـــاد األكــاديــمــــي‬

b. Variations (if any) from planned assessment processes in Domains of Learning (see Course Specification)
Variation Reason
None

4. Student Grade Achievement Verification (eg. cross-check of grade validity by independent evaluator).

Method(s) of Verification Conclusion

D. Resources and Facilities

1. Difficulties in access to resources or 2. Consequences of any difficulties experienced for student

facilities (if any) learning in the course.

None

E. Administrative Issues

1 Organizational or administrative 2. Consequences of any difficulties experienced for student

difficulties encountered (if any) learning in the course.

None Students are very weak in English language.

F Course Evaluation

1 Student evaluation of the course (Attach survey results report)

a. List the most important recommendations for improvement and strengths

b. Response of instructor or course team to this evaluation

Form 5b_ Course Report _SSRP_1 JULY 2013 Page 8

 ‫المملكــة العربيــة السعوديــة‬
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
National Commission for
‫الهيئــــة الوطنيــــة للتقـويــم‬
Academic Accreditation & Assessment ‫واالعـــتــمـــاد األكــاديــمــــي‬

2. Other Evaluation (e.g. by head of department, peer observations, accreditation review, other stakeholders)

None

a. List the most important recommendations for improvement and strengths

None

b. Response of instructor or course team to this evaluation

None

G. Planning for Improvement

1. Progress on actions proposed for improving the course in previous course reports (if any).

Actions recommended
from the most recent Actions Taken Results Analysis
course report(s)

a. None

b.

c.

d.

Form 5b_ Course Report _SSRP_1 JULY 2013 Page 9

 ‫المملكــة العربيــة السعوديــة‬
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
National Commission for
‫الهيئــــة الوطنيــــة للتقـويــم‬
Academic Accreditation & Assessment ‫واالعـــتــمـــاد األكــاديــمــــي‬

2. List what actions have been taken to improve the course (based on previous CR, surveys, independent
opinion, or course evaluation).

3. Action Plan for Improvement for Next Semester/Year

Intended Action Points Start Completion Person
Actions Recommended and Process Date Date Responsible

a. None

b.
c.
d.
e.

Name of Course Instructor: Hiba Al-Senawi

Signature: ______________________________ Date Report Completed: 12/1/2015

Program Coordinator: Hiba Al-Senawi

Signature: ______________________________ Date Received: _________________________

Form 5b_ Course Report _SSRP_1 JULY 2013 Page 10