Sr.

No Unit Process Module Track Issue/Need Current process/ challenges

SRF_AD_16All Busines5. Order to OPM OPM OPM costing sho OPM costing should be booked in
SRF_AD_12FCB 7. Plan to OPM OPM At the time of Third party charges not getting
SRF_AD_12All Busines7. Plan to OPM OPM Allocation of e In standard expense allocation f
SRF_AD_11SCB 7. Plan to OPM OPM Breakup of WIPWIP valuation account should be
SCM_4 FCB 5. Order to OM OPM Presently therePresently there is no system in
175 All Busines7. Plan to OPM OPM Product costingNow we are doing manual entries
140 SCB 7. Plan to OPM OPM System do not sRequirement is to have multiple
Requirement Scope New Type New Effort Count Set Technical Status
OPM costing shoulAdditional Technical 3. High 0
Third party chargAdditional Functional 3. High 0
In standard expenAdditional Functional 3. High 0
WIP valuation accAdditional Technical 3. High 0
Presently there Additional Functional 2. Medium 0
Now we are doing2. Large S Technical 3. High 2
Requirement is to5. Not Fea Functional 3. High 0
Discussion in Progress Detailed Status Remark Solution Track
Issue & Solution yet to be 0. Discussion Required 2
Issue & Solution yet to be 0. Discussion Required 2
Issue & Solution yet to be 0. Discussion Required 2
Issue & Solution yet to be 0. Discussion Required 2
Issue & Solution yet to be 0. Discussion RequiClubbed wit 2
Issue & Solution yet to be 0. Discussion Required 2
Issue & Solution yet to be 0. Discussion Required 2
Count of Sr. No Track
Discussion in Progress Finance OPM SCM Total Result
Issue & Solution yet to be concluded 21 10 31
Solution discussed & in various stages 36 6 32 74
Total Result 57 16 32 105
259
 Sr. No Unit Process Module Track Owner Issue/Need
78 PFB

OPM/Inventory

Plan to Produce OPM OPM Sandeep

108 FCB
Plan to Produce OPM OPM
127 FCB Order to Cash OM OPM

7. Plan to System do not support multiple

140 SCB OPM OPM
Produce approval hierarchy for formula.

7. Plan to Product costing entry to be

175 All Businesses OPM OPM
Produce booked in respective code.

Activity go on for catalyst

regeneration in plant , cost
7. Plan to
OPM_2 FCB OPM OPM allocation from catalyst
Produce
generation process to actual
product / item cost

Presently there is no system in

Oracle wherein Business can
map SHIP FROM address which
is different from BILL FROM.
SCM_4 FCB 5. Order to Cash OM OPM We have requirement of that to
be able to generate E-Way
through api which is done
through manual template as of
now.

7. Plan to
SRF_AD_112 FCB/SCB OPM OPM Outside processing related issues
Produce

7. Plan to Data Obfuscation approach for

SRF_AD_113 SCB OPM OPM Sandeep
Produce SCB

7. Plan to Breakup of WIP valuation

SRF_AD_116 SCB OPM OPM
Produce account

During ISO  manual entry is

7. Plan to
SRF_AD_117 SCB OPM OPM passed for sales and RM
Produce
consumption in respective units

Allocation of expense based on

7. Plan to
SRF_AD_128 All Businesses OPM OPM percentage of production is
Produce
required

7. Plan to At the time of RTV all expenses

SRF_AD_129 FCB OPM OPM
Produce are added to the product cost

7. Plan to
SRF_AD_133 FCB OPM OPM Outside processing issue
Produce

# SRF - General [Restricted use] - This mail, document can be used by recipients for its intended purpose only.
 OPM costing should be booked
in respective GLs (like RM
consumption GLs, Inc/Dec in
SRF_AD_168 All Businesses 5. Order to Cash OPM OPM
stock GLs) rather than posting
every thing in Product cost, batch
variance GL.

Item getting received from

supplier should be inspection
6. Procure to
SRF_AD_183 FCB OPM OPM enabled but same item received
Pay
thorugh IRISO then it should be
auto inspected.

# SRF - General [Restricted use] - This mail, document can be used by recipients for its intended purpose only.
 Current process/ challenges Requirement

Transactional Controls to be built in subinventory transfer,

Move Order Issue & transfer etc)
1. User wise sub-inventory access control
2. Sub-inventory wise Shipping control i.e. Shipment can be
To stop wrong transactions
done from allowed sub-inventories

E.g. Item "BRIGHT-CHIP" should be shipped from FGL

location only but system auto picks it from RML sometimes

Require workflow for ‘Approve with Variance’ in OPM Quality

OPM Quality
Samples
There are cases where customer is required to invoiced from our
SRF org but material get shipped from third party locations.
Options are required to capture Bill Frow location in sales order Order Management

Requirement is to have multiple user to approve the formula

Requirement is to have multiple user to approve the formula (maybe 3 or
(maybe 3 or more) creation. Required for existing MFG plant -
more) creation. Required for existing MFG plant - Dahez (S16) and
Dahez (S16) and Bhiwadi plant (S01) and for any new plants in
Bhiwadi plant (S01) and for any new plants in near future.
near future.

Now we are doing manual entries of producting costing in

Now we are doing manual entries of producting costing in month end if
month end if auto come easier to identified the transaction level
auto come easier to identified the transaction level entries also.
entries also.

Activity go on for catalyst regeneration in plant , cost allocation Activity go on for catalyst regeneration in plant , cost allocation from
from catalyst generation process to actual product / item cost catalyst generation process to actual product / item cost

Presently there is no system in Oracle wherein Business can Presently there is no system in Oracle wherein Business can map SHIP
map SHIP FROM address which is different from BILL FROM. FROM address which is different from BILL FROM. We have
We have requirement of that to be able to generate E-Way requirement of that to be able to generate E-Way through api which is
through api which is done through manual template as of now. done through manual template as of now.

There are certain manufacturing processes which needs to be

There are certain manufacturing processes which needs to be outsourced
outsourced to third party (job worker) for processing.
to third party (job worker) for processing.
There can be different scenario like:
There can be different scenario like:
- SRF to Job-worker & back
- SRF to Job-worker & back
- SRF to Job-worker and then to another job-worker and
- SRF to Job-worker and then to another job-worker and back to SRF
back to SRF
- Supplier to Job-worker and from Job-worker to SRF
- Supplier to Job-worker and from Job-worker to SRF
Data masking required at granular level ( like item description Data masking required at granular level ( like item description needs to be
needs to be masked at child org level) masked at child org level)

WIP valuation account should be different ans it should be WIP valuation account should be different ans it should be based on
based on product type/category/or any kind of other sources. product type/category/or any kind of other sources.

During ISO  manual entry is passed for sales and RM During ISO  manual entry is passed for sales and RM consumption in
consumption in respective units respective units

In standard expense allocation feature, allocation of expense In standard expense allocation feature, allocation of expense depends on
depends on basis of fixed expense type. Allocation of expense basis of fixed expense type. Allocation of expense based on percentage of
based on percentage of production is required production is required

Third party charges not getting reversed while making RTV or

Third party charges not getting reversed while making RTV or correction
correction

There are certain manufacturing processes which needs to be

There are certain manufacturing processes which needs to be outsourced
outsourced to third party (job worker) for processing.
to third party (job worker) for processing.
There can be different scenario like:
There can be different scenario like:
- SRF to Job-worker & back
- SRF to Job-worker & back
- SRF to Job-worker and then to another job-worker and
- SRF to Job-worker and then to another job-worker and back to SRF
back to SRF
- Supplier to Job-worker and from Job-worker to SRF
- Supplier to Job-worker and from Job-worker to SRF

# SRF - General [Restricted use] - This mail, document can be used by recipients for its intended purpose only.
 OPM costing should be booked in respective GLs (like RM OPM costing should be booked in respective GLs (like RM consumption
consumption GLs, Inc/Dec in stock GLs) rather than posting GLs, Inc/Dec in stock GLs) rather than posting every thing in Product
every thing in Product cost, batch variance GL. cost, batch variance GL.

Exclude the inspection steps in case of receipt of items agaisnt

Exclude the inspection steps in case of receipt of items agaisnt Internal
Internal Requistion. If an item is having inspection required
Requistion. If an item is having inspection required setup , then the system
setup , then the system is forcing to follow the inspection steps
is forcing to follow the inspection steps agaisnt the receipt of the same
agaisnt the receipt of the same item agaisnt internal requisition.
item agaisnt internal requisition. Business doesn't wants to inspect items
Business doesn't wants to inspect items while receiving the
while receiving the same against IR.
same against IR.

# SRF - General [Restricted use] - This mail, document can be used by recipients for its intended purpose only.
 Scope New Type New Effort Count Set Technical Status Discussion in Progress

Solution discussed & in

Inscope Technical Revised 3 Pending deployment various stages
Solution discussed & in
Inscope Technical 1. Low 2 various stages

Solution discussed & in

Inscope Functional 1. Low various stages

5. Not
Feasible/ Not
Functional 3. High 0
Recommende
d Issue & Solution yet to be
concluded

2. Large
Technical 3. High 2 Issue & Solution yet to be
Scope
concluded

Additional Functional 3. High 0

Issue & Solution yet to be
concluded

Additional Functional 2. Medium 0

Issue & Solution yet to be

concluded

Additional Functional 2. Medium 0

Solution discussed & in

various stages

Additional Technical Revised 4 Solution discussed & in

Pending deployment various stages

Additional Technical 3. High 0 Issue & Solution yet to be

concluded

Additional Technical 3. High 0

Issue & Solution yet to be
concluded

Additional Functional 3. High 0

Issue & Solution yet to be
concluded

Additional Functional 3. High 0 Issue & Solution yet to be

concluded

Additional Functional 2. Medium 0

Solution discussed & in

various stages

# SRF - General [Restricted use] - This mail, document can be used by recipients for its intended purpose only.
 Additional Technical 3. High 0

Issue & Solution yet to be

concluded

Additional Functional 2. Medium 0

Issue & Solution yet to be
concluded

# SRF - General [Restricted use] - This mail, document can be used by recipients for its intended purpose only.
 Solution
Detailed Status Remark Owner
Track

4. Underdevelopment 1

1. Approach Only 1

To be confirmed if other configuration for

1. Approach Only OSP is also in progress 1

0. Discussion Required 2

0. Discussion Required 2

1. Approach Only 2

0. Discussion Required Clubbed with OSP issues 2

To be confirmed if other configuration for

1. Approach Only OSP is also in progress 2

4. Underdevelopment 2

0. Discussion Required 2

1. Approach Only 2

0. Discussion Required 2

0. Discussion Required 2

To be confirmed if other configuration for

1. Approach Only OSP is also in progress 2

# SRF - General [Restricted use] - This mail, document can be used by recipients for its intended purpose only.
 0. Discussion Required 2

1. Approach Only 2

# SRF - General [Restricted use] - This mail, document can be used by recipients for its intended purpose only.
# SRF - General [Restricted use] - This mail, document can be used by recipients for its intended purpose only.
# SRF - General [Restricted use] - This mail, document can be used by recipients for its intended purpose only.
 Legal Entity
Allocation Code
Month
Year

Sl. No Organization Item Production Quantity

Production Quantity Percentage
SL Issue No Cemli Type Count
Concurrent Program 1
1 93 WebADI 1
Interface 1
2 117 Form Personalization 2
3 119 Form Personalization 2
4 122 Form Personalization 3
Concurrent Program 3

5 159
Form Personalization 1
Report 1

6 48 Form Personalization 3
7 76 Form Personalization 5
Form Personalization 9
Concurrent Program 1
8 81 Alert 1
Workflow 1
PL/SQL Program 1
9 126 Form Personalization 1
SCM_1 Notification 1
10 SRF_AD_78 OAF Page 1
SRF_AD_87
11 SRF_AD_39 Concurrent Program 1
SRF_AD_63 Form Personalization 2
12
SRF_AD_64
Alert 1
13 SRF_AD_73
Report 1
Concurrent Program 2
14 SRF_AD_80
Form Personalization 1
15 SRF_AD_83 Concurrent Program 2
16 New SCM1 Notification
17 152 Form Personalization 3
18 90 OAF Personalization 1
19 43 PL/SQL Program 1
DFF 1
20 1 Form 2
Report 1
Report 1
21 5
DFF 1
Personalization 4
22 6, 8, 16 PL/SQL Program
Table 1
WebADI 2
23 22
Interface 4
24 35 Report 1
Form 1
25 47,99,177,SRF_AD_165 Interface 2
Table 1
Interface 1
26 52,53
Personalization 1
Form 1
Table 1
27 54
PL/SQL Program 1
Interface 2
Report 1
28 59
Personalization 1
29 2 Personalization 1
Report 4
30 58 Custom Table 1
Alert 1
31 SRF_AD_160 Report 1
DFF 1
32 4
32 4
Form Personalization 3
OAF Page 1
33 13
Interface 1
34 170 Digital Signature 1
WebADI 1
35 174 DFF 1
Report 1
DFF 1
36 9 Form Personalization 6
Alert 1
Report 1
37 32 Notification 1
Report 1
38 84 Concurrent Program 1
DFF 1
39 Fin_24 Form Personalization 9
Report 1
Form
40 SRF_AD_184
41 SRF_AD_96 Concurrent Program 2
DFF 1
7 Concurrent Program 1
42 Form Personalization 1
Form Personalization 1
SRF_AD_61
43 PL/SQL Program
44 78 Personalization 3
45 SRF_AD_113 Report 4
46 63 AME Customization 1
DFF 1
47 158 Form Personalization 1
DFF 1
SRF_AD_103
48 WebADI 1
 Status Expected Completion (Development) Developer New
Completed Completed (Moved to Production) Prodipto N
Completed Completed (Moved to Production) Prodipto N
Completed Completed (Moved to Production) Prodipto N
Completed N
Completed N
Completed N
Completed

N
Completed N
Completed
N
FDD User Testing Ajay N
FDD Completed Ajay N
FDD User Testing Sohan/Ajay N
FDD User Testing Sohan/Ajay N
FDD User Testing Sohan/Ajay N
FDD User Testing Sohan/Ajay N
FDD User Testing Sohan/Ajay N
FDD 7-Oct-22 Sohan Y
API Change Completed and OAF changes Sohan/
FDD Y
pending Vishwanath
FDD API Change Completed and OAF changes Sohan/
pending Vishwanath Y
FDD 21-Oct-22 Sohan Y
FDD
Development Completed, FDD Approval PeSohan Y
FDD 13-Oct-22 Sohan Y
FDD 13-Oct-22 Sohan Y
FDD 18-Oct-22 Sohan Y
FDD Y
FDD 10-Oct-22 Sohan Y
No FDD Y
Completed N
Completed N
Completed Completed (Not Moved to Production) Prodipto N
FDD Sohan N
FDD Sohan N
FDD Sohan N
No FDD N
No FDD N
FDD 14-Oct Prodipto N
FDD 14-Oct Prodipto N
FDD 14-Oct Prodipto N
FDD N
FDD N
No FDD N
FDD Ajay N
FDD Ajay N
FDD Ajay N
No FDD N
No FDD N
FDD N
FDD N
FDD N
FDD N
FDD N
FDD N
FDD Prodipto Y
No FDD Y
No FDD Y
No FDD Y
No FDD Y
Completed Completed (Not Moved to Production) Sohan Yadav N
Completed Completed (Not Moved to Production) Sohan Yadav N
FDD 10-Oct Sohan Yadav Y
FDD 10-Oct Sohan Yadav Y
No FDD 20-Oct Sohan Yadav N
FDD Initial Working module shown to user, UserProdipto N
FDD Initial Working module shown to user, UserProdipto N
FDD Initial Working module shown to user, UserProdipto N
FDD Completed(In User Testing) Ajay N
FDD Completed(In User Testing) Ajay N
FDD Completed(In User Testing) Ajay N
FDD 12-Oct Ajay Y
FDD 12-Oct Ajay Y
FDD 12-Oct Ajay Y
Completed Completed (Not Moved to Production) Prodipto N
FDD 14-Oct Prodipto Y
FDD 14-Oct Prodipto Y
FDD 14-Oct Prodipto Y

25-Oct Ajay Y
FDD 24-Oct Prodipto Y
FDD Y
FDD Y
FDD Y
FDD Y
FDD Y
FDD Completed (Not Moved to Production) Prodipto N
FDD Completed (Not Moved to Production) Prodipto Y
FDD Completed (Not Moved to Production) Prodipto N
FDD Ajay N
FDD Ajay N
FDD Completed (Not Moved to Production) Satya Y
FDD Completed (Not Moved to Production) Satya Y
 No of Issues
(UnderDeveloped
Name Track stage) Additional Info Status
Sachin was busy with client call so will have
Sachin SCM 14 discussion for 14 SCM issues tomorrow
morning as discussed on phone.

Both resolved :
* 1 issue already in production deployment
Sandeep OPM 2 Not Nee
* 2nd resolved and need signoff from client to
deploy

As per Satya, Owning only 8 issues.

* Need Status, Effort Required, Priority, Target
SATYA Finance 21 Date for these 8 issues as discussed.
* Need to understand and discuss with team
for the ownership of other 13 issues and
other details.

What about 13?

Jyoti Finance (Need to confirm)
 Effort Target
Required Priority Date Issues ( in FDD stage) Phone Number

9036780474

Sandeep exploring the 14 FDD stage issue.

* Need Bullet points on clarification required
Not Needed 9052441916
* Need time from SRF business team to
discuss further

9966500045
 Last Date Additional Details

18-Nov-22
Joined in Apr (first SCM project)

18-Nov-22

SRM champion, 22 years, Newly joined

22-Oct-22

1 year (joined IBM last year, total 8 years, LOW - 22nd Oct)
 7. Plan to System do not support multiple approval
140 SCB OPM OPM
Produce hierarchy for formula.

All 7. Plan to Product costing entry to be booked in

175 OPM OPM
Businesses Produce respective code.

Presently there is no system in Oracle

wherein Business can map SHIP FROM
address which is different from BILL
5. Order to
SCM_4 FCB OM OPM FROM. We have requirement of that to
Cash
be able to generate E-Way through api
which is done through manual template
as of now.

7. Plan to
SRF_AD_116 SCB OPM OPM Breakup of WIP valuation account
Produce

All 7. Plan to Allocation of expense based on

SRF_AD_128 OPM OPM
Businesses Produce percentage of production is required

OPM costing should be booked in

respective GLs (like RM consumption
All 5. Order to
SRF_AD_168 OPM OPM GLs, Inc/Dec in stock GLs) rather than
Businesses Cash
posting every thing in Product cost, batch
variance GL.
Requirement is to have multiple user to
5. Not Issue &
approve the formula (maybe 3 or more)
Feasible/ Not Solution yet
creation. Required for existing MFG plant -  Functional 3. High 0
Recommende to be
Dahez (S16) and Bhiwadi plant (S01) and
d concluded
for any new plants in near future.

Now we are doing manual entries of Issue &

producting costing in month end if auto 2. Large Solution yet
Technical 3. High 2
come easier to identified the transaction Scope to be
level entries also. concluded

Presently there is no system in Oracle

wherein Business can map SHIP FROM Issue &
address which is different from BILL Solution yet
Additional Functional 2. Medium 0
FROM. We have requirement of that to be to be
able to generate E-Way through api which is concluded
done through manual template as of now.

Issue &
WIP valuation account should be different
Solution yet
ans it should be based on product Additional Technical 3. High 0
to be
type/category/or any kind of other sources.
concluded
In standard expense allocation feature,
Issue &
allocation of expense depends on basis of
Solution yet
fixed expense type. Allocation of expense Additional Functional 3. High 0
to be
based on percentage of production is
concluded
required

OPM costing should be booked in respective Issue &

GLs (like RM consumption GLs, Inc/Dec in Solution yet
Additional Technical 3. High 0
stock GLs) rather than posting every thing in to be
Product cost, batch variance GL. concluded
 Info Required

0. Discussion
Required

0. Discussion
Required

0. Discussion Clubbed with

Required OSP issues

0. Discussion
Required

0. Discussion
Required

0. Discussion
Required