Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PII: S0223-5234(15)30064-7
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.05.037
Reference: EJMECH 7916
Please cite this article as: R. Aeluri, M. Alla, S. Polepalli, N. Jain, Synthesis and Antiproliferative Activity
of Imidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidine Mannich bases, European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (2015), doi:
10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.05.037.
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to
our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo
copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please
note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all
legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Graphical Abstract:
PT
manjula_alla@yahoo.com.
b
Centre for Chemical Biology, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Tarnaka, Hyderabad, 500607,
RI
India. E-mail: nishant@iict.res.in.
SC
to be potent with GI50 values similar to doxorubicin.
U
N N N N N N
CH3
AN
N N N N
H3C
N N
N N
M
N N
H3C 6b 7k
5e
D
PT
India. E-mail: nishant@iict.res.in.
RI
two phases. Mannich bases were obtained by one pot three component condensation of
imidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidine with secondary amine or piperazine and excess of formaldehyde
solution in methanol. The synthesized Mannich bases were screened for in vitro growth
SC
inhibition against a panel of 3 different human cancer cell lines. Most of the synthesized
compounds exhibited antiproliferative activity with GI50 values ranging from 0.01-79.4 µM.
Compounds 5e, 6b and 7k were found to be effective inhibitors of growth of all cell lines,
U
with GI50 values similar to that of standard drug. The structure and activity relationship has
been disclosed.
AN
Key words: Mannich reaction, Imidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidine, Piperazine, Antiproliferative
activity, Growth inhibition.
M
1. Introduction.
The major challenge in modern drug discovery has been the design and development of
D
new antiproliferative drugs with improved efficacy and minimal side effects, especially due
TE
to a rapid rise in multidrug resistant tumours. A thorough review of recent literature reveals
that small heterocyclic frameworks, such as nitrogen heterocycles, offer an advantage in
design of antiproliferative agents as they mimic many biomolecules. Among them imidazo
fused heterocycles such as imidazopyrimidines are important scaffolds in medicinal
EP
chemistry, as they exhibit a broad spectrum of biological activity such as anticancer [1], anti-
tubercular [2], antiviral [3], antimicrobial [4], antifungal [5], anti-inflammatory [6],
C
Parasiticidal activity [7], calcium channel blockers [8], benzodiazepine receptor agonists [9],
and potent P38 MAP kinase inhibitors [10]. Furthermore, fused pyrimidine derivatives have
AC
an established anticancer activity. Several pyrimidine analogues have been approved or in use
as drugs for the treatment of cancers. For example, all four new antiproliferative drugs i.e.,
Gefitinib (Iressa), Erlotinib (Tarceva), Lapatinib (Tykerb) and Vandetanib (Caprelsa) (Fig. 1)
approved by the US FDA for the treatment of cancer possess a benzofused pyrimidine core
moiety. Moreover, fused heterocycles like pyrazolopyrimidines [11], pyridopyrimidines [12],
pyrrolopyrimidnes [13], imidazopyrazines [14], imidazopyrimidines [15], imidazopyridines
[16] etc., have also been reported as antitumor agents. An earlier successful experience with
imidazo fused rings as potential antiproliferative agents led us to explore the potential of
imidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidine derivatives for this purpose.
<Figure 1>
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
2.1. Chemistry
PT
of imidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidine molecules having C-2, C-3 & C-7 (next to nitrogen of six
membered ring) substituents has been designed (Fig. 2). The C-3 position would be the most
suitable position for electrophilic attack. Therefore it was proposed to introduce an
RI
aminoalkyl substitution at C-3. Mannich reaction, one of the most familiar C-C bond forming
reactions in organic synthesis, provides a suitable method to introduce amino alkyl
SC
substituent on the molecule [18]. Recently, Istanbullu et al reported a series of uracil C-
Mannich bases as potent cytotoxic agents [19]. It has been widely accepted that Mannich
derivatives have significantly improved activity profile compared to their parent analogues.
The aminocarbonyl Mannich products are useful in the construction of β-peptides and β-
U
lactams. Several bioactive molecules, such as taxol [20], an antitumour agent possess
AN
aminocarbonyl appendages. In addition Mannich derivatives have better bioavailability and
are amenable to develop water based formulations. Further it was envisaged that variation of
substituents at C-2 and C-7 would add to the diversity of library.
M
<Figure 2>
a]pyrimidine has been achieved using a simple protocol of condensation of the acyl bromide
with various 2-aminopyrimidines. As is evident, the reaction needs (substituted) 2-
TE
aminopyrimidine and acyl bromide as raw materials for introduction of substituents at C-2
and C-7 positions of imidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidines. The pool of acyl bromides commercially
available has been found to be limited for this purpose. Therefore, various acyl bromides
EP
corresponding acyl bromides in pure form. Coupling of acyl bromides thus obtained with
AC
<Scheme 1>
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
<Scheme 2>
<Table 1>
PT
was tested against a panel of 4 human cancer cell lines viz., human epithelial lung carcinoma
(A-549) cervical (HeLa), pancreatic (Panc-1) and breast adenocarcinoma (MDA-MB-231)
using Doxorubicin as standard drug. All the compounds showed significant inhibition of
RI
cancer cell line growth in the concentration range 0.02–7.38 µM as illustrated in table 2.
<Table 2>
SC
All the tested compounds inhibited growth of at least one cancer cell line. Nine of the
thirteen tested compounds inhibited growth of two or more cell lines. This justifies the design
of imidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidine Mannich bases as a new class of antiproliferative agents.
U
Among the amino alkyl groups on C-3 carbon, pyrrolidine and piperidine substitutions gave
AN
the best inhibition. Compound 5e inhibited the growth of all four cancer cell lines with GI50
values comparable to standard drug Doxorubicin. Compound 5m was also effective in growth
inhibition of all four cancer cell lines but to a lesser extent than compound 5e. In both the
M
cases (5e and 5m) the imidazopyrimidine framework had no substitution on six membered
ring, while the C-2 carbon had an aryl substituent (phenyl in 5e and thiophenyl in 5m) and
pyrrolidin-1-yl-methyl as the amino alkyl at C-3 carbon, respectively. On the other hand
D
compound 5i which inhibits growth of 3 cell lines had piperidine-1-yl-methyl at C-3 carbon
with a methyl substituent on C-7 carbon and tert-butyl substituent at C-2 position,
TE
compounds, a focused redesign of these Mannich bases was undertaken. From the activity
results it was clear that pyrrolidin-1-yl-methyl and piperidine-1-yl-methyl substituted
AC
analogues gave the best growth inhibition of cancer cell lines. Therefore, it was decided to
focus on similar Mannich bases. A cycloalkyl diamine like piperazine was chosen.
Piperazines and substituted piperazines are important pharmacophores that have been found
in many marketed drugs such as the Merck HIV protease inhibitor Crixivan [23]. Piperazinyl
linked ciprofloxacin dimers have been shown as potent antibacterial agents [24] against
resistant strains. In the last decade a number of piperazine derivatives have been reported for
their cytotoxic activity [25]. Moreover clinical/preclinical drug development studies of
piperazine compounds by US National Cancer Institute (NCI) demonstrated that they have
capability to suppress experimental tumors. Recently, Akkoc et al also reported that indole
based 1,4-disubstituted piperazines act as cytotoxic agents [26].
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
In this context, earlier synthetic protocol has been extended to construct imidazo[1,2-
a]pyrimidine Mannich bases incorporating N-substituted piperazine. The series of compounds
would have only variation in C-2 and C-7 substitutions, making it easier to analyse the
substituent effects. Mannich reaction of imidazopyrimidine, formaldehyde and N-substituted
piperazines resulted in amino alkylation at C-3 carbon (6a-c). However, Mannich reaction
with N-unsubstituted piperazine resulted in the formation of symmetrical imidazo[1,2-
a]pyrimidine dimers connected by piperazine linker as a by product in 1:1 ratio. Further
optimization of the reaction conditions led to exclusive construction of symmetrical 1,4-
PT
bis((imidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidin-3-yl)methyl)piperazine analogues 7a-l. They were obtained by
treatment of two equivalents of imidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidines with one equivalent of piperazine
and excess of formaldehyde (37%) solution in methanol under reflux conditions (scheme 3).
RI
Structures of all the synthesized compounds [6a-c and 7a-l, table 3] have been confirmed by
their spectral data.
SC
<Scheme 3>
<Table 3>
U
2.2.2. Antiproliferative activity of redesigned Mannich bases:
AN
Preliminary SRB assay results indicated that A-549 cell line was poorly inhibited by the
imidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidine Mannich bases when compared to other cell lines. Thus,
M
antiproliferative assay of the redesigned series of compounds was not extended to this cell
line. As a result, antiproliferative activity of second set of Mannich bases 6a-c and 7a-l was
evaluated against a panel of 3 human cancer cell lines i.e., HeLa, Panc-1 and MDA-MB-231
D
only. Growth inhibitory activities (GI50 values) thus determined have been summarized in
table 4.
TE
Much to our satisfaction the redesigned series of compounds also showed inhibition of
cancer cell line growth. Nine of the 15 tested compounds inhibited the growth of Panc-1 cell
EP
line. Five compounds each out of fifteen synthesized compounds inhibited HeLa cell line or
MDA-MB-231 cell line growth. The compound 3-((4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)methyl)-2-
phenylimidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidine (6b) inhibited the growth of all three cell lines. The other
C
best compound in the series was 7k, a symmetrical dimer which had a 2-methyl phenyl
substitution on C-2 carbon and no substituent on C-7 carbon. Compounds 6b and 7k
AC
exhibited a GI50 of 0.01 µM against MDA-MB-231 while 7l inhibited Panc-1 with a GI50 of
0.06 µM. In all three cases GI50 values have been found to be comparable to that of standard
drug. As mentioned earlier, significant number of compounds inhibited the Panc-1 cell line (9
out of 15) indicating that this series of compounds may be specific growth inhibitors of Panc-
1 cell line. It was interesting to note that both the simple piperazine Mannich bases as well as
the symmetrical dimers were equally effective in growth inhibition. The C-7 substituents of
the imidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidine Mannich bases such as H, methyl or methoxy didn’t show any
specific variation on growth inhibition of cancer cell lines and all of them were equally
effective. However, compounds with bulkier substituents such as naphthyl, tert-butyl and
hetero aryl (2-thiophenyl) on C-2 carbon were found to be poor inhibitors of cell line growth
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
in the dimers. SRB assays of both the series of Mannich bases gave a clear indication that
phenyl substitution on C-2 carbon and cycloalkyl amino group on C-3 carbon are essential for
effective growth inhibition of cancer cell lines.
<Table 4>
3. Conclusions.
PT
and synthesized, in two phases, following simple reaction protocols. All the synthesized
compounds were screened for their growth inhibitory activity against a panel of 3 different
human cancer cell lines viz., HeLa, Panc-1 and MDA-MB-231. Most of the tested Mannich
RI
bases displayed promising growth inhibitory activity against cancer cell lines. Among all the
synthesized compounds, 5e, 6b and 7k showed maximum growth inhibitory activity against
SC
all the cell lines at low concentrations. Their GI50 values were comparable to those of
standard drug. Further studies involving redesign of the active moieties and target
identification are in progress.
U
Acknowledgements:
AN
We thank the Director, CSIR-IICT and Head, CPC division for facilities. ARN thanks
the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, India for research
fellowship. SP and NJ thank the 12th FYP-SMiLE (CSC-0111) for funding.
M
References.
D
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
10. a) K. Nacro, A. J. Duraiswamy, L. R. Chennamaneni, PCT Int. Appl. (2013)
WO2013147711 A1. b) K. C. Rupert, J. H. Henry, J. H. Dodd, S. A. Wadsworth, D.
E. Cavender, G. C. Olini, B. Fahmy, J. J. Siekierka, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 13
(2003) 347-350.
11. a) M. M. Kandeel, L. W. Mohamed, M. K. Abd El Hamid, A. T. Negmeldin, Sci.
Pharm. 80 (2012) 531-545. b) H. Y. He, J. N. Zhao, R. Jia, Y. L. Zhao, S. Y. Yang, L.
T. Yu, L. Yang, Molecules 16 (2011) 10685-10694.
12. M. A. Azam, B. R. P. Kumar, S. Shalini, B Suresh, T. K. Reddy, C. D. Reddy, Indian
PT
J. Pharm. Sci. 70 (2008) 672-677.
13. a) V. Spano, A. Montalbano, A. Carbone, B. Parrino, P. Diana, G. Cirrincione, I.
Castagliuolo, P. Brun, O. G. Issinger, S. Tisi, I. Primac, D. Vedaldi, A. Salvador, P.
RI
Barraja, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 74 (2014) 340-357. b) P. Barraja, L. Caracausi, P. Diana,
A. Montalbano, A. Carbone, A. Salvador, P. Brun, I. Castagliuolo, S. Tisi, F.
SC
DallAcqua, D. Vedaldi, G. Cirrincione, ChemMedChem 6 (2011) 1238-1248.
14. K. Zurbonsen, A. Michel, P. A. Bonnet, M. N. Mathieu, C. Chevillard, Gen. Pharmac.
32 (1999) 135-141.
U
15. A. Kamal, J. S. Reddy, M. J. Ramaiah, D. Dastagiri, E. V. Bharathi, M. V. Prem
Sagar, S. N. C. V. L. Pushpavalli, P. Ray, M. Pal-Bhadra, Med. Chem. Commun., 1
AN
(2010) 355-360.
16. S. Muniyan, Y. W. Chou, M. A. Ingersoll, A. Devine, M. Morris, V. A. O. Marah, S.
A. Khan, W. G. Chaney, X. R. Bu, M. F. Lin, Cancer Lett. 353 (2014) 59-67.
M
(1973) 703-775.
19. H. Istanbullu, I. Zupko, V. Alptuzun, E. Erciyas, Turk J Chem 36 (2012) 583-592.
20. K. C. Nicolaou, W. M. Dai, R. K. Guy, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 33 (1994) 15-44.
EP
21. a) V. S. Miguel, C. G. Bochet, A. D. Campo, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 (2011) 5380-
5388. b) Q. Jiang, W. Sheng, C. Guo, Green Chem. 15 (2013) 2175-2179.
22. S. Holder, A. Zulch, T. Bar, T. Maier, M. Zim, T. Beckers, V. Gekeler, H. Joshi, Y.
C
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Reamer, D. Askin, R. P. Volante, P. J. Reider, Tetrahedron Lett. 36 (1995) 6419-
6422.
24. R. J. Kerns, M. J. Rybak, G. W. Kaatz, F. Vaka, R. Cha, R. G. Grucz, V. U.
Diwadkar, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 13 (2003) 2109-2112.
25. a) C. S. A. Kumar, S. N. Swamy, N. R. Thimmegowda, S. B. B. Prasad, G. W. Yip,
K. S. Rangappa, Med. Chem. Res. 16 (2007) 179-187. b) B. Chetan, M. Bunha, M.
Jagrat, B. N. Sinha, P. Saiko G. Graser, T. Szekeres, G. Raman, P. Rajendran, D.
Moorthy, A. Basu, V. Jayaprakash, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 3906-3910.
PT
26. M. K. Akkoc, M. Y. Yuksel, I. Durmaz, R. C Atalay, Turk J Chem 36 (2012) 515-
525.
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure Captions:
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Tables:
N
N N
PT
R
N
R 2 R3
RI
Entry Product R R1 R2R3NH
1. 5a C6H5 H morpholine
SC
2. 5b C6H5 CH3 piperidine
3. 5c 4-OHC6H4 H piperidine
4. 5d 4-OHC6H4 CH3 pyrrolidine
U
5. 5e C6H5 H pyrrolidine
6. 5f C6H5 H piperidine
AN
7. 5g tert-butyl H piperidine
8. 5h C6H5 H N-methylaniline
9. 5i tert-butyl CH3 piperidine
10. 5j C6H5 CH3 morpholine
M
Table 2: Growth inhibition (GI50 in µM) valuesa of compounds 5a-m on different human
cancer cell lines.
EP
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
Table 3: Synthesized Mannich bases of imidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidines incorporating Piperazine:
RI
U SC
Entry Product R R1 R2
AN
6a H
1 C6H5 H
(R3=H)
M
6b H
2 C6H5 H
(R3=methyl)
6c H
3 C6H5 H
D
(R3=tosyl)
4 C6H5 H H
7a
TE
H
5 7b 4-CH3-C6H4 H
6 4-Cl-C6H4 H H
7c
EP
7 tert-butyl H H
7d
8 C6H5 CH3 H
7e
C
9 tert-butyl CH3 H
7f
AC
10 2-naphthyl H H
7g
11 2,4-C6H3Cl2 H H
7h
12 7i C6H5 OCH3 OCH3
13 2-thiophenyl H H
7j
14 2-CH3-C6H4 H H
7k
15 4-Br-C6H4 H H
7l
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Table 4: Growth inhibition (GI50 in µM) valuesa of compounds 6a-c & 7a-l on different
human cancer cell lines.
PT
6a 0.72±0.03 9.4±0.8 26.7±0.9
RI
6c 4.5±0.2 0.11±0.02 12.9±0.1
SC
7b 2.8±0.01 0.38±0.04 2.3±0.03
7d 2.4±0.3
U 3.9±0.1 1.1±0.08
AN
7e 12.7±0.9 0.6±0.07 15.9±0.4
M
a
Cell lines were treated with different concentrations of Mannich bases for 48 hrs as described in
experimental protocols. Cell viability was measured employing SRB assay. GI50 values indicated are a mean
of three independent experiments.
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figures:
Figure 1:
F
O N
H 3CO
O HN Cl
H 3CO N
PT
N O O
N
HN C CH
H 3CO N
RI
Gefitinib Erlotinib
SC
N
N
O N
O NH
N
U
H 3CO
O NH
O NH
S
AN
O Cl
F
Br
M
F
Lapatinib Vandetanib
D
Figure 2:
C EP
AC
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Schemes:
Scheme 1:
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
Scheme 2:
D
R1
R1
TE
N
N
MeOH
R2R3NH N N
N N HCHO
reflux
4-6 hrs
EP
R
R N R
3
R2
5a R = phenyl, R1 = H, R2R3N = morpholinyl 5a-m
5b R = phenyl, R1 = methyl, R2R3N = piperidinyl
C
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Scheme 3:
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Highlights:
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
manjula_alla@yahoo.com.
b
Centre for Chemical Biology, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Tarnaka, Hyderabad, 500607, India.
E-mail: nishant@iict.res.in.
RI
4. Experimental section.
4.1. Chemistry
SC
All the chemicals used for the synthesis are of the synthetic grade procured from
Spectrochem, Aldrich, SD-fine chemicals. Completion of the reaction was monitored by thin
layer chromatography (TLC) using E-Merck 0.25 mm silica gel plates using ethyl acetate/hexane
U
(5:5) as eluting medium. Visualization was accomplished by using UV light (256 nm) and iodine
chamber. Melting points were determined in open capillaries and are uncorrected. 1H-NMR (300
AN
MHz and 500 MHz) and 13C-NMR (75 MHz) spectra were recorded on Avance 300 MHz,
Avance 500 MHz and JCAMP DX-50 in CDCl3 and DMSO-d6 unless otherwise mentioned.
Chemical shifts are reported in δ (ppm) downfield from internal standard Tetramethylsilane
M
(TMS) and coupling constant (J) values are in Hz. IR spectra were recorded on a Thermo Nicolet
NEXUS 670 spectrometer in KBr with absorption in cm-1. Electronic ionization Mass spectra
were recorded on Thermo Finnigan ESI ion trap mass spectrometer and HRMS done on high
D
resolution QSTAR XL Hybrid/MS system. HPLC data of compounds was recorded on Waters
2998 instrument and Waters 2998 Photodiode Array Detector using Kromasil 100 C18, 5u
TE
column (Dimensions: 150 X 4.6 mm) at 210-400 nm wavelength and water/methanol as the
mobile phase (composition mentioned in the data).
EP
completion of the reaction (as monitored by TLC), reaction mixture was filtered off. The filtrate
was concentrated under reduced pressure to get the desired product in 95-99% yield.
AC
PT
NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz) δ ppm 2.45(s, 3H), 7.35(d, J = 8.12 Hz, 2H), 7.66(dd, J = 4.34,
6.61 Hz, 1H), 7.86(d, J = 8.30 Hz, 2H), 8.94-9.02(m, 2H), 9.74(d, J = 6.61 Hz, 1H); ESI-MS:
m/z 210 [M+H]+.
RI
4.3.3. 2-(4-Chlorophenyl)imidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidine(4c): White solid, Yield: 96%; M. P. 267-269
0
C; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ ppm 7.62(d, J = 7.72 Hz, 3H), 8.03(d, J = 8.83 Hz, 2H),
SC
8.82(s, 1H), 8.99(d, J = 4.41 Hz, 1H), 9.39(dd, J = 4.41, 6.62 Hz, 1H); ESI-MS: m/z 230
[M+H]+.
U
208-210 0C; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ ppm 7.25(dd, J = 4.27, 6.71 Hz, 1H), 7.45(dd, J =
AN
1.98, 8.24 Hz, 1H), 7.62( dd, J = 1.98, 8.24 Hz, 2H), 8.67(s, 1H), 8.87(dd, J = 1.98, 4.27 Hz,
1H), 9.84(dd, J = 2.13, 6. 71 Hz, 1H); ESI-MS: m/z 264 [M+H]+.
278 0C; 1H NMR (CDCl3+DMSO-d6, 300 MHz) δ ppm 7.57-7.71(m, 3H), 7.89-8.08(m, 4H),
8.57(s, 1H), 8.96-9.02(m, 2H), 9.61(dd, J = 1.70, 6.79 Hz, 1H); ESI-MS: m/z 246 [M+H]+.
D
1H), 7.67-7.71(m, 1H), 7.85(d, J = 3.66 Hz, 1H), 8.63(s, 1H), 8.96(d, J = 3.20 Hz, 1H), 9.41-
9.46(m, 1H); ESI-MS: m/z 202 [M+H]+.
EP
0
C; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ ppm 7.27(t, J = 7.91 Hz, 2H), 7.62-7.67(m, 1H), 8.03-
8.10(m, 2H), 8.94-9.01(m, 2H), 9.64(d, J = 5.93 Hz, 1H); ESI-MS: m/z 274 [M+H]+.
2H), 8.63(s, 1H), 8.93-8.97(m, 1H), 9.42-9.48(m, 1H), 9.83-10.17(brs, 1H); ESI-MS: m/z 212
[M+H]+.
PT
4.3.12. 2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-7-methylimidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidine(4l): White solid, Yield: 90%; M.
P. 246-248 0C; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz) δ ppm 2.70(s, 3H), 7.48(d, J = 6.79 Hz, 1H),
7.67(d, J = 8.49 Hz, 2H), 8.00(d, J = 8.49 Hz, 2H), 8.65(s, 1H), 8.13(d, J = 6.79 Hz, 1H); ESI-
RI
MS: m/z 244 [M+H]+.
SC
290-292 0C; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ ppm 2.74(s, 3H), 6.93(d, J = 8.39 Hz, 2H), 7.31-
7.41(m, 1H), 7.71-7.79(m, 2H), 8.41(s, 1H), 9.15-9.20(m, 1H) 9.83(brs, 1H); ESI-MS: m/z 226
[M+H]+.
U
4.3.14. 2-(tert-Butyl)-7-methylimidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidine(4n): White solid, Yield: 85%; M. P. 75-
AN
77 0C; 1H NMR (CDCl3+DMSO-d6, 300 MHz) δ ppm 1.46(s, 9H), 2.78(s, 3H), 7.43(d, J = 6.98
Hz, 1H), 8.09(d, J = 2.26 Hz, 1H), 9.39(dd, J = 4. 15, 6.79 Hz, 1H); ESI-MS: m/z 190 [M+H]+.
M
4.4. General procedure for synthesis of imidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidine Mannich bases 5a-m: To the
solution of secondary amine (1 mmol) in methanol excess formaldehyde solution (37%) (10
mmol) was added. After five minutes imidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidine (1 mmol) was added with
EP
constant stirring. Then the reaction mixture was subjected to reflux. After completion of the
reaction (as monitored by TLC), methanol was evaporated under reduced pressure, extracted
with ethyl acetate. The combined organic layers were concentrated and the crude product was
C
purified by column chromatography using solvent system hexane and ethyl acetate (4:6) to give
the desired product. The yields are 74-94%.
AC
2962, 2849, 1612, 1503, 1231, 1117, 706; ESI-MS: m/z 295 [M+H]+; ESI-HRMS (m/z): [M+H]+
calcd for C17H19ON4, 295.1553; obsd 295.1549.
PT
J = 8.08 Hz, 2H), 8.68(d, J = 7.01 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ ppm 24.24, 24.85,
25.96, 52.45, 54.12, 108.69, 114.97, 127.63, 128.22, 128.77, 132.67, 134.22, 145.01, 148.06,
159.45; IR (KBr) cm-1 3420, 2934, 1622, 1510, 1346, 1205, 1105, 769, 703; ESI-MS: m/z 307
RI
[M+H]+; ESI-HRMS (m/z): [M+H]+ calcd for C19H23N4, 307.1917; obsd 307.1914.
SC
Yield: 85%; M. P. 172-174 0C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ ppm 1.36-1.61(m, 6H), 2.33-
2.47(m, 4H), 3.93(s, 2H), 6.80-7.02(m, 3H), 7.54-7.67(m, 2H), 8.53(dd, J = 2.26, 4.53 Hz, 1H),
8.83(dd, J = 2.26, 6.79 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3+DMSO-d6, 75 MHz) δ ppm 23.64, 25.34,
U
51.44, 53.40, 107.59, 114.97, 115.08, 129.33, 129.43, 133.11, 137.97, 148.75, 157.16, 157.36;
IR (KBr) cm-1 3416, 2929, 1615, 1505, 1380, 1238, 1101, 840, 766; ESI-MS: m/z 309 [M+H]+;
AN
ESI-HRMS (m/z): [M+H]+ calcd for C18H21ON4, 309.1709; obsd 309.1708.
4H), 2.42-2.64(m, 8H), 4.07(s, 2H), 6.81-6.91(m, 3H), 7.65(d, J = 8.30 Hz, 2H), 8.72(d, J = 7.55
Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3+DMSO-d6, 75 MHz) δ ppm 23.00, 24.19, 47.56, 52.93, 108.36,
D
114.77, 114.98, 124.87, 129.36, 132.41, 143.29, 146.86, 156.98, 158.36; IR (KBr) cm-1 3445,
2958, 2771, 1613, 1502, 1388, 1285, 1213, 833; ESI-MS: m/z 309 [M+H]+; ESI-HRMS (m/z):
TE
4H), 4.14(s, 2H), 6.86 (dd, J = 4.53, 6.79 Hz, 1H), 7.38(m, 1H), 7.43-7.51(m, 2H), 7.86(d, J =
6.79 Hz, 2H), 8.56(dd, J = 2.26, 4.53 Hz, 1H), 8.81-8.89(dd, J = 1.51, 6.79 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR
(CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ ppm 23.44, 48.66, 53.61, 107.90, 116.42, 127.83, 128.23, 128.93, 133.18,
C
133.84, 144.96, 147.75, 149.38; IR (KBr) cm-1 3423, 2960, 2780, 1607, 1502, 1387, 1217, 1116,
AC
767, 695; ESI-MS: m/z 279 [M+H]+; ESI-HRMS (m/z): [M+H]+ calcd for C17H19N4, 279.1604;
obsd 279.1598.
1217, 1102, 765, 694; ESI-MS: m/z 293 [M+H]+; ESI-HRMS (m/z): [M+H]+ calcd for
C18H21N34, 293.1760; obsd 293.1750.
PT
6.79 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ ppm 24.17, 25.89, 31.06, 33.58, 52.85, 53.99,
107.34, 113.63, 133.37, 146.71, 148.28, 154.68; IR (KBr) cm-1 3415, 2926, 1606, 1501, 1332,
1235, 1097, 1038, 985, 803, 763; ESI-MS: m/z 273 [M+H]+; ESI-HRMS (m/z): [M+H]+ calcd for
RI
C16H25N4, 273.2073; obsd 273.2067.
SC
viscous liquid, Yield: 74%; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ ppm 3.40(s, 3H), 4.87(s, 2H), 6.59-
7.01(m, 4H), 7.32-7.56(m, 5H), 7.78-7.89(m, 2H), 8.46-8.59(m, 2H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125
MHz) δ ppm 40.51, 55.77, 93.47, 108.41, 113.11, 114.74, 117.27, 128.21, 128.35, 128.62,
U
128.89, 131.29, 144.95, 147.63, 149.27, 149.66; IR (KBr) cm-1 3425, 2926, 1612, 1503, 1339,
1185, 1085, 767, 704; ESI-MS: m/z 315 [M+H]+; ESI-HRMS (m/z): [M+H]+ calcd for C20H19N4,
AN
315.1604; obsd 315.1598.
15H), 2.26-2.52(brs, 4H), 2.57(s, 3H), 3.87(s, 2H), 6.64(d, J = 7.01 Hz, 1H), 8.59(d, J = 7.01 Hz,
1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ ppm 24.27, 24.44, 25.96, 31.09, 33.55, 52.88, 53.95, 107.92,
D
112.97, 132.65, 146.75, 153.93, 157.98; IR (KBr) cm-1 3419, 2935, 1620, 1505, 1445, 1338,
1212, 1103, 986, 792, 765; ESI-MS: m/z 287 [M+H]+; ESI-HRMS (m/z): [M+H]+ calcd for
TE
4H), 3.95(s, 2H), 6.76(t, J = 7.55 Hz, 1H), 7.24-7.50(m, 3H), 7.79(t, J = 8.30, 9.06 Hz, 2H),
8.59-8.67(m, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ ppm 24.67, 51.65, 52.86, 66.61, 108.83,
113.71, 127.68, 128.15, 128.52, 132.19, 133.70, 145.22, 147.93, 159.62; IR (KBr) cm-1 3038,
C
2929, 1620, 1504, 1339, 1111, 1001, 863; ESI-MS: m/z 309 [M+H]+; ESI-HRMS (m/z): [M+H]+
AC
MS: m/z 343 [M+H]+; ESI-HRMS (m/z): [M+H]+ calcd for C18H20ON4Cl, 343.1320; obsd
343.1312.
PT
6.98 Hz, 2H), 8.72(d, J = 6.98 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ ppm 23.39, 24.69, 48.46,
53.50, 63.82, 108.94, 115.78, 127.71, 128.23, 128.76, 129.57, 132.62, 133.82, 144.06, 159.80;
IR (KBr) cm-1 3388, 2927, 2780, 1621, 1513, 1387, 1209, 1112, 768, 697; ESI-MS: m/z 293
RI
[M+H]+; ESI-HRMS (m/z): [M+H]+ calcd for C18H21N4, 293.1760; obsd 293.1756.
SC
solid, Yield: 74%; M. P. 114-116 0C; 1H NMR (CDCl3+DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ ppm 1.79(s, 4H),
2.59(s, 4H), 4.24(s, 2H), 6.92-7.00(m, 1H), 7.12-7.18(m, 1H), 7.40-7.45(m, 1H), 7.59-7.64(m,
1H), 8.50-8.59(m, 1H), 8.80-8.88 (m, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ ppm 23.18, 48.08,
U
53.38, 63.56, 108.10, 108.21, 125.99, 126.22, 127.30, 132.93, 136.05, 139.02, 149.67; IR (KBr)
cm-1 3403, 2958, 1613, 1505, 1318, 1196, 1045, 795, 708; ESI-MS: m/z 285 [M+H]+; ESI-
AN
HRMS (m/z): [M+H]+ calcd for C15H17N4S, 285.1168; obsd 285.1165.
To the solution of piperazine (1 mmol) in methanol, formaldehyde solution (37%) (3 mmol) was
added. 2-phenylimidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidine (1 mmol) was added to the above reaction mixture
with constant stirring. Then the reaction mixture was stirred under reflux conditions. After
D
completion of the reaction, as monitored by TLC, methanol was evaporated under reduced
pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography using ethyl
TE
acetate/methanol (9:1) as eluent to get the desired product in 75% yield. Light red solid, M. P.
183-185 0C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ ppm 2.49(brs, 1H), 2.93(s, 8H), 4.03(s, 2H), 6.95(dd,
J = 4.15, 6.61 Hz, 1H), 7.40(d, J = 7.17 Hz, 1H), 7.42-7.50(m, 2H), 7.81(d, J = 6.98 Hz, 2H),
EP
8.57(dd, J = 1.88, 3.96 Hz, 1H), 8.81(dd, J = 1.51, 6.79 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3+DMSO-d6,
75 MHz) δ ppm 9.07, 46.37, 52.73, 108.73, 115.61, 128.26, 128.76, 128.84, 128.93, 134.22,
145.48, 148.01, 150.23; IR (KBr) cm-1 3423, 2937, 2806, 2677, 1610, 1498, 1399, 1226, 1170,
C
1034, 766, 701; ESI-MS: m/z 294 [M+H]+; ESI-HRMS (m/z): [M+H]+ calcd for C17H20N5,
294.1713; obsd 294.1707.
AC
yield. White solid, M. P. 124-126 0C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ ppm 2.28(s, 3H), 2.32-
2.70(m, 8H), 4.02(s, 2H), 6.88(dd, J = 4.15, 6.79 Hz, 1H), 7.40(d, J = 7.17 Hz, 1H), 7.47(t, J =
7.55 Hz, 2H), 7.87(d, J = 6.98 Hz, 2H), 7.57(dd, J = 1.88, 3.96 Hz, 1H), 8.79(dd, J = 1.88, 6.79
Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ ppm 45.73, 51.50, 52.54, 54.87, 107.95, 114.82, 127.99,
128.32, 128.83, 133.07, 133.62, 146.15, 148.00, 149.52; IR (KBr) cm-1 3447, 2927, 2792, 1608,
1502, 1449, 1342, 1151, 1008, 767, 693; ESI-MS: m/z 308 [M+H]+; ESI-HRMS (m/z): [M+H]+
PT
calcd for C18H22N5, 308.1869; obsd 308.1862.
RI
a]pyrimidine (6c): To the solution of 4-tosylpiperazine (1 mmol) in methanol, formaldehyde
solution (37%) (5 mmol) was added. 2-Phenylimidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidine (1 mmol) was added to
the above reaction mixture with constant stirring. Then the reaction mixture was stirred under
SC
reflux conditions. After completion of the reaction, as monitored by TLC, methanol was
evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography
using ethyl acetate/methanol (9:1) as eluent to get the desired product in 71% yield. White solid,
U
M. P. 185-187 0C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ ppm 2.43(d, J = 7.55 Hz, 7H), 3.08(s, 4H),
4.95(s, 2H), 6.93(dd, J = 3.77, 6.79 Hz, 1H), 7.28-7.38(m, 5H), 7.60(d, J = 7.55 Hz, 2H), 7.73(d,
AN
J = 7.55 Hz, 2H), 8.54(dd, J = 1.51, 6.79 Hz, 1H), 8.59(dd, J = 1.51, 4.53 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR
(CDCl3+DMSO-d6, 75 MHz) δ ppm 22.05, 46.79, 50.70, 52.15, 79.25, 109.58, 121.01, 128.46,
129.04, 129.43, 129.51, 130.74, 130.80, 132.92, 134.51, 134.86, 144.72, 151.30; IR (KBr) cm-1
M
3446, 2925, 2855, 1347, 1165, 1128, 733, 546; ESI-MS: m/z 448 [M+H]+; ESI-HRMS (m/z):
[M+H]+ calcd for C24H26O2N5S, 448.1801; obsd 448.1784.
D
formaldehyde solution (37%) (10 mmol) was added. Imidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidine (2 mmol) was
added to the above reaction mixture with constant stirring. Then the reaction mixture was stirred
under reflux conditions. After completion of the reaction, as monitored by TLC, methanol was
EP
evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography
using ethyl acetate/methanol (9:1) as eluent to get the desired product in 70-93% yield. Poor
solubility of some imidazopyrimidine dimers in NMR solvents resulted in incomplete spectral
C
data.
AC
PT
4.8.3. 1,4-bis((2-(4-Chlorophenyl)imidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidin-3-yl)methyl)piperazine (7c): White
solid, Yield: 86%; M. P. 207-209 0C; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz) δ ppm 2.11-2.44(m, 4H),
RI
2.71-3.15(m, 4H), 4.02(brs, 2H), 5.00(brs, 2H), 7.08-7.32(m, 2H), 7.54(d, J = 8.30 Hz, 4H),
7.78-7.99(m, 4H), 8.58-8.73(m, 2H), 8.90-9.29(m, 2H); IR (KBr) cm-1 2983, 1610, 1502, 1335,
1215, 1128, 1005, 832, 766; ESI-MS: m/z 569 [M+H]+; ESI-HRMS (m/z): [M+H]+ calcd for
SC
C30H27N8Cl2, 569.1730; obsd 569.1721.
U
Yield: 70%; M. P. 287-290 0C; 1H NMR (CDCl3+DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ ppm 1.44(s, 18H),
AN
2.22-2.51(brs, 8H), 3.97(s, 4H), 6.88-6.96(m, 2H), 8.41-8.47(m, 2H), 8.75-8.82(m, 2H); 13C
NMR (CDCl3+DMSO-d6, 75 MHz) δ ppm 32.10, 34.60, 52.23, 53.40, 108.56, 114.16, 134.58,
147.32, 149.42, 155.22; IR (KBr) cm-1 3425, 2948, 2802, 1611, 1499, 1336, 1236, 1146, 1005,
767; ESI-MS: m/z 461 [M+H]+; ESI-HRMS (m/z): [M+H]+ calcd for C26H37N8, 461.3135; obsd
M
461.3134.
D
8H), 4.01(s, 4H), 6.89(dd, J = 4.53, 6.79 Hz, 2H), 7.39(d, J = 6.79 Hz, 2H), 7.42-7.50(m, 4H),
7.80(d, J = 7.55 Hz, 4H), 8.58(dd, J = 1.51, 3.77 Hz, 2H); IR (KBr) cm-1 3442, 2950, 2808, 1610,
1499, 1342, 1225, 1121, 1008, 771, 703; ESI-MS: m/z 529 [M+H]+; ESI-HRMS (m/z): [M+H]+
EP
White solid, Yield: 73%; M. P. 218-221 0C; 1H NMR (CDCl3+DMSO-d6, 300 MHz) δ ppm
2.46(brs, 4H), 3.05(brs, 4H), 3.14(s, 28H), 7.37(d, J = 8.12 Hz, 2H), 7.59(d, J = 8.30 Hz, 2H);
AC
13
C NMR (CDCl3+DMSO-d6, 75 MHz) δ ppm 24.44, 31.19, 33.66, 67.33, 78.60, 107.90, 108.62,
121.74, 132.58, 157.91, 161.82; IR (KBr) cm-1 2954, 1622, 1507, 1448, 1341, 1216, 1146, 1004,
801; ESI-MS: m/z 489 [M+H]+; ESI-HRMS (m/z): [M+H]+ calcd for C28H41N8, 489.3400; obsd
489.3400.
2H); IR (KBr) cm-1 3421, 3078, 1613, 1507, 1336, 1268, 1140, 1004, 758; ESI-MS: m/z 601
[M+H]+; ESI-HRMS (m/z): [M+H]+ calcd for C38H33N8, 601.2822; obsd 601.2826.
PT
1H), 8.52-8.65(m, 2H); IR (KBr) cm-1 3074, 3021, 1610, 1527, 1461, 1344, 1199, 1099, 782,
711; ESI-MS: m/z 637 [M+H]+; ESI-HRMS (m/z): [M+H]+ calcd for C30H25N8Cl4, 637.0950;
obsd 637.0951.
RI
4.8.9. 1,4-bis((5,7-Dimethoxy-2-phenylimidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidin-3-yl)methyl)piperazine (7i):
White solid, Yield: 70%; M. P. 273-275 0C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ ppm 2.68(s, 4H),
SC
3.08(s, 4H), 3.67(s, 6H), 3.78(s, 6H), 4.41(s, 4H), 5.47(s, 2H), 6.93-7.14(m, 6H), 7.39-7.56(m,
4H); IR (KBr) cm-1 3402, 2947, 1665, 1526, 1381, 1204, 995, 770, 699; ESI-MS: m/z 621
[M+H]+; ESI-HRMS (m/z): [M+H]+ calcd for C34H37N8O4, 621.2409; obsd 621.2415.
U
AN
4.8.10. 1,4-bis((2-(Thiophen-2-yl)imidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidin-3-yl)methyl)piperazine (7j): White
solid, Yield: 73%; M. P. 201-203 0C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ ppm 3.40(s, 6H), 5.00(s,
4H), 5.57(s, 2H), 6.90(dd, J = 4.12, 6.71 Hz, 2H), 7.13-7.17(m, 2H), 7.41-7.46(m, 2H), 7.55-
7.66(m, 4H), 8.49(dd, J = 1.83, 6.71 Hz, 2H), 8.57(dd, J = 1.83, 3.96 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR
M
(DMSO-d6, 75 MHz) δ ppm 48.59, 49.04, 108.87, 113.88, 120.58, 126.13, 127.52, 128.27,
136.10, 146.27, 151.53, 151.77; IR (KBr) cm-1 3345, 2840, 1616, 1516, 1431, 1318, 1126, 763,
D
702; ESI-MS: m/z 513 [M+H]+; ESI-HRMS (m/z): [M+H]+ calcd for C26H25N8S2, 513.1638;
obsd 513.1635.
TE
2.74(m, 4H), 3.25-4.02(m, 8H), 6.76-6.92(m, 2H), 7.16-7.48(m, 8H), 7.87(dd, J = 2.26, 6.79 Hz,
1H), 8.51-8.64(m, 2H), 8.77-8.90(m, 1H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz) δ ppm 19.01, 52. 44,
54.66, 108.85, 120.64, 126.07, 126.80, 129.31, 130.35, 131.67, 132.21, 137.01, 138.34, 146.80,
C
149.49; IR (KBr) cm-1 3392, 3066, 2926, 1616, 1497, 1327, 1133, 1005, 765; ESI-MS: m/z 529
[M+H]+; ESI-HRMS (m/z): [M+H]+ calcd for C32H33N8, 529.2822; obsd 529.2811.
AC
4.9. Evaluation of the antiproliferative activity against A-549, HeLa, Panc-1and MDA-MB-231
cell lines.
4.9.1. Materials and Methods, Cell Cultures, Maintenance and Antiproliferative Evaluation:
The cell lines, A-549, HeLa, Panc-1 and MDA-MB-231(lung carcinoma, cervical, pancreatic,
and neuroblastoma) which were used in this study were procured from American Type Culture
PT
Collection (ATCC), United States. The synthesized test compounds were evaluated for their in
vitro antiproliferative activity in these four different human cancer cell lines. A protocol of 48
hrs continuous drug exposure was used, and a SRB cell proliferation assay was used to estimate
RI
cell viability or growth. All the cell lines were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
(containing 10% FBS in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 0C). Cells were trypsinized
when sub-confluent from T25 flasks/60 mm dishes and seeded in 96-well plates in 100 µL
SC
aliquots at plating densities depending on the doubling time of individual cell lines. The
microtiter plates were incubated at 37 0C, 5% CO2, 95% air, and 100% relative humidity for 24
hrs prior to addition of experimental drugs and were incubated for 48 hrs with different doses
U
(0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 100 µM) of prepared derivatives where DMSO treated cells and DMF treated
AN
cells were used as negative controls for simple Mannich bases and symmetrical dimers
respectively. After 48 hrs incubation at 37 0C, cell monolayers were fixed by the addition of 10%
(wt/vol) cold trichloroacetic acid and incubated at 4 0C for 1hr and were then stained with
0.057% SRB dissolved in 1% acetic acid for 30 min at room temperature. Unbound SRB was
M
washed with 1% acetic acid. The protein-bound dye was dissolved in 10 mM Tris base solution
for OD determination at 510 nm using a micro plate reader (Enspire, Perkin Elmer, and USA).
D
Using the seven absorbance measurements [time zero, (Tz), control growth, (C), and test growth
in the presence of drug at the five concentration levels (Ti)], the percentage growth was
TE
calculated at each of the drug concentrations levels. Percentage of growth inhibition was
calculated as:
The dose response parameter, growth inhibition of 50% (GI50) was calculated from [(Ti-Tz)/(C-
Tz)] x 100 = 50, which is the drug concentration resulting in a 50% reduction in the net protein
AC
increase (as measured by SRB staining) in control cells during the drug incubation. Values were
calculated for this parameter if the level of activity is reached. However, if the effect is not
reached or is exceeded, the value for that parameter was expressed as greater or less than the
maximum or minimum concentrations tested.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Spectras:
PT
RI
U SC
AN
1
H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) spectrum of compound 5a
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
13
C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) spectrum of compound 5a
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
SC
1
H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) spectrum of compound 5b
U
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
13
C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) spectrum of compound 5b
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
1
H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) spectrum of compound 5c
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
13
C NMR (CDCl3+DMSO-d6, 75 MHz) spectrum of compound 5c
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
1
H NMR (CDCl3+DMSO-d6, 300 MHz) spectrum of compound 5d
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
13
C NMR (CDCl3+DMSO-d6, 75 MHz) spectrum of compound 5d
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
1
H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) spectrum of compound 5e
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
13
C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) spectrum of compound 5e
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
1
H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) spectrum of 5f
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
13
C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) of compound 5f
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
1
H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) spectrum of compound 5g
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
13
C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) spectrum of compound 5g
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
1
H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) spectrum of compound 5h
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
13
C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) spectrum of compound 5h
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
1
H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) spectrum of compound 5i
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
13
C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) spectrum of compound 5i
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
1
H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) spectrum of compound 5j
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
13
C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) spectrum of compound 5j
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
1
H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) spectrum of compound 5k
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
13
C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) spectrum of compound 5k
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
1
H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) spectrum of compound 5l
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
13
C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) spectrum of compound 5l
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
1
H NMR (CDCl3+DMSO-d6,, 500 MHz) spectrum of compound 5m
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
13
C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) spectrum of compound 5m
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
1
H NMR of (CDCl3, 500 MHz) spectrum of compound 6a
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
13
C NMR (CDCl3+DMSO-d6, 75 MHz) spectrum of compound 6a
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
1
H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) spectrum of compound 6b
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
13
C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) spectrum of compound 6b
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
1
H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) spectrum of compound 6c
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
13
C NMR (CDCl3+DMSO-d6, 75 MHz) spectrum of compound 6c
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
1
H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) spectrum of compound 7a
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
1
H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) spectrum of compound 7b
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
1
H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz) spectrum of compound 7c
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
1
H NMR (CDCl3+DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) spectrum of compound 7d
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
13
C NMR (CDCl3+DMSO-d6, 75 MHz) spectrum of compound 7d
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
1
H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) spectrum of compound 7e
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
1
H NMR (CDCl3+DMSO-d6, 300 MHz) spectrum of compound 7f
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
13
C NMR (CDCl3+DMSO-d6, 75 MHz) spectrum of compound 7f
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
1
H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz) spectrum of compound 7g
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
1
H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) spectrum of compound 7h
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
1
H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) spectrum of compound 7i
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
1
H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) spectrum of compound 7j
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
13
C NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz) spectrum of compound 7j
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
1
H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) spectrum of compound 7k
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
13
M
PT
RI
U SC
AN
13
C NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz) spectrum of compound 7l
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
HPLC data
Conditions:
Column: Kromasil 100 C18, 5u
Detection: 210-400 nm
PT
Instrument: Waters 2998
RI
HPLC of compound 7a
SC
B: Methanol (20 : 80)
U
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
HPLC of compound 7b
B: Methanol (5 : 95)
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
HPLC of compound 7c
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
CEP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
HPLC of compound 7e
B: Methanol (5 : 95)
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
HPLC of compound 7g
B: Methanol (5 : 95)
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
HPLC of compound 7h
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
HPLC of compound 7i
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC