Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Pi’s initial success stemmed from its being a budget board packed with enough computing power and
features to perform tasks ranging from controlling robots to running a media center, but its enduring popularity
results from its strong software support and extensive community, who help newcomers and have created a
wealth of tutorials and guides.
However, the Pi is not alone. A broad spectrum of single-board computers exists—some are similar to the Pi,
some are budget bare bones offerings, and others are more expensive but packed with improvements.
The quality of these boards varies greatly, as does the type of tasks they are suited to. This guide will walk you
through some decent options for Pi alternatives while also highlighting the drawbacks.
Years of work by the Raspberry Pi Foundation improving the Pi’s core software have created a default
operating system called Raspbian, which not only gets the best out of the Pi hardware but is loaded with free
software—both the everyday basics, like browsers and an office suite, and tools for learning to code.
Yet the official support is only half the story, with much of the board’s usability coming from the plethora of
community-created guides and tutorials—with the answer to many questions only a Google away. Beyond the
staunch community support, the Pi can be augmented by a broad ecosystem of boards and kits that extend its
capabilities, turning the board into everything from a robot to a virtual assistant.
The Pi also strikes a shrewd balance between price and capability. Co-creator of the board Eben Upton has
stated in the past that keeping the board affordable is very important, and its latest incarnation, the Raspberry
Pi 3 Model B+, manages to pack an awful lot into a $35 computer.
2
COPYRIGHT ©2020 TECHREPUBLIC.COM, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
THE BEST ALTERNATIVES TO THE RASPBERRY PI
New boards have started to emerge that cram in features not found in the Pi 3: memory, faster processors,
Gigabit Ethernet, and support for 4K displays—onto boards costing $35 or close to it.
That said, the specs list often doesn’t tell the whole story. Upon testing, certain boards that outperform the Pi
on paper have been found wanting, due to bottlenecks in the system.
Poor software and driver compatibility is also a common complaint about Pi rivals, although some are far better
than others in this regard.
If you don’t mind tackling issues with software and drivers, you could try the $29 Pine A64. On the face of
it the board has a lot of advantages over the Pi—combining Gigabit Ethernet and 2GB DDR3 RAM with
802.11n Wi-Fi support, a quad-core, Arm Cortex A53-based processor, and a pin header that is compatible
with hardware add-ons for the Pi boards.
There’s a big but, however: On release, the Pine64 was heavily criticized in several reviews for having such poor
software support that some reviewers couldn’t even get a working Linux desktop to boot.
Two years on and things seem to have improved, with the board’s Wiki listing working versions of Android 7.1
and Ubuntu Xenial with the Mate desktop—complete with office suite and browser—available for the board.
But there still seem to be issues, such as the Xenial build missing support for hardware acceleration for video.
However, the Odroid does trail the Pi 3 in one notable respect, missing that board’s Wi-Fi connectivity.
A big plus for the computer is that the Odroid set of boards have a good reputation for the quality of their
operating systems and driver support. While its software support is good—including Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, the
LibreElec media center, and Android—some of operating systems are older versions, such as Android 5.1.
3
COPYRIGHT ©2020 TECHREPUBLIC.COM, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
THE BEST ALTERNATIVES TO THE RASPBERRY PI
The $25 Orange Pi Lite2 has similar specs to the more expensive Raspberry Pi 3 Model B+, with the same
memory, a 64-bit quad-core processor, reasonable GPU, support for 802.11ac Wi-Fi, 1GB memory and
Bluetooth 4.1 support. It even has several advantages over the Pi 3, at least on paper, such as a single USB 3.0
port, and support for Android 7.0.
However, it trails the Pi in a couple of respects, with fewer USB ports and fewer pins for adding hardware to
the board and missing Ethernet.
The bigger caveat is that in general, Orange Pi board reviews are critical of poor driver support, missing
software, and being stuck with unstable versions of older operating systems, so only buy these boards if you’re
prepared to spend a lot of time trying to get software to work.
4
COPYRIGHT ©2020 TECHREPUBLIC.COM, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
THE BEST ALTERNATIVES TO THE RASPBERRY PI
As such, it’s hard to find a machine to match it. That said, even though the Orange Pi boards do pack in a lot
of features for the money, they come with a less-than-stellar reputation when it comes to usability and software.
If you’re suitably confident you can deal with the technical hiccups, you might consider the Orange Pi Zero
H2, which sells for less than the $10 Raspberry Pi Zero W while still offering the 802.11n Wi-Fi and 10/100
Ethernet of the Pi board.
Available as a $7 or $9 board, the cheaper variant has 256MB RAM—half the memory of the Zero W. And
while the board might be slightly cheaper than the Pi Zero W, it lacks the Pi’s HDMI port, with the only audio-
visual interface being available via the board’s pins, meaning you’ll have to be reasonably proficient at tinkering
with hardware to hook it up to a monitor. This might be less of an issue for a device of this type, however, as
many users would remotely connect to the board via another computer.
The $10 NanoPi Neo will cost you the same as a Raspberry Pi Zero W but lacks the Pi’s built-in Wi-Fi
and Bluetooth support, has half the memory (the 512MB version costs $12), and lacks a mini-HDMI. The
Allwinner H3 processor is based on a newer architecture than the Pi Zero W and clocked to run faster, and it
has 36 pre-soldered GPIO headers for hooking up to hardware. A 10/100M Ethernet port will let you remotely
connect to the board. So it’s a reasonable choice for tinkering with hardware or prototyping simple IoT devices.
5
COPYRIGHT ©2020 TECHREPUBLIC.COM, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
THE BEST ALTERNATIVES TO THE RASPBERRY PI
A good choice, based on the range’s previous track record, will likely be the Odroid-N1. As mentioned, the
board runs on a hexacore processor backed up by 4GB of memory, two USB 3.0 ports, and Gigabit Ethernet.
It will run Android 7.1 and Ubuntu 18.04, can be hooked to 4K displays via HDMI 2.0, and has two SATA
3.0 ports for fast storage access and 40 GPIO pins for connecting homemade hardware. The board, due out
around the middle of this year, basically offers most of the specs of the $449 Samsung Chromebook Plus in a
$110 board.
Of course, the $110 price tag may push it out of the realm of Raspberry Pi competitors in many people’s
eyes, so a better choice might be holding on for Odroid makers Hardkernel to release the N1 Lite, which it
anticipates will be a $75 board, with the same specs apart from having 2GB RAM and no SATA ports.
If you can’t wait, the forthcoming RockPro64 board has similar specs to the Odroid-N1, minus the SATA
ports, and is due out in March for the lower price of $79. However, in contrast to the general good reputation
of Odroid, reviews of a 2016 board from the makers of the RockPro64 criticized the “sparse” software and
documentation.
6
COPYRIGHT ©2020 TECHREPUBLIC.COM, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
THE BEST ALTERNATIVES TO THE RASPBERRY PI
Of the myriad alternative single-board computers available, there are machines that double down on each of
these specialties—here are your options.
If you’re willing to pay a bit more, the $46 Odroid C2 is likely a better choice. The C2 is 2—10x faster than the
Raspberry Pi 3 according to tests, has double the memory of the Raspberry Pi 3, Gigabit Ethernet, supports
4K displays via HDMI 2.0, together with up to 32 channel audio.
7
COPYRIGHT ©2020 TECHREPUBLIC.COM, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
THE BEST ALTERNATIVES TO THE RASPBERRY PI
While it lacks Wi-Fi support, users report the board performs well as a media center, smoothly playing back
local 1080p and 4K HEVC files and with support for streaming services such as Netflix—and running the
Ubuntu, Android, and the media center software LibreElec.
8
COPYRIGHT ©2020 TECHREPUBLIC.COM, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
THE BEST ALTERNATIVES TO THE RASPBERRY PI
A decent choice of board with two USB 3.0 ports, 2GB memory, gigabit Ethernet, and an octa-core processor
is the $59 Odroid XU4.
If you’re willing to really push the boat out, the $135 UDOO Quad has built-in support for SATA, although at
several times the cost of the Pi it’s not really a rival board. As mentioned, the $110 Odroid-N1 will also pack
two SATA 3.0 ports when it arrives later this year.
There are some low-cost options with SATA support, such as the $35 Banana Pi M1+, which has an older
SATA 2.0 port, although a USB 3.0 board like the XU4 would probably be a better option.
That’s obviously fine, as the Pi is so cheap and wasn’t really created with this use in mind. But if you want to
use an alternative board as a desktop computer, it’s worth shelling out a little bit more for something like the
$54 Odroid XU4, which runs Ubuntu 16.04 with the Mate desktop and is bundled with various software, using
GPU acceleration to boost performance.
If browsing the web and content consumption are your primary goals, though, you might be better going with
the Asus Chromebit compute stick or the Intel NuC mini-PC recommended below.
Both seem to perform better than the Raspberry Pi 3, with the Odroid XU4 able to smoothly emulate newer
console games, such as Goldeneye on the N64, Streetfighter on the Dreamcast, and Kingdom Hearts on
the PSP.
One downside is that Bluetooth and Wi-Fi support are not built into the XU4 or C2, so you’ll need to use a
USB dongle for wireless connectivity.
9
COPYRIGHT ©2020 TECHREPUBLIC.COM, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
THE BEST ALTERNATIVES TO THE RASPBERRY PI
If you don’t mind spending a little bit more, there’s the $35 NanoPi Neo Plus2, which also offers 32 pins
spread across two headers.
If you want something with a bit more oomph and are willing to spend more than double the cost of the Pi 3,
there’s the $99 Up Core.
The computer has a quad-core 1.8GHz Intel Atom x5-Z8350 processor, 1GB memory, one USB 3.0 port,
and 16GB eMMC storage. However, the ace up the board’s sleeve are the 100 pins available for hooking up
additional boards and other custom hardware, compared with the 40-pin header available on the Pi. The UP
Core’s high-speed expansion connector includes pins for UART, SPI, 2 x USB HSIC, PCI-Express, GPIO, Intel
Sensors Hub, SDIO, and 5V Power.
10
COPYRIGHT ©2020 TECHREPUBLIC.COM, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
THE BEST ALTERNATIVES TO THE RASPBERRY PI
A good starting place is the Pocket Beagle, a tiny $25 board well suited to prototyping electronics due to its
extensive hardware expansion options—although you will need to solder on the pin headers yourself. The
board offers 2 x 36-pin headers (unpopulated) with USB 2.0 OTG, 8x analog inputs, 44x digital GPIOs, 3x
UARTs, 2x I2C, 2x SPI, 4x PWM, 2x quadrature encoder inputs, 2x CAN bus, 23x programmable PRU I/O
pins, 3x voltage inputs for battery, USB, power line, and 2x voltage output (3.3V LDO + 1x voltage input).
In other respects, it’s not the most powerful or feature rich board, with no Wi-Fi or Ethernet, no on-board
storage and half the memory of the Raspberry Pi 3 Model B+.
A favorite for makers is Arduino, a project that provides hardware, software, and community support for
people who want to create DIY electronics.
Arduino lends its name to a range of programmable microcontroller boards, which serve as the brains of these
homemade devices. The boards can be wired into circuits, where they can interact with lights, sensors, motors,
microphones, buttons, and any other component you want to include in your homespun appliances. For
instance, you could use an Arduino to build a motion-controlled video camera or to remote-control the lights
in your sitting room.
11
COPYRIGHT ©2020 TECHREPUBLIC.COM, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
THE BEST ALTERNATIVES TO THE RASPBERRY PI
A good choice for beginners is the Arduino Uno, which is a bit of an all-rounder, relatively cheap (€20, or
about $22), with enough digital and analog pins to get you started on building electronics, and a raft of relevant
tutorials available online.
Adding new features to the board can be straightforward, with the easiest option being to use a shield, an
expansion board that slots directly into the Arduino’s pin headers. Shields can add an array of features, ranging
from Zigbee wireless connectivity to an SD card reader.
And while training machine-learning models may still be the preserve of more powerful machines, using boards
to run pre-trained models to carry out AI-reliant tasks, such as image recognition, should get easier with the
release of the the RockPro64-AI.
This forthcoming board features a hexa-core processor, with cores clocked at up to 2GHz, and packs a
dedicated Neural Network Processing Unit (NPU).
Makers Pine64 says this NPU can accelerate the performance of deep neural network models—such as
Inception V3, ResNet-34, and VGG16—by almost 100x, with a peak performance of 2.4 TOPS (trillion opera-
tions per second), while also being more efficient than using GPUs.
The RockPro64-AI board, will be available from August 1st for $99, however it’s worth bearing in mind
criticisms of earlier Pine64 boards for poor software support.
12
COPYRIGHT ©2020 TECHREPUBLIC.COM, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
THE BEST ALTERNATIVES TO THE RASPBERRY PI
The device packs a 25 LED matrix display, a motion sensor, an accelerometer, and two buttons onto a tiny
4cmx5cm board. It can be programmed using easy-to-grasp tools, such as the drag-and-drop programming
environment Scratch, or if the user is more confident, by coding in a variety of languages, including JavaScript
and MicroPython.
Individual boards are available for $13.54, with a discount for buying in bulk.
Similar in price to some of the more expensive single-board computers, it’s a 13.3-inch machine with a
1,366x768-resolution display, two USB 3.0 ports, a 1.60GHz Intel Celeron 3855U processor, 4GB of DDR3
RAM, and 16GB SSD. The Chrome OS also includes Google’s G Suite of productivity tools, such as Google
Doc, Gmail, and Google Calendar.
The performance of its Intel Celeron processor J3455 won’t set the world on fire, but the 1.5 to 2.3GHz
processor is no slouch relative to the Pi and its competitors and can output to 4K displays via HDMI. It has
four USB 3.0 ports and one SATA 3.0 connector for fast storage and 802.11ac Wi-Fi, putting it ahead of most
other boards in this roundup.
13
COPYRIGHT ©2020 TECHREPUBLIC.COM, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
THE BEST ALTERNATIVES TO THE RASPBERRY PI
The device is powered by a 1.8GHz Rockchip 3288 chip, has 2GB RAM, 16GB storage, and 802.11ac Wi-Fi
support, and plugs into the HDMI port of a TV or monitor.
While 16GB doesn’t offer much space to store files, it is, like other Chromebooks, designed primarily as a cloud
device with Google’s Chrome browser at the centre of the experience.
The CM3’s compact design, the same size as a DDR2 small outline dual inline memory module, is suited to
being built into electronic appliances.
There are limited alternatives to the CM3, but one option is the $29 SOPINE A64, which includes the same
quad-core Arm Cortex A53-based processor used in the Pine A64 single-board computer, along with 2GB of
LPDDR3 RAM memory. These are packed into the SODIMM-DDR3 form factor—again more commonly
used for sticks of memory in PCs. Like the CM3, the idea is to allow hardware makers to incorporate the board
into appliances.
Firstly, it runs the full desktop version of Windows 10, not the limited Windows 10 IoT Core version that runs
on the Pi. It uses an Intel Atom Cherry Trail Z8300 processor, packs a USB 3.0 port, and has an Arduino-
compatible co-processor that allows it to be used like an Arduino board to control electronics attached to its 20
GPIO pins.
However, it’s not all good news. While Linux-based operating systems run on the board, they are not officially
supported, it’s not always faster than the Pi when running open-source software, and there are reports here and
14
COPYRIGHT ©2020 TECHREPUBLIC.COM, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
THE BEST ALTERNATIVES TO THE RASPBERRY PI
here that the board overheats without additional cooling, resulting in the processor being throttled to a slower
speed. And while it uses the same chip as the Intel Compute Stick, some tests have found the Intel Compute
Stick performs better in benchmarks.
15
COPYRIGHT ©2020 TECHREPUBLIC.COM, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
THE BEST ALTERNATIVES TO THE RASPBERRY PI
Beagleboard, Banana Pi, Cubieboard, PandaBoard ES, Pine64, Rock64, NanoPi, Odroid, ASUS Tinker Board,
UP Core, UDOO, Bubblegum-96, Inforce 6410Plus, MediaTek X20, HiKey 960, and Onion Omega.
16
COPYRIGHT ©2020 TECHREPUBLIC.COM, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
THE BEST ALTERNATIVES TO THE RASPBERRY PI
CREDITS
Global Editor in Chief The information contained herein has been obtained from sources
Jason Hiner believed to be reliable. TechRepublic.com, LLC disclaims all warranties
as to the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of such information.
TechRepublic.com, LLC shall have no liability for errors, omissions, or
Editor in Chief, UK
inadequacies in the information contained herein or for the interpretations
Steve Ranger thereof. The reader assumes sole responsibility for the selection of these
materials to achieve its intended results. The opinions expressed herein
Managing Editor are subject to change without notice.
Bill Detwiler
Editor, Australia
Chris Duckett
Senior Editor
Conner Forrest
Senior Writers
Dan Patterson
Teena Maddox
Chief Reporter
Nick Heath
Staff Writer
Alison DeNisco Rayome
Associate Editor
Amy Talbott
Multimedia Producer
Derek Poore
17
COPYRIGHT ©2020 TECHREPUBLIC.COM, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED