Professional Documents
Culture Documents
REPORT
December, 2013
-1
1. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to summarize design assumption, methodology and follow up of codes and
standards, the design criteria and practices that have been used in structural calculation of the proposed
building for Mr. Krishna Baniya (Sabuj) at Thamel, Kathmandu. These criteria form the basis of the
design for various structural components of the building. Section-01 is the introductory section.
Section-02 will summarize the applicable codes and standards followed in structural calculation.
Section-03 for soil report & section 4 deals with the general design criteria and working methodology,
the assumptions in load calculation both for dead load live load and seismic load. Section 5 is the main
section which describes the details of structural calculation of these buildings.
The structural calculation of this building shall be in accordance with all applicable laws and
regulations of the Government of Nepal, and its referral to any other standards. A summary of the
codes and standards in used in structural analysis and design have been listed as below.
• IS:875-1987 (Part 1 ) , Code of practice for design loads in Building and structure-Dead loads,
Bureau of Indian standards, New delhi,1989
• IS:875-1987 (Part 2 ) , Code of practice for design loads in building and structure-Dead loads,
Bureau of Indian standards, New delhi,1989
• IS:1893- (Part I )-2002 , Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design structure Bureau of Indian
standards, New delhi,1986
• Design of reinforced concrete structure-IS 456-2000
• Ductility design for earthquake resistant structure IS13920
• Design of earthquake resisting building, reinforced concrete masonry, NBC105
3.0 SOIL
Geotechnical investigation of at site has not been made for particular project. Adopted soil bearing
capacity of soil is 125 kN/m2.
-2
4.0 GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA
Design loads for all structures have been in accordance to the criteria described below.
a) Dead Loads:
= 2.875 kN/m2
Design Parameters –
The site location is on high seismic risk as per seismic hazard map of Nepal Equivalently it is
on zone-V (IS seismic hazard map). LINEAR STATIC OR SEISMIC COFFICIENT METHOD has
been adopted in earthquake load estimation and distribution.
c1) Calculation of design Spectra and Lateral Force Coefficients, NBC105, Cl 8.0
Cd = CZIK ,
where C is the basic seismic coefficient for the fundamental translational period in the direction
under consideration.
The horizontal seismic force at each level i shall be distributed (by the software) as:
Fi = V *Wi hi / SUM ( Wi hi)
-4
Determining seismic load based on NBC 105
NBC 105, Seismic load Evaluations
Design Horizontal Seismic Coefficient, Cd CZIK
Seismic Zone factor, Z 1 Cl: 8.1.6, fig 8.2
Importance factor, I 1 Cl: 8.1.7, fig 8.1
Structural performance factor, K 1
Height of the Building 19.63 m
Dimension of the Building Along X, Dx 13.39
Dimension of the Building Along Y, Dz 16.4
Basic Seismic Coefficient along X, C 0.08
Basic Seismic Coefficient along Z, C 0.08
Design Horizontal Seismic Coefficient, Cd 0.08
-5
Reactions
-7
10:DL+1.3LL-
1.16 642.102 35.768 68.417 0.057 -3.34
1.25EQZ
11:0.9DL+1.25EQX -47.454 958.656 0.088 2.704 -0.515 66.224
-8
15:DL+LL 0.312 847.538 0.921 1.618 0.057 0.803
8 1:EQX -74.746 8.445 0.491 0.106 -0.398 126.505
2:EQZ -0.598 133.19 -48.94 -63.868 -0.483 0.925
3:DL -0.697 648.777 -0.156 -0.395 0.078 2.095
4:LL -0.306 190.657 -0.826 -0.426 0.021 0.436
5:DL+0.5LL -0.85 744.105 -0.569 -0.608 0.088 2.313
6:1.5DL+1.5LL -1.505 1.26E 3 -1.473 -1.231 0.148 3.796
-9
7:DL+1.3LL+1.25EQX -53.387 1.31E 3 3.96 6.834 -0.676 77.845
-10
12:0.9DL-1.25EQX 65.434 431.898 2.819 2.94 0.338 -82.539
-11
3:DL -1.939 593.261 0.198 -0.352 -0.089 1.272
4:LL 0.016 132.801 0.201 0.007 -0.019 0.092
5:DL+0.5LL -1.931 659.661 0.299 -0.348 -0.098 1.318
6:1.5DL+1.5LL -2.885 1.09E 3 0.599 -0.517 -0.162 2.046
-12
9:DL+1.3LL+1.25EQZ 3.63 855.827 -60.177 -80.499 -0.3 -5.666
10:DL+1.3LL-
-2.559 929.6 60.396 79.722 0.128 3.335
1.25EQZ
11:0.9DL+1.25EQX -39.031 941.195 3.221 4 -0.379 55.071
-13
13:0.9DL+1.2
25EQZ 4.89 175
5.116 -32.7
707 -48.149
9 -0.141 -6.557
14:0.9DL-1.25
5EQZ -3.891 644
4.064 33.5
524 48.214
4 0.124 5.177
15:DL+LL 0.802 530
0.381 0.1
153 -0.107
7 -0.013 -0.911
COLUM
MN VERTICA
AL LOAD WIT
TH NODE NU
UMBERS
-14
d) Load Combinations
The design loads including earthquake for the Limit State Method shall be not less than whichever of
the following load combination gives the greatest effect (NBC105:1994) :
DL + 1.3 LL + 1.25 E
0.9 DL + 1.25 E
DL+1.3+SL+1.25E (not applicable in our case)
which can been expressed as,
Dl+1.3LL+1.25EQx
DL+1.3LL-1.25EQx
Dl+1.3LL+1.25EQy
DL+1.3LL-1.25EQy
0.9DL+1.25EQx
0.9DL-1.25EQx
0.9DL+1.25EQy
1
0.9DL-1.25EQy
In addition, the load combination (1DL+0.5LL) and (1.5DL+1.5LL) has been
considered in calculation
e) Allowable Stresses
Each load combination shall not exceed the allowable stress permitted by the appropriate code for that
combination. The IS 1893-(Part-I) 2002 allows a 33% stress increase for seismic and wind design in
which specifies loading combinations to be used for the design of structures and portions thereof when
using the allowable stress design method. These combinations are permitted a one-third increase in
allowable stresses for all combinations including wind or seismic. In foundation design, the allowable
bearing capacity could be increased by 33% on the permissible bearing capacity of soil where seismic
or wind load action. In NBC 105:1994, up to 50% increase in the allowable bearing capacity could be
made whenever earthquake load is considered. In foundation design, we have assumed 33% increase
in the allowable bearing capacity of the soil.
f) Materials
The materials described below will be specified and used as a basis for design.
Reinforcing Steel: Reinforcing steel shall meet the requirements of Grade-Fe500.
Cement: Cement used in all concrete mixes will be Portland cement meeting the requirements of IS
standard
-15
Aggregates: Fine aggregates will be clean natural sand. Coarse aggregates will be crushed gravel or
stone: All aggregates shall meet the requirements of IS Code
g) Design strengths
The system of concrete and steel reinforcing strength combinations will be used as follows.
Concrete grade, fck= 25N/mm2 (for column)
Concrete grade, fck= 20N/mm2 (for other structural members)
Reinforcing steel, Fe500 (elongation >14.5%)
Modulus of elastic for steel, Es=200 KN/mm2
Modulus of elastic concrete, E c =5700 sqrt(fck)N/mm2
Primary L/C
Comb. Combination L/C Name Primary Name Factor
5 DL+0.5LL 3 DL 1
4 LL 0.5
6 1.5DL+1.5LL 3 DL 1.5
4 LL 1.5
7 DL+1.3LL+1.25EQX 3 DL 1
4 LL 1.3
1 EQX 1.25
8 DL+1.3LL-1.25EQX 3 DL 1
4 LL 1.3
1 EQX -1.25
9 DL+1.3LL+1.25EQZ 3 DL 1
4 LL 1.3
2 EQZ 1.25
10 DL+1.3LL-1.25EQZ 3 DL 1
4 LL 1.3
2 EQZ -1.25
11 0.9DL+1.25EQX 3 DL 0.9
1 EQX 1.25
12 0.9DL-1.25EQX 3 DL 0.9
1 EQX -1.25
13 0.9DL+1.25EQZ 3 DL 0.9
2 EQZ 1.25
14 0.9DL-1.25EQZ 3 DL 0.9
2 EQZ -1.25
15 DL+LL 3 DL 1
4 LL 1
-17
Reactions
5.3 STR
RUCTURAL
L ANALYSIS
S on STAAD
D PRO
a 3-D Mod
a) deling:
-18
b) Base Reactio ons: The deadd load, live looad and the caalculated seism
mic force hass been provideed
directly to thee software
c) C
Critical fram me has been observed
me selection: After analyzzing the moddel, the most critical fram
allong the grid as shown in fig below. Thhe details of frame
f a design foor the critical one have
forces and
been presented d in this reporrt.
-19
d) B
Bending momment diagram m. The bendiing moment diagram
d for thhe selected most
m critical frame
fr
h been pressented as beloow
has
-20
Directioon of Forces
The speecified horizo
ontal forces arre assumed too act separatelly along eachh of these two
horizonntal directionss, X-directionn and Z-direcction.
Frame Diagram
D of Grid
G C(5-1) showing earrthquake load
ds in X-Direcction
-21
Frame Diagram of Grid 1(C-A) showing earrthquake loaads in Z-Direction
-22
5.5 STRUCTURAL DESIGN:
The structural designs of all beams and columns have been made as per IS: 456-2000,
using
STAAD PRO software on LIMIT STATE METHOD of design.
5.5.1 Design Sample of Column
a. COLUMN DESIGN
Location at Grid A2
Column Size = 0.304m x 0.457m (1’ x 18”)
2
Tensile strength of Steel = 500 N/mm
Grade of Concrete = M25
Using 10 Nos. 25 dia.TMT Bar (3.89 % , 4908.70 sq. mm.)
(Foundation to Terrace)
=========================================================================
C O L U M N N O. 1036 D E S I G N R E S U L T S
-23
5.5.1 Design Sample of Column
b. COLUMN DESIGN
Location at Grid D1
Column Size = 0.304m x 0.356 m (12” x 14")
Tensile strength of Steel = 500 N/mm2
Grade of Concrete = M25
Using 4 Nos. 25 dia. and 4 Nos. 20 dia. TMT Bar (3.04 % , 3220.12 sq. mm.)
(Foundation to Terrace)
============================================================
C O L U M N N O. 1076 D E S I G N R E S U L T S
-24
5.5.2 Design sample of Beam
a. BEAM DESIGN
Location at Grid 1(A‐B) First Floor
Beam B7
Main Beam Size = 0.304 m x 0.406m (12” x 16”)
Tensile strength of Steel = 500 N/mm2
Grade of Concrete = M20
TOP BAR
Using 3 Nos. 25 dia.TMT Bar Through and 2 Nos. 25 dia TMT Bar (Extra Bar at edges)
BOTTOM BAR
Using 2 Nos. 25 dia.TMT Bar Through and 1 Nos. 20 dia. TMT Bar (Extra Bar at mid)
Using Stirrups Reinforcement bar of 8 dia.TMT @ 100/150 mm c/c
============================================================================
B E A M N O. 111 D E S I G N R E S U L T S
-25
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHEAR DESIGN RESULTS AT DISTANCE d (EFFECTIVE DEPTH) FROM FACE OF THE SUPPORT
SHEAR DESIGN RESULTS AT 599.5 mm AWAY FROM START SUPPORT
VY = 97.09 MX = -21.59 LD= 8
Provide 2 Legged 8í @ 110 mm c/c
============================================================================
============================================================================
B E A M N O. 162 D E S I G N R E S U L T S
SHEAR DESIGN RESULTS AT DISTANCE d (EFFECTIVE DEPTH) FROM FACE OF THE SUPPORT
============================================================================
-26
b. BEAM DESIGN
Location at Grid C(1‐2) First Floor
Beam B1
Main Beam Size = 0.304m x 0.355 m (12" x 14")
Tensile strength of Steel = 500 N/mm2
Grade of Concrete = M20
TOP BAR
Using 2 Nos. 25 dia.TMT Bar Through and 1 No. 25 dia. TMT Bar (Extra Bar at edges)
BOTTOM BAR
Using 2 Nos. 25 dia.TMT Bar Through and 1 Nos. 20 dia. TMT Bar (Extra Bar at mid)
Using Stirrups Reinforcement bar of 8 dia.TMT @ 100/150 mm c/c
============================================================================
B E A M N O. 125 D E S I G N R E S U L T S
-27
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHEAR DESIGN RESULTS AT DISTANCE d (EFFECTIVE DEPTH) FROM FACE OF THE SUPPORT
============================================================================
a. Sample Calculation for Slab of Grid (A’-B) (3-4) (First Floor) (4.5” thick slab)
Here the aspect ratio Ly/Lx is less than 2 hence the slab is designed as a two way slab.
OneLongEdgeDisContinuous:
Basic dimensions of
slab = Lx Ly
3.19 3.53
Basic Ly/Lx
ratio = 1.107 <2
Hence designed as two way slab
Clear cover to reinforcement d' = 20 mm
Provided overall depth D = 115.00 mm
Effective depth d = 91.00 mm
Diameter of bar φ = 8 mm
Select Grade of
Concrete fck = 20 N/mm²
Select Grade of Steel fy = 500 N/mm²
Load calculation :
Ast Min
Span Moment Mu Mu/bd² Pt reqd Ast Dia of bar Spacing Ast pro
Coefficient kN.m N/mm2 % mm² mm² mm mm mm²
αx
shorter neg 0.045 4.93 0.60 0.14% 129.15 109.2 8 177 283.99 safe
αx
pos 0.034 3.70 0.45 0.11% 96.03 109.2 8 177 283.99 safe
αy
longer neg 0.037 4.03 0.49 0.12% 104.74 109.2 8 177 283.99 safe
αy
pos 0.028 3.02 0.36 0.09% 77.97 109.2 8 177 283.99 safe
Modification Factor = 2
Actual Lx/d = 34.96
Allowable Lx/d = 52 Hence safe in Deflection
-29
5.5.2 D
Design of fou
undation: The designs of foundations
f arre done by manual
m calculaation on the
s
spread sheet.
COLUMN
N VERTICAL LOAD
-30
DESIGN OF ISOLATED FOUNDATION (CONCENTRICALLY LOADED)
INPUT PARAMETERS
Grade of Concrete (fck) = 20 Mpa
Grade of Steel (fy) = 500 MPa
Longer Side of Rectangular Column (Lc) = 457 mm
Shorter Side of Rectangular Column (Bc) = 304 mm
Safe Bearing Capacity of Soil (SBC) = 125 KN/m2
Unfactored Axial Load From Column (P) = 737.41 KN
Cover to rebar center (dc)= 50 mm
AREA OF FOUNDATION BASE
Area of Foundation Base Required (Areq) = 6.489 m2
Length of Foundation Base Requied (Lreq) = 2.547 m2
Provide Length of Foundation (L) = 2.59 m
Provide Breadth of Foundation (L) = 2.59
6.489
Area of Foundation Base Provided (A) = 6.7081 m2 > ok
NET SOIL PRESSURE
Net Soil Pressure at Ultimate Loads (qu) = 164.8924 KN/m2
= 0.164 N/mm2
DEPTH OF FOUNDATION
Bending Moment about an axis passing through the face of the column:
BM = 242.8803 KNm
Effective Depth Required
1) From Flexure
Effective Depth (d) = 184.3282 mm
2) One‐Way Shear
The critical section is at a distance d from the column face
-31
Assume Percentage of Steel (pt) = 0.24 %
Design Shear Strength of Concrete (Tc) = 0.35 N/mm2
Effective Depth Required (d) = 338.9651 mm
3) Two‐Way (Punching) Shear
ks = 1
Tc = 1.118034 N/mm2
Design Shear Strength of Concrete (T'c) = 1.118034 N/mm2
Effective Depth Required (d) = 323.7703 mm
Depth Required from Flexure = 184.3282 mm
Depth Required from One‐Way Shear = 338.9651 mm
Depth Requierd from Two‐Way Shear = 323.7703 mm
Effective Depth of Foundation Required (dreq) = 338.9651 mm
Provide Depth of Foundation (d) = 350 mm
Total Foundation Depth (D) required = 400 mm
Total Foundation Depth (D) provided = 500 mm 1' 8"
DESIGN OF FLEXURAL REINFORCEMENT
Factored Bending Moment at Column Face (BM) = 242.8803 KNm
Area of Steel Required = 1672.409
Size of Bar Provided = 12 mm
Area of Each Bar (a) = 113 mm2
Number of Bars Required (N) = 15
Spacing Required = 177.8571 mm
-32
Spacing Provided = 125 mm 5" c/c
mm C/C (both
Provide 12 mm dia. Bars @ 125 ways)
Area of Steel Provided (Ast) = 2363.96 mm2 > 1672.40 Ok
Percentage of Steel (pt) = 0.260779 %
-33