You are on page 1of 9

EX 4.

The line graph shows the percentage growth of New Zealand population
from 1950 to 2050

Minh Anh

The given line graph illustrates a clear pattern the percentage of the New
Zealand population growth between 1950 and 2050.

Overall, while the 35-64 and 65+ age group witnessed an upward trend, the
opposite was true for people/children in the age range of 0 to 14. Trend trong
phần overview em nên nêu thêm những cái nhất (đối tượng cao/thấp nhất…)
nhé

To illustrate, Specifically, despite a mild decline from 1960 to 1990, a noticeable


growth was recorded in the number of people falling into of the 35 to 64 age
group. In 2050, the 35-64s 35-65-year-olds held (cô nhắc chia cả bài thì QK để
tập trung vào cấu trúc) is the biggest percentage. Sharing the relatively same
trend with this figure with the population of the 35-64s, the percentage of
figure for people aged 65 or older stabilized in the first 4 decades but then
there was a variation in the following 30 years. In 2010, standing at nearly 10
percent, the number of New Zealand elderly people was approximately half of
the number that of people between 35 and 64 years old.

It’s the next big thing

In contrast, in the first 40 years of this period, the figure for people aged 15 to
34 experienced a substantial increase of 15 percent from?. However, the years
between 1990 and 2000 registered a constant decline this figure in the 15-34
age group before the number of 15-to 34-year-old people it plummeted by
one-fouth from 40 percent. Regarding the youngest age bracket people group
in New Zealand, a modest fall was recorded until this age group rose slightly in
the next 40 years time mập mờ. By stark contrast, the a constant decrease was
seen in the figure for people between 15 and 34 years old from 2000 to 2050.

Hải Nam

The given line graph depicts the proportion of four different age groups in the
total of New Zealand’s population/the New Zealand population over a century,
starting from 1950

Overall, while the percentage of people aged from 15 to 34 and 0-14 witnessed
a downward trend, the opposite was true for that of people from 35-64 and
65+. Besides, the data of people in the 15-34 age group dominated other
categories during the period shown. Hỏi cô về tư duy paraphrase. Is the
predominant age group/demographic.

As can be seen from the chart, in 1950, the percentage of people aged from 15-
34, which stood at around 30% in 1950, was three times as much as that of
people aged 65 or older. Then this figure then reached a peak of 45% in 1950
before declining exponentially by one-third in the next 60 years. In similar
fashion, the proportion of New Zealand’s population aged 0-14 experienced a
constant decrease of over a half from 28% in 1950.

By contrast, a gradual growth of 20% from 15% was recorded in the percentage
of people of the ages from 35-64 and by 2050, this demographic constituted
the largest proportion of the New Zealand population. Also, this figure
dominated other categories at the end of the period. Regarding New Zealand’s
population aged 65 or older hỏi cô về tư duy paraphrase, the proportion of
these people remained unchanged over the first 40-year period, varying varied
mildly between 1990 and 2010, and then rose substantially to 20% at the end
of the period.

Lê Ngọc

The line graph detailed elucidates the percentile changes of in New Zealand
population growth between 1950 and 2050.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily appearent that there was an
surged surging tendency in the 35-64 and 65+ age groups. Also Another
noticecible feature is that a reverse pattern was seen to 0-14 and 15-35 ages.

Looking initially at the groups that witnessed an increase, namely the involving
35-64 and 65+, the former climbed from 15% in 1950 then experienced a
period of small variation before gradually rising rose to its peak at around 34%
in the last year. The latter first stood at 10% in the first four decades in 40-years
40 years’ time to prior to rising steadily despite mild variations to 20% by 2050
to conclude the period.

Regarding the remaining age brackets ages,in 1950, the growth of New Zealand
population rate of people who are in the age from 15-34 the growth rate of
New Zealand population aged between 15 and 34 was the highest/ranked first,
at almost 30%, while this figure for baby children of the ages between 0 and 14
was moderately lower, at 28%. In the next 60 years the proportion of 15-34
ages New Zealanders reached an apex at 45 % before plummeting by one-third
compare with whereas the a non-stop constant downtrend was recorded in the
figure for of the youngest group ( a decreased by a half from 45).

Lê Ngọc

Between 2009 and 2030, looking initially at the detail figures for of China and
the Middle East, the former witnessed a mild rise rose from 2 to 3 millions
barrels in the first 6 years before seemed to saw no trend of fluctuation
recording a period of stability in the remaining years. While this figure for the
latter increased minimally by just only 1 million of barrels from 2 over the
period of 21 years. Em hỏi cô về ngữ pháp câu này

While S + V, S + V

Nguyễn Quý Hoàng

Ngữ pháp ổn (em chia đúng sau mỗi with cần V-ing)

the given line chart details the growth in the population of 4 various age groups
in Newzealand from 1950 to 2050.

Overall, what stands out is that the proportion of people in age groups from 35
to 64 and 65+ witnessed an increase. In contrast, there was an opposite trend
in the figure for the 0-14 and 15-34 age groups.
in 1950, the percentage of people aged from 15 to 34 ranked first at 32% then
sharply increased and reached a peak of the peak at 45% in the next 40 years
before gradually decreasing to nearly 30% in 2050. Likewise, the figure for the
0-14 age group experienced a dramatic decrease from over 25% to 10% in 2050
after a fluctuation in the first period.

Concerning the remaining groups two 2 remains groups, from 1950 to 1990,
the proportion of people aged 65+ remained unchanged stabilized at 10%,
followed by a period of variation in the next 20 years before having a
substantial twofold rise to 20% in 2050 of a double from 10% in the remaining
period. In similar fashion, the figure for the 35-64 age group, despite negligible
variations between 1950 and 1990, grew had experienced the same trend as
the previous with the proportion growing significantly by four-thirds 20% from
15% in 2050

Khánh Huyền Vũ

The provided graph depicts the volatility changes in the population of each four
age brackets in New Zealand over the period of 100 years, starting from 1950.

the quality or state of
being likely to change suddenly, especially by becoming worse:

It is worth-noticing that the percentage of the cohort aged 0 – 14 and 15 – 35


decreased, while the opposite trend was seen for those in 35 – 64 and 65+
cohort.

The years between 1950 and 1990 registered an abrupt increase of 15% from
30% in the proportion of 0 -14 age group, reaching a peak at 45%. However,
over the next 60 years, the figure fell substantially to approximately 30%.
Likewise, starting from 28% in 1950, the rate hỏi cô trên lớp of people aged 35
– 64 observed a remarkable drop to 10% in 2050. Em report hai lần 35-64
nhưng không có 15-34. Rate: dùng cho đơn vị 1/đơn vị hai (khi đơn vị 1 KHÁC
đơn vị 2)

Speed: 60km/h, interest rate: 10%/năm

Growth rate: 20%/năm

On the other hand, the percentage of 35 – 64 years old’s 35-64-year-old people


rose sharply by 20%, to 35% in 2050. Similarly, a constant growth of 10% was
recorded in the figure for over 65 population, reaching 20% in the end of the
period

Gia Phat Luong

The graph given shows ed hỏi cô trên lớp the growth in the population of 4
different age groups in Newzealand from 1950 to 190.

Overall, it can be clearly seen that the number of people in age groups of 0-14
and 15-35 decreased, while the opposite is was true for the 35-64 and 65+
group.

The number of the percentage of people from 15-35 years old started off in
1950 with an estimated 30% and reached it's its peak at 45% in 1960. But then,
the number then After that, this figure began to shrink back to declined to 30%
in 2010 and is predicted to fall to negligibly below 30% in 2050 despite an
insignificant rise in 2030. is predicted to be the same in 2050. While the
number figure constantly changed for the 15-35 group, it can't be said for the
0-14 group. The graph showsed that the percentage has constantly been
constantly declining from 1950 and will be at only 10% 1950.

In Contrast to the abovementioned age groups, first two lines hỏi cô, the
remaining ones have risen. The percentage of people in the age group of 35-64
and 65+ only accounted for 15% and 10% in 1950. These 2 lines would then
began to rised rise steadily, reaching 20% and 15% in 2010, with a prediction of
20% of world's population being people over the age of 65, while those belong
to 35-64 group taking up 35% of the population when?.

Phương Phương

The line graph indicates changes in demographic structure according to age


groups rates in New Zealand in a century starting from 1950.

Overall, while figures for inhabitants between 35 and 64 and over 65 years old
experienced an upward trend, the opposite was true for the 0 to 14 and 15 to
34 groups. It is also noticeable that those ages aged from 15 to 34 accounted
almost for the vast majority of the population for most of the surveyed period.
growth period.

In 1950, more than a third of the total the New Zealand population growth in
New Zealand was at the age of 15 to 34, and followed by roughly 27% of people
children under 14 years old. That number was by far higher than that of people
from 15 to 34 and 65 or plus, which stood at 15% and 10% respectively.

In the next 40 years, the figure for people between the ages of 15 and 34 rose
significantly, giới từ? merely 15% before constantly declining to nearly 30% in
2050. There were stable demographic figures in 40 years for the growth of
people constant growths were recorded in the figures for age groups 35-64 and
over 65 although a fluctuation of the 35-64 group in the first period. After that,
inhabitants between the ages the figure for New Zealanders of the ages from
35 to 64 were still gradually increasing gradually increased to overtake the 15-
34 group in 2050 to become the predominant demographic in this country. the
majority of figures that year. It can be seen easily that there was a similar trend
for the over 65-year-olds’ group in whose twofold increase in the proportion of
population growth between 1950 and 2050, at 20%. From 1950 to 2050, the
percentage of the under-14-year-old population has declined dramatically and
ranked last the least of the percentage, at only 10%, which is identical to that of
equally as over 65-year-old group senior citizens in 1950.

Phương Linh

The diagram below demonstrates the growing changes in the proportion of


New Zealand inhabitants according to age groups between 1950 and 2050.

a simple plan that represents a machine, system, or idea, etc.,


often drawn to explain how it works:

In general, the the figures for people from aged 15-34 and 35-64 recorded an
upward trend. While the opposite was true for the 65+ middle-aged residents
and those from 35-64.

From 1950 to 2050, the figure for dwellers aged 15-34 rose sharply from 30%
to 45%, . This this was followed by a mild decrease of around 5% before
abruptly dropping by over 10% in 2010. From 2010 to 2050, this percentage
experienced a gradual fluctuation negligible variations and then consequently
stood at under 30%/before finishing at 30%. A similar pattern was witnessed in
the percentage of inhabitants whose age ranged from 0-14, which fluctuated
mildly between 24 and 27 percent had a minimal fluctuation of about 5% from
1950 to 1990, followed by a steady fall to 10% in 2050. after that fell steadily to
10% in 2050.
In the same period, the number proportion of people age 65+ remained stable
at 10% from 1950 to 1990, which before it observed an abrupt variation varied
mildly and rose substantially from 10% to 20% between 2010 and 2050.

In the same period, the number of people age 65+ remained stable at 10%
from 1950 to 1990, which observed an abrupt variation.

of under 5% in the next 20 years. This figure suddenly grew to 15% and then
constantly climbed to its peak at 20% in 2050. In comparison, the proportion of
inhabitants aged 35-64 experienced a negligible fluctuation of about 2% before
noticeably surging and peaked at 35% in 2050, which was amounting to a
three-fourths increase from 20% in 2010. compared with that for the number
of dwellers aged 65+.

Ex 2. The graph below gives information about total oil use of 4 main
consumers from 2009 to 2030

Đề bài: Viết 3-4 câu miêu tả graph trên. Lưu ý sử dụng tối ưu các loại từ vựng
đã học

b. Comparing (3)

- so sánh chung
+ the figure for A was ADV higher/lower than that for B

In 2030, the figure for the Middle East was mildly higher than that for Western
Europe and Japan.

ADV: remarkably, significantly, noticeably >< mildly, marginally, negligibly,


imperceptibly.

the figure for/the number of A is considerably higher than that for/of B

- so sánh gấp số lần

The figure for A was twice as much/many as that for B

+ Standing at ____, the figure for A was twice/three times... as much/many as


that for B

In 2015, standing at 10 million, the number of oil barrels consumed daily in the
US was five times as many as that of the Middle East

Standing at 75, the number of female car owners was three times as many as
that for their male counterparts.

+ the figure for A, which stood at ___, was twice/three times.... as many/much
as that for B

In 2015, the amount of oil consumed in the US daily, which stood at 10 million
barrels, was five times as much as that of the Middle East.

- so sánh tương quan

+ the figure for A was at ____ while/whereas that for B stood at ___

+ While the figure for A was ___, that for B stood at ___.

10 million = là cách viết của 10 000 000 => không có ‘s’

180 thousand = cách viết của 180 000

Millions of people: hàng triệu người => trong trường hợp này có ‘s’

In terms of idiomatic expression => thay bằng regarding/concerning from 2009


to 2015, the figure of for oil consumption in consuming for the US remained
remarkably unchanged stable at 10 millions of barrels per day. In comparison,
the oil used in Western Europe and Japan witnessed a mild decrease of 1
millions oil barrel.

As can be seen form from the diagram, the amount of oils used/consumed in
the USA ranked the first at 10 millions in 2009, then this figure remained stable
to 2015, before dropping exponentially in the next 15 years in 2030. In similar
fashion, a constant decline by of a half from 4 millions was witnessed in the
amount of oils utilized used/consumed in Western Europe and Japan.

In 2009 in the US, the number of oil barrels of oil used daily reached 10 billion
barrels. These figures this figure is are significantly lower for Western Europe
and Japan, at around 4 billion barrels, and China and the Middle East at 2
billion barrels each. While oil consumption declined in Western Europe and
Japan in 2015 and peaked in the US, oil consumption in China and the Middle
East increased.

The use of oil in the US stabilized at 10 millions of barrels between 2009 and
2015 before it experinced experienced a substantial decrease of 6 millions in
the following 15 years. Sharing the relatively same pattern with US, the oil use
of Western Europe and Japan declined by a half from 4 over the period. In
comparison, a negligible growth was recorded in the use of oil in Middle East.

You might also like