Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EX-DE 00 03/10/2016 Issued for Approval M. Dela Cruz D. O’Farrell M. Shaker M. Shaker M. Borriello
Validity Rev.
Status number Prepared Checked Approved Contractor Company
Date Description Approval Approval
by by by
Revision Index
Company logo and business name Project name Company Documents Identification
OGI002-QA-0041-00
DRAKE & SCULL INT’L PJSC
Contract N. 5000008451
Vendor logo and business name Vendor Identification
Order N.
Facility Name Location Scale Sheet of Sheets
ZUBAIR OIL FIELD - WATER INJECTION ONSHORE NA 1 of 14
NETWORK INSTALLATION
Document Title Supersedes N.
Superseded by N.
MANAGING OF PREVENTIVE ACTIONS Plant Area Plant Unit
NA NA
Software: Microsoft Word 97-2003 File N° 250600DBQND0028_EXDE00_14.doc
REVISION HISTORY
INDEX
8. ATTACHEMENTS .......................................................................................................................... 11
The scope of this document is to establish procedures for activities related to Preventive
Actions at Field.
DSI PJSC will issue Preventive Actions on self-perform work, or subcontracted work, when
applicable.
1.1 RESPONSIBILITIES
The Project Manager is responsible for verifying and final approving this document.
The Project Quality Manager (and related staff) and the Site Health Safety and Environment
Manager are responsible for issuing and updating this document in accordance with DSI
PJSC regulations.
The Construction Manager will take measures to provide holding areas or other methods for
segregating nonconforming items to prevent unauthorized use, mixing with conforming
items or incorporating into future construction. Where physical segregation is not practical,
tagging, marking or other positive means of identification is acceptable.
DSI PJSC personnel assigned to the various production activities and its quality control
inspectors are responsible for adopting and having adopted this document in conformity with
DSI PJSC instructions, at worksites as well as the facilities of its suppliers (or subcontractors)
subject to control.
Personnel to whom detected non-conformities are addressed are responsible for identifying
and taking the established corrections to restore the specified conditions found to be
lacking.
Project quality personnel or DSI PJSC inspectors (at suppliers and subcontractors) or
personnel from the Eni quality control department are responsible for verifying the
implementation status of the correction previously identified and agreed upon.
Subcontractors have the first responsibility for the identification, control, and disposition of
nonconforming items within their Scope of Work.
More detail about personnel responsibilities are shown in the paragraph 4. “General
Information”.
2. REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
2.1 INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS
3.1 ABBREVIATIONS
3.2 DEFINITIONS
Preventive Action – The action are implemented commensurate with the magnitude of the
problem.
The implementation and effectiveness of preventive actions is monitored.
A permanent changes resulting from corrective action are recorded in appropriate system
documentation.
Procedure also requires that available information be studied in order to detect,
analyse and eliminate potential causes of non-conformities. Information subsequent
preventive action is taken is submitted for consideration during management review.
Preventive Action Request - A quality registration document which, following the detection
of a problem, is used to request action aimed at correcting or improving the current
situation.
The document is also used to manage the implementation of the action, its checking and
evaluation of its efficacy.
Responsible Person – The individual responsible for the group of system where a non-
conformity is identified.
They would be responsible for ensuring its timely correction.
Personnel are encouraged to indicate areas where potential non-conformities may
occur and report such situations.
Any suggestion on possible improvement of the quality system: are also welcomed
from all staff.
Audit - Systematic, independent and documented process for obtaining audit evidence and
evaluating it objectively to determine the extent to which audit criteria are fulfilled
Quality Improvement - Part of quality management focused on increasing the ability to fulfil
quality requirements
4. GENERAL INFORMATION
Preventive action shall be taken on potential causes to prevent occurrence of
Non- Conformance.
Non-Conformance shall be reviewed by concerned people and potential cause
of it shall be determined. Preventive actions shall be appropriate to the effects of
the potential problems.
Project HSSE Manager / Project Quality Manager shall gather and analyse information
from such sources as
Contract review, management review, customer complaints, audit reports, non-
conformance reports, staff suggestions, and staff appraisals, etc., in order to
detect, analyze and eliminate potential causes of non-conformities.
All Contractors staff are encouraged to submit to the Management Representative, via
their Managers, any suggestions on how improvements may be made to the system or any
Policy, Plan, Procedure or Form
The potential cause of non-conformities shall then be evaluated and analysed in order to
plan effective preventive action. The potential impact on quality costs, performance, and
customer satisfaction should be taken into consideration.
The Management Representative (MR) shall submit information on preventative action for
management review.
Preventive action shall be initiated and implemented and records of such actions to be
maintained in format.
The effectiveness of preventive actions shall be evaluated through periodic internal audits
and other control measures.
In addition, Preventive Actions (PA) are undertaken to eliminate the causes of non-
conformity, defect or other undesired situation in order to prevent it being repeated.
The methodology utilized to manage Preventive Actions (PA) includes the following steps:
This document is property of eni Iraq B.V.
It shall neither be shown to Third Parties nor used for purposes other than those for which it has been sent.
Owner Logo and business name Company Documents Contractor Documents Revision Index
Identification Identification
Validity Sheet of Sheets
Rev.
Status 8 / 14
250600DBQRD0028 OGI002-QA-0041-00 EX-DE 00
DSI PJSC
System non conformances such as revealed during audits and incoming material
inspections are dealt with, according to respective procedures.
Not all nonconformities require root cause analysis and / or consequent preventive action
report.
It is acceptable for management to determine that only correction is necessary.
Root cause analysis and preventive action are applied where, in the Project Manager
opinion, the reward is greater than the effort.
Initiator
Normally the PAR Initiator will be the Project Quality Manager that also provide for the first
evaluation of the root cause of the nonconforming condition.
DSI PJSC Subcontractor or Vendor may be also initiator if they are responsible for a
recursive nonconforming situation on delivered product.
Project Quality Manager shall assign a unique number and fill properly the PAR report:
Moreover shall enter the number on the report and on the Preventive Action Report Log”.
Project Quality Manager provides the PAR report with proposed Root cause to the Project
Manager.
Project Manager
All Preventive Action shall be submitted by Project Manager to Eni for Approval of the
proposed actions.
Project Manager shall review PAR with Project Quality Manager and after internal approval
send copy to the Construction Manager (or appointed Site superintendent) for action.
Should it become necessary to void or cancel a PAR during the initiation cycle (upon
discovery that no nonconformity actually exists, or a PAR covering this condition already
exists), and explanation will be written on the original report. The report will be signed and
dated by the responsible person and copies provided to appropriate distribution including the
person who identified the deficiency/condition.
In cases where an activity (that is the subject of PAR occurs infrequently, or where root
cause analysis is determined to be not necessary, the PAR may be closed following
correction of the nonconformity without verifying effectiveness of the preventive action.
ENI Representative
ENI Representative will verify (if required) the applied preventive action and fill the relevant
part of the form and close the PAR.
Construction Superintendent
Upon receipt of the approved PAR report, perform the applicable construction actions
specified in the PAR disposition or appoint a Site Superintendent for these actions.
Verification Responsible
The Person responsible for verification of implemented actions (normally Project Quality
Manager or Field Engineer) must involve ENI Representative in the verification activities and
fill the proper part of the form. In the event of negative closing of the PAR must involve
Project Manager and Project Quality Manager for the subsequent actions.
After Eni Representative Closure, POM shall file the PAR in the Project Final Dossier.
Personnel assigned to DSI PJSC for verification (normally Project Quality Manager
or Field Engineer);
DSI PJSC Inspectors when foreseen (i.e. at supplier and subcontractor facilities);
The Person responsible for verification of implemented actions (normally Project Quality
Manager or Field Engineer shall verify the efficacy of the preventive actions taken to resolve
the non-conformities detected and to prevent their reoccurrence.
In the event the evaluation process shows that the actions taken have been adequate to
correct the shortcomings, the PAR is closed after Project QA / QC Manager Approval.
Eni’s Representative approvals only on the PAR are those that may affect contract
requirements (schedule, quality of product and work, etc...)
When the results of the evaluation process show that the actions taken have not been
adequate to correct shortcomings or avoid their recurrence, a new proposal for solution
must be identified in accordance with the procedure described above.
In the event the result of the control is negative, a new PAR must be opened that makes
reference to the previous one. If following the subsequent verification even this action has
not been sufficient,
Project Manager, in cooperation with Field / Site Engineer and Construction Superintendent,
and ENI’s Representatives must be informed to decide upon a further line of action to be
taken with the function or department subject to verification.
Project Quality Manager have the responsibility of updating the forms and log following the
evaluation of PA efficacy, and archiving a copy of any support documentation, appending it
to the corresponding PAR.
A copy of the form is issued to the functions charged with finding a solution to the non-
conformity, as a reference for the actions to be taken and the overall time frame to follow.
Filing of these copies is up to the discretion of the relevant function.
The status of open PAR(s) will be reviewed by Project Quality Manager in cooperation with
Construction Management and the Project Quality Manager on a periodic basis to ensure
timely close out of the PAR(s).
Recording of the PAR(s) makes it possible for the data collected to be analyzed during the
periodic IMS / QMS review by Top Management and to identify opportunities for
improvement (e.g., training, equipment purchase, etc.).
8. ATTACHEMENTS
Preventive Action Report (PAR)…………… QAF_OGI002_Form_007
Preventive Action Status Log……………… QAF_OGI002_Form_008
Internal Audit
Improvement Opportunity
Identified reason behind the occurrence nonconformity and activity during which the nonconformity to prevent it being repeated.
Process activities not carried out according to Project Management System (PMS) documentation (quality, health, safety and environment)
Objective defined by Company management but not achieved
Remark of activity ineffectiveness
Personnel not appropriate to work assigned or not working in accordance with DSI PJSC prescriptions
Preventive actions defined by Company management but not implemented
Not in accordance with Company specification and project documentation (procedures, plans, work instructions, STD, etc.) issued by PMS of DSI PJSC
Other:
Project Quality Name Signature Date
Manager Review
Project Site / Field Name Signature Date
Engineer Review
Company involved in the PAR resolution Yes No Company requested to approve the PAR resolution methods Yes No
Any references to communications with Company
Continues on back
Project Manager Name Signature Date
Internal Approval
Name Signature Date
Company Rep. Approval
Department to which PAR was addressed Person responsible for implementing Preventive Action (PA) Deadline for implementation of PA.
Continues on back
Person responsible for Name Signature Date
verification of
implemented actions
Name Signature Date
Company Rep. Approval
Full description of detected occurrence of nonconformity (problem), or summary with any reference to letters, reports, etc. (continued)
PREVENTIVE ACTION
Eni Iraq b.v. (PAR) Log QAF_OGI_Form_008
DSI PJSC
5000008451 ZUBAIR OIL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
Positively Closed
Negative status
Positively Closed
Negative status
Positively Closed
Negative status
Positively Closed
Negative status
Positively Closed
Negative status
Positively Closed
Negative status
Positively Closed
Negative status
Positively Closed
Negative status
Positively Closed
Negative status
Positively Closed
Negative status