Diseases have been being around us since we exist, and we haven’t stopped them.

Many believe that it

would be cheaper and easier to invest in preventative measures other than to use cure. I will discuss
about whether preventative measures are better than the cure.

Firstly yes, they’re dominant because many people don’t have the resources to pay for a cure. For an
example, in the undeveloped countries there is much poverty and unfortunately a lot of diseases which
the citizens can’t afford to cover. Even in the developed world we can see a lot of donations centers in
addition to help the ones who can’t afford the treatment. Particularly, the investment in preventative
measures would help many of us in numerous ways.

On the other hand, there is the long-lasting solution in view of the fact that the disease isn’t going to
disappear just like that. For instance, the preventative measures are going to help us up to one point but
after that the danger is still around the corner. Research is in need in every way if the humanity wants to
beat the diseases and doesn’t will to continue the torments of so many people. Clearly, we can’t
decrease the investment in researching and treating diseases.

To sum up, there is the fact that people aren’t that wealthy to cover their treatment but also that we
need to stand against the diseases. I admit that I can’t take a side owing to the fact that both views are
faultless.

EDITED

Diseases have been with us since we've existed, and we've not stopped them in any way. Many believe
that it would be cheaper and easier to invest in preventative measures than in research and treatment of
these diseases. I'll discuss whether preventative measures are better than the costly process of making a
cure.

First, yes, they're prevalent because many people don't have the resources to pay for a cure and
hospital care. For example, in the undeveloped countries, there's a lot of poverty and, unfortunately, a
lot of diseases that citizens cannot pay to treat. Even in the developed countries, there are many
donation centers in addition to help those who cannot afford treatment. Especially investing in
preventative measures would help many of us in numerous ways.

On the other hand, there's a long-term solution, in view of the fact that the disease won't just go away.
For instance, the preventative measures will help us up to a certain point, but after that, the danger is
still around the corner. Research is needed in every way if humanity wants to defeat the diseases and
not continue to torture so many people. It's clear that we mustn't reduce investment in research and
treatment of diseases.

In summary, there is the fact that people aren't as wealthy to fund their treatment, but also that we
need to fight back against diseases. I admit that I can't pick a side, owing to the fact that both views are
flawless.