Professional Documents
Culture Documents
F lywheel energy storage system (FESS) comes round again the correctness of the control model. All the simulation works
due to the latest developments of relevant technology, are carried out in MATLAB/SIMULINK.
ω r*
Te* ωr
*
V DC
V DC
ωe Ld id* + ωeψ f
f qMTPA
iq* Vq* Vα*
−ωe Lq i q*
id* Vd* V β*
f dMTPA
θe
iq iabc
f qFW
> ω rate ? id
f dFW
p
ωe p
ωr d θr
dt
Fig. 3. Configuration of proposed control model of the FESS. above rated value, the flux weakening method is used to
control the armature current. The magnet flux is weakened by
B. Vector control of IPMSM armature effect of id to keep terminal voltage Va constant at its
The saliency (Ld < Lq) of IPMSM makes reluctance torque maximum amplitude value Vm. (6) is rewritten as (9).
available. So the vector control of IPMSM is more Substitute (2) and (3) into (9), the terminal voltage limit
complicated than surface mount permanent magnet ellipse can be expressed as (10) by neglecting voltage drop on
synchronous motor (SPMSM) which has zero saliency. The Rs.
motor control diagram is shown in Fig. 3, in which the power Vd2 + Vq2 =Vm ≤ Vam (9)
grid outage detection and DC bus regulation is also included.
( Ld i d + ψ f ) + ( L i )
2 2
= (Vm ω e )
2
Since the rated speed of IPMSM used in the paper is q q (10 )
8000rpm, control in constant torque and constant power are
both needed to enable the flywheel to achieve 10000rpm. Due Also considering the current constraint (11), id can be
to the limit of ceramic bearing, no higher speed is allowed. obtained from (12) by substituting (11) into (10). In the
FW
In constant torque region, Maximum Torque per Ampere control model, function fd stands for (12); function
(MTPA) method[4] is used to control the armature current. fq
FW
stands for (11). And Switch 1 is in state 1. It is noted that
The relation between id and iq satisfies the following:
FW
function fq works as the threshold of the limit block that
ψf ψ 2f
id = − + iq 2
( 7) corrects the output of the function fq
MTPA
,which has saturated
2( Lq − Ld ) 4 ( Lq − Ld ) 2
in flux weakening region.
Equation (7) is derived from differentiating (4) with respect to
iq and set it to zero. Substituting (7) into (4), then the id2 + iq2 = I m2 ≤ I am
2
(11)
electromagnetic torque can be expressed by iq as:
(Vm ωe ) − Lq I m − ψ f
2 2 2 2
ψ f Ld ψ f Ld
3
Te = pi q ⎡⎢ ψ 2f + 4( Lq − Ld ) 2 i q2 + ψ f ⎤⎥ (8) id = − 2 2
− 2 2
+( 2 2
)
2
(12 )
4 ⎣ ⎦ Ld − Lq Ld − Lq Ld − Lq
If given the reference torque command Te*, reference Once the reference armature current in d-q frame id* and iq*
armature current in the d-q frame id* and iq* can be obtained are established, the gates pulses of SVPWM can be calculated.
from (7) and (8). In the proposed control model, function The reference d-q voltage components are composed of two
MTPA MTPA
fq stands for (8); function fd stands for (7). And parts: 1) the steady state voltage established by reference
Switch 1 is in state 0 because the motor speed is under 8000 current id* and iq*; 2) the incremental voltage established by PI
rpm. Since solving (8) in real time is not practical, a look-up current controllers. As is shown in (13),(14).
table is implemented to compute iq*.
* *
Vd = R s id − ω e Lq i q +ΔVd
*
(13)
In constant power region, where IPMSM operates at speed
4
* * *
Vq = R s iq + ω e ( Ld i d + ψ f ) + ΔVq (14 )
SVPWM block generates driving pulses for the bi-
directional converter which is a three phase two level voltage
sourced converter.
C. DC bus regulation
A voltage sensor is placed in the power grid to detect
voltage sag or short term outage. If no power failure event is
detected, Switch 2 is in state 0, which means the FESS
operates in charging or stand-by mode. If sags or outage
occur, Switch 2 is in state 1, which means the FESS works in
discharging mode.
In charging or stand-by mode, the DC bus voltage is
regulated by AC/DC rectifier. The reference torque command
Fig. 5. Electromagnetic torque of IPMSM.
Te*is obtained from the PI speed controller acting on the speed
error (ω*r – ωr). In the discharging mode, FESS regulates the
DC bus voltage by decelerating the flywheel. Te*is obtained
Te = J d ω r dt + Fω r + TL (15)
from PI voltage controller acting on the voltage error (V*DC – When flywheel reaches 8000rpm at 6s, control strategy
VDC). Additionally, a negative gain is needed in the PI voltage turns to flux weakening and IPMSM experienced a reducing
Te in the constant power region, as shown in Fig.5. At 7.8s, the
controller because when the FESS release energy, the current
commanded speed is reached and FESS steps into stand-by
flows from bi-directional converter to the DC/AC inverter[5].
mode, ready to provide energy to critical loads.
DC/AC inverter in the load side is a three phase two level
The effects of FESS in mitigating influence of power sags
VSI. Sinusoidal PWM is implemented to generate the gate and outage is verified in the following simulations. Typically,
pulses. As long as the DC bus is regulated by FESS, the voltage sags in a utility system with reclosing breaker have a
critical load would be protected from voltage sag or outage. duration ranging from a couple of cycles to more than 10
cycles[6]. Thus, a 3-phase fault is created in 1s, lasting for 10
IV. SIMULATION RESULTS cycles, resulting a 50% balanced voltage sag in power grid
Simulations are carried out to verify the effectiveness of the voltage. Additionally, a power outage event lasting 300ms is
proposed control model in Fig. 3. The energy flow in the UPS also created at 1.2s. Fig. 6 shows the resulting 3-phase phase
system with FESS is implemented in MATLAB/SIMULINK, to ground voltages of power grid.
including the charging of FESS and DC bus voltage regulation
during discharging of FESS. It is noted that only a balanced
three phase voltage sag and power outage are simulated. The
IPMSM parameters and UPS technical specifications are
shown in Appendix .
The simulation starts from a steady state with zero flywheel
speed. Then it is charged to 10000rpm and switch to stand-by
mode. When voltage sag or power outage is detected, flywheel
decelerates until the power grid recovers.
Fig. 4 shows the start up process of FESS. During the time 0
to 6s, IPMSM is controlled by MTPA with a constant torque
Te=13 Nm. According to (15), the flywheel accelerates
constantly at 1370 rpm/s, in precondition that the viscous
friction F of the IPMSM is small and no additional load torque.
Fig. 6. Power grid voltage sag and outage
full state or left uncharged until its depth of discharge is It is clear from these two figures that in the power failure
reached. This simulation adopts the later method and left the event created in Fig. 6, FESS is well controlled to provide
flywheel rotating at 9200rpm. DC bus voltage is regulated at energy to critical load.
508V, as shown in Fig. 9.
Fig. 10. 3-phase voltage of critical load (phase to ground) without FESS.
Fig. 7. Power failure detection signal.
Fig. 11. 3-phase voltage of critical load (phase to ground) with FESS
Fig. 8. Flywheel speed in discharging mode.
V. CONCLUSION
This paper presents a modeling and control method of FESS
in UPS system. A cost effective and reliable flywheel design is
brought forward to prove the possible mass utilization of
FESS in industrial applications. The control algorithm of
FESS is described with detailed block diagram, including the
torque control of IPMSM that driving the flywheel, voltage
sags and outage detection and DC bus regulation. Simulation
results are presented to validate the control strategy. Future
tasks will include control strategy on mitigating unbalanced
voltage sags, parameter variation of IPMSM and experiment
verification of the control methods.
2
Combined IPMSM and flywheel rotor inertia is 0.09kg i m .
UPS technical specifications are in Table I.
TABLE I
UPS SPECIFICATIONS
3-phase, 50Hz,
Power grid ratings
380V (phase-phase rms),
3-phase resistive load,
Critical load
311V(phase-phase rms), 10kVA
DC bus voltage 508V
SVPWM switch frequency 2kHz
SPWM switch frequency 5kHz
REFERENCES
[1] R. BROWN Daryl and D. CHVALA William, "Flywheel Energy Storage
An alternative to batteries for uninterruptible power supply systems,"
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, ETATS-UNIS, Richland,
Washington, US,2004.
[2] Ralph H Jansen. Timothy P Dever, "G2 Flywheel Module Design,"
University of Toledo 2801 W. Bancroft St. Toledo, Ohio, US, Tech Rep.
NASA/CR-2006-213862, 2006.
[3] Active Power Corp. (2008), "Quantitative Reliability Assessment of
Ball Bearings versus Active Magnetic Bearings for Flywheel Energy
Storage Systems," [Online] Available: http://www.activepower.com/
fileadmin/documents/white_papers/WP_111_Bearing_Assessment.pdf.
[4] S. Morimoto, M. Sanada, and Y. Takeda, "Wide-speed operation of
interior permanent magnet synchronousmotors with high-performance
current regulator," Industry Applications, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 30,
pp. 920-926, 1994.
[5] Barbara H Kenny and Peter E Kascak, "DC Bus Regulation With a
Flywheel Energy Storage System," NASA, John H. Glenn Research
Center, Lewis Field Cleveland, Ohio, US, Tech Rep. NASA TM-2002-
211897-REV102PSC–61, 2003.
[6] M. F. McGranaghan, D. R. Mueller, and M. J. Samotyj, "Voltage sags in
industrial systems," Industry Applications, IEEE Transactions on, vol.
29, pp. 397-403, 1993.