You are on page 1of 11

Author's personal copy

Plasmonics (2013) 8:13–23


DOI 10.1007/s11468-012-9371-3

A Shape-Engineered Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering


Optical Fiber Sensor Working from the Visible
to the Near-Infrared
Antonino Foti & Cristiano D’Andrea &
Francesco Bonaccorso & Maurizio Lanza &
Giuseppe Calogero & Elena Messina &
Onofrio Maria Maragò & Barbara Fazio &
Pietro Giuseppe Gucciardi

Received: 20 February 2012 / Accepted: 23 May 2012 / Published online: 24 June 2012
# Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Abstract Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) takes enhancement (∼108–1014) is provided by the resonant, col-
advantage of the giant electromagnetic field enhancement lective excitation of free-conduction electrons in metal
provided by localized surface plasmons in metal nanoparticles nanoparticles (NPs) or colloidal aggregates, the so-called
to amplify the weak Raman scattering of the molecules. Op- localized surface plasmons (LSP) [3–5].
tical fibers coated with noble metal nanoparticles can therefore Since the nineties SERS-active nanoparticles have been
be used as SERS-based sensors for remote detection of mo- coupled with optical fibers in order to develop new concepts
lecular species. In this article, we report on the development of of SERS optical fiber sensors (SERSORS) [6]. SERSORS
an optical fiber SERS sensor capable to operate on a range of provide a safe technique to remotely analyze toxic or poten-
excitation wavelengths from the visible to the near-infrared. tially harmful molecules in hazardous environments [7–9],
We introduce a quasistatic chemical etching protocol to engi- allowing one to detect small quantities (µg/mL) of chemical
neer the tip shape and investigate the effects of the tip shape on and biological molecules [10] without any sample prepara-
the sensor performances. tion and with short acquisition times (tens of seconds). For
these reasons, SERSORS can be used in the medical field, in
Keywords Surface-enhanced Raman scattering . Molecular order to detect proteins [11] and biomarkers of specific
detection . Label free detection . Optical fiber sensors diseases [12], or as high-sensitive control system of concen-
tration of toxic molecules in the environment or in food
products [13].
Introduction In literature, different concepts of SERSORS have been
developed, together with methodologies to improve their mo-
Surface-enhanced raman scattering (SERS) is a process that lecular sensitivity [6, 8, 14–17]. Reference [6] proposed the
strongly amplifies the weak Raman signal of molecules use of two fibers, one to deliver the excitation laser beam to an
adsorbed on metal nanostructures [1, 2]. Such a large external SERS-active substrate (on which the target molecules
are adsorbed) and the other to collect the scattered radiation, in
A. Foti : C. D’Andrea : F. Bonaccorso : M. Lanza : G. Calogero : a head-on configuration. In the so called optrode configura-
E. Messina : O. M. Maragò : B. Fazio : P. G. Gucciardi (*)
tion [16], the fiber apical part is coated with optically resonant
CNR-Istituto Processi Chimico-Fisici,
Viale F. Stagno D’Alcontres 37, metal nanoparticles, acting as a SERS-active element to en-
98158 Messina, Italy hance the signal of the target molecules directly adsorbed on
e-mail: gucciardi@me.cnr.it its surface. This configuration is much more compact and
better suited for operation in microenvironments of difficult
F. Bonaccorso
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, access. SERSORS can work either in liquid or in a dip and dry
Cambridge CB3 0FA, UK configuration [14]. In the first case, the signal is acquired
Author's personal copy
14 Plasmonics (2013) 8:13–23

during the immersion of the fiber tip in the liquid containing and light-to-fiber injection configuration). In the following
the target molecules. In the second case, the fiber is immersed paragraphs, we analyze and describe the choice of each of these
in the target solution, but the signal acquisition is carried out elements for a sensor capable to operate from the visible to the
after removal and evaporation of the liquid in which the mol- NIR.
ecules are dispersed. The fiber geometry strongly affects the
sensitivity of the SERSORS. Shaping the fiber apex as a tip, Silver Colloids: Synthesis, Morphology, and Plasmon
e.g., increases the number of SERS photons trapped into the Resonances
fiber, improving the sensitivity [17]. SERSORS with conical
tips have been produced by abrasive roughening [16], single Silver colloids are prepared by using a modified Lee and Meisel
[17] or double-static [14, 18] chemical etching processes. procedure [14, 26]. Two hundred milligrams of silver nitrate
To date, SERSORS have been produced employing silver or (99.5 %; Sigma-Aldrich) are dissolved in 500 ml of distilled
gold NPs evaporated directly on the fiber surface [13, 16–18], water and brought to boiling. Afterwards, 20 ml of trisodium
or adsorbed on the fiber by immersion in colloidal NP disper- citrate solution (Sigma-Aldrich, 3 %) is added, and the mixture
sions [13–15, 19]. The adhesion of the NPs onto the fiber is kept boiling for 1 h. The mixture is then placed in a closed
surface is obtained thanks to cross-linker molecules, as alumina flask and stored in a dark environment for 1 month. During this
[8, 16] or organic polymers [14, 15, 19]. In SERS, the signal period, a gravitational separation occurs among the silver NPs in
amplification is maximum when both the excitation and the the mixture. Lighter particles, floating at the top of the dispersion
scattered radiation energies are close to the LSP resonance as a transparent supernatant (an aliquot is shown in left vial in
energy of the metal nanostructures [20–23]. The LSP energies Fig. 1a), are separated from the denser layer of aggregated
are different for silver and gold NPs, ranging from the visible to particles which deposits at the bottom of the flask. This is due
the near-infrared (NIR) [24]. The excitation wavelength is to the difference in sedimentation coefficients between small
therefore a crucial parameter to play with for the optimization and large and/or aggregated NPs. The same principle has been
of the SERSORS sensitivity. Moreover, the choice of the exploited for the separation of nanomaterials (0D, 1D, and 2D)
“right” wavelength permits to match the electronic resonances in centrifugal fields [27, 28]. The layer of aggregated NPs is
of the target molecules in order to exploit resonant Raman transferred with a pipette to a smaller flask and undergone to a
scattering effects [25] to further boost the signals (102–103). further week of gravitational separation. We end up, again, with
Finally, the excitation wavelength also affects the intensity of a yellow transparent top supernatant (central vial of Fig. 1a) and
the intrinsic fiber background signal, one of the major obstacles an ultraconcentrated silver colloidal dispersion at the bottom of
to extend the operational range of optical fiber sensors below the flask (an aliquot is shown in the right vial of Fig. 1a). Due to
1,000 cm−1 [14]. Varying the laser wavelength can therefore the presence of a large number of SERS-active silver colloidal
improve the SERS signal-to-background ratio. The develop- aggregates, this is the fraction that we extract and use for the
ment of SERS fiber sensor operating over a wide range of realization of the SERS sensors (vide infra).
wavelengths could, therefore, open new ways towards the Extinction spectra on the top fractions extracted from the first
optimization of the sensitivity and the minimization of the fiber and second gravitational separations have been acquired with a
background signal. To the best of our knowledge, however, all standard UV-VIS setup (Perkin Elmer, Lambda-20) and display
the sensors developed to date [10–19] have been tested with LSP resonance peaks at 414 nm (Fig. 1b, black line) and 427 nm
only one excitation wavelength, and no comparative studies on (Fig. 1b, red line), respectively, indicating the abundance of
the performances at different excitation wavelengths have been individual nanoparticles of different diameter [24, 29]. Compar-
reported. In this paper, we report on the development of a ing the measured peak position with the specifications of com-
broadband optical fiber SERS sensor for molecular sensing mercial (Sigma-Aldrich) silver nanoparticles in aqueous buffer
with excitation ranging from the visible to the NIR (515, 633, [30], we can estimate NPs diameters between 20 and 30 nm in
and 785 nm), whose shape is engineered by a new quasistatic the first case, and 40 nm in the second. The bottom layer was too
chemical etching protocol. dense (optically) to be analyzed by conventional in-liquid UV–
VIS techniques. A drop of NPs has been, therefore, spin cast on
a glass substrate, allowing us to use the Xenon lamp embedde in
Fabrication of the SERSORS the the Raman microspectrometer (LabRAM HR800) as light
source, and the microspectrometer itself as detector, to acquire
The key elements to take in consideration when designing a extinction spectra from spots ca. 100 μm in diameter. The
SERS fiber sensor are: (1) nature, morphology, and aggregation spectrum in Fig. 1c suggests the presence of both individual
state of the metal NPs exploited to induce the SERS effect; (2) nanoparticles (the single resonance peak at 445 nm corresponds
the optical fibers to be used (single mode, multimode, length, to NPs with diameters between 50 and 60 nm [30]) and large
and shape); (3) the experimental configuration used to acquire colloidal aggregates yielding the broad resonance band from
and analyze the signals (spectrometer, laser wavelength, power, 530 nm to over 700 nm [24, 29, 31, 32].
Author's personal copy
Plasmonics (2013) 8:13–23 15

Fig. 1 a Pictures of silver colloids extracted from the top supernatant the final dispersion (the red line is an interpolation of the rough data).
layers after the first (left vial) and second (middle vial) gravitational SEM images of silver colloids cast on a silicon substrate: d aliquot
separation, and (right) from the dense bottom layer of the final disper- extracted from the top supernatant fraction rich in individual silver
sion. b Extinction spectra of the top fractions after the first (black) and nanoparticles; e aliquot extracted from the bottom fraction, showing
second (red) gravitational separation steps. c Extinction spectrum of a large fractal colloidal aggregates
dried drop of silver colloidal aggregates extracted from the bottom of

The extinction measurements have been correlated with Turner-etching process [42]. In this method, the first step
scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images in order to evalu- relies in the removal of the polymeric jacket by mechanical
ate the silver NP dimensions. SEM has been carried out on NP stripping. The nude fiber is then immersed in a hydrofluoric
dispersions droplets, deposited on a silicon substrate, after sol- acid (HF) solution covered with a layer of isooctane (Fig. 2a).
vent evaporation. As shown in Fig. 1d, top part of the dispersion This layer is essential to prevent the corrosion of the part of the
is rich in individual silver particles with a diameter below 50 nm fiber not immersed in the HF solution. HF is an acid not
with some small aggregates few hundred nanometers wide, completely dissociated in water ([H+][F−]/[HF] 06.85 ×
likely formed during the evaporation of the solvent. The bottom 10−4 l/mol). HF is also present in dimer form H2F2 ([H2F2]/
fraction, instead, is characterized by the presence of fractal [HF]2 02.7 l/mol), and the dimers can lose a proton yielding
aggregates (Fig. 1e) tens of micrometers wide. These aggregates HF2− ions ([HF2−]/[HF][F−]03.963 l/mol) [43]. In the etching
feature a high density of hot spots. Hot spots in random metal- of SiO2, the Si–O bond is broken and exchanged with a Si–F
on-dielectric films have been attributed to Anderson localization one. Therefore, the concentrations of all the H+, HF, and HF2−
of surface plasmon modes and yield giant fluctuations of local ions are important. The reaction occurs in two steps [43]:
electric fields at the nanometer scale [33]. At the hot spots, the
local fields are much greater than the applied one and are Si ! O ! X þ Hþ !Si ! OðHÞþ ! Xðwhere X ¼ Si or HÞ ð1Þ
assumed to be responsible for SERS amplification [24, 33–35].

Optical Fibers: Etching, Capillary Phenomena, and Shape Si ! OðHÞþ ! X þ HF2 ! !Si ! F þ HO ! X þ HFðwhere X ¼ Si or HÞ
Engineering
ð2Þ
Chemical Etching of Silica Fibers
The group HO−X is soluble and stable in water. The
To engineer the shape of the optical fiber sensor, we exploit reactions 1 and 2 are pH-dependent, and each one is dom-
chemical etching methods [14, 15] already developed in our inant in a specific pH range [43]. The first reaction, howev-
labs for the fabrication of probes [36, 37] for scanning near- er, determines the velocity of the overall process, which, in a
field optical microscopy [38–41]. We use the so-called first approximation, will be proportional to [H+].
Author's personal copy
16 Plasmonics (2013) 8:13–23

Capillarity Phenomena and Tip Formation Mechanisms [14, 15]. The fiber is initially etched for a time interval T1 ∼
24 min. After the clad has been totally removed the fiber is
When the fiber is immersed in the HF–isooctane, which is moved upward of 2 mm via a micrometer screw (Fig. 2c)
an immiscible mixture, two different etching processes start and kept in this position until the complete etching of the
simultaneously [44, 45]: the bulk etching, taking place in the fiber in bulk, which occurs a few minutes later (Fig. 2d).
bulk HF fluid (green zone in Fig. 2b), and the meniscus The fiber is then removed and washed with ethanol (96 %)
etching, occurring at the HF–isooctane–fiber interface (cir- to eliminate the residual material. We end up with double-
cled zone in Fig. 2b). The two processes proceed on differ- taper fibers shown in Fig. 2e.
ent time scales and give rise to two different tips shapes. In Best sensor performances are expected when the SERS-
bulk, the lateral attack of HF on the fiber sidewalls, com- active colloids are in direct contact with the fiber core (so to
bined with a slight etching rate gradient (higher at the be directly excited by the laser light), and when the core
bottom because of the larger silica surface exposed to the lateral surface coated with the nanoparticles is maximal. In
acid), leads a sharp and long tip (cone angle ∼5°, length in order to fulfill such conditions, the control on the experi-
the millimeter range). Conversely, tip resulting from the mental parameters is of key importance. The initial etching,
meniscus etching is much shorter (hundreds of micrometers) in fact, must be stopped just after the cladding has been
since its formation is driven by the lowering of the HF– totally removed (etching time T1), hindering subsequent
isooctane meniscus [36] generated by the capillarity forces attacks of the fiber core that would reduce its lateral surface.
at the interface. The meniscus height h (inset in Fig. 2b) is To experimentally determine T1, we etch a single piece of
related to the radius of the fiber (r0) by [46]: fiber, several centimeters long, retracting it by ∼1 mm every
! " 5 min. Such a procedure yields a multi-tapered fiber, which
4a
h ffi r0 cos θc ' log ! Γ Euler ð3Þ we use to determine the diameter Vs time dependence
r0 ð1 þ sin θc Þ plotted in Fig. 2f (black symbols). The fiber diameter is
Where θc is the contact angle (inset in Fig. 2b), ΓEluer ∼ observed to decrease linearly with time, well fitted by the
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi relation dðtÞ ¼ d0 ! ad ( t (red line), where d0 0125 μm is
0.577 the Euler constant, and a ¼ σ=ρg the capillary
the cladding diameter and ad 0(3.15±0.03)μm/min is the
constant related to σ, ρ, and g being, respectively, the
etching rate retrieved from the fit of experimental data.
surface tension, the density of the liquid, and the gravity
The exact etching time T1 (24 min) is thus determined by
acceleration constant. We can figure out the tip formation
the intercept between the linear fit curve d(t) and the core
dynamics at the meniscus as follows: HF attacks the fiber in
diameter value d 0dc 050 μm (horizontal black line in
bulk reducing its radius r(t) and, according to Eq. 3 lowering
Fig. 2f).
the meniscus height h(t). As the meniscus lowers, the iso-
octane layer covers the etched part, preserving it from fur-
ther corrosion and generating the conical shape of the tip. Shaping of the SERSOR Tip by Quasistatic Etching
The meniscus etching self-terminates when the fiber in bulk
is completely etched and the conical tip is totally shaped Equation 3 determines the height, h, of the meniscus, and
inside the isooctane layer. therefore, of the tip formed after the meniscus etching.
h depends on a, θc, and d0 02r0. For a liquid–fluid immiscible
Lateral Shaping of the SERSOR binary mixture, the capillarity constant is approximated by the
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
expression a ) ðσa ! σb Þ=ðρa ! ρb Þ [47]. In our case,
To fabricate our sensor, we have used FOS (Fibre Ottiche σHF ∼58 dyn/cm, ρHF ∼1.155 g/cm3, σiso ∼18 dyn/cm, and
del Sud) silica–silica multimode fibers with an inner core ρiso ∼0.691 g/cm3 [48, 49]. Thus, for the HF–isooctane mix-
diameter of 50 μm and an outer cladding diameter of ture, a is ∼4 mm. From Eq. 3, tip heights between 200 and
125 μm. Such a large core diameter permits to easily launch 310 μm are, therefore, expected for contact angles in the 0–π/
laser beams of different wavelengths with the same micro- 4 range (Fig. 3a). These values are in agreement with those
scope objective. On the other hand, the core is sufficiently observed experimentally. In the following, we show how it is
small (e.g. with respect to the 200-μm core fibers) to allow possible to extend this range in a controlled manner. This is
us to effectively collect the backscattered light emerging accomplished by a micrometric change of the fiber vertical
from the entire core area. For the etching process, 50 ml of position during the etching process, in a quasistatic fashion,
solution is prepared in a Teflon beaker using 46 ml of HF accomplished by means of a micrometer screw. The results are
aqueous solution (50 %) covered by 4 ml of isooctane. shown in Fig. 3b–d. The first two tips (Fig. 3b, c), featuring
Optical fiber pieces ∼1 m long are used. About 3 cm of lengths of 380 and 290 μm, have been obtained by retracting
external polymeric jacket is mechanically removed. The the tip at steps of Δz010 μm every Δt05 and 10 min,
stripped part is cleaned with ethanol and immersed in HF respectively. The third tip (Fig. 3d) is ca. 210 μm long and
Author's personal copy
Plasmonics (2013) 8:13–23 17

Fig. 2 Experimental setup for the shaping of the optical fiber by the lowering the meniscus height (b). After the cladding is etched away, the
Turner chemical etching method. The fiber is stripped and immersed in fiber is retracted by ca. 2 mm (c). The etching process terminates (d) when
a HF–isooctane mixture. The immersion depth is controlled via a the fiber core is totally etched, and the final tip is formed inside the
micrometer screw. b–d Etching dynamics during the etching process. isooctane layer. (e) Picture of the doubly tapered fiber. f Plot of the fiber
Upon the immersion of the fiber in the HF–isooctane, a meniscus forms diameter Vs time during the etching in bulk. The red line is a linear fit.
at their interface (circled in b) having height h and contact angle θc (inset). The black lines indicate the core diameter value (horizontal) and the T1
The HF attacks the sidewall of the fiber reducing its diameter and etching time (vertical)

has been fabricated by pushing the fiber towards the liquid processes results in a variation of the effective meniscus
surface at steps of Δz0−10 μm every Δt010 min. Quasistatic height and, consequently, of the final tip length.
etching techniques allow one to vary the length of the tip by
more than 180 %.
From a theoretical point of view, when a small fiber Integration of the SERSORS
is immersed in a nonviscous fluid, the meniscus rises on
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
time scales of the order of t ) 2:2 ' ρr03 =σ [46]. For In order to operate in liquid environment, any detach-
the HF–air interface, τ∼100 μs, i.e. the meniscus rises ment of the metal nanoparticles from the SERSOR
almost immediately to its equilibrium position h, given surface must be avoided upon immersion in the target
by Eq. 3. This means that we should not be able to molecules’ dispersion. Several methods to link silver
significantly vary the meniscus position when moving nanoparticles on glassy materials like silica optical
the fiber up and down since the meniscus should im- fibers have been developed [13–19]. For our purpose,
mediately (100 μs) relax on its equilibrium position. To we have employed a conventional procedure capable to
explain why we can drag up and down the meniscus maximize the surface coverage that exploits the polymer
during the quasistatic etching process, i.e. on time 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (APTMS) [13–15, 19].
scales of tens of seconds, we observe that two phenom- The polymer acts as a linker, sticking to the optical
ena bring us far from the ideal situation assumed in fiber from one side and to silver colloids from the
[46], during the etching process. First, the presence of other, playing the role of glue between them (see sche-
isooctane, a viscous fluid [49], on top of HF can slow matic in Fig. 4a). To this aim, the fiber is dipped in an
down the meniscus rise time by orders of magnitude APTMS solution (5 % v/v APTMS, 90 % v/v methanol,
[46]. Second, the presence of a non-negligible surface and 5 % v/v distilled water) for 15 min, washed in
roughness induced by the chemical attack can induce methanol, and heated at 90 °C for 30 min; then, it is
meniscus pinning effects [50]. The meniscus, i.e., pins immersed in the highly concentrated silver colloidal
at local surface defects allowing us to drag it during the suspension (bottom fraction) for 48 h. In Fig. 4b is
fiber vertical movement. The combination of these two shown an optical image of the fiber sensor, surface,
Author's personal copy
18 Plasmonics (2013) 8:13–23

Fig. 4 Schematic (a) and optical microscopy image (b) of the SERS
fiber sensor. Silver colloids are linked to the walls of the shape-
engineered fiber by using APTMS

collected through the same objective, spectrally ana-


lyzed (600 lines/mm grating), and detected by a CCD
(JY Synapse).

Fig. 3 a Theoretical value of the meniscus height Vs contact angle for a


125-μm diameter optical fiber immersed in a HF–isooctane binary mix- Multiwavelength Operation of the SERSORS
ture. b–d Images of tips produced by quasistatic etching. By retracting
the fiber out of the HF–isooctane immiscible binary mixture at steps of
10 μm every 5 (b) and 10 min (c), we obtain tips with heights of 380 and SERS Activity of the Silver Colloids and Enhancement
290 μm, respectively. Shorter tips (210 μm) are obtained by pushing Factor Evaluation
down the fiber towards the HF–isooctane immiscible binary mixture at
steps of 10 μm every 10 min (d)
Preliminarily, we have checked the SERS activity and
evaluated the enhancement factor of the silver col-
loids. In doing this, we use Rhodamine 6G (R6G), a
and tip, covered by a layer of silver colloids and ready standard molecular probe for SERS [4, 51] featuring
to be used as SERSOR.

Experimental Configuration for SERSORS Operation

Our sensor operates in the optrode configuration. SERS


sensing is accomplished by coupling the shape-
engineered, silver NP-coated optical fiber to a Raman
spectrometer (Horiba Jobin-Yvon Labram HR800)
equipped with three different excitation laser wave-
lengths: Ar+ ions line at 514 nm, He–Ne line at
633 nm, and diode laser at 785 nm (Fig. 5). Each laser
beam is launched into the fiber by means of the same
microscope objective (Olympus 10X, N.A. 0.25). The
sample inspection camera embedded in the spectrometer Fig. 5 Schematic representation of the apparatus for the SERS optical
fiber sensor operation. The fiber is coupled to a multiwavelength
allows us to easily localize and focus the laser spot on excitation (515, 633, and 785 nm) Raman spectrometer working in
the fiber core, achieving maximum coupling efficiencies backscattering configuration. The fiber sensor is dipped in the target
>90 %. The SERS scattered light from the fiber is solution and then dried in air
Author's personal copy
Plasmonics (2013) 8:13–23 19

resonant Raman excitation at 515 nm [52]. A solution


of R6G at concentration of 10−4 M in H2O has been
mixed to the ultraconcentrated silver colloidal suspen-
sion in a 1:1 v/v volume ratio. A drop of the obtained
mixture has been drop cast on a microscope slide and
dried in air, then placed under the spectrometer and
analyzed with a 100X objective. Figure 6a shows a
picture of the sample after solvent evaporation. Large
NP aggregates are visible, alternated to void regions.
At 515 and 633 nm, we measure a nonnegligible
signal IRaman even from the void regions (Fig. 6b, blue
line), suggesting the presence of R6G stuck to the
glass substrate. This signal can be used as a reference
to experimentally estimate the SERS enhancement factor
Fig. 7 Background signal of the SERSORS measured at 515 (green), 633
(EF) provided by the silver colloids. The EF can be (red), and 785 nm (brown). Laser power, 8–10 mW; integration time, 1 s
calculated [4] as the ratio between the SERS, measured
on the colloidal aggregates (Fig. 6b, red line), and the
Raman signal intensities (ISERS and IRaman), normalized the excitation powers (PSERS and PRaman), and integration
to the number of probed molecules (NSERS and NRaman), times (TSERS and TRaman) used in each measurement, i.e.,
ISERS =ðNSERS ' PSERS ' TSERS Þ
EF ¼ ð4Þ
IRaman =ðNRaman ' PRaman ' TRaman Þ

The number of probed molecules, N, is the product


between the laser spot area and the molecular surface
coverage (number of molecules per unit area). With
probing areas located only a few tens of microns apart
(Fig. 6a), it is reasonable to assume an almost equal
surface coverage of R6G molecules for both measure-
ments “on the aggregate” and “out of the aggregate.”
We use the same objective for both Raman and SERS
measurements, i.e., we can assume same probed areas
and, consequently, NSERS ∼NRaman. Figure 6b shows the
Raman (blue line) and SERS (red line) spectra of R6G
carried out at 633 nm, a wavelength at which R6G is
not resonantly excited. The Raman reference measure-
ment required 8 mW of power and 10 s of integration
while the SERS spectrum has been acquired with
640 nW, integrating 10 s. At 633 nm, we therefore
calculate EF 633 ∼106 for the R6G modes at 1,366,
1,513, and 1,651 cm−1. Comparable SERS intensities
are obtained at 515 nm, while at 785 nm, the SERS
signal is ca. 100 times weaker (although it is still
possible to detect a strong R6G SERS signal with
2 μW and with integration times of 10 s). At 515 and
785 nm excitation wavelengths, it has not been possible
to obtain a distinct reference Raman signal. At 515 nm,
it was due to the broad fluorescence band of R6G,
while at 785 nm, the signal was too noisy. In the latter
case, however, we can exploit the noise signal as a
Fig. 6 a Optical image of a R6G-colloids mixture after evaporation of
the water solvent. b Raman (blue line) and SERS (red line) spectrum of
reference to estimate a lower limit of the EF. Calling
R6G excited at 633 nm, acquired outside and inside the silver aggregates, INoise the noise level in the Raman spectrum of R6G
respectively (we consider the RMS value of the signal) measured
Author's personal copy
20 Plasmonics (2013) 8:13–23

when shining a laser power PRaman and integrating for energies (< 900 cm−1) in which the signal is dominated
an interval TRaman, a lower limit for the enhancement by a strong background coming from stimulated Raman
factor can be calculated considering that IRaman ≤INoise, scattering of the silica fiber [53]. Determining the spec-
thus obtaining tral shape of the background, however is important
since we can use this information to subtract it from
ISERS =ðPSERS ' TSERS Þ
EF ð5Þ the SERS signal and retrieve the Raman scattering from
INoise =ðPRaman ' TRaman Þ target molecules. In Fig. 7, we show the background
In our case at 785 nm using P Raman 011 mW and measured at 515 (green), 633 (red), and 785 nm
TRaman 0300 s, we find EF785 >5×104. (brown), acquired on the “as fabricated” sensor, i.e.,
before immersion in the target molecules’ dispersion.
At 515 and 785 nm, we see an intense band peaked
Background Signal at 425 cm−1 with a tail extending towards 900 cm−1,
vanishing from 1,300 cm−1 onward. SERS detection
One of the limitations in SERS optical fiber sensors is with the optical fiber sensors is, therefore, hindered
the presence of an inaccessible spectral zone at low for molecules having Raman-active vibrations at wave-

Fig. 8 a SERS signal of R6G from the sensor (dark green) vs back- 633 nm excitation, after background subtraction, compared to the
ground (light green) for 515 nm excitation (spectra are offset for SERS of R6G from the colloids drop casted on glass (gray line, P0
clarity). b Zoom on the 1,000–1,730 cm−1 range. The SERS signal 6 μW, T01 s). d SERS signal of R6G from the sensor exciting at
from the fiber sensor (light green, P09.2 mW, T030 s) is compared, 785 nm, after background subtraction (hollow symbols, P010.7 mW,
after subtraction of the background, to the spectrum acquired on the T0120 s), compared to the SERS from the colloids cast on glass (black
metal aggregates drop casted on glass (dark yellow, P08.2 μW, T01 s). line, P02 μW, T010 s)
c SERS signal of R6G from the sensor (red line, P08 mW, T01 s) with
Author's personal copy
Plasmonics (2013) 8:13–23 21

numbers lower than 900 cm−1, while good performances


are expected in the range above 1,300 cm −1 . At a
633 nm, the background extends to energies higher than Tip B
1,800 cm−1. We have checked that this additional signal
arises from the specific model of fibers used and not
from the silver nanoparticles linked to the fiber apex.

Test of the SERSORS at Different Excitation Wavelengths Tip A

The performances of our SERSORS have been checked in a k b


“dip and dry” configuration. The metal-coated part of the k
SERSORS is dipped in a solution of R6G 10−6 M in H2O k
for 4 min and then dried in air. Measurements at 515 nm have
been carried out launching 9.2 mW into the fiber and setting Fig. 9 a Signal of R6G from two different SERSORS featuring (tip A)
an integration time of 30 s. The R6G signal (Fig. 8a, dark α015°, L075 μm and (tip B) α010°, L0118 μm at 633 nm excitation
green) clearly emerges from the silica background (Fig. 8a, (symbols represent the experimental data, lines result from multiple
light green) only in the 900–1,700 cm−1 range (spectra are peaks Lorentzian fitting, P0630 μW). Inset: picture of the two fiber
offset for clarity). The detected R6G signal at 515 nm benefits
of a further resonant Raman amplification and shows SERS the SERSORS are either pushed inside the solution or pulled
peaks superimposed to an enhanced fluorescence band. out at steps of 20 μm every 2 min. Two fibers, featuring
Figure 8b highlights the correspondence of the R6G vibra- different cone angles α and lengths L (tip A, α015°, L0
tional peaks detected through the fiber sensor (light green) 75 μm; tip B, α010°, L0118 μm), are displayed in the inset
with the SERS signal measured on the silver colloids (dark of Fig. 9. The fibers have then been functionalized with
yellow), after subtraction of the silica background. Excitation APTMS and coated with metal colloids following the proce-
at 633 nm gives interesting results, although with the presence dure described above. Measurements with the SERSORS are
of a much stronger background (Fig. 7, red line), we detect a carried out after immersion in R6G for 12 min, in a dip and dry
clear SERS signal of R6G in the 1,150–1,700 cm−1 range configuration, exciting at 633 nm (P00.63 mW). The resulting
(Fig. 8c, red line) with only 1 s integration time (P08 mW). spectra, after background subtraction, normalization to the laser
Comparison with SERS of R6G deposited on the colloids power actually coupled into the fiber, and normalization to the
drop casted on glass (Fig. 8c, gray line) confirms that the integration times, are reported in Fig. 9a (hollow and full
signal detected with the fiber sensor is actually the vibrational symbols refer to the longer tip, A, and the shorter tip, B,
fingerprint of R6G. We remark that R6G is not resonantly respectively, continuous lines arise from a multi-peak Lorent-
excited at 633 nm; nevertheless, a signal comparable to the zian fit of the data). We collect a notably stronger signal from
one at 515 nm is observed. The sensor has been finally tested the SERSORS featuring a longer, sharper tip, a factor ca. 2.5
at 785 nm. We show in Fig. 8d (hollow symbols are the rough more intense with respect to the signal measured on SERSORS
data, the red line is a Savitzky–Golay smoothed curve) the with a shorter cone. We interpret this finding as the indication of
SERS spectrum of R6G probed by the fiber sensor using a better light trapping efficiency provided by SERSORS with
10.7 mW of power and integrating 120 s. Again, the most longer cones. SERS photons trapped inside the fiber core, and
intense peaks are in agreement with SERS from colloidal propagating towards the fiber end, are more efficiently retrore-
nanoparticles casted on glass (Fig. 8d, black line). Although flected by sharper tips, yielding a larger number of photons
at this wavelength the sensor is ca. two orders of magnitude detected in the backscattering configuration we adopt. These
less efficient than at 633 nm, our measurements show that it findings are in agreement with the general trend found by Viet
can indeed be operated for molecular sensing in the NIR. et al. [17], i.e., shaping the fiber apex as cones, instead of flat
surfaces, increases the number of SERS photons trapped into
Influence of the Tip Cone Angle the fiber, improving the sensitivity. We can tailor this conclu-
sion, suggesting that sharper cones accomplish the light trap-
We have investigated the influence of the tip geometry on the ping function more efficiently.
sensor efficiency by developing SERSORS with different cone
angles. The SERSORS have been etched, functionalized, and
coated with metallic colloids in parallel processes, in order to Conclusions
reduce systematic errors. In the first etching step, we pull out
the fibers from the HF–isooctane mixture by 2 mm after In this work, we show that multimode optical fibers (50 μm
24 min. During the subsequent quasistatic etching procedure, core–125 μm cladding) can be successfully shaped and
Author's personal copy
22 Plasmonics (2013) 8:13–23

functionalized to produce SERSORS capable to work in a 15. Pesapane A, Lucotti A, Zerbi G (2010) Fiber-optic SERS sensor
with optimized geometry: testing and optimization. J Raman Spec-
broad range of excitation wavelengths. We have tested our
trosc 41(3):256–267
SERSORS in a dip and dry configuration, detecting R6G 16. Viets C, Hill W (2000) Single-fibre surface-enhanced Raman
molecules dissolved in water at 1 μM concentration with sensors with angled tips. J Raman Spectrosc 31(7):625–631
515, 633, and 785 nm laser wavelengths using powers of 17. Viets C, Hill W (2001) Fibre-optic SERS sensors with conically
etched tips. J Mol Struct 563:163–166
∼10 mW. Best sensitivity is achieved at 633 nm where R6G
18. Ma XD, Huo HB, Wang WH, Tian Y, Wu N, Guthy C, Shen MY,
molecules are detected with only 1 s integration time. The Wang XW (2010) Surface-enhanced Raman scattering sensor on
versatility of these broadband SERSORS paves the way to an optical fiber probe fabricated with a femtosecond laser. Sensors
remote detection of resonant biomolecules, such as hemo- 10(12):11064–11071
19. Polwart E, Keir RL, Davidson CM, Smith WE, Sadler DA (2000)
proteins, in which resonant Raman effects can be exploited Novel SERS-active optical fibers prepared by the immobilization
to boost the Raman signal by tuning the excitation of silver colloidal particles. Appl Spectrosc 54(4):522–527
wavelength. 20. Fazio B, D’Andrea C, Bonaccorso F, Irrera A, Calogero G, Vasi C,
Gucciardi PG, Allegrini M, Toma A, Chiappe D, Martella C, Buatier
de Mongeot F (2011) Re-radiation enhancement in polarized surface-
Acknowledgments We acknowledge financial support from MIUR enhanced resonant Raman scattering of randomly oriented molecules
(PRIN 2008J858Y7), European Union Seventh Framework on self-organized gold nanowires. ACS Nano 5(7):5945–5956
Programme (FP7-HEALTH-F5-2009-241818-NANOANTENNA, 21. McFarland AD, Young MA, Dieringer JA, Van Duyne RP (2005)
Grant Agreement No. 241818), Programma Operativo Nazionale Wavelength-scanned surface-enhanced Raman excitation spectros-
Ricerca e Competitività 2007–2013, PON01_01322 PANREX. copy. J Phys Chem B 109(22):11279–11285
22. Messina E, Cavallaro E, Cacciola A, Saija R, Borghese F, Denti P,
Fazio B, Gucciardi PG, Iatì MA et al (2011) Manipulation and Raman
spectroscopy with optically trapped metal nanoparticles obtained by
References pulsed laser ablation in liquids. J Phys Chem C 115:5115–5122
23. Grand J, de la Chapelle M, Bijeon JL, Adam PM, Vial A, Royer P
(2005) Role of localized surface plasmons in surface-enhanced
1. Kneipp K, Wang Y, Kneipp H, Perelman LT, Itzkan I, Dasari R, Raman scattering of shape-controlled metallic particles in regular
Feld MS (1997) Single molecule detection using surface-enhanced arrays. Phys Rev B 72(3):033407
Raman scattering (SERS). Phys Rev Lett 78(9):1667–1670 24. Le Ru EC, Etchegoin PG (2007) Principles of surface enhanced
2. Nie S, Emory SR (1997) Probing single molecules and single Raman scattering. Elsevier, Amsterdam
nanoparticles by surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Science 25. Long D (2002) The Raman effect. Wiley, Chichester
275(5303):1102–1106 26. Lee PC, Meisel D (1982) Adsorption and surface-enhanced Raman
3. Kall M, Xu HX, Johansson P (2005) Field enhancement and of dyes on silver and gold sols. J Phys Chem 86:3391–3395
molecular response in surface-enhanced Raman scattering and 27. O’Connell MJ, Bachilo SM, Huffman CB, Moore VC, Strano MS,
fluorescence spectroscopy. J Raman Spectrosc 36(6–7):510–514 Haroz EH, Rialon KL, Boul PJ, Noon WH, Kittrell C, Ma J, Hauge RH,
4. Le Ru EC, Blackie E, Meyer M, Etchegoin PG (2007) Surface Weisman RB, Smalley RE (2002) Band gap fluorescence from individ-
enhanced Raman scattering enhancement factors: a comprehensive ual single-walled carbon nanotubes. Science 297(5581):593–596
study. J Phys Chem C 111(37):13794–13803 28. Bonaccorso F, Hasan T, Tan PH, Sciascia C, Privitera G, Di Marco
5. Meier SA (2007) Plasmonics: fundamentals and applications. G, Gucciardi PG, Ferrari AC (2010) Density gradient ultracentri-
Springer, New York fugation of nanotubes: interplay of bundling and surfactants en-
6. Bello JM, Narayanan VA, Stokes DL, Vo-Dinh T (1990) Fiber- capsulation. J Phys Chem C 114(41):17267–17285
optic remote sensor for in situ surface-enhanced Raman scattering 29. Kreibig U, Vollmer M (1995) Optical properties of metal clusters.
analysis. Anal Chem 62(22):2437–2441 Springer, Berlin
7. Mehrvar M, Bis C, Scharer JM, Moo-Young M, Luong JH (2000) 30. http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/materials-science/nanomaterials/
Fiber-optic biosensors—trends and advances. Anal Sci 16(7):677–692 silver-nanoparticles.html
8. Stokes DL, Vo-Dinh T (2000) Development of an integrated single- 31. Lu L, Xu X-L, Shi C-S, Ming H (2010) Localized surface plasmon
fiber SERS sensor. Sensors Actuators B-Chem 69(1–2):28–36 resonance enhanced photoluminescence of CdSe QDs in PMMA
9. Wolfbeis OS (2006) Fiber-optic chemical sensors and biosensors. matrix on silver colloids with different shapes. Thin Solid Films
Anal Chem 78(12):3859–3874 518(12):3250–3254
10. Yan F, Vo-Dinh T (2007) Surface-enhanced Raman scattering detec- 32. Huang T, Xu X-HN (2010) Synthesis and characterization of
tion of chemical and biological agents using a portable Raman tunable rainbow colored colloidal silver nanoparticles using
integrated tunable sensor. Sensors Actuators B-Chem 121(1):61–66 single-nanoparticle plasmonic microscopy and spectroscopy. J
11. Yang X, Gu C, Qian F, Li Y, Zhang JZ (2011) Highly sensitive Mater Chem 20(44):9867
detection of proteins and bacteria in aqueous solution using 33. Gresillon S, Aigouy L, Boccara AC, Rivoal JC, Quelin X, Desmarest
surface-enhanced Raman scattering and optical fibers. Anal Chem C, Gadenne P, Shubin VA, Sarychev AK, Shalaev VM (1999)
83(15):5888–5894 Experimental observation of localized optical excitations in random
12. Vo-Dinh T, Cullum BM, Stokes DL (2001) Nanosensors and metal-dielectric films. Phys Rev Lett 82(22):4520–4523
biochips: frontiers in biomolecular diagnostics. Sensors Actuators 34. Moskovits M (1985) Surface-enhanced spectroscopy. Rev Mod
B-Chem 74(1–3):2–11 Phys 57(3):783–826
13. Lucotti A, Zerbi G (2007) Fiber-optic SERS sensor with optimized 35. Lu Y, Liu GL, Lee LP (2004) High-density silver nanoparticle film
geometry. Sensors Actuators B-Chem 121(2):356–364 with temperature-controllable interparticle spacing for a tunable
14. Lucotti A, Pesapane A, Zerbi G (2007) Use of a geometry opti- surface enhanced Raman scattering substrate. Nano Lett 5(1):5–9
mized fiber-optic surface-enhanced Raman scattering sensor in 36. Bonaccorso F, Calogero G, Di Marco G, Maragò OM, Gucciardi
trace detection. Appl Spectrosc 61(3):260–268 PG, Giorgianni U, Channon K, Sabatino G (2007) Fabrication of
Author's personal copy
Plasmonics (2013) 8:13–23 23

gold tips by chemical etching in aqua regia. Rev Sci Instrum 78 45. Puygranier BAF, Montgomery S, Ashe J, Turner RJ, Dawson P
(10):103702 (2001) Imaging tip formation in single-mode optical fibres. Ultra-
37. Patanè S, Cefalì E, Arena A, Gucciardi PG, Allegrini M (2006) microscopy 86(1–2):233–239
Wide angle near-field optical probes by reverse tube etching. 46. Clanet C, Quere D (2002) Onset of menisci. J Fluid Mech
Ultramicroscopy 106(6):475–479 460:131–149
38. Labardi M, Gucciardi PG, Allegrini M (2000) Near-field optical 47. Yang LJ, Yao TJ, Tai YC (2004) The marching velocity of the
microscopy. La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento 23:1–35 capillary meniscus in a microchannel. J Micromech Microeng 14
39. Labardi M, Gucciardi PG, Allegrini M, Pelosi C (1998) Assess- (2):220–225
ment of NSOM resolution on III–V semiconductor thin films. Appl 48. http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/3944/4/
Phys A: Mater Sci Process 66(7):S397–S402 bac0145.0001.001.txt
40. Patanè S, Gucciardi PG, Labardi M, Allegrini M (2004) Apertureless 49. http://www.stenutz.eu/chem/solv6.php?name0isooctane
near-field optical microscopy. La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento 27:1–46 50. Schaffer E, Wong PZ (1998) Dynamics of contact line pinning in
41. Gucciardi P, Bonaccorso F, Lopes M, Billot L, Lamy De La capillary rise and fall. Phys Rev Lett 80(14):3069–3072
Chapelle M (2008) Light depolarization induced by sharp metallic 51. Fazio E, Neri F, D’Andrea C, Ossi PM, Santo N, Trusso S
tips and effects on tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Thin Solid (2011) SERS activity of pulsed laser ablated silver thin
Films 516(22):8064–8072 films with controlled nanostructure. J Raman Spectrosc 42
42. Turner DR (1984) Etch procedure for optical fibers. U.S. Patent (6):1298–1304
43. Knotter DM (2000) Etching mechanism of vitreous silicon dioxide 52. http://omlc.ogi.edu/spectra/PhotochemCAD/html/rhodamine6G.html
in HF-based solutions. J Am Chem Soc 122:4345–4351 53. Stolen RH, Lee C, Jain RK (1984) Development of the stimulated
44. Puygranier BAF, Dawson P (2000) Chemical etching of optical fibre Raman spectrum in single-mode silica fibers. J Opt Soc Am B
tips—experiment and model. Ultramicroscopy 85(4):235–248 1:652–657

You might also like