You are on page 1of 54

CHAPTER I

Background of the Study and Its Setting

Introduction

Before the invention of paper, people wrote on clay tablets, papyrus, parchment

and vellum. In ancient Mesopotamia, Egypt and Iran, cuneiform characters were placed

on wet clay tablets with a stylus made from a reed. Parchment is made from the untanned

skins of sheep, calves or goats, and it has been a writing medium for over two millennia.

Vellum is a finer quality of parchment that is made from the skins of very young animals,

such as lambs and calves. Vellum was used to create scrolls, codices, and books.

Produced from the pith of the Cyperus papyrus plant, papyrus was used in ancient Egypt

and other areas around the Mediterranean. The earliest evidence of papyrus was

unearthed in 2012 at Wadi al-Jarf, an ancient Egyptian harbor located on the Red Sea

coast. Dating from 2,560 – 2,550 B.C., the papyrus rolls describe the last years of the

building the Great Pyramid of Giza. Before the invention of paper, the Chinese wrote on

pieces of bamboo or on silk, but silk was expensive, and bamboo was heavy. Officially,

paper was invented in 105 A.D. by a Chinese court official named Ts'ai Lun, but in 2006,

a fragment of a paper map bearing Chinese characters and dating from 200 B.C. was

found at Fangmatan in northeast Gansu Province. What Lun had done was mix together

the bark of a mulberry tree, hemp, and shredded cloth rags with water, mash the mixture

into a pulp, press out the liquid, and hang the resulting sheets out to dry in the sun. The

word "paper" was derived from the word "papyrus", Ancient Greek for the Cyperus

papyrus plant, and paper was quickly adopted by the Chinese. It then spread via the Silk

Road to other parts of the world (Marcia Wendorf, 2019).

1
Paper alone accounts for 40% of all waste in the United States. That adds up to

about 71.6 million tons per year. What many hope to reduce, reuse, and recycle,

unfortunately and overwhelming ends up being dumped into a landfill. Waste from paper

is a big issue. It’s easy to forget that production of paper also has a devastating impact on

the world we live in. Deforestation has increased at an alarming rate. Paper

manufacturing used up to 40% of all global wood. The process of manufacturing paper

releases nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and carbon dioxide into the air, contributing to

pollution such as acid rain and greenhouse gases. Furthermore, the US consumes more

than 30% of all paper products globally, despite being only 5% of the world’s population

(Dennis Kempner, 2016). Deforestation represents one of the largest issues in global land

use and is estimated to be responsible for about 12% of greenhouse gas emissions.

Forests house carbon in wood, leaves, and soil. When loggers and developers cut down

forests, CO2 escapes into the atmosphere. A deforested area cannot absorb and store any

more CO2. Furthermore, animals and indigenous people who once depended on forests

for life can do so no longer, also removing trees deprives the forest of portions of its

canopy, which blocks the sun’s rays during the day and retains heat at night. That

disruption leads to more extreme temperature swings which can be harmful to plants and

animals (Christina Nunez, 2009). Though all of these seems alarming, a new possible

material in creating paper had been discovered by the researchers.

Cow dung, manure, or feces is indigestible plant material released on to the

ground from the intestine of a cow. Feces is generally not a favorite topic of

conversation, whether it comes from an animal or a human, though Cow dung is worth

discussing. It is a useful material and helps us in a variety of ways, it will be such a

2
shame to waste a plentiful renewable resource. This material turns out to be an excellent

source of cellulose for paper manufacturing in countries where trees are scarce, and in

regions with plenty of farm animals, upcycling manure into paper products could be a

cheap and environmentally sound method to get rid of this pervasive agricultural waste.

The manure is used as a rich fertilizer, an efficient fuel and biogas producer, a useful

building material, an insect repellent, a cleansing agent, and lastly, the possibility of cow

feces as an alternative of tree in the animal already chewed the plant and attacked it with

acid and enzymes. They inexpensively produce a nanocellulose that has the same or even

greater properties than nanocellulose from wood, with lower energy and chemical

composition.

Cow feces paper will be generated from the disposed digested plant matter. As

people used cows for draught work, milk and beef production, their poops are just lying

around and are being wasted, but little they did know that these manures can be as the

source of fiber in making paper. Therefore, efforts have been made to use cow feces for

various nonfood applications including fiber production. These papers are created from

the fiber found in poop, but the paper we use has probably been made from wood fiber

that comes from trees. Trees make good paper, but as the situation people are today, the

researchers think that they should not be chopped down if people are only going to use

paper to scribble on and throw it away. Precious trees should not be wasted, especially

when it can be made from poop, a waste material that is going spare.

The researchers studied cow feces as a waste material that has a lot of uses and

found out that its fiber and cellulose can also be an ingredient in creating industrialized

papers. This study was conducted to create paper that is not just eco-friendly but also

3
durable enough to replace paper made out of wood. As the researchers stumble the

thought that cow manures, a waste material that can be used in many ways is laying

wasted in the ground, they have concluded to use such material in order to lessen and

make use of what is readily available rather down cutting down trees causing many

environmental problems and a lot of work to do just to make a paper, to save cow feces

and to use it for other productive means. That is why the researchers conducted a study

using cow feces, which is a waste material and is said to produce papers from its fiber

and cellulose. The researchers also used cornstarch and flour, and wood ash as the active

materials for the paper’s binding process. Prior to these, the will of the researchers to at

least help in reducing the cases of this issues and help re-using tons of this cow feces

motivated them to undergo in this study.

Conceptual Framework

There are many theories as to who and when paper was invented, but the general

concensus is that a Chinese gentleman named T'sai Lun was responsible, sometime

around 105 AD. He was rumored to have been inspired by bees weaving fibers together,

which caused him to experiment on his own. Although he was not the first to create a

fiberous substrate, he is credited with creating a documented method to the art of

papermaking. At its most basic level, paper consists of small fibers that are bound

together by getting them wet and then drying them again. At the time, these fibers were

hard to come by. This meant paper was made entirely from recycled fibers like rags and

cotton. As time went on, the early innovators figured out how to shred plants like hemp

and bamboo into fibers that could be made into paper (Casey, 2017). As mentioned

above, this theory further added success to the study for the same action was applied in

4
making paper, and that is bounding the small fibers together by getting them wet and

drying them together except the researchers used binding materials to bind the paper.

The word paper is derived from the name of the reedy plant papyrus, which grows

abundantly along the Nile River in Egypt. In ancient times, the fibrous layers within the

stem of this plant were removed, placed side by side, and crossed at right angles with

another set of layers similarly arranged. The sheet so formed was dampened and pressed.

Upon drying, the gluelike sap of the plant, acting as an adhesive, cemented the layers

together. Complete defibring, an indispensable element in modern papermaking, did not

occur in the preparation of papyrus sheets. Papyrus was the most widely used writing

material in ancient times, and many papyrus records still survive (Britt, 1999). As

mentioned above, the gluelike sap of the plant acted as the adhesive of the paper to bind

it, this further added success in using cornstarch and wood ashes as the paper’s binding

material for when these are wet and dried it can also act as an adhesive.

There is also a similar concept in making paper, and that is making paper out of

elephant dung. It began its journey to a new destination in Sri-Lanka around 1997 and has

gone viral for adopting a genius idea of generating handmade papers out of animal waste.

It is not only helping the environment to sustain longer but also has opened up a very new

employment chain for the people living in Sri Lanka (Nishat, 2019). As mentioned above,

the same concept was made that furthers strengthened the liability of the creation of the

cow feces paper which therefore help the researchers conclude that this material turns out

to be an excellent source of cellulose for paper manufacturing in countries where trees are

scarce.

5
Experimental Research Paradigm

Hypothesis

Examination of the durability of the


Procedures of production of the cow feces paper with mixed
cow feces paper cornstarch and flour, and wood ash

Cow Feces Paper

Durability of the Cow Feces


Paper based on the Assessed
Data

Statement of the Research Problem

This research, entitled “The Durability of Cow Feces as Paper”, aims to save cow

feces and make use of it for other productive means. As such, the following questions and

sub-questions help them arrive in their conclusion.

1. How durable is cow feces paper in terms of:

a. texture

b. color

c. absorbance

d. ability as a paper

6
2. What is the texture of cow feces as paper when combined with:

a. mixed cornstarch and flour;

b. mixed cornstarch and flour, and the wood ashes?

3. What is the difference when a certain motion is applied in forming the cow feces

paper in the silk screen, such motions are:

a. circular motion

b. front side to back side motion

c. tilting motion

Hypothesis of the Study

There is a significant relationship between the binding process and the durability

of cow feces paper.

Significance of the Study

The researchers studied feces as a waste material that has lot of uses and found

that its mostly made up of fiber that can be a material in creating industrialized papers.

The researchers came up with this idea to save cow feces and use it to other productive

means. Cow feces is only known for its agricultural purpose(fertilizer) this research study

proves that there are more products that can be produced using cow feces. In addition, the

cost of the product will be cheaper and the production will be easier since cow feces are

readily available anywhere.

Barangay Officials. The barangay officials involved in the study will benefit since

collecting cow feces from their lots and farming lots can help maintain the cleanliness of

7
their area, thus, keeping a visitor-friendly barangay. Clean and healthy environment is for

the good of all and should, therefore, be the concern of all.

Farmers. Cow dung contains harmful bacteria that make people and pet sick when

not properly disposed. Helping them collect cow feces could be a very useful and

beneficial for both the farmers and the researchers.

Future researchers. With this study, future researchers can already have a

grounded knowledge in hope that they will refine this study more and/or even much

better, they will find this study and find other ways or materials in producing paper.

Researchers. This study will be beneficial to the researchers for they may improve

the development of producing a paper out of cow feces. It is also beneficial for the

researchers for with this study, they may help reduce the issues that concern the

environment.

Students. Teachers often ask students to do projects using scrap books, portfolios,

envelops, boxes, etc. This research could play a great role in providing paper products to

students. Instead of buying expensive products from commercial stationary stores they

could use the finish products and help researchers promote it. In return this research

could be the biggest breakthrough in which OLPCC will be known if the researchers had

succeeded in creating the said product.

Teachers. Teachers uses a lot of notebooks and scratch books in order for them to

fully learn what they should teach and t is unavoidable that it will cost a lot, therefore,

this research of making paper in your home can be very beneficial to them to as they no

longer need to buy, instead, made it by themselves.

8
Scope and Delimitation of the Study

This study was conducted to find out if cow feces with cornstarch and flour, and

wood ash can be an alternative for trees in making paper and focuses on the study of cow

feces as paper, it will test its durability in terms of texture, absorbance and ability as a

paper. The researchers choose cow feces as the main component for the alternative paper

for they have found out the potentiality and its availability. There are some materials that

has been added for some purposes, namely: cornstarch and wood ashes for binding the

paper and bleach to whiten the color of the paper. This study is delimited into collecting

feces in barangay Minante I, Cauayan City, Isabela during the month of January to

March. The product was tested by the researchers themselves of its durability and

capability as a writing material. The durability of cow feces paper was determined based

and compared on the standards of the commercial paper that people are using today.

Definition of Terms

Absorbance, used as one of the factors to assess the durability of the cow feces

paper where it’s the ability of a layer of the paper to absorb the ink.

Color, also used as one of the factors to assess the durability of cow feces paper in

change of color over time.

Cornstarch, a finely ground corn flour used as a material to smoothen the texture

of the cow feces paper.

Cow feces, also known as cow pats, cow pies or cow manure, is the waste product

(feces) of a cow to be used as the main ingredient in making the paper.

9
Durable, able to withstand all writing activities done in the cow feces paper the

same with commercial paper.

Flour, a powder made by grinding raw grains, roots, beans, nuts, or seed used as a

material to bind the cow feces paper.

Paper, a commercial paper to be used for comparing the cow feces paper to know

whether it is durable enough.

Texture, the feel, appearance, or consistency of the cow feces paper used to assess

whether it is smooth or roughed surfaced.

Wood ashes, the remains of burned wood or plants that will be used as one of the

materials to bind and make the cow feces paper smoother.

10
CHAPTER II

Review of Related literature and Studies

This chapter presents detailed explanation of literature and studies that has been

conducted relevant to the different variables of the durability of cow feces as paper.

Foreign Literature

In India, cattle’s rearing is a tradition in the country and intimately limited to the

agricultural economy. Different products obtained from cow milk, ghee, curd, urine, and

dung are used widely in a number of ayurvedic formulations. Cow dung is traditionally

used as organic fertilizer in Indian sub-continental farming for centuries. The addition of

cow dung increases the mineral status of soil, enhances the resistance of plant against

pests and diseases; stimulate plant growth and other beneficial activities such as sulpho

oxidation and phosphorus solubilization.

The Hindu Vedas say that the cow is holy and should be worshiped. In India,

cows are very important animal resources and are highly useful in agriculture and dairy

industry. Panchagavya is a term used to describe five major substances, obtained from

cow, which include cow's urine, milk, ghee, curd and dung. All the five products possess

medicinal properties against many disorders. This kind of treatment is called

Panchagavya therapy or cowpaths. Cowpathy is an old system of medicine mentioned in

ancient Indian literature (Ayurveda) as Panchagavya Chikitsa. The ayurvedic medicines

of animal origin are mainly prepared from Panchagavya which boost up the body

immune system and makes the body refractory to various diseases. Although some Indian

literature mentioned the medicinal property of cow excretion, only a few were proved.

11
Several useful properties of cow urine got confirmed by researchers’ patent also. But

there is no report available on antimicrobial activity of cow dung.

In India, 69.9 % population resides in rural areas, where cow (Bos indicus) is

major cattle and generates 9–15 kg dung/day (Werner et al. 1989). Waste is generally

meant for discarding because it may act as a source of pollution (Pongrácz & Pohjola,

2004). However, if it is used in some other process such as feedstock it may be

considered as co-product (Brown, 2003). People in Indian villages use cow dung for

cooking purpose by direct burning. It is also used in plastering of walls and floor in rural

houses for providing insulation during winter and summer. Application of smoke

generated from the burnt cow dung as mosquito repellent and subsequent ash as cleaning

agent for kitchen utensils is an old age practice. Accordingly, different usage of cow dung

by village peoples reflect the native knowledge associated with it. It also depicted that

cow plays an important role in village economy and has high socio-economic value

(Dhama et al. 2005).

In some cases, cow feces played an important role in different ways. It can be

called as a organic fertilizer and it can also play an important cultural role. As we found

out that the application of smoke generated from the burnt cow dung can be used as a

mosquito repellent together with subsequent ash as cleaning agent for kitchen utensils

that helps us on our daily needs. We also found out that cow's urine, milk, ghee, curd and

dung possess medicinal properties against many disorders. This kind of treatment is

called Panchagavya therapy or cowpaths. Cowpathy is an old system of medicine

mentioned in ancient Indian literature (Ayurveda) as Panchagavya Chikitsa. The

12
ayurvedic medicines of animal origin are mainly prepared from Panchagavya which

boost up the body immune system and makes the body refractory to various diseases.

Generally speaking, the decline in quality of paper can be attributed to the

following factors: (1) increas- ing use of paper, which has lowered standards; (2) the fact

that the public is not educated to demand better-grade paper; (3) production of paper by

machine; and (4) low prices, which necessitate the use of cheaper materials. Basically,

how- ever, the reasons for this decline are: (1) damage to the fibers in the process of

machine work; (2) use of minerals, especially the filler; (3) excessive bleaching,

particularly by means of calcium hypochlorite; (4) use of alum; and (5) discovery of

mechanical wood pulp by Friedrich Gottlob Keller in 1845. In the period of transition

from handmade to machine-made paper, the problem of upholding the high standards for

paper- making arose. The resultant loss of quality in the properties of paper especially

that used in newspapers called for a united effort on the part of those concerned over this

decline. This effort may be traced from the beginnings made by Ernst Hartig and Fritz

Hoyer in 1881 and the foundation in 1884 of a division for paper-testing in the present-

day Materialprü- fungsamt (Institute for the Testing of Materials), Berlin- Dahlem, to the

year 1886, when Martens succeeded in estab- lishing the first standards for printing-

paper. These standards led to the extended science of paper making as recorded in the

work of Wilhelm Herzberg, Papierprüfung. The question of paper-testing was studied by

Delisle in France, Franz Ehrle in Italy, the Library Association' and H. M. Stationery

Office in England, the Committee on the Deterioration of Paper in the Department of

Agriculture in the United States, and, finally, it * Norman

13
In this review, the cited work generally speaking the decline in quality of paper

that can be attributed to the following factors: (1) increasing use of paper, which has

lowered standards; (2) the fact that the public is not educated to demand better-grade

paper; (3) production of paper by machine; and (4) low prices, which necessitate the use

of cheaper materials.

Local Literature

According to De Jesus, Seb. (2018) There are many items which can be recycled

in order to lessen the waste thrown every day, they are stuck to paper because they found

it easier to recycle and decorate for it will eventually become part of the environment.

They are focused on recycling and upcycling paper. They collect used paper --

newspapers, telephone directories, cereal boxes -- and use them to create notebooks and

other stationary products with original artwork covers. The bulk of their raw material are

collected and bought from companies who sell scrap paper for recycling. In this article,

the same theory was applied in creating paper, that is recycling fiber from waste or used

materials.

According to Bianca Fernandez in the article Revista Virtual de Quimica, A

growing demand for renewable energy makes the production of briquettes a good

alternative source of energy. This study aims to evaluate the effect of using commercial

cornstarch as a binder in the production of briquettes from sugarcane bagasse. Analysis of

specific weight, gross calorific value, moisture content, volatile and ash content were

performed for both materials. In this, cornstarch was studied to its potentiality as an

active material for binding process which has proven the viability of using cornstarch as a

binding material in our study.

14
According to Algar et al. (2019), starch is considered as one of the most important

plant products for human consumption as it provides a large portion of the daily calorific

intake. The major sources of starch for food use are cereals, but roots and tubers are also

important. Among the main crops that are harvested for starch production are maize, rice,

wheat, and potato which are also considered as staple food crops. Because of the many

uses of starch, its demand also increases. The high amylose content can highly contribute

to good textural properties. It is considered as a versatile and cheap material and has

many uses such as thickener, water binder, emulsion stabilizer, and gelling agent; thus, its

form and functionality are always studied. In this cited work, the starch used in the

cornstarch has its potential to be a good active ingredient because of its uses stated above

that are great for the binding process of the paper. The findings are highly relevant to the

research and help the researchers to find potential active ingredients to successfully create

the cow feces paper.

Foreign Studies

Ofoefule, Akuzuo U. , Nwankwo, Joseph I. et. al. in Advances in Applied Science

Research, 1 (2): 1-8, 2010 that the paper waste which abound everywhere including the

immediate environment is a very good feedstock for biogas production. This waste can be

utilized for energy generation instead of burning them up or having them littered around

and invariably constituting a nuisance to the environment. The study has also shown that

blending the paper waste with cow dung or any other animal waste will give sustained

gas flammability throughout the digestion period of the waste since animal wastes are

good starters for poor producing wastes.

15
In the study of Blaise Pascal Bougnom, Onguene Dieudonne ,. et al. It was

conducted to produce high-quality compost using both cow manure and wood ash that

can specifically be used to increase the fertility of soils in tropical regions. Increased

proportions of wood ash were co-composted with cow manure.

According to Russle C. R. (1973) That the consumption of starch products as wet-

end additives, surface sizes, and coating adhesives. The 1972 figures were ohtained by

extrapolating the data reported (3) for 1968. for extrapolation, an average annual growth

rate of 4.6% was assumed. This assumption seems reasonable because the production of

paper and paperboard is reported (21) to have increased at an average annual rate of

4.6g.; since 1968. In 1964 the figure for all types of starches used as wet-end additives

was 186 million pounds (3) Which at that time would correspond to about 156 million

pounds of corn starch products. In a view of the estimated use of 156 million pounds of

corn starches at the wet end in 1964 and the rise in paper production.

According to Brückle (2009). Bleaching in paper production versus conservation.

the bleaching treatment of paper in restoration shows both similarities and differences to

the bleaching of fiber in paper manufacture. These differences are shown in an overview.

Parallels of historical development are sketched using the example of light bleaching. In

this review we cited different articles, in certain cases cow dung contributes a lot in our

environment. It can be blended with paper waste sustained gas flammability throughout

the digestion period and a very good feedstock for Biogas Production. Also, we found out

that wood ash cornstarch and bleaching of paper can be useful and will help in many

aspects specially on creating a paper.

Local Studies

16
According to Parayno and Busmente, recycling paper provides several

advantages. Every ton of paper used for recycling saves at least 30,000 liters of water,

3000−4000 kWh of electricity (enough for an average 3bedroom house for one year), and

75% of air pollution. Producing recycled paper involves between 28-70 percent less

energy consumption than virgin paper and uses less water. This is because most of the

energy in papermaking is used in the process of pulping to turn wood into paper.

Parayno and Busmente also said that recycled paper produces less air (95% of air

pollution). Recycled paper is not usually rebleached and if it is, oxygen rather than

chlorine is usually used. This reduces the amount of dioxins, which are released into the

environment as a by-product of the chlorine bleaching processes. For every metric ton of

recycled paper, seventeen trees are saved. Recycled paper reduces water pollution by 35

percent and uses 60 percent less water than the manufacture of virgin paper. Every metric

ton of recycled paper eliminates the need for 3 cubic meters of landfills given that paper

comprises 55 percent of today’s landfills, plastic about 14 percent.

In the study of William Henry Brown and Arthur Frederick Fischer, they said that

the increasing difficulty of obtaining wood pulp for paper has led to the examination of a

great variety of substances to be used as substitutes. The possibilities for paper pulp in the

Philippines have been investigated by Richmond and reported on in a series of articles in

the Philippine Journal of Science. Since Richmond's articles appeared very little

information has been obtained concerning paper, except in regard to supply and yield of

materials.

17
CHAPTER III

Research Methodology and Procedures

In this chapter, the research methodology used in the study was described. The

area where the study was conducted, the data gathering instrument used and in gathering

data, procedures, including methods implemented were described. This chapter discusses

the various tools and techniques used to conduct the research study.

Methods of Research

The experimental method was used in conducting this study. Experimental

research is a scientific approach to research, where it directs the experiment by

orchestrating data collection, defines the statistical analysis of the resultant data, and

guides the interpretation of the results by the researchers since the study is focused on the

durability of the cow feces paper to replace paper made out of wood (Knight, 2010). In

addition, observational method was also used in the study, as the name suggests, it is a

way of collecting relevant information and data by observing in order to get the

information needed pertaining the paper’s difference to a paper made out of wood

(Bhasin, 2020).

Respondents of the Study

18
The study was limited to gather data with the researchers, four Grade 10 Science

Class Curriculum of the Junior Highschool Department, themselves as respondents in

conducting the durability of the cow feces paper. Therefore, convenience sampling has

been used as the sampling procedure in the study. Convenience sampling is a type of

nonprobability sampling in which people are sampled simply because they are convenient

sources of data for researchers or readily available.

Experimental Treatments

Table 1.
Different Amount of Mixed Cornstarch and Flour
Treatment Amount of Cow Feces Amount of mixed
Cornstarch and Flour
1 450 g 275 g
2 450 g 375 g
3 450 g 575 g

For Table 1, the researchers used 450 grams of cow feces and different amount of

mixed cornstarch and flour. In this table, the researchers start off with the ratio of 18:11

as the base for the paper and a sequence of increasing amount of cornstarch to see

whether it is a changing factor for the paper.

Table 2.
Different Amount of Mixed Cornstarch and Flour, and Wood Ash
Treatment Amount of Cow Feces Amount of mixed
Cornstarch and flour, and
Wood Ash
1 450 g 275 g
2 450 g 375 g
3 450 g 575 g

19
For Table 2, the researchers used 450 grams of cow feces and different amount of

mixed cornstarch and flour, and wood ash. In this table, the researchers start off with the

ratio of 18:11 as the base for the paper and a sequence of increasing amount of mixed

cornstarch and wood ash to see whether both of it is a changing factor for the paper.

Data Gathering Instruments to be Used

1. Experimental Method

Blender, is a machine that mixes things together, used to chop/mix/crash

everything into little pieces.

Flat sheet of sack, is a bag made out of bounded strips of plastics, used to

lay flat the feces for drying.

Huge pot, a container, typically rounded or cylindrical and of ceramic

ware or metal, used for boiling the poop.

Ladle, a large long-handled spoon with a cup-shaped bowl, used to

mix/stir the poop from the huge pan.

Large flat container, used as a container to put the pulp in with the water.

Measuring spoons, spoons with definite measurements usually made of

plastic, used to measure the amount of the materials needed.

Bucket/jar, a roughly cylindrical open container, typically made of metal

or plastic, with a handle, filled with water used to wash the feces.

Silk screen, a screen of fine mesh, used in forming the paper.

20
Sponge, a tool or cleaning aid made of soft, porous material, used to

absorb the excess water from the paper.

2. Observational Method

Questionnaires has been used to collect data from the respondents.

Attention was given to the paper based on the 21 items questionnaire that

determined the durability of cow feces paper in terms of texture, color,

absorbance, and ability as a paper.

Data Gathering Procedures

1. Experimental Method

In using mixed cornstarch and flour for the binding process.

Step 1. Soak the dried feces in a pot filled with water to clean it for atleast a day

Step 2. Sink the cleaned feces in a clean fresh water for 3-5 times

Step 3. Put it to a pot and wait for it to boil, leave it for about an hour or more

while boiling and let it rest for four(4) hours

Step 4. Soak the boiled feces in a pot filled with bleach and water

Step 5. Blend the feces and the certain amount of cornstarch and flour for 2-4

minutes

Step 6. Prepare the silk screen, and a large flat container filled with water

Step 7. Put the silk screen in the container and pour the blended pulp

Step 8. Move the silk screen with a certain motion

Step 9. Pull it up and let the water drains

Step 10. Gently dab a sponge to the pulp in the silk screen

21
Step 11. Place the silk screen in an area where the sun is exposed and wait for the

paper to dry for about 2-4 hours

Step 12. When dried, carefully detach the paper in the silk screen

Step 13. Cut the paper

In using mixed cornstarch and flour, and wood ash for the binding process.

Step 1. Soak the dried feces in a pot filled with water to clean it for atleast a day

Step 2. Sink the cleaned feces in a clean fresh water for 3-5 times

Step 3. Put it to a pot and wait for it to boil, leave it for about an hour or more

while boiling and let it rest for four(4) hours

Step 4. Soak the boiled feces in a pot filled with bleach and water

Step 5. Blend the feces and the certain amount of cornstarch and flour, and wood

ash for 2-4 minutes

Step 6. Prepare the silk screen, and a large flat container filled with water

Step 7. Put the silk screen in the container and pour the blended pulp

Step 8. Move the silk screen with a certain motion

Step 9. Pull it up and let the water drains

Step 10. Gently dab a sponge to the pulp in the silk screen

Step 11. Place the silk screen in an area where the sun is exposed and wait for the

paper to dry for about 2-4 hours

Step 12. When dried, carefully detach the paper in the silk screen

Step 13. Cut the paper

Statistical Tools Used

22
Weighted mean. This is to determine the rate of the most favorable treatment for

the products. Its formula is x=


∑x
N

The gathered data were tabulated and computed using MS excel with formula of

getting of mean average during the month of March and April. In finding the weighted

mean, the researchers used this formula:

( 5 ) n+ ( 4 ) n+ ( 3 ) n+ ( 2 ) n+ ( 1 ) n
WM=
N

Where:

WM=Weighted Mean

N= Number of Respondents

n= Number of Responses

Interpretation Used in the Study

The Researchers used Likert scale to determine the Durability of Cow Feces

Paper. Developed in 1932 by Rensis Likert1 to measure attitudes, the typical Likert scale

is a 5- or 7-point ordinal scale used by respondents to rate the degree to which they agree

or disagree with a statement (Sullivan & Artino, 2013).

Table 3.
Weighted Mean and Interpretation on Durability and Texture of Paper
Weighted Scale Range Interpretation
5 4.20-5.00 Strongly agree
4 3.40-4.19 Agree
3 2.60-3.39 Neutral
2 1.80-2.59 Disagree

23
1 1.00-1.79 Strongly disagree

The range shall be applied to interpret the agreement of the respondents to the

durability of the cow feces paper, both the combination of mixed amount of cornstarch

and flour, and cornstarch and four, and wood ash, compared to a commercial paper in

terms of texture, color, absorbance and ability as a paper.

CHAPTER IV

Presentation, Analysis, and Interpretation of Data

This chapter presents the data gathered, the results of the statistical analysis done,

and interpretation of findings presented in tables following the sequence of the specific

research problems regarding the Durability of Cow Feces Paper with Cornstarch and

Flour, and Wood Ash. The researchers analyzed characteristics of the products and

answered the questionnaire themselves. The findings are discussed according to the six(6)

variants in the questionnaire.

These are the information that has been gathered to determine the durability of

cow feces paper. These show the outcome of the conducted evaluation of the product.

Meanwhile, the analysis of the data given will be elaborated for further understanding.

Table 4.
Weighted Mean of the Cow Feces Paper with mixed
Cornstarch and Flour in Terms of Texture.

24
Treatment 1 Treatment 2 Treatment 3

Statement Weighted Interpretation Weighted Interpretation Weighted Interpretation


Mean Mean Mean
1 4 Agree 2.75 Neutral 2 Disagree
2 2.5 Disagree 3.25 Neutral 4 Agree
3 Strongly
4.75 Agree 2.75 Neutral 3.25 Neutral
4 Strongly
3.75 Agree 3 Neutral 1.75 Disagree
5 3.75 Agree 2.75 Neutral 3.25 Neutral
General
Durability
Rate 3.75 Agree 2.9 Neutral 2.85 Neutral

Table 4 queries the durability of the cow feces paper with mixed cornstarch and

flour in terms of texture. In treatment 1, the paper’s appeal in terms of texture of being

smooth and rough at the same time was the only statement rated strongly agree by the

respondents and garnered the highest rate in terms of texture. In treatment 2, however, the

papers’ roughness, smoothness, and smoothness at the same time roughness were rated

neutral by the respondents. In treatment 3, the respondents rated its roughness agree and

strongly agree in looking rough but is smooth when touched. Moreover, the most durable

treatment of the cow feces paper with mixed cornstarch and flour in terms of texture is

treatment 1.

Table 5.
Weighted Mean of the Cow Feces Paper with mixed
Cornstarch and Flour, and Wood Ash in Terms of Texture.
Treatment 1 Treatment 2 Treatment 3

Statement Weighted Interpretation Weighted Interpretation Weighted Interpretation


Mean Mean Mean
1 Strongly
4 Agree 4 Agree 4.25 Agree

25
2 Strongly
2.75 Neutral 1.75 Disagree 2 Disagree
3 3.75 Agree 3 Neutral 2.25 Disagree
4 3 Neutral 3.75 Agree 3.5 Agree
5 3 Neutral 2.5 Neutral 2.75 Neutral
General
Durability
Rate 3.3 Neutral 3 Neutral 2.95 Neutral

Table 5 queries the durability of the cow feces paper with mixed cornstarch and

flour, and wood ash in terms of texture. In treatment 1, the paper’s appeal in terms of

texture of being smooth and rough at the same time was the only statement rated agree by

the respondents. In treatment 2, the papers’ smoothness and appeal of being rough but is

smooth when touched were rated agree by the respondents, furthermore, the roughness of

the paper was rated strongly agree which has garnered the highest rate in terms of texture.

In treatment 3, the respondents rated its smoothness strongly agree and agree in looking

rough but is smooth when touched. Moreover, all the treatments of the cow feces paper

with mixed cornstarch and flour, and wood ash were rated neutral of its durability in

terms of texture.

Table 6.
Weighted Mean of the Cow Feces Paper with mixed
Cornstarch and Flour in Terms of Color.
Treatment 1 Treatment 2 Treatment 3

Statement Weighted Interpretation Weighted Interpretation Weighted Interpretation


Mean Mean Mean
1 3.5 Agree 2.5 Neutral 3.25 Neutral
2 3 Neutral 3.5 Agree 3.25 Neutral
3 Strongly
4.5 Agree 3 Neutral 3.5 Neutral
4 Strongly Strongly
1.5 Disagree 2.5 Neutral 1.75 Disagree

26
General
Durability
Rate 3.125 Neutral 2.875 Neutral 2.9375 Neutral

Table 6 queries the durability of the cow feces paper with mixed cornstarch and

flour in terms of color. In treatment 1, the paper’s lightness in color was rated agree by

the respondents, furthermore, the paper’s appealing color garnered the highest rate. The

paper’s darkness in color was the only rated neutral by the respondents. In treatment 2,

the paper’s lightness in color and appeal were rated neutral by the respondents and agree

in the paper’s darkness in color. In treatment 3, the paper’s lightness and darkness in

color and appeal were rated neutral by the respondents and strongly disagree in not

having an appealing color. Moreover, all the treatments of the cow feces paper with

mixed cornstarch and flour were rated neutral of its durability in terms of color.

Table 7.
Weighted Mean of the Cow Feces Paper with mixed
Cornstarch and Flour, and Wood Ash in Terms of Color.
Treatment 1 Treatment 2 Treatment 3

Statement Weighted Interpretation Weighted Interpretation Weighted Interpretation


Mean Mean Mean
1 2.75 Neutral 2.75 Neutral 3.75 Agree
2 3 Neutral 3.5 Agree 2.5 Disagree
3 Strongly
4.25 Agree 2 Disagree 2.25 Disagree
4 2 Disagree 4 Agree 3.25 Neutral
General
Durability
Rate 3 Neutral 3.0625 Neutral 2.9375 Neutral

Table 7 queries the durability of the cow feces paper with mixed cornstarch and

flour, and wood ash in terms of color. In treatment 1, the paper’s lightness and darkness

27
in color was rated neutral by the respondents, furthermore, the paper’s appealing color

garnered the highest rate. In treatment 2, the paper’s darkness in color and not having an

appealing color were rated agree by the respondents. In treatment 3, the paper’s lightness

was rated agree by the respondents and disagree to the darkness and in having an

appealing color of the paper. Moreover, all the treatments of the cow feces paper with

mixed cornstarch and flour, and wood ash were rated neutral of its durability in terms of

color.

Table 8.
Weighted Mean of the Cow Feces Paper with mixed
Cornstarch and Flour in Terms of Absorbance.
Treatment 1 Treatment 2 Treatment 3

Statement Weighted Interpretation Weighted Interpretation Weighted Interpretation


Mean Mean Mean
1 Strongly
2.75 Neutral 2 Disagree 4.25 Agree
2 Agree Strongly Strongly
4 4.5 Agree 4.25 Agree
3 Strongly Strongly
4.5 Agree 4 Agree 4.5 Agree
4 Strongly
3 Neutral 1.75 Disagree 3.75 Agree
General
Durability
Rate 3.5625 Agree 3.0625 Neutral 4.1875 Agree

Table 8 queries the durability of the cow feces paper with mixed cornstarch and

flour in terms of absorbance. In treatment 1, the paper’s natural absorbance of the ink and

28
visibility of writings were rated neutral by the respondents, furthermore, the paper’s

ability in letting the ink dry naturally and does not smudge garnered the highest rate. In

treatment 2, the respondents disagree with the paper’s natural absorbance of the ink,

however, they strongly agree with the paper’s transparency of not letting the ink bleed

which also garnered the highest rate. In treatment 3, the respondents agree with the

paper’s visibility of writings and the paper’s natural absorbance of the ink, transparency

of not letting the ink bleed and ability in letting the ink dry naturally and does not smudge

were rated strongly agree by the respondents. Moreover, two of the treatments of the cow

feces paper with mixed cornstarch and flour, namely treatment 1 and 2 with a difference

of 0.625, were rated agree of its durability in terms of absorbance.

Table 9.
Weighted Mean of the Cow Feces Paper with mixed
Cornstarch and Flour, and Wood Ash in Terms of Absorbance.
Treatment 1 Treatment 2 Treatment 3

Statement Weighted Interpretation Weighted Interpretation Weighted Interpretation


Mean Mean Mean
1 Strongly Strongly
1 Disagree 2 Disagree 1 Disagree
2 Strongly Strongly
1 Disagree 4 Agree 1 Disagree
3 Strongly Strongly
1 Disagree 4 Agree 1 Disagree
4 Strongly Strongly
1 Disagree 2 Disagree 1 Disagree
General
Durability Strongly Strongly
Rate 1 Disagree 3 Neutral 1 Disagree

Table 9 queries the durability of the cow feces paper with mixed cornstarch and

flour, and wood ash in terms of absorbance. In treatment 1, the respondents strongly

29
disagree with the paper’s natural absorbance of the ink, transparency of not letting the ink

bleed, ability in letting the ink dry naturally and does not smudge and visibility of

writings. In treatment 2, the respondents disagree with the paper’s natural absorbance of

the ink and visibility of writings, however, they agree with the paper’s transparency of

not letting the ink bleed and ability in letting the ink dry naturally and does not smudge.

In treatment 3, , the respondents strongly disagree with the paper’s natural absorbance of

the ink, transparency of not letting the ink bleed, ability in letting the ink dry naturally

and does not smudge and visibility of writings. Moreover, two of the treatments of the

cow feces paper with mixed cornstarch and flour, namely treatment 1 and 3, were rated

strongly disagree of its durability in terms of absorbance and neutral in treatment 2.

Table 10.
Weighted Mean of the Cow Feces Paper with mixed
Cornstarch and Flour in Terms of Ability as a Paper.
Treatment 1 Treatment 2 Treatment 3

Statement Weighted Interpretation Weighted Interpretation Weighted Interpretation


Mean Mean Mean
1 2 Disagree 2.25 Disagree 4 Agree
2 Strongly Strongly
4.5 Agree 3.5 Agree 1.75 Disagree
3 Strongly
3.25 Neutral 3.5 Agree 1.75 Disagree
4 2.5 Disagree 2 Disagree 4 Agree
5 Strongly
1 Disagree 4 Agree 2 Disagree
6 Strongly
5 Agree 2 Disagree 4 Agree
7 Strongly
3 Neutral 3 Neutral 4.25 Agree
8 Strongly Strongly
2.25 Disagree 1.75 Disagree 5 Agree
General
Durability
Rate 2.9375 Neutral 2.75 Neutral 3.34375 Neutral

30
Table 10 queries the durability of the cow feces paper with mixed cornstarch and

flour in terms of ability as a paper. In treatment 1, the respondents strongly agree that the

cow feces paper is difficult to write on and to fold, furthermore, they also disagree that

the paper can be a writing material. In treatment 2, the respondents agree that the cow

feces paper is difficult to written on and easy to cut and fold. In treatment 3, the

respondents strongly disagree that the cow feces paper is hard to write on and easy to cut,

furthermore, they strongly agree that the paper can be a writing material. Moreover, all

the treatments of the cow feces paper with mixed cornstarch and flour were rated neutral

of its durability in terms of ability as a paper.

Table 11.
Weighted Mean of the Cow Feces Paper with mixed
Cornstarch and Flour, and Wood Ash in Terms of Ability as a Paper.
Treatment 1 Treatment 2 Treatment 3

Statement Weighted Interpretation Weighted Interpretation Weighted Interpretation


Mean Mean Mean
1 Strongly Strongly
1 Disagree 2 Disagree 1 Disagree
2 Strongly Strongly
5 Agree 4 Agree 4.75 Agree
3 Strongly Strongly
1 Disagree 1 Disagree 2.25 Disagree
4 Strongly Strongly
5 Agree 5 Agree 3.5 Agree
5 Strongly
1 Disagree 2 Disagree 3.5 Agree
6 Strongly
5 Agree 4 Agree 2.5 Disagree
7 Strongly Strongly
1 Disagree 2.25 Disagree 1.5 Disagree
8 Strongly Strongly
1 Disagree 2 Disagree 1.75 Disagree

31
General
Durability
Rate 2.5 Disagree 2.78125 Neutral 2.59375 Disagree

Table 11 queries the durability of the cow feces paper with mixed cornstarch and

flour, and wood ash in terms of ability as a paper. In treatment 1, the respondents strongly

agree that the cow feces paper is difficult to write on, to cut and to fold, furthermore, they

also strongly disagree that the paper can be a writing material. In treatment 2, the

respondents agree that the cow feces paper is difficult to written on and to fold,

furthermore, they also strongly agree that the cow feces paper is hard to cut which

garnered the highest rate. In treatment 3, the respondents strongly disagree that the cow

feces paper is easy to write on and that the paper can be a writing material, although, they

agree that the cow feces paper is easy to fold. Moreover, two of the treatments of the cow

feces paper with mixed cornstarch and flour, and wood ash, namely treatment 1 and 3

with a difference of 0.09375, were rated disagree of its durability in terms of ability as a

paper and neutral in treatment 2.

Table 12.
Average Weighted Mean of the Durability of the Cow Feces Paper
Treatments Average of Weighted Mean Interpretation
Cow Feces Paper with Mixed Cornstarch and Flour
1 3.34375 Neutral
2 2.896875 Neutral
3 3.3296875 Neutral
Cow Feces Paper with Mixed Cornstarch and Flour, and Wood Ash
1 1.96 Disagree
2 2.36875 Disagree
3 2.3703125 Disagree

32
Table 12 shows that the cow feces paper with mixed cornstarch and flour treatment 1

is rated the highest by the respondents of its durability in terms of texture, color,

absorbance, and ability as a paper.

CHAPTER V

Summary, Conclusion, and Recommendations

Summary of Findings

The findings that has been gathered are as follows:

1. The durability of cow feces paper in terms of texture, color, absorbance and

ability as a paper is rated as neutral, hence it is not durable enough as the

commercial ones that people are using today

2. The researchers found out that out of all the treatment, the most durable cow feces

paper with mixed cornstarch and flour was treatment 1.

3. The researchers found out that out of all the treatment, the most durable cow feces

paper with mixed cornstarch and flour, and wood ash was treatment 3.

33
4. The researchers found out that out of all the variation of the materials used, the

most durable paper was the cow feces paper with mixed cornstarch and flour

treatment 1.

5. The researchers found out that the use of both circular and tilting motion in

forming the paper in the silk screen has a great impact of the durability of the cow

feces paper since then it will make the formed paper even.

Conclusion

Based on the aforementioned findings, the binding process, both the materials

used and actions applied, has a great role in making the cow feces paper durable. Thus, it

can be concluded that the hypothesis of the study is accepted. Therefore, there is a

significant relationship between the binding process and the durability of cow feces

paper.

Recommendations

Based on the results and conclusion of the study, the researchers recommend the

following:

1. The barangay Officials can implement the program of collection of cow feces and

turning it into paper to promote a Green Environment as well to eliminate waste

materials establishing a practical but efficient Sustainable Solid Waste

Management.

2. The Barangay Officials can implement Sustainable Livelihood Programs by using

the cow feces collected from the surroundings of the barangay to create paper and

encourage the poor and marginalized people in the barangay to participate in this

34
program, giving the profit from selling the paper to them after. In this way, it

reduces poverty and inequality by generating employment among poor

households and by moving highly vulnerable households into sustainable

livelihoods and toward economic stability.

3. The Farmers can store the collected cow feces in their farms sun baking them for

a long period of time to utilize the openness of the field that can result to a better

quality of extracted fiber.

4. The Future Researchers can use a material that can lighten the color of the paper,

a material that can strongly bind the paper, a better machine to blend the pulp, and

lengthen the time of the purification of the waste material from the cow feces.

5. The Researchers can use their knowledge and encourage people to use their

product.

Cited Literature

A. E-book (Online)

Brown, W. H., & Fischer, A. F. (1918). Philippine forest products as sources of paper
pulp, (2nd ed., Vol. 3) [E-book]. Manila, Bureau of printing.
https://www.worldcat.org/title/philippine-forest-products-as-sources-of-paper-
pulp/oclc/5534658

B. Journals (Online)

Algar, A. F., Umali, A., & Tayobong, R. R. (2019). Physicochemical and functional
properties of starch from philippine edible canna (canna indica l.) Rhizomes.
Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences, 9(1), 34–37.
https://doi.org/10.15414/jmbfs.2019.9.1.34-37

35
Bougnom, B. P., Dieudonne, O., & Sontsa-Donhoung, A. M. (2020). Evaluation of Wood
Ash as Additive for Cow Manure Composting. International Annals of Science,
9(1), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.21467/ias.9.1.100-110
Brückle, I. (2009). Bleaching in Paper Production versus Conservation. Restaurator,
30(4), 280–293. https://doi.org/10.1515/rest.016
Fernandez, B., Da Róz, A., Gonçalves, B., Nakashima, G., & Yamaji, F. (2018). The
Quality of Sugarcane Briquettes Produced with Cornstarch Binder. Revista
Virtual de Química, 10(1), 142–154. https://doi.org/10.21577/1984-
6835.20180013
Knight, K. L. (2010). Study/Experimental/Research Design: Much More Than Statistics.
Journal of Athletic Training.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2808761/
Ofoefule, A., Nwankwo, & Ibeto, C. (2010). Biogas Production from Paper Waste and its
blend with Cow dung. Advances in Applied Science Research, 1(2), 1–8.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303541582_Biogas_Production_from_P
aper_Waste_and_its_blend_with_Cow_dung
Parayno, P. Ph.D. & Busmente, M. G. (n.d). Paper Recycling Schemes in the Philippines.
Integration of Solid Waste Management Tools in Specific European and Asian
Communities (ISTEAC).
http://www.wadef.com/projects/isteac/StudyReport__Paper_Recycling_Research_
Philippines.Work_Results.pdf
Rajeswari, S., Poongothai, E., & Hemalatha, N. (2016). Antimicrobial activites of cow
dung extracts against human pathogens. International Journal of Current
Pharmaceutical Research, 8(4), 9–12.
https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2016v8i4.15268
Reichardt, G. (1938). The Durability of Paper. The Library Quarterly, 8(4), 510–520.
https://doi.org/10.1086/614335
Russell, C. R. (1973, November 4). Industrial Use Of Corn Starch. https://naldc-
legacy.nal.usda.gov/naldc/download.xhtml?id=30919&content=PDF
Sullivan, G. M. & Artino, A. R. (2013). Analyzing and Interpreting Data From Likert-
Type Scales. Journal of Graduate Medical education.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/Pmc3886444/

C. Websites

Bismarck, A. Ph.D. (2018, March 21). Elephant and cow manure for making paper
sustainably. ScienceDaily.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/03/180321090944.htm

36
Bhasin, H. (2020, March 5). Observation Methods – Definition, Types, Examples,
Advantages. Marketing91. https://www.marketing91.com/observation-method/
Britt, K. W. (1999). papermaking | Process, History, & Facts. Encyclopedia Britannica.
https://www.britannica.com/technology/papermaking
Casey, R. (2017, July 19). What’s the History of Paper? Casey Printing.
https://www.caseyprinting.com/blog/whats-the-history-of-paper
Crampton, L. (2021, March 17). The Many Uses of Cow Dung: A Natural and Renewable
Resource. Owlcation. https://owlcation.com/agriculture/The-Many-Uses-of-Cow-
Dung
Debczak, M. (2018, March 22). Cow Manure and Elephant Dung Could Be Used to
Make the Paper of the Future. Mental Floss.
https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/537113/cow-manure-and-elephant-dung-
could-be-used-make-paper-future
Montemayor, M. T. (2018, June 18). Visual artist saves environment via recycled paper.
Philippine News Agency. https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1038576
Nunez, C. (2019, February 7). Climate 101: Deforestation. National Geographic.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/article/deforestation
Kempner, D. (2016, December 6). Impacts of Paper on the Environment. AIIM
Community.
https://community.aiim.org/blogs/dennis-kempner/2016/12/06/impacts-of-paper-
on-the-environment
Nishat, A. T. (2019, February 22). Making Papers out of Elephant Dung: A Green
Solution to Recycling Industry. Change Magazine. http://www.changemag-
diinsider.com/blog/making-papers-out-of-elephant-dung-a-green-solution-to-
recycling-industry
Staedter, T. (2018, March 21). Making Paper From Poop Offers a Solution to the
World’s Manure Problem. Seeker. https://www.seeker.com/animals/making-
paper-from-poop-offers-a-solution-to-the-worlds-manure-problem
Wendorf, M. (2019, April 20). The Long and Complex History of Paper. Interesting
Engineering. https://interestingengineering.com/the-long-and-complex-history-of-
paper

37
APPENDICES

Data Gathering Procedures

In using mixed amount of cornstarch and flour for the binding process.

Step 1. Soak the dried feces in a pot filled with water to clean it for atleast a day

38
Step 2. Sink the cleaned feces in a clean fresh water for 3-5 times

Step 3. Put it to a pot and wait for it to boil, leave it for about an hour or more while

boiling and let it rest for four(4) hours

Step 4. Soak the boiled feces in a pot filled with bleach and water

39
Step 5. Blend the feces and the certain amount of cornstarch and flour for 2-4 minutes

Step 6. Prepare the silk screen, and a large flat container filled with water

Step 7. Put the silk screen in the container and pour the blended pulp

40
Step 8. Move the silk screen with a certain motion

Step 9. Pull it up and let the water drains

Step 10. Gently dab a sponge to the pulp in the silk screen

41
Step 11. Place the silk screen in an area where the sun is exposed and wait for the paper

to dry for about 2-4 hours

Step 12. When dried, carefully detach the paper in the silk screen

42
Step 13. Cut the paper

In using mixed amount of cornstarch and flour, and wood ash for the binding process.

Step 1. Soak the dried feces in a pot filled with water to clean it for atleast a day

43
Step 2. Sink the cleaned feces in a clean fresh water for 3-5 times

Step 3. Put it to a pot and wait for it to boil, leave it for about an hour or more while

boiling and let it rest for four(4) hours

Step 4. Soak the boiled feces in a pot filled with bleach and water

44
Step 5. Blend the feces and the certain amount of cornstarch and flour, and wood ash for

2-4 minutes

Step 6. Prepare the silk screen, and a large flat container filled with water

Step 7. Put the silk screen in the container and pour the blended pulp

45
Step 8. Move the silk screen with a certain motion

Step 9. Pull it up and let the water drains

Step 10. Gently dab a sponge to the pulp in the silk screen

46
Step 11. Place the silk screen in an area where the sun is exposed and wait for the paper

to dry for about 2-4 hours

Step 12. When dried, carefully detach the paper in the silk screen

47
Step 13. Cut the paper

48
Our Lady of the Pillar College - Cauayan
Junior High School Department
San Fermin, Cauayan City, Isabela
S.Y. 2020-2021

Questionnaire
To the Respondents:

The researchers are currently conducting a study entitled “Durability of Cow


Feces Paper.” Thus, you are earnestly requested to answer the following questions
honestly and objectively. Rest assured that all personal information gathered will be kept
confidential. Thank you for your cooperation.

I. Personal Profile of the Respondents


Name: Grade/Level:

II. Assessment on the Sensory Evaluation


Direction. Test and analyze the different samples of the cow feces paper given
and rate them based on how much you agreed or disagreed by putting the
corresponding marks under the aligned tables of the samples 1 to 6:
5- Strongly Agree 4- Agree 3- Neither 2- Disagree 1- Strongly
Disagree

Sample
A. Texture 1 2 3 4 5 6
1. The cow feces paper is smooth.
2. The cow feces paper is rough.
3. The cow feces paper has smooth,
but at the same time, rough texture.
4. The cow feces paper looks rough
surfaced but is smooth when
touched.
5. The cow feces paper looks smooth

49
surfaced but is rough when touched.

Sample
B. Color 1 2 3 4 5 6
1. The cow feces paper has a light
color.
2. The cow feces paper has a dark
color.
3. The cow feces paper has an
appealing color.
4. The cow feces paper does not have
an appealing color.
C. Absorbance
1. The cow feces paper absorbs the
ink of a pen naturally.
2. The ink of the pen does not bleed
through cow feces paper.
3. The ink of a pen dries naturally on
the cow feces paper and does not
smudge.
4. The writings in the cow feces
paper appears clearly.
D. Ability as a Paper
1. The cow feces paper is easy to
write with.
2. The cow feces paper is hard to
write with.
3. The cow feces paper is easy to cut.
4. The cow feces paper is hard to cut.
5. The cow feces paper is easy to
fold.
6. The cow feces paper is hard to
fold.
7. The cow feces paper can be a
writing material.
8. The paper/s I like most is…

Comments/Suggestions/Recommendations:
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

50
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Researchers’ Profiles

Name: Donna Jane T. Alvaro

Address: Reina Mercedes, Isabela

Cellphone No.: +63 926 9411 7098

Email: donnaalvaro3@gmail.com

Date of Birth: February 14, 2005

Place of Birth: Reina Mercedes, Isabela

Citizenship: Filipino

Gender: Female

Marital Status: Single

Parents’ Name: Don-don M. Alvaro & Ely Jane T. Alvaro

Elementary: Nappaccu Grande Sinnippil Elementary School

Highschool: Our Lady of the Pillar College-Cauayan Junior Highschool


Department

51
Name: John Jaztine L. Antonio

Address: Puroc, Luna, Isabela

Cellphone No.: +63 916 216 8857

Email: jaztineantonio321@gmail.com

Date of Birth: August 29, 2005

Place of Birth: Reina Mercedes, Isabela

Citizenship: Filipino

Gender: Male

Marital Status: Single

Parents’ Name: Grace L. Antonio

Elementary: Metropolitan Bible Baptist Learning Center Inc.

Highschool: Our Lady of the Pillar College-Cauayan Junior Highschool


Department

52
Name: Ryalynne Mae A. Perez

Address: Zone 6 Research Minante


I, Cauayan City, Isabela

Cellphone No.: +63 975 013 5510

Email: ryalynnemae96@gmail.com

Date of Birth: September 06, 2005

Place of Birth: Cauayan City, Isabela

Citizenship: Filipino

Gender: Female

Marital Status: Single

Parents’ Name: Ryan Mar O. Perez & May A. Hopper

Elementary: San Gabriel Elementary School

Highschool: Our Lady of the Pillar College-Cauayan Junior Highschool


Department

53
Name: Ashton Jasper S. Valdez

Address: Zone 6 Research Minante I,


Cauayan City, Isabela

Cellphone No.: +63 906 822 3422

Email: ashtonjaspervaldez@gmail.co

Date of Birth: February 14, 2005

Place of Birth: Cauayan City, Isabela

Citizenship: Filipino

Gender: Male

Marital Status: Single

Parents’ Name: Marcing G. Valdez & Alma S. Valdez

Elementary: Cauayan West Central School

Highschool: Our Lady of the Pillar College-Cauayan Junior Highschool


Department

54

You might also like