Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FIGURE 1 | Conceptual model of the mediating roles of career between proactive personality, social support, and pre-retirement anxiety.
=
N
(
x
i
o
i
a
l
e
r
c
i
s
i
t
a
t
v
i
p
i
2
T
61
51
41
31
21
11
01
98
7654
21
l
b
ir
a
V
4
1.
1.
4.
1.
0.
1.
1.
1.
0.
0−
0.
0−
0.
0−
∗
∗
2.
0−
∗
∗
2.
1.
0−
0.
G1
∗
2.
0
3
1.
0.
2.
3.
2.
2.
∗
∗
3.
3.
4.
0.
3.
1.
0−
∗
∗
4.
0−
gA
2
∗
6
0.
2.
2.
3.
2.
3.
∗
∗
2.
2.
0.
e
l
n
iS
3
∗
1.
0−
0.
0−
0.
0−
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
2.
0−
∗
∗
3.
0−
0.
0−
∗
∗
5.
0−
e
ir
r
M4
∗
1.
0
2
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0−
1.
4.
4.
2.
0−
e
t
pe
S5
de
c
r
v
id
∗
2.
0
5
0.
1.
0.
0.
0−
0.
1.
1.
0−
0.
0−
0.
0−
de
di
W6
0
1.
0−
∗
∗
3.
0.
0
6
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0−
∗
∗
6.
N7
n
d
li
hc
6
0.
2.
0.
0
6
0.
1.
0.
0.
0−
05
0.
yll
a
ic
n
n
iF
8
s
pe
d
∗
3.
0−
∗
∗
3.
0−
∗
∗
5.
0−
∗
∗
4.
0−
∗
∗
3.
0−
∗
∗
4.
0−
∗
∗
3.
0−
v
it
c
P9
y
t
il
p
∗
1.
0−
∗
∗
2.
0−
∗
∗
2.
0−
∗
∗
5.
0−
∗
∗
4.
0−
∗
∗
4.
0−
e
r
01
1.
0−
1.
0−
1.
0−
∗
∗
8.
0−
∗
∗
7.
0−
y li
a
f
SS
11
0.
0.
4.
0−
∗
∗
7.
0−
s
e
i
SS
21
0.
0.
4.
0−
s
ht
SS
31
2.
0−
0.
0−
l
a
ic
n
n
iF
41
e
r
e
r
p
∗
4.
0−
l
a
ic
o
51
o
it
a
gil
bo
a
ic
o
S
61
o
it
a
e
il
a
3
8.
21
9.
51
5.
21
8.
91
4.
71
4.
91
0.
51
2.
73
4.
6.
4.
65
8.
5
7.
4.
5.
0.
9.
0.
7.
9.
9.
5.
DS
0.
0
<
p∗
∗
0.
0
<
p∗
.
p
p
a
ic
o
ht
S
r
ht
a
ic
o
e
i
r
f
,
e
ir
F
;
a
ic
o
yli
a
f
,
S
yli
F
.
de
d
ym
m
e
l
pi
t
lu
u
t
t
ir
a
M
;
1
e
la
e
f
0
e
la
e
l
a
ir
a
m
u
de
d
Proactive personality → (SCS) →social obligation −0.035 0.017 0.054 0.010 0.000 Proactive personality → (SCS) →financial preparedness −0.033 0.023
0.012 0.109 0.004 Proactive personality → (SCS) →social alienation −0.023 0.018 0.015 0.049 0.014 SS friends → (SCS) →social obligation −0.021 0.029
0.059 0.088 0.023 SS friends → (SCS) →financial preparedness 0.044 0.015 −0.008 0.107 0.086 SS friends → (SCS) →social alienation 0.011 0.017 −0.011
0.064 0.287 SS family → (SCS) →social obligation −0.009 0.034 −0.066 0.007 0.269 SS family → (SCS) →financial preparedness 0.037 0.016 −0.017 0.119
0.184 SS family → (SCS) →social alienation 0.009 0.016 −0.009 0.064 0.280 SS Others → (SCS) →social obligation −0.011 0.018 −0.080 0.007 0.214 SS
Others → (SCS) →financial preparedness 0.045 0.038 −0.011 0.146 0.117 SS Others → (SCS) →social alienation 0.011 0.019 −0.010 0.076 0.246
Bootstrapping results were based on 5,000 bootstrapped samples. SE, standard error; BC, bias corrected; CI, confidence interval, LL, lower limit; UL, upper limit; SS,
social support; SCS, subjective career success.
that the participants belong to, which induces risk aversive
studies (e.g., Wawoe, 2010; Claes and Van Loo, 2011), tendencies in its works (Idowu and Olanike, 2010). The
which submitted that proactive people have higher organizational type of which the previous studies were
tendencies to save or plan for future earnings than less conducted was not specified, but it was observed that they
proactive people. The basic tendencies of proactive tested for financial knowledge. Public organization workers
people make it easy for them to have a bigger picture of (public sector) are probably comfortable with the job
the world around them than the mere moment. This result security and pension safety net they feel will cover their
could trigger a sense of helplessness in controlling their retirement demands and possibly do not seek financial
income. The policies and constant changes in political knowledge within or outside the organization. However,
decisions of leaders could affect their plans financially by most workers with private organizations are constantly on
delayed payment of salaries, unpredictable economic the lookout for means to secure themselves considering
trends, etc. the fact that they could lose their job anytime. It can
From the finding of this study, proactive personality was be assumed that the participants in the study were
not a significant predictor of financial preparedness. This exposed to financial knowledge, which influenced their
was in contrast to the study of Hershey and Mowen (2000) decisions to make early plans on savings and starting a
and Segel-Karpas and Werner (2014), who posited that business to keep them liquidated after retirement (Denton
proactivity influences pre-retirement financial planning et al., 2004; McCullough, 2012).
behavior. The difference in the findings could be as a Proactive personality was also found not to predict
result of the organizational type (private and public sector)
social alienation; this was also in contrast to the study of there exists a disconnect between his/her family members
Adams et al. (2004), who posited that as people from his/her coworkers. The closest people around the
approach retirement, they get depressed and feel lonely. person are his/her family, both immediate and extended.
This study showed that proactivity does not directly lead The result further showed that there was a significant
to social alienation. The relationship between proactive negative relationship between social support from
personality and social alienation significant other and social obligation but not financial
could be indirect as there is a possibility that the preparedness and social alienation. This also shows that
relationship could be complex or nonlinear, meaning that the higher one feels supported by his/her significant other,
it could be moderated or mediated by another factor. the lower the anxiety associated with approaching
The second hypothesis of the study predicted a retirement. This finding is also consistent with the
significant negative relationship between social support outcome of some studies (e.g., Casale et al., 2015;
(friends, family, and significant other) and pre-retirement Kugbey et al., 2015; Rapee et al., 2015; Roohafza et al.,
anxiety (financial preparedness, social obligation, and 2015; Lilympaki et al., 2016). The results posit that
social alienation). The results of the path analysis clearly people care about their relationships with others outside
showed that family social support was a significant their families. These significant others could be
negative predictor of social obligation. This means that the coworkers, neighbors, and the relationship with religious
higher support an individual perceives he/she receives or organizations or societies they belonged to. These
hopes to receive from his/her family network, the lower significant others could be of immense help to them upon
the chances that he/she is going to experience anxiety retirement in diverse ways. The relationship established
pertaining to social obligation before retirement. This is with coworkers, neighbors, or religious affiliations makes it
consistent with some findings (e.g., van Tilburg, 1992; easy for an individual to ask for favors for self or family
Price, 1998), which argued that as people approach and gain access to some resources, which normally would
retirement, the family relationship is considerably reflected have required longer processes. For example, a coworker
as this could affect the well-being of the retiree after who is a medical doctor can be reached
retirement. This also can be true as the individual retires,