Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/257967376
CITATIONS READS
169 1,107
1 author:
Horst Wilkens
University of Hamburg
70 PUBLICATIONS 2,674 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Horst Wilkens on 21 May 2014.
HORST WILKENS
INTRODUCTION
The cave characins with reduced eyes and pigmentation (Fig. 1) are
mainly distributed in the Sierra de El Abra region of San Luis Potosi and
Tamaulipas (Fig. 2). This consists of an area 125 km in length restricted
to a ridge of highly cavernous limestone. Water drainage, physiography,
and geology are described in detail by Mitchell et al. (1977). Twenty-nine
caves are known to be inhabited by cave-adapted Astyanax. The locations
of the caves can be grouped as follows: (1) southern El Abra caves, (2)
Los Sabinos caves, (3) Yerbaniz caves, (4) northern El Abra caves, (5)
Evolution and Genetics of Astyanax fasclatus 273
c
FIG. 1. (a) Epigean, (b) Pachon, and
(c) Micos cave forms of Astyanax fas-
ciatus.
Micos caves, (6) Nicolas Perez caves, (7) Chamal caves, and (8) Gomez
Faria caves (Fig. 2) (Mitchell et al. 1977).
Inhabitants from five of these caves have been subjected to experi-
mental studies that show they can hybridize with epigean A. fasciatus in
the laboratory, as they occasionally do in the natural biotope. Further-
more, analysis of allozymic variation has shown that the coefficients of
genetic similarity do not support the assignment of surface and cave pop-
ulations to different genera or to different species (A vi se and Selander,
1972): The hypogean fish therefore should be characterized as cave-dwell-
ing populations of A. fasciatus (Sadoglu, 1957; Wilkens, 1970a; Mitchell
et al., 1977). Karyotypic studies are incomplete because only specimens
of an unidentified commercial stock were compared with the epigean
ancestor. However, in both, a diploid chromosome number of n = 50
was found (Kirby et al., 1977).
The first cave population discovered was that of La Cueva Chica,
which belongs to the southern El Abra caves. It was originally described
as "Anoptichthys jordani" by Hubbs and Innes (1936). The status of this
variable form has long been a matter of discussion. Allozyme variation
(Avise and Selander, 1972) and eye histology and genetics (Wilkens,
1972a, 1976), as well as ecological studies (Mitchell et al., 1977; Romero,
1983; Wilkens and Hiippop, 1986), have shown that the Chica fish is a
H. Wilkens
274
tN
'i
oi 10 15km
FIG. 2. Localities of cave populations of A. fasciatus in the Sierra de El Abra region. (After Mitchell
et al.• 1977.)
Evolution and Genetics of Astysnsx fsSC/stUB 275
teresting Astyanax cave forms. Its phylogenetically young status has been
questioned several times (Schemmel, 1974b; Mitchell et al., 1977). How-
ever, a series of studies has verified the original interpretation, namely
that the Micos fish is not an Fx hybrid, but is a phylogenetically young
form (Wilkens and Burns, 1972):
First, a comparison of the condition factors exhibited by the epigean
and hypogean Micos specimens that live together in the natural cave bio-
tope has shown that the epigean individuals are starved (see below, p.
317) (Wilkens and Hiippop, 1986).
Second, a genetic analysis of the eye of the Micos fish has revealed
that due to the existence of a genetic equilibrium that is lost in the F2
crosses between epigean and phylogenetically old cave forms, a threshold
effect is able to manifest itself and bring about a discontinuous distribution
of phenotypes (see Fig. 11) (Wilkens, 1976). For the same genetic reasons,
the variability in the size of the pupillary opening is lower in the Micos
fish than in the above-mentioned F2 crosses (see Fig. 17). The retina of
the Micos fish eye is also, on the average, better differentiated than that
of the F2 hybrids (see below, p. 265).
Third, Schemmel (1974b) based his interpretation of the Micos fish
as a hybrid on the great variability shown by its taste buds (see Fig. 39),
but this phenomenon could just as well be attributed to a threshold effect
known to occur in backcrosses between epigean and phylogenetically old
cave fish. Its manifestation in the taste bud system of the Micos fish might
furthermore be proven by the distribution curve of taste buds, which does
not show normality in the F2 crosses between epigean and phylogeneti-
cally old cave forms, but instead a positive skew (see Fig. 39).
Finally, unlike the hybrid Chica fish, the Micos population does not
possess any allele that does not exist in the epigean population (Peters et
al., 1975). All alleles that have been found in the Micos fish exist in the
epigean form at a frequency of 95%. However, the distribution pattern
of alleles does diverge from that of the epigean fish, thus showing that
the hypogean Micos cave specimens share a gene pool of their own (see
below, p. 319).
PREADAPTIVE TRAITS
eight neuromasts on every scale, this fish is among the species best
equipped with these organs (Fig. 3). With respect to number and distri-
bution, no essential differences can be found between epigean and cave
forms (Schemmel, 1967), even though the lateral parts of cave fish heads
possess more neuromasts.
The lateral line canal of the epigean fish can also be characterized
as typically teleostean (Schemmel, 1967). It is well developed and extends
from the operculum to the caudal peduncle, On the head it divides into
the supra- and infraorbital canals and the preopercular, mandibular, and
occipital canals (Fig. 4). Due to fragmentations, considerable inter- and
intraindividual variability of the head canal system may develop (Schem-
mel, 1967),
No differences in the head canal system of epigean and hypogean
forms have been observed (Schemmel, 1967). However, the loss of the
relatively large eye and the fragmentation of the suborbital bones into
several separate elements (Alvarez, 1946) seem to have caused some al-
terations of the infraorbital canal in the cave forms. It is no longer char-
acterized by a deep ventral flexure and thus has become shortened. In
many specimens it is interrupted (Fig. 4). As in the epigean fish, inter-
and intraindividual variability are significant.
Very often the lateral line canal displays fragmentations in its caudal
part (Wilkens, 1977). This phenomenon has no genetic basis, but is caused
by the fact that due to a reduction ofthe scales (below, p. 280) the cave
specimens lose these organs much more easily than do epigean fish. The
described fragmentations develop because of irregular regeneration.
In comparison with other species of teleost (Hyphessobryeon, Phox-
inus, Tinea, Lebistes), the lateral line system of the Chica fish is much
more highly developed (Hahn, 1960). There are no recognizable differ-
ences between the lateral line system of the Chica fish and that of the
Pachon and Sabinos populations (Hahn, 1960).
The efficiency ofthe function of the lateral line system in A.fasciatus
has been studied, in particular, in the hybrid Chica population (Breder
and Gresser, 1941a; Liiling, 1953; Grobbel and Hahn, 1958). These fishes
are able to localize stationary objects as well as to discern certain shapes
or the distances between bars (Hahn, 1960; von Campenhausen et al.,
1981; Weissert and von Campenhausen, 1981). The same is true for mov-
ing objects, such as cladocerans (Friihbeiss, 1984). The lateral line system
of the epigean fish appears to be as efficient as that of the Chica fish;
analysis of obstacle avoidance in blinded epigean specimens revealed no
differences when compared to the hypogean derivatives (John, 1957).
The far-reaching morphological, histological, and functional simi-
larity of the lateral line system indicates that constructive improvement
was not necessary for the epigean fish to survive in the cave biotope.
Auditory Capacity
3 Lamellae
cf'} Epigean
25 C( form
20
..
.- ....
~~.~.~.;:'::~'..-:'
15
· female
10
FIG. 5. Correlation between the number of • male
olfactory folds and the standard length in 5 • juvenile
the Pachon cave form. Regression lines of
these features in the epigean form are o+-~~~,-,-~~~~
drawn for comparison. (Schemmel, 1967.) o 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9~
Olfactory Organ
The noses of the different hypogean and epigean forms are con-
structed similarly (Breder and Rasquin, 1943; Schemmel, 1967). There
are no histological differences in the olfactory epithelium that might imply
differing efficiencies. Minute improvements in the cave fish could result
from the fact that the olfactory pits are shallower with a larger naris, thus
exposing their olfactory epithelial folds to a greater extent.
The number of olfactory lamellae shows high individual variability,
depending on body size. Male specimens possess more lamellae than do
females (Fig. 5) (Schemmel, 1967).
Comparison between the hypogean Sabinos, Pachon, and Chica pop-
ulations, on one hand, and the epigean fish, on the other, revealed that
the cave fish possess a significantly lower number of lamellae (Fig. 5)
(Breder and Rasquin, 1943; Schemmel, 1967). The numerical differences
are one at 2 cm, two at 4 cm, and four at 6 cm body length in the Pachon
fish. Due to the high morphological variability, Schemmel (1967) argued
that the physiological efficiency of the olfactory organ probably does not
differ between the two forms.
Sexual Behavior
REGRESSIVE TRAITS
Eye
Epigean Fish
conditions possible (Peters and Peters, 1966) (Fig. 6). The globular lens
is accommodated by a lens muscle. A large falciform process is developed
ventrally. The chorioid possesses an argentea and a large chorioid gland.
Cave Fish
FIG. 7. Cross sections of the eye of phylogenetically old cave forms of A. fasciatus. (A-C) Different
stages of differentiation. (D) Eye of F, hybrid between two phylogenetically old cave forms (Pachon
x Sabinos). For legend see Fig. 6. (Wilkens, 1970b, 1971.)
argentea has become fibrous. The sclera may consist, in part, of con-
nective, cartilaginous, and bony tissues.
The eye rudiment is situated beneath the body surface. It is connected
with the superficial tissues by an epidermal cord (Wilkens, 1970b; Zilles
et al., 1983).
fJm
eye size o 0
transverse rb o
• 0
00 00
• •• • 0«0
500 • 0 •
••• • t@o 0
• ••
100 FIG.8. Size and degree of the eye of Sabinos cave
fish; (0) retina with inner nuclear and plexiform lay-
500 1000 IJm ers, (e) retina undifferentiated or absent. (Wilkens,
eye size (proximo-distal rb) 1970b.)
Evolution and Genetics of Astyanax faBclatuB 283
Epigean (ave
Pachon 81 F2 82 Epigean
M=2.0 M=3.6 M=4.8 M=6.3 M=7.1
32.1% 54.8% 84.0%
pa(Gr.nuI t
00%
L tIm
25%
t
50%
titr ItI 0
75%
t! u1n t 100%
F1
M=5.1
61.8"10
Sabinos 81 Epigean
F2
M=2.1 M=3.6 M=4.6 M=6.1 M=7.1
31.9% 51.1% 80.2%
(Gr. Il .......~----~U-J...-'------'~rlT'1T-r---<>-I.J..L..._---'-'~..........
0.0%
FIG. 10. Distribution of mean eyeball size in crosses between epigean and phylogenetically old
Pachon and Sabinos cave forms (standard length 2.5 cm). (Wilkens, 19708.)
Sabinos fish when they were 2.5 and 6.0 cm in standard length. Regardless
of body size, the corresponding crosses do not diverge from each other:
The means are more or less intermediate, slightly shifting toward the
epigean parent (Figs. 10 and 11). In the FI and F2 and the backcrosses
with the cave fish, the distribution curves show normality. In contrast,
in the backcross with the epigean fish, a bimodal, discontinuous distri-
bution is found. With the exception of the F I crosses, the range of the
corresponding crosses includes offspring with eyes the size of the parental
forms.
Crosses Involving the Phylogenetically Young MicosPopulation. In the
crosses with Micos fish, small-eyed and large-eyed Micos parents were
hybridized with epigean and phylogenetically old Pachon and Sabinos
cave fish. Two results are important. (1) The frequency distributions of
the F I generations between small- and large-eyed Micos specimens
crossed with the extremely reduced Pachon cave fish are identical, in
spite of the different eye size of the Micos parent. Furthermore, the F I
of small-eyed Micos crossed with the epigean fish does not deviate from
that of a phylogenetically old cave form crossed with the surface ancestor
(Fig. 12). (2) The F2 and backcross offspring of the Micos fish, crossed
Evolution and Genetics of Astyanax 'asclatus 285
O'~~~~~r-r-~~
20
~ P.Qp.utation
laboratory breeding
10 selected for
intermediate eyes
MiCQS.~t1on
laborutory breeding
for large eyes
o~~~~~~~~
Micos ~lation J1::
i laboratory
2 .
breeling
for small eyes
FIG. 11. Frequency distribution of eyeball size
in the epigean, two phylogenetically old cave
forms and their crosses (-, Pachon; - -, Sabi-
nos), and the phylogenetically young Micos to 2.0 3.0 4D 5D 6D 10 ao
cave fish. (Wilkens, 19708, 1976.) eye size
286 H. Wilkens
with the epigean or phylogenetically old Pachon and Sabinos cave forms,
are characterized by the skewness or bimodality that develops after the
eyeball has surpassed a minimum size (Fig. 12).
MU <Hens
o
4.
• y=1.95+x 1.09
r=Q97
n=60
2.
y=1.15+x1.78
r=QS9
n=43
tween epigean and phylogenetically old cave fish (Fig. 13). Thus, Ft hy-
brids are characterized by the fact that, in adult specimens, lenses and
pupillary openings are relatively larger than in juveniles. This kind of
development has also been found in all other crosses. It must be stressed,
however, that in the small-eyed specimens, the process of ontogenetic
reduction negates the growth processes just described. Thus, in the back-
cross with the phylogenetically old cave fish, for example, the mean rela-
tive lens size is larger in younger fish than in adults, which, as a result
of ontogenetic reduction, also possess fewer lenses. Nevertheless, in Ft
hybrids, F2 hybrids (at least all that exhibit larger eyes than do the Ft),
and in all backcross hybrids with the epigean fish the growth of the in-
dividual lens and pupillary opening is positively allometric (Wilkens,
1970a).
MU tbLens
10
2.0
y=2.62+x 0.69
r=0.94
n=168
1.0
.
O. 5.. 1_.....,ir-_____..,ir-___. .;.tb. ;.P.; U.:;.;pi pl a; ,;r~Y_o;:;p;,; ,en;.; i;.;jn~ _
0.5 1.0 2.0 3.0 MU
FIG. 14. Correlation between lens and pupillary opening diameter in the F2 of the cross between
epigean and phylogenetically old cave form. (Wilkens, 1970a.)
MU
30 Lens
2.0
y= 0OOO2h 2.86
r=O.56
n=151
1.0
FIG. 15. Correlation between lens and eyeball
size in the F2 of the cross between epigean and
phylogenetically old cave forms. (Wilkens, rt>Eye
1970a.) 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 MU
2.
y=0.0000009+x 4.15
r=0.74
n= 48
1.0
• • • F2(MICOS X CAVE)
10 .. .. .. F2(MICOS X RIVER)
B (MICOS X CAVE)
------ X
MICOS
............ F2(RIVER X CAVE)
. ..
\
.r-'+-='~.
." ----2 B (RIVER X CAVE)
X
OI~~--.-~-r~~.--r~~.-~~--.-~~--r-~~~~~-r~~~-r~~M~U
3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 EYE SIZE
FIG. 17. Variability of the pupillary opening (= standard deviation in percent of eye size) correlated with eyeball size in crosses
between the epigean and the phylogenetically old cave forms and the phylogenetically young Micos fish (standard length 2.5 cm.).
(Wilkens, 1970a, 1976.)
Evolution and Genetics of AstYBnBx fBsclBtus 291
different crosses between epigean and cave forms (Fig. 17). However,
the degree of variability is greatest in the F2 crosses.
Occasionally, eyes of different sizes develop in the same specimen,
a phenomenon called left-right asymmetry. The individual structures of
such eyes are developed in proper correlation to the respective size. The
study of backcross and F2 hybrids has shown that the size discrepancy
very rarely surpasses 25% of the diameter of the larger eye. In more than
50% of such cases the asymmetry in size of the eyes is less than 4%. The
occurrence of asymmetry is independent of eye size, but its frequency
differs in various crosses (Wilkens, 1970a).
HistologicalAnalysis ofthe Eyes in Different Crosses and in the Micos
Fish. Much histological work has been done on the eyes of hybrids be-
tween epigean and cave forms and in the variable Micos fish (Luling,
1953, 1955; Wilkens, 1972a; Peters et al., 1975; Fack and Wilkens, 1988).
It has been found that the size of the individual structures and their degree
of differentiation are correlated with each other as well as with the total
eye size. The individual structures of the eye show developmental phys-
iological interdependence. In accordance with findings in other verte-
brates, such as chicken and amphibians, by Coulombre (1969) and Kra-
tochwill (1972), within the Astyanax eye two subunits of differentiation
seem to be characteristic (Fack and Wilkens, 1988). On one hand, the
lens plays a dominant role and influences the degree of development of
pupillary opening, cornea, and possibly at least partially the vitreous
body. On the other hand, the retina is closely related to the development
of the pigmentary epithelium, the lens muscle, and probably the vitreous
body (Fack and Wilkens, 1988).
In the following the process of reduction of the individual eye struc-
tures is described.
Lens. The reduction of the lens is primarily characterized by a dimi-
nution in size. The end of this process is almost achieved when a much
larger lens capsule encloses a rudimentary crystalline nucleus (Fig. 18b).
By this stage the lens capsule has lost its globular form and before its
complete reduction even the crystalline has vanished. In small eyes, the
lens capsule is also reduced.
In contrast to the retina, structural differences in lens formation seem
to develop during the early ontogenetic stages (Sadoglu, 1975).
Cornea, pupillary opening, and anterior eye chamber. The devel-
opment of the cornea and the pupillary opening is closely related to that
of the lens. The diminution of lens size not only provokes a reduction in
the size of the pupillary opening (Figs. 18 and 19), but also a thickening
of the cornea propria (Fig. 18). In the anterior eye chamber, the liga-
292 H. Wilken.
the ventral region. In rare cases, the entire retina is undifferentiated and
develops only as a faint strip of tissue.
The aberration phenomena may be attributed to a disharmonious in-
teraction between retina and lens in their roles as relatively independent
inductors of the size of the vitreous body and the retinal layers of the
eye. This becomes obvious when funnel-shap~d depressions of retinal
tissue develop into the chorioid in the region of the processus falciformis.
This may occur in combination with a small or a large lens (Fig. 18). In
the first case, the small lens is probably not able to induce an adequate
size of the eye to contain a well-developed retina. In the case of a large
lens, the induced eye size is too great for the "genetically smaller" retina.
Both combinations result in the retina being partially pressed into the
chorioid by the vitreous body. This happens in the processus falciformis
region, where the outer eye coats are not tightly grown together.
The aberrations described above seem to develop secondarily during
individual ontogenesis. They are more often formed in F2 crosses and in
hybrid Chica fish than in the phylogenetically young Micos cave fish. It
may therefore be concluded that they are hybrid phenomena (Wilkens,
1972a; Fack and Wilkens, 1988).
Lens muscle. The lens muscle is attached to the tip of the falciform
process. Its development is closely correlated with that of the neural
retina, inasmuch as both are derived from the eye cup. The lens muscle
may develop in eyes whose lenses have completely disappeared (Figs.
18b and 19). This demonstrates the relative independence of lens and
retina as inductors.
Pigmentary epithelium. The pigmentary epithelium is closely cor-
related with the state of differentiation of the visual cells. When the latter
are well-developed, the pigmentary cells assume their characteristic cy-
lindrical form. With the reduction of the outer segments, the pigmentary
epithelium forms only a flattened epithelium. In eyes that show partial
retinal dedifferentiation, the pigmentary epithelium is well-formed in the
294 H. Wllken.
Eye size(~mm)
a
• Epigean fish
• (ave fish
06
04
•.
. ....:.' :~:.
~= ~ .
...:••~••:".'! ~i-.:::::':.::'•
... :i= :..-1' •• ·:····':11:••. :'
.-.
.~Jitr!.A".~'
~-':'"'II"'.
•::':
"::'" • ''''N'
100%1--;'"""-...b
. :".
FIG. 20. Eyeball growth correlated
with body size in epigean and phylo-
genetically old cave fish. (a) isometric
i "11 "~I I
02 0.3 0.40~06 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 ~O 10.0 correlation, (b) occurrence of a lens
Standard length (cm) rudiment. (Wilkens, 1980.)
Evolution and Genetics of Astyanax fasclatus 295
acterizes the adult cave fish does not appear until a body length of about
1 cm has been achieved. Earlier stages show the same amount of vari-
ability as does the epigean fish.
The comparative histology of the ontogenetic development of the eye
of epigean and cave fish has been analyzed primarily by Cahn (1958).
Recent studies have revealed that her results have to be modified slightly
(Wilkens and Meyer, in press). As recorded by Cahn, the very first anlage
of the eye cup is noticeably smaller in the cave fish than in its epigean
ancestor. However, due to the range of individual variability in the tem-
poral process of organ formation, it is doubtful whether the outpushing
of the optic buds in the cave form as observed by Cabn really is delayed
(Wilkens and Meyer, in preparation; Hiippop, 1988b).
In fact, one of notable features of the early larval development of the
eye is that the formation of the prospective retina does not differ in the
epigean and cave forms. Contrary to Cahn (1958), who in part described
abnormally developed embryos, it can be observed that mitotic activity
is not considerably less evident in the cave fish (Figs. 21a,b). Further-
more, the contact of the optic cup with the outer epidermis is as perfect
and close in the cave fish as it is in the epigean ancestor.
At a length of about 3.9 mm (±60 h) the formation of the retinal
layers has taken place in both the epigean and the cave fish (Fig. 21c).
Although the hypogean eye is already considered smaller, all its retinal
layers are developed. Even horizontal cells can be found. As in the epi-
gean fish at this stage, the outer nuclear layer consists of a single row of
nuclei. The sensory cells differ from the normal ones only in that their
inner and outer segments are of much smaller size. These visual cells will
not fully differentiate in the cave form. Their outer nuclear layer will
continue to consist of but one row of nuclei (Fig. 21d) and is finally re-
duced.
In both cave and epigean specimens, the lens is not formed as a
vesicle, but is developed as a solid bud (Fig. 21a). This seems to proceed
rather simultaneously. Due to the above-mentioned temporal variability
of organ formation, it is difficult to determine a size difference of the
newly formed lenses (Fig. 21a). Immediately after the lens has been
formed, however, remarkable divergences develop. Whereas the lens of
the epigean fish increases in size, that of the cave form remains more or
less fixed (Figs. 21a-c). At a body length of about 3.5 mm (± 34 h),
the differentiation of lens fibers has been completed in the epigean ances-
tor (Fig. 21b). In contrast, lens fibers in the cave fish eye are usually not
developed (Figs. 21b and c); only rarely does a single lens epithelial
cell seem to show the development of rudimentary fibers. In all cave fish
296 H. Wllkens
11
I SOI'Jll I
lBhrs
2.B-2.9mm body length
FIG. 21. Early ontogenetic eye development in epigean fish and the phylogenetically old Pachon
cave form: 1, Eye stalk; 2. lens placode; 3. lens epitheliallfiber cells; 4, retina (undifferentiated);
5, ganglionic layer; 6, inner plexiform layer; 7, inner nuclear layer; 8, outer plexiform layer with
horizontal cells; 9, outer nuclear layer; 10, inner segments of visual cells; 11, pigmentary epithelium;
12, cornea; 13, vitreous body; 14, necrotic centers.
a lens capsule is formed, but the cave fish lens is not able to induce any
thinning of the cornea (Figs. 21b-d).
In summary, it can be concluded that except in size, the development
of the eye tissues in cave and epigean fish is rather similar during early
ontogeny. At about 4 mm in body length (±60 h), however, destructive
phenomena become evident, and necrotic processes take place in the
retina and the lens (Fig. 21c). Remarkably, they occur after the retina has
formed its typical layers. It should also be pointed out that these events
obviously coincide with the cessation of eye growth, between 4 and 6 mm
body length, as previously observed (Fig. 20) (Wilkens 1980).
Evolution and Genetics of Astysnsx 'ssclstus 297
12
I 50 ~m
33hrs
3.5mm body length
(ove fish
SOlJm
llmm body length
fish, the size of the eyeball does not decrease under these conditions, but
the thickness of the retina is reduced (Fig. 22). On the average, each layer
is reduced by between 20 and 40%. Only the size of the visual cells does
not seem to be affected. As the number of nuclei in the outer nuclear
layer is reduced by about 20%, the reduction of the retina is presumably
primarily caused by a reduction of the number of visual cells.
Peters et al. (1975) tried to show that the eye size of the eye of the
Micos fish can be influenced by different intensities of light. Eyes of
specimens kept in darkness were smaller than those bred in light. This
tendency was confirmed statistically in individuals of the variable Micos
fish as well as of F 1 and F2 crosses between the epigean and the phylo-
genetically old cave forms (Table I).
Earlier suggestions that the eyes of Pachon and Sabinos cave fish
are smaller when these fish are bred in darkness could not be confirmed,
300 H. Wilkens
~i
ganglionic 0.0330
---
inner dark
0.0330
plexiform
0.0222
---- -42.7
----
inner
nuclear
0.0285 1\ -453
0.0189
0.1494 mm
-31.1%
0.0156 0.1029mm
outer
jJlexifQ!-m
0.0150 "'-
-30.0
0.0105
outer 0.0174
0.0219 -20h
FIG. 22. Thickness of retinal layers in
nuclear
---- specimens of epigean A. fasciatus
ellipsoids 0.0180 -0.0 0.0183 hatched and kept in darkness. Mean val-
- ues derived from five adult specimens.
Genetic Background
TABLE I. The Influence of Light and Darkness on Eye Size in Different Breedings of
the Phylogenetically Young Micos Cave Fish a
Breeding M s N p Size, cm
Light
Dark
4.75
4.39
0.27
0.19
35
59 } <0.0001 2.5
2 Light
Dark
6.85
6.14
0.36
0.41
60
50 } <0.0001 2.5
3 Light
Dark
5.22
5.07
0.53
0.57
98
90 } <0.08 2.5
4 Light
Dark
6.53
6.43
0.36
0.53
60
75 } >0.1 2.5
5 Light
Dark
4.54
4.54
0.14
0.21
7
39 } 2.5
6 Light
Dark
11.8
10.4
0.8
0.67
35
38 } <0.0001 6.0
7 Light
Dark
9.54
9.52
1.24
1.39
39
15 } >0.8 6.0
8 Light
Dark
7.78
7.14
0.54
0.94
17
5 } >0.5 6.0
a The Mann-Whitney-U-test (two-tailed) was applied because only part of the samples is
normally distributed.
in the direction of the epigean form in the offspring ofthe various crosses,
have the same cause.
These alterations in frequency are the result of the expressivity of
the polygenes, which under certain conditions is discontinuously en-
hanced. This discontinuous jump requires that a minimum number of eye
genes, each with the same amount of expressivity, be recombined. A
further essential requirement seems to be the presence of genetic balance.
This can be concluded from the fact that the above-mentioned alteration
only develops in the F 1 and in the backcross progeny, all of which possess
a complete set of chromosomes of one parental form. It is also charac-
teristic of the Micos fish, which is heterozygous for the eye genes and
thus can develop a discontinuous distribution. In the progeny of the F2
crosses, random recombination of parental genes is the rule. This appar-
ently disturbs the genetic balance, and thus, instead of bimodality, a nor-
mal distribution occurs (Figs. 11 and 12).
The importance of the presence of genetic balance is also reflected
in the variability in the size of the pupillary opening. When correlated
302 H. Wllkens
pm eye size
(transverse t/» 0 0
0 0
1000 8> 0 0
0
"
00
0
0
co 0 0 0
"ococ!>qs>o
Cl' 0 0 0
"'" " "'" + 0 " ooi'
0.66 A6A 00
0 0
500 1000
FIG. 23. Eyeball size of the phylogenetically old Sabinos and Pachon cave fish and their F, hybrids.
Means shown in black. (Wilkens. 1971.)
with eyeballs of the same size, the greatest variability is found in all the
F2 crosses between epigean and Micos fish on one hand and the phylo-
genetically old Sabinos and Pachon cave fish on the other (Fig. 17). In
the Micos fish, which are not hybrids, the level of pupillary variability is
far below that of the F2 crosses.
At least six genetic factors have been calculated to be involved in
eye reduction in the phylogenetically old Pachon and Sabinos fish (below,
p. 307). Crosses between these two cave forms have revealed that the
responsible genes are to some extent nonallelic. In the F 1 progeny, the
eye rudiments are on an average larger, and thus better differentiated,
than in the parental forms (Figs. 7 and 23). Occasionally, single structures
develop, such as the lens capsule, that are never found in adults of the
cave fish (Wilkens, 1971).
Pineal Organ
Color Pattern
Epigean Fish
Besides guanophores, iridophores, and xanthophores, the col or pat-
tern of the epigean fish is primarily formed by melanophores (Rasquin,
304 H. Wllkenl
~A
'\
,glli9mP.Ql1!,!latioo
and F,..!iJmgg!Q!lP..2p'ulations
background black
_-+-+-+background white
backcrosses
5 \Wi th hypogean populations
,
~:,~,
, ,
0,0 ',0 2,0 3,0 4,0 5,0 6,0 7,0 8,0
melanophores lunit
FIG. 24. Frequency distribution of melanophore densities in epigean and phylogenetically old
Sabinos and Pachon cave fish and their crosses. (Wilkens, 1970c.)
1947). These melanophores form a basal pattern of cells that has its great-
est density on the dorsal side. Dark patches of larger melanophores are
developed in the caudal area and on each shoulder (Rasquin, 1947; Wilk-
ens, 1970c).
The melanophores of the epigean fish are subject to physiological
and morphological color change. The number of the cells is about 30%
greater when the fish is living over a dark than over a white background.
Blinded specimens show the same development of color cells typical for
fish kept over a dark substratum (Fig. 24). (Wilkens, 1970c).
Cave Fish
~.,
....
4'
.,. . ...
..
""" .. i'
FIG. 25. Melanophore cells in (a) the epigean and (b) the phy-
logenetically old Sabinos cave form.
and those of the Pachon form about 15% of the number found in epigean
fish. The melanin content of the melanophores is also reduced (Fig. 25).
In the phylogenetically old cave fish, it may be partially reduced, or mel-
anin may be completely lacking (Sadoglu, 1955, 1957; Sadoglu and
McKee, 1969; Wilkens, 1970c). The Pachon and the Yerbaniz forms are
known to belong to completely albinotic populations (Sadoglu, 1957; Wilk-
ens, 1984), while the Piedras and the Sabinos fish exhibit partial reduction
of melanin content.
The melanophores of the cave fish are still able to effect physiological
color changes (Burgers et al., 1962; Wilkens, 1970c). Morphological color
changes, however, are no longer possible. Thus, when maintained in day-
light, specimens of the phylogenetically old populations do not become
darker.
Under normal light conditions, the phylogenetically young Micos fish
show no differences from the epigean form with respect to the melanin
content of their pigment cells or their ability to undergo physiological and
morphological color change (Fig. 26) (Wilkens, 1976). In contrast, Micos
fish in darkness are almost as lightly colored as are the phylogenetically
old cave populations. This is mainly due to a 40% reduction of the number
of melanophores.
Within the phylogenetically old Piedras population, some specimens
show the total reduction of guanin, except for some scales of the lateral
line (Wilkens, in preparation). All phylogenetically old forms seem to
show partial reduction of guanophore pigmentation (Breder and Rasquin,
1947).
306 H. Wilkens
r
CAVE FISH ~ •
MICOS FISH
~
~
...-
I 2s
F1
[MICOSICCAVEl
BACK
[MICOSICCAVEI
IC(AVE
BACK {
• .-
(MICOSIC(AVEI
ICMICOS
F2
[MICOSICCAVE)
{
•I
I
[MIca;F1RIVER!~ $
..
BACK
[MICOS RIVER
xMICOS $ •
BACK
(MICQSICRIVER
ICRIVER ~ •
F2
MICOSICRIVE ~
RIVER FISH
~ I
.. 023
0 1 2 3 4 5 S
MELANOPHORES/UNIT
FIG. 26. Mean, standard error (srn), standard deviation (s), and range (r) of the melanophoral
densities over a white (w, open) or a black (b, solid) background in the phylogenetically young
Micos cave fish and its crosses. (Wilkens, 1976.)
Genetics
In the Micos fish at least one locus must be involved (Wilkens, 1970c,
1976; Lande, 1981).
Scales
The species of cyprinid cave fish are especially likely to show a partial
or total loss of scales (Bannister and Bunni, 1980; Bannister, 1984). Similar
phenomena can also be observed in the hypogean populations of the char-
acin A. fasciatus (Bohn, 1986).
The body of both the epigean and the hypogean forms is covered
with densely and regularly distributed scales of the cycloid type. They
are largest in the anterior region and smallest in the caudal area and in
the upper and lower horizontal rows. Nevertheless, in comparison with
epigean fish, the phylogenetically old cave forms show a decrease in the
number of scales. The Pachon population, for example, is characterized
by having one or two fewer scales in the lateral line. It should also be
noted that the number of vertebrae is reduced. A tendency to decrease
the number of scales can also be found in the vertical scale rows in the
cave fish (Schuppa, 1984).
Moreover, the craniocaudal scale diameter of the cave fish is short-
ened. In all body regions of cave fish the quotient scale height/scale length
therefore is greater (Fig. 27). Because of this , the foci, which are normally
located at the center of each scale, are located more anteriorly. Due to
the reduction in length, the scale is no longer as deeply embedded in the
skin as it is in the epigean form, and is more easily lost. Nevertheless,
despite their being reduced, the scales of the cave forms of A. fasciatus
still form a complete body covering. In cases where a horizontal row has
been lost, they develop greater height. Their craniocaudal shortening is
compensated by the disjunction of individual scales. As a result, the scales
no longer form the complete double-layered covering that is typical of
the epigean form.
This reduction of scales in the hypogean populations is probably
brought about by a partial loss of biological function. Noting the great
amount of intraspecific aggression shown by the epigean fish, it seems
logical to assume that the scales provide a protection against bites. In the
cave populations, aggressive behavior is lost, and the scales have also
lost a major function and become reduced. This explanation is supported
by the fact that laboratory groups of enucleated epigean individuals that
no longer show aggressive behavioral patterns have a completely intact
covering of scales (see next section).
Evolution and Genetics of Astyanax fasc/atus 309
Cave fish
/ l~~tlllbe'dded part
Epigean fish
~ EmlJedded part
Aggressive Behavior
Epigean Population
500
400
120
100
creases as the number of fish kept in a given tank increases (John, 1964;
Burchards et al., 1985).
In addition to the available space, state of nutrition also influences
the intensity of aggressive behavior patterns: hungry individuals are more
aggressive than satiated ones.
In darkness, aggressive behavior is practically nonexistent (Fig. 28)
(Burchards et al., 1985; Parzefall, 1985), nor do enucleated specimens
ever show aggression. This is clearly demonstrated by the fact that, con-
trary to sighted specimens, groups ofthem never show any loss of scales.
Causes of Reduction
The reasons for the reduction of aggressive behavior in the cave forms
have not yet been elucidated. Burchards et al. (1985) suggested that, due
to the presumed low population density in caves, the chance meeting of
two specimens is far less probable there than in the epigean biotope.
Because of this "nonusefulness," stabilizing selection no longer was act-
ing. The authors further stress that territorial aggression is only developed
312 H. Wilkens
Schooling Behavior
Activity Control
Forms of Activity
Activity control in epigean and cave forms has been studied several
times (Thines et al., 1966; Thines and Weyers, 1978). Erckens and Martin
Evolution and Genetics of Astyanax fasclatus 313
(D)
120 160
T T
,
11=10 0=12
22 11 23 11CET
100.F"~;"=:;,;j '-';;"""~~
B 500 r
JggJ===;"""",/ I=~=-_...d FIG. 31. (Left) Surface and (right) bottom activity of
(A) four epigean specimens during four consecutive
100 F-II:;.,.a.::.I ,..;...,.~~"""" days and (B) one hypogean Pachon specimen during
500 five consecutive days under LD 12:12. Solid horizon-
tal axes, dark phase; open axes, light phase. CET,
100 I=:.='!!!;;;'-'_~ '==~;;;;;";~ Central European Time. (Erckens and Martin,
22 10 22 10CET 1982a,b.)
the two kinds of activity as in the epigean fish was exhibited (Fig. 31).
Furthermore, a greater variability in the activity answer to external light
stimuli could be observed. This mainly means a weaker entrainment, at
least in part, of the time series.
The activity of the river fish was entrainable by all the applied LDs.
This leads to the conclusion that a passive system controls the activity.
1~~t~:LJ L...... FIG. 32. Complex demodulation in epigean fish of the time
-'O~~M~M.f.If4"-:D~D~_;:';;'~O.t\~S series of surface, bottom, and total activity under LD 12:12
and following DD. Under LD, surface and bottom activity are
I~~~t~~ J I ~ J
I
entrained and oscillate with a phase-angle difference of 180°.
During 4 days after beginning of DD a section of instability in
-535~~;~ which phase shifts take place occurs in surface activity. There-
after the oscillation stabilizes. Bottom activity becomes ar-
ITotol L 11
o~~~
.
rhythmic in DD. Total activity registers weak entrainment
under LD because of the inversion of both single oscillations.
00- DAYS (Erckens and Martin, 1982a.)
Evolution and Genetics of Astyanax 'asciatus 315
LD 12 ,12
0477:~
5 10 15 20 25 30h
QS34~~
10 15 20 25 30h
FIG. 33. Periodogramm analysis under three different time
series of surface activity in Pachon cave fish. The peaks ex-
tending beyond the shaded areas indicate significant
Q537:~
rhythms. Test level 95%. (Erckens and Martin, 1982b.) 10 15 20 25 3Cl1
Alarm Substance
The alarm substance has been found to exist in the epigean as well
as in the phylogenetically old Pachon and Piedras cave forms and in the
hybrid Chica population (pfeiffer, 1963, 1966, 1967a; Thines and Legrain,
1973; Fricke, 1988). It is produced in the epidermal club cells. In the
Pachon fish, 2800 club cells have been counted in 1 mm2 of skin (pfeiffer,
1967a). It is unknown whether there is any difference in the number of
club cells or the quantity of alarm substance produced by a single cell in
the epigean and cave fish.
Fright Reaction
The fright reaction is well developed in the epigean fish (pfeiffer,
1963). In tests conducted with single epigean specimens, three stages of
reaction could be differentiated (Fricke, 1988). The most violent reaction
starts 30-60 sec after alarm substance is added to the water in the aquar-
ium. The specimen darts in zigzag movements and hides. It does not leave
its hiding place for several days. In the minimum reaction the specimens
are only slightly startled for a period of time. Almost all fishes react to
the presence of alarm substance by avoiding the surface of the water to
a depth of 5-6 cm, whether the substance has been introduced at the
surface or close to the bottom. These different behavioral elements are
connected by transitional patterns and show a good deal of individual
variability. When kept in schools the fish show the same general behavior,
but they do not hide, schooling more closely instead and remaining mo-
tionless in one place.
The fright reaction has been analyzed quantitatively by determining
the feeding rate at the water surface, inasmuch as the addition of alarm
substance at the water surface causes a significant decrease of feeding
there (Fig. 34) (Fricke, 1988). The feeding rate slowly rises, but it does
not reach its original level for at least 1 week. The introduction of alarm
substance close to the bottom provokes less intense reactions.
In the phylogenetically old Pachon and Piedras cave fish, the fright
reaction no longer includes any zigzag darting. This behavior is only very
Evolution and Genetics of Astysnsx fsscistus 317
• FOOD
50 EPIGEAN FISH ® ALARM SUBSTANCE
~ PTEROPHYLLUM SKIN EXTRACT
!WITHOUT ALARM SUBSTANCEI
A .. DZIBILCHALTUN
~/ TEAPAO n=16
.4#-,#' n=13
10 15 20 DAYS
80
70
CAVE FISlf1
/ : ."...,' ..e,.,
/i
i ~
I I / '.,' ''W'!
I I / \. .I
60
!" ~./
I
~
1;:150 , ,';-
PIEORAS
FIG. 34. Feeding rate at the water surface in a: ../ :.. , n08
1
epigean populations from Rio Teapao and Cen- I
rarely observed in the hybrid Chica and the phylogenetically young Micos
fish. The fish of all these populations, however, avoid the place where
the alarm substance is introduced and the water surface, including the
space 5-6 cm just beneath (Fricke, 1988). This behavioral element of
avoidance evidently was not recognized by Schutz (1956) and Pfeiffer
(1966). Consequently, both of these investigators reported that the Pachon
and Chica cave fish have lost the fright reaction completely.
As in the epigean fish, the feeding at the surface almost stops after
the alarm substance has been introduced (Fig. 34). The fright reaction
also persists for as long as 6 days before completely vanishes. The intro-
duction of the substance near the bottom also causes a less violent re-
action.
Studies of the ontogeny of the fright reaction have shown that its
manifestation is age-dependent. In F 1 hybrids between epigean and Pa-
chon cave fish, it cannot be observed until they are 46-56 days old and
at least 22 cm long (Pfeiffer, 1966).
This behavioral difference between epigean and cave forms is ge-
netically based. All Fl hybrids show the fright reaction. In the F2 gen-
eration and the backcrosses with the cave fish, some specimens do not
react even when tested several times. Pfeiffer (1966) interprets the in-
heritance as being based on two independently segregating dominant fac-
tors. Unfortunately, this interpretation depends on the erroneous as-
sumption that the cave fish have lost the fright reaction completely.
Additional genetic analyses thus must be performed. Nevertheless, when
318 H. Wilkens
comparing the results described above with the manifestation of the other
complex features found in A. !asciatus, it may be assumed that the fright
reaction is inherited in an additive polygenic fashion.
The partial reduction of the fright reaction in the cave fish can be
explained by the different conditions found in its habitat. Epigean fish
school, and conspecifics can be alarmed visually by rapid zigzag swim-
ming. Such visual alarm signals have lost their biological significance in
darkness and are consequently reduced in cave situations (Fricke, 1988).
On the other hand, the behavioral element of avoidance may still have a
biological function as protection against cannibalism or aerial predation
by bats (Romero, 1985a). It is quite probable that in caves with many
fish, such as the Chica cave, bats (Noctilio leporinus) live at least in part
on cave fish. This could explain why the water surface in particular is
avoided by the cave individuals after the introduction of alarm substance.
However, the possibility cannot be excluded that in caves both features,
the fright reaction and the alarm substance, have no function at all and
are just rudiments.
The light reaction of both epigean and cave forms of A. !asciatus has
been the subject of a series of studies (Breder and Gresser, 1941a,b;
Breder, 1944; Breder and Rasquin, 1947; Kuhn and Kfthling, 1954; Liiling,
1954b; Kfthling, 1965; Gertychowa, 1970; Erckens and Martin, 1982b;
Tabata, 1982; Romero, 1985b). Recently Langecker (1988) carried out a
thorough analysis, which may be summarized as follows. In the epigean
form this behavior is highly variable; eyed as well as blinded epigean
individuals cover about the entire range of possible reactions (Fig. 35).
The mean phototactic response under different light conditions never-
theless reveals a clear tendency: In blinded epigean fish an extremely
photonegative reaction is observed under high light intensities, and this
decreases significantly with declining light. In specimens with intact eyes,
the same trend can be observed (Fig. 35). Langecker (1988) states, how-
ever, that in contrast to the blinded fish, the eyed ones cannot be described
as significantly photopositive or photonegative under any light conditions.
This situation is caused by the fact that the reaction to light is greatly
influenced by visual perception. Its dominant role diminishes the expres-
sion of phototactic behavior in epigean fish. This relationship was ne-
glected in previous studies (Breder and Gresser, 1941a; Breder, 1944;
Breder and Rasquin, 1947; Romero, 1984, 1985b).
The prominent requirements of optic orientation prevent epigean
Evolution and Genetics of Astyanax fasciatus 319
0/0
100 n-6 n=12
-r'" -r
n~8
90
QJ
80 1:
·iii
0
Cl. n=18
70 ~
.c
g n=18
r
60
n~2
~~
5"
~~
40 ~~
§ ~~
ti3
« 0
UJ
er:
.~
t;
0'
QJ
~ .
~2 ()..~
l!l
::J
u..
o 1O·
g
~ .. -
xUJ
FIG. 35. Mean and range of light re- o - - _L-
60 n=18
so
40
~
t::; 30
~
Cl::
~20
g
15 10-
x
~
~ O~---ijL-~--~----~----~r------~~-~I------~~
00 Q2S 0.5 1.0 30 10.0 SOD 100.0 620.0 LUX
LIGHT INTENSrry
FIG. 36. Occurrence of adult epigean fish under different light intensities in the dark (hatched
bars) or lighted chamber (open bars) of a test aquarium. (Langecker, 1988.)
0/0
70- CII
~
.~
60
n=12
SO
i n=6 n=6
n=6
40- ~ .. n:6 ~ ~ t
~
a:
~20 :I:
g ""
.~
t::;30 ....
<t
UJ
~
D
5l'
c:
~~
t
t5 10.
xUJ
~
BUNOED EPliEAN BUNDED YEIIlANIZ PIEmAS PllCIDI
POPU.ATOI PINEAlECTO-
I'tZED
El'lGEAN
POPU.ATlOI
FIG. 37. Mean and range of light reaction in blinded and in blinded and pinealectomized epigean
fish (620 lux) and in three different cave fish (1400 lux). (Langecker, 1988.)
Evolution and Genetics of Astyanax fasciatus 321
CONSTRUCTIVE TRAITS
Gustatory Equipment
Morphology
The gustatory system of the different Astyanax populations is com-
prised of taste buds, which closely resemble those usually found in teleost
322 H. Wllkens
Genetics
(ave populations
~
.:.,. 30% A, Pachon:J
':. 20 " '?)ibinos I
,1 l
rJ I '
10
" I
~-1~~~~~~~~~~~~
30
20
10
----O~~~~~~~~~_r~~~~~
~~'~~~~-~-~"~/~'r/~:'~-T~~"~~~~~~~~~
~f~--
-o,A~,., 1 3 5 7 9 12 13 15 17 19 21
i u, re
i'
23 25
i
FIG. 39. Frequency distribution of taste buds on the ventral head region in the epigean, (-) the
phylogenetically old Pachon and (- -) Sabinos cave forms, their hybrids, and the phylogenetically
young Micos fish. Ordinate, VB = square root of taste bud number. (Schemmel, 1967, 1974a,b.)
have been found especially in the backcross, in which mean, range, and
standard deviation surpass expected values (Fig. 39). This is probably due
to a threshold effect (Schemmel, 1967, 1974a).
It has been found in crosses between epigean and cave forms that
the expansion of the area occupied by taste buds proceeds with a constant
density/area correlation: The more of the lower head region that is covered
by these organs, the greater is their average density. This is also true for
the backcross to the cave forms, although these fish are subject to a
threshold effect. Both the density and area occupied of the taste buds are
probably regulated by the same polygene system. According to Schemmel
(1974a), only the Pachon fish are characterized by a different density/
area correlation. This is still an unexplained phenomenon that cannot be
observed in any of the other crosses of this fish (Fig. 39).
Both the Pachon and the Sabinos fish seem to be homozygous for
the gustatory equipment. The phylogenetically young Micos fish is het-
erozygous, as indicated by the different means of the F 1 hybrids between
it and the epigean or the phylogenetically old hypogean populations.
324 H. Wllkens
Food Localization
The epigean A. fasciatus lives mainly in rivers as a facultatively
schooling species. It catches floating prey in the open water by means of
optical fixation (Parzefall, 1983a). In cave fish, schooling behavior is re-
duced and the individual fish swim continuously in the cave biotope. Their
food is located predominantly by means of chemical sense organs.
Studies in the Micos cave have revealed that the epigean specimens
are able to localize the opening of a baited trap directed into the open
water as successfully as do the true cave fish (Wilkens and Hiippop, 1986).
In contrast to this, epigean specimens have great difficulties in localizing
food on the bottom. In competition experiments, 80% of small pieces of
meat on the bottom were found by hypogean specimens of the Pachon
population, but only 20% by epigean fish (Fig. 40) (Hiippop, 1987). Fur-
thermore, the hypogean fish reacted much faster to the presence of food.
Experiments did not improve this kind of food finding in the epigean
individuals.
The superiority of the cave form in feeding in darkness does not
necessarily imply an improved ability to taste, that is, a lowering of tasting
thresholds (Hiippop, 1987). Earlier investigations were not able to dem-
onstrate this (Breder and Rasquin, 1943; Humbach, 1960). Similar im-
provement in the nasal organ can also be ruled out (Schemmel, 1967). It
may be that chemicals bring more and different information to cave fish
than to epigean ones, which find their food predominantly by optical
means and only secondarily by taste or olfaction.
In the cave fish, moving objects can also be located by means of the
lateral line system (Friihbeis, 1984). In particular, certain kinds of water
FIG. 40. Food-finding success of epigean and Pachon cave fish in total darkness. (HOppop. 1987.)
Evolution and Genetics of Astyanax fasciatus 325
Feeding Behavior
dently from those responsible for taste bud formation and extension
(Schemmel, 1980).
Metabolic Rates
TABLE 11. Oxygen Consumption Rates of Seven Groups of Epigean and Hybrid Chica, Phylogenetically Young Micos, and
Phylogenetically Old Pachon Fish a
Teapao-1F Teapao-1S Chica-O Micos-O Pachon-O Pachon-1F Pachon-1S
Mean standard oxygen 0.314 ± 0.081 0.212 ± 0.079 0.284 ± 0.048 0.277 ± 0.063 0.215 ± 0.035 0.243 ± 0.033 0.150 ± 0.025
consumption, mg 02 g -I h - I
Range, mg 0, g-I h- I 0.230-0.481 0.150-0.361 0.231-0.349 0.200-0.444 0.152-0.260 0.202-0.284 0.118-0.185
Mean routine oxygen 0.415 ± 0.071 0.301 ± 0.084 0.356 ± 0.084 0.355 ± 0.080 0.2% ± 0.073 0.319 ± 0.038 0.222 ± 0.076
consumption, mg 02 g -1 h- I
Range, mg 0, g-I h- I 0.328-0.544 0.221-0.435 0.244-0.498 0.251-0.513 0.163-0.405 0.245-0.383 0.150-0.323
Range of wet body mass, g 4.29-9.86 3.22-6.99 3.35-6.82 3.03-11.33 3.17-9.20 4.03-6.66 3.89-8. \1
Number of each sex 2~,50 32,30 5~, 10 6~,60 5~, 30 4~, 50 32,30
a Hiippop (I986a). 0, Fish from natural locality; I, first laboratory generation; F, fed; S, starved.
Evolution and Genetics of Astysnsx 'sscistus 329
035
015
o Routine
f
Oz- consumption
-Standard D2-consufllllion
!!i
of standard and routine oxygen consumption I I I i
rates of an epigean form (Rio Teapao), the hy- fRlgean (hica Micos Pachon
brid Chica, the phylogenetically young Micos,
and the phylogenetically old Pachon cave fish.
n=7
I
n=6
,
n=12 n=17
(ave fish
y=102.33-2.23 Ix
r=0.987
.~
Epigean fish 0
y=103.06-3.34 Ix o
r=0.990
FIG. 44. Loss of body mass in epi- o~
gean (Rio Teapao) and Pachon cave
8
fish during 28 days of starvation. Each
point represents the weight of six
specimens. (Huppop, 19868.)
5 ~ 1~ 17 2; i5 i9
Days of starvation
330 H. Wllkens
TABLE Ill. Median and Range of Fat Content and Oxygen Consumption Rates
Calculated on Fat Body Mass and on Fat-Free Body Mass for Epigean and Cave Fish
of Astyanax fasciatuS'
vo, (+fat)C Vo, (-fat)C
Fat
N contentb N Standard Routine Standard Routine
,..-024
AA~ •
A
'T
'T
~
':"
en
E
0,3
0,2
0,1
i
0
f*
•i
2
-,-a
tI ..• ·
i
3
p) 0.05
4
i
Eye size
N
~
rs=0.11
AA~
'E
[j
B
.. p)0lO
..
~q
•
'C
..-
c: t
FIG. 45. Spearman's rank-correlation test of
~ I
0,1
i
•
•
i i
eye size and degree of pigmentation shows no
correlation with rate of oxygen consumption in
F2 crosses between epigean and phylogeneti-
0 2 3 cally old Pachon cave fish (N = 49). (HOppop,
Pigmentation 1988a.)
Evolution and Genetics of Astyanax fasciatus 331
x = 0.42 t 0.07
Epigean fish
I i .n. 1J
o ,,
n=7
i , • i , ,n IIH+ 11. ,. n. ,.
.2: , I i
~ 12
10 10
x =0.21t 0.05 x=0.29± 0.10
8
~ 8
~
6 6
F2 F2
4 n =49 n = 49
FIG. 46. Frequency distributions of standard and routine oxygen consumption rates in the epigean
(Rio Teapao) and phylogenetically old Pachon cave forms and their F, and F2 crosses. (HGppop,
1988a.)
fw ~44
f~
3.
f48
2.8
fw
2.6 110
2.4
0.20 Yolk volume (mm 3)
0.18
i"
1 1
0.16 ?w
~50
48
0.14 40
0.12
Ul0 FIG. 47. Mean and standard deviation (15) of yolkvol-
ume and body length in the epigean form (Rio Teapao)
EPIGEAN FISH
.
[..wE FISH
and several cave derivatives 24 h after spawning (n =
number of investigated larvae). (HOppop, 1985b.)
baniz forms, the phylogenetically young Micos fish, and the hybrid Chica
form (Hiippop, 1988b). It has been found that the eggs of all the cave
forms show a significantly greater amount of yolk in comparison with the
epigean ancestor (Fig. 47). Differences among the cave forms studied
cannot be verified statistically, although there is some variability. Within
EPIGEAN FISH
12 hrs
GAG se
~-f±ii9 A
24hrs
~48hrs
onic and larval development of an epi-
~) gean fish and a specimen of the albi-
notic Pachon cave form: A, anus; ABA,
KlGA
swimbladder;CAG, cemental adhesive
(f~
gland; 10, eye; EM, egg membrane; FIN,
pectoral fin; GA, gill arch; MO, mouth;
72hrs
MY, myotomes; NC, nasal pit; NCH,
FIN
notochord; 0, orbital cavity; PS, peri-
vitelline space; SC, statocyste; TB,
tailbud; YS, yolk sac. (HOppop,
e:z:t£±@ 174hrs 1988b.)
Evolution and Genetics of Astyanax fasciatus 333
its range, the phylogenetically young Micos fish has already achieved a
stage comparable to that of the phylogenetically old Pachon cave form.
Yolk content and body length are correlated with each other at the
earliest developmental stages (Fig. 48). Cave fish embryos therefore are
longer than epigean ones from the beginning. In accordance with this,
those features whose size depends on body length are also larger. This
phenomenon is made even more apparent by the fact that the epigean
larvae grow more slowly during the first 8 days.
The rate of yolk consumption in epigean and cave larvae does not
differ. Due to the smaller amount of yolk, the epigean fish complete the
process 1 day before the cave larvae (Figs. 48 and 49).
From the beginning, eye volume is smaller in cave fish embryos. In
contrast to this, the growth rate of the eye does not diverge from that of
2.5 , i
0035 eye volume(mm 3)
0030
0020
0010
• • • • 0' J
o
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
FIG. 49. Comparative development of yolk con-
tent, eye volume, and body size of epigean and Pa- o
chon cave fish larvae during 4 days after spawning. 4
(HOppop, 1988b.) days
334 H. Wilkens
the epigean form until the age of 2.4 days has been reached (Fig. 49).
During the following period until the fourth day, the cave fish eyes stop
growing (Figs. 20 and 49). The described eye growth stop has no effect
on the development of other features, the body length, or on the yolk
consumption rate (Fig. 49) (Hiippop, 1988b).
Crosses between epigean and cave fish show that the increase in yolk
content has a genetic basis (Hiippop and Wilkens, 1988).
that show appreciably less close correlation among one another (see pp.
263,312).
4. Polygenes in principle are responsible for effects of approximately
equal magnitude. This can be concluded from the intermediate means and
the normal distribution of features shown in most crosses. The mode of
inheritance is additively polygenic (Rieger et al., 1968).
5. It is, however, also characteristic of the inheritance of all the com-
plex features studied that alterations in the additive polygenic inheritance
described before develop under the influence of modifying conditions.
Whenever a certain minimum number of polygenes had recombined, gene
expressivity abruptly increases. Usually this change can become manifest
only when the necessary genetic balance has been provided by at least
one set of chromosomes (haplome) of either parental form. This phenom-
enon is due to a threshold effect, and under its influence the increase in
response may be considerable: for example, eye size is enlarged by about
17% (Fig. 50).
6. In all the regressive and constructive features that have been stud-
ied, no phenotypic linkage has been found: for example, eye and melan-
ophore genes show independent inheritance. It is especially noteworthy
that even gustatory system and feeding behavior, which are functionally
correlated to some degree, are not genetically linked (Schemmel, 1967,
1980). The improved ability to store fat is also inherited independently
from eyes and from melanophores (HOppop, 1988b).
Eye
-17%
,
r'\r-lxJckcrossing with
~ \ epigean population
8MU
2345678
me!./unit
feeding behavior
Ffgeneration
(hypogeanPachonx
epigean population)
14%
90 80 70 60 50"angle
standard ~02_
Ff generation
(hypogean Pachonx
epigean population)
FIG. 50. The threshold effect. After re-
combination of a minimum number of
polygenes that are responsible for the
formation of a specific structure, gene
expressivity changes. A structure may
be improved by a considerable amount
in one step. (Data from Huppop,
0.1 0.2 0.3 Q.4 1988a,b; Schemmel, 1980; Wilkens,
mg·g-1·h- 1 1970a,c, 1976).
and the extremely regressed Sabinos fish and at least one factor between
the small-eyed Micos and the epigean form (Table IV).
Melanophores
TABLE IV. Minimum Estimate of Genetic Factors (nE1, nE2 ) Involved in Regressive
and Constructive Traits in Astyanax fasciatus
N m S2 Genetic factors
Eye
Sabinos P, 55 2.1 0.0361 nE, = 7.47
B, 516 3.63 0.2209 S = ±0.46
F, 183 5.12 0.0576
F2 781 4.63 0.4761 nE2 = 7.24
B2 Bimodal S = ±0.42
P2 30 7.11 0.0256
Pachon P, 48 2.0 0.0324 nE, = 6.88
B, 672 3.64 0.1764 S = ±0.39
F, 177 5.17 0.09
F2 1128 4.80 0.5625 nE2 = 6.46
B2 Bimodal S = ±0.62
P2 30 7.11 0.0256
Micos (selected P, 55 2.1 0.0361 nE, = 5.28
for small eyes); B, 45 3.3 0.16 S = ± 1.33
difference with F, 54 4.05 0.09
Pachon F2 96 4.1 0.25 nE2 = 4.54
B2 105 4.2 0.1225 S = ±0.84
P2 124 4.7 0.04
Micos (selected P, 124 4.7 0.04 nE, = 1.2
for small eyes); B, 86 5.0 0.09 s = ± 0.03
difference with F, 77 5.1 0.04
epigean form F2 141 6.4 0.64 nE2 = 1.2
B2 72 6.7 0.64 s = ±0.04
Pz 30 7.11 0.0256
Melanophores
Sabinos P, 375 1.75 0.0961 nE, = 1.47
B, 610 2.72 1.1025 s = ±O.I
F, 137 5.57 0.2601
Fz 836 3.7 1.6129 nE2 = 1.4
Bz 30 5.9 0.2916 s = ±0.08
Pz 214 5.74 0.16
Pachon P, 311 0.94 0.0784 nE, = 3.35
B, 1071 2.21 0.81 s = ±0.16
F, 7 5.77 0.2916
F2 1250 3.06 0.9801 nE2 = 3.72
B2 30 5.9 0.2916 s = ±0.42
Pz 214 5.74 0.16
Feeding behavior P, 120 55.7 3.61 nE, = 2.1
B, No data s = ±0.39
F, 39 78.7 13.69
Fz 134 54.76 b
Bz Bimodal
Pz 43 81.8 12.96
( continued)
338 H. Wilkens
N rn S2 Genetic factors
a N, number of specimens; rn, mean; S2, variance; PI, P2 , parental forms; F I, FI cross; F 2 ,
F2 cross; B I , backcross with cave fish; B2 , backcross with epigean fish.
b The F2 is bimodal. Standard deviation is estimated as twice that of F I.
to four in the Pachon fish (Table IV). Calculation of the divergence be-
tween the Micos and the Pachon fish is disturbed by the fact that the
factors that have already mutated in the Micos form do not manifest in
the latter, but only in the crosses with cave fish that exhibit reduced
pigmentation (Fig. 26).
Taste Buds
Feeding Behavior
Evolutionary Significance
Threshold Effects
and vice versa (Figs. 18 and 19). In some eyes the lens muscle, which,
like the retina, originates from the eye cup, is developed, while the lens
is reduced (Fig. 18b).
In the chicken, the lens influences the formation of the vitreous body.
In the A. Jasciatus eye this influence seems to be rather weak, inasmuch
as small lenses are found in combination with large vitreous bodies (Fig.
18b). It cannot be excluded that the funnel-shaped depressions that have
been described in certain retinas may be the result of inadequate pressure
of the vitreous body, which is brought about by the disharmonious in-
ductive influence of lens and retina of this organ (Fig. 18).
The nature of the polygenes in A. Jasciatus that are responsible for
the formation of complex structures such as the eye has long been a matter
of speculation. In the case of the eye, Sadoglu (1957, 1975) assumed that
specific lens, retina, eyeball, or other genes should exist. In contrast to
this concept, it has been argued that due to the intimate developmentaV
physiological interrelationships within complex structures, it would be
impossible to segregate and identify such specific genes (Pfeiffer, 1967b;
Peters and Peters, 1968; Wilkens, 1970a).
Accordingly, the existence of eyes of different sizes in various crosses
as well as in the Micos fish can be attributed to a whole series of actions
and reactions: for example, the loss of a lens gene diminishes not only
lens size, but, by induction, also the size of all other individual ocular
structures, and vice versa. As a result, the eyeball as a whole becomes
smaller. For the totality of the genes that determine eyeball size in this
manner, the term "eye gene" was coined (Wilkens, 1979a).
An interpretation of this kind, however, implies that a large number
of genes must be responsible for each specific structure. They would be
required in order to explain the continuous, gradual difference in eye size
that exists in the progeny of crosses between hypogean and epigean pop-
ulations and in the Micos fish. The relatively low number of eye genes
that has been calculated to be responsible for eye development (Table
IV) thus does not give any support to this view of the genetics of complex
structures.
The study of the eye of A. Jasciatus has shown that its development
is characterized by a high degree of self-regulatory ability. This can be
concluded from the fact that eye size and degree of differentiation have
been found to be correlated in hybrid eyes as well as in those of the cave
fish and those undergoing ontogenetic development.
In particular, it seems to be the relative size of a given eye that
determines which individual structures will develop, and vice versa. This
is clearly shown by similar tendencies of allometric correlation that are
developed in eyes whose sizes have quite different causes (Wilkens,
342 H. Wilkens
1970a). In the case of the lens in the crosses between epigean and cave
forms of A. jasciatus, for example, a positive allometric correlation de-
velops during individual ontogenetic growth (Fig. 13) as well as between
the eyes of different individuals whose eye sizes are based on a different
number of "eye genes" (Fig. 15).
Similarly, in cases of left-right asymmetry, the smaller eye shows a
degree of differentiation that is determined by its size and not by the
number of actually available eye genes that formed the larger eye.
Furthermore, it was shown by Cahn (1958) that although the earliest
eye anlage in the cave fish is reduced in size, individual structures such
as the rudimentary lens, which becomes reduced during later ontogeny,
nevertheless are developed. From this, two points can be made: first, the
degree of differentiation attained by the adult eye has to a large extent
already been determined in early embryonic stages and it is therefore very
probable that the so-called "eye genes" are regulatory genes. Second,
certain structural genes such as lens genes have not been lost by mutation.
Their manifestation is simply restricted to early ontogenic development,
and the regulatory nature of the "eye genes" once more is confirmed.
Thus, the so-called eye genes predominantly appear to be develop-
mental genes that operate on early embryonic stages. Inasmuch as there
are two developmental subunits that form the eye (see p. 263), two cate-
gories of relatively independent regulatory eye genes can be postulated.
The regressive evolution of the eye of A. jasciatus proceeds con-
vergently in separate cave populations in a species-specific pattern. It is
a process of diminution of size and it is characterized by certain allometric
correlations. These reflect inductive interactions between different tis-
sues. Thus, suggestions are supported that developmental constraints im-
pose limits on the evolution of complex features (Alberch, 1980, 1982).
That the allometric regressions may change is not contradictory for this
viewpoint. In the epigean form, for example, both lens and pupillary open-
ing, as well as size of eyeball, all show isometric correlations (Fig. 13).
In the progeny of the crosses and in Micos fish, correlation between lens
and eyeball becomes positively allometric, that between lens and pupil
negatively allometric (Figs. 14 and 15). However, this change is not caused
by the mutation of structural genes, but by the loss of regulatory eye
genes. The resulting smaller lens, for example, as a less effective inductor,
secondarily provokes different tissue interaction.
The question of why no structural gene seems to have mutated can
only partially be answered. The total loss of a lens gene would most likely
cause the total failure of eye development during early ontogeny. Ap-
propriate eye development may well be necessary, however, because the
eyeball probably plays an important role as an inductor in head formation.
Evolution and Genetics of Astyanax fasciatus 343
preadaptation for active cave entry by epigean fish exists (p. 290) (Lan-
gecker, 1988). The majority of caves in which hypogean A.fasciatus have
been found are of the type that capture surface streams (Mitchell et al.,
1977). In these, epigean specimens get trapped and are not able to swim
back to the surface again.
This process still occurs today in the range of the hypogean popu-
lations of Astyanax. Epigean individuals get washed into the subterranean
cave system during the rainy season; in several caves, mixed populations
of epi- and hypogean fish have been reported (Wilkens and Bums, 1972;
Mitchell et al., 1977). However, in competition with the cave fish, such
surface forms are not able to start to make any cavemicolous adaptation.
Although interfertile with the cave fish, they are not even able to hybri-
dize. This situation has been observed in the case of the phylogenetically
young Micos population, which forms a mixed population with epigean
specimens (Wilkens and Bums, 1972; Wilkens and Hiippop, 1986). The
epigean fish and the relatively long-term cave individuals can be distin-
guished from each other by the size of their eyeballs, which are smaller
in the hypogean population (Fig. 51). The number of melanophores is also
significantly less in the cave form as long as the fish are kept in darkness
(Wilkens, 1976).
Calculation of condition factors has revealed that the epigean fish in
the Micos cave suffer from malnutrition (Fig. 52). This was also dem-
onstrated by comparing the phylogenetically old Pachon and Pichijumo
cave fishes with the hybrid Chica fish and with epigean specimens caught
in a surface river, the Rio Coy (Wilkens and Bums, 1972; Wilkens and
Hiippop, 1986). Malnutrition of the cave-inhabiting epigean specimens
2. Eye size(mm)
"",0
2.5 n=52 0 0
o ax: o
000
2.0 o~:~B
o 0°£ 0 0
~ 0
1.5
• •• n=38
to ..-.... :
. .......
....:.... ••
FIG. 51. Eye size of (0) epigean and (e) hypogean in- 0.5 2'.4' '3'0' , , '4.0' , , '~O' 5'4
dividuals in the Micos cave. (Wilkens and HOppop. 1986.) Body length (cm)
346 H. Wilkens
24
2.2
develops in competition with the true cave fish and undoubtedly is mainly
the result of their relatively poor food-finding ability (p. 296) (Hiippop,
1987) and limited ability to store fat. These undernourished individuals
do not produce eggs and sperm and thus cannot reproduce.
Strong support for the above interpretation is provided by the Chica
population. A large bat roost in this cave provides a rich food supply,
thus compensating for any deficiencies of the epigean form in the dark
(Mitchell et al., 1977; Parzefall, 1983a). Hybridization has therefore oc-
curred in La Cueva Chica (Avise and Selander, 1972; Wilkens, 1972a;
Romero, 1983). This agrees with laboratory experiments, which show that
only a rich food supply can guarantee adequate nutrition of epigean fish
in competition with the cave form (Hiippop, 1987).
Another feature that makes the establishment of hybrid populations
difficult is the increased yolk content of the eggs of cave fish (p. 303)
(Hiippop, 1986b). The mode of inheritance ofthis feature is critical in this
case. That the egg yolk content of the Fl generation is intermediate (Hiip-
pop and Wilkens, 1988) dictates that even in the unlikely instance that an
epigean individual should succeed in participating in a spawning, any
larvae produced by F 1 hybrids would be overcome in competition with
the significantly larger, homozygous larval cave fish.
It is a notable feature of the Micos fish that they are already repro-
ductively isolated from their epigean neighbors even though they occupy
only an intermediate stage with respect to the constructive adaptations
developed in phylogenetically old cave forms. It is very probable that the
beginning of cavernicolous evolution of every Astyanax cave population
was characterized by the fact that, as in the Micos cave, epigean speci-
mens were washed into the cave biotope each rainy season and there was
no separation even for a short span of time. The speciation process had
to begin while in contact with the epigean ancestral gene pool. It was
Evolution and Genetics of Astyanax fasciatus 347
Allozyme Variation
The speciation process also has been analyzed by studying the al-
lozyme variation of several epigean populations, the hypogean popula-
tions that inhabit the Pacnon, Sabinos, and Chic a caves (A vi se and Se-
lander, 1972), and the Micos population (Peters et al., 1975). An analysis
of 17 loci has shown that the epigean populations are among the more
polymorphic vertebrates, with individuals having, on the average, 11.2%
of their loci in the heterozygous state.
In the phylogenetically old cave populations, variability is absent in
the Pachon fish and severely limited in the Sabinos ones. In the hybrid
Chica population variability is less than the average of the epigean pop-
ulations. The phylogenetically young Micos popUlation is monomorphic
for 11 of the 14 loci studied. At three of the 17 loci, the Pachon and the
Sabinos populations are monomorphic or nearly so for different alleles.
At a fourth locus, both are monomorphic for an allele not detected in
epigean populations.
The lower amount of polymorphic loci and the lower mean number
of alleles per locus in the Micos population as well as the almost or com-
plete monomorphic state of the Sabinos and the Pachon populations are
almost exclusively due to the loss of alleles that are rare in the epigean
348 H. Wllkenl
Nonselection
It is a common evolutionary phenomenon that features that have lost
their biological function become reduced. If evolution proceeds long
enough, the features may be lost entirely, but during intermediate stages
the process is often associated with vestigial characters.
Evolution and Genetics of Astyanax fasc/atus 349
The causes and the nature of regressive evolution have long been
and still are a subject of controversy. In all, more than 14 Lamarckian,
orthogenetic, and Darwinian theories have been proposed by various au-
thors in an effort to understand this process (Eigenmann, 1909; Barr, 1968;
Kane and Richardson, 1985; Christiansen, 1985).
In accord with the central role that selection plays in the synthetic
theory of evolution, there has been a recent bias toward explanations
based on natural selection (Culver, 1982), especially those involving se-
lection for increased metabolic economy (Poulson, 1964; Mitchell, 1969;
Sket, 1985) or the indirect effects of pleiotropy (Barr, 1968).
Since Darwin, however, efforts have frequently been made to explain
regressive evolution by theories invoking neutral mutation or the accu-
mulation of random mutations (Darwin, 1859; Weismann, 1889; Hubbs,
1938; Kosswig, 1934, 1948, 1960b, 1963; Brace, 1963; Peters and Peters,
1968, 1973; Wilkens, 1971, 1987). Critical reviews of this subject have
been presented recently by Culver (1982) and Poulson (1985).
The central point of the latter theory is that with the loss of biological
function, stabilizing selection, which normally keeps a feature such as
the eye in its appropriate, adapted form by eliminating deleterious mu-
tants, no longer acts: "Organs, originally formed by the aid of natural
selection, when rendered useless, may well be variable, for their variation
can no longer be checked by natural selection" (Darwin, 1899, p. 376).
Now, all deleterious mutations that affect a given feature may be retained
and therefore can accumulate.
Aside from futile semantic disputes (Banister, 1984; Romero, 1985c),
much confusion has arisen in response to the question of whether this
theory can explain all regressive evolutionary processes. It must be
stressed, therefore, that a loss of function does not necessarily imply the
loss of selection. In the cave-inhabiting, live-bearing toothcarp Poecilia
mexicana, for example, aggressive behavior has been reduced by direc-
tional selection, because it disturbs mating in the dark (Parzefall, 1974,
1985). Furthermore, in most troglobites metabolism is lowered-and thus
in a certain sense reduced-by a directional selective force, namely en-
ergy economy in an impoverished environment (Hiippop, 1986a).
Variability
a Calculated from data of Hiippop (1988b), Schemmel (1974a,b, 1980), and Wilkens (1970a,
b).
Energy Economy
Neoteny
Banister (1984) recently suggested that the characters of cave animals
may be the result of neoteny. This assumption is exclusively based on
studies of the external eye morphology of the cave fish Garra barreimiae
(Cyprinidae) from Oman. According to this, "the eyes in the adult are
identical to those in the juvenile; they have not degenerated, they just
have not developed further." Unfortunately, this observation is not sub-
stantiated by any histological data. As in all the cave fish that have been
studied, histology most likely would have revealed that eye development
354 H. Wilkens
Mg
100 •
20 40 60 60
Equivalent-%Mg++
.0. Sea
o Lake Geneva
o Cuatro Cienagas
• Lake Victoria
60 ~ • lake Tanganyka
\... + Lake Malawi
60 ~ • Laguna Chichancanab
'0
40~.
Ancestral form
•
FIG. 55. Part of the species flock of Lake Lanao (Philippines). The ancestral form is Puntius
binotatus (Cyprinidae). (Wahl, 1976.)
caused by a gene duplication, but by the loss of the function of the struc-
ture for which they are responsible.
3. According to Kimura (1987), random drift and fixation of neutral
mutations play an important role in molecular but not in phenotypic ev-
olution. The influence of such processes in phenotypic evolution indeed
seems to be rather restricted. As has been shown, developmental con-
straints also limit the direction and the number of theoretically possible
evolutionary pathways (Kosswig, 1948; Alberch, 1980, 1982). With re-
spect to specialized pharyngeal characters, the molariform morph of Cich-
lasoma minckleyi of the Cuatro Cienagas (Chihuahua), for example, re-
sembles the mollusc-crushing cichlids of East Mrica more closely than
its conspecific papilliform morph living in the same biotope (Liem and
Kaufman, 1984). In separately evolving Astyanax cave fish, the eye ru-
diments do not show phenotypic divergences, although their genetic basis
is different to some extent.
SUMMARY
is correlated with the relative eye size. In the Astyanax cave fish the
regression of the eye and the adaptive development of constructive traits
seem to be exclusively based on the alteration of regulatory gene action.
Further arguments for the reduction of biologically functionless fea-
tures by mutation pressure ("neutral mutation theory") are presented.
The role of energy economy as a driving selection force is furthermore
questioned: e.g., several behavioral features get reduced in A. fasciatus
even though they are not manifested in darkness and thus do not cost
energy.
The general significance of the neutral mutation theory in construc-
tive evolution is also pointed out in the phenomenon of species flocks of
fishes.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES
Alberch, P., 1980, Ontogenesis and morphological diversification, Am. Zool. 20:653-667.
Alberch, P., 1982, Developmental constraints in evolutionary processes, in: Evolution and
Development (J. Bonner, ed.), pp. 313-332, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Alvarez, J., 1946, Revisi6n del genero Anoptichthys con descripci6n de una especia nueva
(Pisces, Characidae), An. Esc. Nac. Cien. Bioi. Mex. 4:263-282.
Alvarez, J., 1947, Descripci6n de Anoptichthys hubbsi caracinido ciego de la Cueva de Los
Sabinos, S. L. P. Rev. Soc. Mex. Hist. Nat. 8:215-219.
360 H. Wllkens
Avise, J. C., and Selander, R. K., 1972, Genetics of cave-dwelling fishes of the genus
Astyanax, Evolution 26:1-19.
Banister, K. E., 1984, A subterranean population of Garra barreimiae (Teleostei: Cyprin-
idae) from Oman, with comments on the concept of regressive evolution, J. Nat. Hist.
18:927-938.
Banister, K. E., and Bunni, M. K., 1980, A new blind fish from Iraq, Bull. Br. Mus. Nat.
Hist. (Zool.) 38(3):151-158.
Barr, T. C., 1968, Cave ecology and the evolution of troglobites, in: Evolutionary Biology
(Th. Dobzhansky, M. K. Hecht, and W. C. Steere, eds.), Vol. 2, pp. 35-101, Plenum
Press, New York.
Bohn, S., 1986, Zur Schuppenreduktion bei Hohlenfischen, untersucht an cavernicolen Po-
pulationen von Astyanaxfasciatus (Characidae, Pisces), Thesis, Fachbereich Biologie,
Universitat Hamburg, unpublished.
Brace, L., 1%3, Structural reduction in evolution, Am. Nat. 97:39-49.
Breder, C. M., Jr., 1943a, Problems in the behavior and evolution of a species of blind cave
fish, Trans. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 5:168-176.
Breder, C. M., Jr., 1943b, A note on erratic viciousness in Astyanax mexicanus (Philippi),
Copeia 2:82-84.
Breder, C. M., Jr., 1944, Ocular anatomy and light sensitivity studies on the blind fish from
Cueva de los Sabinos, Mexico, Zoologica (N.Y.) 29:(13):131-143.
Breder, C. M., Jr., and Gresser, E. B., 1941a, Correlations between structural eye defects
and behavior in the Mexican blind characin, Zoologica (N.Y.) 26:123-131.
Breder, C. M., Jr., and Gresser, E. B., 1941b, Further studies on the light sensitivity and
behavior of the Mexican blind characin, Zoologica (N. Y.) 26:289-296.
Breder, C. M., Jr., and Rasquin, P., 1943, Chemical sensory reactions in the Mexican blind
characin, Zoologica (N. Y.) 28:169-200.
Breder, C. M., Jr., and Rasquin, P., 1946, Comparative studies in the light sensitivity of
blind characins from a series of Mexican caves, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 89:325-351.
Breder, C. M., Jr., and Rosen, D. E., 1%6, Modes of Reproduction in Fishes, Natural
History Press, New York.
Burchards, H., Dolle, A., and ParzefaII, J., 1985, Aggressive behavior of an epigean pop-
ulation of Astyanax mexicanus (Characidae, Pisces) and some observations of three
subterranean populations, Behav. Processes 11:225-235.
Burgers, A. C. J., Bennink, P. J. H., and van Oordt, G. J., 1962, Investigations into the
regulation of the pigmentary system of the blind Mexican cave fish, Anoptichthys jor-
dani, Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. 66:189-195.
Bussing, W. A., 1985, Patterns of distribution of the Central American ichthyofauna, in:
Topics in Geobiology (F. G. Stehle and S. D. Webb, eds.), Vol. 4, pp. 453-473, Plenum
Press, New York.
Cahn, P. H., 1958, Comparative optic development in Astyanax mexicanus and two of its
blind cave derivatives, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 115:69-112. Anoptichthys jordani
(Characidae), J. Comp. Physiol. 143:369-374.
Christiansen, K., 1985, Regressive evolution in Colembola, NSS Bull. 47(2):89-100.
Coulombre, A. J., 1969, Regulation of ocular morphogenesis, Invest. Ophthalmol. 8(1):25-
31.
Culver, D. C., 1982, Cave Life. Evolution and Ecology, Harvard University Press, Cam-
bridge, Massachusetts.
Darwin, C., 1899, The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, Murray, London.
Dominey, W. J., 1984, Effects of sexual selection and life history on speciation: Species
flocks in African cichlids and Hawaiian Drosophila, in: Evolution ofFish Species Flocks
Evolution and Genetics of Astyanax 'asciatus 361
(A. A. Echelle and J. Komfield, eds.), pp. 231-249, University of Maine Press, Orono,
Maine.
Durand, J. P., 1978, Phenomenes de convergences tissulaires et cytologiques, lies aux pro-
cessus degeneratifs qui affectent l'oeil, chez deux teleosteens cavemicoles Astyanax
(Anoptichthys) mexicanus (Characidae) et Lucifuga (Stygicola) dentatus (Ophidiidae),
Bull. Soc. Zool. Fr. 103(3):269-274.
Durand, J. P., 1979, Aspects ultrastructuraux des mecanismes de la rudimentation retinienne
chez l'Anoptichthys adulte forme cavemicole aveugle de l'Astyanax mexicanus (Char-
acidae, Pisces), Can. J. Zool. 57(1):196-205.
Eigenmann, C. H., 1909, Cave vertebrates of America, Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publ. 104:1-
241.
Eigenmann, C. H., 1917, The american Characidae, Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool. 43:1-558.
Erckens, W., and Martin, W., 1982a, Exogenous and endogenous control of swimming
activity in Astyanax mexicanus (Characidae, Pisces) by direct light response and by a
circadian oscillator. I. Analyses of the time-control systems of an epigean river pop-
ulation, Z. Naturforsch. 37:1253-1265.
Erckens, W., and Martin, W., 1982b, Exogenous and endogenous control of swimming
activity in Astyanax mexicanus (Characidae, Pisces) by direct light response and by a
circadian oscillator. 11. Features of time-controlled behaviour of a cave population and
their comparison to an epigean ancestral form, Z. Naturforsch. 37:1266-1273.
Ercolini, A., Berti, B., Chelazzi, L., and Messana, G., 1982, Researches on the phreatobic
fishes of Somalia: Achievements and prospects, Mon. Zool. Ital. (N. S.) 17(Supp!.):219-
241.
Fack, H., and Wilkens, H., 1988, Eye reduction in hybrids and a naturally variable cave
form of Astyanax fasciatus (Characidae, Pisces), Mem. Biospeol. 15: (in press).
Franck, A., 1964, Vergleichende Untersuchungen am Hohlenfisch Anoptichthys antrobius
und seinem oberirdischen Vorfahren Astyanax mexicanus, Zool. Anz. 172:95-107.
Freyre, L. R., Padin, O. H., and Denegri, A. M., 1982, Metabolismo energetico de peces
dulciaguicolas. 3. Astyanax eigenmanniorum (Cope, 1984), Limnobius 2:342-348.
Fricke, D., 1988, Reaction to alarm substance in cave populations of Astyanax mexicanus
(Characidae, Pisces), Ethology 76:305-308.
Friihbeis, B., 1984, Verhaltensphysiologische Untersuchungen zur Frequenzunterscheidung
und Empfindlichkeit durch das Seitenlinienorgan des blinden Hohlenfisches Anopti-
chthysjordani (Hubbs and Innes), Thesis, Fachbereich Zoologie, Johannes Gutenberg-
Universitat, Frankfurt.
Fry, F. E. J., 1957, The aquatic respiration offish, in The Physiology of Fish (M. E. Brown,
ed.), Vo!. I, pp. 1-63, Academic Press, New York.
Gertychowa, R., 1970, Studies on the ethology and space orientation of the blind cave fish
Anoptichthys jordani (Hubbs and Innes) (Characidae), Folia Bioi. 18(1):9-69.
Gery, J., 1977, Characoids of the World, TFH, Hong Kong.
Gitschier, J., Wood, W. J., Tuddenham, E. G. D., Schuman, M. A., Goralka, T. M., Chen,
E. Y.,and Lawn, R. M., 1985, Detection and sequence of mutations in the factor VIII
gene of haemophilias, Nature 315:427-430.
Gould, S. J., and Eldredge, N., 1977, Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution
reconsidered, Palaeobiology 3:115-151.
Greenwood, P. H., 1984, Mrican cichlids and evolutionary theories, in: Evolution of Fish
Species Flocks (A. A. Echelle and J. Kornfield, eds.), pp. 141-154, University of Maine
Press, Orono, Maine.
Grobbel, G., and Hahn, G., 1958, Morphologie und Histologie der Seitenorgane des au-
genlosen Hohlenfisches Anoptichthys jordani im Vergleich zu anderen Teleosteem, Z.
Morphol. Okol. Tiere 47:249-266.
362 H. Wilkens
Grunewald-Lowenstein, M., 1956, Influence of light and darkness on the pineal body in
Astyanax mexicanus (Filippi), Zoologica 41:119-128.
Hahn, G., 1960, Femtastsinn und Striimungssinn beim augenlosen HiihlenfischAnoptichthys
jordani Hubbs and Innes im Vergleich zu anderen Teleosteem, Naturwissenschaften
47:611.
Haldane, J. B. S., 1935, The rate of spontaneous mutation of a human gene, J. Genet.
31:317-326.
Herwig, H. J., 1976, Comparative ultrastructural investigations of the pineal organ of the
blind cave fish Anoptichthys jordani, and its ancestor, the eyed river fish, Astyanax
mexicanus, Cell Tissue Res. 167:297-324.
Heusner, A. A., 1984, Biological similitude: Statistical and functional relationship in com-
parative physiology, Am. J. Physiol. 246:839-845.
Hubbs, C. L., 1938, Fishes from the caves ofYucatan, Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publ. 491:261-
295.
Hubbs, C. L., and Innes, W. T., 1936, The first known blind fish of the family Characidae:
A new genus from Mexico, Occ. Pap. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 342:1-7.
Humbach, J., 1960, Geruch und Geschmack bie den augenlosen Hiihlenfischen Anoptichthys
jordani Hubbs and Innes und Anoptichthys hubbsi Alvarez, Naturwissenschaften
47:551.
Hiippop, K., 1985, The role of metabolism in the evolution of cave animals, NSS Bull.
47(2):136-146.
Hiippop, K., 1986a, Oxygen consumption of Astyanax fasciatus (Characidae, Pisces): A
comparison of epigean and hypogean populations, Environ. Bioi. Fish. 17:299-308.
Hiippop, K., 1986b, Comparative early life history in surface and cave fish (Astyanax fas-
ciatus), Bull. Zool. 35(Suppl.):104.
Hiippop, K., 1987, Food-finding ability in cave fish (Astyanax fasciatus), Int. J. Speleol.
16(1-2):59-66.
Hiippop, K., 1988a, Genetic analysis of oxygen consumption rate in cave and surface fish
of Astyanax fasciatus (Characidae, Pisces), further support for the neutral mutation
theory, Mem. Biospeol. 15: (in press).
Hiippop, K., 1988b, Phiinomene und Bedeutung der Energieerspamis beim Hiihlensalmler
Astyanax fasciatus, Thesis, Fachbereich Biologie, Universitat Hamburg.
Hiippop, K., and Wilkens, H., 1988, Genetics of egg yolk content in cave and surface
Astyanax fasciatus (Characidae, Pisces), (in preparation).
John, K. R., 1957, Observations on the behavior of blind and blinded fishes, Copeia
1957:123-132.
John, K. R., 1964, Illumination, vision, and schooling of Astyanax mexicanus (Filippi), J.
Fish. Res. Board. Can. 21:1453-1473.
Kahling, J., 1961, Untersuchungen iiber den Lichtsinn und dessen Lokalisation bei dem
Hiihlenfisch Anoptichthys jordani Hubbs and Innes (Characidae), Bioi. Zentr. albl.
80(40):439-451.
Kane, T. C., and Richardson, R. C., 1985, Regressive evolution: An historical perspective,
NSS Bull. 47(2):71-77.
Kauffeld, J. E., 1954, Ctenobrycon spirulus fathers strange young, Aquarium 23:140-141.
Kimura, M., 1987, Die Neutralitiitstheorie der molekularen Evolution, Parey, Berlin.
Kirby, R. F., Thompson, K. W., and Hubbs, C., 1977, Karyotypic similarities between the
Mexican and blind tetras, Copeia 3:578-580.
Kosswig, C., 1934, Uber bislang unbekannte Sinnesorgane bei dem blinden Hiihlenfisch
Stygicola dentatus Poey, Verh. Dtsch. Zool. Ges. 1934:185-190.
Kosswig, C., 1948, Genetische Beitrage zur Praadaptationstheorie, Istanbul Univ. Fen Fak
Mecm. B 13:176-209.
Evolution and Genetics of Astysnsx 'sscistus 363
Kosswig, C., 1960a, Darwin und die degenerative Evolution, Abhandl. Verhandl. Naturwiss.
Verein Hamburg N. F. 4:21-42.
Kosswig, C., 1960b, Zur Phylogenese sogenannter Anpassungsmerkmale bei Hohlentieren,
Int. Rev. Ges. Hydrobiol. 45(4):493-512.
Kosswig, C., 1963, Genetische Analyse konstruktiver und degenerativer Evolutionspro-
zesse, Z. Zool. Syst. Evolutions forsch. 1:205-239.
Kosswig, C., 1964, Polygenic sex determination, Experientia 20:190-199.
Kosswig, C., 1967, Uber das Tempo evolutorischer Prozesse, Zool. Beitr. N. F. 13:441-
450.
Kosswig, C., and Oktay, M., 1955, Die Geschlechtsbestimmung bei den Xiphophorini. (N eue
Tatsachen und neue Deutungen), Istanbul Univ. Fen Fak. Hidrobiol. B 2:133-156.
Kratochwill, K., 1972, Tissue interaction during embryonic development: General prop-
erties, in: Tissue Interactions in Carcinogenesis (D. Tarin, ed.), pp. 1-47, Academic
Press, New York.
Kuhn, 0., and Kahling, J., 1954, Augenriickbildung und Lichtsinn beiAnoptichthysjordani
Hubbs and Innes, Experientia 10(9):385-393.
Lack, D., 1947, Darwin's Finches, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Ladiges, W., 1968, Die Bedeutung okologischer Faktoren fUr die Differenzierung der Cich-
liden des Tanganjika- und des Nyassa-Sees, Int. Rev. Ges. Hydrobiol. 52:339-352.
Lamprecht, G., and Weber, F., 1985, Time keeping mechanisms and their ecological sig-
nificance in cavernicolous animals, NSS Bull. 47(2):147-162.
Lande, R., 1981, The minimum number of genes contributing to quantitative variation be-
tween and within populations, Genetics 99:541-553.
Langecker, T. G., 1988, Studies on the light reaction of epigean and cave populations of
Astyanax fasciatus (Characidae, Pisces), Mem. Biospeol. 15: (in press).
Langecker, T. G., H. Wilkens, D. Fricke, and P. Junge, in preparation, Introgressive hy-
bridization and speciation in cave fish. Studies in the Pachon population of Astyanax
fasciatus (Characidae, Pisces).
Liem, K. J., and Kaufman, L. S., 1984, Intraspecific macroevolution: Functional biology
of the polymorphic cichlid species Cichlasoma minckleyi, in: Evolution of Fish Species
Flocks (A. A. Echelle and J. Kornfield, eds.), pp. 203-215, University of Maine Press,
Orono, Maine.
Liiling, K. H., 1953, Uber die fortschreitende Augendegeneration des Anoptichthys jordani,
Zool. Anz. 151:289-299.
Liiling, K. H., 1954a, Untersuchungen am Blindfisch Anoptichthysjordani Hubbs and Innes
(Characidae). I. Einige Beobachtungen iiber des Verhalten des Blindfisches A. jordani
beim Laichen, Naturwiss. Rundschau 5:197-203.
Luling, K. H., 1954b, Untersuchungen am Blindfisch Anoptichthys jordani Hubbs and Inns
(Characidae). 11. Beobachtungen und Experimente an Anoptichthys jordani zur Priifung
der Einstellung zum Futter, zum Licht und zur Wasserturbulenz, Zool. Jahrb. Abt.
Zoo!. Phys. 65:9-62.
Liiling, K. H., 1955, Untersuchungen am Blindfisch Anoptichthysjordani, Ill. Vergleichend
anatomisch-histologische Studien an den Augen des A.jordani, Zool. Jahrb. Abt. Anat.
74:401-477.
Mitchell, R. W., 1969, A comparison to temperate and tropical cave communities, South-
west. Nat. 14(1):73-88.
Mitchell, R. W., Russell, W. H., and Elliott, W. R., 1977, Mexican eyeless characin fishes,
genus Astyanax: Environment, distribution, and evolution, Spec. Publ. Mus. Texas
Tech. Univ. 12:1-89.
Myerowitz, R., and Hogikyan, N. D., 1986, Different mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish and
non-Jewish French Canadians with Tay-Sachs-Disease, Science 232:1646-1648.
364 H. Wilkens
Meyers, G. S., 1966, Derivation of the freshwater fish fauna of Central America, Copeia
1966:766-772.
Omura, Y., 1975, Influence of light and darkness on the ultrastructure of the pineal organ
in the blind cave fish, Astyanax mexicanus, Cell Tissue Res. 160:99-112.
Parzefall, J., 1974, Riickbildung aggressiver Verhaltensweisen bei einer Hohlenform von
Poecilia sphenops (Pisces, Poeciliidae), Z. Tierpsychol. 35:66-82.
Parzefall, J., 1983a, Field observations in epigean and cave populations of the M;exican
characid Astyanax mexicanus (Pisces, Characidae), Mem. Biospeol. 10:171-17~.
Parzefall, J., 1983b, Genetisch bedingte Verhaltensanderungen bei Hohlentieren und ihren
oberirdischen Vorfahren, Mitt. Hamb. Zool. Mus. Inst. 80:41-51.
Parzefall, J., 1985, On the heredity of behavior patterns in cave animals and their epigean
relatives, NSS Bull. 47(2):128-135.
Parzefall, J., and Senkel, S., 1986, Schooling behaviour in cavernicolous fish and their
epigean conspecifics, in: 9 Congres. International de Espeleologia, Barcelona, pp. 107-
109.
Parzefall, J., and Wilkens, H., 1972, Artbildung bei Hohlenfischen. Untersuchungen an zwei
amerikanischen Synbranchiden, Z. Morphol. Tiere 73:63-79.
Peters, N., and Peters, G., 1966, Das Auge zweier Hohlenformen von Astyanax mexicanus
Philippi (Characidae, Pisces), Wilhelm Roux' Arch. Entwicklungsmech. Org. 157:393-
414.
Peters, N., and Peters, G., 1968, Zur Genetischen Interpretation morphologischer Gesetz-
mal3igkeiten der degenerativen Evolution, Z. Morphol. Tiere 62:211-244.
Peters, N., and Peters, G., 1973, Genetic problems in the regressive evolution of caverni-
colous fish, in: Genetics and Mutagenesis of Fish (J. H. SchrOder, ed.), pp. 188-201,
Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Peters, N., Scholl, A., and Wilkens, H., 1975, Der Micos-Fisch, Hohlenfisch in statu
nascendi oder Bastard? Ein Beitrag zur Evolution der Hohlentiere, Z. Zool. Syst. Ev-
olutionsforsch. 13:110-124.
Pfeiffer, W., 1963, Vergleichende Untersuchungen iiber die Schreckreaktion und den
Schreckstoff bei Ostariophysen, Z. Vergl. Physiol. 47:111-147.
Pfeiffer, W., 1966, Uber die Vererbung der Schreckreaktion bei Astyanax (Characidae,
Pisces), Z. Vererbungsl. 98:97-105.
Pfeiffer, W., 1967a, Schreckreaktion und Schreckstoffzellen bei Ostariophysi und Gonor-
hynchiformes, Z. Vergl. Physiol. 56:380-396.
Pfeiffer, W., 1967b, Die Korrelation von Korperlange, Augen-, Linsen- und Pupillengrol3e
bei Hybriden aus Astyanax x Anoptichthys (Characidae, Pisces), Wilhelm Roux' Arch.
Entwicklungsmech. Org. 158:218-245.
Popper, A. N., 1970, Auditory capacities of the Mexican blind cave fish (Astyanax jordani)
and its eyed ancestor (Astyanax mexicanus), Anim. Behav. 18:552-562.
Poulson, T. L., 1964, Animals in aquatic environments, animals in caves, in: Handbook of
Physiology (D. B. Dill, ed.), pp. 749-771, American Physiological Society, Washington,
D.C.
Poulson, T. L., 1985, Evolutionary reduction by neutral mutations: Plausibility arguments
and data from amblyopsid fishes and linyphiid spiders, NSS Bull. 47(2):109-117.
Proudfoot, N., 1980, Pseudogenes, Nature 286:840-841.
Rasquin, P., 1947, Progressive pigmentary regression in fishes associated with cave envi-
ronments, Zoologica (N. Y.) 32:35-42.
Rasquin, P., and Rosenbloom, L., 1954, Endocrine imbalance and tissue hyperplasia in
teleosts maintained in darkness, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 104:363-425.
Rieger, R., Michaelis, A., and Green, M. M., 1968, A Glossary ofGenetics and Cytogenetics,
Springer-Verlag Berlin.
Evolution and Genetics of AstyanBx fBsclBtus 365
Tabata, M., 1982, Persistence of pineal photosensory function in blind cave fish, Astyanax
mexicanus, Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 73A:125-127.
Thines, G., 1960, Sensory degeneration and survival in cave fishes, Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond.
3:39-52.
Thines, G., and Legrain, M., 1973, Effects of alarm substance on the behaviour of the cave
fish Anoptichthys and Caecobarbus geertsi, Ann. Speleol. 28:291-297.
Thines, G., and Weyers, M., 1978, Responses locomotrices du poisson cavemicoleAstyanax
jordani (Characidae) a des signaux periodiques et aperiodiques de lumiere et de tem-
perature, Int. J. Spe/eol. 10:35-55.
Thines, G., Wolff, F., and Softie, M., 1966, Etude comparative de l'activite du poisson
cavemicole Anoptichthys antrobius et de son anc~tre epige Astyanax mexicanus (Fi-
lippi), Ann. Soc. R. Zool. Belg. 96:61-115.
Von Campenhausen, C., Weissert, R., and Riess, J., 1981, Detection of stationary objects
by the blind cave fish Anoptichthys jordani (Characidae), J. Comp. Physiol. 143:369-
374.
Voneida, T. J., and Fish, S. E., 1984, Central nervous system changes related to the re-
duction of visual input in a naturally blind fish (Astyanax hubbsi), Am. Zool. 24:775-
782.
Wahl, E., 1976, Morphologisch-okologische Untersuchungen zur Systematik der Lanao-
Cypriniden.-Ein Beitrag zum Problem der intralakustrischen Speziation, Thesis, Uni-
versity of Hamburg.
Weismann, A., 1889, Uber den Riickschritt in der Natur, Ber. Naturforsch. Ges. Freiburg
im Breisgau 1889:1-30.
Weissert, R., and von Campenhausen, C., 1981, Discrimination between stationary objects
by the blind cave fish Anoptichthys jordani (Characidae), J. Comp. Physiol. 143:375-
381.
Wiley, S., and Mitchell, R. W., 1971, A bibliography of the Mexican eyeless characin fishes
of the genus Astyanax, in: Studies on the Cavemicole Fauna of Mexico (J. R. Reddell
and R. W. Mitchell, eds.), Assoc. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull. 4:231-239.
Wilkens, H., 1970a, Beitriige zur Degeneration des Auges bei Cavernicolen, Genzahl und
Manifestationsart. Untersuchungen an mexikanischen Hohlenfischen, Z. Zool. Syst.
Evolutionsforsch. 8:1-47.
Wilkens, H., 1970b, Der Bau des Auges cavernicoler Sippen von Astyanax fasciatus (Char-
acidae, Pisces), Wilhelm Roux' Arch. Entwicklungsmech. Org. 166:54-75.
Wilkens, H., 1970c, Beitrage zur Degeneration des Melaninpigments bei cavemocolen Sip-
pen des Astyanax mexicanus (Filippi), Z. Zool. Syst. Evolutionsforsch. 8:173-199.
Wilkens, H., 1971, Genetic interpretation of regressive evolutionary processes: Studies on
hybrid eyes of two Astyanax cave populations, Evolution 25(3):530-544.
Wilkens, H., 1972a, Zur phylogenetischen Riickbildung des Auges Cavernicoler: Unter-
suchungen an Anoptichthysjordani (=Astyanax mexicanus) , Ann. Speleol. 27:411-432.
Wilkens, H., 1972b, Uber Praadaptation fUr das Hohlenleben, untersucht am Laichverhalten
ober- und unterirdischer Populationen des Astyanax mexicanus, Zool. Anz. 188:1-11.
Wilkens, H., 1973, Uber das phylogenetische Alter von Hohlentieren. Untersuchungen iiber
die cavemicole Siisswasserfauna Yukatans, Z. Zool. Syst. Evolutionsforsch. 11:49-60.
Wilkens, H., 1976, Genotypic and phenotypic variability in cave animals. Studies on a
phylogenetically young cave population of Astyanax mexicanus (Fillippi), Ann. Speleol.
31:137-148.
Wilkens, H., 1977, Die Rudimente des Rumpfkanals bei kavernicolen Populationen des
Astyanax, Experientia 33:604.
Wilkens, H., 1980, Zur Problematik der Rudimentation, untersucht an der Ontogenie des
Evolution and Genetics of Astyanax fasciatus 367